The URL can be used to link to this page

Minutes-PC 1961/09/18,,, ~e..-.. -~~iw.. ~' _.~....... - r~~ ' ! 9 ~;~ y a ~~t+ t ~~~'~p ~j~ ~.____-._...,. ~:.:~ „r... . _ . . ..~ , ,..,,, ..;.'. ,.~. .:,..~. . ~~ . .:.,,~,-- ...~.. .~..~`YEBLEY~ 1'ERRY~_.IYMMERS• ~ ~ - .~.: `~i ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: MoRRis. ' ? PRESENT `. ~• MARTIN.KREIDT PLANNER SENIOR , . LANNER.>. _. - ALLAN `SHOFF ' $ENIOR'P . `.:ASSIBTANT CITY;ATTORNEY ~ 'JOE GEISLER ~ COMMISSION,SECRETARY~ . ~ JEAN PAOE . ".~ . ~ INVOCATION ~ REVEREND;A. L..C~SEBEER~,PASTOR OF TNE CHRiST1AN:CHURCH~'4AVE THE`„ '.,~ INVOCATJON. . , ~ -PLED6E`OF ~ . 0 THE FIAG. - CHAIRMAN GAUER LED THE PLEDGE OF IILLEQIANCE T auEC iaNC,E ~ , . APPROVAL OF . - THe MINUTES OF'THE MEE71Nli OF SEPTEMBER 6~ 1961 WERE APPROVED AS 9UBMITTED.' ~ MINUTES ` _ . CONbIT~IONAL USE - CONTINUED,PUBLIC HEARING. PETlT10N 5UBMITJED 8Y'ALBERT B.~ ARTHUR,G::, AND "~`ERMIT NO. 144 ROBERT.R. BRANDT;.4440 AMSttose AveNUe''Los ANae~ES 27. CALIFORNIA~ OWNERS~ R~QUESTiNG'PERM155tON-70 ESTABLISH A fiRAILER PARK ON.PROPERTIC DEBCRIBED AS AN;•IRREOULARLY-SKAPED'PARCEL MITH A:F.RONTAGE OF 580;FEET MORE:OR,LESS-ON +SANTA ANA CANYON,ROAD AND A FRONTAGE,OF 1'~680,FEET MORE~OR'LE55 OH;;JEFFER SON STREET.AND.LOCATED-ON TME-NORTHWE57ERLY ,CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND = - , ANTA'ANA CANYON ROAD;AND FURTHER bE5CR1BED.'A5 8241•JEFFERSON'STREET:` :~ `S . 'PROPERTY PRESENTLY CLASS,IFIED IN SHE R-A; RESIDENTIAL,''AGRIEULTURAL,•ZONE ~c' SUBJECT `PET IT ION WAS ,CONT I NUED FROM THE MEET 1 Nfi OF AUQUST 21 ~ 1961 f 0;' i' ALtOW xME CITY~,S PUS.iC WORKS•AND PLANN'IN(i DEPARTMENTS`;T_tME IN:r'.WHICY -TO CtlNTACT ,:THE COUNTY OF ORAN~E`~ THE `.C ITY• OF' ORANOE~ 'AND THE~ •STATE ~OF C~1L1 FOR t_ S NIA.,OIV151~ON pF;HI~NWAYS FOR INFORMATION JN,RESPECT 70 A PRECISE PLAN'FOR Sr;r ?HE AL70NMENT~OF A ~,:~POSED`SECONOARY H13HMAY`PRESENTLY:INCORP OR~TED' °'iN ;.`+ . , ERIAC'HIfiHWAYS AND, THE PLAN OF QRTERIAL'iSTREETS AND ~>;: THE MAST.ER`PL,AN OF I1Rti _ • . H10HMAY5 9F THE C1TY OF ANAHEIM. ~• , . ~k , . MR. ALBERT BRANDT~ THE.PETIT~bNER~,;APPEARED:BEFORE.TkE COMM1591QNr.AND :~.t 'BTATED::THAT.,HE UNDERSTOOD,THAT '~HE PROPOSED` HIOHNAY' IMP,ROVEMENTS WOUI:D ' ~ REQUIRE`.; FOOTAQE;ALONG THE'NORTNIERN >BUBJECT PROPERTY `, " pORTION QF THE . _ HE 1NDtCASED~ HONEY,ER~ THAT";THE''ACQUIS1T10N'OF THE P,RO~ERTY: BY'THE STATE : ,:'. MOULD NOT 'INTERFERE;WiTH 7HE PROPOSED LAYOUT OF.,TNE TRAILER;PARK~~ ALTHOUGH:>~i ' , _ THE PARR',WOULD'LOSE SbME ROOTAQE:.:;. ' ` , . , ~ . . . .. . ''~~ ~ . .. . :, -~:~i ~ ~ MR. M.;R FIADLEY~.17142 EAST:SANTA:'ANA CANYON ROAD~ A9PEARED BBFORE TME ~ COMMISSION !AD BTATED THAT HE WAS OPPOSED T0,'THE-PROPOSED USE BECAUS6 NE ~.. ' . . CONBI.DERED. R~1~.ONE'FAMiLY~'RESLDENTIAL~;DEVELOPMENT'T0'BC MOR6 SUlTAOLE ,,;,~,, ' F.OR "THE AREA 'r a ; ;,,,;;' A LETT[R OF OPP051TION~ SUOM7TTED'BY VERA,'B. OFFICCR~.16941 EAST~SANTA ANA ,:;~~ ;CANYON, ROAD~,.DATLO `AU,QU,ST; 1'i~ 1961'~ WAS'..READ AN0 SUBMITTED..TO`T.HL-COMMIS '~ U ` '" ' ' ,SUBJECT PETITION sECA SL ~~< S,ION. TME LET.TER IND,iCATED OPP081T10N TO T9iE IIER PROPERTY`•'WAS,PRElENTLY:'_BEING'ANNEXED :T.O.THE.CITY OF`ORANGL°.FOR'_S1NaLL + fi? IAL DEVELOPMENT~ 1N:ACCORDANCE.W7:TN THL':GENERAt"PLAN::'F.OR FAMILY"RESIDENT "~ , ;T,M6:C1TY OFiORANGE.AND TME,,COUNTY:;OF ORANGE SHE STATLD.~fURTH[R THAT'THt ~':~ fl~ANT INfl'QF T.H6 •.SUBilEC7 PET,I7IQN F(QIl4D .P.R~V~NT T.Mt, pROPOSLD D6ViL0.P.NLNT E OF M6R:.PROPERTY:BECAUBC TME?'TRAICER PARK,;I.S INCOMPAT.ISLL WITH;RL5TD6NTIAL - ~ DEVELOPMEN7~ BECAUSE REg~DENTtAt DEVELOPIdENT 1S TAKING PLACt_IMMLD1A766Y l,' ~ ;TO 7N6 $OUTH OF THE SYBJECT AND AsUTTING PROPBRTJES~ AND B[CAUSt 7HE.. GRANTINQ OF THf SUBJECT PETIT,ION MOULD DECRE~SL 7ME VAW E OF MLR PROPLIITY. , ~ , _ , .., d ? ; ', ~, ~ ; ~ ~ A LETTER OF PRDTEST~:R6CBIVED FROM TH6 L'1TY OF O?wNGC ON AUGUST 21~`1961~ ti:, ' , MA! READ AND 8USMITTED,TO T.H6 COMM13SlON `' THE LETTLR fRi01CATLD OPPOd:l ~ ' ON>lLCICUSE PROPER7Y ABUTTING~,iN6 9IloJECT:hR0~tl1 °; TION TO;;;TML SUSJECT;P.6TITJ ~ ~ _ ''7Y ON iT.N6 MESj•_-WAS BE"1Nfi1'ANNEXED'T,OdTHE CITY OF;~ORANGE'FOR S"1N3L6 FAMiLY + n ~ - ; ~R~S,i_DLNTIAL~DENELOPMLNT~ OLC'AUSL~PROP6RTY'lITUAT6D sOUT;MCRLY'•0~ SUSJRCT , ff~ _ !IlO~ERTY MAS"S6LN ANNEX[D 70'THL~C.I;TY OF ,ORANGt,:AND 18:_~RLdiNTLY /RTNQ~ ;; ' ` 'O ` ~ ' , , <' RAAOL ;C~VLLO~LD FOR AN.D•oCCAUSR THL: ~ i:fAMILY::RtSFD6NTIALTDCVCLOPNLNT~ dfNQLE tA FOR`~ ~ ; '66NLRAL;~PLAN AS~RLC~NTLY' ADOPTrD I;O NATLS TNL StiOJLtT 111l ' WHiCH i Dkm M ~ + ;< ' , , , ~ ~ . ~ : ~ . ` ' ; ` ' ' t ~^ THt,~L S1NaLL~FAMII.V RCSIDtNTI AL U6L. T.ME L6TTCR RLQU65TtD FURTHLI! AND _ ,rTNAT : ~ ~ ` ~ * ~ ~ ' 'U!L rATT~RN}}Ae'PROP06LDulY TH6 CITY OF ORANGE B6 CONSIDLRlD 1N,CONNLCTION ~t ,'~^ ~ ~, WITM THB~SUlJLCTrrETYx10N. _ ~~ y ~ " r 7 i T D - - :' ~, r ~.~~;~ l~ f : HE HEARING, WAS CLOSE . - . ; '' ~ .' .. , ; , : r t} ~ ~ ; j , , ~ ~ r ,..: :TMC C6MNti5s10N R[VTtMED D6V6LOPMCNT PLANd:FOR TM6 SUeJRC7 PROP LRTY AND ~: x`e ~ ~ , INQUIRLD OF~TH~s P[T~TIONER IR Hff MAS AWARE OF THE PROJECTBD b11~~I~.R~t . e ~'i i ~ ~, a . i, ~ y + r ~Q i "I` . r ~ l ti7r ' '~i p,t, t Y F J ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 4 '.. ~ . .. '~j rld A f '.+~ ,. e f~ ~~ t j4~~. v{~ ~.J 1 i ~ ~ f~ .~ i' ~ ~ - 1 r ~ .t k~~,~~ ,~y,1~ ~.~ i~s~~ y : , ~ . i ~ ~ YA4:. .'.lh T ~ ~^ I(' :. ` ~ 11 ~L ~ , 1 s ~"~ ~ ~ ..s. ~~ri.?h_'f .... . .. .. ~ 4 _ . „....~ ~ ...,st~ 1. i ...,_~.r.(.~.n.E. ~ ~,~.._ . ,' . „.. ~. ., .~ ,.. . ,,. .S. , . .~N..~ ... ~ a 1 y j ~ 'Vl<u`~ ~.~:^~~~t+~vMad~4k-",~.'~[:'~ _ ~,.C.Y Rh.-M~.fl~~.;. ~HZ:k~m•~ u~.'~`...,_ .. ~ ~ ~ r ~ x `' :,1 j V : 1 _ ~ : ~ ,_ . - ,~ . ,,_.. ~= :,: , - - _ ~ ~ -~. ~ - ~` . ; ~ . .... . , . -, ~ ~ ~ ~ . - ~ ; ~ ~ ~~'; . i '~ 403 ~ :1 ~ , ~ ~ E _ _ ~ MINUTES, CITY PIANN ING COMMISSION, SePreMeeR 18~ 1961~ CONTINUED: ; CONDITIONAL USE ~ FAMILY~RESIDENTIAL USE.FOR TNE-SUBJECT AREA. MR. BRANDT -NDICATED•THAT 144 PERMIT_N0: HE MAS AWARE OF THE PROPOSE~ LAND USE FOR THE SUBJECT AREA~ BUT•THAT•THE . CONTINUED SUBJECT••PROPERTY WAS•SI.TUATED•WITHdN THE LIMITS OF•THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ~ AND HE DIR NOT CONSIDER TME USE 70 BE INCOMRATIBLE WITH•ANY RESIDENTIAL • DEVEIOPMENT. HE STATED FURTHER T•HAT TNE TRAILER PARK DEVELOPNENT WOULD I ~NCREASE PROPERTY VALUES IN THE AREA~ THAT IT MOULD BE AN IMPROVEAfENT TO THE AREA~ AND THAT OCCUPANCY WOULO BE LIMITED TO ADULTS ONLY. •- THE COMMISSION FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOW~NG FACTS RECaARDIN(i THE I SUBJECT PETIT'IqN.. • 1. THAT THE PROPOSED USE IS PROPERLY ONE FOR WHICH A CONDITIONAL USE ' PERMIT IS AUTHORI2ED BY THIS CODE~ TO WIT, A TRAILER PARK. 2. THAT THE PROPO:iED USE WILL ADVERSELY AFFECT THE ADJOININO LAND USES p7; AND THE CiROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA IN WHICH IT IS PROPOSED £ '`~ ~41L... . TO BE IOCATED. . . . .. . ': . ~ ^r , .. . . . 3. THAT THE SUBJECT AREA IS PROJECTED FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY WOULD BE INCOMPATIBLE WITN AND,DETRIMENTAL TO THE PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT AND LAND USE PATTERN ESTABLISHED FOR THE SUBJECT AREA. • 4: THAT VERBAL OPPOSITION~ IN ADDITION TO LETTERS OF PROTEST~ WERE RECORDED AGAINST. SUBJ~CT PETITION. •COMMISStONER MARCOUX OFFERED RESOLUTtON N0..81~ SERIES'1961-62~ ANO MOVED FOR~JTS PASSAGE AND ADOPTION~ SECOTlDED BY COMMISSIONER MUNfin~,!.~ TO OENY ' PETITION FOR CONDITIONAI USE PERMIT N0. 144 ON THE BA515 OF 1'r1E AFOREMEN~ TIONED FINDINGS. • • ON ROLL.CALL THE FORE601NO RESOLUTION WAS PASSED,BY THE FOLLOMIN(i.VOTE: AYES:' COMMISSIONERSS ALLRED~ GAUER~ HAPGOOD~ MARCOUX~ MUN4ALL~ PEBLEY~ PERRY~ SUMMERS. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. ABSENTe COMMISSION[RS: MORR~S. ' ~ RECLASSIFICATION - CONTINUEO PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION SUBMITTED ev MANCIL F. nwo HENRIETTA ; ~ ~f~1-62~22 BECL~ 3434 ORANOE AVENUE~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ OWNERS~ JOHN GOLLIAN~ 6310 ~ ~ WEST COAST HI~HWAY~.NEWPORT $EACH) CALIFORNIA~ AGENTQ REQUESTINQ THAT A PARCEL 144 FEET BY 320 FEET WITH A FRONTAQE OF ED A5 .~ ~ : PROPER7Y DESCRIB 144 FEET ON'THE 50UTM SIDE OF ORANGE AVENUE BETMEEN KNOTT AVENUE ANO i r WESTERN AVENUE~ tT5 NORTHWEST,CORNER BE.INQ APPROXI:AATELY 326 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST'CORNER OF KNOTT AND ORANQE AVENUES~ BE RECLASSIFIED.FROM ; rHe R-A, RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL, ZONE'ro 'rHe R-3~ MULTIPLE fAMILY RESI- ~ • " DENTIAt._ZONE: , , ; ' SUBJECT PETITION WAS CONTINUED FROM 4,yE MEETINa OF SEPTEMBER 6~ 1961 IN ORDER TO PROVIDE.THE PETITIONER AN 0'~PORTUNITY TO SUBMIT REVISED PLANS TO ~ t CONFORM TO THE R"3~ MUL.TIPLE FAMILY :~ESIDENTIAL~ ZOkE MINIMUM CODE REQUIRE~ E i MENTS~ AND TO PERMIT TNE RE~ADVERTI9'EMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY~ AMENDING . THE 144 F00T FRONTA3E ON ORANQE THE DESCRIPTION OF SAID PROPERTY TO INCLUDE s , , , AVENUE WITH THE SAME DEPTH OF 320 FEET. • MR. JOHN GOl.L1AN~ AdENT FOR THE PET.ITIONERS~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMIS~ ~ SION~ AND DESCRIBED THE PROPOSED CONSTRUC710N OF FOUR UNITS CONTAININQ 927 SQUARE FEET OF LIVEABLE FLOOR AREA PER UNIT. i THE COMMISS'ION REVIEWED DEVEL'JPMENT PLANS AND THE PETITIANER~S AGENT INDI- y CATED THAT $I:OCK`WALL9 MOUGD BE INSTACCED ON THE EAST AND>SOUTH PROPERTY - LINES.. HE STATED TNAT TNE'PET.ITIONERS:DID NOT PiIOPOSE T0 CONSTROCT A BLOCK WALL ON.THE WESTERL"Y PROPERTY.LINE OFZ'SUBJECT:PROPERTY BECAUSE A PLANNED BY.THE.PETITIONERS FOR THE.ABUTTINO PROPER~ SIMILAR DEVELOPMENT WAS , TY TO TME WEST~ WHENEVER.FINANCINO WAS AVAILABLE. THE COMMISSION INDICATEO ~', THAT.A BOND:COULD BE'POSTED T0 INSURE THE MALL CONSTR~~CTION 'IN THE EVENT ' " THE PROPERTY WAS NOT'DEVELOPED AS PLANNED. ~ ' THE HEARING MAS CLOSED. ~ C ~... - . THE COMMiSSION-FOUND AYD DETERb11MER THE FOLLONlNfi FACTS-REGPR DIN~ THE ~ ' ~ , : SU9JEC7 ':PET iT lONO .,A , , . ~ ' . 1. THAT THE PETITIONER PROFOSES A RECLASSIFICATION OF THE'ABOYE AESCRI~ED. ti ` PnoPeRrv FROM..THE R-A 'RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL, 2ONE TO TME.R-3,: , ' MULT~PLE FAMILY RESID~`NTIAL~:ZONE. ~ , p, , 2 ~h ;`4 , , ,: _ , .. 2 THAT THE'PROPOSED RECLASSIFICATION OF. SUBJ,ECT PROPERTY IS NECESBARY ~ ' ~ r +~ ' OR'DESIRABLE FOR THE ORDERLY AND pROPER DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMMUNITY. [ @ tz ,, ~x~.~is z- r,, + 3 . - 3 THAT THE PROPOSED RECLASSIFICATION OF'SUBJEC7 PROPERTY DOES PRQPERLY• ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~...~ RELATE T0'TNE 20NES AND THEIR PERMITTED USE9 LOCALIY EBTABLISNED, IN ~x 1 i ~ ., r~ .. _ . ..f ,~'' ~ . , . . '"f - ~ r - ~ ' ~ - ' - : :::d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i { f ~ ti' . ~ , . . ~ , . ~j~~~ g ~:. ~ ' ~ ( , y7~a5z ~"~ ^{- ~ .. t, . ,. . . ~. .: ~ ::_' '.. ':'' ..'. . ~ ~ . ~~:'. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ t. ,. ~- A,~V~yf:i ~~z:iX.. ,.~~.~.~ ». rt~ir~".:"1 ?1.::~.~ ~.''C~'~Ku;?~IY~I. ::..' .~.J~iNznW'Y~... .,F~~IS~S~Su,~Ni?_,y,n,~r~? .'3'PAt45_ii.,~.:'7s.'.v~.',~?tec -~ ~ . ~..~..., ._. . ~. .;,ti ~, .,.~~..:. . ~ ?Y ~.~~F 5 ~YC ,'...hl4b..N+.i1Y'~-v~:M..:C~.. _'-r,.:4_ " wf+ u4~`~. *4....~v'!fC1•._ i ~ 7l~ ~ ~ ~ r ,j y f {~ ~l ~ 4 .: . '~ .... . , .... ;. ~ .. :: , : ~~: ~ . ,, . . ._ ._ _' .. .. . . .-..-...: .... r~ ~. ~ , ~ ~ : ' ' • _ ` ~ ~ ~ : $04' '- ; - ; ~ ~ . :. ;- a MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION;.SEpreMaER 18~ 1961~ CONTINUED: RECLASSIF1CATi0N ~ CLOSE,PROXIMITY TO SUBJECT PROPERTY AND TO THE 20NE5 AND THEIR~PER- NO. 61~fi2-~22: ' M(TT.ED USES QENERALY ESTABLISHED THROUGHOUT THE•COMMUNITY. , CONTINUED 4. THAT THE P•ROPOSED RECLASSIF7CAT70N OF SUBJECT P.ROPERTY DOES REQUIRE ~ ~ ~~~ DEDICATION ~OR AND.STANDARD INPROVEMENT.OF ABUTTJNQ•STREETS BECAUSE , SAID,PROPERTY•DOES.RELATE:TQ:ANO ABUT UPON STREETS AND H1fiHWAYS WHICH•ARE P.ROPOSED.,TO CARRY THE TYPE AND QUANTITY OF TRAFFIC~ WHICH 'WIL1. BE GENERATED.;BY THE PERMITTED USES~ 'IN ACCORDANCE W1TH THE CI.RCULATION ELEMENT OF,THE GENERAL PLAN. • r~• 5. THAT.NO•,ONE APPEARED,IN OPPOS1710N TO SUB~ECT PETITION., ~ COMMISSIONER.ALLRED OFFERED RESOLUTlON N0. 82~ SERIES 1961-62~ AND MOVED FOR ITS PASSA6E.AND ADOBTJON~ SECDNDED BY COMMISSIONER PEBLEY~ TO RECOM~ ~z~; M T;v: - MEND TO 7HE.CITV COUNCIL THAT PETITICN FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 61-62~22 ~ ~ ~-~,; BE APRROVEDy 5UBJECT,TO THE FOLLOMING CONDITIONS: . .. x 1. DEVEIOPMENT SUBSTANTIALIY IN ACCORDANC& NITH EXHJBIT NOS. l~ 2~•AND 3. ` 2. PROVISION OF ENCLOSED TRASH STORAQE AREAS SUBJECT TO TNE APPROVAL OF THE.CHJEF BUtLDIN6 INSPECTOR PRIOR TO F1NAL BUILDINO INSPECTIt1N. OF A S1X (6~ FOOT MASONRY WALL ALONfi THE EAST AND SOUTH PROVi510N 3. . , 80UNDARIES OF.SUBJECT PROPERTY PRIOR T0 EINAL BUILDINa,INSPECTION. ) F007 MASONRY.WALL~ OR-TME POSTlN6 OF A TWO 4. i'ROV1510N OF A'STX•(6 , , (2) YEAR BOND THEREFOR~ ACONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY ~ PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDINa INSPECTION. 5. DEDICATION OF 45_FEET FROM THE MONUMENTED CENTER~INE OF ORANQE AVENUE , (15 FEE7 EXIST1Nfi). 6. PREPARATION OF'STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND INSTALLR710N OF ALL iMPROVE~ MEN7fS FOR_ORANOE AVENUE~ IN ACCORDANCE MITH THE APPROVED STANDARD p1.AN5 _ ON FILE IN THE OPFICE OF THE C1TY ENCa1NEER. OF =2.00 PER FRONT FOOT FOR STREET L16HTIN~ PURPOSES ON ORANOE 7. PAYMENT . AVENUE. 8. PAYMENT OF':25.OO.PER DWELLING UNIT PARK AND RECREATION FEE TO BE ~ COLLECTED AS PART'OF BU;ILDING PERMIT. ~ 9. T1ME LIMITATION OF NINETY (90) DAYS FOR THE ACCOMPLISHNENT OF ITEM 5 NOS. 5~ 6~`'AND 7. ~ ~ THE FOREf301Na CONDITIONS WERE RECITED AT THE MEETINfi AND~NERE FOUND TO 3E A NECESSARY PREREQUISITE TO THE USE OF THE PROPERTY IN.ORDER TO PRESERVE THE.SAFETY.AND ilELFARE.OF THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF ANAHEiM. ~= ON ROLL CALL,THE FOREf301Na. RESOLl1TlON WAS PASSED BY THE FOLI.OWINO VOTES ~ HAPGOOD~ MARCOUX~ MUNQAI.~~,PEBLEY~ AYES: COMMISSIDNERS: P ~ , SUMMERS, ERRYD ~ E ,,„ , . NpES: COMMISSiONERS: NoNE. ' _ ~ ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSe MoRRis. k ~' ~ ~ VARIANCE N0. 1405 - pUBLiC HEARING. PETITION SUBMITT'ED ev JERRY A, nNO SALLEE A. HUFF~ 828 T0 ' REQUESTIN(i PERM15510N FALCD~1 STREET~ ANAHEIM ~ CALIFORNIA O41NER5 DESCRIBED ns: MAIVE Ni1NIMUM FRONT YAI~D SETBACK-R~QUlREME~IT ON PROPERTY ~ , A'PARCEL 80'FEET BY'lOA~FEET W17H:A FRONTA~E OF 80 FEET ON TON1A PLACE AND IDA LANE AND FURTHER NIA PCACE AND I WE CORNE OF T . , ST R O LOCAT~D ON THE NORTH DESCRI'BED'AS;LOT 11.OF TRACT N0:.3946..'PROPERTY PRESENT.LY CLASSIFfED IN ~ THe R-1, ONE FAMILY'RESIDENTIAI, 20NE. • ' MR. JERRY'HUFF~ 828,FALCON,STREET~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMISSION'AND DES~ ~~.. .. • CRIBEb"THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION;OF A NEM RESIDENCE ON THE NORTHMEST . CORNER OF TON1A PLACE AND L1DA LANE. HE EXPLAINED THAT AE.WAS REQUESTIN~ i THE FRONT.AND REAR'YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT FOR THE SUBJECT A MAtVER OF ~ ~ ,, , i PROPERTV BECAUSE THE l0T kA5.D1F:':lCULT'TO OEVELOP-:DUE TQ A'TWENTY FOOT -NG-TO THEtS8U7HERN SiERRAS.POWER COMPANY. HE STATED EASEAENT BELONQ , FURTHER THAT THE PROPOSED PLAN WOULC L1NE UP THE PROPOSED RESIPENC~ WITH ~~~, ~% TNE FRONT YARD ALIQNMENT -0F'THE HOME ABUTTtNa SUBJECT PROPERTY ON THE ~ ~?t,;; .,,,. NORTH° AND FAC I NG. L1 DA LANE:- ~, ~,~~,.*,`~~ THE COMM7SSION REVIEMED DEVELOPMEkT PLANS AND NOT,EO THAT THE;PROPOSED ' , ~ ~+ {`' ~' `i?`~ ACE AND AN CONSTRUCTION WOULD PROVIbE'A TWENTY FOOT SETBACK ON TQ"IIA PL C ON L'IDA L'ANE ~ ; ~ ~~ ~' ~~ . - EIfiHT.EEN FOOT SETBA K .. . ,~.. EAR I NG' NAS'" C LOSED THE H ' ; 1 ~ ~~:_ ~ r a~~r,'~' ~' ` ~~ . . . ~ _.. _ , TNE COMMISSION FOUND AND DETERMINED'THE FOLLOWINa FACT$ REGARDIN(i THE . . ,. . .. . ~ ~~ ,.,. 3UBJECT PETI7ION: . ~~ , " , ..,.o ~ 5 ~. . . _; ..~, ~ ~ o . ~ . ~ . i bI ~ 4 ~ ,:: ~ x 5 , ~ c `~i'" $ J , i ..' ~ -,. a ~. ! t ~3: ~ M ~ 1 Y ~ ~ 1 ' it~ F r~~'T h ~ i l ~: ~ i J tc t j • 't y t'4. rn r F a } - µ S~.z, ~>-y,~.~, Fa~}~ 5 { ~a .a.. 5„ ~ - x~ ~ _~ s+ f {r ~ ~~ s < +i~; ~, ~' ~'~~ ~~• oNt ~ t + a1 r ~~ ` ,: ~. ~.~. ~ . : ~ . ~ .~ ~. . ~ .'~; " , ' ~ ~ , F~~4~~ ' ~ ~ ~-,.`~~'~~~ ii~. . ~ _'~~:.'"~~:^w~"il..-. ~ , :'~J.t 1..~t:~C.b ~,_.._'-'1~'.HL . .,r,...fs%4'..`~tl .i_:a „m i..i~i~...v RS54REbX.f,rR.n ...,.. . v.. . . .. ' ~,..''~t~ V,~i . ~2 ~ c . i : C' c ;~& r ' , r?~".~F..~ . '' .ta'"i" ,wl ~ ., v " - °:4:r~' "~if-'~X.' or. n~~;~~ v...~ ~a,....~ ~ °lti.. A 1 4~ f 'Y .,• 'r .. y . ~ S ~ ~4 (. ~ - ~ _ - ~.~,... _ iir 7yt ~. ~ ~ ' ~ '. ~r : ,. . 403 s `„~ ~,..°: _ , < ,_"; ~ . MINUTES, CIYY PIANNING COMMISSION~ SePrEweeR 18~ 196i, CONTiNUED: vaeiaNCE No:'1405 ~~1. THAT THE~.PETITIONER REQUESTS A1VARIANCE FROM'THE ANAHEIM MUNICI~ rONTINUED PAL CODE•~•SECTION 18.24.030 (1-A AND 3) TO•PERM17 AN ENCROACH~ MENT OF..FIVE (5) fEET INTO THE REQUIREO FRONT YARO AN0 AN ENCROACH~ .•. ~. MENT.OF F1VE":(5) FEET-~NTO THE_REQl71RED~REAR YARO. • ~ 2. THAT,7'HERE.ARE EXCEPTIONAL..OR'EX7RAURDINARY CLRCUMSTANCES~OR 6 ~,• CON~ITIONS ABP.LiCA6tE T0-TME PROPER7Y INVO~~ED OR TO TME 1NTENDED USE OF THE'PROPERTY THAT DO.NOT APPLY (iENERALLY TO THE PROPERTY OR.CLASS OF US~. 1N.THE•SAME VICINITY AND ZONE.• ~ 3. THAT .THE REQUESTED VARIANCE 15 NECESSARY FOR T•HE PRESERVATION AND , ~ ENJOYMENT OF A SU857ANTIAL PROPERTY-R1GHT POSSESSED BY OTHER } PROPERTY 1N THE SAME VICINI7Y AND ZONE~ AND DENIED"TO TME PRO~ C PERTY IN QUESTIOk. • • f ' . _ ~ ' 4: THAT THE REQUESTED.VARIANCE WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO ~ E ~f .'i TNE PUBLIC MELFARE OR INJUR10U5'.TO THE PROPERTY OR IMPROVEMENTS H'`r "•. IN SUCH VICINITY AND 20NE JN WH1•CH THE PROPERTY lS LOCATED. e '~ r , : _ , i 1± 5. THAT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE COMPRE- HENSIVE.GENERAL PLAN: • • „~ 6. THAT NQ ONE APPEARED 1N'OPPOSITION TO SUBJECT PETITION. . ~ COMt715S10NER MUNfiALL OFFERED RESOLUTION N0. 83~ $ERIES 1961-62~ AND MOVED FOR ITS PASSA~E AND ADOPT.IpN~ SECGNOED BY COMMISSIONER MAiiCOUX~ ~ " 'TO GRANT PET1T10N FOR VARIANCE N0. 1405~'SUBJECT TO.THE FOLLOWIN6 , : ~:.; . • CONDITION57 . • € , 1: DEVELOPMENT SUBSTANTIALIY IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXHIBITS 1 AND:2. 1 2. INSTALLATION OF DRIVEWAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED STANDARD PLANS ON FILE IN.THE OFFICE OF THE C1TY ENCi1N~ER. p 3, TIMiE LtMITATION.OF ONE HUNORED.EI4HTY (180) DAYS FOR THF. ACCOM~ PLISHMENT OF ITEM N0. 2. C THE'FQREDOINO CONDIT.IONS WERE.RECITED AT THE MEE7ING AND WERE FOUND ~ TO'BE•A NECESSARY PREREQU1517E TO THE USE -0 F THE PROPERTY IN:ORDER TO PRESERVE THE SAFETY_AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF ~ ANAHEIM. .. ~ ON ROLL CALL THE FORE~OING RESOLUTION WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOWINO ' VOTES ` ~ AYES: COMMISSIONERSS ALLRED~ GAIlER~'MARCOUX~ MUN~ALL~ PEBLEY~ PERRY~ ~ SUMMERS~ HAPGOOD. NOES: COMMISSIO,NERSC `RONE. ~ ABSENT:COMMISSI,ONERS: MORRIS... VARIANGE NO:~i4o7 - pUBI.IC.HEARING. `PET'1TION SUBMITTED BY,JESSE'AND DOLORES N. ARRIOLA, '- 225 EAST. LA PALMA {1VENUE ANAHE7N~ CACIFORNIA ONNERSQ REQUESTINQ PEnMissioN ro YIAIVE MINI.~IUM FLOOR AREA PARKI~IG SPACE, AND D(TERIOR , „~;-;'. SIDEYARD RE~UIREMENTS•-~~so ro.P ERM1? ~NCROACHMENT OF ATTACHED:GARAGE INTO 1NTER1 R'SIDEYARd~:'-ON PROPERTY'.DESCRIBED A5: A PARCEI 47 FEET ~ BY 150 FEET NITH A.FRONYAQE OF,47 FEET.ON THE NOltTH SIOE OF LA'PALMA " AVENUE~ AND LOCAT,ED ON THE NORTHNEST CORNER OF LA P.ALMA AYENUE AND PATT STREET AND FURTHER DESCRIBED A5 225 EAST LA PALMA AVENUE. 'PRO~ . < ~ BERTY P.RESENTLY CLASSIFIED IN TNE.,R~3~ MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDEM IAL, ~.,_ . _ '. ZONE. , ~ MR. JESBE'AkR~OLA~ THE PETIT:ONER~ APPEARED.BEFORE,THE'COMM15510N AND STATED.THAT HE M'ISHED_TO.REPLACE AN EXISTINQ DWELLIHG WITN A N~W r- RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE.CONTAlNIN6 APPROXIMATELY 800 SQUARE FEET. THE HEARING WA5 CLOSED. E .. . ... . . . .. . ~. TME C6MMISSION REViEWED OEVELQf'MENT PLANS AMD DISCUSSED tHE CONTEMPlATEO CONSTRUCT.I'OtC FOit THE WIDENIRO OF PATT'STREET MH1CH'MOULD PLACE'THE PROPO.SED CONSTRUCTION'YITHIN 2} FEET.~OF THE SIDENALK. THE COMMISSION ~ t, ' AL50 :DT3CUSSED.'iHE LACK`O~ COHFORp!!TY NlTH'C9DE-REQUfREMENTS OF.THE € ;,z~.,;: , '. . P.R~SENT USE OF THE',PROPERTY~' At9D THE NECE551.TY FOR SUBMISSION OF ! 4 j;,~ REV,ISED.PLANS INDICATING SETBACKS.AND,DEDI.CATION°FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS r THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED:FOR'THE,SUBJECT PROPERTY.-'COMM'ISSIONER ALLRED ~ ~+; ~ ' `ADVISED THE PET.I?IONER:TO.CQNTACT THE' BUILDIN(i AND PLANNIN(i;D,EPART~ ` ~~ '' MENT.B, IN'RESPECT'TO'SUr'MIT71Nd::REVISED P,LANS~ FULLY DIMENSIONED~ AND {f ~ .~ ,~~: t;~y>~ „ INdICATINa BUILDING SET:iAGKS AND S7REET DEDICATION. HE SUO~ESTED , t.^ ~?,~J.iF~ THAT THE':EXISTIN~ OARA~E BE REMOVED.7N ORDER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE!RREA t~,K ~ r! h FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT _- '. ' °j. ~tiy ~~ • J, R . .~ . ; . i /k~,; 4.,~ THE PETlT10NFR~S.AQENT -'INOICATED THAT. Ha ~ii0UL0 BE ABLE TO SUBMIT ~ + ~~'~ ~ a ~,~ ~' Y ~ r F~ ~ ~ ~~~ r ~,.~M1 ~~ . ~ c. : ~ ~l~ frl. m ~.a fr z,~1~> ~y`- y l~tti Y/> `, t? ~5i u~ ~7± h.~ ti+~. ~~.~ t ~ ~ a., ,~ ~.~ ~~ ~ f t .. ~ .. ,,[ y ar .~ ~ e .~ . ' ~ ~, o~} ~'' ~r ~ i ; r~' ~.J ~a( ~ Y ~~ ~ r f~~~~ ~ ~ , ~ y : ~ , l ~4,~f~ ~~~r'~,~'~.'.~1~ , .. . , f `~ ~ .v , , .,ti .. ~ ~: ; , ., ~ ~? ~,.f9,:;,~ .s. . ° ~~~ ~~ ,:•:, ~~~ ~ ~ ' .;' . . >.. . t0'~ _!;: r L . ~c~~. ' ~ ._~ ,,' :; ::`. ,,, _.. . . .. . .. ..,.... . . . . . . ~ i.; +~zi~y+ek- ~ ' _ ~ . ~.: r (~$N lYC6iMlM ~Y 'I~I~+wa ~ i ~~r~1 ... . . .. .. . . I~~~It~, . . .. .. .. '.... ~_ .: ._ , .._ ~--. 4 YY~~ :6 ~: , ., . ~ J l!t' , ~ i '~ .~' ~ ~~ ~ . .. .~. ~~~~ S , , . d06 - MINUTES,_CITY PLANN11~6 COMMISSION~ SEP7EMBER }8,;1961,,CONTINUED: , YARIANCE'N0. T407 - REVISED PIANS WITHIN TWO WEEKS fN ACCO~tDANCE W1TH THE COMMTSSION~S " CONTJNUED SU(iQESTIONS: ``~ ' COMM15540NER ALLRED OFFERED A MOTION~ SECONDED BY COMNISSIONER • `~ PEBLEY.-AND .OARRIER~ THAT.,PETl:dON FOR':,VARI:ANCC N0.::14Q7 BE CONT)M~ UED'::UNT IL~ .THE-MEE71 NO .OF~` OCTOBER , 2~•: 1961~ . AT•! WH ICN,T IaE .TNE: P~7 1•~ TIONER'SHALt SUBMIT.~REVISED PLANS FOR.;COMMISSION CONSIDERATION~ ' IND IOATINO:BUILDINQ'SETBACKS AND DEDICATION AND BElN4 FULCY DIMEN- SIO~IED~, YARIANCE N0.-14oe - PUBLIC ~IFJIRING.• PETITION 6UBMITTED.BY MaLLIAM D..GRINROt1~ i663 ` x MEST.;BUEN/~cV15TA.A.VENUE 'ANAHEIM • CAL'IFORNIA' AND.LCOYD ~k. PETTEN~ GILL "1564;`TONIA:"LANE'~;ANAHEIM~'~ALIFORNIA~ Ow-ietts; ROTHMAN-STEEN AND dssoc:taTES~ CLAUDINA.`STREET :ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA 223 SOUTH : , AOENTS•`:REQUESTiNO:P.ERM654ION,TO'YIAIVE.MIIVIMUM l0i SiZEpND lOf es- DTH ~E I E E FOR PRO SED`LOT SUBDIV IS10NS ~_oN PaoaeRrY c Yt QU R NTS• ? • _ M PO 'CRIBEO AS '•-AN.;IRREQULARI.Y SHAPEC •PARCEL. M1TH •A FRONT.AOE .OF; 100 FEET:ON.THE EAST..SIDE OF~.EUC U D`AVENUE'BETWEEN BUENA VISTA A,VENUE CORNER.OF EUCLID AND AND PALM',LANE::AND'LOCATED'.ON THE NORTHEAST, , BUENA•VISTA.AVENUES. PROPERTY.PRESENTCY CLASSIFIED IN TME R~A u D R - ~ ': ENTIAL;AGRICUITURAL;aN -1, ONE FAMILY RESI RESIDENTIAL,,20NE . SUBJECT PETITION `IS SUBMITTED iN CONJUNCTION MlTH PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION.NO. 61~2~26: • MR.'`GORDON ST~EN~;THE PETI710NER~5 AQENT~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COM- ' M•ISSION'AND'DISPLAYED:AN'EXHIBIT OF'THE,RROPOSED>DEYELOPMEN7 OF ''- SUBJECT PRO~ERT.Y.:' HE-`DESCRiBED-TME.PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF THE PROPERTY-I,NTO`THRECc51NGLE FAMIlY RESIDENi1AL L0T9~.7W0,OF'WHICH, WI.LL`:BE.60.i,EET.:.IN:.WIDTH~! ONE ?WITH.':'A•. .WfDTH OF 62 FEET~'AND, , . C~NTAINlNO A TOTAL~SQUARE.FOdTAQE OF:,%;8000~;7300~ AN4 67Z0-'RES~ '; PECT.,IVELY~ IN''ADDI.TION-.T0,.7HE STRAI6HTEN1.Nfi:;OF THE:NESTERCX. 1.0T LI_NE?~OF THE,EASTERNMOST'•.PARCEL.OFr 5U8JECT,sPROPERTY.,° HE'• STATED . ` ' THAT THE PROPOS~D;;SUB,D;IVt4"ION WOUCD ENABLE.,•THE PETJTTONERS T0 • OEVEL07:THE PROPERTY,MHICH•HAD:BEEN'fMPOS9IBLE,TO DEVELOP.,BEi,ORE.-• ~:, MR.:'.:STEEN.-THEN •DESCRIBED?HE.;20NtNa AND LAND:,USE, OF`TNE SURROUNDIN~ ' AREA'~ INDICATING'THAT A'CONVALESCENT':HOSPITAG'WAS;STJUATED;`DIRECTLY ,PROPER7Y. HE DdSTRi~ ~ACR09S.BUENA-VlSTA:AVENUE•FROM THE SUBJECT , EDHpLOT- PLANSr COUI~D BE CO-~STRUCTED AN~ ' :OF •T;HE'TYPE':Of' HOMES:THAT ' .' BUT 'S. . „ , THE:;`L'~OTS~.AND• STATED STHAT„,7HE HONES SELECTED yOULD BE COMPARAB4E T0 ~ THE•iRE91D'ENTIAL'DEVELOPMENT IN`7HE.`AREA. HE STA7ED'FURTHER..THAT THE;PRICE'.RANQE•WOULD.BE':FROM s22~000 TO','s23~000"PER DWECLING~.'AND THAi"+THE PROPOSED.'RE51'DENTIAL'':LOTS'`-WOULD,CREATE`AN EXTENSION'OF THE.: RE3TDENTIALi AREA;e41E5TERLY FROM, THE•,EXISTINO' RE810ENTIAL'OEVELOPMENT TO ABUT U,PON •A FINE ~COMMERCI'AL-:DEYEL'OPNENT~ ;TO BE S1TUA7EG:`ui~'TH2 NORTHEAST::CORNER:;OF'.,EUCI.:ID,~AVENUE 11ND'`BUENA;:VTSTA AVENIJE. HE' ApDEC'THAT THE PET;JTlQNERS',k01lLD 8E NILti1NQ'tQ: 9UBM1.T. DEYEI,OPMENT' ' P.LANS FOR'7.HE'REVI.EM AND,,APPROVAL OF.'AN ARCHX7ECTURAL CONTRO~ ` COMM,ITTEE. ' , ,, , MR -~`DUANE DAIISON~,1664.BUENA V.l.STA AVENUE~ AP.PEARED.,BEFORE THE COM~ - MISSION~ AND'DESCRIBED 7HE REB.IDENTI~AL.~.DEVELOPMENT iN THE BURROUNDiNQ 'AREA~ THE;LOCAT.ION OF THE' HOSP"ITAL'.'AND..THE=DOCTOR~.S`.RESIDENCE,. : HE `'QU07ED SECT'IONS';OF THE;NUNIC'1PAL CODE''ilN'REBPECT TO-LOT,MIDTH AND :' .DEP7H.REQUIREMENTS " HE:;BTATED.;THAT TME APPROYAL OF.THE 9UBJECT ~ i: THE'OTHER: RESIDENTIAL RET,IT'ION-WOULD DECREASE..THE PROP, ERTY VAWES:OF , 'SURROUNDING-AREII.;:HE STATED~FURTHER THAT 1T':WAS 'DEVELOPMENT.IN TNE . THE{,OP INI,ON`OF AGI.'"OF `THE' R~BIDENTS ,ON. BUENA`:VI87A` AVENUE THAT THE . . PROPOSED 60 FOOT'rLOT N~DTH:;WOULD.BE;bETRIMENTAC T0 THE'OTMER'RESI~ ; "DENCES !N'THE•AREA~ ALL`OF..WHICH:CONT:AIN:APPROXIMATELY'1500 SQUARE ` ` WHO PURCMASED. THE ' ~~ FEET'. ~MR.:':'DAWSON'BTATED':7HAT MR. ;PETTEN~'ILL~ , PROPEFTY~' HAD. pURCHASED',;1T; ON ;THE:SPECUI.ATIYE MARKETi~ '[HEREFOR6 HE WAS ..' NOT%.CONC@RNED:ABOUT THE'EFFECTrTHE PROPOBED SUBDIVtS10N WOULD.HAVE ON,,THE'SURROUND~Na-PROP,ERT'IES.1F SMA~LER`HOMEB„MER6'-BU1LT.: MR.. DAW~ SON TH6N`;DISCUSSED ?HE POSB.IBfL'ITY OF>SUBDIVIDI~Q THE LOT.S TO CONTAIN ' ' ~ ';70:FOOT,.NIRTNS BY::,UT7LIZINO SOME OF'JHE.PROPERTY PROP08ED FOR THE ~;' ` •;~ COMMERCIAL-DEVELOPMENT~.•;AND ;NE~-INDICATED THAT~~NE'`UNDERSTOOD THAT,': ~; D AYENUE,WOULD:SERVE AS A,.Bl1FFER AND '- „-• " COMMERCIAL';D~VELOPM NT ON'EUOLI ` , . TNAT 1T PROHAHLY WAS SHE`BE9T ,11SE OF PROPERIY AHUTT-iNQ THAT,HU9Y ` , ~ AT THE COMMERCIAL BUILDINO,;NOULD ' ( , STREET HE STATED HOWEVER~ TH ENA VLSTA AVENUE.WNICH.WOULD BE A CREA TE ADDITIONAL!:TRAFFiC ON BU : 1 , , HA2ARD FOR-THE CK7LDREN;IN THE'AREA. '- '"; Mtt `M F. iTATE~ '1636 BUENA' VlST(A AVENUE~ ~APPEARED.,BEFORE THE COMMIS~ ~,`,' SION,AND..OESCRIBED,OTHER':RBSIDENT,UL.DEVEI.OPMENT.ALONG'EUCCID,Ay,ENUE~• ~ Y; .TO HpVE';COMMERCIAL PROPER7Y'FACINa:THE AND':ASKED';fF IT=,MAS NECESSARY:- r s r , ADD)T10N,.,TO ENCROACH- ACROSS EUC,LI:D AVENU~ ON'TME MEST~. IN ` ~: ' HIOH SCHOOL , , 1NQ:DPON RESIDENTIAL CE1fELOPMENT -. ; e F , , : TWO,pET1TI0NS OF PROTESTR CON7AyNiNG A'TOTAL'OF 66 SIQNATURES~ WERE aY " ~~~° READ AND+BU6NITTBD TO 7HE COMMI8SION 3 A DISCUSSION_MAS I~ELD UPON: ' x ~~~' INDICATICD; THAT; 7HE -PET1T10N TNE;;pETLT1AN8 OF `PROTEST~AND~ ~T NAS ~, -~ ' :` ,. DATED SEF,TEMBEIt 16~ 1961';SUPERCEDED THE OTH[R BECAUSE THERE WAB A. .; i; a+~ ~, ~ tl~ i ` /! l ` ' . h _ ti.4 ~ ~ - f f Y • ~ ~ S ^ ^ ~ ~ t ' ~ : :, t i .~ ~. :. ~ ~ ~ ~ ' s 4~ ~~~ ~i '~ . a c. ~ .~ ~-. ., , ,~` 'e i1 rc • .. ~ .. ... . . .: r ..~'~ k S /f .~~: .i :'~ ~ _ ~ _ _. .. .~> 5 ~~~~ m. ; j r = .... . _,, ~~ ~ ... ~: ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~. .. . .. . .~ ~ ~. . ~ ~ ~~ . ~.., ~~ .~~'. : ~..~~ . . ~ . :~... . s .;~ _ t . ~ ~~ .. ~. ~ . ~ .. _' . -. ~ d:l~ ' . ' . . ..... : _: .. ~ ~ . . . . . . ~ ~ ~ ~.. .. . . . _ . . :.; :. . ~~ : . ..4~~ ~ . ~ . . . . , ' ~ .. ~ ' ., . '.. ' : ' ' ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~, ,.:~: . .,. . . ~ .:.. ~- . ` .. .. . _ . . . . - ~ , .~.~~ . . ... ~ . , ~ . ~ , . ~ ":'` , HINUTES; CITY RLANNiNG COMMISSION, SePreNSeR 16~ 1961~ CONTINUED: , } , VaRIANCE N0. 1406 ~ _ . , . DIFFERENCE OF OPINION AMONfi THE RE57DENT5 7N,?HE AREA. BOTH PETJ~ " CONTINUED ' TIGNS~.'HOWEVER~ BROTESTED.AQAlNST•THE RROPOSED VARIANCE. , ' MR.-GORDON MOWRY~ 1647.BUENA VISTA AVENUE~ APPEARED.BEFORE THE•COM~ SStON T0 CLARIFY-THE 1~47.TER..OF THE TWO.PETITIOMS~ ~HE STATED THAT• WI , AGL TME RESIDENTS•HAD%THE SAME INTEREST~ WH7CH WA5'THE PROTECTION OF THEIR HOMES'~,;`AND H.E.REQUESTED THAT 7,HE..LOTS.BE MAINTAINED 1N CONFORM~ ANCE,WITH'THE SURROUNQfNQ AREA. ~ •• • • MR.-~OHN:ROTHMAN'~ A~iENT FOR THE PET;ITIONERS~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COM~ ~ PETITIONER~ MR. PETTEN6ILL~ MAS 1NTER- MI,SSIbN~,AND•STATED THAT THE E$TED,I:N THE AREA,AND HAD OO.NE TO SOME EXPENSE.IN ORDER•T0 DEVELOP THE MO57 SUITAB.LE.pLAN FOR•THE•,PROPERTY. HE STATEb FURT.HER 7HAT TNE. YOUT WAS DEVlSED IN ORDER:TO•LIMIT TN.E LOCATION T0 ONLY pROPOSED CA q ~ , ONE .LOT'~EACING THE HOSPITAL `ACRO55 THE:.STREET~, AND THAT•TO INCREASE "' ~, ; ~y THE .DIMENSlONS T0.70 FEET, ,WOULD PLACE iTMO LOTS' IN•''ERONT OF THE ,,, ~ 4,, ` HOSPITAL~ THEREBY,CAUSING THE SELI.ING ~PRaC~ T0; BE ~SLIGHTLY-LESS THAN , Y .~ .;: IF ,T•HE LOTS: FACED:;RESIDENTJAL:,DEVELOPMENT FIR.. 'R~T.HMAN STATED: FUR- ~ ~ THER THAT THE HOR~j9~.M0.U.LD= BE. ,CONSTJtU.C.7ED 1 N~ CONFORM ITY • N ITH •7.HE OTHERS IN•THE NE1Q~9Q.,RHOOD~,THAT:;~.EGONOMIC~FAC70RS IN.RESPECT••TO TNE ELOPINQ':THE::RESIDENTIAI.~~PROPERTY WGULD REQUIRE.THAT THE COST'OF DEV ; . HOMES S~l.C..FOR AP.P,ROXIMATELY' =23~~000~. THAT 'AtL; ~OF THE', L07S ON THE ' ~ STREET WERE'DEED RESTRICTED TO.A'MINl1AUM OF•I~500•SQUARE FEET OF LIVEABLE FLOOR AREA~ THAT THE PETITIONERS WOULD B2 WILU NO'TO ' RESTRICT THE+PROPERTY TO ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL~ AND•THAT T0•EXTEND SHE,RESIDENTtAL'LOTS TO EUCL7D AVFNUE WOUCD"NOT BE DESLRABLE BECAUSE OF THE TRAFFIC;'AND THE,RROBLEMS.:CREATED BX RESIDENTTAL DEVELOPMENT MR. ROTHNAN STAT•ED'.TiIAT BECAUSE OF•THE.PROBLEMS ON'A;,MAJOR STREET, .. -0F THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY•A8UtT7Nfi EUCLID QVENUE~ THE PROPERTY ON THE'CORNER F!AD BEEN,PI.ANNED FOR A COMMERCIAI DEVELOPMENT' LIMITED T0 BUSINE55 OR PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY~ WH7GH WOULD 8E AN . ASSET TO THE AREA.- HE STATED ALSO THAT THE PLANS PRESENTED WOULD ENABLE TNErPETITIONERS T0•REALf2E:THE.FULL POTENTIAL OF THE.PROPERTY~ THAT:THE RROPOSED OFFfCES NOULD.NOT fiENERATE A•BREAT AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC~ TNAT ONLY 18.PARKIN(i SRACES WOULD BE REQUIRED'FOR THE COM~ MERC~AL PROPERTY{`THAT-.2HE.PLAN OFFERED NAS A REASONABLE PLAN~,AND THAT-THEX,-WERE WILLING T0 ATTACH CONDIY~IONS'TO ITS:APPROVAL. . ~, THE HEKRING MAS CLOSED. ' . THE.`COMM,45S:rON REV.IEWED.THE ACTIONS BY WF~aCH THE HOSPITAL WAS APPROVED AND:THE A~(~~{! ~QF'`AREA iNVO WED. A DISCOSSION WAS-HE4D ON THE SUB~ EN7LY CLASSIFIED • Y PRE U ~ S DIN4 THE PARCEL OF PROPERT JECT VARIANS~ ~GC NED AND:OCCUPI'ED•BY MR. ` OW ZONE LY'RESIDENTIAL 1 R~1 ON ~ , ~ ~ LN THE- ~ M1, G. y QRINROD~ AND THE~PROPOSED THREE LOTS PRESENTLY IN'THE R~A~ RESIDENTIA~ ~ AdR1CULTURAL~ ZONE. A$S.ISTANT CITY.ATTORNEY''JOE GEIBLER.ADVISED THE COMMlSSION THAT THEY.MOULD BE TAKIN~ TWO ACTIONS~:OOVERED'BY TNE SUBJECT-VARlANCE~ ANE'UPON.THE R~1 ONE FAMICY RESIDENTIAC~ ZONEU t PARCEL~.AND ONE<ACT1bN'UPON THE!R-d~`-RESIDEN7.7AL AfiRICULTURAL~ ZONED : PARCEL. ~ THE COMMISSION DISCUSSEO LOT D'~MENSIONS AND T,HE POSSIBLE.EXTENSION OF . THE;PROPOSED L075 '1NT0 THE PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER ~ TO ESTABLISH LOTS CONTAININa 70.'FEE7'IN WIDTH. MR. ROTHMAN 18R);CATED~ ~ ` HOHEVER~,7HAT.7HE REASON FOR THE:REQUESTED.LOT DIMENSLONS WAS `1N;` r J "'~ ORDER;TO'.LIMIT 7HE NUMBER OF .~.OTS.FACINO 7HE NOSPITAL. ~` 4 ~ THE COMMISSION T.HEN D15CUSSED.THE PROBLEM OF DEVELOPJN~C7HE SUBJECT PROPERTY N1TM THE POSSIBILITY THAT,A REQUEST FOR MULTIPLE FAMILY ~ ~ RESIDENTIAL DEV,ELOPMENT'-MIQHT.BE SUBMITTED. . , ~ I COMMt5510NER MARCOUX OFFERED A MOTION•TO CONT.INUE 7HE SUBJECT PET'I'~ ~`. .; WHIOM TO CONSIOER TH~' + TION 1N ORDER~70'PROYIDE ADD~TJONAL T:~ME IN , . THAT.THE SUBJECT PETITJON MATTER. COMMISSIONER PEBLEY INDICA7ED'. ~` ` , 'CONTAINED A LO~ICAL•PLAN:FOR<DB`lELOPMENT AND: TMAT~:'If A;DESIRABLE. PROFESS10NAl'DEVECOPMENT'WERE.;ESTABLISNED'AND'STRTCT CONTROLS W,ERE~ TNE',DEVEGOPMEN7`COULD.`BE.AN'ASSET''T0 THE-AREA.' THE MOT'1,ON• 1MP08ED~;. G ~ ~ ,. , , . DIED FOR:LACK OF'A SECOND ° ~~ - . . : ' ` i ~ THE.'COMMISSION FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLONINQ FAC'~'S REOARDINQ THE ~ ~ SUBJECT PETI~ION:` ` '' ' i , a :" << _ . _ . . :. 1' THAT'THE PE7lT10NER:REQUESTS A VARIAHCE:FROM THE AHAHEtM,MU!l1C1 ~~ i. PAI. CODE~ SECTlON 18.16.030 (4 B~.TO PERMI THE.SPLIT.OF SUBJECT fi,~ { ti 4 PR~PERTX INTO FIVE.:(5):PARCELS„2`AND SECTION 18'.24.030, (4~A) TO 1s~ y ~+ERMJ..T, THE;:M,INIMUM WIDTH OF SIXTN (60~'-FEET AND A MINIMUM'LOT ' y~ y~ ' I,FfED IN THE. R~1~ AREA OF. 6~770 SQQARE Fe.ET'.;FOR PROPERTV CLA55 Y ~ ~., .: ~ , t . ONE F.AMILY RESIDEN7IAL~ ZONE ~ ' , x , y , ~7~ yi ,., ^ ;. , . , ` ` ` ~` "^~ " . . ~ . 2 THAT' THERE ARE EXCEPTIONAL; OR' EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES. OR~ . . ,~•Eqf 74 'uw~Y , . '. COND1710N5 APPLICABL° TO.THE PROPERTY INVOWED';OR TO THE : R~. 4~ ; . .. ~ SE` OF. 7HE' PROPERTY. TNAT DO .,N07, APPLX' tiENERALIY TO ,THE :~ li1T,ENDED U „ ~ , , _ , FROPERTY OR;CLA54 OF USE ,1N TNE SAME V1,CiN1TY^AND`20NE y ~* ' ± b~~ • . . ,. PRESERYATION THA~'.THE REQUESTEO';VARIANC~ 19.NECESSARY FOR:THE 3, f ,- ~ r s! z :..P:..~ ' ~ , er'~~G . ~ 6$ e c ~.. ~ ;. o ~ ~, ~:~ ~. . ~: _ , ~, '., , M ,.°Kt'c ys~ r ..~ 3`:i3~!a..n~, - ' ~~ ~. .._ ,_.. ~, .,:. ....~ ," ~ . . _ . . ~ . .. . . , . _`. .;. .,._.~..~...~'.._..... `. . .' - -_...~--. . .. `c . . , 6_+...u:_;..~: ..:.;:-.:_.:: . ~. :., . .,. ~,.,:, t.~.., . : ,~......._.2.:~w.::_~":I.:Sa3~:'.'".::.`::,':.~.'o.l4fk.:1r.2".~s:rl:..~:.w:kd:~5+:{7. E:17L'LL:SseV~Y.'6e~i.C:i.'.:G'~4.hx+:r,'~ ;,z..... :~_.. 4 ( `E i. . if . t i~v. I. ~:(. ~ '~,' y~ 't~f.1%4 S 1 S . ' ~ ~ '_. VT`kY ~,. ~' ::~ ~ ~ ~ . .. .. ~ - ~ ~ ' ~~~, .. . - . . .. . ~~~ :. '- ~~ , . . . . . . ~ . . ~ . ~ ~ •' . ,-'.~i _,: . 408 _. ; _ - _ ' ~. _ ;;~ _ ~ MINUTES, GITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ SEPTEMBER 18~ 1961~ CONTINUED: . VARIANCE NQ. 1406 ~ AND ENJOYMEN7,OF•A SU95TANTIAL PROPERTY R1~HT POSSESSED BY OTHER ~ CONTiNUE~ PROPERTY'1N THE SAME VLCINITY AND ZOliE~ AND DENIE~ TO THE.PRO~ PERTY~IN QUESTI~N. . 4: THAT THE REQUESTED~YARIANCE WII.L•NOT BE MATERIALLY•OETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC MELFARE OR INdUR10U5 TO THE PROPERTY OR IMPROVE~ MENTS•7N SllCH VICINITY•AND 20NE IN WHICH THE PROPERTY 15 LOCATEO. 5. TNAT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE MILL NOT ADVER5ELY AFFECT THE COM~ . PREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN. • • 6. . THAT THE PETITI0NER5 kAVE YNCICATED N7lL1NGNE55 TO ESTABLISH AN • ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL UPON THE DEVELO?MENi -0F SUBJECT PROPER'iY !r AND T HA7 THE R~SIDENTIAL L0i5 BE DEED RESTRICjED~ LLM171~ 7H~ MINIMUM L NEABLE FLOOR AREA TO BE CONSTRUC7ED TO 1500 SQ, F!E ~ ~iuc ~ FEET. . . . , . . . . 't`" ~~`'? 7. 7HAT VERBAL OPPOSITION~ IN ADDITION TO TWO PETITIONS OF PROTEST~ ~ 1 WAS RECOROED AGAIN5T-5UBJECT PETITtON. , • . { ~ COMM15510NER ALLRED OFFERED•RESOLUiION N0. 84~ SERIES 1961~62r AND ~ MOYED EOR 1T5 PASSA4E AND ADOP710N~ SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER 17UN~ALL~ , * TO GRANT PETl.TION FOR VARLANCE N0. 1406~ SUBJECT TO THE FO~LOWING COND7TION5: ~ , 1: DEDICATION OF 53 FEET FROM THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE QF EUCLID RVENUE (30 FEET EX1571Nfi). , ~ ~ 2. PREPARAT.tON'0F STREET IMPROVEMENT•PLANS AND INSTALLATION OF ALL lMPROYEMENTS FOR EUCLID AVENUE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED ~ , S~ANDARD:PLANS ON~FILE IN THE ~1FFICE OF TNE GITY ENaINEER. ~ ! 3: PkOVfSION'OF U7ILITY EASEMENTS ALONCi EXT6RIOR BOUNDARIES A5 g -ETERMINED TO BE NECESSARY~BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES r ~TO ADEQUATELY SERVE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND OTHER PROPERTY. ~ 4: RECORDATION OF A RECORD OF SURVEY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. , 5.. SIfBJECT T0 THE APPROVAL OF PETITION FOR RECI.ASSIFICATION N0. ~ . 61-62-26. ti fi. RECORDATION OF DEED.RESTR1CT10N5 LIMITIN~ MlN1MUM LIVEABLE ~ FCOOR AREA PER RES7DENCE 7C, 1~500 SQUARE FEET. ~ K 7: DEYELOPMENT PLANS TO BE SUBMTTTED TO AND BUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF ?NE ARCHITEC7URAL REVIEM COMMITTEE. ~ 3> .. ~ ~ . . .. , . . , . . . . r O: TIME-,LIMITATION OF ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY (180) DAYS FGR THE ACCOM~ P UBHb1ENT OF aTEM HOB.' 1~ 2~ 3~ 4~ 5~ 6~ AND 7. ' VHE FOREQOIN~ CONDITIONS MERE RECITED AT THE MEETING AND NERE FOUND r. ~• 1 40 BE A:NECES$ARY PREREQUISITE,,TO THE USE OF 7HE PROPERTY lN ORDER~ XO:PRESERVE THE.SAFETY AND WEI:F'ARE OF 7NE C,lT12EN4 OF THE CITY OF ~ ANAHEIM. _ r ON ROLL CALL THE FOREOOING RESOLUTION YAS PASSED aY THE FOLLOMINQ . .': ;; _ VOTE. ' ~ AYES: COMM1SSa0NERS. ALLRED~'GAUER~ HAFQOOD~ MUN9IILL~ PEBLEY~ _ PERRY~.SUMMERS. ;. NQES: CQMMISSIONERS: M~Rcoux. ~ ABSENT: COMMlSSIONERS: MORRIS. c RECLASSIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING. PeTyrioN sueMirr.EO ev LLOYD R: PETTENGILL 1564 ToNJ~ •' < ~ N0. 61-82-26 LANE ANAHE.IM~.CALIFaRN1A~ OWNER• ROTHMAN-STEEN ~Nn ASSOCIdTES, 223 SOUTH CLAUDINA STREET~ ANAHEIM~ ~ALiFORN1Ay AfiENTp REQUESTING T-IA7 : - FRGPERTY:"OESCRIBED A5. A PARCEL 100 FEET BY 223 FEET M17H A f.RON7'AQE ~ OF 100;FEET ON'7HE EAST S1DE.OF:EUCLID AVENUE BETWEEN BUENA VISiA AVENUE AND PALM LANE AND LOCATED -0N THE NORTHEA87 CORNER OF ~1CLID FA16 SUEHA~VISTA AVENUES~ BE:RECtA94lF18D FROM THE R-A ,RESED€NTIAL ~~ A6RICULTURAL;"20NE To'fHE -0-1 NEIGH80RHOOD COMMERCIAt~,ZONE (RESTRICJ.EP ~ _ ~, - TO..BUSI,NESS AND PROFES310NAL bFFICES)• ~ j {, StlBJECT',PETI710N IS SUBMIT7E6 IN CONJUNCTION MITH PETIIION FOR,VARIANCE , x~ ' ~No 1406: ,~F ~tiy . _: . ~ ,, ~',( e1 cs' i HR GOFtDON STEEN~ THE:PET171dNER~S,_AQ6NT~. APPEARED,86FORE THE COMMIS~; 7 4YNR ~ ,,,,; 910N ANR'STATED'TNAT:THE PROPERTY PROPQSED`FOR'RECLASS.IFICATION`70 +t~ ~~ ` ~ •. , ?HE C..,I~~ NEIGHBORHOOD~',CCMMERCiAL~ .ZONE NAS 'ONNED BY'MR.' PETTENGILL.-, '" ~ - • • . MR.' STEEN' DISPLAYED- A,PLOT :PLAN~ SNOMINa TWO: BUtLD~-t~Si AT'IACHED BY A' , ; '" "' ` S-FOR,BUSINESS OI~rFROF,E5S10NAL `, ~l, y: BREEZEWAY AND CONTAINING SIX SU1TE ~ 1' ~' _ ~ r;!F . L ~ `~ ~t . . ~ . ~ik+~ e ~~ s~ rc . i_ ~'~ ~` ~ -``7~'}r ~} x .. . ~ ~ . . - ~. 1 sY' eF ~ ,~~ti ~ ` ( . ~i .~~ y (dM~ id~ ~ , {S ^Ia 1'dHj _ ..f N 1~7 i} S S~ 4"LiJ~. ' ! rt y~J f. ~,~~`Rj .4 ~ SiVi w~ "~y~~ `tr4'ra`u `;~72yfr a 9 - ~~ ,rr '~ `~` i.y, e ~t 2, f ' . ~ '; ,r: ! ~ ~ .v~~~ ,~. ti ~ ~~~.e .4~,. ~r,a~4 ~~ ~~~~ . ' ~~~`..~_~., ~?~; _. .. .r... .~ ~i~.~,"~~'' ii ~ ? %' ?r ~ . ~ . ~`~ ' -:11 ~.~ ~ .. .. ~ ,.. - . -_A- . . . ,. .:.. _~ :: . ' . _~:. ~~ ~ .. ' .... . ~ ~i -: .. • ~' ',. • . - 409 r . ~'' NO: b1-62~26 ..~ .~. ......n., .-nc VYVM1/Ytl un. to PARRIN(3 SPACES AT THE REAR OF SUBJECT FROPERLY~ ANQ-oROVtD1Nfi ACCE55•'f0•THE-PARK7Nf3 AREA FROM• '' -CONTINUED :EUCLID:AVENUE•.AND•BUENA V15TA AVENUE. .MR., STEEN~` STATED THAT~•THE , ARCNITECTURE;'OF 7HE:BLICDING WOULD BE.RES'IDENT1AIs,1N CHARACTER~ 7HAT ~ ' ' ~ DENEROUS.AMOUNTS.OF.:LANDSCARINa WOUL[1~BE,PROVIDED~::THAT•THERE NOULD <BE-AN-AMPGE AMOUNT~OF PARKINa AT THE.kEAR.OF•THE PROPERTY NOT VISIBLE FROM;THe'STREET~.AND THAT 7NE DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE TN HARMONY WITH , THE HOSPITAL:PROPER7Y AND WITH THE RESIDENTIAL'DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA.:... A PETITION~ CON7A1N1NG 35 SIGNATURES~'MAS READ AND SUBMIT7E0 TO 7HE COMMISSION~•REQUESTING THAT'T E ' ? ' H .SUBJECT .PROPERTY BE LIIn1TED T0 BUSIMESS•OR PROFESSIONAL OFFICES ONLY~ 7HAT NO ACCESS OR EXITS BE P.ERMITTED,ON BUENA V157A AVENUE~ AND THAT NO RETA1l SALES BE ~y ~V r# . PERMITTED. , . . .. : . . ~ ~ . r~,.J::, MR. DUANE DANSON~ 1654 BUENA.VISTA AVENUE"~ APPEARED BEFORE 7HE COM~ ' rtiti~~' - MISSION~-REYIEWED THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS~ AND STqTED 7HAT~THE PRO~ ~~ POSED USE'WOULD ADD TO,THE TRAFFIC.PROBLEM•1N 7HE•AREA~ THAT•1T. ~~ WOULD.'BE A.HA2ARD.TO THE,CHILDREN IN~jHE AREA~ THAT CARS MOULD•BE ` g PARKrN~ ON.THE STREET AND.TURNING AROUND IN THE MIDDLE OF 7HE BLOCK~ AND T ' t ' HAT HE CONSIDERED THE•PROPERTY MORE SUITABLE FOR A LIBRARY. ~! MR.:•~ORDON-MOWRY~ 1647 BUENA VISTA AVENUE~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COM~ ` M1SS10N~•AND STATED THAT,ALTHOUGH 7NE RESIDENTS NOULD PREFER RE51- DENTIAL DEVELO?MENT ON.THE'SUBJECT,.PROPERTY~ A REALISTIC VIEMPOINT OF THE SITUATION 1NDICATED THAT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPNENT M1GHT BE THE ONLY FEASIBLE USE AND THAT~ PROVSOED 7'HAT NO :EXITS+ OR ACCESS WERE PERMITTED'fROM BUENA VISTA AVENUE~ f{E WOULD NOT OBJECT T0 THE DEVELOPMENT. :. , MR;.`JOHN-R07HNAN~ THE PET1TlONER~S AGENT~ APPEARED BEFORE THE C07.i^ ' MISSION~ANp STATED THAT.THE PLANS COUL:D BE'AMENDED ELININATING THE• ; ACCE55 FRON'BUENA•VISTA'AVENUE~,ALTNOUGH TKE PURPOSE FOR THAT ` ~ ` ACCE55 HAD BEEN IN ORDER.TO PROVIDE MORE ADEQUATE TRAFFLC CIRCULAT'ION ` ' WITHIN THE SUBJECT 'PROPERTY .;1THE COMM155ION INDICATED THAT THE ` . ACCE55 ON BUENA VISTA AVENUE SHOULD:,BE ELIM~NATED. ~ THE HEAR1iJG WA~ CL.OSED. " THE,COMMISSIL'1i_FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOL~OWtNG FACTS RE(iARDINO ' :THE.'SUBJECT PETITION: • I 1. TNAT'.THE PET1T10NER PROPQSES A REClAS51FICATION OF THE ABOVE DES- ~ C E ' ' ' RIB D ~pROPERTY FROM THE R-~A RE${DENTIRC A~RICULTURAL~ ZONE TO ' j :; TMe C-1~:=NE1.GH80RH00D COMMER~IAL~'Z'CNE~ LIMITED 70 BUSINESS OR ~ PROFE5510NI1L OFFICES'ONLY.' i 2. THAT THE PROP05ED RECLASSIFICA'f10N OF SUBJECT PROPERTY i5 NECES- I' SARY,OR DESIRABLE'FOR 7HE;ORDERLY AND PROPER DEVELOPMENT OF THE , COMMUN77Y: ` - 3. THA7 THE PROPOSED'REClAS81FICATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES ' I . PROPERIY RELATE 70 7'HE 20NES'AND THE1R PERMf77ED USES LOCALLY I ES2ABCTSHED_[N CLOSE PitOXIMI:TY:T0 -5UBJECT 'PROPERTY: AND TO TNE `' ; ~ , . , ZONES AND 7'HEfR PERMI7TED~:USES CiENERALLY ESTABLISHED.THROUGHOUT ' . COMMUNIJY. ,, .. . . : THE , 4. THA7 THE~PROPOSED RECLASS'IFICAT/ON OF SUBJEC7.PROPERTY DOES REQUIRE DED1CATlON FO,R:ANO'STANDARD~1MPRdVENENT OF..ABUTTINa .SjREET5;8ECAU5E SAID PROPERTY-DOES RELA7E TO AND'ABUT-UPON' ` SSREETS AND'HTGHMAYS NR1CH-";ARE:PROP05E0 TO CARRY'THE 7YPE AND ' ,. QUANTITY.OF'TRAF'FIC~ WHiCH,MILL:BE'fiENERATED BY THE PERMI7TED ; .,..~;;, . . ; USE~~"IN ACCORDANCE M'ITH_THE C,IRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE'GENERAL P.LAN.: - ` ' ' S. `THA7 VERBAL.OPPOSIT.ION BY;ONE ONNER OF.PROPERTY 1.N THE SUBJECT ~ ' :' AREA MAS RECORDED,:A~AINST,:SUBJECT.PETlTION.. ' COMM~4SIONER PERRY OFFERED;RESOLUTION N0. 8S~ SERIES 1961-62~ AND' ' ; ;; NOVED FOR 7'TS:PASSA~E'AND ADOPT,ION~ SECONDFD BY CONMTSSIONER MARCpUX' ' ` ` T 0!RECOMIiEND.TO T.H~.C~TY' 'COUNCIL THAT PETyT40N.FOR'RECLASSIFTCATION ,'~ ~ N0.-61~62.-26 BE`APPROVED~'SUBJECT.:TO,THE F.OLLOWING"CONDITIONSi " ~ .c 42~; ~ .., . : < . . .. . ,. , . . . . 1. DEVEI.OPMENT':SU887ANTIALLY:IN ACCORDANCE WITH ExHterr:No. 1~ MITH ~,~y ~ti., , T1iE EXCEPT ION THAT ; INQRESS- AND EGRE58 BE ELIMI NATED ,FROM BUENA i ~~~ '~ VISTA)rAVENUE. : • ' . : . ,. ' ~ riT.+:~7~i . t .. , . .. ' ..~ ~ ~. ~ ~ -,'. ~ .. . :: , . . . .. . . ~ . ~ h TV~ . . 2 CONSTRUCTION:.OF A SIX (6) FOOT MABONRY ;WALL ALONG.7HE EAST AND ~`NtlRTH'BOUNDARIES:OFtSUBJECT PROPERTY PRLOR TO;FyNAL' BU1LD'INQ'. `:%IN9PECTION ~ , 3~ ' RECORD.ATION,:OF DEED:'RESTRICT.TONS:~IM(T1N4 U9E :,OF SUBJECT PROPER~ ' " ~ .. .. ; ~: ~Y TO, ;BUSINESS AND,;:PROF6S9JONAL:';OFFICES'•ONLY. ': .. r ~,, ~5'i~li~^ a ~ ~,j~~5.+~j~ ~ % '~ l~tF~ F+„G ~+. 'A t h ~ +Zti~ ~ ~ew7~ ~ ~ ':'i\ ?, f~'~. J~' ` frt.~~L . . . . ... . . .. .. . . . .. . .. ... r i. ... . . ~. ~ , .. . . . . i . .. ~.. .. . .... . ;~ , s.~~ ~1 ~. /' ~' j 7f n. mcs t ~ W ~ ., § ~ ~ i t t ~ . ~. i: '.: .':; .:~•: :.'c~ .:'j _ . '.,. ~. ., ..,~ .y _ . ' ` '1:~, . . ;~K' ~. " 4 ~R' y . . ~ ~ . ^ j ~~ ., i . . - . . ~ ~: ~ ~ ,_ . . .. ' ~~ ~ t ~ . , . ,,. . . . . . . . . . . ~ - . . _ - :~_ _..,. • 41~ _ .:.._ ~ _ .~.. .,.._ . ::. :-. . :,. . '. . , .,_ -1 ~ _ 1 , .. . . . . ~ ~ . . .. , . ~ MINUTES CITY PLANNING COMH1SSi0N, S 1 196i eE C r' ~ " e ' ~ , , EPTe~ ~a e, oN tNU n: ` RECLASSIFICATION ~ 4. DEOICATfON~OF 53 FEE7 FROM 7HE MONUMENTED CENTERL)NE OF EUCLTD y ~ N~. 61~62~26 . _ . 'AVENUE•'(30 FEE~ EXISTINCa}`.. .. : c . . .. '. CONTINUED , . 5. PREPARATION OF STREET [MPROVEMEN7 PLANS AND INSTALIATJON•OF ALL IMPROVEMENTS FOR EUCLID I~VENUE' IN ACCORDANCE MITH THE AP.PROVED b -SIANDARD!PLANS ON FiLE IN.iHE FFiCE OF 7HE CTiY~ENQINEER..•. ~ 6: PROVI610N• OF ~U7`IL17Y EASEMENTS• ALONG EX7ERly0R BOUNDARIES AS DETER-' , ;~.. , M~NED 70 9E NECESSARY BY'THE D~REGTOR OF PUBLIC U71LTT1E5 T0 , - ADEQUAT•ELY SERVE-THE SUBJECT AROPERTY ANb•07HER'•PROPERrY. ~ 7a ' RECORDATtON OF•A;RECORD OF SURVEY OF SUBJECT•PR~~PERTY.•~ "<< 8. PAYMEN7 OF..=2.00 PER FRONT F007 FOR.STREE7 LIaHTIKQ PURPOSES.ON ' EUCLID.AVENUE: ~r`x . 9. T1ME LIM1TA710N'OF ONE NUNORED~EIGNTY (180) DAYS FOR THE ACCOH- =" ,g ~ ~ PL]SHNENT OF ~TEM N05. 3~ 4~•5~ 6~ 7~ AND 8. . x ~ J > , ~ . THE FOREGOIN4 COND'IT.JONS MERE~REC'17ED A7'•THE MEETINO AND WERE FOUND ~ T0 BE.A HECESSARY PREREQUISI.TE TG THE USE OF TNE PROPERTY IN ORRER 70 . PRESERVE THE SAFETY'AND WELFARE OF•THE CI71ZEN5 OF THE,CITY OF~ANAHEIM. . ON ROLL CALL THE FOREQOINa P.ESO~UxYON tlA5 PA55ED 8Y THE FOLLOWINQ:VOTE: AYESO .OMMISSIONERS.. AILRED~ GAUER~ HAR~OOD~ MARCOUX~ MUkQALL~ • „ PEBLEY~ PERRY~ SUMMERS. , NqESr COHMISSI'JNERSe NoNe. ~ AB~ENT: COMMISSIONERS: MoRR~s: CONDIT10NAl USE -. PUBLIC HEARIN6. RET,17lON sueMlTren ar ALBER7 KEVORKIAN, 22z9~Easr PERNIT N0: 15F RO~1flEYA DRIVE .ANAHEIM~' CAl1FORN~A~ OWNERS REQUESTIN4 PERMISSION•TO CONDUCT AUTO ~LES PE N ' A ~ O PRO RTY DESCP.78ED A5: PAFCEL 7B FEET BY 90;FEET MI'iH A FRON7AfiE CF 90 FEET ON NOR H STRRE7 AND LOCATED ON T•HE ' O N ~ N RTHIIESTERLY CO_RNER OF ORTH;STREET AND ORTH COS.ANQELES~STREET AND FUR7MER ,DESCRIBED.'AS 80Y NORTH LOS AN4ECES STREE7. PROPERI'Y PREBENTLY ` CLASSIFTED,IN THE•C-2, GENERAL COMMERCIAC, ZONE'. ,. ; MR: ALBERT KEJt7RK1ANy THE PET'ITIONER~ APPEARED.BEFORE SHE COMMISSION ,, AHD:STATF.T.i`''7HAT,7HE`'PURPOSE.OF 7HE REQUE57ED:VARIANCE MA5 50 THAT HE COULD.CONSTRUCT,.A STRUC.TURE~';CONSlSTINa OF A LARfiER BLOCK BUTLDIN~~ ON THE .PROPERTY~7N ORDER T0 MAICE 1,HE 'PROPERTY `MORE. PRESEN7ABLE. ', ;` ~ MR. RAY CNAMBERLI.N~ 107'MEST NORTH S7REE7~ APPEAREb BEFORE THE COMMIS~ SION'AND S7ATED THAT 'riE MAS TH6 ANNER OF FI~OPERTY ADJOININ~.THE SUB~ , , JECT.PROPERTY'ON-SHE WEST,. MR::CHAMBERLIN;REQUESTED THAT A FENCE, , BE CONSTRUCTED ON THE,SUBJECT PROPERTY'FOR PR07ECTlON OF:HIS PROPERTY ' , FROM'AUTO EXNAU57S AND,NOISE.' - THE'COIIM7SSION DISCUSSED iHE ZONINQ:OF 7HE ADJO)N'ING PROPERTY AND N07ED THAT;;lT WAS.::1N THE C 2~'.GENERAL CONMERCIAL~ ZONE~ WH1CH WOULD NOT REQU~RE 7HE 1.NSTALLATION O.F.,A'WALI-FOR CONFORMANCE.MITH THE'MUNI~ 'CI.PAL' CCDE:, THE'PETIT`IONER JNDICAT.ED THAT.HE WOULD ~NSTALL A MOOD ~•;'.l FENCE'IN.ACCORDANCE M17H H15 NEIQHBORlS WI5HE5. ' , THE;HfAR1NG.MAS CLOSED.:` THE'COIIM.I,SS70N FOUND I1ND DE7ERMINED.THE FOLLOWTNG FACTS REGARDING 7HE ~ SUBJECT:PETI7,ION., % 1. THA7°THE PR6POSED'-USE IS'PROPERLY ONE FOR WNICH'A CONDI7IONAL USE ',P.ERMIT 1S AUTHORI2ED BY THCS CODE~ TO M17: TO ESxA8C1SH THE USE %: OF AN AUTO SALES:LOS AS A CONFORMIN4 U9E AND TO PERMIT 17'S EXPAN~ ' sION. ' t ; -'- , ' 2. THAT THE PROPOSED-USE W)LL NOT ADVERSELY"AFFEC7 THE ADJ0INTN(i ~ " r-l"ANQ:USES` AND' THE, GRQWTK'AND:'DEVELOPNENT OF THE ARE0. 'iN' WH1CH- iT - ` [S PROPOSED TO BE'LQCATED.':' ~ - 3. THAT :TNE'.S1ZE AtiD SHAPE 8F' THE SiTE PROPOSED FOR iHE '-i35E 15 #DE= n: , . ; ', QU,AxE..xO ACLON THE:,FULL OE4ELOPMENT OF THE PROP058D USE ~N.A, ~ ~;! , MANNER N07 .,DE7RIME~ITAL..7.O:,THE -PART ICULAR •-AREA :NOR t0, THE PEACE~ ` ~~ HEALjH~ SAFETY~ AND QENERAL WELFARE OF 7HE C1T1ZEN8 OF THE C)TY ~ '? OF ANAHEIM ~ YrA ~ r 3~ 7 ~ ~'` ^ ~ - ~~.: ; -,. . .~~., ... ~ ~ ~ : ~ . :~'~ ~, ~;' ' 4. . THA7 TME TRAFF,IC OENERATED;.-gY THE PROPOSED USE~:WlLL NOT.IMPOSE " AN UNbIlE ~ BURDEN UPON THE STREE "~AND H[OHIIAYS E l , ~ ~ z ~ '. ` a S '~ M~~c ~ , - C S at2ED AND 75 lMPROYED TO',CARRY'THE 7RAFFIC IN`.THE AREA ' 7 ~ . ~'X ~,~',~,, ~'yt ~ 5.. ':THAT THE QRANTIN~ OF THE CONDITIONAL USE'PERMIT:IINDER THE COHDt~ TIONS''1MPOSED~ IF ANY~ WILL NOj B~' DE7R)MENTAL 70 THE PEACE~; y~ '! >!~~" , ~~~1: .~, ~S~ - . . . ~,.. . ' ' .,~~ ;... ';,'. , . ' : • , .~ ~..~ .~~~ .~. ~ ~'.~ ".:.'~ r.. ~! ~~:~~ ` f,~ '.~..".a ~ µ ` ~`lt T ~ ~ 1nr ' A~ " µL ~ ~`8f. ..:~ '`.l+J 1"E~ } .C{ t ~ / :C t p}t ~ x~L~~~~ " ~ ~ ' ~~ ,'`~ ~ .~t5111t ~ { bfY1 ~~'~~~i ' ' y 4i ~.~~ -:~i : ; e . . . .. .. :. .. ~ ~ 1 i~ ~~~~ ~, ;~ '~~r~~if'~'~4 f v ~A~L ~~;:~~li~ . ~ :~, ~ r ~ , , ,; F .,~ J1. ~ ~ ~ }5~rq~'.., .. .. i ), . n ~ ~ r r i ' . ~n . ~.i .: n i- , . ) .. ...~ 1.~~~.. . ~. J,~ .3~~ 4?:y1 .~~ .''::. . '..r.-_ r ...r... . . . ,.1~~.•.~. . ,...i.~ . . ~ 1 .. . .... ... .. . . r-~ . . .~J~,F'.u.. ~. ..~. .sti. . ' F . - „~ ~ w r. ~~ ~ ~p~,:i~ +,...J}v.;.r~'^w~ ~ ~„ n7 +n . ~ :~ i ~ ~ .. r ~ i~ rmj ~e S+ .,:,Ly , . ' _ci9lar sm^,.-~-,_ a+...rec: . Krc `'~,.~r ~ / _ ~' .1" , . h F F ~ ~ . '~ , ~; vj ,K. ~ '~. 1 . ~~~~' . ~.:..,. . -.. .. '~ . Y,. '., :~ :~:: ~' ~ J T '„yy~W ~t CI t~ :. ~ .1:..!r~ P! . 7 r ~ y 4 ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ . .. . , . . . . ' f~ ~ ~ .: ~_:: . . . 411 ' _ . ~:. K .r _, ~ ~ ~a MINUTES, CITY PLANNIRG, COMMISSIOr~ SEPrENeeR 18~ 1961~ CONTINUED: ~ GONDITIONAL USE. ~ BALTH~ SAFET.Y~ AND QENERAt MELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY ~ PERMIT NO•. 156 `UF I~NAHEIN~. . , . .. . . . • ~ CONTINUED 6:, •TNAT NO'ONE APPEARED 1•N OPPOSLTION TO SUBJECT -ETITION. '. I COMMISSIONER•~ARCOUX OFFERED RESOW710N N0. 86~ SER'IE5 1961~62~ AND ' MOVED,fOR ITS BASSAGE AND ADOPTION SECONDED BY CONMIBSIONER ALLRED~ NO. 156~ SUBJECT. 70 TNE TQ IiRANT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL I~ISE PERMIT ~ ~,, ... , r.: . FOLLOWINQ CONDITlON52...:.. . `: I. DEVELOPMENT SUBSTANTIALLY IN ACCORDANCE MITH EXNlB1T N0.'l~•.WITH ` TME PLANS FOR THE'PROPdSHD EXPANStON T0 BE SUBMITTEb.TO AND' 'i SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING AND PLANNINa DEPARTMENTS. 2. INSTALIAI'ION OF A 5'IX (6) FOOT WOODEN FENCE ON THE MESTERLY ~~^~... ' BOUNOARY OF:• SUBJECT . PltOPERTY. . • ~ 3. REPAIR OF SIDEWALKSt CUR85~ QUTTERS~ AND PAV1N~ IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED STANDARD PLANS ON F1LE'IN THE OFFICE.OF THE C1TY'ENGINEER. . _ 4: TIME LIMITA710N OF OkE HUNDRED EIGHTY (180~ DAYS.FOR 7HE ACCOM~ P1.ISHMENx 0F ITEM N0. 2 AND ITEM N0. 3.` • 7HE FOREQOIN~ CONDITIONS WERE RECITED AT TNE MEETINQ AND WERE FOUND TO BE•A NECESSARY PREREQUISITE TO THE USE OF THE PROPERTY 1N ORDER TO PRESERVE THE SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE C171ZENS OF THE CITY OF . ANAHEIM. . . ' _ ON.ROLL CALL 7HE FOREGOINQ RESO W710N'WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOWINO.VOTE; AYES: COMMISSIONERSO ALLRED~ GAUER~ HAR(i00D~ MARCOUX~ MUNGALL~ , PEBLEY~ PERRY~ SUMNERS. NQES: . CO.MMISSIONERS: NoNE. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSS MORRIS. ~ r CONDITIONAL USE - Pl18LIC HE{IRING. PETITION SUBMITTED BY ESTATE OF A..DRABKIN 1243:C~.ue ASSOCiATED'PROP~RTY MRNAGE- iF ia ~OW eR Ca R •PERMIT N0. i57 e O N , N V~~w•DRrvet Los~;AN~eces 633 SOUTH WlTMER ~TREET LOS ~1NaELES 7 CALIFORNIA AGEN75Q MENT ~ aE4uESr~Na PERMissloN 7o ESTA~LISH A PRACTICAL.NURSIN6 S~HOOL oN PRO- PERTY:.DESCRIBED:AS• A`PARCEL 172 FEET BY 202 FEET WITH A'FRON7A~E OF 172 FEET'ON SOU7H'LOS ANQELES`STREET AND LOCATED ON 7HE NOR7HMESTERLY CORNER OF SOU7H LOS•AN~ELES STREET AND CHE4TNU? STREET AND.FURTHER DESCRIBED A5 133-151' SOUTH LOS ANQELES STREE7. PROPER7Y PRES~NTLY CLASSIf1ED. IN.THE C~2~ GENERAL;COMMERClAL~ ZONE. NO.ONE APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMISSION'.TO REPRESENT THE SUBJECT PET7~ _ T10N: , MR..FLOYD,MEST~ 751 NOR7H Z10N STREET~.APPEARED BEFORE THE COMM~SSION ,. AND:STA7ED.THAT`A LETTER~ SUBMI7TED BY JUDaE MAURICE SPARL1Nd IN SUBJECx PROPERTY~ OUTLINED:HIS OBJEC•~ SO 7HE PROpOSED U5E OF'. PROTEST ~..;~{ , , TIONS TO THE`SUBJECT PE71TlON. HE STATED 7HAT HE'OWNED A BUSI.NESS IN THE AREA AND THAT:THE PROPOSED USE MOULD CREA7E TRAFFIC CON4ESTION~ AND.7HA7'ME:CONSI~ERED THE AREA TO;BE MORE SU'ITABLE-FOR,A RETAIC • " COMMERCIAL`USE. - THE.COMM15510N NOTED'TNAT THE FROPOSED USE MOULD BE SITUATHD 1N THA7 PORTION OF AN EXfS7IN~'BUILDINQ THAT FORMERLY CONTAINED A BAR. I7 L TS PRESEN7LY.'1N OPERATION~ NAS POIN7ED pUT THAT>7HE NURS'INQ SCHOO . H71VIN4 BEEN ORANTED.AN EMERaENC.Y'BUSINESS IICENSE BY THE CTTY COUNCTL. CLARIFICA7ION MAS MADE~;FOR 7HE'BENEFI7 OF MR. WESTy OF THE LOCATION OF THE.NUR5ING SCHOOL AND 7HAT;.THE 20NxNQ MOULD NOT BE CHANQED. - THE-LETTER'RECEIVED FROM JUDQE MAURICE SPARCING~ P.ROTEST(NQ THE 3RANT-. '` t IN~ OF THE'REQUESTED USE~ WAS READ AND FIIED M1TH TME SUBJECT PET1~ ~ ~ TlON ( ~ ;.' , _ THE NEARING NAS .CIOSED: ` . , ' 1 , ` THE.CONMISSION FOUND AND'DETERMINED THE•'FOLCOWINQ FACTS:RE~ARDINO ~ ~"s~~` ~ ~i.ar ; THE SUBJECT PET.ITIONS' ,. ~, r, . i , { t "~ ~ ~ i L TNAT.THE PROPOSED'.USE LS PROPERLY ONE FOR MHICN A COND7TIONAL ~ ~ .„ ; ~ hR ~ , USE PERMIT tS AUTHORIZED BY TH1S'CODE~.TO NIT.'. A' P.RACTICAI. ~ 5^HOOL. ' ~ CE A ' i Sj r '.+_, . - RIAL:SERVI INO ANC SECRE7 NURSES TRA1N _ ~ t ~ ~`~'r=. ~ ` ILC NOT,> ADYERSELY AFFECT 7HE, ADJOlN1N~ 7HAT THE. PR06~SED. USE FI 2r ~ ^ ~'~: . , , ELOPMENT OF THE AREA;?:lN MHICH THE OROWTH:;AND DEV LAND:':USES'AND . ~ ~~ , , 1T,X5-.PROPOSED 70.BE LB~ATED • ~`; F i~^ . v }. '; 1 '~ i ~ f ~; J t ~ `Q~A: I 4 v. ~ > ~ ~'~ jyti { ' S ~i ~ ~ r,~Ya~3 a~fi~ ` 9 4 y S k v4 ~V ~ :: , ":. ~ 4 -t t .a ' ~ ~: ~ ~ , r ~ ,~ .~~ti ~ ~ ~ . 1 . : ~~ d.y,{." ~ 1 ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ 1 . _ S ~ .y ti-J'w~tf~r.4i ~ * ~ 4~~~ r .. . .. . . { 1 ~!" ~.{ S. ~ J~=._ ( ., . `~ . .,. .4 . r. .. .. ~ ~ . . .,.~ : ~ 1f ~ .. ~ A .. _te .t.. . ~~~ , . _ _. _ : ,.~~.~r~~nr.e . . ~ . . . -.. ~:~: `~. ~ . . 412 ~ I MINUTES, CITY PLANNIN6 COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 18, 1961, CONTINUED: i CONDITIONAL USE ~ 3. THAT-THE 512E AND SHAPE OF THE SITE PROPOSED.FOR 7HE USE IS ~ I PERMIT NO. 157 ADEQUATE TO A4LON 7HE.FULL DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPOSED USE IN CONTINUED A MANNER NOi DE7RIMENTAL TO THE PARTICULAR AREA NOR 70 7HE PEACE~ HEALTH~ SAFETY~ AND GENERAL MELFARE OF 'fHE C1T12EN5 OF ~ THE C1TY OF ANAHEIM. • • ~ 4: THAT THE 7RAFFIC GENERATED BY THE PROPOSED USE MILL NOT 1MPOSE ~ AN UNDUE BURDEN UPON THE STREETS AND HIGHMAYS DESIGNED AND ~ IMPROVED TO CARRY THE TRAFFIC IN THE AREA.... ~ ~ 5. THAT Tk1E ~RANTiNG OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMiT UNDER ?HE CON~ ~'' . DITIONS IMP~SED~ IF ANY~ WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE ?EACE~ E ;'s HEALTH~ SAFETY~ AND QENERAL WELFARE OF THE CIT'i2EN5 OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. • • • ~~ 6. THA7 VERBAL OPPOSITION BY ONE OWNER OF PROPERTY IN THE AREA~ IN ADDITION TO ONE LETTER OF PROTEST~ WAS RECORDED AGAINST SUBJECT PETITION. . • , ~ . . , COMMISSIONER ALLRED OFFERED RE~SOLUTION N0. 87~ SERIES 1961-62j ANC E MOVED FOR ~TS PASSAGE AND AD~PTION~q SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER t'ERRY~ r TO GRANT PETiTION FOR CONDtT10NAL USE PERMIT N0. 157~ SUBJECT TO THE FO~LOWING CONDITIONS; . • ~ 1. CfMITATION~OF THE OCCUPANCY BY THE PETITIONERS FOR T.HE PROPOSED USE~TO THAT PORTION OF THE BUILDING AS SPECIFIED ON EXHIBIT No..i. . ' 2. SUBJECT TO TME APPROVAL OF THE CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR~ FIRE ,; CH1EF~ AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION. • ~ f~ _ ~ 3. INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALKS AND CUR85 IN ACCORDANCE MITH THE APPROVED STANDARD PLANS ON FILE iN THE OFFICE OF 7HE CITY ~" ENGINEER. • t 4: TIME LIMITATION OF ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY (180) DAYS FOR THE ACCOM- PLISHMENT OF ITEM No. 3. (; iME FOREGOING CONDITIONS WERE RECITED A7 TiiB MEETING AND wERE FOUND TO BE•A.NECESSARY PREREQU:517E TO THE USE OF THE PROPERTY 1N ORDER TO PRESERVE THE SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CIT12EN5 OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. • ' ON ROLL CALL THE FORE(i01N0 RESOLUTION WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOWINQ `'- • VOTE: . . AYES: COMMISSIONERSt ALLRED~ GAUER~ HAPQOOD~ MARCOUX~ MUNaALL~ PEBLEY~ PERRY~ SUMMERS. , NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. CONDITtONAL USE - PERMIT N0. 159 ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSI MORR15. PUBLIC HEARJNG.. PET1710N sueMtrrec sv B. 1. C. - BAII AND MAGNOLIA, • A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP~ SU1TE 704~ 900.NORTH BROADWAY SANTA ANA CALIFORNIA~ OWNERS~ REQUESTIN~ PERMISSIQN TO ESTABLI~H A WALK~U~ RESTAURANT, ON PROPERTY DES:RiBED ASS A PARCEL 345 FEET BY 522 FEET W~TN A FRONTAGE'OF 34`i FEET ON THE E.~ST SIDE OF'MA6NOLIA AVE- ~ NUE BETWEEN BAI.L ROAD AND IrIARRiET LANE~ ITS NORjHWEST CORN~R BEING APPROXIMATELY 390 FEET SOU~H OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF'BALL ROAD AND MA~NOCIA AVENUE AND FURTHER DESCRIBED AS 1254 SOUTH MAl3NOL1A AVENUE. PROPERTY PRESENTLY CLn551F1ED !N THE C-1~ NEIGH80RHOOD COMMERCIAL, ZONE. , - HR. EDMARD (,lNDSY,0t~~1126~A EAST 17TH. STREET~ SAN7A ANA~ REPRESENTA- TIVE FOR THE PETITIONER~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMN1551~9N AND STATED TNAT THE PROPOSED.RESTAURANT WAS FOR A COMBlNED DININ~3 ROOM AND I_ WINDOW SERVICE MHICH WAS TO BE INTEpRATED WITH THE SROPPING CENTER 7HAT IS BE(NCi CONSTRUCTED. HE STATED FURTHER THAT THE PRIMARY DiNiNO AREA MAS TO BE WiTHIN THE BUILDLNG~ THAT THE BUILDIN6 WOULD BE LOCATED IN.FRONT OF THE COMMERCIAL BUILDINGIS~ THAT THE SURROUND~ IN~ AREA WOULD BE PAVED~ AND THAT THE FLOOR PLANS INDICATED A TRASH 570RA~E ENCLOSURE THAT^WOULD BE HIODEN FROM ViEM FROM ALL SIDES. THE CONMISSION NOTED THAT SOME TYPES OF RESTAURANTS PROVIDIN~ W1N- DbW SERVICE DO NOT PROVJbE ADEQUATE TRASH DISP08AL BERVICE`AND THE AREAS BECOME UNSIOHTLY. THE PETITIONERiS A4ENT. ASSURED THE COMMiS~.. SION THAT THE SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT NOUL~ BE MELL MAINTAlMED. THE COMMlS510M REVIENED:DEVELOPMEN7 PLANS AND THE PETI710NER~5 ~ A~ENT 37ATED THAT,THERE WOULD BE TWO SERVICE NINDOWS ON THE NESj ELEYAiION OF THE:BUILDINa AND THAT 7HE DININQ AREA WOULD BE LOCATED ON THE NQRTH SIDE. ~ ` r A . . . , . . . . :. . . . ~ . ~ ~ ., . .. . . . ~-.~ - _. . . ~ . . .~ . ~ ~ . s.1'. r f ~ ~ ,.:.~.~ I ..~ ~ - . . . ~ ' . rCt ~e ^~.-r. . < a... ~, ~. ~ , .'.n:t^:+ , _ - . ~,~ _. . . " ~ . , S 1 1 ,` r.:> ` ~ ~ 1 .. ._-. . .„ , . , ,, . ~ 1 ~ ~ . ~ ~ . . ~ ~ . ~ A ...~ . ~ ~ 7 . . . ~ . . . . .. ., ' ~~ . ... j . .~,r . 7 413 ~ • ~ ~ MINUTES, CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 18~ 1961~ CONTINUED: C4NDlT14NA~ USE - 7'k1E HEARING•HAS CLOSED. • PERMIT N0. 159 . . CONTINUED THE COMMISSION FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACTS REGAR~IN~ ~ THE SUBJECT PET.ITION; . . I 1: THAT TFIE PROPOSED USE IS PROPERLY ONE FOR WHICH A CONDITIONAL ~ USE PERMIT IS AUTHORIZED BY THIS CODE~ TO W1T: A WALK~UP ~ RESTAURANT. ~ 2. THAT THE PROPOSED USE MItL NOT ADYERSELY AFFECT THE ADJOINING LANO USES AND THE aROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA IN WHICH 1T IS•PROPOSED ?0 BE LOCATED. • . 3. THAT THE 517.E AND SHAPE OF THE SITE PROPOSED FOR THE USE IS ;,,;..5_,,;: ADEQUATE TO ALLOW THE.FULL DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROP05ED USE IN ;,~`.-",~~':;`',S A MANNER NOT DETRIRIENTAL TO THE PART ICULAR AREA NOR TO THE ~~'`' PEACE~ HEALTH~ SAFETY~ AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF THE CtTY OF aNAHE!M. • . 4. THAT THE TRAFFIC GENERATED•BY THE PROPOSEG USE WILL NOT IMPOSE AN UNDUE BURDEN UPON THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS DESIGNED AND IKPROVED TO CARRY THE~TRAFFIC IN THE AR[A. .. 5. THAT TME GRANTING OF THE CONDITIONAI USE PERMIT UNDER•THE CON~ DITIONS IMPOSEDti IF ANY~ NILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE PEACE~ HEA~TH~ SAFETY~ AND GENERAL MELFARE OF THE CIT12EN5 OF THE CITY OF QNAHEIM. . 6. THAT THE PROPOSED SlGN SIZE AND LOCATION~ IND~CATED ON EXHI8IT N0. 2o IS NOT A PART OF THE APPROVAL OF SUBJECT PETITION. . 7. THAT NO ONE APPEARED IN OPPOSiTtON TO SUBJECT PETITION. COMMISSIONER MUNGALL OFFERED RESOLUTlON N0. 88~ SERIES 1961-62~ AND MOVED FOR ITS.PASSAGE AND ADOPTION SECONDED BY COMMlS510NER HAPGOOD~ TO GRANT PETITION f'OR COND(TIONAL ~SE PERMIT N0. 159~ SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: - 1. DEVELOPMENT SUBSTANTIALLY IN ACCORDANCE NITH EXNIBIT NOS. 1 AND 2' AND IN ACCORDANCt WiTH PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 6b-61-83. 2. PROVISION OF AREAS FOR ADEQUATE TRASH STORAGE AND'PICKUP AS . DETERMINED 8Y THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.PRIOR TO FINAL • BUILDINO INSPECTION. • 3'. INSTALLATIOH OF THE REFiAItiiNG SIDEWALKS AND PAYING IN ACCOR~ ~ DANCE WITH THE APPROVED STANDARD PLANS ON FILE 1N THE OFFICE OF THE CITY EN6TNEER. k 4. T~ME LIMITATtON OC' ONE-HUNDRED EIGHTY(180) DAYS FOR THE ACCOM~ PLISHMENT OF ITEM N0. H~ THE FOREfi01N~ CONDITIONS MERE.RECITED AT THE MEE71N~ AND WERE FOUND ~ 70 BE.A NECE55ARY PREREQUISITE TO THE USE OF THE Pf~OPERTY yN ORQER TO PRESERVE TNE SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF THE CiTY OF ~ ANAHEIM. ON ROLL CALL THE FOREGOINO RESOLUTION WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOWfNa F YOTE: ~ AYES: COMMISSIONERSL PELRED~ PAUER9 SAP600D~ MARCOUX~ MUNOALL~ BLEY~ ERRY~ UMMERS. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. ~ ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSC M~ARRIS. ~ CQND{T{ONAL USE - PUBLlC HEARING. PETiTtON SUDG:tTTec ev K1MB0 YOSHITOMI, ET aL, 947 PERMIT N0. iB0 NORTH EUCLID AVENUE~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA OWNER~ RAIPH LONG~ C/0 a Y L D S ~ ~ ANM EE W7MMING,AND IVINa SCH00L, 25 1 WE57 LINCOLN AVENUE~ ANAHEIbi' CALIFORklA~ Af3ENT~'REQ11(ESTlNd PERl4lSSlOH TO ESTABC)SH A GOLF PRACTJCE RANGE~ ON;PROPERTY DESCRIBED A5, A PARCEL 338`FEET BY 335 FEET WiTH A FRONTA6E OF 335 FEET ON THE NOR7H SJDE.OF LIN~ COLN AYENUE BETMEEN MACiNOL1A AVENl1E AAD GI.LBERT STREET~'.1TS SOUTH- WEST CORNER.BEIN~ APPROXIMATELy 522 FBa* E.AST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MA~NOLIA AND LINCOLN AYENUES ARI' F'URTHER ~ESCRIBED AS 2511.MEST L NCOLN AYENUE. 'P.ROPERTY PRESEHTLY CLASSIFIED IN THE ' R-A~ RESIDE~IAt AGRICULTURAt, ZONE. 1 - MR..JOHN WHITE~ 9776 KATELLA:AVENUE~ APPEARED,L*EFORE THE COMMISS'ION~ ~ 5?ATED.THAT HE REPRESENTED THE PETITIONERS~ ~~PIA STATED.THAT THE- PETITJONER WAS REQUE57lN~ PERMISSION TO RELOCATE A fiOtF PRACTICE J RAN~E~ PRESENTLY'I,N;OPERAT(ON,ON ADJOIN)NCs,R:ANp~ B6CAUSE THE ~ `~ ~ :.~ _ , ~.,~ ~- -.~. ,': ~ , ': F'~~ . . ~I:,.s~fn..klAa,, e.... t~1. . v- T•k_,~....1. ..... .. , f' _.K i .~1.s~~i.~1.c.~.~t~:~.~naf...~'v~~ . . . . } ~ 4, r r .. ~ ~.. ~~}.. ! ~ ~ ...:~.~ ~. . . ~ . , ' r ~a ~ •'~.,.t»e :7,J:"..e~--~.,.<.a~ tir~ ..!?, ~ r r. .. :2e ~ c, ._i.. ~U . . .. .bv ~~`,~."~ - . ~; . ~'a Q~•q~ ;, ~. . ~ ~~A ' ... ..... ....~ .. '. : . ~ .. '~:-- - ~. .. ~e..~ ~~:; :' i:.'. '. . 1 ' . ~ ~ Vm1lILIH!' V ~'::i. . . . . ~ ~ . ~ ~~ . . ~ 414 ~ HINUTES~ C1TY PLANNIN6 COHMISSION~ SEPTEMBER 18~ 1961~ CONTINUED: ~ ~ COND~TIONAL USE ~ PRORERTY HAD BEEN ACQUIRED.BY Th~ SCFlOOL biSTRICT BY CONDEMNATION TO I ~. PERNIT N0. 160 BE•DEVELOPED.FOR•SCHOOL PURPOSES. ME STATED EURTHER THAT THE PRO~ ~ CONTiNUED P~BED•'LOCATION••MAS IDEAL BECAUSE OF ITS LOCAT,(ON ADJACENT TO THE r EXISTING SAMMY LEE SWIMMINQ AN0•DIViNQ SCHOOL~ BECAUSE OF THE TRAFFIC , ~ ON LINCOLN AVENUE~ AND BECAUSE OF T.HE•LOCATION NEnRBY•OF SCHOOL ~ r FACILITIES, MR. WHITE ADDED 7HAT THE RECREATION MAS A.CLEKN~ WHOLE^ ~ SOME RECREATION THAj WOULD BE OF•SERVICE TO THE COkMUNITY AND 7HAT F~._ : IT HAD BEEN USED IN THE PAST BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM IN CONJUNCTION ~ P , MITH THE C1TY~S RECREATION PROGRAM. ~..• I THE HF1iRING•WAS CLOSED. •• • ' s THE COMMISSION REVIEMED GEVELOPNENT PLANS.AND THE PET1T10NER~S AQENT ~HDIIIA7ED THAT LANDSCAPING WOULD BE PROV7DED TO•PRESENT AN ATTRAC-• T1VE ARPEAR~NCE~ THAT PARKINQ WOULD BE PROVIDED.IN CONJUNCTION•M17H ~ . THE SAMMY LEE SWINMING SCHO!JL ON PROPERTY ABUTTINQ SUBJECT PROPERTY 70 THE EAST~ AND THAT NETTING NOULD BE NECESSARY FOR.PRGTECTION PURPOSES. • • THE COMM1SS10N,DISCIJSSED THE PROPOSED•1NSTALLATION OF NETTING ALON~ ~. ?HE BOUNDARIES OF SUBJECT PROPERTY RATHER 7HAN THE IN57ALLATlON OF CHA1N LINK FENCINQ. THE PRESENT COHDITION OF THE PROPOSED PARKING AREA MAS.ALSO•DISCUSSED. .. . . . THE COMMISSION FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACTS REfiARDINIi TNE SUBJEC7 PET171~N: • 1. TNAT THE PROPOSED USE IS PROPERLY ONE FOR MM'LH A COND1T10NAL '-' USE PERM17 15 AUTHORI2ED BY TH15 CODE~ TO V11T: A QOLF DRIVINQ RANGE. • • 2. THAT THE PROPOSED USE WILL NOT ADVERSEI.Y AFFECT THE ADJOININQ J L'AND U5E5 AND THE QROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA 1N WHICH ; iT 15 PROPOSEQ TO BE LOCATED. ~ ~ 3'. THAT .THE SIZE AND•SHAPE OF THE SITE PROPOSED FOR THE USE IS 'r. ApE~UAITE TO A4LOW,JHE,FULL DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPOSED USE IN A..•MANNER NOT. OETR]MENTAL TO THE PAR7ICULAR AREA NOR TO THE PEACE~ HEALTH~ SAFETY~ ARD QENERAL NELFARE OF FHE C1T12ENS OF TNE CITX OR ANAHEIM. • 4. THA7 THE TRAF:~1C 4ENERATED.YY 7HE PROPOSED USE WILL N07 1MPOSE AN UNDUE BURDEN UPON 7HE STREETS AND HIfiHWAYS.DESI3NED AND PROPOSED TO•GpRRY THE~TRAFF~C•1N 7HE AREA. ••••• 5. TN~T THE ORANTINQ OF T•HE CONDITJONAL USE RERMIT UNDER•THE CON~• DITIONS IMP08ED~ 1F ANY~ N1LL NOT BE DE7RlMENTAL 70 THB PEACE~ HEALTH~ SAFETY~ AND GENERAL NELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF THE C1TY OF ANAHE'IM. ~ • • • • 6: THAT TH! PROVISION OF STANDARD NETTIN~ 42 FEET (N HEIGHT Al.ONG . ALL BOUNpAR1E8 OF 9UBJECT PROPERTY 18 HEREBY AUTHORI2ED AS DOVERNED BY CO~E $ECTION 18.64.070. ~ ~ 7: THAT NO ONE APPEARED 1N OPPOSITION TL~ SUBJECT PETITION. COMMISSIONER MARCOUX OFFERED RESOLUTION N0. 89~ SERIES 1961-62~ AND ' MOVED POR 7T5 PASSA~E AND'ADOPTION~ SECONDED BY COMM15510NER PEBLEY~ TO aRANT PETITION FOR CONDJTIONAL USE PERMTT~ SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOW~ ~ INa COND(TTONSS 1. DEVBLOPMENT SUBSTAN7IALLY IN ACCORDANCE W~TH EXH,IBIT N0. 1~ ~ N1TH :HE EXCEPTION 7HAT THE FENCE SHALL BE SETBACK A MIN'CRIUM OF j 7EN (10) FEE7 FROM THE RIQHT-OF~MAY LINE OF LINCOLN AVENUE~ li j; FLANS FOR SA1D DEVELOPMENT~TO BE SUBMITTED TO AND SUBJECT TO THE ~ APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING AND PLANNINQ DEPAR7MENT5. , Z: PROVISION OF A TEN (10) FOOT LANDSCAPED SETBACK AREA ABUTTINa LINCOLN AVENUE ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY~ PLANS FOR SAID CANDSCAPINQ TO BE SUBMlT7ED T0 AND SUBJECT 70 ~.' THE APPROVAL OF THE.-SUPERiNTENDENT OF PARKMAY (~iAiNTENANCE. @ 3, PAYMENT OF 2.00-PER FRON7 FOOT FOR STREET L1(iMT(Nla PURPOSES ~. ON LINCOLN ~VENUE. • ~ 4. °kOV[S'ION OF UTJLI7Y EASEMENTS ALONO EXTEFi~R BOUNDARIES AS t DE7ERM(NED 70 BE:NECESSARY BY THE DIRECTOR OF' rUBLlC UT,~LIT1E5 b TO ADEQUATELY.SERVE THE 8UBJECT,PROPERTY AND 07HER PROFERTY. ~ `~ 5. PREPARA710N OF STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND INSTP.L,LATION OF ALL ~ ~''* IMPROVEMENTS FOR LlNCOLN AV6NUE IH ACCORDANCE WiTM APPROYEp ~ ,~,,` S7ANDARD PLANS ON F1LE IN THE OFF~CE OF THE CY7Y ENd1NEER.. ~ ~~~~ : [ b. TIME.LTMLTATION OF ONE HUNDRED E1aHTY (180) DAYS FUR THE ACCOM~ E~ ~~~~~ PUSHMENT `OF )T£M NOS. 3p 4~ AND 5. ~ 4 ~~~ _ ~. . ~ { .a .,, ,_ .. . .~~~.~ , . ~ ~~~ r 4 { t d : . ~ ..~ . . , :~'. ' ~ . . ... . .,~, ( ~,~ ~,,,.,,.,...~ _ _.~.r__,_~ . ..~ ~...... ._ .~ . .. .,~ ~... ~_. ._... ,., ~ ... ..... ~---.~.__~~_ i ~ ~ :: ~, ! , ~ `:~: dJf F y 1 . f . ., t..~ :r.l ~ ~ ~ i " _. . ~'f;~ 'tC r ;..~ . :: ... . ..: v: n_ . .: ~. .~:~ :..; , ..'. ... ~ ~.i:..i , . ~...i,~.~4 i!'fli`I~.::~~R-av. . . F ~~ .;,- .. ~ ,; . ..' . ~ ~, :,-.:,.-.. ... ::.._. ;.. . ;. ,. +::~ . '. .. ' :.J .'~:~~ . . I _~ ~ . ~ _ . . . . ~ .> ~4 a~z . i , ,. ~ ~ ~ .. _ 415 ~ 7 ~ . HINUTES, CITY"PLANNlNG COMNISSI~N, SePrewseR 18,;1961, ConTiNUEO: ~-~ - CONDITIONAL.USE ~ TNE•FORE40]Nfl CONDIT~ONB WERE RECITED AT THE MEETINfi AND.WERE FOUND :, PERMIT.NO. 160 T0•BE A,NECESSARY PREREQUISLTE:TO 7HE USE OF:THE,PROPERTY IN ORDER CONTfNUED TO PRESERVE THE:SAFETY AND.MELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF ~ ANAHEIMr . `,~~ ON ROLL CALL THE FORE~OING RESOLUTION WAS PASSED BY THE FO~LOW1Na' ~ ~ _ . VOTEI : : ~ . AYES: CONMISSIONERS: ALLRED~ GAUER~ HAPGOOD~ MARCOUX~ MUNtiALL~ ;j PEBLEY~ RERRY~,SUMMERS. ! ' ; ~ ( NOES: COHM1SS10NERS: ,NoNe. ~ ~ . , '; ., ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS. HORR75. ~ r ~; ~. ~ :, . . . . ' ~ ~~ . - ~ . CONDITIONAL USE pUBLIC HEARING.• PETYTION SUBMITTED BY ADOLF.L. ANO ELYIRA H. MILLER~ ~ ti". PERMIT N0. 161 107 EAS7 I INCOLN•QVENUE ANAHBIM CALIFORNlA OMNERS~ Y1 MELSH ! ~ ~ ~ , ~. . MORNINGSTAR~~107 EASY LINCOLN AVENUE' ANAH6IM CALYFORNIA AGEN7• reeQUESTINO PERM15S10N TO ESTABLISH U~EO CAR LbT MITH OFFIL~E AND fFEPAIR ~ ~ ~ - • SHOP~ ON-PROPERT.Y DESCRIBED:AS• •A.PARCEL.131.FEET BY•141 FEET MITH '. 4 A-.FRONTAQE OF 141:FEET ON.LOS.•AN(iELES'STREET AND LOCATED.ON THE NOR7H~ ':~ r''' WEST CORNER OF.LOS AN(iELES STREE7 AND ELM STREET AND FURTHER ~ESCRIBED - A5 325 SOUTH LOS AN~ElES STREET. PROPERTY'.PRESENTLY CLASSIFIED IN THE ' : M-1, LIGHT MANUFACTURING, ZONE. . _ . ; MR.,W. W..MORN1Na5TAR~ AT,70RNEY REPRESENTINQ THE~PETITIONERS~ APPEARED `? BEFOR& 7HE-.COMMFSSION.AND EXPLAINED THAT THE PETIT]ONERS WERE REQUEST- { 6NQ• iHE_ ESTA9L,JSHMENa'' OF'A USED CAR LOT MITH AN OFFICE~ AND REPAIR SNOP •;~ . GN'.BUHJECT;PROPER7Y~.•.5A'ID OPERATION HAYINQ BEEN.IN EFFECT••AT THE SAME ;q - LOpATION'FOR~APPROX1~1A7ELY SIX~YEARS. HE STATED FURTHER THAT THERE !.~ I MOULD BE NO:CHAN~ES 1N THE OPERA7lON AND THAT THEY:WERE PRESENTLY ,, OPERATING UNDER A!l INTERIN BUS1NE55 LLCENSE YlH1CH EXpIRES ON OC~OBER S ~ 15~;1961. "; :` `:.: T,HE HEARING•YIAS CLOSED. ~ _ , ' . . . • '' + _ THE'COMMiSStOPf FOUND AND DETERHiHED THE'FOLLOMiNG FACTS REQARDINQ THE SUBJECL•PETjTlONt • ... j : a l. THAT.rHE PROPOSED USE lS PROPERLY ONE.FOR NH1CH A CONDITIONAI 3 U5E PERNIT IS AUTHORTZED BY TH15 CODE~.TO W17y USED CAR LOT j ' Yt1T•H OFF.ICE AND'-REPAIR SHOP. : • • • . . j 2: THAT THE~PROPOSED USE WILL NOT ADVERSEtY•AFFECT THE ADJOININO ~ ,, . LAND USES AND THE QROWTH AND.DEVELOPMENT OF TNE AREA 1N WHCCH :,.; ;:' !T J.S:'PROPOSED TO'BE LOCATED'. . .. ,, a ~ , ; ,, . ; . . .._' . '.,{ 3. jHlAT THE 512E AND~SHAPE OF THE SITE PROPOSED'•FOR•THE USE 'IS :~ ADEQIi(1TE; 70 ALLOH THE.FULL DEVE~OPMEN7` `OF THE PROPOSED •USE IN ~ A MANNER NOT. DETRlMENTAL 70 TH6 PARTICULAR AREA NOR TO THE ~ ~I PEACE~.HEALTHy SAFET.Y~ AND QENERAL WEI.FARE OF 7HE CITTZENS OF ' 7HE'C1TY OF'ANAHEIM. • ,-1 4~, THAT THE TRAFFIC'~ENERA7ED eY THE PROPOSED USE MILL:NOT'1MPOSE ~~ , AN UNDOE.BURDEN UPON 7HE'STREETS AND HI.aHWAYS DESIaNED AND ~+~ INPROYED TO.CARRY`THE TRAFFIC`-IN THE AREA. ~ . . . . ~ . . ~ ~ . - ~ j _ . . . . 5. TliAT:THE QRANi1NQ.OF THE COND1TlONAL USE PERMiT UNDER.TH E CON- . '~ . , . D171ON8 IMPOSED~ ]F ANY~;MILL NOT BE'DETR'IMENTAL TO THE PEACE~ ,!~ • " HEALTH~ SAFETY~ AND GENERAL MEI.FARE OF'.THE.C1Ti2ENS OF THE CITY OF~flNAHE~iM.: _, , , _ _ _ -,'i 6. THAT NO ONE APpEARED I'N OPPOSI,TION TO,SUBJECT.PETIT]ON. ~ <~ COMNISSiONER PERRY OFFERED RESOWLION N0. 9Q~ SERIES 1961-62~ AND Z . NOVED'FOR ITS.PASSAQE•'AND ADOPTION~ SECOND6D BY COMMfS510NER MUN- s __,.',~ DALL~ 70 QRANT;PET1710N'.~OR,,_CONDITlONA~ USE P•ERNIT N0:.161~-8UBJECT ,~, ; TO 7HE FOLLOWINO CONDt7'i0N5. `, ~ ~ 1. REPAIR OF DAMA~ED AND/OR.HAZARDOUS•SIDEMALKS AND CURBS LN ACCOR~ ~ ~AkCLr Mi7H-7HE APPROV~D ;i~'ANDAR6 pLANS`OM FItiB fN tHE OFFIC~ OF . ' _ THE`C1;TY•.ENQINEER. + f, :~ ` 2. T1ME.SLIMITAT:lON OF'GNE RUNDRED EIfiHTY (180) DAYS FOR.THE ACCOM~ °t i ~ - No 1. : PL.ISHMENT,OF ~TEM ' ; ' ~ ' .3 ~ ``t ~ ~t~~rti a . . , , . : , THE'FORE40lN~ COND1T10NS NERE~RECITED AT THE MEETING ANQ.MERE FOUND z , i~+ ~ ~ ~~ TO::BE A NECCggpRy PREREQUlaJ7E.`70 THE USE,OF THE~PROPERTYi.1N ORDER - ' ' a ~~ 1 a ' ~' . . . ' ' ,T01 PRESERYE TNE`SAFE'1'Y=AND M6CFARE OF. THE, CITIZENS OF •THE.CJTY i0F . ~ v,~ . , p +wetia ,._~. v~'~,?L~`4 . ; _ ,, ANAHi i M . _.... ,.: J ~~' _ ' ~ . :.~ ~.-. . ~., ..,,.... . . .. :.:.~~' ~..,' •~. _.> '• - i a . rS ;~.,._...r:.;.:~ ~ ~ . ' / ` ON ROLL CALI THE'FOREQOINQ RESOLUTIQ?l MA5 PASSED By xNE FOLLOWINQ f ~ `~ ~ a ` . ~i ' ~: Yo7'E V .~ $ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ..1 ~'k'~{^ )J,l f ~ ' ~ t~ l~~~'~1 ' ~ ~. * ~'},1F ~ 1 ~ k ~ ~'7 :_ ~ K ~p ]5y ~ f ~ 4 t~~'i~f~sYf i ` ~'i' : r y t .. ~ ~ r t t rv ~: ~ta~sr _--j _ -_ .-- - - - - - ., __d_~' ._,. . .. ___ ...~_ . .. . ...... . ...,, . ,. _ ., _ ..... ..> > ... _ . _ ., ~_. ,,,. ~ ',. :;,~_,~.. ._ _ . ,~ A ' . ,t I ~ . } .J I ~ /~ i y~y~ ~ t • l ! ~ef. ~ ~. ., .. ... ....... , ! Y..~. . ~Y~ ~ .i..~ ., . ..i,. •... ~t:.,t~' . ~ ,p> ...` { ~ .i tt ~~i~~t~';~~~''~+~' ,4k~„ ,~;L'~w':~Ars.. _ r~:r .: '~')°':i ~ i~`~~,'p~.H3~ u+.''~~d~y~..'~?l'~? . 'M i r . r .~.Y e "~t 4 sd n ' .;~ i ~ 4 ' __ vu~(W ~ {~ . ~ ' . ~ .. . '~ ' * ~ , . . . ~ . . . . ... . ~ ~~ ~ . ., `~ ~ . . , ,.. .::.` _ . . . .._ - F,~ . . d16 _ _ ._ .-- = { ~' . , _ . ~ • .~ ~~ i ` MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMM1SS10N~ S~P'rEMSER i6~ 1961, CoNr~euen: • i ,~ CONDITIONAL USE - AYES: COMN.ISSIONERSt ALLRED~ GAUER~ HAQGOOD~ MARCOUX~ MUNGALL~ ~ PEBLEY~ PERRY~ SUMMERS. ; ; ' PERHII NO.•161 roNr~NUeo NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NoNE. ~ I. ~ ABSEM : COMt4lSS30NERS: MORR15. ~ : . ;`j sueMtTiFO eY RAYMOND.6. aHC ALICE E. SIMRSON~ T ~ CONDITIONAC USE ~oH - PUBLIC HEARING. PEr~ SANTA~ANA CALIF~RN1Ai OWNERSy•REQUESTING PER~ 2441 RIVERSIDE DRIVE AN • ` PFRMI~T ~N_0. 16~, ~ A5: ~sstoN.TO•ESTQBLISH A TRQILER ~ARK~ ON.•PROPERTY•DESCRiBED HE M N j T • IRRE~ULAkIY SHAPED PARCEL•NLTH A FRONTAQE OF 160 FEET LOCATED O ELES STREET BETMEEN CERRITOS AND KATELLA f A ,~ •~ i N EASTERLX SJ•DE••OF SOUTH LOS• AS 1750 SOUTH I.OS AN~EI.ES STREET. HER DESCRIBED . AVENUES AND FURT PROPERTY PRESENTLY CLA35IFIED IN THE.C~3~ HEAVY COMMERCIAL~ ZONE. ~ ~i~'~~' MR. RAYMOND SIMPSON~ TNE PETITIONER~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMM]SS10N 1RPOSE OF~THE REQUESTED COND7t10NAL U5E P~rMIT E P y ,7 ~:` { AND STATED THAT.TH ~AS 1N ORDER TO ESiABU SH 7HE EX75TING TRAILER PARK•AS'.A CONFORMINQ OF THE 7RAICER PARK BY THE ADDITION ION a „ • y9E•AND 7'O PERMIT THE•EXPANS N / D K L ~ NCE • PARK ~ THE THATEHETANpDHISRNHFE HADTOPERATED A71N~SSJNCEN1944~ Y ROOM•HAD•ALREADY BEEN -0OMPLETED?FOR,MM3C-t A ~ ~ 1954~ THAT SHE LAUNDR PERM17 WAS ISSUEO 1N ERROR~ THAT IMPROVEMEN75 AND.:MODERN[ZATIOC4 OF AND TNAT THE C17Y E`IN'ERROR DO ' ~ ~ N lA5 ALSO 7'HE PARK•'.TWO•;YEARS A00 LY DISCOVERED'THAT THE EN71.RE OPERATION WA5 EN :~ 7 ATTORNEY~S::OFFICE REC A NON-CONFORMINfi'USE. ~ ,j THE COMM1aSi0N.REYIEMED PL07 PLANS AND DISCUSSED THE•LOCA710N QF THE THE PE7ITIONER INDlCATEp•THAT THE•POOL L ~ . PROPOSEp 17 8Y 40•FOOT POO ' WII.G BE SITUATED 1N THE•LARDSCAPED~AREA ADJACENT TO THE PARKINQ AREA HE STATED ALSO THAT NE D'ID NOT THINK ~ AND 60`FEET FROM THE.STREET. THE PROPOSED WIDENIN& OF"THE FREEWAY FRONTA(iC• ROAD WOULD AFFECT THE , . POOL. • • r IT WNS POINTED OUT•THAT:THE DlREC70R OF PUBLIC YIORKS HAD•)NFORPIED THE STATE•HAD PROCEEDED 70. AL COMMITTEE ?HAT 5 3 . THE INTER6EPARTMENT SONE-EXTENT 1N DEVELOPING PLANS FOR TME•WIDENIN4 OF THE•FRONTACiE TED THAT THE pET1TlONER•CONTACT TME STATE E ) ~ S ROAG. THE COMMISSION SU~Q HIQHMAY DEPARTMENT T0 OBTAIN xNFORMA7Y0N ~N RESPECT TO THE POSSIBLE E R EFFECT THE PROPOSED WlDEN1NQ WOULD HAVE UPON THE EXISTJNa TRAIL ~ PARK: 7HE HEARING•WAS CIOSED. •~ ' ~ THE COMMISSION FOUWD AND DE7ERNINED 7HE FO~LOWINQ FACTS REQARDINa ~ THE SUBJECT•PET.1710N: ~ - 1: THAT TNE•PROPOSED 115E TS P.ROPERLN ONE F~R WHICN.A CONDITIONAL AUTHORIZED BY TH15 COPE~ t~ M'IT: T0 1LSTABLISH 7 ' j ~ S USE PERMIT AN EXISTyN6 TRAILER PARK AS A CONFORMFNQ USE AND j0 PERMIT 1T5 . EXPANSION. . .. . • I 2. THAT THE PROPOSED USE W7LL NOT ADYERSELY AFFECT 7HE ADJO~N.ING Q THE aROWTH AND DEVECOPMENT,OF 7HE AREA IN MH1CH A ~ N - LAND USES lT XS P.^.OPOSED TO BE LOCA7ED. ~ i 3: THAT THE 512E AND.SHAPE OF ?ME SI'~E PROPOSED FOR,TNE USE IS THE FULL DEYELOPMEN7'OF THE'PROPOSED USE ~N A ~~ " ADEQUATE TO ALLOM MANNER NOT DETRIMENTAL TO TNE PARTICULAR AREA NOR TO THE,PEACE~ ENERAL WELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF TNE C17Y ~ HEAL7H~ SAFETY~ AND D ~ . ' OF ANAHEIM. 4. THAS THE SRAFfSC DENERATEC BY 7HE PROPOSED USE WILC NOT 1MPOSE tlPON'THE STREETS AND M1.~HWAYS DESi~NED AND ' ~ ~ . KN UNDUE BURDEN ]MPROYED 70 CARRY THE TRAFFIC IN THE AREA. ~ ~ 5. THAT THE.aRANT1NQ OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERM[7 UNDER THE CON~ IMPOSED;,F ANY~ W1LL'NOT BE DETRIMEN7AL TO THE'P£ACE~ , ~' ;~ ' D1T10N5 AND QENERAC NELFARE OF THE C1772EM5 OF THE E Y ;~ ~ ~ T :~ HBALTH.~ SAF C1TY OF ANAHEJ.M. . 3 6. THAT NO ONE APPEARED 1N OPP041F:1ON 74>SU9JECT PE7lTI0N. ' ~ COMM195lONER PEBLEY OFFERED RESOLUTlON W0.;.91~ $ERIES 1961~b2~ AND ~ ~ : ; MOVED'FOR 175 PASSAfiE AND:ADOPTION~_SECONDED BY.COMRISSIONER ANT PET1~'ION FOR CONDITIONAL.USE PERMI7 N0. 162~ , ~; " . , ALLRED~ TO.fiR TO:THE FOLLOMINQ CONDLTION. :- BUBJECT + _,. .;,;, . . 7N:E%H1B175 1~ 2~ ANI! ANTIALLY 1N ACCGRDANCE M1 '~ , 1. DEVELOPMENT SUBST ,. ~ x ,h v 1i~~~ ~ ~ 3 . THE FOREQOINti'CONDITlON WAS REC~TED'AT 7HE MEETINQ AND SIAS FOUND TO IN ORDER TO PROPERTY , x NyA~ ~ , BE A NECESSARY PREREQUISJTE'TO THE;USE OF 7HE- TY AND WCLFARE OE 7H~ C1T12EN4 OF THE C'ITY OF ANAHEIM ' ' i ~ t~ ' ~~.5~~,r' ~' a ~ . ~ . HE 5AFE ~ PRESERYE .. . ~ - ~ ., ,,; ,,,; + ,.~ „~ . , . ~ - _ . . ~ . . . ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ c . .:x';, ~' ~„ ~ . ' . . . . ._. ... . . .. .. . .. . . . . . ' ~ . . .. .. .~.. .: .:.. : ~~ ...~ ~.~ -~ . ~ ~:'.~.~ ~~. . -~:~ ~ : ~ ~~: ~. r ~ ' ~r; ~~ i .,. M1 ( , . , . .. . , „ .. . . ) y R~ ~I '- ,` ~ - ' ' ~i ~; ~. . . _ ~~~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ >>G _ ;. .. . ;. u r.. ~-. :~ , ~. .. t 1 ~ ' _ . . . ,..: . ~ .," ,';., . ' .:~ .,'~"~,. s l ~ ~ ~~ ~'~r~ ~k ~ ~~ M ~ 7 1~l~ . ,. ~. ~ . ' 13. i :.~ ~ ~. . rL~ . 'I~ri~ ~ ~.. iJ/:.> ~.l~~R.t'~.~. l 1 ~ ' ~~ ~ . . , ~ fi,. . ' . : ~r ~. . ' +v1 ,/, ~ ~ ' ~L .~/ ~A {y yy~ ay,, t1T'~r~~~.n,~~~..4?.R~?{S`tk>VLT~1.1:+~Y~i'vi~JsL"~7.'~tlL~i.:~.T. ~i':~~" a~_),.41nZY~~~.'~W!!'~~. b.Yi'~VVa .~.J~i$.~..,e_ ~ a"~ NtL'~~.`: ~ x ~ t'~5 .L r~ F t 9 rf.Lt S _ ~ YL~:tiL~~3,~ a n ~~.:. .- ,.. . . ... -,.. ...',. . ,~. .,_. ..,. ~ ~. . ~~ ..' w~ . . . - , ,.. . _ : 413 ~ `MINUTE5,' C1TY'PLANNING COMM1SS10N~ SEp~EMBER 18~ 1961~ CONTINUED: TIONAL USE' ' - `CQPID ON ROLL CALL 2HE FOREQDINB RESOt~)TION WAS PASSED BY'THE FOLLOMINQ ' ~ PERM T. NO 162 VOTE: .' . : ~ ~ ~ -'.-CONT I~NUED • ~ AYES: ~ ~ ' ~ • ~ - ~ ~ COMHISSIONERS: AtLRED~ GAUER~ HAPGOOD~ MARCOUX~ MUNIiALL~ . - PEBtEY~ PERRY~ SUMblER5._ ' NOES: COMMISSIONERSe -Noi+e.' ~ ABSE;NT:. COMM15SlONERS: ,MoRR~s. PF~USSSIFICATION ' N0. ei-52-23 PUBIIC HEAR~NG. PETITION SUBM(7TED ev C. N. HESTER, TON:'ANb.C. MARD, c/o C. W.;HESTER~ P. 0.'B,ox 215~ F. C, HARRING- •3800 EAsr Consr ~;i i, Sutre . HIGHMAY 'CORONA:DEL~MAR~:CALIFORNIA~ OMNERS2~•JOSEPH M.•61RARD~ 610~ 65b5 114L5HIRE BoULEYARD~•LOS'.APl~ELES 4tl~ CALIFORKyAy A(iBN7~' TtEQUE5T1N~:jHAT•pROPERTY DESCRJBED,ASt A PARCEL 246.FEEi.BY 265' 3' FEET 'WITH7A,:FRONTAGE.OF 265' FEET ON LI,NCOLfl ~IYENUE AND,-LOCAiED ON THE NORTHEAST,CORNER OF LINCOLR.I~YENUE AND HOM7EREY.STREET AND FURTNER r'. N OLN AVENUE~ BE RECLASS[FTEG: FROM`THE':R-~A~ DESCRIBED AS 2261 MEST I.I ~ , RESIDENTIAL AGR~CULTURAL, ~Q~iE To 7xe_C~2, GENERAL CpHNERC.IAL•~'ZONE. _ 5' ~ MR.;aRTHUR•PASTEL~ 6505 W11.5HIRE BOULEVARD~ LOS AN(IELES~ APPEARED t ,„ ~ BEFORE THE:COMMISSION AND' STATED 7HA7 SHE• PETITIONLRS •MOULD•BE MLLL- 7NQ T0•AMEND THE~SJBJECT PETITLON BY'REQUEST~N~,C~1{•NEIQNBORHOOD COM[dERC1ALy-20N1NG FOR••THE SUBJECT PROP,ERTY'BECAUSE.7HE PET:1T10N HAD BEEN;IN:.ERROR IN REQUESTINQ.C-2~_GENERAL COMMERCiAL~ 20NINQ FOR THE PROpOSED DEYELOPMENT.• . MR•,G. ('..~KELLER~.201 NOR7H MONTEREY•STREETti APPEARED BEFORE THE,_ COMMi55fON AND"57ATED THAT HE~WAS QLAD 7HA7 THE PExJTI0NER5 HAD ; ~ Z C R ~ ' ~ 4 ~~ THA7 PERMI7 USES MOULD ZONE GENERAL•COMMERCIA LE BECAU6E'THE C 2E WOULD~BE•CE55'DESIRABLE. HE STATED FURTHER'7HA7 THE.ABU77tNQ RE51~ ~`_> - DENLFAL::•DEVEGOP.MEH7, CONTAINED• H14H CLA55~ i~OMESr:2HAT ~HE`: R6ALl2ED ' CONMERCIAC DEVELOPMENT MOUtD 8E ESTABL•TSHED 'AT THE PRDPOSED•'tOCA~. . ~ AND~THAT iNE PARK7Nfi' LOT PROPOSED FOR 7HE NORTHERLY:PORiION T(ON~ ' '!' , HOW- OF:.7HE SUBJECT PROPERTY ME7 MITH'HIS APPROVAL. ••HE,.1ND)CATED~ EVER~•7HAT• HE DID, NOT'CONS~IDER 17 ;ADVISABLE •TC•. PROVIDE ACCE55'TO. THE PROAOSED REAR PARKIN~ AREA,FROM-:MONTEREY $TREE7•BECAUSE•THAT STREET-TS A LOCAG:STREET AND,6ECAUSE THE`USE-OF MONTEREY•STREET TO ~ SERV[ TME RES6DEN71AL DEVELOPMENTj'IN ADDTTaON•7'C'7HE•SCHOOI BUSES ~ S~RVING~'YHE'ELEMENTARY':SCHOOL~•HOULD CREATE~T00 NLCH TRAFFIC CCN~ ~ DES710N_FOR 7HE..SJZ6 OR THE STREET. HE SUdGESTED THAT IH~:'ACC655 PARKIHQ AREA BE:LIMiTEp AHD THAT MOST OF xHE ENTRIINCES ~ TO:7HE.,REAR , BE'PROVIDED FROM:LINCOLN AVENUE: HE DESCRIBED THE PRESENT'TRAFFIC I PhOBlEMS'. IN THE : AREA. ~ " AP?EARE4 BEFORE THE COqMT5510N.AND STA7ED;THAT. , MR.-R. L.iRlCHMOND _ 'APPROYCD O,F:THE•R$~Ji3E0,REQUE57•FOR C~1~ r1E1~HBORH00D:COMMERCIAt~ H6 . 20NIN4 RATHER-7HAN THE C~2~ GENERAL COMMERCJAL~..ZON)NG. HE,ADDED,~ HOMEVER~;?HP.T 7HE 1NQRESS~AND''EQRESS SHOULD BE L1N1.xED ON•:MON7EREY ST:'EET. BECAUSE: T.HE: USE, .FOR: THE COMNER~ IAL: DEVEI.OPN6N7 MOUI:D .BE' • AL TO.TNE`RESIDEN7IAL'TRAC7. HE.STATED:F.URTHER'THAT`NE DETRIMENT , WAS.OPPOSED TO`7HE;PROPOSED,TWO.STORY;DEVELOPMEN7 MNICH.WOULD.PERM17 A V1EN.,TNTO,THE ADJACEN7; RESJDENTTAL'PROPERT).E9. ~ LILA DRAQI,CEVICH~.9802''POLK.AYENUE~ APPEARED'BEFORE THE'COMMISSI,ON ,.NO OBJECT70N5 T0 THE.PROPOSEp CONSTRUCT10Ny S7ATED`THAT SHE HAD AND , ,. THE>7HREE ENTRANCES PROPOSED;:FROM MONTFREY THAT'SHE DID 09JECT~70 BU7 . , ST.REET~ BECAUSE J~~NOULD,BE,HAZARDOUS FpR THE CH~LDREH':T.N ~'HE.'AREA , ,,, . AND"BEQAU,SE ,IT;;MOUI.D CREATE.'TRAFFIC CONOESTION, 'IN'RESPONSE:70 HER, 'CODE INQUIRY REQARD~Na NALL':REQUIREMENTS~.SHE WAS,INFORMED THAT THE REQUlRES,.A.'SOLI,D,':FENCE:;liHERE;THE SUHJECT PROPER]'Y'AB13Tg!'fKE RE53- ' ID6R A DRA~jCEVjCH STAT.ED THAT'.3HE.DlD NOT;CONS DENT[AL ZONE. MRS ' . ROVIDE PR07ECTION FOR THE,ABUTTJN~ SOL7D'FBNCE 70'BE ADEQUA7E'TO:.P , RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPNEN~'.: ASStSTANT=CL7Y"ATTORNEY.:IOE 6EdSLER : ~ ApVISED T.HE COMk18510N 7HAT A'MALL.COULD~6E,,MADE A'CONDITION OF. . ' . ::~: . ' APPROVAL OF 7HE SUBJECT>:PETITION. 1 POLK AYENUE~ APPEARED.;BEFOR6.THE COMM1SS10N MRS. NAE KRAVtT2~'9762 ' ~~ : . 7HOUGH'f'.,'kNA7' THE.;USE OF TNE SU.BJECT,:PROPER7X' AKO(-STATED:THAT. SHC ` " ;. , ?r : . . _ -: ~ SHdULB' BE;:GIMITED:70`_D$SiRA~LE• PROf~ESS/,atiAt'U.SE''BECAUSB:OF; 7HE ., ° NI!MBER OF-CHICDREN PASSiN~ TNE'ARBA bAXLY `ON,,THEIRt,MAY T0,5CH00L. ,~ ~ '' _ PETITIONEFt~S:A4EN7+APPSARED BEFORE 7HE COMM1SSj.ON AND°STATED'.7HAT THE',' ,z.:~ ~ ~ , ?HEY HAD.PROPOSED;TO~CONSTRUCT?SERVI,CE..ST.ORES~ SUCH.AS BARBER.SHOPS__` ~~ '`.. ~ 1~tRf, Y .~\ ,~'f 't k ~5~~7.. '.~ ' r~,5 l t S .~.W ~ t( ~:~:~ t ~. , ~ i 4 .^ ..,h . 4 ' ' toG~+~• ! ~~ - ~ ,.~ T~: . ':. . '- ' ' _.' .. ~ _ r i ~ ~rsr0~ ~. ~ k~(~: i . ' . ~' .. ~:~ ~ ~ ~ '--- °- i ~' ~ ~ ~ ~r a i die ,,~ - ~ ,~ . `i . ~;; HINUTES~ C17Y PLANNlN6 COMMISSION, SePreMeeg 18, 1951, Coarit+ueo: " ~. , : : ; RECUISSIFI^A'~ION - . THE HFlIRING•.WAS• CLOSED. . • ~ • ~ NO 61-62 23 . , • ~ CONT1_MUED- THE COMMJSSION D1,SCUSSED~pO55IBlE REV7510N OF THE PLANS~ ELlM1NA71N~ MINDOWB ON•'SHE~NOR7HERLY ELEVATlON OF jHE.PROPOSED.9UILD)NQS. THE PE7~IT10NER y5iA7ED';'7MAT 7HE EYE' HEIGHT OF THE MIISDOWS COULD BE RAISED~ BUTy,7NA7=NlND~WS`MO~ltD'•BE':NECE.SSARY:FOR:VENT7LATION PURPOSES. HE ; STATED THAT~,IN•'V1EW OF TME LOCATlON OF THE BUlLDINfiS iZ0'FEET SOUTH~ ER4X OF TNE PROPERTY'L'INE~.IT WOULD BE''1MPOSSIBLE FOR ACCUPANTS TO ; '.V1EM'ADJACENTsPROP.ERilES. ~' THE COMMI.SSION A150 D15CUSSED'THE INSTALLAS'~ON OF A FENCE OR WALL~ ,, AND THE PE7~lT:lONER:IND'ICATED THAT THEY MOULD BE 1iTLLING T0 INSTALL ' ` 4 p MALL li JT WERE REQUI.REC. •:• r THE::COMMISSION FOUND AND DETERMINED 7HE FOLLOMINQ FACTS RE6ARDIN~ 71~E ! 7~. SUBJEC7•PETITI.ON:•' ; ~ s ;. ; ~~rti' 1. ]'HA7 THE PETITIONER PROPOSES A RECLASSIFICA710N OF 7HE ABOVE -y t+' <~ DESCRIB~D PROPERTY FROlA SHE R-,A RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL, ZONE. ~,' T~c rHF C-i, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMER~IAI~ ;2UNE. , • ~:• 2. THAT 7HE PROPOSED.RECLASSIFLCA710N OF SUBJECT PROPER7Y TS NECES~' SARY.OR'DESIRABLE FOR THE ORDERLY AND PROPER DEVELOPNENT OF 7HE ~, ~i C OMMUN 1 TY'~ _: _ ~ - 3. THAT.THE PROPOSED RECLASSIFICATI,ON OF,SUBJECx RROPER7Y DOES PROPERLY RELATE TO THE ZONES AND THEIR:•PERMITTED USES LOCAtLY EST•ABLISHED. IN-~~GS: °RORIMITY:TO SUBJECT PROPERTY AND TO 7HE 20NES,AND TNEIR PERMITTED USES ~aENERALLY ESTABL75HED THROUfiHOUT THE COkMUNtTY: _ . . - 4~ .'THA~''THE PROPOSED RECtAS51•FICATIAN OF SUBJECT PROt`ERTY DOES NOt - ; REQUIRE DEDJCAT•1•ON FOR'•AND ST•ANDARD-IMPROVEMEN'~'OF' •ABUTT)NG ' ' STREET5=8ECAUSE SAID PROPERTY DOES RELATE i0 AND ABUT'UPON ` ST.REETS•AND Hb~HWAYS WH1CH.+ARE'~IMPROVED•70•CARRY THE•TYPE AND `: ! - QUANTIT-Y OF:'TRAFF]CY WH1CH WILC'BE'QENERATED BY 7HE PERNITTED ~ : " U5ESti 7N ACCORDANCE WITH THE CIRCULATION'ELEMEN7 OF.TH~ GENERAI , PLAN... , ' 5. ' THAT.NO ONE APVEARED 1N OPPOSTTION TO THE C~1{:NE1aHBORH00D COM~ MERCIAL~ ZONE CLA551F1CA710N•FOR•SUBJEC7;PROPER7Y4.AL'THOU~N ~ ' YERBAL:OPPO51'1'lON'MAS RECORDED;AGAJNST:THE PROPOSED TMO,STORY „1,_?~ . . • , - •HE14HT OF THE,BROPOSED COMMERCIAL, DEVELORMEN7. . " y COMMISSIONER PEBLEY OFFERED RESOWTION N0. 92~ SERIES 1961+62,'AND ! i MOVED FOR.'.]75 PASSAQE-AND ADOPT(ON~ SECONDED BY•COMMISS)ONER,SUMMERS~ ~; ;C,f '.. , . .; . ~~ TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCTL' THAT. PET'1TION FOR RECLASSIFICATION_ r' N0.`61-62~23~BE:.aRANTED~ SUBJ.ECT TO`SNE FOLLOWIN~ CONOIT.JONS: ..•. ='~i ' 1. ' DEVELOPMEN7';SUBSTANTIALLY 'IN ACCORDANCE M1T,H EXYIBiT NOS. 1~'2~ ~ '~; AND.r3~ W1YH,THE.;S7IPULAT.TON;THA7,NO BUILDiNGS 9E PLACED M1TH1N- ,~ ~ 120 FEE7 OF THE NORTHERLY_PRQP,ERTY C1.NE~ AND WtTH.THE"EXCfiP710N 9 TNAT.7HOSE AREAS:PROPOSED.FOR',.INQRESS AND.EQRE5S BE MODIFIED~ ~ ~ T.[i11TINa TH& ACCESS FROM ~i0N7,EREY STR~ET 70 THE CENTER ACCE58 , AREA ONLY~,`AS 1NDlC'ATEO ON,EXH18iT NOt,1~ AND WI7H TH~ PROV1~ ~ S10N'OF LANDSCAPING`~TN ACCORDANCE MITH JHE.REQUIREMENTS STiPU~ .i x+-"r, LA7ED-YN'CONDITTON N0.'.2::' PLAN9:FOR SAID -0EVELOPMENT 70.BE' ';r `-'ae';, SUBMITTED'TO AND:SUBJECTrZO THE'APPROVAL OF 7HE'BUILDING AND •.j PLANNIN~'DEPARTMENiS. ~ ~ ~ ', 2. PROV'IS70N OF A M1NIMUM.51X ,(6).EOOT STRIP OF_LANDSCAPING ALONO ~ ~~ ' MONTEREY S7REET..:AND LINCOLN AVENUE,MI7H 7HE INSTALLATION'OE SREE'.NELLS~'~EyTHER':7N 7NIS"LANDSCAPED'BTRIP:OR iN THE PARKNAY P01tT10N OF'THE:PtANNED,l1iQt1~AY:;RlANT.~OF~MAY:LINE OF'LINCOLN AVENUE AND;MONTEREY SxREET~ PLACED AS:FORTY (40~ FOOT 1NTERVALS~ ~ PlANS'FOR;SAID LANDSCAP:I:NQ-TO BE'SUBM[7TED TO,AND..SUBJECT 70 '~'• TNE':'APPROVAC OF'THE SUP.ER7N~ENDENT OF PARi.WA~-.NAAN7ENANCE ,AND y; - • TO BE.1H3T,ALLED PRI.OR TO;FINAL;BUILDINO ~~iPEC7lON ',; ~` ; 3..;'.INSTALLATION OF A S1X',(6)~'FOOT`MASONRV..NALL A40NQ.THE.,NOR7'HERLY '~' 1~ PROPERT.Y L~NE i:HERE SUBJECT. PROFER7Y ABUTS THE:R~1~ ONE,FAlA1LY ~ ~~? . R~SlDEN77ALX ZONE'PRIOR ''.TO F1NAL BUILDfNA INSPECTION ~ . .°:~ ,~ 4~' PRGY:I,SION OF PARK[HQ IN AGCORDANCE MITH CODE REQUIRENENTS AND +' '% 1N ACCORDANCE MJ7H~T-lE OPEN AlR'PARKING 8PACE.`S7ANDARD4'ON FJLE ~t~~~`~;c~ IN THE OFFTCE OF TNE P1.ANNCNQ ~EPARTMENT ~ wls'~'~~, , ~, "' r~ r,i~~tiry ' S. P1IYMEN7 OF ,=2 00 PER FRON7 ~'007.`FOR STREET ~.LGHTiNQ PURPOSES ON ~ ~,~r LINCOLN AVENUE. -` . :: :1 ~ f~' „ '1:: . . . .. . . 1 .i '~~t~~~ 6.. I~187AL1,ATYON OF 81DBNA~.KS TN ACCORDANCL M1TH Tl~L APPROVED S7AN- ~'~ DARDrPLANB 0N~FILE~YN.TM6 OFFIQE OF THE C1T1f EN~Tt/E6;R. ; ~ . .. ~. ~ ' .~~1 r~~ I~, .I,NSTALLAT:XON OF-STANDARD COMMER07Al DRIVEMAYS~TN ACCORDANCE `iiY`D ` ,. ; . Y~ITH-TME;AP.PROVED.~.BTANDARD PLANS ON FTLE 1N 7HE O-FlCE OF 7NE S~n . ,~.: ; .:.:. ,,.. GIJY,1 ENQINEER. ~:`i '~i, , `; ~ k_: ~ ~. ~~a.~ , , ~ r~ ~ ti~r ,~~ 3~~ ~~,1',~~ ~ ' ~ '~ «,k~t~~ f ~~av~~'s + , r ~ { ~ ~` 7ti' r~!~~~, 1 n fi-. i i!., .~~~4~~~ ~~~"r~ ~ '~:~ R~ ~ .e ~, T t ^ ~ ~ ~~~:it~.i ~. r ~ ~ l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - 7 ~ xe~~~r~~~ ~ym.r~t~~~..-,.., .. ,. . . „L. .,~' ..~ . ,. ,,. .,. ~.. ,..,,.....~~~...~. ~_.~ ~.. . , ._,_ ~ } .~i~ ~S'P ~~~ n,~~ ~a~ i~-~; . T ~ s~..•;l,~ ~~A~} 5+3~y`t~~qZ s '~ `• r~ `~ <- nC~~. 7'~'~` ~~: '~ PY' ~<t7 1 c r C ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~t / ~ , y~ ~,~ ~Y~~ ri~'f ~r ~ T [ r ~ i i S .~~ ~ ~ : 1 ~: 5 ~ ': + ~ ~ ~` ( 7 _ 1 ' ' ~A L . c, „ ~ ~. .~. ~.. :. ~J . :.~ ! a :'~ ..1 ^~ }if * r r ~ f ~: ~ . . ~ .. . ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ .' ~ . ~ .. : ' - . . .. ': . - -~ . . ~ . ~. - ~. ":. ~ ~ . . ~. . ~~.~~ ~ . . _,....y _~ . . . . .. , d±g • _ _ < ,-- :> _ ~ f ~ ~ ' . ~ ~ M1NUTES, CaTY:PLANNING COMM1SS10N~.SEPTEMBER 18y 1961~ CONTINUED: ~ RECLASSIFICAT-,ION ~ ' ~ ' 8. PROVISION OF UT1LlSY l~ASEMEN7S ALONQ-EXTERfOR BOUNDAR)ES AS ERMINED 70:BE NECESSARY BY THE DIREQTOR OF PUBLIC UT'lLIT1E5 D~T 3 ;, 62~23 NO..61 _ xHE•SUBJECT PROPER7Y AND 07HER PROPERiY. TO ADEQUATELY SERVE ~ f,ONT1NUED , LIMITATIOH OF NINETY (90) DAXS FOR THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF 9. TIME ~,~ ~, :- ;: '. . .. ~ ~TEM a05. 5~ 6~ 7~-AND 8. . .. ,. ~ 1 TNE-FOREQO1NCi CONDlT10NS MSRE RECLTED A7 THE MEE7INQ AND WERE FOUND ~ ' A'NECESSARY`PREREQUISITE T0 7HE USE OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER T0'BE• ~ . TO PRESERVE THE SAFETY AND NELFARE OF'THE CITIZF.NS ~F THE CITY OF ~ ANAHEIM. . .. ~ ON ROI.L CALL THE FOREGOINQ RE501.UTION WAS PASSED BY 7HE FOLLOWINa `~ VOTE. , #~ i' AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED~ GAUER~ HAPa00Dti MARCO~IX~ MUNOALL~ ,~ ~v~{' PEBLEY~ PERRY~ SUMMERS. AK ~ ~~ . ~ ' ... . . ~ ' NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NoNE. . . ;.:~ i:;- _ ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSI MORRIS. • , :~ ~ . RECIASSIFICATION; 61-62-24 ' N - PUBLIC HEARING. PEx1710N.5U8MITTED av DONALD M. MILEY~ 5i3 SouTH ~ EIiCLID AVENUEi ANAHEIM~ CALLFORN)A~ OWNERy EDWARD PICASSO~•228 ~ y `;~ ~_ HACIENDA STREET~ ANAHE7M~ CALIFORNJA~ AGENTZ• REQUESTING THAT PRO- 60 FEE7 BY 101 FEET WI7H A'FRONTA6E ARCEL A a , , P PERTY'•DESCRIBED.ASL- 'MEST SlDE OF EUCLID AVENUE BETWEEN ORANCiE AVENUE THE EET ON 60 i . ;F. • OF: ~'ITS SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING APPROXIMA7ELY 120•FEET AND-BROADNAY . NORTH OE THE NORTHWE~T CORNER OF EUCL.ID AND ORANGE AVENUES AND ~ FURTHER DESCRIBED A5 513 SOUTH EUCL'ID AVENUE~ 86 RECLASSIFIED FROM THe R-i ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL~ ZONE TO 7HE'C-1~ NEIGHBORH00D ~ COMMERC1At, ZONE. • ;~ MR. EDNARD-PICA550~-THE PETITIONER~S AGENT~ APPEARED 8EFORE TNE COId~ MISSION AND DESCRIBED THE•20NINQ AND LAND USE -0F 7HE SURROUNDIN6 ; 1 HE INDICATED THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY A9UX•5•A'VACANT PARCEL AREA . ON'•THE~'NORTH~•7HAT A.SERYJCE STAT'.ION WAS SITUAT'ED SOUTHERLY,-0F !iUB- ~ i JECT PROPERTY~ AND•THAT.OTHER COMMERCiAL U5E5 WERE LOCATED TO TIdE 11NTERSECTION OF BROADHAY AND.EUCLID AVENUE. MR. E ~ . NORTH AT, TH PlCAS56 STATED•FURTHER!TNAT 7HE EX,ISTIN(i RESiDENCE•ON SUBJECT PI20~ ~ PERTY WAS:NOT SUITAHLE FOR RESIDENTyAL U5E ANY LON6ER~8ECAU5E OF' ~ THE AMOUNT:'OF TRAFFIC ON EUCLID AVENUE~ AND'THAT THE•PROPOSED OF JHE ST,RUC7URE FOR A REAL ESTATE.OFFICE WOUlD BE OF ALTERAT70N ~ ~;' . BENEFIT.TO THE AREA'AND WOULD NOT BE A DE7RIMEN7 TO tHE NEl(ik80R~ HOOD • • ~ ~ • MRS. DONALD HALL~ 438 SOU7H FALCON STREE7~ APPEARED BEFORE THE,COM~ MISS~ON'AND 5TAiED 7HAT MHEN THE':SERYI:CE STAT.ION WAS PERMITTED ON ' !~ . THE'CORNER~,THE OMNERS OF THE PROPERTY 1N 7HE.AREA NERE•PROMISED ~ .NOT ESTABLISH;A'<PRECEDENT FOR COMMERCIAL DEYELOPMENT~ • THAT ~IT.:WOULD . A:MATTER OF;HONOR THAT TH)S P.ROMISE BE KEPT. SHE AKD TNA7 IT~-WAS: . BED'THE VAI.UE AND'THE.!"dPROVEMENTS OF'7HE,RESIDENTIAI AREA DESCRi , PROPERTt''ON THE WEST~ AND STAiED THAT THE THE:SUBJEC2'" `A9UTTINQ . , ENCROACHMENT OF,'.COMMERCIAL,DEVELOPMENT INTO:THE AREA.MOULD PRESENT IES FOR ANYONE WISHIN~ T0'OB7'AlN`F. H. A:.FINANCINQ.OR FICUL T; DIF LOANS FOR~,TME7R;PROPERT'fES.' SHE'COMPLAINED ABOUT THE,'HAZARD' ESENTED BY COMMERCIAC DEVELOPMEN7 FOR THE SCHOOL CHtLDREN IN THE P :~ ~ ,R AREA BECAUSE OF:THE:AMOUNT OF:.T.RAFFIC THAT '15 OENERATED BY COMMER~ ~ C'1'AC.'DEVELOPMENT`~ ABOUT THE S1~N5 7HAT VARl0U5 ESTABLIBHMENT3 USE~ AND THAT THERE WAS A~SUFFICIENT AMOUNT KS ~ ~ ABOU7 tHE:LACK.OF SIDEdAL 'COMMERCIAL PROPERTY `0.L'READY ES7ABLISHED'Ty THE AREA. SHE STATE~, OF a ~ , F.ikRTHBA~;~HAT .TME TYPE OF COtdt4ERC-AL ,OEYELOEMENT THAT NOULD BE . A :~ ~Z ,_ ' F [FICATION WOULD ENCOURAQE.CHE PROPOSED RECLASS >PERMITTED•;BY'THE' i . , ELOPMENT.TNA7 WOULD NOT.BE'AN,ASSET 70 7HE'COMMUNITY~~ DEV COMMERCIAL ; F . , AND THAT~':'IF;:THE;SUBJEC7~PETITION WERE AP°ROVED~ THE VACANT PARCEL CIAL C M ~ O MER `'ON'.THE''NORTH:WOULD:ALSO REQUEST RECL,ASSiFlCAT10N 70 A; 20N6 '.- . ' ` z~a f> - S A~ENT~ Mz Plcasso,,IN REBUTTAL~`S7ATED THAT H@ MAS` THE PET~TTlONER~ ~ ~ . REAL•SSTATE'BROKER~ THAT HE'-D1D NOx 1N7END TO DO ANYTHING 7HA7t ' A'~ -,. ~ , BE-A'DE7RIMENT..T,O THE,SUBJECT..PROPERTY.OR:TO TNE:'SURROUND,ING MOULD ' ~ +; .., ING FOR AREA} ANb=THAt'=ME INTENDED.TO.U7)L1ZE.THE EX~S7LNG CMELL ~ ~ ~; ' RE5IDENT;IAG;P.URpOSES'(N CONJUNCTION:-M17H A<REAL ES7ATE OFFICE.• ' . ' ~ . ~ . _ •~ 6 ~: .r. ' y ' „ . . - . . • . ~ . : . ~ . E HEARING NAS:CLOSED. . . TH , ~ T ~ ,~L , ~~ ?y4 . THE COMMiSSiON NOTED•THAT THE:SERYICE STATION WAS ES'[ABLIBHED BY THE ' t , rt, ~ ~iy~j~ ,THE RES'IDENTIAL 7RACx.' CHA7RMAN GAUER iNDICATED THA7 DEVELOPER OF ~, ~~ ~ ~'~' ' . . . . AST:SOME DEVELOPERS MAD RESERYED;CORNER PROPER7JES F.OR. •TN THE P C ' t 4 ;~ r . E ACCORDAN ¢OMMERCIAL SPECULATION'1iHICH,DID NOT ALNAYS DEVELOP.IH - f ~.~4 !' , TH AND' IN HARMONY M'1TH'IHE"SURROUNDINQ AREA W1 ~.}i~(t 'r ~ ; ~. ., ~ , . ,- , :.. ' . , ~. . . .. . . . . ONER P,EBLEY, ST.AT6D '~HAT~ 1N H18 OPtNION~•.1T..MAS A MAT7~"R OF.' COMMr581 r j p ;. i~ - ~q` , - ~ s ~4~'tl; d. ~Y a4 t1f~S1} ~ '~T n. ' r~h, Y~ Hq ~l~ ~' Sr ~+ ~ iln > ~x ~ ~ ~".; , ; A1 ~'~ti ~ y' f t. J }, ~ ..~~ 7 /~i ~ ) ~ `i+ j . ~I'~~ 1 'T~ r ' -. i .. 1 ~ ~ J ~ ,,q ~ " 1 ~ W ~PS.( ~~~~k t{~~~ ~7 ~/ ~ 1 _ `L J : ~ - ~ t . ~ A i ~ CI ~» -~ ~~ ~ J i. : ll :J { ~ ~ ~ ~~t,~is, j !t h .~ .~~ ; ', n ~ ~, '. r ~~ -: t .: Y.: ~ ~ .~f f~l `~ ~ . ~+ lt ~,~L'r. p ~uk?M.d'~%~h'W' W ,~ ~ , i , ~ .~ ... . - ... `vd~.9:9 .~ . . .; ;., ~ 7 c ~ . . .,. ~. ' , . .~ .~ ~. ~ ri. "k~dxaS+Gd'+`+7+'~U'.~ :N.~c r:, "i~ ~~wn,~c i.r +~n t 's~mA'"~~#'^"'.~~; ~.~,~ - ~, x . 'v .a~,~' . ~a 5~~~~,~;~'~ ~ ~~~'y 14~r.~F~~,~,e'~~,ip~s~'F~+,"u~)~€~7~~a, ~~ ~~' ~ ~r ~ a`'r T~' ~~ ~ FH ~ t ~ ~ l . ~ 1 /j 1 l ~ '~ *~ ~ ~rJ `~ ~ y .'r. ; .~~t~~. .5 :~i^^.ti+a~ ' ~ . 1~.j~~ ..~ . _ . i M . .. . Z %., : : . ;. c r ~ ' 1 ~', ~ n ' S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ; ,_ .. , , . . , - , 420 ~ . >,~ Y ~ . . ' ~ ~ . . ~ . ' ' ~ . ~ ~ . ~~ _ ~F -MINUTES, C1TY PLANN~N6 COMMISSION, $EP7EMeER 18, 1961, CoNr1NUeD; . `~ , . . a , •'RECLASSIF1CIiilON ~' TIME.BEFORE'OTHER PROPERT.IF°.~OCATED',ON MAJOR ST.REE=•S MOULD EITHER ; NO.~_61~62 24,', BE DEIFELOPED FOR.COMMERCIAL ?URPOSES,OR.FOR MULTIPLE FAMILY RESl-. ~ _~ONT'INUED = DENT)AL USE~ AND THA7,HE'.CONSIDERED.7HE PROPOSED USE'OF SUBJECT PRbpERTY 5U[TAHLE.FOR A VARIANCE TO BE PERMI7TED FOR A LIMITED .`~ , ; . . .. ,' ... '' :. . < ' . PERIOD::OF TIME., ~ ~ 4 THE'COMN7SS,ION FOUND AND DETERMINED THE F01.LONINQ FACTS REGARDINa i THE SU9JECT:PET1T10N: ? f 1: THAT xHE PEx)71QNER PROPOSES A RECLASSIFICATION OF '[HE ABOVE DES~ • ~ CR18ED PROPERTY FROM THE R~1 ONE.FA~IILY RESIDENiIAI „ ZONE ro .~ rHE•C-1, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMER~•IAL, ZONE. • 2.: THAT 7HE PROPOSED REClA551:F1CAT10N OF SUBJECT PROPERTY I5 NOT ~ ~~a'= NECESSARY OR DESIRABLE FOR,7HE.ORDERLY AND PROPER DEVELOPMENT ~ ~ •OF 7HE COMMUNITY. ; *~ 3. THAT THE PROPOSED REClASSLFI~CATlON OF SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES NOT i~. 'PROPERLX.RELAJE 70 THE 20NE5 AND SHEIR PERHI7IED USES LOCAILY i ESTABLISHED JN CLOSE PROXIMITY..TD SUBJECT. PROPERTY AND TO THE ~ ~ _ ZOHES AND THEIR PERMITTED USES'QENERALLY E57ABL15MED THROUGHOUT . . y :;' THE COMMUNITY. . g ~ _~t ;.f 4: THAT THE E57ABLISHNENT OF A SERVlCE STATION AN9 OiHER COMMER~ '~ CL:AL DEVELOPMEN7;;1N CLOSE PROXIMITY TO SOBJ~CT PROPERTY DOES i N07 ESTABLISH A'PATTERN FOR COMMERCIAL DEYELOPMIEN7 ,IN 7HE . ..; AREA. . ~ ~ t 5. _ THAi.1T 15 HEREBY•RECOiAMENDED,TNAT CONSIDERATION OF 7tH& PROPOSEp ~ USE.OF 1'HE SUBJECT PROPER'E'Y~ FOR A REAL ESTATE OFFICE ~'0 BE ~ ;.-; : OPERA7ED ~N'CONJUNCTION NL'JH 7HE RESIDENTIAL USE OF SUBJECT ~ ~ : PROPERTY~ COULD BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE F1Ll.Na OF A PE71T10N FOR ;; ~ . VARIANCE. • F 6. THAT VERBAL,.APP.OSITI~N BY"ONE 1WNER Of PROPER7Y iN 7HE SUBJEG7 ~ ~ ~' AREA MAS RECORDED AOAIN57.7HE SUBJECT PETtTI.ON. :, ~ - COMM15510NER;MUNOALI OFFERED.RESOLUTION N0. 93~ SERlE5~1961-62~ AND '~ ~ MOVED FOR.ITS:PASSAQE AND'ADOPT:ON~ SECONDED:BY COMMISSIONER PERRY~, ,~ ~ 70 RECOMMEND T.0 THE C1TY COUNCit'THA7:PET.1TlON FOR RECLASSIFICATION , !~ ~ N0. 61-62-24 BE;DENIED,ON 7HE BAS15 OF THE AFOREMEN710NED FINDINGS. ~ ON`ROLL CALL 7HE FOREGO)NQ RESOtU710N MAS PASSED eY:THE FaLLOM1N~ '~ .:, . ~ : VOTE: : , ,. ~ AYES: COMM1SSIONERS. ACLRED~ GAUER~ HAP~OOD~ MARCOtlX~ MUN~ALLy j PEBCEX~ PERRYt SUMMERS. ~ i NQES: CQMMISSIONERSO NONE~ ~ r j E ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS.' MORR15. ~•, j E RECLASSlF1CATJON - RUBU C HEARJNG. .PEr~T:tort SUBNITTED BY JOHN H nrt~ DORATHA l. OAUGH- ~ ,~,,,,;'. N0. 61~-G2~28 'ERTY 722'NORTH'PHILADELPH~A}`ANAHEIN~ CALIFORNIA~ OMNERS~ JOHN H. , KINN~`Y., JR.~ 1441 SOU7H LOS AHaELES STREE7~ ANAHEIM~'CALIFORNIA~ ;~ ADENT~ REQUESTIN~.THAT PROPERT,X DESCRIBED:AS: A PARCEL 50 fEE7 BY a 133 FEET N1TH A.FRON7AGE OF:50 FEET LOCA7ED ON 7HE.EAST SIDE -0F " SDUTH ~EYN STREET BETMEEN MIDMAY.DRIVE ANG_DFAD~ENG. ~TS NORTHWEST ~ , CORNER'.BEIN6 APPROXIMATELY'25Q FEEx~S0U7H'OF 7HE SOUTHEAST CORNER ~ ' OF MfAMAY DRIYt" AND $OUTH ZEYN STR6E'~ AHp FURTHER DESCR BED A8`1458 ~ ~~ SOUYN'ZEYN S'~REET~ HE`REC~ASSIFfED FROM THE R~2 ONE FA~.1LY RESIQEN~ ~ ~,~ 3IAL; ZONE to THE M-i~ L,IGHT MANUFACTURING; ZON~. +' 3 S '' ' MR. J. H.,.K1Nt{EYy ;.L'ENx.FOR xHE PET1TtONER'~ APPEARED BEFO~:Z THE COM^~ " ' MISSION~`AND S1'ATED THh? HE MAS NEQOT;IATIRQ FOR THE ?URCHASE OF:TH6 ' ~'~ PROPERTX ABUTTINQ SUBJEC7 PROPERTY'ON 7NE NORTH 1N ORDER TO 1NCLUDE s _ . . ' : 1T;IN HJB.PROPOSED:.DEVELOPMENT, , _ '.`.' .f'~I TH~ COMMISSION'REYIEMED A PL07' PLAN OF 7'NE SUBJECT;PROPERTY AND THE ~ SURROIiA41Nfi AREA' AND.7NDjCATED THAx:'~HE ENTIRE AREA SllOULD BE ~ _'• RECL'ASSIF]~D,xO:'7HE' FE,~1'~ Ll,QH7 NAN~JFACTLRIHQ~ ZOPIE. ~~ .. .. .`:: .. , -. ._ .... . : . ,~_ ~ ...~ :.. ... _~~ .. ~ ~ . .,~.. ... ~;3 . ... .. .. :.;_ . ~ ...~ :~..~ .. ... ".'..` :. . . . . h i~ ~~ THE PE71710NER~S AQEN7',~ND(CATED"xHA7,HE MA5 PLANNINfi T0'BUILD A , ~,~ ~.; , CONCRETE';BLOCK MANUFACTURIN(i:BU}CDiNQ TO;,COVER,THE ENT,(RE AREA"OF ~ 7~,~ ~,; ~tM ., ' LOT NOB.'21 AN0;;22 Hfi S7ATED~ HONEVER~ 7HA',f ESCROH PROCEEDIN6S s,- r. ~~,, c~. 11ERE,PRESENTLY BE1NQ NANDLED FOR 7HE ACQUa5~x10N.OF LO7.N0 22 ONLY. a5' ~ ~`'~~ - i~{ ' ' , . , , ti„~~~"~.~' THE.COMMI.SSION REVIEMED 7HE.•,ZOHIN3.AND LAND:USE OF ~HE SURROUNDING ' >~ x~q;~l~`s ,.AREA' AHD'_ JT MAS'.POINTED OUT THAT THE; SOU7.HERLY: BOUNDARY L'INE'..pF ti ~~ F~?~~~ ';TEYN' STREE7 WOULD BE ~A'fl00II P0,iN7'OF: DEb1ARC'A71AN BE7MEBN';]xNE TRAILER £ pARK-"pROPERIY .;AND THE , MAHUFAC.TUR) N3. USES 5'ITUATED, .70 7HE .NORTN. ' THE s~~. ~' '~ CONMISSION'Dl'BCUSSED'P088186E }N~71A2,ION OF A RECLASSIFICATI.ON IN ~" ~+ ~' } F~x; ORDER 70; ESxABL•ISN A UNIFOPM 20N1.HO~FOR 7HE: EAS7':.SIDE OF ZEYN STRE67 ^ aj,~{., Y ...~.r`~..'' ~ tiuh '~' ~ i ~'° f"f inr {+v } ~ 1 + - . a: .iwd~.~~~ ~ 1+1~~ > .~. ~ /~ i ~~ ~n '~~'~; ~ z i ~ ~` `~ 1 „~fEl~~~`~!d J t~ ~7` 7~ S ~*~ ~~~~n.~ ~F ti ~~ + ' ~' . ~,~ ~ ~`h9? K"~~~ ~_ r t tF~ v,,i ~~ ~jf ~Y ~ ~' ' .. • , . ' '', ~ ,~e~ V,' g y k~ '~'t:•.~i ~ ~. ~..- . ...,. ._ ,..,. ._..~.,~ ~. ,. .~-r+.:~r-:..-r-~';-r;c:_sr-*--~^~.-~a~. .~,....,_._. _ __ _...,_.._W -~-~....,~~... . ... .,. ' . . ..?:"~'~~~c7 Y`~'' ~.Y'~,7 Es'F~"'p r~ ~,~' ~i tvrl~' d~s.N"`'~vie~ v ~'} im~aS.fTj; . . ..~ .:"~. . . , . , .,4~`1~,,,~`~;. ' ~~~''~ r "~ ~ f ~.,, r b a ti j .:3 ~t t -. r1,~ _ ~~.,y` 'f}1,~Y . j ~1 ! ~ V Y _~. ~ , .:_ .. .. f. , . . {a r ~ ~ ~..~~"~ Y . .l, L . _ . , . :~ ., : .. .- . : . .. ~ h3 f w ~ r~ t._ : ~ 1(' ~ - :' S1~,~41 i ~ . . 1 . ~ , ~. :.~ ' ~ f ~ { ..". . . . : . '~. ~ -' .. ' ~~ . . . . , _ a„ . _ , ~;5 '' ~ , -; ' _ ,' . . , ° ' i _ , ~ .. r , .. . . . - . ~ . . . ' . - :. ... ' ..~., . .. . .. ... .~ . ~ . . :~~, , ' MINU7ES, CITY-PLANNING COMMISSION. SEPTEMBER 18~ 1961~.CONTINUED; ' ' ~, , . - . , : ,,, ~ RECLASSaF1CAT.ION ~ TO.,CORRESPOND W1TH THE PENDINQ M~1 ZONINQ FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ~ NO 51~62 25 ;' ACROSS THE; ALLEY;,TO THE EAST. ': ~ i ,' CONT'YNUED .. . _ ~ ~ MR. DAUGHERTY~ THE OkNER OF 1'HE SUBJECT PROPERTY~ APPEARED BEFORE THE ~ COMMISSION-AND ST.ATED THA7 NE MAS.ANX10U5'TO CLOSE ESCROW PROCEED1Nti5 i; llPON THE:SUQJEC7 PROPERT.Y. - , ` ~ MR. KINNEY 1NFORNED THE COMMISSION 7HAT THE RESOWTION OF INTENT FOR ~ ` THE PENDINQ`.RECLASSIFICAx1ON~OF.PROPERTY S17UA7ED-ACROSS tHE ALLEY ~ROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY~ 70.THE M~ly~ U QHT MANUFAC7URbN(i~ ZONE HAD NOT BEEN COMRCETEp;.BECAUSE HIS OFFICE SAFE HAD.BEEN STOLEN~ THEREBY ~ ~~ THEACITY ATTORNEYSS~OFFICE INEORDERATOTCOMPLETEDTHE~20NINQAAC710NY ' ~ ~i , ~ ~ ~ THE REPRESENTATIVE FOR`M. L.•V. BOSTWICKe H1.DYiAY TRAILER PARK~ AP?EAR- ~' ~w~,k'r ED BEFORE.THE COMMISSION~ 57ATED THAT 7HEY.MERE NO,T OPPOSED TO•THE ~a~i SUBJECT PETITION~ AND REQUESrED iHAT THE PETLTIONER BE•REQUIRED TO p ~`4- _' INSTALL A 51X F007 HLOCK'WACL ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY.LINE OF + SUBJECT PROPERTY 20 SERVE-AS.,A BUFFER BETMEEN THE TRAILER PARK AND ~ ~ : 7HE"MANUFACTURING BUSINESS. • • ~~`, MR.:R. E. HILKINS~ ASSISTAN7`.70 MR. B057MiCK~ APPEARED BEFORE THE 3 COMM~SSION AND 57ATED THAT THEY MOULD N07 08JECT T0 7HE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT~ BUT 7HAT~THEY NISHED T.0 HAVE A ST]PULATION 1N WRt71NQ THAT~ SHOULD THE,.PETITIONER DISPOSE OF.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY~ A USE ~ SIMILAR:TO A BOI.LER'FACTORY COULR NOT BE ESTABLISHED ON THE PREMISES. HE NAS ASSURED THAT ANY USE'THAT MAS•NOT PERMtTTED IN THE M~1~ LI~H7' MANUFACTURING~.ZUNE WOULD NOT~BE PERMITTED IN THE SUBJECT'AREA UNDER ~ - THE•EXISTING 20NE CLASSIFICAT~ION. HE STATED FURTHER THAT THE TIL7 K UP,TYPE OF`9UILD1N6 PROPOSED FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WOULD SERVE AS ~ A NALL"BETWEEN.THE T,RAILER PARK.USE AND THE MANUFAC'fURJNG USE. r ::•.i TNE HEARING WAS CIOSED'. r- COMMISSIONER.ALLRED LEFT SHE COUNCIL CMAMBERS AT 5:30 O~CLOCK P.M. ~ THE PETITIONER~S AGENT 1NFORMED THE COMMISSION TMAT HE HAD ACCOM- PLISHEC ALL OF THE CONDIiIONS FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION TO THE M~1~ LIGHT.MANUFACTURING~ ZONE.FOR PROPER~ r TIES ABUTTIN~ SUBJECT PROPERTY ACROSS THE;ALLEY ON THE EAST. A DISCUSSION WAS HELD RELATiVE T0 THE CONPLETION OF THE PENDINQ ACT10N ~' TO CORRESPOND W1TN 7HE RECLASSIFlCA7JON OF THE SUBJECT,PROPERTY. ' THE'COMMISSION ALSO DISCUSSED THE RECOMMENDATION BY 7HE .INTERDEPART~ MENTAL COMMITTEE RE~ARDJN~ THE'DED1CATl.ON OF ZEYN STREET~ AND'7T WAS t Pp1NTED"OUT.THAT`THE WIDENIN4 OF SHE STREET WOULD BE NECESSARY JN ' ORDER TO SERVE THE MANIlFACTURINO USES SHOULD THE;PROPERTlES TO THE - NORTH BE RECLASSIFIED T0 THE M~1~ LIGHT MANUFACTURIN6~ ZONE. THE COMMISSION FOUND AND DETERMINED THE.FOLLONIN6 FACTS REDARDINO THE.SUBJECT.PETITIONC' • 1. THAT-THE PE7.ITIONER PROPOSES.A RECLASSIFICATION OF THE ABOVE - DESCRIBED PROPERTY FROM THE R-1~ ONE FAMILY;RE5IDENTIAL~ ZONE :.,. TO THE H~1~ L14H7 MANUFACTURIN~~ ZONE. . , `. '"? ` 2. THAT:THE PROPOSED.RECLASSIFICATION.OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 15 NECESSARY OR DESIRABLE FOR 3HE ORDERLY AND PROPER DEVELOPMENT OF THE'COMMUNITY.' 3. THAT',THE PROPOSED RECLASSIFICA710N OF SUBJECT'PROP.ERTY DOES .,, .,. ,. PROPERI.Y RELATEr70'THE:ZON65,AND THEIR~PERMIT7ED USES,LOCAGLY `~'` ESTABLISHEO 'lN GLdSE PROXi1A1TY'TO SUBJEC7-PROPERTY AND 70 TNE - ,, , 20NE5`AND 7HEI,R PERMITTED USES GENERALCY ESiABLISHED THROU(iH~ >., OUT .tHE COMMUNTTY... ,. , ; ; 4 4. THAT'7HE P~ROPOSED RECLASSIFtCAT10N OF SUBJECT PROPERTY D0E5 e;'. i REQUIRE bEDICATJON FOR'AND'STANDARD JMPROVEMENT"OF.:A8UT7lNQ k ~' . STREETS BECAUSE.SAID PROPERFY.DOES.RELATE TO.~AND::'ABUT'UPON : € ;; - - STREETS FND:;HI'GHWAYS WHIGH ARE PROPOSEO TO CARRY:THE TYPE AND ;.: P QUANT,ITY'OF-TRAFFIC~ WH,ICH MILL.BE QENERATED.BY THE PERMITTED ~ ; U$ES~ IN ACCORDANCE W1TH:THE CIRCULATJON ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL ' _ .. r~~'., a,_.:. ~ PLAN. ,.' r' ' ~ 5.' THA7 THE PROPE(tTY'ON THE, EAST S1DE OF' 2EYN STREET,A9UTTINQ SUB- w JECT PROPERTY,TO..'THE HORTH,AND.'EX7EHDINO NORTHERLY.`70 MIDMAY. ;~ '~~~F. ~ DR1VE SHALC'.BE'INCLUDED-.iN A PET1T10N;FOR'RECL'ASSIFICATION` ~~'SA 4'~.z`5`x,~ FRON,THE R~1~ ON~`FANILY,.RE51DEN7,IAL~ ZONE'T,D.,THE M~1~ LyQHT. ~1 'i ~,,~ MANUFACTURINQ~ ZONE TO BE`IN171ATED BY THE PLANNlNO COMM14510N 4~~ r~, ~,~~~ AND BE7 FOR,PUBLIC:HEARINO ON ~CTOBER ~~ 1961 '> „ ~:` . ~ , ~,~{ r 6. THA7,!NO ONE)APPEARSD 1N OPPOSITION TO BUBJECT'PETITION ~,~ COMMIBS,IONER MUNOALL OFF~RED RESOLUTIAN N~ 94~ SER)ES 1961~62~ AND ~r ~ti~ "~x MOVED FOR':1TS PASSA~E Aki~''ADOPTION~ SECONDED BY COMMJSSIONER PEBLEY~ tr~i {A1;5 . s J~ ~, s ~' ~ ^ ~ t i ~.~.. iw~ '- ~ ~ .i ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~,~'~, 1'~y~~N ~~ - . ~,~ ~7~ ~ }t?v; w+, 5' .•k'~g}a ~ ~~ i~t~ ~1 _ i ~ ~y }S dFa ' ~..e'~` 1 - 7 ~,'~'~ . ~r~yi~.~'SY~,t ~r ; ~' - k~- ' h~ r .. r 1 L ~Y `~-'~ r n ~ : ~ , "'yyk;~s, F 93$?''~4, '' .` • + ~y~ ~ , ~ ~~' r ~ i ' ' ~ ~~„~~a"~,, ~~~ . . . . _ . .___ _. _ ..,. ,.. .. ~ f_ . ,.,. --- _.. _~. _ __ .. . ... .. . . _ _ _{ .. . ~ . .. . _ . . ryd ~ + t , .L~ 4~ee 1 I.C'~^.. ..._ "'~':~~~~ 4..5 ?:~~.LY~~,l.•m sl~j, f J r, r.l 1 . i1f ,~ .. } ~ :. . "~~' ln ? ' ' Y - •x ~. ~ r~ ~ '''~tf~ Y "'"M~F' ~,'-kiVti~ .'r~Fe;_1~ y?„fi~+.~Y~ ,ra ~+-:.(T~ ~ ~, ' i ~ 'y ~ 'v ,~ ' r * k ~ :x ~ '. 1}1 K ~ _ ~ ~, .2 ; ~ ` _ ~ ~ . ~,~ ~ fi ~ ~R 1 ~ ... ~ .. . - ~ ~ .. :: ~ . . ~ . ... _ : . . .. ....~ ~ ~ ' . ' . . . , ~ ~ ~ .~:..:.~ .~~ , . ~.... . . ~~.. ' ... : ~."_ . . . .~ ... .. ' . . . .. . . ..: .. .. '. . . ~ .. . ~ . . . . . • . ,:. ; ...:..i ~ . . , .. ~ : ~ . . _ _ . _ _ . 422 ~ ~ ' ~ -. ,: _ MINUTES~ C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION~ SEPTEMBER 18~ 1961~ CONTINUED: 9 ~ ~ RECLASS:IFICATJON - 70 RECOMMEND T.O,THE CITY'COUNCIL 7NAT.PETITION FOR ~ECLASSIFICATION S i NO .61~62-25 N0. 61~62~25 BE:APPROVED~ SUBJECT T0 '[HE FOLLOWIN~ CONDITION3: j I ~ ' a ONTINUED _ 1. SUBJECT TO JHE REC~ASSIFICATION TO THE M~1~ LIdHT NANUFACTURINO~ , '~.~ i.. i . 20NE OF LOTS 5 AND 6 OF BLOCK 1~ IRACT N0. 419 AS INDICATED ON FacNleir.No. 1. . . • ~ ' ~ 2. DEDICATION OF 32 FEET FROM TME MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF ZEYN ~ . , STREET (26.5 FEET EX1ST'INfi~. f 3.. T1NE LJMITATION OF NINETY (90) DAYS FOR THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF ~ ~ ITEM N0. 2. ~ THE FOREGOING CONDIT10N5 WERE RECITED AT THE MEETING AND WERE FOUND `j TO BE A NECESSARY PREREQUISITE TO THE USE OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER ) 27 ~ E~ ~n ~ TO PRESERVE THE SAFETY AND MEI.FARE OF THE C1T12EN5 OF THE CITY OF f i '~ Js+% ANAHEIM. .. ^ ON ROLL CALL THE FORE601NG RESOLUTION MAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING i VOTE: AYES: COMMIS~IONERSI GAUER~ HAP600D~ NARCOUX~ MUNGALL~ PEBLEY~ ~ - PERRY~ SUMMERS. ] NOES: COMMISSIONERS. NONE. • 3 ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: A~~Reo~ MORRIS. •',' COMMISSIONER MUNQALL OFFERED RE50 WT{ON N0. 95~ SERIES 1961~62~ AND ~ i MOVED FOR 1TS PASSAGE AND ADOPTION~ SECONDED BY.COMMISSIONER PEBLEY~ ! TO,INITIATE A PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION FROM THE R~1 ONE FAMILY + RESIDENTIAL't ZONE'AND'THE P~1,~ PARKING~ ZONE (LOT N0. 23j~.70 THE ~ M~1~ LI~HT 17ANUFACTURINQ~ ZONE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY DESCRIBED A52 LOT N05. 22'~- 23~ 24~ 25! AND.26~ BLOCK I~ OF TRACT N0. 419~ SAID PROPERTY BEINQ SITUATED ONT.HE EAST 5lDE OF ZEYN S7REET~ SOUTHERLY OF MlDWAY DRIVE. . . ~ . . . . , . . . , , ... . j • ON ROLL CALL THE FOREQOIN(i RESOLUT'ON WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOWINa ~ VOTES , ~ AYES: COMMJSSIONERS: GAUER~ HAPGOOD~ MARCOUX~ MUN(iALL~ PEBLEY~ PERRY~ SUMMERS. ~ t NOESo COMMlSSIONERS; NoNE. : ~ ABSENT: .CpNMISSIONERS7 ALLRED~ MORRIS. ~ ~, RECLASSIF1CATlON - PUBLIC:HEARING. PETJTION SUBNITTED BY ORVAL M. nNO•MADGE.HALVORSEN~ ~ NO. 61-62~27 2012 WEST'ORANOE•AVENUE~ ANAHEIM~`CALIiORNlA~ OWNERS• REQUEST1Nfi ,: THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBEO AS: A PARCEL:217.FEET BY 22a FEET MJTH A '• :~ • FRONTAQE OF.217 FEET -0N BALL ROAD AND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BALL ROAD AND EUCLID AVENUE~ BE:RECLASSJFlED FROM THE R~A~ ; `GENERAL COMMERCIAL~ ZONE. RESIDENTIAL AGRICUL7URAL~ 20NE To T-te C-2, ~ 3 < , . ~ ,, MR. ORVAL HALVORSEN~ THE PET.ITIONER~ APPEARED BEFORE TNE COMMISSION ~ AND STATED THAT HE OWNED THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND xHE ADJACENT PRO~ ', PERTY TO.THE SOU7H~.TMAT 1S PRESENTLY DEVELOPED. HE STATED FURTHER ~ ~ TNAT SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES NOT ABUT ANY•R~1~ ONE.FAlAtLY RE5IDENTtA~~ ,.~ PROPERTY AND'THAT HE_MAB`ftEQUESTINQ C^2~ GENERAL COMMERCIAL~ ZONIN6~ INSTEAp OF,C~l~ NEIRNBORHOOD.COMMERCIAL~'20NINQ~ IN ORDER TO DEVELOP ~ THE FARKINa LOT AND INSTALL SIDEWALKS AT THIS TIME~RATHER THAN j MAITINQ UNTIL:THE PROPOSED COMPIERCIAL BUILDINaS ARE CONSTRUC7ED. ,,,~ THE COMM13810N'REVIEWED DEVECOPMENT PLANS AND DIBCUSSED THE~AMOUhT OF '~ PARKING REQCIRED. IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT CALCUCAT10N5 'IND,iCATE ;~ THAT FOR THE '1'OTAL 26~000 SQUARE FOOT BU(LDING.AREA~;176 PARKING SPACES.MOULD.BE REQUiRED RATHER THAN'THE 149 SHOMN ON T.HE PLOT PLAN. `~ - THE PET:IS.IONER.STATED:THAT AT THE PRESENT TIME APPROXIMATELY HALF OF THE EXIS7IN6.PARKING AREA WAS-NOT-BEINO,UTILI2ED AND'THAY ADDI- '~ ^ TIONAL.P.ARKIN4 AREA COULD BE MADE AVAILABLE'AT THE REAR AND.ALONG a ' " THE WALL-fN THE AREA PRESENTL7:BEINfi USED FOR A DRIVEWAY. HE STATED ~ THAT THE ENTIRE AMOUNT MAS MORE THAN ADEQUATE,AND"THAT SHOULD THE : a NEED..ARI.SE~ THERE MAS AN AMPLE AMOUNT OF LAND.A1'AILABLE FOR 7HE ~~. ~ FUTURE EXPANSION OF THE PARKINA A'REA. 'MR. HALV.]RSEN;INFORMED THE ' ' ;~ TYPE OF BUSI.NESS DID NOT HAVE ANY PLANS FOR THE : COMMISSION THAT HE ~,v~~ . ` THAT WOUCD BE OCCUPYiNCi THE BUILDINGS. , " S ~} a~~ ~ ; THE HEARING MA5 CLOSED. ' u< ~ `eE' ~ ' YH~ COMM15510N FOUND ANO DETERMINED THE FOLLOWIN(i FACTS REGARDIN6 ~ ~~~ ~~ ' THE. SUBJECT PETi'f ION: i .~ G k~~~~ , ~ ~ ETITIONER PROPOSES A kECL4551FICATION OF THE ABOVE ^ 1: THAT TY.E P } ~ ~ , : " . . ~ ~ ` FI ~f . . . . . . J ~~t r i i >~ ~ tit i; y z . ~ . •., irr~ r x ,: n , i ~ c . ( C7 ~~' +~ ~ ~ ~Sti ~ ~ y4~ i~ ~ ~j~ C i~ ' ' '-, ~' . .. . . ., . ~~. . ~. f t ~-' ~ ~~ t~ ' A ' J +~ l~,~, . ,~ ~ ; r, - ~ '`A ~l ~, w~4~' . -y~y -T-- c~... .. ~..±,!~.Im .. . ..r~::: S'?'. a..~k'+.?"`5:$lL:'G9l'`~1h1i;5..'ttn~'"bf ~'.~.. s.,1 ~i_.. r~5~.44^.~~'.~,i ~1.WiK4R*tiu}i`YN.RI.i.`GY.,}ien. ..... .. ......._.. _ . . 3 • , .~~~ !_. v`~J:`? Sd'd°r :'ui t ~:: f 1.~._ ~ ,: 4 ~ .l.,f,u _a ~ ...~,. .+, 'w"~ ~:r`-,-~'t?~:sp w~ ~ ~S~" <r~'~,~' ~ .. .. . . ~~ yz<r..G .~ r~-h ~dt , _ . :.,,~ ~'~ .~~' ~ : ..; :~i ' l . . ~~ " ~ ~ :jc ._.. . 1 ~.: : . ~ I 1 ; .. . ~ ~ - .. ti. . .~ ~ . . ,.+X'~,rl h1~. . . ' . .~ ~. .. ~ ~ . . . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~~ 4P3 ~ ~ ~ :~ 3 ~ t MINUTES~ CITY PLANNfN6 COMMISSION~ SePreNSER le.,iy61~ CONT1NUEb. ~ RECUlSS1F1CATlON ~ DESCRIBEA PROPERTY FROM THE R-A, RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL~ ZONE i ~ NO 61-62-27 ro rHE• G2, GENERAL COMMERCIAL~ 20NE. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ONTINUED . , . . 2. THAT THE PROPOSED RECLASSIFICATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NECES~ ! y SARY OR DESIRABLE FOR THE ORDERLY AND PROPER DEVELOPMENT OF THE , ~ COMMUNdiY. I ' ' THE PROPOSED RECLASSIFICATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES 3: THAT ~ ~ , PROPERLY RELATE T0 7HE ZONES AND ?MEIR PERMITTED USES LOCALLY ESTABLISNE~ IN CLOSE PROXiMITY TO SUBJECT PROPERTY AND TO THE >~ ZONES AND THEIR PERMITSED USES QENERALLY ESTABLISRED THROU~HOUT i THE COMMUNI7Y. . ' ~ 4. THAT NO ONE APPEARED IN OPPOSlT10N T0 SUBJECT PETITION. . _. ~ ~ . . :~ . ~ .i COMMISSIONER MARCOUX OFFERED RESOLUTION N0. 96~ SERlES 1961-62~ AND ~ ~iy„_„ ~ a±..: MOVED FOR 1T5 PA95AfiE AND ADOPT.ION~.SECONDED BY COMM15S10NER PEBLEY~ CATION 7 T C :~ ~ FOLLOMIN~ CONDITIONS T0T7HE SUBJECT ~ . NO.R61 62~27•BE APPROVED~ ' DEVELOPMENT.SUBSTANTIALIY 1N'ACCORDANCE M17H EXHIBIT N0. 1~ PLANS 1 i 1 . FOR LANDSCAPINQ SHOWN ON RLOT PLAN TO BE•SUBMI.TTED 70 AND SUB~ d OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKMAY MA1N- JECT TO THE ARPROVAL ~ . PRJOR:TO FINAL BU~LDIN~ INSPECTION. BE iNSTALLED O A ~ . • ND T TENANCE 2, PROV15lON OF.PARKINQ AREA IN ACCORDANCE W1TH CODE REQUIREMENTS 6 YN ACCORDANCE N1TH THE OPEN AIR PARKINQ SPACE STANDARDS ON ~ AN FILF. IN THE PLAyN1NG DEPARTMENT. , ~ iNSTALLATION OF SlDEWALKS AFTER COMPLETION OF THE CITY~S CON~ 3 ? . F/CEAOF~THETCITYE D EN E ' U G R S F THE FILE N ON PLANS STANDARD APPROVED ; ENGINEER~• • 4: PAYMENT OF s2.00 PER FRONT FOOT FOR STREET LIaHTIN6 PURPOSES ON ~ ~ E AND BALL ROAD. EUCLID AVENU TLME LIMITATION OF NINETY (90~ DAYS FOR THE ACCOAPU SHNENT OF 5 ~ 3 . ITEM N0. 4.. '" ~ TNE FOREQOIHG CONDLTIONS WERE RECITED AT THE MEETINQ AND WERE FOUND `'~ TO 8E A NECESSARY PREREQU)SITE TO THE USE OF THE PROFE RTY 1N ORDER ~ TO PRESERVE THE SAFETY AND MELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF THE C1TY OF ANAHEIM. . _ . ., .. ~ ON ROLL CALL THE FOREfi01NCi RESOLUTION'MAS PASSED BY'TME FOLLGWINO ~ ~ VOTE3 AYES: COMHISSIONERS. .GAUER~ HAP~OOD~ MARCOUX~ MUNGALL~ PEBLEY~ PERRY~,SUMMERS. NqES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. ABSENT; COMM1SS10NERS:, ALLRED~ MORRIS. RECLASSIFICATION - P.UBLIC HEARING. PETITION Stl9MITTED ev ED CLASEN 1517 EA57 LA PALMA un_ ~~~~-28 AVENUEA ANAHEJM~ CALIFORNtA~ OMNER; R. A. D)EDRI~H~ 908 EA57 OLEANDER~ BREA~ GALIFORNIA~ AGENT~-REQUESTINQ'THAT PROPERTY DE4CR~BED ASt AN IRRE(iULARLY'SHAP~D PARCEL'W17H A FRON7AQE OF 280 FEET ON TNE,EAST SIDE OF ACACIA STREET BETMEEN ROMNEYA DRIVE AND LA PALMA AYENUEj IT5 SOUTH41E57 CORNER BEINfi AI'PROXIMATELY 295 FEET NORTH OF THE NORTHEAST _ CbANER-OF LA-PALMA AVENUE AND ACACIA STREEi AND FURTHER ~ESCRI.BED'A5 1040'NORTH ACACIA STREET~ BE RECLASSIFIED FROM THE R~A RES~DENTIAL AGRICULTURAL, ZONE To .rHE R-3, MULTIPLE FANILY RESI.DENt1AL, ZONE. SUBJECT PETITlON IS FILED IN CONJUNCTION MI7N PE7ISjON FOR CONDI~ T70NAL USE PERMIT NO'. 158. MR. BILL JONES~ THE PETITIOHER~S.REPRESEN7ATIYE~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMM1S510N AND 87A7ED HE HAD NOTHINQ TO ADD T0.7HE IHFORNATTOW COH~ 7A1NED 1H THE.SUBJECT PE71T10N'FOR RECLASS./FICATION TO THE R~3'~ MUL'[IPIE FAM,iLY•RE81DBH71AL~:ZONE IN ORDER 70 PERMIT THE CONSTRUC~ TION OF ~ARD6N APARTMENTS.': . , 7HE HEARI.NG WAS CLOSED. THE COMM15SlON REYlEMED DEYELOPMEHT PLANS'.AND IND~CA7ED THAT 7HEV HAD D15CUSSED-THE PROPOSED DEYELOPMENT M17H THB.DEVELOPER. IT WAS NpTED THAT CARPORTS:WERE SHOMN ON THE:DEYE~OPMEMT PLANS~ MHTCH MOULD BE COVERED:BY`PET.IT,ION•FCR'~OND~T,lOAAL USE'•PERMIT NO'. 158. , fHE COMM1$SlON FOUND AND D6TERMIAtEO.THE FOLLOWINQ FAC74 REQARDIN~ THE SUBJECT PETIT/OIQ3-: `~ ~ :' . '. ;.; ~ , . . . : . :. .... ~~_ ~. l7~ r~'~}~~ ~ ~x ~> N~cF~~+r-zrU. a phi~o- ~ M- .~+Yj b~ >?~.ww~r,~' '.~~.KC+_Y,. "£nc'Yu... a'~i'.rS~~ y,.,.~ ~IY.'`,a.ILe,~LG'~jr.h.riw~s'1.nnS~..~j.»3.~.i.r.~.JLh'~~..~.2~..i.i_., ....~..._1r,_t'.7:___• ; S f N.. r _ ) r: '~+i~:tt^~. wS~'=a'~~n..f,w a~~y 11~ C'....z P,'F ;~ -'dt~` lSr~ :w'?tR'Y; ~;. _` 1 1' ~~ ~ +. , ~ C . y ~ . .~~;..~'~. ..~ . .: . / . ~. :~. .:: ' ..-.~i ,. .~: ~-"1 •s;::.... .. . . ... ~~ '. .. . ~ ' ,.',: . , . .- . . . ..,-. , . Y ~. .. ~. ...~ . ...~. .~. . .. . ~:... :.. ~ ~ ~~ ~- •..( .. . . . ".' .. ~:.' .. . ~..` . .....~:'r. .~~-::'J`- ~ . :. ~.. .. . - '..'-~ .. : . ..~ .\ , i.. . . . .... . . ~. . . .;',. ~ ' .,~ , . .~; ir;`... . . ~ ~ ~ . .. . . ~ .. .. . .. ~ ~~ ' . ~~~ ~ . ' ' ~ . . ~ ~ _ .'._'....~ .. . . _ . . . ~ . . ~ ~ :' . ' . . . . . . . .- . ' . .. , ' . ~ . . . . . ... . ~' . ;: . . . 424 ~ MINUTES, C1TY PLANNIN& COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 18, 1961~ CONTINUED: RECLASS•I~iCAT10N - 1. THAT 7HE•PETiTIONER FROPOSES A RECLASSIFICATION OF THE ABOVE ~ ~ NO. 61~62-28 D65CRIBED PROPERTY FROM THE R~A~ RESIDENTIAI, AGRLCULTURAL~ 4 CONTINUED ZONE TO THE R-3, MULTIPLE FAM•1LY RESIOENTIAL, ZONE.•• f ~. ` 2. THAT THE PROPOSED RECLASSiFiCATiON OF'SUBJECS PROPERTY IS i . ( NECESSARY OR DESIRABLE,FOR THE ORDERLY AND PROPER DEVELOPMENT ' ~ i OF`7HE COMMUNITY. ~ i 3. THAT THE PROPOSED RECLASSIFICATION OF SUBJEC7 PROPERTY DOES j PROPERLY RELATE 70 THE ZONES AND THE1R PERMl7TED USES LOCALLY ~' ~ ' ESTA8L15HED IN CLOSE PROXlMITY TO SUBJECT PROPERTY AND TO THE ~; . 20NE5 AND THEIR PERMIT7ED.USES GENERALLY ESTABLISHED THROUGH~ OUT THE COMMUNITY. • ~ ~, ( . 4: TNAT.THE PROPOSED RECLASSIF/CA7JON OF SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES ! ~, , ~ . c '~', ' ;. REQUIRE STANDARD 1MPROVEMENT OF ABUTT1Nfi STREETS BECAUS& SAID ~ , .. PROPER7Y DOES RELATE T0 AND ABIIT UPON 57REET5 AND HI~HNAYS MNICH ARE PROPOSED TO CARRY THE TYPE AND QUANTI7Y OF TRAFFIC~ _ IiHICH MILL BE GENERATED BY THE PERMITTEO USES~ IN ACCORDANCE y WISH THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN. ~ ~ 5. THAT NO ONE•APPEARED IN OPPOSITION TO SUBJECT PETITION. COMMISSIONER PERRY OFFERED RESOLUTION N0. 97~ SERIES 1961-62~ AND - k i MOVED FOR 1T5 PASSA~E AND ADOPTIONA SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SUMMERS~ TO RECOMMEND TO THE ClTY GOUNCIL~ THAT PETITJON FOR , RECLASSIFICATION N0. 61-62-28 BE APPROVED~ SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• 1. UEYELOPMENT SUBSTAN7IALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXHIBIT NO~. 1~ 2, 3, AND 4. C 2. PROVISION OF LANDSCAP1Nti IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS•PRESENTED~ , PLANS FOR SA1D LANDSCAPING TO BE SUBMITTED TO AND SUBJECT TO E THE APPROVAL OF THE SUPERINTENDEN7 OF PARKNAY MAINTENANCE AND ~ TO 8& INSTALLED PR10R T0 F(NAL•BUILDING INSPECTION. • i . . 3: PREPARA710N OF S7REE7' JMPROVEMENT PLANS AND INtTALLATION OF ALL i'-' IMPROVEMENTS FOR ACACIA.STREE7 IN ACCORDANCE M1TH THE APPROVED STANDARD PLANS ON F1LE 1N THE bFFJCE OF THE CtTY EN6INEER. , 4. PAYMENt OF ;2.00 PER FRONT FOOT FOR STREE7 L1aHT~.NQ PURPOSES , ON ACACIA S7REE7. . ~ 5. PROVISION OF UiILITY EASEMENTS ALON~ EXTERIOR BOUNDARIES•AS DETERMINED TO BE NECESSARY BY 7HE DIREC70R OF PUBLIC UTILITIES TO ADEQUATELY SERVE THE SUBJECT PROPER7Y AND OTHER PROPHRTY. 6. PAYMENT OF =25.00 PER DNELLlNQ-UNIT PARK AND RECREATION FEE TO 8E COIIECTED AS PART Of BUILDJNQ PERMIT. ~ 7. PROV1510N OF AREAS FOR AOEQUATE TRASH STORA~E AND P(CKUP AS ~ DETERMINED BY THE'O1REC7UR OF PUBLIC NORKS PR10R 70 FINA~ BUILDINQ INSPECYION. - 8. SUBJF.CT TO THE APPROYAL OF PEi1710N FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERNIi N0. 158. 9: TIME I.IMITATION OF ONE HUNDRED ElaHTY (180) DAYS FOR TNE ACCOM~ - P1.ISHNENT OF ~TEM NOS. 3~ 4~ 5~ AND 8. THE FOReQ01NQ CONDITIONS WERE RECITED AT THE MEE7INQ AND WERE FOUND TO' BE A NECESSARY PREREQUISITE TO 7HE U8E OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER . TO PRESERVE 7HE SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE C17)2ENS OF THE CITY OF r~ ~ ANAHE.IM. '\'~ 4 ~ . . . ~ . . . ON ROLL CALL T.HE FOREQOIN~ RESOLUx10N WA5 PASSED BY THE F04LOWING` : ~ .. VOTE. _ ` : A:'ES: COMNISSIONERS: GAUER~ HAP~OOD~.MARCOUX~ MI1NfiALL~ PEBLEY~ ~ ~ PERRY~ SUMMERS. ' NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NoHe. . , ABSENT: 'CQMMISSIONERSa A~~Ren,'MoRais. F .. ~ .. . . ~ ~ ~ . _ ~ ~ . . .: ~ ~ . ~. ~ . ~ . ~ . . ~ . : . . . ~ ~ K ' ; CONDITIONAL USE - PUBLIC.HERRING. PETITION SUBMITTED~ED CLASEN 1517 Ensr LA'PALMA .D)E~RICH~ 906 EAST ' + PERMIT N0. 158 AVENUE~ ANAHE1k~ CALIFORNIA'~ OMNER~ R: A. r ~, _ , OLEANDER~ BREA~ CALIFORNIA~,'AQENT~ REQUESTJ.NQ 7HA7 PROPERTY DESCRIBED ' ~~'~ ~ ~ AS; AN 1RREGU~ARLY-SHAFED PARCEL M1TH:A FRONTA~E OF 280'F~ET AN THE ~ _ ~'~ ~ ~ '-: 'EAST S1DE OF ACACIA.STREET BETWEEN-ROMNE~A DRIVE ANb LA PALMA'AVE~ f 'F{1~~~~V 7 NUE~ ITS SOUTHWEST CORNER BEINti APPROXIMA7ELY`.295 FEET NORTH OF .THE ., '~i~~'1~ ~ .R NORTHEAST: CORNER OF'LA(PALMA AVENUE AND `ACACIA STREET'AND FURTHER ~ ~ ~^`N ~ ~ -. ~ V ~ ~.F N ~ ~ ' . ~ ' ~ ~N b . , ' ~ . . . . ' ~ ~ /.~:. } . . . ~$ ~ f ~ .~ ~ ~ 5,~~:' ~ i ~~H ~ Z ~, ~i ~~ ~' ~ ~ ' , , . { .. ~.~. . ~ : ~_ .: ~ p ~~ ;,~~ , . :' ~ . 71 a r~ .-' ' ~ f+ :,.", , ~ : eu.tiue . . . . .-' t~*2Y~r~.~..~1•7~.m.Lf..l,riY.,'r /$._ ~.~ ~ l ~ . . _ . .. T'- ._n ~.. ... f .. !•.5 . t .. ..... .. +. {Jri ..t'. kxw. ,.7.. ~...~ ...+3 :,^ "~'xfK!Gmr;~wav. __ .. .. ', { , .~il.. J 4 , . ' , 7 1 t. i ~ / , y -L 1 f..~ `~c?,~~N.f"''24'~~'li'vc+..' .1~iu:~~~i~"~~ . J ~~` ~~F~~:i~f~..`W..c#RG:~~.'~i r:C : {* ~ ~ ~ 1 ~,~ ~'J~' ~~.'Y \!t"~ F ~ <' i _ , ;Y , ~ ~. r ~ ~ ~. ; ~ _ .' ._ .._ . - _ .a~G R_ ..~.•.~~7 .~_.. ... ... . ... . ~ . ... . . .. . . . . . '~' . 1`' 'NiNUTES, CITY P.LAhNiNG CQMMISSION, SEPreMSeR 18. 19@1~ CONT~NUED: CONDITIONAL USE ~ DESCRIB~D AS 11140 NORTH ACACIA'STREET~ BE A_LOMED THE ES7ABLISHMENT PERMI7.N~i. 158 OF G11R~EN 7YPE APARTHENTS. PROPERTY'PRESENTLY CLA55)FIEQ IN THE CONTINUED R-R~ RESIDENTI{'~C-AGRiCUCTURAL~ ZONE. StlBJECT PE71T]~N SUBMIT7ED IN CONJUNCTION WITH PETITION FOR;RECLA55~ 1FICATION ~0. 61~62~28. NR.'B1LL ~ONES~ 7HE PET1TlONER~S AQENT~ WAS PRESENx AND INDICATED HE HAD N07H1NQ TO ADD TO TME.INFORMATION CONTAIWED IN THE SUBJECT PETITION. f THE HEARING NA~ CLOSED. ~; THE COMMISSION REVIEWED DEVELOPMENT PLANS AND ASSISTANr CITY ATTORNEY f JOE GElSLER ADVISED THE COMMISSION THAT THE PROVISION OF CARPORTS ( wt..;a RATHER THAN GARAQES COULD BE PERNITTED BY THE APPROVAL OF THE SUB~ ~ ~ie~ ." J~CT PET IT ION. '1'} ~ 4 THE COMMISSION FOUND AND DEiERMiNCD THE FOI.GOWING FACTS REGARDIN(i , }~ THE SUBJECT PETITION: 1. THAT THE PROPOSED USE IS PROPERLY ONE FOR WH1CH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 15 AUTHORIZED BY THIS CODE~ TO W1T: QARDEN TYPE APARTMENTS. 2, THAT THE PROPOSED USE MlLL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE ADJOININa LAND U8E5 AND 7HE QROMTH AND D~dVELOPMENT OF THE AREA 1N MHICH ~T IS PROPOSED ?0 BE LOCATED. i ~ i ~ Y ~ ~ ; ~. -j ' ( 3: THAT THE SIZE AND SHAPE OF THE 5(TE PROPOSED FOR THE USE IS 4 ApEQUATE TO ALLON THE FULL DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPOSED USE IN i A MANNER N4T DETRIMEN7AL TO THE PARTICULAR AREA NOR TO T.HE PEACE~ HEALTH~ SAFETY~ AND ~ENERAL WELFARE OF THE C171ZEN5 OF ~ THE C,fTY OF ANAHEIM. 4. THAT THE.TRAFFIC GEHERATED:BY THE PROPOSED USE wiLL t~OT IMPaSE ' AN LNDUE BURDEN UPON TNE STREETS AND HIaHMAYS DE513NED AND PROPOSED TO•CARRY 7HE 7RAFFIC IN THE AREA. 5. THAT.THE ORANTINQ OF THE COND.ITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER•THE CON~ DITIONS IMPOSED~ 1F ANY~ WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE PEACE~ HEALTH~ SAFETY.~ AND QENERAL WELFARE OF THE CIT12EH5 OF 7HE CITY OF ANAHEIM..-. 6: THAT THE QARAQE REQU)REMENT IS NEREBY NAJVED TO PERMIT TNE " INSTALLA7ION OF CARPORTS RATHER 7HAN QARA~ES UNDER THE AUTHORITY~~RANTED BY CODE~ SECTION 18.64.070. 7. 'IHAT NO ONE APPEARED.IN -0PPOSITION TO SUBJECx.PETITION. ' COMM1S510NER PERRY OFFERED RESOLUTION N0. 98~ SER1E5,1961-62~ AND MOV6D'FOR JTS PASSAQE AND ADOPTION~ SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HAP~OOD~ TO aRAHT PEi1T10N FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 158~ SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWIN~ CONDIT10N5: 1. DEVELOPMENT SUBSTANTIALLY 1N ACCORDANCE SiITH EXHIBIT NCB. 1~ Z~ ~ 3~ AND 4. 2. {~ROVISION OF LANDSCAPINQ IN ACGORDANCE N1TH PLANS PRESENTED~ P:.ANS FOR SAID LAND,SCAPINQ 70 BE SUBWITTED:TO.AND SUBJECT TO ` THE-APPROVAL.OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKWAY MAINTENANCE AND ~ TO BE INSTALLED PR10R TO F1NAC BUILClNG )NSPECTION. 3. PREPARATION OF STREET IMPROVEMEN7 P~ANS'AND INSTALLATION Of ALL IMPROVEMENTS FOR ACACIA STREETR IN ACCORDANCE M1~H THE APPROYE~ ! ST.ANDARD PLANS`ON F1LE IN THE VFiJCE OF`THE C1T.Y ENQINEER, 4. PAYMENT OF s2•00 PER FRONT F00T FOR S7R~ET LIQHTINQ PURPOSES ON ~ ACAC,LA S7REE7. ,:.: . S. PROYISJON OF UTILITY EASEMEN75 AL,~'~'. EXTERIOR BOUNDARIES AS - DETERMINED.TO BE NECESSARY BY THE D1RECi0R OF PUBLIC UTILITIEB ' '' - Tb'AD~QUA7ffLY. SERVE TNE SL!BJEC7,PROPERTY AND OTHER PROPERTY. , 6. SUBJECT 70 THE ARPROVAL OP PET1TlON FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. , _ . , • 61-6~2-28. _ ; ` . ' 9• _ , PROV1510N OF AREAS FOFi ADE,QUA7E.7RASH S70RAGE AND PICKUP AS . _ DETERMINED BY THE OEPARTMENT OF PUBL.IC MORKB. f r ' 8 , . 00 PER DWELl.INO UNIT PAkK AND RSCREATION.:FEE',T0 ' PAYMENT-AF s?5 4 ~~~~ • ' . BE COLLECTED A5:'PART.OF BUILDINa PERMJT. ; t ~~4~ ` '9 TIME-LIMI3ATION OF ONE`,NUNDRED EI~HTY.(180):DAYS FOR THE ACCOM~ ~~,~~ . ' PLISMMENT OF ITEM N09.' 3~ 4~;5~ 6.~ AND 8. i" ~ THE FOREa0IN0 CONDITION9~MEFiE RECIiEO AT T,HE.p1EE7lNQ~AHD NERE FOUND . . . . , . ''° L1 ' , t ' Yl . . . . , + , _ y iE /! L I 'x ~k'! 4 ~ ~+~ i, r 1 ~ 1 ~ / ~ ~ r,~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~;. / 'r,y ~ Vy.W~~~ i. .: ~ ' : . ~ -~ . , ~ ~ ~] , , .. . .. . ' , . " . y~/r +~~: 1 T ~ ~y '."y~~ 4> - :~oaFn . , u ..~a....r..~~ . ~ . LL'.~rP.t~.vs.Ni3t~.~u,~.v,3...!4.. __ . ^,.r"'~'~ p .-T~+"~ ts .M1R~0.m~a,.t4,..t...sHC..lfYl4Y 3:+._afX.e~..'~..~J.y3iUml.iW~ScY;~)1..i1'.4atAYJ~17.A.~r1ufl.Ytin~w~a..~.?~ ._,~G„t~,,..7: R. -,, + j a r ~ `~.~''7 .ert~.~.....~t ' .~. i` . . . „. . ?~lx:.t'+•; • t~...~Ye ''~~Y.~ _E''ll~~'-rc;~'. .'~`y' i, ( t ~.' ~~ ~f~~' itN,~3 . r rf~,~~a. ~'~.,.R 'i i 'T~~ r'' r 1 ~ ( ;~~ ~ ~ , E r. . ~ j ~ ~ ' ! : ~- t .v~ t< c: i t ~ ~ y~ _ ~ti ~ ,tx~ L f}~ , . . . .. ;f~~ f ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ .. . . _ . . ~ .. . ~ . i ~ ; 426 1 ~ MJNU7ES, CITY;PLANNINB COMMISSION~:SEPTEMBER 18~ 1961~ CONTINUED: C~NDITIONAL U5E ~ 1'0 BE•A NECESSARY;PREREQUl51TE T0 THE USE OF THE PROPERxY 1N ORDER I AND MELFARE OF 7HE C1712EN5 OF 7HE CITY OF i SAFET Y PERM17 N0. 158: t0 PRESERVE THE ` ~ ~ ANAHEIM. ' F OW ROLL CALL THE FOREQOING RESOLUTION WAS PASSED BY.7HE FOCLOMINQ . F ., C VOTE: OMM1SS10NERS7 GAUER~ HAPa00D~ MARCOUX~ HUNGALL~ PEBLEY~ AYESe C , PERRY~ SUMMERS. . NOES: CDHM1SSlONERS: NONE. . ~~ ABSENT: COHMISSIONERS: ALLRED~ MORRIS. ~ ~;. tr rORREsPONDENCE - ITEM No. l: ORANGE COUNTY USE VARIANCE~N0..4s34: F ~ ,,} ~~ 1 ~ A NOTICE RECEIVED FROM.T.HE ORANQE COUNTY PLANN1Na CONMISSION~ RELA- ~SE iIAR1ANCE N0. 4834~ WA5 SUBM177ED T0 THE COMMISSION. E s ~ 1 '"~~- TIV TO SUBJECT-PE7JTJON R QUEST.S PERM155ION TO ESTABLISH AN•ASPHALT NIX1N(i TRIC7 IN COUNTY TERR)TORY. ' ~T ~ S I~HT INDUSTRLAL PLAIir'IN THE,'M~1~5 AN-ASPHALT'MIXINQ STRUCTUREr CONVEY0R5~ CON515T OF ~ . SAID PLANT WILL STORAGE B1NS FOR SAND AND ORAVEL~ A DRYER~ TRUCK SCALES~ UNDERGROUND - ' ,, SUB 870RAQE OF,.FUEL OIL AND ASPNALT~ AND~ACCESSORY EQUIPMENT ALL THE LOCATION3 1NDICATED ON THE PLOT E 512F AND 7N . ~ . Y OF 'fH STANTIALI Pl.AN SUBMITTED NITH TH~ P6TITdON. THERE M1LL 9E N0 STRUCTURES ABOVE ~, 6ROUND LEVEL CLOSER THAN 80 FEE7 FROM THE FRONT, PROPERTY LINES.~• E OPERATED IN CONJUNCTION MITH AN EXISTING SAND ANO ~ ~ SAIb PLANT-W1LL B (iRAVEL:EXTRACTION.AND.PROCESSIN3 BUSINESS~ PRESENTLY ON THE PREMISES~ AS COND1710NALLY APPROVED ON OECEN~ 436 ~ N FOR WH1CH USE VARIANCE N0. 4 BER 23~ 1959.: ~ ~ BNING THEPNORTHERLY BANKDOFNTHEESANTA ANAERIVER~CSOUTH OF~QTWOOD~ [ . JO AND COH$PST S OF.APRROX{RlATELY 18 ACRES ALONG SAID R1VER. k i MRr ALLAN:SHOFF~ PLANNIN~.OEPARTMENT SENIOR PLANNER~ APPEARED BEFORE DLSPLAYED:MAPS~OF THE SUBJECT AREA~ AND REVIEWED.THE ~ THE•COMMISSION~• ENT CONSIDERATIONS BY THE ANAHEIM PLANNINQ COMMIS~ E 4 C BACK~ROUND OF R SION AND SHE ORAN~E COUNTY PLANNINp COMiA1551ON IN RESPECT TO PROPOSED e DEVELOPMENT IN THE,NORTHEA57'IND6'_°RfAL S~CTION OF THE`ANAHEIM AREA. THE COMMISSION OF JULY 24~ 1961 ~ ~ HE INDCCATED.THAT AT THE MEETJN~ CONSIDERED ORANQE COUNTY TENTATIVE MAP OF YRACS N0. 4286 TO BE ~ LOCAT.ED,ON.THE SOUTHEA57:.CORNER aF MALNUT AND FEE ANA STREETS. E AbDRE55ED THE COMMISSION AT THAT TIME REE N ` ARD S PLANNIN~ DIRECTOR RIC t AND THE FOLCOWINQ OBSERVATlONS NERE MADE: r 1. THAT: THE,P.RELIMINARY GENERAL PLAN INDlCATES TN1S AREA AS 1NDU5° _ .,, TRIAL USE.., _ ~ 2. THAT ACCESS TO THE AREA 1.5 EXCELLENT M1TH 7HE FREEMAYS AND 'JERY ADEQUATE RAIL EACILIT~ES AS AS WELI , , .. PLANNED HLfiHWAYS~ BE~Nfi MAJOR FACTORS 1N THE SUBJEC7 AREA. i ' THAT UTlLITJES~ OEARED 70 1NDUSTRI.AL REQUIREMENTB~ARE AVAt~.ABLE~ 3 ~ t .,~'';„ . AND b01L CONDlT10N5 ARE EXCELLENT. t 4: THAT FINE RESIGENTIAL AHD CGMAERCLAL FACILITIES ARE CL08E BY'TO HOUBE AND SERVE 7HE EMPLOYEES'OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. ~ THAT THERE 1S~ AND NILL'CONTINUE TO 8Ey AN INCREASJN~ DEMAHD 5. ~ . FOR 1NDUSTRlA! LAND 1N'ANAHEiM:. ~'•• 6.. THA7 THE SUBJECT AREA 1S VERY FAVORABLY LOCATED FRON A COMPETI~ T~VE VtEMPO1NT. . ~ ~ 7. THAT THE INTRUSION OF RESIDEN7IAL DF,V~LOPMENT ON A,PIECEMEAL ECT THE LOCATlON OF INDUSTRY IH TH& + ', BASIS.COULD SERIOUSLY AFF - , Y AREA. ` : ~ ION AT THE MEEiING ON ~ULY 24~ 1961~ THE ANA~ ` I~PTER LEN~TMY DISCUSB - - , HEIµ PLAN~~lN3 C.OD!lS1551QN.RECOMMENDED TO 7HE ORAN~E COUNTY PLANNIN4 fN THE J~REA ~, . ~ I ',;COMMI,SSIQN-THAT.-'F10:RESIDEN7IAL DEVELOPMENT,BE APPROVED ORANQE COUNTY'PLKNNTNfi DEPARTMENT HAD COMPLETED~ AKD THE UNTlI THE } ~ ~• .. ''ORANOE:COUNTY'PtANNING CQMMISSION HAD AOOPTED~ A MASTER PLAN.FOR ~ ' , , ,t, : AND PRO 7H6'AREA~ 1NCLUDIN~ BROAp~,`OVERALL::MAJOR LAND U8E POLICY ALIGNMENTB FOR ARTERJAL HIQHMAYS. THE COMMIBS'lON DISCUSSED ,POSED ' ' r . - ~Y OMNERS IN THE FURTHER,THE ADV15AB1LITY OF CONTACT)ND THE~PROPER M071.ON 7HAT'THE' AND REQUE57Ep BY HE ~~~!.,„ ~ri~K ; 5 AREA T0'DE7ENMI;NE THElR W18 ANAHEIM CIiY'COUNCII~ CONDUC3;:A~JO7N7 MEETIN~ HITH~~THE-ANAHEIM PLAN~ HEA8T R ' x rv~ ; , FHE NO 7 NX11Q COMMl8510N 70 DI9CUSS 7HE MA7TER 0~, LAND.U8E lN. # ,,~ , ~ ,~' AREA , ,t " . ~ ~~` q MR. SHOFF JNFORMED 7HE COMMlSSION THAT~THE CoUNTY PLANNINCi COMM15- lVE NAP. OF TRACT NO., 4286~`AND ' THE TEN7AT ED DEN r~i ~ , r ~'a ~ , ; J. S10N SUBSEQUENTLY y ~ ~ r ~~m i~ ~.I.: ht ' f ~ _ :, r ' :'~~ .. ~ ~ ~ I " * .`f: ~ i } S r 'L t. ~f ri~ 4 - _ . . ~ ~ . ~ i c tY5 ~,• 4~~~ t .-1~~~ ,l ., , ~ y ~. ~.n,>!t3 ; .~ ttl~ .r: t rtr? ~~ a~ ~ 7 + .4 ,.~~~ax~ ~i; ~ ~T fi~~ `•'~ ' ~ w J' ~'~~'~he ~ t t 1 -~ ~~, :~ ?~;{ • ' ' t1 ~ ~ _~~ ;~ .~ ~ ' 1 . ~ ~ u,Jy{~o~$~.n A fi•• ~ , .: ,. .' . , . .. --r--~`r ~ '.` . . ~ . C .^"aJ 1 l . j ' ~! JA' 'h ~. •P Y 1 'N ~ ~V 0.f `[3 f~ L. .,:s~~~'~ ,~.wa.~+.^~7. ~i ~Jr~r~r.~,F-7.S.i~. L ~.. .3:.,..~ ~i..,t.,, .r.ar .~wE~.l~t2~ _~4.. t.raw'~?~'f~`~l'~x~,U'S:~'b~'~~~.,~ -i:?~ ~~.r vsb;.°~ , _.,.~ ~'~.; ..5~.. ,~~ ~ ~ti i~c~, , ~S i 7~v:c7.s.. fe `.Jr T^1a~c~. tt Fllt~ilx~` ~YL'`"1 t .a~~ 7+ rL ~ ~f h f k l 7 ~ I ~~ N. . t ' Y '~ . F ..! ~ `l. 1 {wfly _ y,~ ~`J':+~e .vn:_ .1.. ~}a 'ti_ l ~ F! f 1 1 ~.I 7Y ` , i { 7 aC . ~ ~ ~ f 4 A x d W L i a l ~ A ~ ~ ~~' .~;'~ ~'t ~ ..f ~ ij <i Q - ~v `~ ~~~..~J ` ~riA1~~ ~ . ~ ~ ' ; ; l r s ~ ~ 4~ a ` ~ r'x4~ ~ ~ . ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~~i ~ r ~.._.~ _.7 ~ ~ ~ . , . 427 :I , -: ~ ,.~ _ ,: _ ' . , ~ E. r.l ~ ` ~NUEC ' ~ 1961 C 8 ; oa r , , HINUTES,. CITY PLANNING COMMlSS10Ne SEP7EMBER 1 . . . , ~ . . ~ rv ~. ~. . .. , . . .. . . . , . r CORRESFONDENCE - 1TEM N0. 1~ CONTINUED: ORANGE.COUNTY USE VARaANCE N0. 4834: ' ~ CONT~NUEb , THAT THE @9ARD.OF SUPEK/ISORS ADOPTED,AN EMER(iENCY M~l ZONING ORDI~ ~ NANCE IN THE ~ENERAL AREA EAST'AF THE~:ANAHEIM C)TY LIMITS~ MITH THE ~ ~ R~QUIREMENT OF,A.~EINIMUM LOT'S~ZE OF'i?IVE (5) ACRES. •HE INDICATED ~ . .0UN7Y-:PLANNi.NQ STAFF !S PRESENTLY WORKING,ON A FURTHER THAT jHE ~ . .: . MASTER PLAN FOR THE AREA~ MH1CH THEY'EXPECT ?O HAVE PREPARED FOR, ~ ~ SUBMISSION~TO-TiIE C~ ~NTN PLANNINQ COMM15510N BV•QECEMBER~-1961: HR.•SHOFF THEN STATED THAT A MEETIN(i:WAS HELD 1N 7HE NORNING ON j SEPTEMBER'18~ 1961 N1EH~.EI~HT,OWNERS -0F PROPERTY IN THE SUBJECT F , ! AREA~AT MH1CH TIME A DLSCUSSION WAS NELD 1N RESPECT.TO THEIR MISHES ~ FOR •THE.,USE OF T•HEfR LAl~D. SEYERAL -0F THE OWNERS! ORANQE• aROVES ~ HAVE BEEN AFFLICTED WITH.QUICK bECLJNE AND•THEV -1NDICATED THEJR ' M65H T0 SELL THEIR PRJPERTIES.. NOMEVER~ 7HE MARKET FOR INDUSTRIAL "` ACREA(iE 15'MOVINQ`SIOWLV~'WHEREAS~ THE`MARKET FOR RESIDENT.IAL LAND • ~ ~.~r L~~ i5'VERY ~CT.1VE.. IT MAS. P01N7ED-OUT 7HAT THE COUNTY,~S Eb1ERQENCY r'~ M1-5 ACRES'ZONINfi IN-THE AREA MOU1.D PREVENT SUBDIVISION INTO. Y~ STANDARD SINaLE~•FAMILY RESIDENT UL LOTS. IT MAS ALSO POINTED OUT Q ~ , THAT~ iN CONNEC7.lON W17H'THE SUBJEC7 PETITION F'OR AN•ASPHALT MlXIN OPERATION~ AN UNDESIRABLE PATTERN WOULD•BE ESTA9L15HED FOR THE ~ DEVEWPNENt OF.THE AREA-BECAU6E OF"THE NOISE AND.DUST AND APPEARANCE t OF THE USE. THE RESIDENTS'AL50 N07ED TNAT THE 2RUCK TRAFFLC WAS + BECOM~NG~ A,PROBLE:M •IN THR AREA. . ~ MR. SHOFF I.NFORMED THE CGMM15510N THAT•ASPHAtT MIXINO•15 SPECI.Fl~ CALLY PROHIBITED B1 THE'COUNTY ORDINANCE~ AND IS PERMITTEJ IN , • :: ; F~EAVY MANUFACTURI NG~ .ZONE. •ONLY 9Y. A' COND IT I ONAL USE ANAHE IM!S M~2 ~ ~ 5 , . PERMIT.'-.HE STATED ~HAT THE SUBJECT PET1710N SHOUCD eE CAREFULLY CONSIDERED BECAUSE IT COULD EASILY SET,AN UNCESIRABLE PRECEDENT MHICH COULD EASILY CONTRADICT'THE ULTIMATE MASTER PLAN FOR THE ; i . AREA. : THE CONMISSION•DISCUSSED-THE,PROBLEMS.OUTLINED AT SOME LENGTH AND ~ A4REED'THAT THE ANAHElM PLANNlNQ•COMMJ5510N•SHOULD RECOMMEND•T0 THE•CUUkTY PE.ANNlN4 COMMISSION THAT 7HE 5U8JECT PETITLON:BE DENIED k UNTdL 5UCH T1ME 'AS THE CQUN7Y PLAkN1.N(3 STAFF'COMPLETED'TKE MASYER F PLAN FOR'.THE NORTHEAST ANAMEIM~YORBA L1NDA'AREA. •• COWNIBSI~N~R•MUNQAL~ OF,FERED:A M0710N~ SECOiiDED BY COMMl5S10N6R• _ SUMMERS., VV CARRIED~ THAT THE'P1.ANNINQ JECRE7'ARY 'iRAN¢MIT• NOTJGE , , TO THE O~:ANQE COUNTV PIANNlNQ COpIM155tON•'R'HA7 THE ANAHE!M PLANNINQ COMMISSd-0N-RECOMMENDS•THAT.USE VAR(ANCE N0. 4834 BE DENIED UNT1L SUCH TIME AS THE COUNTY PLANNYNQ STAFF HAS DOMPLETED THE RASTER PLAN FOR TNE SL'BJEC7 AREA. IsEM Nor 2: ^RANGE COUNTY USE VARIANCE N0. 4e36: NOTICE RECEIVED,FROM THE ORANQE COUNTY PLARYIN(i COMM15S10N~ RELA~ , , TIVE`TO USE VARIANCE N0. 4836,~ WAS SUBMITTED 70 7HE COMMISSION. SUBJEC7 PEjITION REQUE57ED PERM(SSION TO ESTABLISN A DENTAL OFFICE AND REAL' ESTATE`-0FF.1CE lN THE R~ly.ONE'FAMILY RESIDENTIAL~ DISTRICT. SAIQ OFFlCES MILL BE-•JN 7HE EX15T,IN~ DMELL1kQ AND ATTACHED QARADE PRESENTLY ON THE PREMISES.. OFF~57REET PARKIN~ WIlL PE PROVIDED FOR INE CARS A8'1NDICATED ON.THE PCOT pLAN 5UBM1T7ED M1TH THE PET1710N. N , ONE DOUBLE-FACED SIaN~ M:TH.;A:MAXj?AUM AREA OF 25 BQUARE FEET ON EACH FACE~.MILt BE LOCATED dT TNE SOU7NEA5T CORNER OF 7HE PREMISES SUBSTA!l7SALLY-AS ISIDICATE6 ON'THE PL07 PL'AN~' SI3TH. A MININUM EIGH7 (8) F00T fiROUND:CCEARANCE. 'SUBJECT PROPERTY 15 tOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BROOKHURST STRlE7 AND STONYBROOK DR1VE~ MEBT OF i THE ANAHElN`CiSY, LiMISS.' - k STAFF REPORT RECOMMENDATION WAS 5UBM1T7ED TO THE COMMISSION~ IND1~ A` _ CONS~DEkATION'SHOULG BE'aJVEN T0 THE'ADVISA9ILISY ' CATIN4 THAT DUE ~ , , CONVERSION OF A RESIDENTIAL.USE,TO A COMMERCIAC USE OF TME PROROSED , DMELLIN~~ .FRON71.Nfi ON>'As RF.SIDENTIAL '1T APPEARS'7HAT THE;, BECAUSE ~ . . N7EQR17Y 0F THE JMMEDIATE AREA BY STREET~.COUCD BE9T'NA'INTAI~,~'H~ I ' . .REPORT INDI.CATEG REMA;~'NINa 1N'THE EXIST~,N4'REBiDENTJAL_USE. THE r FUR7HER'7HAT JME NUMBER OF !'ARKLNQ SPACES PROV,IDED.ON'THE Pt07 PLAN ; CONFORMANCE.:MITH THl C1TY,OF. ANAHEIN CCDE REQUIRE- JS IN SUBMITTED ', . , ., MENT FOR!COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENi'. "-TME REPORT RECOMMEHDED THRT~ iF ; t , THE 9UBJECT"PETL710N MtRE APPROVED"'-SUfTABLE LANDSCAPINt9 51.DULD 8E IVE ANb BROOKHURST ' ABUTTIPI(~ ~TONYBRQOK L1R E ~ " , ~ PROVIDED,ON THE'FRON7;AQ STREET~ fN ADDITION Td'.YNE PROVIS)ON OF LAND3CAPiNQ'IN:7HE PARKlN~ ~ : AREA. .. ~ ~ ~' ~, -;,. ,: . . 1HL.~.OMMISSION'DISrJSSED TN~ LOCATlON.Or 7HE SUB~ECx PROPERTY AND } i Y~~' ' ItiOyCATED THAT A LAND.,,USE BTUDY OF THE SUBJECT AREA °HOULD RE TME IBLE MPA . ~ r. ~ i ~ ' ~ T BAS~S~FOR DET~RNlNIYlG`:lf THE REQUES760 YARIANCE 40ULD,BE CO ,. ' " !; ~ b t/" , r,~-~. ,~~ AREA. , • !li THE M`Y7M' 7HE .DEY,.t.^^MENT ~ ~ • A NOYTON~ SEOGIiDED BY COMMI,BSIONER COMMIS810MER SUMMl~RS OFFaRED ~ ~~ , ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ • 1J~ ~ . ~ ~ . . . . . , ~ - ~.u ti4rij ~ ~ i.. L; ~ r<~, ' ~ ; ~.~ ~, ; NI ' ~ , . rl_.r. L ~ fYA ~ .a • ~ ~ ' +4 1 ~1'1 ~J ~ 4.f. !'a S'4 ~ ~~ t 7 ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ r ~~~ .., ~ / t+~'f~ ~ ~ ~{ I J f ~. T ! ~ . \ ~1,~"~4C~` ~4; i i . ` .I . ; ' ;,, ' . .. '. ' . '. ~~ , , ' 7 ',; ~y r' , k t? `; ~ ~,. ~ ~ K~k~~ut',~dii~~Vu.d a~_ ~ cr. ., ~'~ "~'a . y ,~ rro ~ i^ r v '"_' "'y '_^~ , ..., ti3 ~ tYn.~r.?~~fi~~. ~V3,i4M_l~Fi 5, ~ . ,..:!!~ _~'~G „ ~_ _ ~...~. . _ f~ iS'e :Sl ., i`re@,4~a"FFki s , :~ra Y~,v' <. Ea'•1, . . . , . ~ rc , . 71~^- ~ ~~~; TIVE TO USE VARIANCE N0. 4837~ WAS SUBMI7TED TO THE COMMISSION. r ~ ~~ : ~ SU9JECT PETITION REQUESTED PERMISSION TO ESTABLISH A 122 UN1T 6 TRAlIER PARK IN`THE A1 GENERAL AtiRICULTURAL DISTRICT. SA1D [ TRAILER SPACES<AND.ACCESSORY STRUCTURES TO BE.SUBSTANTIALLY OF ~ , THE St2E AND LOCATJON.AS INDICATED ON THE PLOT PLAN SUBMI7TED. , n: THE PREMISES WJLI BE ENCLOSED BY'A SIX FOOT BLOCK MALL. ONE ~ ' DOUBI.E-FACEO 514N~ CONTA~NING A MAXIMUM AREA OF lOO SQUARE FEET ~ ON EACH FACE M164 BE' COCATED ON THE -BWE GUM STREE7 PRORER7Y LINE , , .IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF, T HE.ENTRANCEs:DR)VE AS INDICATED -0N THE Pi.07 ~ , PLAN~ MITH A,M~NIMUM!OF lO FEET OF'GROUND CLEARANCE. THE SUBJECT ~ PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLUE GUM STREET AND ~ CORONADO S7REET~ NORTHEAST OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. • ~ THE COMMISSION REVIEWED PREVIOUS ACTION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A e TRAILER PARK ON THE.NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLUE CaUM AKD CORONADO STREET~ NHICH HAD BEEN CONSIDERED BY.THE ANAHEIM PLANNINQ COMM15510N AND ~ RECOMMENDED•FOR APPROVAL TO THE_COUNTY PLANN.ING COMM-SSIONy•MITH- ~ THE ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATION THAT THE MEST SIDE OF BLUE GUM STREET BE ESTABLISl1ED AS A DIVlD1NQ LINE BETMEEN MEDIUM FAMILY RESIDEN7IAL ~ DEVELOPMENT AND THE.iNDU5TRIAL bEVELOPMENT. IT MAS NOTED THAT THE. ~ CITY COUNCII'DID NOT COMPLETELY ENDORSE TNE COMMISSION~S RECOMMEN- DATIONS~IN RESPECT TO•THIS ACTION. ~ TH6 COMMISSION MAS INFORMED THAT THE PROBLEM OF ESTABLISHINQ A ~ DIVIDIN~•LINE BETNEEN THE TWO USES~ IN VIEW -0F THE 1MMEDIATE PRO- POSALS•FOR DEVELOPMENT-OF THE LAND~ HAD BEEN DISCUSSED M1TH THE ~ CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE. THE CITY COUNCIL HAD RECENTLY REQUESTED ~, THAT THE COMMI4SION;CONDUCT A STUDY OF 7NE LAND USE IN THE AREA: S s THE COMMISSION•DISCUSSED'AT SOME LENQTN THE NECE551TY FOR ESTAB- LISHiNQ A`POLtCY.IN RESPECT T0 TRAILER PARKS ENCROACHINQ INTO c PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL SECTI0N5'AND NOTED THA7 IT MAS THEIR OPINION THAT BLL7E S!!M STREET-SHOULD'BE,ESTABI.ISHED A5 A POINT.OF DEMARCA- ~ TION. ~ ~- '~ COMNISSIONER HUN~ALL OFFERED A MO7)ON~ SECOND~D BY COMMISSIONER PEBLEY AND CARRIED~ THAT THE MATTER BE CONTfNUED UNT1L THE MEETIti3 % OF-OCTOBER 2~ 1961 IN ORDER TO PERM17 7FiE PLANNINQ STAFF TIMH 1N ~ WH1CH TO PREPARE A LAND USE S7UDY AND REPORT OF THE SUBJECT,AREA. r' ~~~ AO,~OURNMENT ~ THERE BE1N~ NO FURTHER BUStNESS~ THE MEETINO WAS ADJOURNED,AT 6:45 O°CLOCK P.M. .:;, . .~ . .. ~,~ - ~ ~ ' , , . . ~. . ~ ~ . ~ ~ . _ .. . ~ . . .. ~ . , ;>`. I . ~i'; iy ~ : ~ ~ .~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' . .. . . . . ~ , . ~i + !: ;i ~ , .. ~;, ~ , ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~; . 7 ~ ~ , } i^~ ~ .. - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i Y+ ' ~:'+ ~~~ J~~~~ ~ '" ~ ~ (. . ~ ; ~ 'j; !i ~ t~: i ti rT t " " " ~ . - ~ ~ ) ~ r "'..'.~"~"~'. _~i8, ~r.w.~.t.n Ri •t_ fl4 K;~d . ~ } .i~t-~ 1 • ......,,'~.~i '~!. i~~. .+t„ .~:~rY ,~. ....- , .'~ .~.~~.:..~.ht'Li.:lYSW.n~~:s6ttakt , _ .'3" ~ 1~'~'~_'~' ~. ~ ~., z. ~_..,~.., , y~: w h . ~ ~` 0... ~~d.~.