Loading...
Minutes-PC 1958/02/03~~ Citq Hall Anaheim, California February 3, 1958 RBGUTAR h~BTING - A Regular Meeting of the City Planning Commission was called to order at 2:10 0'Clock P.M. by Chairman Summers, a quorum being present. 'pgg3gNf - CHAIRMAN SUh4~ffiRS, COMMISSIQNBRS: Ailred, Gauer, Mauerhan, Thomp- son and Mungall. CON9dISSI0I~R Morris entered the Meeting at 2:35 0'Clock P.M. COD4IISSIQI~R Hapgood entered the Meeting at 3:20 0'Clock P.M, pB3HNf - COMMI3S~ONffiR DuBois. \ MINtTrBS - The Minules of the Adjounred Regular Meeting of January 20, 1958. Two corrections were requested by the Commission. On Variance No. 889, the followiag should be inserted: "Mr. Whitmore, after Commis- sioner Thompson explained his position on :he opinion requested from the City Attorney, agreed to have the Hearing continued." Also on the last page, under Tentative Map of Tract No. 3303, No. 1, the word "line" should be inserted after the word "straight". With these changes, t~; :~?autes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of January 20, iy58, were approved. VARIANCH NO. 889 - This was the time set for the re-opening of the Hearing upon this Va=iance. The Secretary read a letter from Mr. Preston Turner. City Attorney, in which he gave his opinion relative to the matter under consideration: , February 3, 1958 Anaheim City Planning Department City F3a11 ~ Anaheim, Calif~rnia Attention: Mr. R. W. Mungall, Planning Director Dear Mr. Mungall: I hasten to apologize for my delay in answering your request of January 14 for an opinion upon the matter therein re- ferred to. I was engaged in Court all of last week and was unabie to complete my research. You advise that by Reclassification proceeding No. F-55-56~19 a 50-foot P-L Zone, starting at Bali Road and running southerly along South Los Angeles Street, was established on March 5, 1956 as a part of the over-all planaing for that area. This 50-foot zone is, in effect, a setback regulation for the construc- tion of buildings or_ property in the area and is required to be landscaped by the property owners. You advise that an application for Variance No. 889 has been filed by a proposed purchaser of a small triangular parcel of property, lying on the east side of South Los Angeies Street, seeking a waiver of compliance with this setback. I am informed that the setback established covers a substantial portion of this triangular parcel of land. 1~ ~- ~. ~ i You reque~t an opinion as to whether or not the P-L, Parking~Landscaping setback Zone is a valid exercise of the police power of the City insofar as it appiies to this particular pazcel of property. It appears that this small triangular parcet. of ~ property was originally a portion of a largez parcei of property ~ on the westerly side af South Los Angeies Street and that whea the ~ State Highway was established at thet point, the State of California, ~ either by purchase or coademnation, took a strip across the property ~ , -I- ~ s ~ 1 r • ~ _'.~.__._.__.......___'"'_ .'~ ' ...;_::~+x~.::~wa~~r.s:;-_=z.rti.-.::.. ' ~ _ s _ _~7 _'_ _ --__ . _. _ _ __ f ~ ~ i i j - ' MINfTTB3 OP RBGUTAR MBSfING. CTTY PLANNING COhAtISSIQN, PBBRUARY 3, 1958, CONTINUED: VARIANCH N0. 889 - for State Highway purposes which resulted in leaving this small CContinued) three-corner parcel of property on the east side'of the highway. Undoubtedly~ the original owner was compensated at that time for the property taken by the State and for the severance damages which he suffered as it affected this triangular parcel of property. Since it is my understanding that the applicant is not the present owaer of this property, and siace the zoning of the area and the estabiishment of this Parking-Landscaping setback 2one was estab- lished as a part of the general plan for zoning the area prior to the date of acquisition by applicant, it is my opinion that the establishment of ~the P-L Zone is a valid exercise of the police power by the City of Anaheim and is binding upon this proposed purchaser of the property. If coaditions affecti.ng a pF=ticular parcel of property exist at the time of its acquisition by an owner, he is not misled as 4o any use that may be made of the property nor deprived of any property right by the City. If he acquires the property under such conditions, h~ does so with full knowledge that its use is limited by the zoning regulations of the City, and any loss which he may sustain would be the result of his own act and not the act of the City Planning Commission nor the City Councii. Whether or not an application should be graated in any ;*+~tance is a matter that is committed to the discretion of the Planning Commission and the City Council. The denial of a variance dces not deprive the property otvner of any vested right. It is my opinion that the denial of the application for Variance No. 889 would not result in denial to the applicant of any substantial property right and would be a valid exercise of the discretion vested in the City Planning Commission. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Preston ~urner CITY ATTORNBY Mr. Witmore, attoraey for the applicant, appeared before the Com- mission and stated that if the P-L Zone is maintained along this property, no use couid be mar!e of the property, and this wuuld be discriminatory and ua~easonable. He stated that the commercial use proposed, namely a:estaurant and cocktaiJ. J.~unge, is a use permitted in an M-1 Zone, and that this would act as a buffer between the M-1 Zone surrouading the property and the C-1 Zone on the other side of South Los Angeles Street. He also stated that the proposed use would be an attractive-buildiag that would aot detract from other buildings that might be erected ia the area. Mrs. A. A. Warnoff, ~311 South Los Angeles Street, as the broker handling the sale of this property, stated that, if ailowed the usual setback for commercial uses, they could erect an attractive building with ample off-street parking on the property. Mr, Wii- liam P, CYark, Santa Ax-a, as representative of the owners of the property to the South, North, and 8ast, stated that the City of Anaheim in settiag up a P-L Zone along South Los Angeles Street and Ball Road showed real vision, an1 this setback would enhance the industrial area. He also stated that the P-L Zone should not be broken down on this smail parcel. He also stated that they would be willing to purchase this property at a fair appraised price. Mr. McPhersoa, of Orco Commercial Properties, stated that they have never received an offer for the purchase of the property by the owners of the property at the rear, Mr. Clark stated that theq would be willing to sell a.portion of the lot at the rear so that the proposed buildin~ could be e~ected and the P-L 2one maintauted. He also stated that they had received a letter from Mr. Bryan of Orco Commercial Properties, offering the property for purchase at an unrealistic figure. THS HBARING WAS CIASED, _~ ~ -2- ~ ~~ ~ : -~, ~: MIN[TfB3 OF RHGUTAR MBSfING. CTfY PIANNING C~II$SION, P&BRUARY 3, 1958, CONfINUED: VARIANCB NO. 889 - A motion vras ~ade by CoQissioaer Thompson, that Variance No. 889, (Contiaued) ticaiving the P-L Zone on this particular parcel be granted, together ' with his reasoas for believing that it should be granted. This motion failed for lack of a ser_ond. A motioa was made by Commis- sioner Alorzis, secoaded bp Co~nissioner Allred, aad caYried, that Variance No. 889 be dcnied. Cos~issioner Thompson voted "No" on this motion. :;cesolution No. 171. Series 1957-5$.) VARIANCB N0. 701 - PUBLIC HBARItiG. PETITION subuitted by N&VILLE CHEMICAI. CO[YLPAN7, (AMBNDBD) 1336 Patt Street. P. O. Box 68, Anaheim, California, as Owner, requesting persission to RHVISE PL~ P~ LAYOUf OF BUIIDINGS. AND FACB BLTIIDINGS ON CSRRITOS AVENUfi; also, the applicaat wishes to CdNSfRUCT BUTIBR TYPB STEEL BUILDII~bGS, with possibly no office buildings, on~the property described as lying 660 feet east of Placentia Avenue, having a£rontage of G60 feet on Winston Road, thence running thzongh to Cerritos Avenue, containing 20 acres, more or less. The property is presently classified R-A, RESIDHP~- TIAL AGEtICULTURAL. Mr. Ulrich, of the Neville Cospaay~ appeared before the Commission affi presented a r~~eriag of the Qroposed cLanged plans for their iastallation. He stated that this ronld be a better use for the property to place their bnildings on Cerritos Aveaue instead of Winston, as it vrould ga.ve access from the railz~ad via spur to their warehonse. He statzd they would build a But2eE building 80 feet by .100 feet, and that they~ veould alse bui.id an office building, A represeatatice of Pacific Scientific aad Company appeared before the Co~ission aad stated that originaliy the Neville Company snbaitted plans for a nice-looting office building and a warehouse ~ich raas probab2y of tilt-up construction, These buildiags ~oere to be placed oa Kinstoa Road, a~ would have been attractive and siailar to their buildings, which they have on the aext p»perty to the Mes4. Mr. Van Cook, of the Pacific Scientific Company, also appeared befo=e 4he Comsission and stated that they were not objetting So the re2acatioa of the Neville plant, but the introduction of a Butler bnilding ~ight invite others to put the same type on ilinston 8oad or Placentia. He agreed, however, that the Butler type building shown at the location of the plot plaa would aot be visible eitLer from Cerritos Avenue or from Winston Road, being hidden by orauge trees. Mr. U2rich stated that there had beea no change in plaas as to the screening of their property that w~as agreed to on the original Variante. These conditions will still be aet. T~ t~'ARING KAS CLOSED. Upon a motion by CoaissioaQr Thoepson, secoaded by Commissioner Gauer, and cazried, it was aoved bp Resolution No. 172, Series 195i-S8, that Zariance fio. 7di as ll~ended be grante3 in coaformity with the plans presented together with the plot plan, but that any future developoeat of the north portion of the propertq be subject to reviex by the Planning Comission and City Council before any Building Peaits ray be gzanted. VARIANCB N0. EGU - PUBLTC HSARING. PEfTTION subaitte~ by M D C CORPORATION, % Mr. ~~~~~ J~ps L. Fallon, 7805 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles 46, Cali¢'ornia, as Owner, reqnesting persission to MOVB THIE 1DCATION OF WOPIDHR BOYlL TO Tf~ NOR~ASf OORI~R OF i~-ALN[PP SfRHBT AND gpTgLl,p AVEN[TE,~aving a frontage on Satella Avem~e of 370 feet aad a depth of 510 feet. The property is pres~ntly ciassified R-A, RHSIDHNfIAL AGRICULTURAL. ~ir. Ray Rhodes appea:ed before the Comsission as =epreseatative of the M D G Corporation =egardiag the barling alley aad other facili- ties to be erecYed at the northeast corner of gatella Avenue anG Walnut Street. He stated tmat he had a aeeting xith the property owners in the aie a last Sunday, and that as suggested by this group, No, 1. They ivould have no access to the propertq from Walnnt Street; 2. That a fifteen foot plaating area along 1lalaut Street should be insta2led rith trees and shrnbs; 3, That a maso~y tyne of tvall six _~ .. ~ ~ ~ ... - -- - ----- .. ....... ....:.+~a , _ s .~~ a iif 1.J' ~ ~ MINUL83 OF RBGUTAR MBSTING, CITY PLANNING CObAtISSION, FHBRUARY 3, 1958, OONfIt~[JED: VARIANCS N0. 800 - feet high should be erected along Walnut Str~eet at the rear of tLe (Continued) pianting of 'he area; 4. That a four-foot wall should be erec*_eil along the North property line. Mr. Galen Moore, as represeatative of the residents in the area, stated that the M D C Corporation have been most cooperative, and that with the above plaas, they~ were willing to go along with the M D C Corporatioa. THfi AEARING WAS CLOSBD. Upon a motion by Commissioner Mauerhan, seconded by Commissioner Hapgood, and carried, it was moved by Resolution No. 173, Series 1957-58, that Variance No. 800 as Ameaded be granted with the following conditions: Namely, 1. No access or egress to the property from Walnut Street, this condition to be established by Deed Restrictions, so that if at some future ti~ ownership should change, the coaditions would still remain. 2. That a fi:teen-fr,ot planting area with trees and shrubs be installed along Walnut Street. 3, That a six-foot Qasonry wall be erected on Walnut Street at the rear of the landscaped area. 4, That a four-foat masonry wall be erectec~ on the north property line. ' 5, Bngineering requirements. VARIANCS N0. 897 - Mr. A. R. McDanic:~.~ as Hngineer for the subdivider. appeared before #he Commission and ~tated these are f3~e 1o*_s :~ T_ra=tr *Ia. 2872 that are under the 7.,,~ foot frontage requirement, but that contained 8710 square feet with a 67 foot frontage, No one appeared in opposition to the granting of the Variance. T~ HBARING WAS CLOSBD. Upon a motion by Commissioaer Thompson, seconded by Coaissioner Gauer, and ca:ried, it was moved by Resoiution No. 174, Series 1957-58, that Variance No.'897 be graated for lots 13-17 inclusive of Tract No. 2872 with a 67 foot frnntage. TBNrATIVH MAP OF - A Tentative Map of Tract No. 2872 was preseated to the Co~aission. TRACE N0, 2872 Subdivider: Herman H. Toikan, 1253 North Laurei Drive, Hollywood, Caiifornia. The Tract is located just south of Riverside Freeway on the east side of Acacia Street. and contains 18 lots. Upon a motion by Commissioner Mauerhan, seconded by Co~mnissio~r ? Ailred, and carried, it was moved that Tentative Map of Tract No. ; 2872 be approved, subject to: s ~ ~ 1, Bngineering requiremeats. ~ 2. Should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdi ~ vision, each success~ve subdivision thereof shali be sub~itted ; in tentative form for approval. ~ RBCLA3SIPICATION - PUBLIC HBARING. PBTITION submitted by HBRMAN H. TOIBAN, I253 North } N0. P-57»58-34 Laurel Avenue, Hollywood, California, as Applicant; A. R. McDaniels ; as Authorized Agent~ requesting that the property described as being on the east side of Acacia Street between Pinewood Avenue a~ ~ Burton Street (or Houston Preeway) be reclassified from R A, RBSI- DBNrIAL AGRICULTURAL to R-3,MHFEdP~ FAMILY RBSIDSIaIAL Zoni.ng on lots 2- 17, and R-~, MBIDI~EBE FAMILY RBSIDBNfIAL on remainiag lots. ~ Mr. A. R. McDaniels, as Bngineer for the developer, appeared before the Commission and stated that although some time ago a protest Lad been filed against using these lots for Multiple Family Residentiai, he had talked with the owners in the aie a and that they had agreed to go along with this development, provided that two lots on Acacia Street be kept as siagle family, aad that an alley be instaile3 separating the Multiple Pamiiy from the Single Familq Resideatial. -4- ~;; __~~._-~------ __ .__-_-- -------~-- .- -- ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j 3 } ~ ! . ,., ._ ~ MINUTHS OP RBGULAR MBSTING CTTY PIANNING COMMISSION, PBBRUARY_3, 1958,_COI~INUBD: RHCLA3S~FICATION - THB HHARING WAS CIASSD. N0. P-57-58-34 (Continued) Upon a motion by Commissioaer Mauerhan, seconded by Commissioner Morris, and carried, it was moved by Res olution No. 175, Series 1957-58, that Reelassification No. P-57-58-34 be recommended to ; the City Council for approvai, subject to: ~ s • 1. The filing of standard R-3 Deed Restrictions of the City ~ of Anaheim. ~ 2. That the two lots at Acacia Street be kept as Single Pamily Residential. The vote on the above Resolution was as follows; ;, AYBS: COMMISSI01~ffiRS: Allred, Gauer, Hapgood, Mauerhan, Morris, Summers, Thompson and Mungail. ' NOBS: COMMISSIOPBRS: None. ABSHNf: COMMISSIONBR DuBois. ' YARIANCB N0. 904 - PUBLIC HBARING. PBTTTION submitted by CHHSTBR HBRPBRT, 11042 Highway 101, Anaheim, California, as Owner, requesting permission to BUILD TWO SMALL COhA~RCIAL BUILDINGS IN PRflNf OF HXISTING B6SI- DHNCB TO HOUSH A CAM SHAFT SHOP APID PLOWSR SHOP, on the prop~.-~•:;~ described as 11221 South Manchester Avenue, ard further descri~ed • as lying on the west side of Manchester Avenue between Midway Drisre and Iiaster Street. The orooerty is oresently classified R-A; ~ RBSIDBNfIAL AGRICULTURAL. i Mrs. Herbert appeared before the Commission and stated that she had aothing to add other than that contained in the application. i A representative of the Culligan Water Company, who are consider- ~ ing the purchase of a site along the Proniage Road, inquired as to what the building line setback would be. Plans for the Herber4 property called for a 17-foot setback from the property line. It was pointed out that this setback had been pretty weil established by the County, who allowed one or two variances to go in on the Prontage Road in this section with 15-foot buildiag line setbacks, and although the Commission would like to see a greater setback, the pattern has been pretty well established. The 15-foot setback would satisfy the Culiigan Water Company, the representative stated. THB HHARING WAS CLOSHD. ~ Upon a motion by Commissioner Mauerhan, seconded by Commissioner Thompson, and carried, it was moved by Resolution No. 176, Series 1457-58, that Varia.nce No. 904 be granted, subject to erection of ~ the building in coi~formity with the plans presented, 3nd subject to $ngineering requirements, ~ VARIAPICB N0. 905 - PUBLIC HBARING. PBTTTION ,ubmitted by ARVIDS and INfA TSfBRS, 715 ' North West Street Anaheim California = ~ , , puxchasing under contract, A. B. Robertson as Authorized Agent, requestir.g permission to ~ OPBRATB AN INfBRIOR DBCORATING SERVICB on the property d escribed ~ as 523 3~uth Palm Street. The property is presently classified ~ R~1, SINGLB PAMILY RBSIDBNTIAL, ~ ~ Mrs. Teters appeared before the Commission and stated that she < desired to conduct a decorating and drapery service from this ~ ~ xesideace. Mr. Glen Sharoe, 554 Sout~ Pa1m S*±~ee*_, app~ared ~fa:~ ~ the Commission and asked the applicant if she was going to move the house from the propertq and erect a store building. If 4he ~ residence was removed and a store building erected, he wouid be • ~ willing to go aiong. He s`ated the three corners to 4he North have # been develope~l with nice commercial buildings that have parking = areas in coanection with them, and that they hnow that sooaer or '~ later paim Street wili probably go commercial~ but that he did not believe these commercial ventures should be allowed to go into the _g_ ~ ~ .. . _.......~.: :,~-------~ ------ ~ ....~..~...~.,...v.,T- .. _.._,., l~ MINUfH3 OF RSG[JLAR MHETIN' CITY PLANNING COM,NISSION, PHBRUARY 3, 1958,_CONfIN'JSD: VpRIpNCB N0. 905 - existing residentiai buildings. Mr. T. A. Padilla, 53T South Palm fContinued). Street, appeared before the Cownission and stated that it is true that there is a 15-foot alley at the rear of the property, but that this is not ~ through aliey, and only runs part way between South and Water Streets, arid ~herefore wouid not be readily accessible to customers desiring to park at this business. Mrs. Teters appeared before the Commiasion and said that she is not planning to put out signs, and there would never be over two cars at a time, as she would tiave cery few customers, and these couid park in her driveway. Mr. Robertson~ as the realtor in connection with the subject prop- , erty, stated that the 2ubject house iB four years old and that Mrs, Teters has a license for this business, and does work aS present in her home at 714 Nort1 West StreeC. Apparently Mrs. Teters would use this praperty only as a supply ar.d work room and would continue ~ to live at h~r, present address on North West Street. Mr. C. R. Fear~ 527 South Palm Street, stated he lived aext door and that there would be room in the driveway for cars, and that he was not opposed to the granting of the Variance. THS HHARING WAS CIASBD. Upon a motion by Commissioner Gauer, seconded by Commissioner Allred, and carried, it was move~ by Resolution No. 177, Series 1957-58, that Vaziance No. 905 be denied. Commissioners Hapgood and Thompson voted "No" on the above motion. VARIANCB N0. 906 - PUBLIC HBARING. PHTTTION submitted by PARIC VILIAGH HSTATSS, as I.essee, 15312 Arcow Highway, Baldwin Park~ California, requesting peanission to CONSfRUCT A TSMPORARY DIRBCTIONAL SIGN TO ADVBRTISH 1~HE 3ALB OF HOt~S IN TRAGT N0. 3044 in the City of Anaheim, on the property described as the Southwest corner of Cresceat and Mag-olia Avenues. The property is presently classified R-A, RSSIDBNfIAL AGRICULTURAL. No one appeaxed for or against the granting of the Variance for a dlrectional sign. THH HHARING WAS CLOSBD. Upon a motion by Commiasioner Mauerhan, seconded by Commissioner MungalT, and carried, it was moved by Resolution No. 17'8, Series 1957-58, that Variance No. 90G be granted, subject to the nine conditions established by the City Council for such directional sigas. • VARIANCBS'NO3. - PUBLIC HBARINGS. PBTITIONS submitted by LUXURY HOMSS, INCORPORATHD, 907~ 908 1557 West Commonwealth, Pullerton, California, as Lessee, requesting permission to CONSTRUCT A TBMPORARY DIRHCfIONAL SIGN to advertise the sale of homes in Tract No. 1567 in the City of Anaheim, on the property described as appraximately 1320 feet north of Lincoln Avenue on the west side of hfagnolia Aveaue. The property is presently c].assified R-A~ RSSIDHNfIAL AGRICULTURAL; and 'oy IARAMORB CONSTRUC- TION COMPANY, 1111 Beverly Houlevard, Yihittier California, as the Lessee, requesting permission to CONSTRUCT A THMPORARY DIRSCTIONAL SIGN to ¢dvertise the sale of homes in Tract No. 1812 in the City of Anaheim, on the property described as the southeast corner of Lincoln and Hardi.ng Avenues. The property is presently classified R-A~ RBSIDSNfIAL AGRICULTURAL. No one appeared for or against the granting of these two Variances. THB HHARING WAS CLOSBD. Upott a motion by Commissiona* Thompson, seconded. by Commissioner Hapgood, and carried~ it wae moved by Reaolution No. 179 aad 180~ respectively, Series 1957-58, that Variances Numbers 907 and 908 be granted, sub,jecic to the ni.ne conditions established by the City Ccuncil for such 3irectional signs, -6- ~ ~ r _.. . _ _.-- -...._ __....____.. _ .__ ..---_..__ . .__ __.__....___--__ ____._.__., ,~ ----------- ~ .... ~ ~ :__/ ~ 3 ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~, ~~~~r~ CITY pIANNIHG CQFAIISSION PSBRCARY 3 1958 CONrINUHD: ~~- 9Q9 - P[fBLiC F~ABIDiG. PBTIfION submitted by B. L. JBPPBRS, 548 South Los Angeles Street, Aaaheim, California, as Lessee, requesting peuission to OONVBRT AND Ugg Tf~ ~Xi~z~ ggSIDBNCB FOR A LOCR A1~ 1~Y SffitVICB on the property d escribed as 426 South Palm Street, aad fiuBher described as the !:~rtheast corner of yanta Ana Street and Pals Sireet. The property is preseatly classified R-2, TWp.. FA6tILY RBSIDBNfIpL. ~~` 9~ '~LIC FffiARING. PBTTTION submitted bq CONSOLIDATBD ROOFING AND ~~TAL COI~AiVY. 702 South Los Aageles Street, Anaheim, Cali- farnis, as pwner~ requesting permission to USE COh1I~ffiRCIAL BUILDING. ~R SALB Alm FABRICATION OF SHBST I~ffiTqL on the property described as 729 South Los Angeles Street. The property is presently classified F2. GBNBRpt. CpF1~RCIAL. No oae appeazed before the Commission as representative of the ~piK~• Mr• B• ~. Campbell, residing at 707 South Claudina Street, appeared before the Commission and stated that he beiieved that unless some control was placed on the operation the whole ~aildiag, ia case of change of ownershi mi ht sheet metai operation whieh would be a nuisance to the~ a heavy residing at the rear of the sub'ect people to B4r. Caapbell that the applicant had~requestedtonls pointed out for the sa2e and fabrication of light sheet metal inyconjunction xi't8 roofing and house construction on1y, TF~ HHARING WAS CIASSD, Upon a aotioa by Commissioner Allred, seconded by Commissioner ~~~~, a~ carried, it was moved by Resoiution No. 182, Series I45a-58, that Variaace No. 910 be granted, subiect to; I. Coafining the hours of operation of the sheet metal work to ~ betaeea 7:00 A,M, and 7;00 P.M, 2• That the operatioa be limited to the sale and fabr:ication of light sheet metal ia conjunction with roofing and house constructiori. ~ 3- T1~t a21 r.ork doae must be within the building, ~' N~_ 24 - pQgi,EC ~gA~~. pgrTTION submitted by MR. AIVp MRS. W. BRADWAY ~~- 2332 Hast 3eviile Avenue, Anaheim, California, as Owner, =~e~1DB Pe~ssion to BRBCP A BLOCg iVqI,L ONB FOpT IN PROM THH Y~~TY LII'B on Lot 72 of Tract No, 2569, and further described as 2332 Hast Seville Avenue, The property is presently classified R-I. SIIIT:LB FAMILY RBSIDBNfIAL. ~O °~ ~~~~ fO2 °r a6$inst the grant;ng oF the Special Use Pe~i.t for a six-foot bloct wall fence located one foot at the rear of tLe s3dewalk on Normaady Drive. THB FIDARING WAS CLOSHD, IIP~ a~otian by Cocrmissioner Muagall, seconded by Commiss3oner Tl~aapsoa~ and cazried~ it was moved by Resolution No. 183, S~ries 14Sf-58, tLat 8eview No. 14 be granted aad that a Special Use Penait be i,ssned for the construction of this wall. ~~~ ~ -~C ~~- PSfTTION submitted by RANC~ip Lq ppZ MOBILB NOI~ffiS Y~~ ~i Bast Oraagethorpe Avenue, Anaheim, ~alifornia, as Owner, -7- 1[r. Jeffers appeared before the Commission and stated that he had an ere~ some 32 feet by 40 feet coming in from Palm Street that cunld be used for off-street parking, and that he proposed to im- ` prove the existing builcSiag, THB HgqRING WqS CLOSED. IIpoa a~ot;oa by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Cod.~issioner Mauerhaa, aad cazried, it r~as moved by Resolution No. 187., Series I95T-58, that Variance No. 909 be granted for a period of three Yeazs, xith the off-street parking area to be improyed, ~ --- -- __.....»,._____-_ ___..,.. `---~ ~„~ '~r ~ ~ ~.~ --- :.~.. .- ..-------~ ---_ __-- ---- f ~. ( ~ i ~~ t ~ , ~ ?J i - I i ' ~ MINVPSS RBGUTAR I~HTING. C1TY FIA1~II~~ ~QSSI~, ~RY 3, 1958. CCki~INOID: ~ Review No. 15 - Yem~eth 6,. Brmm, llans~er, re9~esti~ p~e~+~2°~ to EEPAND 'ffi t (Conti.nued) pRBSIDdf TRAII~ ~ 3~0 ffi AD~~ 1~ ~tES OLi T&E I~ST SID& OF ~ t'HS ffiISTII~ p~, ILL'88~SI~ ffi CABSCYIT OF '~ ~$[ BY I10 TRAIIBA SPBCSS. 16l1YI~ A'E~AL ~ 290 'IaAII~ SA'4CFS.. The property i.s prese.ntly c3assified l6-1~ Li~' ~, ~cit6 a 50 foot P-L Zoae on Ora~etho:pe s~e~. 1~lr. Gatta appeared befame tlie Co~issica aad stated that they desired to add 310 spaces of a~ery dlelc~e tfpe cf dev~clopmeat to their present trai]er psrl~ on tme adjoiaiag Ifest 10 acres. He stated thaY tLey desire to ~~~a ttie zec~eatioml area~ that _ they have erected gara~es mrst ta t~e ~_~~~ to screen the propertq, t that all atilities ase ia, aad t~t tleeT ~a~e b2aclrtopped streets throughont the ParY. Be statefl 1t~t this particalar part has a five-star rating, ~irh ss tbe mly ooe ia tme Citg of Anaheim , with sneh a ratiag_ ltrs Ys~esia 'Y'_ Haapion appeared before 4he Co~ission a~ pne~t~d a letter ~~rtaia aeasares for the protection of the p:aq~esty adBacent ta ffie proposed addition to the Rancho La Yaz Kobile Ho~s Part_ Caodition 1 ns that the x2ischo I.a Faz ~~+~.~ a su-foot sL~x! ~e feace the Iength of the botu~ary bet~eea !~e t~ao gumpezties. DCr_ Yea~etlt Brora, as Manager of the Raac2~ d~ Paz, sta~ tmeg oertaialT v~oald install a fence betreen tbe tro prope=ti~s, 4aQt at t.iais time thep would not litn to Ca~it t~r~selves becsa.~ tLe detez~tioa of the *?F of fence tion3d sesnlt lar~ely fn~m tbe ase to rhich the westerly acreage is paR. Ytf it 3aald go ia~to maafacto~ring, they ; probably s4an]d ertct :. ~ to ei;ht foolt bLocg ra2l beta~eea the ` two praperties_ ~rs. Hm~tan also zeqsested a coccrete waii i apprmci.mately Y~o feet hi~h alcmg 1t~e ~Smc)arF t2taieea the tvro ' properties. ~si.s siso ~mnld tie ia rith Reqmest Ho. i, depending ' upon what the praperty to t3~e 11est tias nsed for_ i;oa;itioa No, 3 xas that Baacho 7a ~az use tbe g:a.~~~sr~ ir.~.iLz Part ia a maaner so ~ as not to interfene ri#h ar disnqrt iat r~ rag t~e urigation pipe iines aad r-ghts.oE ~ray tberefore a~ed ~~frs. Hav1taa aad the irrigation of Ler ce~;~ pra~erty_ '~i.~, accozdiag to bir. BroMn, the Rancho Ia Paz kaer, aad •~+r,••a»S ~ca~lef; aot clsaage. Item No. . 4- that Rancho ia Paz ce~t its apera.#:rin of t6e ~rai.Fer Pazt in a marmer so as noY to 9aterfere rich or eadaager ezisting structnres and bni3iiiags 3a a~ich s[rs_ Hf~mptom hss aa c~mershfp interest. It ~aas poiated oast ma ~s item ~gr Atr_ B=owa that these buildiags cvasist o+f st~3s riiidi are in ~ aepair aad ar~ prac- tically £alliseg apart_ It~ 5- t~at ~cmo Ia Faz issne a permanent ~iver a~ ~y cla~ for ~ts xr"~~ fras spraYiag. i heating, fertilizatinm, arrag~tiam as4 mt~ez tre~ ~eais of the I adjacent oraage ;grar~s o~ed b9 lfrs_ ~tan- ~ Co~issioa . ; felt that this had noth"sr~g to do ~ei't~ t~e nse of the land• Mr- Rule , o~er of 5 acres acro5s ~e aii~ to ~e 1~or~it of ihe subject propert9 in tfie Catg of E~7lertoa, stxted that he has a 30-foot road ea~at ac:nss tt~e ~bo La Fsz property. It was not ascertaiaed hoaa 3~e aooaa~ ~ t~nis roxd ~ea.se~meat to get to his property ualtss he aoere to ~ai-d a bsicl~e oses iFee drainage canal. _ THS F~ABIIiG 1lAS CI:D~_ Upon a~otion by C~+«;~~ ill~, yec~ bg Co~issione~ lKonis, a~ carried, at oeas'ase~ E~ ~tso2atian 1~0_ IB~F, Series ~ 195?-58, that Be~vie+v ]~o_ 35 be ~~ a Special IIse Pes~it j issued. ~ , RBCIAS~IPICATIQN - PUBLIC HBSRING. P~:'flTImif ~tried hg II~YD A_ MA1~S, 9602 ~ 3 N0. F-57-58-35 Orange Avem~e, AaaLeia, Califo~ix, as A~lici++*, reqaesting that i the property destribed as lyiag as E~e east s3de of BzooEhnrst " StreeY, 130 f~ee# soath of tLe aa~erline of 1Fiobe Aveaae, fiaviag ~? 324 foot froatage cm Bz+oot3mirs~ aad a deptEa oE 25ff feet, be reclas- ° Sif ied f ram E-~, Rffit~arr~r ~an.ss~rE^rsc ~~cs Ff, 1~I(~HOOD ~ C~BCIAL. ~ ~8- ..,..~.ccr!~--' . : j ~ ~ j I i ' F ~ _._--------~- _ _ ----- ..._ __ ~ ~.. . . ~a . _ .. . . . _-_-.. .__ .. ---------------~ g -------- --_ ~ ~ :' _.. ~ • ~.. _...._._._.~..._. _._.__..._._.~_-__-. . _-- . _._ ----___.._____......~...._~_ , - -__- - - - ~'- ~ i ( .. i ~~ ~ ' i Ij ~pgs Op ~g gg~QI,dR hffiSfING CTfY PIANNING C(Y~AlISSIQV FSBRUARY 3, 1958, O~NTIN[I&D: I' ~NO~PS57I 8T35N as~tolhow henwas go ngrto ase~the pr pe~yssiT~ ~Rr~e~d~BD. ; (Continued) Upon a motion by Commissioner Alired, seconded by Comaissioner Hap- ~ good, and carried, it was moved by Resolution No. 185, Series 1957- ; j 58, that the Commission recommend to the City Council that Reclassi- ; ; fication No. F-57-58-35 be approved, subject to: ~ 1. Deedin of 53 feet from the centeriine ~f Brool~hurst Street ~ g i ~ to the City of Anaheim for street widea.tag. ~ 2, The erection of a six-foot block wall aloag the east side of the property . ~ 3. The filing of the standard C-1 Deed Restrictiaas of the Citq j of Anaheim. ! 4. Bngineering requirements coasisting of cuzbs* gutters, sidewalks and street lights. ' The vote on the above Resolution No. 184 was as follows: pYBS: COlQfISSI0IIBRS: Allred, Gauer, Hapgood, Mauerhan, Morris, Summers, Thompson and Muagall. NOSS: COAAfISSIOPffiFtS: None. ABSSNT: COMMISSIONBRS: DuSois. TSNTATIVH MAP OF - Subdivider: Huntington Development Company, 2411 Bast La Palma TRACE N0. 1353 Avenue, Anaheim, California. This tract lies between Sunkist Street and Placentia Avenue, adjoining the Riverside Freewaq. A motion was made by Commissioner Gauer, seconded by Co~issioner Mauerhan, and carried that the Tentative Map of Tract No. 1333 be approved, aubject to: 1, Sngineering requirements. . 2. Should t~is subdivision be de~eloped as more than one sub- division, each successive subdivision thereof shali be submitted in tentative form for approval. RSVISBD - Subdivider: J. T. Hintz~ 9221 Carl Lane, Garden Grove, California. THNrATIVB MAY OF The tract is located on the west side of Westexn Avenue, approx- TRACT N0. 1646 imately 1657 feet north of Bali Road. A motion was made by Commissioner Iiapgood, seconded by Comaissioner Mungall, and carried, that Revised Tentative Map of Tsact No. 1646 be approved, subject to: 1. Bngineering requirements. 2, Should this subdivision be developed as mose thaa oae sub- division, each successive subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. TSNfATI9E MAP OF - Subdivider: George M. Holstein & Sons, 166 Hast 17th Street, Costa TRACT N0. 3199 Mesa, Caiifornia. The tract is located on the west side of South Suclid Avenue, 527 feet south of Bail Road. A motion was made by Commissioner Gauer, seconded by Cflmmissioaer Mauerhan, and carried, that Tentative Map of Tract No. 3199 be approved subject to: 1. Bngineering requirements. 2. Should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each successive subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. -9- ---~---__-- --- -- ---.. _ _.._.. _ _._._.___ _._ _ _.._----- ----------- --___ .., ~ -- --~ - _ r f I i I . ~. i~ ~ ~ MIMTrB3 OP THH RS(i[1IAR MHBrING ~ITY pL-NNING CODAlISSION. PBBRUARY 3, 1958. CONfINUBD: THNPATIVB MAP OP - Subdivider: Subdivision Pinance Corporation, 512 North La Brea, TRAGT N0. 3278 Californ3a.,. Tract is loca*e3 between Walnut and Ninth Streets, south of Cerritos Avenue. 1. Bngineering requirements. : 2, Should this subdi'visioa be de~eloped as more than one sub- division, each~successive subdivision thereof shall be submitted in ttatative form for approval. TBNfATIVB MAP OP - Subdivider: Moore Built Homes, 10401 Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, TRAt,Z N0. 3308 California. Tract is located on the south side of Cerritos Avenue west of Nutwood Street. 1. Hngineering requirements. 2. Should this subdivision be de~eioped as more than one sub- division, each successive subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. RHCLASS:tFICATION - A request was received from Mr. John N. McLaurin, as attorney for N0. F-57=58-11 Jerry Maler, requestiag that the Commission continue further hea.:;:.;s ott Reclassification No. F-57-58-•11 for a period of six montins. A motion was made by Commissioner Gauer, seconded by Commissioner Mauerhan and carried, that Tentative Map of Tracfi No. 3278 be approved, subject to: A motion was made by Commissioner Gauer, seconded by Commissioner Muuerhan, and carried, that Tentative Map of Tract No. 3308 be approved subject to: Upon a motion by Commissioner Thompsoa, seconded by Commissioner Gauer, and carried~ it was voted to continue further hearings on the above Reclassification until the Meeting of August 4, 1958. pDJpURNN~NT - The meeting adjourned at b503 0`Clock P.M. ~. ~ ; ~~ __.._.,..~._ ., -------~---... _.._._.___ _ _._ .._..___. _. __._._--------- ` ,~._____ _-----------