Minutes-PC 1961/02/06~;.
~
~
~
~
~
t
i
i
s
~
_
i •
~
~
.,1 _ _..,._...._~. _._.._... _._-:.-~__._.:... ~ ~-- _._ .._... ~.
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~,
. ;
~
~
CITY HALL
ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA i
FEBRUARY 6~ 1961 '
RE6ULA MEETING OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING - A RECU~aa MEETING OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMIBSION WA3 CALLED TO ORDER ~
AT Z:OQ OtCLOCK P.M. BY CHAIRMAN GAUER~ A QUORUM BEING PRE8ENT. !
PRESENT - CHAIRMAN GAUER: CON~JIISSIONERS: ALLRED~ MARCOUX~ MORR18~ MUNGALL~ AND
SUMMERB. COMM18810NER HAF,OOD ENTERED THE MEET~NG AT Z:SJ P.M.
ABSENT - COMMISSIONERSS NONE.
MINUTES - THE Mituures oF THE MEETING OF JANUARY 16~ 1961 WERE APPROVED A8 SUBMITT:D
WITH THE FOLLOWING coaaecrioN: PAGE 27~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 96 -
PARAGRAPH Zy LINE S~ ~~COMPLEX GOLF COUR3E~~ TO READ ~~GOLF COURSE COMPLEX.~~
PRESENT - AcriN~ PLANNING DIRECTOR - RICHARD REE8E
PIANNING TECHNICIAN - MARTIN KREIDT
AE813TANT CITY ATTORNEY ~ JOE GEI8LER '
i
COMM18310N SECRETARY ~ ~IEAN PAGE
V~RIANCE N0. 1326 - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION 8UBMITTED BY CLARENCE J. BARTON~ 885 SourH RE- j
SEDA STREET~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ OWNER~ WALTER BODOR JR.~ 'IZS FA9H~ON ~
PLACE~ APARTMENT ~~E~~~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNiA~ LESSEE~ FOR PERM18810D! TO
WAlI~E MIR+!!~JM C-?OSS FLOOR S?ACE REQUIREMENT; TO AI.LOW CONSTRUCTION OF A
1420 SQUARE FOOT HOME~ ON PP.OPERTY DEBCRIBED A3: A PARCEL S3 FEET BY ~'IS
FEET WITH A FRONTAGE OF S$ FEET ON LIVE OAK DR:`IE AND LOCATED ON THE 80UTH
81DE OF LIVE OAK BETYlEEN LIVE OAK BRIVE AND ~^xROVE AVENUEj 1T8 NORTHWEST
CORNER BEING APPRCXIMATELY 'IE~ FEET EAST OF THE 90UTHEA9T CORNER OF GROVE
AYENUE AND LIVE OAK DRIVE~ AND FURTHER DE8CRIBED A8 ~Z7S LIVE OAK DRIVE.
THE PROPERTY IS PREBENTLY OLA881FIED R^O~ RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN.
, SUBJECT PETITION FOR VARIANCE wA8 OONTINUED FROM T}IE MEETING OF JANUARY 16,
1961 TO ALLOW THE PETITIONER AN OPPORTUNITY TO 8U8M1T REVI8ED PLAN8 INDI-
CATINfi CONFORMANCE W17H THE BIDE YARL CODE REQUIREMENT OF S.3 FEET OR TO
, INFORM TFIE COMMISSION 0~' H18 INTENTION TO 8UBMiT Ai~ RDDiTIONAI PET{TiOH FOR
VARIANCE FOR WAIVER OF THE SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS.
WALTER BODOP~ JR.~ THE PETITIONER~ APPEARED BEFORE THE CCMM18810N AND D18CU8-
SED RE419ED PLANB WHIOH INDICATED DIMEN810N8 OF S.F> FEET FOR 81DE YARDB~
39.8 FEET FOR REAR YARD~ AND 1,429 BQUARE FEET OF GROUND FLOOR SPACE FOR
, THE PROP08ED RE8IDENCE.
MR. CAMILLE ALEQ~ JR. APPEARED BEFORE THE COMM18810N AND REYIEWED OPP091-
TION TO THE PROPOBED CONBTRUCTION WHICH HAD BEEN D190U88ED AT,.THE MEETING
ON JANUARY 'I6~ 1961, HE BTATED FURTHER TMAT RHSIDENTB IN THE AREA HAD
OONCLUDED TMAT A RE8IDENOE OONTAININ~ 'I~6OO BQUARE FEET WOUID NOT 9E OB-
JECTIONABLE Al.TH0U0H THE CODE REQUIREMENT wA8 FOR 2~000 8QUARE FEET FOR
~ BUBJEOT PROPERTY.
MR. LLOYD KLINE~ A RE8IDENT ON LIVE OAK DRIVE~ ArPEARED BEFORE THE COMM18-
810N AND REVIENED REBTRICTIONB IMP08ED ON THE ABUTTING R-'I~ SINOLE FAMIIY
RE8IDENTIALt TRACT TO THE EABT WHICH RtQUIRED THAT THE ABUTTINCi TIER OF
RESIDEt~CEB MUBT CONTAIN 'I~(OO BQUARE FEET PER RE8IDENTIAL DNELLING. THE
HEARINO WAS CLOSED.
THE COMMl88lON FOUND AND DE7ERMINED THE FOLLOMIIN~ FACT8 RE6ARDINa THE
SUBJEOT PETITION FOR VARIANOE:
•- 40 -
'"".._'"__,_.~ ...__`^_""'__'" __._"_....... .. .:4'9".
' • . ' . . .. . . -
~
41
MINUTES~ CITY FLANNING COMMISSION~ FEBRUARY 6~ 1961, CONTINUED:
. ;~ ;
~
VARtANCE N0. 1326 - 1. PEYITIONER REQUE3T3 A VARIANCE FROM CODE~ SECTION 18.ZI~.U3U ~4-D~~ ~
CONTINUED MHICH REQUIRE3 FOR II_~BJECT PROPERTY A SINGLE FAMILY DK/ELLI~~G WITH
GROUND F~OOR BPACE OF NOT LE98 THAN `Z~OOO 3QUARE FEET~ IN ORI)ER TO
CON3TRUCT A DWELLING CONTAINING 'I~4Z9 3QUARE FEET OF GROUND FLOOR
BPACE. j
Z. SUBJECT PROPERTY IS A 9,545 3QUARE FOOT VACANT LOT ~:T~{1N dN R-O~
RE3IDENTIAL SUBURBAN~ TRACT. SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ~_OT N0. ?S OF TRACT
N0. 1696 RECORDED ON MARCH~ 1954.
3. THE AVERAGE GROUND FLOOR SFACE OF RE9IDENCE9 IN CL08E PROxIMITY TO
SUBJECT PORPERTY 18 APPROXlMRTELY 'I9E)OO S:1.UARE FEET. '
4. PEITTIONER INDICATED THAT IT WOULD 8E ECONCIMICALLY IMP08818LE FOR HIM
TO CONSTRUCT A RES11)ENOE QF 'I~E>OO BQUARE FEET~ WHICH WOULD BE AGREEABLE
TO THE OWNERS OF PROPERTY IN CL08E PROXIMITY TO SUBJECT PROPERTY.
S. PETITIONER ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED A PLOT PLAN SHOWING INADEQUATE SIDE
YARDS. HOWEYER~ HE 8UBMITTED REVI8ED PlAN3 PROVIDING THE 8.3 F00T
SIDE YARD CODE REQUIREMENT FQR 3UBJECT PROPERTY.
6. SUBJECT PROPERTY ABUTS A VACANT LOT ON THE WE3T~ THEREFORE~ THE APPRO- '
VAL OF 8UBJECT PET':ION FOR VARIANCE WOULD ESTABLI3H A PRECEDENT FOR ~
GROUND FLOOR AREA FOF THE VACANT PARCEL. ;
~. SUBJECT PETITION FOR VARIANCE CONTAINS THE SUPPORTING 81GNATURE3 OF SIX ~
RECORDED PROPERTY OWNER3 RESIU'iN8 ON LIVE OAK DRIVE. THEBE PROPERTY ;
OWNER9 REQUESTED THAT THEIR NAME8 BE REMOVED FROM THE PETITION FOR
VARIANCE AT TH[ JANUARY 16, 1901 MEETING. THIS REQUEST WA3 CONTAINED
:N A PETlTION OF OPP081TION FILED WITH THE COMMISSION RELATIVE TO SUB- +
JECT PETiTION WHIC'r1 CONTAINED A TOTAL OF ~I4 81GNATUREB OF RE3lDENT3 IN %.i
TNE ARFA. ~
~
COMMISSIONER MARCO~X OFFERED RE30LUTION N0. 1E3~ SERIE8 1960-61~ AND MOVED s
FOR ITS PASSAGE AND A,DOPTION~ BECONDED 8Y COMM13810NER MORRIS~ TO DENY %
VARIANCE No. 1326. a
~
ON ROLL/THc FOREGOING RE80LUTION WA3 PA38ED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTEC
~
'~ ;
L
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED~ GAUER~ MARCOUX~ MORR19~ MUNGALL! SUMMERS. ~
;
~
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. ~
~
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSC HAPGOOD. n
"~
;
IANCE NQ. 13~1
V
~R - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION BUBMITTED eY WILLIAM GUTOSKY~ 837 BencH BUULE- ~•
,,,
, VARD~ ANAHEIM~ CAI.IFORNIA~ OWR'ER~ CECIL C. OWENBY~ ~Z9OZ L.EMONWOOD LANE~ % •
• GARDEN GROVE~ CALIFORNIA~ LE88EE~ FOR PEflM18310N TO WAIVE SINGLE STORY ~
HEIGHT LIMiTAT10N TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF TWO STORY APARTMENTS WITHIN ~
150 FEET OF R-1~ AND WAIVE SIDE AND REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS T6 PER- ;;~
MIT ENCROACHMENT OF GARAGES TO WITHIN ONE FOOT OF PROPERTY LlNE oN PP.OPER- ~
TY DE9CRIBEII A37 A PARCEL ~O FEET BY ~3O FEET WITH A FRONTAGE OF ~O FEET ~
ON SOUTH EAST STREET AND LOCATED ON THE WEBT 81DE OF SOUTH EAST STREET ;;
BETWEEN EA8T SANTA ANA STREET AND EA3T SOUTH STREETj ITS NORTHEA3T CORNER '~
BEING APPROXIMATELY 155 FEET 80UTH OF THE 90UTHWE9T CORNER OF EAST SATITA
~NA STREET AND SOUTH EA8T STREET. THE PROPF.RTY IS PRE8ENTLY CLA881FIED ~
R-A~ RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTUHAL. ~
MR. CECIL OWENBY~ 'IZ9OZ LEMONWOOD LANE~ GARDEN GROVE~ APPEARED BEFORE THE ~
COMMIS810N AND STA7ED THAT HE WA8 PURCHA8ING THE $UBJECT PROPERTY CONTIN- ;~
GENT UPON THE APPROVAL OF THE BUBJEOT PETITIGN FOR VARIANCE. THE HEARING ~
WAS CLOSED. ~
PLANB WERE 8UBMITTED TO THE COMM18810N AND D18CU8810N C~AB HELD RELATIVE `~
TO MAINTAINING A S FOOT BUIIDING 8ET9ACK FROM THE PROPERTY LINE ABUTTING
THE ALLEY. THE PETITIONER INDICATED THAT THE PRE$ENT OWNER NOULD FiLL ~ ~
~
S~
,,,,. _..~~
-- ' . . .- --~ -._._._. ._._.__ __ --- ---- --- _..._--•------------ ....~_ _ -----_.....
i-- ' ~ _ _ - . . . _.
~
_ _ ,,,._._
~ ~
. . ~
t ~'
~' ~~ ~ ~
I
~ • 42
_
MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMh41SSI0N~ FEBRUARY 6, 1961, CONTINUED:
VARIANCE N0. 1331 ~ - AND SEAL THE EXI9TINC, WELL LOCATFD ON THE BUBJECT PROPERTY. ~
i
CONTINUED
i THE COMMIBSION FOUND AND DETERMINED THE fOLLOWING FACT8 REGARDING THE 3UB- i
. JECT PE?ITION FOR VARIANCEC !
j
~. PETITIONER REQUE3T8 A VARIANCE FROM CODE~ SECTION 1S.3Z.O6O~ WHICH
RESTFICTB 9TRUCTURAL HEIGHT DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY TO ONE
8TORY IN ORDER TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY APARTMENT BUILD-
ING WITHIN 1SO FEET OF AN R-'I ZONEj AND SECTION 'IS.3Z.O8G ~Z~~ WHICH
FiEQUIRE9 7.S FOOT 81DE YARDS FOR 9UBJECT PROPERTY~ TO PERMIT ENCROACH-
MENT OF E).S FEET INTO EACH OF THE TWO 81DE YARD9 IN ORDER TO CONBTRI~~T
'IO GARAGES TO WISHIN ONE ~1~~F00T OF THE PROPERTY LINE.
Z. SUBJECT PROPERTY~ PRESENTI.Y ZONED R~3~ MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL~
ABUTS THE R-.~7 ZONE ON THE NORTH AND 80UTH~ THE R~~I~ SIPIGLE FdMILY RE- j
91DENTIAL~ 20N~ ACRO83 EA3T STREET ON THE EA9T~ AND THE M-'I~ LIGHT •
i
MANUFACTURING~ ZONE ACR03S THE ALLEY TO THE WEST.
3. ALTHOUGH THE PROPERTY TO THE 30UTH HA3 BEEN DEVELOPED k41TH A ONE STURY
APARTMENT BUILDIN(i~ THE R-3 PROPER?IES 30UTH OF TH18 BUILDING AND THE
R-3 PROPERTY TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAdE BEEN DEVELOPED
INTO TWO 3TORY APARTMENT BUILDINGB~ AND THE M-') PROPERTY TO THE WE8T,
NAS BEEN DEVELOPED FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSE3. ~
4. NO ONE APPEARED IN OPPOSITION TO THE SUBJECT PETITION. !
COMMISSIONER ALLRED OFFERED RESOLUTION N0. 164~ SERIE8 1960-61~ AND MOVED
~On iTo ?ASonGc AivD AB^vF7i0N~ oEvOl:DcD .. ~ ~0'l~:!~4~~CP:Eo AA~iur~Li'Tn r_Rn(~T 1
a
VARIANCE N0. 1331, 8UBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONB: =
i
3
~I. DEVELOPMENT 9U88TAMTIALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH BUILDIN~ AN~ PLOT PLANS ~
PRESENTED. 3
t
Z. FILLING AND CAPPING OF i~oAWB~NEB S7cLL Sif6uE07 TO APP(iOVAL BY TH:
DIRECTOR OF UTILITIE3. . ~
I 3. PROV1310N OF FIYE ~S~ FOOT BUILDING SETBACK FROM THE WE8T PROPERTY i
, LINE ABUTTING THE ALLEY.
THE FOREGOING CONDITION3 WERE RECITED AT THE MEETING AND WERE FOUND TO BE,
A NECEBSARY PREREQU181TE TO THE U8E OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO PRE8ERVE
THE 3AFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZEN8 OF ANAHEIM.
ON ROLL CAIL THE FOREGOING RE80L!lTION wns PA99ED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
CiAiicR~ {'J~ARCOl3n~ ~ORRIS~ !:~UP:GALL~ 5ll:'M'E.:B. :
~ic$: Cia~J~i~=$$~~i ~~'i$9 RLLRE~
~
NOES: COMh91SSI0NERS7 NONE.
ABSEtVT: COMMISSIONERS: HAPGOOD.
VARIANCE ~. 1332 - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION BUBMITTED er L. GLA'JYS LARSON~ Q~Neag ELLIS L.
' SONEH~ 11836 Wi~so~ AvENUe~ COMPTON~ CALIFORNIA~ LE8SEE~ FOR PERM18810N T0,
~ CREATE TWO 8700 SQUARE FOOT PA~iCELS iN R-A ZONE~FOR PROPERTY DE8CR19ED ns:
A PARGEI Sa FEET BY 31O FEET WITH A FRONTAOE OF SS FEET ON WEBTERN AVENUE
~ AND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEABT CORNER OF WE9TERN AVENUE RND LAN~R08E DRIVE.
I : THH PROPERTY IS PRE8ENTLY CLA831FIED R~A. RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL.
I
MR. ELL18 SONEB~ THE PETITIONER~ APPEARED BE~ORE ?HF CON~1A18810N~ BEBFRIBED
THE PROP09ED LOT BUBDIV{810N~ 3TATED THAT HE HAD PURCHA8ED THE °ROPE(iTY ON
A LAND SALE AGREEMENT~ AND THAT HE OWNED PROPERTY ON EACH 81DE OF THE
EXI8TIN(3 RE81DEN4E. HE BTATED FURTHER THAT HE INTENDED TO REMOVE THE
~,,. _ .~_--~-
~------------ •-...__..---------- __..._-__._..,---- .----- --____.._..,
, .
-. _:~ _ . .__ ._ . _.___~_.,_,-
. t ., - ,._ . _ _. ._
_[~ ~ ~ ~ P , t•. .
~ ~~.~ ~~ '~ ~ ~ k^~~. ~~'~' ~ ... _
' S , . . . ~ . - .
~~
~~
~
43
MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ FEBRUARY 6~ 1961~ L9NTINUED:
VARIANCE N0. 1332 - DEBR18 WITH WHICH THE PROPERTY IS LITTERED AT THE PREBENT TIME.
CONTINUED THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
THE COMM18810N FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWINO FACT8 REGARDING THE
BUBJECT PETIYION FQR VARIANCE:
~. PET1710NcR REQUE878 UARIANCE FROM CODE~ SECTION 'IB.'IE.030 (4-B~~
WHICH REBTRICTB SIZE OF R-A~ RE8IDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL~ PARCELB TO
ONE ACRE OR MORE~ IN ORDER TO 8PL1T AN EXI8TIN0 R-A LOT INTO TWO
a~7OO 8Ql1ARE F00T R~A PARCELB.
Z. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ABUTB THE R-A 20NE ON THE NORTH AND EA9T~ AND
THE R-1~ SING:.E FAMILY RE9IDENTIAL~ ZONE ACR088 LANER08E DRIVE ON THE
90U7H AND ACROSB INE8TERN AYEI~UE ON THE WEST. THE ABUTTING PROPERTIES
H6."II BEEN DEVELO~ED FOR RESIDENTIAL PURP08E8.
3. EASTERLY HALF OF BUBJECT PROPERTY HA8 AN EXIBTING DWELLIN(i UNIT AND
OpRAGE. THIS GARAGE 18 IN A DILAPADATED CONDITION AND 1T8 REMOVAL OR
IMPROVEMENT~ AND ACCE8S TO IT~ 18 NECE83ARY TO IMPROVE THE AREA. TH13
WILL COMP~EMENT THE PROP09ED IMPROVEMENT OF THE WESTERLY PORTION OF
SUBJECT PROPERTY THEREBY IMPROdING THE ENTIRE AREA.
4. THE PROPOSED PLOT PLAN WILL HAVE TO BE ALTERED IN ORDER :0 CONFORM TO
T11E REQUIRED FRONT YARD 8ETBACK AFTER THE REQUIRED DEDICATION FOR
WE3TERN AVENUE.
S. THE AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE RECORDED OWNER A38URED THE COMM18810N
THAT THE PROPERTY i'0 THE EABT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY~ WHIOH HE OWN3~
WILL BE CLEAREll OF THE LNRuE %1MOu1~11 dF DE6R~S :::?~ :":':!~H !7 !! ~.liTE~-
ED.
E. NO ONE APPEARED IN OPP091TION TO THE 8UBJECT PETITION.
COMM18810NER MUNGALL OFFERED REL?OLUTION N0. 165~ SERIE8 1960-E'I~ AND
MOYED FOR IT8 PASSAGE ARD ADC?TION~ 9ECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MARCOUX~
TO GRANT VARIANCE N0. 1332~ BUBJECT TO TtiE FOLLOWING COiVDiTI0N3;
'I. REMOVAL OR IMPROVEMENT OF~ AND PROVISION OF ACCE89 T0~ E7f18TIN6 GAR-
AGE IN ADDITION TO REPAIR OF BROKEN PUBLIC 81DEWALK LOCATED AT THE
EA9T5RLY END OF 8UBJECT PROPERTY.
2. DEDICATION OF QS FEET FROM THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF WE3TERN A~ENUE
~ZO FEET EX 18T 1 N(i~ .
3. PREPARATION OF 3TREET IMPKOVEMENT PLAN8 AND THE IN9TAL~ATION OF ALL
IMPROVEMENT8 ON WESTERN AVENUE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED 9TANDARD
PLAN9 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGIHEER.
4. PAYMENT OF ~Z.OG PER FRONT FOOT FOR 9TREET IIGHTINf3 PURPOBEB ON WES-
TER1~ AVENUE ONLYo
S. FILING OF RECORD OF SURVEY MAP INAtCATING THE REQUEBTED LOT SPLIT. ~
3
6. PROV1810N OF ZSF00T BUILDIN~ SETBACK AFTER DEDICATlON FROM THE FRONT ;
.~
PROPERTY LINE ABUTTING WEBTERN AVENUC. ~
~
THE FOREGOING CONDITIONB WERE RECITED AT THE MEE71NCi AND WERE FOUND TO BE '~
A NECE98ARY PR.REQU181TE TO THE U9E OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO PRE9ERYE ,~
THE BAFETY Al~D MIELFARE OF THE CITIZEN9 OF At~AHEIM. ,~
ON ROLL CALL THE FOREQOING RE80LUTION NA8 PA88ED BY TliE FOL~OWING YOTE: ~
K
AYES: COMMI~SIONERS: ALLRED~ GAUER~ MARCOI;X~ MORR18~ MUNaALL' SU~MERB. ~
NOES: CO~IIMISSIONERS: NONE. :~ '
AB~ENT: COMMISSIONERSS HAP(i00D• ~
;
__._.~Y_ . __ __- -~----- - -- -- -- ___---- -..___
~ ~, . - -- • -- -- - - - --•~-- ~ -- _ ~ ,., -.~.~
- 1
~ ~
~~ .e _ .1
~ ~
ij •
t
~
44 '
~ MiNUTES~ CITY PI.ANNI NG COMINISSIUy~ FEHRUARY 6~ 1961~ CONTINUED:
-
? VARIANCE N0. 13?~ PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION 8UBMITTED BY KENNETH K. AND CHARLOETTE J. KIMES~
,
~ 9~~C) KATELLA AVENUE~ SUITE ~~O~~i F~NAHEIM~ GALIFORNIA~ OWNERSj RICFWP,D
' GUTHERY, 9AME ADDRE88~ AUTHORIZED AGEN7~ FOR PERM18810N TO CONSTRUCT AND
~I !JPERATE A 100 UNIT MOTEL AND A 14,000 SQUARE FCx,~ RESTAURANT WITH COCKTAIL
~ ON PROPERTY DE3CRIBED :~9: A PAF~CEL ~~IO FF.~T BY•E)~O FEET WITH A
LOUNGE
! ~
FRONTA6E OF ~7O FEET Otd NARBOR BOULEVARD AND LOCATED ON 7HE EA8T 31DE OF
,~ HARBOR BOULEVARD BETMtEEN KATELLA AVENUE AND MIAWAY DRIYE~ IT8 NORTHWE3T
' CORNER BEING APPROXIMATELY 'IOOO FEET 90UTH OP THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
NARBOR BOULE~'ARD~AND MIDWAY DRIYE AND FURTHER DE9CRIBED A3 1544-1550 HaR-
BOR E!LEVARD. THE PROPERTY 18 PRE cNTLY C1.A381F1ED R-A~ RESIDENTIAL
AGRICULTURAL.
MF.. RICHARD GUTHERY~ AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PETITIONER3~ APPEARED BE-
FORE THE COMM18810N~ PRE8ENTED PLANB AND DE8CRIBED THE LAYOUT AND CON-
S7RUCTION OF THE PROPOSED MOTEL~ INDICATED THAT THERE WOULD BE A RE3-
TAURANT AND COCKTAII LOUNGE IN ADDITION TO 8EVFRAL BMAL.L SHOPS~ AND
STATED THAT MORE PARKING AREA WOULD Bt PROVIDED THAN IS REQUIRED BY THE
CODE. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED. ;
D18CU8810N WAS HELD WITH THE AllTHOR12ED AGENT RELATIVE TO LAND3CAPING
ALONG HAR6:" `.''ULEVARD AND THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT SUITABLE FOR THE DIS- ~
NEYLAND Af' .
I THE COMM1S310N FOUND ANA DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACTS REGARDING THE ?.
SU6.iECT t~eT i T i Gt~ f vR ti~'.R 11.~:OL: '
~. PET I T I ONER REQUE3T3 A VAR 1 ANCE FR01.1 ~ ODE ~ SECT I ON 'I S.'I K.O1 O~ WH I CH
3T~PULATE3 PERMITTED USES IN THE R'~~ RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTt1RAL~ 20NE :
TO PERMIT CON9T::JCTION OF A 1OO UN~f MOTEL AND A'I4~OOO SQUARE F00T ~
RE3TAURANT AND COCKIAIL LOUNGE.
Z. SUBJECT PETITION HA9 BEEN RECEIYED IN ACCORDANCE GITH THE YARIANCE
POLICY ESTpBLISHED FOR TNE DISNEYLAND F.-Q•A A9 DELIMITED ON THE GEN-
ERAL PLAN.
3. SUBJECT PROPERTY ABUTB THE TROPICANA MOTEL ON THE NORTH~ AN ORANGE
GROVE flN THE EA8T~ A VACANT PARCEL ON THE 80UTH~ AND D18P1EYLAND
ACR098 HARBOR BOULEVARD ON THE WEST.
4. THE PROPOgED PLAN INDIC+.TEB MlFNA(iERB~ APARTMENT8 WIT!(~ KIT'CH~A"~FCMCI-
TIEB. BECAU8E OF THE CriARACTER OF THfi SURROUNDINfi LAND UBES AND THE
NATURE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF BUBJECT PRO°ERTY THEBE HPARTMENTB ARE •
CON8IDERED AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE MOTEL DEVELOPMENT.
S. PROP09ED DEVELOPMENT IS COMPATIBLE WITH DEVELOPMEYT lN THE 8URROUND- :
i
iNG AREA.
6. NO ONE APPEARED IN OPP081TION TO TNE SUBJECT PEYITION. ~
COMM18810NER ALLRED OFFERED RE30LUTION W0. 166~ SERIEB 'I9E~O-G~~ AND MOVED
FOR IT8 PA88AGE AND,ADOPTION~ 8ECONDED 9Y COMM18810NER MUNGAIL~ TO GRANT ~
VARIANCE N0. 1333~ 8U9JECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION9C {
'I. DEVELOPMENI' 8UB8TANTIALL`l IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANB PRE9ENTED. ~
Z. AEDICATIOM OF C)O FEET FROM THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF HaRBOR BOULE~ ~
VARD (SO FEET EXIBTIN(i~. ~
3. PREPARATION OF 8TREET IMPROVEiu1ENT PLANB AN~ INBTALLATION GF ALL IM-• ~
PROVEMENTB ON HARBOR SOULEVARD IN ACC~~1P..'YCE tMITH THE APPROVED BTAN~
DARD PLANB ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINSEN. ~
4. PROV181UN OF ZO POOT lANJBCAPINQ BTRIP RBUTTItlfl THE FRONT PNOPERTY ~
c
~ ' LINE EXOEPT FOR TMOBE AREAB REBERVED ~OR ACCE88 DRIYES AND '8ALK6~ ;~
~
~
~
. ~
~
`~"~ •-
---_.--_. ..._.. _- -- - __._ ._ . . . . _..__.__.. _..._... _ __ _ -----_ _ _..._.._ -
~ _.~... ~ ~ . ... _ __ : . _._...__. -.
~ ' __ ___. --•-
~ ~'A ~' ~
~ i
F 45 =.
t
~ ~
~ MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ FEBRUARY 6~ 1961~ CONTlNUED:
~ VARIANCE N0. 1333 ° AND PREPARATION OF LANDSCAPIN(i P.ND WAtERING 8Y3TEM PLANS 8UBMITTED
~ CONTINUF~,_ TO THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PARK~WAY MAINTENANCE FOR APPROVAL~ AND THE
{ IN8TALLATION OF THE APPROVED LANDBCAPING AND WATERING 8Y8TEM.
(
~ THE FOREGOING CONDITIONB WERE RECITED AT THE MEETING AND WERE fOUND TO dE
A NECE88ARY PREREQUl81TE TO THE U8E OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO PRESERVE
t .HE BAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITI2EN8 OF ANAHEIM.
~ ON ROLL OALL THE FOREGOINfi RE30L.UTION WA9 PAE38ED BY THE FOLL05~ING VOTEC
i
AYES: COMMISSIONERSO ALLRED~ GAUER~ MARCOUX~ MORRl8~ MUNGAI.L~ SUMMER8.I
NOES: COMMISSIONERSO NONE.
ABSEM': COMMISSIONERS: HaP~ooa.
RECLASSIFICATfON - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION 8UDMITTED er THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF
NO. 60-6'I-54 LOS ANGELES~ C~0 ORANGE COUNYY LANA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY~ ~3O1Z EUCLID
AVENUE~ GARDEN GROVE~ CALIFORNIA~ OwNea,~ McDANIEL ENGINEERING COMPANY~
ZZZ EA9T GENTER STREET~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ AUTHORI2ED AGENT~ REQUE3T~
ING 7HAT PROPERTY DEBCRIBED ASS A PARCEL 333 FEET BY 6Z3 FEET WITH A
FRONTAGE OF 333 FEET ON MAGNOLIA AVENUE AND LOCATED ON THE EABT SIDE OF
MAGNOLiA A:'ENUE BETWEEN LINCJLN AVENUE AND BROADW.AYj 1T8 NORTHWEST COR-
NER BEING APPROXIMpTEI.Y Z7O FEET 80UTH OF THE BOUTHEA8T CORNER OF LINCOLN
AND MAGNOLIA AVENUE9~ AND FURTHER DE8CRIBED A8 'I~O SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE~
BE RECLA8SIFlED FROM R-A~ RESIDEiVi iF-L nGnlCilLitiiv+i..~ '[G13[ YO ^n-.^~~ MULTi-
PLE FANiIL'f RESIDENTIAL~ ZONE.
MR. GEORGE SNYDER~ REPRE9ENTATIYE OF THE ORANGE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY~W.IS PRE3ENT AND 9TATED THE ENGINEERING COMPANY~ THE AUTHORIZED
AGENT FOR THE PETITIONER~ WOULD DISCUS9 PLANS FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOP-
MENT WITH TNE COMMI$SION.
IVIR. W. W. BAILEY~ ~3~I SOUTH MAOiJOLIA AVENUE~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMIB-
310N AND BUBMITTED A PETITION OF OPPO8ITION ^ONTAINING P5 91GNATURE3.
MR. ANOELO SCAGLIONE~ 9~OZ LINCOLN AVENUE~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMM18810N~
REVIEWED PABT COMM18310N ANI COUNCIL ACTION ON H18 PROPERTY LOCATED ADJA-
CENT TO 8UBJECT PROPERTY~ AND HE INDICATED THAT HE NAD CHANGED PLANB FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF H18 PROPERTY BECAU8E OF THE CITY COUNCIL~9 ACTION.
; MR. MCDANIEI~ ENGINEER REPRE8.?NTING THE PETITIONEI,q~ APPEARED BEFORE THE
~ COMMIS810N AND 8TATED 'i'HAT IN DEVELOPIN~ PLAN9 FOR THE 8UBJECS PROPERTY
~ INVESTIGATION HAD DETERMINED THAT THE PROPERTY WA8 PROJECTED FOR R-$~
~ MULTIPLE FAMILY RE8IDENTIAL~ DEYELOPMENT ON THE GENERAL PLAN AND THAT THE
8U9JECT PROP08AL WOULD COMPLY WITH THE PROJECTED U8E OF THE LAND. HE
8TATED FURTHER TkA7 IT WOULD APPEAR THAT COMMERCIAL DEYEIOPMENT IN CL08E
~ PROXIMITY TO BUBJECT PROPER7Y WOULD NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE PROP08ED
DEVELOPMENT. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
~ THE COMMISSlON D18CUS9ED CODE REQUIREMENT8 FOR DEVELOPlNf3 THE PROPERTY~
~ THE PROP09ED INBTAI.LATION OF Ak ALLEY TO THE SOUTH~ AND A REQIlE8T BY THE
~ ENGINEERiNG REPAESENTQTIVE THAT THE BLOCK WALI REQUIREMENT FOR THE 80UTH-
~ ERN BOUNDARY LiNE BE WAIVED. A 8TUDY RELA7IVE TO THE ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT
~ ^.' THE qEWFiiAL Ar~EA WAB ALBG 1118CU98ED•
~ , TGM SMITH~ 3U5 Sau•rH L~NCO~N AVENUE~ AUTHORIZED REPRE8ENTATII~E FOR THE
~ETITICNER~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COtdM18810N~ ANA STATED THAT THERE WAB
~~~ IOMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN 7HE VICINITY OF THE BUBJECT PROPERTY AND THAT HE
C0~91DERED THE PROP08ED REB~DENTIAL DEYELOPMEN7 TO BE NFOE88ARY AND
__.__.__ _..__ ._.~ _.... --... __ _....___ ...._._..-~---- ....
_...... . _. _._ _ _.. ----. _,. .
~u ~ ~ . - - _...
~
.~
~
46
MINUTES~ CITY PLP;NNING COMMISSION~ FEBRUARY 6~ 1961~ CONTINUED;
RECLASSIFICATION - nestaae~e FOR THE AREA.
N(~. 60-61-54 ~
CONTINUED THE'COMM18810N FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACTB RERARDINO THF
9UBJECT PETITION FOR RECLAS8IFICATION;
'I. PETITIONER REQUE8TS :. RECLA581FICATION OF 9UBJECT PROPERS'Y FROM THE
R-:1~ RESIDENTIAL AGRICUL;URAL~ ZONE TO THE R-3. MULTIPLE FAMILY RE-
SIDENTIAL~ ZONE IN ORDER TO PERMIT DEVELOPMENT Of A ONE BTORY MUL-
T~PLE FAMILY RE8IDENTIAL TRACT CONTAINING FOUR UN1T8 ON EACH OF
81XTEEN LOT3.
Z. SUBJECT ~ETITION FOR RECLA881FICATION WA8 FILED CONCURRENTI.Y WITH
1/pRIANCE ~0. 1334 AND ~ENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT N0. 4084.
3. ~L'9JECT PROPERTY ABUTf, THE R-A AND C-~'I~ NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAI.~
ZONE ON THE NORTH~ THE R-A ZONE ON THE EAST~ 80UTH~ AND ACR03S MAGNO-
LIA AVENUE ON THE WEBT.
4. THE PROPOSED F~OOR AREA 13 APPROXIMATELY 9OO 8QUARE FEET FOR EACH TWO
BEDROOM APARTMENT UNIT WHICH 18 ARPROXI~:~.CTELY ~OO SQUARE FEE7 IN EX-
CE98 OF THE CODE REQUIREMENT.
S. THE MINIMUM LOT AREA FOR FOUR UNITB REQUInED BY CODE IS 4~SOO BQUAflE
FEET. ALL TME PROPOSED LOT3 CONTAIN IN EXCE88 OF B~OOO SQUARE FEET.
6. PROPOSED ZONING WOULD BE CQMPATIBLE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE 8UR-
ROUNDING AREA PARTICULARLY ItJ YIEW OF THE C-'I ZONING E8TABL18HED FOR
THE INTERSECTION OF LINCOLN AVENUE AND MAGNOLIA AVENUE AND THE IN-
TERSECTION OF LINCOLF! AVENUE AND BROADWAY.
~. A PETITION OF OPP081TION CONTAINING THE 81~NATUREB OF ZS PROPERTY
01YNER8 IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF BUBJECT PROPERTY~ IN ADDITION TO
YERBAL OPP031TION~ WAS RECORDED AOAINST 8UBJECT PETITION. SUBJECT
PETITION OF OPP081TION REQUESTED THAT A 9TRIP OF PROPERTY Z53 FEET
WIDE FROM TI1E CENTERLINE OF MAGNOLIA AVENUE EXTENDINCi FROM LINCOLN
AVENUE TO BROADWAY BE CLA891FIED TO THE C-1 20NE~ IIMITED TO B1181NES8
AND PROFE8810NAL U8E ONLY~ AND THAT THE PROPERTIES ~~CATEA TO THE
EA87 AND WE3T OF THE COMMERCIAL 20NING BE RECLABSIFIED TO THE R~3~
MULTIPLE FAM!LY RE8IDENTIAL~ 20NE.
COMM19810NER MARCOUX OFFERED RE30LUTION N0. 167~ SERIE9 1960-61~ AND MO\ED
FOR 1T8 PA39ACaE AND ADOPTION~ 8ECONDED BY COMM1381fi~~ER MORR18~ RECOMMEND~NG
TO THE CITY COIINCII THAT RECLASSIFICATION N0. EO-6'I-S4 REQUE9T FOR RE-
CLA391FICATION FROM THE R~A~ RESIDEIVTIAL AGRICULTURAL~ 20NE TO THE R^3~
MULT~PLE FAMILY RESIDEN~IAL~ 20NE 8E APPROVED~8UBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONBC
'I. CONSTRUCTION OF A 81X (6~ FOOT MA90NRY WALL ON THE NORTH AND EA8T PRO-
PERTY LINES OF 9UBJECT PROPERTY~ AND THE POBTINCi OF A BOND ~OR THE
PERIOD OF TWO (Z~ YEARB FROM TNE EFFEOTIVE DATE OF THE 3UBJECT RE-
80LUTIGN F0~ THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 81X (Fi~ FOOT MA90NRY WALI~ 8AID
WALL NOT TO BE CONSTRUCTED IF ABUTTING PROPERTY TO THE 80UTH 18 DE-
YELOPED FOR MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITHIN THE TWO (Z~
YEAR PERIOD OF TIME.
Z. SUBJECT TO APPR04AL OF TENTATIVE MAP OF TRAC7 N0. 4084~ DATED ~ANUARY
1961 AND KECEIYED 8Y THE PLANNINO nEPARTMENT ~ANUARY 13~ 1961~ AND
BUBJECT TO THE APPROYAL OF VARIpNCE N0. 1334.
3. PROVISION OF LANP90dPIN0 IN THE FRONT YARD AREAB AND THE SIDE YARDB
FACING MAGNOLIA AVENUE EXCEPT FOR Tl108E AREA8 RE8ER4ED FOR ACCE88
DRIVEB AND WALKB.
THE FOP.EGOING CONDITIONB WERE RECITED AT THE MEETINO AND WERE FOUND TO BE
A NECE88ARY PREREQUIBITE TO THE U8E OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO PtiE8ERVE
ThE 8AFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZEN8 OF ANAHEII~1.
c
~
~
~~
..._ _--~---. ... _ ,
_-_--'_-,..--'-_.i_-....__.. ._..---...' _- -.'-.... ..__..,.,_. . ---~___'-" -' . . '-_-- . .. .. .. .__.__.__._...
~ . l ~ . ~ ~ .-. ..~ . . . .._.. .. ..--
r.:j:
~ I ~ r~: ~
' .•„
i •
:..
,
; .. ~,
1'l
~i'
.~.
~
~
47
MINUi'ES~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ FEBRUARY 6, 1961, CONTINUEU:
RECLASSIFICATION ° ON ROIL CALL THE FOREG0ING RESOLUTION WA3 P~138ED BY iHE FOLLOWING YOTE:
N0. 60•-61-54
, CONTINUED ~ AYES: COMMISSI~~IERS: ALLRED~ GAUER~ I-IAPGOODR MARCOUX~ MORR13~
MUNCiALL~ SUMI~AERS.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSC NONE.
VARIANCE N0. 1334 - PUBLIC HEi~RING. PETITION 9UBMITTED er THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF
LOS ANGELES~ C~0 ORANGE COUNT`~ LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY~ 13012 Euc~in
AVENUE~ GARDEN GROVE~ CALIFORI~IA~ OWNER; McDANiEL ENGI` iRING COMPANY~
ZZZ EA3T CENTER STREET~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ AUTHORIZf AGENT~ FOk PER-
MIS810N ro WAIVE MINIMUM CORNER LOT WIDTH REQUIRENfENT OF 80 FEET IN R 3
ZONE TO PERMIT CORNER LOT WIDTH OF 75 FEET ON TWO LOTS~ oN PROPERTY nes-
CR18ED A9; A PARCEL 333 FEET BY E)Z3 FEET WITH A FRONTAGE OF 333 FEET ON
MAGNOLIA AVENUE AND LOCATED ON THE EAST SiDE OF MAGNOIIA AVENUE BETWEEN
LINCOLN AVENUE AND BRO,>DWAYj IT$ NORTHWE9T CORNER BtING APPROXIMATELY
ZiO FEET SOUTH OF THE 80UTHEABT CORNER OF LINCOLN AND MAGNO!IA AYENUES~
AND FURTHER DEBCRIBED A3 13O SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE. TkE PROPERTY 13
PRE3ENTLY CLA381FIED R-A, RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL.
MR. MCDANIEL~ ENGINEER REPREBENTING THE PETITIONER~ APPEARED BEFORE THE
COMMISSION AND DE9CRIBED THE PROPQ9ED REDUCTION IN LOT WIDTH~FROM THE
CODE REQUIREMENT OF aO FEET TO ~5 FEET FOR TWO CORNER LOT9 OF PROPERTY
~ ~ 1 T`A~4~T ~~I` ~A~ F
INVOLVED ifV RECLASSIF~ob~;ory yo. 00-01-54 s~ Q o~ Tnac= ~o.
4084.
MR. ANGE1.0 SCAGLIONE APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMISSIUN~ STATED H18 P081TIOP~
AGAINFT THE PETITIONER~S PROP08ED RECLA331FICATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY~
FiLED COPICURRENTI.Y WITH THE 3UBJECT PETITION FOR VARIANCE~ AND REFERRED
TO PREVi0U3 PETITIONS FOR RECLASSIFICATION FILED FOR PROPERTIEB IN CL03Ii
PRCX(MIiY TO SUBJEC'f PROPERTY. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
THE COMMISSION FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACT3 REGARDING THE
BUBJEI'•T PETITION FOR VARIANCEL
~. PE7ITIONER REQUE8T8 A VARIANCE FROM CODE~ SECTION 1a.3Z.OSO ~Z~~
WHICH REQUIRES THAT R-3~ MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL~ 20NE CORNER
LOTS HAVE A MINIMUM WIDTH OF BG FEET~ IN ORDER 70 PERMIT AEYELOPMENT
OF AN R-3~ MULTIPLE FAMILY RE3IDENTIAL~ TRACT CGiJTA1NING TWO CORNER
L0T8 HA`/ING A MINIMUM WIDTH OF ~S FEET.
2. SUBJECT PETITION FOR VARIANCE WA3 FILED CONCURRENTLY WITH RECLA331F1-
CATION N0. 60-61-54 AND TENTATIVE ~~AP OF TRACT N0. QOB4p
' 3. PETITIONER 8TATE8 THAT 9UBJECT VpRIANCE 18 NECE99ARY IN ORDER TO PER-
MIT THE DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY INTO ~E) MULTIPLE FAMILY RE-
81DENTIAL LUTS.
4. THE PROP09ED CURNER 'OT3 ARE IN EXCE83 OF THE MINIMUM R-3 CORNER LOT
AREA CODE REQUIREME ~P B~OOO 8QUARE FEET AND WOULD COMPLEMENT THE
DEVELOPMENT.
S. NO ONE APPtk:lE:: IN OPNOBITION TO 8UBJECT PETITION FOR VARIANCE. A
PETITION OF OPPOSITION WA3 BUBMITTED IN RE9PECT TO PETITION FOR RE-
CLASSIFICATION N0. 6O-E>~-S4 AND BUBJECT PETtTION FOR ~(ARlANCE. HO~~
EVER~ BUBJECT PETITION ~:' OPP081TION INAB NOT PERTINENT TO SUBJECT
PETIT~ON FOR VARIANCE.
FOR IT9 PA39AGE AND ADOPTION~ 8ECONDED BY COMM18810NER MUNGALL~ 70 GRANT ~
VAk1ANCE N0. 1334~ BUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION8C ~
~
ik
~. SUBJE^vT TO APPROVAL qF TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT N0. 4OB4~ DATED ~JANUARY x
~
5
~OMMiSS10NER MORR18 OFFERED RESOLUTION N0. 168~ $ERIEB 1960-61~ AND MOVED ;
~ ...'--- --'__.._ .. _ . ~ . . . .._..... _ .. .. ...._ . ._ _... ... __-_ _ . :__,._._.-._,... . _ . . . .. .. . ..... . _.. . _._ ~ :~"
~~
48
MINUT~S~ CITY PLANNING COMMIS~ION~ FEBRUARY 6~ 1961~ CONTINUED:
VACONNCNUED• ~334 - THE1APPROVALEOFEPETITION FORNRECLASSIF~CATNONJNOUa6O 6~~5Q36~~ AND
THE FDREGOING CONDITION WA8 aECITED A1' THE MEETiNG AND WAS FOUND TO BE
A NECE83ANY PREREQU181TE TO THE UBE OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO PRE9ERVE
THE 3AFETY ~ND WELFARE OF THE CITIZENB OF ANAHEIM.
ON ROLL CALL 7HE FO~EGOING ReSOLUTION WA3 PA88ED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTES
AYES: COMMISSlOivERS: ALLRED~ GAUER~ HAPGOOD~ MARCOUX~ MORRISS
MUNGALL~ SUMMER8.
NOES: COMtJ115~1iN4ERSS NONE.
ABSENT: C~MMISSIONERSl NONE.
TENTA7IVE MAP OF - SUBDIVIDER: SOGAL•AND CURPORATION~ 3OS KENMORE~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNiA.
TRACT N0. 4084 THE TRACT 18 LOCATED 333 FEET SOUTH OF LINCOLN AVENUE ON THE EA8T 91DE OF
MAGNOLIA AVENUE~ AND CONTAINS ~F> PROPOSED R~3y MULTIPLE FAMILY RE31DE1~
TIAL LOTS. SUBJECT TRACT IS BUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH PETITION FOR
RECLA881FICATION N0. 60-61-~4 AhD PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1334:
PJIR. MCCIpNIEL~ ENGINEER REPRE8ENTING THE PETITIONER~ APPEARED BEFORE THE
COMMISg14N~ DE3CRIBED THE PROP08ED TRACT LAYOUT~ INDICATED THE PETITION-
ER~S ABI~ITY TO COMPLY WITH ALL COMMIS810N REQUIREMENT8~ AND DISCUSSEI)
THE PROVISION OF A 1~ F007 ~Ft:DSO.'.°ED AREP. P.ND DRAINAGE FACILITIEB FOR
THE PROP09E:) DEVELOPMENT.
MR. TOM SMITH~ THE AUTHORI2EL~ REPftE8ENTATIVE OF THE PETITIONER~ APPEARED
BEFORE THE COMM18810N AND INDICATED WILLINGNE88 TO PROVIDE LAND8CAPING
AREAS IN THE FRONT OF THE 8UBJECT PROPERTIEB.
MR. TONY ~IULIAN~ OWNER OF ADJACENT PROPERTY~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COM-
MISBION AND DESCRIBED PREVIOUS COMM18810N AND COUNCIL AC710N8 RELATI~lE
TO A PETlTION FILED FOR PROPERTY THAT HE OWNB.
MR. ANGELO SCAGLIONE APPEARED BEFORE THE COMM18810N AND 3TATED THA7 THE
OWNERS OF PROPERTY IN CL08t PROXIMITY TO THE 8UBJECT PROPER7Y WERE
OPP09ED TO THE PROP08ED TENTATIVE TRACT. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Tt!E COMM19810N D18CU88ED THE PROV1810N OF A MODIFIED STREET TURN AROUND
AREA AT THE EABTERLY END OF THE 8UBJECT PROPtRTY~ P088181LITY OF FUTURE
STFiEET CONTINUANCE OF TRANSIT STREET~ 7HF r'OV1810N OF THE REQUIRED SIX
F00T A6ASONRY WALL ON THE EABT PROPERTY LINE~ AND THE ADV18A81L{TY OF
PROVIDING DRAINAGE FACILITIEB IN~ AND EAP: REMOVAL OF~ THAT PORTION OF
TME WALL LOCA7ED WITHIN THE AREA 70 BE UTILIZED FOR FUTURE 8TREET CIFiCU-
LATION. .
THE COMM18310N FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACTB REGARDING THE
8UBJECT TENTATIVE TRACT a'O^:
~. SUBJECT TENTA7iVE MAP CONTAIN8 ~J ACRES nFi+'3 lo PROROSED FOR ~~ R"3~
MULTIPLE FAMILY RE8IDEHTiHL~ LOTS.
Z. SUBJECT TENTATIVE MAP 18 SUBMITTE~ IN CONJUNOTION WITH PETfTION FQ4
Vk.FiANOE NQ. 1334 AND P~TITION FOR RFCLA881FlCATION N0. 6~-6~-54.
3. TN~ i'ROP08ED l0T AREAS ARE IN EXCE&8 0 '~~ ~dINiMU61 CODE REQUIRE-
MENT3.
4. VERB:IL OPPOAITION WAB REOURYiED ADAiNBT """ '`•T TENTATIVE TRACT.
c -
COMM19810NER MORR18 OFFERED A MOTION~ BECON. :;Y COMM18810NER HAPGOOD ~
AND CAfiRIED~ THAT TENTATIYE MAP OF TRACT N0. 4OSQ BE APPROYED~ SUBJECT ~
TO THE FOLLpWIN6 OONDITION9:
.~
__T__.__,,. __.__. _,.. . _ ..._.____..___. . ___ __ _._..__-" _ .. . ....... _._,__ . . ... _____ _..__.._.,._ .
_.-.'iiHe i . . _ _ _. . .,_ ....__._,. Sy. . ..
m\ . ._ .. _._._.
. 1 dR... _...-r...-
~` ~ ,
, ~ , -
i • _ _
."~. ~ ~
L.1
~ ~ 49
MINUTES~ CITY PLANN ING COMMISSION~ FEBRUARY 6~ 19619 CONTINUED; '
~
TENTATIVE MAP CF - 1. SUBJECT TO 7HE APPROVAL OF PETITION FOR RECLA381FICATION N0. 60-61-54 ~
TRACT N0. 4084 AND THE APPROVAL OF PETITIOPI FOR VARIANCE N0. 1334. t
i
CONTiNUED ~
Z. CONSTRUCTION OF CURB AND SIDEWALK AT EASTERLY END OF TRANSIT AVENUE ~
TO 8E CURVED WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY TO PROVIDE MINIMUM TURN-AROUND AND •
ACCEPT DRAINAGE FROM THE EAST.
3. REQUIREMENT THAT 8HOULD TH18 SUBDIVISION BE DEYELOPED AS MORE TkAN
ONE SUBDIVISION~ EACH BUBDIV1810N THEREOF SHALL BE SUBN-ITTED IN TEN-
TATIVE FORM FOR APPROVpL.
THE FOREGOING CONDITIONS WERE RECITED AT THE MEETING AND WERE FOUND TO BE
A NECES3ARY PRER:QUISITE TO THE Ut3E OF THE PROFERTY IN ORDER TO PRESERVE
THE SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF ANAHEIM.
CHAIRMAN GAUER qEQUESTED THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSMIT TO THE
CITY COUNCIL TF:E RECORD9 OF PETITIOIJ FOR RECLASSIFICA710N N0. 56-5?-4Z
'AND PETITION FOR RECLA3SIfICATION N0. 58-59-5 FILED BY ANGELO SCAGLIONE~
AND PETITION FOR REf'•LA88iFICATION N0. S8-S9-14 FILED BY TONY JULIAN~FOR
CON3IDERATION BY THE COUNCIL IN CONJUNCTION WITN RECLA831FICATION N0.
60-61-54, ~ARIANCE N0. 1334, AND IENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT N0. 4084.
VARIANCE N0. 1335 - PUBLIC HEl+RivG. PETITION 3UBMITTED 8Y JALOr~IA R. aNn WILLIAM E. HALL~
'Ifi2Z EA9T VERDE CIRCLE~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA? OWNER3~ FOR PERMI8SION TO
WAIVE MINIMUM REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT TO ALLOW ENCROACHMENT TO
WITHIN 11 FEET OF REAR LG"f LINE; ~oR PROPERTY DEBCRIBED ns: AN IRRE-
GULARLY SHAPED PARCEI. WITH A FR~"'• :GE OF 44 FEET ON VERDE CIRCLE AND
DE3CRIBED A3 LOT HZ OF' TFiACT N0. 3371 AND FURTHER DESCRIBED A3 1622 Ensr
VERDE CIRCLE. THE PROPi'sRTY IS F'RESENTLY CLA881FIED R-'I~ SINGLE FAMILY
RES!DENTIAL.
MR. WILLIAM HALL~ THE PETITIONF.R~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMM18810N AND
STATED HE HAD NOTHING TO ADD TO THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE SUBJECT
PETITION Foa VARIANCE. THE HEARIN6 WAS CLOSED.
THE COMMI8SION FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACT3 REGARDING THE
3UBJECT PETITIONS
~. PETITIONER REQUE8T3 A VAP.IANCE FROM CODE~ SEC710N 'IS~Z4.030 (3)~ ~i
INH!CH REQUIRE3 FOR 8UBJECT PROPERTY A ZS F00T REAR YARD~ TO PERMIT i
EPICROACHMENT OF 14 FEET INTO REQUIRED REAR YARD IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCi
AN ADDITION TO 4~`':XISTING RE3IDENCE.
Z. SUBJECT PROPERTt ~S riURROUNDED BY R~~~ SINGiE FAMILY RE8IDENTIAL~ ZONE %
DEVELOPMENT. ~
3. PROPOSED CONSTRUCI'IOi: WOULD OCCUPY APPROXIMATE~Y 'I8O SQUARE FEET OR '~
5.4~ OF REQUIfiED REAR YARD LEAVING AMPL~ REAR YARD AREA. '
4. NO ONE APPEARED IN OPP081710N TO 1'HE 9UBJECT PETITION. ;
COMM18810NER MUNGALL OFFERED RE80~UTlON N0. 169~ SERIE8 1960-61~ AND
kOVED FOR ITS PASSA~E AND ADOPTION~ SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HAPGOOD~
rp r_ppyT ~ARlANr_.c Nn, 1335~ 9uRJFC7 T4 THE FOLLOWING CONAITIONS
'I. DEVEIOPMENT SUBSTANTIALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANB PRE8ENTED.
THE FORE~OING •^.ONDITION WAS RECITED AT THE MEETINO AND WA8 FOUND TO BE A
NECE93ARY PRErlEQU13TE TO THE U8E OF THE AROPERTY IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THE
8AFETV AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZENB OF ANAHEIM.
ON ROLL CALL THE :"OREGOING RE80LUT10~1 WA8 PA98ED BY THE EOLLOWINO VOTE:
~.~ ----~-,--- -~-... _ - __.. _ ___._ ._.__.__.___ ._,.___ ___..._._ ____.--~°------ --- -._..... ..
-.
Y _..
-'~ ~ ~ . _--.•- . _ .
. ~
~
i •
. . . _~ .
-:~__.. ___
+i - ~;•3g ~~~
F ~., s~ taJ' +'j 7
~
~ 50
s
i i
~ MINUTES, CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ FEBRUARY 6~ 19Eis CON7INUED: i
~ VARI{'~NCE N0. 1335 - AYES: ~'AMMISSIONERS: ALLRED~ GAUER~ HAPGOOD~ Mnacoux~ MORR13~ f
CONTINUED MUP7GALL~ SUMMERB.
NOES: COMMISSIONERSC NONE. "
~
„
'~ ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSS NONE.
i
CONDITIONAL USE - PUBLIC HEARING. PtTIT10N 3UBMITTED aY WARREN W. JAYCOX~ 918 Easr Vea-
'k PERMIT N0. 99 MONT AVENIiE~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ OWNER~ ROQ,UE1' REALTY~ 1Z~ WE6T BROAD-
;. WAY~ ANAHEIM~ CALiFORN1A~ LE3SEE~ FOR PERM13310N TO CONSTRUCT AND OPER-
fr ATE A SERVICE STATION~ ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS: A PARCEL '65 FEET BY
1HU FEET WITH A FRONTAGE or• 180 FEET ON RAYMOND AVENUE AND LOCATED ON
THE WE8T SIDE OF RAYMOND AVENUE BETWEEN LA PALMp AVENUE AND THE RIVER-
31DE FREEWAYj ITS 80UTHWEST CORNER BEING APPROXIMATEI.Y 'I'I~S PEET NORTH-
EHLY OF THE NORTHWE3TERLY CORNER OF RAYMOND AND LA PALMA AVENUES. THE
PROPERTY IS PRESENTLY CLAS8IFIED M-'I~ L~GHT MANUFACTURING.
MR. BOB DEDIC APPEARED BEFORE 7HE COMMISSION A8 REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE
PE7ITIONER. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
THE COMM13810N D18CUSSED THE PROP03ED CONSTRUCTIQN WITH THE AUTHORI2ED
AGENT OF THE PE7ITIONER~ AND HE INDICATED THAT NO TRUCKS WOULD BE SER-
VICED ON THE PROPERTY~ THpT IT WOULD BE STR!CTLY A BERVI~E 3TATION
UNIT. AND THAT THE OCCUPANT WOULD BE THE HANCOCK OIL COMFANY.
THE COMMISSION FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING PACTB REGARDING THE
SUBJECT PETITION:
1. PETITIONER REQJEST9 A CONDITIONAL U9E PERMIT~ FOR t:NICH PROV1310N IS
MpDE IN CODE~ SECTION 'IS.E)4.OZO ~3~E~~ IN ORDER TO PERMIT CON3TRUC-
TION OF A 9ERVICE BTATIONj~UBJECT PROPERTY.
Z. SUBJECT PROPERTY~ PRE9ENTLY ZONEB P-L~ PARKING-LAND9CAPING~ AND M-~I~
LIGHT MANUFACTURING~ ABi1TS THE M-~ 20NE ON THE 80UTH~ WE9T~ AND
kORTH~ AND THE C-~~ NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL~ 20NE ACROSS EAST STREET
ON THE EA3T. CODE~ SECTION 18.GO.O'IO ~3~ REQUIRE3 THAT WHERE A 3ER-
VICE 8TATION 18 LOCATED IN nN M-1 20NE THE PARKING-LAND8CAPING ZONE
BHALL BE WAIVED FOR THAT PARTICULAR LOT BUT THE BUILDING 8ETDACK ~INE
BHALL REMAIN AT 5O FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.
3. PETITIONER HA8 SUBMITTED A PRELIMINARY COPY OF A RECORD OP SURVEY MAP
IN CONNECTION WITH THE PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL U8E PENMIT.
4. PRPF•08ED DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE COMF\TIBLE WITH EX18T1~7G 20NING AND
LAND USE OF THE AFtEA.
S. MODIFICATION OF 8TREET WIDTH IN ACCORDANCE WITN DEVELOPMENT PLAN9
BUBMITTED BY PETITIONER 18 PERM183ABLE SINCE 90UTHERLY LINE 13 CON-
TIGUOU9 '!0 ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL D18TRlCT 9ETTLING BA31N.
6. NO ONE P.PPEARED IN OPP081TION TO TF{E SUBJECT PETITION.
COMM18810NER MORR19 OFFERED RE80LUTION N0. 'I~O~ SERiE8 1960-61, AND MOVED
FOR iT8 PA98AGE AND ADOPTION~ BECONDED BY COMM18810NER MUNGALL~ TO 6RANT
CONDITIONAL U3E PERMIT N0. 99, 3U8JECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITi0N8;
~. DEVELOPMENT 3UB9TANTIALLY IN ACCORDANCE riI7H ~LAN9 PREBENTED.
Z. PREPARATION OF 8TREET IMPROVEMENT PLANB AND INSTALlATION OF ALL IM-
PROVEMENT8 ON RAYMOND STREET ONLY~ IN AC~ORDAPlCE WITH APPROVED BTAN-
DARD PLANS ON FIIE IN THE OFFICE OF TNt CITY ENGINEER.
3. DEDICATION OF 45 FEET FROM THE MONUMENTED CENTERLIr1E OF RAYMOND n/E-
NUE (3O FEET EXI8TING~. ••
4. RECORDATION OF THE RECORD OF SURVEY MAP.
(CCNTINUED~
'1"'_".._ . _.~'.'"' _' ....... ._.._......_ ... _. .. ..'_"_... . "_'_'""._ ' ' . _'_"_"'_'" _'"" ._... ~ .. _ '_
1 ' "'. . ~ ~ . . . . _ . . .
•, . . .; ~ .:` '4
_ _ ~ ..,:.~ - - ~=-- -~ ~-=- =-= `---
~ r r. '
~l
,, .
: _ - . ... - .-
. _ r~'i .. . .. . ~
~
1 ~
~~f
g:~~~r
~f/Y,
~
51
MINU7ES~ CITY PLANNI~G COMMISSION~ FEBRUARY 6~ 1961~ CONTINUED:
CONDITIONAL USE - S. CON3TRUCTtON TO CITY STANDARDS OF FUTURE STREET BHOWN ON RECORD OF
PERMIT N0. 99 SURVEY MAP SUBMITTED TO AND ON FILE WITH THE COMMIS310N~ r'J3.O'I FEET
CONTINUED IN ~lIDTH pBU7TIN0 80UTH BOUNDARY OF SUBJEGT PROPERTY~ PRIOR 'f0 DEDI-
'CATION.
6. PAYMENT OF ~Z.OO PER FROIdT FOOT FOR 8TREET LIGHTING PURPOSES ON RAY-
MOND AVENUE AND THE FUTURE 8TREET A8 INDICATED O~U THE RECORD OF
SURVEY MAP BUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.
~. PROVISION OF 5O F00T BUILDING 9ETBACK FROM THE PROPER7Y LINE ABU7TING
RAYMOND AVENUE.
~I~HE FOREGOIN6 CONDITIONS WERE RECITED AT THE MEETING FND WERE FOUND TO BE
A NECEBSARY PREREQU131TE TO THE USE OP THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO PREBERVE
THE SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE C1T12EN3 OF ANAHEIM.
ON ROLL CALL THE FOREGOING RE30LUTION WA8 PA93ED EY THE FOLLOWING YOTE:
AYES: COMMISSIONERSC ALLRED~ GAUER~ HAPGOOD~I~IARCOUX~ MORRIS~
MUNGALL~ SUMMERB.
NOES: COMMISSIONERSC NONE.
A^SENT; COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
CONDITIONAL USE ~- PUBLI~ HEARING. PETITION SUBMITTED 8Y C. ROSS DEAN~ 1561 WE:.T LINCOLN
PERD~IT N0. 100 AYENUE~ Foa PERMIBSION ro EXPAND EXISTING ANIMAL HOSPITAL~ AND TO PRO-
VIDE LIVING QUARTERS FOR ATTENDANTS, oN PROPERTY nESCaieEa ns: aN IRRE-
GULARLY SHAPED PARCEL WITH A FRONTAGE OF 35 FEET ON LINCOLN AVENUE~ AND
iT3 30UTHERLY BOUNDARY ABUTTING THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE SOUTHERN
PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND IT8 WE3TERLY BOUNDARY ABUTTING THE
EA8TEKLY RIGHT-QF-WAY OF LOARA STREET. THE PROPER7Y IS PRE3ENTLY CLA381-
F I ED M-1 ~ L I Gl~fr MANUFACTtIR I NG.
MR. R088 DEAN~ THE PETITlONER~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMM18610N~ DESCRIBED
TNE ~ROPOSF.D DEVELOPMENT~ AND 8TATEi:: THAT THE EXI3TING WAREHOUSE BUILD-
ING LOCATED ON THE WE3T 81DE OF THE PROPERTY WOULD BE REMOVED.
THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
THE COMM19810N D18CUS8ED WITH THE PETITIONER THE EA3EMEN7 lEABE WITH THE
SO~fHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY GRANTING ACCE83 RIGHT9 TO THE BUBJECT
PROPERTY~ THE PARKING FACILITIE8 AYAlLABLE ON THE PROPERTY~ AND THE
NECE891TY FOR COMPLYINO WITH CODE REQUIREMENTS RELATIVE TO STREET IM-
PROVEMENTS ON LINCOLN AVENUE.
THE COMM18810N FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACT3 REGARI'ING THF.
BUBJE4T PETITION;
'I. ~ETITIONER REQUE8T8 A CONDITIONAL U8E PERMIT FOR WHICH PROV1910N 18
NADE IN CODE~ SECTION 'IB.E)4.OZO ~3~C~ IN ORDER TO PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
~F A TWO 8TORY BUILDING CONTAINING AN ANiMAL H09PiTAL~ KENNEL~ AND
LIVING QUARTERB FOR ATTENDANT8 ON SUBJECT PROPERTY.
Z. SUBJECT PROPERTY~ PRESENTLY ZONED M~1~ LIQHT MANUFACTURING~ ABUT9
THE M-'I ZONE ON THE NORTH AND EABT AND THE M-'I ZONE ACR098 LINCOLN
AYENUE ON THE 80UTH AND AOR088 THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-
OF-~WAY ON THE WE9T~ AND 19 SURROUNDED BY INDUSTRIAL AND COIJMEROIAL
LAND U8E9.
3. THE PROP09ED CONSTRUCTION CON8TITUTEB A 8UBBTANTI:L IMPROVEMENT TO
THE AREA.
4. NO ONE APPFARED IN OPPOgITION TO THE PETITION.
, --_._._.._ _____ .
--- __ -- __ __ _ - - - - --_ _ _ __ _ -- -.~ --..._,-- - --- _ --~..
___...--~ ~ , ~...: . . _
- - ~ ,._t, -- -
.
. ' :
: . ,
~=
. z- t~.: ;
.. - l. .f __
. .. .
- . , _
_ _ - _-
1 -..j . . ~ .
.,
.
.
t
~`
~
~
52
MINUTES? CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ FEBRUARY 6, 1961~ CONTINUED:
CONDITIONAL. USE ~ COMM18810NER SUMMERS OFFERED RE80LJTION N0. ~1~~ SERIE9 1960-61~ AND
PERMIT N0. 'IOO MOVED FOR IT9 PA88AGE AND ADOPTION~ 8ECONDED BY COMMI8SIONER MARCOUX9
CONTINUED TO GRANT CONDITIOPIAL U9E PERMI7 N0. 'IOO~ 8UFIJECT TO THE FOLIOWING CON-
DITIONB:
~. DEVELOPMENT BUBSTANTIALLY lN ACCORDANCE WISN PLAN8 PREBENTED EXCEP7
THAT NO PARKIN(i I9 TO gE PEFt~A1TTED BETWEEN FRONT PROPERTY LINE ABUT-
TINO LINCOLN AVENUE AND THE EXI3TING H08PITAL.
2. PREPARATIOP! OF 8TREET {MPROVEMENT PLAN8 AND IN8TALLATIOiJ OF ALL IM- !
PROVEMENT8 ON LINCOLN ~VENUE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED 8TANDARD
PLAN9 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINECR.
3. PAY~IENT C1F ~Z.OO PER FRONT FOOT FOR BTREET LIGHTING PURP03ES ON
LINCOLN AVENUE.
THE FOREGOING CONDITIONB WERE REOITED AT THE MEETING AND WERE FOUND TO
BE A NECE83ARY PREREQU131TE TO THE USE OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO PRE-
BERVE THE SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZEN3 OF ANAHEIM.
ON ROLL CALL THE FOREGOING RE90lUTI0N WA3 I'A3SED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED9 GAUEk~ HAPGOOD~ MAP.COUX~INORRIB~ MUNGALL~
SUMMER8.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NoNe.
ABSENT: COMMIS~!ONERSS NONE. '
CONDITIONAL USE ~- PUBLIC HEARI~G. PETITION 9UBMITTED sY W. A. AND MILLIE M. EEHNKE~ 215f ',,
PERMIT N0. ~IQ1 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD~ RNAHEIM~ CALIFORNlA~ O~NER8' FOR PERM19310N FOR ;
OVERNIGHT PARKING FOR SMALL VACATION TRAILERS~ oN PROPERrY DE9CRIBED ns: '
A PARCEL ~4O FEET GY ZOO FEET WITH A FRON1'AGE OF ZOO FEET ON HARBUR ~
BOULEVARD P.ND LOCATED ON THE EAST 81DE OF HARBOR BOULEYhRD B't77iEEN i
ORANGEWOQD AVENUE AND WILKEN WAYj IT9 80U7HWE3T CORNER BEING APPROXI- ;
MpTELY ZSO FEET NORTH OF THE NORTHEA8T CORNER OF HARBOR BOU~EVARD AND ~,
WILKEN WAY~ AND FURTHER DE8CRIBED A8 Z1SE> SOJTH HARBOR BOULEVARD. THE y
PROPERTY 18 PRE8ENTLY CLA881FIED R~A~ RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL. ),r
MR. W. A.BEH~vKE~ THE PETITIONER~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMM18810N AND IN- ~
DICpTED THAT HE INTENDED TO EBTABLISH A TRAILER PARK FOR THE OVERNI(iHT y
PARKING OF 9MALL VACATION TRAI~ERB Otd1.Y~ THkT HE HAD OBTAINED A VARIANCE {
FOR THE TRAILER 9ALES LOT WHICH WILL REMAIN ON THE PROPERTY~ 7HNT HE HAD
80LD THE TRAI~ER PARK LOCATED EABTERLY OF THE 8UBJECS PROPERTY~ THAT H£
WA9 AWARE OF THE REQUIREMENTS THP.T WOULD BE IMP08ED BY THE TRAILER PARK 5
ORDINANCE IF IT IS ADOPTED 8Y THE CITY COUNCIL~ THAT THE BUBJECT PROPER-
TY COt~TAINED APPRCXIMATELY ONE-H,~LF ACRE~ AND THAT HE INTENDED TO PARK i
i
AP:'P,OXIMATELY TEN TRAILEF.8 AT A TIME. '
~
MR. C. H. CORNELIU9~ 'IZ'I'I SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD~ APPEARED BEFORE THE ~
COMM18810N Al7D 8TATEII H18 OPPOSITIOP] TO THE SUBJECT PETITION.
A~R. JOHN KENT~ REPRESENTATIVE FOR RUTH HATTON~ OWNER OF THE WEBT WIND9
TRAILER LonaE~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMM188!ON AND REGI8TERED OPP081TION
TO THE 8UBJECT PETITION ON THE BA818 THAT IT WOULD ATTRACT TNAPJ817
CLIENTELE~ 1'f WOULD CP,:ATE UN8I~HTLY COPIDITIONO~ OTHER TFiA1LER PARK
OPERATORB DID NOT CON8lD"cR OVERNIGHT TRAILER PARKING DE$IRABLE~ PROP08ED
PARK 81ZE WAS INADEQUATe~ APPrlOVAL OF BUBJECT PETlT17N WGiJLD ENCOURAGc
ADDITIONAL REQUE8T8 FOR OVER ~IGHT TRAILER PARKING~ EX19Tlk3 TRAILER
PARK INSTALLATIONS IVERE A OREDIT SO ~HE ri1TY WNEREAII THE PROPf18EU UBE
NOULD BE DETRlMENTfIL~ AWD THAT IT WA6t1~T TH~ PROQrR U8E FOR PROP~RTY
LQCATEA Q~1 HAa~+~ t $OULEVARD.
..._,.. .....~__._.._. . .__.___ .... _.._~.__~. _
..____....~__._..._. ""1__'.'__..._'_ '_'__ _ ."__.._- ,...____.._ .-... . .... __".. .,~...,. ~
.
~ . . . _..... .
~ . ~ . _.....-...
MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ FEBRUARY 6~ 1961~ CONTINU~Ti;
CONDITIONAL USE ~- MR. ~OHN 'NE18T A"PEARED BEFORE. THE COMM183t: : AND STATED THI~T IN !il8
PERM17 N0. 'IO'I EXPERIENI:E MANAGING TRpILER PARK9 THE STATEMENTS IN OPP081TION TO 9UB-
CONTINtlED JECT PETITION HAD PROVEN TO BE CORRECTy AND THAT THE OPEF.:T~'uN WOULD BE
n;~rlC'.lT TO PGLICE.
MR. RO~I BEHNKE~ Z~SE) SOUTH HARBOR BO~:~EVARD~ AP~EARED BEFORE THE COM-
M18810° .:..^. 9T.".'eU THAT nPEQUA7E FACILITIES FOS~ OVER NIGHT PARKING FOR
VACATION TRAILERB WERE NOT nVA1lABLE IN ANAHEIM AND ~fHERF. WA8 A NcED fAR
SUCH A SERVIOE~ THAT MOBT OF TNE CLIENTELE WOULP BE DEaIRABLE~ AND 7NAT
THE PETITIONER WOULD PROYIDE 8lfpERr!810N A7 c\LL TlME8. FI~ SUBMIT'iED
PICTURE8 OF ADJACENT PROPER7Y IMD!i.i.71NG TH6 ~°ARk "1G OF TRAILERS IN E~~
CE88 OF THE CODE REQUIREMENT. iHE HEARING WA~' CL"uaED.
THE COMMIS8ION D18CUSSE'.7 THE VARIOU8 ABPECT8 OF THE PRO°08~•'1 TRAIIER
PARK ORDINA."7CE IN RE9PECT TO THE SURvECT PETITION~ Ah:~IL"'Bi9TANT CiTY
ATTOFiNEY JOE ~:E18LER.INDICATED THAT ALTHOUGH THE ORDIhAN,E 41AD NOT BE~N
pDOPTED A8 YET BY THE CITY COUNCIL~ THE COMM18810N HAL~ UY RECOMMENDINC
APPROVAL OF THE ORAINANCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL~ DETERMINED A 8UITABLE 9ET
OF STANDARDS FOR THE REGULATION O~ TRAILER PARKB AND THAT IT COULD BE
CONSIDERED AS A PROPER 3ET OF 8Tli41DARDS UPON WHICH TO BA3E ACTION8. •
THE COMM18810N FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACTS REGARDING TIiE t
SUBJECT PETITION;
'I. PETITIONER REQUEBTS A CONDITIONAL U3E V~ERMIT FOR,.WHICH PROV1310N 18
MADE IN CODE~ SECTION 1H.E)4.OZO ~3^T~ Iti ORDER TO PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
OF 3UBJECT PROPERTY FOR W YRAILER PARK FOR 7HE PRIMARY PURP08E OF
OVER NIaNT PAkKING FOR 9tAALL .~ACATION TRAILERB ONLY.
2. SUBJECT PROPER7Y~ PRE8EN'~LY Z0~!'.:D R~A~ Rt81DENTIAL AGRICULTURhL~ I:
8URROUNDED BY R-A ZONED P?uPERI'7 UN THE NORTH~ EA87 AND 80UTH~ AND
ACR093 HARBOR BOUi.E~'ARD OM THE WEST.
,3. SUBJECT PROPER7Y IS I''qE9EC+TLY UTILIZED FOR A TRAILER 8AI.F@ LOT nNA
ABUTB THE WEBT WINDi3 TRAILER LODGE ON THE 90U"fFi.
4. THE PETITIONER PROP08E8 THE CONTIi:UED USE OF THE &UBJECT ?ROPERTY
FOR TRAILER 8ALES.
S. THE RECEN?LY ADOPTED TRAILEH PAF~!~ ORDINA~~U~~ AHICH 18 `sCHEB'.:LE:) FUR
CITY COUNCIL HEA:tING ON FEBRUARY Z~I~ ~9~~~ DeFINEB A TRAILER PARK
A8 ~~ANY AREA OR TR0.CT OF LAND WH£RE 9PACE IS RENTED OR HE~D OUT FOR
RENT TO ONE OR MORE OWNER3 OR U8ER8 OF TRAI!..ER COACHE3~ OR WHERE
FREE CAMPING 18 PERiJI1TTED OWN~R8 OR USER8 OF TRAILER COACHEB FOR TI1E
PURPOSEB OF 8ECURING THEIR TRADE.~~ TH18 DEFINITION CLARIFIEa TH't.
PROP08ED U8E A8 A TRA1l.ER PARK. THE NUMEROU8 PROVISIQN8 OF THE
TRAILER PARK ORDINANCE WOULD HAVE TO BE COMPLIED WITH~ ANA TH: PR,ri-
P08ED DE81(ir! OF Teic 8UBJEC7 TRAILER PARK DOE3 NOT COMPLY WITH A
NUMBER OF THESE SECTIONB.
6. THE RELATIVE LOCA7101i AND 81ZE OF THE PROPOBED TRAILEa, PARK W11U~i~
NOT CONSTITUTE A DE8IRABLE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT FOR HAR90R G"vUt.EVAFtD.
~. THE PROP09ED COMBINATION OF RETAIL 8ALE8 AND GdER NYfiF!T FARKING OF
TRAII.ER8 WOULD NOT BE DESIRABLE.
Be VERBAL OPPOSITION WAS RECORDED AGAIN8T 8UBJECT PETITION.
COMM18810NER MARCOUX OFFERED RE80LUTION N0. ~I~2~ SERIEB 1960-61~ AND
MOVED FOR IT8 PA88AGE AND ADOPTION~ 8ECONDED BY COMM18810NER MUNGALL~
TO DENY CONDI710NAL U8E PERMIT N0. 'IO~.
ON ROLL CALL THE FORE(i01N0 FE90LUTION WA8 PA88ED BY THE FOLLOWINO VOTEO
AYES: COMMISSIOPIERS: ALI.RED~ GAUEi'i~ HAPOOOD~ MARCOUX~ MORR18~
(I~JNGAIL~ SUMMERB.
NOES: COMMISSIONERSS NONE.
ABSENT: C~INMISSIONERS: NoNe.
_-__ __ _... _ _ _-.. _ _----._ .--- _ _... _... _ .._..--- - --
~ ~1 _ _ . ..._.--------~-- --- ~ ~
- .- _ ~ ~
`~r~,~y-h'
a
~ ~
I 11~ ,'
~ i;
~
/. ~
~
54
;~!f~t'~ES~ ~17Y F_At•~N1N~ C~'MISSION~ FEBRUARY 6~ 1961~ CONTINUEL:
RECLl;SSIFiCA?~UP! - PUBLIC HFARING. PSTITic:: BUBMITTED e~ DAVID IK. RO~.R~ 9971 KNOrT Aae-
NO~,~~O~F>~,~5:?__,,,, NUE~ ANAHEIM~ CAL!FORNIA~ OWNER~ REQUE3TIN~a T!iAT PROP=.°.'Y DE3CRIBED A3S
A PARCEL 153 FEET BY 153 FEET WITH A FRONT;IGE OF ~5j PEET ON K~IOTT AYE-
NUE~ AND LOCATED Oh '~HE NORTHWE3T CORNER OF KNQTT AVENUE ANn B~,LL ROAD~
AND FUR7HER DESCR~BEL AS 9971 KNOTi AV~NI!?.,. BE RECLA8SIFIED FR~)M R~A~-
RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL~ ro C-•3~ !i_KVY C'.^~~~'~RCIPJ...
MR. D~vin RoPFa~ THE PETITIQP:cA~ Arr'EAhEti BEFOR~ 'itiE COMMiBS'~:1N A':it
STATED 'IHAT IT WAS HIS IMTENTION 70 llEVELC'P TNE !dUBJECT PROPERiY IYITI:
A SERVICE STATION WHIf,H IS TO BE OPFRATEb Bl' THE JYION OIL COMPANY~
;.ND TN,4T THE PRGP031:D CON8~RUCTIOP: WAS COMPA7i8LE WITH THE EXISTING
DEVELOF'MEN7 IN THE AREA. THE HEi,~il!'•G WAS CLOSEL.
THE PET:iIONER DISCUSl3ED CODE REqU1REM-NTS w!TH THE v!1MM18310N AND RE-•
QUESTED VJAIVER OF TIiE ~VALL REQUIREfdEN? W4[:RE 9UBJECT PRGPERTY neurc r'ti-A,
RESIDENI'IAL AGRICU'_SURAt_~ ZONING~ BECpU8E IT 18 H18 INTENTION TO DE-~
YELOP ABJOINlNG PROP~RTIE3 FOR COMMERCIAL PURP08E8 IF POSSiBLE. A8918-
TANT CITY ATTORNEY vUE C=ISLER ADVI3ED THE PETITIONER '(HAT S4CH A WAIVER
COULD BE CONSIDERED BY TI:E CITY COUNCIL IF SO REQUE3TED.
1~HE CGf1M18SI0N FOUN') AND DETERMINE:1 T(1E F(iLLOWING FACTS REU'ARuING THE
SUBJEC ~ r'ET I T I Gi3;
~. PET I 7' I ONER REQUESTB REC!.I.S81 F I C!~'f ! ON OF 3ll8JECT PROPERTY FROM THE
R-•A~ gESIDENTIAL AGRICU_TUR.",~~ 20i1E TO THE C-3~ HEAVY COMMERCIAL~
ZONL iw JrtuER TO CONSTRUCT A 8ER1'ICE 3TATION.
Z. SUBJE':~i °ROi ERTY ABUT:i TME R~A ZUNE ON THE WE3T A~ID NORTH~ R-A
AI:RO~S KY0T1' AVENUE ON THE EA3T~AND A PETITION FOR RECLA381FICATION
NJ. 59-60~-SS I:~ PEiVD 1 NG FOR A BERV I CE 8 i AT I ON ACROSi. BaL.L ROAD ON
THr SGUTH.
3. PROP03ED UEYELOF~,~IcNT I$ COi~APATIB:.E i117H BUNROUNDING AREA AND WOULD ~
NOT BE DE?R~ME~~lAL TO fHE E9TAELISMED C-'I~ NEIC,HBORHOQD COMAtERCIAL~ ,~.
U3E3.
4. NO ONE :PPEAFED IM1J uR:'081TION TO SUBJECT PETITION.
:i
COMM'.•;JIONEP ALLRED O~F[RED RESOLUTION N0. 173~ SERIE9 1960-E)'I~ AND ~
A'~"ED FOR !T3 PA33AGE AfdD ADOF'TION? 3ECONDED BY COMM1991ONcR MARCOUX~ ~
RECOMMENDING TU SHF (;ITY COUNCIL THAT RECLA991FICATION N0. EQ-J'I^55 BE ~
APPRGVED~ SUBJEC'f TO iHE FOLLON~ING CJNA~1'ION9: !
:~,
'I. DEVELOPMEr1T ~J88~ANTlALLY IN ACCUHDANCE W11'H PLANS PFESENTED. ';
Z. FILING OF DE~D RE°TRICilONB Llt~l'iING 9UBJECT PRC°ERTY TO BERYICE
3TAT I Oi: U8E ONLY.
l
3. DEL:CA710N OF 53 FEET FROM MONUMENfED CENTEFi~INE OF qA~L ROAD AND
KNOTT AVENUE ~3O FEET Ex19TING ON BOTH 8TREET3~. ~
4. PREPARATION OF 3TR~ET IMPROVEMENT PLAN9 AND IN8TA.LLATION OF AlL IM-
PROVEMENT8 ON BALL ROAD AND KNOTT A\ENUF' IN ACCORDANCE iVITH APPROV'cD 1
STANDARD PLANS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE G'' ThE CITY ENGINEER.
S. PAYMENT OF ~~.OO PER FRONT FOOT FOR 8TREE'~ LIGHTING PUFPOSE3 ON BOTH
BALL ROAD AND KNOTT AVENUE.
b. TiME LIMITATION OF 9O DAYS FOR ACCOMPLIBHMENT 0!' ITEM PjOd. 3~ 4~ AND ;
5.
THE FOREGOING CONDITIONS WERE RECITED AT TFIE MEETING AND WERE FOUPID TO
BE A NECE83ARY PREREQU181TE TO THE USE OF TME PROPERTY IN ORAER T7
PRE8ERVE THE 3AFETY AND WELFAaE OF TNE CITIZENB OF ANAHEI~A,
~ ____.___.~...... _.~. _._ _ _. _ _. _ _ _ _ _. ._ ._ .____._ __.___.. .-._.._.. . --
_ . __ .. .
--~,~ . ~ ~ .,. __...~
f~
r
~
;
J
~
~
55
~~
~ MINUTES~ CITY F'L.ANNING COMMISSION~ FEBRUARY 6~ 1961~ CONTINUED:
~
~
i
~
I
~
r
~
e
RECLASSIFICATION - 0-~ Ro~~ CAIL THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION WAS PA3GED 8Y THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
60-61-55
N0 •
.
Gnn~T!s:~en _ AYES: COMMI~SIONERS: ALLRED~ GAUER~ HAPGOOD~ MARCOUX~ MORR18~
MUNGALL~ SUMMER3.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NoNF.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSS NONE.
RECLASSIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION BUBMlTTED sv DONALD M., aNn ALEENE E. WILEY~
60-61-56
NO S13 SOUTH EUCLID AVENUE~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ OWNER8~ JOHN B. THORPE~
. ~17Z~ BLUEJAY LANE~ GARDEN GROVE~ CALIFORNIA~ AUTHORI2ED AGENT~ RE-
QUESTING THAT PROPERTY DE8CRtBED A3: A PARCEL i~Z FEET BY 366 FEET WITH
A FRONTAGE OF 1~Z FEET ON BROOKHURS7 STREET AND LOCATED ON THE WE3T SIDE
OF BROOKHURST STREE7 BETWEEN ORANGE AVENUE AND STONYBROOK DRIVE~ ITS
NORTHWEST CORNER BEIN9 kPPROXIMATELY 3OO FEET SOUTH OF THc 80UTHWEST
GORNER OF ORANGE AVENUE ANP BP.OOKHURST STREET~ AND FURTHER DESCRIBED A$
9S~I SOUTH BROOKIIURST STREET~ BE RECLAS8IFIED FROM R-A~ RESIDENTIAL
AGRICULTURAL, ro C-2~ GENERAL COMN~RCIAL.
MR. JOHN THORPE~ THE PETITIONER~APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMIS810N AND DES-
CRIBED THE PROPOSE7 DEVELOPMENT. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
THE COMMISSION DISCU8SED THE CODE REQUIREMENT FOR A 81X FO~T WALL WHER-
EVER COMMERCIAL ZUNING ABUT8 REuIDENTIAL 20NING AND THE PETITIONER
INDICATED THE P0831BLE INTENTION OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS OF ABUTTING PRO-
PERTIES TO DEVELOP THEIR PROPERTIE8 FOR COMMERCIA~ PURPOSE8.
MR. GLEN BURCHETTT 6Z7 SOUTH BROOKHURST STREET~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COM-
M18810N~ STATED HE OWNED A REkL E8TATE OFFICE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AD-
JACENT TO 3U8JECT PROPERTY~ ANil INDICATED THAT HE CON8IDERED THE IN-
STALLATION OF A BIX FOOT WALL 'AETRIMENTAL TO THE 9UBJECT AND ADJOINING
PROPERTIE:.
THE COMMIS310N FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACTS kEGARDING THE
3UBJEC7 PETITIOM1:
~. PETITIONER REQUEST3 A RECLA881FIOATION OF BUBJECT PROPERTY FR ~+I THE
R-A ZONE TO THE C~2~ GENERAL COMMERCIAL~ ZONE IN ORDER TO PERMIT
C~W8TRUCTION OF A DRIYE-IN RE9TAURANT.
Z. Suo.izCT PROPERTY ABUTS R~A ON THE SOUTH~ WE8T~ AM1D ACROSS BROOKHUR8i
STREET ON THE EABT~ AND C-1~ NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL~ 20NIA+ ON THE
NORTH.
~.' PROP08ED DEVELOPMENT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTIP~G DEVELOF~d'cNi IN
TNE BURROUNDING AREA.
4. COMM18810N RECOMMENDB THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CON3IDER WAIVER OF THE
COAS REQUIREMENT8 FOR THE WALL ON THE 80UTH SIDE OF 9UBJECT PROPER-
TY.
S. NO ONE APPEARED IN OPP091TION TO THE SUBJECT PETITION.
COMM18810NER MORR18 OFFERED RE80LUTION N0. 174~ SERIE8 1960-6~~ AND
MOVED FOR ITS PA88AGE AND ADOPTION~ SECONDED BY COMM1881pNER ALLRED~
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT RECLASSIFICATION N0. ~u-5~-56 BE
APPROVED~ 9UBJECT TO THE FOLLOWINO CONDITIOSi9S
~. DEVELOPMENT SU88TAN7t~LLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLAN3 PRE8ENTEL.
Z. DEDICATION OF 6O FEET FROM THC MONUMENTED C~NTERLINE OF BROOKHUR3T
STREET ~3O FEET EXI8TING~.
(CONTINUED~
4
~
~
b"""'
._~__..~.---_ _ .~_ __._.. _..... .. .... _ ._ ___ _ _ ._...
_....,.._...__---- -__ ____._..
, .N~
- ~ , 1 ~ty _ _._ __ ......
~~. _,..,._ ._
_ ...____.._...__._._...__._._.. .--_--
_. _. . _- ~
( ~ ~ -~
~ 56
i
~ "~INUTES~ C17Y PLANNING COMMISSION. FeeaunRV 6~ 1961~ CONTINUED:
~
- RECLASSIFICATI~N - 3. PREPARATI01. OF 8TREET IMPROVEMENT PlAN9 pND INSTALLATION OF ALL IM-
~ NO. EO-E)~-SE) PROVEMENTB 1;J ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVEA 8TANDAiD PtANS Ok FILE IN
; CONTINUEA THE OFFICE v" THE CITY ENGINEER.
4. PAYMENT OF ~Z.OO PER FRONT FOOT FOR 3TREET LIGHTING PURPOSE3.
I S. T~ME LIMITATION OF 9O DAYS FOR ACCOMPLISHMENT OF ITEM NOS. Z~ 3~
~ aNa 4. ~
~~ b. CONSTRUCTION OF A 31X ~E>~ F00T MASONRY WALL ON WE3T PROPERTY IINE
OF 8UBJECT PROPERTY~ AND P08TING OF A BOND FOR A PERIOD OF TWb ~Z~
YEAR3 FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF SUBJECT RE30LU710N FOR THE CON-
STRUCTIOi~ OF A 81X ~E)~ FOOT MASONRY WALL ON THE SOUTH PRO?ERTY LINEy
3AID INALL NOT TO BE CON3TRUCTED IF ABUTTING PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH 18
REZONED TO ANY COMMERCIAL ZONE WITHIN THE 8AID TWO ~Z~ YEAR PERIOD
OF TIME.
THE FOREGOING CONDITIONS WERE RECITED AT THE MEEYING AND WERE FOUND TO
BE A NECE83ARY PREREQUISITE TO THE U3E OF THE PR~PERTY IN ORDER TO PRE-
8ERVE THE 8AFETY AND WELFARE OF THE C1T12EN8 OF ANAHEIM.
ON ROLL CALL THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION WAS PAS3ED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
~,YES: COMMISSIONERSC A~LRED~ GAUER~ HAPGOOD~ MARCOUX~ MORRI$~
MUNGAIL~ SUMhiER9.
iVOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS~ NONE.
RECLASSIFICATIUN - PUBLIC F~fARING. PE7!TION 3UBMITTED~BY BALL-BROOKHURST CORRAL COMPANY~
NO. EO-6'I~S~ 9ZS SOUTH GILBERT S?REET~ ANAMEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ OWNERj STANLEY NORRIS~
'ISO7 DIANA AVENUE~ ANAIiE1M~ CALlFORNIA~ AUTHORI2ED AGENT~ REQUESTING
THAT PROPERTY DE9CHIBED AS: A PORTION OF A PARCEL ZSO FEET BY 4ZO FEET
WITH A FRONTAGE OF Z8O FEET ON BAIL POAD AND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEA3T
GORNER OF BROOKHUR8T STREE7 pP~D BALL ROAD~ AMD FURTHER DEBCRIBED A9
1226 SOU7H Elr200KHUR3T STREET~ BE F=CLA831FIED FROM C-1~ NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL~ To C-2~ GENERAL COMMERCIAI_, ,
, MR. STANLEY NORRISS THE PETITIONER~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMI8SION AND
INDICATED THAT HE W18HED TO ESTABLI8H A RE3TpURANT IN CONJUNCTION WITH
TtiE ON-8ALE OF MALT LIQUOR3. TNE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
THE PETITIONER INFORMED THE COMM13310N THAT HE WA8 REQUESTING THE 20NE
RcCLA381FICATION ON iW0 EXI9TIN0 BUILDING3 OMLY~LOCATED SVITHIN THE
CORRAt SHOPPING CEtdTER~ THAT THE BUILDING3 WOULD BE COMBINED INTO ONE
BUSINESB iYiTH TI~IE 31NGLE ADDRF.93 OF ~`ZZE SOIITH BROOKNllR9'f~ AND THAT
TFiE ON-BAIE OF LIQUOR WOUID BE LIMITED TO BEER NRODUCTS ONLY.
M~R. RAL.PH GRAHAM~ REPRE8ENTATIYE FOR THE PETITIONER~ APPEARED BEFORE
THE Cdu1MI0S10N pND DISCU88EA THE LIMITATION OF THE C-Z 20NING TO THE
TWO BIiILDING3 INTENDED FOR THE PROP09ED USE~ THE NECE831TY FOR 9UPPLY-
ING A PROPER LEOAL DESCRI?~ION FOR THE PROPERTY CON7AINING THE DE8-
CAI?TIOk OF THE TWO BUILDING8 ONLY AND SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY
ATTORNEY~S OFFICE~ THE RESTRICTION OF THE L.IQ~OR 8ALE8 TO MALT LIQUOR9
ONLY~ AND THE FACT THAT THE DA~ICE 8TUD10 PRE3ENTLY IN OPERATION IN THE
3HOPPING CENTER WAS E3TAB~IBHED BY A PEfITION FOR VARIANCE.
THE COMM19310N FOUND AND DETERI~IINED THE FOLLOWINCa FAC73 REGARDING THE
BUBJECT P'eTITION;
~' --- --.__ .. ___ ._ ._
_"~ . . ~.~~..._ _ _ __ _ , . ~ -
6'~` :~~ -- . ~ ~. . . .. . _ _.~ ........
. ~
57
MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ FEBRUARY 6, 1961, CONTINUED;
RECLASSIFICATION ~ ~. PET171UNcR REQUE8T3 A RECLA8SIFICATION OF 9UBJECT PRO'eRTY~ 'IZi~E
NO. 6Q"61~5~ SOUTH BROOKHUR3T STREET~ FROM THE C~~~ NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL~
CONTINUED 20NE TO C-Z~ GENERAI COMMERCIAL~ YONE IN ORDER TO PERMI~ ESTAB-
LISHMENT OF A RE8TAURANT WITH ON-SALE OF MALT LIQUOR.
Z. SUBJECT PROPERTY K'A3 INTENDED BY THE PETITIONER TO COVER ONLY THE
SMALL PORTION OF THE CORRAL SHOPPING CENTER. THE LIM1T8 OF THIS
PORTION OF PROPERTY ARE OUTLINED IN RED ON A KEY PLOT PLAN SUB-
MITTED BY THE PETITIONER AND SIGNED BY NIM AT THE COMMISSION MEF.T-
ING ON FEBRUARY G~ 1961. A LEGAL DEBCRlPTION.COVERING THE ENTIRE
CORRAL SHOPPING CENTER WAS RECEIVED~ THEREFORE~ THE PETITIONER WILL
SUBMIY A REViSED LEGAL DESCRIPT!4M GQyERING ONLY THE PORTION OF
PROPERTY HE DE3IRES TO HAVE RE20NED AND IT WILL BE BUBMITTED FOR
REVIEW BY THE CITY ATTORNEY~S GFFICE.
a. NO ONE APPEARED IN OPP081TION TO THE 3UBJECT PETITION.
COMM18810NER MOFtRl8 OFFERED R80LUTlON N0. ~~5~ SERIES 1960-61, AND
MOVED FOR 1T8 PASSAGE AND ADOPTION~ SECONDED BY COMM{.9310NER ALLRED~
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT RECLA331FICATION N0. 60-61-57
BE APPROVED~ 8UBJFCT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION8S
"I. THAT A PROPER LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH THE 'IZZE)
SOUTH BROOKHUR3T STREET MAILING ADDRESS BE PROVIDED AND APPROVED
BY THE CITY ATTORNEY~3 OFFICE COVERING ONLY THE PORTIONS OF THE
3UBJECT PROPERTY INDICATED 9Y THE PETITIONER AND 81GNED BY HItuS
ON THE KEY PLOT PLAN 3UBMITTED FEBRUARY 6~ 1961.
2. DEVELOPMENT 3UB9TANTIALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLAN3 PRE8ENTED.
3. LIMITATION OF ON-a.4LE LIQUOR 3ALE8 TO THE 8ALE OF MALT LIQUORS Oi1LY.
THE FOREGOING CONDITION3 WERE RECITED AT THE MEETING AND WERE FOUND TO
BE A NECEBSARY PREREQU181TE TO THE USE OF THE PROPERTY IN ORAER TO PRE-
SERVE THE BAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZEN3 OF ANAHEIM.
ON ROLL CAIL THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION WA3 PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: CAMMISSIONERS: ALLRED; GAUER~ HAPGUOD~ MARCOUX~ MORRIS~
MUNGA~L~ SUMMERS.
NOES: COMA9ISSIONERSC NONE.
ABSEM': COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
FiEVISED TENTATIVE ~ A REVISED TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT N0. 3909 '!"A3 PRESENTED TO THE COMMIS-
MAP OF TRACT N0. sioN. SUBDIViDER: W N J INVESTMENT~ INCORPORATED~ 'IOSGZ KATELLA Ave-
3909 Nue~ ANAH~iM~ CAL{FORNIA. THE TRACT IS LOCATED ON THE EAST 81DE OF
GRAND AVENU~~ 347.ZO FEET NORTH OF LfNCOLN AVENUE AND CONTAINS ~8-PRO-
. POSED R~3~ MULTIPLE FAMILY RE8IDENTIAL~ LOTB. TH13 TRACT IS SUBMITTEA
IN CONJUNCTION WITH VARIANCE N0. 1322 AND RECLASSIFICATION N0. 6O~E1-'I9
RECENTLY APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
THt COMMIS810N FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING Ff~CTS REGARDING THE
SUBJECT TENTATIYE TRACT;
~
i.
`
, ---- _~--- --
~. REVISED TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT N0. 3909 WA8 8UBM1T7ED IN CONJUNC-
TION WITH REfLA381FICATION N0. 60~~1~~9 AND VARIANCE N0. ~3ZZ
APPROVED 8Y C1TY COUNCIL RE90LUTION~ COVER$ APPROXIMATELY 8EVEN
ACRES~ 18 PROP09ED FOR 18 MULTIPLE FANIILY RESIDENTIA~ LOT3~ AND
18 LOCATED GN 7HE EAST SIDE OF GFAND AVENUE BETWEEN JACK80N WAY
AND LIMCOIN AVENUE.
~._`~__~~_.__
~
58
MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSlON~ FEBRUARY 6~ 1961~ CONTINUED:
REVISED TENTATIVE -'L. THE PETITIONER HAS 3UBMITTED A LETTER DATED FEBRUARY 'I~ 1961 RE-
MAP OF TF.iACT N0. QUE9TING MAIVER BY THE COMM19$ION OF THE WALL REQUIREMENT8 ALONG
y~9O,9 THE EA9TERN AND ~OUTHERN BOUNDARY LINES ADJACENT TU VACANT R~A~
RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL~ 20NED PROPERTY BECAUSE OF THE POSSI-
BILITY OF R~3 OR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF TH03E PROPERTIES.
COMMI9SIONER MUNGALL OFFERED A MOTION~ SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MAR-
COUX AND CARRIED~ THAT REVI3ED TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT N0. 3909 ee
APPROVED~ 3UBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION3L
1. CON3TRUCTION OF A 31X ~6~ F00T MASONRY YIALL ALONG THE NORTHERN
BOUNDARY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY WHERE IT ABUT3 THE R-'I~ SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIpL~ DEVELOPMENT AND THE P08TIN6 OF A BOND FOR THE PERIOD
OF TWO ~Z~ YEARS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SIX ~E>~ FOOT MASONRY
WALL ON THE 30UTH AND EAST PROPERTY LINES OF SUBJECT PROPERTY~
SAID WALL NOT TO BE CONSTRUCTED IF ABUTTING PROPERTY TO THE 30UTH
AND EA9T ARE REZONED TO AND DEVELOPED FOR R-Z~ TWO FANIILY RcSI-
DENTIAL~ OR R-3~ MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL~ U3E8 WITHIN 3AID
TWO YEAR PERIOD OF TIME.
Z. ~S.OO PER DWELLING UNIT PARK AND RECR'cATION FEE TO 6E COLLECTED
AS PART OF BUILDlNG PERMIT.
3. REQUIREMENT THAT BHOULD TH18 SUBDIVISION BE DEVELOPED AS MORE THAN
ONE SUBDIV1810N~ EACH SUBDIVISION THEREOF SHALL BE 8UBMtTTED IN
TENTATIVE FORM FOR APPROVAL.
TENTATIVE MAP OF - A TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT N0. 4O8'I WA3 3U8MITTED TO THE COMMIBSION.
TRACT N0. 4081 DEVELOPER: JOHNSTON-NELSON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS~ ~O58Z KATELLA
AVENUE~ ANpHEIM~ CALIFORNIF. THE TRACT 18 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF ANAHEIM STREET~ ~I3ZO FEET MORE OR LE3S WEST OF BLUE GUM ,STREET AND
CONTAIN8 38 PROP08ED R-1~ SINGLE FAMlLY RESIDENTIAL~ ~oTS.
A LETTER FROM THE DEVEIOPCR WA3 SUBMITTED TO THE COMMIS810N REQUE3T-
ING THAT CON8IDERATION OF THE TENTATIVE TRACT BE DEFERRED FOR TWO
N~EEK3 TO ALLOW BUFFICIENT TIME FOR THE PLANNING STAFF AND THE CITY
ENGINEER TO RESOLVE PROBLEMS WITH THE STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT IN
RESPECT TO THE PROP03ED FReEWAY TO BE LOCATED EA3T OF THE 3UBJECT
PROPERTY.
MR. RON RANKIN~ REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE~ APPEARED
BEFORE THE COMMI9SION AND INQUIRED ABiiUT THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT
PROF09ED FOR THE 8UBJECT PROPERTY. THE PETITIONER INDIC.4TED THAT THE
PROP08ED DEVELOPMENT HAD BEEN APPROVED BY THE VETERAN3 ADMINISTRATION
AND THAT THE STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT WA9 INTERE3TED IN THE SUBJECT
AREA AT THE PRESENT TIME.
A LETTER OF OPP031TION~RECEIVED FROM THE CITY OF PLACENTIA~ WA3 SUB-
MITTED TO TME COMM18810N INDICATING THAT THE PROP03ED RESIDENTIAL
TRACT WR8 TO BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO M-'I ZONING IN THE CITY OF PLp-
CENTIA AND THAT THE PLACENTIA PLANNING COMMISSION DID NOT CON8IDER THE
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL AREA TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE M-'I 20NING.
COMM18810NER N~ARCOUX OFFERED A MOTION~ 9ECONDED BY COMMIS910NER MUNGALL
AND CARRIED~ THAT THE TENTATIVE MAr OF TRACT N0. 4OS~ BE CONTINUED
UNTIL FEBRUARY 20~ 1961.
CORRESPONDENCE - ITEM N0. i. BUENA PARK PRECISE PI.AR N0. 123~ ZONE CHANGE N0. Z-186;
NOTICES REOEIVED FROM THE CITY OF BUENA PARK REQUE8TING RECOMMENDATIONB
OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMM18810h IP~ REBPECT TO FaRECISE PLAN N0. 123
, , e- --_._..~.
, .
---- . .. ,~ .
~ ~ ~
~, , -T , ~ j
I
•
;; '
i~`:
:: ~
~` ~ ., ,~ ~
59
MINUTES~ CITY F'f..ANN{NG COMMISSION~ FEBRUARY 6y 1961, CONTINUED:
CORRESPONDENCE - AND ZONE CHANGE N0. 186 WERE SU81.11TTED TO THE COMMIa`SION. IT WA3 NOTED
(,~'ONTIrIUED THAT TNE SUBJECT PROPERTY !8 !_OCATED WEBTERLY OF KNOTT AVENUE 0~~ THE
NORTH 81DE OF BALL ROAD.
A 8TAFF REPORT WA3 PRE9ENTED TO THE COMMISSION INDICATING THAT THE RE-
QUE8TED 20NE CHANGE FROM R~~~ SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT~ TO C-'I~ NEIGH-
BORHOOD COMMERCIAL DI5TRICT~ AND THE PRGCISE PLAN SHOWiNG COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT~ WERE CON8IDERED DETRIMENTAL TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BE-
CAU8E IT WOULD JEOPARDILE THE AREA FOR IT3 HIGHEST POTENTIAL~ THAT THE
AREA 18 E98ENTIALLY RESIDENTIAL IN NATURE~ AND THAT THERE IS SUFFICIENT
COMMERCIAL ZONING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF KNOTT AVENUE AND BAL~
ROAD.
COMMI8SIONER MUNGALL OFFERED A MOTION~ SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MORRIS
AND CARRIED~ THAT THE PLANNING DEPAR7MENT TRANSMIT TO THE CITY OF
BUENA PARK THE RECOMMENDATION BY THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMI3SION THAT
THE SUBJECT PETITIONB BE DENIED ON THE BAS18 OF THE AFOREMENTIONED
FINDING3.
ITEM No. 2: ORANGE COUNTY USE VARIANCE N0. 4692:
A NOTICE OF AP°LICATION FOR ORANGE COUNTY U3E VARIANCE N0. 4692 WAS
PRESENTEA TO TNE COMMIS810N~ IN ADDITION TO A STAFF REPORT 8UBMITTED
BY THE ANAHEIM PLANN{NG DEPARTMENT WHICH INDICATED THAT THE PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT IS NOT IN HARMONY WITH THE PRE8ENT DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA~
WHICH IS SIN6LE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL~ AND IT IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH THE
PRELIMINARY GENERAI PLAN FOR THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
MR. M. F. CHETTY~ REPRESENTATIYE FOR THE ANAHEIM-SUNKIST CIVIC A330CIA-°
TION~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMISSION AND PREBENTED A STATEMENT OF PRO-
TE3T CONTAINING REASOIJS FOR THE OPP~SITION BY THAT ORGANIZATION.
THE 3TATEMENT WA8 READ TO THE PLANNING !:OMMIS810N~ AND IT WA3 MOVED BY
COMMI8SIONER ALLRED~ SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SUMMERS AND CARRIED~ THAT
THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSM{T TO THE ORANGE COUNTY PL4NNING COMMIS-
810N THE RECOMMENDATION THAT THE SUBJECT USE VARIANCE PERMIT BE DENIED
FOR THE FOLLOWING REA80N3;
~. COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY ViUULD BE INCOMPATIBLE
WITH THE R-'I ZONING AND DEVE~OPMENT IN THE AREA.
Z. THE PROP08ED CC NF.RCiAL DEVELOPMENT WOULD ESTABLI3N A PRECENDENT FOR
COMMERCIA!. DEVELOrmi.Mr ON ANAHEIM-OLIVE ROAD AND SUNKIST AVENUE.
3. THE 9UBJEC7 PROPERTY 13 A PART OF THE PROPERTIE3 PREBENTLY INVOLVED
iN ANNEXATIOW PROCEEDINGS BEING CONDUCTED BY THE ANAHEIM CITY
COUNCIL.
4~ NINE 8ERVICE 3TATIONB ARE PRESENTLY ESTABLISHED WITHIN 1~2 MILE
RADIUB OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
S. PROP08ED DEVELOPMENT OF REMAINDER OF AREA INCLUDED IN SUBJECT PE-
TITION IA NOT INDICATED BY THE APPI.ICANT.
6. SUBJECT U8E VARIANCE WOULD CON3TlTUTE THE ESTABLIBHMENT OF A COM-
MERCIAI STRIP DEVELOPMENT.
T. PROP08ED CONBTRUCTION WOULD CREATE TRAFFIC CONGE3TION AND WOULD BE
DETRIMENTAL TO THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA.
~~ .~_.. ~i_~~., `___:. , .
~ . . . ---"-"-~_-__' ___ --•
! . ~ . . . ., . : . , ' ~ .
' ~
' ~ ' .. ., w... _.. . . ~ ' . . . . .. _ r - -~-.-...-.~..._... ... _. . 7
_._._ _ __-------__...__~_.-----,.
i
~
~~
-
~'`
~ 60
MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING (~MMISSION~ FEBRUARY 6~ 1961~ CONTINUED:
REPORTS AND RECOMNIEN - IreM No. 1: NOTICE OF TNE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PLANNING CONGRESS
DATIOMS ~ DiNNeR MEETING TO BE HELD FEBRUARY 9~ 1961 AT THE
COCKAT00 INN IN HAWTHORtdE~ CALIFORNIA WAS SUBMITTED
i0 THE COMMI8SION.
~ I7EM NO. 2: WORK SESSIONS:
THE COMMISSION DISCUSBED INTENTION TO 5ET A DATE FOR
A WOkK 9ESSION FOR THE PURPOSE OF OUTLINING THE PRO-
P08ED GENER!L PLAN~ POLICY FORMULATION~ AND STUDY OF
VARIOU3 3ECTIONS OF THE CODE THAT ARE TO BE CONSI-
. DERED WITHIN THE NEXT 31X MONTHS PERIOD OF TIME. IT
! WA3 AGREED THAT A WORK 3ESSION BE CONDUCTED STARTING
~ AT 'I:OO P.M.~ WEDNESDAY~ FEBRUARY 'IS~ 1°61.
( ~IIJOURNN~NT - THE MEETING WA3 ADJOURNED AT 6:00 O~CLOCY. P.M.
RE8PECTFULLY 3UBMITTED~
~~2~
N PAGE~ SECRE RY a
___..__. _. . _ --- -. __ _ _ - - - -.__
~ -._,_.__ __. _ _ _ - - -•-- --- -------~^-, ~
_~ _ . _____---
- , --- ~.. ,
_ . .,
_
-- ' ,. '
. _ . . . . ~--- ~ ~
~ _ :, ._. _.__
_ ~: ~.-~-