Minutes-PC 1979/06/04~ '.. ~
~lty I+sll
Anahcim~ Gallfo~ni~
June 4. 19~`+
REGIlLhR MEETING OF THE ANAHE111 CITY PI.ANt~ING CQNMIS510N
REGULAR - Thc regular nraciny nf thc Anahein i.lty Planning Commissi~n wrs celled to
MEETING order by Ghel rm~+n Herbst at 1:3~ P•m• ~ June 4~ 1979~ 1n the Councll
Char~er~ a quorum beinq prese~t.
PRESEt~T
A~SLNT
ALSt) PRESENT
PLEUGE OF
ALIEGiPNCE
- rh,~i rrn, n: Her6st T~~Ar
onr~ission~rs: Barnes~ Bushore, David~ Johns~n, Y.lnq~
- Com~~i ss i onc rs : None
- Jacb. 1lhitc
Jay Ti tus
Paul Sinr~er
Mni},~ Sant~~lahti
Robcrt Kelley
Ro~ert Ncnnin~~~~r
~di th I;erri~,
Ucputy Clty Attorney
Officc EnqEnc~~r
Tr~~fftc: En~~~nc~•r
Assistant Dir~~~cor f~r Zoning
Ass~ciotc Ptar.rcr
Asslst.nn~ Planner
Plannin~~ Commis~ton SecretAry
- The Pledr~e of legi~~nc~~ to the Fla~ wes lcd hy Commissionpr David,
CONTINUED PUUI.IC HEARING, f1WNE.'~: BRYA-~ I!~UUSTRIAL
ITEM NU. 1
~-C LG RI(,Al Ex~NPT10"~-CLASS 1 PROPERTIks. I-IC.. 11~6 f.ast Oranqe'ho~re Avenue~
(t~G.~
iNTaAVt51~`t
11GENT
~
•
p' . U
1"14~
~
:
!2.u~1.
Anaheim CA
14~ East Orangcthorpe Avr.nue. Anaheim~ CA ')2:'~~ .
~
ONDI 10 AL USE CR!11 N0. Petltloner renuests pcrmissl~n to RCTAI~~ A flItIGO
PARlOa WIT~i 61AIVEP, OF MIt~IMUM NI /B~P, OF PARKING
SPA~ES o~ property ~escriberi as a rectangulariy-shaped P~~Ce~ ~feet~onCthei~erth sl~ie of
roxl~+tely 2 5
f
epproximately 1.~ acres fiaving apn
a frontage o
th of t~pproxtmately 27J feet, being located
' de
i
Orang~tharpe Avenu..~ having a~
t of
f p
mtx.
x
che cente~line uf ~emon Strer.t~ anci further cescril»d as
eet e~ts
approxir.-ately 11?r>
n
e
A Property ~resently clr~sslfted ML (IHDUSTRIAL. tIM~TEO)
.
ve
u
145 East Orangethorpe
ZONl..
SubJect peti tian was continued from the me:eting of Apri 1 23. 1'~?''' cause of a tiG vote
t of tt~e petitioncr.
and from th~^. meeting of May 7, 1'~19 at the reques
n(
~~ t;^~~~'Was~
The~e was no one indicating tt~~ir presence in oppojl
d~atnthe,public
Q
1
,
ea
not
the staff report to tl~e Pianning Gortmisslan date ~
hear i ~g, i t i s referred tr~ and made a part of the mi r,tes.
Chair~aan Herbst expl~ined thl3 Iter~ was co~tinued fron the meettng of Aprl1 23rd because
of a tie vote ~^~csentedhorpif,anyhofrthe Lommissiore~scwouldelikG~coihaveetheWheari~~new
av i denct to be p
reopened.
79-407
5/4/79
• 1MfSM'7`F71N .e~e.:'V ~ .:..:...... ..~t,:z~... -f ~.~'i... i..~:I.~yxu' ~
. __. _. _.._~w,lyVlFqE9y(YA.NttYK~3Y5~~, .
~
~-
MINUTES~ F~NAHEIM CITY PLIINNING COMMISSION~ JUNE 4~ 1'119
EIR GATlGbRICAI EX~NPTIQN-CLASS 1 ANU CON'ITIONAL USE PERMIt N0. 1y46
~
79-408
(continue~d)
Commissl~ner Tolar indic::tcr~ ha rrould likr_ to hav~ the quelti~n ~~werr~! r~nardiny the~
potc:nti~il off•sit~ Parkinq~ and Corrmissloner f3arnes Indic+~tc~i s~ ~ns ~bsrnt at the Aprll
23rd mectin, and had reviewed thc mattcr~ hut ~+ould Ilke tn ~~ve the heflrinq reo~eneci tn
or~ier to ;~~av~~~ a bett+~r und~rstr+ndinQ of the pmposal.
THC Hu~il.l c HEnRI ~~r WAS REOPC~t~U.
Fl~yd l. Farano~ attorne~y renre:gentin~) I~LI'AVISIOn~ Inc.~ explalned th,at off-stte p~irkinc~
IS evalloblc, '~ut that he doe5 n~t h~~vf a sl~nrd a~;~r,en~nt r+t this tirnc; thfit thr
petitioner has Arrinq~•d ~•rFth t~~c ~wnr.r c~f the prorerty on tl~e south s(de of ~' +ncteth~,r{~e
llve:nue ~ di rect ly across thr. st rcrt , t~~ ~~se tt~~t I>rc~(~r~Ly for .ici~11 t lona) ~.ir~ '~,~1~ i ~
neede~i; » thne the rat run~ ~f t-,~ h i n~~~ ,>ner~t ic~~n wl 1 1 n~t hc• endnnqere~; ~ tn~~ ~ct i t loncr
propos~s t~ hirc t.hrer ~~f~~'cs tr ~ar~ the cnrs .~n~i offe~r H v~let servic~; t-~~t Hhen
subJect prop~•rty's p.irl iny iti exh~usced. the v~lrts wi l l pArk the nitrons' car5 ~icross the
street~ +~nd the patrrms woul~i I,c ~xpected to r~~t~ ^vc chrir rn•m vr.l~iclc•s ~~ith thc
assist~tnce :m~1 ~~ui~lanc.e of c~nr of the v.i'e[ er~~~ _~~S hh~ ~~•~t~in5 nfter cl~sinn.
M~. Farano rxplAinc~; lie h.id ~~hysic.~lly Cciuntnd th~~ nnrl:{n~ ~D,~C~,', nn~1 e~v-n t~~r~uyh thc
pl•~ns sh~w 112 st,~ce5~ hr.. I~~d c~unte~i 11'~ yracrs, ;~n~t th~~t Comr~issloner f;u-hr~rn I~t~~1
eountc~~ 1')~i s~,~ceti. He su~•,e•str~i th~t [hr nw-~h~r ~~f s~ice, rr.auirc~ ! h~• c:.~l~ ~ila[rr1 ~~n tl~c
bASI~~ of one st~nce f~~r rv~rv ;~, Sn~are ff!P.T c~f ~area tht~t ls nctu~l ly usrd for I.~in~t~, ~~ ~~1
that the are.i not us~d f~~r hinn~ s~~ch .5s the rr5tf0~)m5, cc~nferenr..e roor~c, c~ffices, etc.~
be dclec~~d~ thrr~by fir~urin~~ thc spnc~s or+ bn3';.'~ snuarr f~ct (1'~~ sr~~cc°.). f~e explalned
the~~e are in cxcc:,s of 1~^ s~>ac^s avai I~hic or, thc s~~utt, sldr ~' th~ Strr~et anri they fer.l
odeyuete parkin~~ c~n br furnis~h~:i. He ~~resentcd pt~~to~r~pitis of th~ insldt dnd outside of
the f,~..ility, p~~i~tin~~ out th~: arca wh~re the bin~;o tablcs are ~~~c..~tr-'•.
Nr. Farano ex~lainccl Introvislon~ Inc. is a nnn-{~rr~fit orr~,~nil~ti~.~n wt ich exists for the
purpose ~~ enc~~igin~~ in n b~~siness of furnis~h(n~~ cA,settec of ~ st~iritu~~l and phySic~l
n~turc for nc~nle oihc~ are i I1 or ar<~ :r~+aitinq sur~~cry; th.~! tl,c n~~n-profit status w~~s
yrante~i in ".~7' as an ~~ivanc~~ rul in~;~ sul,.jzct to furthcr d~~terr~in ' lon And unti 1 furthrr
inspe~tlon was yiven by th~~ Int~rnal Revenue Sprvice- a~~' ix ~xr~~res on Jecerr,hPr 31~ 197~~
bu: Lliat the IRS hr~s nnt revi~w~ed Che sltu~tion tc~ date; !hat as far as thc~v knc~w~ the
exemption cSc~es stand and t~~cy ~~ have an cxer~tion by th~ Calif~rni~ Ela~rd of Equalization
Nhich mea~s that fun~s raised t,y t~~e hin~}o oPeration I~ave tc~ be c!rvote:l tu a verv s~+eclel
purpose; that the wurkers arc volunter_~s and are not p~id and funds from thcse activities
will be tevote~l tn the ~~ro,fuctlan of t"t~e cassettc~s; and that the Vetcran~ Admini;tration
and Artx~rican Legion have shown intr.rest in these cASSette~.
THE PuULIC HERRI~~r; ~IA; CL~~CD.
Corrnissioner t3ernes asked if any coms.~lalntK have been r~c~ived reqardln~ .he parklnn, and
Mr. li~ni,inher, Assistant Planner, replt~d t!~at none hav~ '~eer r~ecelvP~l.
Commissioner darnAs .asl:ed if ihe hours of operAti~n ~re to b~e the same ~~s irdicated in the
staff rep~rt, and Mr. lienninc}e~r explained the haurs of ~~cretion ~re controll~d bv the
binc~o ordinance.
Mr. Farano stated the petitic~ner ~Ibna to operate from ~~:~0 p.m, co midntaht; that th~y
anticlpaLe g~oups in ~xce~s of 3ii0; that tt~e rnaximum capacity 1s 33'l; and that durin~ the
gasol ine shorte_c,e they hnve bern having approxirnAtely 2~~~ tu ?75 r-I~yers.
Commissioner Bu~h~re asked if thc ner4ons ufferine; the vblet s~rvice wil{ he pa(d~ and Mr.
farano explained that thcY wi11 be pa~d and are private cantract:rs. Commissioner Bushore
Ytated he hed asked the questian because [he proposed velet ~brkl~g r+ould prc>t~atsty so1ve
~/4/79
~ ~g_l~~n
MINUTES, ANANE~M CIT~ PUNI~ING CUMM15510N~ JUNE 4~ 1^7n
clR CATEGORICAI FXEMPTION-CLASS 1 AND CdNU1710NA1 USC PlRN17 ~~0. 19~'~ ~tonti ued)
thr p~~kinq problem~ hut 1f ~t ls not e IeQitimat~ usr.. of funcls. then it would n~t be
permittcd and thc v+~rkin~a n~oblem wou~d r,ot he anlvrd,
Jack Whfte~ Uet~uty Clty ~~torney~ ~xplaineJ ic is ~ossiblc the ~~~Pts can be ~+.ifc!
deP~n!ling upon huw thr payments are m~+cSc rnd from wht~t fu~~~fs~ b; C that th~ P1Annina
Commisslc~n should r~ot be concerned :~buut c~~ntrol of the binv~ ~~ ~r.rAtion and thef r decisfon
rclatea only to thc ~and usc; that the operati~n w~2~ havP to conf~rm to c~de rr~visions
er~d the code controls how thr. ^~ofits ~y bc uscd and whAt expensns ru~y ae p~~~.i from th^
proftts.
Chairman Her6s[ pointed out thc U~titionr_~ had had s~ncc April to obtain A si7npd
agrcei~nt for off-sitc ~arkinn rnd he could n~t underSt~n~t why it hA~ n~t heen ~b[~~ined~
polntine~ aut the pr~~~rty ~+~~-r 1~ )u5t ~~r~s5 th~ strret fr~r+ suhtect proP~rty.
Mr. Far~,no ~~~~1 ie~i thC pra~+rrty hfls ~Iw.~ys 2>ecn :~vni l.~l~le fnr D++rkinq~ hut the~ ~~tohlem h~~
been how to ~l~t [he p•^trons across [hr strcet. f~~ stated they do n~t h~ve thc siqned
agrecmr.nt, but wr~ulc; su~~aest that tl~e Commissjo~ ~~r~ii~rf~~ rt~~ufurntsh~c~cwithinhl!, cfnys.
condi t ion that .in a~ir~:ement acccptab le to th~ Ci tY Y
Canciissi~~ner Kinq aske~i lf the CASSCLtCS ancl ''~~-h~~~ur tc`ephon~ •,ervice are avnilable at
this tlmc~ ond Mr. F~rnnc, replied th~t intr~visi~>n h.~s nrepare~f two pilats `~~r thc purpose
of shnwtng t-i~s~, to various orq~niz~~tions and aftcr the~y rafs~ cn~ugh mr~nr.y~ n*~duetl~n of
Che tape5 wi 11 bt: und+~rway~ And cxnlained the t.~n~'s n~ed sccncry end ~r~fcs5ional act~rs
erd .~re exp~~n~; i v~ t~ mal.e.
f,omtr~l5si~nCr ,lavl ~~1~r'stinnrd [he hln~~ ordinanc~ an~1 ~~.krci if if. address~s ~1 n~M-nrofit
facade for th~~ purp~~s~~y n~ hin~~~ and J~ck uhit~ r~pl~••J the c~des~and 1~cisep~ssihhP
pertent~~ue ~f i~r~~fits whiGh muyt he ~1r.v~>te~i t~ ch~~~~t~~~~ E>~~~
administrative costs of u~nductin~: thc <;a~x~, coulr' ~~r~tircly Uffsr..t thf~ nrofits or t-~e
profl cs c~ulcl uc v~ry s~nal 1,
Lcxnmissioner Tolar st~~te~1 he h~s rrcc~nsinered thi~ use ~^~i feit the qur.s[f~n is the land
use and q~x~stl~ned thi~, pmperty bcinq used for another hinnu ~arlor, Hr. felt one of the
questions to he answerc~ wa~. wheth~r or not the Comr+ission wants to c~ntini~e to build the
reputatton th~t Ana+ti~~~'~~ is getting reg~~rdin~ bin~~~ narlors; thRt hinqo was ~ric~inally
startpd manY yer,rs agc} to r.~ise fnnAS~fc~atlons'can vzryrye~s(lyS~l'intottheVEnciustri~jhts
Drum an~1 Bun I c Cor~s ; t`,m! the U 1 g ~
arcas or int~ tt~e ind~strial n1:+nts a`ter hours :.nd~ reqardless of agrecr+ents f~r off-sit~
pArl.Ina~ thc~ inuustrial plants could beyln working seve~al shiftx ar~f narF;inn would be~ome
a problem. f;e was also cnncernhdr'thata~~o~S`adsn~onducivicetoeihenlnduscrial arc+ttwhether
his mind is wi~ethrr or not [hr ~ P
non-profit o~ profit ~r~a~traci~ns. Ne felt this use wcyui~i he a vinistinn ~f the
in:fustrial tonN because it ~: a cor,mercial vent~re.
M~. Far~n~~ st~~ted tne ectual ~rse of the propertY when th~ ta~es ~re in production N~1~ bt
industrlal and is a permitced usc and a conditional use oermit will not be nPe!ed. Ne
statcd ttiey ~re askiny for a temporary c~nditional use pern,it froni now until Ft,~ruary
1'1g1~ which is the lcrm of t~~c Icasc; t-~aL [hey anticipate hey+nninc~ pro~i~~cc~~"~ ~f the
cassett~s bt th~t ~~~i tf~et the use~ (n the ar~e are a~ much retr.il as they ~re
industrlal; that tt~c h~urs of oncr~tion ~ere such th.. ~ nt~ undue b~rden wij! Ce pla~ed on
the Clty oP Anaheim strr_ets in t~rms ~f traffiC~usincssn~ocatedtat thisaD~pP~~tY,abd will
closed or~ Friday niqhts beceuse of tiie catal~g holid~y sh~pping
be clossd from 7han~csgiving unti 1 after January lst because of the heo'iY
traffic.
l,/4/79
~ e..
,~ .._... _
~t
5~
MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ JU~~E 4, 197~ 79-4~n
EIR CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION-CLASS 1 AND CONDITIONAI, USE PERMIT N0. '9~~~ (contlnued)
Commissioner TolAr cl,~rifle~i tl~e petft~oner is rec~ue~ctng a permtt until February 19E'1~
whlch will t.pnform to the ten+~s of the I~ase~ an~ asked whet thetr int~sntions are at thAt
time, and Nr, Farano explalned the bingo oneratio•~ wtll be discantinued and at thet rtme
thc premises wi l l be usec~ for nroJuct ion of the c ~ttes . Ne stated thr ~eti t lonrr h.,s
app i l ed for c~ ;~ub l i c bon;l.
Conmissl~ner Y.In~; aske<I Mr, Farano if he wauld like to hav~ a continuance in ord~r tc
sc~lvc th~ p~~rkin!~ pr~hl~m~ ~n~i Mr. FArana replleJ tl~~t he did nat want ~i continuance. He
stated when the bin~ ~pr.ration is Jfscontinued ar~J the pr~~~rty is us~d for productton of
t~e cassettes~ thcr~ wi I1 n~t t,e ~~,irktnq prohlem.
C~r-x~tssf.~ner Barnes remin~!ed the Lommissl<m thr~t they had rec~ntly denled a req~~st for a
church in th~ In~fusLrf,i) z~nc ~•lhtch woul~f only havc !,~en usr.d on Sun~tays~ nnd she felt
this requcst should Ge denicd c>n thc samr t>es15 h~causc it will ar ar~ cncroachrncnt into
the indu5trial arca and ,~p~oval would he qran~iny a sp~ci~l ~rivilenc not beinq alluwed
others. She stated sh• ~s nlso c,~nc•.rrncd about the nr~lifcratlo+, ~,f hlnqo o~crations in
the City of Anahcfr~ an~, in fac[~ pevple fr, ~~ ~tlier cfties have t3ecn asklnn whNn Nc arr
,ryoing to stop them. She stat~~d shc was not c~~nvinced this w~uid !~e a y~od locati~n for
chls type af use.
Cam~lssianer 7olar fclt thc d(ffercncc fn th(s request anC the church was that the
property wa~. b~ i~; purchas~d hy tF ~ ci~urch for t~at. spec i f f c use nnd that thi s nroperty ! s
lease~f and wi 11 l~e cui-verteci to an in~.fustrfal use lat~r on.
(L wa5 notn.d the Plannin~~ C~(rector or his Autli~rizeJ representative has cfetermined that
th~ prop~sr_~ ~roJrcc f~!15 within tl~e de•f(nltion ~~f Categoricnl Exe~~tinns~ Class 1, as
defined in parAgr.~nh 2 of thc Llty ~f Anahe~m Cnvir~~r,ment~l I~pact Re~ort Guideltnes and
(s~ therefore~ c~~te~ric<~Ily rx~r+mt frr,m the rrqulrer~nt to ~re~are an EIR.
Cortrntssfoner Tolar off~re~~ ~~ ~~~otic~n~ seconcicd by Cemmissloner David~ th~t the re~uest f~r
waiv~r of the code rc~uireRr_nt be ~~rinte~.1 on thc bo,is that the petitioner had stipulate~'•
ta pruvide a p~rkinc~,~c~rcement~ sub~PCt Lo thr_ Clty Attorney's apprnvaJ, Lo ~rovidc (~2
off-si [e pr~rkin~~ spaces ~ and ~m the basls that [he ~ff-s 1 te parking Ni 1 I t,e handleci by a
cuntreCLed vale.t service,
C-~airman Hert~s[ ~c~tr.d hc would opnose ttie motion t~ec~use Northrop is located next do~r
and may~ in thP fut~r~~ wor~ longrr hours and they havc had prohlems w(th the b~n~o
operation usin~ cl~eir par~:inq ln the past anJ ~ven [hnugh that pruhlem has been
ellminate~, it co~:l~.! reuccur, Ne f~~1c [he ov,~~f)ow of parkiny wlll infrinQe on thc
ne i gFibo rs .
Commtssic~ner ffust~ore was wncerned that pec,~le wf ! i nat use the va~et parking becauxe many
pcople do n~t trust their vehlcl~s to the valets,
Lommissioner 7olar st~ated his subsequ~~nt rc,olutf~n wro;ild be fqr approval of the request
to February lyiyl :~ecause they are ~ing to c.onvert the use tn an industrial use at chat
ttme. Concernin~~ th~. v~let parking~ h~ felt people wil) u5e it becaus~ ic 1s m~re
convenient.
Chalrman Nerbst called for the Questio~ on the ~revia~~~;ly-offered mofion~ and the MOTION
FAILLt~ TO CARRY~ Commisstancrs Brrnes~ Bushore~ Nerbst, Johnsor~ a~d Ktnn vatinq no.
AC?IAN: Co~~issio~er Eiusliore offzred t~esolution No. PC7~-i~y Ar moved for t[s passage
an u ption, tl~et the Anahelm City Plann(ng Commisston cbes h~ ~~y dcny Pett~ton for
Cenditinnat Use Pcrmit No. 1946 on the basis that the pmrused ~se would not be conductve
b/4/7~
~ ry. ~ ~
'~ 7~-h 11 ;!
COM~~ISSION. JUtIE 4~ 1979 ;:
MIIIUTL'S~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING
IR CATEGORICAL EXCMPTION-~~~5 1 AND CANOITIO~~AL USE PERMIT N0. 19~E~ (contn'uther~ is a ~
E
to thc surrounding lndustrlal use~ and theApa;n~~~nt would~notabe~utlllizecl.
posstbl~it~, thc praposed off-sttr perking °
tl~e f~lla~tng vote:
On ro~i call~ tl~e fore~oing resolutlon was passeci bY
AYES: COMMISSION~P,S: BARI~ES, BI~SI~IORE~ ~~ERBS1'~ JOHt~5011. KItJ~
NOkS: GONMISSIONERS; UAVID~ TQLA
ApSENT; GOMMISSIOII~RS: N~1~[:
ommissloner I~usiiore oFfered a ~not(on~ seconded by Commisslaner Johnson and MOTION CARRIED
C that the reyuest for waivcr of codP requirenK
(Commissioncrs Uavic: and Tolar v~ting ~~). artial solutlon~ but is not a t~tal
bc den 1 ed on tl~e b as i s tih~ ~~~' ~hooset~~ ~r tO~ <<''ke advan taqe of i t.
solutlon~ ~nu that people Y
etitloner with the writtcn ri~~ht to a~pcal the Planning
Je~k Whi te presente~l the P t,~ the Ci ty Gounci l.
Commission's decision wiChi'~ 22 daYs
pWIJERS; ALFaED 0. AND
ITEN t~0. 2 Cor~TI1~UfU PUflLIC HEAkI-~r,.
IR NEGA VE OECLARATIGN JOSEPIIINE PAINQ~ iS1 South Fieach ~Gu~p~~~a~dnerh~im,
~~ --~-- GA 925~~• 11RUNER
qr,Et1T: G. U• ~' ' Oran c CA
RECLl1SSIFICA710N N0. 70'79'~3 Associa[es, 21~0-~-p Glessell Strret~ y~
p OUE E UIREMiOT 1972 9~6f~, property descrihed As Po~tlon A- a
E RM~ rectangularly-shape~-: Vercel of land consisting of
yr'°IANC~ ~~C. 3~91 a~,proximataly 0•3 rcre having ~~ frontage of
J~proxiint+telY 1~~'~ feet on the sast stde of
1layward Street. haviny a rnaximu~ depth of approxirnatcly 1Q~ fect. and beinc~ locatcd
11y0 feet s~uth of thc ~:enterli~e of Orange ->v~:nuc; and Porclon 9- a
approximat~lY roximatciy !.~ ac~e h~+vlny a frontage
rectangularly-shaped parcel of lan~f consisting of ~PP h,~vln a meximum depth of
of approximatcly 1~0 f~'~'t on the west sid~o~i~icly Blu4~fcet~south of th<~ centerli~e of
approximately j02 `eet, h~i~~J located app rescntl
and furt~~~r ciescribed as 111 South ~eac`~ 3ouievard. P~operty p Y
4rAnge Avenue~
classtfied CL (COtM1CRG~~L~ LIMITEU) ZONC.
REQUESTE.U CLASSIFICAT~O~~: (PORTIO}~ !~) RS-724~% (RESIQENTIAL~ SiNGLE~FAMI~Y) ZONE• ~LEX
R~QUES7EU COr~DITIO~~AI ~~~~ ~PORTION ~) U~ ~X~~HUrASTRUCTUR'GaNt~GNT,R~~REATIOtIAL CQM
wiT-~ uAivta
RE UC5TED VARIAIJCE: (PORT!ON ~) WA~y~"~TUO RE510EhTMAL LOTS.' t~~NT At.D (Ii) MITlIMU1' LOT
~' AREA T~ EStAB~~S~~
Sub'ec,[ petltlons we~~ w'~~~n~'e~ rrori the rr~eet~nas Qf May ~1 ~~~ 21• ~979~ at che reyuest
1
of the petitlane r,
It was noted the petit~uner t~ad reques~ted a tr+o""'~~~ wntlnuance in order to alla+
addi tional tin~e to abtal n a sound stu y
kisrnes o{fercd a motion~ seuonc3ed by Ganmissio~er Oavid ane MO'f~~N
p~;~pN; Cc~m;l5sioner Gondit~onal Usc Permit l~io•
~D, th~t considrration of Reclassifi wtion t~o. 7~~79'W3+ of the Planning
1°72 and Vc lante No. 3092 ~~ ~r~tlnucd to tt~r_ regularly-sGheduled mecting
Cortm{ssion nn June 10• 1q79. at the request of the petitto~er.
~~4/~9
._ .,.
I p
~ . ,,
MINUTES, I1NAl1~ iM CITY PLANNING CQMMISSION~ JUNE. 4~ 5979 79-412
17LN N0. 3 Reyuest for approval of r~moval of t~ spec(men
~~A~IVE OECL/1RI17101J trees in arder to Gc~nstruct ~ tennis court on
R~U OR !- ~L approximately 1,0 acrc at ;:3 Peralta Nllls Ortve.
REMOVAL OF SPE:CIMEN TREES
SubJect request was continueu from the n~eecings of Fe~ruary 2~ and May 7~ 1979~ in orc~~.~r
for the petltloner [o submit an EIR Neyat(vc Ueclaratio~ bnd lancfscaptn~ and yractlny
plans.
It was noted the a~plica~r was not present~ and Chairman lierbst explained it was ~~is
understanding that acceptable plt~ns had n~t been submitted end the metier should be
conttnued ta altow the petitioner tlme to complete preparatinn of the rP~uested plans.
Commiss(oner Johnson was concernrd witii the effect th~ese continuances would have on thls
matter~ and Co~.unissionrr Toler indicated t~e would supF~ort th(s c.on[fnuance~ but it was his
opfnion if the mottcr is not resolve~i by Juiy 2nd~ It should be rer~ovsd from th~ calendar.
Ne stated he unders[ood there are son~c othcr leg~l problems which hev~ to be resolved and
felt these continuances arc a waste of a lot uf staff t(me an~~ thc request should be
witf~drawn with no action ta4cn if no[ res~ive~1 by July 2nd.
.9CTIQ~1: Commissioncr Uavid offereJ a mc~tion~ seconded by Corriissioncr Klnc~ an~i MOTION
CARRIEU~ that consideration of the reryuest for approval ~f ~emoval of specimen trees be
continued to the re_yularly-sched~~lec1 n~-_acin~~ of the Plannlny Cor~riission on Jul~~ 2~ 1~79~
ln order to alluw th~ spplicent time to tompleCe p~cparation of the rcquestcd plans.
iTE~1 N0. ~~ PU~LIC NlnPING. UWNCP,: TEXIICO-RNA~IEIM F;ILLS~
_._.~.
ENVIRONIIE-aTl1L {NPACT INC. ~ 3~~~ Anal~~ir~, Hi I I~ Road, Anaheim~ CA 92i307,
REPORT Nq. 21a (ADUENDUM Np. ~) ENGINELR: JEt~NlUGS-N1ILUERMAN-NOOU~ 540 t~orth
UE 0 ODE E U R Mf;N Golden Ci rc;lc Urive, ~uite i l l, San-.a Ana, CA
qNU NAL U E~ ERMI N0. 197; 327~)y. Pro~erty Jcscrihcd as a~ irregularly-sh~ped
E~II~A I'~ VE MriP OF RACT NOS, parcel uf lan~ consiscing of approxirna[ely 1u.2
1Q~+03 (REVISION N0. 4) AND 1~~713 Acres havtnc~ a frontaye of approximately 40f,
f~et on the wesc side of the propasea cxtension
of irM~crial H(gtn.-ay~ haviny a maximum d~nih cf
approximately ieib2 fect~ and befny located appr~ximately 10;£ feet south of the centerline
of tiohl Ranch Road, Propcr•y aresently classified RS-HS-lO~~~Q(SC; (P,ESIDENTIAL~ SINGI.E-
FA.MILY-'iCENI~ GORRIDOR OVCRLAY} ZONE:.
CONUITIONAL USE PERMIT RE~:~UEST; TRACE N0. 10703 - TG PERMIT ti 53-UNIT CONDOMINIUM
SUBUIVISIOH WITN ~lA11dER OF hV1XIHUN STRUC?URAL FIEIGHT.
TRACT NO. ~0408 (REVISIOia N0. ~~) R[Q,uEST: 8-u,rlT~ RS-HS•10~~00 SUBDIVISION,
There were two persons Indiceti~y tt~eir presence in opposltion to subJect reyuest, ~nd
although the staff repori to tfie Planniny Comni;sion dated Ju~~ ~+~ 197q wes nat ~ead at
the public ~aring, it is refc.rreJ to and made a~ ~a~t of tt~e minutes,
Modrls Tiderr~nnis a~d Uan Salceda werc p~esent representing An~h~(m Hiils~ Inc.
Mr. Salceds stated Anaheim Nills is a planned co~munity of approximately 430Q acres and
Anaheim Hllis~ Inc, is the largest residential cieveloper in the City of Anaheim, and th«y
do hbYe a significant respo~sibil(ty to th~ citizens and the CiYy to prevldr sn
appropriate ho~ ing mix. He stated their wmpa~~y is conti~ually re:iewing the demographic
6/~+/ 79
&~ _ ;
MINUTES~ MIAHEIM GITY PLANNING GOMMISSIUN~ JUNE 4~ 1979 79'~+~3
EIR NU. 218 (ADDENDUM N0. 5)~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1973 AND TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT
NOS. 10408 (REVISION N0. 4) ANQ 10713 (contlnued)
r~.~ources to cieterm'ne~ the type of ho~sing necessary for the needs of thP cnrtniunity and
heve natlced tl~et althou,yh they are a planned communlty~ the ratlo of stngle-famfly,
deteched houSing to slnyle-family~ attached housiny is in the nei,yhborhood of six to one~
and thoy f.~c 1 i n thc chany i ng hous i i~g patte rns ~ chey mus'. p rov i de a ty40 mode I rather than
stay wiih the protutype uf the past 3~ years~ and ~hat thls is predicated on land cost and
the cost of n,.mufactured l~~ts ln the hillsidc dcve~opment. 11e stated in August ef ly7~S~
Chey had requested and received apprc~val for Tentattve Tract Map Nos. 104Q7~ lOG0E3~ 10409
and 101~10~ which was essenr~atly an 8~~-acre pr~ject with a density of 1.9~+ unlts per acre~
and ^'~at thcy arc proposl~ y to reassess that densi ty in tcrms of land ~ntx and reevaluate
i t to an acreage dens i ty ~~f 2.02 un i ts ner acrc ~ and added ~that the property i s zoned RS-
NS-IU~QOQ~ whi~.h allows <~ meximu~~ density ~f ~ unlts per acrr.; and Lhat most of Anahelm
H i 1 1 s 15 zoned RS-fl S-1 ~~~)~~Q and tlie dens 1 cy naw re f 1 ec ts 2. 6G un i ts pe r ac re and the
property is at 40'r of tl~~• maximum build-ouc available. He stated the project today
reflects the J~:nsl~y fro~~ 1.~ t~~ 2.0 units {~cr acre; that fram readiny the transcrlpt af
thc meetinc~s in Auc7u~t~ a sic~niFltant Issue had k~een yrading a~d~ in this Instance~ there
fs virtu~lly nu yrAdir~q re~auired; that th~~y had asked their civil engineers where some
singie-faml ly~ at' ~:.' eci housing v~uld be provided and were informed thl~- property ('ract
No. 104Uu) ~•~ould .•.. readily convertibl~- and tha[ they are ~ctually proposin~ that the
proposed ~:~ht sin~ale-famlly houses in Tract No, 1U40~ rEmain as a huffer to thP Westridge
tract t~ the north and incr•ease the Jensity to ;~ units for the new Tract 1~ap No. 10713.
:1e stateJ Tra~t No. 1071~ is a new coricept simil~-~r to Sinyiny Wc~od Nill whicf; is a recent
developrnent in An~liEin 11i l is; ttiat thls is a cluster-type housln~ proJect and is not R~
dense proJect; thac code requ~res 1~0(1 s~,~~are feet of usable open ~pace And this tract
will providc 31i?~ square fe~:t of flat~ u5abl~~ o~en space ~er unit; ar;i tl~at thc residents
in Westrldqe w111 not see these units and thrre is no trAffic conyestlon. He ~tat~d they
had stlpuSate<i [o resioents in westrtdg~ to chariye~ the traffic pattcrns +~nd only permit
Lhc elqht sl~~yle-family unit~~ to filter chr~~ugh their tract and all thc other units would
have inc~ress an~f c~~ress ~ff Imperial Iiiutiway.
Ile exp'.ainFcf residents of ~~nly one ci+~el Iing in uestridc~~ wi I1 be able ta se~ the unlts fn
2he new project~ pointlny out, again~ the ciyht slnylc-f~mily ur.its will serve as a
buffe~•. He stated hr had been to the site of thc one I~onk whlch ~rould be able to see the
units and~ because of veyctatia~ an~ a water t.3r~k~ he could n~t see the sitc
H~ state~ when the pro}e~t was presentt_d co the Ilill and Canyon Nuricipel Adviso~y
Carur~ittee (iitiCMAG) ~ the i~~•a was prornc~ceci that ' ~ project will be a detrir~e:nt to tf~e
lifestYl~e of Anaheim Hifls~ but he did not th' it would be betause this would be the
same type Ilfestyle as is evidenced by the Si, iny Woad Nill proJect. I~~ stated it is
dlfl'ieult for hi~n to seu hc~w Slny(ng Wood Hill cc~uld F~~e considereci as one of ttre s~~re
s~»ts in Maheim Nills anci that they~ as develovers~ .,re ~rouel ~~f it an~i consider it one
of their best projects.
t~e referred to ti~e fisca) i~~act reNort nre~.~rr.d by the EIR consultants which was
sG~b~~iitted as an addcnJus~~~ which shaws f~c~r tl~ese ZG add(tlonal unlCS will ~~ffec[ the Ci~y
in a cost/benufit analysis, and thac thc units wl11 appreciate anriroximately S8,0~0 to the
goc~d to the Gity an~ it could 'ue sl~~nif(cantly rno~e as years pro~aresx.
He reterred ta the recently•a~lc~~ted revisc~d ~rdinance reyuiring rmrc parki-iy and point~d
out thcy arc prcviding 3.~o spACes per unii~ whith is even more ~ar~.inq than required b~
code .
He retei red to rt,e reque•.te:i waiver ~f n,a~lmum structura! hriyt~t and pointcd out~
tredi ticsnal ly ~ this has beer~ accepted for ~nui tiple-fami ty cievelopments in Mahetm Ni f 15.
o/4/79
-- ~ ~
t 7g-4i 4
M 1 NUTCS ~ ANAIIF. I M C I TY PLAt~N I NG COMMI SS I ON ~ ~~~+E RMI T9N0. 1973 At~D TENTAT I VE MAP OF TRACT
EIR N0. 218 (ADDENDUM N0. 5~. CONOITIONAL USE PE
~aOS. 1040b REVISION N0. 4 At10 10713 contin~.~ed
Hans Gawa~ 53~ P+~s~o de Luna~ A~aheim, representing HACMAC~ stated he has s~~nc vtry
~Qrious InGulrles into this opplicatlon by Anaheim t~Ills~ ~,n~~hctq~st~an~d1whetherdor not
referrrd to a ~ee<1 for chis :ype housing in the community
it is ttie necd nf thc comn,u~;~:1' or the need of Anahe~ ~ookins~atnr~ 1ar~es(nventory af~ ~re
1
not always the same; that tt~e cortxnunity is presently 9
unsold h~uses a~d therc are somr, ~i~51~iCbyr~te~~mnq ~hesaAslnc~le-ffamlly~Iattached liousin~;
a~iea~l and trying to inc,rebse [~e Y it shauld be c~11ed multiple-f~mily
and that he fel t wi tt~ t~~i s 1~rgc increase i n dens i ty ~ ~,ut when hc ~ookcd
housiny. He stated they I~ac~ indlcated the incr~~ase would be ~bout 2:;~
at the (ncrease ~f 2G units (~~ di~~d~n~~a~~Indicatedtt~~e~lcode`~PrmltsSS~n(ts}per''acre~ but
and ls consldcratlc; tl~at Mr, S~ c
in hillside deve~aP~~~~ 5 units pe~ ~7~~,' Would be dlfficult and ~tacc<f the code was
wrltten for the fl~tlands~ and hc thou~~ht chere~ was no w~y tu butld i units to the acre
a~d felt ~his 15 going to l~c a very densc devclopment. Reqardtng the 310~ sQ~~in[Ing~outf
~
ope~ 5{~ace mentloned, he yuwstlonec! wh~•re tha[ open space woul~l be lo<.ite~~ th~t they are
he thought most uf it woul~i~hn foc~~tesetba~k and hetfe1tugrantin~7rthatACOUId be interfering
askinc~ fnr a waiver of thc. ~.-
wlth the lifescYle th~t the Westridye homca+ners ~re Nn~~tlyd to hccaus~~ they purchased
thelr propcrty wi th :hc idc~i tl,at dev.^.lopm~ni would hc slnylc•fami ly~ ar i that the 1;0-
foot setback wai ver wouldr~Ot1en'en {AC~~?~nU ~ je Ce~i ~~rt~~~t I i festylef'interferenc~ Ana
Saicecla s comrr~en. ch~t s ~ J but d~d
I ndi cated hc wa~.. that pe rso,~ ; t~1at I•,e th i nk,s S I ngi n~J Nooci li1 1 1 I s a c oo~i pro ect ~
not think It c~~u~cJ bc cor;.areei wi tt~ Lhe prup~sed pr~ject beCa~se they are not Lhe same;
tha~ Sinolny ~ooci Hi ll i5 all bY„i~~`'~aitt~nMra'.r'Salced~cst`c,~m~r(nt [t~A[~theeunitpUwoul~t be
by 1tself; an<t that h~ did not ,
apprec.iate S~~~~~~ Per unit~ stating hc is e profe~sional ~npraiser and there is no way Co
datermine wliat the appreciar~~'i atlunb^ in tl~e futu~c. tie sLated hc would advlse the
Cc~mnission to ~cject th~s apnl c
Jan Nall~ 5~~~ Yu~»hlew~e~, ~naheim, indicat~ tic ha~i bccn as~.ed ta speak on behalf of thc
~1~S•ridgc liomeuwnPrs/f.~urinatt~~oseCh-v=~ett~~y~~ itdwasu~~'~~`v~~~Yr1~learbthcsc wouldabe much
these four 2racts ..~J ~ 9 P ncx*u~s tha~~ thosr_ (n Nestri~i~~c enJ Nould ~~ok
larger and much more expensive~ luxury'tvatucs, and sne did not thin4 ~utting thrcc
bctt~- and ~oul~f ~~n~~ance cheir prorarty
aitaGhed unit4 on thc samc spacc as onc horne is yoic~ t~~ ma1,c a luxury homc; th~+t Mut hc
~ble ta see this site~
Sal ce~la has i ndI ~ated the Westri d9c har•+eorr~ers wi 11 not be ~
had been to on~Y onc or two of the har~c~, and poinc~c out •1ou cnn 5 f~ eCtsasrde~~strated
the Alber[son's shoppin~~ cent~:r; and that it ~~i ~~ ~'~ ~ Ir~perial~ ilyhway. She statpd
by the con~lominiurns being bufit ar~ t~ohi RanbtutRL';dSa`;roJect wlll be abave Westridge ~n~
Singiny Woc~d Ni 11 is n~stled in ttie h( I Is, drivln,
9
wi l l bc 5eer~ by ev ~~ Lnao~h~~i n~s `'~~~ '+ph 1 1 RanCh` ROad, andm i th~s notc~cs t led awaY i n the
through ~nto the t .
hil~s Iike Sinyin~~ uood N111 ana is right up at tt~e hicnest point behind them.
Mrs. t1a11 refcrred to tl~e eiuht sinqlc-farnily homcs~ o~~~°,n~ Su~ ~est~d thattthose elght
)9
cavtnants~ c.onditions and restrictio~s (CC6R's) p P
ho~rws haviny Lo malntain t~1e~ntaln~the slopese otherwiseethe~assessmenta~or mainienance
hpmCt~wners t~5sociatlon tc ~
w~~d ~~ v~ry i~igh 1 f divided only by etyht hort~es. ~he st•~~c:d these pads were graded or
10~OOU squere foo• lo!s end na~+ they aresuitable for 3n~~) square foot lots ~nd ~oantined
cnncern rhat other ~roj~cts cauld be casily canvc~ted to multiple-~~Si~nd~felt if 10~000
out chat th~re is a lot of {an~f al rcady gradccf al th fai rly l~rge p
square foot pads can bc rapidly convcrtcd to 3U0~ squareraooiat°~tf~~tsurrounding single~
foot^in-thc~door; and that thcy feel it (s totally i~aFP P ~
famliy homes. She stat~d thc West~ldqc resl~ents are upset and that th~r~ ts 86/4/~3ract
~ ~
~,. ' .y
MINUTkS~ ANNIEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ JUNE 4, 1'179 79'y~5
EIR N0. 21$ (ADOENDUM NQ. 5)~ CONDITIQNAI USE PERMlT N0. 1973 I1r~D TENTA7tVC MAP QF TRACT
NOS. IQ4Q8 (REVISION N0. ~+_ AND 1_ 0713 (conttnuedl
bc(ng constructPd ~nd felt tf those homcowners k~ew what ts happ~nln~~ they w~uld AISQ be
upset. Shc stated homes ar~ selling ve ry slowly and posaibly there ts a neeci fo~
multi{~le-fami ly housiny~ but these untts wi 11 sel l fc,r appraxlmately S13')~~0~1 and wi 11 not
be low- cost hou5iny~ and with the vtew premlum ancl ungrading added~ they wlil be tmr~ibly
expAnstve hom~.s; that tl~Py discussed only 2F chi I~Iren impacting ttie scho~l ~ but for the
enttre school dtstrlct It has been found Anaheim Hllls h~s mnre chll~lren per h~ouschold
than other Areas and p~inted out a five-bedro~m home (s not ~n empty-ne~ter's home and is
a home for a family~ and even 'Li; chllJrcn in the Oran~~c~ Un(fir_d School Olstrfct today Is
2~~ too many. She statc~l there ar~~ n~ cumulative fi~aures glv~n tn thc EIR comraring what
wlll h~pen betwe~~n t-~c tirnr these h~rnes 3re occu~~le~i and th~ othen c~~s in the area are
occuried. She state~~ hearin-~s are bein~~ held this week on havin~~ ye~r-arou,,d schcx~ls
s i nct they are ovc rc;rowclcd f.od.~y; that 7.(~ th i I dren t s on : ful 1 c) ass room and they dn not
have lt. She st~~teJ thc citizens in 'rletitr(d~~r w~ul~i sinccrcly ur~ie t'~e Cc~mnisslon not t~
approvr. th(s pr~ject.
Mr. $alceda refurre<1 to coirr-icnts ree~ardin~l thc invent~ry ~f unsold hnuse5 in An~ihe(r~ HI115
an~i state~f in ter~~s ~%f singlc-f.~mi ly~ d~~t~3ched ho~nes thcrc was ~~n Inventory of
•~p~rnxlmatcly G; ho~ ~5 bcforc t!~is ~~ast wec.k.cnd, and ~r~~hably eiyht or ten ~f which were
sol~l~a~nd felt Ic~s Chan ~~~ unsolci Ix~uses c~~~t of ~i,~~~ is a~nr~~xirt-~~tcly 1-1/?~',. Ne stated
hc ~id not recall statin~~ that Anahcim flills~ Inc. (s Icx~kin~~ at tl~is as low-c~st hou5ln~
and presently t~~~erc is a vaid in Ch.~ ~i~0~0~0 t~~ ~1h0,~~~ prlcc ranne (n An~helr~ Nills.
He exal~(ned -' soi~ir.on~r In anc~ther are~~ ~~f llnaheim cho~ses to move (~ t~ onr of thPSe units
frum a dwellin~; in the 57~i,0~~ [u S95,UQ~1 price ~~nc~e wlth an ~qufty~ then thet w~uld help
Chaw the marketp I ace for i~~dr, r.icc haus i ny; tha! nc,i hous 1 n, i r, th~~ $ 75 ~~1~n to S9`i ~Q~~
pricc ran~e Is not bein~ crc~atecf. He st~~ted they rec~~tnize it is dtff(cult to move from o
nx~drratc prlced house (nto anc c~f ~naheim I1111's ta[est nx~drls in the S1F,r)~~~~ to $207~~00
price ran~~c.
Ne cxploinc~: thc iensity fioures wcre based on the nverall d-nsity of the entirc proJect~
and thc density fur Tract No. 1071~i is 3.5~ which ls st(11 wcll beiav the ~anyon General
Plan of ~.0. Ne expl~ine~1 the j.1C~0 s~uar~ feet ~f opt~n space is usable~ flat ~ptn space
and potnted out the apen space areas on the exhihit. Conce,rning the 1~~~-fn~t setback~ he
expla(ned the ~e~~ple rn~st .iirectly affected will be those rroperty owner~ in t'~e tract
being constructed adjacent to this tract~ and that t~-ose purchasers will see tliese untts
wl~en they purchasc their property. lie ~ca~ed Mr, Gowa h:~d suggested S~ngfng Wood Nill is
not an ap; ropriate example an~f paint~d out he fclt it is~ and explained i[ is locr~ted
adJacent co Stoneg~te~ whfch !s a oet.~chrd h~u5in~ D~~~~~t. He cxplatned the flgures
menti~ned f ram the f i• ca I imp.~ct rr~>c>rt arc evl dence presen ted and the f i ~ures bre nated
on page 7 of the adde;,du~~ and are predicated cx~ appreciatln~~ property valucs. Hc rcferred
to the romment that lt h~d becn indicated by Maheim I~ilis~ Inc. that these tracts would
be bette~ homes than WesLriJ~~4• an~i in::Ecated he had listene~t ta the entire transcript and
there was no men[ion anywhere that these maps were cast in u.~c~crete and that thr.y woul~l be
a speciflc type n~usinu, and the crnly refere~ce had been t4 ca~tilevered-type housing, He
stated lt was note~. by th~ o~pas(tion that this preJect would be visibl~ from the
Alb~rtson's shopping cence- and pointed out that is a stgnificant distence away~ and
stated it is elso posait~le ~esidents In Yo~~a Linda woulcS be able to see thes~ units;
however~ the clos~s~ homr_ from Westrid~,e i~ a minimum of 360 feet away frnm this pro)ect
gnd polnted out the pr~,ject is not on Co~ af the rid~~e and cheir tracts 10407 and 1041d
~i 1' be at a hl~~her elevation.
Mr. Salceda explafncd th~e eiglit homPS pr<~~osed will t~e part af the rr.aste~ assoclation as~~
will be a srt+all part of a much large~ oryan(zation that w~il take care af the siopes. He
atet~d tht m+~ster associatio~ has been dc~inq a ve y credlble }ab ntiaintain!nc~ the sha+
slopes. L~ncernlnr; che commHnts r.:garding hw~r many rtbre areas can b~ converted~ he
indicated he could onl~ say th~{~ civil engineers are ihe one~ whe sald this particui;,c•
6/k/79
~
MINUTES. ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COhWISSION~ JUNE 4~ 1979 ~~'~+~~'
EIR N0. 21t~ (AODENDUM N0. 5)~ CONpITIONAI U5~ PERM17 N0. 1973 AND TEt~TATIVE MA^ OF TRACT
NOS. 10408 ~REVISIDW NO 4) AND 10113 ~4ontinu;d)
ract was virt~ally 1~0~ adaptable tor a~tached housing~ h-~t Anahcim tillls~ Inc. would
11ke not to havc it so close to Westridge ~ecause they recoynizP th~ concerns or th~
W~stridge homeawner~ over the past oi~e ~~nd one-ha{f years~ but that thi~ ~~te wps chosen
b~cause It w as tht most readlly convertible.
:~e stated the EIR ha~ rr.ferred to tt~c poaslUility of ?.(~ sclio~l childr~n end that fiyure
included six hiyh scf~oc~l children, ~nd pointed n~~t pre~~ntly the elementary and )unlor
hl~h schools ean handle these chi ldren and the hi~~h schc~ol does tiave emporary housing for
the chil~iren. He fel[ tt~is fi~aure was iil~l~ and pointed out there is only one chlld in the
5inging Woo~1 Hil~ project of 2-i units. Ne added It wr~s his understandin~ that there wlll
not be wny five~b edruom untts in the pro.ject.
TIIE PUliLIC NCAKIIiG WAS GIOSEU.
Ghalrman Nerbst p~inted out thc staff r~porc indicritcs there wlll be five-bc~lroom units~
and Mr. Salced~ e~l~lned thc plans arr_ ve ry canJectUral AnJ that thcy h~~ve uscd th~ Oak
Knol) proJect ccnc~~pk baC.~use the dirrw~nsl~ns of this p~an sue~qest Qak F.nol) rather Lhen
S i ny i ng Woccf 111 1 I.
Lommissioner b~rnes statc~ it d~~es rnal:e a ~i fferc~cn whcther or n~t [here wi 11 be five-
bedroem units and in~Jicat~~~ she tl.ouyh: tl~,e units of 5ingin~a 4looci HII1 we~e three ~edro~ms
with possiUly a srtWll studic~.
Mr. Salceda stetc~.i thcy d~ noi ar~ticipatc a^.v fivc-bedr~m units~ but tl~at that would be
the bulldcr's pr~ro~~ative. Ne statcd he probably sho~~ld not have med~ th~vt co~~ent and
asked that it b~ stricken fr~m thc rcco.•d.
Conmissloner Tolar stdted the qur.stlon in his mind relates to the adaptahlll~y of this map
to the RM-L000 devc lopmen[~ ~nd wonclercd hcn~ many othcr prop~.rties i~ this ~ro}ett are
readily adapta4le co cunJa~inium projects~ pointinq out tl,is iot had been g~aded for an
RS-NS-1~)~QOU dcvel .pment.
Mr. Tldcmenl5 staked the <;raded pad ca~figuraeion for this proJect is just about the same
as the one prcvlously aoproveci. t1r, steted they havc nu ~lans to cnnvert th~ other threc
traets at this tirrre.
Commisstoner Tolar s[at~d there were no plans one year ayo to cor,vert thls project~
either~ and stated these hills can be e~radeJ in any wav the developer wants to grade them
and state<f, a,yain~ that other lots can be wnNerted. Ne asked about the market(ng ~urveys
which haci brougt~t. a~out Sinying Nood NI11 a~d state~' he felt ic is very possiblz the other
tracts whict~ have bcen ap~~roved wi 11 coR-e (n far a chany_e.
Mr. Salceda statrd 1.he otl~er eracts ~Pp~aved for this project are nat a~lapt~ble to
attached ho~sinr~, and Mr. TidcrrWnis expl~lned this tract was mc3re or lsss ane level and
the other trocts psnqress u;~ t~~e hlllsicfc~ and there are a Ic,t of spltt-level lots ond a
differentlal tn pads.
Gommissione~ Johnson scatec~ t~e thouqht lt is reasona~le ta say any project that has had
niasstve grgJing would certainiy be adaptable~ anc' Co~m~issioner Tolar stated that chat was
his Goncer~; that on the surface the :.? units p~r ~+c.re cr~r+pareJ with 1.9i~ units per acre
is a very minor change. but 5~~ ur~its on 1;; acres is not a minor change, a~d felt t!~e
Jrastic cF~ang~:s In th~ markectng surveys probably dlctated a Year ago that che proJect
~+ould scil with a higher dcnsity and he clid not think (t has ~hanged that much in the last
year~ and his ma}~r disconfurt ls with the fact that any tract becc~nes adaptable with somr
mod) fieat ions of ttec gradir,g, t1e fc) t also that ~he pro,jec[ wt i l be seen frnm other areas
bia~~9
~:
' 9
~ ^~
MINUTES~ Af~A1~EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ JU~~E 4, 1979 79'W17
EIR IJQ. 2113 ~ADDENUUM N0. 5) ~ CONDITIUI~AL USE PERMIT N0. 1g73 at1D TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT
NOS; 1p4Q8 (REVISt01~ t~d. 4) A~JU 1071" continued
and pointed out he also recagnizes there ls e lioustng n~ed in tl~e City of Anahelm. Hc
s~ateJ meny hc~urs werr. spent on this proJect and I~e could not understand w{~y the marketing
survey di~ not show this was the type of housing for that ~rca ~+t tl,a~ time and the
proble,.~ could nave been JPalt with ttien~ and kliat he has a lot of cl-scomfort wlth the
d~veloper comt~y back one year later for tt•~is rev~slon and he is wondering what will
happen one ye~r frorn naw when the rest ~f che tracts corw f~rth.
Cort~nissioner Bushore stoted he has heard inany timcs whI Ie on the Conmisslan that free
enterprtse will dlctate whether or not a proJect wlll ~vork and he felt economics is
prob~ly thc mottvation for ch~ revision; that he had gone to the site ~znd walked the pads
as possl'ble and had seen only one or two homes ~~hich could posStbly hdve a view
infrin,yement, anJ those were tt-c u~~~cr-story bcdroom wi ndows, anci that is no dl fferent
than nthcr homes in Westridgc which arc lool;ing rlown on thclr netghbars; that he h~s h~ra~d
no obJectlons to the sinnle-f~mily homes and fclt thcy would be a gaqd buffer ancl polnted
out therc is no e~~ress or (n~ress from the morc densp areas, an~f asked whet h~'rn will be
Aonc to the ar_a becAUSe tl~erE ~~re a few morc uni ts.
Comnissioner Tolar c~xplained he stfll has not rntde hi~ decislon on th(5 proJect, but wes
conccrned wl,ether or not tr,e Cornmi:,,lon will be cc,r~fronte~l with mrare of these condominlum
tratts in thc future. Hr_ 3tateJ he was not sure this project would do any ~iarm to Lhe
a~ea~ but hc has a lr~t of ~~Isc~mfort with the fiy~res bein,y p-•esented conccrning che
nurrber of units per acra. He st~tc.f rnor~ imnort~~t than that, he Is concerned about the
adaptability of an; lot t~ Rh4-3~~0 afeer the; qrading h~s been Jone,
Chal rman Hcrbs t s tate-l chcre was a lot c~f an i mos I ty at the puh i i c hear 1 ngs on these
pro)c~cts and the nel~~hbors were very upset~ and that Anaheiro Nills~ Inc, had ~ut together
t~ jlysew puzzle and on the last day of tf,e hearing the pu7_zle fell t~qeth~r with the road
blocked to this pert~cular pprc;el, and it appP~~red t~ solve rnost of thr. objections to the
trafftc flow through the tracc b~lu~ w(th ali the traffic ar,inq dumped on Imperial
Hiyhwey~ and at that poinc the whole project wa~, •ied to thc traffic flnw and the
Cortmiss6an t~ad approvecl the proJect. He stated t~e did not think the tim'n~ was adequate
at that tlme for the drveloper to sce this would be an isolateA pro.J~Gt. Ne stated
Anahe(m Iliils~ lnC. was cor~battiny tlic oppc~sitinn conccrnin<3 the traffic flow~ and
Co~nmissfoner Johnson statcd he woulcl a~,ree thac this •vas not a planned discrepancy by
Anahcir~~ ~~i Ils~ Inc.
Cammissioner Talar stated hc did not ~t+nt his comments ta reflect th~t he fclt it was a
plann~d Jlscrepancy~ eith~r~ a~~cf he fclt [he eight huuses proposed all~rviated the
clrculati~n prob'crrri. but that hls rr-~Jor concern is the t(me tt~at has been spent on this
project and he thinks more density ~nd lower rrices would cAUSe rnore demand f~r [he
housiny in the arca~ erd stacnd~ again~ r,is maJor con:ern is wl~ere wc will bc gaing with
th~e rest of the projects bec:~use evcry lat that i. graded is ..~~ ?table t~ change.
Commissioner Barn~~~ stated this same thing has ~een goin~~ on for a long tirtr_~ and w~ 11
continue as long +~s we have t!~e free entc~prise sysccrr~; that a person has the riyht to
make these requests anJ thc Plrinr~ng Comnisslon has thc riyht to ask f~r ccrtain things in
-eturn~ and also tl~e riyht to deny the requcst~ and that is tt~e ~nly safeguard wr_ havc.
She st~tcd she ha~ ilscened Co HAC"1RC's concerns 3nd dgrecd w!th somc of them; that therr
are a ls~t of unsolJ hc,mes -n the area and the c"semand for s tngle^famt ly dwel l ings is down~
but she felt thls (s a tertporary~~ situat+~n and there is a h~aW demand for this type
housing riyht nnrr. She stat~ci s'~e likcd Lhe parklnr proposcd. Indicating the lack ~f
gucst parking is one of the maj~r problem5 with the Singin~ Wood 11111 project. She
t~auyht inc~uding the eight hort~s In th- -nastcr association W~11 solie the CC~R question
end she aas not cnncerned +~hout the graJing; that she did not thlnk these :-n(ts which wlll
prc~bab ly sel 1 in che S 120.000 ta ~ 153,00~ range wl 1 1 af fcct property val ues i n any way ~
6/4/79
~
~ ~ ~
79-A 1 S
MINUTCS~ IINANEIM CITY PLANNING CUMMISSI~JN. JUN~ ~~. ~97'3 ~
EIR N0. 218 (AQGENpUM N0, 5) ~ COHDITIONAL USE PERMIT PIO. 1973 AND TENTATIVE PIAP OF TRACT ,
NQS. 1Q408 (REYISION t10, 4) lWU 1071~ (continued) _
and felt this arc~ument could bP used by anyonenc~S~~nSfthe,Westr(dge~t~ractt aShe asked MQe
any problems thnt eoulJ af fece the property o-r
Gowa haw thls pro,lret woul d interferc wlth the surr~unding c~rimunlty.
Mr. Gawa stated the comnunity has [o be lool~ed at as lt Is today with its present property
v~~lues anJ t4~e type of io~xnunlty it h~s beconre~ and nat what it was suld for• many years
ago; that the homes wera ~old to rmst prop~rty nwncrs wl th thc~ idca thst th) s ls a sinqle-
family residen[lal community; that ttie market is chanqin~. but he did not thtnk It is
thengln~,~ in thfs prlcc rar~•~e Eecaus~ a lot of people arc loc.~king far tow~cnst housing and
this is not low-cost hous in~; that the develo~er has suc~~~standtholnted'aut~[hereVare aany
chi ldren in thi s proJect, h~it used Qa~. Knol l as ~~n exa~^ple~ P
lot of children tn Uak Knoll ~nd stated therc Is no way to c~ntrol the numbcr of children
who wl ll rravc intc> a prnJect; th:~t the stt~ff repart incficat~s there wl ll be five-hedroom
unlts and felt~ ~vinusly ~ that will :,ffect thc arca s~mewhat. He stated t'~e other
concer~ af NACMAC is th~t thfs is thr. wed~~e th~~t w( 1 I o~en thc floodq~~t~s for other
developers who are al rcecly lnqu i ri nq ~s [o whethc r or noc tt~c C i tY wi 1 I pe: ml t th I s type
of devetopment of hl~:lher den'.hc~ ~rcan cFir. str~tedrnhe1 ic:lievea~t~h~ref wl l lcbeidozensaofect
the qual l ty of 1 i festvle in t
appl icatl~ns ~or thls sar*-~ tli{n~;.
C~rxni ss lone r Uush~,re i~id i c~te~i he ~f 1~1 not 5~~~• t~~~c~' ~~f4ae ~~nd hc di ~ Ln~t'secpnowr any~n~~ i s
a q~od flcn,in~~ mix of multin1c'fan:ily ut~its in th
could move into ~'~r~ahelm Nills ~nd belicvr it Is r~oin~ to b~~veloped,thrre~,a~1AMr,yGowa
ccxnr~uni cy wl tli the mult~ nle-faml ly 4ni t, th~it arc al ~ea y
stateJ he had not sald I t woul~i be t~~t~~11y sinyle~far~ily. but that lt wou1d be
predominantly sinqle-far~ily.
Chairman Ncrhst st~ted he d1~~ n~t tf~l,;iniuh~srand~a{~~~rt~,~c~t~Crr"~t~f~e'area'lwhieht~arc~+some of
rl~3ht n<w~; Ch~it there are scN+e con~
the finest in t~~~: city; and th~tit therc are~ ;~eoP1c ~~rF,o lik.c tu live in sln<~le-family hume5
a~~7 people w;~o 1 ikr~ [0 1 ivc in aS~artrk~nts~ an~ als~~ ~Tr_ORIe who ti~k" ;~ st~tcdnhc could not
canck~miniuns or natic~ hc~~es~ and hr. fr.lt th~ mix^is `•°•`'CCn~-'~`V(e~~l ~~JJncent to a single-
flnd a plaee in A~ahelr; i1i~1S wf~v~lur has~een`Aec'reasn_d~ pointing out all the unlts~
fami ly house whe~e thr, Propcrty - ~~~, ~ have <~one up +n vAlue tremendous~y
wh~thcr s i ny le- i`aml ly, coc~~omi n i ~n-~s ~ pa[ i~3 homes ~ Y He stat~d the re
over the ~~ast year anC the mix ~f~~tvwoullan~tpwork.tbut rePfelc itr~+ould work i~ this
are certain areas whcrc tl~is proj •
area because it has totallY i'fo1~Qe~LLhWasrsubm(tte~iwwhlchhwouldtaffc~ct the'mnafflc, then
Hi~hway. He statcd if anothc p 1
t~,Qre wo~ld be SQr~C objecCions from the Corrnlssfon•
Nr, Gowa st~tP~ thc exhiblt shows traf(ic is durn~+in9 into Westridqc~ and Chalrman Herbst
clarified that that traffic is frAm the ciyht single•fami~y hc~us~ •
Mr. Salceda scated thcy h~v~ spent uc~~sl.le~abie tlme ~ith Lhcir engineers and had trled to
f 1 nd anvther tratt wlth 1 n tf~ese fou~ tracts Wh~n~ ~he~ r~spon5evaft[heb~ngl netrs~wasf thatt
want th~ project t~ b~ so clasc to uest~idr~e,
there was r~~ other^I,miiion~etachedecieveloprtrentsfe;en' time thc other tfiree tracts erz
proposed As s i nqle f y~
Gc~mrnlss~~ner Johr,son statecl he cuuld nat flnd ln the staf~`Lenih~ C~isslontcons dershhow
bu1 ldings al 11 be anA stat~d that ir a s1~~~1~-fami ly pro) -
far apart the bulldings w{11 be so thac they wi11 have the aapearance oP a falrly spaclous
area. _ .. .__
__ _
~
, ~ ~
M~NUTES, ANAIIEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ JuNE ti~ 1~79 79•419
E• A N0. 218 (ADDENDUM N0. ~) ~ CONUITIONAL USE PEW11 T N0. 1~/? ANU TENTATIVE MAP C,~ TMCT
, NOS. 1040$ (REVISION N0. 4~ ANO i071~ (contlnued)
~II~ i - - r~~ ! ^ ~
, Robert Nenningor~ Assi~tant F'lAnner, stated the distences wil) vr+ry considerably And in
'~ the RM•~ 30~~0 Zone~ the d1~!anccs dre contr~lled hy the n~turc of the walls~ the lennth of
[he wal ls. anJ the nurrber oi ;,~.,~ !QS.
Gomm(ssloner Johnson rev(ewed the pl~ns, and Mr. Nenningcr pointed out the dlstances
b~tween buildings on the plans.
C7mmisst~nerJohnson asked if the developcr has the prtvtl~~e of ~ffcr!ng the mastr.r
a~soctatlon tn th~se tracCS el~c~aciy est~blished, an~i Mr. Salced~ explalned the CC~R's for
Tract No. 1Q40fi were aiways t~ be tncluded fn the rnaster eSSOClatiun. Ne stated th~
C CcR's can be emencled up unt i 1 the ti rrx~ ~f th~ f 1 rst clos inq of an r_scrow And~ subsequent
ta that. a unnnimous vote of all thc hart-eowners would be rec~uire~d,
Cammissioner Bushur~~ statc*d he wes rca~ly to offcr A mUti~n becauSe he could not sec any
valid objectfons,
Ganmissiancr Johnson stated he was searching f~r concrete evf~ie~nu• on whlr_h to base his
declslan and pointed out the maE~ ~bes not shaw this ~~1'O)CCC as an Island, hut that it is
s urro~nded with nlce, largc~ singlc-f~mily rr.stdences almnst t~ the top of thc rldg~, and
thls -~oulc! be a llttle island af multiE~le-family dwell(n~~s.
Commiss ioner I~ushor~- polnted out the pr~ximity of nthcr mul tfplc-fami ly pr~_j~cts tn the
are~ G~ sln~~lc- faml ly resi d~~ntfa) arcas.
Mr, Salceda 4tatecl ehe sin~le-family, ekt~ched urits arr~ to be built and the owners qoiny
i nwlll notc thF~y o~e adjac.cnt to thr. singlE fnmify~ attac ec un ts
ACTIDN: Coin~nissl~~ner fiuslinre offcred a rnr,tlo~~ 4econdr.~ hy Commissioner t;ing and MOTION
CA R D~ xhat Environm'ntal Impact Report -lo. Zi~~ Addcndum i~o. ;, for thc Droposed
divtsio~ of Tentatlvc Map of Tract No. 1'1~~0~' into tw~ tracts~ 1~1~iQ8 anJ 1~713~ havin~ been
consid~rcd this date b~• the Anoheim City Plannin, Corm~isslon an~ evidence~ both written
and oral~ haviny bccr~ ~,rrsent~•~ to su~plcr~ent EIR No. ?.1&~ Add~ndum No. ~i~ flnds that
potentie) proJect-yenerat~d ^nvironmenta) im~acts havc been reJuce~1 to an acceptabie level
by confo~r,iance with City plans~ t~~licics and ord(nances; [h.it EIR No. 21R~ Addendum No. 5,
is {n compllonce with th~ Calif_rnia Environment•~l Qual([y Act and C~ty a~d State EIP
Guldelines and. thercfore~ baseJ upon suth inforr~atio~~ the Anahelm Clty Planntng
Commisslon dc,QS certi fy E IR No. 21i:~ 4dd~nd~ No. ;.
CammissloncrBushore off^rcd a motion~ seconded by Cor~missioner Devid anrl M0710N CARRIEO~
that thc Anah~Tm City Planning Comrt~issfo~ docs hereby grant watver of code requirement for
enoximum structural hei gt~t on the basis of the hi I ly terraln ~d g~ade c!i fferen~tels of the
sub}ect proper~y, end on the L•asis th~at a sinylc-fami ly devr.lop~ent would be permttt~d to
hBNC two-story un(cs~ and on the basis that denial wouid be deprivin~ sub,(ect property of
a privile~e being enJ~.,yed by other pr~perttes in thfs same classificatlon and vi~initv.
Commisslnner dust,ore offer~d acsoluci~n No. FC79-106 and moved for lts passa~c and
adapti~n, that the Anaheim City Planniny Cnmmission cbes herP.by ~rant Petiticsn for
Cqndi tionol Us~ Permf t~~o. i'373, sut, ject to Interdepartmentoi Commi t:ec recon-menda~t ion~.
CammisslonerJohnson stetpd hc would opposc the resolutlon on the basis that hc did not
thlnk the Commisslon woutd ~nuve vote~i in favor of it I~ad i t been brought in seven m~nths
aga when the traet wes urigina~ ly -approved and the isnd ~eas sti I 1 raw.
On roll call, Lhe fore~oSny resolutio~ vras pessed by the following vote:
6/4/~9
,.
~ ~
MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMM15510N~ JUt~E 4. 1979 7~•420
~.IR N0. 21$ (ADDENGUM N0. 5)~ CONDITIONAL USE. PfRM1T N0. 1973 ANU TENTATIVC MAP QF TRACT
NQS. 1040° (REVISION N0. N~_ANU ~~7~3 continued ~_ ---
AYE:S: COI~hli551UNCR5: lfARNLS, EiUSHORI:~ DAVIU~ 11FR95T~ KINf,
NQES : GOMMI ;5 I ONCRS : Jt)HtISON ~ TOLAR
AFISLNT: GOMMI5S I(~NCR.S: NONC
Co-nmission~r liushnre offc~r~~d a rnc~tic~n~ s~~conded by Cor~rr,lssl~ner Y.ing and M~TION CARP,IED
(Cor~missl~ncrs Johns~.~n and Tolar vot ing no) ~ that thr. lln~ilielm CI ty Plnnninc~ Commissinn
does hc~eby finc~ thAt t-,r. pranosc~i sul~~iivisi~~i, toacthcr arith its dcsl~n An<i irrprovcrr~nt~
is cons i~tent wl th thr. CI ty of llnehcim Gener+~l Pl~n~ nursu.+nt tu Govcrnment Crn1e Sectlc~n
G(,473.', an~f ~~~:s, therr..forc, <~prov~~ Tent~tiv~ Nap of Tra+ct Ilo. 1n~~~lf: (Revision N~. ~+) for
an clyht-lot, ftS-N4-1''1,)~~;(S(,), ',in~~-~•-frin,lly suhdivislon, subje~.t to thc follc~win~~
con~l tl ~~ns :
1, That ~noi~l~1 t-~i~ subdivlsl~,n bc devcloped ~15 rnn~ Lh~~n cm~ suhdiv(si~n~ cach
Sut~c11vI5Ion thPc'~~c~f s!iall hc suhm~tt~.~d (n tent~tlvc form f~~r .~~~~r~val.
;~, That a11 luts wichin this tr.ic~ shall hc scrv~~c1 ~,y unJcr~~rnund utllltl.~s.
3, That ~ny pr~~;~o~~c•~ cuvcn,~nt~,, cnn~iitic~n',, ~in~', rc~~trictl~ns shall bc submittc~l to
an~S aE.~rrovcd by thr. C I ty At [~~rncy's Of f i ~~~ pr lor t~~ G i ty Counci 1 a~~prc~~,~l ~~f thc f i n,~ 1
t.raCt ~'~.~f~ ~~n.;, further~ th,~t [he .'+;~{~rov~~~.l c~+ven.~nts~ c~.~n~iitl~~i5~ .jnd fe5t1'IG~I(1t15 sh,ill be
rr_c~rdeci nr(~,r tu th~~ fin~il tr~acc r~ti~~;~ ~~uF~r~.~v,~l.
~, Th.]t StYr_t~t nari~~5 Sh.~ll he ~(~pruvcd by thc l.lty ~'l~+nninr, u4;~art~~er!t ~rt•~1' tta
e~~pruval ~~f ~~ f incil trar.t m~h.
~, lhat thc ~~wncr(s) ~F sut~ j~•c[ ~rnpcrty shal 1~ay t~ thc• Ci ty of Anahetr•~ th~~
opproprlate par~. ~n~! rec.r~~atlon ir~-li~u f~r~. rs ~ict~r+~in~~, tc~ be apprc~nriat~~ hy the City
Gouncil, snid f~~rs to he paid at kf•~c limc [h~ builc'inn i~~rmit is issu~d,
(,. Th,~t ~'r,~ina~,e ~f sai~i pro~~r.rty sh,,l i;~c AISt~c~se~~ ~f in a nannrrr satisFact~ry tc~
the Lity Enyin~cr. IF~ in t`i~~ {~r~a~iratic~n of thr ;ite~ sufficient ~1r,~din~~ is required ta
neeessitat~ a~rac1(n~~ permit, no work. on yradln~; will bc ~crr~itte~~ betwe~n Oc[oher 15th
and April l;th •+nl~~ss ~II rc~;ulrc~i nff-sitc drain~i~~~ f~icilitics have been installed ~~+nA
are op~rative. Pc~S~ tiv~~ assur~-nce shai 1 be provi-fr.d th~ City that such dralnaqe
facilitles wi11 b~~ cur~~~letMd t~rior t~ Octuber l;th. tlecessar~! r~~7ht-of-way (or off-site
dralnagc fati I i tE cs sh~~l 1 be ~lcdic~t<<1 t~ thr., CI ty ~ or thc Ci ty f.ounci I shal 1 have
initlaied con~femn.7t~on ~irocee:finqs therefur (the costS nf which shall be borne by thr~
develope~) prlor [o C~~c~ cur~ente+~~r,t of ~iradi~~y opcratians. Thc rcnulred drainaqc
Factlitles 5hi11 be ~~f a sizc; an~d 2yp~ sufficient to c:+rry runaff waters originatinq from
higher prope*rt(es thr~~u~ah said ~r~aperty kc• ultim~tc dishosal ~s approveJ by the City
Enginzer. Sald drain~~~~e facilitfcs sf~all bc the fir~t itc~m of cons[ructton and shall be
ccxnplett'd and be functi~nal [f,roughout thc tract xnd from the downstream boundAry af the
propertY to the uttimatc p~int of disvos~al prior to :hc isSUancc of any flnal buliding
inspect(n~y or occ~mancy {~ermits. Ur~ina~~e district ~eimt,ursement agreei*~ents m~y be made
available t~ tt~c devclopers of ~.~iJ proFcrty us>~~n thcir renuPSt.
~. Th,-~; yrading~ •~xcav.itiun, an~ all othcr construction activities sh~ll be
ccxiducted in such a rnanner sc~ as t~ ninimlze thc possil~i i ity of a~y si it originating from
this pro,jeet be;iny carried Into thc SantA Ana ~tlver by storm water ori~ina~tin~ from or
flawing thrauyh this proJect.
$, If perrnanent strcet namc si<~ns have not t~cen ir~stalled~ temm~rary s[reet n~~+me
signs shall be installr..~i pr(or to any occupancy.
y, That the owner(s) of s~bject prc~perty shall pay anpr~priate dra(n:-ge: asses~,ment
fees ta the Gity of M.iheim as dct~rmined by the City Cn~inecr pr3or to issua~ce o! a
building pcrmit.
~q, That ownership and maintenancc resp~nsib(lity of Lot "A" 5ha11 be retalned by the
hcxseavnCrs association.
~1. !n accord~nce with the rcqulrements of Section 18.(12.t14~ pert~tntng to the
initial sala of residentlal homes in the Gity of Ar:aheim Planning Area "0". the seller
shal) provide each buye~ with written infornation cc~nrerning the Anahelm Generel Pian and
the exl~ting zoning wlthin 300 feet of *_he boundaries of subJect tract.
6/4/7a
~
"~ {
~,
MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CITY PI.ANNING COMMISSION~ JUNE 4, 1979 7J'4z~ ~
E IR N0. 218 (A~OENDUM N0. 5) . CO`IDiTIU1~AL USE PCKMIT IJO. 1973 AND TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT
NOS. 10408 (REVISION NO. 4~ ANU 1071~ (continur.d
12. Thet f(re hydrants shal l be Instel ied and charc~ed~ as requi red and determined to
be necessary by the Chief of the Flrr_ Depertrtxsnt~ prior to c~rnrkncemrnt of structural
f rami ng.
13. That All requirements of Fir~ Zone 4, ot~~erw(sc Identlflcd as Fire .~dministratlvc
O~der Flo. 7(~-01~ will bc met. Such requ(rements Include~ b~~t era not limlted La, chlmney
sra~k Hrrestors, protected attic and under flcx~r o~r.ninqs~ Class C o~ bett.er roofing
metcrla) and one-liuur flrc-~csistive u>nstructlo~~ af h~riz~nta) surfaecs i f withln 2~0
fQ~t of ad)acant brush land.
14, That fucl brcaks shall be provided ~s cktcrmincd to bc rcqui red by the Fire
Ch ief.
1~. That nativr. r, Inpcs Adjaccnt to n~~wly u7nstructed h~~rws shal l be hydrosecded with
a low fucl corfiustible seed mix, Such slopes sl~all f~e sprinklcr~d ancl wae~led as require~i
t~ establish 14~ f~et se~par~~tinn nf flarxnablc vegctation from any st~uctur~.
1G. That the owne ~(s) c~f subJect praaerty shal 1 pay the traf f i c slyn.~+1 assessment fee
(O~d,nancc No, 339ty). in an aciaunt ds dut~nninr.d by thc City Cbunci 1. for ench ncw
dNell(n~a unit pr(or t~ thr_ issuancc of a buildin~i ocrmlt.
Robert Ilenninycr rcfcrrc~l [o f,pndicion ~~o. `3 cif Intcrd~rpA~tmCntA) Gor~n-It.ter. reconxnr~nda-
tions for Tract No. 1~)13 wt,{ch require, that al) prlvate stree[s shall be devela{+ed in
accordance wi th Cl ty of Anahcim Standarci Deta( I f~a. 122 far pri vatc strects wt,l ch requi res
sidewalk5~ and pc~lntcd out the petitioncr has rec~ucsted waivcr of [he SIdcWBIi'.5 In this
a~ e-e a .
Jay Titus. Office ~n~~ine~r~ explaincd thcre arc nWny condomini~m proiccts i~ the Anaheim
Ni Ils erea that do nc•,t hav~ sidr.walks. Ne statccJ th's concJ(tion for priv~tc strcets was
~pproved by the Planr. iny Comrnis, lon and Ci ty Cou~Gi I rc+qui riny t~~ese I!n~rovements ~ and
wanted to make cert.~in tt,c Plannin~~ Commisslon is y+ar~: of thc sttuailon,
Commissioner El~rnc•s was concerned wh~ther or not there +s any Nay ea limit the size of
[hese un) ts ~ st,~ti ng she r~al 1 zr.s yau cannot ! imt t the ~~umber of ch i 1 dren i n the un i ts ,
but th~t the sir.c af the units (nu~c~ of Gedrnorns) cu~ld be limit~d an~1 the developcr
eould control wh~,t the builder is alluwed ta build.
Commissioner f~ushure asl.e~ if ihc Plannin~~ Commisslon could require thac nrecise plans be
brouyht back before [hc Commissi~n for thelr approvai~ and Mr. Salceda indicated he was
wi 11 ing to stip~latc that the plans would be r~evicwed by thc Planni ~ry Comr~issi~n.
Cpmmissioner tiusliore offcred a mvtiun, seconded l,y Conmission.~r David and MOTIQN CARRIED
(Cam~(ssi~ncrs Johnson ~nd T~lar voting no), tli~t the Maheim City Pla~-ning Commisslan
does hereby find that the pruposed subdivision, toc~cthe~ wlth its desl~an and impr~vement~
i s consistent wi th tha Ci iy of i~n,~!~clm C.~neral Plan~ pursuant to Goverr.mcnt Code Section
6~~+7~•5 and cfries~ Cherefore~ approvc Tentative Map of Tract No. 10713 for a 53'unit
~oncSominlum subdivision in t~~e RS-t15-ic)~OQO(SC) Zonc~ subJect tu Co~di~ion No. 9 being
aimended to d~:lete the requirement for s(dewalks~ and subJect t~ the f~llowing conditions:
1. That the apnroval of Tentative Map of Tra~:t Na. 1U71; is granted s~bJect to
approval of Gonditio~al Usc Permit No, 1~~73.
2, That shoulci this subdlvlsic~n be developed as more than on~ subdivision~ each
~ubdivision thereof shall be ~ubmttted in tentativ~: form far approval,
3. Thet all iati withln this tr~~ct shall be ~served by underground uCllities.
4. That thc covenar~ts~ cc:~nditions~ ~n~! restrictions shatl be submltted to and
approved b~y the City Attorney's Offlce prior to City Councii apprr~val of ~he final tract
rr,ap and~ further~ t~iat the approved covenants~ to~ncliLlons~ and restrictians sf~ail be
recorded prior t~ the final tract map approval.
6/4/'79
~~..
~i..
MItIUTES~ ANANEIM I;ITY PLANNING COMNISSION~ JUNE -~~ 1~7~'1 79-42?
E1k N0. 21a (l1DUEt~DUM N6. 5) ~ CONDITIONAL U5E PCRMIT tid, Iq73 AND T~t~TATIVE HAP OF tRACT
NOS. 1040Ei (RCVISION ~~0. 4) AND 10713 (co~~tinuad)
5. That st~~~et names shal l be ipprnvrd by the Ci ty Pl.~~~n(ng Qepartrr~nt pri~r to
approval of a final tract ~~u~;~.
G. That dralnagt~ of said prc~perty shall bc ~1IS~t>SC~j of in a m~~nner sAtisfaetory to
~he City Cn~;lnser. If, In thc ~reparation nf thr,. sit~:, sufflcl~nt ~~rAd(n~~ Is requlred to
necossi tate a yradin~~ qe.rmi t~ na worl. on c~ra~lln~~ wi 1 i he permltted betwecn Octobe ~ l;lh
and Aprl I l~t.h unless al l requi red ~~ff-si te drt~inac~c f~ci i i ties havc been instal 1 ~d and
are opereti vr.. Posici ve assurance shal I be s~rr~vided the Ci ty that such dra(na~e
facilltics will bc compl~:t~d prior t~~ Octo~acr l~th, Necessnry r(qht-of-~aay for uff-sicc
d~ainac~e f~cllitics sh~ll ;~e deditated to thc City~ or th,~ Clty Couricil shali hAV.~
initiuted caidermati~~n proceedin~Js thcr~:`rr (the costs of which shall he borne by the
developer) prior to the c~nrnencem~~nt of ~~radin~~ c~peraLlr~~s, The rec~uired drain~c;~
faellities shall be of .~- si;e and type sufficlent t~ earry runoff wat~~rs orlc~ln~~tinq from
hiyher propertles throuqh saiJ property to ultlmat~ dis~osal as ~pp~ovecf by thr C ity
E~~c~ineer. Said dralnaye f.~ci l ltfes shal l t,e the fi rs t I tem of con~,truction and shal 1 be
completed and be functional throu~hout the tract and from the clciwnstream boundary of the
property to th~c ultimatc point of d(s~osal pric~r to Lhc issuancc of any flnal 5ui idlnn
i~spectio~s or occupancy pr_rmits. Urainn~~: dlstrict ~eimbursement anreements mr~y he made
gvat lab le to thc deeve lopers of said pro~~erty upon tf~e i r request.
7, That yrarJln~~, excavation, and ~Il otl~er cc.~ns tructicm ~ctivlties 5ha11 he
co~ducted in such a rnanner so os [o minimize the p~ss ib) lity ~f any silt ~r(qlnat (n~ from
this proJect bring carr(~d int~ thc 5anta llna Rlv~~r ;~y st~rm watrr oric~lnacinc~ f~an or
flowing through this project.
Fi. That thr c~wner(s) ~f subject pruperty shall pey to Lhe City of Mahelm ihe
app~opriAte park anJ recrcation in-llcu fees as deterni(r~e~ to be approprinte hy thc City
Council~ said fees co be paid a'. the tirne thc bui!din~i t~erm~t is issur.d,
9, Th~t al l t~ri vate strects s~hal , b~ develo~~e~i in aecordance wi th the C1 ty of
A~Ahe(m's Standar~J Detai 1 Ilo. 12i fot' prlvate str~ets , exce.~t th~t the requ(rement for
pedestrlan sidewalks sh~~l) he dclete~l, Plans for thP p~ivat~ street llghtinc~~ as requircd
by the st~~+nd~rd detai I~ st,al l be submitted to and ap~rovtd hy the Electr(c~l Divislon.
ApproveJ prlvate street lightinn plans shall then be submitteci t~ the. Uullding Divislon
`or incl~sion with thc buil~iin~~ plans prior to issuance of buildinca pcrmics,
10. 7hat the alignment ~ind t~rminal point of st~rm drains shaa~n or~ this tentative
tiract maf~ shall nut be considereci final. These drair.s sha~~ bc subJe:ct to precise desiqn
eonsl~leratluns ~nd approval of [he City Enyin~ser.
11. If permanent street namc sic~ns have 7ot been InSt~11e~1, temporary strceL name
si~ns shal i be instal led prior to any occupancy.
12. That thc owner(s) of subject pro~erty st~a11 pay aPnropriate drair~agc assess~-ent
fees Co thc City ~f Anahcim as dctcrmine~l by the City t~gtneer pr(or to issuance of ~
bui ld(ng permi t.
13. That an ordi~ancc re2oning the subject prap~rty shall in no evr.nt becor*~e
effective except upcx~ nr fo1la~Inc~ the recordation of f inal Tract M~op No. 1f~713 wlthin the
time spacifit~d in fovernment Code Secclon G~,463,5, pr suc;h further tlmc a5 the advisory
agency or City Gounci 1 rnay ~rant.
14, In atcordance wl th the rcqui rcrnents ~f Scct ion 1%i.~2.047 pertafnin3 to the
initial sale of residentlal homes in chc City of Matieim Plannfng r\rea "D"~ tt~e seiler
shall provl~Se each buyer wi th written inf~rMatlon cra~cerniny the A~iahelm General Plan and
the existing zonin~ wlthin 3~~ f~et of thc boundaries of subJect tract.
15. That al) requlrerr~nts of Ftre 7.o~e b, otl~er~ise 'dentified as Fire Admi nfstrative
Order I~o, 76-01~ wlll be met. Such requirements inelude~ but are not limited to~ ehlmney
spark arrestors~ protected attic anu under floor op~nings~ Glass C or better ~~ofing
material an~ one-hour fire-resist(ve constructidn of har3zontal surfaces if withln 200
feet of ad}acent brushland.
16. That fi re hydrants shal 1 be tnstal led and eha~ged, as requi red and determined to
be necessa~y by the Chief of the Fire Department, prlo~ ta conxnencement of structu~~t
f;amtng.
6/4/7q
~ ~
MfNUTES~ ANANEIM CITY PLANt~ING COMH~SSION~ JUNE 4~ 1979 79~~23
E I R N0. 218 (ADOEIIDUM fJO. 5I . CON~ IY I ONAL USE PERMI T N0. 1913 At~D 'TENTAT I VE MAP OF TRACT
NOS. 10408 ~iiEVIS10N N0. 4) ANO 10713 (continued -
r 1). That netive slop~s edJacent to newiy c~nstructed homes shell be hydroseeded with
a{ow fuel cortbus[Ible seed mix. Such slapes ~!~all be sprlnkle~ed and woeded es ~equired
to n~tablish 1QQ fecc separatlon of flammabl~r veyetatlon from any structure.
1$. Th~.~t thQ owner(a) of 3t~JCCL ~~roperty shall pay the trsfflc slc~nal Assessr~nnt fee
(Ordinanco lic~. 3~9G) ~ in en arn~unt as dote-'mine~ by i.he LI ty Councl I~ for eath ncw
dwelli~y u~tt pri~r [o the issuance of A bulidiny permlt. C and ~4
1~. That the c~wn~rship and m~intenancc res~~ons~h) lity of Luts "A", "t1"~ "" `
shal) bc ret+~ined 5y tl,c horrwa+ncrs assoc.tation.
20. 1?~at Lots "A" and "C" shall be devclo~+e:f v~ith a flat pavin~~ r~atcrtal suitable f~r
continuous usc as a bearln~ surfacc for c~ash [rutk t~affic.
Commissicmrr Johnson indlcatcd t~c would like to makc the stAtemer-t thnt he is not
vtolently oppc~scd to this proJcck~ but wanted his opposincl vote to 5tAnd as an
i Ilustratfon to An.~l,elm fif 11~~ Inc. that he is strongly opposed t~ thc "bite of the time
principle" end felt th~~ surveys ~nd plans should be a little clnscr togr.thcr, Ile felt if
this proJett had been presentcd scve~ ~{~ths a~ao~ lt waul~l havc been denieil unanimously by
the Planning Gommissi~n.
Conmissicx~er Tol~~r st~t~d his ne~~ative vote refle~ct5 his ohjer.tic>ns to the waY the
cAlculations were presented. ~le state~i he wouid a~.~rec that the {~ra,ject would nat have
been appraveJ c~ne year a<tr~; that the nurber of un f ts ner acre i s accorr~, I i shed because of
the c~radinr~ an~ he feels stronyly that there is ~~~reat deal of the canyon ~re~~ which
never shaulei have bcen ~~racl~d and cic~veloped.
RECCSS The mec[ing ~cu:ssed aY 3~z7 t~•m•
ttECO~~VEtIC
.._...~~- Thc mectiny reconv~~nr~1 at 3:~+~ ~•~•
! TCM N0. ; PU3l I G NE:ARI tIG. OWNER : t3RQQKt1IIRST SI~OPP I NG CEtITER,
E q G IVE DECI.IIP,f,TlD~1 2293 W~st Dall Road~ An~hcim, CA 9?~O~i. OF.VEIOPLR:
RECLASSlFICATIi)1! N0, 7-73-W5 PACESGTTE:R NOMES. 45~~0 Zam~us Drive~ Newpo~t Beach~
~l . 073~ Ca 92hL(t. E~1Gt~~EEk: Tl'~~7 ~ ASSOCIATES~ INC. ~ P.O.
Box 41~25~ Anahr~lm~ CA 9a~~~3. SubJrct property is
a rectangularly-slia~ed parcel of iand co~sisctnq
of approximately F~.~~ acres having a frontagr of approxir~atety J7~ fect on thc snuth sidc
of Vaneouvr,r DrivF, havin,~ a maxtrnum depth of approxiau+tcly 3fi4 fect. And bcing loc~ted
approxTmately ;3h f~=Nt west of the centcrl inF~ of Drookhurst Street. Property presently
classified CL (COMME:RCIAL, IIMITED) ZOFIE.
REGLASSIFICATI~N REQUEST: RM-3~n~ (RESIDENTIAL~ MIILTIPLE-FAMILY) ZOI~E.
T(:t~Tl1TIVE TRACT REQUES7: ONE-IOT~ GO-UNIT~ CONDONINIUM SUBUIVISI0~1.
There was one person present lndicating his interest in the pro,}ect~ hut was not sure
wheth~r or not he rras npposed to the proJect, and aithough the staff report to the
Planning Commission dated J~me 4~ 1979 was not reac! At the public hesring, lt is referred
to and made a part of the minutes.
Fr~ed Kingdon~ rep~esenting Pacesetter tiomes~ stated tF'~ey are. in agreemcnt with the
conditions proposed by the staff; hawever~ requestcd that the 20-fooi landscaped buffer an
the west property line be reduced to a 10-foot lendscaped buffer. with the additlonal 1Q
6/4/79
~ ~
MINUTES. ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS510N~ JUNE 4~ 1979 73`424
EIR NEGATIVE UECIARATION RECLASSIFICATION N0. 78-7g-~+S ~ND T~NTATIVE 11A(' OF TRACT N0. 1013~
feet of landscaptnq to bc sp~ead thruuc~hout the proJect. lie stated they wf I1 bc provic11n9
e new black wal) alonq thC w~sterly boundary and felt 10 fcet of lendscaping would 'uc
adeq uatu.
Jatl: 4lhite~ I~ruty Clty Aktorncy~ expl~inad a waiver would bc requ(red far watver of the
I~ndscaped buffer and would r.^.qutre en adve~tlsament for anothcr publlc hcarinq~ and Mr.
Kingdcm IndlcatcJ hc wc~uld witl~drnw hls request.
Harry McGlusky~ 9y37. Mystlc Lane, An~helm~ stated this is a deadend street with a
barricade~ and aske~l about the Gloc~. wall prop~scd o~ thc west side rnd asE:ed if thr.
devcloprr would bo wantin~~ to eontinue Chet strecc. Ile ~sked if the units t~r~p~scd are
twcrstory~ bnd Robcrt Ilenninyer~ Assist+~nt Planner~ rcrlieJ thal' th~y are.
Mr, McClusl<y stated he was also concerned about thc residents being able to look down into
his back yard.
Chai rman herbst explaines thet thc structurc Hi 11 bc Approxlma[cly 75 fr_et fror~ thc f~ncc.
He dlso explatne~i that after tF~e property is Jevelopeci~ there wlll be no way to continue
tf~e strec~t on thrc~u~~li.
Mr. HcClusky st~ted he has 1(ved at this pf0~)CfLy since it was developec.l and a lot oF
people had move~ tt~ere bccause of the cfeadenci street with very little traffic,, and khere
is a lot of eonc~:rn un thei r pert rec~arcling this issue:.
Ghairman Flerbst stated t1~e r~e~~uest fUr reclassifica;ian fror~ comrnerci~l to residr.nt(al
will mcan a much liyhter usc.
Neal Hoyan~ 371.2 Myst(c Lane~ Anahcim~ indicatcd he was concerned abaut thr, trnfflc
eonyQStlon~ polntiny out the ~-lans shaw ttie craffic flowing out on[o Vancouver Or1ve an<i
the corner of Vancouver ~riv~ and Calchester U~ive is a bad t~rner already anci they I~ave
h~d a few acci ~encs tt~ere,
Ch~irnian Herbst explalned the Traffic Enginee~ hrri r~vir.a~cc! the plans; that the existing
zor~inc,~ is for comrnercial an~1 a c~~nercial establishnx~nt would cre~~+te more traffic.
Mr. Hogan stated ~ co~nnercial development would have yone out onto Sall Road or Brookhurst
through the slioppin~ center~ but this development forces rhe traffic auY through ~he small
~csidenti~l strcets.
Cortmissioner Johnsur indicat~d he wuuld ~ike to have the Traffic ~nglneer's opinion on
tl~is pro)ect.
Vlneent Tock~ 7ait ~ Associates~ Inc.~ enyineer~ state~ they had met wich the Traffic
Oepartment and recetvod r-o adverse comrn~nts regarciing the flvw of traffic~ ancl stAted
there is no c+ther place for traffic to qet out ontu Ball Raad; tt~at there is an ec~~ess
point northerly to Colct~ester and another one westerly to Gi lbert. Ha stated hc did not
think it would be feasible to tak` the traffic throug~ the shapping center~ and p~otnted
out except fcr the front~~p on Van u~uver Orive~ the property Is almost landlockcd. He
explalned they are clostny off Mystic Lane with a mcadifted cul-de•s~c to avold any t~affic
onto that rasidential street.
Comcnissloner Johnsan polnted out to Paul S(n,er. Traffic Engin~er, that usually a ltght
~esidential use would be better Lhan a conmerclal use; ho+~ever, in ttiis particular case. e
ccxnnercial development would have the traffic out o~to Brookhurst~ but the condominlum
6/4/79
~ ~ r
MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ JUNE 4~ 1979 ~3~~25
EIR N~GATIVE DtCLAM'fI01~~ RELLASSIFI_CATION N0. ]8•79~~U At~O TE~TATiVE Ml1P OF TRACT N0. 10~38 ~
developmont puts the trafflc through thc residen[Idl str~ets. Hc statrd tho cltizena~ have ,
indlcated thet torner Is badly (mpactcd at the present tlme,
Paul Singer~ T~afftc Enginecr~ staled the pra}cct wfil qcn~ratc app~aximatcly ;10 trips
pcr doy and from purely a volume st~'+ndp~int. the~e is no rcason why thP stre~t cannot.
hsndle t1~e traffic.
Commissioncr Bushorc askcd f~r clarific~tlon rn~~ardin~ the a,aivcr re~utrerr,enC f~r the two-
story ~tructures ad.jacent to re~ldenti~) pr~~pertir.s~ and Nr, Henninger explatncd that
walver Is nc~t necessary becausr. the adjacent hpmrs a~e tn the c~unty and the code relates
to other res~l~3r.ntlal zone, in the city.
Coinmissloner 8usho~~ statr,d thcse county property awnr.rs' ri~7htS ar~ no different than
people 1 i vl nq wi thi n the cl ty an~1 shoul d bc prate.c:te~i~ and hr, waul d not be ln fnvor of
this p;~)ect:. Ne alsn askcd why a ne~~ativr.. decloretiUn h~d b~+en sug~ested on a ~ro}ect
this largc.
I~r. Ilennin~e~r replie~ this pr~Je~t re~resents (~~ unlts and the P~a~nin~~ Carmils5lon~ ma~y
t{mes (n thr. past~ has grantcct nc~~~~tive declaratl~ns for ~ro)ccts uf thiS size.
Che~irman ilerbst state~l thls pro~~crty is comr~erci~l{y zone~l and the requcst is for RM-?0~0
and explained t~ie CI ty of Anaheim is onc of the only ci ties whi cl~ requi r~s a 150'foot
setback frorn property lines~ and Garden Grove ~+~c1 Uuena ~'a~i•k I~ave >J-fac~t setbacks.
Gonrnls5loner ~ushore statecf hr has been tuld hy c~th~rs tl~at t.hc City of Anaheirn is one ~~
Cl~e most far-si-~htec~ citiss and ane of the best F~lace~s in ci~ec cnunty to live~ and fie feit
one of thc tti~in~,s that makes khis true is this typc renuirernc~nt and felt th~sse people arc
probably fortun;~tc to livc aJjacent to thc CItY nf Anaheim because t,c w~uld grant them tha
sam~: prlvi le,es ~ ane! as l~ng as ttiere arc cwo-story structurPS chTt close to single-
family~ hc wil) rx~t votc for ii.
'TIIf PUULIC HEARI~~G uAS CIOSEU.
Chaf rr,~an Herbst fc:ic one area of thc cod~~ whicfi shouid h~ r~~vic~r+e~+ is the trentment r~f
eondamin{u~Lypc d+.~ellinys JS multiple-famtly residential r~ither than sinyle-~amilv; that
a two-story~ sinyl~~-family house could be built 15 f~yP.L awAy fror~ the fence; and t•~at
tF-ese ettacl~ed~ sinyle-fami ly hc~mec~ncrs are penalized by t~aviny to have the 150-'oot
setback.
Cornmissioner E3ushore stated re~cntly t`iere h.3d been an R!1-3o~n pro,jett s~jbmitted and the
waiver was g~anted because i[ was adJacent t~ only onc ciwellinq unit and there arere plans
for that unit, and khat projec[ had provided che 1>~-foot setback ~n the west side. tie
stated t~e would be conccrned al,o about (iaviny sorncanc looking clc~wn unto his property.
Commissioner T~lar stated thesc structures are quiCe a distance ~-+way~ but if they wer~
yEngle-family resiciences, [hey could be placed witt~in 1~ feet of the property Iti~e. tie
pointed out tht proJect In :.he canyon ~pproved just pri~r to thts hearing hacl had
condc~minium units within i;0 f~.et of sin~le-farnily residential areas,
Cnmmissionar Bushore statcd thers was a vatid reason for supporting that praJect and also
the one two weeks ago, but in this cas~ ~here will possibiy be 12 units overloaking onc
back yard, whereas a sinyle-family proJect would have only une or two unlts tooking down.
6/4/79
~
MINUTES~ ANANEIM ClTY pLANNING COMMI5SIOri, JUNE 4~ 197`~
7~-~+2F
k'IR NEGATIVE: DECIAMTION~ RECl.~SSiFiCATIUN Np~7~-7~Ar~D TE!~ IV[ MAP oF TR~1CT N0. 10738
Curtr~issloner Tolar statecl hc did nat t~~~nk thcre would be T?. hcxncs loak)n<~ ~town into o~~
back yrrd ond wl th the structurr.s over 70 f~et awey from thr. fenc~~ he cii,i n~t think they
woulci bc: ablr to sce into the back yards anyway.
fJea) Nog~~n slated Iils onfy cc~nc~rn about the tr;~ffic is the visihllity~ an~1 tht, pro.~r.ct
w~uid ad~ morc traffic. 11c statc~f hc wa, glad the ~r~nr.rty ~~ras ;o(n~~ r.c, br develnped~ bun:
wanted to suy~ar~st th~t maybe som~~ arca sha~~l~l he ~ics(gn~ted for "n~~ norkinn" in o~cter ta
kcep the parkinq aw0y from thc corners, Ne stutcd Colchcstcr i~; hcAVi ly conq~sted w~ th
parkiny at the pre5ent time frcxn the existin~ a~,artments.
paul Sin~er st:~ted that ~rc~Glem coulct uasily bc solved~ ,~n~f ~tr. !io~ian thc,uld c:un~ac~: the
Fn~~lneerinq Jr~~artnt~nt since tlicre is an c~t~struction of his vt5(~»~, ~an~1 they c~i~ld (nstall
a "re d zonc" .
M~, Toek painted qut Lhe ~'is.arc~ ft•~~n thet wal 1 t~~ Lhr. structur~ ~s ACiUA~ Iy E i ,`eet
rathcr than /~ as inditatc~~ ~in:i Comrissiancr Johnson Sta~eJ th~r~• is an~ther Z~ feet from
the wall to the sinyl~~-family residences.
ACTIOlJ: Comr,issi~~ncr I;iny uftcred a mati~n, srt~nd~d ~~ Ganr~~i5ti~c~nr•.r Tolar ~~n~~± MO'r10N
~L`~ Lhat th~~ Anahaim City Planniny C~mnissi~n h.,~ -~~vi~wlc.~! tne prnpoS~l to rec:lassify
subject properky from the CL (Coirxrr~rcial, Lim(ted) ~ e R~*-3~0~~ (ResEd~ntlal~ ~Sultiple-
Fdmily) zonr tb est~~bllsh ~ one-lu[~ r.~~-unlC, RM-3" ~ne~ ct~nc3on.lniixn subdivi~;ic~n on a
reett+ngularly-shapcd parcel of lan~f c~nsi~.tin~: of .tn;,t~.~ly F>,~. a~res havin~a a
frontaye of appraxirnately J7~ fr,et on the suuth ~ ~.~f,.c~uvcr Dr(ve~ havin~~ a m.~ximum
depth of approxir,-ately 3Gl~ fcct~ ~nd bcln~l Ir~G3t' ,~ ,,~~CP.IY '~~f, fFet west af thie
center) ine of t3ro~-churst Strect; and ~ioe~s hrrF•b~ ~~~~ r.: tlec~ative Declaration ~'rom tt~e
requi re~c~nt tc~ {~reparo an envl ronmrntal impacr - - e bas is [hat thr_re would be no
si~nifieant In~iividual ~~r cumulativ~ aJver~~~ ~ ~t,~ ;:~. irip<~ct due to the a~Proval ~f
this Neyatlve Declaracion sincr t'ie l~n~he(rn '' ~ ~ '~n Jesiynatec chc subjeci prope~~ty
for ~nedi um der.s i ty res i ri~n t I a) I an~~ us~s cc~+-.•~~ ~ -•: ~ t h the p ronosa 1; that no sens i t i vc
envi ronmental ItIQACCS are involved in the n-'t~n4~~-+ .'•~a~ the tni clal Study submlt4ed by
the pettticx~cr indicates na significant in~'~+ - - r.umu~otivc adv~rse~ Frnvironmcntal
impacts; anJ that thr: Negative Uecl~rati~x~ ~•~* ~-~+ ~; ~a*;n~; the foreg~oln^ finc!ing, is o~
f91e in the City of Anahcim Planniry Ucparrr,r=
Commissioner Ki~g offerea Resolution IJo. P~7~)-T' ; ar~ move~ for its passane and ad~Ptiun~
that the Anaheim City Plannin~~ Cor~missior ;~u~s ~~~~r~°,,y ~rant Petit(on far Reciassificatlon
No. 7b- J9^4~, sub ject tu I nterdc~~rtment.~~ CoM1n-.~ ;~~~e recorn~nend~t ions.
On rol) c~11, the f~reqofny res~lution was ~ass by t`~~• f~llaving vote:
AYCS: COMMISSIO!tEqS: UARr~ES, I3USNnRE, ~ df:~. HER~ ~, JOH~~SOfJ, KING~ TOLAR
~IOES : COMMI SS I ONC RS : NO~~~
A65ENT: COHMISSIOt'"RS: NO'ri.
Commissioner king offer«-~.i a n~tio~,, `~cc>n~d by Commissi~ner UaviJ and M071U~J CARRIED,
that th~ Anahcim Ci[y 'lanniny Ca~T~sission does hereby find that the proposed subdivisic+n,
together wi th i ts des ~~n and impruven~nt~ is cc~nsistznc wi th the Ct ty of Anaheim General
Ptan, pursuant to ~overn~ne~;t ':~iJr~ Seccion 66~~73.5 and dor.s~ therefore~ approve Tentative
Map of Tract No. 1'~r=~ for a~~ne-lot~ UO-unlt, RM-30~~ Zone. toncioir~inium subdivisian~
subJect to the follvwin~a concfitions:
i. That th~ apnroval of Tentative `1ap of Tract No. 1073~ is granted subJect to the
approva~ of Reclassification I~o. 78-7~-~5,
6/4/79
,~ ~
MI NUTES ~ ANN~C I M C I TY PLAI~tI I NG COMMI SS I ON ~,lutiC 4~ 1979 ~~"~+~ 3
E I R NEGATIV~. DECLARATION~ REGLAS51 f 1 CATIOt~ ~ld. 78•79-G5 AND TCHTA7IVE MAP OF Tf~l1CT N0. lU~
2. That shoul~l this suf,dlvision be dcvcloped as morc th.~n onc subciivlsio-~~ crich
subdlvisl~n thcreof sholl bc submfttcd in t~ntatlve forrn for approvpl.
3. Chat ihe cove~nants~ conditlons, and restrlctlon~ shall be submi[ted to ~7nd
approved by tl~e Clty Attarney's Office and Lity Eng{neer's Office ~~ri~~r to City Counci)
approvrl of the fin,el tract m.i~~ and, further~ chat thc~ ~nroved covenants~ con~ilclons, ~~nd
restrictlc~ns shall bc r~-cord:~d pr(or ta tl~e final tract map approv~~l.
4. That street narms shall be approved by the Clty Plonninc~ Departmr.nt pr(or to
apprr~val of a fin~~) tract map.
~, That ~fraina~ie of Slb_jCCL pioF~erty shall hr. disposed of in a manncr s:~ isf~ictory
to thc City Enyine~~r.
G. That the nvncr(s) of subject pr~perty shall p~y to the Clty of An~~1~r_ir~ the
+~ppropriatr, park and recrcAtin~~ in-licu fecs as deCrtr~In~J t~~ be .~pprupr(~~tc~ by the City
Gounci l, sai d fces tc~ bc pai d ~t the timc thc bui ldi n~a permi t i s (ssur~l.
7. That a mc~difled eul-cle-sac shall hc cunstructed at the terminus of Flysiic Lane
S~bJect to the app~ova) uf the CI[y Enyinecr.
b. That all priv~te strc~ts shall be ~icvcl~~~c~l in acc~rdanct: wlth th~~ Cfty of
Ar-ahelm'S StanJard Uetail -~a. 1:; for ~riv~ite str~ets. Plans for th~ priv~~te strect
ll~~htln~~ as requlred by tlie standar~ detail~ ~hall b~ submitt~~1 tc an~f ap~roved by the
Elec[rical Ulvision. llppr~ve~i G>riv~jte street liql•,cin-~ nl.ins sh~~ll then bE~ submltt~rd to
the f~uildin~~ Division fr~r intiusian with thr bulldinc~ pl~~n5 ~rior t~ iSSUance ~f uulldinh
pcrmf ts.
~. If ~errTM~ncnt strce~t n~rrx~ sl,~ns havc not hecn installed~ tc-np~rary st:reet nane
si~~ns shall br.. (ns[~1led ~rior to .iny oeeupaney.
10. That ~n r.~rdinance~ rc:~nin~a the subJ~•ct propcrty shall in no event become
eFfe.eti ve except u~cm or fol Sowi n~ th~ recor~;at iun ~f f I n~l Tract Map I~n. 1~73i' wi thl n the
timc sp~cifir.J in Governmcnt Codc Section bu4(3.~~ ~r such furthcr tir~c as the advisory
agc~cy or Ci ty C~unci 1 may ~~rant.
11, 7hat the oa~ncr(s) ~~f subje~_t pronerty sh:~ll ~:3y tfic traffi~, sir:nil assess~nt fee
(Or~1i nance 'Jo. y~.~~(:) ~ in ~n ario~,nt ~5 ~1~tcrrii ne~f I~y thn Ci ty Cour~ci 1, for eacl~ new
dwHlllnq unit prior tn thF~ issuancc c~f r, bulldin~~ ~crr~it.
ITE:M N0. t~ PUitiLIC NEl1P,ItJG. Otill~~k: NJ1lTCP, A. "ROME, JR. ~
~{K'VE UECLARATI~~N 17~`31 Irvine E3oulevard~ ~417~ Tustin, CA 92680.
CUI~_p ' 6NAL U~SC PE~tM T NQ. 19ii3 Peti tioner requr.sts pennission to RETAIM EXI51'ING
O~FICES IN TIIE ML ZOt~E an property descrlbed as a
rectangularly-shaped parcel of land conslsting af
approxfmately iS.d acres having a frontage of approximately 51; feet on the south side af
La Palma Avenue, having a n~aximum depth of a~proximately 7~s~ fe~et~ being iocated approxi-
mately 563 feet west of the centerline of Imperia) H(ghway~ anC' further described as 560Q
East La Palma Avenue. F'r~perty presently classified ML (IND~JSIRIAL, LIMITED) ~OME.
There was na one indicatiny their presence in oppositi~n to sutrjcct request, and although
the staff report to the Planning Gommission dated June 4~ 13~~1 was not re~d at the publlc
hearing~ it is r•eferred to and made a part of the minutes.
4lalter Frome~ owner~ stated he hao ~cquired full title to su~Jhct property ~0 days ac,~o and
lat~r learned that the ~ffice spac~ of 3500 square feet has had some probiems with the
Clty of Anaheim; that ~oldwell Banker was managing the properCy befare he haa purchased
it; that he had met witfi steff afte~ heartng of the problem an~ was informed he would have
io get a new condi tlonal use permi t every time he gets a new tenant and tl~at he has some
Lenants who are paying only S90 a mcanth and he would not ba able to c~et them to do this;
that he ha~ explained there are 10 or 12 very small officcs at the site and the proJec*
was built in 1970 or 1971; and that he would like to do something to expedite the
6/4/79
~ ~
MI NUTES ~ AfIAl1E IM C ITY PLANN 1 ~!G COMMI SS I ON ~ JUNE -~ ~ 1979 79-428
EIR NcGATIVE a~k'C~LA,MTION ANU CONDITIONA~ ii:,C PERMIT N0. 198~ (conttnued}
sltuat~on snd was tnfarmed the best way to handlc It would be to file for a conJltlon~-1
use ~~ermlt for the entlre 3;7~ squarc f~et and 1(st the proposed uses. I~e strtcJ he was
provided e Iist for ~- sfmtlar proJcct on State Collegc Doul~verd which had bcen prevlously
epp roved and he haJ de-~uctrd several uses from that Ilat~ ~nd his proposed Ilst 15
(nciudud in the st3ff rs~ort. Ile statr.f he c~uld Ilvr. wltli the list of resstricted uses.
R~!garding the parkfnn far thls site~ I~e stated he had heen to th~ ~roperty at
appmximately 1'):30 a.m. and thr.rc werc 44 vecant p~r{ctng S~AClS.
THE PUliLI C NLARIIiG WAS f.LOSEG.
Commissloner Tolar staced th~ Planniny Commiss(nn had discusseJ In e ~ecent work session
th~s proble~ with certain busfnesses bei~~~~ c~ra~nte~ huslness licenses wh4n they needed a
condltlana) use per~~il[~ and osked scaff whot ste~s have been teken to ~ectlfy that
situstlon,
Robert Ilennin~ier~ AS515tArit Plantr~:r~ statc~i staff t~as been telkin~~ mor~ closely with the
Llcense Uivisi~n staff anJ they do uncierstr~n~d the cancerns~ and staff is mo~ttar(nc~ the
requa~ts f~~r bu5lness ltccnses rx~rc closcly than befure. He stated whrn the
reorganizat;an is corr~lr_tc, the Lic~nsr Divislon wlll be physlcally locatc~l ad}acent to
thc 7.on(ng Uivision~ an~i that shoulJ improve rn~nttoring the uses (n the industrle) arta.
Canmissioner Johnson st~tcd he wes conce rned wlih interinr decoreti~n as a proposrd use
(Item "m" in th~e 1(st of uscs) and felt there ts a possihlity this c~uld bc turned into a
furni ture storc, fie state~i ~ccasionnl ly s~me~cme wi l l sl ip e bui ldln~ throuqh the Ci ty
rules anu thc Commission docs n~t t ry t~ har~y the nea+ awner~ but does expect the ncw owncr
to help strei~~hten out the situation.
Comr~(ssioner 7ola~ fel t che tnterfor decnration use could pc,ssihly bc more of an
industriril use than some of tt~e other usas listed.
Mr. Ilennlnycr stated he doubted thts could become a furnitu~e store because thes~c ~fftces
ere very small~ rflnying In sizc from 1~}0 square feet tn 3E.~ squAre fcet~ and this
c4nditional use permit relates only to the second-sto ry offices.
Chairtna~ Ilerbst statecS therr. was a public hcarine~ regarJing cr~rs approximately one yea~
ago end Coldwell tlanker was inv~~lved, ancl asked if they hbd advised the petitloner of that
publlc h~ariny, and hr, frur.n~ replie~ tie had le~rned of the problem only after he had
purchased tt~e property.
Mr. Frome stated t~e tiacl spoken w(th the Traffic U~partment and after d(scussin~
Interdepartmental Commlttcc recormxnda;fon No. 2~rich tl~cm, he would ltke ta bsk tha~ lt
be chenqed ta off(ce uses instead of comr~:rci~l u•es for tt~e t~affic sl~~nal assessment fee
and lt was JetcrMlned khere Is a different frc f~r office use~s~ and Mr, fienninger
indicated th~t c~ndition cAUld b~ changed.
Mr. Frome referre~d to Condltion No. 1 re,yarding trash storage areas ancl indtcated it was
hts understanding that that condition is automatically added to these requests and stated
thcy do h;~ve trash storage facllitics tt~ere naw~ an~ Mr. Henninger stated it. was his
un~~rstanding afCer tall:tng wlth the Streets a~d Sanitation Qivision that they do have
sorr~ N~roble~r~ with existing trash storage areas and they would iike to have them brouqht
up ta ~;tandar<i.
Cortimissi~ner Bushore explrlned that drea is in the tanyon a~ea and the City is trying to
keep thAt a~ea top-grade and indlcated when he had traveled a round to the back of this
property~ the b~ns we~e upen and lu+~ber was alt over t4~e place and there was a p~oblem
6/4/79
. '~p
~ .,+
MINU7E5~ ANAIiEIN CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ JULY ~+~ 1~79 7~~~24
EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION ANU CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 198; (continued)
getting throuryh. Ile was concurned that ftre vehlcles would not be able to get th~ough.
and Mr. Frome explalned thet fence automatically opens for erne~ryeiicy vel~icles.
Gnmmissiuner Tolar stt~te~ I~e d(d not thlnk there would be any diffcrence in these~ usss and
other IndustriRl proJects which have becn approv~ci and tt ts less then 3~~•
Lommissl~ncr Johnson expl.iined 1 f c1~e pet( ticmer leases the sp~ce t~ so~ec~~e else with a
use ~ther than th<~se or, che list~ he would be In vlolatlon af the ccm ditional use pe~mit
and the perml t coul~i I~e revc~ked.
Commissio~er Uarncs statPd shu wes concc rned becausP other arcas such As irvine have had
trouble wlth offices mc~vtng Int~~ the in~iustrtal ~reas end c~~using pa~{:In~~ F!rob:ams~ end
Mr. Fwme statcd thcy IIaVP, ahaut ?-1/?.~ ~~` thc tatal s~~u.ir~ foc,t~i7c of thc ~~ro_Ject with an
excr.ss in parkin~ spacc~.
Mr. Neni~inyar exptaine~l th15 ccmditional usc per-~it wtll relatr [n [hc 3~~~~~square foot
upper story oniy and eny ex~.ansi~~ woulJ requ(re an adc!iti~~na) ce~ndition~~t use (~ermlt.
ACTION: Cortrnissinrer Tol~r uffercd a motion~ secondcd by Cammisston~r Kin~ end MOTI01{
~~D, thAt thc Anaheim City Planniny Cornt*iigsic.~n has reviewc.d the nro~sal t~ reta(n
existiny offices ln the ML (Industrlol, Llrnited) Tone c~ a rcctanyui~irly-sh.~~-ed parcel of
land consiscing of approxirnately ~,.~i acres heving a frontanc~ of approx(mat~ly `;15 9eec on
thc south side of l.a Palma Avenuc~ ~iovinq a maximur~r :Jn_ptt~ of ~hp~oxir~atcly 7~'~ feet~ being
located approxir~itely '~~„ fee: west csf the crn[erlin~ af lr~-~erial 111yhway; and does hereby
approvc ihr. I~e~~acive Uecl.aratia~ from thc~ rcyulrer:x~nt ta preparr_ an envlronnKntal impa~t
report on the basis that tf~rre woul~l be no si~~nificant individual r~r cumulative adverse
envir~inmental i~n~~act du~~ to the at~provni of this t~e_yatlv~ Decleracion since tt-e Anaheim
Gencral Plan clesignate~~ tt~e sut~Ject property for yeneral ind~istria) land uses cortwne~surat~°
with the propos~'+1; that n~ sensit(ve envirc~nment~~ impacts Are involved in [he proposel;
that the Initial StuJy submltte~f by tl~e ~~ecitioner indicates no slclntfican[ individuA) or
cumulative adversr. r.nvtronmental im~,acts; and [hat the Negative Declar~ti~n substantlating
the farey~~ing findln~~s is on file in th~ Clty of Mahelm Planning Depart~nent.
Gommissio~cr Tolar offc:r~s~! Resaluti<~n 11a. PC7'~-1QII and moved for fts passage and acioption~
that thc Anahelm City Planning Gommissfon does hereby ~~rant Petltion f~r Conditlonal Use
Perml t tlo. 19i3• sub.lect t~~ the neti t toner's stirul atlon c~ permi t si mi lar type uses in
the futu~e In the folla•rlny specific cateyorlts; mnrtyage a7~d financc~ compantes~
tnvestmr.nt security coR~panics~ Insurance corr~anies - branch or homc offices~ insurance
ayencles and brokera~~p f i rn~s ~ real estatr f t rms - i~vestment, commerclal and industry ~
tltle and escrow companies~ attorneys~ CPA's. advertis(ng~ engineerin~ firms - consulting,
architects~ marketing rescarch~ inte:rior decoratlon~ management consultants~ accounting
(clerical) ~ travel ayency. sales ofEice~ r,anufacturer's rep~esent~tive~ and telephone
answe~ing servlce; and sub)ect to Interdepartmenta) Conxnittee ~ecommendations~ with the
exceptton of Condttlon No. '2 wl~ich should be chenged to read, "That th~ awner(s) of
subJect property shall neY the difference between the Industrial an~i office trafflc signai
assessrnent fees."
On roll call~ the fore9oiny r~solution was passed by th~ foalc~wing voCe:
AY~S : COMM~ S51 ONEP.S : BAitNES , f3USi10RE, DAY I D~ HERE35T ~ JOtIPISAN ~ ttl NG, TOLAR
~QE$; COMMISSi0NER5: t10N~
ABSENT : COMMI SS I ONERS : NO~~E
6/ 4/ 79
~ ..
MINUTES~ ANAHCIM CITY PIANNING COMMISSIQN~ JUNE ~~ 1379
~
79~434
ITEM N0. PUt3LIC IIEARING. OWNEK: L11 P,4LMA BUSINESS PAR,Y.~ LTJ.
E N• Vc UECLAMTION P.O. E3ox ~3~+~~ Orrnge~ CA ~)2f~67. AGENT: RICNARD
CONDITIONAL USE PERHIT N0. 1984 BROAUWAY, I.P.S. Companlas~ P.O. Box 6348~ Orsnge~
CA 92b67• Petitlo~er requests permission ta ESTADLISH
A UOt~UT SHOP AND SANDWICFI SNOP WITH ON-SALE 6EER AND
WINE IN TNE ML ZONE on property de~cribed as a rectangulnrly-shaped p~ercal of ldnd
ca~sisting of ~pp roxin~ately a.2 acres h~ving ~pproxima[e froncages of 455 fett o~ thc
south slde of La Palma Avenur~ ;00 feet on the west side and j+0~ feet on the r~urth sl~:fe of
A rn~ancfo Strcet, and furthar described as ":~37~ ~~s~ Le Palma Avenue. Property present~y
classifted ML (!'~pUSTRIAI~ LIMITEp) ZONE.
Thcre was no one indlcatiny their presence. ir~ orpacition to suhJect request, ~+nd although
the staff report t~ the Planning Commissior~ dated June 4, 1~79 was not ret~d at thr: put~lic
hoaring~ it Is referrec: to and made a part of the minutes.
Richard [lroadway ~ agent. was present tA answer ~~•~ qucstlnns.
THL PUL'LI C NCARII~G WAS CLOSt:U.
Comrnlsaioner Jvhnson was conCernec! about the request for brer ~~nd wlne in conJunctlon with
thc sandwich shop an~i it was noted simil.,r uses hav~ necn granted ln the Industrial ar~lis.
Mr. 8roadway stated (t ts hls unacrstandlncl [hat bcer an~i wine wi[t- a sa~dwich shop is
permi tted fii tl~c ML 'lone wi th ihe approv~yl of ~ condi tio,ial use permi t.
Commissloner Barnes asked tt~e purpo5e of the beer and winc ancl ~skec: if markecing surveys
have been cione to cktermine whetl,er ar ru~t havin~i th~ beer and wlne wi 11 increase thr
busincss.
Mr. Efroaclway stated they h,~vc looked at oth~r industrial pnrks In othCr areas and this is
a very common practice~ and they feel a lot of ~eople would like [o have a heer or wine
with their sandwich. He st~t~~~ the sale of beer and wine i~ Just an accommodatlon for
their customers.
Commissioner Johnson statera the concept of sandwich shops is t!~at mc~st of the food is
taken out and felt it is t~ard to associate thc sele of beer and wtne with this use un{ess
there is going t~ be a lot of seating places.
Mr. Broadway stated tl~cy will have Ilmited seating instde and are c~niemplAting seating i~
che la~dscaped area outsi~ie~ althougl~ hc a~as nat sure of that~ or they cauld take the beer
and wine 6atk to Cheir oifices,
Robert E~enninger stated therc was no outdoor sea[ing shawn on cRe plans and (t was potnted
out a conditlonal use p~rrniC would be required to have outdoor seating.
Ch~irman lierbst indicatecJ he is o{~posed to the sale uf bee~ and w~ne in an In~iustrial
arca.
Gomm(ssioner Barnes asked hcsw many parding spaces are proposed~ end Mr. t3roadway ~ep~ied
there a~e 210 spaccs~ which is 3B over cade~ and 1%~ spaces are ~equired. It was noted
the 210 spaces are for the entlre proJeci, and Gommissiors~r Barnes was concerned that when
the other untts ar~ occupled, there could be a park(ng problem.
Mr. Henninger explained the parkiny relates t~ thc uses proposcd an the proJect and
pres~ning all thc otlier ~~ildinys will be industrial uses as lndlcated o~ the plans a~d
6/4/79
~ w' ~
MINUTrS~ ANAHEIM G17Y PLANNING COMMISSION~ JUNE 4~ 1979 79~~3)
EIR NEGATIVE OtCLARNTION AND COND1710N~L USE PERMIT tJO, 1~984 (continued)
wtth the two cortxnerc(a) uses~ che totel require:rncnt ts 172 spaces and they have 21r-
sp+~cas.
CammisslUner Tolar felt wlth tlie ~r~nosed hours of operatlon~ most of thc husinr.;s will be
derlved from tfie uses In the area.
ACTION: Commissioner Tolar offcrcd a rwtion~ secunded by Corr~~csi~~n~~r Kinc, .~-nd MOTI~'~
ARR J. that the Anahelm Clty Planniny Commisslan has revi~wec~ the rrn~~~sal ta permlt a
donut shop and a sancfwich shop with the on-sale of beer and wine In an ML (Industriel~
Limlted) Zone an a r~cta~iy~is~rly-sheP~~ Parcel ~f I~~nd c~nsistln~~ of a~proxim,3tely 5.2
ec~es heving approximate frontayes of 4~~ fect on the south side of la Palmn Avenue~ .`,~~'~
feet on the west sid~ anC ~~~1~ fe~t on the nort-~ sicic of Armancfo Street; and daes hcrsby
approve the Negatlvc Gecl~~r~~tion frum the requirern~nt to rre{~are ~n environmental impact
report on the bosis that thcrc woul~ be no si~anificant Snc~ividu.~l or cumulative adverse
environmr.ntal impact Juc to the~ ~,ppmv~l af tliis Nc~~~-tlve Qeclaratlon sincc the Anah~:lm
Generai Plan Jeslynate5 lhe s,~bjuct pruperty for ~a~neral indust~lal l~nd uses corm~ersurate
wi th the propos~l ; th~t no s~:ns i tlvic envi ronmr.ntal in,~~acts are (nvolved in the pro;,asal ;
that thc Initia) St:.~d~~ submitteJ by the petitloncr incllcates no sfyniftcent (ndividual or
cunula[ive adverse. environment~l inu~act:•, and that the Nec~atlve Uecl,a~ation substantlating
the f~reyoing findinys is un filc In t!~e ':ity of Anahcim Planning Dcpartment.
Commissione~ Tolar aske~i tt~c terr~s of thr. lcasc~ an:f f1r. Broacfway repllcd that the lease
is for thr~*e years wfth a ncgotiable option.
Commissioner Tolar offered Resoluti~n t~o. PC)~-~~'' ~~i1 ~~ved fc~r its passa!~c and adoption~
that the Anaheim Citv Plar~nin_y Con~~ls~ion dnes hcreby granc Pet(tion fhr Conditional Use
Pemit lio. 1~~~4 fur a period af thrsc years~ subJect [o review by ihe Pian~ing Garxnlssion
for possible extr.nsion~ of time, and subJrc: to the pctttioncr's stlpulAtion t`~At hours of
opr.ratl~n for the donut shop sha11 be ~~:00 a.m, to ;:Q!1 p.r~.. -~onday throuqh Friday~ and
b:p(~ a.m, to ~oo~ on Saturday~ an~J thc hours of oper~~ticm for t'~c sandwlch shop shall be
1J;00 a.m. to y:00 p.m•. ~O~d~Y thr~ugh Friday~ ~n~i sub}ect to Interdepartmental CcMr~lttee
recomrtiendations.
Commtssiqner !Cin~~ pointecJ out the s'aff report indicaces che weekday clostng c:rt~e is
[entat(vc and subJect to chang~~ and Mr. Broad~ay st~ted the petiCione~ would be flex~ble.
Gomnissioner Tolar statcd he would likr_ the condition added to the resoiution that if the
petit~oner wishes to chanqe ttie haurs .,f o~eratio~~ the change should bc approved by ihe
P lanni ng Corimi gs ion. and Jack uh I te ~ Ueputy Ci ty littorney ~ sugges ted that the hours of
operatlon be made a part of cl~e conditions nf approval and anY change would bc subJect to
approval of the Planning Co~u~tssion.
On roll call. thz foreyainy resolution was pas~~:d by the follariny vc~te:
AYES: CUhtMI5510NEFtS: BARhlES, DAVIU~ KING~ TOLAR
NOES: COHMISSIOt~tRS: L'USHORE, MERdST~ JONN50N
AIiS~t~T: COM-iI5510~1ER5: ^I~I~E
Chairna~ Nerbst stated he had not supperted the resolutlon ~ecause he did not believe
having an-sale beer and wlne in an Ind~strial zane withi~ walking distance of the
m ~facturing plants is in the best in;erese of the commun'ty and workers going out and
havtng a heer or wine an their lunch hour end coming back to work around the mochines is
not a good practicE~ He stete~i he has no ob}ectlons to the sen d+ich shop or cionut shop.
but ts opposed tn thc on-sale of beer and wine.
Wmetssiener Toiar felt if an adult wants t~ beer or r+ine for lunch, they can drive to a
l~quor stvru. 6/4/79
~
MINUTE:.~ ANAl1EIM CI1'Y PI.MINING C011MISS10~1~ JUNk ~~. 1~1~
~
~9-432
ITEH tIQ. ti PU~LIG HEAii14C. OWNLRS: DOMINIC f, ETCNAND~~ ET AL,
EIR NkGA IVL DE.CLAM'fION c/o ELU~.N W. ~AINHRIDRE~ ?80~ South M~In Str~et~
ONpI (0`1 L USE EkM T~IC~1`J~~1 Unit K, Ssnta Ana, CA '~'t7~7. AGENT; CLDEN W.
HAIN~taIUGC~ Iti~~ S~uch Mstn Strcet~ Unlt K~ Santn AnA~
CA ~32)~7. P~tit~on~r r~questx perMisslon t~ E~T~k3L.15H
A RESTAUR!-NT ulTit ON-SAI.E BEE.R A-~U WINk c~n propcrty rlescr{h~s~i es an Irrenulorly-shnpcd
pArcel of lenA c~~nsistinn of approxlm.vt~lv ;.3 acrr.s havin~ r~ fronta~r of appTOximetely
8UU feet ~n tl~r. e~ast sicle of ~u,tln llvr.nuc~ havlnq a R+r~xlr~um ~te~th of apprcaximet~ly 3~~~
feet~ b~iny loceted ~p~~rc~ximot~•ly ',~„ feet south of the cant~~rl ine of L~ P~lmr Avenue~ end
furthar eie~scrll~e~~1 r~ 1n: b NArth Tu~stln Avrnue~. P~~pertY ~resantly cl~ssified ML
( (~~UUSTRil1l, L IM17l.~) 7p'~t.
There wos n~ <x~~: InJtcalln~~ their pr~•,~~ncr ir, p~~pc~sit~on co subj~ct rrquest~ Hn~i alth~uqh
thr staff rc~,ort [o thr Planninq Commissi~n ~int~~l Jun~ W~ 1~7'~ wss noT. r~~d at the publlc
hesring~ It Is refcrr~d tr~ an~1 ~~u~~l~ a pn~t of th., minucc•s.
Rir,hard Gesyuciro, 232!', t~uck.l~nd Lnnr_, E1 Toro, stat~~1 this will b~ ~ senAwlr.h sho~ and
the hours of o~~er~tlon ,~r~~ se[ from ~',:0~ n,r~, to `,:Q~ p.m. ~ Mc~n~1~y thrauqh Friday.
THL' PUULIC HI.~RI!IG '~~AS C.l.O;t.li.
Ccammissi~ncr Uarn~s askcd t~~c pFtitioncr why hr hnd ch~scn this partic.ulnr Slte~ end Mr,
Cas~ueiro rcplled I~e hacf ch~~sen thr sit~~ t~ecausr of th~ industrl,~l bull~lln~s in the a~ea
sincc hls tra~lc (s ~~tr~~ngly lunch cirno,
ConxriiSSloncr Hern~~5 Stated the anly prc~bler~ sh~~ has wlth tr~Is i~ thet the petiti~ner who
had presc~ntc~1 thc plans for thc uxhpler. hacf sworn to the Cc~mtilss(an thrt th~ese but lclinc~s
would be strictly in~.~ustr(a) bulldlnys, anel now a c.cxmK.~rGial venture is t~ein~a requesied.
Shr. stt+teJ her problcm et that timc wa5 r~ot tF~~. ~traffic ctrc.ulatlon~ f~ut th~ fact that thc
bui Idinys werc desl~nc~1 for cor~wnercic~l uses anc; were pPrpetrated tc~ thc Gommission es
Industriol bu(Idinc~s ancl sh~ f~lt t~~is ts pro~f of it.
Ccxnmbssioner Tolar stAted Lht yAS shortaye has occurred slnce th~t ti~ne and this is one
way to have ltss trAffic out or~t~~ Tust(n Avrnue atth the pe~ple in thP erea not having to
go out of tl~t arr.a for ~uncl~ anct thai pcaple wi i I c~t whethcr tf~p usc ls corm~rcial or
industrl~l.
Cornmissioner Barnes state:d si~r woul~3 wtc n~ on Chtz project bccnuse ahe res~nts the
person wh~ had trle..i t.~ say thcse are fnclust~ial buf ldinqs and shc wi f 1 alwsys vote no for
commerci~l uses an thls pr~~pcrty.
Chairma~ HCPF~SL statr.d ~s fer a~ ftoar spacc is a~ncerRed~ the ssndwlch sl~op could qua) T fy
as a restaurant.
Ca-a~issioner Uavid stated cvery uscr will havc tc~ fcquetit a conditi~nal use pcrmit +~nd t~e
felt the Cummission sl~ould assurne this pctitioner Intends to scrve thc Industrib) us~~s ln
the area.
ACf10~1: Gomm(ssion~r Uavld ofS`ercd a motlan, sewnde~ by Commlssloner Kiny and HOTIOti
~' t~t u(Commias(oner I3arnes voting no), thec che Anal~etm City Plann~ng Commixslon hes
rovEe~+ed thc propusal to permit a ~estourant wtth the on-sa1N of beer end wine on an
frregulerly-shope~i partcl af land conSlstlr~g of approxirnately ;.3 acres having a frontsge
of approxlmately a~3~ f~et ~n tl~e east slde af 7ustin Avc~ua~ hevin~ e maxbmum depth of
approxirnetcly 36'~ feet. beinr~ lc~cate~~ apprr~ximately 56; !`eet ~outh of the r„~~terline of La
Palma Avenue; anci ~iaes hereby apprave ths Negative Doclaretion from [hc requirement to
6/4IT9
~,
NINUTES~ N~AIIEIM CITY PLA~lNINf, GOHMISSION~ JU~IC 4~ 1~7!~
EIR NEGATIVE DECLAWITION ANU CONUITIONAI. US~_ PERMIT N0. 1987 (contlnued)
~
79-433
propares an envir~nrnentel In~p.~ct report on thc basis thet there would bc no s(gniflc~nt
(ndividua) or cu~nulative a~v~r5e envlronmrntA) Impoct cJua to the approva) nf this Nsgative
Declaratlon slnce the Mahet~n Genaral Plan Jt~signatas th~ subJe;t property for ~~encra)
IndustriAl IAnd us~s tcmmensuratc wlth the proposal; thac no sensitive envlronrnentAl
Ir~pacts are Involvcd in t~~c propasal; th~t thc Initia) Study submittcd by the petitloner
indicates no signiflcant ir~dtvidual e~r cun-ulat~v~ adverse environmrntal tmpa~:ts; and that
the Neyative Uec1,~rAtlon g~~t~stantiating the fore~oing findings is on flle ir~ the City of
AnaNclm Plannln~~ ~~epartment.
Ccxnmissfoner iiusl-nre asE,e~ the petiti~~ne~ t~ cl,irify the hours of operntlon as shown in
the staff repart slnce hc hA~f indit~tetl they would be: frc~r~ s:Otl a.m, to `.,:~1~ p,m. nnd thc
steff repc~rt (nJlcates fror, $;0~ a.~. tc> >-:!1f1 p.m, ~ And Mr. Ces~~ue(ro stated the hc~urs of
oper+~tlon will be from ~>:0~ a.m, to ~:0~ p.m.; that he wll) not be o-~en et nl~ht end
usually closes ~t 4:00 p.m,~ but would lik~: the ~~xtrn time In c~rdcr to get closed.
Ghalrmen Herbst st~itr.d ~~ wo~lcf op;u~sc chls rec~ucst for thc saine baslc reasan as the
previou5 onc~ and th,~t ls hc d~es not app~cavc of the ~elr ~f bccr and w(nc (n the
Industr(al ar~n,
Ccxnmisyl~ner Talar stated he coulcl appreciatr Chafrman Nerbst's c~ncern, He felt,
hcxvc:ver~ reg~rdless of whether chis pro~~erey is develo~ed witl- cor~merc(el or industrial
us~s, a scnnll restaurant wlth contrr~llcd hours of uner~~tlon would s~rve thot ar~a and
w~uld cra3tr less traff(c ln thc ~+r~a, which t,a~, bern a rtw)nr cc~nccrn.
Commissfoncr liernes stAted -,cr discomf~~rt is no! with thc tr~ffic, ~ut that she fe~els thts
was A very cl~ver m~nipulatinn of thc Cor~niSSiQ~ti by tt,e devel~pcr f~~r ~ cr,rtn~«rclal complex
and that tl~is Is Just e stt~rt~ nnJ .~skc~1 what bctte~ wey to qet c~mmercial usos on the
property than t~ call this ~;.~ndwlch shop which is usu~lly apprpvrd by the Cortu++tssian.
Canmissi~ner Busiia~e stated I~e fclt tl~is petitionrr wlll want ta draw bu,iness fra~
outstde the afea as well as fra~~ the inslda~ and he f~~ltthe reasonlnc; of less traffic is
totally Inv.-~l(d.
Comm(sslaner Johnson statcd In thc tix years hc has never ~ir.cn in th(s posltlon; that hc
does not llkr. t~ ha~ve two petitiorers with identicel aDp~icet ons coming 1~ and one c~oing
o~~t v+i th e~prava 1 an~i ~n•~ w 1 th den I al ; tf~at he cic~es not 1 1 ke i ncn. ns 15 tency ~ but 1~ th I s
casc has to be persanally Inconsistcnt in order f~r the City to br. rlc~ht~ a~nd willsupport
thc resolut{on,
Commissioner Cavid offere~i Resolution 'lo. PC73-110 and rtsnved for lts passage and adoption,
that the An~hcir~ City P1~,nning Commission doe:s hcrehy grant Petition for Conditiona) Use
Perml t Ito. 19 ~7. subJecx to tt~c petl tion~r's stipulatfon that the hailrs of operation st~al l
be from b:0~) a.m. tn ,:0~ p.m.~ Monday throuqh Friday~ and suh}ect Lc Interdepart~nt+~l
Gommi ttce recommendot Ic,ns.
0~ roll cel~. [he foreyaing rssotution was passed by Che follawing v~otc:
AYf:S: CO~~~~15510'ItRS: DAVID~ JOHNSOr+~ KINf~~ TOLAR
NOES : CUMMI SS IOi1ER5 ; UARNES. l3U5~10RE ~ NEP.t55T
ABSENT: CUMMISSIONEftS: NONk.
6/4/79
~
MINUTk.S~ ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ .IUNE 4~ 1979
~
79-434
ITEM N0. 9 PU~LIC HEARI~~G. OWNER: WILBUR N. KLINE, 200$ La
EIR~NE6ATIVE OECLAaATION Cueva~ ~4~ Rowla~d Helghts, CA 9174a. AGEN7: TOM
0 ~NTS tUCKER~ Klinge 6 Associetes. 16168 Beach doulava~d~
r~~~,~1_ y89 /119~ Huntingto~ BeACh~ CA ~1647. Petitioner requests
pcrmission to ESTABLISH OFFICE USE5 IN A CONVEaTED
RESIQENTIAL STRUCTURE WITtI WAIVER OF (A) MINIMUM
NUNdER OF PARKING SPACES AND (b) MINIMUM IANOSCAPE.~ FROt~Y SETUALK o~ property descrlbed as
sn t~regulerly-shsped oarcel of land c~nsisttng of spproxlmat~ely ~27; squnre feet lac~ted
at the nortt~wcst corncr of Chelsesa D~lve and State College Boulevar~+~ having approximAte
frontages of 40 feet on the north sida of Chel~ea D~Ive and 14q f~~t on the west stde of
State College tioulevard~ and further descrihed ~s 1~41 Eest Lhelsea Drive. Property
p~c:se~t~y classtfted RS-72p~ (RESIDENTIAL. SINGLE-FAMILYj 7.ONE.
There was n one Indiceting th•'• presence in ~ppositton to sub_)ect. re~ue~t, end although
the staff rcp~rt to the Plann~~~y ~ommission dated June 4~ 1~7~i was not read at the public
hea~ing~ It Is re'Ferre~i to and made a part of the minuteS.
Tom Tucker~ ng~nt, was present to enswer eny qucstlons and referred co Cond(tion No. 4 of
the InCerdepArimental Cortx~+ittec rtcomi»endatlons~ sl'Attn~ it was his undcrstending the
proposed trash containers would be tn confnrmance with City ardinances; that Cnndltlon No.
6 requir~s a 6-foot hi~~h masonry wall along the north and west proper[y llne~ and lt was
their Intentiun ta construct a 6-fcx~t hiqh wall to fulty enclose thP properCy; and that
ccx~cerntng Conc;ition Nd. i;. any changr.s in the plan woulA bc interfor wall thenyes.
La~nard Kacz~ 53C South Reverc Strcet, Anaheim~ stetecl chls prot~ertv does nat have an
alley behinJ it and he was concerned about the locatlon of the trasl~ bins (Gortmissloner
Oarnes pnlnt~d ou~ the propased Ioc~Cicm of tttP t~'asl~ bins ~n t~~e plon to Mr, Kati). lie
was alsa concrrn~-d +~out (nc~ress and egress to Chelsee~ qointin.~ out that is a bad corner~
and also he was concerned ~bout parking o~ t17r. residen[ial gtrcets.
Mr. Tucker statel the existinc~ d~iveway will be closed off co~ietely and a new drivew~y
will hc located 111 feet nort-~ af Lh~lsea with ~ntrance onto Statc Colle~e. He exptatned
the trash enclos~res wlll be locAtr..ci a~Jacent to the drlveway on Stale College and the
area hehi~d the butldiny Nill be landscape<f. tle stated this area is basically cam-erc(al.
THE. PU6LIC HLAf~Ir~G wAS C~OSEC~,
Chairman Herbst -ras concerned about the request for mintmum i~ndscepln<~ in the front
setyACk with 2~ feet requlred and none proposed~ and felt sor.ie beautiFicat(on should be
provided on the propcrty.
Mr. 7utikcr slateci thc avner of the property would be ailling to provide some na~row
planters, but tt~ey haa elimin»ted t1~e 1nnJscaping in order to pravid~ more parking a~d the
driveway. No explained the p~an is ta move thc garage~ but the s~u~re footage wili not be
Increased.
Commissioner Bushorr. stated he would like to s~e thls project approved because the
struGture dcfinitely needs improvement and agree~i it is not suitable as a residancc. He
kas conccrned about the (nyres3 and e9ress propose:d, and asked how many use5 a~e proposed
for the prape~ty .
Mr. Tucker replied tl~e maximum number of uses wauld be th~ee~ but. h~pefully, there would
be one or two.
6/4/7~
~
MINU7CS~ MlAl1EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ JUNC 4~ 1979 ,
EIR NEGATIVE DECIARATlON AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO . 1989 (co~tinued)
Commissioner 6ushore suygested leavlny tlie existing d~ivewaiy fo~ entrance
circuletlon from south to north and with a d~tveway fo~ axit only to the
College. Ne stated I~e ,+uuld also want to see some landacaping provided.
~
19-~+35
only with
rlyht on St~ta
Chalrman Flerbst stated thc frontage on Chelsea ls only ~~0 fee.t widc and if a vehlclQ
cominy daw~~ Chelsen tvwa~d State Colleqcs trled ta mnke a lef~-hand turn at the cc~rnAr~
th~re could bc a trrfflc hazr~rd.
Mr. Tucker stat~d the Traffic Department had obJected to the driveway on Chelsea and the
prop~sed driveway was the Traffic Department's rccomm~ndatlon.
Comm(ssioner Hernes stateJ she would Ilke ta scc this pro~~rty improved and did not see
anythlny wro~~ wlCh the prolect~ but thet she was con eerned about the lanciscaping.
Cheirman Nerbst stated some lnndscaptng cauld be provided alonq the driveway~ and P,obert
Henning~r~ Asslstant Ptanner~ stated ~~l.~ns shc~w they eould pr~vidr approx{mAtely i-1/2
feet of landSC.apin~J,
Commisalone~ Barnes sugyested tlie 3'faot dedication s trip be landscaped~ and Mr. Tucker
polnted ou[ the parkway is adJacent to the c~irb.
Jay Tltus~ Office Englneer~ explained thr_ 3'fuat ~e~iicacion strip could be landscaped with
an cncronchment permit and stated full street improvGrnencs suct~ as curbs, gutters and
sidewelks do exist In tl~is area and thc street is not to its ultimatc width but there are
no Qlans to irnprove it At the prrsent tin~e.
Comr sloner aarnes stalc:d i f thc petitfoner is w~ ~ ~ i~~9 t`~ ~ ~oximatelthe feet~ofdedicatlan
str~~ in additian to the 2-i/7 fect of hls a+n prope ~ty. pP Y~
landscaping eould be provideJ,
Mr. K~~tz aske~ for clariflcation r~c~ardtng the drive~+ray~ and Chalrman He~bst explained the
drtveway Ni 1) be rernc~ve~ and the are~ provided with eurbs and gutters.
ACTION: Commissfoner Barnes offered a motion~ seconded by Commissloncr Davld ~nd MQTION
~Q, thAt thc Anaheim CI ty PSanning Cc~nmission F+as reviewed the proposAl to prr'rr-i t
office ~~scs i~~ e converted residential structure with watver of mtnimum number of parking
speces anef mtnimum lendscaped frant setback on an i rregularly-shapnd parce~ of le~~
consistiny of approxlmately 9275 square feet located at the northr+est corne~ of ~helsea
Drlve and Strte Co{lege doulevard~ having approximate frontaqes of 40 feet o.ry :he no~th
side of Chelsea Drlve and 140 feet on the v+est side af State CollQge Boulevard; and does
hereby approve the Negative Dec~aration from the requlrement to p~~epare a~ environmental
impac[ report o~ the basis that ther~ would be rw si gnificant individual or cumulsttve
advers~ enviro~rn~ntal lir~act due to the approva) of this Negat~ve Detlaratian slnce the
Anaheim General Plsn desir-++~tes the subject property for qrneral corm~rcial lend uses
conmensurate with tt-e proposal; that no sensitive ertvtronmentTl impacts ere Involved in
the proposal; that the I~itlal Stu~iy ~ubmitted by the pstitianer indicates no significant
individusl or cumulattve adverse enviranmental impaets; and that the ~legrtive Declaration
substsntlating the foregeing findings is on fll~ in the City af Anaheim Planntng
Depe~tn~nt.
Commissloner Barnes offered a motion. seco~ded by Gartrnlsslon~r pavld and MQTION CARRiEO,
that the requested walvers be granted on the basts that the structurt is an exlsting
resider~tlal strur,tu~e and the size and shape of the property is unusual and denial would
be dep~ivln9 sc~lect property of privileyes being enJoyed by other properties tn the same
zone and vicinity.
6/4/79
~" ,
MINU7E5. ANAHEIM CITY PI.ANNINC~ COMM1S510N~ JUNE 4, 1979 14'43~
EIR N~GATIVE DECLA_T ON ANQ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0: 1~989 (contlnued)
Commissioner 8arnes offered Resolution No. PC7~~111 ond moved for itg passeyn and
sdoptlon~ that the Anahcim Clty Planni~g Commisslon da~s hereby ,yrant Petltlon for
Condl t(onel Use Perrnl t No, 1989 ~ sub)ect to the ~setitloner's stTpulatlon to ~rovl de
approxinwtely 2-1/~ fer_t af lendscapi~g on tl~e w~st prope~ty Iine ed~acent tu State
Lolleg~ Bouleverd end to pr~vicie I~ndscaping in the 3-foot dedlcation strlp~ subJect to
approva) of ~n encrorcl~ment pe~mit~ and subject to Interdepertmentol Committee
~ecommendntl~ns.
On ro) l cal 1~ thc foraqnlny resolution was passed by the fol l~ving v~te:
AYES : CUMNI SS I~-~ERS : 4AFtNES ~ t3USf~ORE ~ DAV I D, IIEa(15T ~ J411NSON ~ KI NG ~ TOLAR
NOES : COMMI SSI ONCR~i : NONE.
AQSEt~T: COMMISSI~NER5: NONf~
ITEM N0. 10 PUHLIC NEAi11NG, 041NEP.; SqUTHER~~ PACIFIC RAllROAD
EIR CATEGORICAL CXLNPTION•LI.ASS ~~ C0. ~ C1~ South Main Strect~ Los Anqe~eS~ CA '~bOlh.
OND 1') ONl1L USl PCRMIT N0, 1~7 AGE:I~TS . NESSEL-~ CONSTRt1CT ION C0. ~ INC. ~ Nal t Tay lor
Lumber Co. ~ 1717 lresc Ltncoln Avenue~ Anahelm~ CA
92~1 ~nd TAIT ~ ASSOCIATES~ It~t. ~ P.O. Box
442~~ Anohclm~ CA 92PA3. The City af An~heim proposes to REVOKC SU6JECT GQNUITIONAI USE
PERMIT FQR FAI LURC 70 C~MPLY 1d 1 iN TNE CONUITIONS OF APPROVl1l., Property described As an
lrregularly-shaped ~vrcc) of land c:c~nsis[ing of Appr~xlmately 3.2 ecrr.s having approximate
frontages oF 1~+~a feet on thc north si de of C11 wortl~ Street. ~+~5 feet on the south slde af
5anta .~na Street, 1~') fect un the c.rst sl~ie ~f Claudlna Street~ a~ci 13c1 fect on the MeSC
sicle of Olive Strec[. ProG~r.rty pr~srntly classlficd Ml (It~~IiSTP•I'l ~ LIMITED) 7.OtIE.
There wes ~nr. p~rscn Indir,+~t in~~ tt~r_i r pres~• in ~ t ion t~ suhJect requcst. and
elthoug)~ th,e stafF rc~or! tu the Planninr, Conmi~, ccl June 4~ 197,9 was not read e[
the p~11c henring~ i; ~; ref~rred to an made a n~ ~e minutes.
Yincent Tock~ Tait b Assv~:ie,tes, I~c,~ a~.•.it~ request~d that thc Comnissian not revoke the
con~llcicxial use ~ar:~lt~ ~ statecl the petitioner admits they have been tardy putting (n
tlie improve~nents as cnnd tlon~~; tn che origtnal con~lftlonal use permlt; that they found
th~mselvas f^ the posit~on nf uein~ :onfused about the requirements; that there w~re some
c~nflicts wl [h the inspec,tur; , et~:.. ~ Anel nc~w they finJ Che~-+selves being tarAy. Ne stated
a 30-day contir-u.~nce wo~~l~i ~r sufficieRt in order tc~ brinc~ the property into cc~nformence.
Connir. Mendaza~ 3~-•• ~a~t Ellsworth Strfee~ Anaheim~ sta~ed the n~lgl~borhood is fast
dtterluratin~~ Ar~d polnteJ aut the huusekccpi~y at ~his property has been te; rlble and the
landscap(ny has ~ot bcen Frovided as renuircd. i~ addition tp the other requtrements. She
stateci she had counted 1(„ paper cups inside t~~~ fence and stated one year has gont by and
nothing has been dnne.
Corm~issioner Buchare asked about the ~1fOpUSC~ restrooms an: sto~age but ld(ng a~ sliown an
the plans adJacent to thc GI ty property and askcd if there ar~ any restrooms at the
present tfineo and Mr. Toc~: replied Lhere are none ther~. Cormiisstoner Bushore stated that
1 s anothc ~ I tr.m wh i ch needs t~ be accomp 1 1 s hed because the p 1 ans do shc~w res t rooms . 1~e
pointed out lur~ber is bciny stacked above tha hcl~~ht of the fr.nce tn violation of the
code.
ACTION: Gommissloner Barnes offered a motton, seconded by Commissianer David an~i tSOTIQN
CA RIF:U, that cunsldcration vf Conditinna9 Uae Permit No. 1574 ba continued to c.
~eyularly-scheduled maeting of the Planning Commlssion on July 16. t979~ at the '~.~uest of
the petitloner.
6/4/79
~ ~, ~
MINUTES~ ANANEIM CITY PLANkING COMMI5SIQN~ JUNE 4, 1979 79-437
EIR CATCGORICAL EXE-iPTiON-CLASS 8 AN~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1874 (conttnued)
Chsirmen tlerbs. stated he would llke staff to makc e report at thAt time as to what hAs
bee~ accomplishe~.
Commissloner Toler stated he had vated in favor of the contlnuence~ but if the conditlons
are complted with witl~tn the~ slx weeks and thes permlt is qranted~ thts ktnd of thing w(11
be manltored In the future and a~y vIa{atlons could cause revocation of the permlt. He
atated he would not support another conditional use permtt on tt~ts property If violAtians
occur after It has be~n clesned up~ which means the petitloner cannot continue to operate
In thls s ame manner.
M~. Tock stateci nearly S1n0~000 hav~ been invested tn Improven~ents and the petttioner
would not put themselvr.s in .~eopardy agatn,
Crxnmissioner Kin~~ stated the lumber cannot be stackeo higher than the f~nce. Ile pointed
out there are othcr violetions In the area and was con~rrned Chts petltloner ts being
discrlminated ageinst.
Commlasianer Busl-oro stated he 1~ad seen other proble~s in the area~ but that this petittan
(s before the Commisslon for considerat(un at this 'irr_ and tndtcated he h~s noted the
other problems that nesd t~ be Investigated.
The rcpresentattve from the Wait Taylor Lurrt~er Company pointed nut part of thc trash
problem is causeci hy Kwikset vrhtch ts adJacent t~ thelr property and the(r employnes teke
breaka fn thei~ vchicles and throw trash ~n the aree. Ne stated tve ry dey they hav~c
approximately 250 beer bottles and trash fn thc area~ a~d suggest~d Kwikset should be
roquired to keep thc area clean nnd t~ pravlde the requlred lendscapinq~ ttt.
Lha{rman Herbst suggested the property awner discuss the prnblem with Kr,rlkset
representatives~ and Commissloner Tolar suggPSted the Planning staff cnntrct Kwikset.
The reprasentative from Walt Tayl~r Lumber Comp~ny asked about the estrooms and stated he
could not get the sewer put In and had discussed the E~roblem w1C-, ":V staff ~s to where
thelr restroams connect to the sawer and cauld not qet ihe neces4a~y inforn~atlon.
Nr. Tock asked if ic would br neGessary to include thc restroorns~ and it was po(ntad out
the restrooms are a part of the plan as submittecl and e candit~o~ of the conditional use
pe nnit is that the property wlll be developed substantially in accordance with the plans
t~s subml tted.
Ghairma~ Nerbst stated thP main co~cern at the prestnt t(me ' ,-~t the property +s
cleaned up and the l~ndscaping end screening are rrovided. ~r~ted a report could be
presented at the r+xeting in ~ix we^ks as co the situation rey.;r:~ng the restrooms.
Ann(ka Santalahti. Ass(stant Director for Zoning~ reminded the Commisslon that th~ us~ 'f
this prope rty w as nriglnally established Illegally and a lot of cc~mplaints have been
received. She stated th~ landscaping end screenins~ w~re required by tht Pta~nfng
Cammissian and spaclfic requlrements were spelled out. and that tt has been ane yea~ And
they have nat bcen sattsfied. She explaincd the us~ is bordered by residentlal
propertics.
M~. Tock {ndttated the use was astebiished (Ilegally by another core+pany and v+hen this
lumb~r conepany had taken over she Qroperty~ they had come to the CiCy a~d attempted to ab
i t propcrly.
6/4/79
~ ~
... ~
MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMiSSiON~ JUNE 4~ 1979 y9-438
EIR CATCGORICAI EXEMPTION-ClASS 8 ANQ CONDITIOt~AI; USE PEaMIT NO_,_1814 (conttnued)
Commis5loner Bushore was concerne6 ebout the restrooms~ polnttnq out there ere tustomers
coming i~to the facility~ and Mr. Tock polnted out thls Is basicelly a transfer yard end
is ~ot a ret~ii use. He stare~i therc A~~ employees working on thA prope~ty throughout the
dny who 10~~1 en d un 1 oad the 1 umbe r.
Commiss{oner Johnson statPd thcrc wQrc e lot af difPerent r.ondittons A~d stlpulattons in
the resolutlon end lt wes very complex~ end fie understo~d ~omethinq could heve been
overlooked. but the things being dis~ussecl today are doflned and he felt they should be
taken cerc of and stated thc Cormitssion would be reasonable if somethtng wes overlooked.
Chalrman Herbst pointeJ out there will bc no further nottces r~garding this hearing which
wi 11 be held p~ July 1G~ 1?19.
ITEM N~. 11 PUbLIG HEARING. OWNERS; JAMES J. LIBERIO AND
EIR NEGATIVE UECLAP,ATION ROB~R'T J. ANU JtAN CRANE~ 172Q West La PAlma Avenue~
C Npl ONAL USf: ERMI N0. 193G Sultc A~ Anaheim, CA 92~01. Petiti~ner requests
parm(ssion ta ESTAl3LIS11 AI~ AUTOMQ4ILE BODY REPAIa
ANU PAINTING Fp,GILiTY IN Tf~E Ml. ZONE on propcrty
described as a rectangularly-sh~~p~ci pmrcel oF {and cn~sisting of epproximetely 0.6 acre
located at the southwest corner of Ceenr- Court and Kraemer aoulevard~ having approximate
fronteges of 190 fect on the s+~uth sldr. of Cecna C~urt +~nd 12y feet o~ tne west side of
Kraemer f3oulevar~~ and further described as 1361 North Kraemer Boulevard. Property
presently classtfled ML (INUUSTRIAL~ I.IMITED) 20NL.
There wes no one indicatinq their presence i~ o~positlon to subjett request~ end t~lthough
the staff repor[ to the Planninq Commisslon dat~d Ju~sc 4, 1~7~1 ~ras not rr.ad at the pubitc
heariny~ (t is referre~ tn and ma~ic a nort of thc minutes.
James Lfberio~ owner~ was present to enswer any qucstio~s.
T~1E PUbLI C IiEAaI NG ~dAS CL~SE 0.
Chelrr,an tlerbSt aske~! lf ail work wfll be done ins(de the fecility~ and Commissioner
Barnes asked hu~+ !nany cars wi I I be ~epaired or ~air.tcd during one day.
George Cuevas~ operator nf th~ busincss, staxed all work wauld be cione (nside and Chey
could re~alr approx(rnately five to ten cars a dey a~nd will have flve employees.
Chalrn~an Il~rt~st stated he wanted to clarify t.hat all work Nill be cfont lnside the buildl~g
and thc~e will bc no outdoor stora,ye of autonr~biles because the~e have been problems In
the past with th~se type facEliti~s leaviny w~~cked automabiles stored outside the
facllltles~ and Hr. Llbn io stated they have approximately 10~00r) syuare fePt of space and
thAt will be adequate far Ail storage ar-d aork.
itubert Nennlnc~er~ Asststant Planner~ potnted out Condition No. Z of the InterdepartmenCal
Cornntkteo recortwnendAtiUns rGquiring che paynK~nC of tratfic signal assessment fees at the
commerclal ratc. and Mr. Ltberlo indica~~.d he understc~od thac condit~on,
ACTIaN; Commissloner David offrrcd a motlo~, seconded by Cort~missloner Tolar and MQTIOt~
~f~1~0, that the Ar.aheim City Planning Cammission t,as revlewed thc proposa) to permlt an
automobile bady repair end pa(ntSng facil{ty In the ML ~I~dustrial~ llrnfted) Zone on a
rectanyularly-shaped parcel of lane! conslstlnq of approximately 0.6 acre located at the
sc~uthwest corner Of CtAnA Co urt bnd Kraemer 8euleverd, having ~pproximate fro~taqes of 190
6/4/79
~~ ` ~
MINUTES, ANAIIEIM CITY PI.APlNING COMMISSION, JUNE ~~ 1~79 79-439
EIR NCGrI'IVE DECI.ARATIQN ANO CONDITIONAI USE PERMIT H0. 1986 (c~ntinued)
- .._r_.......
feet on the south side ot Ceena C~urt and 12~ f~et on the west stdG af Kr~em~r Boulevard;
an~ does heret;}~ apprave tf~e ~~egative Declaratlon fr~m the requlrement Co prepare en
environmental Irt~act r~port ~n tf~e basis th~t there w~i~ld he no slqnlflcank lndlvidual or
c.wnulative adve~se snvir~nmental Impacc due to the appruvrl of thts N~gr,~tive Decleratton
since the Anahelm Genernl Plan cfcs(4nate.s the subject rroperty for ge~era! industri~l land
us~s cumn~c~surate wlth the proposal; chat n~ sensit{ve rnvironmental impacts nre involved
In tho p~oposal; tl~at Che Inltla~ Sf.udy subm(tted by ttic p~titlonc indlcet.es no
signiflcant indivtdual or cumulatlve adverse environcx ntal impacts; and that the Noqetive
Deelaration substantlatin~~ thr foregol~n findtngs is o~ ffle In th~ City oF Anahesim
Planning Departmr.nt.
Commtssl~ner U~vid offered Resolution No. PC7'?-11? nnd maved fpr Itg passa<ac and adc~ption~
that the Anpheim City pl.~nninq Cain~nissior~ da.s hrreby grAnt Petltl~n fcar Conditt~nal Ust
Permit N~. 1~uL~ sub,~ect tc> thc~ nctitioner's stipulatinn thnt no work wlll be dcm~ outslcle
the far.lllty ~nd there w(II be no autdo~r stc~raqc of vr~h(cles~ and suuJ~ct to
Interdepartment~~) Conrnltt~.~~ rc:commendations.
On rall cnll~ t-~e fc~r•~y~~(ng resc~luticx~ was passe.d by trie f~~llo-.~In~a vota;
AYES; COt1HIS~If,trEAS: (tAttf~ES~ '.tU5NORE. DAVIU, HERB51~ J~I~ISON~ KING~ TfII.AR
NOCS ; CQNM (551 p~~E~~S : r~0t~~
A(3SENT; COMMISSI'`~IiF.RS; MOh~r
ITE~~!2 PUE3L6C IlE11RING. OwWLR; NIGY, i~. LOCOC~, 3721~ Spcncer
EIH NEGA?IVE ~ECLA~,~TIOH S~reec~ ai2~, Tarrnnc~~ CA ~-A50;. AGENT: GEORGE
VAIt1Af~CE Nfl. 3~'3j SINIT;:N~ Oenny's I c.~ 14~~81 In~iustry Clrclc, La
MI ~e~a, Cn ''~~-~17. Qct i t i~rcr requr.s ts Wf~l VER OF
MIMIMUM NUNfiER QF PARYING S¢ACEz TO CQNSTitUCT A
RESTAURANT ~n prnt~ert~/ dr.~cr(bcd as fl rect~n~iularly-sha~,r.d p~rGel of land eonsistiny of
approxlmately U.~~ acre t~avfny a fr~~ncage of anpr~~xir~atefy 90 feec on the cest side of
Harbor lioUlcYarrt, havtnn ~ rr,~xic~um c}eotl, of approxi,~trly 3~0 fect~ bei~g 1oc~ted rpproxt-
mately 5~+~' feet r~ort-T ~f ;F~r cr..nterl inr of FrceMrar~ NAy~ and further d~scr(or.d a~ 1610
South Narb~~r Houlevt~rd, P~opertv presr.ntly r,lasslfied ~-R (CONMi.RCIAL•REGREATIOf~) 20NE.
There wes no onr (ndic~tir+y their presenc~ in o{~po~itlon ta s~ibjett request~ and although
the staff report ta the PlonnincE Ccx=xnissio++ d~t~~ June b~ 197~ wes r,~t read ot the publlc
hearing, it ~s ~cf~rred to and madc a part of the minutes.
Robert t~bore~ age~t. st~ted tl~~re is ~n existinc~ Denny's rPStaurant Khich is lE~ years old
at thts l~catlon an~i Ic ts arcl~It~:ctura~lly absolcte; that it has 10l~ seats and 32 parking
spaces; that they are proposing to demolish the~ existfnc improvements and conttruct a new
restaur~nt wtiicf~ woul~ br unlque (n~t a pfOLpC'~1Pf'~ but ~leslgned speclflcally fpr this
proJect) ; th+~t it wi 1 I have lb i seats mnd ;9 parE.ing ~ia! i~, Ne stated they had dfscussQd
[he area upyt:airs with staff~ which Is appraximaaiely 311~ squa~e fe~t. and ic was tndicated
that 1t migh+: not be nete.sAry tn calcu6ate th~at area in thr. pArk~ng reyutrements and~ if
[hat ar~:~ we.rr. nc~t Included, che~ aark~nr apaces r~equ{red would be 4~~ Instead of 50. He
stat~d the.ry 1`e~el this is a unlqur± si[e; that they havc lt; years' experlencc at this site
anJ it h~s bR~~en chelr experiencr. ~ticy havc Acfcr~~ace narktnq; that thcy propose to invest
threc-quart~A's of a milli~n ~ioli:~rx ~ndHOUld not considcr dtvcicrpin<~ on this stte If they
did not fr.~) Chere would be adequate parking; that thcPe~ blggost custc,~nrr time Is at
b~eakfast with peaple staying tn the mateis~ gc~ing to Disneyland~ etc.; that they have
conducted a~ survey end ovPr a W~riod e~f r.ighi separAte nccaslo~s their rnexirr,um usage
averaged about 9 p~a~king stalls. Ne stated Lhgy hsve a ciemand ta servlce additlQnal
6~4~'79
~ ~ ~
MINUTES, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ JUNE 4~ 1~79 79-440
E1R NEGATIVE D~CIARATION AND VARIANCE N0. ~093 (continued)
r~~~ r
customers and feel with the current cost of constructlon they cannot do tt wtt~~ the number
of seating they now have.
THE PUULIC ItEARING WAS CI.OSED.
Cpmmiss(one~ Barnes atated she felt this looks like a go~d proJect and aqreed that most
people wll) w alk to the restaurant.
Commissloner Tolar stateci thet with a lot of peoplc coming fnto chP area by plane or bus
and not prlvatc automoblles~ maybe thc parking requiremr:nt shoulcl be looked ~t tn this
area~ and Commissloner Bdrnes felt it shoulr! bP I~ft the wey ft Is so thet the Pl~nning
C~mnisslon can rev(ew each prAJect.
Mr. Moore stated one: of th~ conditions pe~Kains ta ttic sie~ning~ K-olnting out they have en
exlstiny free-standinca sign wl~ich tl~ey sharc wtth Che Narco Polo Motel et tF~e rear af the
property end tf~ey have an obliga[ian tc~ th~m rr,garding the slgntnq~ but would Iike to
modernlie thelr s(gnin~~ If possible~ and askPd if that. c.onditlon wtll make a r~qu{~tnxnt
on the free-standlny sign which exists. He stnted tlicy undc~stand any new signing on the
structure weuld h~vc ta mcet cocie requ(re~~~encs and [hat they ttiav~ r~sked staff for
info~mation rogarding chc existing siyn.
Chalrman Herbst stated the Commisslon d~~s encouraye incnrporatlan of uses on thc sarne
siyn end asked why thr_ negative cleclaration is n~cesst+ry slnr.e a restaurAnt currently
exists.
R.obert Henninger~ Assistant P19nner~ exhlAine~f Lhe negetive ~eclaration is necessr+ry o~
this proJect becausr ttie intensi ty of the use of the ~arcel is b~i~c~ incr~ased and a
parking waiver is b~;ing reyuested, Ne also explained thnre ts an exi,cin~ slc~n varlence
on the property. but was not certain oP thc~ exact nature, and stetecl any new sl~ning would
have to meet the coJe~ and that staff wG~.~'~~ have ta see spec:if(c detalls which have not
been provldea befor~~ a definicivc answer cauid be yiv~n reqAr~iing thP existtnq free~
stending siSn.
Comniss(on~er Darnes stat~~d it is tl~e ln!r.ntlon cf the Comm(ssion tl~at s(yntng cioes have to
meet tlie current si~~nlnu ordfnance~,.
Carrrnissioner ~olar refcrred t~~ a recent~y requcsteJ n~:w sign ~~ Katslla an~ asked tf there
Was some w~y ta v~te on thts pr~Ject toJay wi~,.y the conditlo~ that ttie proposed signinq be
revlewcd laccr by the. Piannin,y Commisslon.
Co^mi55ionrr JOtinSOn steted he was f~.cl iny thc sa-x~ concern and stated perhaps :here are
grandfattier ri9hts with the existing sigii~ ar+d tt~at there is an existing vartance and a
new slgn would be cvnsidereJ under dffferent {~mund rules.
Mr. Moore state~i the si~~n is not t~taliy within tl-ei~ contral because It fncludes another
use~ end stated they want to upgrade the(r siqn and hoped they would be able to br(ng back
a plan and Nould bc able ta hsvr, somc flex(billty so that the Nholc proJect will not be
def~ated by something over whicF~ they h~vc no controi.
Jack Nhite~ Deputy Ci~y Atcorney~ sxated the properLy has an exist(ng variance for some
slyntng and if tfie exl~t(ny vari~nce is far thfa slgn, then the petittoner wos~ld nQt have
to come back ss lar-g ss he kaeps thaC sign ur stays wtthln the existing variance. but a
new sic~ which is ln excess of the currenc code would I~ave to be approved with e new
variance.
6/4l79
~ .n .1 ~
MINUTES~ ANANEIM CITY pLANNING COMMISSION, JUNE 4, iq~9
~R NEGATIVE D____,EC~A~ATION ~N~l RIANCE ~IO. 30~3 (contlnu~d)
79-441
ACTION: Commissioner Bsrnea offered a motion~ sec~nded by Commissloner Tolar and NOTI~N
~R D, that the M ahetm City Planning Commisston has revlewed the proposa) tu construct
a restaurent wtch minimum ~urtt~er ~f perking speces on A rectengulnrly-sl~apecl perce) af
land conslstlny of approximatoly 0.(, acre haviny a fro~tege of approxlmet~ly 4Q feet on
the Qast sido of NarSor Buulevard~ having a maxir~um deptl~ of e~p roxlmatoly 3~0 feet~ being
located app~oximately ~40 fcet nartl~ of tl~e centerline of Fr~edman Way; and does hereby
approve thc Negative peclaratton from the requtrement t~ prepare an enviran~nent~+l impact
r~po~t on th~e bmsis tliat therc would bc no sic~nlfico~t indlviduAl ar cumulative adverse
environmental impoct due to the Approva) of tl~~s Negativ~ DeclAratlcx~ stnce the AnAheim
Gener~l Plsn desl~nates t~-r. subJpct property for comrn~:rcial-recreatian lond uses
commensurate with the proposal; that no sansitive enviro~ment~l impects ore involved In
the proposAl; thet tfie Initlal Stuay submltted by the netltic~ner tndlcates no slgntficant
Indivlduei ur cumulai(ve advc~r~e environmental irnpacts; and ch~t the Neqatlvn Declardtlon
substanttattng tt~e foreq,rtng findings Is on file in the City of Anehelr~ plnnning
Department.
Commissioncr Barnc~ offerc-~1 Rasolution No. PC79-i13 and rtaved for fts passac~e and
adoptlon~ thAt the. Anahelr.i Clty Planning Commiss(on does hereby grant Petitlon for
Varlance No. 3~~~?, o~ thc basls thAt a number ~f the guests wlll be arrlving by
trensportatio~ mo~Ses at~~er than pr(vate autonabiles, subJect to the petitioner's
stirulation ehal the p~o~~ose~ signin~ will be b~ought before the Planning Commissfon for
their review anu nprraval~ and sub)ect to Intr.rJepartmental Commlttee re a~mmendetlons.
On roll crl i, i!iP fnrec~aing resolution was nassr.d by the fol lowtng vote:
AYES: COM~I;SIONERS; BARNES~
NOE:, : C~iM111 SS IO1~ER5 ; NONC
t-aser~r: COMI'1155lUI~ERS: IiONE
1 Tt:h1 I~O. 13
'n~~ ~ II RECOMMEt~DAT10'15
BUS1iORE ~ DAV I O~ NE RtfST ~ JO-I~~SOri , K I HG ~ TO LAR
A. Gt~IERAL PLMI AHEl~UNEtJT N0. 1;1 - Reyuest by petieioner for withdrawal of
cons erat o~ o t ree parce s on the soutln~rest cc~rner of Orangethurpc and
Raymond Avenues.
The staff report to the Planning Commission dated June 4, 1979 was prGSe~ted~ nating that
subsequent to the Pla~nin~~ ComnissiAn setting th~ subJect amendment for a public hearing
for June ii3~ 1919~ the applicant submitted a letter requesting withdrawai af the
application. Nowever~ An~e;ndrnents p~rtefniny to thc Glrculatto~ Element will still be
considered on thc aforementioned date.
It was noted there was no actian necessary by the Planning Cexronisston.
tl. RECLASSIFiGATtON N0. 77-78-4$ - Request for approval of speciflc plan~. for second
can5truct on p ase.
The stsff ~epurc to the Planntng Gonmission daCcd June 4, 197a r~as present~~~ notin~
subJect prope~ty (Portion A) is an irregularly-shaped parce{ of land consisting of
approxlmntely 4.5 ncres low ted at the southwest corner of O~angewood Ave~ue a~id Rampart
Street, having ap~rox(mate frontayes of 36~ faet on tha south side of Orangewood Avenue
and 425 foet on the west side o~ Rampart Street; and (Portion B) an irregularly-shsped
6/4/79
MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMNISSION~ JUNE 4, 1~79 79-~~42
REPORTS ANp RECOMMENDATIONS • ITEM E3 (G~ntinued)
pa~ce) of lend consistiny of a~prox(nkitely 11.3 ecres having n frontage of dpprnximately
670 feet on the wast sido of ftampart Street. h~ving a meximum dhpth of approximately 7~3~
foet, and beli~g locate~! approximatriy 415 feet south of thr. contarline of Orangewood
Avenuc~ and tliat the npplicant requests appraval of speciftc plans for a part of Portlon
B; that Reclassific~t(on No. 77~7~'W8 (Pa tc, CL on Portton A and PR to CO o~ Pnrtlon B~ to
establlsh ~ planncd commercial end officc park) was approved by thc Planniny Cc~mmisstnn o~
April 1f3~ 1~7f3~ sub)oct t~ the submitt~l of c~ncc:ptunl plnn~; end that F.nvironmantal
Impact Re~ort N~. 213 was certified in cc~nJunction witt~ sald reclassiflcat~on en~! sa1J
~eport indlcated ~tentlal sl~~nificant adverse noise irnpacts on the mobilehome~ park south
of the subJect pro~~rty.
It was further n~ted that ~xi May 3, 197`3, the Planning Com~lssion ap~roved spectflc ~l~ns
for rn office bulldin~a on thP northwe~t portion of Parcel 0 end~ at thet. time, a
supplemcsnta) evAluetl~~n of noise Imp~ct m(tigat+on ~~x~surNs was p~esented whlch stated the
wall cur~cntly cxisting at the south property lina adJacent to the mobilehome park Is
adequote mitiga[i~~n. Further, the nn(se Icvels bath ins(de an~ outs(de of the mobtlnhomes
were pr4Jected t~~ be bclow the Clty ~~f /1nAhelm requirements ~~f (~5 CNCL flutstde and 45 CNCL
inside, and the estlmatr.ci inside noisc Icvrl assumed that nny mobll~hcm,e wlnciows faclnc~
the proposeJ pro.ject wou1~J be ci~sed.
ACTIQN; Gcmrnlssloner K(ng offer~•d a rrx~tiun~ seconded by Cor~misslaner David nn~l MOTIOH
C RR CU~ that the An~~heim Clty Planning Commission has Jctermined that th~e existing well
adJacent to thc soutf, propcrty linr (~ adequatc noisc mitiy~ti~n considerino the
prev(ously-submttted suppicr-ental ev.ilu~itlon an~f does~ therr_fo~e~ arprovc thc spectf(c
plons.
G. ORI111GE COUt1TY USE PCRN,IT N0. UP7,)-32P AND VARINICE N0. VA7'~-~+P - Request for
construct ~n a a i>o~~~d n~n u~'nT corpo~oted area ~id, acent to Uouqlass Street
south of Y.ate 1 1 a Avcnue.
It was noted that the prop<,sal wnsisted of ~n ~pplicailon for a use pe rn~it and a varlance
s~bml ttt~1 to tti~ Or~nye County k:nvi rnnmr.ntal M2+na~rment Agency t~~ construcc a b i l iboard~
the appllc~nt being Jay Y.t~,qry. Pacific Outdaor Advertisi~~a Con~any. It w~s noted that
the proposed billboard~ lac~ted within the City of Anah~in's sphrre of tnfl~ence~ dc~es not
conform to the City of~ Anaheim Municipal Code in chat It cxcsecls thr. height permltted in
thc Gity of Anahe(n,, it exceeds the maximum permicted are~ of a billboard. it is oriented
to a freeway and Code praf~tbits suc,h orlenta[ion o~ a blllt,oarcf, and it is no~ lacated
within 200 fect of the Intersection of h.~o a~terial hl~~hways as requi red by Code.
ACTtOFl: Cammissi~~nr_r David offcred a rrntio~~ s~concfed I~y Commiss(oner Jo~ns~n and MOT~~':
CA~RIED~ that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recomnQnd ta thc~ Cit•~
Councll of tt~e City of Anaheim that sald Council forw ard e recommendatlon of denlal in
connection with the praposcd O~~nyc County use pc~mit and variance.
ADJOURNMEtJT Therc being no further business~ Commiss1oner David nffered a motion,
secanded by Ccxnmissione~ Kin~ and MOTION CAFtRICD~ that ehe meeting be
adJourned.
The meeting was adJournrd at 5:30 p.m.
ELH:hm
Respectful ly submd ttcd,
~~ ~ ~~-LC..r..
Edith L. Narrls, S~cretary
Anahefm Ctty Planning Gommission 6/4/79
~