The URL can be used to link to this page

Minutes-PC 1981/05/18~ ~ • CI vl c C~ntmr Anaheim~ G1lfornta ~ay 18 ~ 1981 ItEGULAR MEETING OF THE ANANEIM CiT1f PLANNING COHMISSION REGULAR • The ~agula~ meeting af the Anaheim Clty Plenning Commission was MEETING called to order by Ch~irmen Pro Tempo~e Bushore at 1;~5 p.m.~ Nay la~ 1g61 in the Councll Chember, e qua~um betng present. PRESENT • Chairmen Pro Tempore Bushore Commis~toners: Barnea~ Bouas~ Fry~ Nerbst~ King A~SENT - Commissianer: Tolar ALSO PRESENT - Annika Sentatahtt Assistant Qirector for 2o~ing Mac Slsughter Deputy City Attor~ey Jey Tltus Ctty Englneer Pau) Sirrger Trsffic Englneer Grag Hastings Assistant Planner Edith Har~is Planning Gommisslon Sec~etary PL~DGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO T~iE FLAG LED BY - Commisstoner Fry. ~ APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: - Commtss{one~ Bouas offered a motlon~ seconded by Comm ssioner K ng and MOTION CARRIED (Chalrman Talar being absent and Commlssioner Fry ~bsCaining)~ that the minutes of the May ~~, 1981 meeting be approved as submitted. : EIR NEGA?IVE DECLARATION RECLASSIFICATION N0. 80-81-28 VARI FIJT . S OWNERS: TERRA FIRMA PROPERTIES, ATTENYtON: JIM MARTIN, 4~8 East Katelia Avenue. Suite 2Q9. O~ange, CA 92667. Property deacribed as an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately ~.9 scre. having a frontage of approximately 180 feet on the south side of Wilken Way~ east of the centerline of Harbor 8oulevard. Property prese~tly classified CG (COMMERCiAL, GENERAL) ZONE. RECLA~SIFICATION REQJEST: RM-3000 VARIANCE REQUEST: WAIVERS: (a) MINIMUM BUILdING SITE AREA~ (b) MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE. (c) MlNIM~M LANDSCAPED SETBACK~ (d) MINIMUM RECaEAT10NAl-LEISURE AREA ANO (e) MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES. Subjact petition was continued from the meet(ngs of March 23- 1981 and Rprit 5~ 1981 at the request oF the petitioner. It was noted the petitioner had requested that subject petition be cantinued for two woeks to the meeting of June 15~ 1981• ACTION: Commisstoner King offered a motio~~ seconded by Comml~sio~er Nerbst and MO'~~ON CARRIEO (Chait~man Totar being absent), that consideration of the above- mentioned item be tanttnued to the regularly-scheduled meeting of June 15, 1981 at the request of the petitioner. 81-282 -- ..._.__•,~ ~ . MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNiNG COMMISSION, May 16~ 1981 ITEN N0. 2t ION. REVISION OF EXNIBIT N0. 1 OF THE S S"~T"3~ uN ~ NQ. 2 1~1 ~"- 81-283 To con:ider e revlslon to Exhibit No. 7 of the Santa Ana tanyo~ Rosd Access Points Study In orde~ to p~ovide access to a 6.G acre commerclal site located o~ the southwest cor~er of Senta A~a Canyon Roed end Fairm~nt Boulevard. Sub}ect petition w~a continued from the meeting of Apri) 20~ 1'j81 at the request of the peti ticx~er. It was noted the pctitioner has requested that subject petttlon be continued co the reguiarly-scheduled meettng of Juno 15~ 1g81 in orcler for the petitioner ta re~oive concerns regardiny access end property bounderies. ACTION: Co mmissioncr King offered e motfon~ secanded by CommlssionPr Bouas and MO~TI~QN CARatED (Chal ~n~+n Tolrr being sbsent) ~ that cansid~eration of the aforementioned item b e continued to tha regularlv-~ch~duled m~eting of June 15~ 1981 at the request of the petictonar. ITEM N0. : EIR NEGATIVE QECIARATION RECLASSIFIGAT'ION N0. SQ-81-20 VARIAN N ENT N • PUBLIC HEARING. OWNERS: GERARU F. ANO JOYCE M. wARpE, 4334 Eest La Paima Avenue, Anaheim~ CA 928c17. Property describad as a rectangularly-shApod parcel of lsnd consisting of app rox(mately ~.64 scre loGated at thc northeast corner of Ketella Ave~ua and Dallas Orive~ 2035 West Ketcila Avenue. Property presently ctesslfted ~S- 7200 (RESIOENTI AL~ S INGLE-FAh41l.Y) 20NE. RECLASSIFICATION REQUEST: RM-3000 VARIANC~ REQUEST: (OELETED) wA1V~R5 OF: (a) MINIMUM LOT AREA~ (b) MAXiMUM STRUCTURAL HEIGNT~ (c) MINIMUM LANDSCAPED SETBACK~ (d) MINIMUM RECREATIQNi1l-LEISURE AREA~ (e) MINIMUM NUMBER OF ~AaKING SPAGES. TENTATIYE MAP REQUEST: ~0 CONSTRUCT A ONE LOT. 9-UNIT CONOOMINIUM SUBOIViSION. SubJact petftton was cantlnued from the meeting of May 4~ 1g81 at the request of the petitioner. There were app~oximately three persons indicattng thelr p~esence in opposition to suhject rec~uest~ and aithough the staff report was not re~+:+~ it is referred to and made a part of the minutes. Ge rard Warde, petitloner~ was presenk to a~swer any questions. 5(dney Sm~th, resident of Casa Empe~ado~~ 2011 West Kaic!~a Avenue~ asked about the watvers which have been deleted as indicateo in the staff report. 5i~aia~ ~ NINUTES~ ANAIiEIN CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ May 18, 19$1 81-284 i:hairman P~o Tempore Bushowe explalned thoso vsri~nces were deviAnces from the normel zoning ~:ode~ but that the petttioner has submitted revised plans ~limineting the n~ad for those watve~s and that tha project naw conforms to tha z~ning code. Mr. Smtth asked if this moans thay wil) not be buildtng two-story butldings and Annika Santelahtl. Assi~t~nt Dlrector for tonlnc~~ explalned the dev~loper could bulld two story units es lang as they complled to the zoning code. Mr. Smith statad the report indicates they propase to build 9 units which Is right next door ta the Casa Emperador which has 74 units and according to the plans thaL p roJect will back up Co wlLhin 6 fnet of the prop~rty Iine end he was ooncerned whether or not the buildings witl be loceted 84 feet aweY meeting tho codas. Na presented a petttlon cantatning approximately 100 slgnAtu~es of residents of the Case Empersdar and stated they obJect to a~ything whtch is not in conformi~ce with the xcx~ing ccxle. He stated they heve no obJectl~n to the property being developed beceuse it Is an eyesore~ but feel it must be improved according to the code and regulat(ons entirely. Chalrman Pro Tempure ausho~r pointed out the revised plans r.,ave daleted ell variances and the plans do conform to cade. Mr. SmItM asked why there hAS been a change from the ~''`°-~~~nt ~etback required for swcrstory st~uctures to E3A feet and stated they wcre ~=~*r++e~ that t~is density would create too much tr~fflc. Annika Santalahti ~ Asststant Director for Zoning, e~+~+~-a:=~ ~r,. Smtth is correct ar,d that the revlsed RM-300Q ordtnance became effecti~+~^~,.~e~+~~ ago and the primarY affect on this project wes that the butiding hei~~~* ~~ sY=~~'-- rrneviously had to be 150 feet for ~ two-story st~ucture has bcen modified a~~ t+.az nrevlously the driveaays were sibtracted from the calculattons for densicy ~ rkey are no lonqer subt~acted. Margaret Geall~ 1775 South Dalles Drive~ statec: h+~ =+~erty is on the northwest corner of Dalfas and Katelie and that she is a~nf~ aa ta whether or not this will be ona-story o~ Cwo-story units and was also objer~~~ 'bsceuse ehe has the same concerns as Mr. Smith concerning the traffic an~1 ra~.yna~g. She stated this is a singie-story residentlal area and she felt it shc>u~i~i ~e kept that way. THE PUf3LIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Commissloner Barnes pointed out thc derelorme~+R nf :~nis pr~perty Is proposed 6 feet from the property Itne. but wanted the oppost'tivn t~a know that the Cass Emperador is developed S feet from the property line sv threre it no~ •nnt much dtfference. She asked Mr. 4farde to explaln the access qwestion on tlallas. Mr. Warde siated thst is t~e anly ls~gkc;sl eccess polnt and he dtd not thtnk the Tr~ffic Enginemr wautd ailsw an acoesa off Kacella b=cause it would be a bad situation with trafftc tu~+-+ing IeFY. Me stated there wi11 not be that many cars tn and out of that properCy ~+~th anly 9 units pra{sosed. 5/18/81 ~ MINUTE5~ ANAFIEIM CItY PLANNING COMMISSION, May 18~ 1981 81-285 Commissianer H~arb't point~d out the location of the two-story untts a~nd the satback= o~ tfie revt:o;S plans posted on th~ wall. ACTIONs Cohmfssionar King offered a motian, seconded by Commissioner Bouas end M~10 CARRIED (Chsirman Tolar being absant)~ thet thes Anahelm City Pl~nning Conmisalon has re viawed the proppsal to ~eclasstfy subJect prope~ty from the P15-7204 (Raslden~lal~ Single-Fam~ty) Zone to the RM-3000 (Resldentlal~ Multiple-famtly) Zone to establish a 1•lot, 9~ unit Gondominium subdiv(sion on e rectangularly-shaped parcal of land consisting of app~oximetely O.G4 acre locsted at the northnast corner of Katelle Avenue snd Dallas Drive (20;5 West Katella Ave~ue); and does hcreby approve the Ne gative Declaratian from thn requirement to prepare an environmen~ai impect repa~t un the basts that ther~ wou)a be ~o stynifica~t indivtdual or cumulattve adverse envlronrtnntal Impact due to the approvrl of this Negative Declaration stnce the Anahelm General Plan dastgnetcs the subJect property for Ivw-medlum dansity restdenttal land uses commensurate with the proposel; that no senstttve environmental Impacts are tnvolved in Cf~e proposel; thst thc Initial Study submitted by the petitioner Indicates no stynificsnt individual or cumulattve adverse envtronme~ta) (mpacts; end that the Negatlve Declarstlon substt+nttating ch~ foregotng findings is on file In the City of Anehelm Planning Department. Commisstoner King offerod Resolution Nca. PC81-103 and n+~ved for its passage and edoption that thc A~~heim City Planning C~ommission docs hereby grant Recla~sificattan Na. ~30-81-20 s~bject to Interdepartmental Committes recommenAations. On ~all call~ the fo~c yoing resalutton was psssed by the follc~wing vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES~ ~OUAS, BUSHORE. FRY, NERBST~ K~NG NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NON£ ABSENT: COMNI SS I Ot1ERS : TOLAR Commissioner King offered a motion~ seconded by Commissinner Bouas snd MOTION CARRIED (Chairman Totar batng absa~t). that the Maheim City Pla~ning Commission does hereby withdraw Variance No. 3182 on thc basis thet rev(sed s~mitted plens d~+leted Che need for said waiver. Commissione~ Ki~g offer~d a motian, seco~ded by Commissione~ 8ouas and MOTION CARRtEO (Chairman Tolar being sbsent), that the Anai~eim City Planntng Commission does hereby ftnd that the proposed subdivislen cagether with its design snd tmprovement is conslstent with the City of Anahnlm Gene~el Plan and pursuant to Gov~srnment Code Sectlon 66473.5 and does therefore approve Te~tative Nep of Tract No» 11030 (Revisian No. ~) for a 1-lot~ 9'u~it condominium subdtvlsion aubject to the followEng condittons. TENTATlVE MAP OF TRACT NOi 11A30 (N,evlston Mo. }; 1. Th~t thn appr~val of Tentative Map of Tract No. >>030 (Revisla~ No. 2) is grantcd s~Ject to the approval of Reclassiftcation No. 80-a1-20. 5/18/St ~ NINUTES~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIpN, May 18~ 1981 81•286 2. That should this s~bdtvisin~ be develaped as inore than ona tubdivislon~ each subdivlsion thereof shsli be submttted in tentetive form fo~ approval. 3. Th~t the ortqin~l documents of the c.flvenants~ co~diti~~~s~ and rest~tctlons~ and a lrotta~ sddressed to developer's title company authorizing racordatlon the~roof~ shall ba submitted to tha Ctty Attorney's office and app~oved by tha Ctty Attorney~s Office~ Public Utilittes Depsrtment~ Building Divlsion~ and the ~ngineering Divtslon prior to final tract map app~ovel. Said documenta, ss approved. shal) be flled ~nd recorded In the Office of the Orange County Recorder. 4. That streot names shai) be epproved by the Clty Planning Dopsrtment prtor to approvat of a final tract map. 5. That trash atorage areas shal) be proytded in accordance wtth app~oved plans on file with the Offic~ of the Executive Olrector of Public Works. 6. 7hat fire hydrants sh~ll be instailed and charged as required and determined to b~ netessary by the Chtef of the Fire Department prior to comme~ncement of structural framing. 7. Thst dralnage of subject prup~rty shal) be dispo~ed of tn a manner setisfactory to the Clty E~gfneer. 8. That the awner of s+~ject property shall pay to the City of Anahetm the approp~iatc park and re~c~eotlon in-iteu fees +~s determinad to be appropriate by the Clty Cauncii~ said fees to be pafd at the ttme the building permit 13 Issued. 9. That appropriatr.~water assessment fees as determtned by the Offica of Utilities General Mansger shall be paid t4 the City of Mahetm prtor to the issuance of a building permit. 10. That all private str~ets shaii be developed in accordanct with the Ctty of Ansheim's Standard Oetail No. 122 fo~ private straets, including installatlo~~ of street name signs. Plans for the prTvate street Itghttnq~ as requ~red by the standard deteil. shall be submitted to the Building Dlvis(an for approval end incluston with the buildtng pians p~lor to the iasuance of building permics. (Privatc streets are those which provide prtmary acce~s and/or circul~tio~ with~n the pro,ject. 11. If permanent street name signs have not been instelled, temporery streat name signs shall be installed prior eo any occupancy. 12. Thet an ordinanca rezaning the subJect property shai) in no event become effecttve e xcept upan or foliowing the recordetlon of Final Tract Map No. itOjO (Revision Na. 2~ withtn the time sp~cified in Government Code Section bb4b3•S or such furthe~ time as the adviso ry egency or City Council may g ra~ t . 5/t8/81 ~ } MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMI5SION, May 18~ 1981 B~•287 13. That the awner(s) of subJect property shall pay the traffic stgna) assessment fee (O~dtnence No. 3~96) in a~ amount ae detarmined by the City Cauncil~ for aech naw dwelling unit prior to the t~suance of a building permit. 14. The ~elle~ sha11 provide the purcheser of each condc>mintum unit with written informatlo~ concerning Anahelm Muntctpel Code 1~.3z.5~0 pertAining to "parking restrictod to facilttate street sweeping". Such written informatlon will ciearly indicate when on-street parking is prohibited and the penalty for v{olation. 15. "No perking for street sweepin5" signs shall be Instelted prtor to fina{ street inspection es ~nqutred by the Publi~ Works Executlve Director tn accordanca with specifications on flle wlth the Street Matntena~ce ~Ivtslo~. 16. Prior to the issuance of b uilding permit~~ the applicant shal) present nvldence satisfacto ry to t`~e Chlef Buiiding Inspector that the proposed proJecc is in conformance with Gouncil Policy No. 542~ S~und Attenu~+tlon in Residentlal ProJects. 17. Prlor tu the issuance of building permits~ the applicant shall present evtdenca satisfactory to the Chief Bulldtng Inspe~tor thet the untts wt11 be in conformsnce with the Noisa Insulatlon Standards spectfted in the Californta Admintstrative Code~ Title 25. Chatrman P~o Tempore Bushorc cxpiatnad to th~ oppositlon that the action of the Planntng Commisston todey reclasslfled the property to xhe RM-300Q zone and that the proposed proJect w(1) be built In conformance wlth that code. Commissionar Darnes fu~ther p~inted ouc that the proJect wlll be bullt exactly to cade :~tth no v~~iances requested. ITf M N0. 4: EIR NE_GATIVE OECLARATION ANO CONDIT10~1AL USE PERMIT N0. 2206: PUBLIC HEARIt~G. OtiINER: GENERAL AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE, CA.~ 1630 South Sunkist Street~ 1B. Anaheim. CA 92~6. AGENT: DON TILLEY~ 1500 South Sunkist Street, AC~ Anaheim, CA 92806. Proparty des.:ribed as an irr~gularly-shaped parce) of land consisting of approximatety 7.4 acres. ~ocated at the southeASt corner of Cerritos Avenue and Sunkist Street~ 150d "~3" South Sunkist St~eet (Tilley's T~r(m Shop). P~opertY prese~tly classified ML (INDUSTRIAL. LIMITEO) ZONE. COND1710MAL USE I~~QUEST: TO RETAIN AN AU70 UPHOLS7ERY SHOP IN T41E ML XONE. Subject petitton was continued from the rneeting of Msy 4~ 1981 at the request of the petitioner. There was no one indicating their prssenc~e In oppositio~ to subJect request, and ;lthough the staff report was not re~ad~ it is referred to and maoe a part of the minutes. 5/18/81 MINUTFS~ ANAI~EIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS510N, May 18~ 1981 81-288 Judy Tiliey~ 1y00 '"C"~ Sunkist Street~ referred to the condttion raqulring payment of treffic aignel at~sassme~t fee and explained she (s leasing th~ property and ts not tha owne~. Ti~E 1'UBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Annika Santalahtl, Assistant Oirector for 2onin~~ explatned that the condition requt res that the d( fferenoe between I ndustrial end commerciAl fees be paid. Chalrman Pro Te mpc~re 6ushore e xplatned that a conditional use permit is requtred on this use because 1 t ia a comrtierciel type use in an industrtal zone and that tha fees ware pald an tho property for industrlal uses a~d comn~rcial uses are heavler ~equtring more tra~fflc signals. Annika Santalehtl dcta~mined thet this is an exlstiny buildlnq and explained normaliy thts fee is not assassed unloss there is new construction or expa~~sion of a bullding. She stated she ~11d not believe this conditton should hava been included ~nd that tt can be deleted atnce tt is an existing building. Commissioner Nerbst palnted out he thought the Pianntng Comntssicx~ had made tha decermination bef~~re that automobile uses are more an industrlal use than commerctal use and that those fees heve been waiv~ed tn the past. Comnlssloner Fry pcil~ted ouC that one of thc findings the Pianning Comm(sslon must make in order to grant the conditio~al use parmit is th~t the traffic generated will not impose on unduc burden on the streets and he felt thaf covers thts problem. AC_ T_ION: Commissioner Ba ~nes offercd a motlon, seconded by Commissione~ Herbst and MOTION CARRlED (Chel~man To1as beln~ sbsent), that the Anaheim Clty Planntng Commission has ~eviewed the proposal tu retain an autorrbbile upholstery shop in the ML (Industriel~ Limited) Zona on a irregularly-shaped parcel ot land consisting of approxlmately 7.2 acres located at the southeast corner of Cerritos Avenue end Sunkist Strnet (1500 "B", South Sunktst). and does hereby approve the kegative U~claratiQn from the requtrement to prep~re sn envlronmental impact report on the besis that tfi era would be no slyniftcane individuai or cumulative adverse envi ronrr~nta) lrtpact due to the approval of this Negetive Decla~aeton since the Anaheim General Plan design~tes the subJect p~operty for general industrta) land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensittve envtronmental impects are involved in the p~opasal; that the Inlttal Study s~mltted by the petitloner tndttates no sig~lftcant tndividuai or cunwlattve adverse envtronr-x ntal impacts; and that the Negative Declaratton subsrantiattng th~ foreqotng findings is o~ file tn the City of Anaheim Pla~ning Department. Commtssioner Berncs offered Resolution No. PC81-104 and moved far its passege and adoption thet the Anaheim City Planniny Commlsslon cioes hereby grant Conditional Use Pe rmit No. 2206, deleting Condition No. 1 requiring that the traffic •,ignal fee be Naid on the basis that it has been det~rmined that thts is more an tndustriei use than a commercial use and pursuent to Sections 16.03.030; .031; .032; .033: •Q34 and 5/18/81 ~ y MINUTES, ANAI~EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ Mey 18~ 19$1 81-289 .0;5, Tltle 18 of the Anahetm Municipsl Code and subJect to Interdepartmental Comml ttee recommendatt ons. numbers 2 through 5. On roil call~ the fo~egot~g rasolution was paased by the foilowing vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES~ BOUAS~ BUSHORE~ FRY, HERBST~ KING NOES; COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOIAR : EIR NEGAT11fE C~ECLAaATIQN (PREVIOUSLY APPROVED), REG~ASSIFICATION NO PUBLIC HEARING. OWNERS; t'.ATNI ANN AND ROBERT TIMOTNY SHORT~ 515 Velencla Street~ Fullerto~~ CA 92033. Property descrlbed as a rectangulsrly-shaped parcel of land consiating of approximately 0.27 acre, 124 North Caffman Street. Property presently classifled a5-7200 (aESIDENTIAI~ SINGLE-FAMILY) ZONE. RECLASSIFICATION REQuEST; RM-240p VARIANCE REQUEST: WA~VERS OF: (a) MINIMUM BUILDING SITE AREA AND (b) MAXIMUM 5TRUCTURAL NEIdiT TO CONSTRUCT A 4•UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING. 5ubject petition wes continued from the meeting of May 4~ 1981 because of a tte vote. There was no one indicating their presence in oppositlon to subJect request, a~d aithough the staff report was not resd, i t is refcrred to and made a p.,rt of the minutes. Chairman Pro Tempore Bushora explalned this matt~er was cantinued from the previoua meeting due to a cie vote an4 that the n~.~lic hearing will not be reope~ed unlesa there I s e ~equest that 1 t b0 reope~ed. Conmissloner Fry stated he~ was ebsent from the prevlous meeting but has reviawed the minutas from that mceti~c~ and Ilstened to the tape and does not feel additlonal testimony is rcquired 1n order fo~ hlm to vot= on thts matter. ACTiON: Commisstoner hing offered Resolution No. PG81-105 and mov4d for its pssssge an a tion that the Anahelm City Plsnning Cortmisston cioes hereby grant Ve~lance Na. 3211 on the ba~ic that the pro,~ect would be conststent with General F'lan M~endment Nc~. 160 and on [he basig that denia) would dep~ive subJect property of a privtlage enJoyed by other properties in the same zo~~c and viclnity and subJect to Interdepartmental Committee reconmendations. Comnissianer Nerbst stated he could nat agree with the resoluti~on on the basls that athers enJoy these se~ae prtvileges and askod what other prQperties enJoy : these prlvtleges. Comntssloner King stated the~re ls a two-story st~•ucture within 150 feet of thr residentiai er6a. 5/18/81 MINUTES, ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ M~y 18~ 1981 81•290 Commissione~ Herbst stated ha wauld call thts "spot zoning" tn the mlddle of an RS- 7200 area ac~d that thare ere no two-story unita tn this block. Commistioner Fry stated adJoining this property to the east there Is a two-story apartment-hotel complex and thet the precedent has been set. On rall call, the foregc~ing reaolutton FAiL~O TO CARRY by the tollowtng tt~ vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES~ FRY~ KING NOES: COMMISSIONERSr BOUAS~ BUSHORE~ HERKST AdsEr~T: COMNISS IONERS ; TOLAR Ch+~irmen Pro Tempora 8ushore tndicated he would change his no vote to a yes vote; therafore the foregoing resolut(on cerried by the follawtng vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARFJES~ BUSt~ORE, FRY~ KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: 90UAS~ HERaST ADSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TpLAR Conxnissioner dernes ststed she undentands the reason Commtssianor Herbst '.~ted agalnst thts pro~act because he fQels it is "spot zaning" and would llke to see a ~esolutton of intent. Commissioner Nerbst statcd he felt if the f~,mmission Is going to "spot zone" pr~perty in a rniddle of a single-faml ly area~ that ~hey should procecd with rezoning or a resolution of intent on ail the property on Coffman and determine who woutd pay for blocking off Cypress Street as tl~e Councll and Commissio~ has r~comnended, but right now it appears that no one will pay for that except the City. Commissioner ~arnes stated she would like co see a resolutio~ of intent so the pepple in the aree ~il) know whet is happening and asked if thmre should be a recomnendatio~ to the City Counc) l. Annika Santalahti erptalned m resolutian of i~tent Is prepared by the Plenning Department as a Commission inittatc~ item nnd the Commissio~ shauld dtrect staff to proceed with approprtate action. AGTlOH: Comnissianer Bar~es off~red a motTon, seccmded by Comntssloner Herbst and ~~N CARRIED (Ch~lrman Tolar being absent)~ that the Anahelm City Planni~g Cortmtssion daes hereby inscruct staff to prepare a resolutton of intent fo~ both sfdes of Coffman Street and the no rth side of Cypreas Street to multiple-famtly uses w(th the cloaure of Cypress Streat included. ITEM N0. 6: EIR NEGATIVE OECLARATIOH. NAIVER OF CODE R_E 4UIREMENT ANO CONOITIONAL USE PERMI NQ. 2209: - - ------- PUBLif HEARING. OHNER: ATLANTIC RICNFIEID CQ.~ ;00 West Glenoaks 6oulevard, Gl~~daie~ CA g1202. AGfNT; CHARLEa Y. MICKS~ 300 Vrest Glenoaks Boulevs~d, Gle~dale~ CA 91742. Prope~ty descrlbed as a recta~gula~ly-shaped parcel of land oonsiating of 5i18/81 MINUTES~ ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ M~y 18~ 1981 81-291 •pp~oxim~tely 0.3~ scra~ located •t the southwest corn~r of Balt Road and Drookhu~st Str~et~ 1201 South 9rookhurst Str~at. Praperty presently classifled CL (COMMERCIAL~ LIMITEp) to~e. CON DITIONAL USE REQUESTs TO PEaMIT A CONVENIENCE MARKET WITN GASOLINE SALES WITN WAIVER OF MINiMUM LANDSCAPED SETBACK. I t weot notnd the pet) t loner had requested a s ix-week contl nuanca. ACTION: Conmissinner King offerod e rt~tlon~ sewnded by Cammtssloner Boues end ~b'f~~ CARRIEO (Chalrman 7olar betng absent)~ thet conalder~tlon of the aforen~enttonad ltem be continued to the reguterly-scheduled meettng of June 29. 198i at ~he request of the petitloner. ITEM N0. 7: EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND CONOITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 221Q: _._.._... PUBLIC NEARING. OWNER: ELBERT L. SMITN ANO LIDl1 L. SMITH~ 12921 Wheeler Place~ Santa Ana, CA 97705. AGENT: BUDGET RENT-A-CAR OF OaANGE COUNTY, 4040 Campus Orive~ New port 9each, CA 92660. Property describnd as a ~ectangularly-shaped parcel of lend conststing uf approximately 0.5 acre~ located at the southeast corner af Manchester Avenue and Harbor Bouleverd, 1400 South Harbor Bouleverd (Budgat Rent•A-Cer). Propo~ty p~esently clnssified RS-A-43~0~0 (RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) Zone. CO~i01T10NAL USE REQUEST: TO EXPAND AN EXISTING AUTOMOE3ILE REN7AL AGENCY. There was no une i~dicating their presence tn opposttton to subJect request, a~d although the staff report was not rcad~ It is referred to and made a pert of the mi nutes. John Mich, 26;1 West Ltncaln~ Anaheim~ explained chis request is to allav addltional parktng on an existing lot. THE PUUIIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Cortmissioner Nerbst asked if the petitione~ agrdes to p~ovlding a temporary closure of the driveways as recc,mnended by the Ctty T~afflc Engineer and M~. Mich replled that would be acceptable untl l tha leaae ~s renawed for a longer period of time. He explatned they would know ~epp roxfmately 60 days before the cnd of thetr leaae whether or not i t wt I 1 ba ~cneyed and for haw long. Commissioner Nerbst staied he would be agr+eeabl~ to granting the pern-it for a six- month periocf untt) the ~nd of the existtng lease period with a:emporary closu~e of ~he drtveway sa that ch e petitioner wo.~ld not be required to provide a parmanent cl~sure unti l the Icase is rena+ed. ACTION: Commissionar Herbst offered s mation, seconded by Can~i~sioner Ktng snd M TION CARRiED (Chalrn~en Tolar betng absent). that the Anaheim City Planning Co~misslon has reviewed the proposel ta expand an axl~ting autom~bile r4nta) age~cy on e~ctengularty-sh~ped pafcel of land consisting of approxirnately 0.5 acre lou ted si~8~a~ MINUTES~ ANAIIEiM C~T11 PLANNINC COMMISSION~ M~y lA~ 1981 a~-z~z eL th~ toutheest car~~~ of Manchester Avenue •nd Harbor Boui~v~~d (1b0A South Ha~bQr 8oulev~rd), ~nd d~es h~reby Npprove tha Neg~tlve Decla~ation from the requireine~t to propa~e an envl~onment~) (mpact ruport on the ba~is that the~e would be no signific~nt Individwl or cumulativa advarse environmo~tal impact due to the approvai of this Ntgative Dacleretlon `lnce tha An~helm Cene~al Plan designates tha s~~bJect prope~ty for commercial land u~as commensuraee with tha pro~i~l; that no ~ensitlva anvlronmental imp~ccs a~a Invelved tn the prop~sal; that the Initial Study submittad by the potltlonar tndlc~tes na sig~lftcsnt Individual or cumulutive adverse e~v) ronm~nta) Impacts; and that the Neyetive Dacl~ration substantl~ting the foragain~g findings ts an fI1Q in tl~e Ctty of Anaheim Pi~nntng Depsrtmant. Cortml~•;!oner King offered ReAOtution No. PC81-106 and mov~ed tar ItY p~sasge and adopt~on thet the Anahel ~Ity Plenning Commisslon doos he~eby grant Conditlonel Use Permit No~. 2210 fo~ a perlocf of six months to exptre Nuveebe~r 18~ 1q81 subJect ta the petitioner's stipule~lon to provide a temporary closure accentable ;~ the approval of tho T~sffic Engineer, of tha n+ost northerly driveway on Harbor Boulevard •nd the most westerly drivaway on Mancheste~ Avenue and subJect to the p~tittonur's stipulatlon that tharo shai l be no mnr~ tl~~n 2; cars on the premises and that the servtce ~tetion wtll not bo operated except for the petltloner's privata use a~d pursuant to 5ection~ 1~.03.030; .031; .03Z; .033; .03h and .f13;. Title 18 of th~ Anahelm Mu~icipal Code and subJect to Interdepartmenta) Commlttee recommendetions. On roll call~ th. foregoing res~lutlon was pnssed by the following vote: AYES: CpMMISSI0NER5: BAFWES~ iiOUAS, BUSt10RE~ FaY, HER85T~ KING NOES: COMMISSIOI~ERS: NONE A9SENT: COMhSISSI01~Ek5: TOLAR ITEM N0. 8: EIR NEGATIVE 6°CIARATION. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT IWO CONOITIOIIAI USE H I 0. 22~~~'~- PUgIIC IIEARING. OuNER; KRAEMEa 1NDUSTRIAL PARK PARTNERS~ 1542-a 11ou1ton Parkwey~ Tustin~ CA 926II0. AGEI~T: UtiL b VAN TUYLE ASSOCIATES~ 2729 A Saturn Street. prea, CA 92621. P~operty descr(bed as an irreguiarly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximetely 6.34 acres. located at the southeest corne~ of Frontere Street and Glassell Street~ having a frontage of approxlmately 1~00 feet o~ the aouth slde of Frontera Street and a fror~tage of approximately i50 feet on the eest side af Glassei l Strect. Proporty pr~sently classificd RS-A-43~00~ (RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) ZONE. CONUI'TIONAL USE REQUEST: TO PERMIT A LARGE EQUIPMCNT STORAGE YARD IIITt~ uAIVER QF M! H 1 MUM LANUSCAPED S ETBACK. ~'here was no nne indicattng their preaence (n opposition to subject request, and a~lthough the staff report was not read~ it is refer~ed to and nrde a part of the minutes. 6111 Uhl~ agent~ explalned a prevtously approved proJect on this property for e 195p0-squere foot Industriai cor~lex was not bullt due to finsnclei prablen~ and thia proposAl is fnr a large ~qulp~rant storage yard on the western half af the ps~crl. Ne 5i~ai8~ ~ ~ MINUTES~ ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ M~y 18~ ig81 81- 293 •xplalned the large aqulpm~nt would b• t~~sh trucks~ backhoss~ etc. but would not be the heevy Industrial caterpillar tractars; and that the facility proposed wil 1 b~ the corporato headquartars wlth an offtce buildi~g~ service depsrtmenL ~nd ps~ts dapsrtmant; snd th~t the naw equlpmant wti) be stored o~ the west~rn portton whtch Is most naturally shtelded by Gleatell~ the Riverside Freeway and the flood con t ~o) settl ing ba~ins. He stated thla proJact togethar with the other four industr inl buildinga tr+mediately to the ~ast comprise approxtmdtciy 73~~00 square feet, whtch Is 23~000 squere feet less than the original approved project and it will be s lets tntense proJact. Ne refar~ed to the requested welver af mfnimum setbeck and stated the ordtnence rcads thst 50 feet of setback shsll be provlded basically f~an a butlding on an artertal highway which i~ fiessell and 25 feet from a seconda ry arteris) road wl~tch (s F~oncera and that 1Q feet must be landscaped. 11e stated they have provtdcd 10 fee+t of landscaping eround the entire pertmeter of the prope~ty and thero Is a slope on the north end west sides of the properCy because Glassell rises to go ove~ the freaway snd Frontcra riscs to meet Glassell Street ~nd with equlpment parked cm tt~at s i de. I t w i l l hard ly be seen~ Ne stated th~y feel they are provi d) ng the prnpesr amount of lAndsceping and that the ordinance ellows parking nn th ~ drtvewa}•a outslde the 10-foot lendsceped strip and there wtll be pa~king the~e but tt wil) be so mething other then ordinsry eutomobtles. TIiE PU~LIC HEARING wAS Ct,OSED. Commis~loner King a~sked if the petttioner has any problem complying wtth the Traffic Engineer's recomnendation that all driveways adJacent to Fronte~a St~aet be reaitgned perpendicular to Frontara Street dnd that the proposed 1~-foot wide service dr(vo abutttng FronterA Straet be res:ricted to egress only and that vehicular acc~ss from Glassel) St~aet be dedicated to the city. Mr. Uhl stated they had requested a one-way 16-foot wide drive.wvey and M~. Si nger reque5ted that the driv~eway be 20 feet w(de or that wheel spikes be providtd to deter poople fram trying to use [he one-way drtve for two-way traffic; but that th ~ recommendation was written thet the driveway would be fo~ egress purposes on ly and they have requested thet It be for ingress purposes. He stated Hr. Singer did not se~m to cere whether or nc~t i c was fo~ egress or 1 ngress ~ as long as 1 t was one way only, and stated they wauld like to have ~a 16-foot aide one-r+ay driveway for (ngress only. ACTI ON: Cortmt ss inner Barnes of fered a rrot lon~ seco~dcsd by Comrni ss tone~ K1 ng and M I t~ CARRIED (Chairman Tolar being absent). thst the Anaheim City Planninc~ Comnlsston has revlew~ed the proposal to permit a large equlpment storege yard with waiv~er of minimum landscaped setback o~ an irr~gularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 6.3~~ acres, tocat~ed at the southeast corne~ of F ~ontera Street and Glassel i Street~ ar~d does hereby app~ove the Negative Declaratlon frpn the requirement to prepare an environmentai Impact repc~rt on tf-e basis that ther~ would be no significAnt tndividual or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the suhject prope~ty for genera) industrial land uses commansurate with the proposal; that no sensitive envirornnental impacts are involved in the proposal; thbt t he Initlal Stuay subMitted by the petitioner indicates no ~ignlftcant individua 1 or cumu~ative advers~ environmenta) impacts; and that the Negative D~eclaration 5/18/81 MINUTES~ ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ May 18~ 1981 81-294 tubs ta~ttattng the faregoing findings 1• o~ file i~ the Ctty of M ahalm Planning Department. Paul Sing~r axplained th~t s 16-foot Nide drtvewey te not wida enough for twwway traffic bacwsen the two bulldings but the petttlone~ doas not wan! o two-way drivaway and would Iike a one-nvay I~g~ess drivaw~y o~ly •nd that in order to control the ingross on1y~ he hed recommended that thay uie tire busters. Commtsst~~er Ktng asked if the other reconwr~ndetions had been complied with end Mr. Uhl explai~ed that they had changed the slts ple~ to compiy with the other rocorrxnendad chanqes. Annika Santelahti~ Asslst~nt Director for Zoning~ asked thst Condition No. 12 ba dnleted. Cammissioner Barnes offe red a mottr,n, seconded by Commissioner Fry and MOTIQN CARRiED (Chai~m~+n Tolar bein9 absent). thc~t tha Maheim CTty Planning Commtssion does hereby grant request for walver of code rrquireme~t on the basts of the unusu~l shape end topography af subject property. Commtsslener 8ar~c~ offered Resolutian No. PC81-107 snd movod for It~ pessage and adoption thst the Maheim Ctty Pianning Commtssfon does hereby grant Conditional Use Permit No. 2211 dcleting Conditlon Mo. 12 and subJect to the petitian~r's stipulatlon for a 1G-foc~t wide d~iveway for ingress purposes only and pursuant to Sections 18.03•030; .031: •~32; .033: •~34 and .035, Titl~ 13 of the Anahetm Munlcipa) Code and sbbject to (nterdepartmentel Commlttee rocommendatlons. On ~olt ~~{ 1, the for~going resolutic~n w~, n• , v the fo) lowing vote: AY~S: f~aMM{SSlUi. ~.'rS: RARNCS. BOl S. IfUSMORF ~' . { cRBST, KING NOES: G>>MMISSIO~~ER5: N~N~ ABSENT: C0~IMISS'ONGR;; TOLAR fommissioner Hcrbst pointe~~ out that it was up to the petltioner to supply wate~ to the p~operty and Mr . Uh ti i ndi cated hc unckrs tood. ITEM N~~: EIR N~~;ATIVE DECIARATION~ WAIVER OF ~OOE RESUtREMENT ANU CONDITIONAL USE ~' RM 1 T N0. 2212 i~ ~~- ~- PUt3LIG HEARING. 041NEf~: LARRY R. ANO JUD17H I. SMITH, 17046 Ma~ina Bay Ortve~ Iluntington Harbor. CA 92G49• AGENT: TNE HLD CORP - G. J. ROACH~ 945 South Knott Street, Anaheim, CA 92804. Property described as an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisttng af approxfmately 1.G ac~es, located north and west of the narthwest cor~er of Bali Road and Knott Stre~:t, 945 South Knott Straet. Property presently classified Cl (COMMERCIAL~ LIMlTED) 20NE. CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST: TO PERMIT A COCKTAIL LOUNGE WITN IIAIYER OF MiNIMUM NUMBER QF PAaKING SPACES. 5/18/81 { ,, x MINUTES~ ANA4IEIM CI ~~~~ PLANNING COMNISSION~ May 18~ 1981 81-295 Thera wero two perso~• (ndicating thetr presence In oppositlon to subJect r~que~t~ and although the staff report w~s not raad~ It ts referred to and made a pa~t of the minutes. Pete 11111tams, secreta ry of HLD Corporatlon, statod tho code required 159 parking spaces and that 146 spaces a~e avallable end ha dtd not think there wtll be a parking problem. He stated the adJoining property w~s a~proved for a racquetball facility and they have given them a~ reciprocal agreeme~t for ;0 parking spaces and he did not think these two aperattons wil) have the same peak houra and parking will not be a problem. Me stated the rostaurant's Giggcst crowd will be thn dinner hnur a~d he thou9ht the lerge~t c~owd for the recquetball facllity will be i~ the mornl~g and msybe at noon. He stated they feel that probably the old opnration had e g~eater impact on the nelghborhaod than the new operetion wiil and thst the~e are same contempleted changes by tho manager whtch wii) reduce eny tmp~ce. Noreen Moore~ 906 South Knott, asked if thts is ar~ expanston of the French Quarter and it wes oxplainnd by Annika Santalehtl~ Assist~~t Director fo~ toning, that this is a different operation and the locetion wes pc-nted out to Ms. Moore on the pla~. Ms . Moore s tatad thay d~ locatton is really loud singing untf 1 2:OA a.m. loud. She statad there perking~ but thei r only ordlnance in thls City. ~ not object to the bustness but and thay are Abi e to hear the p~ She stated shc did not knaw if is a lot of vacant ground which obJectio~ is to the naise. She tha~ the ~oise from that ~Unding of the drums and this new business wll) be as could be blscktopped for asked if there Is s notse Commisslo~rr Herbst asked Ms. Meore tf she knows whlch operatlon is causing the noise and Ms. Moo~@ replled the nolse canes from tho French Quarters. Annika Santalahtl explatned the Franch Qud~ters Is the~e under •~.4nditlona) use permi t and the not se ardl nance Is based on nol se ~ead) ngs at t:~ ~ c+~operty 11 nes and it is difficult to gat som~ne out tu the area quickly enough; ih~t the roadings are done by a regular member of the Pianning Department staff becau9c the Police Department does not heve the equlpment to take a noise leve) reading and it is hard to have a staff inember get out when the noise is befng made. Hs. Moore stated she has tried to find out what the noise levels a~e bec~use she wanted to make a tape recordfng ~nd expiatned they live ac~os~ the stree: and down the street. Camnl ssioner Barnes stated the C) ty also has a nui sance o~ a~. d.,ces and stated she would like to direct staff to ha~e someone make a noise reading. Mr. Williams stated he appreciates Ms. Moo~e's position and that they have discussx' this preblan bacause they aro also worried about the notse f~om the French Quarter. Ne stated a biock wall behind the lacation has bean rats~~ and he has spent approximately S50~000 to open the block wall end add sand which would be s notse buffer to proter_t them f rom the nolse. Ne steted he dld not think thtir operatian wi11 add to the noise. Ne stated they du appreciate thel~ neighbo~s and added that 5/18/81 ~~ j MINIITES~ ANAMEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Msy 18~ 1981 81-296 one of the noighbors had reportad a fire some months ago which probably saved thc bullding and they vslue tha nelghbors and da not w~~t to allenate them. THE PUBLIC NEARING WAS CLOSED. R~spanding to Commlisio~er Barnas'qunstlon ss to the type of muslc planned~ Mr. Wtltiams axplalned they wlll hev~e a dinner c~avd with Iive mualc and tntermittent racorded mustc. Me st~ted th~y wl{1 probably heve live muslc o~ Frlday ~nd S.turday nighta wtth dancing. He also explained the HLD Corporetion is operatiny on a lease •t this particular address and that this aperation wtll be loceted betNean the French Quarter to ths east snd Woodstock to the west~ and the chlld d~y-care center and racq uetball faciltty fu~thor to the west. He e+xplained they expect a small noon crowd and a much more s~bstantial dinner crawd. Chairman P~o Tempore Bushc~re statcd he reelizes this Is already a beer and wine location but that this would mean there would bo three hard liquor operatlons tn the one a~ea and there ~iave bAen ~roblems in tt~e area and he felt th~ cumulative dffect with tho throe operetlons tn one ce~tcr could ceuse e more severe problem than what i s al resdy there. Mr. Willlams stated the French Quarter does have a h~rd liquor ltcense and Woodstock has beer only and probsbly sells nr~re soft drinks than beer which attrscts the younger crawd whlch (s ~re noisy. Ne stated en operatton with a ltquo~ license would attract a more matura crowd and he would expect this operatlan would be better for the neighborhoad. He stated the Waodstnck runs an o~+eration where there arG a lot of 14 to 16 yebr old kids who come to dance and ifsten to rock and roll music and It would be better if thet operation also had n llqu~r llcense. Ne stated they have contacted the managers of both places because there hos bee~ very little supervlsion around the erea and they propose to mutually maintain a full•time securtty guard during the pcak hours to patrol the parking lot. Responding to Commissl~ner Bouas' question, Mr. Willtams explainecl the cepaclty of the restaurant wlll be approximstely 2G0 people. Chairman Pra Tempore Bushore statad ~ these three operations plus the recquetball fac) lity could cause quite a park(ng problem and noted a car wash has been app~oved on the corner. Mr. Williams stated all the parktng will be available because it is the same owner and after the wliole area is developed. the entire ~rea will be pt+ved and he did ~ot think there wi l l be a problem because the racquetbat l faci l ity and chi ld daycare cante r peak hours are d i f ferent. Chairman Pro Tempore Bushore stated he did not think the sit~ation will be improved and will be compounded even more r~ith threa hard tiq uor establishments and dancing and he thought it would be a cktriment to the area. He stated he knows there have been problen~ in t~tiis locatton in the past. 5/18/81 ; , MINUTES~ ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION. Mey 18~ 1981 B1.2g7 Mr. Willtams statad untii ths last fea na~ths thia operetlo~ w~s baing conductnd under a bear •~d wina Iicense and if ihts condttlonsl use permit !s not grantsd they wll) reopen wtth th~t iicense because they do have the leASe there. Chatrman Pro Tenpo~~ Bushore stated the Fr•nnch Quertar appraval for da~cinq was on e one-y~ar b~sla and eve n if ha supported this request,it wouid be '~~ one year only and he folt that would probabiy be a confitct for the aperator with a 10-year lease. M~. Wtillams atateG the improvements have to meQe anyway. Ho stated they already have a license to oparete and before the place burned~ it was a beer and wl~e fsciltty and chey have sdded a partne~ and incorporatad end are adding a hard tlquer licensa and tf this request is cknted~ thcy wt11 ~ave to reopen unde~ the old ltcense whlch hn folt would be worse for the area. 4ie clarlfled that thyy were former;ly operettng as tha "Casa Blrnce" and sre trying to upgrade the operation with a dinner hause and a cocktatl opcrption. Commtssloncr Bo uas a~ked the type of foods to be served and M~. WI11(~ms stated they wtll be serving steaks~ chickans~ h~arrburgers~ etc. since it will be a young crowd they are caterfng to because t~ay went them to stay and da~ce. Ne steted they servad steaks~ crablegs and hamburc,~rs with ihc operatfon of Casa Blanca. Commtssionar F ry stated the petttioner safd eerlier they wonted to stay ewsy from the younger cravd by serdtng herd liyuor but naw Is saying they want to attract a younge~ crawd for dancing. Mr. Wi l l lams stat~d chey consider 2S-to-~0 yea~ olds a yaur~q crowd but want to awid minors whlch sre attr~sted wlth a beer and wine Ilcense stmiler to the uoodstock, Commisstoner Fry stated he agreed that th ~ee of thcse type facllfties (n one center would not help the naPghboT!hood and felt it would he intolarable. Mr. l~fi Il lams stated th~re ere elreacy three Qstabtish-nent3 in tl~e e~ea and they ere simply trytn~ to makc it better. Commisstoner 9ar~~~s stated she tries very hard to see the applfcsnt's potnt of vtew and knows i t i s hard to n~ake a bus i ness wc~k today, but sht agroes w! th Conn~i ss Ione~s Fry and 8ushore zhat a~prowal of a cocktail launge would be cktrimental. She stated the Planning Conmission is responsible far th~ health~ safety and welfare for ail the c i t i ze~s . Mr. Willlams steted the Alcoholic Beve rage Cantrol Ba~rd requlres that they sel) food as 50$ of the(r busin~ss. He stated lf thei~ request is denied~ the operatton wtil be a beer and wl-s iicense catertng to ~ rack arod roll crawd but with s cocktail license It ~ril~ be r mo~e matur~e c~o-vd. He clarlfled they operated the Casa Blanca for Just a few months before it burned and prtor to that the cperation was "The Sting"', but that was a completely dtfferent avner and it haa a bad reputatton. Ne stated after they ope~ed the Casa B~anca~ they have hac' no problems. He explai~ed the fire was in August 1980. 5118/81 MINUTES~ ANANEIM CITY PLANNiNG COMMISSION~ M~y 18~ 1991 81-Z98 Commtaslane~ Fry elaritied the operation can rec~pen in the ~~ms locatlon ustng th• oid iicen~te without a new conditional use permit end Annika Santslshti expl~ined it the condltion~ of the oriqinal uss pe~mit ~re compltad with, they csn reopen. Mr. Wllll~ms statad thay h~ve kapt the license current •nd he unda~:tends he could ~eopen tomor~av under the old Iicen:e. Commisstoner Barne• asked if this locetion could be made into a vlable connarclal araa considertng the surrounding businessAS And stated alnce thera have been a lot of problem~ 1~ the ~rea end a lot of police prablene, she would iike to knew If It could be rrwde Int~ a vlable area wlth other uses. Mr. Wtlilams replicd that wlth a mnssive influx of cepttal it could be used for enything snd he pointed out this feciltty is behind a s~arvtce statlan on the carne~ so they have very limited vts~btlity. Ne ststed he could not think of anything thet could be put fn this location beceusa the prope~ty Is run down. Conmtssloner He~bst patnted out thet aGCOrding to lhe staff feport 12~ of the a~re~ wtll bo devot~d to kttohen and esked if thAt cuuld be brought up to restaurant sta~d~rds. Mr. W1111sms stated that the kttchen aroa ts mora than adequate ta serve the dining a rea. Commissione~ Herbst pointnd out that code requlres ~S~ of the floa~ are~ to bo devoted to kltchen end saked tf thls could be b~ought up to me~t those standard:. Mr. Wililart~ stated that are• designated as 12Y for the ki;chen is qulte a b~it less than what thcy actually use because a{ot of the urea Is for storege and a aalk-In freezer. Annika Sontalahti expiained the kitchen ares is the erea Involved in the preparation of food end typically that would include tha freez~rs. She stated if the petitloner we~e to reestabllsh under the old pe rn+it. he will ba required to have s 25$ kltchen area. Mr. Williams steted he felt it is closer La 2;$ now including the wslk-in f'reezer and he thought they could meet the code for kitche ~ area. Commissioner He ~bst stated he has no problem wlth a cocktail lounge with a regular restaurant; that The Sting was thero btfore and caused a lot of p~vbient~ but if the problcros hsve been recognized in the remodeling and the establishment is brought up ta restaura~t sta~dards~ it woutd upgrade the area. He stated fram the police report tha nature of some of the crimes (ndtcate about 7SZ wouid probably be from Noodskock. Ha feit mayba the aoodstock permit sh~uld be (nvestigated slnca it appea n the Casa 8lanca had a lesse~ sm~unt of prableas. 5/18/81 ~, - MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ Mey 18, 1981 81 •299 Commissioner Bo~nes esked if the French Querter ts serving foc~d and M~. Willian~ replled th~y servad food befo re but with thatr new conditlona) use permlt, th~y have eliminated the ~e~vice of food. Commissionar ~arnes indicetod she thought that request had been danied by the Planninc~ Conmisstan end approvod by the City Council. ACTIONs Conmtssloner Herbst offered a rtqtion~ seconded by Cummisatoner King and MO i N CARRIED (Ch~irman Tolsr being absent)~ that the An~heim City Planning Commisston has reviewed tha propoaal to permit a cockt~tl lounge with wetver of minimum number of parking spocas on e rectangularty-sheped percel of land consisting of app roxlmately 1.6 acres located north and weat of the northwest corner of 9a11 Roed and Knott St~eet (945 South Knott St~eet) , and does hereby epprove the Ne9atl ve DeclerAtlon from the Mqutrcment to prepere an envlronn+encal tmpact report on the basts that there would bc no stgnlftcant individual or cumulative edverse environrre ntal impact due to Lhes approval of this Negative Declaration since the Anahetm Generai Plan dexig~etes the subJect property for cortmercial and medtum density residential lard uses commcnsurate with the p~oposai; that no sensitive environmentai impatts ara involved In tha proposal; that the initiel Study submitted by the petitioner inciicetes no sl~,~~(ficant indivtdual or cumulative adverse envirormental imRa~ts; and thet thc Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings Is on file in the Ctty of Anahelm Planntng Department. Chalrman F~o Te m:or~ Bushore explained he would vote in favor of th~ negative declarationi that hls p~evlous s~atement that he fett a h~rd liquor 1(cense at this location would have a cumulstlve effect on the araa would not include ~nvlronmental tmpacts. Comnlssioti~er f~erbst offered a motlon, seconded by Commissioner King and MOTION CARRI~D (Chattman To1ar bei~g absent)~ that the Anaheim City Planning Cammtssion does heroby gran; the waiver of code requiremenc on the basls that the request is minlmal and with the reciprocai pa~king agreement thcre witi be adequate parkfng. Commissloner 1lerbst offered Resolutlon t~o. PC~1-10$ and movcd far its passage and aifoptton thar the Anehetm City Planning Commission does hereby grant Conditional Use Permit No. 2212 subJect to the condltio~ that the kitchen area would bc 25$ of the floor area and on the condition that the use would be revtewed in two years and purs uant to Sections 18.03.030; .4 31: .032; .033; .03~ and .035~ Title 18 of the M Ah~im Municipal Code and subJect to Interdepa~tmental Comn(ttea recommendattons. Chairman Pro Temporc Bushore asked that the permit be reviewed in one year and Commissioner Nerbst agreed. On roll call, the foregoing resolutton was pessod by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES~ BOUAS~ tiERBST, KIN6 NOES: CQMMISSIONER.S: FRY, BUSNORE ABSENT: ~OMMISSIONERS: TOLAR S118/81 NINUTES~ ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, May 18~ 1981 r 81-300 Chsirm~n Pro Tempore 8ushore st~ted he would ilke st~tf to conne up with tha numb~r of Incidences at thts location since Septembe~ 22~ 1980 +~nd to Include Woodstock. Commissioner tlerbat stated he aould like to have a dectbel readtng at the property line as soo~ ss possible and A~nika Santalshti explein•d errengements would have to be made ta have e nlght ro ading but it 1s possible and would be done in a month. Mac Slaughter~ Deputy Ctty Attornay~ steted that the pdtttloner would need s dance permtt since thera is a changs of ownership. Chalrman Pro Tempore Bushore stated he would ltke to h+~ve the other uses In this area revtawed end 1 f thoro are any violations~ then the pe~mit should bo set for e publlc hearing and that the owne~s would be notified. Commissioner Fry suggesthd th~t staff do the d~cibe! readings on Friday and Satu~day ~ights botween 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 e.m. and do tt n~re tha~ once. Commtssioner Barnes offered a motlon~ seconded by Conmissloner King and MOTION CARRIEO (Chalrman Tolar being sbsent)~ directing staff to take de~clbel readinga at this location on Friday and Saturdsy nights between 10;00 p.m. and Z:QQ a.m. RE__ CESS There was a ten-mtnute receSS at 3:00 p.m. RECrVENE The meeting was reconvened at 3:10 p.m. Commissione~ Barnes returned from recess at 3:15 p.m. ITEM N0. 10: EIR NEGATIVE DECIARATION AND COh101Tf0~fAL USE PEkM17 N0. 221$: PUBLIC HEARING. OWNE R: JAMES A. AND BAR4ARA N. STOVALI, 1110 West Katella Avenue~ Anaheim, C11 92802. Property described as an trregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 0.8 acre~ 8$7 South Anaheim Boulevard. P~oparty prasently classifled CL (CGMMERCIAL, LIMITED) 20NE. CONDITIONAL USE P.EQUEST: TO PERMIT A PROPOSED RESTAURANT WIT11 ON-SAIE ALCOHOLfC BEVERAGES. There was no one indlcating their presence in opposition to subJect request, and although the staff report was not read~ it Is refer~ed to and made a part of the mtnutes. Jim Stovail, 887 South Anaheim Boulevard~ was present to answer any questions. THE PUBLIC HEARlNG WAS CLOSED. ACTION: Commissioner King offered a motion~ seconded by Commisstoner Fry and MOTION CARR ED (Chalrman Tolar and Cnnmissioner Barnes being absent)~ that the Maheim City Planning Commtssion has reviawed the proposal to permtt a propo~ed restaurant with on-sale alcoholic beverages on an irr~gularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of 5/18/81 l ~ MINUTES~ ANIIHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Msy 18~ 1981 81-301 approximataly 0.8 acre having a tront~~e of s~proximstely 108 feet on the west side of Anaheim 8oulevard (~87 South Anahatr~ 6oulevard)~ +~nd does hereby approve the Negativo Deciaretlon from the requfrement to prepare an environmenta) tmpact raport on tha basis that there would ba no aignificant indivtduat or cumulattve adve n e environmenta) Imp~ct d«e to the approval of this Negetive Doclaratton since the Anaheim General Pian doaignatas the subJect property for general commsrclal land uses comme~surate with the propoaal; thst no sensitivic environmantal tmpacta are Invoived in tha proposal; that the Initlal Study submitted by the patittoner Indtcetes no atg~ificant Indivtdual or cumutative adversa onvironmentsl impacta; and that the Negative Declaratlon substantlating the for4going findings is on file tn the City of Anahelm Ple~ntng Department. Commlasioner King offered Reaolution No. PC81-10g and moved for tts passage and edoption that th~ Anaheim Clty Planning Commtsslon doos he~eby grant Condlttonsl Use Permtt No. 221; in compliance with Sections 18,Q;.030; .031: .032; .A33: •034 a~nd .035~ Title 18 of the Anaheim Munt~ipal Code and subJect to Interde~artmantal Committee ~ecommendattons. On roll ca11~ the foregoiny resolution was passed by the foliewing vote: AYES: CONMISSIONERS: BOUAS~ BUSHORE~ FRY~ IIERBST, K{NG NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT; CnMMISSI0NER5: BARNES~ TOIAR f,ommissioner Bar~ies returned to the Councli Char~+er. ITf.M N0. 11: EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND CONDITIONtiI USE PERMIT N0. 2216: ._. ......r...._ PUBLIC HEARING. OWNER: SOUTNERN CALIFORFJIA EDISOM COf4~ MIY~ LTO., c/o L. J. LOWER150N, JR., P. 0. 8ox 2307, Senta Ana~ CA 92707. aGENT: GOIF WORLD INC., c/o GEORGE 1~. BRIMHALL, 1U5$5 East Firestc-ne. Norwalk, CA 90650. Property described as en irregularly-shaped pa~cel of land consisting of appraximately 2.4 acres located at t~h northeast carner of Freedman Way and Narbor Boulevard~ 1656 South Harbor Boulevard (Golf n' Stuff). Property pr~sently classified CR (COMMERICAL-RECREATION) ZONE. COI~DITIONAL USE REQUES?: TO EXPAND AN EXISTING h~INlATUaE GOLF COURSE FACILITY. There was no one inditatiny their presence in opposition to subJect request, and although the staff report was not read, it ts referred to and made a part ofi the minutes. George Brint~all, 1055a East Firestone Boulevard~ Norwa~l~, stated they propose to expand an existing club house and ~rcade fac111ty at a miniaturs golf cvurse. He asked about the condition requiring a signa{ assessment fee. THE PUBLIC HEARIMG WA5 CLOSED. 5/18/81 MINUTES, ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ Mey 18~ 1981 81-3Q2 Jay Titus~ Office Enginser, explsined the treffic signal assessment fee Is a fee eatabllshed by the City Counci) ta ba uaed throughout the Ctty for the conatructlon and improvement of t~afflc signals and is imposod b~slcalty on new constructlon or expanslon~ of existing conatruction and ts a square foacsge fee tmpased on all propa~ties. M~. Brtmhal) stated they wauld havc no obJactlon complying with that condit~on. ACTION: Commissioner King offered e motioro~ seconded by Conmtssioner F~y and MOTION ~D (Chairman Tolar being abaent)~ that the Anahaim City Planning Cortmissfon has revlewed the praposel to expend an existing minlaturn golf coursa facillty on an i~~egularly•shaped parcel of land consisting of app~oximetely 2.b a~cres, located at the northeast corner of Freedman Wey and Harbor Boulevdrd~ having a frontage of app roximetely 600 feet on the north side of F~eedman Way and o frontage of epproxf mately 1N0 fcet on the east sida ~f I~Arbo~ Boulevard (1656 South Narbor ao ulevard)~ and does hereby approve the Negetive Declaratlon From the requtrement to prepare en environmental impact re~urt on tha basls that there would 5~ no significant tndividual or cumulative adverse envtronmental impact due to the approval of thts Negattve Oeclaration since the M ahelm General Plan designates the subject property for commercial recreetlon land us~s commensurate with the p roposal; that no sensitlve environmental (mpacts are (nvolved in the praposai; that the Initiel Study s~b mitted by the petitioner indicates no signiftcant indtvidual ar cumulative adverse env(ronmental impacts; and that tha Negative Declaratlon substantiating the foregc~ing findings is on file In the Ctty of M eheim Pl~nning Deparxment. Comnis~loner King offercd Rcsolution No. PC81-110 end m~ved ~~or tts passage and acbption that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant Conditlonal Use Permit Na. 2216 pursuant to Sections 18.03.030; .031; .032: .033; .A34 and .~35~ Title 18 of the Anaheim Mun(cipal Code and s~6Ject to Inter~epa~tmental Committee recommendat lons , On roll call, the foregotng resolution was pasaed by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES~ 80UA5~ BUSNORE, FRY~ HERBST~ KlNG NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLAR ITEM N0. 12: EIR CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIOH-CLl15S 2 AND VARIANCE N0. 3216: ~~~~~ i ~I~~ PUBLIC I~EARING. OWNER: JAMES STOVALL, ET AL. 1110 WGSt Katella Avenue, M aheim. CA 92802. AGENT: JAMES STOVALL~ 1110 kest Katella Avenue, AnAhelm, CA 92802. Property described as a rectangulsrly-shaped parcei of land canststing af approximately 0.46 acre, loceted at the suutheast corner of Ball Road and Nnsc Street~ 1200 South West Street (Astro Inn Motel). Property presently classlfied CR ~COMMERCIA~., REGREAT{ON) ZQNE. VARIANCE REQUEST: WAIVER OF MAXIMUM NEIGHT TO PERMIT A FREE-STAIIOING SIGN. 5/18/81 ~` i :" MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CI?Y PLANNING COMMISSION~ MAY 18~ 1981 ~1-302A ITEM N0._ _12s E 1 R CATEGORI CAL EXEMPTION-CLI-SS 2 AND V11R1 ANCE N0. 3216: PUBIIC HEARING. 01~/NER: JAMES STOVALL~ ET AL~ 92802. AGENT: JAMES STOVAII~ 1110 West Kate described as a rectangularly-shapad parc~l of acre~ located At the southeest corner of Ball Stra~t (Astro Inn Motel). Praperty prosantly ZONE. 1110 West Katella Avenue~ A~aheim, CA Ila Avenue~ M ahelm~ CA 9~a02. Property land ccnsisting of epproxtmately 0.46 Roed and West Street~ 1200 South West clasaifi~d CR (COMMERCIAL, RECREATION) VARIAI~CE REQUEST: WAIVER OF MAXIMUM HEIGNT TO PERMIT A FR~E-S7ANOING SIGN. 7hera was no ona indicating their presence (n opposition to subJect request~ and althouyh ths staff report was not rcad~ It ls referrEd to and made a part of the minutca. Jim Stovall, agent, axplained Best uestern requlres that one tl~Ird of tho siqn Is dovoted to tlie i r en'b l em wh i cl~ ( s the reason for th i s request . TIIE PUBLIC NfARING MIAS CLOSEU. Commissioner Herbst stated I~e does not feel Beat westc~n should try to writa Che City~s slgn ordinances and lie knaws tfiat they do hav~ s~+aller signs. Mr. Stovall stated he ayrees they have smaller ~tgns but Itie doas not feel the sig~ sl~ould be any lc~rer because West Stroet (s vory busy and thero (x a problem wtth vandelism. Commlsslon~r Ilerbst statcd he felt the sign should be relocated on the propcrty because ~f tl~e traffic signal and lt is presently proposed aver e public ~tght-of- way. Mr. Stoval) stated he dndicoted 10 feet of property when hc purchased the prope~ty to the City vf M aheim for street widening and then he was r~qulred to sct batk another 2p feet. f1e stat~ed he wants the sign at this locetlo~ so ic can b~ read from both ways. He stated he has been In the area for a long tirtie and can understand tha Planning Commisslo~'s point of vicw but thc building deslyn is alr~edy made up with IEghting on the building and the~e Is no place for a wal) sign and he f~~ls he needs the height in ordcr tu rent the rooms and pay his taxes. Commissioner Barnes asked why t-~e 35-f~t height is necessary es opposed to the 25- foot helght and asked if hc thou3ht tl~e stgn would be seen from further away. Mr. Stovall stated he feit the sign would be seen from further away e-id it is 12 feat f rom the s i dewa 1 k to thc botto~n of tliG s i gn and the +s~ote 1 next door has a s i gn wh i ch blocks his vision because it (s under tl~e old variances and does protrude into the street. Chafrman Prv Tempo~e Bushore staied the petitfoner has requested an encroachis~ent pe~mit for the p~lic right•of•way. Annika Santalahtl~ A~sistani Di~ector fo~ Zonin9~ st~tod the City Attorney has pointed out that the zoniny coda does specificalty addrass the issue of the anc~oachmonts and prohibits ft and thet a w~lver should have bee:~ ~overtlsed. Cfi airmen Prn Tempore Buahore stated he has no prablem with th~ locatiar~ of the sign but is opposed to the height of the sign st 35 feet because he has always opposed a~y height vartances in the r.o~ma~tial racroatlon zo~e end that ocher requasts have bee~ ~ ~~ z' i. ~:: S r ~ ~ NINUT~S~ ANAFIEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ MAY'18~ 1981 81- 3028 der~ted. Ne stated (f th• concern (s fc~r vendolism~ the stgn could be moved to Ju=t outstde the swtnming poo) are• in itne wlth the corner and be 25 feet htgh a~d a two- sided v-shaped sfyn cauld be read from both ways on Bell Road and one way on West St~eet and would ba Just •s affectlve. Ne thought ~t 2S feet the viewer would not have to look up to see tho sign ond that it would be better. He stated people traveling in the Qiar~eyl~nd eree do not look up to sce the signs because they are eng mssed with the erea and the surroundfngs. ~~o stated he thaught the stgn woulcl be batter :een If :t was plac~d in the mlddle nf the anirt-als because thet ts where the people are looktr,g, Mr. Stoval) stated th+~t woulci be a problem because of the swimming pooi. Israei Radrlquez~ Rhodsn Slgn Compeny~ statecf lioving a lower siqn~ even a monument slgn~ would block traffic vision. Cha(rrr~n Pro Tompore E3ushore stated ttie Commisslon is s(gn but ere sug~sting lowering thc sign in tts pres~ p roblem to trAffic. Ne suggested a 25-foot htgh sign beyond th~ swlmning pool. Ile stated people ~raveling dlrectlon wc~uld see the sl9n becauseit Nould be right almosC all thc troffic in the Disneyland areo makes a and Che on ly ones who woul d noc sce the s i gn woul d be Road and they are leaving the area anyway. not referring to a nanumont ent locatiw~ wouid create a moved back on the property t~all Road in en easterly tn the ilne of vislon and left-turn at that intersectlon thosc traveling west on Bal) Mr. Radrtquez stated moving thc sign would put tt 7 feet fram the swtmning poo) and that would not be a good locatton. Fle stated Best Nestern wants one third of the sign area end lvwering the height would be 1lnlting Mr. Stovall's advertising. Mr. Stovell 1tated the proposed sign without the helght would make it very close to the ground and people would b~eak the slgn and it would aiso black traffic's vlew. Chairrr~n Pro Tempore ausho~e stated if the stgn ts rmved further back, there would be less chance of vandalism and the slgn would be mQre vlsible. Ne stmted ar-other problem is that other similar requests have becn dented. Commtssioner Oarnes pointed out that a similar requesc from a~ brand near motel an Narbor, Just south of Che S~adtum~ was dentcd end they had a bette~ argu~.xnt than this bacause they were not loeat~d on a main st~eet. She stated this City does havQ sign ordinances and the Planning Co.ani,sion is ;rying to clean up ihe signs In the Ciiy and would 11ke to go along Harbo~ and reduce the site vf all the signs all at one t1me~ but it has to be dcanr, gradually and po(nted out the Plenning Commission really has not alic,wed any varta~ces. She stated she resiizes the petitiomer has a hardship, but that many people though_ tt~ey ;idd a hardshtp and after their requests were d~nled, thc~ busineases have done quite well without the large stgns. She esked why the reader board ts needed on thet slg~. Mr. Stovall rsplied that hG itkes to use the reader board to teli visitors about Uisneyland and other r-ew facOlities in the area. Chsirman Pro Tempere Bushor~ suggested a smniier Best 4Jestern stgn on the maln sign wlth s~11er a~es on che stda of the b1t~~!ing. Commia~sioner He rbst asked if the sign ordinanc~ req uires a ce rtaTn distance betwee~ the ground end the bottom of the sign and M nika Santaleht3 explalnod It depends on tha diatance f~um the ~ntersectipn and there is s trisngle where nothin9 is permttted under 8 feet and that it applles only in ~yat triangle wNer~ the li~e~ of sight are lntarfer~ad wfth. C ~ ~ _j ~ ! MINUTE8~ IWAHEIM CITY PLANNING COIWISSIQN~ MAY 18~ 1981 81•30ZC Co~ais~la~~~ H~rbst •t~ted h~ did not think locatlon of Lha stgn would ba p~nnittad b~o~w • of t~affic con~id~~atto~s and th~t It Must ba r~laca tad. Ch~in~an Pro T~~apo~e Bu~ho~e pointed out his suqge~tlons o~ ths pians to th~ p~ti ! toner •nd •tated ~ s the Conrnt ss lon coul dn' t~ct on th 1 s r~q~st bec~ufe of • varianc~ which wa~ not ~dv~rtised p~rtai~in9 to th• ancroachwent •nd su99e~ted th~ petitionar r~qusst a nontinu~nce ~nd redesig~ the plan witM~u t tha variance~ ACTIONs Cammis~lon~r Nerbst offer~d a m~tlo~, secondad by Coa~ml~sloner Klns ~nd ~t~ CARRiED (Chalrmsn Tolsr b~ing ~bse~t) ~ that the M~haim City Planning Commisaton doe~ h~~eby continue ~o~~ideretion of the ~for~mentlo~~d matte~ to tha regularty-schedutod meeting of June 1~ 1981 ac the ~equest o f the petltloner~ - ,,: ~ MINUTES, ANAf~EIM CITV PLANNING COMMISSION~ Nay 18~ 1981 81'3~3 ITEM N0. 1: EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION. aECLASSI~f~ATION N0. 80-81-3~+. VARIANCE N0. r~~~~~~ • Z PUBLIC HEARING. OWNERS: JEaI NUR MAXSON KN~LE5 KEPENEK~ 1572 West Or~ngewood Avanue~ Anshetm~ CA 92~02. Prape~ty desc~Ibed aa a recta~gulerly-shaped parce) of land conststtng of approximetaly Q~60 ~cre~ 1572 West Orangawond Avenue. RECLA.iSIFICATION REQUEST: RS-M43~A00 to RS-7200 VARIANCE REQUEST: WAIVERS OF: MINIMUM I.OT WIDTH TO ESTAE3LIS11 A 2-LOT SUBDIVISION. The~e was no one lndtcatinq thelr prosence In opposition to subJect request~ and eltho~c,~h the staff report was not read~ it Is referred to and mede a part of the mi nutes . Del Boyer~ agent~ was present to answer any questtons. THE PUDLIC HEARING WAS CLJSEp. ACTION: Cortmisslonn~ Nerbst off~red a motlon~ secanded by Commissione~ King and ~I~ CARRIkD (Chairman Tolar bei~ng absent)~ that the Maheim City Pianning Commisslan has re vtewed the proposal to reclASxify subJect Draperty f~om the RS-A- k3~0A0 (ResidGntial/Agricultural) Zane to RS-7200(Residential~ Single-family) Zcx~e to establtsh a 2-lot RS-7200 subdivlsfon with wAivnr ~f minimum lot wldth on a recte~gularly~shaped parcei of land conslsting of app~eximatel~ ^•60 acre~ having a f rontage of approx) metc 1y 132 fect on thc south s i d~ of Qrangewc~ ~.: '~ ~c^ue (1572 West Orangewood Avenue) ~ and does hercby epprove the Neg+~tive Declarrtio~. rrom the raqulrer.ient to prepare an environmcntal in~ ect report on the basis th~t there would be no significant Individual or cumulativ~e adversa environmentAl impact due to the app roval of this Negatfve Declaration since the Anaheim Genoral Plan deslgnates the s~b,ject p~ol~Crty for law density residenti~l land usns comn+ensurAte with the proposai; that no sensitive envi~onmente) impacts are involvCd ir. the proposal; that the In{tisl Study submttted by the Cetttioner lndicates no slg~tfir.ant tndlviduat or cvmulative adverse env( ronmental irnpacts; and that tha Negative Decl~~r~tton substantiat-ng the foregoing findings is on flle 1~ tt~e Clty of M aheim Planntng ~epartn+cnt. C~mmiss~a:~ar Herbst offered Resolution Noe Pt81-111 and r-~oved for its passage a~~d adoptio~ [h~t thG M eheirn City Planning Commission does hereby grani Reclaasiftcation No. 80-81-34 s-b.iec.t to Interdepartmental Gomnittee recommend~+ttons. On rol) call~ the faregoing resolutian waa passe~d by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES~ BOUAS, BUSHORE. FRY, NERBST. KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE AB~ENT: COMMISSIONEFtS: TOLAR Commissloner Herbst offered Resolution No. PC81-112 and moved for its passage and edopLto~ that tlie Anaheim City Planning Conmi~slon does hereby grant Variance No. S/18/81 MI~~UTES, ANAI~EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ May 18~ 1981 81-~04 3x15 on the bosl s th~t deniei would deprive ~ubJect proparty of prtvl legas e~~oyed by other propo~ty tn the same zone ~nd victnity since other flag lot sltuattons h~ve bnen app~oved •nd a~b)ect to (ntardepartmentel Committee recarmiendattons. On roll call~ the foregoing resoiutton was pessed by the following vote: AYESt COMMISSIONERS: BARNES~ BOUAS~ BUSHORE~ FRY~ HERDST~ KING N06S: COMMISSIONERS; NONE ABSENT: COMMISS IONERS s TOLAR NO. 14: EIR_NEGATIVE DECLARATION~,, .R,,~ECLASSIFICATION N0. 80-Si-36. WAtVE a ~'~1' AND ~8~'~Tb~7~L"~~~"R€1~'Fi'f No. ~'fTT: "' PUtiLIC NEARING. OWNERS: SPEECN ANO LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT CENTER~ INC.~ MARCARET WATKINS. 1h51 Quall Strect~ Newport Beach, CA 92~~6Q. AGENT: OSCAa E. WHITEBOOK~ P. 0. Box ;1k~ Yorba linda~ CA ~2Gah. Property descr(bed as a rectrngularly-shaped percel of lond consisting of approxtnately 0.20 acre~ 135 South Lo~ra St~eet. RECLASSIFICATION REQUEST: RS-A-43~~~0 to ML CONDITIONAL USE REQUE5T: Tp PERMIT At~ AUTO STORAGE FACILITY W1TI1 NAIVERS OF: (a) MAX 1 MUM STRUCTURAL IIE I GtIT~ (b) M 1 N 1 MUM S I DEYARD S ETBACK. ( c) aEQUT Af D 5 I TE 5 CREEN I NG. T'• er~ was no one t ndtcati ng thei r presenco i n opposi tion to subject roqucst. and a 1 though the staf f report wes not ~ead~ 1 t 1 s referred to and rnada a part of the m(nutas. Oscar Wh i tebook ~ P. 0. Bnx 314, Yorbe LI nda ~ s tated he had dt scussed th i s p roposa 1 with his nQighbors which he felt would be most ~ffected by this proJect and with the principal of the school and they voic~~ no objections. Ik stated this is a transitional arca and explained they will be purchasing the entire area~ pointing out there are some ~id residential structuras o~ the adJacent lot to the south s~d slnce they w I 11 be the sarr~e owners ~ they er 1 11 not ob j ect to the bui 1 d i ng be i ng there. He stated they had bcen to the schoot just es It was letting out an~d the~e Nas a 1at of nolse and this site is directly adJacent to the school play yard. He did not thtnk anyon~e wouldwant to build a ~esidentiel structure on this site and the choi~e is to eithe~ l~ave (t ~dev~elopad or have somethtng adaptable to the sttuation. 1ia stated they propose a 20-foot walt wlth no windows extending the ful) width of the property which will permtt no entry by the children and there wfll be no pnssibility of the children bcing tnjured. He statcd he was totd by the Planning Department that in the paat the schooi had opposed certaln developments on this property and he feit this proposat doea meet with the school's approval. He stated by placing the bui lding at the back and fencing the f~ont they taave the residents free of any intrusio~ from the bui iding, Me explained Mr. Meloy, wfeo would be operating the repossession of vehicles activity~ has been In Maheim for the past 8 or 9 years and has a good relattanship wi th the Anaheim Police Oepartment. He stated they are prosently loceted in sn op~n compound 5/18/81 NINU1'ES~ ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ M~y 1@~ 1981 81-305 and that 1 s a p~ob 1 aT btcause ha ( s respons ib 1 e fo~ the vehl cl es wh i l e they s~e I n his postession. He stated they h~v~ raquested an 8-foot fence rathar than a 6-foot block wall and felt that a biock w~ll would be tess desireble to the surround{ng community than e redwood slatted fe~ce. He steted they do ~ot quite unde~star~d why the Trafftc En9lneer felt they should move the front fence b~ck. pointing out the~e a~e planter~ In the front ~nd atdewalks, etc. I~e stated someone would be at the faci t ity at 7:00 a.m. a~d wou) d open the gates and once tho gete I s open there Is ar,cess I n dnd out. D~ve Boone, 229 Loare~ stated he is agaln~t rerrbvinq the ~tcc odobe wil l on the north side of the property~ but would have no abJectlon to e chaln-llnk fonce on top of that wall. 11e steted he would not 1 tke the Ide~ of the redwood slatted fence whtch ts not aa nice as the extsting block wall. Mr. Whitebook stated they have no obJ~ctio~ to that proposal and explained ha had stopped tc sce Mr. 8oonn but he wasn't ~vatleblc at the time. TIIE PUBLIC fIEARING WAS CLOSEO. Pau) Singer~ Ctty Yrafftc Engine~~~ explatned where chern is a security gate and a drlvaway~ there is a good posstbtlity that vehicles waitinc~ for the gate to open would be proJccting tnto the trave) lanc and he has requested that any cers watting would hava a place to walt ~rior ta the gate being oQoned. He stated tnis happens quite frequently in th~ industrial area and es long es there (s a gate there shouid be a plece for the v~ehicles ta park and noted thls is a narrow ~ivo-lane street. Ch-~irmen Pro Tempore Bushore asked if rrost of the v~htclea would ba brought tn by tow truck and Mr. Whitbook explained thst If s csr is brought in at nfght there ts not much traffic a~ the st~eet and for the most pa~t the vehicies would not be b~ought in by ta+ truck, because the repossessor has keys to the cer. Chaira~an Pra Ten~ore Bushore asked if che gate would be ope~ated elect~icaliy and Mr. 4lhiteboak ~eplied that had not been considered~ but that (t ooutd be done. Chatrman Pro Tempnre Bushore noted a ropossessor bringing In e car at night wout~d have to get out o~ t~~e vahicle and open a gate whtch wouid necessitate parking the vehtcie on the stre~t and tha~ is the Traffic Enginee~'s conce~n and h+e felt those concerns are very vatid. Mr. Nhitebaok stated i f vehicles would be caning i n at ntght~ there would not be very much traffic and that the gates would be open at 7:30 in the mo~ning and cio~ced at ni ght because there wili be an assemblying operation going on In the plant. Chairraen Pro Tempore Bushore ascertainad that sll employees repossessing vehicles would hdve ke~ys so the vnhicles wpuld not be left parked on the street over nlght. Commi sslnner Fry aske~ haw long the vehlcles would be kept on the pramises at~d Mr. Irhitebnok stated that generally speaking the vehictes would not be the~a any lo~ger 5/ 18/St MINUTES. ANAHEIM CITY P UIHNING COMMISSION~ Ma~r 18~ 1981 81•306 tha~ one w~ak because wh~n a ca~ Is repos:essed the owner Is qround4d snd if the car ~eans ~nything to him at ali~ payments will ba mada a~d the car retrteved. HA st~ted thass ere nic~ vehicies and not J~loples. Me atetad • vehicta would be disposed of if (t ~teys there longer then 15 days. Commisslonar Fry sskad if the vehlcloa woulcf be advertisad and sAld on the preml:es afta~ the 15 d~ys and Mr. Whttebook statQd there are no auctions o~ sales o~ thc pramisea and tl~e vohicles would be taken to an automobtle euction estabiishment o~ di sposed of th rougl~ a pr 1 vate source. Commisaloner King polnted out no parkfny is allowed on the west side of l,oera Street and Cammisa lonar Bernes steted she wouid be in favo~ of thr proJect but fett the Trafflc Engl~eer lias a valld polnt and ssked if the entrance could be reloceted. Mr. Whftebook stated thls is a srt-~I1 lot and relocating the ent~ance wauld ellmtnate som~ of the parki~g spacns. Commissloncr Fry stated if the pur~ose of the setback is to n-eke spaces for a vehicle to get out of the street~ why It could nat be 25 feet from the curb itne and Mr. Singer polnted out that then a vchlclc would be parkad on the sidawalk and thts is close to che school. Commissionar Fry statcd during the day tha gete would be open end thnre is no parking permitted and at night the school would not be tn sessian and Mr. Stnger repiled thore is no way to guarancee that the gate would be opened durtng the day. Mr. Wh(tebook respondcd to Chalrman Pro Tempore Uushore's quastion as to the nurrb~er of employees explal~ing tha n wrb er would va~y depending on tha actfvity but generally thern wauld be from 3 to 5 People. Chairma~ Pro Temporc: Bushore stated It Is propased that 5 vehicles would be stared outsid~ a~d asked huw many would be stored tns(de and Mr. Whitebook responded there wouid be no vehicles stored inaide. Chairman Pre Tcmpore Bushore asked what the butiding would be used for,with Mr. Whitebook responding the bulldtng would be used for aasemblying and handed out brochures explaining the prnposed ope~atton, Cht~irman Pro Tempore Bushora statcd he w~s not aware that there woutd be manufacturing gc~ing on tnstde the facility a~d Nr. whiteboak stated the merchandise would be assertbled an the premises~ not manufactured, and Chairmen P ro Tempore Bushore stated this would be two uses on the prop~rty and AnnikA Santalahti~ Asststant Director far Zoning, erc~lained the application resds for a 39~090-square fa,t induatrisl butld(ng ef which 4g2 sq wre feet wouid be office space wtth the remaining devoced to werahousing. Chatrmen Pro Tempore Bushore stated he assumed the automobiles would be warehoused and he fei t this 1- ~ to squoaae two usas on the same property and aslced what 5/ 18/81 MINUT~S~ ANAHEIM CITr PLANNING COr1MISSi4N~ r~ay t8~ tggl g~.3p ~ !ha other existing st~ucture wauld be used fnr a~d Mr. Whitebook ~t~ted that structuro will be used for resfdenti~l pur~wses. Chai~m~n Pro Tenppra 8ushoro ssk~d if the awner would be willing to cancel a11 pravlously •pproved conditto~al use permita on both propertl~s Including the speech and therapy cltnlc a~d the day cere facility. Ne atated ha had no p roblerr~ with this use untl 1 Mr. Wh 1 taDaok pe'sed out the broc~~ures ~ but that he I a concerned about Qvo use~ on the property. Mr. Whitebvok expiained these are two separtate operations; that there wii) be 3 or 4 employees who wtll be repossn~sing vehtcles wlth the opersto~ of thst bustness occupying the office and thst the building itself will primarily be dev~oted to the assembly and sto~ege oF these units with about 2 or 3 err~i~yees who would do the essen~blyin9 and 2 or 3 Qr++P~Wees tn the office. Ch airn~an Pro Tenpore Bushore steted this means there will be approximately 10 err~ioyees who would need parking spaces wlth an rddit(on~l 5 spaces used for the storage of autumobites. Mr. Whlteboak explafned thG people who repossess automcbilea usually go out (n pair~ and cb not stay an this property and Chalrman Pro Tempore Dushore steted wtth the storaqe of the veh(cles and the employees in the building~ the employees would ev~entueily be pa~king on the street and he felt it ts Just too much on the p~operty. Commisstoner Herb~t stat~d the parking was calculated on the use for a warehouse op~~etlon and not for a rnanufscturin~ operation and asscmbling ts not a werehouse and he~ would cons(der it a factory. Mr. Whitebeok statad he h~d made it clear to the staff what would be going on at the p rope r ty . Commlssloner Nerbst stated he woulcf agree wlth the Tr~ffic Englneer regarding the entrance with the situetlon an Loera Straet. M~. Nhitebook stated since the adjoining praperty is owned by the sama property awr~r~ the~e would be no problem using the driv~+vay to the residenca so the employees wuid park there and uniock the gate and bui ldtng. Chairman Pro Tempore Bushare stated there Is a possibility the other prope~ty oould be sold. Commissioner Herbst steted the propepty must stend on its awn and suggested the p roject be redesign~d and that th~ Traffic Engine~r's suggestion be e~mpl~ed with baceuse there is Just Coo much on the pr~perty. Mr. Khitebook stated there is a possibility the owner could rerrqve the existing residenttal structure and they couid use the s msller butldtngs fo~ offices and have land available and he would then request a reclassiftcation. 5/18/81 MINUTES. ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ M~y 18~ 1~81 81-308 Commisslo~~r F1~rbst ftated he would rather see s reclasslficati~n a~yway because h~ is opposed to "spat zcmin~" and felt the whole area should be rezoned. Mr. Whitebnok asked for a ono-manth continuance. ACTION: Commissionar B~rne~ offerad a motton~ saco~ded by Commlssloner Fry and R~~bN CARRIED (ChairmNn Tol~r baing abssnt)~ that constderetion af the aforemantlonad ttem be continued to the ragularly-scheduled meeting of June 15~ t981 at the request of the peti tianer. ITEM N0. 15: EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND CONOITIONAL USE PERMIT NA. 219(~: - ---- PUBLIC HEARING. 041NERS: MELODYLAND SCHQOL QF T-IEQLOGY~ 1730 South Cleme~ttne Stree~~ Anaheim~ CA 92802. AGENT: DIVERSIPIED MANUFACTURING ANO ENGINEERING~ 16191 Co~structtan Ctrcle West~ I~vtne~ CA 92714. Prop~rty described as a rectangularly- shaped parcel of land consisting of approxlmately 0.72 acre~ 1732 Seuth Clementina Stroet (Melodylend School of Theology). Prope~ty presently classifted Ml. (IN WSTRIAL, LIMITED) ZONC. CONDITIONAL USE RF.QUEST: TO PERNilT A GYMNASIUM IN CONJUNCTION wITH AN EXISTING PRIVATE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUYION WtTH WAIVER OF MINIMUM LANOSCAPED SETBACK. There wa~ no one lndicating thetr nresence in opposition to subJect requeat~ a~nd atthough th~ staff re~,ort was ~ot raad~ it is referred to and made a part of the minut~s. Mr. McMurtry, representing Melodyland School of Th eology~ was p~esent to answer any questions. THE PUBIIC IfEARING MAS CI.OSED. Commissioner Nerbst referrad to the Traffic Engineer's ~econmendation for a block wall which would requlre the students to go to the signol ta cross the street. Paul Singer~ Traffic Engineer. statcd if the petttioner is requesting a 25-mila a~ hour school zone sign~ the only Nay that could be dane. tn compllance with the Callfornie Vehicln Code, is by providtng a fenced area but if the area is not to be posted for a school zone, than the fencing is not required. Mr. McMurtry stated they would then not request 25•mile per hour speed zone slgn. Chalrn~an P~o Tempore Bushore asked how the stucSents wauld be co~trolled to keep them from crossing Clemientine. Mr. McMurtry replted they would hav~ supervislon~ noting this is a private school with much mo~e control ovar the students end ~otad they ha~d expelled 33 students lest year from a 35a~student achool. so the sLudents have to con~ply and vialators are dealt wlth severely. 5/18/81 c ;; ~ MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNiNG COMMISSION~ May 18~ 1981 81'309 Conmissloner H~rbs~ stated thsre will be a lot of treffic on that street with th~ freewey off-~amp and stated he couid not support tha reques~ unless the fanco is provlded. Ne statad tha supervislon would not stop some of the students from cra sing ths street end it wtll ba very busy and th~y should cross at tha signai. Chairman Pro Tempore Bu~thora stated tha fe~cing bel~g dtscussed ts on the east stde of Clementtne snd he thought It ~hould be on the west aide. Mr. Singbr st~ted it doesn't matter which side ts fe~ced end the fence wes ~equestod to comply wtth the 25-mi le per hour speed =one, He noted the scf~oo) had also requestad +~ cressing guard end that crossing hunrds are nat provtded for high schoo) studnnts and tha control of the students ia whotly In the province of the school. Chalrmnn Pro Tempore Bushore stated tha conce rn ts for the s tudents cro~sing the stroet and ~ust one student being htt by an autc~mobile. He steted he did not think the speed limit would keep students from crossing the streat at that locatton and the fence on the oast side would not accomplish it ond he fett the fencn should ba on the weat side. Comnlssion~r Fry pointed out thet that Is where the ~ntrAnce to their parking 1ot Is loc~ted. Mr. McMurtry explained a lot of the traffic from the parkiny lot exlts on Clementine et that polnt. Mr. HcMurtry atso explatnad that this is a privetn sc.hool and operatas on tultion and one of thei r concerns i s the cosL of the Fencing. Cheirman P~o Temporc Bushore stated the Co mnisslon understands and recognizes that they will try to protect the students~ but he dtd not feel this would be adequate a~d somethtng must be done naw to pratect them because not all students can be controlled ahtch is evident with the 33 rxP~lled last year. Comnlssioner Herbst stated he woutd not be so concxrned if this aasn't an off-ramp for the f reeway and asked the expected traffic count. Nr. Singer replied It wouid be substantial but could not give a dcfinice figure. Commtssioner King asked if m~st schools hsve chain-link fences and Mr. Singer stated all publfc schools have a 6-foot htgh chain-1(r~k fence to protect the students. Ch~+irman Pro Tempore Bushore stated he stttl fenls the f~nce should be on the left slde of the st~eet and if Rh~t ls a valtd exit to the parking lot, then Lhere should be a crosa•w~lk provided. Ne suggested a stop light w(th a button the students tould push when they want to cross the street~, but noted that would be more expe~stve than a fence. Ne also suggested a fence o~ the west side and clasinc~ off the exit gate during school hours. 5/18l81 -=~:~ ~ 1 ~. 1 MINUTES, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION. 14ey 18, 1981 81-;10 M~. McMurtry asked the cost of a push button stop stgna) end Mr. Singer replled a push button atop sign~) in mld-block wtth no driveways would cost approxirrbtely $25,000. Chairma~ Pro Tempore Buaho~e stated thare are e lot of uaas on the prope~ty and thera has to be somo givcz and take on eYaryone's psrt. Cortmissloner Herbst auggostcd the studants cross the str~ot at the gymnaslum and then go up the other sida of the street to the tntersectton and then the only way to get to the gym wouid be at the intersection. Ne dtsagreeQ thet the fence shouid be on the west side of the st~eet. CommisstonQr Bn~rnes ~sked Mr. MeMurtry whtch side of tf~e street iche students would use Lhe mast. Mr. McMurtry repiird the schoo) side would be used the m~at ond that the fence on che a~st sida wouid be the most effectlve. Mr. Stnger noted therc a~e quita a few drivewe~ys an the east side and Mr. McMurtrY stateci there (s one primary drfvcway for exiting purposes only on the west stde. ~1e potnted out tf~e p~tmary entrance on tho plans. Thera wes a brinf dtscussion at the podlum ~egarding the plans and suggested chAnges. Mr. S(nger stated a mld-block stop stgn would not be permttted on an orterial street and that ~ push button stop light would be possible. Chalrman Pro Tempare 6ushore stated he has no problem with the usc or the veriances but was concer~~d how ihe students would ba contralt~d. He suggested the petitioner request a continuance and work out a solution because the concerns are vaild and the solutlon must be something the petitioner can it~e with. Cormiissioner Fry asked lf the f~ctlity is being uaed at che present ttme and Mr. McMurt~y replied that the Melodyland Schooi of Theology uses the school atl the time and there ere approximately 200 students who occastonally cross the street. Commissioner He rbst stated the concern is because of the change In the use of the highway wtth th~ off-ramp. Mnika Santalahti, Assistant Dlrector for Zoning, strted this is a secondary a~te~ial hlghway and thn oonditio~ ~equtring dedication to the ulttmate width was not tncluded which wlll reducn 13 feet from the front of the property. ACTION: Commissione~ Barnes offiered a motion~ seoonded by Commtssianer King and M0~ ON CARRIED (Chatrman To18r bcing absent)~ that consideration of the aforementioned ttem be continued to the reguisrly-scheduled meeting of June 1, 1981. S/18/81 ~ ~, , 3 MtNUTES~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ May 18. 19$1 81-;11 ITEM N0. 16 ~ RECOMMENDATIONS The follawing Reports and Recommendstlons staff repo~ts w~re presented but not read: l1. ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD tONTROL DISTRICT - Request to determine conformonce with t e enera an. u act perc~ s ocated on the south side of C~escent Avenue approximately 330 feet west of the centerl ine of Brookhunt Street. AC_TION: Cammissioner King offcred Resolutton No. PC81-113 and moved far its passage and adoptlon thet the Anahcim Ctty Planning Commisslon does hereby find that the dispositton and conveyance of a surface use eaa dne~nt of the s~bJect pnrcels is In confornv~nce with tha Ctty of Anaheim General Plan. On roll call. the foregoing resolution wes passed by the followtng vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; aARNES, BOUAS, BUSHORE~ FRY~ NERBST~ KING NOES: COMMISSIONCRS: NONE A~SEN'f: COMMtSSI0NER5; TOLAa B. ADANDONMENT N0. 80-8A - Request ta abendon a vehicular and pedestrt~n ngress an egress easement from Ltnu,ln A~enue to Jullette low School. ACTIAN: Commissioner King offered .~ motion~ seconded by Commtsstoner Fry and MOTI01~ GARRIEO (Chairman Tola~ be(ng absenf), that the Maheim Ctty Planning Co mnisston does hereby recommend to the City ~ouncil that Abandonment No. 80•8A be approved. C. VARIANCE N0._~A - Request for terminatton from Doug Alani for property Tocatea a 823"~'outh Beach 9oulevard. ACTION: Commtssioner Ktng offered Resolution PC81-114 and moved for its pas g and adontion that the An~heim City Planning Commisston does hereby terminate Variance No. 2234. On roll call~ the foregotng resolutfo~ was passed by the followtng vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, 80UA5~ BUSHORE~ FRY~ IIER95T~ KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLAR D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 20 1- Request for retroacttve extenston af ttme rom Haro d M. Wr ght or property located at 1290 Sunshine Way. ACTiON: Commisstoner King offered a nption~ seconded tsy Commtssioner Fry an OTION CAR~tIED (Chalrman Talar being absent)~ theR the Anahelm Ctty Plannin~ Commission dces hereby grant a one-year retroactive extension of time far Conditional Use Perm(t No. 2071 to expire April 21~ 1982. S/18/81 MINUTES, ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ May 18~ 1981 81-312 E. CONOITIONAL USE_PERMIT NQ. 1705 • Request for a two•yea~ rntroscttve extans on o t me ~om o ert . A~darson fa~ property on tha east side of Red Gum Stre~t~ south of La Jolla Street. ACTION: Conmtssfoner King offered s motion. seconded by Commtssloner Fry a" n~Fi~ION CARRIED (Ch~irmsn Toler baing absant)~ thst the Anaheim Ctty Plan~InQ Cc~mmisaton does hereby g~ant a two-yesr retroactive extension of time for Conditional Use Permit No. 17Q5 to cxpire May 9~ 1983. F. TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT N0. 10624 - Request for extenslon of time f~om Fred W. He-st dge~or property at ~250 South 9raokhurst Streat. ACTION: Commissioner King offered a motlon~ secondad by Commiasioner Fry and 0 ION CARRIED (Ch~irman Tolar being absent and Commtssloner Bushora abstalning)~ that tho M aheim City Plann{ng Commisslon does hereby grant a one-year extenst~n of time for Tentattve Mep of Tract No. 1069~~ to expire on May 1~~ 19$2. G. VARIANCE N0. 24 4- Request far retroactlve extenslon of klme from Dill en~ r.~ or property at 133x Narth Mitler Street. There was a brlef discussion and tt was no~ed there had been no ccxnpl~tnCs and the use has not been detrimcntal to the property. ACTION: Commissioner Y.Ing offered a motion~ seconded by Commtssioner Herbst ana M~ION CARRIEO (Chrirman Tolar and Commisstpner 8arnes betng absent)~ that th~~ Anahcim City Planning Commission does hereby g~ant a one-yeer retroactive e~ctension of time fur Vartance ~~o. 2454 to expire on January $~ 19a2. Oscar Whltebook requestnd to speek regerding tiem No, 14 and Mac Slaughter, Deputy Ctty Attorney~ stetad that public hearing was conti~ued and it would be inappraprlate to hear additional testinr~ny. Chafrnwen Pro Tempore Bushore suggasted ha talk wlth staff. ADJOURI~MENT There boing no further bustness~ Commissione~ King offered a rrotic~n, seconded by Commisstoner Fry and kOTION CARRIED (Chairman Tolar and Cortmissioner Barnes being absent)~ that the meet~ng be adJourned. Th e me~ting was adjourn~cf ~t 4:30 F•m. to a special work sesslon to be hetd on May 2fS. 1981~ 7:00 p.m. in the Councll Chamber with the City Nousing Commissfon, the Adviso ry Zorttnittee and interestzd citizens to discuss the proposed Nousing Elnment. Respectfuliy submltted~ ~~- ~' a~~ Edith L. Harris~ Secretary Mahetm City Planning Commissian CLH:Im