Loading...
Minutes-PC 1967/04/24i.~'. ~\' F'3" a(.~f~~2.!T. Cd~~...."f,: ? ar: : _ ; ^ , ~.9E;' 4 REG-=''!F MSFT n-- ('-- -~-~`''a! ==~ r r~-~i_a'„'~_~_ Crld9~ jS-OD- i RFG!J1.4P. MEETING • a~eou.3: ~eet r.c ^' tra 4r.ah.e:.rr: Cit~; ~':a;:c_: g Ccnn_ss:cr. w,~c r,:a_:ed ±o crde-• !-., ;'r; =m~c o:o te:, :ieics.. ~t 2:0~ c'._~cr t-,pt . . , 3 ~uo°~.n: k_~e'r.a c ese; t Cjrrc 'w: n a P. ± ~ .-r~li1~ r'RFSENT - CNA.FM.a'•;: r.te: ~? it:e '"; .~ :.. C! ;nre: 3 1::.E ' M ~•. ~ ~ - COhI:~,'SS"'NE2~: ;..: ec F 3: j~~ _ : 3~~e~ e°hs*, A":; p.3: ~,~ . Rcw_yr.d ' ~ j Li ~ ~ a~SEJT - CC4+?,,'S~'r~_~q,: ~;~r.e ~RESE~T - 4ss;s±ar± :`e~e cc~*ert ~er~. ~es D:se~i .. R:~he;± NLCKE:s~: 70I~'f:O 7'JC?...'.SC.:~: ROf:~i.C i(:~fi:CS^f: , De~.;t•~~ C~?•: yL+C:'f.2\': EU'f13f Roce~ts ~,::~.ce E;.c-.i ee:: 4-*,.!r~- na.r 5ssc:-~.3*e ~. ar•,e_; '.~~k. C'~z:,G;o~fe_s~r, .ann::.c Cca~r..s~.or ~e~_.pC9; 7 a-r u_ehs ~': ELl,E OE A; iEGIA~CE - C;^n: ~s_or:e: ~_ . • e:' _ec ~. *'.e .e^ao ~ a:.eq;~„re ts *.he =;. ac 4PpROGAi CF - T~.e M rn~te~ ~r tre ;;eet'r.g .. ,.. . (;, .9c'.. were :ep_c~ed _. ct-.or. T!'~ ~~+i~;','TES cv Coa:. : ,. ,,. _ h'. :a a. ^ • ~ . ^ n ' ~ • sec~. ~ec -v ~,.,~, _ss-.ere. A--=e~ '•c~.' ":C~;~'~ ~yRr•E,~, u,, ±'.~*~.B '0.._,,w . .?!` G' . ~~aCB i$O. C;i~9C:.'.C~l ' . '._.. T2~ir: :~~~8_~2 . , . _ ... ...:T_f?@:: U'i5:.^.EF~ LC C°: Srlic3 !'';L......55'...~'.e.~ ~^N' . , ~ ~ `~ f - "' °•'d ~c me* r+, a ::.. t e:reet ra t~ 4K.: _ . _- ~t . . ~0 4~ ~ . ~„ ~~ . ~ . . . .. . _ SPS _ . ., ~ ~ ...P. : °1'.2W i ~ `Fc ~~ ~7e Ge; e. ; r 3 ;n =5'.C: _ ~ P~ : .. S@fCi _'.ed t~e ,._ h^QT'.~ti ~ 4RR`E~- ;i ,; ~_4P.IA~CE UO__ E59 - COn'T.r,;I F^, c'P:.'C HE4R'C:;" 'ERR~ "~+.4P.kS: ?;4a Wect ;:r.co:r. 4•~er.~~e, -~ 4ra~.e:r, ~, F.-r,~a ~,svr:e:, ^n ~ CCO~'~ :;: Weat. E'r St: * r - ee.. ~r,ar,e:T, ~a_ f ._ ~ aoer t, eoazsi~r.a ~~,.3ri~-ce `o GERM:T 4 20.O~C S~1.:4RE FO~T W4REF~CliSE W:TF' F0~'F pqRk i~~ E CCa c~ a1 i~'~ 3C ;T;- =^ ^~~aa;~ nc Tc•c E~rgT.~~. ~~4PC+N4P,F ~ACIIiTY. W_'T'r. W9'~.FPS nc r ~ ~ Ci: ~ :D'~~v ~r'P3Cy A~f` ':?; tJ \''M~.:M. F~R~::'JG SP4Ct ~]ZE i en property des~::'.:ed .3;: 4.-er.a;•:~:,3,_~: ;t;aFe~' pa~ce_ ~_ _ar.d ~;ppzcx.mate_y _50 roet h•;, ~32 feet:, *.he souc're;.v oe_:r~~.: o` ,:•b:ie^t p-epe:-t. he:r.g ~oF:o~~mateiv _3c cee* -,n;r•, 'y o~ t~~e cer~?.e.: •.r.e ~r ~. aK~itr a,~ Gr •e a c~ *.r.? : c: tt.er•.•. :..:•.c,r•: re:no ,acorea_Ta*.e.v ~:0 il feet soutt: ef tt:e c'e~.te -ce o +.cc . a•.er ;e ;~.d ~.:rt^e: des;r:t ed as 2:-i-7 West :?.ccc_r, q Avenue- Pr.ope=tv c*esent.:~, r.,, s. `.e~ f`•.. a~1~MOn'iE i4RR:KG. ZQI~'E Suk;;ect pet_+_~or was cont:r~.::ec *_o;r r„e rree't-;.q~ ..= 1":a~:cr. _' ar.d ~'. !.°t?, tc :3._ow t:m~ .`or tno petiti.oce° to ~t.:;rr=t : ec: sr-' F:.j: G ;ssoc~.~te =_~cr.e: .i3f,K C~~:-~stc~~e°so~: .d~ sec ±!e C^:rii-_.=.a;.c~: tr.at the ~qent `o: tr.ec~±:.*'one. ;'~ad sunrr,~ttec a iette: sea~~estirc t~3t'suhie~t pe±~t`..cn i~e :.or.*.;;~~uee t: iho M.~•, 22, _QE., m=eting te ._:ow ,,-.;re ror ~t:e -~.r~p;et c~ o!' _e~:i~;ec p...r:s ar.d T:ee*_'.rc w_tF• :~d,~_:'~c o~r.pert.•; cwr. er s -. - Co:rmiss_oner .4'.:red offe_ ed 3~~ot:~ .`c ~or t..~:e Pet't~ ;. fo~ ~~r: ar•.~e No. :.85° to ne ~v1=.v 22; ~_967 meet_ng >.s re,,ue;tec cy ±~e cet'_*:erer, Cor~Ti.as`.o;~er M•.!rq-~i' seccr.ceu~ r,e Tcticn~ NOTION CaNRIE~ - ~ ~ I VaRT4NCE [~Q 18t1 - CO<<T ~' ic^ PURI _C YE4F.:tiG h^R 4;~:'~ NP.S hL~l44RD ~.U:JL'~~?;: :a;2 .;ar.e~r. Way ' A'~D 1~9R .-4\D MF.S ALV:~ FAKER, ~26 West ~vcamore Street, .4r, 3he'rr.: ,,-~ Caiifornia, Owr.e:s; CHURCFM4N S EOl?vD.4T.T0id, ?i2E :os Fe::>_ ~uule~~a:d. i_os .4ngeles~ Califorc~_a, AND R. CUNM?\GS d,4SSOC~aTES, 99 Soutn Cheste~, F~sadena; Ca:_*o:r-.,,, Agerts; _*equesting a v3riance to tSTABL?SH A;'-S;pR:' ~~Gi~-RiSE AGARTMENT P'.'ILD~NG, W~TN ;~.~; WAiVER~ OF (:) MI~IMUM REQU:REP I'.4Rk?4'G S~'4CES, (2; Ni'dIMU~J: :..4ND ARE.A PER I~NEIII~'G :,1!?T. ~?i M' ~"UM CWEL.L:nG L~iIT Ei00R 4FE.4, ~4' MAX?M"N B~II~i:~;G "EiG~?T, .4\D (5~ M;'~:IiJ ~U RECRE ~ ~ ` ATIOVAL-'E?SURE 4REA on p~opertv descr_c~ed as: ar eq.:_~:i~• sr.aoed pa~cel o' a:~ ioc=ted south ar,d east of a parce: of lar,d _ocated =.- tne soi,r~.eas_ co:r.er o* Sycar,ore and ;_emor. ;~ * St:eets, suhject p=oFe:t. !,~~;; o a'rc:.'age c• appr.ex.nate_c ?0 .'ee* cn Sycamoz•e S~reet ar.c? aFF=o`~~.~ate:Y 200 feet cr. l.emr; St_eet F.oc= ±y pleeer~t_•; r.~ass:fied R 3, Nd!'.1IPI.E-F4~~~ILY ~ ~ ~ RES7DEhTI4L, ZONE ~ =t0~ ~ ~v.~.<<rES, cir~ ~Lanm~;n~~ c~rnr.~~_ssro~: aF.~: 2a, .9e~ ~~o, l4R?.4NGE ~C _EEi - Assoc:.ate Fiennei .:eck t:h.:steffersoc ~aa-r. :ev ewed ±he ren,:e~i n.' (Ccrt:nued) the cet::t'-e,,e:s, ^cat~o;~. of sub,er,t~ ropertv, ar,~ :a . F' .: ^(j US@5 5'~•..Oli(~C;~- ~nq su'riect F'oPe~~Y, :~r.r. ~u~:tf;er ceted t~..at ±!,e pet;t:or w.js r;rt ,-,.e~ fro~r the meet~r.a of V3rc~ 2', _96', tr., ;~l:ow tFe Con,r_s,-o~ t-.T~ ro ~ev'ew data suhn:-~tted to them. 4~s: star.t Deveioon:er.t Serv:-ce; n' re~tc: Fotre: t. Pr~ rke:.sCr t! er o_ eser.±e;! ,_. des `;'r~;. tv tt.a staff of the I_utt;ez Tcwe~s`., 3ar ~'eoo ss'~ de~e.,c~re~:t be'.r,~ s:~r-.~- tc r rse~ ~Y ~t'e petitioners._ _ ' - '~' r: ~• _ • - !~'c Fohert Cu.nrr'ngs.. ~ epr ese, t„9 t',e ~.er*_ ~. *.I e r.et: t , - : e• ~ 3Fpe 3re:' he-cr e`i l'~ ~.-~ r,~ , , ~o, ~ '• - 9a`-~~ - ewen ire , e^uest .3::^ st =t~ r j. ~.at, : en , . e y'- a c_rg tre c Pc=°" ~~r s, ~ ~+N' ~ ~" i.ert :t was a:.sc r.o*_ed t~a*„ t~e Ct -~r's Foir.~.t ., . . ~ ~o ~'ec e r C , , cp ~ a.j •i e ti"ethod st Ct~.urcF '.ad ~ . o~r,-.r.ed t.~ c cv: de ; t;~e :oa`- p. s ,~ r c, ~ . c'• ,r.~± r I.j ~ . ~ 3 : ecrq a~ 3 r,eed fo: ,.!cg '.c~ e de:: d sere:r 3r .~ ~:.d r, 3t ,,: e r ,-~,es ~I r ' _ , rec~:e 3:. r.~c C~: f~ n_a.. i~r.be~ o~ ce~e.cpn?~ t~ . ,. 5-,±~e:;: r.. ~'~ ; ~ ~ti^: ,:~oward i,oudce. one cf tr,e pet`t~oners ~~~ed he~ 'FF_ _ o- ~ C e ri.e cTn-s;:^r ard s~ ,• ~' ,~ t .s w~ fe we:e the ewners o.' t~e prcpert~.• nr ~'~:r*_~ Le:r:er: ~ : . .e tree' c; w'r- ; * i e a;c i i :;er.t deve~oFment wa. to be cor,st_•~~ted~ 'r:;t I-e w_shed t ~ .r . ~e ,r.7ours ~;~ ~~'~. ., i , ;; .ard was orig~.~a~:y procured 'ov 1'-+o:.-a-The:rra Ca _3t - -p P1 j~_~, L~ 3.~,: z. ~ ~ p: +~,o ~ - c ~ro t • ~ . _ I _ of ~te corpcrat~or~ .~t tFe t•:te r•±; 3~r.,s•t.~,, ~+~,t s ~ e r, r s w_ a wcta , ce !: + t~e • ~,r.~- . ;` heen disso_~ed .3r.d ~:e ~r.d .:c wi-e ~ id ass.ned t~~ a ~ corr•r,: 3 F c 3~ . . sset.s c tte ~a:pcr~_..,. ''~".: ~-cuder. tnen p-eser.tec a pet:.tio:. s:qr:ed bv i99 er~c; s~c f>cn_ o~ th P E pl~,~~~~: ~,~. ~ ` „t,. '"r . i.oudon ther exp_ai.ced to the Ccrr;T:° ss~.o;; how he ar.d ~: s w= r -. _.e {~e eree ~i • ~~F F:o;;ect s:nre thi~ nuest~cn h:iri beer ralsed b~: pecp,e ccta ;.o r~: :eq c•r~ t_-z~-~ ~r,- Rer:t, th3t _r. exress of ter ~ea.;, tr:caaf' ~~^er,Ck;e:sF:c r= ~3:..o:s cnrr.-:'Ltee~ inte•e-+e~ _ "o~~runilY a_°fai.ts~, t;ei.n4 a rce;r.cer .,. ;..~ °orn~.e:. p.-es_der.*, c: the Cc.3TCe° ^ c.rr:a~er~.e. ~,~ ~cimer pubi .sher of the 4rahe;T: P.~~^'eti.r .' e. w'±t-; c.`te-; .eser ` t~.e ; ~ . p. _r• '„ur~r ~~,~;~~_._ s~w tre reec ~or ~1tim~te ~e^e~,e.comer,*. o~ t're dowc~ow; ;re~ s-.:, P*r:uY r.~~ ~~•~, ;F - trrouoh th-,:s pe~•.od to t~.~o aoout t;,_s :edev2:cFr..er.t 3s ; ru.m~.- _.~^ r~ Lf?_. P. ,C° ~.. _• n ar.y tve.~ •p_3r~rec' stuc: es we*e ore~ented ti~: o~.or. ?he F: cre~ t~; cwn?: s of ,ne ~ow• ?cw~ r r.cwe~•e:, these we~e n:ocked d.~? to `t:? ~:.ab`:.'.t~: ef the Frocerty ow:e.s ~i r,~~e dowr~,t;u~r,, ;re, t~ :ear.h ~n agreemert cr ,+n~• p_~c; tr,t ,.~c~ ±i~.e these ef{c-ts =a' '' .ed .3 d ±:~.~n a~A-,, .e~ ~,v,:,. ~ ~.t seemed to ne the gene:3: cp_ =cr. t~.,t tte or,e wa•, a~~o^p_:s- tr_; wo;'_o k~a +i~-c ~: - afre: ts ei an ?~ d id:~: or w;.ti~ , a'r,o.e pcciect ?r ~ . _ - ~ ~ W_.'.:_C ~!: ~,r, i ~3~ 3.l'c~ . r P, WC-!is. t~.e p~•vs~ca, p;.es?cce c~ a:.ew de~e.cp~rer.t we~.r. a•' .as :~•,.~:~ a - ~ ti ,^, , . o..ow~!; tr~at se~~er~:. T.en.be_s o~ trese ccT.re_*±e~s ~+d :;;? ?±o~ _,+ ~,~.~ . . _. . i'. . C;44 .E. tl.ev wou~d dc ti;eir pe~sor.a: uT.rost to 'r.ri., ~r:-.s ahou± .~! i-:.j~•~c .....__r.a-.ec . : e~_tcr~ ~.n `he ~~ea; tt::~t at t~e .iTe t~i= tru;, we e,eet. rg w•±r :Fe C ni~er F ~ c~. J ~ CC!P.'t :L825i the 4c~~e.rr C~tv Co~r,r-_: H~c .: ~~r+`.r:a nt~~c'e= ;?.r ~or =.. . . " ~ ` ~ ~ . . '~ :-li:c ~'.:C. ~ I G- r,.c. Grue~. snd Eccr:on:c Rese~rc~ 4ssociates te est.~~:is~ ; rt ~ A,~ ;f ,.o._ . d~ p~ce o;. `.~- r, F ~:~.t~. ar.d the re;u,ts of t;.ese t d?= were a•i,ttr~~ o~ p;.h ; ~r~~ r j iar + t. ct., aS ~cr•st ~:t:v ir.d~cated .a need f.r n ai: r.e~ ,~ tv ; e;. d<r ti a; cro ~e~t; ~rR,ed~ zt~_: ~r~, ~ i _ . ,,.P, r ... ~re owntowr- sreFp:..r.o area c:.! ce t'. ~ r ee~.der~ts o{ the-e dece.oFrrart; wc~;:,' .o-, .' ~~ ~co' •,u fae--..ries :r•d serv:ces, m~ki~.o .t e~cr.o;rSc.,:..v ~es.:ar;e tn ;ede•.e:r,p *~ c+o~r *c~~ ~;.a:, ~ ?r~t ~Fc.o?'a,tP_v two ar.d Or.e .-~_~ •,ee:5 ago ece o tF:e -ej.*c_5 .~dv.sF-i thec . :.Fw - I r.:o~2 ef prope.ty wr,icF rrtgrt i:r tr.eir u:ren~ent, a~d sa~d oj*~e: wt: ~ _ ~ , t: oze;:gh s*udv was T,de o* tr e o± *_ F t "' s ~ '~ `~ • • p er a_ o. t:c prccezr~ .jp~roi_nat?.~ or2 •a'r {:; r:.~_~ t~~3s p~:r~:ased 4pprr,xirt:ateiv ore .~aa. ,c~ +i:ev dec-_ded ~.ct tc de~e.op +he ~rcpF~: se_ves, but to piace :t oc ~ne m3:ket .;o~ru~es were ~r,;:,ed io ', e. . de„esc~e.s, .a~:d ;s ; tesu_t o* tn~c ~,r-;,~v were -:ertac•,ec . ; ~.err~ber1of ti..e ,,**c~;r.v? '~ ~ Foar,c~t,ion chrouqh ore of the re~.to:s; t1,~t he`o:e tiev entered .~r.`o ~ pote~'...,. s;:-lc~ tr.e prcpertv fcr the proposed p,o7ect. evecv e:~rrt was r,~de tc T,~ke cer*.~i;. ±';at :r we;:~ he i:: tt:e best ir.terests of tl•.e a:ea :jr.d of ti~e City: ;;,ere we*e :r.~r:~• cis`_*~ *r, ' o;ects ;_ s:T~:+_ F= r. Scuth ein Ca: i ferr:i a bui.t bv ~;:is fou; dat~.~~~ , 3r,d e~ery '-~cei. :-, ~ was d;.scussed w~tn profess~.or.~:s arc ba~ kezs of t;~e Cit~~ ;~.~ men~ers ;,= ti;e.pP,,os ::~~~~ i ~:o~r.mittee oF San D:egc, ~rd 3:. were hi h ir, ti~e ' ~E:~e~Cr' ; , 9 prai.se c~ the pro'ect l.~,:.de ~:c:r. ;~*° ~ :s .~ ratai•/st te c«=ve:.npn.ur.t, i:r ; eudoc cor,tir.ued. tt,e: e we:e se~era~ Fo~.r ts ~.e w.3c~e~l ~o preser.t to tne ComT_.ssion fo_ tr.e:- r..oneide: 3t._or : ( ±''e F,oFose9 de~.•,.orn,~nt wc :. ~ c-c ~ec ~ • jo,', ;partrr.ents, ~nd the 's3r.d use permitted or. eue~ect prcpe_tv pe:rt.:.t?ed ; ~ ,.~v ,?_ :;._t :. '!.e .,.cre~sed de~:si.tv me3ct ir:creased re~~er.ua, P'eser.tiy the ~ioht and w=.ter :ever~~~ F~o~ t.i.r e,,G;.. 1,:~ d=~;etoprr.ent was $372a ye-~-, 3nd ~th ar: ave: ioe ;rir.:.~~u:r c~ tf~e esen. i: r: -- - ~o ec.ted for h ~. ±~ P' + 9: _ ~.~ yr,r.' ~3~.~.I P- J t ese i9e in_ wouid me~r. a revr'nue of $0,000; (2; 3vd: _:kt: ,, o~ ri~e ~ as! '.ow ;r;to the dow;~tcwn a;.e•~ since tne p.oiect did r.ot pzovide 3nv E~r,i,it~ec tn +:he :e=:de~tc except 3 smat, w3~,t~e.c d:yer ~oorr; and t~,~.; was dor.e u.~ o P~p se.v te er:h3r.ce +_ne s.~_c~- or *~ e , p'.%iect to tt.e a:ea ~r,d ha~e tne res-de~~cs of tt.e pro,ect :;e~or.~e p+~ti~_pa::t~ c~ tre ccrr,,:::n:_±v ~. which tiiev i've; ~?; rr.e~r: cpe:~:h;e `rro-:e of $4,OOG ~ i w . ' 2i: w}..~F Wo~,:d ~•2a ~'Sd ~"~~~ 3 ;e3~, or one-n3_r ir,~. .o- do,.;u:s es sFeroar:e .r. tte do~v~.t w,~•ea, ~4, [;t;~ ~~er.j, ~ ~: cm th? Ci ty wou.~ ,; A . - o;. .~ sa:es :3x - tr~s rou.d n:er, a~ ac!riit'_rr.-~. ~5.?`,0;~., _~.= r~,, ~ -'.~'iiTESy C1T~ Fi_4i~h_f.G COhl~,i~S!C';, . Ap~i, 24, ~.9c-7 ~: r , 1J: l!ARiAfeCE `0 _i8E_i -(~i there were t.rnse wt;o we:e intere;ted :r. this develo~rtert w},~ ;;s„ ,'Continued;' ~•iewed a s~mii3: pro~ect, ~nd it was t~oped these peooie wece te~e t~.e Ceur.c i Cnarrcer ted,~. to express ti.e~ ~: ~~: ews si;~ce t.i-=y ~r d c;!.-c su:pr~se ar:d ple~su_e at tte de~~e:cF~°e; r theV ,,_ewe^ i;. zespor.se to Cemnussicr. .uest~~or.:cq,- ~~1r .:o~~'or statr^ t.h.~t ±I~ev ~sF~c „ a~~:,3,:; - ~- - per n:crth; 'rcwe~e:, the -er~t.3:s preposed were cetweer i,~ ~~ .~rd J 3...ri per :rc:r ; i. • ' _ ?e:r-~~d W_ to_d~! , ~..'?2 ~a:k 4ve,,~~e, .~FF°'?'~d ~efc_e , .~ ~c~r.~r.'s=i-% r,r . ~~: ~I-~ir. T~(?2 '.t A!~~~lf~G~if.t!V C_237 ti~gt :..e ~:1~ ..~ c.J-.?ti^..~_ !.: `L _r,- .. . ..,... . , c t . . - ~'i . , @~ i - .. s~ ~~~ G: o f': t ~r.y w~y shc.:~ d i*_ oo a}.ear. r; wc i. he ~e i~ ed - ~~~.s w e r r t c.;-, . ° hB w91 te~' tG ;~'3kB t~ :6 St.9t2n'2nL [, * j ec~use c~ s.,.,e . ,, ,at.or, w._cr ey rer. ,.: ~,~; ~ w, ., i wa; oo.;.c tr^our.hc,i*_ *.;.e .arr,:c ±.~ ar,cu± ~ ~ n _, +~ _ s F c,~e;~.; *nyt ' - s _ w;; .p :-ec-~~~se re f ad wcr.kzd w t~ ';1. .ou~cr ~e rzr.g ; R~.~t r ., p'c• e,. ,c.~e*.har ~r ~~, , : ~ ~~-. . n~ + re w„~rl; he cuotec~, trat we-e sor.e c~ ~. s~e:v de=_- a,_~c a , E ~ :'i arr ~e_ whc f ± r~,,. ~. . . w~ a_: ,. t : e. ~ , ; . , _ F e~ otte_ sz ~to, r t:.• p~c,ec.t t.r:~r re ~•~ ~,cwe~ *' w.v~ r.- -,~ . ~.i _:v~no _,~ tr.e ~~r'ter S~3te -~ d r:~':a tte G-i~,_:ear r• ~,. : wc• _.. w:t~ ~..- cc~, , ~c2~r,e_v ~.~~ina tF.e p3,t .~ •:e, . :t ~~.,s ; r`,rt ~.a T.c ~r~r c :e~. - ~~, ` i ~,i,tr~ pee~:e ca;. he y c.it ~_e,.o. w_t~c~,t cn:~. '~ •.~ , ~ i ~ ~ erer _s srd st.~,. ~ ,•~• 5.:r,:ects; tnaL ~e wa; ;c: ±re r-opesed -'e~.e cr!;er± a,5e ie fe.t Nas o~,c ~ ' c~. .i:U~~1t'i: tf:-1i, ,iCF^OK'fi~ALE_V _G ~C V@~3cS e.10 . ~'(' .~]%'.. +~.p i., _ .. . . J. ~. ,. -- ~^ . _; -, ~ . r, , ~e~~rerce, exFressi.ca _s ~er=~n~_ conce.- ~;:o..t~,,re .~r,-e ef ±:.- dcw• t_w, ~ - = ~ ~ ~ti'~3 .~ V@:9:'S ;' ~ •',.(~ ~G!(.E' t~•~.:~6 9 t'pfi~. 3 rOT.iUf.' N-. ~F P~b':.r -(1•, . iL~,G .i~. \1 i:'f~3 [ j(' OC~ . r ~ I rCVJ i .i1~,2(: .. ~:I~'~ f' WCI'S ~ f:3-I~:E! .'•'!7 f 2 r~.~ir f, 5 n~' ^ K CW~cnUP 1f(. -~l ' ~l ot w~~it is ~>.FFe ~ru to ~.~a'~e 7..~ a~d not ce~cme cor.re_,.ac.,•' ;t , ~; ~:, r i~i ie ~c, _ tFe `,i:st c~~:r~r3~ or ~`(i:st. , Pe ewy. n._ttee _` t e. ~.; t i. ._ Co:! e~ce; c:.at re i~d ~e:~:Pd r,, .ueus:v o t-.~s ce n:,*cr •^ .~e c-:s. ~r. ~ 3dd~ ~.cn, i,ad atte:;ded :r ~• v o c .: i ~ ~e :neeii.~as ~ n s,,t i a~ . ~r *h e ree q~ ; e ~ i ~erew3; Ac'v_sorv ~:o;rn.9?tee 3~;CO:I ted ~y t;e .,..t~ Co~rc'i. w_t. ~r_ r~< - !' ~ .o: ~ i<r. ~er.. :r•.a *_re [conomic Researcr. 5sso::~tes, :~.d ~e t.ad lis±~r.ec repe~ted.y ~:o _:,e:: v;~„.~;.,,,- - `! presected cy c.ot; of t - - eese o~.i:st?nctng ~esearc~. fiires o* wr~t we,_.d ;.~r,pe, ,_n ..~s ~-,:~.~ ! '~ we did re; take r,cte of o~_: c c.::. ,::d more r r:a6-e : otz ~ar s .-, F~ ~ ihev ~raolF :e~neri:ed; t:~-t ~ive e~~s o~e wa~ se•c aus ~ - g ,s C .r~r . c t A ~w.: .'or ,i. t_e o~ ti~.e ~' aT;;e :`o rAr > >+ •~v:• ~ r r.~ c.. E ...~,^.P a ' : I f - - _ ~ -: ~, re . ot;;.side o: E C.i.t) e~s~c t.r:_ at:c ~ •ec ~:ea c,c .~ :r~ r ~ a~.~ess t`.e ~~.~v toek t~e :•~~i;i .._ : cor.;riu:~ . ,.. ~,._s.ae er:~e cF,e. w ~:, cc . F i _, risk ~,is mo: e,~; t~ev a: c t.~ ecco ~tee :epe~ted.,, •.e~e was ~, e-:- ~ ~r .. ~~ _ Wi~~ ~ ~ the ttou;~:e of p~ttu~., ~;qet~e ou~ f've~ =~ twe: ;r- i~ I o' Sr7r.e:r, '..imse_', w3 ,,e io yo W.e ro.cie of n.tt: ;:e=e .._I,A ~. _ ...i i•..?O 3 t':.9 2.^.OliClr. i:t,; t"v :^~lkc ; t WO:~tt if'.E: W ~_. _. ;. N=~ ~~55. h. E i , .C;~; i~.., . .- _ !~I tl:we~~e-, LIE' dGC~@:~ ~t':5 W9•.~.:Ca. ~~i±. ;ee.r5 w :5' ..,~.~L cL97t 1.0 ~.~~_. .C:ii: . .. _'. i owr. bce`.st, , ,- :ps i,efo:e se;cecne e.se w=-. •.c:re ...,~to yc . „_~r: _ , . - . . . . .. . , _ . . - r r, . , c,•dar st yt.ed I.e w7s a ci::Ke- c~ o:~.~esaior ..,s e~e: ;~r~av ~, ~„~= ;~ ,:i; i ~:'. ~~. ~S i'.1,~ :in~1.0:.5, 9f(' 9g 'li`..t ~ ~ ' ' ~ .._. ..... e~ o. . ~t, , r6e: r_ _;~a e ~ wC'J~.a .r0f ..E lf ~~.f: ^ i ~:' SC C•'rf. `~..~:7 ~ .~.ir~r'dt•, i, .. ,. . .. . E~!`CL' ^,." . :.C~ SCl1Qf`i ~I"~,2 .l. ~5. ~~ a ~ ~ ~ ~• . • . ~ ^ ~, apc,ed Me~e ep•i,~~ ~ w~s r c -~ '^ ~r r;e: c:o~ect witr a~:c e c~Te .. t:_~ t 7~ e ec~ ~- r .. cf 'e s~~ic- st esT~r. of 'v~ ;'.e ~., C~~ae :• ,Fi, w ~ , CP:~GC LtLI _ '"~'' z ~e is t at ~,~o~c ~t:drir.er•t 1s ro :c.t : tt ~- .,c . c _ .. cr~~ ~.: ~~ u ~ ~ ~i~' ~u.d or,> n,,~e ::coF~s'~~ F:= °ct, ynd ti•~at t cseHw,.c were ~.i..~v:. _,a , .. ~,•_-+,; ., Oo ~.. t-^ t.'15 j J2 o;ect 3f: d Go1•.G i~ b1BNi c,.t . .~ ec~. t'tl'.t° 0:~~\.n~~ci~y•~~.~_~~.C .._. ;c~ ~. .~.e .,.fo_n;~t:or tc fo:m ~ p:.oper ludamer.t ._ ~ ~~: 'crd7~, ti;e~. cor.tinued ttat ~'rev had pro~eec'ed to est,i,.,.=.~: ti~.e ~acts w;.ei .is f i-st rame l.,efere them to determir,e who Robe*t Cummir.gs •~v,; ~ t,: s: EF~t;t.'-cr. ~r o~ . ~ :es,r.or~sit~iity; i,d t~:ey dor.e these F':: ec±s beforey we.~. c:ey exper•er.ced, wou.n -- ~ I ~:e know.!,ew. couid teey i~e dependeo upor? li:e ~:;~r~m~nq~ ..rm w~s ci,ecked ,.,. w r!--L~ , : ar;kers, witt~ peopie witi~. wt:o:n tt:ey had worked e~ pro,;ects ~imi:ar te ?t::sn ;~.d w~t; , ~ commurity w:.ere they had pe:formed such operationso it:e•r ~.ad -i~~w,G~ c,,.,' so~:a c~ ~f~~ - I ,,.. _ _ ~., . suc'. es iuti,er lowers: ac~ ;iao r. erkec: w,th the banker wt:o had 'n.eer. ti.e C~ • o~~d or '~ ~tc,s of ti,at pro;ect sir~ce ~.ts incep~:ion before this lewer was ever b~.:iit ^~~ ~~r ;ie~~ .~,'F,~ c~ecked witi. tt~e city o`fic:als nr S3r, Diego, with t'r:e ~:~,w,.*nw,: ~,n Diego ;sscc;.~t;.o. , tia,~~`y. tr;e ~ousir.q Departme;~t of the Federa'_ Gove.r.~rent wno were :ecpocsir~ie fnr ~~ne•.:is~~ a~: d~. overseei.r.g thes= projects, ar.d :r. this ir:vestigatior. t'rey F:~d ci~t~~r.ed : et~~:i:~ but r,• e :r.,or:rat~or: sbcut bo*_t: ti~e p=_op_e w'r.o prnpose ~i:is and tf.e pio,iec±s ti,e:rse:~ec.. 7':.e rh~;Ir;,.ma~.`s ~ Foucdetior. was a.so ;r ces~9-: ;t.e~ : ec.,use it was feit mec e~: fo_rc.it.i.cn wj> ~,ecess.a: v: ea,rd_r.q ' t~-is F.odv of peopie who p:oposeo 'to come ~cto t;~e coT:~u; __; ,;:r~ ~.i~,;d tr~E,* de~,e.n:::re..-. _ , o; _~is w~s der.e cefore ~!~:. !uudoc evei signeci 3; opt:or. t,o ~]:ew ?.rese peep;e to nutc;;.~,=F'... * , f ~ ; FrppeT tv. :1 ~' r,.~z ,~ I . ~c;;!,~, tt~ ~ 52.eted *_t.dt : ~.umi?ei of ~taterrer'g r ic; !EE ~:ade i~ ;re .ac:.,>is m=e, 'i ~r.d :~se ,~;SCUSSior. -;':d cetr.~:E: ts woir' r.ade ~ t;~ coi~.n.;.t~' w~i:'i we-e oi ccrc;_~,,. r.~ i, Pe:c;ie. -~n~ it was e:~.v orpnee tc~se ~.EOC:e si.ouid :~E c~:~rer;~d .~to~,; •~"~ ~.,., . {, r t •~ + ~p,T.il.Ji! t','/ . . ~. LGE V~?d! 5 f-~.B I18C ~~@B:- :;.~.7 G ~OTJCII!'.' i; , , t ~ . ... .., '~ ~I -• , . .. . OTC~3i~. 5. d'-'- -. B ! f ... .. . r, F ib+;rq;ITE~, CII'~' ~i4^:i;~f~"; ~ ~`!i?G'»:C^. , A~::° _ 29 .90' ~dG~ i~ ~ '~4R.4~•'CE ~C? .Ht. • ::9!",...'G9ru^ ... ?('. . IG ±r:~t w~.; . .. r. t^e t:ect .; *e;?st, ~f tre ~Coi~t~:...:ec: ~c;::r~in:t jr.;. -- ~. ., ~~~A e ~ot c~ r~= -;,,,,. ,;,:es-. -:p.; .., . ,e ,NO_ , ~.,~e ..., r3,± -r. tle c-c~~ect, t~ ~c ~ .~,c :a. . .-r.::,~rt ~~~~. ., ace : e~ +: : : c *' e c-e,r.os?~ Tyca . :G: ~ rta~er,? +: .: . :. c o~ : ::~ _ ., _ . t° r.o;~ q '-~: ur,des~. i~ e +:=r.a; ?s t~ ; ~~ ~..~ r ~ppei:e-' ch~. ~o~~rr, , _e,:. :~ . •i ~.: ~ ~vr.c .:s-te~! t~eae Frc~e:±; ~.a-- -ee:, tte .*.',pe -. r.Ar,p.e Nr- ...~. ,.,~« G,r ::*: _ pFr.c e ,,e vn.:r carer.T~. jn~ ~. , h~.,~ ., ..,. ro :r so: ,_ , : .. . ;r.d -. ... K.~~. ~ . - F;ecc.e w!~c ..,?w.,.bac t~ . j~, !... ey* .~._ t~:a~. ..~.~ c~~w ~,~~: _ A. .~ rc r.~? r„~~ - ,r^ .e,t~..~.e~s. w~~ ~: _rFV we_e _... ~ e, . a~.,:~~ , e _~.. ; r. c ;e3• . • +`e=_: pecc_e were ~ ^t r c:.C a, . t! ; i ~~ ...> r~:_ . ~~!st ~ t.e-. ._.. ai ~e = ~. .. ~c . ~e. ~es r. o:~ier te r ~ a_ k .e to . e ., _rec~ .ac a: *. e: r . .~ ~t _ w. . . . ~<, . ~ . . .. . tre *.P.e~*..ed ce. .. tt~t .•~ _~ .i t, pe-:~ ;*.e~ .. r:~ =•rv c~e._. ... ,~::. ~,A~. ... :' ?~'! l'o3r5 Ca ~? ,-aY~ 1. ' . . i... 74'U ~ (. 1~. ~%ll C2' f?.~:!:. i. . '^~I v.~.~ ;:'~ . ,. !'CI-.. :. :~~• i[~. v . ^.n,n.. . .. . er:.. +. . ~o _ ti.e r.r nc~ ;e^ r ro ., ± ,, ~I ,,..re _, e . e ~ . - , ar - o•r:r~. . -,. i, _ . ~ .~ t ~ ,v~:_ ..de=.r~i~.e :e; 'e ~., c. .!e ..-•~; ~r-~t t~~~~ ., .- , . __ -. .~a: b*.~. ,. ~:~*~ r.l~~ e~;;t ~r.r~ wA,t. s':'e~, c,~ •.'e -..;eet +re-e were ;~r.-e.:. :to:, 'c :0 ~;r .. . • ~ . - ~.:-,.AC- . '.I. '.)_+. .... ,. .._ y'T.~,a`- W~~ . ~ ..e ."2E. ~_•E _~:~.' f~~c~:"? '~? i:l.~. ... ._ . `;~~:f~~'.i~..'.'/, 'f!C~ ;'Ef.L 1.. wo: C ' i- V'.r_i,~r~ .' F :. E: t~l: ~ . ~ .I .. . -~C:'..<.?~ ~.. . ~. ... ... . ' ' .. ~o-1"S. ('.E ~f~-1!'~ ..?'~~: .P1: 3: . . '.._ . _ . :_.~ .~. i.. ..:i: ? -. _ ....'.~.r^ .~! ~[ i-.;~P~P C'~?\P:.'~L:II~E:~.t^ .~P`,^.C7 ..l?~ . ~~.? ~ ~ ...~~ .. . .r'. ,'F: .~, ' f'E'. '~.i,.......~ 'crdar. tt.e„ :e~.,=wc,: . _~tte: . ~ _.~~ ~ __.-`c~ w~- , ; .. 'ce=_r _ i ~. ;r -. (%-v;c'.`•,.e?! ._?:9t~ct .s rcGi:.. ..a .~ .., . ~9_ .. . ..,.,-. ~~. , ~,[. .~. .a~:~ .. i.~~... . .. ...: .. ._. - 'c. ..~Cf:S ji.("? i'c~LE"! _ ~ ~. ~: E '. .;-V .. ca; ?I:" . it`!~~~ iC -; .] ~v:~ . i ~. ' .' E ..-~,. i":c~::}.i'.E . . ed;ca tk:e ti~;,;~. ., ~~~~•s , a. . r •,~r•~,a W9_\@: Wl< .':2: ._ .~wc' if( '9', .,'n'c:F ~.~.ma- l~ ~~.e. --rc" ~,, ce:- . - W.~E? W ~i. - .. .. . (:?'.E~.~:[~~:i:E!... . .,. .~.7~'. .. Y~'.. .. ... 7~ ....' .. ~ ~ ... .'~?f: ~ ~ .. .. . _ ..."~ . ~:i ~:.~_. '. na =r~~ eti W: ~ . . t~a i.. . _ ?.' . .1^.. ~ i'< .. ~ .. _ " .. _ • . c C i , ,. . - ... , , .. . .. ...`.(:.f`C:fT~F~ j: ..~~'.fe ?.' ~ . ~' , .e;., 1~... . _ ~ .:(`L'~.-_ ~ i..:r. ~f'e' ... . .. °f.? :?i: i .. . .. ,:. .:~ t~~.e~ C:_~F..~.Q i _'~~ '2`.. '_P~ F,:.. tv'. ... ~,. .. _, C' . .- ._. ~ ~ . S ..n f:.JC,,r. , _ ,:.. ~. . ~~ . . ....~,F .~~P•~ WI'f?i. f~,YP i~3~ ~'" ;2_. r: E ...,'C;.... Wi' .i... ., ._ . .. _.. . _ ....... ~'~F~='. .. _. ~ w~ !. _?5;, tf`..9:. LnE r., . . : Er ... ,.. .. _I E ~. ~.'.~'. .. . i7=, .. , ,. n -.. it '.t: ' ~ .. . . . . `? -. •e , ;;e-- ~'e•,~..r-A:.. . ~>= _ ~o s ,. re~ - c . . . . . ,- r~ . . _i . ~ .. a _..depe~.de~.* ~ 3;.k.. a` . -., ,.. , .., , . . . d , _ "-..~ e . ~ . . .~ . , . ~ . ~ - _ ; c:c,. ~e:~ ;.r. ~ irk .r,a. ar.r ±! e sa : r. ... .. ~ e-e: '. ~ ~ . ,~.r ~~~: e , ~ _. .. . . ! _ ~~ c,J'... ~ .. _ ~t^:E. ' ~~~C'•. P: . 't'' . Wn: . ~. _ h'~ . ~!?' ' .. .'.C _ . E. E:. . . ; .. _ ~r - . .. • .. , 54~"h~'!a .~. ~i~E (~~Wi:~",'N~: lit~i. C~:~t ~_~P. [~:e~a^O'r r. C~eo: E'_f.i.. '..P,' i. ..'i.il.e 1i7.. ~. ~C:r'A:. ~f.2: ".,.c..~ .~.i? ~~i. ..1". i.~~a ~. .... .. 'E!. ~BL.. .. .. `.~~? l?;;'_. ~ ... n'...... ... . .. . -~C_ 2~ ,e h~.' ~0~i ?O W~.. .. '-2 ... c"'. 1Yi.., L'. `i-i .. ;' . . '~ELC. , • , ~•F' . ~ _. ~ .'. i7 ~ .( ~~ 1'., t~ e ;:f . , i, , i,.... .. _ '~~t~ ^e~.`•.E' • ~'! .' i~.{ . 7.. . e~ ... 'Ni' . - ..f..~ . . . . . =. .. ,i ?'~ i~l:i.~~C.:.1.5 C~ .:2 .:E3 W: ~,. W;;1.(~ ;;F~L.'. ~,...~r.-lc ._. C:C'.e!'. i. . `i' n .. ',:C.~... ... 'r~~'.'a:~: ~_ . i('.~. _~P_G '.V: .'.. E~ , i. ..!,p ,~...i~:~,r.W~ 1;~3: ,. ~u.P..!1C:E'. ..._ . . . ,.. . '' - ..~..-. ~r~ 9 ,~~'.9.vSi ':C. C:e!~. ~...5 ^GW;'.~Vt: :.aC9~.f:.LC!'.Ett. ti':.'.F,^. - 1 'i';7.'.~c .. ~...., ~ . . .'. .'.(~ .. ~ '.~(~Cf. .f,C! _-t .g_ ~_~.P ~l~ _rI _. B ~- C'.. S C~fC P.~~ a~_C1 Y~-' . ~~7c:~ ~ l. ~ : . ~ie., ;i:cu_ci ro~. ie ..,ro c~e: ti.: e. io: :ed=,.e~:.cae~.~ e: :F !ow; •;wr p~ ^_, . ~ ' i.F1 .E-; . 5: C . '~~.. W i * .~~C.i ~, . 'j~ ~ 1 7T '. e . . j~ Oo ~LI a-1!'' ~'~ r ~ ~ J ~ Y s` ate re GF 3a ,i , es. ~~ ~~ e, ;c.e r, F r.e; r,u: e i. r:. ' ; + - t:.e C' }:~ . :~: . ~ e w i eec.. ~ ~ o. e . t . _ ~ • .~ _~ e . ~~ ~ : F,_ ~ . . ~ . , . ~., t() f~1,"c .~ r~~.rr.E t~, SF2iK I~E ~:.:? '~e l-~,ir.^~:55:7: ?C:;li~ .~ ~ ..:e !'.E Wi~ ~,r?;...: .^t~'r,.:?f? W:'. .'E , ~ F~ c~ e5s o r2 ~ t;; _ w e e ~,k~ ?. ' :o.a :~ ~+ r, ~ ~ 1 ~ w ,i . ~, cw .o c ~ ~ „ ~ . - w=• ~ , '~ 3 Cw-~ z Cc ' e ~,r ~ e , ~ i e ; : n ; ' F ~ v •• t C~cc E7;'~.~ " nra Y ~e "r. _~; , it - *t _ ~ ~ 4 . F-~c E +r r ~ , . f r ~ ~~ ~~2C.i~f,•' a G~ t~E~ i ~ 1:1'. ~P.; f~~ i r 1~..,-e:~~E~ c.~!"'•12 C. .~ . ~..r.(~ .,'C] F~ .` 'F • ~ i. f~ ~~~:N.i: ('~ t,~` _~~~k .i~.q ~ .3L . -1 -, D~.I? 4 . -~-,t'". 3. ..:L . . r'C, ~ , . .~'a: ~ . . . . .. ._ l .. . . ~ '~ 1!. . _ ,...ce_.e,~' r~E'.'.t~?(j ?. ! li ~~ ~„ .~,E:.~ ~u/1S ... : C~1.? f. ~t? _~ .P:. ...P . ~~.~~. i..., . -. u\E .~F_ ' • ' :!E' ?. f` L@ C~Gw TlW' .1 l91 w? : 9..~ 7 f: tF~P ~;TCCG.c~ C..~ 2~r ~~orC`E f. ..~ ~; r. ~ ~ . ' ~ : . 'N-35 . . .:S' Y,f'i~ 'E Wj~ (( L:I ^.3 ' fl. ~'O_ ~,~ aE. «...,FE'.~ ln". ~n P 'Ni i I E . *~., c- _ .._, crn.e . w.!. ~' i+e- e:` h :t . , -? .< ._re,. w~e: `2 t,e~. ` _. t, t~ e s r::~-e ,cct~ge o.' ; ese i~"9:'Yli.f-f ' .. ~. :.U 7~ i:~:*e~: e w i; _ . ~-~.ve~.e- , i~.e .. *! :- , .. *.r, cc to S~r. D ear ,c~' ;.~e;+; U :ie ,i e ut.i,e- , ~we: ; a..~ ! e r 3r? . . - ~~;e:= nr.e~~e; -i ~ . i' 3 ; ,...3-e .`uot e=F ; :e: r~ ;~ ;-,_-~a; i. w,a cc~.s-1 . ,. .. :_~ i,~ : •;e:c _ ~. 3r.,e ~-e,. ... ,, - -r 3„v. !e wo._c , k= . ,r.r . t. c•~,+. <.c 't= . •n 55` . *t . :er~.:.at..,... c~ .`e ir ~, ~v~,c. v,,.. , ;: ~ i c ~.r p•o ect. i :e ~ e , ~de• . t.h. ~cw~-c ^c: -' - .~ c ,,~ H e - 2., ~ ~ we ~ i' .~,e: c' C'c,•~e e c:: e . , P, .. i~ ' t e :~ ,~e•,.~> •~.+ ... .e:~ ;r~, ti~F j. ,. -A ,.~ _ ~ ~i.? o ~ tt~F~. ; t•. ~~ ~, wt . e r e : e~ ,~;. .,,,. ?i e e m• , , , , ~ . _ . -. ~ . _ e-' : e , r ~ ;a * t e: e•.ad ~< ti.ev ,.:~ f: ,r. ~r . ~ .,. . _ . . t ~. ` -st ec . ~ rere~.e :.crer - ::' ~:e _,: '.c•,~~r ~ 1, al-e-n ize; 1~ : . Cl:'~GI~~ ~.1'ai~ I~~; ±~r-! *.I . t ~ ' ICE' . . ~ S , :.@:I~i,r. . . . f F. . ~ 'nc.. .~. n.p,~ o. . ' . . . . . .. . ._ ~.CC.~i' . i'(:Il~:i.'t.i.oP. ~if~('! .'f.i,' '.~'1::.*.2! .. .. ~ .'E'1l'ii_ .I y;.l,'c-I'. . ... .~... '~.... . c. w.~l.. _'MP_ ., ~ 4~'Ni!TtS. C'T'~ F1.9' 't' ~'n~, - - `,~~~' ~C' . ~.1, qF ; ?-1Ct. n ; ,~ _4P ~ CE _~t_. - sre~~ rUre e- ~ ~~. ,~P _ " .. . . •~P. ~.+ C'.. a.t. . t~i' :~r.~.3 ~..p •-~~ l.^(?t.'.P!lEd, ~.~ . ' ' 'I'~! `E .. 2, . I.. .~B CF.F~._ il . ..C = ,~.`' ... ._.fE .. tt c . .. I .. ~ C ~. _ . f ~~ i~ ~ ~~ I ~`'; ~ ^. 1 i.i ~ _~1 ~ +i.Yw ;~~ 'r,~.~~ n F _., er•e=er.. ~q _ . ' . . ',r ~ • ~ , i. ~ 't i ~l ~.~. .i.r ~,0.2~~:. , .~.. >.{ -c' P. . r.n " a.. .~ _ - _ C~t? P <7:OlC~ ,CWi4 L~? C:;~C. .. ;?rl . . ,~'. .-- _:l~.. ' ... ' 'P^ . _.-P. :L...pl . ~ .f .. : A .. . ~.. . G"t ' ~. i~ (~ ~ia ~ e. t! 2:. ~. 1 . T.f. 1~' ~ ' I . C.: ..r . : _ „ _. .. .. ... ... ~PP' 'CC.... '. .~a ; -c.~~... ..e li. ': -'_ . . ~ . .f r ~ - _ ~~~1^ ~'.GT . j.. . . . *.1 1 J I . . ' .- .. . ~ . . .~~G~ `~C:': . ' F. .. ~ . . '.\'? , .'r:~ . ?f _ ,~U .... , .C ' ~ . . ' - •~n'. ~'~~'~ i`.....':...2 . ~~'F: ' ...1,' .~F, "7' 4 . , .~1~ _ . '.. ., .. . .....' .. . . . . . . ' _;~~ . Ni' ~E' _ ~.CC, . w .~_SC f~.~~~_f 3~~._ . _ , i~ :t .. ~., .,~u ~ _ ~.. ~ . '-- . . , ~1 _ . , e =j ,^.e i 'i~, ~~ ~ , s, etr . ~, . +-:c .o' c e .. ~! , . a .e: ,. ` ~, c . ~ o ` : c 1~i c , ., a•. ~.a; , . • r. ... .+P, ~ ~ ~ . ~. 3• , ~ ., ~ c- , - ~lbr a'. ?f.'f.' .'9:. :i~ ~ ` ~~' . ' ~ e . " ' ~ . . . - ~ - . . . P. .Ut . . ] , . . . f'. C' N 2 ~ e ~ ~ t ; , ~ ,;, .. . * . . _ . . . ~ . ' . D~ 3 . .F 1'". ".Z~ WP. r' .. `~e.. ~. ~, ,_ P~ .. ~ . . . .. _ .: . . . . . . 1 .. C~ f . ~ ~. Fi'.?~ '.; G~ (: P •.e~ f 1 . a' C ~. . . . l- . . .~ E' ~ .i .. ~. - 'F ^, . .. . '. .. i.a , i 'f;l:~.:: •.~ Vl;~r, . , ' .. .-. ~ . . . .. N'f.~fF . ; ~ tE... 4il: F .' C_ . . . . . ~~ ~. '~ .^C . ~.C~ •a , - ~ . . 'E' .?I.LS . . `f'F.~E 3t'.~. :?; ..-. Wi .. ~ . . ... . _ . .., -, , '' . _ . .: . .. . . >~ .~ .~, .,~ ,~. `~' ° ?^ - _ 'c-~ .. ~? _ •e~ , v . Yr . _ ' i ~~ :~.a~~ ~ _ .. . r~ e~• ~ti ~ F , , • ~ .: - . . . . . .. _ . :.• c. . . . , !~ .~- '~".',r • ... tC: -, i _ ~ . C~"~C~r.`. .~n.p"' 11': .. . . _. • r e. _ ,v . .. . . 3• . ,~• ~ C.• _C.a~':. ....ES _- C~ C ..'. ~. , _'r~ . c- ~_'.~I. . ~ . , ` ... " ~ . . •G: .t:t ..?jt . .. . . , , u ;p_ _~1 _ _ . 3f.. K ir. ._. . ~ _ , , . . . . ... . . . . _ J'.. . _ 'C . . ~ . . ..._. , . . . . ~_. ;[.~. ~ . , . ` n~i. e ,. c : _. c . ~ , ~ , ~. ~ t ~.:' @ I T t e . T '. ~ ~ ' ' ~ ; h ^ F, t'~-E ?~:~r:i.,O~'. ~-~.E . .. . n'c ~ ... ._ . .. . ~, ,. yL., .~._ 'G . !.c '~' .[ ~ i~)E~ . . . . :i , ~.. .~ .~ _. ti.. * ii.~ ..^31.u Wr I~e,.'..n'. Vt.~E('2'1e .... . ( , -. C'_ i. , \ ~ . , . . ~'~ C. . . 't' .,y.. ` l.. . . ~ '~ P ~ t ( ~ ~1 ~ ..y~~~ i-aEf~ F_ 3f~.!.~ 1 i" Ni.'. .. ... . - . .. "... '('.. ' ... .... . ~ ~ E.i ~... ^\ ... . . .~. _ i .. ~ _ : l7.1 ' . ~ i '. _ ~ . . f ' P': iC('^ . ir :t , . C'. . ~_ ~ . , rN ~~E ~ ~ ' - C .. . - -ll' . ~ -~ ~ ir t ~,~. _ . N,. . ;e . . , ~ ~ • ... -. ~ ~ - ~,t. ^~-~ 3~ , ~ _ ~~ - F~ . , ~~~ _ ~ e _ _. .. `' ='~e •,~~_ _ .. ' 1 if.~~ . ._ . 1,'~ _ ,.. ~ . . • ... . ... ' n ' . " . .--r ! _ . . -, . .. i . . ' ' ~'~. i I~'...U A' .c . . .@ .. ~ . , ~ . .. . . ,.. . - .~ :1 ' ... ~ . .~~', r . ; . . . ' ~ . L . . _ ' . . .. . i t . .. , . . .- ~ ._,. ~ . . . . .,;GI.. ' .... .~.ta C 1'. . .. . . .~ ~ .. . ~. ' . c .. . ~ ~ , .. . .. i' "a 't' (?['.• , ? . . ~ . . .. . , . .. . . . . . ~- ~. ,. ~ . .,". '1 ~ ° . C . . . l ~ . , . . -. -. .. . '. .:, ~ ~ . . ~ c . . . ` .., . _ , . . ,, 1, r r ~ ~ •,c ~ • ` ~i: . - _ • .. . , , . e ; ~= ~ . . , c ~_ ., r- N ; ..._ , , _ . ' `. r: '~ ` i . v`- F .. . • . . '_~ . . . ~ ` .- .~ ~ r , , C? . . .. n `~ tY~ ' . . 7 . . ~ ~ ~ . - . ..: C +. - f~ ~.v .. _ . . ~ , . . . . . . : . . ., . ' ' . ~ ' _ ' _ _ . . ' . . t~~ . . i C : _ "_.l ' F^ , . . . . . . . . .. ' ' ' . _ - . ' ~ ' . -. , . .. ' . . . _ . C I . . . . . ~ ... 1 . - . ~ .. .....~ i. . C.P ~ ~ . _ ., ,' .. , .. . ~ ._ - .. ~~.1' 3~~ . .. ? i~ ;. vi,~ .. . . -r- C~ =~•_. ~ . " . L . _. . . F ~ . .. J... ~.~t i 'i,i~ . ~r . tl _ ~ ~ ~ ..._, .' ~ .," . h • t+'~ t? \ c ~ .. V.".._.. I ~ '~j ~ ~ J . ~. . ._ . ~ - .. . i . . " . - ' t.I .~ . ... . .:.J _ " ' ~ ' f . . . . L. .. . ~ ' . ' . . ?.. . : ,?. `: 3' ~ ' i , . ' . ,• , w+ ~. ~r~r ;e~.ve; r , ,~ ~. ~n ~ ~ ~ . . . ~'~c • ~~.' . .. 1;~-V _ ~~~ 'rL~.! . Ei ._,^'i~ny _~G h ~ G Y C...r ,! ,P', r- , ~` , Y .. .. .:~C ~'~ . . , ~ r ~, ~ ~ r, . . . ? e •~ : a : . 1 . , i . - .-. , ~ ~'~I~"e t E'E'~.E ~? r ~3 .~- . ~ i .., . i,7 .;C. 'p,7 .... .~ t~ ' ~ ' . _ . i . . . . <. .v~ .. W-._ ' 3I-.C`. +~t. .~'1~~. . t~i.. ~ , ' ' _ :i . . . ~, r~ " r? . .. . ~ . ` 1 ' . . r ..E F c-i . ~ 1vC:~, . . ' . J~ P. ~ P i . ~.n C. . ^t' an•:. •.~..- t~ i fl~'F; 'f, ~.. ~ .I _ 'F'~' I. _ _ ~t ~~ .. 1 ;: t~.. ~ t. _ , . . ~. ~' .. •- r,.. .. i~ .. > >C . ' `i.Ff! : .i . . _ ~ ;~ 9 ~.'~t~i ~ t .. tf . . ~: ~? •N i , ~ ~ ... ' ' , . . _ . . 'N .~ . ~ . . • . _ 7 : . . ~ r 1. .ii.(: ..- ._ ~ (~P T~ ~ . . f . . . . .~ . . . _ . . .. . . .. . .: r?^ , ~ J.^ ~c'~'l. W 3' . 'P_ .. ~ t . _ti ~ r-i:l - .. .. ~.~ .. . _, . t uE, y. ~i~1.n .. ' . ~ . . . -. . . N, . . `'i~`f r, ~, ~ F•st r r ~( , A• , ~ . - +.r . t~ ~ it. _ c ,.: ~, ~r , ~ . _... i ~ ~ . , . ~ i ,;...~iTE~. C.' Gi..4~'~~„~.•!.~ ('~~"`~tr;..,i.~'..(~~`, ~C. . :~1 . ~'f., a~~' .'4F'A`•'~F N(i :3c: ~ ve -~*'.c: c` ±,'~~ i ~~; ±^at ~ ..~' r.,~. _~_ ca~ , _ C'~ . ---Ccrt n ~ec----- ., _ ;KC ~ e -! ; .v ... . ~~ ,*.e .. . , _ ,^re~ tc *.:ru . . . ec:, ;,n~ r ,~,., ~ ,~F ,... , .:ne c . . i~ !~ _. _,_ e_~r= . a-;.,= _°e ('.t~, _ r-e r:a ~ _. .d ti:e C~ ~ a~~ct='_1. , ~~rzn . .°_n~, ,.~ i=- . ~a _ ~ : a3_tc: k.r.ew_;.a , .. , ... .c -. ... _ ~te~. 3:. ra? . . . ~~u. at- ::r,- ;' -r ~ ;~ a . .. ;~ ; e~edente~' w3v ;r _ . ,s ~ a __ ~ . - . .~. a' - jr ;t ~ ~~~: ... • .. _ ~.~,,, ... _ ..~r c~ .., .. .'~,... ~F ~_ .or s ~?ec.r•?.on ~ i 3-:n;~. prc tan: ~e-t•,± ~.;,: s~,.: t, a 3:-.-er•,•~e -.. ... . ~ ~ - . ~:t .-.~_i*e ir . ..-sca; ~o-. . em~rk- aa.d_;r _~.e ~nara~._. _ T'~ ~-a•,n -- .~ . _ ~ ~.e Co:ir ,~ . w~; a •,•..;r . . ~,~i -. wer? -e: ~: ~.~ , p:.. r t~ u,.r *Fe r o~ ~.:.+ at1 .. .' c.. , ae ~., ~; E w~. , 3ra ,,,..., . ..~.*_? ; e~rh .;aw `=r vv , .;i-. . . ~.c . .r.,~.. _+i.. _ *o `_n? . . ~ . „. .. - -~ . ... . ~a • ~. ~. ..;~ .~,,e~s-~or. wy~ .r•~c.~~~ ., -;,N .e . .~ 5 F..:_f.ert~ . , ~e±s 4c^.'~e: :2° .eoi ;~ a ~t eet. ~r.pea_e^ !:e`.c;~e ; e , ,T~:::.; ,. ..~. c~ .,.. .~.:~' r.et' tio; c~ orcos' *_ n~. s ai e' ' v . _, c•cpe. ~, ~,,," ~; ; ~ .e . :.c _ ~.~ ` ~* ` w~;+:~ e: ,i.d . ,,~ . ;~ ~:;e:a:rte.:. ~~F~e w;,, , ~ ,~~ '-F~:. , ~, ..- -. ar.~r~;:e, ~'~ , j - I a %I ~ `.'• C;~,:e ~~te~ , ~~'~ . iRe'• . ~~.c:.z, ~.c,e :ec ~. occ: = t , ~_~~: •-c~ ~. ~ ..;c..~~ ;._.e•_3= .ter.F: r. ,~,~jt n~a ~.e -pe" - +~__y± - ..~ ,.. ., -. .ia..u<< •.. _ F' :e~+ wjs t ~o~ :~.',a~c~i-, ., r,e; _,+ ._ ~r- ccn~~_. _ c..a,- '~ ~ _.~, ,. • . f, , , _ , . «~~.:!e ~co5ed `;,. ~. a; _ .._.. ,~ ' e ~~e~e • . •r. ~ _ .. r . __, , ~~e _ ,. ev .,., _ . • .~ ~. .. ' c atA:~ . ce: ~ _ ce _: 2,e' :-.F ~c. e .: ~. "' ;_. . .. - -. . - . f~ - 'i . ~ ~c~~ a: : ~t~t= + ~~ i. ~ -. , 3: ±. , de~. e..~.F.:. ... L i v: , , w? , t1.e 3r. .. . , u ~.. `~;. j; : r~a,:. , -- «5 . .. C~ w:..:C '.f"E''d ~~+a ..~ ;i: . .. ...., ..-',5 '~'E~ ..a. ~n!. -n:: . "' ~.?' .~ > :~FI~.t .~i~.: . >. / C:2.' :l.! .. .. W~ ±~' t.'~.~ . _. . ~. ' _ .~.(:~ .... . ~C:1~ ;~,t .. . ~. •' C.t?' . _,.?. ' • .. . ,~ . . ~ . .. .. '. .. ~. .... i.. C'. ~ ~ t' 'G,.'~.2: ~ .~.- [~~.. :~. . . :. i. ~ _. _, Lv:.. _ „ =. ._. G?. : . -. '.. ... .. ' .. ... , .. _9 ; t ~n~95 Yn :~2 . .. .. . ".a- ; a~ ... ~ " ~ ~ ~°~ .~ . . _ . . - . . _, ' . cB* . . . ` •-±. -• ~':ee. - r-r. ~t-FC•. ,r ;o. _ • _ : .. .- .r. _ ; -..a ±r.. .E n.._, `C . ; al ' '':-. .= .~c~ B= '.rd ' - 7,. ,.. .. C •r'.-. _.. 1_c~i . jri . U: S~i ~... .' . '~•J~ . . . =:. ?".. C~2`.. i, .,. . ; ;C::.. E". .'r?,. '....,.~:[:~ ~.~'.... . ~~? .~We:_. 1~3i;.. C .~'c. ..'~ . . .:=. i:.E .. . \E .. .. "~L'. .~.0 , G:..._ .-. ~ 'G,- ' ~ ,.. ! ~e:s'., ,-e~~i;25f. ~ . _~. N!'1C''.: 'f;'r '.. `il~ ,-., t.'F' `.' _ . _ .,:C'. - ' :(.._~.: ., ~c~e~ ~i ~rds f~, ~ • ... ,~.. . _ ~.c' , ~'* =e. ., - e.~_, , c.~ , . ~ _. .: u ._ _ - .. _ ~~' tw.~ :~.,.., >.p.. r.et._. -.. -.r- _..;e , .'er*• w.r' ._ .. _. +<• ~n..,_. w ~r - .. e - ~ ,.~,~~ ~ 1~~ _ : {r?:.E'S~. C.a_C . . f. _ .vC: ~ .... _ c- .. TF~^. ~ - .... t~~.,~•. . , .. . ~!"~P [.... [ . ~. " F'. `N^.., t:'.e~^~t. N'.3~_;+_. Ci .. _ . .. .. ' . _ ...~. . :F Y..' :. ' . .. . , .i~ C .. i ':f~~C.. .'\' .r .~ . :?:e cr ti'e~se.~~e;:' '~~; ~o~:o:, '~o-.r,r=~ '20 ~f~,• ,. __ ., ...:e<' :pee re' ; e~' . ~ :cr. ~: , CY. ?C~~C . . wd5 .2G.2t_3; . . ?'..i . . ~ . _- w@`c, .:C: ... _ ~ @tr~ . ..__ . _ i* ,,.. F:r. ~ : iC.C,e,'. .!.4 :f'~ G~i{~:%~"._.^f' 'NC?~> G'..IS;: ~-. .... _=.'.El~ 31'~~ _. . . _.. _. W~.?' .' e . ."E' ~,.c~G:u2l.? _ ' . ' F ^C':~~ r~f:`.~, i -~! e i• :'~ ,-.c: ..~I' i ~ -. "~~'. ' .~`Wf.i.~YJ:. ~lE''1 ?I.. ~!'.~!P.~.. .: ..... ~- .. ~~ . . .. . . ... ... . . . F.' oc~. ., ... : e dowi *_~wc~ ,: e' ;, . 1~. , . ~ "`.2 ..~:w ~a; I:: ., .,.r. : r, ..r. cc~ ~ e,:,- - .. j~ t: . _te f~ir.:!s 3cd ur.ca.l ?.e!. : w_.. i ? ~or e ..e ; : ~ - ~ : i,~A~e: :~ i• ~ : c. ~, . . _ .. . i ,r~' r.'e :r.•: c:cY.e~ r,••.c .- . '~~.e.nrie.c .~r -e !~ 'rec V, .. . :ei .eyar!+:~o *.e .. ~.-~ ~ ? .c.:iert t ec~ r,E A wc;a .'.;F.;:~- .r ,-e .F.: ~ :; _ . I -ac~:.t~, tr:e yo~e::r.ect N0J_^. _ ;C1_f<'~•.`. tfe . c~:~~t. ..-, ;et ~cr+~ . -.,_ . ~ ~C~~:I . L}~2f~. _'t` Ps/P~ . 'c' cr.~. ~:I ' r. '. r ~. . i`„ . = ..... ('_ .' . . .~. -f?' ~ -. t` ._ :ec~:~.,s.~ rr *.~e s±~ter.~,.T~ ^;r.'e i~~ .~r F..~.~~.,~.. -.i.e w~~: c: rr..~. -~~ -. ~ re ac .2 ,.~er.t _cr : o. o' . ,e . -c e: . . 5re .. ~., r.c-e, _. - ,_ _~ c.~; , . . _ ._ ~.. ~ . ~ ! ii: '9 .?e!`. E'~i'.5t1~(~ - ~ .~ . '; . . 't~.P . .?LCG?~^. ..:C.c . '2'.2:^L1,~ i. .,_ B~. . ~ :.f- «,c c~ .~ • ... `.~.._ t~-.E .~P.c. t?X'.~tci~ . ~. ., ?.., .. '67° . .-.., r., . _ .. . .. .. ., ~ . -i. .. ... . :n. .. .. ;. ~ :E'. _ . , , i.0 CS 2' _: EI'.': P .^li..^~ .'.P .. ~^ .. L~ ~. E ~ .'t'~' Cc'~~.'.. . '\'C~~_.... ~ I . . <. . .. . . . ' ..~ . ~ =_*_-sei~.F haa'. -.Ea3..; ...~, . rjce. :?ed ~..,.. ~ i~~c~r.r~..... _ ~. r.i_ _. __. -,_r~e_~._e, r.t:e`4ct -. ~*A: .. ._ +.r~e :'-ti ^A~cs t fc ~ . ;ei• - -~:.. a-. : . . ~ c -'=,y; ~c `? ,D9:: :7.E . - ~.'s .er 3; .. n +, be w.ai ~, ~~ . * t e cece_:,pe~ : ar ::r, ~ o~_- .. ~. . , c ~ . , w,._, r,d'~ ;+_e tie•: h~~.e e_. ~~~. ~:c, ed .c ±BI...: L6 _ . ,. ~~ ..: 1F.? . . .... ., e~ "1 .. ' ~N~.'l~ f.~;t. 4~~ Yf~le~~ CC1~,i(~ ;li~i1C ... LPOC~:e _~~~. ,,.,...., .... . ~~r! ;r~ O~.I:~i.rP`~ _ ... ..~C;'~:. ~ iiC? i~~~ _,1:1~7ti0-3t.:Ci~. ~h'j~ :Pi;'.F?. .'.!: ~;'.''l' T.!.r.ic~ C°0~%" i; -,~.~~._:_Sr~''i: •~,t''~~.._-.2i .. y...~ '~.1. ...._~.iC~(~. :Ei~.L:~_ OE 3 ,.~.,~. -.. WC~... ~2~T .:l:t~' :C~O'~-3. ,. .. _f~c.:'F W(`LI. ~.~E ~' I~~ U ~1K•=N'...u ~ *.h_^r.~.imtiez c` perao~ ; cr. . i:3r. r.~. . ---, . ,... ~ pr ;ect . .-. , c,;... .s , , te' -e;..- r. ±, e peco:e ~ ~. ti~? i n:reo'. a te ~. e~ ,.. i", t~.e er. ~. a C _ c~ , e~~r,~..~.^ ~- ~, u~~re ~. .^r .. ..D'?F'.. ~.a5', ~DUT.f". 3r'.~ 'N.i:t j?:"E'F?~ .if'.p S'.C71".1'.'~:i25 ... ~'.[~C~~S'. .~.. ,...=rtTr'l ?.~f`.F ~. ~:P"f. ~.c :PS"~~E'i:25 OF ?~'E ~IL`:. '~::~ S~:yi F~eais;.i:. 68~ ';r._.*; :er-~ ~tceet. ,Fce~:ed . ~r.P t~e ~oT.r -,., . op:~•: .. . r~?-,ra +.F,t i± see~e~ t~ he ... ~',r ttir,~~' to f;roc~ce j. ~e I:stcr: ~r,r i rer-cr _~ 3rein. ~~.d thereuF;cr. aa~e ti:a ~. =to, . c,~ : e_ ~3a::~ .ar,:l fu~_?re. .; te:: ±i':3t sle ;:.d . _. r~. =i ~;.. , ,. -. ~r.d p:id t3re- :r .. ~~ :,. ~c~: ~r.n:e ': ... .., ve+_s. 3;.~ +!'7t ,_, q: ~: ~nrtr.e~ w:s , .. ,: .:,, ..:. ._ , , -,.~ -.__ ._ : ,. _ .... .+1 ~ . . - . . ... - _ . . F ,. ~~\ ', G-- 1 t . a~\~~'~. .,J ' ~~.i . ~J ., ~~L.' . .UC. .:i]H ~~ i~, ---- -- ~-- ~e-r~e F +'te .~:c'r_e; . C~._=; ,. t• TY,P' _ • '!':`c .i _' . ........ .. . ..? . . ~a^.. tf.@ 'F _~..2 ... _... (,. • . . ~ :r:.. , t'., . . .B ,,. . 'e~ ~"',v@,. ~ ~~ . ~i ~ ~ i 1 l ~ i _ . -;,., .~~er. ~i~te_+ 4~ , ~ c~ :! e ..;s` ree*'nq = ~ , j~ r,~>A~ , - a is;er.t. ^p °~r,., a~.. d~t. +r: _ ,.._ z'2 cco~ .*... ~ .._ e, .:~ .. , . „it :!'@V N'21E .,iLC iCGc.. \ ,..~a 9.:~1 '~'G`.,. ~B ! _ ' :Gf. . . .~... -L~ - . , . e•e 2'Fi`,' J~ T; _ . ~ 3 Sf'v . _' S: ~a_ E.- . . t~ ~'? t" T. 0 _ .. ., (~nC 1" _~. 71: - ~ ...'~.2:~ .OW2:~S 9f~_ "C^.C.3Ct r'f tt:~ ~~ ~ ~:i . . ~ "' . c : ~ i_;. ~'',wC-'~?. :F.i . .~ , r : ~ . : ~ 1.,~ .; r•~~ _,3e, a, ;r, kA . :_ ie . 'i' ;5. . ~. ` P.v r?,.~,~,@e 'e S ~~. C''_ e~_r c , B , ar:^ 1 ~a - : t c cr; 3 a„ t t~ ~t :~e a e, • ~ i. ~. i 3,? o . r. ir w~ :* . Fw-~_ -~~e3 wc . w~ u~ n~ ; t e~ , ~; ; ^ ~ e . s, ~ '~.c: 2t"2'~ ~C "jt:- .. ~1! 42 `~..i L~-l . . . ' C .~ ._ ' ... _f \'C. ../:-.`.C''. ,.. ~N~( C"•~ y L` ~ ~y[. _'.BOG tf-CF~ . ;'Id: r?y ~ :2":t:_~. . _ . -.. G . _ .~: ~ ~. . ~ .,: .,,~... W , ., u_ , . ~.e ~ . ,~ ac. .. ~C('.C' :'e...~ e :-. .: . !.:~ '.t:La^ ~~~ .:P=~. I~O V' -1?~ ~J3~ "f'.P .fa~^.'. . . -; . . rr , . IC~. , . .. ~3f ..:2C1C i~" . ' y.. ~ . r'3".4Ct~-. ..3(, f'~. _Ft~ _. . . _. 3~~;2 L!. .. , -, . ,. - - ~ ~ .. . . '~il.. ~ C.c t^ C~CCP'. 2 . .'T.'E:JI'~ V+35 i:~.V ~ .t ' ' 7-. . . . . ~ . . _ ~ ,J' ~t'.._ . . __ .O:.r,!~ ~ , , . ~ ,.:5=. ..E' 1..~~...' ,. '.:!'' _ ~ .':?' l.t_\' .'2i wi' E'.'@!~~. .?:': c~" ~... . . _ _.. "~ . ' ~ .~i.' C ~r~ "~+t - ~ •'• .. .r. , I , a~ " 12 C• -2 :F;,"•E t~ ~ ..i' e ,~~•. .'ha:B ~ .~r~- ..C~- [. .... -~ ~.v . ~ !J. ,' 1(~rl,~~l T,:, 1: ~ Lr. . ,... . c!i ~' - ~' . .. c . '~@ ,. ?.9p...r, _ ,. ... .. . _ fo tt''.n~. ;~e'te"' ~Vr,'. - ,.. ._ *~c T.~~ -~.+ , _ +c ~ . , ,:s j:.r' 7 _ _ , v~r . . ^c , c.c. =d . F a . ~ . ~ B .. ~' c!. .. :i~ ."e ~'~ _ ,'n: w~; . _, .. c'e. _ _ . r•' F -w.= , ' . _ - . _ . ~n~r .. . . , , . . _ ..f I. ~ ~.._ . ".. `.G. . , ... i~ .7'.~'. W' .. . . .. . .. . . ~ ._ _. i?,.i . Il... .: ~~ ~ln. t'S .._ u:.- i _ . .. . . .. . .'t' ~.•t' .. .'G. ... ,. ,. . : . . _„ - .. ... . . .. ~ _. ~. F1..~G".;" . '.. ' . .. ~ ~. . . . . . . - y. ..P , ~ ' . ~. ~ . • ~ ~ ' ~ ' .. . , . , . i.,.. _ , . ~ .. . ~ ~ ~ . ~. .. .. ' , . , . . ~• . ' , . . . n ~ . ~ +~~.C. .C : " '.!e .'ei 'f - L: :,{: ~ ' . " .rJ r~ , , _ N~ ~ .. I .B'.~.E_'@i .i.. .,__'I:..tE i:~_~..-,~n._.., :B ~C..-....`3~, :,_ ~ . f ; ;L:L._...._ ..':f.'._ 1'.'NiG ..,._ E:' . ~'N' ' . J ` . -' _ ._ . ' .,~~' ";E'~ ..'[~.~ . - _ C ~.E' ,'ll' . . .(~:_..." 11:C ~.' .i.. ..1~.: ..t. 1! _,:E.~)[.~F. .. I!.? ~ ~ ., i~ ~~ • . ..c ._:r-.'t_ ..,.. • _. .-.... .F• .e:~:Et - .•_.- •- . -.r' ~-. ~.-.~ .?St _~ . ,n~' ~~:.,... ~ ... i:.`.~_.. ~'~'._.. l:'. .; .. '('. ,., . _r..,- ..'!!' .~ .?i^ C' ;~, • µ', ; ~1 ~ 9 ~ `I .4Y . ~.~'3`... \.,-..'.f~, iU ~l:F=.. .'y.. ~tCi i~[;"rl~c~ .. .,. ' r~ -. .. .-._ ' .. = ~ :7 . ~ . . . ~C~.I E?F~p.'. .: (r5E . . ~ , c . 4: . ~ 'hr~~ .. • . . _. . .....'E C'. , . -'i'r.~. ~t c~ . C~c. *. ,.i . " ~ ,. ... . ' 3;`~ '~e~f ' ~ i. ' ~' .. << . ~1. ., ~ . ' .LI'~.:1 ... ~ -. ~ . . ~ ~ - = .:~. `~,- .~e ;,.;t~. •r . ~ -. _ . . re w~, ,.,. •~,.~,s ` N , ~ ` ~_ _ , . f~ .iY'. :=..~1 .~ '..ti. .:(= .t.'. './ .. . . ~..•.C'~...N ' i_- =..t-..'3.~' .1~ ~ 'Nf-'.r- r. } e t.:~ ,~ ci.. c . .-F _ . , +,'• ~ V -~ . ,. , ' _ ic t~ ~~eea_~, r _.,:k • :r .,,...ur r~ w.. ~. .~~e .., `~• . ~.. 'o° ,: . ~ . tieLr.cw; ~_cwr -:rer 5:., :i y-ei. . , , . . ~ • ., , ,. .. . _ t~. ~ee• ., ~o~ ;i • ~;.'a .. : ~. ~ .- ~, - , ~_ 3re: ~~ -, ,N_ _ _ ;r :F .;i . . - ~ i ~ . . e N . . _, q ~_c ~ a6 ~ . F . . _ . . a c,; a r - _ ' ~ , ~ , : , • e;; e,; c -~ , - awa ,N~ .. : ,•,;e :,ee~ :~«~ . ,, e ~ , r.~.e~ . ~;:e+; :,c--a..: . ; ' ' . . 4 . . . . ..I .C .. i• .. : ~~.`.. i~.~ `f, !'.I~_. ^..I .. ' .i ..~F.i ~ ' . .~.~.1'^f CE-. . . ..~ f'~ , .... . ... ^~ .1., , . ~ = .i.re i ~ i. -.. .v:= . _ . ., ei u=ae~' , ' . . . . ~. : P ~ . I ~: ? ~ . , ~ O • ~ , _. . - . ,('; ~i~~~7t.cti ~C::( •..~:~;! . ~ . 2 ....!r~~ ~~, , C... t,: , . -~.'~ ni ~.(~f- c '.e- u c . ..I ~,i• ~Vir . +=•n .Ei ~, re;•.,rl . e cr ,.~'.r.: -ea:. •`~,, t~.e ~ ,.o i' •= ~. ~ ., . . C.. ') . Ct=~ '~F.~ . 1~t',~':. i.~C ..~.i.i~...~~:,4 W'- , , t ~ i~ _ ._.. .., . - . ~ f .ir.~ a ~ ., . ~ ~ F , ' . _ ~ l~ _ .. ~ l. 7 '~ f? ' / .. F ~ . .. . ? !, ~ .. N ] _ . ' ~ ~ C . . ~ ~ . . . . ' . C ~ . . . ~C~yS. ,. ..:C a . ~•-e-, ~ . / ., ,1' ~ 1 " ' ~.L: j . :.W~, l ~ . . i r `!~ . , ~ro . ~ _ . .... ..~`~t.e -!::w, ~~w;. .. _ , :i ~ r~e c~..,n ~ .~,~,r Gc .. . .. ... _ . F . . P. . ~ .bCr..t. .. . . 9:8. .... , ... ...G;r• . c . ~ . _~_i_. .a_ ...~ C~rF-,~ ~.. . .,2 .~'i~.CCtY:-. i:C-,. L , ia t ,~ .. . ~ . . . ,.' ,. E,. :~~ ... , .. . . .. -1:~ c~.. n~3~ .. ! ~ .~.1 `C .c ...'2 .... . ,. _ '~E'. . ... ~ . . . ~. ~• ,~ ~o:r it~cr. . .~ ~.ev :a w~~. :ir ,~ewr rrw; ~-_~3. • _ r.e Y n ;e • ~ ~~, . ~.. :.' e. _ w>: e -_~ 3. •m-~v~ tr . ~ G._,. 'c e~".cr e: ~ e wa, ~~e: i_ f cs~:3. r._ ~~~'~ ~ r;:~ , j., , -,' te•~er ~~ a,cve ~ea~;:+.r,7 . _ ~ .~tF.v ;t'~t.e:te..+, ~aE ±; ,r ~e ~. .~ w,. r; e a,.,_ ,c. . ~~f' '~~._:. .. !_' ~4:.1.'~ t_.e +.... ~<<, ~ ~e:.3. ~. .~,:, . ~' . e r~ntcse. -~~~.e.:c~u-~ ,,:: ~ r:_. . f.::c: =e :ca : ~e~.e~ t~.5 ,r ntt s~± :~~~. .ie .ec'e;c. er:~ ~ ti :. ' .. ' . _~,: r~'.i~:. 9~, ~-, ~r.P ':CLr.._-(.'Oi. Wi~ 2.;Fi2c;B^. tf~ E .~..^.2 ;2^~1'~E'tcLtS iC:~ .`Bi2 :'C.P ]~e` .p~~;, _ .... _, ..r;p7 ..C ~f~.r._Ui.•2 .,~',c~ [:?C', _o~n ra ~~ ~ -1 ~' . . . ~ f~t~ F~,. pr~~2r.c, ~:. t.N :aed tie ~~ -- ~ , _ ~c. ~• ,,,'~2,_*. F~E'.'~:CI. ~ ~ ,~ .y:'/ l,:c;r'-_. . _-~ V~ti-... ~A~,icP~le:r' ~.t'@f'~'r. 3{-DB-1::_. ~..F,Oi~B _..~ ~Cn;P.:c. .~ y,... .~t-~..~ .. 1'. ~.~ !.'r_ . _ :~C~~lf-.i j":E~ ~ '~.(.'if-?~~_"( .i:.2 ..i _..~0~~: ~ 0:'-. :iC~'.!?I~ :.-3.~i- i~~'~ ~LrVP~~ _ ~ ~. ~f • ,, - _cF.c ..; o' :50~COG pecc_c ~:. ±! r?op_e : ~ t=. ?- . . t: e 'ir.ner , . .~' . ., ~~ . .a~ ._ ~ , te~~ L: e dt:w„'.ow, -,~ ea , ,, . , ; : ~ t e = ;~ t,~? t ~~ C~ ,,,n ; n t,e . . . _~' . E' ' , 'a'6~'. . SE'r: ~.~ r, ! .. fr: ~ ; v . - * f. .es ~C':~r,rut, t~ *v ~• -,~. -F .r ~ +~ e -_~e~ .. .~. _. _ _ - - .. - -__ ..-,~~_' .o~ ._.r. ~ . - _ _,.._ .... -~-- ._ .• ' .- ^ ..ti.r~*~~"~`*~+:'~'-:u~_u.-+~~.~~°""',a+"S f. F. ~,..~..lr~. C'.'.' ~l.A'<~:~`3 ~-r„~,~;~~~'c;''. aP"~ 2~, .°f." ~lpc '_4P.:4\:E ~_0 iBG~ ~r_. Ce.,..._-.^as, 'i. -e~ .tt~.. co•~e: ... ;:i e ;est:.,, s ~; ~ ~t+*er c ~ ,. ,:er:t ace ~~~+'- ~~ed; k••~ t.t.e c~~rc,:*.:_^r. ~s .,._ows: . _~e . :~-erre: ~ .,,a,ae , re~. n ~•~ *eoird~ra ~u., .. ra;i~tng . ?t:e G:'~:C.tISBCS1~.:O;PCt w3: r.ot *c r:2 ~nr.s ;e..-.. , C.•.,L. : .. F~.;~l:~ !1G 7Gi'2 t~. ~ H'in .:Il:'2: ~.f-~.E ~C~pG60:9..' C~ ' .'.'r. l ~-~Ilfi !~' =~. ~ c I"~'~I-^!3t.:,^,fl 31~~C~ .:..(' iit ^: ~Ci1~:0.i'aC? },n n:~;~ -Q?G~`, p:.'i Wf~ ,.. N3~ .'.1~ . _ .2"~"' ! .~, ~~.?'. ...j~,.+r,~ ~~C2'.i.~C('~: ~7~' ~i_.l:±ht~: ~~Wa: .~~:~ :,GL~. G3V ~=-1Xli ... t.'e t"~. ~V~'f~ VE.3:'_ .1f.'~ C3:'~ tf'F. ..~iC~' r~'. ..~,Ba Uf!'~2:. . ~:@i: i"B "",2V !9;` f~.C~, a:±O:f'.~t'.'~:@ 'f _.__ `i.0 C.~e~erre =t= n c'`...~. If' r~,~ , 2`.'?i'T ii~.e C::ESPf't. .°O::.j~.~i•. , ~~,f ~`i~E' ?Oe- -e~~e:=FG i<:.a. -3f'.~ F.:' :C~ ~~.P~? (i.4?.i..'.'.f~~~'~ -'.'! 5'.at2 1'.'N i!.f~~~E:" ti" ,i"2^„C*_:~t`f. .~.... l.l:`!~e'~ lC.W2'.~ 'C',1:~~ ,;T, ;T-!'_ft.?.~ C1. _.EO-1::v ~~.y. . ~ ~t.:e.:~ :f 1 1;3. o.e;:.F':.` .tif ; .,._°cc ~. Ci '~ `~,~~.25 ...^N: ~!'iT~. ~-.NC~.F•:' : F,i.: . ~-~ , ` .. . ` ' t ~ . . . . .^ `. . f ~ ° 1_ : .?Y. '!1?'.t~'':1.~~ ~ pr ~ti~..c'..~ f.: ' !_. ~~C''Na: 'N.. _ .., . "EI ~ . .. ~I~ f 1.:~:C i"?i ;J: .' ~ ^t.f~r,: P~'. _ ~ t 'a . ~r5 ,. ~~f~a~~ ~.r ..? E~~~:If_~. ~il* IN W~~ a -a' G• C~~~°i`t ~~3~. cv .~..~ -. jj -~~, ~:; t~_•.5l~! 1~. ~..~ 1iti tN.,. C_'t'. "E~C' ~C~~!~2~.!.~ ~ '~~ i ;t~T ,F .~~ ac1~,1W'1r,f; +'~ ,~ t 1. ~~c2 ..._9 Gf , ~'~.? ~ e5~ ... .~.8: ~i_1 rf:f~:. t y(C? .. iye COK'( a~C ~~~2 J~.i .E .F.O~~?. dt'.:? °C' L@'n~ , _. ... ~*~JI~. 9,'.. ut7 ^,E......- . :u• h~~ "4 , .ac ~ , , ' ~ ~ ~ r. _ ^ . " . [r. -1 / ~. . .: E.' _ , : P'! . ~ . ~' J . r O : G - c.?' . - . . Fir'.SSC.. .., ! i.~c'~ .,.~_ ~ C :c~_` G' Tf'. r ,.. N3~'or~~..l c .~r,. _ (' 'w, iI~^, fF "C.-. . !~.. F, l ':V ~~•,.. . E . . ?f.' il~. _ ~ - . -L C.iL'~'~ ._. .. . *' .. . .~ ~rt-..j~..~.. .. .... . .:f. ... ~" ' , " ~i i~'3'_ GECIC:_t' ..~`.. 1.':a '.~ . 1 ~~ .Wa C.. .~N'~-. . 1^.3^.2 ~F c~clr ~p r-~, _ . ... jr~~ . _ r :~_Nr ar~ ~.vo~i . .;~o:: t- 1~ ~e . ~e.. h. •~~c . _ ~. rr~, Dec~:+.~•e:._ ." .., , ~c .. - .. ( : rFP it3*?il'?.~.?. . i. !j~_ UGI~ Wf~~l. . ."e 2~'P ..1~ .~. O."? .3:'. . _.'/• ~ ' .t. ' ' . L~~Ci•~1:~ ... 1 ~. i ''E'^ r~.~.G_B i!~.:~ 5-I~ii/~ ~`, ir _. . . 'P.^ .. _~,' ' ~ ~~ -._ . ,. . .. . . . . ~.2 . 1: ~ ~ _,E?Wl ,~,~.j.. H~jc :~.C ..,_ ..:~'c:l'.'~: _ .'E i~ . ~ . : ' . .+.~'.. ~ ...'_ .... .- r ~ ~ . 1~ : ^C . ?! ., ~ ~.~ ~E~ r' P. .'.f? - .:e~=~.T'~..~ ~ _',r,i " . .. _. . . , . . . .. .. . . . . . .I I .. . . ' I F. ~. ,. ... .., ~ .,, ~ _~c` . '` ~ _ ... ., ,.. o~t._,.,.~..-p .~ _. 3`_. C: ~,. . :f•~e' : . „ , I - :. ~• _... s Fc.. ..~, - `~?: . . :r - _~+.h , e, c _ . t: . . - . : . . . _',E l , ;l,.~C'~ . '1'.r? •I. . _ _.... :T .'~4.C~ . '5..~ 'i. '~G .: . . . . ~ t~ ~ -3' . . . . l'~" E' ~ . ~.. r - ~ ? . . ' ?.:. _ - .. . ~.. _ . . :~ a ., a t C _ N ~ .. "'r : i~ . ~ _ _ . . . . . ... . . `,(~. ~ . - . :f i. .. •. P, ~. ,. ' .. i~ _ -. .. .. e r,~~r, ~a- , . •,~~~.._. _ w: , .. - • -.v:~ ~ • .> _ "~ ,~.. , -. r' ~.^c': ~ L:"E_. .. 'Ni- C.~. 9>B' . .~.=t. ~~ `'li C:~. . .~l"~ 'CC. ~r. ~xr~ . , . ~.'~'~~ , e:e~'e^ ,r.c- . ;te. 'w. . , - - ,~ . . .... _ . S2' , i i:. .. ~' aQr ~. ~ _ . .. ... ., ,. . . . . :i,c, , , _ ._ ~.. .i:U [,~. , ''i'F. 'CT .'C' '1. ?,:.._ ; . -. ~C . `~.i.. _.'.e.. ..~ r... ._ , . 'i~ .. ~, ~ _ "'c:~' '~ ~lpr;.. .. . :~f'. , . . ~~1'.' ~. :CN'2i" ~ j. •~~' .` ' ' ~ ~ . .~ c 2'" . . .. . . . G a - - . , .. (.. __ .U~ ^ . ..'~1_'. ti..~~~ . .t~' . ._...~(,`f. y~~l f• .' ,n . .2 . ..=WF:•, ~ - . . .. . ' I- .. .. _ ~ , '..~P l.'.'1_r"1'.., i ~-f.f ...~1•: ~ ~f C C:"C'•'a:'~.. ,tira ~ . _. . . C? . .' F:. :1 . . `~ .. ' . .'f? !~G\c ..tEi , f.~' .. ... . .. f_',. ~;,. _..'c ~.i..._... . .„ , „rf '~.. " ., ~ ~ - ~ 7' . . . ~. . c.rc= ` --`i,-at.or.: t~.3t ~.s .r.te: est c,. ..ct . . _ ~n~ . _ . ~.t : .. - . • , ., ~. • . _ ;. ~ _. _, i.~~ ie .-.. ~'~ ..ee~os~-r.:i:v ~r~i~ ta':_e . ..e ~o'.e:;ner:` c.r,. ..._ .,.~ rr. , ~p'.O:.f ~' ~e: . f. " , . .:t.qi rN: , . ..~'. .. ~... .. , ..~. .~~:r. ~~ . . , ' . • . .. .-F .t ._. . . . S'., . ~ C,:r~.t" . .. . . __.. 'Z:i. C~ . +C`: 3f~. C+.! :. ..;f .. . .3i (i . ~~,~ , . ~ . . .._ . . E?I "Cr,' . . i. . .:2' ?; ~i,.- .-aaf . ~. . .., '.. i.;. E ..~i ..e .'(.,i,7.~.. P ' - . 7: . . . ,. "li ._ _ .. . . I ._ .. . C. '~I . ,.y. ''il', C~o G~... . _ c _ PI.1~ ... . :~E", .. (..`.c':~i` . .~ . , , r. _. . _ ,.. ,i cFr ;t . ~2 . .. . .~u~. t ee- ..'_r:= i F ~ c'.F~ er. . ?~~ ~:r ..rc.:c .. , . . ~. .e~ -. , - j~ ~ r.i ct ! e e: iw;. . . ., .c~, : ~ , ,~ , e.e=:=c;~. ~~~. ~ , , - . . _ .. . . _ l . . _ . 3 . I . . W . - . c .. ,. ,."!~' . ..i'~.'1.:: ~'., ~5: .. .~ ._ r. ,-l: . . :S'fYC~' ,=P' '~~ra.,r .- i • t' .,3: ' .~ .Ci~, ',~. ''~_ . . F~ ,. . ~ .~.C';t~"f'.3.~ . ...., - .~... . _ '.E'. .. ~ ~1:.,.,.. ", -.. _ ~ ll'. : !.1' .~ S . . .. ~.i'. ..,. W .. ~c:•C. . Gi. S .rf. Fl1i-,f 5 . S 'r~'.. ' . . ' ~'.. . ^f 1 . .~c:c~ , .. . i.:~ .. :E'. . .. i. '?f'1 ;C~~. ..l.t-:' . .. ........ . . j; +_ :'\' `... . . ;. . ' .. ~( . .. . _ . .. r .. ... ~ -. I ~ W .. ~ . ~ ` .. 2 ,'., ~. " . .... . `E . ~ ~' ' .I ct W . . Y.: . '!.:. . ... . ~~, l~, ~. , /~~r . . ' S-. ~ `C , i . .J . ~ . .. . .~t? . :. ~_.~ A~ :. ~ = ' ' ~ .. .. . .~ ,. ' t ?. .. . ' .. 7 , , ,i. ~ ~.. ' r ?. . ~ ~.~0`:E~ . . ~( ' 'ii i , . . . ~ C i ~ . . . :(~ i _ .i. . - Y~ . . -f '... ~. I ~. ~ ,:1. „ f . i.F' ~ _ ':f: ~ . . .. i . :, :[:C F:?2i . F., . ' f.. . ' . . ~~ ^' ~::'~ C.c: ".~,.' _. ... ~ . . .. ~ !r ..1 ~-f.' , . ;-P : E'~ ^n~ ~ ; r, . _ - . . . . . . . . ~..~ - c: . . ~. • ' '.._..... t.,=.. .... 1:'. ._,. _:G:'~E~=i _-. ....:tl!.^. ~' _ iC,i.';i<' ,. ~ ' . . , ..- ^21 t s ,. iCo .. 'r. . ~t ,. . 1~' i t C'i~: G~ . • . .- '~.c . . ~ ~ . . , ~ , . . ~ ..",l: f._:, .f:,:~. . +F'.i'.ri '~~'~'h . . . . .~ ..~.~~ ~~; =-)::. :3f ~,^ ,:.C. ' ., ~ ~.G S , . ,. . , . . .. .. . . .. .~ ^.F . ~ j 'L.. ~ .~ .i. S.f ' ., ~F_ . _ 't.c , . , ~ ' ' e• . _ . ~pr ed .... i~ .rer ~ . . _ _. - r: _ - • ~ =E . r: F ~ c I .. .-'.1?' ..2:'.P_f ± ~ . .. '. . .~ !' l'. ~ f . . ?i ~ . . : r- .. - • ~ 'n ~' . ,.. ~ :~ ?fE C;. „ _~, .,. - ' ' '.~~? l . .'r~'t 't ., .,..~ ^.a':OI'. 1:,. ,E? ~. i{:.. ~'`'(~. ., P~.~~ ' i? " _ . ~ ~';I.'.. I ~ ' ~ ^ ` ,~ .~..e e . .. E e.~ h~e jrr . . ! _ .a r~ _ .. _ .3 , y_ r Cf k:C ~ tiY !~ .. ~ i .. . ~N f~til: E~ . - .. , ~ ' 1`~ , e_: k d c,. ~ i ~ ~. t v~ f . i. t r, ,~ ~ _ i_ ~~e t ~c. cr~t ~ j:~ ie ; r c.;: e~ r ~;a ~~...~ ~ ~~ ' e ,.ei +.c :•,b~ ~_ ~ c r; . t ~ ~= :e3; t_?: - ~ r i e ~ cr , e: r~ _~rj~. ,. ~ ., ~ • .~ ~~ ~. ~ F ~'.Z 3 .. .. _ t,rCL.P ~ '.I.c] ~ hF,E? rO,...;f ~t~' ~.' WI ~I-' t.? C'~~,E:~' '.ti ~ . . _f.t 2 .i. ..r. E . ; 3S LC f. . ..e .~:~. 'lI.(. Ct-V-, -1. l , .. . . ~ _ 1 1 ~~ ;f ~ ~.a ,qe .~.c*_?d ;5 ~._., ce- ,r.,:tne;.t w,,.: a .~i ~, r~ ~r - -~ . :o_ • , * ~ ~ ~•:~ ~ . . .i ',C'i~ . '1 ~ f~. ic r u i F ,,'r.p _~qe: er. `- i F . ~,~ . . . _ . _.. . .. . F . r ; ~,.. .a , a. . ~ „ ~,v; ;~ .!-~2 't, . .~ .~~.:~ 'o It LQi y. i~ .':.. , N ~i~i _ .`i~~. C:c. ~a~'.~E . • . (r~ .FE'.'p r~~ q . . •. , n i ~ ... . . . .. i . ~i( C f . C3 . ~f.. I:le.'C~ . .. ~ :dl'.~~ ~ . ..~A .. i'. 'l~C~ ~ . . ' !I ~. . . . ~' 1 _ . .. . . . , * , i ~ - `,~: . _ _ ... . :-::.~.~:_:.-:_ .. ,. . . ~:. .-^ '-:~~~- ~ "_ __ "' ~' ~' . . .. .. ~... .~. .~:. ~. r. ~ - . . _.. _._.. . _ _ . . ...:.. ~~~~~otl h . _ ., . ~ _.. ` .L~v ~ ~ ~e"`F ~"-r r"'~.',q~",~eq'i°x"1.:I~ ~i~l`-rmJ ~{-: ~v ;:.~r ~ ~~ MI~It7cS, CI'~Y PLAp2NiNG COMN!ISSIO~ ~ April 249 i957 VARIANCE N~e 186~-4; Mr~ 5teed stated that a i7-story buiiding would'not be-sui±able for (Continued) the elde:ly, when actusliy he meant attractive to the elderly, but from our experience at Luther Towersy we have had more demand for upper~story apartments rather than lower~story apa;tments; that he had personally checked the 202 residents of Luther TowersY and of all of these oeopie, cnly tho persons refused to use the self•-service elevator> 5) Mrsa Hoskins raised the question about rent supplementation, which was ar.swered~ Her statement as to discriminetion •- he could only state that the Churchman's Four.dation was a Christian organ!zation, and if they were permitted io discriminate9 they would not do soo Ano.th~_r question of Mrs~ Hoskins ~- was it a fact that 25% of the uperating budget requir.ed by the Federal Governme~t on an application could be waived? This represented 25% of the first year`s operating costs, and although the Federsl Gouernment does oermit waiver, this was ve=y diff:cuit to obtain even though 75% o.' the proposed developmer.t was pre•-rented prior to construct~:on, since the mortgagor corporation ente~ed ~nto a legal agreement that the rtiortgagor would g~larantee any additionai requirement nee~ed during the fi.rst five years of operatinn,, and it i.s not easily obtaired; trat it was not the Ctiv,ch.m:~n'S Foundation ir.te~tion ~io make application even :f the~ did have ?5% of the development rented, and this 25% first year's operatfrg budget9 such as this project reprecented, was aoproxi•- mately S?65,OU0~ The question as to whethar or not peopie would te brouoht in f:om other az~ss - he could only say these people come ~s a result cf referrals from this area •- o~ relatives of these people livi.ng eisewhere. There has ,,e~:er been any attempt9 a~d it was not r.ecessaryj to ~se any progra:n to promote resicential use in the faciiity to come fiom outside of the area, and again, reiterated the statement that the Federai Goverrment required absoiute proof that the fac4lity was necessary~ and that no one would be brouoht tu this facility without their asking the Foundation firsto Mro Cummings noted that Mrs~ Pearson had indicated there w.ss a c9issimi?arity betweer: ti:e Luther Towers a~d the propos=d Tower iocation; however~ this same th ~rg happened _n Pasadena where they had taken s~:re o_d t.ouses in the c~:tiy~I1G are~s of the downtawn core to cor.struct the development they have tt:ere; furthermore, the turnover for the San Diego facility over the past two years was 37 out of the 202 units, and this was considered a general minimai for the age 9roupo T!~ HE4RING-WAS CLOSED. Commissioner Gauer, prior to m3king his motion, prefaced it by stetir.g that he had beer. a resident of Anaheim since 1925; that he knew a great many of the peopie in the audience; that the proposed structure ~vas great as structures go; that he visited the San Diego facility and considered it a high-class hotei for senior citizensg that it ~iffered some•- what from th= proposed developTent insofar as stsucture is concerned9 as foilows: (lj ihere were three more sto:ies; (2) the lounge in the San Die9o facilfty took up haif of the first fioor~ and the proposed structuse has a very small lounge fo* 196 people; (3) recreational facilities and the libra;y were the same~ Furthermore, he was great friends with a number of people, i.ncluding the Loudons; that he had considerable backgi~our.d haviny been on 'r,he Planning Commission since 1934 and having served as Superintendent ef Schoois in .4naheim between 1925 and 1951; that he had tried to look at the proposed project objective:y; +,hatthe statement was made that the average income foi unmarr?ed persons wss $2,277 ar.d married persons~$4y170; that in the brochure passed out by the Churchman~s Fourtdat~or. thev stated they wouid use these iunds if they were in excess for scholorships, fel.lowships, =esearch for church problems, new churches, etce, whi.cti he considered a wonderftii objective~ He was aiso a.senior citizen and had been invited to go into the t~ethodist 5enior Citizer.s` Home and others like that at Mount San Antonio Ga~densy however, it was also necessary for the City to.consider the standpoint tha± many people no longer cared ~o a~ai,ntain their homes, and this type of facility might serve it~ purpose~ Commissioner Geuer offered a motion to deny Petitior, for Variance No.v 1b61 on th~ bas:s of: (1) its proposed location, since the location does not have the same probiems as that in San Diego which is now surrounded by other high-rise buildings; even though~there was in~ sufficient roo~ for recreation iacilities, these peoole had to waik to Salboa Parkp (2) ihe grocery sture situation was sol•,red in 5an Diego; hvwever, nothing had been done reoarding that here in the proposed developme:~t ~ regarding the purchase of groceries in person would be deZivered by a specific gror,ery store; (3) the size of the property was only a79 of an acre, although parking which was not in conforrance with Code would be adequate, since many of these people do not own or drive a~tomobiles, and this could be verified by a s~~rvey made thrnugr~out the United States; (4) the economics - this,wil: be a profit•-makin9 venture fer the Churchman~s Foundation, and they will drain off the money for other projects ~ other•- wise they would not have gone into this type of venture; furthermore, :rom an economics standpoint as.far as the downtown area was concerned, it did not need any support from any of the taxpayers outside of the downtown areae that he felt there was enough wealth in the downtown area, after having attended many of the Urban Renewal Committee meetings with property owners of the downtown prapesties, and he knew most of them, and if they really wanted to develop the downtown area, they h~~d plenty of money to do so by themse]ves without A w ~ ?-;i>J ~.~,~;,:u;; _=Y~ --~'.` "r--•.~~ U~ ~. _ .s . . - ~' xk7~/S li ~ , ~Y L - 4 . V/ ~ MINUTES, CITY PLANI~ING COMMISSION, April 24, 1967 iiaC ;~ I~ARIAN~E N0~ 1861 •- any assis•:ance or subsidy from the Federal Government or ar.yone eise; (Continued) (5) it wo~~d neo~te two ordi.nances already in force in the City~ r.amely ~ the R•-3, which re;uires 70U square feet for one•°bedroom apartments, and the Motel Ordina~~ce since mosi motel rooms were larger than most rooms in the development$ the C=ty iad not aliowed very many kitc}~en units to go into the rr.otels except in rare occasions where motels catered to fami?ies, anci this could be cor.sidered a f:otel with kitchen facilities; (6) it would set a precedent for size o.' spartments since they state these were apartments; however, he felt this was a hotel with. kitchen facilities, r and the Commi.ssion would have a difficult time deiending thelr action on any future requests `•';' askir.g for the same thing, even though they Nere not government subsidizedo `.`~r ,:,~'p Commissioner MLngali seconded the motion on the basis that: (1) use of government money, in his opinion, was the first steo to socialismg,_~) opposed to tax~-exempt use oi the piaper*y; (,3) no evidence submitted that were sufficient '~vear oid persons who wou~d avaii themselves of these,facilities in the City oi Anaheim, an~e need was not proven to provide i.hese facilities for other th3n peopie outside of the City. ~ Discussion was held then by the Gomnissi.oi7 w;.th Commissioner Rowland stating there eeverai things which h~d not been brcught to light: (])the Commisston has been spending m~ny evenings re•-evaluating goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan which ia a pubiished document and which was exhibited on the west wall of the Council Chamber; (21 or:e of the things being discussed was where was :he Ci.ty going ir. ~11 of the areas? (3) were some of the statements of the Generai Plan a true entity as it stands today; (4) the General Pian states that the City finds it de~irous to maintain the low density residen±ial character of the community; however, the Commission and Staff have been wondering i.f this particular statement.was necessarily true, and evidence seems to =ndicate this isn`t eractly true; (5) the appea:3nce of peopie at this hearing t~day indicates they are saying one thing ~ primarily that the high••density character af this particular site is not desirable, 3nd most ef the peopie were ob~ecti.ng on the basis of density of all the factora presented •- this was prabably the most important, e+_ther high or low density desigaation; (6) the statement made Ey Ms~ Faessel, after quoting N,r~ Mumfo*d out of context, also made a very pertiner.t point o£ what this could place or. the demands ef the com.munity facii.ities, ard what several of these structures might present in the matter of problems; however, Mro ~ Mumford`s stateRfent was directed to the $54 mzllion research grant for accelerating the ~ !; urban renewal researchq (7) the matter of parking.he thought covid be handled on a project ~- such as thz.s slmply by posting a bonr.' to the effect that multiple-story parking to confor~ to ordinance repuirements couid be provided in the event this project was vsed for other i than proposed•, (8) the matter of visual intrusion had ~ot been satisfied anc} couid r.ot be satisfied by trees, sight iine, or anything else ~ tt was proven if anvone lived ir the ( Westmont area-just by look.ing out thei: window, they ceuld see tne Califorr.ia Federal ~ bui.lding and it was on~y eleven stories hi h!~ +~ I 9 3 9, the c.msnd on the recreat=onai racilities is very intense, but then this a~so could be indicated on the ,onununity facilities, ard ' this facility does not provide fr~r a specific recreational facility, thus forcing the neople ou~ of their apartivents ar.d into the life of tLe community~ Which w3s an acimirable social ooal,. but it would increase the demands on the particular park considerab_y, and (10) i.f, as Plannin9 Comr..issi.oners, they were to consider anything ottier than land use and der.sity provisions, he felt the oney single, most cnfortvr,ate aspect of any such faci- :.ity, whether it was multiple•-story or single-story, was the strat:f?c.ation o.° socieTy •- however, as a Planner, he did not necessarily feel the st~stif?cation by society of age group was necessaz•y, Commissioner Fa:ano noted that he vas the youngest Planning CommissionerY both~ in age and term of service, and maybe because he had been in Anaheim only five and one-half years, some oecple would feel. he had no ~ight in a~roice i~~ thi;; however, he had been given a r=sponsi•- bility of which he was justly Qroud, and if there were any way he could be of benefit, r.ot only to the town of which he +yas proud, and in Califorr.ia i.n whioh his anr.esr,ois h3d contributed greatl.y to~ he felt he did have a right to make some comments reg~rding the proposed .deveiopm=nt~ He noted thet in the evidence submitted today, everyone talked :jrdund the periohery of land use, the desirability or Isck of desirabil`_ty of a certair. type of project, but nowhere until Commissioner Rowland touched on land use has anyone reaily discussed land use per se~ The Flanning Commission is presently engaged in the di.sr,ussion of the Anaheim General Plan~with the view to overhauling or changing this Plan so that the City might more co:rectiy, efficiently, and beneficially •• as far as the Gity was concerned - continue to grow and developa The Urban Renewal Project has not been dis- cussed a great deal; however, he did not agree with the statement of those who ssy this wil~ £inanced with federal funds, becau~e ir. his estimation it was no more tnan anyore who _'inanced building for either multiple~story development9 commercial development, or single•-fa~uily. residential use through use of the facilities created by the Fecleral Govern•- ment to finance such Ioans on the basis that the government backed up through insurance any loans made ~- however, the mortgagee stiil had to pay for tt,is loan~ These loans were similar to what was done in other cities where the cityY state, or federal governmer.t per se erected lar9e apartme~t dwellings, and the ones he had seen in the city of which he is a r~~~tive are all substandard; however, subject development was not such a project, ar.d if - - -. ~sr, - ; _ : .'.: _ . L.'-! ' „' ''_', ' '_~' . - .5/:.~. , n . .. .. v f,.. ,-~~J! ~ . . ~,... , h~-. .. .~ . . , . , .. :; •: <. ,. ~ : ~~ ~ ' ~./ ~ MINt.I;'~S, CITY PI.ANNING COMMISSIO^]9 April 2~9 }.o~i 3412 V4P.IAhCE hOs 1861 ~ anyone in the Council Chamber had not seen one o_° the e projects, ~ie (Continued). urged them to look at one9 since :r. his est:.mation this coald not be compared~ Insofar as iand use was concernedy he bel~eved tha+; the City of Anaheim does, in fact, want tc renew tne downtowrt area and will have to.fl.ncl a breakthrough soreew'r,ere; that he agreed as a taxpayex he-would nct want redevelopment of the downtowr area to be accomolished by use of :ederal £unds; but if so many people are inte:ested in echieving this breakthr.ouah in the City, where have they been `or the past seven to fifteen years? Commissioner Farano further stated that he felt the proposed development.was a breskth,^ough wh3ch the.City needs to continue i's desirability; however~ the oossibil3ty of indigent persons ar~d f.ederal subsidies a*e realiy extraneous insofar as this Cortur,issidn is :oncer.ned~ This property happens te be in the beundaries of the VSctor Gruen Urben Renewal StudyP and if the City was interested in oursuing ~t, ther, he would sugg=st ±h:s was the breakt}i:ou9h, and if the City diri net take advantage of ity not just because it was the ffrst or.e to come along, but in his opinion this was a high~-grade develapment and if r,ot adopted, the C:ty would be naking a mistake, Commissioner Farano stated he had tnken the troubie to 0o to San D±ego on his owr, ~ast Saturday, and he was sure he saw what the others who had visited the facility had seer.; however, he did not see any irdigent peopleY he did not see any crioples, he did not see any who were ~nable to take care of themseives ~ a1i :~e saw primarily were people in tt,e tw~light years of their lives enjoying a good life •- they we*e h~ppy, well-dressed, and appesred to take care of themselves: Furthermore, he did not ccnsider this an old peoples` horre, but a development which .4nahei.my.maybe not now but in the near future, w:ll orovide as a basis for the cataiyst for the renewal of the downtown area~ Commissioner Allred staied that he concurred with most of the statements made by Cortunissioner Farano; he felt the ouality of the project would not be a detriment to ti~e City~ Not only does the City need a breakthzough in the downtown area; i.n his mind the p.~oposed d.evelopment could not be considered a detriment to the downtown area or to the area in which it is pre•- posed to be located~ that somethir.g should be done for the downtown area since most of the large shoppir,g districts were outside of the oeriphery of t~.a City, and other-developments had occurTed around this periphery; snd in order to revitalize the dowr.town area, the pro- oosed development could act as a catelyst to start private enterprise cominq in for further developmento F3e also notec' that the City of Santa Ar.a had many hfgh-~ise executive buildings erected there, and the City of Anaheim had none9 and there must be some reason ior tnis •• whether :t was because prooezty could not be assembled or it was too expensive, and he considered the proposed deveiopment a good start~ Commissioner Herbst etated he feit he w~s a part of Anaheim, having moved to Eullertor. in 1921 and had lived in Anaheim for eighteen years and owneo his home ar,d business in Anaheim; that he H~~as very interestec? in the growth of Ansheim which was the ninth laroest city in C~ii•- fornia today; unfortunately the downtown area has been acting like a small town 3nd wes actually l:ving in the past, and he thouqht it was time for the people of Ar.aheim to wske up to the ,'sct that they were .3 iai•ge city and should thir.k like a].3;ge ci~y and take thei•r lumpb li~e a iarge city; tt~et the City could not always have the good things; ihst the downtown area needed to be ceve~:oped =~~ce Urban Renewal Studies indicated this~ ih.at he felt e~ery member of the Commission h~~~ ,one a good job in studying this project~ that he had viewed subject pronerty several ti._.es from different angies and had tried to analyze what this wovld do for or :iot do foz the City of Anaheim, and whether ?t might huzt the surrounding property; however, he knew a lot of oeople in ihe Council Chamber did not think in this manr.ez, but he feit it was a benefit to the property owners and wi1.i be a great asset to Anaheim, not only in the area of high-rise while this project was_beina projected foi an R-3 Zme s?nce tne City presently did not have a high•-rise zone, and the density could be analyzed by the fact that the efficiency apartrqepts would have only person ar.d the bedroom apartment~ would have only twopersons, and based on the square footage per person, this would be.co~siderably more than a*eyuiar apartment building would haue~ Commissioner Gauer interjected Cortur.issi.oner Herbst°s comments by statir.g that this was a :7•-story building on a very small plot of iand; that he was not opposed tc high-rise struc~ tures in their.}uoper place, and that the lounge proposed was about one-f.i:•th-that developed in the San Diagc p_~ject~ Mr~ Cummings also interjected by advisirg the Corrcnissior. that a lounge was also propos~d for the 17th floor and was Iarges than that in the San Diego facility; howeve:~ Commissioner Gauer noted that th~s was not ind?cated on the plans before the Commissiono. Commissioner Far3no stated he did not want tc~ answer ali the issues, only those which were pertinent to land use, and the statement of 3nadequacy of the structure ar.d tivater ~r~d seweiage fac~lit~es ~v;s e prebiem which woulo have to be resolved in the event the Citv was serious : about the redevelopment of the downtown area~ whether for the proposed development or any other,this still would have to be resolved, and if the City feit they did not desire to incur the expense of increasing the water and sewerage facilities, there wouid be no ~;rban ~.<. j T : ~:_~ .t .l i,. '" ~ .. ~=;~t .":a: _'~ __ _" ... - L "1. ~ _ 4,T = - i ~ .., .t,.~..,.r,. ,.., , . . ~ - ~~ 1 J ~t r~Y4 S L~ ~ - _.~. _~ ~ ~~J~ . ."~.~y).. ~ ~ .~ ~ . 3413 i . .. ..: yl .' r~ MINUTES~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Aprii 24, 1967 VA~TANCE N0~ 1861 - renewal of the downtown area. Furthermore, likening this development (Continued) to hotels or motels could not be done since it was his opinion•that any development of this type should be considered an agartment> ' Commissioner Allred noted that the Commission and Council had granted many var3ances in ~ the past, and it was his opinion that the proposed development would not set a Ks,raoedent since waivers had been ~l~owed in specifi~G instances where it was deemed advisa:~;e that waiver of the Code be permitted, and adherence to the Code in other instanceso `=,,.,~ ,., Commissioner Rowland noted that projec±.ir~ the density for this project.on the basis of '.'~;;~ one or two pL~rsons per apartment would ~rean ~ maximum of 236 persons per net residentia? `'? acre9 and the denoity on the Generai ~:an indicated the maximum of 36 dwelling units per - net residential 3cre9 resulting on the basis of 302 residents per dweiling unit o.- a reduction of 50%, or only li8 persons per net residentia~ acre; the densrty, therefore, was considerably greater in this instance~ _ Co.~nmissiorters Farsno and Allred agreed with this statement9 but noted they were quoting the sauare footage on the basis of density per aparcmenta Upon roll cail the foregoing resolution was voted upon as follows: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Gauer, Mungail9 Rowiando NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Al.lre~, Farano~ Herbsta :aBSENT: COMMISSIOIQER:;: Camoo Deputy City Attorney Furman Roberts advised the Commissior, and the inter.ested persons in ihe Council Chamber that the Commission wouid be required to hold over furthex voting until the subsequent meeting; however, the hearing did not have to be reopened, and if no majority vote was arrived at within 40 days, the petition would be sent to the City Council without recommendation, RECESS - Chairman pro tem Herbst declared a ten minutes recess at 4:25 °~M~ RECONVENE - Chairman Camp recor,vened the meeting at 4:38 P,Mo, all Commissioners being presento RECL4SSIFIGATIQN •- CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGe M4X C.. AND PAULINE N~ GRAVES, 40b South Ohio NO,. 60-61-96 Street, Anaheim, California, Owners; Property descr;bed as: A rectangu•- iariy sha~ed parcel of lar.d situated at the southeaet corner of Underhill RECL4SSIFIG4TION A~enue and State Coliege Boulevard and having frontages of approxim~tely ~Ow61•-62-30 127 feet on Underhiil Avenue and approximately 98 feet on State College Boulevard, and further described as 2004 and 2008 UnderhilZ Avenue~ CONDiTIONAL USE Property presentiy classified R-1, ONE••EAMILY RESIDE~TIALS ZOhE, pERM:T N0~ 42~ .~~~ REQUESTED CL4SSIFICATION: AMENDME~T TO CO[~DII'lONS PERTAINING TO STREET ACCESS POINTS AND SIGNS~. REQUESTED CONDITIO!~AL USE: PERMIT A WALK-UP RE~TACi~4~T WITft WAIVER OF ROOF SIGNSo Subject petitions were continued from the meeting of March 27, 1967, to ailow time for the petitioner to resolve probiems regarding deveiopment~ associate Pianner Jack Christofferson reviewed the request for waiver of the deed restrfc- tior.s to permit access to Underhill Avenue and State College Boulevard, and to oermft sign•~ in9 of sub3ect property in accordance with the C•-1 Zoneo It was also noted that at the previous meeting the petitioner and the restaurant operator had x•equested that Conditional Jse Permit P7oa 928 be terminatedo The location of subject property and uses establ=shed in close proximity were also revieweda Mre Mike Gehring9 representing the petitioner9 appeared be_'ore the Commission9 noting that the petitioner had amended his request for amendment to Condition ~oe 4, and that he was reouesting only access righLS for the easterly 40 feet of Lot Nod 9 and a 30-:oot drive from State College Boulevard, together with permission to compiy with sign :eouirert:ents of the C-1 Zone since the~petit:oner was having a difficuit time developing it due to access problems, and that sirip zoning had been granted to all these homes along State GoTlege Bouievard~ Ms~ Gehring then reviewed the request for termination of Conditional Use Permit Noe 928~ ` '!~':' ~ ~ MINUTES, CI7'Y.PLANNING COMMISSION~ April 24,'1967 3414 RECL4SSIPTGATION - Mro Gehring also noted that no opposition had been presented at the NO_ 60-61-96 .~ previous hearing since it was a forpgone conclus3.on that commerciai uses would be established in accordance with amended reso:utions by RECL4SSIFICATI0t3 _ the City Council, NO., 61•-62-30 - - No one appeared in opposi.tion to subject petit~ons, CCNDITIONAL USE PEP.MIT NO:. 9p8 THE HEARING WAS CIASED~ (Continued) Discussion was heid by the Commission relative to permitt:.ng access to State College Boulevaxd, it bein9 noted that theze would he three cvrb breaks within a space of 97 feet which could be hazardous permittino.access to State College Bouleuard by so many curb breakso The Commission further noted that State Col:e~e Boulevard at this area was 106 fee~ wide, and that if the dedicated alley were to be used for ingress and egress9 th?s would create a traffic hazard to the re~idents easterly sir~ce they were using the ~lley for access a2soo Commissioner Farano was of the opinion that the Commission should not consider subject petitions unless deveiopment plans for the imorovement of the property were submitted, and he did not £eel that granting of the additional sccess would alleviate any problems for ~evelopment plans~ Com.missioner Gauer offered Resolution No, PC67-76 and moved for its passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Mungail, to recommend to the City Council that Petition for Reclassification Nose 60-62-96 and 61-6~-30 be amended with Condition No~ 4 permitting access to State College Boulevard and Underhill Avenue for the easterly po:tion of Lut Noe 9s and that Cond~tion No~ 7 of Reso2ution No~ 7353 be deieted to permit signing of subject pzoperty in accordance with the C~1 requirements of the Sign Ordinanceo (See Resoiution Book) On roil call the foregoing resolution was passed by ttre :o~iowing vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Munga119 Rowla~d, Campo NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Noneo ABSENT: COIulMISSIONERSo Nonea Commissioner Gauer offered a mot.ion to terminate all proceedings or. Conditional lise Permit No~ 928 as requested by the petitioner~ Cort~mi.ssloner Mungail seconded the motion~ MOTIO~ CARRIED~ CONDITIONAL USE - PUBLIC F~ARIhG, JOIiN GRAYSONS zc292 Ridgemoor Drive, Sun City, PERMIT N0~ 936. Caiifornia, Owner; GENE WAHL AND ,JIM WOODS, 3067 Orange !1•venue, Anaheim, California, Agents; requesting permission to ESTABLISH A REST HOME, WITH WAIVERS OF (1) BUILDING 3ETPnt;K AND (2; USE OF FRONT AND SIDE YARD SET5.4CK FOx PARKI'~G on property described as: An irregularly she~ped p~rcel having a frontage of approximately 152 feet on the east side of Stinsor. Street ar:ti having a maximum depth of approximately 123 feet, the southerly bou~d.3;•y of subj~ct prooerty being approxi•~ mately 650 feet south of the centerline of Lincoln ~`~e.~ue, and further described as 134, 133, and 142 Stinson Street~ Property presently cl ~~;i,iied R-A, AGRICULTUR4L, ZONE. Associate Planner Jack Christofferson reviewed the p.^~•~p,~sed petitio~, the location of subject property, and the uses establiehed ir close proximit~~ and further noted that the Commission had previously approved Conditional Use Permit No~ 7J3 on May 20Y 1965 for a guest home at this location;~ however, development had never occu~r.ed, and the applicant was now prooosir.g a similar use which amounted to approximately a;3% i~.r,r.•ease in square footage over the previQ~s proposelo Thus, if Conditional Use Per,ait No~ 936 wes approved9 the Commiss:on might consider terminating Conditionai Use Permit No~ 703 bec:~;~Fe of the duplication o: the useso It was noted by Office Engineer Arthur Daw that d~edication and improvement of Stinson Street had beFn accompiished alreadyo Mr~ James Woods, one of the agents for the petitioner, appear?d before the Commission and stated he was available to answer puestions, No one appeared in opposition to subject petition~ TI'~E H.EARING WAS CLOSEDa N. T ,.1 4 , ~~ 1 ~ '~ .,. I 1i; 7 i'~n - , . 's~ . _ .. ~ ~ M1 ~ ~';~ ~ I ' '. MZIdUIES,.Ci?Y PLAN~ING COMMISSION, April 24, 1967 3415 CONDITIONAL USE - Commissioner Herbst offered Resolution Noa PC67-78 and moved for i±s PERMIT NO,. 936 passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Farano, to grant Petition (Continued) fo: Conditional Use Permit No, 936, subject to conditiorts> (See Resolution Book) On roll call the f~ureooing resolution was passed by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Munga119 Rov~land, Campo NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Noneo ABSENT: CAY~ulISSIONERS: Nonea Commissioner Allred offe•red Resolution Noa PC67-77 and moved for its passage and ~doptior.9 seconded by CoR~missioner Mungall, to terminate Petition for Conditional Use Permit Noo 703 granted by the Planning Commission Mey 20, 1965, for a guest home on the basis that approval of Conditional Use Permit No~ 936 was for a similar useo (See Resoluti.on Book) On roll call the foregoing resolution was passed by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano~ Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Rowiand, Campo NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Noneo ABSENT: COMNiIS5I0NERS: Noneo CONDITIONAL USE •- PURLIC NEARING~ SFEEC:'. 4ND L4^IGilAGE DEVELCFMGNT CE.R~TEP.y ?IdCORPOP_ATED, PERA1iT K0~ 937 241 South Loara Street, Anahe_m, Califorr.iay Ownerq GL4DlS GLASONy 9301 Hi:iview Road, .4nane~m9 Calj.forni.a9 Rgent; req~aestino permission to EXP4~D Atd EXISTI~G SFEECH T!-~RAF^: FACIL.ITY, WITH WAIVERS OF (ii MIhIMUM I.OT AREA9 (2j MINIMUM LOI' WIDTHi (3) EUILDTNG SETB_4CK.9 AND (4) USE OF SETE.4CK FOR A4RKiNG on property described as: A rectanguiarly shaped parcel oi pxoperty with a f~oritage of approximately 82 feet on the west side of Loara Street and having a m=x~mum depth of approximately 119 feet, the northe±ly boundary of subject property being approxi mately 395 feet north of the centerlir.e of Broadway, and further described as 24i So~~th Loara Stree.to Property presentlv classified R-A, AGRICI:LTUR.4L, ZONEo Associate Pianner Jack Christofferson reviewed the pr.oposed reauest9 Iocation of subjec± property, and land uses in close proximity, and it was also noted that Conditional Use Permit Noo 722, app:oved July 29y 1965, established the speect~ and language therapy clinic in a residential structure, and aithough waiver of lot area was advertised for this petition, this was covered under the previous conditio~:sl use permit, and therefore was unnecessarya Mrso Gladys Gleasonq agent for the petitioner, appeared before the Commission and stated she was available to answer questionsy and upon questions being presented by the Commission9 noted that there were ~`ive speech therar'sts and two were on a part•-time basis9 and it was not expected to have a maximum of moza than 15 students at one time or. the premfses since speech thexapy was done almost or. an individual basis; howeverj upon completion of the fi.rst phase of this developmer.t, they would have five ~ull-time therapists9 and said,ph~se shouid be completed within one year9 and ir the corr~r~unity would suoport their pro~ect, the second phase wouid be avaiiabie w:tl-,in five yearso Furtherm~re, at the present time the=e were anly ten child~en on the premises at one time~ No one appeaxed in oppositfon to subject petitioro THE HEARING WAS CLOSED~ Coaur.issioner Ferano offered F.esoiution No~ FC6'•-79 and moved for its passage and adoption; seconded by Commissioner Gayer; to grant Peti.tion for Conditionai Use Perm3t No~ 937~ sub,~ect to conditions< (See Resoluti.or Bookj On io~I call the forego~ng resolution was passed by the foilo~ing vote: AYES: CAMMISSIONERS: Allred9 Farano, Gauer9 Herbst, Mungall~ Rowiand, Camp~ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~one> ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Noneo r:~ ~, ~'_' U c rt` ~; 7sC' Y7... ~. V ~ 4~ MIAiUIES,.CITY PLANNING CON~MTSSIONs 4pri1 24, I967 34i6 CONDIT.IONAL USE - PUBLIG f~ARING~ CONTINE~TAL SERVICE CONPANYy i335 South Grand Avenue, PERMIT-N~o.938 Los AngeZes9 Cal3farnia9 Owner; K4TELLA REALTY, INCORPOR4TED, 1741 West • Katella Avenue, Anaheim9 California~ Agent; reouest±ng pexmissior to - ESTABLiSH 9 SCNAOL FOR PRE-SCHOOL CWILDREN IN AN EXIS?INC~ RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE.~ WITH WAIVER OF M4XIMUM SIGN SIZE on property described as: An irregvlarly shaped parcel of land having a frontaoe of approximately 162 feet on the south side of Cerritos Avenue and having a maximum depth of approxim3tely 185 fest9 the westerly property line of subject property bein9 approximately 6?0 feet east of the center.l;ne of Euclid Street,. and furthe: described as 1640 West Gerritos Avenuea Froperty presently ciassified R-1~ ONE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ZONE~ Associate.Planner Jack Christofferson reviewed the proposed requa~at, property, and uses established !n close p:oximity, together with the notir.g thst the principal question f~cing the Commission was whether wouTd be com~atible w;th the surrounding R•-1 usese Iocatior. of subject Report to the Commissiony or not the proposec use Mro G~ Co Lybeck, representing the Katella Realtyy agent for the petitioner, appea:ed before the Co~un~ssion and stated that the Revererc Dozmar. Buttram would review the psoposed request. Reverend Do:i::~n Puttram~ 2923 Westhaven Dr:ve9 appeared before the Commiseion, r.oting he was the pastor of the Town Church on West Rroadway where a gre•-school nursery had recently been established in conjunction with the church faciiity~' and it was noted there was a tremendous need in the West Anaheim area ioz this type of se~vice; that the Department o`. Sociai Welrare of the State of California s i'_st:ng of the riumber of fuI'_•-day ::nd haif•-day proorart:s avai?•• able in West Anaheim indicated thi.s need9 and beca~se of the trenendous respor.se to tY~e pre~schooi iacilit°_es at the church, they tiad made a=urvey o: the res~dentiai areas •~n order to locate prooerty whese they could piace a similar faciiity~ c+nc' that subject prooerty ient itself idealiy to the proposed use~ The plot plan was then reviewed by Reverend Buttram9 noting corrections to the pe*.it:en wh=ch i.ndicated that 65 chiidrer. x~ere prop~sed to ut3.lize tt~`_s s=hool, but ir. accordar.ce wzt`. the Social Welfare•recuirpments, eniy 56 cot+id be accommodated - however. the piay area was su:*iciently large enough to accommodate more than 100 child.reng and that the reasor for requesting the size of the sign was because additional dedication was being requiied3 which would act,as a barrier to peopie trying to locate the nursery school; and that all land~ scaping presently existing would be retained> The Commission inquired whether or not a caretaker would be residing in the structure, whereupon Reverend Euttram stated that no serious consideration had been 9iven, but it might be possible a couple would reside in the bnilding to take care o: the property.• Mro Donaid Baggott, i624 'Nest Cerritos Avenue~ apoeared before the Commission and presented a petition signed by bl property ownexs in opposition to subject petitior.~ noting th:s represented aimost all the residents on Cerritos Avenue and Melis Lane, and r,otin9 that the proposed operation would be ioc~ted in a very high-class3 residentiai area and wouid be detrimentai to th~ vaiue of the surroundirg propertyg further9 that it would tend to establish a precedent to ailow a business ooezation in the R-1 Zor.e; that subject property was iocated in the middle of the block - therefore, it wou~d set a precedent for simii.a: reauests from adjoining oroperty owners, causin9 a deterioration of th'_s fine residenti•:'_ areaq and reouested that the Camm:ssion consider denying subject pet'_tior.a Mr~ Baggott further noted that homes in this area were approximately 15 years of age9 ar.d the ho~re on subject oroperty was consi@exed z•~sry palatial-type home9 and it was the deaire of the residents ihat it be kept in that manner; fur±hermo:es Cersitos Avenue could not be considerea simiiar to Katella Avenue or Harbor Bou~evard on which str-~ cortmerc'_al zoning was approved~ Mr~o James..Ba Maddoxr 1641 West Me~is iane9 appeared before the Commission in opposition and stated she was opposed to a business operation in a high-class9 residential arear th3t a21 the property owners were quite'agitated wher they received their not±ces relative to the proposed use; that the noise ano c~ars of operation would be b~rmful to the resi~• dent3.a1 character of the area since 56 children were proposed for this fac~lityg that M:.so Kellas formerly operated a small nurse:y schooi wit~ five children9 and with the msny trees around tnere the children weze constantiy in danger of falling and hurting themselves because of r.o super~ision; and that the comTercial use wouid affect the possible resale vaiue af .the homes in the areao Mra Ron Fostery 1759 West Broadway, appeared before the Commission and stated he did not know what type of nursery schooi was formerly operated on subject property; however; the State of California Department of Social Welfare was very strict as to the number of aduits needed to take care of children in the play area~ , ::: '~: ~:~~u ' ~i,'ip ~ ~ . . . . . ~. ~ . . . °~3 ; ~ . ~ ~ ~ . . ~ g~ f a ~ - ~ P~._! ~~:~.t`.,;... ~ . . . . . / i ! `; ~ ~ - . . . :'sw;;:;~i:`,; MINUTES, GITY PI,ANNING COMMISSION, April 24s 1967 3417 »,~.-;; , , x.~- ,;` C~JhDITIONAL USE - In rebuttal, Reverend Buttram preser.~ted the Commission with-a schedule ':`....; PERMIT.NO~ 938 of activities of the nursery school as approved bY the State o# Caiifornia ~} ~~ {Continued) Department of Social Welfare, ar.d the schedule and requirements of the ,~; ,. Department were checked throughout the year as well as prior to renewal ~~', of the license to operate, and because of the strinoent rules set up by ,r the Depart,ment of Sociai Welfare, there wou2d not be any children climb3n9 trees or destro.y- ~ ~'`'' in other ~;,,,.- 9 persons` propertye ,{cr~:;i~ . r'~ Reverend Buttram also reviewed the width of the street as proposed on the Ceneral Plan, ~~~• ~~w stating that subject property had been vacant for quite some time9 as well'as adjoining propertieso i '~;.r?`;; Mrs~ Maddox again appeared and stated that sub ~:r,~,;:;,~~ ject property had been vacant or.ly since ~; DecemFer; that the property to the east had ,;ust been purchased9 and that tbe man to the f~ y west had his home for saie, although he was also opposed to any business adjoining nis {~`~;:e~ p:operty; and thst in her estimation, widening of the street would not c:~an e the character ~'-`` ` ~ of the area, g t ; THE f-,EARING WAS CLOSED~ Conmissioner Rowlard offered Resoiut?on No> PCF?•-80 and moved ror ±ts nassaoe and adoot?on, seconded by Commissioner Farano, to deny Petition for Cond'_tional Use Permit Noo 938 on the basis that the proposed estabiishment o£ a child care nursezy school would estab2fsh a pxecedent for intrusion of commercial uses in a restdential area; that the pr~posed use wiii adveTSely affect the adjoinino iand uses and the charscter of the ~esidential area in which it is proposed to be located, due to the hours o: operation, noise, :ind traffic inherent in such uses; that the noise~ hours of opera±~on9 and iraffic created by the pro~- oosed Iand use would have a deieterious effect on the oeacey ~e•~lth, sofety, and ger.erai welfare of the :esidentia2 a:ea 3n which :t is proposed to be locatedo (See Reso?ution Book) On roll call the foregoing resolution was passed by the fol?owing vote: S1ES: CONJNISSIONERS: A12red, Faranoy Gauer, Herbst, Mungails Rowland9 Camp> NOES: CAMMISSIONERS: None~ ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSs. Noneo Commissioner. Herbst left the Council Chamber at 5:30 P~Me CONDITIONAL USE ~- PItBLIC I-~ARINGo AN.4 PARKy INCORFOR~IED, 1557 West Mable Street, Anaheim, PERMIT N0~939 California, Owner; KENNETN HOLT, 1557 West Mable Street, Anaheimy Californ!a, A9ent; requesting permission to ESTABLISH A PRIVATE SCHOOL AND REI.ATED , FACILITIES on property described as: An irregularly shaped parcel of iand located at the southeast corner of Loara Street and Mable Street and having fror.tages of aoproxisaately-125 feet on Loara Street and approximateiy B10 feet on Mable Street~ Property presently classified M•-2y L.IGHT INDUSTRIAL, ZOI~E~ as=nCi3te planner 7ack Christofferson reviewed the proposed request, noting that the orivate school was already estabiished or. the north side of Mable Streety and this wou'id be an e~osn- sion to provide for cafeteria9 kitchen storage facilitSes, five classrooms, and a service area ior the school buses~ The land uses -n ciose proximity we.re also reviewed9 togethes with the Report to the Corranissiono Mro F, W~ Holt, agent for the peti~t:oner9 3ppeared before the Commission, stating he was one ot the operators of the Fairmont School and wouid be available to ar.swer questions~ ~ ~t The Commission inquired how man; add'ztionai students were proposeds from whom were thev ' receiving permi.ssion for accese to Broadway, how long had they been in this locatior,; whether or not a11 children were bussed into the school faciiity, how much of the property was being ! ut:iized for.the proposed use; whereupon Mr. Nolt replied an additional 150 stuaents were M proposed with.grades ::;m kindergarten through eighth 9rade; that the number of>instructors ' would be increased from the present 14 to 20; that Doyle Hill, in a verbal agreement, had indicated an accesG easement would be granted over tneir property; that they:had been at the ~ present location since 1954 - however the school had been under operation for 35 years; that a11 but 40 children here bussed into the school faci?ities~ and these 40 were brouaht by their parents, with children coming from all parts of Orange County as well as cut:ying towns outside.of.Orange County; and that the buses are not parked on the property but.are kept at the residen.ts of the drivers of the buses$ that a considerable portion oi the property was going to be utilized #or a playground area; and that he was havin9 difficulty in obtaining the necessary cash to build all the buildings and requested consideration of permitting development on the easterly portion for classrooms and restrooms with the possibility of the ~ ^ following year the fifth classroem and the multi-purpose room being construc~tedo Commissioner Herbst returned to the Council Chamber at 5:35 P,M, ~` ~ ~ MINUTES~ GITY .PL4NNING ~7MN~ISSION, apri:. 24, 1967 ,. ~ .~ s ' ~;~ _~___ _ ------- -_ _ '-~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ 34~8 ~ CONDITIONAL~IJSE~ - Mre Merrill Sherriil, Cocr~tr.niler of Bryan Properties, appeared before PERMIT h0~ 939 the Comm3ssion and presented two Iett•ers of oppositio:~ which aiso requested (Continued) that certain conditians be required i€ the Commission r•onsiders favor.ably • the expansion of the existing a:chon,ly both letters aske~i for full and adequate off-street parking for b~3sas and personnel, ard the buses tc be ioaded aad unio~ded on the preperty itself 3nd not in the street; that a9eouate curbs, 9utters,. and--lightin~ be provi~3ed the same ~s was reouired for the industri»1 properties to the north; and that adee~.!ate fenci~g be qro~~ided to prevent children fsom indiscriminately running across the street to on~oming traffic because of the fact that iarge trailer trucks were coFlStantly using Mabie Street to gain access to the General Van and Storage fac~.lities at 1565 West Mable Street~ In zebuttal, ~Niro Holt stated that the pian indicated o:f•-street parking for bus loading and unloading•-however~ nothing Nas indicated regarding a fence; that they were not opposed to providing additional parking to the west; that the control of ioading studer,ts before and after school.hours was a:ather difficult task on rainy days, and they were aware of the probiem •- however~ considerable more pazking was planned9 and bus luading facilities d=d take this problem from off the streeta Furthermore, in response to Commission questioning9 Mro Nolt stated they olanned to recess the play area for the chiidren ard extend ~t westerly f:om a portior~ of the proposed structure; that it was planned to continue the grapestake fencing alon.g the south property line ~ however, i.f the Commission desired turther fenc=ng aiong the north and west, this would be donea TNE HEARING WAS C1ASF.D,. Commissioner Munga?1 offered a motion to approve Conditicnal Use Permit No~ 939; sub~ec± to conditior.so Discuss±on was held by the Comris,ion imrt:ediately after this mo.tion, the Comm:ss?on bein9 of the opinion that all conditions shouid be so stated; the parking and p2ay area should be definitely located or, the plans before approval; that the existing small play area was inadeauate; that it was the City°s desire to keep industrial ertcx~oach- meat away from the residential area •- howevery considexationshould aiso be oiven to them from encroachment of schools without properly fenced facilities; and that subject petition shouid be continued for a better layout showing the parking area for loading and unloading buses, loadir.9 and unloading children from private vehicles, parkinq for the instructors, adequate playground area with proper fencing, and fencing to be in accordance w~th the requirements now made of public schoo:s, and the exact boundaries arid plans fo-r the two- phase program proposed, Commissioner Mungail withdrew his motion of approvalo Commissioner Gauer offered a motion to continue Petition for Conditional Use Permit No, 939 to the meeting of May 22, 1967, in order to allow the peti.tioner time to su~imit revised olans indicating the loading and unioading location for buses and private automobiles, ihe location of parking for instructors and vi.sitors, tentative plar,s of the two•-phase program, ~nd location of a fenced playgroundo Commissioner Mungall seconded the motiono MOTION CARRIEDo I~ARIANCE I~0..~1870 - PUBLIC HEARING. DCIYLE 8 SHIELDS REALTY COMPANY, 1333 South Euclid Streety Anaheim, Califorria, Owner; JO[iN KELLY AND MARY GIBBONS, 1600 West Broadway9 Apar.tment 17••A, Anaheim, California, Agents; reqesting the following WAIVERS TO PERMIT A ROOF SIGI~: (Ij ROOF SIGN IACATION, (2) MINIMUM DISTANCE REIINEEN A FREE-STANDING SIGN A~D A ROOE SIGN, AND {3) TO PERMIT A FLASHING SIGN WITHIN 300 FEET OF RESIDEP7TIAL STRUCTURES on property described as: A rectangularly shaped parcel of land havir.g a frontage oi approxi.mately 340 feet on the east side of Euclid Street and having a maximum depth of approximately 260 feet, the southerly boundary of subject property being appraximateiy 200 feet north of the centerline of Ball P.oad, snd further described as 940 South Euclid St:eeta Property presently classified C~•1, GENERAL COMMERCIAL.y ZONE, Associate Planner Jack Chri.stofferson reviewed the proposed request :or a roof sigr. and noted the location of subject property and the land uses in close proximity, as well. as the Repost to the Commissiono Colonel John Kelly, 1600 West Broadway, eppeared before the Commission and noted that the size of the sign would be 9-feet, 9-inches 6y 3-feet, 6-inches, and represented a figure of a man, and then presented pictures to the Commission showing the type of wali sign that was prooosed in comparison with a free-standing sign as normally erected on s:mflar develop•- ments, and further noted that since there were so many free•-standing signs in existence already, it was feit this roof sign would somewhat compensate for the loss of advertising due to the fact that an off•-site sign advertising a restaurant was located almost directly in line with their facility, and that in his estimation, the approval of the proposed sign would not be objectionable to the apartments abuttiag t.o the east or be a hindrance to the drivers of automobiles along Euclid Streeto 1' ~ ~r~ P°~ssc:<' ~i 4 i.r...- ~" - . . . . . . _ - _ . . 1:.~ ~ ~ ~. f':. ~: ; f1~~ . '1:''~ ~ , ' . . ;. ~4l . . . ~ ... ' /,~" . ~ . . . . 1'x . .. ~ ' . . MINUIES, CITY PLANhING COA~N!ISSION, April 24, .19b7 ~ 3419 VART_4NCE NO~. 1870 - Commissioner Rowland left the Councii Chamber at 6:00 P,M~ (Continued)a~ No one appeared in opposition to subject petitiono THE 1-~EARZNG WAS CLOSED> The,~Commission noted that subject property had far in excess of the number of free-standing signs any shopp,tng center shcuid be permitted, as well as an excess of roof signs, and the oetitioner had not demonstrated the need for the proposed sign, regardless of the fact that roof signs exist~ad in the areao Furthermore, in the reference made to the'off-site, free- ~ standing sign, this had been denied by the Commission> Commissionei Herbst offered Resolution Noe PC67-81 and moved for its passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Allred, to deny Petition for Variance No. 1870 on the basis that the petitioner had not demonstrated that there were exceptional or extraordinary c_rcum•- stances applicable to the property to approve the variance; that the Sign Ordinance adequately provided for signing of subject property; therefore, there was no necessity to ailow th= petitioner to enjoy a privilege not afforded otherso (See Resolutior. Book) On roll call the foregoino resolution was passed by the following vote: .4YES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Gamp, NOES: COM.MISSIONERS: None. ABSENT: COMMISSIO~ERS: Row:and~ RECLASSIFICATION •- PUBLIC HEARING~ FR4NK L.~ TAYLOR, c/o M~ S~ Bernard, 817 North Broadway, NO,. 66 67_57__~ Santa Ana, California, Owner; INVESTORS TRUST, INCORPORATED, c/o Ro D. Kent, Jro, 1801 Avenue of the Stars, Los Angeles, California, Agent; requesting that property described as: A parcel consisting of two adjoining rectangular lots at the southwest corner of Cerritos Avenue and Walnut Street and having frontages of approximately 130 feet on Cerritos Avenue and approximately 85 feet on Walnut Street, be reclassified from the R-3, MULTIPLE-FANILY RESIDENTIAL, ZONE to the C•-1, GENER4L COMMERCIAL, ZONE9 to establish a convenience market on subject propertyo Associate Planner Jack Christofferson reviewed the zone change request, and land uses in c~ose proximity to subject property, and the Report to the Commission, M;~ Eugene Mueiler, representing the agent for the petitioner, indicated his presence to answer questionso No one apFeared in opposition to subject petitione THE HEARING WAS CLOSEDo The Commission in reviewing the Report to the Commission, after having viewed subject property, was of~the oFinion that subject property was developable :or muitiple-family residential use to complete the already established R-3 uses in the area; that recommending aporoval of subject petition would establish spot zoning in the area, and the area was not suited for the proposed type of commercial facility since it was immediately adjacent to the Commercial-Recreation Area. Commissioner Allred offered Resolution Noo PC67-82 and moved for its passage and adoptiony seconded by Commissioner Herbst, to recommend to the City Council that Petition for Reclassi- fication Noe 66•-67-57 be disapproved on the basis that the area was not suited for commercial development and would resuit in spot zoning for the area; that subject property was develop- ab2e for multiple-famiiy residential uses; that the proposed reclassification of subject property was not necessary or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community, and that the proposed reclassification did not properly relate to the zanes and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject propertyo (See Resolution Book) On roll call the foregoing resolution was passed by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Camp~ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Nonea ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Rowland. Y1 a:~'.x ,Jrv ~~ ~ W If~ ~ u MINUTES, CI'FY PIANNING;COMMISSION, April 24, 1967 ~ ~ ~GO RECLASSIFICATIMI - PUBLIC FIEARIhG~ MAX HILTSCHER, Box i569 Umpqua, Oregon,. Owner; NO,. 66-67-58 POY ROBINSON, 14508 Cornishcrest Road, Whittier, California, Agent; property described as: A rectangularly shaped parcel of land Mavino CONDITIONAL'USE a frontage of approximately I33 feet on the east side of State College PERMIT NOe 935 •, Boulevard and having a maximum depth of approximately 162 feet, the northerly boundary of subject property being approximately 330 feet ~ south of the centerline of Balsam Avenue, and further described as 1100 North State College Boulevarda Property presently classif:eti R-3, MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIr1L, ZONE~ REQUESTED CL4SSIFICATION: C-1, GENER4L COMMERCIAL, ZO~IEo REQUESTED CONDITIONAL 'JSE: ESTABLISH A WALK-UP RESTAURANT, Associate Planner Jack Christofferson reviewed the proposed reclassification, the use proposed for-subject property, the use:: established in closc proximitys and the ReQort to the Commissiona Roy Robinson, agent for the petitioner3 appeared before the Commissior~ ar,d noted tnat this was the kiltscher residence9 and the surroundin9 property was still an orange grove and egg ranch; however, with the uses Pstablished along State College Boulevard and tte ensu3ng traf£ic, the Hi;tschers no longer resided in this house~ Mr~ Robinson aiso reviewed the zoning of properties on Stata College 3oulevard for commercial purQoses and noted that it would not be setting a precedent to permit camieerc:ai uses, since the alley to the east provided adequate buffer to the residential uses established to the east9 and garages were alor.g the alley; that dedication for street wider.ing purposes had been made and improvement of the street Was also provided; that since previous aeniais for McDonal3's drive~-in restaurants have been made by the City, the operators ~~ave ~ttempted to acquire property where the drive•-in restaurant would be more compatibie; a~d althoagh =ubject property was not integrated within a shopping center, it was immediately adiac2nt; tha't there was more demand for commercial uses of properties along Stste College Boulevard; t3~at the R••3 developments are all. single•-story units; that the McDonald`s drive•-in restaurant di~ not reauire access to the alley; and that between 20 and 35 persons wouid be emplvyed in the proposed restaurento Mr~ Russ Betker, representing Fredricks Development Corporation, owner of the multiple-family residential development immed?3tely to the north of subject property, appeared in opposition, noting they had a long-term lease on the property; that the pro~osed use would be injurious to the ne.~lth, safety, and general welfare of the lessees of the apartments because of the hours of operation, odors, and noises which always emanate from a drive•-in restaurant; that even thou9h a six-foot wall and Iandscape trees would be required, this could not buffer all the noises that would emanate from the proposed developmEnt; that his company, in previous times before the Commission, had always been required to separate residential uses from commerciai uses with an alley, and this could not be p:ovide~3 if subject property were developed ir a~cordance with plansa Mr~ Luigi3 representin9 the McDonaid's drive-in restaurants~ appeared before the Commission and staiced that McDonald`s had always operated a very clean, attractive restauraRt, and this would be no exception~ THE HEARING WAS i:~QgED~ Discussion was held by the Commission relative to the harmful ef.Eects the proposed drive•-in restaurant would have on the residential uses established to the north and east of subject property due to the brigh•, lighting, noise from automobiles, and hours of operations, as weil as the odors from co~~king food; that any six-foot masonry wall and lardscape tx•ees could not eliminate this; that at the time the apartment development was sald by the peti•- tioner, the petitioner had expressed a desire to have multiple~family zor,ing for his property; that there was no hardship in developing subject property for multiple-family residential u~e; that the proposed use should be established in the center of a shoppin9 center in order to screen lights, bright signs, cooking odors, traffic problems ane' occasional police problems where adjacent to single-family residential usea Corranissioaer.E!erbst offered Resolution Noo PC67-83 and moved for its passage and adoption, seconded by.Commissioner Farano, to recommend to the City Council that Petition for.Reclassi- fication Noo 66-67-58 be denied on the basis that ttze proposed reclassificetion of subject property-was not necessary and~or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community; that subject property is developable for multipls•-familv residenti3l use since it was surrounded by multipie-family uses tn the north and eastg t.t:at approval of the proposed reciassification might set a precedent for similar requests and that proposed reclassifica- t~on would have a deieterious effect on the adjoining propeztieso (See Resolution Book) ty , ~ r: a~~ p~ ~~ ~.:iP ;~' jl ,~ ~,::~ . :7 ;;:i~: +. f~~`t,~~r~~-,u, ~~ 1~s1~^ ~E~ *e~~~~„~~~'`t~~rti„~"fi'~.;'~k t~ j.'v~~ ir~::~~ ~ ~,~ ~s : y r * y. ;: ~ ~ ~. ..~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . ~ ~ ~ . . . MII~UTES, CIIY PLANNING COMMISSION, April 24, 1967 ~ 3421• RECL4SSIFICRTION - On roll call the foregoing resolution was passed by the following vote: NOe 66-67-58 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Campo CONDITIONAL USE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Noneo PERMIT NOe 935 ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Rowianda (Continued) Commissioner Farano offered Resolution Noo PC67~84 and moved for its passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Allred9 to deny Petition for Conditional Use Permit No, 935 on the basis that the prcposed use would adversely affect the adjoining land uses to the north and east due to the lights, hours of ooerations, and odors emanating from the proposed operation; that the proposed drive-in restaurant should be integrated in the center of a shopping area where it can be buffered against the intense commercia•1 use with the problem of lights, si9ns, cooking odors9 and traffic problems, to9ether with occasional police problems; and that the proposed use could create a traffic hazard, having_ingress and egress to State College Boulevard for approximately 132 feets the parcel having only approximately 132 feet along State College Boulevard and reqairinq a minimum of two- 22-foot, one-way access drives, or a 30-foot, two~way drive to a hea~ily traveled streete (See Resolution Book) On roll call the foregoing resolution was passed by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ailred9 Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungal2, Campo NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Noneo ABSENT: i.OMA4ISSZONERS: Rowlando RECL4SSIFIG4TIOId - PUBLIC HEARINGo M~ J~ GOBERT, 431 North Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, NOo 66-6Z-59 California, Owner; COVINGTON BRUTHERS CCNSTRUCTION COMPANY, 841 North _ Harbor Boulevard~ Anaheim, California, Agent; property described as: VARIANCE N0~ 1871 Parcel 1- A rectangularly shaped pazcel of land having a frontage of approximately 320 feet on the west side of Magr.olia Avenue and having a max..mum depth of approximately 249 feet9 the northerly property. line of subject property being approximately 330 feet south of the centerline of Crescent Avenue, and Parcel 2..- A rectangularly shaped parcel of land (approximately 361 feet by 320.feetj, being west of and adjacent to the westerly property line of Parcel l; the easterly prcperty line being approximately 297 feet west of the centerline of Magnolia Avenue; and the north- erly property line being approximately 330 feet south of the centerline of Crescent Avenue~ Property presently classified R-A, AGRICULTURAL, ZONE, REQUESTED.CLASSI.FICATION: R•-3, MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ZON°_~ REQUESTED VRRIANCE: ESTABLISH A 48-UNIT APARI'MENT BUILDING ON PARCEL 1, AND A 72~-LH~II.T APARTMENT BUILDING ON PARCEL 2, WITH WAIVERS OF (1) MINIMUM FLOOR AREA (PARCELS 1 AND 2)~ (2) MAXIMUM BUILDIP;G HEIGHT (PARCELS 1 AND 2); (3) MINIMUM LOT AREA PER DWELLING UNIT (PARCEL 1); (4) M4XIMUM COVERAGE (PARCEL 1)~ AND (5) PERMITTED CARPORT LOCAI'ION (PARCEL 1)e Associate Planner Jack Christofferson reviewed the proposed reclassification and waivers to construct two apartment developments, noting the uses established in close proximity and the findings•and evaluation in the Report to the Commissiona Mro Gared Smith, architect for the agent for the petitionery appeared before the Conxnission and reviewed the proposed development, noting that it was basically one and two-bedream unit and density per unit would be an average of two; that the waiver for construction of-carpo_ts in the front 75~ would be similar to that developed on the property to the south; that the waiver of the one-story height limitation was being requested adjacent to the R-A parcel to the north.since it was a logicai R-3 development - however9 one-story would be maintained within 150 feet of the R-1 to the west; that the General Plan indicated low-medium density and the density proposed was less than that permitted in accordance with the medium deneity zoning request~ Mrsa Karen Stee1, owner of the apartments to the south of subject Fro ert a r ~ the Commission•-o P Y, Ppeared.befo_e ~ pposing the higher density for sub3ect property than developed on the property ! she owned to-the~south and commented regarding Mr, Smith's statement that this would be Yower density becavse there were more one-~bedroom apartments, and that she had discussed the problems regarding the proposed development with a member of the Covington Brothers; however, the plans ' were not inade available to hery and it had been determined that approximately 80~ of tMe dwell- ing units~-would be one-bedroom apartments; that Mr, Covington had also advised•her t}iat _entai would be ~120 per month for the one-bedroom and $140 per month ior the two-bedroom; however, in her op±~nion, the one-bedroorn apartments would not rent for that amount and $100~was a more realistic fi9ure, as was $125 fo: the two-bedroom since her units, whi.ch were all one-story, rented for approximately $125 per month for two-bedroom apartments and all utilities were furi;ished by her; that because of the location of the property, being only 300 feet from a ' school, it seemed more logical to have two bedrooms so that the children could use the school . y,~~z:5 X-M ~ - - ~ , ..~ ~r,l~ ~ ~ F ,t ,pl. { r ~~ , . ~ ~ ~ _. _a_`'!',7`~w MINUTES, CITY P ~ ~ LANNING COMMI6S10N9 April 24, 1967 ~~LASSIFFCA~IpN ~_ {acilit I: h~~~66 67~59• y Yi th8t she 3422 - ~- properly ~esioned pWas not oAPosed to a VARIqNCE Np„ this wou2d be m or lower densit pa=tments- and if the ~`"`""'---1~~~ erea^ ore 3n keeo+ Y9 such as one~sto_ Y w~~ (Continued) ~ that the proPert ~~g With the residential ch~ra~te~e°tsq f; ~c . at least ten or fifteen t~ the north WoUZd be t, e@ U af t1~e- , aunt9 and a stipuiafion YeBrs s3nce it was oa F~riliti.oation for being her not be sold so lon °f the will re Tt of the esiate of her_ vaca~cV mother, and she 9 aS one daughter Was~i`ed that the factor-for ~r,e•- h~d at ~east a still ali~e pTOPert ' deterioration of the bedroom a a ° fteer,- Y could ; ten t ~; , this dau .~` the plans. Propert p rt~o~ts was quite highsethus~fe excecta~cY, thaththe ~j ~ that she W~S Y~ that pja~ a runnin rr.any zoning,oroblems whichehad the ma rea was indicated F 9 a hazard of n ~ ~ occurred °ld~-timers in the nei hborhood She had reviewed 4 ~ ~'o Clare~ ln the area~ 9 , and she knew of '~ i' ihat h~s e Nolt9 p649'~ornell Avenue ~ P=operty was '' h~ving mose informatio~m~ediate~. ' eppEared before the Co ' ~ '~ that he was o f tO the West of subject ~ission in o ~ Pposed ~eoarding the oafiaoes which wouidpbepe2t Pp°sition9 stating r; ~ ~ jmprovement o~. to two•-story construction Y' th3t he was desirous~of ., the second f his home a s3nce he };ad located abuttin loor.ad-~ nd did not want to have SAent considerable moneyro~erty; f ' ~ J cent to his pxoperty looki~ the visua2 i~t,rusion of ; ~ •~ Zoning Su e: 9 into his home and pe0p1e livino,on , x A visor Ronald Thompson advised A~fr, p his be maintained Yard, ` ~~ ,. that t 1~~ feet easterly of the °lt that the ' ~` ~ the onee ~~r~ges were to be irrunediatelysad' tW0`story constr gle•-family residential P uction wouid ~ ;; story he#.ght 2imitation was bAj~ Jacent to his pTO erty to the west; -~~ ,~ ~~ Presently:Zp~d R--p~ Propert 9 req,uested for Y' ~~d that the waiver of ~ M=~ To ProAer.ty to the north ~ ~"- ` ~Y Bur~s, 2648 W , which was ~; _~ , hf~ property was also iest Baylor lvenue ' two streets which ~ the sin ' aPFeared before the Co , dead•-ended into1e~family residentiaT '~'~~SSion and stated that ~ ,~ for vehicles which rreated sub' tract to '~ ,~ h.is front yard area a 4ulte 3 ~ect property and had ~o the west; that there were `' '? - and i nd tearing ~ probiem with the trash 3 Fj~VZSi~~ for turn~-arou ~~ tF~~ nquired What the City intendedthe urass which he had wo kedher trucks backing uoni~nto , :~ if these properties tO dO =elative So laburiousl '~ ti! the Commi F~ '~ould be ~qsite hazardous due to this~increase ;~ t~'e~.t~tlr~°~tior,nof these streets~ maintaln, ;:f ,;;i on should consider garden•-t ~ since ~resQ W '~ h:9he: densit Ma9nolia and Crescent ~~ that two- ere more comoatible to ± Ype aoa;tments Y' that in his estimatio~9 ' story construction was he sir.;! =ather than two- ~ Mro D3 obJectionak,lee~family residential use Story development ~d ea~weree' 2656 Ray2or .4~~enue, a S tO the west4 and ~'~ R ' ~~ $12.. 000 4, tial pPeared in oppostti.on quaiit ° hOOes; ano that he had mo~e~ ~ stating that t a'~ Y~ 3~d he w~s ppQSed to „~ two••stor lnto this are~ he homes in this ~ ~'~'> Smith Y ao:~;t;~ent develo becau5e °{ its resi homeow ' lR I'ebuttaY3 statee that pment adia den- I ners; however he was i~ cent to himo 6 ~ sin91e-fami~ y the City did re ~ir Svmp3thv wfth the co ~ ,~ rurther ~ y homes; and tf~e ~~ e~~e~-stor ncern of the sin ~ placf~q tre car o_ Aroposed development Was°nstruction withi~ 1gp feet of theamily ~' r no recreation area Wi p~ts Which woujd add ~omplyfng With this r = thin the i50 feet of tO the line of equ~rement, and ~ garden-tyQe aoar{ment; that the develo the R•- Si9ht b).ocka ~ and owns 500 units f Per of thel' that he was familiar WithtT~~e there was ~P•3rtmc•r.,ts 3 ~ Orange County P~sed ~ Commons ~; nd even bachelo_•• '" therefore hey~ nits was density was " tYpe a art, fe~t there was a We1j k~OW~ 1~ the C:.tY ~ pecpie than whexebecause t. p ments which need hey wouid be Were not for one~-bedroom ~ar92r aPartments wy catering to adults a Permitted in An~heim• ~ T-'~ HEARING th more bedrooms werend eXpected ~ that the ~ 1~4S CLOSEp, there wouid be less ~~' permi tt ed o i:;r! ~ ; Ensoussion was held by ine Comrr,- F 9 neering peP3rtment wouid lssion reiative to what t r subject propert do cn Haylor.aven~~e YPe o. ~~ ~ this Y' 3~~ urr;.ce E Which modified cul-de-sacin ~ modified cul~-de_Sa~ 3 ~9ineer Arthu: r~aW W35 the onl 9 the ~, ~ the fuli 5p..goot Aortion of t 3dvised the Co Y Street dead.-~~dx~ i ~ cul-de-sac he parkwa ~jssion t g nto ; that was normally requiredd be used, a l t houghhgt W° °Onstruc t j Mro Thompson then reyiewed for ould not have (~ ~ low~-medium, densit '~he Commi I ~ residential a~re y fo` S~bJer.t pro ert Ssion the fsct that the :eside 9 a~d the P Y~ Which permitted a naximumeneral PZan ~ ntial acreq a~thou hFroposed rz~1assifi ProJected Per net resider;tial a~ 9 they were onl cation permitted ~ 01 i6 dWeji~~~ i xe~ Y ProPosi~ A to 3fi ur.its 9"n~ts per net 9 33 units on one a per net Ccmrnissione: p,.; ~d 29 units on another althouoh a-`~O exp~essed o `' S~bject pzaperty w~ pposition to the hi be in the R_2 cate or S developable f 9her density 9 Y, with a or muit_p;e-famil ~ beir.g of the rn.,h~mum or i8 units Y residential U°p~nfon that ; per net residential acreSe9 it should ~-- ,,,f ... _ `. ~a.~,:; . .,. ...., ,.r . ., ~. . .,.... ,< ...,: r , ,.~r.x~ ,... . .. ~ ~1L`'^ wm.~ ~~,...rw:;,.~ :. - - _ ~~, _ . ~ • ~ ..~ . ~ . . . . ~ MINUTES, CITY PL.4NFIING COMMISSION, :,prii 24~ )96~ '~~ ~ ~ . y•:~. ~x~+ 'Ng:c ~f L ~ ^ ~„x',~„ r.,:~:;; : :.'s~.Ry, . .-~.._~,~ ; . Z.J~ ``, .. 3423 I RECLASSIFICAI'ION~ ~ Commissioner Allred offered Resolution No, PC67-85 and moved for its P~O. 66~67-59 passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Mungall, to recommend to the City Council that Petition for Reclassification Noa 66••6%••59 VARIANCE N0, 18-71 be approved, subject to conditionse (See Resolution Book) (Continiied) ~ On rollcall the foregoing resolution was passed by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer9 Mungail9 Y,erbst9 Campo NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Faranoa ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Rowlanda Ccmmissioner Farano stated that his opposition was based on the fact that density was ' proposed higher than the General Plan indicated, and a maximur.. density of 18 dwelling units per net resider~t;tal acre should be permittedo Commissioner Herbst offered Resolution Noo PC67~86 and moved for its passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Allred, to grant Petition f.or Variance Noo 1871 for wai.ver of m~cimum permitted lauilding height, permitting two-story r,or,structi.en adjacent to the property to the north - however.y one-story wi.thin 150 feet of the property to the west and carports within the front 75% of the property, since the revised plans no longer reouired waiver of the minimum floor area, waiver of the maximum coverage and waiver of the m:ir,~.mum lot area per dwelling unit9 and subject to conditionsa (See Resolution Book) On roll call the roregoing resolution was passed by the following vot=: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer~ Herbst, Munya119 Campo NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Faranoo ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Rowlando ` RECLASSIFiCATION - PUBLIC HEARINGo INITIATED BY Th1E CI1'Y PLANNING COMMISSION~ 204 East -N0~ 66-67-60 Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California; proposin that as: A rectan ularl sha ed g property described mately 330 feet on the southpsideloffCrescent Avenuefandthaving aPmaximum depth of approximately 1,230 feet, the east=-ly boundary of subject property being app:oxi- mately 370 feet west of the centerline ef Muller :4venue9 be reclassified from the R-A, '~AGRICULTURAL, 20N~ to the M~1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, ZONE, to establlsh an existing industriai use in its~mos•t•appropriate zoneo Associate Planner Jack Christofferson reviewed the proposed reclassification of property known as part.of the Richfield Oil Research complex, noting that single-family residential use was establi.shed to the south and west of subject property,and that the Richfield Oil Research offices were located to the east, and undeveloped R-3 zoned propprty to the west; furthermore, the northez•ly one-half of subject property was developed as part of the Richfield Oil Company complex and the southerly half of subject property is presently undeveloped, but is designated on the General Plan for iight industrial developmento It was also noted that the State Divisi.oro of Hi.ghways had preliminary plans for the overpass of the Santa Ana Free- way extendin9 Crescent Avenue easterly, and ihat perhaps i.nstead of dedication for street widening purposes of Cresceni Avenue, an irrevocabie offer of dedication could be required untii the State`s•.pla~s became final~ Mro Don Lewis, representing the Richfield Oil Company, appeared before the Commission and noted they.had started building an addition when they were informed that the property on which they:,.proposed industrial development did not have the correct zone - therefore, subject petition was in. order; that the requirement of an additional 5 feet for dedication would be given •- however, there was a request that some working agreement be made with the City and 5tate so that-.ingress and egress would not be blocked off in the event the overpass became an actuality;.that the State up to this time had not requested any additionai land for the overpass ~ howeuer, the company was concerned relative to the ingress and egress; and they were willing to give the irrevocabie offer as suggestedo THE EIERRING WAS,.•CLQSEDa Commissioner ~auer offered Resolution Noa PC67-87 and moved for its passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Mungall, to recommend to the City Council that Petition for Reclassi- fication No, 66~67-60 be approved, subject to conditions, and ar. amendment to Condition No~ 1 to require,.an irrevocable ofier of dedication for street widening purposes at such time as the City requested ito (See Resolution Book) On roll call the foregoing resolution was passed by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Campo NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Rowlande `; 7 ~', ', -`.".'i~ 1 7'/'C" ~ ,~;'. ~ ~ MINUTES, CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, April 24, 1967 \~ 3424 RECLASSIFZCATION -- PUBLIC HEARINGe INITIATED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, 204 GsSt ~'~n N0~ 66-67-61 Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California; proposing that property described ';:;~;~ as: That area generally bounded by the Santa Ana Freeway on the east, a~, Oran,gewood Avenue on the south, Walnut Street on the west9 and Ball Road on the north, and further described as the Commercial-Recreation i 4^=a, be recLassified from the R-A, AGRICULTURAL, C-1, GENERAL COMN~.RCIAL, P.ND M-l9 LIGHI'. - -~' INDUSTRIAL,• 20NES to a Resolution of Intent to the C-R, COMMERCIAL-RECRE.4TIONy ZONEo .~, ~ ~,~j Associate Planner Jack Christofferson xeviewed the general boundaries of subject property, Sk noting that since the City Council had established the Commercial•-Recreation Zone, it ~~~ seemed appropriate to establish a resolution of intent on these properties as depicted in ~ P.eference Map No, 1100~64-i, and that this zoning action had been initiated to provide '~•*.ss;; for the expedi.tious *eview of future development in accordance with the standards of the '`:`.+ C~R Zoneo , No one appeared in opposition to subject petitione THE HEARING WAS GLOSEDo `~' Assistant Development Services Director Robert Mickelson advised interested persons in ~A' the Council Chamber that he wished to inform them that the action which might be taken by the Commission did not automatically reclassify the property; however, it would speed up ,4 any zoning action on their properties in the event they wished to deVelop within the ~,,..;: permitted uses-of the Commercial-Recreation Zoneo Commissioner Gauer offered Resolution No~ PC67-88 and moved for its passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner All:ed, to recommend to the City Councii that Petition for Reclassi- fication Noa 66~-67-61 be approved, subject to conditionso (See Resolution Book) On roll call the fore9oing resolution was passed by the foilowing vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungal3, Campa NOES: COMMISS~IONERS: Noneo ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Rowland. Chai.rman Gamp declared a five~-mi.nute recess; after recess Chairman Camp reconvened the meeting at'7:05 PoMe, Commissioner Rowland being absento GENERAL PLAtQ - PUBLIC HEARING~ INITIATED BY TF~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, 20G East AMENDMENT N0~-93-~ Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California; proposing an amendment to the - Circulation Element, Highway Rights-of-Way of the General Plan by establishing Convention Way between Harbor Boulevard and Anaheim Boulevard and Clementine Street between Katella Avenue and Orangewood Avenue as Secondary Highwaysa Assistant Development Services Director Robert Mickelson reviewed the proposed extension of Convention Way easterly to connect with Pacifico Street, east of Anaheim Boulevard, and the extension of Clementine Street between Katella Avenue and Orangewood Avenueo Mro Mickelson advised the interested persons in the Council Chamber that no precise align- ment had been established tor these streets - that only preliminary studies for the General Pian have been formulated by the Staff; however, the Traffic Engineer indicated that with the completion.of the Convention Center and the extension of Convention Way to Harbor Boule~~rd, it was imperative that additional internal circulation in the Commercial-Recreation Area withirr Harbor, Katella, Haster, and Orangewood Avenues be considered; that Katella Avenue and Harbor 8oulevard traffic carsying capabilities were almost taxed to a maximum; that the traffic on Haster~Street had increased 75% in the last two years ~ therefore, the only street in the area with any substantial capacity left was Orangewood Avenue, and this would also be increased at such time as the Orangewood freeway overpass was constructed, and that since the generai aree in which these.streets were projected to cross had areas that were undevei- oped; this•would i.ncrease the potential for development of these propertieso Mr. Mickelson,.,i~.sesponse to general questioning by interested persons in the Gouncil Chamber, stated,that there was no specific date when this would go into effect; that it was a Geneaal.Plan amendment only, and that at such time as traffic volumes in the area became so heavy.that the existing streets could no longer carry them, the precise alignment would then~be adopted, and development of the extensions of these streets would take placea Mro verald Ho-Dye; 1949 South Manchester Avenue, Mr. Dudley Frank, Mro Raymond Terry~ Mrn Masaemasao Fujishi9e, 1854 South Harbor Boulevazd, and other interested persons present in the Council Chamber took part in e discussion reiativE to problems which might be encount ered when the precise alignment was adopted; namely, structttres in the way of the proposed alignment, access to the trailer park property being eliminated, the number of years this ~j . ~f- 'M ..-~ - J< ` _ ~~ ~ ~ ~ .. _ , x;. . .. _ ~ . . . . GENE&4L PLAN - would take placea signalization of Convention Way and its aligrment AMENDMENT_NUe•9? across Harbor.Bouievard9 use of Orangewood Avenue to handle the traffic (Continued) rather than extending Convention Way across properties indicatedo trailer park was proposedltoebe~redevelopednwith~higherhdensityuusesn~thetincreasesind traffic would ~e~erate problems - there£ore the plan might be accelerated to occur within the next five-yea•rs; that access would not be denied to any properties due to the possibility of the extension•~tirver the freeway in the event the precise alignment was adopted, and the ?' ' affected stxuctures might necessarily have to be removed in order to extend this alignment; R,~`,~~'' dedication wou3d•no~ be requzred for the new street until the precise alignment and develop~ `~ ~ ment of the.individual r~~~ properties af{ected by the extension of Convention Way and Clementine ,;.:Yy ~ Way was propose~;•and tha•t the General Plan would only indicate that the City deems it desir~- ~=:~~. able to have a.street at this general locatione Office Engineer Arthur Daw advised the Commissi~n that signalization of Convention Way and a f Harbor Boulevard would have no off•-set intersection because the signalizing would be difficult ; to control'due to the heavy flow of traffic anticipated from Convention Way and the existing ~ traffic along kaibor Boulevard; however, the alignment could cur.vs after its intersection 'a; '~: with Harbor' Bo~le~ardo 's; : The Commiss~ion r~oted that since the I~terdepartmental Committee saw the need for the proposed " extensicn of Convention Way, and the need did exist re ular ~` the oreci 9 ~ ~ ~ 9 public hearingswould establish k ~ se;aii nment• however this General Plan amendment makes those people who own ~~ ~, property in this a•rea aware of the proposed street in this general erea in the event they ,, decide to.redevelop their properiies9and at the time the prer,ise alignment is considered, ° ~:' further discussions and oppositions may be voiced at that hearing when it affected v:,zieus 'w ~ propertieso Associate Planner Jack Christofferson advised the Commission that if the City was cognizant of the plans of the property ownexs, the precise alignment wouid be established considerably sooner than the prasent indefinite dateo Zoning Supervisor~Ranald Thompson advised the Commission that the General Plan amendment would allow the people ownin9 property in the area to develop their plans for property in terms of right-of~way and in teans of what the City needed for circulaticn, and at such time as they were approached with offers for development of their property, the requirement of dedication of-their property for streets would not become a surprise to them, thereby requiring expensive alterations of development plans. THE HEARING WAS CLOSEDe Commissioner f~ungadl offered Resolution Noa PC67-89 and moved tor its passaqe and adoption, seconded by Cwnmissioner Farano, to recommend to the City Council that General Plan Amend- ment No. 93, establishing Convention Way between Harbor Boulevard and Anaheim Boulevard, and Clementine Street between Katella and Orangewood Avenues as Secondary Highways, be approveda (See Resolution Book) On roll call the foreooing resolution w3s passed by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIO:JERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mun9a11, Campo NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Nonea ABSENT: C0~IMISSFO!~lfRS: Rowland~ REPORTS ANID - ITEM NOe 1 RECOMMENDATIONS ~. Conditional Use Permit No, 780 - William Ca and Ada I, Higdon ~ ~• Snider ~ Request for an extension of timea Associate Planner Jack Christofferson advised the Commission that Conditional Use Permit No. 780 was approved by the Plannin9 Commission on November 18, 1965, and two previous extensi.ons had been granted, the last having technically expired March 23, 1967, and that development proposed was for a~travel tzailer park which would start development in a few weeks. - Commissioner Herbst offered a moticm to grant a 180-day extension of time for the completion of conditions of Conditional Use Permit Noo 780 granted in Resolution No. 1842, Series 1965-66, said time extension to expire November 21, 1967o Commissioner Mungall seconded the motion~ MOTION CARRIEDa . ,~:~' ~A'~. J _... , ~,~ . _. ,. . ,:__._~._~_ . ,. 0 ; -' _ _ ._ ~ ~ NiINUTES, CI~'Y .PLANNItJG' COMMISSIQN 9 April 24, 1967 3426 REPORTS AND ~,:;~ri~A~-~tp, 2 ~ RECOMMENLIATI~S. -General P2an Circulation Element Study - Right-of•-Way width (Continueat) Anaheim $oulevard~from Wilhelmine Street to South Streete Zoning Super.visn~•.~Ronald Thompson advised the Commission that at.the March 27, 1967 ,.meeting the-P-,i:e~m~ing Commission directed ~the Staff to make a studv regarding the street widening xeauix.emerrts`.for`Anaheim~Boulevard between Wilheimina snd South Streets3 that a study had=been-msde end reviewed by a committee composed of James Maddox, Gity Engineer; Ed Gran_ow, Traffic Engineer~ .4rthur Daw, Office Engineerg and Marvin Krieger and Norvin ' Lanz from Development Services, at which time it was noted the Tatie of Exceptions to the Circuiation Eiement of the Generai °lan dated November 23~ 1965, required a building set~ 'back of 40 feetp however~ any changes concerning right•-of~way within the Center City should ,,be held in abeyance until a decision concerning the downtown redevelopment had been made ' and related:traffic requirements had been estabiished~ Comm:.ssioner Mungall offered a motion to h,oid in abeyanr.e any further study regarding the General P1an Circuiation Element Study •• Right•-of-Way of the width of Anahelm Bouievard between Wilhelmina Street and South Street untii decisions had been made on the urban reaevelopment of tke Center City Study~ Commi.ssioner Gauer seconded the motior,~ MOTION CARRIEDo Msa Thompson then advised the Com~nission that the property covering the Angel Carwash, under Conditional Use Permit No, 853r should have the condition reauiring the dedi.catlon amended to ready "Ihat any structures be set back 40 feet from the centerline of An3heim Boulevard"a~ Commissioner Gauer offered Resolution Noe PC67-90 and movec' for 3ts passage and adopticns seconded by Commissfoner Y.erbst3 to amend Condition Noo 1 of Resolut~on No> 2080, Series i965-669 dated June 20, 19ti6, to require that ail structures proposed for sub,~ect property shall be set.back 40 feet froR the centerline of the street along AnaheQm Eo~Ieva;d~ (See P.esolution Bookj On ro~l ca3,1 the foregoing resolut3on was passed by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred9 Farano, Gauer- Herbst9 Mungall9 Campo NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Nonea ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Rowlanda ITEM NO,. 3 Orange County Master P~an of Riding and Hiking Trai;s within the Anaheim plannino area ~(Proposed Amendment Noo 1) 2oning Supervisor Ronald Thompson noted the Report tr, the Commission conta:.ned all the information the Staff had relative to the amendment to the Oran9e County Naster Plan fo: R'_d±ng and l:iking Ira±isy however; Proposal D was not ref2ected on the Hi:l and Canyon Ger.eral Pian and woutd have to be set for public hearing~ The Commission advised the Staff that any Catailed report regardin9 the Orange County ~ pA.aster Flan of Ridic~g and Hiking Trails be held in aceyance untii the public hearino for Gypsum Trail~ Commissioner M~ungall offered a motion to direct the Commission Secretary to set for public hearing consideration of an a~r~ndment to the Hiii and Canyon Geners~ Plan ta pro~ect Gypsum Trail as a hiking and riding traily said public hearing to be set °or May 229 1967~ Commissioner ~llred seconded the motion~ MOTI~ CARRiEDa . ITEM NO, 4 Conditional Use Permit Noo 810 •- Dovalis••Casagrande - : Request for an extension of timeo Assocfate Plann.er Jack Christofferson reviewed the request of Joseph and Ethel Casagrandes owners oi the,pxoperty considered under Conditional Use Permit Noo 8109 proposing a con- valescent hnspital,-reauesting an extension of time for completion of conditions, noting that because of the wide-spread difficu]ties experienced during the past year in obtain:ng buildings loans,,they had been unable to formulate final plans$ howevex,. the project would be.underway by August of 1967~ Corr.missioner Mungall offered a motion to grant an extension of one year for comp:etion of conditions in Resolution Noo I9509 Se_ies 1965-66, dated February 28, 1966, said time extenslon to expire March 28, 1968o Commissione: Allred seconded the motion~ MOTION C.4RRIEDo f .; :.,: ~. : ;,~:~ ;.'~ _ ,.:::~ i ~~~~~~`~. i <'_ ~ . ~ ~~./'''°'1.. ^!t4 lt:.., ' '.1.:~; ~ . .~ ".., ... ~msK ~ '~i~~~. t~ , f I ~ . I i 'J.•.., ~ ~'~1`+,'Y ra~~'s~r~~' ~~ Y~h' 7~ 1 tr,~ z(.. ~ zn: ~.~_ t;:,~ .yT;i .. ~ G~_~.i -: ~.:~ a. 1 k"r~~'+f~~ lY P~~c~~~~~ r~~ bfT~, ,r }~ 1 i ! ^ , n r ~t'~~i`~`~ ~ TM r ~~ y k ~ t.~N r n~ i. u t ~ ~ ~~ ~ i ~: r ~ ' ~~i , i ~ ~ ' ~~-, 't ~~^ f ~ ,' I f ~L i r r~, ~ k' ~, Y .'~ ~ r .i ~b :y ~'~ . ~ ~ . i ~'- ~ , . -_ ~~ ~..: __ . " .' - y, .' _ '.. _ ~ ~"~ ~ '_' r~ " ~ " ~ ;~ :r; ~. r y ~ ~•: : I E ~ . y ~ ] ~' ~ j . ,, . .. . ~ d~ 4 . . ~ ~ ~ . • ~ ~ rr ~ ~ Y r t, - „ . i. ~ ~. ~ t i ~~ ~ ~ '- 5 1 T i yS t _ ~ 4~ ~ , ';i - . . , ~i ~„* t ~ ~ . ~ ~i r~4.-.,'~~ r t ~ ( _~ I P hr, ~ ~' y [. - j ~ zy _ 1 t l ~? •i 3! ~ :: k 1 ' ~~~ J`~I `' n ,a i c i i s r r i F ~ i ~, t ;j., +~ t 1 j '~ fi 1 ~ . . I jl _ - . ' . ~ . . . . ~ . , . ~ . .. . I I f I ~ ~ ~. ~ , , y 5 : T r i 1 .~ -r ~i , r , ti ; ' : ' ` ~ , _ _ , , , ; .~ ' ~ `, ~ r ,. , `i `: , . r r . - r r; f `v ~ ~ i , '. i i r f I ~ i ~ a^r'~+~r »~ . - ~ _...-_. - ~ ~. .n:.a. - - . ... . ~ ~ ' . ' ~ ~ .. . . ~ ~ C ~ .. ' ~,. ,. , , . ' . ~ . . . . .. . . , .. ~ . ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ . . . , . ~ . . . .. .._