Minutes-PC 1961/01/161~
~
~ ~
. ~
• REQULAR MEETING
PRESENT
' ~ ABSENT
CITY HALL
ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA
JANUARY 16~ 1961
- A REdULAR MEETINO OF THE CITY PLANNINO COMM19810N WA8 CALLED TO ORDER AT
Z:OO O~CLOCK P•M.~ JANUARY 'I6~ 1961~ BY CHAIRMAN GAUER~ A QUORUM BEING
PREBENT. '
3
_ CHAIRMAN GAUERs COMMISSIONERSs A~~Ren, Maacoux~ Moaais, MUNGAL~, nnn ;
SUMMERB. COMM18810NER HAPGOOD ENTERED TH8 MEETING AT . t
3:00 P.M. '
- COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
PRESENT - ACTINfi PLANNINO DIREOTOR - RICHAfiD REE9E
SENIOR PLANNER - MARTIN KREIDT
A8818TANT CITY ATTORNEY - JOE QEIBLER
COMM18910N SECRETARY - JEAN PA4E
MINUTES ~ THE MINUTEB ~F THE MEETING OF ~IANUARY 3~ 1961 WERE APPROVED AS BUBMITTED. ~
RECLASSIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION BUBMITTED BY ELMER aNa DORA KAMMEL~ ET AL~ 907 ; o
NO. 6O-E>~-44 SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE~ ANAHE~M~ CALIfORNIA~ RECORDED OWNER9~ ROBERT W.~ ~
McCARTER~ ZS69 WEBT BALL ROAD~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ AUTHORIZED AGENT~ RE- ;
QUEBTING THAT THE PROPERTY DE8CRIBED A3C A PARCEL LOCATED ON THE WE8T ;
81DE OF MAGNOLIA AVENUE BETWEEN BALL ROAD AND ROME AVENUE~ AND Fl1RTMER ~
DEBCRIBED A8 L0T8 'IZa-141 OF TRACT N0. 1951, BE RECLA991FIED FROM R-'I~
SINQL'E FF,MILY RESIDENTIAL, To C-1~ NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL. ~
• SUBJECT PETITION FOR RECLA981FICATION WA9 CONTINUED FROM THE MEETINCiS OF
DECEMBER S~ 1960 AND JANUARY 3~ 1961, TO ALLOW PETITIONER AN ADDITIONAL
OPPORTUNII'Y TO APPEAR BEFORE THE COMM19910N TO PRE8EN7 H18 REQUE9T~ AND
TO AFFORD THE COMM18810N ADDITIONAL TIME IN WHICH TO 8TUDY THE VARIOU9
ABPEOT9 OF THE PROBLEMB IWVOLVED. •
MR. BOB MOCARTER~ 9'I9 SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE~ AUTHORIiED AGENT FOR THE PE-
TIONERB~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMM18910N AND 9TATED THAT A8 A REBULT OF THE
PLANNINO DEPARTMENT 8TUDY~ WHIOH WA8 PREPARED AT THE REQUEBT OF THE CITY
COUNCIL~ THE PETITIONER OON8IDERED THE ALTERNATIVE PLAN BUBMITTED BY THE
PLANNINC~ DEPARTMENT AB A BUITABLE PROP08AL FOR UTIL12AT1~ OF THE 9UBJECT
PROPERTY.
~
THE COMM18810N D18CU88ED THE PLAN INDICATED BY MR. MCCARTER. THE HEARING
WAS CLOSED.
~ TNE COMM18810N FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACTB REGARDING THE
BUBJEOT PETITION FOR RECLA881FICATION;
'I. PETITIONERB REQUF.ST REOLA881FIOATION OF 9UBJECT PRQPERTY FR~OM THE R-'I~
SINOLE FAMILY RE9IDENTIAL~ iONE TO THE C-1~ NEICiHBORH00D COMMERCIAI~
- 20NE IN ORDER TO PERMIT DEVELdPMENT OF RE8TRIOTED COMMERCIAL U9E8.
2. SUBJEOT PROPERTY ABUT9 R-'I~ SINfiLE FAMILY~RE8IDENTIAL. ZONIN4 ON THE
WE9T~ R-'I AOR088 ROME AVENUE ON THE NORTH~ R-A RE9IDENTIAL AGRICULTUR-
AL~ R-'I~ C-~ NEIOHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL~ AND C-3 HEAVY CGMMERCIAL~ ZONING
ACR088 MA~NOLIA AVENUE ON THE EA8T~ AND R-A ACR088 BALL ROAD ON THE
80UTH.
3. SUBJECT PROPERTY 18 THE EA8TERLY PORTtON OF A 81NGLE FAMILY RESIDEN-
TIAL TRAOT AND ABUTB A VARIETY OF RE8lDENTIAI. AND COMMERCIAL U8E9
AOR088 MAONOLIA AVENUE ON THE EA9T.
- ~~.-
~
;
i
- -r~~~ .~,---- -------_ ---... -- --- .._~_._..- ------------
'rBF , ~ --i- • 6i~_....~,_..__~
~ ~ ~:
. , . ~
j
.. ~. •
,
V ~ ~
MINUTES~ CITY'PLANNING COMMISSION, JANUARY 16, 1961, CONTINUED:
RECLASSIFICATION -- 4.
N0. 60-61-44
~CONTINED) '
5.
6.
18
3
~
~
~
~
i
SUBJECT PET I T I ON FOR RECLA881 F I CAT I ON '!'.~.5 :;'i t,: t i l.~ i fJ licTA I L BY THE ?
COMM18810N AS TO THE DE81F,481LITY OF IT: :'.,.~;r;Tµ' ';~6N91TION TO RE- j
BTRICTED COMMERCIAL U9E. THE 8TUDY INCLUDED AN ANALY313 OF THE
CHARACTER OF THE BUBJECT AND ADJACENT PROPERTIEB~ THE NATURE OF THE
PROBLEM OF 81NGLE FAMILY DWELLINGB FRONTING ON,AN ARTERIAL,HI!'HWAY~ AND+
THE SPECIFIC CONDITIONB WHICH MIGHT BAFEGUARD THE ADJACENT RE8IDEN-
TIAL AREA AND INBURE AN ORDERLY TRAN8ITION FOR A QUALITY DEVEIOPMENT. j
THE REZONING OF 9UBJECT PROPERTY FOR COMMERCIAL U8E I`$'DEEMED TO PRO-
VIDE AN EXCE98 OF COMMERCIAL U8E9 IN TKE AREA AT THE PRE4_KT TIME~
WOULD CONBTITUTE A 9TRIP COMMERCIAL 20NE~ AND WOULD BE PREMATURE FOR
THE PROPERTY UNDER PRESENT CIRCUM9TANCE9. ~
VERBAL OPP081TION WAS RECORDED AT THE MEETING OF DECEMBER S~ 1960.
COMM198l~iVER MORR18 OFFERED RE80lUTI0N N0. 149, SERIE9 1950-61~ AND
MOVF%' r'Or IT8 PA98AGE AND ADOPTION~ SECONDED 8Y COMMI$$IONER MUNGALL~
TO DENY RECLs.SSIFICATION N0. 60-61-44 REQUEST FOR RECLA831FICATION FROM
R-1, SINGLE FAiAILY RESIDENTIAL~ ZONE TO C-~~ NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL~ ZONE.!'
ON ROLL CALL THE FOREGOING RE90LUTION WA3 PA89ED BY THE FOLLOiN~.... VOTEt
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED~ GAUER~ MARCOUX~ MORR18~ MUNGALL~ SUMMER8.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
s
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HAPGOOD.
VARIANCE N0. 1323 - PUBLIC HEARIN~, PETITION BUBMITTED 8Y GEORGE D, BUCCOLA INVESTMENT COM- y
PANY~ P. 0. Box 1937~ NEwPORr BEACH~ CALIFORNIA~ OWNER~ MARCEL MOYNIER~ ',•
1S'IZL IiUNTINGTON BEACH BOULEVARD~ MIDWAY CITY~ CALIFORAIIA~ LE9SEE~ FOR . ;
PERM18810N To SELL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES TO BE CONSUMED ON THE PREMISES~ oN
PROPERTY DE9CRIBED A8: A PARCEL SZ FEET BY 'IZO FEET WITH A FRONTAGE OF 8Z ~
FEET ON COLONY STREET AND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLONY STREET BE- ~
TWEEN COLCHESTER AND VANCOUVER DRIVE9j IT3 NORTHWEBT CORNER BEING APPROXI- ~
' MATELY 144 FEET 30UTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF COLCHEBTER DRIVE AND
. COLONY STREET~ AND FURTHER 1~ 3CRIBED AS 8Z'I SOI:TH BROOKHUR3T STREET. THE
PROPERTY IS PRE9ENTLY CLABST'FIED C-'I~ NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL.
SUBJECT PETITION WA8 CONTINUED FROM THE MEETING OF JANUARY 3~ 1961 TO PRO- `
VIDE THE PETITIONER AN ADDITIOP~A~ OPPORTUNITY TO APPEAR BEFORE THE COM- ~
M18SION AND PRESENT HIS PETITION. 1
• MR. BUCK~ REPRE9ENTATIVE FOR THE PETITIONER~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMIS- '~
810N AND D13CU88ED THE PROP08ED LAY!1UT AND U9E OF AN EXISTING 3TRUCTURE 4
FOR THE ON-3ALE ~„F„LIQUOR IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT.
~"ti~, 3
MR. MARCEL MOYNIER~ THE LE88EE OF iHE 811BJECT PROPERTY~ APPEARED BEFORE ~
THE COMM188ION AND 9TATED THAT ONLY BEER WOULD BE 3ERVED IN ADDITION TO I~
LIGHT LUD:CHEB~ AND TFiAT THE OPERATION WOULD BE CONDUCTED AS A HOFBRAU
TYPE EATING E8TABL19HMENT. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED. `5
i
THE COMMIS910N FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACT8 REGARDING THE ~
SUBJECT PETITION FOR VARIANCEC 3
~
'I. PETITIONER REQUE3T8 A VARIANCE FROM CODE~ SECTION 'I8.4O.0'IO~ WHICH ,~
3TIFULATE9 PERMITTED U3E8 FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY~ IN ORDER TO E3TABLISH ~
IN AN EXI9TING 8TRUCTURE THE 8ALE OF BEER FOR CONSUMPTION ON THE PRE- ~
M18E9 IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RE9TAURANT. ~
Z. SUBJECT PROPERTY~ PRE8ENTLY 20NED C-'I~ NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL~ ABUT8 ~
-- ~
------ . ~ -
~,._.
•-•.-_.._.._ ---~----------__._.,~k
~ ' ' . ~ ' .
~
! MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING CUMMISSION, ~JANUARY 16, 1961, CONTINUED:
19
VARIANCE N0. 1323 - C-1 ON THE NORTH~ EA3T AND 30UTH~ AND R-3~ MULTIPLE FAMILY RE3IDEN-
~CONTINUED) TIAL~ ZONING ON THE WE8T ACR033 COLONY STREET~ AND 18 IN CL08E PROXI-
MITY TO THE BROOKHURST SHOPPING CENTER. ;
3. SUBJECT PROPERTY WA8 REZONED FOR R-3~ MULTIPLE FAMILY RE8IDENTIAL~
' U3E TO C-~~ NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL~ USE 8Y COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. 1414,~
DATED NOVEMBER 'I7~ 1959, WHICH GRANTED PETIT~ON FOR RECLA881FICATION
No. F-59-60-20.
4. NO ONE APPEARED IN OPP031TION TO THE PETITION.
COMM13810NER MARCOUX OFFERED RESOLUTION N0. 'ISO~ SERIEB 1960-6'I~ AND
MOVED FOR IT9 PAS8AGE AND ADOPTION~ 9ECONDED BY COMM18810NER MUNGALL~
TO GRANT VARIANCE N0. 1323~ BUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION3:
'I. DEVEI.OPMENT 8UB8TANTIALLY ~N ACCORDANCE WITH PLANB PRESENTED.
Z. LIMITATION OF LIQUOR 8ALES TO BEER ONLY~ CON8UMED ON THE PREMISEB IN
CONJUNCTION WITH,THE RE3TAURANT OPERATION.
~
THE FOREGOING CONDITION3 WERE RECITED AT THE MEETING AND WERE FOUND TO BE ~
A NECES3ARY PREREQU131TE TO THE USE OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO PRE3ERVE
THE 8AFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF ANAHEIM.
ON ROLL CALL THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION WA3 PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRET`., GAUER~ MARCOUX~ MORRIS~ MUNGALL~ SUMMERB. ~
,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS7 NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HAPGOOD.
~
VARIANCE N0. 1326 - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION BUBMITTED av CLARENCE J. BARTON~ 885 SourH Re-
3EDA STREET~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ OWNERj WALTER BODOR JR.~ ~ZS FAHRION
PLACE~ APARTMENT ~~E~~~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ LESBEE~ FOR PERMISSION TO
WAIVE MINIMUM GROSS FLOOR SPACE REQUIREMENT~ TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A
1420 SQUARE FOOT HOME~ ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS: A PARCEL S3 FEET BY 115
FEET WITH A FRONTAGE OF 83 FEET ON LIVE OAK DRIVE AND LOCATED ON 1'HE SOUTH
81DE OF LIVE OAK BETWEEN LIVE OAK DRIVE AND GROVE AVENUEj IT8 NORTHWE3T
CORNER BEING APPROXIMATELY ~E>7 FEET EA3T OF THE 80UTHEA3T CORNER OF GROVE
AVENUE AND LIVE OAK DRIVE~ AND FURTHER DE3CRIBED AS 1278 Live OAK DRIVE.
THE PROP~RTY IS PRESENTLY CLASSIFIED~ R-0~ RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN.
THE PETITIONER WA3 PRESENT. CHAIRMAN GAUER READ A PETITION OF OPPOSITION
CONTAINING ~4 31GNATURE8~ E OF WHOM REQUE3TED THAT THEIR 81GNA7URES~
SIGNIFYING APPROVAL~ BE REMOVED FROM THE PETITIONER~B APPLICATION. THE
PETITION OF OPP081TION AL80 REQllESTED A COMPROMI8E BE EFFECTED BETWEEN
THE FLOOR pREA SIZE REQUE3TED BY THE PETITIONER AND THE Z~OOO 8QUARE
FOOT CODE REQUIREAAENT.
MR. ARNOLD MAAS~ ~Z9O LIVE OAK DRIVE~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMI8SION AND
9TATED THAT THE RE8IDENT8 IN THE AREA W.4NTED THE BUILDING AREA DIMENSIONB
FOR THE BUBJECT PROPERTY FIXED AT 'I~E)OO i~QUARE FEET OR MORE.
0
THE PETITIONER APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMIS810N AND DESCRIBED THE PROP08ED
CONSTRUCTION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE 9UP.ROUPt~!NG AREA CONTAINING HOMES
OF VARYING 912E8 AND LF89 THCN THE Z~OOO 3QUARE FOOT CODE nEQ!~IREMENT.
CAMILLE ALLEC~ ~IR.~ RE9IDENT IN THE AREA~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMI8SION
,s AND 8TATED H19 RE8IDENCE CONTAINED 'I~S3O 3QUARE FEET AND THAT HE WAS DE-
SIRUUB OF HAVING DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY REMAIN COMPARABLE TO
H13 PROPERTY.
_ _ _.___._ _ .._ _._-_ _ .- .-. -- __..~
___ _~ _._ ~_. .__ .. .
, ~ - ---.~_. .. .,
'_ q .~
•~ ~
~ ' ~
i
t .
__._._
.__ ----- __ __ ..__ .
,
~ ~ . ~` ` ' ~
20
~ MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, JANUARY 16, 1961, CONTINUED:
VARIANCE N0. 1326 - THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
~CONTINiIED)
THE PETITIONER D19CU98ED 81DE YARD CODE REQUIREMENT9 WITH THE COMM18810N~
.THE AS819TANT CITY ATTORNEY~JOE GEISLER~INFORMED THE COMM18910N THAT THE
FLANS 9UBMITTED INDIOATED INADEQUATE SIDE YARD 3ETBACK9 OF C).8 FEET,
CONBEQUENTLY~THE CODE REQUIREMENT OF B.3 FEET FOR BUBJECT PROPERTY COULD
NOT BE MET UNLE88 A VARIANCE WERE OBTRINED FOR T4E 91DE YARD BETBACK3 IN-
DICATED ON THE PET`ITIONER3 PLANB OR IF THE PETITIONER PROVIDED A REVIBED
PLAN FOR UTIL•IZATION OF THE AVAILABLE REAR YARD WHICH INDICATED CONFORM-
ANOE WITH THE 8IDE YARD CODE REQU.IREMENT8.
COMM18810NER ALLRED OFFERED A MOTION~ SECOND~D BY COMMIBSIONER NIUNGALL •
AND CARRIED~ THAT THE 9UBJECT PETITION 8E CONTINUED UNTIL THE MEE1'ING OF ~
FEBRUARY 6~ 1961, AT WHICH TIME THE PETITIONER 9HALL 9UBM1T REVIBED PLANS ~
INDICATING CONFORMANCE WITH THE 91DE YARD CODE REQUIREMENT9 OF H.3 FEET ;
OR INFORMihG THE COMM18810N OF H19 INTENTION TO 9UBM1T AN ADDITIONAL PE-•
TITION FOR WAIVER OF THE 31DE YARD REQUIREMENTB. ',
VARIANCE N0. 1327 - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION BUBMITTED BY SAMUEL SHEFF, 4601 Co~isEUM STREET~;
L09 ANGELE3~ CALIFORNIA~ RECORDED OWNER~ FOR PERM19810N ro (1) WAIVE SIN-
GLE STORY HEIGHT LIMITATION TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF TWO STORY APART-
MENTS; (2) WAIVE MINIMUM CORNER LOT SIDE YARD REQUIREN~NT TO PERMIT EN-
CROACHMENT TO WITHIN TEN (10) FEET OF PROPERTY LINE FOR APARTMENTS, AND
FIVE (5) FEET OF PROPERTY LINE FOR GARAGES; (3) WAIVE RESTRICTION OF
ACCESS TO ALLEY ONLY, ON PROPERTY DE8CRIBED A8: A PARCEL j,3O FEET 6Y
158 FEET WITH A FRONTAGE OF 'ISS FEET ON SYCAMORE STREET AND LOCATED ON
THE SOUTHWE8T CORNER OF SYCAMORE STREET AND NORTH BUSH STREET~ AND FUR-
THER DESCRIBED A8 LOTS ZS AND 2C OF TRACT N0. Z7Z3. THE PROPERTY 19
PREBENTLY CLA881FIED R-3, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
MR. SAMUEL SHEFF~ THE PETITIONER~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMI3SION~ DE8-
CRIBED THE PROP09ED CONSTRUCTION AND THE CHARACTER AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE
8URROUNDING AREA. HE INDICATED THAT USE OF DRIVEWAY ACCES3 TO THE PRO-
POSED GARAGE3 FROM SYCAMORE STREET~ RATHER THAN FROM THE ABUTTING ALLEY~
WOULD PROVIDE MORE GARAGES~ LARGER AUTOMOBILE TURNING AREA~ AMD QIVE'IGfQRE
~FF-STREET FIIRK~IGG •SPMGE. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
THE COMMIS310N FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACT3 REGARDING THE
SUBJECT PETITION FOR VARIANCE:
~. P_TITIONER REQUE3T9 A VARIANCE FROM CODE~ SECTION 'Ia.3Z.OE)O~ WHICH
REQUIRE8 FOR 9UBJECT PROPERTY HEIGHT LIMITATION TO ONE STORY BECAU3E
OF THE PROXIMITY OF R-'I~ SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL~ PROPERTY~ ~N OR-
DER TO CON3TRUCT A TWO BTORY APARTMENT BUILDINGj SECTION 'IS.3Z.OSO~
WHICH REQUIRES FOH 8UBJECT PROPERTY A'I5 FOOT 3IDE YARD ALONG SYCA-
MORE STREET~ IN ORDER TO ENCROACH S FEET INTO SIDE YARD WITH APART-
MENT UNITS AND IN ORDER TO ENCROACH 'IO FEET INTO SIDE YARD WITH
GARAGE3~ SECTION 18.3Z.'IOO~ WHICH REQUIREB FOR 3UBJECT PROPERTY THAT
INGRE89 AND EGRESS TO ANY GARAGE SHALL BE FROM THE ABUTTING ALLEY
ONI.Y AND NOT FROM THE BTREET~ IN ORDER TO PERMIT INGRE33 AND EGRE3S
TO THE PROP08ED GARAGES DIRECTLY FROM SYCAMORE STREET.
2. SUBJECT PROPERTY 13 COMPOSED OF TWO VACANT LOT3~ LOT N03. ZS AND 26
OF TRACT N0. Z~Z3 WHICH WA8'RECORDED IN MARCH~ 1957.
3. SUBJECT PROPERTY ABUTS R-3~ MU~TIPLE FAMILY RE3IDENTIAL~ PROPERTY ON
THE EA3T ACROSS BU9H STREE7 AND ON THE 90UTH AND ON THE WEST~ AND R-'I~
SINGI.E FAMILY RE3IDENTIAI~ ACR088 SYCAMORE STREET ON THE NORTH.
4. ABUTTING R-3 PROPERTIEB HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH TWO STORY MULTIPLE
rAMILY RE3IDENTIAL CONBTiiUCTION WHICH APPARENT~Y WERE DEVELOPED PRIOR
TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE PREBENT R-3 ORDINANCE~WHICH LIMIT8 THE
i
_ ,
.,_ _ __. . .._.~ ~ _ _..._.
_ _ _ ~a ' • ' '8'i
_ . : ~ - -_.- --
. . ,
~ .
:.~
----- --- -_..e.._.,.....~-M , ~.--- _ .. _ . _._ ~.
~ ~ ~
21
MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ ~ANUARY 'I6~ 1961, CONTINUED:
i VARIANCE N0. 1327 - 9TRUCTURAL HEIGHT'OF ANY BUILDING IN AN R-3 ZONE~ WHERE IT ABUT9
~ ~CONTINUED) UPON AN R-A~ R-O~ OR R-'I 20NE~ TO ONE STORY FOR A D13TANCE OF 'ISO
I
~ FEET FROM THE R-3 20NE BOUNDARY.
S. THE PROPOSED PLOT PLAN INDICATE9 'I6 DWELLING UNITB 0.>dD Z4~ RATHER
THAN THE CODE REQUIREMENT OF 2O GARAGE9~ AND ONE DRIVEWAY FROM THE
PARKING AREA TO THE ALLEY AND ANOTHER TO SY~AMORE STREET.
~ E. ADDITIONAL 9TREET DEDICATION 18 NOT REQUIRED BECAUBE FUTURE STREET
WIDENINO CAN BE ACCOMPLI8HED WITHIN THE EXI9TING RIGHT-OF-WAY BY DE-
CREASING PARK-WAY PARTICULARLY IN VIEW OF THE NARROW WIDTH OF THE
8UBJECT LOTS AND BIDE YARDB.
7. NO ONE APPEARED IN OPP091TION TO THE PETITION.
COMMI9810NER MUNGALL OFFERED RESOLUTION N0. ~S'I~ SERIE9 1960-61~aNa ~
MCVED FOR ITS PA89AGE AND ADOPTION~ 9ECONDED BY COMMIS910NER MARCOUX~
TO GRANT VARIANCE N0. ~327~ BUBJECT TO 7HE FOLLOWING CONDITION; ~
~
~. DEVELOPMENT BUBSTANTIALLY IN ACCORDANC'e WITH PLANB PRE8ENTE17. i
THE FOREGOING CONDITION WA9 RECITED AT THE MEETING AND WAS FOUND TO BE A
' • NECE98ARY PREREQU191TE TO THE U3E OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO PRE8ERVE '
THE 9AFETY AND WEIFARE OF 7HE CIT12EN8 OF ANAHEIM.
ON ROLL CALL THE FOREGOING RE80LUTION WA8 PA35ED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: !
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: AL~RED~ GAUER~ MARCOUX~ MORRIS~ IV~UNGALL~ SUMMERS.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSt HAPGOCD.
VARIANCE N0. 1328 - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION 3U6M~TTED BY RAN-DAL COMPANY~ BY C. O. RANDALL
PRE8IDENT AND AUTHORI2ED AGENT~ ZOE)O SOUTH NORMA LANE~ ANAHEIM~ CALI-
FORNIA~ RECORDED OWNER~ FOR PEaMissioN To CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A COCK-
TAIL LOUNGE~ ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED A3C A PARCEL 1Z~ FEET BY Z46 FEET
WITH A FRONTAGE OF 'I27 FEET ON KATELLA AVENUE AND LOCATED ON THE NORTH-
EA9T CORNER OF KATELLA AVENUE AND SOUTH CLEMENTINE STREET~ ANL1 FURTHER
DESCRIBED A8 Z3~I~Z33 WEST KATELLA AVENI~E. THE PROPERTY 18 PRE3ENTLY
CLA381FIED C-1~ NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL.
MR. C. O. RANDALL~ THE PETITIONER~ APF'EARED BEFORE THE COMMISSION AND
' DE3CRIBED THE LAYQUT AND CONBTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED COC,KTAIL LOUNGE
TO 8E LOCATED ADJACEMT TO THE CORAL REEF REBTAURANT PRE9ENTLY UNDER
CONBTRUCTION. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
D18CUSSION WA3 HELD RELATIVE TO AN EXI9TING DEED RE3TRICTION~ FILED IN
CONNECTION WITH RECLA381FICAT~ON OF THE BUBJECT PROPERTY IN APRIL~ 1957~
W:~1CH REQUIRE8 THAT ALL PLAN3 AND BPECIFICATION3 FOR BUILDINGS TO BE
ERECTED ON THE PROPERTY MU9T BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY AN ARCNITEC7UR-
AL COMMITTEE. THE PETITIONER INDICATED THAT HE WAS NOT AWARE OF THE
DEED RESTRICTION~ AND•A981STANT CITY ATTORNEY ~JOE GEI8LER POINTED OUT
THAT THE ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE~ UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS
DIRECTOR~ WOULD NOT BE INTERESTED IN THE FLOOR AREP. LAYOUT UNLEBS 30
DIRECTED BY THE COMM18810N.
THE COMM18810N FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACTS RE~ARDING THE
BUBJECT PETITION FOR VARIANCEt
'I. PETITIONER REQUE8T9 A VARIANCE FROM CODE~ SECTION 'I8.4O.O~IO~ WHICH
MAKEB NO PROV1810N FOR ON-8ALE LIQUOR E9TA81.13HMENT8 FOR SUBJECT
. .
,.. _~_.._.~-._..~_ _---------- _. _ __ - _- -- _y.._.r--- • ---------
:q„ -' - ---~ .--
.fim - ~ ~_ __ ~~,
L.
~ ~ ~
GG
MINU~~~~ CITY PLRNNING COMMISSION~ ~IANUARY 16~ 1961~ CONTINUED; j
s
VRRIRNCE N0. 'I3ZB - PROPERTY~ IM ORDER TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF A COCKTAI~ l.OUNGE. ~
~CONTINUED~ Z. SUBJECT PETITION FOR VARIANCE HA3 BEEN RECEIVED IN AC''~RDANCE WlTH
THE VARIANCE POLlCY FOR THE D'i3NEYLAND AREA AS DELIMITED ON THE I
GENERAL PLAN. ';
~ 3. SUBJECT PROPERTY~ ZONED C-~I~ NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL~ ABUTB M-'I~ '
~ If LIGHT MANUFACTURING~ ZONE ON THE NORTHp C-~ ON THE EAST~ R-A~ RE-
BIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL~ ON TFIE SOUTH ACROSS KATELLA AVENUE~ AND C-~
ACR083 CLEMENTINE STREET ON THE WE3T. •
4. SUBJECT PROPERTY~ PREBENTLY UNDER QOh3TRUCTION FOR A REBTAURANT~
ABUT8 M-'I USE ON THE NORTH~ VACANT PARCEI ON THE EABT~ VACANT PARCEL ',
ACR099 KATELLA AVENUE ON THE SOUTH~ AND A VACANT PARCEL ACR033
CLEMENTINE STREET ON THE WEBT ON WHICH A RE30LUTION OF INTENT FOR
, AN APARTMENT MOTEL IS PENDING.
S. PETITIONER REQUE8TS THAT THE NORTHERLY ~OO FEET OF 8UBJECT PROPERTY
BE UTILI2ED FOR A TAVERN.
6. A DECLARAT~ION OF RE8TRICTION3 FILED IN CONNECTION WITH RECLAS31F1- '
CATION N0. F-56-5?-31 OF 8UBJECT PROPERTY TO L'-~ ON APRIL 29~ ~957
REQUIRED~ IN PART~ THAT ALL PLANS AND 3PECIFICATIONS FOR BUILDINGS
TO BE ERECTED ON THE PROPERTY SHALL BE 8UBJECT TO APPROVAL BY AN
ARCHITECTURAL COMM~TTEE.
7. NO ONE APPEARED IN OPP081TION TO THE PETITION. i
~~~;1MM I 9310NER MORR 13 OFFERED RESOLU'i I ON N0. 152, SER I E9 1960-61 , AND
MQVED FOR IT8 PA98AGE AND ADOPTION~ 8ECONDED BY COMMISSIONER ALLRED~
TO GRANT VARIANCE N0. 'I3Z8~ SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING COND~TIONB:
~. DEVELOPMF!.T SUBSTANTIALLY IN AGCORDANCE WITH PLANS PREBENTED.
`2. SUBMI9SION Or o!IILDING PLANS TO AND APPROVAL BY THE ARCHITECTURAL
COMMITTEE A8 REQUIRED BY COUNCIL RESOLUT~ON N0. 3805 IN RECLA331-
FICATION No. F-56-57-31.
3. IN8TALLATION OF SIDEWALKS ON CLEMENTINE STREET.
THE FOREGOING CONDITIONS WERE RECITED AT THE MEETING AND WERE FOUND TO
BE A NECESSARY PREREQUISITE TO THE USE OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO PRE-
8ERVE THE 8AFETY AND WELFARE OF THE C1T12ENS OF ANAHEIM.
ON ?OLL CALL THE FOREGO~NG RESOLUTION WA3 PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: COiv~~",ISSIONERS: ALLRED~ GAUER~ MARCOUX~ MORR18. MUNGALL~ SUMMER3.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS; NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HAP~OOD.
VARIANCE N0. 1329 - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION SUBMITTED BY Mas. LERA Mae DWYER~ 501 Noa-;~
WE9T STREET~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ RECORDED OWNER~ FOR PERMI,~A;uN TO
. WAIVE MINIMUM LOT SIZE REQUIREMENT OF 1Q~000 SQUARE FEET TO PERMIT A
MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 9375 SQUARE FEET. ALSO~ TO WAIVE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH
REQUIREMENT OF 90 FEET TO PERMIT A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH OF 75 FEET~ oN
PROPERTY DE3CRIBED A3; A PARCEL WITH A FRONTA6E OF SZ4 FEET ON WEST
STREET AND LOCATED FROM 7S FEET TO 699 FEET 80UTH OF THE 30UTHWESTERLY
CORNER OF WE9TMONT DRIVE AND WEST STREET AND EXTENDING WEST TO DWYER
DRIVE AND FURTHER DEBCRIBED A3 TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 4069. THE PROPERTY
18 PRE3ENTLY CLABSIFIED R-O~ RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN.
MR. RICHARD BLAIR~ ENG~NEER REPRE~^+ENTING THE PETITIONER~ APPcARED BEFORE
THE COMMIS810N AND DE8CRIBED THE PROP08ED FOURTEEN LOT 8UBDIVISION~ WITH
__..._
--- ..__._.._.
~_~.---. _.-r.,- - ----ti- -------------__ __--- ~..:___~
..,,
-~ ~ , ~. . . . _..... _ _ ---
„ ...- ... -
~ •
~ , .
.
~ ~
~
~
`,
. 23
MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSIQR., .'~:.ivuAa~ 16, 1961, CO,NTINUED:
VRRIANCE N0. 1329 - MINIMUM lOT WIDTHS OF ~~ FEET AND A MINIMUM LOT AREA OF 9,370 BQUARE i
(CONTINUED~ FEET. HE STATED THAT IN PREPARING THE PROPOSED 3UBDIV1810Ng aURVEY OF
~ THE 9URROUNDING AREA HAD INDICATED THAT THE PROPOSED LOT SIZES WERF
8UITABI.E FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
MR. BERNARD RYE~ 'I2O4 WEBTMONT DRIVE~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMISSION AND
8TATED THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER9 IN 'fHE AREA OBJECTED TO THE PROP08ED RE- '
DUCTION IN 812E OF LOTS FRONTING ON DWYER DRIVE~ THAT MOST OF THE EX18T-
ING LOTS CONTAINED BS FOOT FRONTAGE3~ THAT ADJACENT PROPERTIES WERE DE- I
VELOPED ~IITH EXPEN8IVE HOME9~ AND THAT THE PROP08ED REDUCTION IN 31ZE ;
REQUIREMENT8 WOULD HAVE A DETRIMENTAL EFFECT ON ALJACENT AND NEARBY PRO~ y
PERTIE8. HE READ AND 9UBMITTED 7W0 PETITIONS OF OPP081TION~ CONTAINING ;
A TOTAL OF 48 81GNATURE8~ REQUE8TING THAT THE EX18T'ING LOT 31ZE REQUIRE- ~
MENTS BE MAINTAINEA IN OR11ER TO PRESERVE EXI8TING STANDARDS AND PROPERTY ~
VALUE8 WITHIN THE SUBJECT AREA. MR. RYE AL80 fiEQUEBTED THAT H18 NAME -
' k3E REMOVED FROM THE SUBJEGT PETITION~ WHICH HE HAD SIGNED INDiGATING
ENDOR8EMENT OF THE PETITIUNy BECAUSE HE HAD UNDER8TOOD THAT ONLY THE.
lOT3 FRONTING ON WE3T STREET WERE PROPOSED FOR ~5 FOOT FRONTAGE3 WHICH
HE DID NOT CON8IDER OBJECI'IONABLE DUE TO THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC ON Tk}qT
8TREET.
MRS. GER~LD ENDICOTT AND MRB. JAMES CIiMMINS ADDREBSED THE PETITIONER
AND REQUESTE:] INFORMATION ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANNED FOR THE SUBDIVI-
810N~ THE REA80N3 FOR THE REQl:EBTF.D LOT 81ZE REDUCTIONB~ AND IF IT WOULD
BE P0931B1E TO CONBTRJCT RESIDENGE5 COMPAAABLE WITH EXISTING RE8IDENCEB
IN THE AREA ON l.OT8 CONTAINING tuIINIMUNi ~S FOOT WID7H3.
MR. BLAIR INDICATED THAT ANY R~~IDENCEB TO Bt CON3TRUCTED WOULD HAVE TO
CONFOR~d TO CODE REQUIREMENTB~ THAT THE LOT 81Z68 AP°EARED TO BE COMPAR-
ABLE WITH EXISTING LOTB~ THAT IN H18 OPINION RE9IDENCEB COMPARABLE IN
AROHITECTURAL DE91GN .COULD BE CONBTRUCTED; ON THE PROP08ED L0T8~ AND
THAT THE LOT9 WOULD BE 80LD INDIVIDUAILY~RATHER THAN SIMULTANEOUSLY IN
A TRACT DESIGN~ WHIGH WOULD BE OF BENEFIT TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY
OWNERS.
MR. LYNN THOMP80N APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMIS3I,ON AND STATED THAT HE WA8
THE PARTY THAT CIRCULATED THE SUBJECT PETITION~ THAT THE PROPERTY OWN-
ER8 CONTACTED HAD READ AND 31GNED TFiE PETITION WITH THE UNDERBTANDING
THAT THE LOTS ON WEBT STREET WERE PROPOSED FOR 7S FOOT WIDTHB WITH
VARYINO DIMEN810N8 FOR THE LOTB LOCATED ON DWYER DRIVE. THE HEARING
WAS CLOSED,
THE COMM18810N FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOILOWING FACT9 REGARDINO THE
BUBJECT PETITION FOR VARIANCE:
'I. PETITiONER REQUEST9 A VARIANCE FROM CODE~ SECTION 'IB.ZO.030 (4-A~~
WHICH REQUIRE9 FOR 3UBJECT PROPERTY MINIMUM LOT WIDTH9 OF 9O FEET
AND MINIMUM LOT AREA OF 'IO~OOO SQUARE FEET~ IN ORDER TO 9UBDIVIDE
9UBJEuT PROPERTY INTO LO'f8 HAV~NCi MINIMUM WIDTH8 OF ~S FEET AND
MINIMUM AREAS OF 9,370 8QUARE FEET. •
Z. SUBJECT PETITION FOR VARIANCE 18 8UBMITTED ~N CONJUNCTION WITH TEN-
TATIVE MAP OF TRACT N0. 4069~ WHICH INDICATE8 14 R-0, ONE FAMILY
SUBURBAN~ LOT8 FOR 8UBJECT PROPERTY.
3. SUBJECT PROPERTY~ PREBENTLY 20NED R-O~ABUTB R-O PROPEFtTY ON THE
80UTH~ ON THE WEBT ACR098 DWYER DRIVE~ AND ON THE NORTHj AND R-'I~
SINGLE FAMILY RE:l~DENT1Al.~ 20NE ACR088 WE37 STREET ON TNE EAS1'.
4. THE PROP08ED LOTB RAN(iE FROM 9,375 BQUARE FEET TO 11,625 8QUARF
FEET~ AND AVERAGE AFPROXIMATELY 9,890 8QUARE PEET IN AREA.
~ . ,~
~ . .~___.,._...---i--._._..----`~--~---...--~-~---~--___._...__._....___....._~..~---....._._....----.-'._.___~.
. ~ ..w ~-.~ ~ ~ .. , ' ~ . . . ~ ..__...... -. ". _ ' ..
_ __ .__.._____ _.__....----~~-- --.. _ _-_.-------------,---~__.._.....~._v.~_._~_---. ~~.
j. ---- __.. .
~ ~ ~ ~
` 24
~
MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ JANUARY 16~ 1961, CONTINUED;
VARIANCE N0. 1329 ^ S. VERBAL OPP081TION IN ADDITION TO TWO PETITIONB OF OPP081TION~ OON-
~ ~CONTINUED) TAININO 48 81aNATUREB~WERE REOORDED A(iA1N8T 9UBJECT PETITION.
f
~ COMM18810NER MUNOALL OFFERED RE80LUTION N0. 153, SERIE8 1960-61, AND
MOVED FOR 1T8 PA88AGE AND ADOPTION~ BEOONDED BY COMM18810NER SUMMERB~
; TO DENY VARIANOE N0. 1329 REQUEBT TO WAIVE MINIMUM LOT BIZE AND WIDTH
~ REQUIREMENTB FOR SUBJECT PROPERTIE9 OF TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT N0.
4069.
ON ROLL CALL THE FOREOOINO RE90LUTION WA8 PA88ED BY THE FOLLOWINO VOTE: j
t
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED~ GAUER~ HAPGOOD~ Mnacoux~ Moaais~ ~
MUNGAII~ SUMMERB. j
NOES: COMMISSIONERSC NONE. '
:~
, ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS! NONE. i
,~
TENTATIVE MAP OF - TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT N0. 4069 SUBMITTED TO THE COMMIBSION IN CONiIUNC-
TRACT N0. 4069 TION WITH VARIANCE N0. 1329, REQUE9T FOR WAIVER OF MINIMUM L07 REQUIRE°
MENT9 OF 9O FEET AND MINIMUM LOT AREA REQUIREMENT9 OF 'IO~OOO BQUARE
FEET. SUBJECT TRACT LOOATED BETWEEN DWYER DRIVE AND WEBT STREET APPROX-
IMATELY 'IOB FEET 90UTH Of WE8TMONT DRIVE AND CONTAINING 'I4 PROP08ED
R-O~ RE8IDENTIAL SUBURBAPI~ LOT9.
i~IR. RICHARD BLAIR~ ENGINEER REPRESENTIN^u THE DEVELOPER~ APPEARED BEFORE
THE COMM18910N AND REQUESTED CONTINUANCE OF CON8IDERATION OF THE TEN-
TATIVE MAP UNTIL C11Y COUNCIL ACTION 19 OOMPLETED ON THE SUBJECT RRO-
PERTY OF VARIANCE N0, 1329 REQUEBT WHICH WA8 DENIED BY COMMIB810N RE-
90LUTIGN N0. 153~ SENIE8 1960~61.
A8918TANT CITY ATTORNEY JOE GEI9LER ADVIBED THE PETIiIONER~3 REPREBENTA-
TIVE THAT THE TENTATIVE MAP COULD 8E WITHDRAWN OR A REVIBED MAP COULD
BE 9UBMITTED TO THE COMM18810N.
COMM18810NER MUNGALL OFFERED A MOTION~ BECONDED BY COMM18810NER ALLRED
AND OARRIED~ THAT CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT N0. 4069 BE
CONTINUED UNTIL THE MEETING OF FEBRUARY ZO~ 1961 AT THE REQUEBT OF THE
DEVELOPER~B AGENT.
VARIANCE N0. 1330 - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION 8UBMITTED ev EUCLID BERGER COMPANY~ 166 Ensr
'I~TH. STREET~ COBTA ME8A~ CALIFORN~A~ RECORDED OWNER~ FOR PERM18810N TO
WAIVE MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS TO PERMIT TWENTY (20) FOOT
FRONT YARD SETBACKS FOR LOTS No. 1 AND No. 2: WAIVE MINIMUM REAR YARD
SETBACK REQUIREMENTS TO PERM{T REAR YARD SETBACKS OF 16.7 FEET FOR LOT
NO. 1 AND 18.2 FEET FOR LOT N0. Z~ ON PROPERTY DEBCRIBED A8: L0T8 ONE
AND TWO OF TRACT N0. 3840 WITH A COMBINED FRONTAGE OF 'IEO FEET ON PA-
LA18 ROAD AND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PALA19 ROAD AND EUCLID
AVENUE~ AND FURT'HEP DEBCRIBED A8: LOT 'I~ 1695 Pa~nis ROAD AND LOT 2~
1689 Pa~nia Roan. THE PROPERTY 18 PRE9ENTlY QLA881FIED R-A, RESIDEN-
TIA.. AGRICULTURAL.
Ma. HARVEY BEROER~ THE PETITIONER~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMlS510N AND :~
BTATED THAT HE OOULD 9UPPLY NO ADDITIONAL INFORMpT10N OTHER THAN THAT :~
CONTAINED IN THE BUBJECT PETITION.
MR. A. R. MCDANIEL~ ENGINEER FOR THE DEVELOPER~ APPEARED BEFORE 7HE COM- ~
M38810N AND BYATED THAT THE PETITIONER WA8 UNABLE TO AOQUIRE ABUTTING
PROPERTIEB TO THE NORTH OF THE 8Ui3JE0T LOTB IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THE a
REQUIRED LOT AREA CODE DIMEN8!ONB. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED. ,,~
.
_...----.•.-.-.__._ _,._.__.._.--____._.._....._._..._._..._..--_._.._.....__---._._.. ..__.
r- - --- --...- - ., ~
~ •
_,_. _ ____
~~
r ~ _ ! C
~
~
!:{, c
~
~ `'
:.,
~' ~
25
MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ JANUARY 16, 1961~ CONTINUED:
VARIANCE N0. 1330
~CONTINUED~
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT N0. 95 _
- THE COMM18810N FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACT8 REGARDING THE
BUBJECT PETITION FOR yARIANCEC
'I. PETITIONER REQUE8T8 A VARIANCE FROM CODE~ SECTION 'I8.Z4.O3O ~~ AND '
3~~ WHICH REQUIRE8 FOR BUBJECT PROPERTY ZZ.S FOOT FRONT AND REAF ~
YARDB~ IN ORDEFt TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT OF Z'~' FEET INTO REQUIRED ~
FRONT YARDB OF LOT NOS. ~ AND 2 AND ENCROACHMENT OF 3.B FEET INTO ~
REQUIRED REAR YARD OF LOT N0. 'I AND 4.3 FEET INTO REQUIRED REAR '
YARD OF LOT N0. P. ~
Z. SUBJECT PROPERTY 18 COMP08ED OF LOT N08. 'I AND 2 OF TRACT N0. 3840, ;
RECORDED ON DECEMBER 2~ 1960, THE PLANS FOR WHICH WERE BUBMITTED TO '
AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 13, 1960 A3 PREBENTED
AT THAT TIME. SAID APPR04AL WA3 NOT INTENDED TO COVER THE INADE- ;
QUATE FRONT AND REAR YARDB PROPOBED FOR 3UBJ~CT L0T8. THE BUILDING ~
DEPARTMENT COULD NOT 19SUE A~BUILDING PERMIT BECAUBE OF THE IN-
ADEQUATE FRONT AND REAR YARDB. THE DEVELOPER ADJU8TED ALL OTHER LOT8 ~
TO CONFORM TO THE CODE REQUIREMENT8 WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE TWO ~
3U@JECT PARCELB. THE8E TWO PARCEL9 ARE EXCESSIVELY 8HALLOW IN COM- I
PARISON WITH THE REMAINDER OF THE TRACT BECAU8E OF THE INABIL~TY OF ~
THE DEVELOPER TO OBTAIN A PORTION OF ABUTTING PROPERTiE$ TO TkE
NORTH.
3. NO ONE APPEARED IN OPP091TION TO THE PETITION.
COMM18810NER ALLRED OFFERED RESOLUTION N0. 154, SEkIE9 1960-61, AND
MOVED FOR ITS PA88AGE AND ADOPTION~ SECONDED BY COMMIS810NER MORRIB~
TO GRANT VARIANCE N0. 1330, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONp
'I. DEVELOPMENT BUBSTANTIALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH'PLANS PRESENTED.
THE FOREGOING COND1710N WAS RECITED AT THE MEETING AND WA3 FOUND TO BE
A NECES8ARY PREREQUISITE fOR THE U8E OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO PRE-
9ERVE THE BAFETY A'ND WELFARE OF THE CITIZENA OF ANAMEIM.
ON ROLL CALL THE FOREGOING RE30LUTlON WA8 PA88ED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: . COMMISSIONERS; ALLRED~ GAUER~ HAPGOOD~ MARCOUX~ MORR18~
MUNGALL~ SUMMERB.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
- PUBLIC HEARlNG. PETITION SUBMITTED ev AUBREY ANDERSON~ 8111 LtNCO~N
AVENUE~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ RECOanEn OwNEa; DARWIN GLENN, 95'IZ ORANGE
AVENUE~ ANAHEfM~ CALIFORtdfA~ LE98EE~ FOR PERM19StON TO ESTABL48H A
GO-KART RENTAL ARENA~ ON PROPERTY DE9CRIBED AS: A PARCEL 315 FEET BY
368 FEET WITH A FFONTACaE OF 315 FEET ON LINCOIN AVENUE AND LOCATED ON
THE NORTH 91DE OF LINCOLN AVENUE BETWEEN BEACH BOULEVARD AND BEL AIR
STREET~ 1T9 80UTHWE3T CORNett BEING APPROXIMATELY Z8O FEET EA8T OF THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF LINCOLN AVENUE AND BEACH BOULEVARD~ AND FURTHER
DEBCRIBED A3 8111 LiNCO~N AVENUE. THE PROPERTY 10 PRESENTLY CLASSIFIED
A8 R~~ RESIAENTIAL AuRICULTURAL. COMM18810NER ALLRED WAS NOT PRESENT.
MR. DARIMIN GLENN~ 9S~Z ORANGE AVENUE~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ LE88EE OF
THE PROPOBED pMUSEMENT CENTER APPEARED BEFORE TNE COMM•IS810N AND STATED
THAT HE HAD e3EEN OPERATING (i0-KART 7RACK8 IN THE SAN DIEGO AREA~ THAT
RULE8 AND REOULATIGNB WERE EBTABLI9HED BY THE INBURANCE COMPANY~ THAT
REGULAR INBPECTIONB WERE CONDUCTED BY THE INBURANOE COMPANY~ THAT SUPER-
VISION AND CONDITIONB IN8URING BAFETY WERE MAINTAINED AT AlL 71ME8~ THAT
W
i
. •
. _--°- ~ ..,, -..:_.-_......_......,..,..._ . ~.~rn:.r.,acn..r:..~,:.oa,.o,..,..,..,...~.,...>.x..e...:,_ae:,~:x:~.n~ox.ivrs,em.~c,.r.:.:a..d...
~
~,:
~~
~~
26
MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ ~IANUARY 16, 1961, CONTINUED:
CONDITIONAL USE - rHer WOULD HAVE Z4 CARS~ 'I2 ON THE TRACT AT A TIME~ AND THAT THERE WAS
PERMIT N0. 9~ VERY LITTLE N018E INVOLVED DUE TO THE USE OF MUFFLERS.
(CoNriNUen) _
T~HE COMM19310N REVIEWED THE PLOT PLAN AND IIISCUSSED THE NECE331TY FOR
CURB BREAKS TO PROVIDE ACCE88 TO THE PROPERTY~ MAINTENANCE OF THE PRO-
P08ED S F00T LAND9CAPED AREA ALONCa LINCOLN AVENUE AND THE NEED FOR
ADEQUATE PARKING FACILITIE3.
MR. ~ICHARD BOMBARGER APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMI3310N AND STATED THAT
HE HAD PREPARED THE PLOT PLAN AND THAT ACCE9S PRG9LEM9 COULD BE RE-
80LVED.. HE EXPLAINED THAT A RESTROOM WA3 AVAILABLE IN 'NE EXIBTING
BUILDING ON THE PREM19E3~ AND THE COMM13310N INFORMED HIM THAT kE3T-
ROOM FACILITIE8 MU9T BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CODE REQUIREMENTS.
THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
THE COMM13810N FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACT9 REGARDING THE
SUBJECT COND!TIONAL U8[ PERMIT;
~. PETITIONER REQUEBT3 A CONDITIONAL U3E PERMIT FOR WHICH PROV1310N
IS MpDE IN CODE~ SECTION 'I8.64.OZO ~3-J-VI~ IN ORDER TO ESTABLI3H
A GO-KART RENTAI. ARENA ON SUBJECT PROPERTY.
Z. SUBJECT PROPER7Y~ PRESENTLY 20NED R-A~ RE9IDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL~
ABUT3 C-3~ HEAVY COMMERCIAL~ ZONE ON THE WE9T~ R-A ON THE NORTH AND
EA3T AND ACROSS LINCOLN AVENUE ON THE SOUTH.
3. SUBJECT PROPERTY ABUT8 THE AKRON SHOPPING CENTER ON THE WEST~ VA-
CANT LAND ON THE NORTH AND EA3T~ AND A REAL E3TATE OFFICE ACR088
LINCO:.N AVENUE ON THE 80UTH.
4. THF. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONFORMB TO THE BUIIDING SETBACK REQUIRE-
MENT3 OF 35 FEET FROM THE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF~WAY LINE E8TABL18HED FOR
TH18 3ECTION OF LINCOLN AVENUE.
S. THE PETITIONER INDICATED THAT THE RACE TRACK AREA WOUID BE BLACK
TOPPED~ THAT PROV1910N WOULD BE MADE FOR TIRE AND HAY SAFETY BARRI-
CADEB~ HEAD GEAR~ PUBLIC LIABILITY IN3URANCE~ REGULAR IN8URANCE
COMPANY INBPECTION3~ EXHAU3T MUFFLER8 ON THE CARTB TO CONTROL
N019E~ ADEQUATE RE3TROOM AND LAVATORY FACILITIEB~ AND ADEQUATE
PARKING FACILITIE8.
6. PROP09ED DEVEI.OPMENT APPEARS TO BE SUITABLE FOR THE 9UBJECT AREA.
7. NO ONE APPEARED IN OPP081TION TO THE ?ETITION.
COMM18810NER MORR18 OFFERED RE80LUTION N0. 155~ SERIES 1960-6t, AND
MOVED FOR 1T3 PA88AGE AND ADOPT~ON~ SECONDED BY COMMIS910NER MARCOUX~
TO GRANT CONDITtONAL USE PERMIT N0. 95, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CON-
DITION3:
'I. DEVELOPMENT SUBBTANTIALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS PRESENTED.
Z. IN3TALLATION OF 31DEWALK8 AND DRIVEWAYS.
3. PAYMENT OF $Z.OO PER FRONT F00T FOR STREET LIGHTING PURPOSE3.
4. PROVISION~OF E)O DEGREE IMPROVED PAFtKING 3PACES IN THE PARKING AREA
DELINEATED ON THE PLOT PI.AN.
S. DEVELOPMENT OF THE EA8TERNMOST CURB BREAK FOR INGRE83~ AND THE
WEBTERNM08T CURB BREAK FOR EGRE88.
E. PROVISION OF A FIVE ~S~ F00T LANDSCAPED .:REA fRONTING ON LINCOLN
AVENUE EXCEPT FOR TH03E AREAB RE8ERVED FOR INGRE8S AND EGRESS.
~. PROVISION OF PROPER SUPERVISION AT ALL TlMES AND THAT IN9PECTIONB~
PUBLIC LIABILITY INBURANCE~ AND ALL SAFETY FACTORS NECESSARY FOR
TiiE BAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZEN8 OF ANAHEIM 8HALL BE PROVID-
EA.
B. PROV1810N OF ADEQUATE RESTROOM FACILITIE8 IN ACCORDANCE WITH
h
3
~
~
~
-.4
~
~
$
i
~
~
i
, ~ ~
i •
~,~
~ ~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `:4
Sc~ `ri:~
t
25 '
,~
MINUTES~ CITY PLAfVNING COMMISSION~ JANUARY 16~ i961~ CONTINUED; ~
a
VARIANCE N0. 1330
- THE COMM18810N FOUND AND DETERMIri~D THE FOLLOWING FACTS REGARDING THE ~
•'~
~CONTINUED) 8UBJECT PETITION FOR VARIANCE: ~
~
'I. PETITIONER REQUE3T3 A VARIANCE FROM CODE~ SECTION ~H.Z4.030 (1 AND a
3~~ WHICH REQUIRES FOR 3UBJECT PROPERTY ZZ.S FOOT FRONT AND aenR ~
YARDB~ IN ORDER TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT OF Z~ FEET INTO REQUIRED ~+
FRONT YARDB OF LOT N09. 'I AND Z AND ENCROACHMEPJT OF 3.8 FEET INTO
REQUIRED REAR YARD OF LOT N0. 'I AND 4.3 FEET INTO REQUIRED REAR !
YARD OF LOT N0. Z.
Z. SUBJECT PROPERTY 18 COMP08ED UF LOT NOP. 'I AND Z OF TROCT N0. 3a4O~ ;
RECORDED ON DECEMBER 2~ 1960~ THE PLANC FOR WHICH WERE SUBMITTED TO i
ARD qPPROVED EY THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 13, 196~ AS PRE8ENTED I
AT THAT TIME. SAID APPROVAL WA3 NOT INTENDED TO COVER THE INADE- '
QUATE FRONT AND REAR YARDB PROPOBED FOR tSUBJECT L0T8. THE BUILDING ,
DEPARTMENT COULD NOT 198UE q BUILDING PERMIT BECAUBE OF THE IN- ~
' ADEQUATE FRONT AND REAR YARI38. THE DEVELOPER ADJU8TED ALL OTHER L0T8 ~
70 CONFORM TO THE CODE REQUIREMENT3 WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE TWO ~
SUBJECT PARCEL3. THE3E 7W0 PARCEL3 ARE EXCE881VELY SMAL.LOW IN COM- ;
PAR180N WITH THE REMAINDER OF THE TRACT BECAUSE OF THE INABI.ITY OF .
THE DEVELOPER 70 OBTAIN A PQRTION OF ABUTTING PROPERTIE9 TO THE
NORTH.
3. NO ONE APPEARED IN OPPOSITION TO THE PETITION. 1
COMMIBSIONER ALLRED OFFERED RE30LUTION N0. 154, SERIEB 1960-61, AND ~
MOVED FOR ITS PASSAGE AND ADOPTION~ SECONDED BY COMM18310NER MORR19> j
TO GRANT VARIANCE N0. 1330, BUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION;
1. DEVELOPMENT SUB3TANTIALLY IN ACGORDANCE WITH PLAN3 PRESENTED. ~
THE FOREGOING CONDITION WA8 RECITED AT THE MEETING AND WAB FOUND TO BE
A NECE38ARY PREREQUISITE FOR THE UBE OF THE FrtOPERTY IN ORDER 70 PRE-
8ERVE THE 3AFETY A'ND WEIFARE OF THE CIT12EN3 OF ANAHEIM.
ON ROLL CALL THE FOREOOING RE30LUTION WAS PA33ED BY THE FOLLOWING "OTEt
AYES: COMMISSIONERSC AL~RED~ GAUER~ HaPCOOn, MARCOUX~ MORRIS~
MUNGALL~ SUMMERS.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: CONWIISSIONERS: NONE.
CONDITIONAL USE - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION sueMtTTEn 6r AUBREY ANDERSON, 8111 LiNCO~N
PERMIT N0. 9S AVENUE~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ RECORDED OMINERj DARWIN GLENN~ 9S'IZ ORANGE
AVENUE~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ LE88EE~ FOR 9F.RM18810N TO ESTABLI8H A
GO-KART RENTAL ARENA~ ON PROPERTY DE9CRIBED A3; A PARCEL 315 FEET BY
36d FEET WITH A FRONTAGE OF 315 FEET ON LIPICOLN AVENUE AND LOCATED ON
THE NORTH 81DE OF LINCOLN AVENUE BETWEEN BEACH BOULEVARD AND BEL AIR
STREETj 1T9 80UTHWE8T CORNER BEING APPROXIMATELY ZHO FEET EA3T OF THE
NORTHEA8T CORNER OF LINCOLN AVENUE AND BEACH BOULEVARD~ AND FURTHER
DE8CR18ED AS g'I'I'I LINCOLN AVENUE. THE PROPERTY IS PRE8ENT~Y CLA881FIED
A3 R-~AS RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL. COt~1M18810NER ALLRED WA8 NOT PREBENT.
MR. DARWIN GLENN~ 9S~Z ORpNGE AVENUE~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ LESBEE OF
THE PROP08ED AMUSEMENT CENTER APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMIS910N AND BTATED
THAT HE HAD BEEN OPERATING Ci0-KdRT TRACK9 IN THE SAN DIEGO AREA~ THAT
RULE3 AND REl3ULATIONS WERE E8TA8L13HED BY THE IN8URpN0E COMPANY~ THAT
REGULAR IN9PECTION8 WERE CONDUCTED BY TH~ INBURANCE COMPANY~ THAT SUPER-
V18ION AML' CONDITION8 IN3URING SpfETY WERE MAINTAINED AT ALL 71ME8~ THAT
_------ ----~------------• -_.~__.._._-----.~~-,.~ ~
- . --r-- . . , . . . .
~ 1 , -.--.- • -. n -..._. .. _..__
, . . ~ . ~T ~
~ ~ .
~~. ~ ... ~ ~ 1
26 ;
MINUTES~ CITY PLAN~VING COMMISSION~ JANUARY 16, 1961, CONTINUED: ~
~
G~iVDiTi01VAL US~ - THEY iit7ULD HAVE Z4 CAR3~ 'I2 ON THE TRACT A~ A TIME~ AND THAT THERE 1iA3 ~
PERMIT N0. 9S VERY LITTLE N013E INVOLVED DUE Td THE U8E OF MUFFLER9.
~CONTINUED ~
THE COMM19310N REVIEWED THE PLO? PLAN AND D13CU33ED THE NECE831TY FOR
CURB BREAK3 TO PHOVIDE ACCE88 TO TkE PROPERTY~ MAINTENANCE OF THE PRO- i
P03ED S FOOT LANDSCAPED ~~1REA ALONG LINCOLN (iVENUE AND THE NEED FOR '
ADEQUATE PARKtNG FACiLITIE8. ~
:
MR. RICHARD BOMBARGER APPEARED BEFORE THE COMM13810N AND STATEA THAT ?
HE HAD PREPARED THE PLOT PLAV AND THAT ACCESS PROBLEM9 COULD BE RE- ~
80LYED. HE EXPLAINED THAT A R~3TROOM WA8 AVAILABLE IN THE EXI8TING f
BUILAING OPJ THE PREM18E8~ AND ?FIE COMM18810N INFORMED HIM THAT REST-
ROOM FACIIITIES MU9T BE PROVIDED IN ACCOR*JANCE WITH CODE REQUIREMENT8.
~ THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
THE COMM18910N FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACTS REGARDING THE
SUBJECT CONDITIONAL U9E PERMIT;
~. PETITIONER REQUE8T3 A CONDITIONAL U3E PERMIT FOR WHICH PROVISION
13 MADE IN CODE~ SECTION 'IH.E>4.OZO ~3~J-VI~ IN ORDER TO ES7ABL13H
A GO-KART RENTAL ARENA ON 8UBJECT PROPERTY.
Z. SUBJECT PROPERTY~ PRE3ENTLY 20P~ED R-A, RE8IDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL~
ABUTS C-3~ HEAVY G~OMMERCIAL~ ZONE ON THE WE9T~ R-A ON THE yORTH AND
EA3i AND pCROBS LINCOLN AVENUE ON THE 30UTH.
3. SUBJECT PROPERTY ABUTii THE AKROt~ SHOPPING CENTER ON THE WE3T; VA-
CANT LAND ON THE NORTH AND EA8Ty AND A REAL EBTA':'E AFFICE ACR088
LINCOLN AVENUE ON THE 30UTH.
Q. THE PROP03ED DEVELOPMENT CONFORM8 TO THE BUILDING SETBACK REQUIRE-
MENT8 OF 35 FEET FROM THE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF~WAY LINE ESTABLISHED FOR
TH18 BECTION OF LINCOLN AVaNUE.
S. THE P~TITIONER INDICATED THA~ THE RACE TRACK AREA WOULD BE BLACK
TOPPf:D~ THAT PROVISION WOULD BE MADE FOR TIRE AND HAY 9AFETY BARRI-
CR.:iE3~ HEAD GEAR~ PUBLIC LIA9ILITY IN3URANCE~ REGULAR IN3URANCE
OOMPANY INSPECTIONS~ EXHAUST MUFFLERB ON THE CARTS TO CONTROL
NOISE~ ADEQUATE RE3TROOM AND LAVATORY FACILITIE8~ AND ADEQUATE
PARKING FACIIITIE9.
E). PROP08ED DEVELOPMENT APPEARS TG BE SUITABLE FOR THE 9UBJECT AREA.
~. NO ONE APPEARED IN OPP081TION TO THE PE7ITION.
COMM19310NER MORR19 OFFERED RE30LUTION N0. 155, SERIE3 1960-61~ AND
MOVED FOR 173 PA88AGE AND ADOPTION~ SECONDED BY COMM13310NER MARCOUx~
TO GRANT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 95, 8UBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CON~
DITION3:
'I, DEVELOPMENT 9UB8TANTIALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLAN3 PRE3ENTED.
2. IN9TALLATION OF SIDEWALK9 AND DRIVEWAY3.
3. PAYMENT OF ~Z.OO PER FRONT FOOT FOR 8TREET LIGHTING PURP03ES. :
4. PROV1810N OF 6O AEGREE IMPR01'ED PARKIIJG 9PACE8 IN THE PARKING AREA
DELiNE4~ED ON THE PLOT PLAN.
S. DEVELOPMEkT OF THE EA8TERNM03T CURB BIiEAK FOR INGRE98~ AND THE
WESTERNMOBT CURB BREAK FOR EGRE33.
6. PROVISION OF A FIVE ~S~ FOOT LANDBCAPED AREA FRONTING ON LINCOLN
AVENUE EXCEPT fOR TH09E AREAS RESERVED FOR INGREBS AND EGRE8S.
7. PROV1810N OF PROPER SUPERV1810N AT ALL TIMES AND THAT INF,^ECTIONS~
PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE~ AND ALL 8AFETY FACTORS NECE38ARY FOR
tH; SAFEYY ::YD WELFARE OF THE CITIZEN8 OP ANAHEIM 9HALL BE PROVID-
£D. .
B. PROVISION OF ADEQUATE RE3TROOM FACILITIEB IN ACCORDANCE WITH
, _ ~. ____._._....,___ ---- _ _
~ _~. ~_ ~ _ ~--- -._.... .
--___ ~
_
f- `
.._ _ ----------..._.____..~ . __~ ~ .
~ ~
_ ~._ _ -- --..~..w._.......~..,..,.~,.,_.~._._.,. - -•-- __._
--
4
4 ~~ {~ ~ ~
~ ~
27
~
MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ ~JANUARY 16~ 1961, CONTINUED: ~
3
F
~ CONDI';,;~AL USc PERMIT ~ BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTB. j
~ NO. 19 9. ALTERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ANY BUILDING TO BE UTILIZED FOR x
! ~CONTINUED) COMMERCIAL PURP08E8 IN ACCORDANCE WITH BUILDIK3 CODE REQUIRE- f
MENTB.
i
' ' THE FOREGOINfi CONDITION3 WERE RECITED AT THE MEETING AND WERE FCUND s
~ TO BE A NECE88ARY PREREQU181TE FOR U3E OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO
~ PREBERYE THE SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZENB OF ANAHEIM.
a O~+ ROLL CALI THE FOREGOING RESO!.UTION WA8 PA99EA BY THE FOLLOWING
~ VOTEC
AYES: COMMISSIONERSC GAUER~ HAPGOOD~ MARCOUX~ MORRIB~ MUNGALL
~ SUMMERB.
NOFS: COMMISSIONERSC NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIG HEARING. PETITION 3UBMITTED BY DISNEYLAND~ INCORPORATED~ `
NO. 9E) 1313 Hnasoa BOULEVARD~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ OWNERj WRATHER HOTELS~
INCORPORATED, 1441 WESr STREET~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ LESSEE~ FOR
PERM19810N ro CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A 50 TEE GpLF DRIVING RANGE~ i'
AND AN 18 HOLE MINIATI~iE GOLF COURSE, ON PROPERTY DE~JCRIBED A8: A
PARCEL WITH A FRONTAGE OF E>ZO FEET ON CERR1T09 AVENUE AND A FRONT-
AGE OF 1390 FEET ON WEBT STREET AND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWE3T CORNER
OF CERRIT08 AVENUE AND WEST STREET~ AND FURTHER DESCRIBED AS 1349
SOUTH ~YE8T STREET. THE PROPERTY 18 PRESENTLY CLA381FIED R~A~ RE-
SIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL.
MR. nOBERT P. FOSTER~ REPRESENTATIVE FOR DISNEYLAND~ INCORPORATED~
APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMIS810N AND STATED THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
I8 A TWENTY ACRE PARCEL LEASED TO THE ~IYRATHER HOTEL COMPANY~ THAT
IT WOULD BF UBED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DISNEYLAND HOTEL FACILI-
TIE3~ AND THAT IT WOULD BE PART OF THE COMPLEX GOLF COUR3E AND
OTHER RECREATIONAL FACILITIE8 AND WOULD NOT B~ BEPARATED FROM THE
OTHER FACILITIES. 7HE HEARING WAS CLOSED,
THE PETITIONER~9 REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWED THE PLOT PLAN~ AND D13-
CU38ED WiThl THE COMMIBSION 7ME LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED FACILITiES~
LIGHTING~ AND IN8TALLATION OF ORNAMENT~.L LRNDSCAPED 8CREENING FROM
THE STR~ET~ DIRECTIONS pF THE COUR9E TO IN3URE SAFETY~ AND MAIN-
TENANCE OF THE GROUNDS.
THE COMM138:ON FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACTS REGARDING ;~
TN'e BUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERA7ITS ~ ~
~. PETITIONER REQUE9T3 A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR WHICH PROVI-
SION IS MADE IN CODE~ SECTION 15.64.OZO ~3-J-V1~ TO PERMIT E3-
TABLI9HMENT OF A GOLF DRIVING RAN6E AND MINIATURE GOLF COUR8E.
2. SUBJECT PROPERTY~ ZONED R-A RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL~ IS 8UR-
ROUNDED BY R-A 20NED ~ROPERTY AND ABUTS THE DI6NEYLAND HOTEL
ACR038 CERR1T08 AVENUE ON THE SOUTH~ ORANGE GROVES ON THE WE8T
AND THE NORTH~ AND DISNEYLAND ON THE EA3T ACR08$ WE8T STREET.
3. PETITIONER REQUE9T8 THE OPERATION OF A SO TEE GOLF DRIVING
RANGE AND AN ~S HOLE MINIATURE OOLF COURBE TOGETHER WITH ,~,4~
PARKING SPACEG.
4. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APPEAR3 TO 8E COMPATIBLE WITH THE
AREA.
S. NO ONE APPEARED IN OPPOSITION TO THE PETITION.
------------~---.--._..---------_.._- -- -----~._,_,_.._.
.
.:-
,_ ._...___....~......
~ `........ . .. ~ ..___. .
~.~ ~~ . ~
28
MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ JANUARY 16~ 1961, CONTINUED:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - COMM19910NER MARCOUX OFFERED RE30LUTION N0. 156~ SERIE8 ~17b1~-E)~~
NO. 96 (CONTINUED~ AND MOVED FOR IT8 PA8SAGE AND ADOPTIGfv~ SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
HAPGOOD~ TO GRANT CONDITIONAL I~SE PERMIT N0. iE~ SUBJECT TO TNE
FOLLOWING CONDITION3:
'I. DEDICATION OF 45 FEET FROM THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF CERRI-
T09 AVENUE.
i
i
~
Z. DEDlCATION OF 45 FEET FROM THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF WEST
STREET.
3. PAYMENT OF ~Z.OO PER FRONT FOOT FOR STREET LIGHTING PURPOSE3 ON
BOTH WE3T STREET AND CERRITOS A~ENUE.
4, PREPARATION OF BTREET IMPROVEMENT PLANB AND INSTALLATION OF IM-
PROVEMENTB ON CERRIT09 AVENUE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED 3TAN-
DARD PLAN9 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY FNGINEER.
S. DEVELOPM~ 8U08TANTIALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS PRE3ENTED.
THE FOREGOING CONDITION3 WERE RECITED AT THE MEETING AND WERE FOUND
TO BE A NECESSARY PREREQUISITE TO THE USE OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER
TO PRESERVE THE 8AFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZEN3 OF ANAHEIM.
ON ROLL CALL THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION WAS PAS3ED BY THE FOLLOWING
VOTE:
AYES: COMMIBSIONERS: ALLREt~~ GAUER~ HAPGOOD~ MARCOUX~ MORR13~
MUNGALL~ SUMMER8.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NoNE.
CONDITIONAL U5E PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION 3UBMIT:~D er WESTERN AVENUE SOI;~THERN '
NO. 9~ BAPTIST CHURCH~ ZZ9 WESTERN AVENUE~ ANO.HEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ OWNER~
FoR PERMISSION ro ^ANSTRUCT A CHURCH AND HOLD N~EETIh~GS oN PROPER-
TY DE3CRiBED A33 A PARCEL 2SS FEET BY 648 FEET WITH A FRONTAGE OF
ZBS FEET ON LYESTERN AVENUE AND LOCAiED ON THE WE3T 81DE OF WE8TERN
AVENiiE BETWEEN LfNCOLN AND ORANGE AVENUESj ITS NORTHEA9T CORNER
BEiNG APPROXIMATELY 99O FEET 30UTH OF THE 80UTHWEST CORNER OF LIN-
CO~N AND WESTERN AVENUE3~ AND FURTHER DE8CRIBED A9 Z'I~~ ZZ3 AND ZZ9
SOIiTH WEBTERN AVENUE. THE PROPERTY PREBENTLY CLA881FIED A8 R-A,
RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL,
MR8. LEA ETTA NIXON~ AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PETITIONERS~ APPEAR-
ED BEfORE THE COMM18910N AND INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NOTHING TO
BE ADDED TO THE INFORMATIO~ 8UPPLIED IN THE PETITION.
MR. RO"! HENDER80N APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMIBSION AND 3TATED THAT
HE WA8 NOT OBJECTING TO THE PROPOSED USE OF THE ~ROPERTY FOR CHURCH
FACILITIES~BUT THAT HE WA8 INTEREBTED IN OBTAINING INFORMATION ON
A PREVIOUS ACTION FOF DEVELOPMENT OF CHURCH FACILITIES ON THE PRO-
PERTY~ AND INFORMATION ON THE IMPROVEMENTB THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED
IF APPROVAL OF 3UBJECT PETITION WERE GRANTED.
INR8. NfXON EXPLAINED THNT SUBJECT PETITION WA3 TO PROV!DE A TEM-
?JnnRY 6v i LB i P:G '^v GE CO`:.°.T.°.~'OTE.^. .".!ti= UT I L! ZEL~ cny r.ytiqr_.H M~FT I NGS
. ..._ ..~ _--__-_ -- ~i ---~.,-------
- _----N_.. _.~ _ --- -- _--.___ ._.:.: - -
. . ~ . . .. ~ ~ ~~. ::-~..... . . . . . . -- -. . .. ._
- i '
~
~ ~
:_ .,
__. _-------_ _ _ _ ,
,. -_ _
- _ _ -__-- --_------ ----- -- - ~
f `_i ,
1 A V i' ~ ~ . 'i
I ~:' lyd `
t
~ 29 ~
~
~ MINUiES~ CIiY FLANNING COMMISSION~ JANUARY 16, 1961~ CONTINUED; s
~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - UNTIL THE PERMANENT CHURCH BUILDiNG I9 READY FOR OCCUPANCY. SHE t
~ NO• 97 _(CONTINUED~ STATED THAT IT WA3 THEIR INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE PARKING AREA i
AkD OTHER IMPROVEMENT3. ~
I
~
,! REVEREND MACK H. WILDERy PA8TOR OF THE WEBTERN AVEMUE SOllTHERN BAP- '
{ T18T CHURCH~ APPEARED BEFOFiE THE COMM19810N pND STpTED THAT THE
{ MEMBER$ WERE PREPARED TO PROCEED NITH THEIR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT~
THAT MONEY WA9 NOW AVAILABLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION~THAT ALL COMMISSION~
CONDITIONB IMP08ED WITH SPECIAL U9E PERMIT W0. 7'I WOULD BE FULFILLED~`
~ THAT IMPROVEMENT8 DEEMED NECES3ARY FOR BUBJECT PETITION WOULD BE IN-
f' STALIED~ AND THAT USE OF THE TEMPORpRY BUILDING WOULD NOT EXCEED A
~ ONE YEAR TIME PERIOD. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
CHAIRMpN GAUER REVIEW:D THE PREVIOU8 PETITION FOR SPECIAL USE PER-
MIT N0. 7~~ WHICH GiiANTED THE PETITIONER3 PERMI3SIOh TO E9TAF3L19H
A CHURCH ON THE BUBJECT PROFERTY IN APR~L~ 1960, AND THE COMMISSION
DISCU89ED THE CONDITIONS IMPOSED AT THAT TIME.
THE COMMIS810N FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACTB REGARDING
THE SUBJECT CONDITIONAL U8E PERMIT:
'I. PETITIONER REQUE3T9 CUNDITIONAL U9E PERMIT FOR WH~CH PROVISION `i
IS MADE IN CODE~ SECTION 18.E)4.OZO ~'I~C~ TO FERMIT UBE OF 9UBJECT •~
PROPHRTY FOR A TEMPORARY CHURCH MEETING FACILITY. '`
2. SUBJECT PROPERTY~ PRE8ENTLY ZONED R-A~ RE81DEN71AL AGRICULTURAL~ ;
ABUTS R~A 20NE PROPERTIEB ON THE 80UTH~ WEST AND NORTH~ ANb R-'I~
SINGLE FAMILY RE9IDENTIAL~ 20NE ACR093 WE3TERN AVENUE ON TH°_
EAST. SUBJECT PROPERTY ABUT9 WESTERN HIGH SCHOOL ON THE 80UTH~ '~f
VACANT PARCEL ON THE WE9T~ A 91NGLE FAMILY RE9IDENCE ~N THE %
NORTH~ AND 81NGLE FAMIIY RESIDENTIAL TRACT ON THE EAST ACROSS
WE8TERN AVENUE. i~
3. SUBJECT PROPERTY WA8 GRANTED SPECIAL U8E PERM{T N0. 7~ BY PLAN- j
NING COMM18910N (~{E80LUTION N0. 238 oN APRIL 'IB~ 1960 FOR TWE
ERECTION OF A CHi1RCH. ALTHOUGH ONE OF THE FINDING8 IN TH19 RE- ~
80LUTION INDICATED THAT THE PETITIONER WA8 TO 8TART BUILDING AS ~
SUON A3 THE PERMIT WA3 189UED~ THE PROPERTY TO DATE HA3 NOT BEEN ~
DEVELOPED. THE PERMIT IS NOT EFFECTIVE BECAU8E THE CONDITION8 ~
ATTACHED TO SPECIAL U8E PERMIT N0. ~~ HAVE NOT BEEN MET. THEY
AftE NOW REQUESTING A NEW CONDITIONAL U8E PEP.MIT IN ORDER TO CON- ~f
STRUCT A Z4 BY QB FOOT TEMPORARY BUIIDING~ THE SLAB FLOOR OF
WHICH WILL BE ULTIMATELY USED A3 A PORTION OF ONE OF THE BUILD-
ING3 SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLOT PLAN SUBMITTED WITH SPECIAL USE i~
PERMIT N0. ~~.
4. A'ISO DAY TIME EXTEN810N OF $PECIAL U8E P[RM17 N0. 7'I~ GRANTED i
BY RE80LUTION N0. Z3B~ SERIE3 1959-60. FROM ITS EXPIRATION DATE ~+
OF OCTOBER ~3p 1960~ WA8 GRANTED AT THE REQUE3T OF THE PETITPONER.:'j
S. THE PETITIONER INDICATED A NEED FOR THE SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT N0. 9~ FOR A'I YEAR PERIOD OF TIME OkLY. ~
E). T4E ORIGINAL PLOT PLAN~ AFPROVED IN CONJUNCTION WITH SPECIAL U3E ~'~
PERMIT N0. 7'I~ INDICATE8 PARKING FOR BO CAR3. PETITIONERS INDI- ;;
CATE THEIR INTENTION TO PROVIDE PARKING FACILITIE8 A9 SHOWN ON K~;;~
TH13 ORIGINAL PLOT PLAN. ~
7. NO ONE APPEARED IN OPP081TION TO THE PETITION.
S
COMM18810NER ALLRED OFFERED RFt?ni~TION N0. 'IS7~ SERIE3 196Q-61, AND '~
MOVED FOR IT8 PA38AGE At~D ADOPTION~ 8ECONDED BY COMM18810NER SUMMER3~ '~
TO GRANT CONDlTIONAL USE PERMIT Nn. 97; R1~9~!Err 7n Tu~ cn,~~~n,w~u~ 'n
OONDITIONB; ~
...._._..__ _.--- ....----- --------._ .__._.__..----__._._~._______....~, .
~ __ ,
~ . .,___~...--
i -~. ~
.
,
•
~'"
j F t
,~
] ~h
~
.
l
~ ~ ~ i
I 3~ 4
y
i MINUTES CITY PL.ANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 16 1961 CONTINUED:
> > e ~ ~
~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ~ 1. DEDICATION OF 45 FEET FROM THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF WE8TERN '
€ NO. 9~ ~CONTINUED) ,VENUE. ~
'
~
i
Z.
PREPARATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANB A
NA INSTALLATION OF ALL ~
r
IMPROVEMENT9 IN ACCG'•L`kNCE WITH APPROVED 3TANDARD PLAN9 ON FILE ii
I IN THE OFFICE QF THE CIYY ENGINEER.
1
i
~
3.
PAYMENT OF ~Z.OO PER FRONT FOOT FOR STREE
T LIGHTING PURPOSE3.
F 4. DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED PARKING AREA AND TEMPORARY BUILDING IN
~ ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS 9UBMITTED AND A PPROVED BY RESQLUTION
~0. 238, SERIE8 1959-F0, FOR $PECIAL U8E PERMIT N0. ~~.
S. PROV1810N OF ZS FOfiT BUILDINfi 9ETBACK FROM THE FRONT PROPERTY
LINE OF WE8TERN AYENUE.
E>. TIME L.IMITATION OF ONE (~~ YEAR FROM EFFECTIVE DATE OF CONDITION-~
AL U3E PERMIT N0. 9~ FOR U9E OF 9UBJECT PROPERTY FOR TE(dPOFiARY
CHl!RCH FACILITIE8~ WITH COMM18810N REVIEW AT THE TERMINATION OF
tHE ONE ~'I~ YEAR PERIOD.
THE FOREGOIPaG COPIDITIONB WERE RECITED AT THE MEETING AND WERE FOUND ;
TO BE A NECE33ARY PREREQU131TE FOR THE U8E OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER '~
TO PREBEFIVE TNE SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZ~~'8 OF ANAHEIM.
ON ROLL CALL THE FOREGOINCa RE90LUTION WA9 PA38ED BY THE FOLLOWING
VOTE;
AYESS COMMISSIONERSO ALLRED~ GAUER~ HAPGOOD~ MARCOU~~ MORR18~
MUNOALL~ SUMMERB.
NOES: COMMISSIONERSC NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
A8818TANT CITY ATTORNEY JOE GEI9LER INFORMED THE COMM18810N THAT 7NE
PREVIOU9 SPECIAL U9E PERMIT N0. 7'I HAD EXPIRED ON OCTOBER 'Ia~ 'Ig6O
AND THAT ~ENERALLY A REQUEBT FOR AN EX7EN910N OF TIME WA8 BUAMITTED
PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. HOWEVER~ IT HA9 BEEN THE POLIOY IN
THE PABT TO GRA~~- AN EXTEN810N 8UB8EQUENT TO THE EXPIRA710N DATE
PROVIDING THERE WA9 NO CHANuE IN PLAN9 AND THE CIRCUM8TANOE3 REMAIN-
ED THE SAME. HE ADVISED TpH~F COMM18810N THAT A VERBAL RFQUE'9T SUB-
MITTED BY THE PETITION ER~ TH18 TlME COULD BE ACCEPTED AND WOULD PRQ-
YIDE THE COMMIS810N WITH THE PROPER PLAN8 FOR EXECUTION OF THE .N-
TElfT OF COMM 18810N RE80LUT I ON N0.'I ST.
REVEREND WILDER BUBMITTED p VERBAL REQUEST FOR 4N EXTEN310N OF TIME.,~
. COMMISSIONER MORR19 OFFERED A MOTInN3 SECONDED BY COMM18910NER ALL- ~
r
RED AND CARRIED THAT THE °ETITIONER BE GfiANTED pN EXTEN.810N OF TIME~:;
UNTIL APRIL 'I8~ 1961,oF SPE.^.IAL USE PERMIT N0. ~'I FOA 'I8O DAYS FROM •
THE DATE OF EXPIRATION OF RE80LUTIOK N0. 238~ $ERIE8 1959-60.
CONDITIONAL LSE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING. PET;TION 8UBMITTED sr MELVIN L. aNn DONNA D. SCH-
N0. 98 ARNWEBER, Box 340, PERR18~ CALIFORNIA~ RECORDED OWNER8j ROBERT S.
UNGER~ 3S4 ORANGEWOOD AVENUE~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ LE33EE~ FOR PER-• ~
M18810N TO COP~STRui,i SINGI.E STORY~ SEMI-PRIVATE~ DELUXE APARTMENTS~ ~
ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED A3: A PARCEL S3O FEET BY E3O FEET WITH A ,x
FRONTAGE OF SSO FEET ON HA3TER STREET AND LOCATED ON THE WE9T SIDE ~
OF HA9TER STREET BETWEEN KATELLA AVENUE AND ORANGEWOOD AVENUEj IT8
~
~
<, .~
~
. ~
---__..,._- --. r_.. . ..---._.. _._ __. ._ _--- ~--•..__ _.
- - - -___~...-------
-----~ . i ~.` _ ~ -.---. _........;=~ . ..
a . ~~ ~
4
I ~
.. '~~ -
~M1 6~ ~ ~
~
31 ;~
;~
MINUTESs CITY PLANNING CAMMISSION~ JANUARY 16~ 1961~ CONTINUED: ;
=x
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - NORTHEABT OORNER BEINO APPROXIMATELY 6OS FEET 30UTH OF THE 30UTH- ;g
ti
NO. 9B ~CONTINUED~ WEBT OORNER OF KATELLA HVENUE AND HA3Ten STnccio THE FRO°E.°.TY !9
' ,
IAL AGR ICULTI~IAL. ~
~R~SE"lTLY C_ASg; F! En ~~4 ~ RF$ ~ pFNT ~
a
MR. ROBERT UNGER~ AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PETITIONERS~ APPEARED BE-j
FORE THE COMM18810N AND BTATED HE HAD NOTHING TO ADD TO THE INFORMA-`
TION CONTAINED IN'THE 8UBJECT PETITION.
MR. ROBERT MCMANN~ REPRE8ENTATIVE OF THE SATELLITE TRAILER PARK~
APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMISBION AND 8TATED THAT THEY WOULD HAVE NO
OBJEOTION TO THE PROPOBED DEVELOPMCyT BUT THAT THEY WOULD BE ADVERBE
TO HAVINCi OOMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT FRONTING ON HA8TER STREET.
MR. NEL80N B. REEMB APPEARED BEfDRE THE COMM18910N~ STATED HE 1NAS
THE DEYELOPER OF THE PROP08ED lDN1T3 AND DESCRIBED THE INTENDED LAY- `
OUT AND THE NUMBER OF UNITS AND GARA(iE8. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
DIBOtF0810N N'A8 HELD WITH THE PETiTI0NER9 RELATIVE TO THE ONE OWNER
DEVELOPMENT REQUIRIi~r p MANAOER~B BERVICE~ THE COMPARISION OF DE~I-
SITY IN AN R-3 DEVELOPMENT WITH A 81NGLE UNIT DEVELOPMENT~ AND THE i
LACK Of RECREATIONAL FACILITIE8 BECAUBE OF.THE PETITIONER~8 HOPE +
THAT THE RENTAL OAN BE LIMITED TO ADULTB ONLY.
i
A9818TANT CITY ATTORNEY JOE~GEIBLER AAVI8ED THE COMM18~310N IN RE9- ~
PECT TO THE CODE~ SECTION 16.64- COND{TIONAL U9E8~PLANNED UNIT HOU8-~y
INO~ AND THE NECE881TY FOR REOLABSIFICATION OF THE 8UBJEOT PROPERTY ~
TO R-3 IN ORDER TO CONBTRUCT THE PROPOSED TYPE OF DEVELO?MENT. ~
u
THE COMM18810N D18CU88ED THE Bd81C IDEA OF PLANNED UNIT LEVELOPMENS3 a
IN COMPAR190N WITN THE BUBpJ1NECTT PETITION~ AND THE LOCATION OF TRAILER~
PARiiB IF1 TH'e BURROUNDIN~AHD~THE FACILlTIEB THEY PROVIDE. IT WA9 ~
NOTED THAT NO ?ROVIBION HAD BEEN MADE FOR TRABH OOLLEOTION AND THAT ,~
CITY FOROE8 OOULD NOT ENTER PRlVATE PROPERTY. THE PETITIONER IN-
fORMED THE COMM18610N THAT TRABH CO~LECTION BTATION9 WOULD BE PRO-
VIDED IN OL08E PROXIMITY 70 THE 8TREET~ AND THAT HE DID NOT CON&1-
DER RECREATIONAL FACILITIEB NFCE85r~RY FOR THE 9UBJECT PROPERTY.
THE COMM18810N fOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACTB REOARDING
THE BUBJEOT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAI. LiSE PERMIT;
'I. PETITIONER REQUE8T8 A CONDITIONAL U8E PERMIT FOR WHIOH PROV1810N%
19 MADE IN CODE~ SEOTION 'IS.64.OZO ~'I-E~ IN ORDER TO PERMIT GON°;
BTRUOTION OF A CiROUP OF UN1T8.
2. SUBJEOT F!ROPERTY~ ^REBENTLY ZoNED R-A~ nEoiDEiZ71AL AGRICULTURAL~;
ABUTB R-A ZONING ON TME 80UTH~ WEST~ NOF2TH~ AND ACR088 HABTER
STR~ET ON THE EABT. SUBJEOT PROPER7Y ABUTB AN ORANGE GROVE ON
THE 80UTM AND WE87~ THE RIVIERA MOBILE TRAIIER PARK ON THE NORTH
AND ANOTHER TRAILER PARK AOR089 HABTER STREET ON THE EABT.
$. THE PROP08ED DEVELOPMENT~004ERIN0 4.S ACREBy ^~n~A1N8 A TOTAL OF:
9C UNITB OR AN AVERA~E DEN9ITY OF Z1.3S UN1T8 PER AORE. A BTAN-
DARD MULTIPLE FAMILY RE8IDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT i.ON1'AIA9Nfi TH18
NUMBER Of ~N1T8 WOULD BE REQUIRED TO OONTAIN 1ZC C3ARAfiEB. THE
PROP08ED pLOT PLAN INDIOATEB Z8 OARAfiEB~ 9Z fiARA0E9 WITH A ROOf
AND REAR WA~L ONLY~ AND 3'_ PARKING BPAOEe.
4. THE PROF08ED DEVEI.OPMENT IS OOM~OBED 8F ~ aRdUPB Of UNITS 6EP-
ARAfED BY ASPHALT DRIVEB AND PARKIN~ AP.EAB.
S. A8818?ANT CITY ATTORNEY JOE QEI$LER INFORMED THE COMM18810N TMAT
IN AOOORDANOE WITH CObE~ SEOTION 'I~.~4 ~ CONDITIONAL U8E8~ PI.FN-
NED UNI7 MOU81~0 DEV'eLOPMEN78 9HALL COMPLY ~NITH LAND UBE _
_.__~__,_~_. .__ ------..---~_ _.__.__,. . _..-,----~r-----
. _ , ...>
~ --~ - --°- ------
_ .__..
---~-~ .. 1 ~ .' . . . ~ ~ .,._ -.~ ~ ~ ---... `. .
i , t
'
~
~ . i
S ~...
~
32 a
~
.5
MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSlON~ JANUARY 16, 1961~ COMTINUED: 'f
-~
7
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PROP03AL8 AND POPULATION DENSITIEB AS SET FORTH IN THE COMPREHEN- S
NO. 9B ~CONTINUED~ 81VE GENERAL PLAM AND THAT .4G ZOiJING ORDINANCE TO DATE IS THE ~~
ONLY 3UCH ADOPTED PI.AN. TH13 ORDINANCE MAKEB ?ROV1310N FOR AN R-A ~
ZONE~ OF WHICH SUBJECT PROPEF.TY IS A PART~ AND MAS E3TABL18HED DEN- ~
81TY RESTRICTION3 ON TH13 20NE. THEREFORE~ 8UBJECT PROPERTY BHOULD ;
BE REZONED TO R-3~ IJIULTIPLE FAMILY R=31DE~TIAL~ IN ORDER TO PERMIT ~
THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTiON A9 A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. HE ADVI°-i
ED THAT ANY APPROVAL OF 3UBJECT PETITION fOR GONDITIONAL U8E PERMIT'
BE 8UBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF A PETITlON FOR RECLA381FICATION OF
9UBJECT PROPERTY FR~M THE R-A~ RE3IDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL TO THE R-3~
MULTIPLE FAMILY RE8IDENTIALy 20NE.
6. NO ONE APPEARED IN v'DPOSITION TO THE PETITION.
COMM18810NER MARCOUX OFFERED RESOLUTION N0. ~SS~ SERIES 'I~6Q-6'I~ AND
MOVED FOR ITS PA8SACE A,lD ADOPTION~ SECONDED BY COM~AISSIONER SUMRIERS~
TO GRANT CONDITIONA:. U8C• PERMIT N0. 9B~ SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CON-
DITION8:
'I. SUBJECT TO THE RECLA381FICATION OF BUBJECT PROPERTY FROM THE R-A~
RE8IDENTIAL AGRICULTURA~~ZONE TO THE R-3~ ~4'IJLTIPLE FAMIIY RE8IDEN- '
TIAL~20NE.
Z. DEVELOPMENT 9UBBTANTIA:LY IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLAN8 PREBENTED.
3. DEDICATION OF 45 FEET FROM TME MONUMENTED OENTERLINE OF HABTER
STREET.
4. PREPARATION OF BTREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN8 AND INSTALLATION OF IMPROVF-?
MENT8 IN ACOOFiDANCE WITH THE APPROVED 8TANDARD Pl,ANB ON FILE IN THE %
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENG~NEER.
S. PAYMENT OF ~Z.OO PER FRONT F00T FOR 9TREET LIGHTING PURP08E9.
'
6. PROVISION OF TRA9H PICK-UP 87A7lON9 IN CL03E PROXIMITY TO ihE PUB- ~
LIC 8TREET.
TNE FOREGOIN(3 CONDITIONS WERE RECITED AT THE MEETING AND WERE FOUND TO ;
BE N NECE9SARY PREREQUISITE TO THE USE OF THE PROPEriTY IN ORDER TO PRE- ;;
SERVE THE 9AFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CIT12EN3 OF ANAHEIM. `t
"'1
AYES: COh'~MISSIONERSC ALLRE~~ GAUER~ HAPGOOD~ MARCOUXp MORR18~ !~ ~
MUNGALL~ SUMMER8.
NOES: COMMISSIONERSO NONE. ;
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
RECLASSiFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITI~N 3UBMITTED ev PALMALL PROPERTIES~ INCORPORATED~~
N0. 60-b1-51 P. 0. Box 7~ ANAHEIM~ I~ALIFORNlA~ OWNERj ARTHUR H. SHIPKEY~ 1559 EM-
DA88Y STR~ET~ ANAHEIM~ CAIIFORNIA~ AUTHORI2ED AGENT~ REQUE8TING THAT
PROPERTY DEBCRIBED AS; PP.RCEL ~~A~~ ~ A PARCEL LOCATED ON THE 80UTHEA9T-
ERLY CORNER OF OrANCHE3TER AVENUE AND BROADIYpY~ PARCEL ~~B~~ ~- A PARCEL
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWE3TERLY OORNER OF THE INTER9ECTION9 OF BROADWAY~
WALNUT STREET AND THE SANTA ANA FREEWAY~ AND FURTHER DE3CRIBED A8~ PAR-
CEL A~ 1216-1222 Wear BROADWAYj PARCEL B- 3~9 SOUTH WALNU7 STREET~
eE RECLA881FIED FROM C-2, GENERAL CONVNERCIAL, ro.PARC~:L A, C-3, HEAVY
COMN~RCIAL aNa PARCEL B, M-1, LIGHT MANUFACTURING.
Ml~~. F~RTHUR H. SHIPKEY~ THE PETITIONER~ APPEARED BEFORE THt COMM18810N
AND BTATED THAT THE SUBJEOT PROP'rRTY HAD BEEN APPROVED FOR A 8ER41CE
~ ~ _ ..._ _. _._..._..__~ . ,_,.-
_._. _ ...__. - - - _ _ _ . __ _--- ~_ _---- _.. . .._ _. _.._ . .. _ _ _ __~
. _ __._
_ ._. . _-+'i~ , ~.. . . __ .
. ^ _
i
,
~ _.
~~ ..
~ ~' ~
~ ~
a
~
33 A
~
'~
5
MINUTES~ CITY {~APrNING C~MMISSION~ JANUARY 16~ 1961~ CONTINU~D; ~
~
RECLASSIFICATIpN - 8TATION U8E PREYIOUBLY BUT THAT THE PERMIT HAD EXPIRED BECAUBE FINAN- ~
NQ. EO-~i'I-5'I CING COULD NOT BE ARRANGED. IN RE~ERENCE TO THE SUBJECT PETITION~HE ~
(f:ONTINUFD~ gTATED THAT THE STANDARA OIL GOMPANY WOULD CON3 TRUCS A 9ERVICE STATION ;~
' ON PARCEL I~ OF THE PROPERTY~ AND THAT HE WOULD OPERATE A WHOLE9Al.E ~
WAREHOUBE FOR AUTOMOTIVE 8UPPLIE3 ON PARCEL B. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED .y
~
THE COMM19910N FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWI
NG FACT8 RE6AFDIk~ THE ;
;
SUBJECT PETITION FOR RECLA9SIFIOATION:
~. PETITIONER REQUE3T9 RECLABSIFICATION Of PARCEL A OF SIIBJECT PROPER-
TY FROM THE C~Z~ GENERAL COMMERCIAL~ 20NE TO THE C~3~ HEAVY COM-
MERCIAL~ ZONE~ AND PARCEL B FROM THE C-Z~ GENERAL COMMERCIAL~ ZONE
TO THE M-'I~ LIGHT ~~AANUFACTURING~ ZONE~ IN ORDER TO CON9TRUCT A SER-:
V105 STATION ON PARCEL A AND A WHOLE8ALE WAREHO!f8E FOR pUTOMOBILE I
SUPPLIE3 ON PARCEL B OF 8UBJECT PROPERTY. ~~
Z. SUBJECT PROPERTY ABUTB A C-2~ GENERAL COMMERyIAL~ ZONE ACR098 ;
BROADWAY ON THE NORTH~ THE SANTA ANA FREEWAY ON THE EAST~ A C-Z~ ~
GENERAL COMMERCIRI~ ZONE ON THE 80UTH~ AND AN M-'I~ LIGHT MANUFAC- =..
TURING~ ZONE ACR083 MANCHE8TER AVENUE ON THE WE8T. j
3. Si1BJECT FROPERTY IS 3URROUNDED ON THE 90UTFf~ WEST~ EA3T AND NORTH ~
SIDEB BY COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USE8. ~
4. PARCEL A WA9 GRANTED VARIANCE N0. 935 FOR A BERVICE BTATION ON ~
MARCN 1~~ 1958 8Y CiOMMIS810N {jE80LUT10N N0. 2~1~ SERIES 1957-5s. ~
THIS VARIANCE HA9 BECOME VO1D BSCAU~E OF THE EXPIRATION OF THE 'IaO ~
DAY TIME LIMIT.
S. NO ONE APPEARED IN OPP031TION TO THE PETITION. ~h
s
~
~'iOMMI$910NER flI~UNOALL OFFERED RE90LUTION ~~Oo 159, SERIES 1960-E)'I~AND ;
MOVED FJR 1T8 PASBAGE AND ADOPTION~ 8ECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MARCOUX~ ~
RECOMMENBING TO THE CITY COUNCIL 'NJ.T RECLA8SIFICATION N0. 6O-C)'I~S'I ~
a
BE APPROVED 9UBJECT TO THE FOLLOWIYG CONDITION8: ~
'I. RECLA881FICATION OF PARCEL A TO THE C-3~ HEAVY COMMERCIAL~ 20NE .~,
FOR BE~VICE 97ATIOW U9E ONLY~ AND RECLf.E:t~FICATION OF FARCEL B TO ;
THE M-1~ LIGI~T MANUF'ACTURING~ 20NE FOR A WHOLESALE WAREHOUBE.
Z. IN9TplLATION OF 81DEWALiC8 AND DRIVEWAYB ON MANCHEBTER AVENUE.
3. PROV181UN OF 8TRUCTURAL PROTECTION FOR EXIBTING BTORM DRAIN9.
4. DEDICATION OF 45 FEET FROM THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF MANCHEBTER
AVENUE.
S. TIME LIMITATION OF 9O DAY3 FOR ITE~d9 Z~ 3. AND 4.
THE FOREGOIWG CONDITION8 WERE RECITED AT THE P!lEETING AND WERE FOUND TO
BE A NECE39ARY PREREQUIBITE TO THE U8E OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO PRE-
8ER4E THE SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CIT12EN8 OF ANAHEIM.
ON ROLI CALL THEFORE(iOING RE80LUTION WA8 PA88ED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTES
AYES: CO~V1M15SIONERSC ALLRED~ GAUER~ HAPGOOD~ MARCOUX~ MORR19~
MUNGALL~ SUMMERB.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIOIVERS: NONE.
RECLASSIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION BUBMITTED BY C. J. RENTAS, B. BRUSH nka P.A.
~Q. 6~-f>~-52 MOLLlS~ 'IZ~4Z STANWOOD DRIVE~ L08 ANOELE8 66~ CALIfORNIA~ RECORDED
_._.------- . ...._.. _ _. ---- ---- .. _. .._....._. _..___.-._.,.-_.._
__ _- _ _-- ----.. .;
--~i . i' . ~ -^-- :_- . • _ . . . - -
~ ------
~~~ ' ~~ ~ ~ • ;
_ x
• 34 ~
~
~
NINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ JANUARY 16~ 1961, CONSINUEU: ~
~
RECLASSIFICATION - OWNER3~ REQUESiTING THP.7 PROPERTY DESCRIBED RS: A?ARCHL WITH A FRONT- "a
NO. 6~-61-SZ AGE OF 17O FEET OM L08 ANGElE3 STREET AND 14O FEET ON WINSTON ROAD~ `!
,~ONTINUED) AND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWE8TERLY CORNER OF IIPIN3TON ROAD AND L08 ANGELE:'~
STREET ~ BE RE :LA881 F I ED FROM (i-~~ Ht14VY I:UIVIIVItItC INL ~L 1 M I TED TO SE:iV I~C E'
STATION U3E ONLY~ TO C-3~ HEAVY COMN~RCIAL (LiMirea ro SERVICE STATION ~
U8E ONLY~~ AND ALL C~~~ I~EIGNBORHOOD COMNERCIAL~ USE8.
MR. PETER MOLLIS~ THE PETITIONER~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMISSION AND
BTATHD HE HAD NOTHING FURTHER TO ADD TO THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN
IN THE PETITtON. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
THE COMM19810N REVIEWED THE PA3T HISTORY OF ZONING ACTION3 ON THE 3UB-
JECT PROPERTY~ THE DEED REBTRIC710N9 FRE9FNiLY IN EFFECT~ AND THE NE-
CE9SITY FOR BUBMITTING PLANB ANA THE REn'iIRED SIGUATURE8 OF ADJAOeNT
PROPERTY OWNER3 TO THE COUNCIL 70 OBTAIN APPROVAI. OF THE 3UBJECT PETI-:
TION FOR RECLA981FICATION, s
THE COMMIS810N FOUND AND DETERMIW'ED THE FOLLOWING FACT9 REGARDING THE w
9UBJECT PETITION FOR RECLA331FICATION: ;
'I. PETITlaNER REQUE9T9 A RECLASSIFICATION OF 8UBJECT PROPERTY FROM
THE C-3~ HEAVY COMMERCIAL~ ZONE LIMITED TO SERVICE STATION U9E ON- ~
~Y~ TO THE C~~ HEAVY COMMERCIAL~ 20NE LIMITED TO BERVICE STATION i~
USE ONLY AND ALL U3E8 PERMITTED IN THE C-'I~ NEIGHBORHOOD COMMER- ~
CIAI 20NE~ IN QRDER TO PERMIT DEVELOPMENT CF 8UBJECT PROPERTY FOR ~
A 9ERVICE 9TATION AND ANY C-'I U8E. 'I
Z. SUBJECT PROPERTY ABUT9 A C~j~ NEICsHBORH00D (iOMMERCIAL~ 20NE ON THE j
WEBT AND NORTH~ M-'I~ LIGHT MANUFACTURING~ ZONE ACROS8 LOS ANGELE8 '
STREET ON THE EABT~ AND C~3~ HEAVY COMMERCIAL~ 20NE ACROS8 WIN9TON k
ROAD ON THE SOUTH.
3. SUDJECT PROPERTY WAS RE20NED ON MARCH Z9~ 1960 TO THE C-3~ HEAVY
COMMERCIAL~ ZONE LIMITED TO BEP.VICE 8TATION U8E ON6Y. ON NOVEMBER >~
15, 1960 TiE CITY COUNCIL AND CITY ATTORNEY ADVI8ED THE PETITIONER ~i
THAT IN ORDER TO DEVELOP 3UBJECT PROPERTY FOR A COFFEE 9HOP~ A8 IN-~i
a
TENDED AT THAT TIME~ THE OWNER WOULD HAVE TO OBTAIN THE 31GNATUREB ''i
OF ALL PROPERTY OWNER3 OF TRACT N0. 2637, OF WHICH 3UBJECT PROPER- '
7Y I5 A PART~ IN ORDER TO MODIFY 7HE DEED REBTRICTION8~ WHICH PRE-
8ENTLY LIMIT USE OF BUBJECT PROPERTY TO 8ERVICE STATION USE ONLYp
SO PERMIT THE CONBTRUCTION OF A COFFEE BHOP. THE PET!TIONEfi WA3
INFORMED AT THAT TIME THAT IF TH18 WAS ACCOMPLI3HED~ A NEW PETI-
TITION FOR RECLA381FICATION WOULD NAVE TO BE FILED IN ORDER TO DE-
VELOP 8UBJEOT PROPERTY FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN A BERVICE BTATION.
SUB~ffiCT PETITION FOR RECLA981FICATION IS THEREFORE A FOLLOW-
THROUGH BY THE PETiTIONER ON THIS COUNCIL DIRECTIVE.
4. PETITIONER INDICATES THAT HE 18 REQUE3TING RECLA881FICATION OF 8UB-
JEC7 PROPERSY FOR EITHER 3EFiVICE STATION U3E ONLY~ OR FOR ANY C-'I
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL USE.
~. NO ONE APPEARED IN OPP081TION TO THE 8UBJECT PETITION.
,niQMM18810NER SUMMER9 OFFERED RE90LUTION N0. 'IE>O~ SERIEB 1960~E'I~ AND
MOVED FOR IT8 PA98A(iE AND pDOPTION~ BECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HAPGOOD~
REOOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT RECLA881PICATION N0. 6O-C'I-SZ BE
APPROVED~ BUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONB;
'I. DEDICATION OF 53 FEET FROM THE MONUMENTED CENTEP.LINE OF L08 ANGELE8
STREET. •
Z. TIME LIMITATION OF 9O DAYB FOR ITEM N0. 'I.
~
~
~
~,~v~ _-.----- _- --_ ..__...._. _... .... ,....__--- _.._
.-. __________._ _.__~
_ ~ ~. ~ . . . _ . _
"'__. . 1 -..
, ~
~ ~
, ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ,. ~ ~
~ 35 • ~.
~ MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMMI5SION~ JANUARY 16, 1961~ CONTINUED: ~
~ }
q RECLASSIFICATION -•3. SUBJECT TO TNE MODIFICATION OF THE DEED RESTftICTIqN9 IMPO$ED BY ~
~ NO. 6O-E'I-SZ CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. 1459 TO PERMIT EITHER C-3~ HEAVY COM- ~
~ ~~NTINUED) MERCIAL~ ZONE LIMITED TO BERVICE STATION U9E ONLY~ OR TO ANY C-'I~ z
i LIGHT COMMEROIAL~ U8E. ''
~
~
i~
' 4. SUBJECT TO THE APPROYAL OF PLAN9 8Y THE ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE. i
i
;
THE FORE~OING CONDITION9 WERE REOITED AT T4E MEETIN4 AND WERE FOUND TO
S BE A NECE88ARY PREREQU181TE TO THE USE OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO PRE- ;
~~
~ BERVE THE BAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZENB OF ANAHEIM.
g ON ROLL CALL THE FOREOOING RE80LUTION WA9 PA98ED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: CQMMISSIONERSO ALI.RED~ GAUER~ HAPGOOD~ Mnacoux~ MORR18~
MUNGALL~ Sl1MMERS. ~
NOES: COMMlSS10NERS7 NONE. ;
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
~
RECLASSIFICATION
- PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION SUBMITTCD sY FRED MEYERS AND LEO TANDENBAUM~ i
NO. 60-6~~53 'I9O NORTH CANON ARIVE~ BE"ERLY HILL3~ CAI.IFORNIA~ OWNER8: NEWTON COR-
BUTT~ 1161? i~OLLECiE AVENUE~ GARDEN GROVE~ CALIFORNIA~ AUTHORIZED AGENT~ `~
REQUESTING THAT PROPERTY DE3CRIB[D A8: A PARCEL 'IO3 FEET BY ZH4 FEET ti
WITH A FRONTAGE OF 'IO3 FEET ON BROOKHURBT STREET AND LOCATED ON THE :
WE3T 81DE Of BROOKHUR8T STREET BETWEEN KATELLA AVENUE AND vRE8TW00D ?
LANF~ 1T9 SOUTHEA9T CORNER BEING APPROXIMATELY S4O FEET NORTH OF THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF KATELLA AVENUE AND BROOKHUR3T STREET AND FURTHER
~ DE8CR18ED AS 1735, 1737 AND 'I739 BROOKHURBT STREET~ 8E RECLASSIFIED ~
FROM R-11~ R~SIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL ro C-1~ NEfGfiBORH00D CCAIMERCIAL. ?
THE PETITIONER APP~ARED SEFORE THE COMMIS810N AND DISCUSSED VARIANCE
N0. 1294 WHICH ~RANTED PERN18810N TO ESTABLISH A DANCE STUDIO ON NEAR-
BY PROPERTY~ AND THE TENTATIVE PROP08A: TO LOCATE A PANCAKE HOUBE
NORTHERLY OF THE 3UBJECT PROPERTY~ TNE PLOT PLAN OF WkICH INDICATES
TNAT THE BUILDING SETBACK DID NOT CONFORM WITH THF BUILUING BETBACKB
OF THE REMAIfdDER OF THE DEVELOPMENT. THE PETITIONER INDICATED THAT
HE PROP08ED TO CON8TRUCT THREE RETAIL 8TORES AND PROVIDE ADE~UATF
PARKING FACILITIE3~ LIGHTING AND LAND8CAPIN6. THE HEARING WAS
CLOSED.
THE COMMISSION DISCU38ED THE PROP03ED BETBACK OF THE 9UBJECT BUILDING3
AND 1HE 8EYBACK8 INDICATED FOR ADJACENT COMMERCIAL DEVtLOPMENT TO THE
NORTH, A8S18TANT CITY ATTORNEY ~IOE GEISLER POINTED OUT TO THE COMM18~
910N THAT THEY COULD NOT REQUIRE C~~ PROPERTIE8 TO THE NORTH TO COM-
PLY WITH THE 9ETBACK REQUIREMENT9 THAT WOULD BE IMP08ED ON THE SUBJECT
PE7ITION.
COMMIS810NER ALLRED INDICATED THAT A BLOCK WALL 3HOULD BE INSTALLED
ON THE WE3T IN AOCORDANCE WIYH CODE REQUIREMENT8 WHERE C~1 PROPERTY
ABUT8 R-'I 20NING~ BUT THAT THE PROBLEM OF REQUIRING A BLOCK WALL ON
THE SOUTH TO SATIBFY CODE REQUIREMENTB MiGHT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE.
PROPERTY IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT IT WOULD PROBABLY BE DEVELOPED FOR
COMMEROIAL U8E. A8819TANT CITY ATTORNEY ~IOE GEI8LER INFORMED THE COM-
MIBSION THAT THE COMM18810N COULD REQUIRE THE POSTING OF A BOND TO
PROVIDE FOR WrALL CONBTRUCTION IN CASE 9UBJECT DEVELOPMENT WA8 NOT
AOCOMPLIEIHED WITHIN A CERTAIN PERIOD.
THE COMM18310N FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACT9 REOARDING THE
BUBJECT PETIT~ON FOR RECLA381FICATION;
... ..
.._.___. _ _ _._... __ . _-•--_~-•- - •°_--- ----- ----_-~~, _._._._ _ ,,.
_ _ __ _ .._,_. ,
. _--~ ' ~ _ .._. • - - _ _ _. __.__~ __.
.. ~ . ;
-'
~
i '
f f ' ~ :: ,~
° ~ ~
,,~
3
36 ~
':i
MINIR'ES~ CITY PLANNING
~ COMMISSIOfJ~ JANUARY 16, 1961, CONTINUED: e
RECLASSIFICATION -
1. PETITIONER REQUE8T8 RECLA331FICATION.OF BUBJECT PROPERTY FROhi THE `~
NO. E>O-E'I-53 R-A~ RE8IDEN'fIAL AGRICULTURAL~ ZONE TO THE C-~~ NEIGHBORHOOD COM- y
' ~CONT 1 NUED}
i MERC I Al g ZONE y I H 4RT]ER TQ GOS:8T,P.UCT .". SU f LD t tiG COHTA I ~J i i~iu TriR'eE T
~ RETAIL BTORE8. ;~
Z. $UBJECT PROPERTY ABU73 AN R-1~ SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL~ 20N'c ON '
THE WEBT~ A C-~~ NEIGHBORHOOB COMtdERCIAI~ ZONE ON THE NORTH~ R-1 ~
~ ZONE ACR088 BROOKHURST STREET ON THE EAST~ AND R-A~ RE8IDENTIAL ~
° AORICULTURAL~ 20NE ON THE 80UTH.
~~ 3. SUOJEOT PROPERTY ABUT8 AN ORANGE SROVE ON THE 90UTH~ 81NGLE FAMILY
RE8IDENTIAL TRACT ON THE WEST~ A NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL U8E ON
THE NORTH~ AND 8113GLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TRACT ACR033 BROOKHURST
STREET ON THE EA8T.
4. PROPOSED PARKING IS ADEQUATE AND ": PETITIONER INDICATES THAT
LANDBCAPING WILL BE PROV{DED.
S. NO ONE APPEARED IN OPP081TION TO THE PETITION.
COMM1S910NER MORR18 OFFERED RE90LUTION N0. 161, SERIt8 1960-61, AND
MOVED FOR 1T9 PA88AGE AND ADOfTiON~ 8ECONDED BY COMMIBSIONER ALLRED~
RECOMMENDING TO TNE CITY COUNCIL THAT RECLA831FICATION NC. 6O-E'I-S3 BE
APPROVED~ 9UBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION3:
'I. DEVELOPMENT $UB8TANTIALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS PRE9ENTED.
Z. CLEANOUT PROVISION8 FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSE8 AT LOCATIONS DESIG-
NATED BY THE CITY ENGINEER 3HALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE EXIBTING ~
DRpINAGE DITCH~ WHICH IS TO BE COVERcD A8 INDICATED ON THE PL07 1
PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.
3. DEDICATION OF E)O FEET FROM TtIE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF BROOKHUR3T ~
STkEET.
,3
4. PREPARATION OF 8TREET IMPROVEMENT PLANB AND INSTALLATION OF ALL
IMPROVEMEMTB IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED 5TANDARD PLAN8 ON FILE IN
THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER.
5. PAYMENT OF ~Z.OO PER FRONT FOOT FOR 8TREET LIGHTING PURP08E3.
6. TIME LIMITATION OF 9O DAY3 ON ITEMS Z~ 3~ 4~ AND S.
7. IN9TALLATION OF A SIX ~C~ F00T MASONRY WALL ON THE WE3T PROPERTY
' LINE~ AND POSTING OF A BOND TO A83URE CON3TRUCTION OF A 81X ~E>~
FOOT MASONRY WALL ON SHE 80UTH PROPERTY LINE~ IF NECE3SARY~ AFTER
A TWO ~Z~ YEAR PERIOD OF TiiviE FR4ivi THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE 8U8-
JECT PETITION. ,
THE FOREGOING CONJ?;YIONB WEfiE RECITED AT THE MEETING AND WERE FOUND TO
BE A NECE98ARY PREREQU181TE FOR THE USE OF THE P.^.~PERTY IN ORDER TO
PREBERVE THE 8AFETY AND WELFAZE OF THE C1T12EN8 OF ANAHEIM.
,~.
ON ROLL CALL THE FORE601NG RE90LUTIpN WA8 PA93ED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: COMMISSIONERSC ALIRED~ GAUER~ HAPGOOD~ MARCOUX~iVIORRIS~
MUNGALL~ SUMMER8.
NOES: COMMISSIONERSC NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSS NONE.
PUBLIC HEARING - STREET NAME CHANGES. THE PROPOSED CHANOE IN NAME OF CERTAIN BTREETB LO-
CATED WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL LIMITB OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM WA8 Si~••
MITTED TO THE COMM138ION. IT WA9 NOTED THA7 ON DECEMBER 19, 1960 THE
QOldA~}!,°,8lOk ,".DO°7ED RE~.'i'LlST:Ol: r~0. ~nr(~~ .ciERiEo 1~i~Q°5~~ ^n'cCOAntn'ciiDitiG
THE CNANGE IN NAME OF CERTAIN 8TREET9 AND THAT 8UB8EQUENT INFORMATION
INDICATED THAT THE CORRECT 8PELLING AND FURTHER OLARIFICATION OF TIiE
PROP08ED NAME OHANfiEB WAS NEOE89ARY. NO ONE APPEARED BEFORE THE COMM1~3-
' BION IN RE9PECT TO THE PROP08ED NAME CHANOEB. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
---._. _--- -~- -- ------- __._._._. _.. _ __._ -----.... .,
~ ---- - .. _ _ ----- ------__
__ .._ . - ___._ __
-°. ~
.---~ _ ~~ . . _ __ ... ._.
~ .~ . `
A ~'. , ~
~s
~
g7 `;~
~
MINUTES~ C17Y PLANNING CONWIISSION~ JANUARY 16, 1961~ GONTIiJUED; ;~
PUBLIC HEARIfdG - A98187ANT CITY ATTORNEY JOE GEI8LER ADVI3ED THE COMM18810N THAT RESO-.
'~
~CONTINUED) LUiION N0. 140 COULD BE REBCINDED AND THE ADOPTION OF THE OURRENT ~
m
~
, PROPOBED 8TREET NAME CHANGE$ COIiID BE ACCOMPLf$HED iFi OVE n'coOLUTt~JN. ',~
~
COMM1S810NER MORR18 OFFERED RESOLUTi^iJ N0. 162, SERIES 1960-61, AND f
MO~ED FOR IT8 PA88AGE AND ADOPTION~ BECONDED BY COMMIBSIORER ALLREB~ y
RE8CINDING RE80LUTION N0. 140, SERIE9 ~96O-E)'I~ AND RECOMMENDING TO ?
THE CITY COUNCIL THE CHANOE IN NAME OF CERTAIN 9TREETS IN THE CITY OF j
ANAHEtM A8 FOLLOWB; ~
~ ~ ~ ~
ORANGE AVENUE ONONDAGA STREET WE3T OF AND PARALLEL TO EUCLID AVENUE
8TUBBING NORTH FROM LA PALMA AVENUE.
MADRID STREET TIARA STREET EA8T OF AND PARALIEL TO EUC1_ID AVENUE
BETWEEN SUMAC LANE AND KATELLA AVENUE. i
' TIARp STREET MADRID STREET EA3T OF AND PARALLEL TO HARBOR BOULE- f~
VARD 87UBBING NORTH FROM WILKEN WAY.
ON ROLL CALL THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION WA8 PA33ED 6Y TNE FOLLOWING VOTE O i
AYES: COMMISSIONERSt ALLRED~ GAUER~ HAPGOOD~ MARCOUX~ MORR18
MUNGALL~ SUWMERB.
~ES: COrr1b11ssiQ~:~RS: rdoNe.
ABSENT: CO(uiMISSIONERSi NONE.
TENTAT~VE MAP OF - THE TENTATIVE IVIAP OF TRACT N0. 4060 WA8 8UBMITTED TO THE COMNIS810N.
TRACT N0. 4060 THE SUBDiVIDER ia MORAGA-FULTON BUILDING COMPANY, c/o FERMAN BUiLDER3~
GSOS WIL8HIRE BOULEVARD~ LOS ANGELE8 48, CALIFORNIA. THE TRACT IS LO-
CATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CREBCENT AVENUE~ AND 1194 FEET MORE OR LE38
WEBT OF BROOKHUR8T STREET AND CONTAINB ZO PROPOSED R~3~'MULTIPLE FAM-
ILY RE8IDENTIAL~ LOTS.
THE COMM19810N D18CU88ED THE LAYOUT OF YHE TENTATIVE TRACT~ AND FOUND
AND DETERMIiNED THE FOLLOWING FACTS REGARDING THE PROP08ED TRACT~
I 'I. THE SUBJECT TRACT IS LOCATED ON TFiE NORTH SIDE OF CRE9CENT AVENUE~ t~ ,
EA8T OF GILBERT STREeT~ AND CONTAIN3 APPRORIMATELY 6.8 ACREB AND ,;~
13 PROP09EP. FOR ZO R~3y MULTIPLE FAMILY RE9IDENTIAL~ L0T9. :;
2. CONSTRUCT40N OF A 6 F00T MASONRY WALL 9EPARATING rHE R-3, MULTI- ?~
PLE FAMILY RE8IDENTIAL~ ZONE FROM THE R-A~ RE8IDENTIAL AGRICUITUR- "
I AL~ ZONE WOULD 9AT19FY CODE REQIlIREMENT8.
i 3. NO ONE APPEARED IN OPP081TION TO THE PROPQ3ED TENTATIVE TRAOT.
COMMI88~ONER ALLRED OFFERED A MOTION~ SECONDED BY COMM19810NER MORRIS
AND CARRIED~ THAT TENTATIVE MAP Of TRACT N0. 4060 BE APPROVED~ 8UBJECT
TO THE FOLLOMIINO CON~IITION8t
'I. RECORDATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT IVO. Z9~Z 81M~L7ANEOUSLY WITH OR
PRIOR TO RECORI)ATIOU OF TRACT N0. 4060 IN ORDER TO PR=9ERVE ALLEY
DE810N.
Z. HOUBE PLpNB NOT 8i18JECT TO REVIEW BY CITY COUNCIL~ BUT BUBJECT TO
PLANNIN(i AND~pR BUILDING DEPARTMENT RE41EW IN ACCORDANCE WITH
QiTY ~,flUN~31L POLIOY EBTABLI8HED ~,1~~~~6~.
_____.__._..~.~_.-„ ..,
---------- --- -._.__ -----° ------._. _.._._.__.-_.__.~-_..._
~ ,~ • ~_ _..._ --. _ ... _
~,.
~
~
~ ~
38
MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMM15Si0N, JaNUaRr 16, 1961~ COWTINUED:
TENTATIVE MAA OF - 3. PROV1810N OF ALLEY ON WE9TERLY AND 80UTHERLY BOUNDARIES OF LOT ZO
~ TRACT NO. 4OEO • WITH CONNECTION TO ~~B~~ STREET AND WITH TURN AROUND AT NORTHERLY
L ~GONTINUED~ ~T!D OF :ESTEP.LY ALLEY.
~
!
.( ~. REV1810N OF LOTB ~T AND 'IS TO CONFORM TO MINIMUM DEPTH REQUIREMENT
'~ OF SO FEET. RE%18eD TENTATIVE MAP TO BE 8UBMITTED.
CORRESr'ONDENCE
S. REQUIREMENT THAT BHOULD TH18 9UBDIV1810N BE DEVELOP=J AS MORE THAN
ONE 9UBDIVISION~ EACH SUBDIV1910N THEREOF 9HALL EE SUBMIT'fED IN
TENTATIVE FORM FOR APPROVAL.
- ITEM N0. 1. ORA~GE COUNTY USE VARIANCE N0. 4678:
A NOTICE FROM THE ORA":aE COUNTY PLANNING COt~M13810N WA3 3UBMITTED TO
THE COMMIBSION RELATIVE TO UV-4678, REQUEST FOR QN OUTDOOR ADVERTI3-
~
s
~
~~
~
i~
t3
~
:~
z
ING 81(3N ON PROPERTY LOCAiED IN CL09E PROXIMITY TO THE RIVERSIDE FREE~ '
WAY.
A REPORT FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT WA8 SU6!iIITTED TO THE COMMIBSION `
CONTAINING REFERENCE TO ORDINANCE N0. 'IZ~9 OF THE CITY OF APIAHEIM °i
WHICH PROHIBIT3 ANY RDVERT131NG 3TRUCTURE~ ACCE830RY 31GN~ POST 31GN ~
OR OTHER ADVERT181NG 81GN FROM BEING ERECTED OR MAtNTA1NED IE SUCH '
STRUCTUHE 18 DE8IGNED TO HAVE THE ADVERT191NG THEREON VIEWED PRIMARILY ~;
FROM THE MpIN TRAVELED ROADWAY OF A FREEWAYo PROPOSED 81GN WOULD BE ~~,
IN VIOLATION OF 8AID ORDINANCE IF ERECTED WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF
ANAHElM, '
y
i
COMM18810NER ALLRED OFFERED A MOTION~ SECONDED BY COMM189:~NER SUMMERS ti
At~D CARRIED~ THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSMIT NOTICE TO THE CRAN3E ~
COUNTY PLANNING COMM18810N 7HAT THE SUBJECT REQUE3T FOR VARIANCE BE '~
DENIED ON THE BAS1S OF THE AFOREMENTIONED FINDINGS. ~
ITEM N0. 2. BUENA PARK~ PRECISE PLAN N0. 106~ REVISED ~~B":
A COPY OF Meo ~pR PaECI3E PLAN N0. 'IOE~ REVIBED ~~8~~ RECEIVED FROM TH'e
CITY OF BUENA PARK WA8 BUBMITTED TO THE COMM193lON. IT WA8 NOTED THAT
THE BUBJEr,T PROPERTY WAS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO YHE ANAHEIM CITY LIMITS
AND THAT THE PLAN DID NOT !N ANY WAY APPEAR TO BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE
PROPERTIE8 LOCATED I;ITHIN THE ANAMEIM TERRITORIAL LIM1T8.
COMMIBSIONER MARCOUX OFFER~D A MOTION~ SECONDED BY COMMIBSIONER MORRIS
AND CARRIED~ THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRAN8MIT A NOTICE TO THE
CITY OF BUENA PARK CONTAINING THE AFOREMENTIONED FItJDING.
FiFLD SURVEYS - THE ~`,OMM18810N EXPRE33ED 8AT19FACTION REGARDING THE FIELD 9URVEY~CON-
DUCTED IN A GROUP BY THE COMM18310N PRIOR TO THE MEETING~OF PROPERTIES
8CHEDULED FOR HEARING~ AND IhDICATED THEIR DEb '^ E8'iA.8L13H TH13
BURVEY A3 A DEFINITE PROCEDURE.
COMMISSIONER (If,~RCOUX OFFERED a MOTION~ 8ECONDED BY COMM13&IONER'SUM-
MERS AND CARRIED~ THAT THE COMM19810N BHALL _MEET MONDAY MORNINGB
AT 'IO;OO O~CLOCK A.M. PRIOR TO MEETINGS~ AND THAT THE PLpt~'~ING STAFF
ARRANOE FOR TRANBPORTAT~ON AND PREPARE A ROUTE MAP INDICATING THE
PROPERTIE8 TO BE INVE8TIGaTED.
REPORTS AND RECOM- ~ - A DISCU8810N WAS HEID REGARDING PRELIMtNARY PRECISE PLAM STUDY FOR
MENDATIONS HARBOR BOULEVARDt WHICH HAD BEEPI REQUE8TED BY THE COMM188ION A9 A
-._.___._- -------------------.__....__..._--__...----
~--- ----- --------.__ .. .
~
_ _ . . _ ,-._ .--_.-,..
. ~ -_-.._
~ ~'
(.
E
~
~
~
~
~
~
i
I
~~
_._..
i
, _...w....,
----_.__...__._._ ._--.
, _
r~,~,k,..._~,~._~....,,
._...,..~....~-,~..:,,._,~,- ,
___ ___
._ -
•
---- - -
~
;~
~ ~
39
MINUTES~ CITY PLANNiNG COMN-ISSION~ JANUARY 16, 1961~ CONTINUED:
REPORTS AND RECOM- - RE8ULT OF PETITION9 FILED RECENTLY FOR RECLA9SIFICATION APID COMMERCIAL
MENDATIONS ~ HARBUR USEB ON HARBOR BOULEVARD.
BOULEVARD STUDY
(CONTINUED) PLANNING TECHNICIAN GORDON STEEN PREBENTED A PLAN AND BAMPLE STUDY OF
HARBOR BOULEYARD FROM WILHELMINA STREET NOP,TH TO LA PALMA AVENUE AS
PREPARED BY THE PLANNING STAFF. HE EXPLAINED THAT THE STUDY WA8 OF A
Pfi08LEM AREA AND THAT THE PROP03ED 90LUTION TO THE PROBLEM 3EEMED TC
BE THE M08T EQUITABLE ONE FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER8 IN THE AREA.
Al'k10URNM~ENT
A DICCU8810N EN5UED RELATIVE TO THE USE OF HARBOR BOULEVARD A3 A
MAJOR TRAFFIC ARTERY~ P08818LE INCREASE IN CONGESTION DUE TO POPULA-
TION INCREA8E~P088181LITY THAT RE8IDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON HARBOR
BOUIEVARD COULD REMl41N IN CERTAIN AREAS~ AND DEVELOPMENT OF A MASTER
PLAN FOR THE AREA AT A LATER DATE. THE COMM18810N INDICATED THAT
FURTHER D{8CU9310N ON THE MATTER WOULD BE HELD IN THE NEAR FUTURE.
- THE MEE1'ING WA8 ADJOURNED AT 6:00 O~CLOCK P.M.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED~
(~ ~A/
J~'I PAGE; SECRETARY
v
--~
: ___._._.. ..____. .
,_ ..__ ---_.__. __ _---___--- -- ----..---- ..
, ~ .._:__---
i~
':~.
=~
~:Y
J
k.
S
a
i