Minutes-PC 1959/11/02i ~
~ ~ ~ ~
city saii
D7ove'ber 2, 1959
Aaaheim, California
B~ ~ ~ '~ C1TY P~ ~ISSIOii
~ ~ ~t~ ~ ~ ~~,piam~ing Cosvission Mas called to
1t8GQiAR 1~STIIIG - ~n Ganer. a quoram bein6 present.
ozder at 2:02 O`Clnc~ P.ll. b~
~ia~ers; IIoBois. Manerhaa. Susers. MunBali.
PRBSffi~1T: ' ~_ ,~;s ~~~eting at 2:10 0•Clock P.M..
~~r g~ ~ed tbe ~eetin~ at 2:25 U'Cloet Y.M.
~~ ~~ ~re~ t~e ~eeting at 2:25 O'Cloct P.M. Also
psesent at #1~e ~6 ~ ~ ~=r• ~sistaat City Attozaey.
~~~8 ~~~~ gega~ar Meeting of October 26, 1959
MINU1~3: ~~~~ ~~ f~r this seetiag and ai11 be coaaidered
at tbe mcetin~ °f ~ 16~ I959.
~~_ ~TIQ~ maD~itted b7 DQ'II'i H. ~~N~ 888
VARIANCS Id0• ' ~~ ~~les S~t. ~- ~fornia. aa Opaer, se-
1'~'-~ 9uestia6 P~°° tO ~~ ~~~~ oa this R-2 PAOP8ltT7t AND
40 ALi~ BlSiG~+ ~ 5 P~F ~ g?Dg ypRD LII~ on fhe properry
. ~~~ ~ y~yy~ m~ Kst aide of Olive Street betWeea
~~~ ~~g ~~ aa,d fertker deacribed as 723 North
~R ~~- ~ p~p~~ ss presen2ly clasaified R-2. 1W0
I~i11ILT ~'
~ p~t~ ~. ~~y~ appeared before the Coe~isaion aad
stated t~t rilth ~~~ f[x DuiZtron the p oF,erty aet deep a
s~atiafaato~~ tiiW~
7~5 ~tOrth ~Yive Stzeet appesred before the
9fr. C. 8. 1m~9• ~~~~~ ~~d ~ gg pLOp~=ty owuere in
~0~'~°° ~~ beyieved that the varigace if appsoved
~~ ~~~ ~~t~ aad f~e nadersirab~e to the arc~.
~~. ~,~ ~~y~~ T3Q ~oZt~e phila,delphia Stzee4 stated that
~~~ y' p~~t1T mmed for a daplea dxeliing and that a
~~ ~ ~ ~ f~ ~ ~p~=ty. ;lr. Rosa L. ~Segley.
rn~~~lp~,= y~seet 12ao ~ciced hia op;,osition to the
~tit~ of tbe ~arianoe- '!~ HBARIIiG OfAS CIA~°~BD.
~~ ~aa cfEezed Heao2ntion No. 98. Se=ies 1959-60.
t6at O+ariamce ~. 3164 be d~mied. .
~s x~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ner ~uBois and csrried.
~ ~~ ~ ~ symR ~~~tio~ rms aa follo~+s:
w~: ~Q~,~,s: 11aHo,€s, (~ner, Manerhsa, Morris, Summera..
~21• .
Ei~S: ~~~= lfone'
~: ~pQ~[~,~: Dfooe.
g~ ~_ a~~ ~t~ ~y, !lARTIN pSICB, 2642
VARIAI~CB 1~0~ ' ~,~~ ~, ~iiforaia. aa Oraer., requestiag
1165 ~ tm I4~LL 9iD~Q1~ P0~ Itf SIDS 9fAEtD oa the P=°perty
~ ~y ~~ ~ ~ ~sthtiest co=ner of Greenbrier Aveaue
and ~s Y~rh Street aad f~~ ibeQ a~I~~ PAMIYbr~ID&ITIAL.
me p~rtt is pzeseatl7
~, glaas ai~Or xis•~~y ~t ~~SO~°~ ~ng pool is eom-
p~~l~ ~ y~ ,~u ~r~,at t~e easteza end of the lot. There i~
~~1j =~~ ~~ x~ e~t of• the lot and on accevat of the •?
-1-
------~- _ ._ . . _ .. ._.._._._ ._
~ _-- "-
~......._,_,_.___..-..-• - -
l,~ ~ '~iF
Rg(~J1AR MBBTING - CITY PLANNING CON~IISSION -NOVF~ 2 1'9~~9 -~= ~
~
CH N0.
VARIAN - oniy door to the rear being from t.he 3?~ 3~. att ss ~
a~~ ~$
l as far away from ¢hi~ ~o°= ~s ~~"
1165
'-'~- to keep the poo
f or the placing of same at the ex*s~e east ~d ~' 1~ ~- ~
$a~ ~~~ °~
a
s
neighbor with the keq lot directly soarh s.~
the variance. ~i8 I~l-RZNG UiAS C~~
Commissioner Morris offered Resolnt3vn Nc- ~w S~ Il~"~•
ff
ted ~ciYh
~ ~
~
that Variance No. 1165 be ;~an
~ line and subject to the plans ~-
ert
}
prop
aeconded by Commissioner Manerhan and ~""'"~
was
1Y-e vote oa the above resolution ~as.e as ffmb~~xaa
~. ~• ~'
&aner
DuBc3s
8
,
,
:
AYB9: CAb4dI38I0NSit
~Aungall.
NOB3: C~4xi3SI0N~tS: None.
pgS~: ~pi~4~lI33IONffitR: Alired and ~apgamd-
VARIANCS PTO. - PUBLIC FffiARING. PBTITION sub~it~eQ 3r~ 3t~'ff' S. &~S 3. ~~ ~
722 North Pine Street, Anaheim, t~l3fmraia» as ~~ ~
116b
- to WAIVH RBAR YARD SaT ~ACf ~m ~~'~ ~~
i
on
perwiae
amo~
as being on the east aide of Pine Strre3 8~e3~ ~~~
~e
d further described as'~1flesC~ ~3~ ~' ;
North Streets aa
reaeatlq classified ~-1, SI'PG7~ ~ ~
ia
t
~ p
y
preper
No oae appeared for or agaiaet the ~~~~ ~' ~
1l~lg HBkItING WA9 CIA9HD. t
~
i
This v~riance caiis for an eacraehmeat 3~a n~ s~~ ~~ ~ ,
6" with a setbacY of 1' 6" from the ~r~epes~ i
eonnect the gasage and the main d~ae113siS ae3~ a a~' ~° z~~ ~ '
rumpua room. 1liere is an exiatiaB f3re~~e ~m ~s ~'~~ ~n
be ineorporated iato the new rcom- ~°~'1~ ~~~~~
wall aext to the propertq iine. TB9 ~.~ ~~~
Commias3oner Mauerhan offered itesoluti~m Il~c- 1'1• ~~ n~•
that Variance No. 1166 be appravea, snb~t t~'~~iF~~ ~
that the aorth wall be solid, also ~a~ ~e ~m ~~g ~
froat of the propertq be repairtd.
lbie reaolutioA wae aeconded by t~mmisd~es ~~~'~'
The vote oa the at ~ve resoiution yras as ffo3b'e~+sc ~
A'189: Cq~9dISSI0NBR3: Allrea, Dn~ois„ t~+es. ~•
Mozria, ~. ~n-
Kpgs: CpPg,llS'IpNffitse None
AB88NT: COlM~lIS~IONHt~9: Plonr.
VARIANCB N0. - PUBLIC HBARIt~. PBTITION submil~Y~3 m9 ~~ ~* ~~a~
1167 8sbins Street, Anaheim~ Califcra~is u~+ ~~
- to OPIDiATB A GUBST Ii01~ P0~ AGBD an ~he ~x~esltP ~~~~
on th^ east side of Sabiaa Sizeet bet~em ~~~m°II~ ~
Btreeta and further described as 730 N~ ~- '~ ~~ ~
preaeatiy claseified R-2, TWO ~~
Mra. Clarice Graham aa the aPPl~~ ~~~ ~~°°~
aad stated that she has four gueats ambn~s~7 ~~ ~~ ~'~
the dupiex and that there is ample raam $~r s~ ~~ ~~~~`
like to hnve a vnriance gzaated far 3D ~~8 ~-
Flr. B, M. Hradford, neighbor to the so~h slta~l ~a1t ~e ~~
ob,~ei:°cion to the preaent operation ~~his ~mmve. ~ 1~~ ~~'~
increcaed ta 10 to 12 persona 3= ~38h4 ~em~e a~~" ~"
Graham again sppeared before the~~ ~~~~ ~°
families might heve IO peoPlt 1~vi~8 ~ a~~ ~~~ ~
-2-
-~---- ~-- - ~_-_ _ . . _____~ _. .
~
~
.~^
~
ggGUIpR MHBTING - CITY YIANNING COMNISSION - NOVBMBER 2 1959 - CONTINUHD:
VARIANCH N0. - guests would be less noisy than families with chiidren. She
1167 further stated that she might turn the two garages i.nto lwing
~opNTINUgD) quacters. There are three garages on the property. TEIE I•ffiARING
WA5 CLOSHD.
Commissioner Mauerhan offered Resolution 101, Series 1959-60, that
Variance No. 1167 be denied.
lhis resoiution was seconded by Commissioner Morris and carried.
The vote on the above resolution wn.s as follows: ood, Mauerhan,
pygg; CODIMISSIONBRS: Alixed, DuBois, Gauer, Hapg
Morris, Summers, Mungali.
NOB3: CUM~I3SIONBRS: None.
ABSHNT: CQhAfISSI0N8RS: None.
...
~
i
SPBCIAL USE - PUBLIC HBARING. PLTITION submitted by GBORGH BANHY, 1412 Damon
pBRMIT N0. 53 Street, Anaheim, Califorr.i~, as Owner, requesting permission to
gRgCT AN ICH S&ATING RINS p~ND A RHSTAURANT on the property described
as being on the north side of Ratella Avenue between Zeyn and
Ciementine Streets. The property is presently classified C-1,
IdHIC•f~0RH00D CaN1MHRCIAL.
Mr. George Baney appeared before the Commission and presented a
render~ng of the building that he proposed to erect £or an ice
skatiag rink and restaurant which restauran~t would not have a
bar and stated that he believed that there is a aeed for this
type of recreation in the area.
No one appeared in opposition to the grantirg of the Special
Use Permit. DiH HBARING WAS CIASBD.
Commissioner Mauerhan offered Resolution No. 102, Series 1959-6~,
that Special Use Permit No. 53 be ~approved, subject to the erection of
the bu~lding in accord_nce with the plans presented and that there
be no bar in the proposed restaurant.
The vote on the above resolution was as foilow:.:
CONMISSIONHRS: Alired, DuBois, Gauer, Hapgood, Mauerhan, ~
_
~
AYSS:
Morris, Summers, Mungall.
NOSS: COMMISSIONffitS: None. ~
pB3HNT:C~A4dI3SI0NBRS: None.
This resolution was seconded by Commissioner Ailred. _
RBCIA3SIPECATION - PUBLIC HBARTNG• pBTITION aubmitted by ROBBRT R. STBR'.tNS and
2936 West -3ncoln Avenue, Anaheim, California, as '*
-
N0. P-59-6q-38 WALTBR H. DUPP,
requestiag that the property described as being on the
- p ~
wners,
south side of Lincoln Avenue between Dale Aveaue and Stanton
2922 to 2930 West Lincoln Avenue be ;
~
Avenue and further described as
BIGHBORHOOD CODNdBRCIAL to C-3, I~AYY ~ "
reclassified from C-1, N
CONH~fBRCIAL. y,
red for or against the granting of this reclassification. y
Na one appea
'1HH iiBARING WAS CIASHD.
Commissioner Mauerhan offered Aesolution No. 103, Series 1959-60,
'
•
that Reciassification No. P-59-60-38 be denied.
This resolution was seconded by Commiasioner Alired and carried. r
f
The vote on the above resolution was as foilows:
COhA1ISSI0NBRS: Allred, DuBois, Gauer, Hapgood, Manerhan, {
,
;
py8g;
Morris, Summers, Idungall. ' 3
1
Npgg; CO~fY8SI0NHRS: None. s ~
pgggNT; CphIIdISSION~tS: None. ;
_3_ ?
~
. __ _ .~.~.~~. 3
S
~
.._ ..
~~..~_~-..__.__-__- - -..
_...._._,: _..~~ ~.
--
.,~
~ ~ ~
~
i
gg(~TIAIt MSBTING - CITY PIANNING COMMISSION - NOVBMBBR 2 1959 - CONTINUHD:
RBCIA3SIPICATION - PUSLIC HHARING. PSTITION submi'tted by RUSSSL O. 8s DOROTHY B. ROQUBT,
314 5outh Indiana 5treet, Anaheim, California, as Owners, requesting
N0. F-59-60-39 that the property described as being on the west side of Placentia
d Streets and further described as
Avenue between Center and Redwoo
th Placentia Avenue be reclassified from R-1~ SINGLB PAMILY
429 Nor
.
RBSIDBNTIAL to C-1~ NHIGHBORHOOD COMMSRCSAL•
reclassification was held over from the previoas meeting. On
This
,
accuunt of a 5 to 1 vote of the Commission. The Commission was
ew ruling of the legislature, which '
b
y a n
iaformed by Mr. Geisler that
law went into effect in Septemt~er, it is now not necessazy to have a ~
- two-thirds ma,~ority of the total Commisaion. Only a simple ma3ority i
of the Commisaion is required. This means that the vote of the 5 to 1~
ith it an approvai of the reclassificatioa.~
d
i
w
e
at the laet meeting carr
RHCLAS3IPICATION - PUBLIC HBARING• YBTITION submitted by ROBHRT J. DRAB&IN and HARVBY j
215 Weat 7th Strcet~ Los Angelea 14~ California,:'
ite 1303
3
N0. P-S9-60-44 ,
u
A. GLA98R,
David S. Collina, 1130 West Lincoln Boulevard~ Aaaheim, ~
as Owtters
,
Califoraia, as Authorized Agent, requesting that the propertq des- i
ast corner of Lincoln aad Carletoa
th
e
cribeq as being on the nor
be reeiaseified from C-2, ~L ~~~CIAL to C-3, ~AVY ~
Avenuas~
CONWIBRCIAL. ',
Uader the aew ruliag referred to under Reclaseification No. P-59-60-39 '
l at the meeting of Oc4ober 26,
thie reelassification met with approva
1959.
AECIJ199IPIGTION - PUHLIC tIDARING. PSTITION aubmi~ted bq LHSLIS S. & MARIB A. GUTFIIIIH,
Calif~rnia, as Ownera. Louis H.
Anaheim
N0. P-39-60-46 ~
728 North Buc11d Avenue,
Diainger, 1815 West La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, Cali€oraia~ as
that the property deacribed as being
i
ng
Authorized Agent, requeat
on the esat aide of Huclid Avenue between J,a Palma Aveaue and
RuAthRB5Ip8BNTIALdAQtICUL NIVAAL touC13a AHHAVYe,
~f
e
rom
recia eified
be
COMMBRCIAL, (Motel uae only). ~
Mr, Jsmee H. Watere~ 348 Vailey View Drive, Pullertoa, California,
ion and etated that a aurvey of the
i
ea
appeared before the Comm
~ect property ahowa that thp oaly possiblE uae of aame wouid be
eub
h
,
for a motel with Buclid Avenue a primaxy highway aad a north sout
Thia
route between the Aiveraid~e Preeway and the SaAta Ans Pseeway.
further stated thet the existing
H
• e
prop•rty ia ceatraily located,
dweliing would be removed from thepsoperty. Tf~ HSARINd WAS CYASBD.
Due to the fact that no plane were px'eseated for the wotel or e
tion waa made by Commieaioner Msuerhsn. aeconded
propes plot plea, a mo
by Commiesioner Muagall and carried that thia reclasaification be
held over uatil the mteting of November 16, 1939
~~U~ NQ. _ ppgT,I~ }~pRipd, PBTITION aubmitted by J~iN A. SHOGMMir 12631 Pletcher
California, as Owaer, requeeting permiaeioa to
den Grove
G
1157
-----"'° ,
4r
Drive,
gRgCT p gIpN 4' x 6' on the property deacribed as being on the west
aide of Hrookhurat Btzest bctween Broadway 8treet aad Orange Avenue
ead farther deacribed as 9301=9309 8outh Hrookhurat Street. The
proparty ie presently claesified R-A, RHBIDSNTIAL AGRICULTURAL.
Trtia veriance was held over frem the meeting of October 26, 1959, on
accaunt of the applicaat at thet time being unable to ehow the ~
Cocimieaion what type of aign was propoaed to be erected upon the
premieca. He appeared at thia meetiag before the Commie~ion and
6 feet4sdvertieiagetwo businea~es ingthe ad,~oining atorearwith~e~y
cloek iu between the eigns. The ciock would be iig~-ted at eli
4imm and the advertieiag eigae would be shut off at aight after
businaea houra. Tt~ HHARING WAS CLOS$D•
-4-
, ~
\ -------------- ~-~--------
~..~
----------------- • - - '
~ ~ _ , ~ -- _. .. . __...,_,_.
<.
~
~~~
0
~~.~~ - Q~ p~ C~WISSIpN_.. NOV~NNB&R 2, 1959 - CONTINUSD:
~~yp. _ ~issioeer Allred offered Resolution No. 104, Series 1959-60 that
ly~ ~ui~JMP ~. ~,yS7 be graated.
(aQiT~D)
'~e yo~e on the above resolntion xas as follows:
sg~: (7~71I3SIOi~3; AlI=ed~ DuBois, Gauer, Hapgood, Mauerhan,
• Morzis~ Summers~ Muagall.
ppgq: a~tig3I0NHt3: None.
dg~F= O~QSSIQV~S: None.
~is nsoirRioa ras seconded by Commissioner Hapgood and carried.
y~~r~~~~ _ p~iC ~JIRING, pgTITION submitted bq IAUIS G. & MARY M. VANDffit SOOM,
p~_ g„59~47 i3pg gonth groothnrst, Aaaheim, California, as Owner, requesting that
. - tbe propert~ desuibed as being on the west side of Brookhurst 3treet
y~t~een ga11 guad and (G~inida I.ane and f~rther described as 1309
~onth Broothnrst Street, be reciassified from R-A, RBSIDBNTIAL
A~I(~LIURAL to F1, NBIGHHORHOOD COMI~RCIAL, (Chiidren's Nursery).
ltr. Yaader Booa. as Appiicaat appes.zed before the Commisaion and
~~ed t~; t.hey plan a schooi for 14 chiidren. The building wili
aot be c~nged sad there wiii be no lighted sigas. No one appeared
ia oppositioa to the reciassification. THB HBARING IU-S CLOSHD.
C~mssiomer Hapgood offered Resolutioa No. 105~ Seric:a 1959-60
t~at Aec2assification No. F-34-60-47 be recommeaded t~~ the Ci.ty
Cmacii for reclassifieation from R~A, RBSIDffiVTIAL AGRICULTUAAF. to
~1~ ~g0~ COlIHRCiAL, subject to:
1_ ~e dediution of 60 feet on Brookhurst to the City of Anaheim.
2. prepare stzeet p2ans and install ali improvements in accordance
tdth approved standa=d piaaa on file ia the office of Lhe City
~ogiaeez.
3. ~e payaeat of SZ.00 pez front foot for street ~lighting purpoaes.
4. arat a 90 day time lim.it be set for the accompliahment of the
above conditions.
'~is zesolntioa ras secoaded by Commiasicaer Allred and carried,
~e wte oa the above resolution was as followa:
s~; C~YI19SIONBR3: A21red~ DuBois, Gauer, Hapgood, Mauerhan,
l~orr;s, gymmers~ Mungall.
~s: p~II~SIp[~ffitg: None.
AB~ffiMi: C~liS3I~lt3: None.
~~~I~~; - g~,IC ggARII~DG. FBTYTIQd snbmitted by AWIBROSB G. ~ PLORA E. MC DONA'.D,
~, p_sq_~p_~g ~ D. ~ IpIS g, gC~FIppHR, 307 Cal3fornia Hank Buildiag, Anaheim,
~gornii~ ss Onaera, sequesting that the property described as being
on t6e aorth side of Mlilshire Street betweea Loara Street and Lincoln
p~e~e be reclassified fros R-A~ RBSIDHNTIAL-AGRICULTURAL to C-1,
1~I(~ORHOCD COY~tC3AI.-
ltr. Niltoa S1ay, 1450 Birchmont Avenue appeared before the Commission
and stated tl~st he xas natopposin~ ttsis zeclasaification~ but wanted
to bt anre ti~e sau zestrietions xere impoaed as were requ3red by the
recmtiy caapieted bniiding to the west. No one else appearetl for
ar a{~s~nst the propoae8 reclasaification. T7~ HBARING WAS CL09BD.
(7o~iasio~er Nauerhaa offered Resoiution No. 106, Series 1959-60, that
p,eegassificstioa No. F-59-60-48 be recommeaded to the City Council for
reclassificatioa froa R-A. RSSIDBNTIAL AQtICUL'I"JIFAL to C-1, NBIQiHORH00b
q~~tCI,L~ anb3ect to:
-5-
__ _._- -------- - -- -•: - ------ --- ~
~ ~.., •----_._..._._..
~ ---- . ~ ~
, ~ .:.. _ • - ' . ~7
' - -- - `
~ ~
L1
RBGULAR MBBTING - CITR PLAI~II~Tifi1G Q~SSI@Y -~ 2„ Ig54 - CONrINUHD:
AHCIASSIPICATION - 1. ~a# aIl1' ~araB~~s ~~~~'~ ~e subject property shall be ;
N0. F-59-60-48 3~~~ ~ ~ S'~ 'a ~~~' ~
(CUNTIN[IBD) ~
2. ~ar t~e a~+~~ ~g a~e sapj~e~t ~sopertg piace of reeord standard i
Citg of 9~mma3aei~ C-aa ffi~cc~ ~est~ictioas approved by the City '•
~~,~~y~ ~i¢~ aesltsi,~ta~ms a~iIl~ Fimit t~he C-1 uses of the property ~
fa ~~,~c~ ~a„~;~ss pF~a~es, D~ncae_ aad Dental Offices, Pharmacys ,
aad PrDfessi~8 ~ffames, m~-Eetait sezvice businesses and any uses ;
~~~¢ ~~sam~s a~Ena¢~ ~ag me $ereafter authorized and permitted
~~ g~~~ ~img mf 1t~e (.ctg af A~aaheim in the proposed C-7, !
$usiaess am~ ~amffesss~aP ~f£iee zone.
3. mat tz+ees s~laafiIl ~e pB~4ecfl im ff=a~ of the 6 foot masonry wall to
~ e~~~ a# g~ seas ~ff tlhe Frope=tg as a sound barier.
4. ~at si~~aflBrs ~aSl ~e ims~aIlre~ ~s required by the City
BngiaePr mf 4~e lrittg off A*~r+~'"" before final inspection of the
bni3,clang ss ~-
3. ~a* ~~~ff ~ 1~e ~jiect pzepertg shall pay to the City of
~a~ei~ ~e smm of $2_~ ~es froat foot for street•lightiag purposes.
6. ~ax t~ere ~n~ ~ esg~t~A'c~ a 25 €oot minimum rear yard set
bac3c_
7. ~at asea SngBsftnmffi s~aL.Il tee ~ai~taiaed beiow the height of the
yvaLi,s effetted at tffi seae ~f tEee prope=ty.
g. ~a* ~~;A ;+~ tto be eaected essentially in accordance with
the ~3as~s psesmted_
~S =~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~g f~~issiouer Morris and carried.
The vote on tl~e a~~e aes~flz~ta~n ~s ~s follows:
Ay~. p~yg~~g- AEEredx ETaBmis, Gauer, Hapgood, Mauerhan;
DE~ss$s, ~ersr Munga].I.
NaES: ~Y~S: 1~e-
ABSBNi': CJO~~SSI~S: ~n~-
RBCIA9SIPICATION - FUBLIC ~ABI~G- P~'I~ ~°~~~ ~F DBLFA P. MC CARTY, 211, South
IdO. P-59-60-49 Phiia@.e3qahia Stseet• m'""~"""""• C~~~~a~ as Owner, Lew Sinor, 414
North P3sr.e~ti.a A~e~e. A~im~. C~Si~ornia, as Authorized Agent, re-
questing tffit ~e F=opnert9 ~es~si~ as being on the west side of
p~1~~~ ~~eeY bericeen g¢~rmg aad Center Streets and further
descri~er~ a:> ~1S a~ 295 ~th P~aBaderPhsa Street be reclassified from
R-3, lA1TL~TIIPI~ FsA-.SLY ~AL ~s P-P~ FARgING.
~. ~ g;y~,=, as g~,st~sized !lgea4 £ar the app :icant appeared befose
the ~cmmissioa a~ staite3 rloat it is groposed to use these two 40' x
155' lots for off-stree~ ~Satimg tm ~e reated bq the day, week or
month. ,Plt the preseat tsm~z zt °s Fz~pOSed to leane the dwellings on
the fran4 of t~e propeYt9 affi 6=t oa~F t~e rear pc-tion for this
off-sts+eet paririug. rhich L~s fII'~atage °a two alleys. •n pet3tloi- was
presentefl by S4 pa~opertp a~oers an t~e asea protesting the use of this
propertg #os P-II, Paxkan~, ~at that it was the opinion of the signers
t~f r~9 ~g~ ~a~ mo omjeetimm to zoaisg the whole block for
~~r~;aa ~ses. It ras ~i~ted bg Mr. S±.aor that this would be
a co~erciafl ase m t~e p=a~e~t9 ~ t~t it would be imp=oved with
black tap so t~at tLere a~aid ~ee a° dan aeated. Mrs. Myrtle Holman,
208 Sonth Phila~dei~ii Street ~ a=eF=eseatative of Mrs. Hilda
~~~s~ ~~~ s~eaa yphia Street appeazed beforethe f~u~ission
~ yoi~~ ~eis objeetians im add'atiom to signing the petition
~~t ~ pya~osed rec3~ssi£icaition_ THH HBARING WAS CIASHD.
-~-
~
. ~ r4.~...__------,_..-
: __. _ .. .... .._.~~......_
E ~~
~
i
II
~
~
;,.~
ggGZJIAR MBBTING - CITY PLANNING CaMMISSION - NOVHMBBR 2 1959 - OONTINOHD:
~ ~
~ i
,
I
RBCIASSIFICATION - Commissioner Morris offered Resolution No. 101, Series 1959-60, that i
N0. P-59-60-49 Reclassification No. F-59-60-49 be recommended to the City Council ~I
~~~I~gD) for reciassification from R-3, MILTIPLB PAMILY RHSIDBNTIAL to P-1,
pARKING, subject to improving the p=operty with black top and with no
ingress or agress to Philadelphia Street and that the lot be laid out
essentially as per the sketch presented. Also subject to the i
foilow=ng engineering requirements. ~
RBCIASSIPICATION
N0. P-59-60-50
a
1. 17iat the sidewalk on Philadelphia Street be repaired.
2, That the proposed plan for parking be submitted to the Public ~
Works Department for approval and recommendation.
3. 11iat a payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes
be made.
4, That a 90 day time limit be set for the accomplishment of the ~
above conditions. ~
This resolution was seconded by ~ormnissione= Alired and carried. ~
~
The vote on the above resolution was as foilows: ~
pyBg; COMMI3$IONffitS: Allred, DnBois, Gauer, Hapgood, Mauerhan, i
Morris, Summers, Mungall. ~
NOES: CONAlISSI~IBR3: None. j
pgggNT; COMMISSIONBRS: None. ~
INC., ~
- PUHLIC HBARING. PBTITION submitted by MICBBY CONSTRUCTTON CA.,
1545 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California, as Owner, Arthur B. Hintz,
1545 Satella Avenue, Anaheim, California, as Authorized Agent, re-
questing~that the property described as being on the north side of
Ratella Ave:we between Ninth Street and Carnelian Street and further
described as 1515, 1525, 1535~ ~.;45 Katella Avenue be reclassified
from R-1, SINGLH PAMILY RBSIDBNTIAL to C-1, 1~ffiIGHBORHOOD COhOlHRCIAL.
D1r, Harry Bniseiy appeared as Attorney for the applicant and stated
that he had nothi.ng to offer at the opening of the hearing. Mr. John
Phipps, 11341 Satella Avenue, owner of property next to the subject
property on the west stated that it was only a short time ago when it
was proposed to do this same thing with these dweilings, namely move
them off tha propertY and build professional offices on the property
and he was opposed at that time and he is still opposed to pro- '
fessional offices next to his home. Mr. Staniey Stobaugh, 1524
Holgate Place also stated that this is the second time that this
proposed reclassification has come up and that the houses presently
on Katella are the same as his home and can be lived in. He further
stated that he would have never purchased his home from this company
if he had known the houses on Batella would be moved off and businesses
would be pu4 in their place. Mr. Paul 1lirner, 11339 Ra.tella Avenue
and Mr. R. D. Crowl, 11322 Rateila Avenue also appeared before the
Commission and voiced their oppositions to the proposed reclassification.
Mr. Herry Kniseiy then appeared before the Commission au~d stated that
it is proposed to buiid a single story office building on the property
and that the offices would be used for business and prof°essional use
only. There is no change in the plans from those preseiited in March of
1958 and no change in conditions in the area. Tf~ HBAR7:NG WAS CLASBD.
Commissioner Mauerhan offered Resolution No. 108, Serie3 1959-60 that
Reclassification No. P-59-60-50 be dei-ied.
This resolution was seconded by Cormnissioner Alised and carried.
Zlie vote on the above resolution was as foliows: ood, Mauerhan,
A]BS: C~lI3SIONffitS: Allred, DuBois, Gauer, Hapg
Summers, Mungall.
NOSS: COMMISSIONHR3: None.
pgSBN:: COM~(ISSIOPTBRS: None.
-7-
--- •----. -~- - - -. -- . - -. -~~----;-,'_'"'r...,..____
~
..~
_ ~
-.;~
~
I
i
i
~
RHGUTAR MBHTING - CITY PIANNING COD4~lISSION_- NOVBMBBEt 2, 1959 - CONTINUBD:
RBCIASSIPICATION - PUBLIC HBARING. PBTITION submitted by CLBARBROOg IANB CORPORATION,
N0. F-59-GO-51 3700 Newport Blvd., Newport Beach, California, as Owner, W. L.
1Vorthen, 3700 Newport Bivd., Newport Beach, California, as Authorized
Agent, requesting that the property described as being on the northwest
corner of Brookhurst Street and Coichester Drive be reclassifiedfrom
C-1, NBIGHBORHOOD COI~AISRCIAL to C-3, HEAVY CON4dHRCIAL.
Mr. W. L. Worthea, 3700 Newport B1vd., Newport Beach, Califoraia,
appeared as Authorized Agent for the applicant. Iie stated that they
proposed to build a service station on the front of this lot faciag
on Brookhurst Street and that there would be 200 feet of commercial
property at the rear of the service station. It was pointed out to the
applicant that this property would be adjacent to single family
dwellings on the north and that it was felt a lighter commercial use
should go on this property. Mr. Robert B. Scott, representative of
the Community Service Stations, Inc., appeared before the Commissioa
and stated that other installations had been made of their service
stations where they adjoined single family residential property.
After a discussion which primarily covered the piacing of a service
station next to single family residences and the fact that this station
will be located in the middle of a block, a Rr_•solution No. 109, Series
1959-60 was offered by G~mmissioner Allred that the Coamaission recommend
to the City Council that Reclassification No. F-59-60-51 for re-
classification of the subject property from C-1, NBI(3~ORHOOD OOMMffitCIAL
to C-3, HBAVY CQMl~tCIAL be denied.
This resolution was seconded by Commissianer Mauerhan and carried.
The vote on the above resolution was as follows:
AYH3: CO~SdISSIONBRS: Allred, DuSois, Guaer, Hapgood, Morris, Su~ers,
Mungall.
NOHS: COM~IISSION~tS: None.
ABSBNT:COi~AfISSION~tS: None.
ANAI~IM CITY - A letter was received from Harold L. Pranzen, Assistaat Superintendant
SCHOOL DISTRICT of the Anaheim City School Aistrict requesting the approval of a site
described as a11 that real property l~~ated in the Countq of Orange,
State of California, described as Lot 7 of the Sellogg Homestead
Tract as shown on map 8-51, Miscelianeous Maps of Orange County, aiso
as shown on as Assessors No, 17, Book 81, Page 17 of Asse~sors Maps of
the Countq of Orange. This site is located,on the south side of Sail
Road, 439.40 feet west of Nutwood Street and contains approximately
8.8 acres.
Upon a motion by Commissioner DuBois, seconded by Commissioner Surmners
and carried, it was voted t:~at this site was approved by the Co~ission
as being suitable far a school site from a land use standpoint.
pDJpUgI~4BNT; - 14ie meeting adjourned at 4•:50 0'Clock P.M.
-8-
~