Minutes-PC 1959/07/13.. .-~----_ __.. ..
_._ _. _
~~ ~ ~-- -
City Hall
July ,13; 1959
Anaheim, California
RHGUTAR MHBTING OF ~B CITY PIANNING CObAtISSION
RAGUTAR MBSTING - A Regulaz Meeting of the City Planning Commzssion was called to
order at '2:05'0`Clo~k P.M. by Chairmaa Gauer, a quarum being
present.
pRgggNT; - Chairman Gauer; Commissioners; DuBois, Mauerhan, Morris, Summers,
Thompson, Mungali.
I-BggNT; - Commissioner Allred.
MINUTBg; - The minutes of th. Adjourned Regular Meeting of Juae 29,,~959 were
approved with one change. On Page 10, the second and vote should
have been recorded. This correction wiIl be made.
HI(3~ SCHOAL - Mr. Ken Wines, Administrative Assistant of the Anaheim iTnion High
gITES; Schc~oi District appeared befare the Commission and stated that
the~y had already stazted condennation proceedings on the 3 sites
proposed for senior high schools and the 1 site proposed for a
junior high school, He further stated that when these schools
are developed they will Ue carrying a maximum i oad of pupils.
,1HB H~ARING WAS CIASBD.
A motion was made bq Commissioner Mauerhan, seconded by Commissioaer
~ompson and carried, that the Commission approve t'•= 3 sites for
senior high schoois and the 1 site for a junior high school as
shown on the map which becomes a part of the record together with
the exact descriptions of the four properties.
VARIANCB N0. - PUBLIC H3ti1tING. PBTITION submitted by JUANITA MILLS~ 1068 I.oaita
1126 Street, Anaheim, California~ as Owner, requesting permission to
. OPffitATB A BBAUTY SHOP IN THE HOMH, ALSO BRSCT A 2' x 4' SIGN on
the property described as the east side of Lomita Street between
La Palma Avenue and Claredge Drive and further described as 1068
Lomita Street. The property is presentiy classified R-1, SINGLB
PAMILY RHSIDBNTIAL. •
lMr, Lay appeared as Attorney for the applicant and stated that
the applicant desires to use ths..s property for a one operator
beauty palor with off-street pa~:king provided from La Palma Avznue
and not from Lomita and that she would be wiiling to do without
a sign if necessary. Mrs. C. Verweei~ 1232 West La Palma Avenue
appeared before the Commission and stated that she was in favor
of granting the Variance and could see no difficuity for in-
creased traffic oa Lomita Street. The resident, directly across
the street aiso appeared before the Commission and stated that
she could see no objection to this use of the propertq and that
it would serve the neighbors in the area. Mrs. M. Woodsoa, 1053
Lomita Place appeared before the Commission and presented a petition
containing 27 names of property owners ia opposition to the granting
of the Variance. She st.ated that other business on La Palma Avartue
are in a group by themselves aad that this would be an intrusion
into a residentiai area. 1he petition preseated by the appiicaat
contained the names of 23 persons in fxvor of granting tk-e Variaace.
~iB HBARING WAS CIASHD.
Commissioner lhompson offered Resolucion No. 8, Series 1959r60 be
gra~ted, subject to:
1. The dedication of 53 feet from the center line on West La Palma
Avenue to ths City of Anaheim and providing of off-street '
parking oa La Palma Avenue with the entrance to the beautq parlor
to be from La Palma Avenue. '
-1-
~ ~
. '
i
~ .. ~
..~
- t
.
'
;, .
~.
~
_l
~ ~ ~
RBGUTAR M88TING - CITY PIANNING COihAlISSION - JULY 13. 1S59 - CONTINUBD:
VARIANCB N0. - 1!-e vote on thig r,eso~.ut~.an was as follow.s:
1126
AYES: COhAfISSIONffitS: DuBois, Gauer, Summers, Thompson,
NOBS: COMMISSIONBRS: Mauerhaa, Morris, Muagall.
ABSHNT: C'1MMISSIONBRS: Aiired and Hapgood.
RHCLASSIFICATION - PiJBLIC HBARING. PBTITION submitted by C. S. DRUMMOND, c% William
N0. F-58-59-113 T, McManus, 514 South Brook.*.;:rst~ Aaaheim, California~ as Owner,
William T, McManus~ 514 South Brookhurst Street~ Anaheim, California,
as Authorized Agent, requesting that the property described as being
on the east side of Brookhurst Street between Oranoe Avenue and
Broadway Street and further described as 500 South Brookhurst
Street be reclassified from C-1~ NBIC~ORHOOD COhAlBRCIAL to M-1,
LIQiT MANUFACTURING.
Mr, Kent appeared as Attorney for the appiicant and stated that
the use proposed is more of a commercial nature as an agency and
that the•~ are not interested in getting an hi~l classification ia
:he area~ but would like to know how the matter can be handled,
The Secretary advised the Commission that after talkiag with Mr. Joe
Geisler~ Aasistant City Attorney~ it was his feeling that the applicant
be requested to withdraw the reclassification and file for a Variance
which would take less time than attempting to chaage the code to
include this use under C-2, 1HB I~BARING WAS CIASED.
Upon a motion by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Commissioner
Mauerhan and carried, it was moved that the applicant be permitted
to withdraw the reciassification petition and refile for a Variance
with no additionai fee.
RIICLASSIFICATION - PUBLIC HHARING, PBTITiON submitted by S. Q. R. LAND CO~ANY, 202 s
NO. F-58-59-119 West Center Street, Anaheim, California, as Owner, William P. Webb, I
407 ~alifornia Bank Building, Anaheim~ California, as Auti-orized ;
Agent, requesting that the property described as being on the ~
northeast corner of Paim Street and Bail Road be reciassified from
R A, RESIDENTIAL-AQtICULTURAL to G2, GHNBRAL CObAfffitCIAL. '
,
Mr. Bill Webb appeared as Attorney for the applicant and stated
that this property has been lying dormant for many years and is
not presently producing en.ugh citrus to pay for the taxes involved.
He presented a tentative plan which he stated was purely tentative
and they did not want to be held to this pian which he psesented
as it was only a study of the area, Mr. Webb was questioned that
why he had ~pplied for a C-2, Generai Commercial while it was felt
by the Commission that all uses that they might care to place upon
this property would come in the C-1, Neighborhood Commercial classi-
fication. He stated that they would be willing to accept a C-1
classification. Mr. 1a. G. Hartman, 422 West Ball Road~ owner of
the north haif of the tract, directly to the west~ stated that
cocunercial development on this property would be a benefit to the
whc~le area, Mr. H. B. Schamp, 227 West Ball Road at the corner of
Cambridge Street appeared in opposition to the granting of the
reclassification and stated that he was being squeezed on each side
by commercial development and that :~e was against C-2, General
Commercial in any residential azea. Mr. J. B, Mi1.1er~ 302 West
Ball Road stated that C-2 is not an appropriate classification
for the area and that C-1 would be very much more desirable,
Mr. Rideout of 1042 Cambridge Street appeared before the Com-
mission and questioned whetfier Clifton Street would be continued
into this proper4y. It was pointed out that on proposed tentative
study Clifton Street was extended and had an outlet at Ball Road,
oui this being oni.y a teutative study no determination could be
made at this time as to waether Cliftoi! Street would be continued.
Mrs. J. H. Weanberg, 212 Camdon Avenue appeared before the Com-
mission and stated that she understood a school and park had been
proposed for this pecticular site and suggested that the applicants
come back when they have a definition plan for the development of
the property. Mrs. M. G. Hartman also appeared before the t;ommission
attd stated that there are many residents in the area in favor of
granting the reciassification who were not able to come to the
afternoon meeting, ~iB HBARING WAS CLOSBD.
_2_
(~
~
~
~
C~
RBGULAR MHSfING - CITY PIANNING CQMMTSSION -~ULY 13 `1959 - CONTINUED;
RECIASSIFICATION - Commissioner Morris offered Resolution No. 9, Series 1959-60, that
N0. P-38-54-119 the Commission recommend to the City Coqncil that the subjert
(Glontinued) property be reclassified from R A, RSSIDHNTIAL AQtICULTORAL to
C-1, NBIQiBCRH00D CQbff~tCIAL, sub3ect to:
1. The filing of staadard C-1 Deed Restrictions o£ the City of
Anaheim approved by'the City Attorney.
2. That as the applicant stipulated a minimum of 50 feet wuuld
be maintained as a buffer next to the R-1 residential.
3, That there be a dedication of 53 feet on Ball Road.
4. That there be a dedication of. 2 additional feet on Palm
Street.
5. Prepare sicreet improvement pians and install all improvements
in accordance with approved standard plans oa file in the
office of the City Bagineer both Bali Road and Palm Street.
6. That there be a payment of $2.00 per front foot for street
lighting purposes on both streets.
7. That a 90 day time limit be set for the accomplishment of
i;he above conditions or such other time as the City Council
may specify. '
This Resolution No. 9 was seconded by Coaimissioner Thompson and
carried.
The vote on the above resolution was as fol'ows:
AYBS: COD9~tISSIONSRS: DuBois, Gauer, Hapgood, Mauerhan~ Morris,
Summers~ Th~mpson, Mungall.
NOES: COMh1ISSI0NBRS: None,
ABSHNT:COMMISSIONBRS: Alired,
RBCIASSIPICATION - PUBLIC HBARING. PHTITION submitted by R. L. COONS~ 111 West Blm
NO. F-58-59-120 Street. Anaheim, California, as U~vner, requesting that that property
de.~cribed as being on the south side of Broadway between South
Ciaudina and South Philadelphia Street and further described as
Lots 1 to 7, Block M of Center Tract be reclassified from R-3,
MULTIPLB PAMILY RBSIDHNTIAL to C-1, NSIGf~0RH00D CQMMHRCIAL with
uses limited to those shown in the proposed C-7, BUSINHSS and PRO-
PBSSIONAL OPPICB ZONB.
Mr, Rector L. Coons, 111 West Bim Street, Anaheim, appear~3 before
the Commission and stated that he had contacted all the owners in
this block except one and they were in favor of reclassification
oi !~~e or~perty from R-3 to C-1 with uses Simited to those shown
in the proposed C-7 zone in the new ordinance„ He further stated
that Bast Broadway is slowing changing from a Multiple Pamily
Residential District to the type of commercial suggested, namely
business and professional offices and that this transition has
already started at the northwest corner of Broadway and Loara
and in the 300 biock on the south side of Broadway. ~
1
E
~
~
,~
No one appeared in opposition to the grantiag of the reclassification. %~
TItS III3~iI'~Ii:^v Ti7AS CLOSBD. 3
Commissioner AuBois offered Resolution No. 10, Series 1959-60, that ~
the subject properties, namely Lots 1 to 7 inclusive of Biock M of
center tract be reclassified from R-3, MULTIPLB FAMILY RBSIPHNT7AL ,
-3-
.~
~
~
~
--~-----, ----.... ------- -------- ---- - ------- ----- ~
~. - ------ -----__ _.----
~ C.~
~~
E-~
~
RBGULAR MH&T! NG - CITY PLANNING C0~9dISS~Di -,j~~H.B D~ Il~ -~
RBCIASSIPIJ-TION - to C-1, NHIC~~D~ ~r9II, ~ ft~a~ ~ Il IIee~ B'estrictioas
N0. P-58-59-120 be filed on t2i~se ~srs Ila~ikc~ tt~ ms~s ta those proposed
(Continued? in the new C-7 zone aad ~~~tt ft~:
1. The replacemea~ ~f s~B~ ~ mti*r~ II,~~ Cxandina and
r
Broadway and tiie ~m ¢m ~g ~~ at such a
time as liaea~es ~x+e ~€'~a tb~ mg tJ~ese propezties for
the new classi~'3za~.
This resolution ~cas ~ ~g ~~ ~~ ~ ~azried,
The vote on the abeRe ~sn~sftflmm w~s ~s ffmll~i c~z
AYBS: Cd~9dISSI~: ID~, ~¢~W ~ac~,, b~erhaa, Morris~
~=~ ~ ~' ' -
NQBS: COhAfISSI@ffitS: ~I~~
ABSffiYT;Cd~lI5SI0~ffit~: mnn,.~
RBCIASSIFICATION - PUBLIC HBARING. ~T~1 ~nfimm~ Eog EL~Pffi'dE Off t1RSIN N. HAFtTTfAN
N0. P-58-59-121 and AHIVA L. HAR~AN, ~e,o~a~ ~~¢$, D~ice Gale ga~tmaa,
Administrator and ~aersc~nr.~ ~ -Y~tt ~IlIl ~a~, gaa;heim, California,
- as Autncrized Ageat, rag~ f~ft tt~ paag~t~ desGribed as
being on the north si~de m~' ~aIl.Il ~~traMeem 8art~er Boulevazd
and South Balm ~YreE~ ~e ~n~~iFn~ ffau~ ~~, C~L COMh~.'RCIAL
to C-3, HBAVY COt~CII~II..,
Mr. M, G. Iiartmaa ap~eax+~l fi~fr'~ae if~ ~mmnssiem a~ tIte app~icant
and stated trst ~e 3a~eade~. ~m poIl~ a. ~g 9~simess ia, the area
as shown on pipt ~laa. '~ ~,~r ~~~is p=operty i.s
undeveloped at t3ie ~+re~~ ~~e ~71~ aft daes ha~ aa exi.sting
oid gazage aad it is g~z~g,m~e~l 11~ ~ f~as aa~ as boat storage if
found necessary, ~th~a+~f0r~, ~ aommIlaIl ~n~ itrs ga,~¢e tlie whole area
that he owns reclassif'tied ~c ~„ ~~ ~rci~S~
Co~nissioner ldauer~aa ~'fF~ ~mDm~ IIia_ ~]'i~ ti~xt ttte subject
property be reco~mende~ ibo tB~ Q~tt~ ~a fos recSassificati_on
from C-2, ~~~nT 2'O1~CII4~ ibm ~, ~Q~ff 4~.Tgi,, subject to:
1. 1he constrnc#ion r~ ~~+~n~t~ ~ g~m y-y~~t a„~ garbor gQUlevard,
2, •,ua dedicatian ~af 33 ff~tt ffa~ #~ eea;~r Ilsae of HazL~or to U~e
Citv of Anaheim.
3. ~e gaymeat ~o£ $2.~D g~s ffammtt ff~tt ffe~ stxeet Iighting purposes
on mth Palm ,aad SaxHwra
4. lhat there be a~9D ~a~v ~a~ Ils~itt ffm~ it~ accvmglishmeat of the
above coadi#i,onsa
1Y-is i:~_3~tion ~s ~eanma~ ~p ~mm~a Sapgoo~ and caZried.
The vote on the a~ove ~~ca~nrtt~ a~s ~ fcc~Il3aa~s:
AYSS: COhfldISSI~: Il'l~ans,~ ~„ ~i~, Nfaner~ra, Summers,
NQBS: C~9dIS$3U11T~.~'~ ~SaS~ pdp~Il]Lw
ABSBP7T: COI~MfISSI~d~°.S: 9-a n „~
NOTB: It would ~ppear ~att ~ mff ~~ 3 rerlassificaticn wixh-
out some restricti~e ~vnsamms as ft,m it~ ms~s ~euz~ possibly persit
a nnmber of up.zs ~vhi~ +~e ~aitg ~ff ~smm'~a1cP an.t desire ia this
area,
f
i
~
~
t
~
i
i
~~
~,, - -~ --
~-
~~
~. -Q~ ~ ' g
i
~