Minutes-PC 1963/06/10~ I ~:~ .
_... - ~ ,
--~. _.__.__. ..----_. _-___... ._. - . ~ : _
~~' . ~ _ t.:. ~
~_--..~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~_; x~~
City Hall
Anaheim, California
June 10, 1963
RHGULAR MHBTING OP THH ANAHHIM CITY PIANNING COMMISSION
RBGUl.AR MESTING - A Regular Meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission was
~ called to order by Chairman pro Tem Gauer at 2;00 0'Clock P,M., a
~ quorum being present.
j~ PRB3BNT - CHAIRMAN PRO TBM: Gauer.
COMMI3SIONSRS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Pebley, Perry, Rowland,
Sides.
AHSBNT - COA9~lISSIONBRS: Mungall,
PRBSBNT - Zoning Coordinator: Martin Rreidt.
D~puty City Attorney: Furman Roberts
Acting Planniag Commission Secretary: Lee Burgess
ii,cermcuiaie Sienograpner ~ierk: Jacqueline Sullivan.
INVOCI-TION - Reverend Walter Perris, Pastor of West Anah~eim Baptist Church, gave
the Invocation
PLBDGH OP - Commissioner Rowland led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Plag,
ALLBGIANCB
APPROVAL OP - The .Ninutes of the meeting of May 27, 1963, were approved as
TFffi MINUTBS subm~tted.
CONDITIONAL USfi - CONTINUBD PUBLIC F~ARING. FRANIC W, SACBBTf, Owner; c/o L-G-S Cor-
PHRMIT Nf~. 387 poration, 2120 South Main Street, San:a Ana, California, Lessee;
CHARLBS G. SCFII.HGHL, 433 West Highth Street~ Santa Ana, California,
Agent; requesting permission to CONSTRUCT A SffitVICS STATION AND A
DRIVH-IN or WALK-UP RSSTAURANT oa property described as: An irregular parcel of land
having a frontege of 200 feet on the north side of Lincoin Avenue, a frontage of 228
feet on the north side of Wilshire Avenue, and an average depth of 500 feet, plus or
minus, the easterly boundary of said property being approximately 485 fe~et west of
Carleton Avenue. Property presently classified R-A, RBSIDBNTIAL AQtICULTURAL, ZOiVH.
Subject petitioa was continued from the meetings of Marcb 18. April 15 and April 29, to
permit the petitioner an opportunity to submit revised pU~ns.
Zoning Coordinator Martin Kreidt. advi~ed the Commission that no revised plans or
comMUnication had been received,
Nc nne appeared to repr~sent the petitioner.
No one appeaied in opposition to subject petition. "
CommissionEr Alired offered a motion to continue Petition for Conditional Use
permit No. 387 to the meetinR of July 8, 1963, to allow the petitioner sufficient time
to sub~it revised plans, Commissioner Camp seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
- 1604 -
., ~=-~r..
_-__._______ ~_.__._-----.----- ----
,. - --
~- : .
_..._. .
__._,_ : __ _. __.
~ - .~ .._ . ..._
~~
V'F;:
~~ ~ (~ : ~~
MINUTE9~ CITY PLANNING CaAAlISSIaN, June 10, 1963, Continued:
1605
CONDITIONAL USB - CONTINUBD PIDBLTC F18A1tING. R0.SffiIA M. TILTON, 517 Hast Sycamore
Pffit1~IIT N0. 411 Street, and EDWARD W. and VIOIA P. STBINffitINK, 502 South Gilbuck,
Anahaim, California, Owners; r~equesting permission to CONSIRUCT A
TWO (2) STORY PIANNHD RB3IDENTIAL DBVBLOPMHNT WITH CARPORTS on
pro~rty described as: An L~shaped parcel of land having a frontage of 65 feet on the
north side of Sycamore Street and an average depth o£ 487 feet, the ~asterly boundary of
said property being approximateiy 220 feet west of the centerline of Pauline &treet, and
furthez described as Sx7 8ast Sycamore Street. Property preseatiy ciassified R-3,
MULTIPLH FAMILY RBSIDBNfIAL, ZONB,
3ubject petition was continued from the meetiags of April 29 and May 27, 1963, in order
to permit the petitioners sufficient time to submit revised plans.
Mr, Jerry Case, 24142 Clarissa Lane, Santa Ana, agent for the petitioner, reviewed the
changes of the revised plan,
No one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
Tf~ FIBARING WAS CLOSBD. • '
The Commission was advised the density of developmeat was compatible to the density of
surrounding developed properties.
Mr. Case advised the Commission that alternate front elevations wouid be used on the
proposed buildings.
Zoning Coordinator Martin Kreidt adv:sed the City will initiate abandonmeat of an
improved ailey,~l2,~2 feet wide, with retention of necessary easements for existing
pole lines.
Commis~rioner Camp offered Resolution No. 788, Series 196'~-63, and moved fo= its
passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Perry~ to grant Petition for•Conditional
Use Permit No. 411, subject to coaditions. (See Resolution Book.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was passed by the f~ilowiag vote:
AYSS: COMMISSIONffit3: A11red, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Pebley, Perry, Rowlaad, Sides.
NOB3: C01~9~1ISSIONBRS: None.
AB3SNT: COFA~lI3SI0NHRS: Mungall.
RHCIA33IPICATION -~ CONTINUBD PUBLIC HSARING. JU~.IUS and BDITH NAIHAN, 801 North Loara
N0. 62-63-116 ~ Street, No. 236, Anaheim, Cali£ornia, Owners; requesting that
. property described as; p rectaagular parcel of land haviag a
frontage of 66 feet on the east side of Bast Street and a depth of
211 feet, the southerly boundary of said property being approximatelq 345 feet north of
the centerline of Santa Ana Street, aad further deacribed as 400 South Bast Street~ be
reclassified from the R-2, 1W0 FAMILY RBSIDSNTIAL, ZONB, to the R-3, MULTIPLH FAMILY
RH3ID§iVTIAL, ZONH, to consiruct a 7-unit single story apartment developmeat.
3ubject petition was continued from the meeting of May 27, 1963, at the request of the
petitioner, in orde1 to submit revised plot pians,
Mr. Jack Pianegan, 1226 West Pifth Street, Santa Ana, agent for the petitioner, appeared
for Mr. Nathan.
No one appeared in opposition to sub,ject petitioa.
Tf~ HBA1tING WAS CLOSBD. ~
. . . ~ . ~..I. . . . ... --__ ~ - .
r ~
~ ~ ~_~ . ,
MINUTE8, CITY PLANNING COD9dI3SI0N, June 10, 1963, Continued: 1606
RBCIAS~7IPICATION - Mr. Pianegan advised that the front two units would be two story
N0. 62-63-116 and the semaining units one story; the front two units would be
tContinued) 150 feet from R-1 property. Mr. Finnegan also advised that the '
Planning Department staff had requested the 21 foot wide drive-way
on revised plans, which made room for one more unit. .
Zoning Coordinator Martin Rreidt advised that the Planning Department did not recommend
increasing the density on the property, or cutting down on the green or patio area, only
widening of ci~c u~ireway. ~r~~,a.-~~ is ~crra n3ed a~ th~ nar*_h b; u_?, oa *he east t~
R-1, to the south by R-2, directly across Bast Street (west'side of Bast Street) is R-3
with R-1 units constracted on it. The Commissioners suggested that new exhibits and
elevations be submitted, more in keeping with R~2 developmea4.
Mr, Julius Nathan, the petitioner, stated that the property is too expensive for fewer
units; that there are 7 units on the north side of the property, and on the south an old
wooden house. Revised plans would be submitted if the Commission wauld indicate just
what was desired. Mr. Nathan further advised that 5 units would not be financialiy
feasible, and requested consideration be givea to retaining the 7 units and indicating
more green. He also requested a new date for presentation of plans.
Commissioner 3ides offe=ed a motion to continue.Petitioa for Reciassification No. 62-63-116
io tne meeting oi july 8, 19b3, seconded by Commissioner Chavos, who stipulated that
plans be revised to indicate not more than 5 units. Commissioner Camp indicated that
if Mr. Nathan is going to make revi.sed plans, the Commission should go on record that the
two story units should remain in the front, and delete two ground floor units to the rear,
For greater possibility.of open area. MOTION CARRIHD.
CONDITIONAL USB - PUBLIC FffiARING. P. W. and U. C, WATBRS, 816 Hast Katella Avenue,
PBRh1IT N0. 434 and R, G. and A. E. SIMPSON~ 904 Hast Katelia Avenue~ Anaheim,
California, Owners; WESTPQRT DHVBLOPMHNT COMPANY, 700 West Orange-
wood Avenue, Anahesm, California, Agent; requesting permission to
BSTABLISH AN OPPICB BUILDING AND WAIVB Tfffi MINIMUM SITB SIZH OP FIVB (5) ACR83 on
property described as: A rectangular portion of land having a frontage of 331 feet on
the south side of Ratelia Avenue and a depth of 630 feet, the easterly boundary of said
property being approximately 2,140 feet west of the centerline of State College Soulevard,
and further described as 816-9~4 Bast gatella Avenue. Property preseatly classified as
M-1, LIGHT INDU5TRIAL and P-L, PARRING IANDSCAPING, ZONHS.
Mrs. Hstelie Aunger, agent for the petitioner, appeared before the Commission and stated
that the lower lever of the proposed two-story office building is to be occupied by
subcontractors, such as, eagineer, landscape architect, etc.; and that the second floor
is to be occupied by Westport Developmen# Company. Plan no development for Lot~l at
present time, but propose it for sma.ll manufacturing business; plan of development is
northerly portion only, not entire five (5) acres.
No one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
THH HBARING WAS CLOSBD.
The Commission inquired of Mrs. Auager as to why this particular zoning had been applied
f,br, and she replied, it was needed for the two story office building and because of the
people with whom her company doea businet~s, the area was mose desisable. It was
determined there would be no retail salea from the office.
Commissioner Camp offered Resolixtion No. 789, Series 1962-63, and moved for its passage
and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Pebley, to grant Petition for Conditionai Uae
Permit No. 434, subject tc conditioas. (See Resolution Book.)
On roil call the foregoing resolution was passed by the following vote:
AY83: COMMISSIONHRS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Pebley, Perry, Sides, Rowiand.
NOBS: COMMISSIONERS: Nor.e.
pH3BNT; COMMISSIONffitS: Mungall. •
p
r'
a
MINUTB3, CITY PIANNING COh4~l1SSIOII, June 10, 1963, Contiaued: 1607
Commissioner Rowland left the Council Chamber at 3;00 P.M,
CONDITIONAL USH - PUBLIC FIDARING. LOUIS C, and PRANCESH L. LARSON, 338 West Lincoln
PBRMIT N0. 435 Avenue, Anaheim, California, Owners; DAN ROWIAND, A.I.A „ 617 South
Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, Califoraia, Agent; requesting permission
to BSTABLISH A RBSIDBNCB IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PRINTING SH~P IN A
C-2, 20NH on property described as: A rectangular parcel o£ land having a frontage of
63 feet on the south side of Lincoln Avenue and a depth of 125 feet, the westerly
boundary of said property being approximately 98 feet east of the centerline of
Melrose 3treet, and further described as 506 Bast L3.ncoln Aveaue. Property presently
classified C-2, G&NBRAL COMMffitCIAL, ZONH.
Mr. Paul Ruffing, 617 South Harbor Baulevard, architec.z for the petitioners, appeared
to answer questions.
There was no oppositxon.
THS HRARING WA3 CLOSHD.
Commissiene* Pe**~ offerecl Resolutioa No. 790, Seriea 19b2-63, and moved for its
passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Chavos, to graat Petition for
.:onditional Use Permit No. 435, subject to conditions. (See Resoiution Book,)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was passed by the following vote:
AYB3: CONiMISSIONffitS: A11red, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Pebley, Perry, Sides.
NOHS: COMMI3SIONSRS: Yone.
ASSBNT: COI~AfI3gI~IffitS: Rowland, Mungali.
VARIANCB N0. 1574 - PJBLIC FffiARING. ~AVID S. COLLINS, 1077 West Ball Road, Anaheim,
California, Owner; requesting permission to BXPAND AN BXISTING
BUSINHSS AND PROPBSSIONAL OPFICB BUILDING on property described as:.
R rectangular shaped parcel of land haviag a frontage of 62 feet on the east side of
Plore Street and an average depth of 124 feet, the southerly boundary of said property
being approximately 112 feet north of the centerline of Ball Road, and further described
as 952 South Flore Street. Property presently clasaified R-1, ON8 PAMILY RSSIDBNTIi~L,
ZONH.
Mr. David S. Collins, the petitioner, appeaxed and presented a small tract map for
review of Commissioners.
Commissioner Rowland returned to Council Chamber at 3:05 P,M,
t~lr. Collins indicated he wanted to expand existing office space and presented petitioA
with signatures approving said variance. Commissioner Chavos indicated that anq person
signing petition should be present. Chairman pro tem Gauer asked far a roll call of
any people present who signed petition. Mr. Coilias indicated if this was an issue~ he
would be glad to have the persons present, but ia the past, the Commissioners had not
made such a request. If the validity of the petition were an issue, he would request
postponement and bring in people who signed petition.
Mr. Robert Shaw, 930 South Fiore Street, appeared in opposition. He had purchased his
home in this particuiar area because of the residential atmosphere, He also noted
that tourists coming ou4 of the Disneyland area wouid see this development and it would
not be a good reflection of the atmosph~re of Abaheim. /
Mr. Frank Tulley, 924 South Plore Street, appeared in opposition, and stated that when the
originai parcel on Bail Road was made businese; the Council required off-street parking;
that cars are parking on Plore Street at the preseat time; that he opposes the trend
to move business up Plore Street; and that more traffic will become hazardous.
~ --
~.. ~ ~ \_..~ ~~"~
~ ~ " !
_. : ~~
__ - _ --- --------._ _- -- _ ._. _ _. ~.
-~.
`, ~ <~ - i;-~
MINUIBS, CITY PLANNING COM1AIISSION, June 10, 1963, Continued: 1608
VARIANCB N0. 1579 -,Mr. Collins advised he has been working with City Sngineess to
(Continuec}) relieve on-street parkiag; and that commuters are at present
parking on Plore Street, and they have been requested to park
elsewhere.
! Commissioner Chavos offered Resolution No. 791, Series 1962-63, and moved for its
' passage and adoption, szc:nded by Commissioaer Perry, to deay Petition for
Variance No. 1579, based on findings. (See Resolution Book.)
I On roil call the foregoing resolution was passed by the following vote:
AYBS: CObAIISSI0NBR3: Alired, Camp, Chavos, Gauer~ Pebley, Perry, Rowland, Sides.
NOHS: COI~IISSIONffit3: None
AB9HN:: CObAfI3STONHR3: Mungall.
Commissioner Camp stated that he would like to have heard from some of the peopie who
favor 4he petition, they seem to be more closelq affected.
Commissioner Chavos stated that if those property owners who signed the petition were
interested, they would have been here; they were notified by the City.
Commissioner Perry stated that an encroachment into a residential area should nbt be
permitted. •
VARIANCB N0. 1580 - PUSLIC t~ARING. WILLIAM K. and YVONNS L. NYMAN~ 813 Aurora Street,
Anaheim, California, Owners; requesting permission to WAIVB FRONT
AND RBAR YARD RHQUIRBMBNTS 1'0 CONSIRUCT A RBSIDBNCH on property
described as: A rectangular parc~l of land 'naving a frontage of 61 feet on the south
side of Glencreat and a depth of 100 feet, the easterly boundary of said propertq being
approximately 133 feet west of the centerline of Cambria Street. Property presently
classified R~A, RBSIDBNTIAL AGRICULTURAL~ 20NB.
Mr. Wiiliam K. Nyman, the petitioner, advised that the h~use was to be constructed, not
a"move••in", and would be 22 feet from rear property line.
No one appeared in opposition to sub,ject pr:tition.
THB F18ARING WAS CLOSBD.
Commissioner Alired offered Resolution No. 792, Series 1962-63, and moved for its
passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Sides~ to grant Petition for
Variance No. 1580, subject to conditions. (See Resolution Book.)
On roll call the foregoiug resolution was passed by the following vote:
AYHS: COMMI3SIOI~IDRB: Alired, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Pebley, Perry, Rowland, Sides.
NOB3: CObAlISSIONHRS: None.
AB3ENT: CODAtIS3I0N~tS: Mungali.
CONDITIONAL USB - PUBLIC I~ARING. WBNDHLL H. PAYi~ffi, 220 Bartlett Avenue, Woodlaad,
P~tMIT N0, 430 California, Owner; OIA SUITT, D.B.A., WCTS, INC., 1800 Bsplanade,
Redondo Beach, California, Agent; requestiag permission to
HSTABLISH A TRADH SCHOOL on property described ae: A rectangular
parcel of land having a froatage of 60 feet on the west side of Lemon Street and a
depth of 110 feet, the southe=ly boundary of said property being approximately 126 feet
north of the centerline of Lincoln Aveaue, and further described as 119 North J.emon
Street, property presently classified C-2, GI3NERAL CQMNIDRCIAL, ZOIVE.
Mra. Ola 3uitt~ of Redondo Beach, owner, appeared and stated she was not aware the
license previously issued for operation of the schooi was an inierim businesa licenae
oniy aad was under the impression that ail necessary papers had been completed, Now
steps were being taken to correct this, she had no deaire to.faii to cooperate. The
school is stili ia ope*ation.
___ __.-
,~..--_ _. .
_ ___--_-------
~ ~ U
~
V
MINOTB3, CITY Z~LANNING COi~4dIS3I0N, June 10, 1963, Continued: 1609
CONDITIONAL USB - No one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
PffitMIT N0. 430
(Continued) THS I~IRING WAS CLOSBD.
Mr. James A. Saker, manager of Trade School, 215 South Rose Street, appeared and
discussed the parking situation~ advising that most o£ the st~udents were parking on the
street, out of the meteied area. The schooi had been established prior to parking
=equirements, taerefose a waiver had been granted.
Commissioner Pebley offered Resolution No. 793, Series 1962-63, and moved for its
passage and adoptioa, seconded by Commissioner Camp~ta gcant Petition for Conditional
Use Persit No. 430, subject to conditions. (See Resolution Book.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was passed by the followiag vote: ,
py8g; COMMI3SIONHR3: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Pebiey~ Perry, Rowland, Sides.
ppgg; COWV~IISSIONHRS: None.
AgggNT: COMMISSIONBRS: Mungall.
CONDITIONAL USB ~ YUBLIC I~ffiAItiNG. PRANK BASII.B+ 809 South Snott Avenue, Anakeim,
PBRMIT NO. 431 California, Owner; OTHO R. and HAZBL M. PARMHR, 3057 Coolidge Avenue,
Anaheim, CPl.ifornia, Agents; reques:ing permission to BSTABLI3H A
+ PAMILY•BILLIARD CBNTBR on property described as: A rectangular
parcel of land having a frontage of 215 feet oa the west side of Knott Avemle, and a
frontage of 137 feet on the south s3de of Savanna Street, and further desc=ibed as
829 Sonth Knott Avenue. Propertq presently ciassified C-1, NSIQiBORH00D CaMI~ffiRCIAL, Z01~.
Mr. Otho R. Parmer, agent for the petitioaes advised only soft drinks were to be sold,
no beer or. alcoholic beverages, therefore no liquor license required. The center would be
comparable to Billiazd Center at Linbrook Bowl.
Commissioner Camp inquired as to illumination in the Center.
Mr, parmer replied the giass would *° c?ear, no drapes and no covers over the wiadows.
The Center was not a pool halY, but a piace where families and children with parents
could go.
James W. Wright, 3515 West Savanna Street, appeared'in opposition aad stated the Center
wouid not be an improvement to the community; that children would pass to and from the
school, there was already a ta-rern in one of the buildings at the end of the development.
He has a petition with 39 signatures of persons opposed.
Mrs, James W. Wright, appeared in opposition. She would not want her children to attend,
and did not feel it an asset to the community.
Commissioner Sides advised that of some 30 items listed_ in the Code Book for
permitted uses~ there are many more objectionable.
Mr, parmer advised he is now employed at Golden Que Billiard Center; there are two
bars close by; that people drinking do not come into a familq type billiard center; the
requested center will be a clean place for families, for boys to bring girl friends,
and for family enjoyment.
THB f~ARING WAS CLOSHD. 1"
Co~issioner Perry commented if this Center is opera~ad in the same manner as the one '`
at Lincoln aad Brookhurst, it would not be detrimeatal to the area. ~
~_..~.-`-- °~-
~
~. -T :
~' ,
___ ._.. _. __ _.. ~~ -----....
._.._, ., , J
_ :<-_
U ~ U ~
MINUTBS, CITY PIANNING COI~4dISSION., June 10, 1963, Coatinued: • 1610
CONDITIONAL USH - Commissioner Perry offerefl Resolution No. 794, Series 1952-63, and
PffitMIT N0. 431 c:oved for its passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Sides,
(Continued) to grant Petition for Conditionai Use Permit No. 431, subject
to coaditions. (See Resolution Book.)
On roli cail the foregoing resolution was passed by the foilowing vote:
AYBS: CObAfISSIONHRS: AlYred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Pebley, Perry, Rowland, Sides.
NOBS: COMMI3SIONffit3: None.
ABSBNT: COMMI3SIOPffiR3: Mungall. •.•••
Coimnissioner Perry left the Council Chamber at 3;40 P.M,
RBCIASSIPICATION - PUBLIC I~ARING. ARTHUR F~RBBRT SHIPKBY, JR., P. 0. Box 7, Anaheim,
N0. 62-63-121 and California, Owner; property considered described as: A rectangular
shaped parcel of land having a frontage of 126 feet on the south
CONDITIONAL U3B side of Sycamore Street, and a frontage of 122 feet on the east
Y23KM11' NU. 'FG8 side oi nasi 3ireec. rroperiy piesentiq ciassiiied as ft-1, ONH
PAMILY RBSIDHNT7AL, ZONB.
RBQUHSTBD CLA8SIPICATION: . C-1, NST(~iB0~RH00D COhAlBRCIAL, ZONH.
RHQUBSTBD CONBITIONAL USE: BSTABLISH A SBRVICH STATION.
Mr. Benneth Lay, 914 West Lincoln Avenue, represented the petitioner aad advised the
traffic pattern makes this undesirable for R-1 developmeat; at present R-1 on northwest
corner only; to the north on North Street, two service statioas were permitted to go in;
the safety factor is important; there are no injuries at a service station; children
Siving in the aeighborhood are weli protected; there would be no increase in traffic on
Bast 3treet or 3ycamore Street; no traffic hazards would be created; advised the
granting of subject pe~ition would be in coaformance with the general use that should be
in the area, at tL•e paxticular corner of that intersection.
Clement Heinz, 1235 Bast Sycamore Street, appeared ia opposition aad presented a petition
signed by 116 p~rsons who bought homes in an R-1 area; and if these people had any idea
that a service station were to go in, they wouid not have bought home~ in that area;
that the service station does not add to the appearance of locality; and that the homes
are too new, there is no possible buffer zone.
Mr. Marcus P. South, 1218 West Rowan Street, appeared in favor of subject petition, and
a.iso represented brother and sister who owri two (2) acres of this property across the
s;.xeet; it is almost an impossibility for people to get in and out of driveways due to
traffic, keeping this an R~1 zone; property should be acceptable for any kind of
business, zoned commercial. New stat.ions soing ia to the north, and a schooi on the
. street. _ . . . _ _ .
Mrs. Blanche Morley, 501 North Bast Street, appeared in favor of subject petition.
The Morley's bought iand 30 years ago and have now moved away because of the traffic
condition. The fumes from the street* noise, etc, are bad, and property cannot be used
for other than commercial purposes.
Art 3hipkey~ the petitioner, 1824 Ladera Vista Drive, Pulierton, formeriy owned the
property in quest~.~n, when soid did not reserve it for any specific purpose; he still
owns some and would like to know what can be done with his, 240 feet by 220 feet.
Bast Street is becomiag more commercial, aad eventualiy it wiil ail be commerciai or
manufacturiag; gas from cars is killing orange trees; people oa the corner properties
should be given some consideration; and that he is not interested in a service station.
Mss. Thelma Real~ 1232 Bast 3ycamore Street, appeared in opposition and stated that there
are now six gas stations on Hast Street within 3/4 mile from Lincoin Aveaue to Romneya
Drive; that there is another proposed for the corner of North and Bast.Streets; and if
Mr. Shipkey builds one, there will be.eight within 3/4 mile.
~
i
!
~
~
i
_ . _ . _...._ . .__ _ _ _ . . _
,
_ , , . .__ ~
, . . _. ...
~.... ~.~ : . ~.. .---..,
.
_---_ _ _ --- ---- _ .
~
n
~ j '~ (~ ' : ,'~.
MINUTBS, CITY PIANNING COMMISSION, June 10, 1963, Continued:
1611
RBCLASSIFICATION - Mr. Roy Kirk, 1229 Bast Sycamore Street, appeared in opposition and
N0, 62~63-121 stated if Hast Street goes business, something besides service
and stations could be used; there arP no sidewal~~, children now walk
CONDITIONAL USH in the streets; service stations will not help a bit.
PffitMIT N0. 428 Mr_ John Dressler, 1207 Bast Plower Street, appeared for the
(Continued) petitioner, and stated that property in question adjoins him on
the south, he is two parcels from subject property and has no objection
to a service station; that it has never been an inconvenience in any way, shape, form,
or manner; that there are no driving hazards with stations; and that people do not race
in or out of them.
Tfffi HBARING WAS CLOSHD.
Commissioner Sides offered Resolution No. 795, Series 1962-63, and moved for its
passage snd adoption, seconded by Commissioner Chavos, to recommend to the City Council
that Peti~tion for Reclassification No. 62-63-121 be denied, based on the fact that the
station was not compatible to the area.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was passed by the following vote:
niui: ~.n~uiiuoiv:ammi~~.ca: niiS::u! ...u:uY! ~:::.:Sa .~'i:u.^.Z~ a.^...~7~C~q .n..^.::~3.^.~0 .c..`~C~.~ ,
NOBS: CUMMISSIONHRS: None.
AB3BNT: COMMISSIONffit3: Perr.y, Mungall.
Commissioner Chavos stated th.is constitutesspot zoning,would have an adverse affect on
the area, contrary to the general welfare and healt'. of the area. Those ia favor of the
petition definitely have a monetary interest in the area. Sycamore Street is a
resideatial street and traffic in no way affects the area.
Commissioner Sides offered Resolution No. 796, Series 1962-63, and mored for its
passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Chavos, to deny Petition for
Conditional Use Permit No. 428, based on findings. (See Resolution Book.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was passed by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONffitS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, PebTey, Rowiand, Sides,
NOH3: COMMISSIONBRS: None.
ABSBNT: COI~AlISSIOIJBRS: Perry, Mungall.
RHCHSS Commissioner Sides offered a motion to recess the meetiag for ten (10)
minutes, Commissioner Camp seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIBD.
The meeting recessed at 4:00 P.M.
RBCONVBNH Chairman pro tem Gauer ceconvened the meeting at 4:20 P.M., all Commissioners
being present, except Commissioner Perry and Chairman Mungall,
RBCLASSIPICATION - PUBLIG HHARING. JAMB3 L. SLU4N, et al, 1001 North Acacia Street,
N0. 62-63-122 Anaheim~ California, Oxmers; RAY MBRCADO, 13016 Huclid Street,
Garden Grove, California, Agent; requesting that property
described as: A rectangular portion of land having a frontage of
185 feet on the west side of Acacia Street, and having a frontage
of 125 .`eet on the north side of La Palma Avenue, and further described as 1001 North
Acacia Street, be reclassified from the R-1, ONE PAMILY RESIDBNTIAL, ZONH to the
C-1, NBIGHBaRH00D CO~CIAL, ZONH to establish a medical center.
Ray Mercado, agent for the petitioner, appeased and advised that Reclassification
No. 62~63-77 was denied by the Council on April 7, 1963, after which the petitioner
submitted a letter asking•that the six months waiting period be waived, which request was
granted b~ca~se uf only one protest at the time the caae was brought to City Council~
whereas there had been a number of names in favor of petition. Applicant feels this is
the highest and best use for property at corner of Acacia Street and Ball Road; plans
have been su'omitted ~ Agent has a petition with 206 names of peopie within 300 feet
~ , :. . .. _ ---- -- _ . .,_ .i._ . ~
~ ----- . ~...__~ ~ • ~~,.._.-°
,,.
~.
(~ ~ (~ O
MINUTBS, CITY PIANNING COMMISSION, June 10, 1963, Continued: 1612
RSCLASSIFICATION - in favor of subject petitioa and adjacent to the area, and
N0. 62-63-122 presented petition to the Commission. The architectural design of
(Continuad) the proposed building will not detract from the area which is
predominantly R-1 north of La Palma, and R-3 south of La Palma,
with a church and school also to the south. A service station to
the west has been approved by the Commission and Council; area being R-3 and R-1, it
will supF~ort such a development as pzoposed; and that La Palma Avenue wi'1 be a primary
street ir,~ the future.
Six people were present in the Council Chamber in favor of petition.
THB HBARING WAS CLOSSD.
Mr. Joe Huarte, 1464 Bast La Palma, appeared, formerly owned property at that
location and wanted to know what business could be established there.
Commis~ioner Chavos inquired as to reason petitioner did not wait 180 days before
refiling, and was advised that, since there had been only one objection, it was felt
sufficient reason was availabie '^ re~submit,
A map prepared by the Planning Department was submitted indicating R-1 development in
the area.
Mr. James L. Sloan, the petitioaer, presented a petition with 206 signatures in favor
and indicated n,r~ons who signed same were willing to have pharmacy and medical center
in that area. Commissioner Sides noted that on this petition, 75~ of the people who
signed lived in apartments un Wanda Drive, and not considered home owners,
Commissioner Rowland offered Resolution No. 797, Series 1962-63, and moved for its
passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Sides to recommend to the City Council
that Petition for Recl.assification No. 62~63-122 be denied, based on findings.
(See Resolution Book.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was passed by the following vote:
AXHS: CObVNISSIONBRS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Pebley, Rowiand, Sides.
NOBS: COM.NISSIONBRS: None.
ABSBNT: COI~A~IISSIONffitS~ Perry, Mungall.
Commissioner Chavos stated that since having been on the Commission, the 180 day
waiting period has been upheld, Does not feel the reason given justifiable, and the
law is to be applied to evesy situation.
RBCLA33IFICATION ~ PUBLIC HBARING. BLBANOR M. CASSEL, 2133 South Loara Street, and
N0. 62-63-123 and HORACB H. RATHVON, 2151 South Loara Street, Anaheim, California,
Owners; (a2ANT HARLINH, 537 Vicky Lane, Placentia, California,.
CONDITIONAL USB Agent; property being considered described as: A rectangular
PBRMIT NO. 429 , parce.i of land having a frontage of 329 fee4 on the west side of
Loara Street and a depth of 311 feet, the northexly boundary of
said property being approximately 330 feet south of the centerline
of Orangewood Avenue, and further described as 2133 and 2151 South Loara Street.
Property presently classified as R A, RBSIDHNTIAL AGRICULTURAL, ZONH.
RBQUBSTBD CIASSIFICATION: R-3, MULTIPLB PAMILY RBSIDBNTIAL, ZON~.
RHQUB3TBD CONDITIONAL USB: HSTABLISH A SINGLE S1'ORY MULTIPI.B FAh~ILY PIANNAD RESIDBNTIAL
DSVBLOPMHNT WITH CARPORTS! ;
Mr. Prank Cushman, appeared and advised he was acting as agent f~r petitioners.
Our files do not indicate any letter authorizing this person to act as agent.
_y~ ~. , ' .~- ~~' ~ ._
~- : ' i
\J ~ \ ~
~
.,y'
. ~~,\_/...
MINUTBS, CITY PLANNING COI~AMISSION, June 10, 1963, Continued: 1613
RBCIASSIPICATION - Property does not abut R-3 immediately to the souin; to the west
NO. 62-63-123 and the nearest building would be some 35 feet from an existing block
wall, 115 feet f:^om the nearest single family dwelling on the
CONDITIOt~jAL USB west, R-2 buffer zoae on north could be used if needed. Size of
PffitMIT N0. 429 parcel is uneconoilically sound to develop as anything but R-3;
(Continued) present usage of p:operty has lost its identity and is not
compatible with existing development. A rendering was submitted
as an exhibit indicating low single story rambling type
construction that would in itself be a complete entity and surrounded by alley or
driveway and completely finished on the west.
Mrs. 8ugene Thomas~ 2080 South Loara Street, appeared in opposition. She lives to the
north of the property and has a petition with 27 signatures; she believes this develop-
ment would not follow the master plan which should be preserved for the beauty, value
and safety of the people who have homes in the area; school facilities are not ample,
and that there i:; more trvffic in th~ area due to additional apartments. Garden Grove
has seen fit to make property to the south low density and it should be continued R-1.
Commissioner Camp left the Council Chamber at 4:47 P.M.
Mrs. Thomas requested that application be denied on the grounds that it is incompatible
with current land uses.
Mrs. Avis Oleson, professi~nally a teacher, appeared in opposition, felt professional
obligation regarding overcrowding of schools.
Robin Fairbairn, an attorney xepresenting a home-owners group, appeared and submitted
petitions with 98 signatu=es protesting due to value of homes in area; application is
detrimental to the area; apartments can be a nuisance and it would set a precedent if
R-3 is allowed due to lower density.
Commissioner Perry returned to the Council Chamber at 4:55 P.M.
THH HEAk1NG WAS CLOSHD.
Zoning Coordinator Martin K•rei3t res~ a Ie:.e: :.om the City of Garden Grove, and
fur~her no4ed the tabula~!ions of nsnes in excess of 177 who opposed petition. Also,
a map presented by the Planning Department indicated there could be 8 lots of the
R-1 minimum lot size of ~200 square feet.
Commissioner Sides offered Resolution No. 798, Series 1962--63, and moved for its
passage and adoption,seconded by Commissionex Chavos, to xecommend to the City Council
that Petition for Reclassification No. 62-63-123 be denied based on the fact that
the development was not compatible to the area, and that the density is too high, and
also referred to the letter from the C.ity of Garden Grove.
On roll call the foregoing sesolution was passed by the following vote:
AYBS: COMMISSIONSRS: Allred, Chavbs, Gauer, pebley, Rowland, Sides _
NOHS: COMMISSIONBRS: None.
ABSCAIlv: COMMISSIONBRS: Perry.
ABSHNT': COhAiISSI0IVBRS: Camp, idungall.
Commissioner Sides offered Resolution No. 799, Series 1962-63~ and moved for its
passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Chavos, to deny Petition for Conditional
Use Yermit No. 429, based oa findings. CSee Resolution Book.)
On roll call the foregoing resolutioa was passed by the following vote:
AYE3: COMMI3SIONBEtS: Aiired, Chavos, Gauer, Pebley, Rowiand, Sides.
NOBS: COMMISSIONBR3: None.
ABSTAIN: COMMI3SION~tS: Perry.
ABS&NT: COMMISSIONSRS: Camp, Mungall.
~ ~
--- .___._ .. .
_
,... .
_ .
~ . . . .._ __ _. .
~-:.~_' .~ -
. ~ t_) ~ (_~> ~
MINUTBS, CITY PIANNING COMMISSION, June 10, 1963, Continued: 1614
RHCIASSIFICATION ~ PUBLIC HBARING. DOYLB and SHIBLDS DBVELOPMHNT C0~lPANY, 831 South
N0. 62-63-124 and Manchester Avenue, Anaheim~ California, Owners; property being
considered described as: A rectangular pareel of land having a
CONDITIONAL USB frontage of 494 feet on the east side of Magnolia Avenue, and a
PBRMIT N0. 432 frontage of 523 feet on the north side of Winston Road. Property
presently classified as R A, RBSIDffiVTIAL AQtICULTURAL, ZONB.
(~ RSQUBSTED CLASSIFICATION: R-3, MULTIPLB FAMILY RESIDBNTIAL, ZONH.
RBQU89THD CONDITIONAL USB: BSTABLISH ~ ONB AND 1W0 STORY MULTIPLB FAMILY PIANNBD
f RHSIDBNTIAL DBVHLOPMBNT WITH CARPCRTS, AP~ WAIVBR OP THB
ONB STORY HBIGHT LIMITATION. •
Neil Gray, 831 South Manchester Avenue, appeared for the petitioner, and advised that
this development was formerly in the hands of another firm, but the development did
not materialize and his company was forced to take it back. Therefore, the new
application was presented.
No c,ne appeared in opposition to subject petition.
THB HBA1tING WA5 CIASHD.
Commissioner Pebley offered Resolution No, i;00, Series 1962-63, and moved for its
passage and adoptior., seconded by Commissioner Sides, to recommend to the City Council
that Petition for Reclassification No. 62~-63-124 be approved, based on the fact that
these plans were far better than any subm3.tted pxeviously, and wished that other
property had been developed as satisfactorily, since in their inspection they were
sorry to have passed some other petitions for development.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was passed by the following vote;
AYSS: COMMISSIONBRS: Allred, Chavos~ Gaaer, Pebley, Perry, Row.land, Sides.
NOHS: COMMISSIONHRS: N~ne.
ABSBNT; COb4dISSIONBRS: Camp, Mungall.
Commissioner Pebley offered Resolution No. 801, Series 1962-63, and moved for its
passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Sides, to grant Petition for Conditional
Use Permit No. 432, subject to conditions. (See Resolution Book.)
On,roll call the foregoing resolutiun was passed by the following vote:
AYHS: COMMISSIONBR3: Allred, Chavos, Gauer, Pehley, Perry, Rowland, Sides.
NOES: COMMISSIONBRS: None.
ABSffiVT: COhAiISSIONHRS: Camp, Mungall.
RHCIASSIPICATION - PUBLIC tIBARING. MORTEN M, and MAUDH A. DI2NBY, c/o HARRY M. HOL3TBAD,
N0. 62-63-125 and Attorney at Law, 617 South Olive Street, Anaheim, California,
Owners; CHIP CHASIN, 15111 Beach Boulevard, Westminster, California,
CONDITIONAL USH Agent; property being considered described as; An L-shaped
PBRMIT N0. 433 parcel of land having a frontage of 313 feet on thesouth side of
Ball Road, and a depth of 630 feet, the easteriy boundary of said
property being approximately 406 feet west of the centerline of
Dale Avenue. Property presently classified R-A, RBSIDBIVTIAL
AC~tICULTfJRAL, ZONB.
RBQUBSTBD CLASSIPICATION: R-3, MULTIPLB PAMILY RBSIDBNTIAL, ZONH.
RBQUB3THD CONDITIONAL USH: BSTABLISH A SINGLE STORY MULTIPL$ PAMILY pIANNBD
RBSIDBNTIAL DEVEIA°MBNT 'NITH CARPOltTS.
-__ . ----- _ _. _ _ ...
__ ~
,.
-- ---
_...--~ , _ . . . _, ..
~ _„
G.
MINUTHS, CITY PI.F~NNING COMMISSION, June 10, 1963, Continued: 1615
RBCIASSIPICATION ~ Mr. Ray Mercado, appeared for petitioners, and advised plan now
N0. 62-63~125 and shows some 88 units which is zeduced from previous plan.
Councii denied similar request on the basis of incompatibility.
CONDITIONAL USB
I PffitMIT N0. 433 The Commission discussed R~3 standards and planned developments,
(Continued) and Mr. Mercado was aduised that conditions have not changed siace
~~ denial previously,
No one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
~ THB HBARING WAS CLOSSD.~
The Commissiori further discussed the density of various developments and inquired if
property in question was leased iand, when advised it was, dedication could not take
place on leased land because the owner would not sell the property, only lease it.
Commissioner Sides offered a motion to continue Petitions fur Reclassification No. 62-63-L?5 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 433, to the meeting of July 22, 1963, in order that the
petitioner may submit revised plans, Commissioner Pebley seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIBD.
RBCLA3SIFICATION - WALKER and LSB, INC., et al, 25.$0 West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim,
N0. 62-63-126 Califoraia, Owners; PRANK R. HART, 2580 West Lincoln Avenue,
Anaheim, California, Agent; requesting that property described as:
An L~shaped portion of land having a frontage of 62 feet on the
south side of Lincoln Avenue, and a frontage of 89 feet on the east side of Magnolia
Avenue, the southerly baundary of said property being approximateiy 254 feet south of
the centerline of Magnolia kvenue be reclassified from the R-4, RBSIDffi1TIAL AQtICULTURAL,
ZONS to the C~1, NBIGHBORHOOD COMMBRCIAL, ZONB to utilize the existing property for a
real estate office.
Mr. Frank Hart, agent representing the owners of leased portion of property. appeased.
Commissioner Allred left the Council Chamber at 5:30 P.M.
Commissioners advised the agent that Walker and Lee, Inc., were overdoing the display
of fiags in their front office, that it did not add to the City's dignity, They
inquired of the agent as to time table for removal of the house on the property, and
were told that it was important to start work as soon as possibie, since the
administrative offices of Walker and Lee Inc, are in Lakewood at present and it is
hoped to consolidate them as soon as possible in about two years.
No one ap~;ea*ed in opposition to subject petition.
THB HBARING WAS CLOSED.
The Commission decided that the proposal added no asset to the corner pm perty and
would like a more definite plan of development. _ . .
', 2oniag Coordinator Martin Rreidt read a letter to the Commission from the applicants.
The Commission further discussed the desirability of the proposed development, the iack
of a definite ~lan of improvement, and .the undesirability of using the residential
structure for commercial purposes.
The Commission requested information of the agent as to resubmi.tting plans and were
advised the agent would be willing to do so.
Commissioner Sides offered a motion to continue Petition for Reclassification No. 62-63-126
to the meeting of July 8, 1963, in order to ailotiv the agent for the petitioner
sufficient time to submit revised plans. Commissioner Perry seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIBD. _
~
. (~ ~ <;.~ '` ``~
~ 9
C~ ~ ~~ ` ~ ~
_ ;
1616 ~
MINUTBS, CI~Y PIANNING COMMISSION, June 10, 1963, Continued: ~
I
~ AMHNDMHNT TO TITLH 18 - PUBLIC HBARING. PHTITI0~11 INITIATSD BY THH CITY PLANNING
( ANAI~IM MUNICIPAL CODH COhAlISSION, 204 Bast Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California,
ADDITION OF CHAPTBR to consider amendment to Title 18, of the Anaheim Municipal
18.38, C~O, COMMffitCIAL Code by the addition of Chapter 18.38, C-0, Commercial
OFFICH, 20NH. Office, Zone which zone is intended to provide for and
encourage the or derly development of.business and profes-
, sional office centers, and further to recognize the i
i development potential of Anaheim's office areas which is due to geopraphical location, ~
regional markets, and regional labor pools.
i
Corrections submitted by Planniag Director Richard A. Reese, were to Page 6, No. 7 I
Signs, new paragraphs a, b, c, and d. The Commission noted that discussion had been '
extensive on this zone at a previous work session. That no one appeared for or against '
subject amendment. ~
Commissioner Allred retuzned to the Council Chambers at 5:45 P.M.
Commissioner Perry offered Resolution No. 802, Series 1962-63, and moved for its
passa~e and adoptiono seconded by Commissioner Rowland, to adopt the C-0, Commercial
Office, Zone, as submitted with amendments.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was passed by the following vote:
AY83o COMMISSIONBRS: Chavos, Gatier, Pebley, Perry, Rowland, Sides.
NOBS: COhA1IS$IONHRSa None.
ABSTAIN: COMMIS3IONHRS: Allred.
ABSffiVT: COMMISSIONBRS: Camp, Mungall.
RBPORTS AND - ITBM N0. 1
RBCObAlBNDATIONS
The Cammission discussed a parcel of property located on the south
side of Llncoln Avenue at Muller Street extended~viewed on their
inspection tour the morning of June 10, 1963, classified in the R-A zone, where
various kinds of debris was being dnmped. Request was made that the Pire Marshall and
Fire Department inspect and require the cleaning up of the property; and requested the
Planning Department staff ta iarestigate and determine what zoning codes were being
violated; and also tu advise the Building Department.
Motion was made by Commissioner Sides, seconded by Commissioner Allred. MOTION CARRIBD.
ITBM N0. 2
CCINDITIONAL USH PBRMIT N0. 328 - GBRIA7RICS and RHHABILITATION
HOSPITAL - west side of Knott Avenue approximately 500 feet
south of Lincoln Avenue.
The petitioner's request was continued for more engineering data; oniy 4 feet of fill
would be required at the westerly end of the property to gain access to the sewer.
Request that a 6 foot high solid redwood fence be permitted instead of a masonry wall
along the south boundary.
Commissioners discussed advisability since any businets activity would be a complete
separation from the baCk yard of the development, if developer has raised the elevation
of hi.s property, definitely a wall should be installed.
Zoning Coordinator Martin ~reidt referred to request of May 21, 1963, from Aaron A.
Graham, A.I.A, of Abraham Shapiro Associates.
The Gommi3sion advised the 5 foot masonry wall should be measured from the finished
grade levei to the west and south, and referred petitioner to minutes of March 18, 1963,
wherein this item was ciarified,
_...._ ~ ;
_ __.._...
.. ... .. . ..... _
......_..____. __ ,~~ ' ---~--------• ,
. , ~ ~.._.._._. . . . __._
,--
MINUTSS~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, June 10, 1963, Continued: 1617
~ ,.. .
RSP~tTS AND - TTEM N0. 2(Cor.tinued) '
RHCONAMBNDATION3
(Continued) Commissioner Sides offered a motion, seconded by Coromissioner Chavas
to advise that conditions applicable at the time of granting of
Cond'stional Use Permit No. 323 haye not chaaged, and should be
applied at this time. MOTION CARRIBD.
ITHM N0. 3
yARIANCB N0. 1563 - requesting permissioa to waive deed restrictions
per4aining to building material for service station, etc., and
VARFANCH N0. 1523 - C-1, NSIGHBORHOOD CObAfBRCIAL, ZONBD property
east of Katella Avenue and Haster Street.
One of the conditions to approval was the installation of landscaping, including tree
welis as noted on Bxhibit No. 1. Plans showed landscaping, etc., however, applicant
advises that this landscaping was not on original plans subaritted. Mr. Marvin W.
Krieger, Jr., Assistant Pianner, Development Review, advised that notations on plans
indicate the landscaping of tree wells was on plans when he "red penciled" them.
Also, Mr. Ronald Thompson further advised that at the time of review of staff report,
the tree wells were indicated on the plans.
Attorney Furman Roberts advised he would telephone Mr. Smedegaard regarding the
landscaping, tree wells, etc,
Commissioner Chavos made a motion, seconded by Cormnissioner Sides, that it was the
intent of the Commission to reqairr landscaping in the two strip areas indicated,
although they may be reduced to two (2) feet in width; that evidence from the staff
indicates there was landscaping on the plans prior to the time they were presented to
the Commission with the Petition. MOTION CARRIHD,
ITBM N0. 4
CONDITIONAL USE PBRMIT N0. 327, LBO LIBBRIO, 1622 West Rickey,
Anaheim, requesting permission to construct a restaurant and
cocktail bar.
Mr. Leo Liberio, 1622 West Ricky Avenue, the petitioner, requests an extension of
six (6) months due to the fact that lessee of building was denied liquor license, and
it was necessary to negotiate with new lessee.
Commissioner Allred made a motion, seconed by Commissioner Chavos, to recommend
six (6) months extension of time, with the provision that all conditions are to be
complied with before expiration of the 180 days originaily granted - June ?.7, 1963,
MOTIOId CARRIBD. •
ITBM N0. 5
(YtANGB COUNTY AMHNDMBNT TO USB VARIANCB 5091, to permit the
enlargement of an existing typing service ciffice in the RP,
RBSIDffi1TIAL PROP$SSIONAL DIS7RICT.
Zoning Coordinator Maztin Kreidt reviewed subject petition with the Planning Commisaion.
The Commission-discussed the appearance and development of commercial usage of the
residences on the east and west sides of Lincoin Avenue, northerly of Brookhurst ~:reet,
and the manner by which the re53.dential structures might be upgraded so as to present a
most desirable appearance.
. a
, ~ ~
I ~' ~; •
}-, ~
, ~.._...._...+....~....~. - - ~ .. . ' ~ . . . .. . . r'k Y ~ ' .
_. v .:.n~''i~.:::
~ ~ .... ,~ ~ ~ '~
r •
MINUTBS, CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, June 10, 196z, Continued: 1618
I RBPORTS ~iD - ITEM N0. 5(Continued)
~ RHCObA1HNDATIOIvS
~ (Continued) Commissioner Si.des offered a motion to recommend to the Orange County
~ Planning Commission that Orange County Amendment to Use Variance 5091
be approved provided that the two 9 foot drives for access to the
rear of the property be instailed, that parking in the front of the structure not b~
~ permitted~ that the existing asphalt in front of the structure, except that aecessary for
~ i expansion of the 9 foot wide drives to Brookhurst Street, be removed, that staadard
~ s;.dewalks and driveways be installed,, and that the front yard area, except for said
9 foot wide drives, be landscaped with evergreen shrubs and that said landscaping be
I physically protected from pedestrian and veklicular encroachmen~, that the parkway portion
of the Brookhurst Street right-of-way abu#4ing subject property be landscaped with a
street tree and evergreen shrubs, and that all signs on subject property visible from
Brookhurst Street be limited to one sign with a maximum area of 8 square feet; and
further provided that, if it is impractical or impossible to upgrade the existing
development in the manner outlined above, the existing structure be removed and replaced
with commercial facilities incorporating adequate setbacks, landscaping and parking
facilities in a manner that would be an asset to the County of Oxange and the City of
t Anaheim. Coramissioner Perry seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIRD.
iicin iv'v. 6
Letter received from August L, Pellino, Ceneral ~ontractor,
RB: RECLASSIPICATION N0. 62-63-119, requesting Commission approval
for revising driveway access to public parking areas at Dr. Tseu
Clinic.
The Commission discassion disclosed that the two 16 foot driveways, which were a
condition of the reclassification, sheuld remain rather than one 21 foot, as requested
now by petitioner.
Commissioner Sides offered a motion to deny request, seconded by Commissioner Allred.
MOTION CARRIBD,
ADJO[1RNMffiVT - There being no further business to discuss, Commissioner Pebiey offered
a motion to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Alired seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
The meeting adjourned at 6:20 P.M.
,_~.,. ~Mm ~„«. __,~ ---~--__._____._~.
~
Respectfully submitted,
.R.~/ ,~C/ .P,p,Q~
B~~$$
Planning Comm' sion Secretary
Pro Tem
. . . .. _ _ .... _ .
~ ~;..._...._ . _ __ . . .__