Minutes-PC 1982/08/09REGIJi.~-A, MEETING OF THS 11N11HBSM CITY PI.~NNIN(i COl~M1288I0~
~.~-~.. -
RaGVIJ1R MEETZTIQ The r~gulnr maetinq o! khe ,Mahe~m City Planninq Camoission
was caliad to order by Chairn-en Fry at 10i00 e.a., 1-uqust
9, 1982,in the Counail Chaenber, e quorum being preemnt and
the Cocm~iesion revler+ed pl~r~e o! the i~ems on todAy's
aqenda.
PRlPBENT Cheixtnan r Fry
Commiesionere: Houes, Buol~ore, Herbet, 1Cing, La Claire,
McBurney
1188~NT
AL30 PRESENT
Comn~iseionere: None
Ron Thnmpeon
Annike 8nntalehti
Jack Wliite
Jay ~'itus
paul Singer
A~an Shere~r
Rt~lph Compton
Edith Harris
Planning pirector
Aeaiatent Director !or 2oning
Aeaistant City Attorney
offica Sngineer
Trnffic Enqineer
Aesociate Plnnner
AesociAte Plenner
Planning Contmieaion Sncretary
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE '"0 TNE PL11G LED BY: Conm-ieeianesr King
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commiseioner Bonas offeXed a motion, aeconded by
Commisaioner King nnd MOTION CARRIED, that the minutea of the meeting o! July
25, 19B2, be epproved ee eubatitted.
ZTEM NO. 1: EIR NEGATIVE DECLAIUTIVN, WAIVER OF CODE RSQU7RF.MENT AND
CONDITIONAL US8 PERMIT NO. 2355 (READV$RTI3SD)•
PUBLIC HRa-RING. OWNER: ALFRED D. P1~It30, ET AL, 774 Lowry, Oranqe, CA 92669,
1CIM SHIK AND MYUNG SHIK Yt1N, 735 S. Beach Boulevard, )lnaheim, CA 92804.
AGENT: ULYSSF.S 8. BAUER, 17390 McAllister, Riveraide, CA 92503. Property
deecribed as a rectangularly-shaped pnrcel of land consistinq of approximately
1.25 acres, 727 South Beach Boulevard.
To permit a 101-unit motal witt~ on-sale alcoholic beverages in the CL Zone
with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces.
There were five gersons indicating their presence in oppoeition to subiect
request and although the staff report to the Planning Commiasion was not read
at the public hearinq, it ia referred to and made a pert of the minutes.
Ulysees Bauer, agent, wae preaent to answer any questions.
82-409 a~9/8z
~
~ .'
MINU?'~B, 11NI1HEIM CITY PLIINNINfi COMMI89ION, 11ugu~t 9, 1982 82-410
8teve Wozney, 818 8. H~yward, 1lneheim, ropzeoentinq the Neyward Qtraet
Homaowner'e 1-ssociation, relerr.d to th• etelf rep~~rt reference to e 20-l~ot
wido emergency acoes~ and trnsh truck cirivaway with getes lrom Hayward Street
to tihe waet. He aleo reterred to tha statf report indication that a 30-inch
hiqh block wall is to bo located 10 leet lrom tha weeterly property line
adjaoent to HAywnrd Street. He atated they are concazned about the hiqh
echool etudente crossing over thet fence to go to the other echo~ls in the
arae nnd indlaeted thay would like to ~Qe thet wnll be nt leeat Ei leet hiqh.
He explained the peCikioner hee a~qreed to add wrought iron to the top ot the
30-inch high well makinq it 6 Paet, but they would like that a atipulation in
tho record. Hc~ etated thay would eleo like a atipuletion tha~t the 6-f.oot hiqh
wall will be meesured l:om the ineid~ property linoe beceuse there ia a three
loot grade differentiel nnd aomeone could eaeily jump over the well. He
atated thay are eleo objectinq to tt~e tresh location as ehown on the exhibit
on the wall and axplained the petitianer had in~'icated it would be movec~, but
they wauld like t.het atipulati~n in the record. He edd~d the,y te~el the
fifteen perkiny epncee propoaed on the eouthwest pur.tian o! the property could
be better utilized with landscapingt however, thnt concern ia not ae stxingent.
Mr. Bnuer stated in hia ebsence the owner worked wiCh the Pla~ninq Departmcsnt
stalf and moved the trash erea eesterly ir.vnediately adjacent to the canopy
area (Dean 3herer, Aseociate Planner, indicated that is correct). Mr. Hauer
continued he underetood that if they put the block wall elong the property
line, it must be 6 feet above the icnmedtate grede level end that they would
etipulete tn comply wi.th that requirement. Ho stAted they ere not permitted
to have e hiqh~r fRnce on Hayward because ~~f thQ safety of the people drivinq
in and out of their driveweyr however, they are willing to provide wrou,ght
iron fencinq on top of the 30-inch high block wall ao there would atill be
qood visibility nnd it would etill provide a barrier.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Commisaioner Bushore asked whdt justitication is qiven for the parking waiver,
other than precedent. Mr. Bauer replied they have actual fiqures ~f parkinq
utilizeti~n of the Tiffany Motel in the sa~e area and owned by the snme
owner. He stated their study ~f actual registration, as compared to the use
of the parking apaces, indicate the average ie 718 fxom June 1981 through
March 1982.
Commissioner Buahore asked if there was ever a time when ~here wes not
adequate parkinq spaces. Mr. Bauer exp2etned the hiqheat usage was 70g in
August and there wae probably no time that the parkinq lot was completely
full. He di:ated occasionally several pgople arrive in one vehicle and aek for
two rooma or they arrive in qrc~ups. He added the c~otel would be lucky to have
100$ occupancy during July, Auquet and September, but the averaqe occupancy
for thoae months is 80~ and the garkinq apace utilization is 71~ eo they
redlly only need 56~ of the Qerkinq apaces required.
Commiseioner Huahore s~ated motels in the Disneyland erea heve been granted
waivers based on their occupanay rate and atated he wanted to be sure there is
justification, eepecially eince there is a restaurant involved.
~
M?NUTEB, 11.~111H~IM CITY PLANNING COMMI88ION, 1luguet 9, 1982 82-411
1-CTIONe Commieeioner 1Cing o~fer'd e motion, saconded by Commiosionar 9ouae
end MOTION CARRISD, that the Maheim City Plenninq Coannission hae reviewed Che
propoeal to permit a 101-unit motel wi.th on-sale elc~holic beveraqee in the CL
(Comn-ercial, Lienited) Zone with wai.ver of minimum number o! parking epecee on
a rectanqulnrly-sheped parcol o! land coneistinq o~ epproximetoly 1.25 scre,
having e lrontaqe of approximately 140 feet on the w~eAt aide o! Beach
Houlevard and lurther described ae 72'~ S~uth Beech B~ulevardt end does hereby
approve the Neqative Declaration from tha r~quirement to prepnre en
environmental impact report on the be~eis thet there would k~ no signlPlcent
~ndividual or cumuletive edverse environm~ntel impact due to the dpprovel of
this Neqetive Declaretion since the l~nnheim Generel Plan deeiqnatee the
subject property for qenerel commercinl lanci uaes commensurate with the
propoealt that no aeneitive environmentel impacte are involved in the
propaealt thet the Initial Study eu~s!tted by the petitioner indicetee no
significent individual or numulative adverae c~nvironmental impactsf and thet
the Negative Decleration substantl.eting the foreqoing Pindings is on lile in
the City o! Anaheim Planniny Department.
Commieaioner Le Claire eteted elze did not thlnk khe bJ.ock wall isaue hed been
completely ee~tledt and thet thes getitioner hns aqroed to adc~ wrouqht iron to
the top. She claritied thaC the gete will be ueed zoutinely by the traeh
trucks e-nd indicated she is concerned about the noisa end ehe would prefer to
aee a higher wall to take cere of the noise for the neighbors on Heyward
Street.
Chairman Fry reopened the PUBLIC H~ARING.
Mr. eauer stated if the Plenninq Cotmnission would be willinq tio approve it,
they would be willing to provide a 6-foot hiqh solid block wall And aeked if
it would be permitted eince it will be located 10 Peet ~rom Che property
line. Dean Sher~r repl.ied that would be acceptable.
Commisaioner Kinq offered a motion, aoconded by Commiseioner Bouns e~nd MOTION
CARRIL~D, thnt the Anaheim City Planning Coaimiseion does hereby qrant requeat
for wniver of code requirement on the basis thet denial would deprive eubject
property of a privileqe enjoyed by other praperties in the eame zonQ and
vicinity and that similar waivere have been granted on the bneis that a
cartain percentage ot queste arrive by transportation modes other than private
automobile.
Commiesioner King offgred Resolution No. PC82-150 nnd moved for itie passaqe
nnd adoptian thnt the Anaheim City Planning commission does hereby gr~nt
Conditionnl Use Perruit No. 2355 subject to the petitioner's stipula~ian to
conatruct a 6-loot high block wall on the westerly property line 10 feet from
the property line and subject to Interdepartwental Cocanittee recommendations.
On roll cell, the foregoing resolution was pesasd by the following vote:
A7f~S: B01JAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HER83T, KING, LA CLAIRE, MC BURNEY
NOEBt NONE
ABSENTs NONE
Jack White, Asaietant C.ity Attorney, presented the writaten riqht to appeal the
Planninq Commiseion's decieion within 22 days ta the City Council.
:J
'1
~ .. 1 ~ ~
MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Auguat 9, 1982 82-412
ITEM N0. 2 t SIR N~(iATIVa DaCIJ1MTI0N, ~~IVaR OF CODE R~QUIREMEN'j' 11ND
CONDITIONI-I. iJBE ?ICRMIT N0. 23'S6
.~ r+
PUBI~ZC HE?~RINC. OWNER: ABSL ANp CAROL A. MENDEZ, 100A N. Lemo~ Street,
1lnahel.m, C11 92801. AOIENTi IJIWR~NCE eUC1~,BY, 611 Civic Centar Orive West,
8anta Ana, CA 92701. Property dascri.twd eo en irr~aqularly-sheped perael o!
lana con~isting of eppr~ximntwly 0.14 acre, 1039 N. Anaheim Houleverd (Cash
1~uto Snles ) .
Ta retain a ueed auto eelee lot in the CG Zone with waiver of minimum number
o! pnrkinq spaces.
Continued from the meetinq o! Ju1y 26, 1982.
The applicant w+~e not present end thia mntter wns henrd prior to Item No. 5
fallawinq thQ 3s10 p.m. recaes.
Chairmnn Fry noted the applicnnt had not been present et the July 26, 1982,
meeting and now is ebsent aqein.
Commiesioner Herbat etate~ hA would prefer to deny t.hie requeat on the basis
thet it ie hsrmtul tc~ the nrea.
ACTION: Commissionez Herbet offered e motion, neconded by Commisaioner King
end M~OTION CARRIED, that the Aneheim City Planntn~ Commieeion hee review~d the
proposal to retain a used nutomoblle sales lot in the CG (Cocuaercial, Generel)
Zone with waiver of minimum number of parking epacsa on an irreyilarly-ehaped
parcel of land consisting of epproximetely 0.14 acre lo~eted et t.l~e southeeet
corner of Anaheim Boul~vard ~n8 Lemon Street and turther ~3esc~ibed as 1039
North Annheim Boulevard (Canh Auto Salea)t e.nd daes hereby disapprovo the
Neqativ~ Declnration fram the req~iirement to prepnre an environmental impoct
rep~rt on the basig that there would be siqnificant individual or cumulative
adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this Neqative Declaretion~
that environmental impnctg nre involvgd in the propogall that the Initial
8tudy submitted by the petitioner indicatea significant individual or
cumulative adverse environmental impact~.
Commieaioner Herbat oflere3 a motion, seconded by Commiseioner Bushore e-nd
MOTION CARRI~D, that the Anaheim City Planninq Commiesi.on doQe heraby deny the
requeat !or wr~iver of code requirement on the basie that no hardships were
demonetrated pertaininq to the size, location, ahepe or tnpography of subject
property.
Coamiiseionar Harbet offered Reaolution No. PC82-151 and moved for ite pasaeqe
and adoption that the Anahelm City Plan,-inq C~mmisei~n does hereby deny
Conditional Use Permit No. 2356 on the bneie that tl~e applicant wss not
present to enewer Com~niaeion's concerns pertaining ta the propoAed use end
that the petition was a reeult of ~+ction taken by the Zoning Code Enforcement
Otficer, nnd beaed on th~ history o! a aimil.ar use at subject location.
On roll call, the foreqoing resolution waa paaeed by the foilowinq vate:
11YESt BOVAS. BUSHORE~ FRY, HERBST, 1CING, LA CLAIRE, MC BURNEY
NOESs NONE
l1B8ENT s NONE
Jack Whito, Assistant City Attorney, preaonted the writter~ riqht to appeal the
Planning Commiasion's decision aithin 22 ciays to the City Council.
~,. ' ' t
82-413
MINUTE9 ~ 11N1~HRZM CIT7f PLANt'lIN(i COMMI88ION, 1-uguet 9, 19H2
2361
ITEM NO. 3s RIR N~1-TIV$ DBCI.)1RJ-TION AND CONDITIONAL USE PSRMIT NO•
pUBLIC H811RING. OWNER~ SOUTHERI~ C1~I+IFOfiNIA DISTRI~T OF LiITHERAN
CHURCH-MISSOU'RI BYNOD c/o HEPHATHA LUTti~R~1N ~HU~H-a~ H~'iD~N. 5900 L. Sante
DAVIG L.
Ana Cenyon Road, Maheim, CA 92807. 7-GLNTs Hl-LABI-LEVINBON 6 1-SSOC.-
LEVINBON, 1671 (8) E• Lincoln Avenue, Oranqe, CA 92665. Property described ae
A rect~-ngulerly-aha~ed percel o~ land coneietiny o! appror.i~nately 4.2 acres,
5900 E. 8ante Ann Csnyon Road (Nephdtha Lutheran Churah).
To pern-it e private day school (Gradea K throuqh e) with a maximum anrollment
o! 370 children.
There wer~s two peraons indiceting their praser~ce in appoeition t~~ aubject
request ~nd altho~in thiteie~referred ta end rnadennnpart o~thencrinuCest read
at the public hae 9~
Deve Levinaon, aqent, stated revised plene have beAn aubmittod whtch he
thought setisfied all the concernA.
Mel Green, 135 Lenndro Street, Anaheim, atdted hie pro~erty is loceted
immediately to the east of subject property and he was concerned about the
heiqht of the proposed bl~ck wall becduse there is n 2-or 3-foot qrade
BifPerential between their properties. He etated he understnnde a echool is
vital l•.o the educetional qrowth and devpunpl-'A=en for•hthe~n~umbery°gbetuden~sot
feel they nre propoe+ing ndequate pleyqr
pr~~~ea• rHeatedtbd thc twogchurc~.~heslinethetareaWithie increesenintdensity
currently .re Y
shauld be stoppcsd.
Chairman ~ry clarified with Mr. Grr~en that he had seen the reviaed plans an,i
that he was still opposing the request.
~-ndy lvquyen, 131 S• Leandro Street, Anaheim, etated he appreciates the
opportunity to eppear at this public hearinq to express his personal pc~i~it of
view regarding the new development adjacent tc hia propertyt thnt he ~c ~BalrY
reaeonable peraon and does not have a negative attitude toward this p F
for a school ~ite, but he would like to req~~e8tionat riorptonreachin~eefihal
9
].ook into the problem and listen to hia suqq P
decision. He p~~eb~t~Pad intoethe~recordlandiindicatedeitnie9aeditferent6th
and asked that
letter than the previouely submittec] one.
Deen Sherer, Associate Plnnner, passed out capies of Mr• Nquyen'e letter and
read the letter i.nto the recardt copy of the reference letter is ln th~e
Planning Departm$nt files.
Mr. Levinson atated :he wall alonq the eseterly property line w~uld be 6 feet
hiqh measured fYom the higheet grade. He noted they ~id check with the State
regarding the qui~olines since there was a concern regarding t.he ac-ount of
recreat~onal space and was iriformed that there are no stTndeident~ra~nd ~Qtte
elamentary echool pertaininq to the recreational area pe
they were+ aleo informed that the State anticipates that recreation+~lart of the
requirementiB in school will become nfter-achool ac~ivities and not p
sahool recreation. He stated Mr. Nquyen ia aesociated wit'.i Rivereiae and theY
alao checked with the City o~ Rivergide and found they ha~~e no etandarde for
recreation~-1 space !or achoola beyond pre-school.
~~ .
R2-414
MINUT~S~ 11NAHEIM CITY pLANNING COMMI88ION, 1-uqust 9, 1982
Mr. Levinson mtated there will be ~wo racase peziode, ona !or the younq~r
childrsn and one !or the older childrant ena that thi~ recreational epace will
provide 75-square leet per child !or the kindargerten through 4th qrede
student.s end 96-equare leet per child !or thao nd etzen9n ivengtime,~and~thet
based on the numbsr of ahildr~n on the pl~yqr Y 9
theeR fiqures exclude Che beeketball aourt proposed on the perking lot. He
etated th0re is An exietinq eaeement !or the utilities end build~nga 20 feet
lrom the rear. property line and they will be required to provide eccesa ko
those buildinqe tor the Fire Depertment and accese ~or maintenence o! the
trees end power linea•
Mr. Lovinson etated they te~l thay nre providing adQquate buffere for the
residente and indic~ted they did havo e meetiing with the neighboxe end all
neiahbars were invite~ and attended, except Nir. Green, and they le;ft the
meetinq with the underetandinq that every~ne felt they had satie~ied the
requirements, except Mr. Nguyen who atill wanted to make fu~oved b~`1the8Citye
st~ted dreinege will be a part of the plan thet muat be app Y
He s'~ated, basically, they teel this project doea meet all the requirements oP
the City an~ State•
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CL03ED.
Commissioner La Cleire clarified tha aquare footage per student figures wer.e
baeed on the pla,yqround area only enc' did not irtclude the clasaXOC~ms. She
pointad out that Mr. Nguyen's letter refQrs to the claesroom area aldo and
asked if there are any State guidelines for classx'oom area• H~atatedsthey
indicated there will be 30 students propoaed per claseroom.
are coversd by quidelines !ar the pre-school and are licensed !or the 55
aCudents, but tl~at ie completely diffesrent than a kindergarten throuqh Sth
qrade school.
Mr. Levinson atated the State did provide guidelines for developinq a privete
elementary school through hiqh school, but there a.re no set etandarda and
indicated he would be happy to provide the Comanisaion with those suqqested
guidelines• He added there will be nine classrooms plua the pre-school. He
further explained he was i.n error at the previous meeting wh~r~ he indicated
there would b~e only 240 studenta, and there will be a total of 270 students,
30 studenta per claesroom for the kinderqarten through 8th qrade ~peration.
He clarified there will ~ tWTepech olUCannotaoverlaphintohthe elementary
neparate entities because a p
e;chool, etc.
Conmaissioner La Claire stated the request is ~or a privnte day school,
kinderqarten throuqh Sth grade for a maxicaum enrollment of 370 students and
she felt these should be two aeparate reqveats.
Chairman Fry gtated if the request is granted, it would be subject to the
numbez of students breakdown in Item No. 9 of the staff rcport•
Comaaissioner Herbat aaked how construction will proceed, wiCh Mr• Levinson
indicating they will be dQVelopinq the K~.hrough 8th classrooms and the
aclministration building with rostrooms and expuneion of the parking lot in the
first phase of development.
l
; ~
MiNUTEB, 71r1AHICSM CiTY PL71tiNINa COMMi88I0N, 1luquat 9, 198Z 82-415
Commiseioner ~isrbst rel~rred to the 10-loot erae betw~en builclinqs, indiaatinc~
he thought thet could areeto a noisetunnsl and askad what the haiqhr o! the
well would ba ort the ee~terly pzoperty lina in that aree betwaen the two
buildinqs. He askad i! ther.e would be any acceet !or the children to qet to
that ei,de ot t~~e buiiding.
Mr. Levinson repll.ed tha wall wou].d be 6 laet aboue the higheet qreda and
expleined the trees wi.ll provide e ber.rier and it will be elmoat imposeib].e to
squeese through because o! tl~e trees. He eteted the treea are haltwey between
the lence end the building and that aree will not become n pley zre+a. H~
etnted they hed discuaeed a decorative wall to keep the children out.
Commiseioner Herbat sugyested a wall to throw the sound ei~eways.
Rseponding to Chaizmnn Fry, Mr. Levinaon stnted there will not bQ any doore on
the rear of the buildiny.
Comniiesioner King auqgested connacting the twa buildings.
Mr. Levineun stated they did consider that bui: it would create a long
building. He atated if there are children qivinq the homeowners problems, the
situation would not be the seme as with~ a public school because the neighY~ors
could talk to the Peator and the problem could be reAOlved. He atate3 they
would not wa~t e 190-£oot long buildinq bec~use it would be difficult to get
around in caAe of nn emerqency or to maintain the aren. Ne s~nted they felt
with the c~ense trees, they could prov~ to staff, prior to the issuance ot
building p~rtnita, that they will meet the soun3 standnrds.
The rece~ses were briefly diacuased and it was not~d there will b9 no
clasaroom changea by the studenta nnd the children would only Ue out during
the recessea nnd during the lunch peri.ad. Mr. Lavine4n clarifisd the actual
guidelinee for the opetation of the ~school have not b~~^ es*_abliahed e~nd he
was not pc~eitive wh~n the breake would oc:cur.
Coc~nissioner Herbst auqgested t-~nt a eound atudy ahould be performed t~y a
Sound Enqineer end aeked iP the petitioner would be willing to stipula~te to
provide such a study and comply with the Sound Enqineer's recommends a-ith :rlr.
Levinsor- indicating they would be willinq to make thet stipulation.
Comn-iasioner Herbst explained to Mr. Nquyen that Anaheim dcea not hav~ an
Architectural Iteview Soard or architectnrel control.
Coa~uniseioner Souae aeked the claaest diatance of the parkinq spaces to the
property line• Mir• I,~vinson explnined the parkinq lot would be 10 feet from
Solomon Drive and 25 feet fr.om Conatantlne, an8 about 3 apaces in the existing
parking lot wou1~ be within S or 6 feet on the west. He further exgleined the
expaneion of the exietinq parking lot was eppro~ved in 1976.
~~ ~' ~~ ~
MINUTEB, 11.i.alElM CITY PLJINNINO CC"MI8820N, Auquat 9, 1982 82-416
]~CTiON: Com~nissioner Herb~t o!l~red a nwtion, seconded by Ccm~aai~~ioner iCinq
~nd M~OTION C1-RRIBD, that tho l1n~h~ita City Plenninq Gommis~ion he• r~viewed ths
proposal to p~rmit s priveta day-oare ~chool (Grade~ K throuqh 8tfi) with u
nu~ximum •nrollment o! 370 childr~n on a rectenqularly-~hapsd parcel o! land
coneisting of epproximaiely 4.Z acr~e loceted on tha east ~ide of Solomen
Drive betwsen santa 1-na Canyon Ro~d and Const~ntine Ro+~d, end lurth~r
Qascribed e~~ 5900 East Santa Ana Canyon Roed (Haphetha Lutheren Church)t end
does h~reby approvs the Negetive Daclaration lrom the r~quiremant ~o prepdre
an environmental impect report on Che baais that there rrould be no eignilicant
individutsl or cua-ulatiive Advorae anvironmontal impect due to the approval o!
this Ne~,~tlva Daclaration eince the Anahaim Oeneral Plan de~ignates th~
subject property !or hilleida low density reeidential land use~e aonnneneurete
witti the proposal~ chat no seneitive environmentel impacts are involved in the
propoealt that the Initial Btudy submitted by the petitionar indicates no
signiticant indivi~luel or cumulative edverae environmental i.enpacter end thet
the Negative Decleration eubetantietinq the foxeqoing lindinqs is on lile in
the City of Aneheim Plenni.ng Depertment.
CommisBioner Harbet otfered Reeolution No. PC82-152 nncl movefl tor ita paseaqe
end adoption thdt Lhe Annn9im City Planning Commission doee hereby grant
Conditional Uee Permit No. 2361 eubjeci to the number ot etudents baing 100
!or the pre-sc~ool and 270 for the kindergarten throuqh 8th greda nnd eubject
to the petitioner's eCipulntion to provide ~ Sound Rnport by a certitied Saund
Engineer and to comply with any recommendetiona made by eaid Sound Engineer
and aubject to Interdepartmental Comn-ittee recommendatione.
On roll call, the foreqoing resolution was p+sneed by th~ followinq votes
AYE3s BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERH3T, KING, LA CLAIRE~ Mf: BURNEY
NOE3s NONE
AB3ENTs NONE
Jack White, ~esistant City Attorney, preeented the written riqht to appeal the
Planninq Commission's de~ision within ?2 days to the City Council.
Commiasioner La Claire explained thet the Planninq Commisaion doea tnke the
opposition's suqqestions into consideration and would not had voted !or
approval of thi~s project unless they felt the neiqhbor's property would be
eateguarded.
~
~.
; t
MINUTEB, ANIIHEIM CITY P1.ANNINO COMMISAIO~N, 7luqust 9, 1982 82-417
ITEM NO. 4~ ~IR NL3ATIVE D8CL11R~-TION AND TENTATIVE M~1P OF TR11CT NO. 11780
PUDi~IC HEARINO. OWNERt BTUART 71ND BARAH LEDINGliAM, 30 Hleckewen, Irvin~, Ce
9Z714. ACi1sNT: (iSNE L. MILL~R, 212Z S. Grend 1lvenue, I~F Sente Ana, CH 92705.
Property described as en irragularly-.hapad par.cmi of lend consietinq of
epproxicnately 4.47 nores, havinq a lrontsqe of appraximately 85 leet on the
eouth sids o! Rio arende Drive, epproximetely 1200 teet eouthwest o! the
canterline oP Fairmont eouleverd.
Tc, establieh e 7-lot (plua one open epnce lot), RS•Hc-22,000(SC) 2one
eubdivision•
There we~re four pereone indicetinq thair preaence in oppoaition t~ subject
requeet and elthough the stalf roport to the Plenninq Commiseion wea not rend
at the public henring, it is referred to and made n pert of the minutos.
Commiesioner Herbet declered a cantlict of intaroat ea defined by Anaheim City
Plnnninq Commisalon Reeolution No. PC76-157 adoptinq a Contlic~ of Intereet
Code for the Plnnninq Commieeion and Govarnmont Code Section 3525, et eeq., in
that the petitioner ie a cuetomer of hi~s company and pursuant to the
provi$iona o! tho ebove Codea, declared to the Chairmen that he wa-s
withdrawinq trom tho henrinq in connection with Tentative Map of Tract No.
11780, and would not taka pnrt in either the discu~sion or the voting thereon
and had not diacuesed this mettez with any member of the Planninq Commieaion.
THEREUPON, Commiseioner Herbet left the Council Chamber at Z:20 p.m.
Gene Miller, aqent, was pre~ent to anawer eny questions.
Dnn Hearn, 6298 Palo Alto, Anaheim, atated he ia speaking for himaelf and his
neiyhbora. Mr. and Mrs. Gene Hetzel, 6265 E. Rio Grande, who could not
ettend. He atnted they are concorned about the dreineqe from the privete road
down to Rio Grande becauee the nearest exieting drain is the furtheat northern
home on Quintnna and all the watsr from Palo Alto Drive, Qulntana e~nd Rio
Grande ~sbove all flow$ into thia dreint and thnt during the past three
winters, Mr. Iietzel. has hed to cell the city to cleen away a 2-foot high mud
bank into his driveway. He edded thexe is nothinq in these pl.ane to ehow how
the drainaqe would be handled. He added thQ city requirpd the deveioper of
the Grove Tract to the sou~h to put in a larqe 12-foot underqround drain with
an 8-foot qreded cover drain with a 2' x 2' half cemer~t drnin to the weet and
south and esked where thie waCer would go after the SAVI canal is filled. He
stated debris qets puehed into the canal at the preaent time.
Mr. Hearn stated there are a number of private roads in tracts built over the
past three or Pour years and a lot of them now have potholest and that there
are no draina in the road thems8lves end the water doea come down to the city
roade where they are expected to drain.
He gtated he ie pezeonally concerned because he livee at the point where the
!~ighest run-o!f from the hill would be and he wae concerned nbout the dreinaqe
ot the road fillinq the canal and waehinq into his back yard. He stated the
tract directly east of the propoaed c3evelopment had an exteneive amount of the
hill on Rio Grande aome down during the rein~ las~. yeer.
R
~ • , . J
MINUTaB, 1WAHaIM CITY pL~1NNIN0 COMMlISBION~ ]luqust 9• 1982 82-418
Mr. Hearn etated thAy are inter~ot~Q in linding out where the, s~waqe, water
and ~l~ctrioal laoiliti~• will be loca~ed. He s~atad his primary concern ia
vrhsre ths water will be drained end what assurance~ thsre are th~t since thi ~
in a privata drivc which the city do~• not meintain, thet the roe-d would not
be washe~d out into someon~'s driv~way or hou~a.
Hs askad if the traah truck~ would be qoinq up or i! the homaownars would be
bzinqing down hhe traeh ta the point nAjeaant to the equestri.an trsil.
Clann Ridinq, 6246 ttio arunde, l~nnhaim, etated his mein concern !e the eewaqa
and mud problem and explained when the homee were beinq constructed high~r up
on Rio arende end the raine ceme, thera wee a tromendaua mud problem and thoy
could not qet into their ~uees. He etated cere slid nnto hie lewn beceuan o!
the mud nt the c~rner of uuintnna ~snd Rio Grandet and bece-use o! the
eontinuoue drainnge problem they have now, he sees cars eliding around the
corner. Ne stated he is concerned thet there will be n terrible accident wi th
eomeone killed. He eteted they pr.eviouely e~eked for a etorn- drain et the
bottom oP the hill, but were told by the City Enqineer that it wae not neede d
end feel they were given n"rdw deal", but with the addition of theae eiqht
homes, the draineqe down the private roed will worsen the problem. He state d
Rio Grande wes not a thrauqh atreet when he firet moved in end he did not know
there would be homes built theze and he would not have moved in f he had
known, but now cannot afford to move.
Mr. Ridiny eteted he underatends thie area is zoned tor horsea and noted th e re
are no other horse pr~perties in that vicinity and he thought if these eiqht
hanes are pern;itted to have hozsee, the smell, when it rains, would be
terrible end did not think it would be loqical to have horses.
Mr. Ridinq stated it ie anticipated there will be tF~irty-five additianal
vehiclea i'or theae eiqht lote and he did not think there would be edequate
parkinq for khese ad3ltional vehiclea and thouqht they would be perking on Rio
Gzande in lront of his neiqhbore' residencea.
Mr. H9rn etated this plan, as presented, cannot be developed because it
includes a portion of Qroperty to be purchased lrom Mr. Hetzel and that Mr.
Hetzel had nsked him to inform the city that he is not qoing to sell th~
property.
Chairman Fry noted thnt the Plarening Commiasion cannot diacuss that ieaue.
Mr . Ledinqham etated caost of the site ctrains into the etorm drain to the south
and one of the conditians is that the drainaqe is aubject to the City
Engineer's approvel. He etated there will be a hameowner's aseociatio:~
meintaining the private c.~ive. He notesl the plan will be sengitive to the
grading attd the houses wi:.l fit onto the site, rnther than tryinq to a~ake t2~e
site fit the housea. He atated the trash will b~ out front, near the entrn z~ce
and will be entirely acreened in and encloae3. He explnined 5 parking apac~e
are required per unit includinq 2 in the qaraqe and 2 in the driveway and that
the circular aren of the cul-de-sac will pravide en additional space per un it.
Stu Ledingham, owner of subje.:t property, gtated the mud which accumulated in
tron~ of these two homee wae n~t qenereted from subject property but ~rom
further up Rio Grande dus to the new c~natruction anS leck o~ proper seeding
o! the slopea, etc.
__ __ ..~.__...._W.~,..,.,~,~- _. ~
'~,,,;, '~;~ ~.
MINUT$8, 1V~11-ft~IM CITY P?.~1Nt~lINCi COMM1I88ION, ]1ugu~t 9, 1982 92-419
Commis~ionez McHurney asked what typa dreinaq4 lacilities will be canstructsd
!or tihis pxo;~act. Mr. Ltdinqhem raplied th~y have not dsv~loped those plane
es yat.
TH$ PUSLIC H~-RING WAS CL08BD.
Mr. Ledinghem atnted thay ere very een~itive to the problem o! drs~neqe and
will con~truct the dreinage to u~eat city etandard~.
Jay Titus, Otfice Bnqineer, atated there iR en exietinq drninage problem in
Rio Grende Driva which comes moetly lrom Canyon Woode and tracte furthar up
Rio c3r.ande end there was conridersble arosion of elopos, due to leck of
landecepinq end proper treetmentt thet the drainage trom this property
currently comes down e ewale and moet of it qoee into the existing SAVI cnnel
and ie picked up in a drein there end lie did not believe very enuch dreinnqe
lrom this property gaee o~it~ Pio Grande at this time. Ha atnted he hes not
made any studiee 4! what woula be required, but the developer will be requlred
to provide thoae etudiee and to pxovide whatever fecilitiea are naceseary to
handle tha drainaqe.
Commiseioner McBurney noted the petitionor ie aeking that the SAVi canel be
lilled which would elimindte a portion o! their dreinege faailitiee.
Jay Titue dtated fecil.itiss will heve to be install.ed to i~andle the water that
would normally go into that channel. He stated normally the drninaqe eyatem
would be cloeed, but thet would depend upon the studiea and fiqures involved.
Cammiesioner La Claire stated there appeara to be a dreinaqe ~-^~lem here and
the extent is not known or what it will take to correct it. S..a stated on a
previou~ project the Conuniesion lelt the problem could be rASOlved with a
qrading xeportt however, the developer was held up almost two years because of
the environmental impact report. She added ehe doea not think an EZR is
necessary on thie project, oxcept es it pertaina to drei naqe. She added ehe
thouqht thie ie a good project but there could be a lot of grading and it
could digrupt e lot of other th inqat however, ehe sherae the opposition's
concerns about the draineqe. Sh e auqgeated the developsr could save himself a
a l.at of time by providing the infora-ation required even to offer an
environmental neqative declaretion.
Mr. Ledingham stated these are thinga noru~elly done after spproval ot a
tentative tract map when the en gineerinq is etartedt and that thcsre will be a
minimal aunount of qradlnq. He stated they feel thie is not a major zact or a
tnajor piece of property end he wae sure they can handle tho drainage in a
profeesional manner and did not see the need f~r a lot ot detailed enqineering
at thia time.
Mr. Ledinqham etated there is no water running acrose subject property trom
any other property and that he has owned the property for four years.
Commiasioner euahore atated he did not aee how Com~iseion could approve this
requeet with the slopes that axe there, not knowinq how much dirt vrould be
cwved and how it will aftect the other properties.
~'.'
MINUTESi ANAHEIM CITY PId1Nt~lINCi CW+~+lI88IdN, 1luqutt 9, 198Z 82-4Z0
Mr. Ledinqham ~tated th~re is no int~nt to add or subtract any dirt. H~
stetad the prop~rty is a hill~id~ an8 the wetar wilt drein naturally. H~
~tetad th• aanel aa~ not intendmd ne a drsin~ge ditch sncl wes inteMAd ae a
water ~ource !or irriqationt however, it waR bloakad a!! and lalt and as
ddvelo pmtnt ceme,it wa• lolt and ir is partially city-ovmed property. Hs
statad the trsct to the ~outhweat wda raquired to put drainaqe in to take the
water From this property underqround to an exi~ting atorm drain and thet 75•
o! the drninage was propsrly handled in an underqround storm drein nnd the
balsnce callecta in a basin nnd rune to tr~e atorm drain.
ReApondittg to Gommieeioner Bushoro, Mr. Ledingham expleined the retsininq
walle are 10 laet on Lot 1, none on Lot 2, 13 teet on I.ot 3 end none on Lote
4, 5, 6 and 7. Ha expleined two home eite padm are showr~ in error and ehould
hnve Deen removed lrom the drewinga.
Commiaeioner Hushore aeked iP there are any other tracte in the area with
reta~ining walle as high as 13 leet, expressinq hie concern about thA slnpee.
He etated he does not rc+member enythinq beinq alloweci w}~ich required that
much cuttinq into the hillside. Mr. Ledinghdm stated the intent of the
retaining wall is to minimize qrading end the option would be to qrade the
hill and lower the rataining w~ll.
Jay Titus stated he could not recnll any retaining walls that high.
Chnirmisn Fry etated approval would be a co~cspt only and a final mep would
come back, but obviouely there is i draineqe probinm there now and if this
project would add to that problem, e aecond look shuuld be taken at the
pro~ect.
Commniesioner Huahore stated th~~ peticioner has already indicAted two chanqee
on this drawing nnd it ie not correct aa preaented. He steted because of the
draineqe and how the lots are qoing to be constructed, he would not want to
approve e tentetive tr~ct map without knowinq what ie qoinq to happen ~o the
water runoff and without seeing the ped areas and he did not think that would
require that much enqineering. He atated he could not act on this map as
pre$ented.
Commissfoner Kinq stated he felt Lhe yrading dhould be reviewed by the
Comtni sa ion .
Mr. Ledingham atated thia 3s not intended to be a linal map and he realizes
there are some eketchy areas and there is no question thnt there are concerna
pertaininq to drainaqe, but thnt can be handled by an enqineerinq etaff. He
added th:t~ project is not a pad-on-grade concept nnd that these will be cuatom
houses, *.E~ecifically desiqned, and ehowinq pade et this p~int would be more
confuaing.
Coam~iesioner McBurney stdted he ia concerned about the retaining walls and in
order to even qet an area that would house e qaraqe, there wauld h~ve to be a
retaining wall nnd the Cosunisaion is interested in where thoae walle will be
and how hiqh they wi12 have to be.
ea-aai
MiNUTSB, AN11H1EIM CITY PLl1NNINa CONIt~I88I0N, 1-uquet 9, 1982
J~ck Whits~ 1~~si~tent City 1-titornsy• statad the qrading permit is a
diearetionsry p~~ti i~suad by tho City ~-91=°~°~iatebtor~the Plsnning ~'1e
City c:ouncilt tharetor•, it would not bs ePP p n approvRl o! tha
Comtniasion to act upon th~ aradi.ng Permit~ however~o Pa with a clarillastion
tentative map, tha negetive d~claratlon can be epp
thet it i• approved merely !or the ~ubdivision end +~ ruNohetntediilnthe~al
xeviaw would be aonducted with reqard to tho grading.
Commission ia conoerned about the drainaqe patt~rns, it would be poesible tu
add e conclition to the tentatl.va tract epproval requiring Aubsequant eppraval
by the Plenninq Cocuniesion oP a precise drninaqe plan to be eubmitted la~er.
and approved prior to ap,provnl of a final tract map. He eteted it is posaible
if all other queetions are alaneend/stillCheve the citynedequately protectedut
hevinq the preciee gradinq p
Commiseioner Hushore clarifiad that once the tantetive maP i8 npov9dedwith~ut
project could qo throuqh the final staqee with the lots, ns app
the CommiesionheVCOnditione~ara includedpatnthiettimeclarifying thnt it ie his
concern that t
Jack White etated in order for the developer to get appruval ot `he linnl map,
he would heve to comply with ell the conditiona of the t~ntetive a«.;+ an3 if
the conditions he mentioned were included, thoy could not record th~ finsl map
nor eell the lot.s until thoee co~d~iTi~V~ewa~~dmnt r ve theaeinlanfhbecauseithe
C o m m i e s i o n is not the onl.y ~Y PP p
HQ explained the
City Engineer ia responsitle for the qrading permits.
e,pproval would be for the eubdiviston of the lnnd and if it cen~^t be
acc~mpliehed bacause ~f topoqraphy, etc., then the final map would not be
record~ed and the petitioner would probably seek revieion of the tentative.
Commisaioner MeHurney stated he would like to see the qradinq plan and tha
drainaqe Pein'takenccare of~esotthere wi.lltnotibe enaerosion9 histcon ernsage
ia ndequat y
have been satisfied.
Mr. Ledinqham noted Condition No. 5 does ed3r~ss the drainage issue and he
felt i~ provides the protection deaired.
Commissioner La Claire atated the fact that there is a drainage problem there
naw indicates L•het sometimss the city m.a~kes mietakes. She stated she wcauld
like to see the drainage plant that she ie conaerned about the cumul.ative
ndverse effect of the draineqe on the whole erea, even though thie project
alone enay not hnve ~ny effect. She clerified ahe was referrinq to the
cumulative effect of drainage fran this property. 3he stated she wauld dqree
with the Attorney'e sugqestion that before any pern-its are issued tor qrading.
the Commiesion would review And approve the draineqe plan.
Jay Titus expleaned~~ethare wouldebe nosprobleoa i~pthevPlanningtCommiaeion pg
the drainage pl ,
wanted to review the study of the drninnge.
I~4r. Ledinqhaim stated he was not aware of a drainage problem caused from this
property but they would be willinq to comply with the recommenciations of the
City Attorney and noted tha Enqineering Staf~ ie rasponssble for determination
og tha adequacy or inadequacy ot the plans.
~
MINUTES, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, August 9, 1982 a2-A22
C~n~ni~eioner Bushore •teted he r+ou1Q not want to ~tert cutting into hillsidee
aithout mor• inPormation es to the amount of qYadinq, the ha~qht of the
rex~ining walls ~nd would queetion whether or not the property should ba.
developed with thia many l~ts.
Mr. Ledinqha~ steted no qrading would be dane without permite.
Comtniseioner Buehore chntinued he !e concer.nad ebout whet effect grnding of
~his prop~rty would heve on the hillside ahove and he Would went to mee moze
study en~ would elso want to know if there hdVR been any o~her projecte with
retein~nq welle this high.
Commieeioner Boues stated ahe could agree with the Attorney's auggnsti~n and
Commieeioner I,e Cleire esked about eppt•oval of tlie negative declaretion end
whether or nnC ~ could be approved nt t}iis ~int end chenqed if neede~ in tl~e
luture.
Jack White ateted 1E the majority ~P the Commisaion feels ~hero would be a
cumulative edverne impect of the dreinaqe relating to thie project in
~onnection with the drni.nege of other propertioe in the area, that is
prQCiealy the typQ of information conGninad in en environm~ntal impact report,
but iP they epprove thQ negAtive dealnratj.on !or thie pruject ~or the
eubdivision of thia property into the various percela, they cannot at e leter
dAte, after eeeing the drainaqe pldn, decide that en environmental impact
report ehau~d be prepared. He eteted the City Engineer would be looking at a
diflerent scop~ of the project in connection with dreineqe and qrAdinq and he
can require an EIR at thet point and that EIR would heve to addreee all those
leaues to his eatiafaction and painted out the City Enqineer is en expert in
that li~ld and best qualified ta make thrt determination. HQ etated approval
of the neg~tive declerati.on would be the ~eciai.on ~f khe Planning Commiesion
as far ea tHeir phase of the project ia concerned and pointed out the
Cammiasion is not lnoking at the whc,le project. He sf.ated the wordinq of
approval of the negative declar~tion should be clear chat the negative
declaretion relates to the aubdivision e~~~~ n~t t~~ tiie approval ot the gradinq
or drainaqe permits.
Commisaioner Bouas naked if there dre other propPrtiee in thnt area which have
haraes. Deai~ Sherer stated horees are permitted ~n hal~-ecre lots in the
Mohler Dri•~e area, but there ere certain other code requirements such as how
far it must be atabled from the property linea, etc. which could affQCt the
issue.
Mr. Ledingham stAted they have na intention of hav.ng horses on the property.
ACTION: Commiasioner McP~irney offered a motion, seconded by Commisaionez
La Claire and MOTION CAI2f2IED (Coanaiesioner Herbst abaent end Commisaioner
Bushore abstaining) that the Aneheim City Planninq Commission has reviewed the
propoeal to eatabliah a 7-lat (plus one open space lot), it3-HS-22,000(SC) 2one
eubdivision on an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consistinq of
a~pxoximately 4.4'7 acres, havi.nq a f.rontage of approximately 85 feet on the
south side of Rio Grande Drive, having a meximwn depth of approximately 1200
feet southwest of the centerline of Fairmont Boulevardr and does hereby
apprave the Negative Declaration for the subdivision portion of the project
only. Separate environmental review ahall be completed with reqard to any
~ ~' _~ ..~
MINUTES, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS510N, August 9~ 1982 82-423
gr~di~g And/or Qrainaqa permitt r~quired. Poter~tal environm~ntal impacts due
to ^ub~t~nti~l gr~d• dilisrsntial• on esch parcei wi11 be rsduc~d to an
i.nsiqnilicant l~v~l by tnitigetion measurao incorporatad into the CCiR~ !or the
propo~ed subdivision es lol.lows:
a) Inst~+nd o! qrading larqe pade !or eech hou~e, each unit will b~
multi-lavel ueing plenkinq and atem walle to the ext~+nt poseibin.
b) Rether them m~s^ qradinq 2i1 slopes, retein.inq walle will be
inetelled inter.mix~c] with elop«± lendsrepinn•
c) Deeiqn control for the pr~~~ect through the use of CC6Rs will Fie
implamented.
d) The existing revine will remein ns presently contoured.
The Plenning Commiseion dc+ea hereby ~ind thet th~ propc~a~ed mitigdtion meaaures
aro edeque+te tor enproval of an EIR Negetive Decleration.
The Negative Declarat~on .in approved on the baaie that there wou.ld be no
ei,qnifican;: individual ar cumulative adverae envizorimental impact due to thes
epproval of thiA Negetive beclaral•ion eince the Anehoim Genernl Plan
desiqnatee the aubject property Por hilleide low-deneity residentiel land uses
commeneurete with the propoealr thet no senaitive environmental in-pacte are
involved in the propoeel~ that the Initiel Study euba-itted by ttie petitioner
indicates no significant individual ar cumule-tive ndverse environmental
impectsr an~ tl~at the the Neqative Decleretion aubetantiating the toreqoing
lindinqs ia ~n file in the City of Anaheim Planning Depertment.
Connaieaioner McBurney offered a motiort, seconded by Commiesioner $ouas end
MOTION GARAIED (Cotmniasioner Herbst abeent nncl Cammiaeioner Huehore
abstaininq), thet the Annheim City Plenning Conanisslon does herebl ~ind thet
the propoaed subdivisihn, toqether with its desiqn and improvemer~t, ia
consiatent with the City nf Annheim Genernl Plnn, pursuent to Government Code
Section 66473.Sr and doea, therefore, approve "'entative Nap of Tzect No. 11780
for a 7-lot, (plue one open spnce lot),RS-N3-22,000(SC) Zone e~ibdivision
subject to the following conditinns:
1. '^hnt ahuuld thig subdivision be developed es more than one
subdivieion, ~ach subdivision thereof shall be submittecl in tentativQ
fozm for approval.
2. That all lots within this tract ahell be served by underground
utilitie~.
3. That street namQS shall be approved by the City Planninq Ueparta-ent
prior to epproval of a tinal tract raap.
4. That fire hy3rante ahall be inetal.led and charged ea required and
determine~i t~ be necossary by the Chie! o~ the Fire Depdrt.ment prior
to commenaement of structural traminq.
~, i
MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, August 9~ 19$2 82-424
S. That draineg~ o! ~ubjsot property ahell b~ diep~o~sd ~f in a manner
sati~~sctorp to the City Enqin~er.
6. That the ownar o! subjact proparty eh+~ll psy to th• Gity ~f 1-naheim
appropriat~ perk end r~areation in-li~u l~es as d~termi.ned to ba
approprisl~+ by tho City Council, seid fe~s to be psid at khe time the
bui:ding psrmil: ii iesued.
7. Thet qrsdinq, excavation, end ell other conatruction ectivitles shell
t~ conducted in such a men~ex eo ae to mini.mi~e the poetsi.bility of
any si2t oriqineting lr~,m thie prc+ject beinq carriec~ into the Senta
l~na River by etorm w+~t~er origineting from or tlawinq throuqh thie
project.
8. TY~at eppropriate weter aesesement l~eea as determined by the 0lfice o!
Utilitiee General Meneger bhell i~e peid to the :.ity ot Anaheim priar
to th~! ise~ence of e buildinq p9rmit.
9. I! parmanent street name eigne heve not baen inetelled~ tempornry
street name signa shall be inntallod prior to nny occupancy.
10. Thet the owner(s) o! aubject property shell pay eppropriete draineqe
naee~ement Peee to tho City of Annheim as de4ermined by the City
Enqinper prior ta isauance of a building permit.
11. That all requiremont~ of Firo 7•o~-e 4, otherwise identified es Fire
Adminiatretive Order No. 7G-O1, wi11 be met. Such requirements
include, but nre not limited to, chimney eperk arrestors, protected
attic and under floor openinge, Clees C or better rooting metAriel
anc~ une hour fire reeist.ive conetruction of horizontal eurfaces if
within 200 feet of edjar,ent bruahland.
12. TTiat f.uel breake ahall t,e provided es determined to be required by
the Fire Chief.
13. T}~at native stopee adjecent to newly constructed homes ahnll be
hydroseedPd with n low luel combustible seed mix. Such alopes shall
be sprinkl.ered and weeded na required to eetabllsh a 100-foot
separati~ of flammeble vegetation from eny ~tructure.
14. Thet the owner(s) of subject property ehall pay the trnffic siqnnl
assesamenr !ee (Ordinance No. 3896), in an amount ne determined by
the Cixy Council, !or eech new dwellinq unit prior to the igsuance of
a building permit.
15. That any specin~sn tree removnl ahall be subject to the regulations
pertaining to tree preeervation in the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone.
16. That the private atreet ehall. comply with the City o~ 1lnaheim
standard for private streeta in the Mohler Drive a-rea and shnll be
fully paved prior to 8ale of any lots in the tract.
, ~
~~ ~
MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CIYY PLANNING COMMISSION, Augu~t 9~ 1982 82-425
17. ThAC a modiliad cul-de•~ac ~hell b~ installed by Lhe develQper at the
~outh~zly tarminu~ o! Cenyon Noods Road prior to the aale o! eny lot
!n th~ tr~ck.
18. That th~ B.A.V.I. irriqation channel sh~ll be l121ed wS.t' ~+dxCh to
the estistaction of the City o! 1lnaheim Parks and Recreation
Department by tha developer, tor the entira lrontage uf subj~ct tract
prior to ~he eale of any lot in the tr+sct.
19. Thdt eecurity in the form o! a bond, certifieete af depc~eit, letter
of czedit, or cash, in an amoant and lorci satiafectory to the City o!
Ansheim, ehsll be poeted with LhA Gity prior to epproval ot the final
trect map to quarentee eatistactory campletion o! Condit.ione Nos. 16,
17 end 18.
20. That ell L•urning radii on the proposed ~rivate etreet ehe11 be
s~tb~ect to approval ot the Firn D~partment prior to the finel trnct
mdp.
21. That the trash atorage arese ahall be canetructed in eccordence with
city apecifications et the entrance ko eubject tract +~t a loceti.on
approved by the Ci*_y Traftic EnginRer ~and Che 3treQte Maintenance and
Sanitation Department.
22. That on-site gradee at the entrance ~~! eub~ect property shell be
subject to review end epproval by tt~+e City Trt~ffic Enq±neer prior to
approval of the final tract mup.
23. That the City's equ~strien trail eneement ghnll be free an~i clear of
any driveway ~r other encroachmente. The developer ahnll pravide for
clear entrance to the trail eesement cff of Itio Grande Drive, to the
satisfaction of the City Packe Di~~ieion, prior to the construction of
the private driveway to the subd~vieion.
24. ThAt a Drainaqe Stud}r shell be ~submitted to end approved by the
Planninq Commixsion prior to approval of the finnl trect map.
Jack White presented thc written right to appeal the Alanning Commiasion's
decision within ten (10) days to the City Council.
Commiseioner La Claire aeked how thoae present in opposition would find out
when the drainege study ie goinq to }.x~s reviewed by the Planninq Comn-ission and
Dean Sherer indicated the Plenning Department Staff can notify those people
who ehowed up at today'e heerinq in writing.
Commissloner 8uehore steted he has nothing aqainst the project, but wasn't
aurc he wanted to vote for approval and atated the city should be concerned
about what is above there caueing the drainaqe problem riqht now and that th~
situatlon ahould be inveatigeted.
RECE38: There was n ten minute receas at 3.10 p.m.
RECONVENL: The meetinq was reconvened at 3:20 p.m.
~ ~.
'-~ ~ .~
MINUTES~ ANAMEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, August 9~ 1982 82-426
IT1CM NO. St LIR N1D(3]1TIV8 DECLAI~ITION NID RECIJ186IFICATION NO. 82-83-5
PUALZC HB)1RINCi. OWNBRs AUTOMO8iL8 CLUB OF SOUTHERN C7-LIP'ORNIA, 2601 8.
~'iqueroe, Loe Angeles, G 90007. A(;1lNT: PAVL J. TfJR2GLiATTO, 2601 8.
Fiquoroa, T.os Angelea, C71 90007. Property d~scribeA ae en irreqularly-eheped
parcel o! land consimting of approxin-etely 3.0 ecrei located et thM eouthwest
corner o! Santa Ana Canyon Roi~d nnd Avenidn Marqari,te, hmvinq epprAximate
trontagee ~t 450 leat on the eouth aide of Sante Ana Cenyon Road nnd 425 feet
on th~ we~t side of Avenide Margarite.
RS-A-43,000 tu CL Zonn to conetruct e tw~-etory otfice building nnd bank.
There wne no one indicet.ing their preeence in oppoeition to subject request
and al.thouqh the stetf report to th~ Plnnninq Canuni~aion wes not reed et the
public h~aring, it ia reterred to and made e pert oP the minutes.
Peul Turigliatto, aqent, refr~rred to Condition Nos. 3 end 16 perteining to the
traeh etorege ar.eas and noted the proposed locetion of the trash bin ia
caueiny aome! contlict with the bank's drive-throuqh windowt~ and etatt
euqgeeted i.t be relc~cated which would eliminata the need Por the ]F,-foot
drive-through lane in Condition No. 16. Ne stated one of tha rscommendatiana
ia that tho drivewey oft Margeritm where the dri.ve-through lanea are located
be deeiqnated one-wny end tire buetere inetalled. He etated if the lnne le
wfr~ened to 16 feet, he felt trnffic wauld tx~ eble to qet in from the other
pdrkinq area which vmu.ld cauee problama beceuae they r~ould not Ine able to get
back out. He etated they feel reloc:atinq the tresh bin entirely out of. that
area would aolve the pr~blem and a 16-foot drive-through lane wo»ld not be
ndceaeary.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSEU.
Commiseioner McBurney stated he felt beceuse of the confiquretion of the
drive-throuqh lanes, he did not think people would be qoing in there and he
did not want to require tire bustera. He steted he would like to ees the
trash enclosur.ea zelocated to a different site. tte ~elt after the cuatomore
qet uaed Lo the drive-in windows, they will uae thet as in inqrese and would
not come back through.
Canmissioner Herbst asked about the parkinq stnlls and Commiasioner McBurney
felt those epacea should be reviewed taec8use it appenra they could be used by
the public and suqqested they be deaiqnated "for employees ~nly". Mr.
Turigliatto indiceted they would he deaignated and identified for apecific
employees.
Commiesioner Ln Cldire clarified that the rear doors will be used by employees
anly and not open to the public..
Mr. Turigliatto responded to Co~anisaioner La C:aire that the Automobile Club
will be cloeting their Placentia Diatrict Office and thia office will serve as
a dietrict office f~r d portion oF Aneheim, Pl.acentis, Yorba Linda and a
portion of Or3nge nnd there would bc~ ebout 51 employees at the Autoenobile Club
and bnnk. Ne explained this o~fice will provide cotaplete member service,
including travel agency, mapr~, routing, insurance claima, etc. He atated they
would expect, durinq the busiest hours araund nonn, that there would be as
many as f iftee~n membera or customere in the office at one time.
(
S
MINUTaB, 11N114tEIM CITY PLl1NNINa Cd~M1I88ION, )~uquet 9, 1982 82-427
71CTIONe Coeamission~r La Cl~ixs c~t~ered e motion, ~oaonded by Caamissionar
Bouar and MOTION C7IARZED, that t1~o Anaheim City Planninq Comu~lA~lon has
reviev~-ed tha praposal to reclaasily ~ubjsot property from the RS-A-43,00~18C)
(Residential, Aqriculturel 8cenio CorridAr Overley) Zone to the CL(BC)
(Commar.cial~ Limit4d 8canic Corr~idor Overlay) 2one to oonntruce e two-atory
o!lice buildinq and bank on an :lrrsgulnrly-shaped parcel of land consistinq o!
~pproximataly 3•0 acres loaated at the oouthweat cornmar of 8snta Ana Cenyon
Road and l~v~nida Margaritet end doea hereby epprove the Neqetive Declaration
lrom the requirement to prepnre an environmenknl ir.,paat report on tha bssis
that thRre would be no eigniticant individual or cumulativa adverse
anvironmrntal impact dua to tht! epproval of thie Negntive Decleration ei.nce
the Aneheim Generel Plnn deeiqnates the aubject property !or general
commercial/hillaide low doneity reaidential lend usee coam+eneurate with tha
proposalt that no sensitive environm~ntel impacte aro invol.ved in the
proposalt that the Initial Steidy eubmitted by the petitioner indicatea no
siqnificant individual or cum~zlative ndveree environmentai i.mpnctet rnd that
the Neqdti.ve De~].aration subscentiating thd foreqoinq findinge ie on lile in
the City of Ant~heim Planning Department.
Commiseioner Le Claire ofEer~ec~ Reeolution No. PC82-153 and moved for ita
pnseaqe and adoption that tlie AnAheim City Plenning Commieeion does hereby
qrant Recleesification No. 82-83-5 subject to Interdepartmental Coma~ittee
recommendetiona.
Dean Sherer, Aesociate Pl~snner, clarified th+st Condition No. 3, as prbposed,
should remnin es worded end th~t Condition N~~. 2 should be 8eleted since zhe
krash location will be ct-anged. He poin~ed out the Tr.eltic Engineer has
requested that the southerly driveway on Avenida Marqarite shall be vehiculer
4gress only with tire b~iaters inetalled to prevent vehicles from exitinq at
this location end asked, if xt ie the Planning Commiesion's l.ntent to include
that condition.
Commissioner McBurney yuggeeted that the lane be desiqrted for inqress only,
rather than inetallinq tire bustera, end deleted c'ondition No• ~.7.
On r~ll r.all, the foregoing reaolution wae pasaed by the following vote:
AYES: SOUAS. BUSHORE, PRY, HERB3T, KING, LA CLIIIRE, MC BURNEY
NOES: NONE
A88ENT: NONE
ITEM NO. 6: EYR NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND VARIANCE NO. 3286
..._._._
PUBLIC HEARING. CJWNER: CHEST~R H. AND AGNES Y. CHIYA, 8002 De Vries, Lar,e,
La Paltna, ~:A 90620. AGENTs HELEN V. GEtJHTNER, ~152 Bon Villa Circle, La
Palme~, CA 90623. Property deecribed ae a rectanqularly-shaped parcel oP land
consisting of approximately 9231 aquare feet, 3169 West Lincoln Avenue.
Waiver of maximum structural height to con~truct a two-etory cortune,rcial
buildin~3.
There ~aas one perbon indiceting his preaence in oppoaition to aubjact requc~st
and n:though the etntf report to the Planning Connaieaion wee not read at the
public hearing, it is referred to and mnde a part of the minutes.
t
MINUTICB, 11N~-NSIM CiTY PLANNINO CaMIMti88I0N, l~uqust 9, 1982 82-428
Richard Certex, 1640 Oranqethorpe Way, llnah~sim, aqen~, statscY the ~tnlL raport
indi.cate4 this proparty i.~ z~ned R8-72q0 (Ree~,dentiel, 8lnqle-Family) and he
beli~ved it i• aoned CL (Commervial, Lic~ited). He statec9 this variance is
necessary beoauee tho buildinq will be located within 150 leet of
single-lamily rsaidontinl zon~ (Aean Sherer ngresd the property is aoned CL.).
Thomae Heatty, 3165 W. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, ataCed his property ia
edjaaent to the e,ast of eubject proportyt that subject property wae
xeeidential pronerty end was rezoned beca~rse the owner thouqht he hed it aold
to another rasteurant chain betore Wendy's came in and that he wea under the
impreaeion that the coannercial coninq had been approved only iP it wee aold in
lota of two with a street down the micldle with the totel of 20 reeidential
pro~. .:ies.
Cheirman Fry stated that recla$eification excluded thle particular lot.
Mr. HRatty stated he would object to the requeat becnuee their only ~cceae ie
a nar.row elley and riglit now Wendy'e hae cauaed a traffic problem to the
ree.identa. He etated naiae is also n concern. Ne added he felt another
commercial use wauld creeto more traPfi~ problema for the r~oiderrts o! thgse
aeventeen houscse. He added there ie a filteen mile per hour speed limit in
the alley, but a lot of people travel much faster. He atated Wettdy's does
Fiave block walls on both sides of their access and veliicles cannot be seon and
it ie d blind corner.
Mr. Carter stated they have provide~ a driveway through thie property to Mr.
Bentty's property off Lincoln ao he hae a much better aituetion. He atated
the developtnent will bc a dress shop and will not generate a lot of noise and
will not be open at night. He stated they have no c~ntrol over the speed of
the traffic.
THE PUB~LIC NEARZNG WAS CLOSED.
Commiasioner King stated he thinka this ie a qood project for this aren
because there is a poasibility the area on the north eide of Lincoln will be
rezoned commercially and pointed out there is a study currently beinq
underteken of the north aide of Linc~ln.
ACTION: Commissioner 1Cing offered a motit~, seconded by Coatnissioner Bouas
and MOTION CARRIED, th~t the Anaheim City ~lannlnq Commiseion has reviewed the
proposal to construc~ a two-story commercial buildinq with waiver of maximum
stzuctural heiqht ~n a rectanqularly-shaped parcel of land consietinq of
approximately 9231 square feet, havinq a frontaqe of approximately 62 feet on
the north side of Lincoln Avenue nnd further descrihed as 316y W. Lincoln
Avenuet end doea hereby approve the Negative Declaration fsom the requirement
to prepare an envirotuaental impact report on the baeie th~t there ~rould be no
siqnificant individual or cumulative adve•rse environenental imgact due to the
approval of this Neqative Declaration since the Anaheim Gtneral Plan
deaiqnatea the subject property~ fox low deneity rosidential land uses
commensurate with the p.roposalt that no sensitive environmental. impacts are
involved in the proposals that the Initidl Study submitted by the petitioner
indicatee no si.gnificant individual or cumulative adverse environmental
i~nctet and that the Negative Declaration aubstantiatinq the foreqoing
findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planninq Depart.n-ent.
~r' ~'. .~
~
MxNUT1!$, A1~111}lLIM CZ7.'Y PL11NN1NC COMY+lI~J3ION, 1-uqust 9, 198Z 82-429
Comn-isa~oner Kinq o!l~x~d Re~olution No. PC82-154 a~nd moved !or it~ pns~aqe
en!! ndoption that the 1-naheim City plenning Commia~ion doas hereby qrant
Varienca No. 32H6 on the ba~ia of the eixe, 1xaLion and aurroundinge of
subject property and that the property on the north sida o! Lincoln Avonue
would not be desirable !or residsntial ueae becauee o! tha hesvy trsl~ic end
tha~ cammercial would be the higheat end t~est use for the lots and subject to
Interd~-partmental Committeo rec~mmendatians.
On roll oall, the fareqoinq resolution was pneeod by the tollowing vote:
AYEBt HOUAS, BUSHORE~ FRY, HERHBT, KING, LJl CI.AIRE, MC BURNEY
NOEB: NONE
ASSENT: NONL~
Jeck Whita, Asaintant C~ty Attorney, preeented the written riqht to appeal the
Plenning Conuniesion's decieion within 22 de~ye to the City Council.
C~mmiesioner Herbst statad oince thia property i.e zoned for commercial usea,
nny uae permitte8 in that zone could qo in without cominq before the Plenning
Conm-isaion end thie appeera to be a much lees intenee use.
Commieaioner King pointe~ aut hc thought this would ent-ance the neighbor's
prop9rty.
ITEM N0. 7: EIR CATEGO~iICAL EXEMp'I'ION-CLASS 11
PU$LIC HEARING. OWNERs SHELL OIL COMPANYr 511 North B!'ookhurst Street,
Annheim, CA 92803. AGENT: D. LINDSAY 6 J.B. BIRD, 511 North Brookhuret
Street, Anaheim, CA 92803. Property deecribed ns an irregularly-shaped parcel
of land consisting of appr.oximately 0.35 acre located at the nnrthweet corner
of Ball Road anc] Harbor Boulevard, 601 West Ball Road (Shell Service Station).
Weivers of maximum number of freeatandinq aiqne and minimum distance between
freeatanding eigna to retnin two canopy siqna.
There wan no one indicatinq their presence in opposition to eubject request
and althouqh the ataff report to tha Planning Commiseion was not read at the
public henrinc~, it is referred to and made n part of the minutes•
Decoeta Lindesy, representing Shell 011 Company, owner, stated theae aiqns
ahow "self-serve and open 24-houre" end that they would consider them to be
directi~nal/informational type signs. He added they did not realize theae
would be conaidered free~tanding signe aince thay are attached to the cenopy
and during construction they were under the impression the siqne could be
installed.
THE PUSLIC HEARING W1~.S CLOl3ED.
Comoaisaioner McBurney pointed out there are otl~er aimilar signs in that saune
area and he did not *_hink theee eiqnB aze in contlict with whet is exiating
and aleo felt they would be helpful to the cuetomera.
~`
~~
MiNUTEB, J-N11Fi3IM CITY PI.~INNING COWMISSION, l~uqust 9, 19HT 82-430
Commis~ionsr H~rbet ~t~ted h• has a probl~a- with the vrording o! the r~qiie~t
"to permit tw~o lrs~etandinq ~igns" becau~e wh~n othar pstf.tionars rasRarch
Planning recordn, th~y would b~ ebla to oay that thes• trs~standinq eiqna were
permitted +~nd aven though the Conani~rion i~ not supposed to oet prseedent,
o~har ~:.tition~rs uoa th~ea as exaa-ples. Ne st~ted in hi.s opinion this ia not
a lre~~tandinq siqn.
Annilca Sa~ntalahti, Assietent Director for Zoning, eteted coda doPines e wall
eiqn end a roo! cign and i! the sign propoeed doee not me~t o.~s of thapa
ariLerin, it ie coneidcrad e freastAnding Aign end thet a canopy i• not
coneidered a building. Bhe atetc~d if the Planning Conuni~sion qrants the
requeat on the haei• that it ie ettechsd to thie type etructure, then there
~ill be no prohlem wit~i fu*ure requesta without the eeme circumntancee.
Commieaioner I,a Claire eteted she wnuld connider those diract,onel type siqns.
It wee nnt~d ~he Plenniny Director or hie euthorized re~reaentotive hee
deter.tnined thet the propoeed project fells within the detinition of
Cateqorical Examptions, Cleee 11, rsa defined in the State Environme~tal Itnpect
Report Guidelinea end is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement
to prepare nn EIR.
ACTION: Commisai~ner McHurney o~fered Reaolution No. PC82-155 and movad tor
its peeeaqe end adoption ~hat the Anahei.m City Plnnning Commis~ton does hereby
qrant Veriance No. 3282 on the basin that i.t te Planni,~g Cortaniepion'e opinian
that theae are not t.aeetandinq aignA end are dfrectional an~ informati~nt-1
type siqna attdche9 to a c~nopy, rather then n wall and subject to
Tnterdepartmental Commi.ttee recommendatians.
On roll call, the foregoing resolution was passed by the fo~lowing vote:
AYESs SOUAS, UUSHOftE, FRY, HL~RBST, KING, I..A CLl-IRE, MC BURNEY
NOEB: NONE
ABSENT: NON~
ITEM NO. 9: EIR NECATIVE DECLARA'PION, RECLASSIFICATI7N NO. 82-83-2 AND
VARIIINCE N0. 3283
PUHLIC HEARING. OWNER: PABLO V. ANlD LAU1tA KNOWLTCIN DOMINGUEZ, 1523 E. 3anta
Ana Street, Ar:aheim, CA 92605. AGENT: D. LINDSAY & J.B. BIRD, 511 Ncrth
Brookhuret Street, Anaheic~, CA 92803. Property descri.bed as a
rectengulnXly-shaped parcel of lend coneiating of approximately 0.5 acre
located at the eoutheast corner of Ball Rioed and State Calleqe Boulevard, 1200
S. 8tate Colleqe Bo~~levard (Shell 3ervice 3tation).
Reclassification requget: RS-A-43~000 to CI. Zone.
Vbrience requegt: W~ivers of mnximum number ~f freestendinq eiqns and minimum
distance between freeetandir.q aiqns to permit two canopy pigns.
There was no one indicatir~q their preeence in oppc~eition to ~ubject request
and although the etaff report to the Planninq Coa~mieaion was not xead at the
public hearinq, it is referred to and made a part of the minutes.
i
MINUTB6• 11N11H3IM CITY PL~INNING CONrlIS6IOiN, 1luqust 9, 1982 82-431
Decost• Lindsny, r~pr~i~ntinq 8he11 011 Canpany, ~xplainad thie is a similer
requs~t to th~ previoua hearing.
THE pUSLIC ttRARING W7-8 CLOS$D.
1-CTION: Coamaisaioner McHurney otlerad a motion, eeconded by Coaunie,lot;er
8ouas end MOTION C1IRRIEU, thet the llnaheim City Planning Conm-istion hae
reviswed tha propo.el to reclseeify sub jeat property lrom the R8-A-43 , 000
(Rssidentisl, Aqr:cultural ) Znne to th$ CL (c:omraercial, I.icnited) Zono to
parmit two canopy aiqns with waivers o! maximwn number o! lreertnnding eiqne
and minimum clistance batween lreeatnnding siqns on a rectnngularly-eheped
parc~l af land consieting o! epproximetel.y 0.50 ecre lccated at the southeaet
corner of Ba11 Road dnd State College Boulev+~rd and lurther deecribed ea 1200
SouL•h 3tate Colleqe Boulevard (Shell Se rvice Station)t nnd daea hereby approve
the Neqative Oeclaration from the requi rement to prepare an environmental
impact report on the bdaia that there would be no a3gnilicant individual or
cumulative adverse environmental impact due ta the approval of thie Neqetive
Declnrestion aince the Maheim Generel P len desiqnatee the oubject property for
ganeral caenmerciel land uaes commensurete with t~e propc~aalt thet no
senaitive envirunmental impacte are involved in the propoealt thet Che Ini:.ial
Study eubmitt~d by the petitioner indicatea no siqnific~nt individual or
cumulative adverse environmenta i impacts ~ ancl that the Neqat.ive Osclerat.ton
substantiatinq the foregoing findinqe i s on tile in the City of Maheim
Planni~ng Department.
Cotatniasioner McBurney offered Resolution No. PC82-157 and moved far its
peesage nnd adoption that the Aneheitn C ity Plenninq Comntissian doe~ h~reby
,qrant Variance No. 3283 on the basie that !.t is Planr,inq Coaanission's opinion
that theae are not freest•ending eigns and are direct.'.onel%informatf.onal signa
attached to a canopy and eubj~ct to interdepartmental Cortanittec
recommendet'_one.
On roll call, the F~regoing resolutic+n wes pxsse+~ by the following vo*_e:
AYES: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, KING, LA CI.)1IRE, MC BURNEY
NOES: NONE
ABEENT: NONE
MINUTEB, ANAHEIM CITY PLIINNINti COMMI88ION, Auguet 9, 1982 82-432
ITEM • ~ • 9
~~
REPOAT5 AND R1lCOMMENDIITZONS
Th• tollowinq Reporte and Reaommendntion etelF reparte were
preaented but noL reed:
A. CONAITZONAL U8E PERMIT NO. 1831 - Re!queet by Dave Pulver,
owner o! Mr. Bare Un!`.iniahed Furniture tor temporery
dieplay of flegs, ba nnera end orher epecial evcnte on
property locateci ~n thA nouth si.cte o! Le Palma Avenue
bptweon White Star r-venue and Armando Straet.
Annika Santalahti, A esietant Director l~or ~oning, ~+xpleined
requests come up oc casionnlly to diaplay tlaqs and bannera
or conduct epeciel evente whore cc-nunerciel uses have been
atlowed in thF indu strial r.one under a conditional ues
por.mit, paXticular 1 y when the permit allowa a number of
usea. She exi lained apecial. evants are not permitted in
the industrial zone . 3he st.ated tho Plenninq Commiaeion
.:an rer,ommend thnt thp code be ar,iended ~o allow apeciel
events when a cond i ti~nel uee permit hea been approved, or
recoaanend that the original approval ot the permit be
interpreted to pera-it such eventa and the diFplny of Elaqs
and benner, or recoaimend that the code not b~ amended and
that the original permit does not pernit such activiti.eg.
Crnnmissioner [ierbs t stated he has always been opp~eed to
this type use in th e induetrial zone, but as lonq ae
Counc:il has seen ~ i t to allow theee commercial usea, the
petitioners should T~e entitled to the oame privileqeR 39
uther coaunercial activitiea in the city, end that the
spe~iel eventa shou ld only be permitted twice a yenr.
Jnck White, Assi.stant City Attorney, stated if that ~, the
conaenaus of the Cammission, e code amendment should be
recommended to City Council.
Commissioner Sushore stated he felt that would be ~~oing
ngninst everything the Commi~ssion is tryinq to acc~mplish
and if the Council wants to approve these uses, this
decision sh~uld a 1 so be theirs. He aqreed with
Commissioner Herbst thet thie is not a qood locdtion for
this type u~e and f elt now the buainesses are finding they
made a mietake locstinq their business here becauae of
accese, etc. and w~nt to correct that c~.istake and are
askinq the city to help them.
Commissioner I,a Claire stated she is not as concerned about
the areas designated by Council for coamtercial uaee, but ie
concer~-ed ebout the illeqal coa~aercial uaers in the
industrial zone who would expect the riqht to display flnc~a
and t~nners and that would d: ~couraqe induatry from wantfng
to locate in Anahe im'e .industriAl area.
~.~
Mltd~'PaB, AN~-H1~IM CITX P1~ANt~tNa COMMI88ION~ August 9, 198Z 87-433
Conuaiesioner Herbgt explained hi• thouqht wae that the
Counail has ellowed thaas conm-arcial uee~ and they should
be granted tha eame privilsgos ao the other connn~rcial usee
in th. city, but agraod thi.s could heve a detrimental
a!l~ot on the induatrial area.
Coarniseioner Auehore ~ointed out it would be di!licu2t !or
the Code Entorcament Of ticer to determina which c~nes were
legal.
Cocamissioner La Claire suqqeated C~mm-iReion recom~nend that
Ceuncil dany thie request~
Jack White suqgeated deniel of thfs pdrtiouler rectueat,
giving tha petitioner th~ ~ption of gureuing the requeat.
Annike Santalahti stated Ahe lied expleined the procedurs to
the property owner and the c~de could actually be amended,
or the reaolutian could be modilied lollowing a public
hearing bePore the cicr Cou~cil, or an interFretation could
be made that the ectivity meets the intent of. the nriginal
epproval.
AC ON: Comm~ssioner La Gl.eire affereci a mntion, sacnnded
by lommC iaei~ne,r King and MOTION CARRIED thst the Maheim
City Planninq Commiesion does liereby recommend to the City
Council that the request for tamporary dieplay of flegs and
bannera and other apecial eventa for conanercial husinesa in
the industriel zone ba denied on the besis that thir+ would
be detrimental to the integrity ~f the induetrial zone and
could discournqe othor industries lrom wentinq to locate in
Aneheim.
A. CONDITIONAL US~ PEIiMIT N0. 1171 - Requeet from Aurnra
Kerley, Sonfarrel, Inc., for termination of Conditional Use
Permit No, 1171 for property located on the north Bide of
Miralome+ Avenue, ap~roximately 705 feet eeat. of til~e
centerline of Red Gwn Street.
ACTION: Commiasioner Rinq offered Reeolution No. PC82-158
anrdinoved for its passage and adoption that the Anaheim
City Plenning Comtnission does tera-inate Conditional Use
Perutit No. 1171.
On roll cell, the forego'. nq resolution wae passed by the
follo~ring vote:
AYE3: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HEItBST, KING, LA CLAIRE,
McBURNEY
NOESt NONE
pig8Et3T : NONE
~.. ~
MINUTEB, 1-N1IHSIM CITY PIJINNING COMMI88IUN, A~~qust 9, 1982 82- ~34
C. RRCI.1-88tFTCATION NO. 80-81-1 - RecTUeac From Surrel D.
Magnusaon, B~y Development Corpor3tion for en exteneion o!
time tor property loceted et the eouthwast coxner o!
Lineoln Avenue and Rio Vistn 3treet.
ACTIONs Codanisaioner King oPfexed a motion, seaanded by
Co! mmieeioner Bouae and MOTION CARRIED, that the Anaheim
City Plnnning Coaaniesi~n does hereby qrant a retra;~~~tive
ona-year exteneion of time for Reclassificetien Nn.
80-81-1, to expire on July 28, 1.983.
n. ruCLA98IFICATiON N0. 80-81•6 - Requeet from I.eoncio T.
Laurel for an extension of time f.or property tacated at
15'5-1595 W. Katella A ~nue.
ACTION: Commiasioner King offered e m~tion, srconded l~y
Comm si aioner Bouae end MOTION CARRIEd, that the Andheim
City Planning Commi.s~ion does herebf grent a ~ne-year
~3xtension of time for Reclaseification No. 80-81-6, tc~
axpire on Auqust 25, 1983.
E. TEN'TATIVE MAP OF TRI~CT NO'S 109d3 and 10984 - Request from
~enneth Glendt. Kent Land Company for an exteneion of timQ
for property (TT10983) lor,ated et the s~~~uthee-st carnQr of
3enta Ane Canyon Road snd Weir Canyon Road and (TT10984)
located approximately 720 feet south nf the centerli.ne of
Santn Ana Canyon Rond, with approximate frantaqe of 46U
feet on th~ eatt side of Weir .;enyon Road.
ACTION: c'ommiartioner Kinq offered a motion, aeconded hy
Commissi~ner Bouas end MOTI0IN ~ARRIED, that the ~neheim
City Planning Commission does hereby grent one-year
extensione of time for Tentative Mep of Tr.dct Noa. 10983
and 10984, to expire on September 23, 1983.
F. COAL CAtdYON SHOOTING SPORTS CENTER - Joel Fick, Aasiatant.
pirector for Planning, presented a memorandwn for
Commission'e information pertaining to Orange Co~~.nty
Environmental Management Agsncy's proparation of a Draft
FIR for the propoeed development of a ehooting ~pc~rts
center on approximately 400 acres of a 1600-acre site in
Coal Canyon aauth of the Rivers.de Freeway• He explained
the County will hald a hearing on the proposal on Monday,
Auqust 16, 1982, and pressnted a letter ataff proposes to
forward addressing collective City of Anaheim
Tnterdeparta-ental Comments peiteiti;ing ta the General Plan
and circulation aince the proposal deletes Senta Ana Car,yon
Roed 1n the project area and elicnt~nates Coal Canyon Road on
the sitP.
~ ~' . ~
.,,,~
..~
MINtI"~1~8, 1~?iAH1CIM CITY p2.11Nt~lINCi COMMI8820N, 1luquet 9, 198Z 82- 435
7~CTi0N: Coaaii~eioner Ls Clairo afle~ed e motion, aACOndsd
..+.~
by Comaii~eioner Nerbet ann M~TION CAItRIBD, that the Anahaim
City Planninq Commission ha~ reviewed Lh~ project deacribsd
in Che Orelt Environnwntal Impa~ct Report tcr th~ Coel
Cdayon Shootinc~ 8porta Center. Th• Planninq Commiusion
recoqnises that approval o! tha propo~ad land usa in th•
County o! Orange would neassaitate a luture amendment to
t'~e t~nd Use nnd Ciraulatic,n El.manto to tha Anaheim
General Flan. WhilA the Coaaniaoian i~ no~. opposed to the
propo~ed land uss and endoreee projecta whiah etimulate
qrowth in the touriak and recr~ational areas, the
Commission ie concerned that the building locetiona nnd
orientations currently contemplated preclude the eabterly
extaneiona o! 8enta Ana Canyon Roed and Monte Vista Road,
as w::ll as the eoutherly extenaion o! Coal Canyon Road,
thereby potentially impeding developnent ot eurroundinq
propertiee such na ti~e Irvir.e Company and prohibitinq them
~ran acceaeinq the Coel Cenyon Interchange. Ae a reault,
the impect o~ theee roedway deletiona on land use plnnninq
!or surrounding p.roperties ehould be evaluated in detdil in
the Draft EIR.
RECE33: 4:06 p.m.
RECONVENE: 7s00 p.m. Hrookhurat Community Center
MINtJT~B, J1N~HEiM CiTY PL7WNItaG Cc7MIMi88iON, Auyuat S, .1982 82-436
BPSCIAL MBE~I'ING 0: '!'t1E ANAHEIM CITY P1.11NNING COMMI88ION
PR88ENT Chairmen: Fry
Coa~mieaionerei Bouae, Buahore, Harbst, Kinq, 1,n CtAir.e,
McBurney
TASK FORCE MEMBER3 PREBENT: Glenn Irving, Juhn Dailey, Pst Kieh, Peul Baetwick
AL30 PRE3ENT Ron Thum~~AOn
Annikn S.~nte~lehti
Jnck White
Ralph Compton
Dnan Sh~~rer
Edith Hazris
Plenninq Direct~r
Aaeiatent Director f~r Zoning
Asoiatent Ci.ty Att~rney
Ass~ciete Plenner
Aasociate Plenner
Planning Coaimiseion Secretary
Chairmen Fry expleined the Mobilehc~me Te~nk Force Committee srr,nt meny lonq,
tedioue meetinge preparing this proponed ordinance nnd t-:dt he underatends
thero was r~ unanimoua agreement of the Task Force mP!~.bers on this ordinence.
Ke expressed Planninq Commiaei~n's thnnka to thP `faek F~rce for their work.
He atated this ordine>>c~ will not provide anawers to all thinge, to al~.
people, but it is a qood start r~nd it ie good es far as it has qone.
Chai.rman iiushore a' the Mobilehom~ Tesk Force c:ommitteo, idantified the
membere of the Task Force an~t bzisfly reviewed the Task Force directiona fron
City Council to develnp a zoning ordinance !or mobilPhome perka, identify
dpecific mobilohome perka which are potential convereions to other land uses,
and provide recommendatione for shelter mobilehome parks in terma of
identifyinq potential eites and recommendinq reloc3tior~ stsndards. He
explained the Tesk Force met fourteen times and hed e tour through nine of
Anaheim'e mobilehomg p+~rks. He stated afker the tour tnc Task Force decided
it would be presumptious to suqqeet or xecommend thet any apecific mobilehome
park h~ identified for canvereion.
Commiasioner Huahore peraonally r.h~nked all membere who served on the
Committee and those who gave th~ir input either by ph~ne or attendinq +«h~
meetings. Eie stated they did make A valid ePfort to coneidex all the needs of
the pa.rk ownere and of the mobilehome or coech owners.
Jack White, Assis~nnt City Attorney, explainad the term "overlay zone" and
briefly hiqhlighted the propcased ordinance, which if adopted, would create a
mobilehome park overlay (MHP) Zonet that it creates ~he ~one to which these
propertiee ca.n be rezoned, roquirinq a sepnzexe aet of public hearings and
appr~val by the City Council en~ Planninq Commission and ~hat everyone
involve~ in these properties, wauld be notifiedt that once the pr.~pertiea ere
rezoned tc. the MHP Zone, uses permitted would ?~e mobilehome parks or
mobilehome park eubdivisions, together with certain accessory usea thet ere
incidentnl to the mobilehome park, listed on Page 3. He eL•ated thls ordinance
would further pernGit the rezoning of property from the MHP Zane only if one of
the findinqa of fact wea made as stated on Paa• 6 0! the or9lnance and that
would epply tn any lend upon which there was a~xietinq mobilehame park or
where a mobi;ehome park had existed for tao years previoue to the application
!'or the rezoning. He e~ated ~rio to the change of uae for any existin4
~..
.~
MINUTBS, ANIIHEIM CITY PLJINNING COMMI88ION~ 1-uqutt 9, 1982 82-437
atobilehor, park, even it it is not rezonsd, ~he mobilmhome perk owner would
have ta lile with the City o! ~-nnheim a Gonversion Impact Report ae eet lorth
oi~ Pege 4, a! the ardinence end e copy of thd report woul~ have to be made
evailnble ta each rasident !ilteen (15) dsye prior tc+ the public hear.inq nnd
that publia hearing would be open !or coaanenta by all the mobllehome park
ownere nnd ell re~idents.
Jack White brietly reviewed the ralocation be~n~fite ae eet lorth o~ Paa 4 end
5 of Lhe ordinance. He stated it is overwhelming to him to sde the n~~:.-ber of
people attendinc~ thie meetinq, which doea show there is e areet dee-1 oP
intereat in thia issue. He explained the purpose of toniqht's meet ng ie For
the Plannins~ Commission to make e recommende-tion to the City Coun~~lt and
prior to thie ordinance beinq edopted, it will have to g~ to the :ity Council
for e public hearinq, nnd everyone he.re will ha~e had an opport~::~ity to digeat
the entire ordinence before thet henrinq.
Mobilehome Taek F~rce member, John bailey, thanked the City Council for
appointing him to aerve on Chis Task Force. He atated they did work h~rd for
several weeka and had a very good leader in Jerry Buahore and atated he
enjoyod the work end t~oped to continue ta serve on the Taek ~'orr;e.
Glenn Irving, Mobilehome Task Foice memher, atated he aqreed Jerry Buehore wds
an even-handed dn.1 fine Tnak Force Cheirman and he felt bAtween the park
residents and the membera of the Plannir.q Co~niseion, they did come up with a
fair ardinence and it is a etep in the riqht directi~n and protects the park
owners and the park r.esidente and he felt it ahould be adopted ae it etands.
Pat Kish etated ahe thorouyhly enjoyed working on the Taek Forcei that the
meetinqs werp open to the public and they did seek input from everyonef that
they did have oppoaition f.rom the park ownera but ehe thaught they did
overc4me that opposition and the reault is the propoeed ordinance. She etated
everything wae takon inta consideration, incLudinq the coach ownsr's
investment end the land owner•s invrstment. She stated they did come up with
the benefite which they thouqht were quite importan~ whRn a par k is being
eliminated because they felt. it ~ra~ important L•het everyone would be
cc~mpenaeted Peirly. She a~ded ehe hoped ever;ane would re~+~' the ordinance and
agree with the Task Fcrce and turn out again when the public hearing ie h$ld
before the City Council. She auqqested pveryo~e present should enc~uragE~ their
neiqhbors to also ettend becauae it shows they are interested in thQ issLe.
eill Vol •r, 1400 S. S~xnkiat, l136, Anaheim, steted he read the proposed.
ordinance over tne G ek~nd and re~alizes the tremendous amount of wor~. tnat
9taff nnd the commiCte,e has done. Chairnien Fry read the follc~winq letter Mr.
Vallmer had prepered:
"Your propoeed xoning amendment affectinq mobilehome owners is a goc~d
etart but does not affect the crux of the cn~tter. You have not added one
lot in the city zoned excliiaively for mobilehomes.
Your propoeed t+giP Overlay (a temporary zone), is designed to, over n
pariod of ysars, a~ove us out of Anaheim and out of Oranqs County into a
different climate and cultural zone.
~
MINUTRS, 11NAHSIM CITY PI.AN''~SNCi COMMIB$ION, August 9, 1982 82-438
Ws don't wieh to live in the low c~esert or the high dea~rt or in Kern
County (sll wi~hin the 125 cnile ~ndiut in th~ ordinance). We do nnt wiah
to loee the cultural opportunita~• we h~ve in residing in 7~na~heim euch ea
the 3tadiua- and the Conventio-~ Center and the line reeteurante and
Dianeyland.
As I•aid in my liret par~qraph, you heva mede e stert but you ehould
reline the propoued ordinance by not ki~kinq your people out o! town. You
ehould pass your MNP O•~erlay with e ten-yeaz freeze on any removal of euch
overlays.
Your next n~ep sho~ild be to ravtde the Zaninq Mnstez Plen to provide ereee
within the city limita for percnanent MHP Zoninq euflicient to absorb ell
the residente of thoso parks chet thc~ Conanieelon in ita atudies indicate
will be .~kinq for uee chanres in the next decade.
Very truly yonrs,
(signAd) iPm. A. Vollmer"
Dale 8mith, SO1 F. nranqeLhorpe Avenue, 45 Fir,thanked the Coc..nitteQ for their
herd work end paticnae e~id etated he thought tt-e Planning Staff for the City
eP Aneheim wes tho best in Orange Co~nty. He statdd qenerally this ordinance
ie n good thinq and a etep in the riqht dfrection and t~qreed with Chairr,-nn Fry
that it ie not e pana.cea. tie nsked if it would take e request from an owner
to qet this nverley zane changed,just the sa~ne as for any other zone chanq~s
(Jesck White repli~r~ that is exactly c~~~ rcrct ). Mr. Smith referred to Paqe 10
oF the ordinance, Secti~n .0404 which ststeg "n~thing conte.ined herei.n ehall
be deemed to pre-.;lude any mobilehome awner e-nd mobilehome park owner trom
mutually aqreeinq upon different henefits in lieu ot the beneflta otherwiae
required to be paid tc~ such mobilehome owner by this aection", and asked it
that meane it can be worked either way.
Jack White explainpd if both parties mutually agreed to anything, that would
be agreenble. He ateted the ordinance fe not tryinq to stop both sides from
qetting togather to work out a deel.
Nr. Smith asked if a mobilehome ie too old to be moved to another mobilehQme
park, would the owner of *he park atill be required to pay the c~ovinq costs.
Mr. White replied they would have to pay the coete anyway.
Mr. Smith stnted h~ aqreed that peopl.~ ahould not be raising falae ~~~pea and
he aqreed that there is ~lenty of time to revie~ the ordinnnce before the City
Council heerings, but he wnnted to say that for a retired person living below
the proverty level, juat e little bit of hope ia better than none at all. He
etated e majority of the a~obilehome owners, do not want a hand-out but they
want a hand and he thouqht this ordinanc~ iB a atep in the riqht dir.ection and
that it cAri be cnorally justif.ied, even thvuqh there arp dcxne radical ~ROple
who eay it cennot be juetitied. Ne etated if the City of Anaheim decided to
put a street throuqh e park and move aut all the mobilehort«s, they would havs
to completely compensate the people who live there and the owner of the park
end thut thia ordinnnce doesn't do t.nnt, but it doee easc the burc3en. He
stated he thouqht it ia a ~eal qood ordinance and he will be at the City
Council rearinq.
~r #.. ` ~~
MrNU..r'S, 11N1WSIM CITY PLIINNING CafM1I8820N, August 9, 1982 82-439
Jeck Whita axplained the ovsrlay sone i~ ee p~rmAnent as eny type zoning in
tha City o! Anaheim and once it ia appli~~+, that pxoperty can only be used !nr
e mobilehame ~rk or a n-obilehome park aubdivieion indalinitaly and tha only
thing the-t can reaiove that is a lull blown reaoninq o! the property and lrom e
leqA1 standpoint that is all the City can do.
Patricin Hurley, 300 W. 1Ce~te11.., 3paue 40, Riveria Mobilehome Park, ata~ed she
is epeaking for the workinq people who livn in mubilehome perk$t thst ehe
worke in Buena Park end if ehe wds moved 1Z5 miles nway, ehe could not koep
har job and she could not tind another job because she is tu~ young to be
coneidar~d e eenior citizen end too old to find a job. She neked thet the
w~rking people be taken into coneideratior-.
Pat Kish explained the workinq people were diecueaed c5uring the Taek Force
meetingi and thnt an attorney hna sugqeated n 500-ntile radius end aftar much
d~•r.uaeion, the Tesk Force reeched a cans4neus thet the 125 miles i~s moro
realistic~ however, thal doein't mean a person would be moved 125 milea and it
juet mc-ana the area would be larqer to se~k relc~cet:on.
Commissianer Le Claire mtated when thQ Taok Force telked about the 17.5-mile
radius, it waa their coneensus that some people would want to move to pleces
like Santa AazUare, San Dieqo, etc. anc~ the Tae~k Forc~_ did not want to limit
that radiua becauae thA 125 miles would make more pe~~ple happy anQ that no one
hae to move 125 miles nway.
Commissioner Euahare stated the Tesk Force is attll xeekinq public input and
ideas that can be incorpornted inCo the ordinan~:e that will aolve specific
problems.
Jack ~lhitie stated th~ Plenning Commisaion recommendation cr-n be that the City
Council adopt th!.s ordinence in ite entirety, or with modific•tione, or e~~en
to zeject it.
~7acY, White stated the 125-mile rA~ ue has nothinq to do witt~ where they mave
to and they may move anywhere ~ y wentr that the 125-mile fiqure has to do
with determininq the relocati~ c~sta or benefite to be paid after determining
the avernge oomparable mobilehome park u~on which the benefite will be bnsedt
fo: example thr~e parks, one 50 milec~ nwey, one 75 milea away and ~ne 100
miles acray could be used and thc~ benofita to }~e paid for ccsts suct~ a$ a
profesaional van to mo.~ the coech atc. would be calculated on the average of.
the 50, 75 and 100 miles and that doss not have anythinq to d~ with where th~
pereon decides to ~nove.
Nancy flni~ey, '300 W. Katella (Riverie), asked where these gpaces are located,
indicating there are no epaces nvailable in Orenqo c'ounty or any closer than
Hen-et. 8he atated if the coach ia too old to move, the money to move i*. would
r.~t do any qood.
Cerl Shoiey, ,Riveria, stated the 125.mile radiua aeema to be a bi~ thorn in
ever.yone's sldet t.hat th~y da not want to leave Anahefm becauae tiiey have a
lot of benefits and ~~-ey have worked hard fur Anaheim and epent their money in
Anaheim and want to ~tay iri Anaheim and do not want to move eren 50 atilea
away. He stnted eome tenente are workinq people and the expenee of driving
that far to work eve:yday would be hiqh and tho eaajority of the resideats
~
J ~
MINUT88, AN1WffiIM CITY PLl~NNING COMMISBION, Augue* 9, 198:. 82-440
could not aftord to move eny glece elsa. He et+sCed hs doee not understancl
thie 1Z5.taile radiue. Hb added some o! thas• p~ople nre 85 ysers old or older
nnd referred to one couple 90 years old who moved to Phoenix becauee they were
being harasAed but they ere unheppy there end went to move beck.
Mr. 8horey rsferred to Paqe 5, 8ubsection .04Q3 which indicetea Chat up to lOt
o~ the mobilehome ownera ehell ~e eliqible to receive 100~ of the eatimeted
improveenent coet to rAlocate, end in th41r park thr~t would mean 14 or 16
pe~ple rnd he kncw of pi~obebly 7.5 people in their park who could not e!lord to
pay any of the cuets and aeked h~w i:he 10• would be choser-. He atated
requiring e+ t~nenrial etatempnt would be aasy because all they would have to
do ie put a"zero" ~~n a piece of paper beceuae they do not heve anythinq but
the mabil.ehome thoy live in.
Concerning ~he ~verlny, Mr. 3horey clerifieA that no ct~nngee or convereions
cen bes approved untit e~ttsr thia ordindnce ia ado~ted. He steted their perk
ie gettinq ru~i down and they ere peying the snme rent and are not qettinq the
benefita thF; aro paying foi. He edded he personally beli.eves ~hat the Ci.ty
of Anaheim Hhc~uld do somethinq ab!,ut theee p:rke thet nre beinq let go and
someonP w~~u toured the parks beto:e, ahould t~ur ~hem aqain to see how they
ere goii~g downhill. He stnted thia is ti~~ir. way of livinq and this is the way
they want to live and they cannot efford t~ buy a house.
Mr. Shorey referred to Paqe 4 which indicat~s the Conversion Impect Report
shal~ ir.clude an est:.mate as to the coat to reloct+te t~ach mobilehome to an
averaqe com~arable mobilehome park (coat to relocato means disessembly and
rA-•essembly including inst:+~lati~n of awninqs, akirting, porchee, atoraqe
atructures end other amer iea required by an average comparable park) and
t.ran~portation coets as :~in provided. He explained hia double-wide coach
i^ actually located in a ainqle-wide apace because the manaqer, at the time,
want3d to keep him at che park nnd agreed to locate the coach i.n this 8pgC81
n~wever, he doea not have a cerport becduse there ie no room for e cerport and
axked if he would be gnid for a cgrport, if a carpart ~ns required in the new
park to which he ~rould be relocuted.
Commisaioner Bushore clarified that ~ip to 80! of the improvement COBtiB would
be paid fnr, per this ordinance.
Jack White Lriefly explained the section of the ordinance relating to the
Convereion Impact 'teport and the relocation bPnsfits, clarifying for Mr.
3horef that 80~ of ths improvement costs would be paid by the mobilehome park
owner.
Mr. 3hozey stated it would make everythir,u much simpler to let them atay in
the mobil~~home parke and leave them alone.
P~~~1 Kotch, 23a0 S. Lewis, (Ponder.osa), asked if the adoption oE this
ordinancQ autometically puts ~sll the mobilehome parke now in Anaheim in this
zone and asked what would be the outcome if the park owner did not want his
property rezoned to thia MHP 2one.
,~' g ~ ~
MINUT$8, A~1tt8IM CITY PLANNING COMMI88ION, Auquot 9• 1982 82-441
Jack White ~xplainod this ie v two-atop procedure and the ~firet etep ia to
edopt ~he or8inance~ and ttie saaand atep is to rrsona existinq mobilahane
perks, eith~r all or eome to thie new zonm and thet thet would require n
separete public hearing and thet request could ba initietbd by the City or the
park owners.
John Lnviolette, 5815 E. Ls Palma (Friendl}~ Villega), etated he eupporta the
other commente that have been me~det thAt they leel the ordinence ie n atep in
the ri~ht di.reotion~ that they do tnke exception ta the 125•mile radiue~ that
it is acceptable !or eeteblishing averagee but thinking oF the working people
and the reeaone people have locate9 in Anahefm, he thought ~he actual move to
an nccaptable park should be within n 25-r.,ile rediue and not 125 miles.
Chairntan Fry eteted if a 25-miie limit was astablished, then anyone wantinq to
moti~ to Nemet or eamo placo further thnn 25 milee would be precluded lrom
receivinq any benafits. He explained thia limit is to eetablish a maximum
dietance and rdnqe to wc~rk within•
Mr. Lr~violette atated a spece in tiemet would not be acceptable to him or to
the taajority o! the people in their perk. He etated if he wanted t~ movA to
Heme!c, it his gark was converted, he would feel the 25-mile limit ie fnir and
woul.d be happy to pay the diffcrence. He auqgeated the word "estimnted" on
Sec'cione .OA01 and .0402 be changed to "actual" and that the "80e" referred to
~n Section .OA03 b~e chnnged to read "1QOt" becnuae the park owner ia th~ one
maki~lg the financiel gain and thg coacl~ owner al~ould not be subjected to nny
cc,~l..
Ella Jane Shorey, 300 W. Kstella tTtiverie), asked if tha overlay zone ia for
nll mobilehome pnrks in Anaheim and if tiot, why not?
Jack White explained this zone, i~ adopted, would 'becocne a zone ot the Cit}•
juet like any other zone. The aecond step would be t~ rezone particular
~arcele of land and there would be xnoth~r eet of public hearings belore the
Planning Commisaion and City Council nnd this meeting toniqht is not to talk
about individual park rezoning, but to adopt the ordinance, which is the
mechuniem to qet it on the booke so the properties cnn 2>e subsequently rezaned.
Ms. Shorey stnt9d ahe ia ~oncerned that aome individual parks, such ae the
Riveris and other parke, aould somehaw qet out of beinq rezan~ed to this MHP
Zone.
Jack White stated it will be the s~~bject of eeparete public hearings and the
residents ~f each park and the owner ~f each park will have ample opportunity
to ^ay why the park should or ei~ould not be placed in that particular zone and
he thought that it is probably the beat reason to aeparate the adopti.on of the
ordinance that creatas the benefits and the mechaniam frcm the actual rezoning
procesa. He atated regardless of whather the propexty ia placed in this
overlny zone, in order to chnnge the use of an existing mobilehom~ park or the
property upon which a Mobilehome gnrk was exietinq within 2 yeara~ residants
of that park would be entitled tc+ all the relocation benefits just as if they
were in that zone.
`1r~' 't~,s' °"
MINTJ'I'ES~ ]1N11HSIM CITY PLANNINC COMMI39tON, Auguat 9, 1982 82-442
Me. Shorey eakacl eboue tha ahelter parke and ete~ted e hae never gotLen an
an.war. abnut all the oahoc~te in the srea that ara va~nnt., wh~.~:h are beinq ueed
!or cocna-una.ty activitiee, anc! saked i! thoae echeola were eold by the City.
Conunieeioner Hushore etated L~~e City does not own t~~e echc-ole and the~y nre
ovmed by the echool dietrict which is ~ separate qovernn~en~el body.
Commi~sioner Ln Cleire atatdd the City ~! Anaheim did .ry to purchaoe property
from the Anaheim Union School Disxrict nnd wa• outb.~d by several mill.ton
dJ11arA.
Kethy Wriqhta, 5815 E. i,a Palma fFriendly Vi11e~eJ, atated ahe ia n~t
relocatablei that her hueband hna been dt }11.9 job for 19 yeara within the city
limita and she hae been at her job for 6 yeera and they have 12 and 15 yeer
old auns end there ere no famtly park spacea available and givinq her $7,000
to relocate when ehe canr~nt rQlocete would meen walkiny eway from her ~35,000
to ~40,000 invaetment. 3he ac3de~i the park owner w~uld put 2 ta 3 condominium
unl.tes on that spot whers .~or coach is l~cdted and meke aeverel hundred
thoueand ~9o11ars end tl~nt iwthe::s her. She etated she respects the property
owner's riqht to make a reaeon+~b1A proflt on his invest.~?-ent= however, everyone
eeems to have that riqht, except the mobilehom~ owner and they have invested
too. She stnted she felt it should be ec~ual and if ah~ could not be
reloceted, euqgested that the owner should give her a fair market price !or
her coach or offer her an opportunity to huy one of the units at an affordable
price and ahe did not mPan affordable at ~1,000 per month, becnuse that is not
affo:dnble.
Commisaioner Buahore atat.ed right rtow if the park owner dec:ided to change the
uae nnd gives the tenants ~ntice, they have even l~sas however, if this
ordinance is adopted, the:~_ is a atipulation thet if the park c~wner decidRs he
doesn't want ko pey anything ar~ qives the State minimum ~iotice of one yea~r
ard aita on the land for two yenra, he can d~ that but there has to be some
incentive and the Task Farc~e has tried to do something that ie as realistic na
possible to benefit a~ many people ae poasible.
Ms. Wriqht stated she hes been before the City Council before when the
Friendly Villaqe was trying to convert co "own your own lot" and that was to
be a golden opportunity for the tPnanta, but beaause of red tape end intereat
rates, that never happened. She suqgested for those people who cnnnot be
relocated~ no matter what the n~ileaqe limit is, Chat they be reimhursed far
the cost of the coach 100~. She atated she feels she has a riqht and the City
of Ananeim Pldnninq Coauniseion and City Council has an obliqation ta see that
her riqhts are protected.
Glen Cramer, 2111 S. MancheBter, Spece 64, ateted in talking about mobilehome
reaidents and park ownera, there ia an imaqe created that somehow the
residenta are no~ ownera and he thouqht tho aqqregate investment of 90
mobilehomes and thgir coet on the market today would be similar t~~ the
investment cf the land so both the land owr-era and the coach awners have
inveated and the coach ownera do not wnnt to loae their investments in the
same way the land awner does not want to lose his investment on the land. He
referred to landmark cnees, Vancamp and ealerro, ~rherein one computates the
value on the baeia of percentaqe of increaee and the other on the amount of
labor and in either ca,se their investment is protected. He atated residents
~.
.,..
~~ `~
82-d43
MINUTE9, ANAHEIM CITY PI+IINNINO COMMI$SION, l~uqust 9, 1982
at Ornnqewoed Acr~s hnve nhuwn they care ebout th~ir placee ntiid their
invmetme~nt in time ehould not be lost end they should be compeneated if and
when there ie e con~erAior.. H~ ateted it is not unzeaeonable ta expACt to qet
their lnvestment beck• but they should nleo hav~ justitiable uee a! that money
end the increa~e in thelr velue, pointing out the landowner will not be
aelliny the lnnd et 20~year old prices nnd they are aaki~iq !or today'a rtarket
value ~or their inveetment ~n thei: conches and they ':hink 80• would be the
absolute minimum !or their increeaed coat, plua the actual coet o~ moving•
Mr. Cremer stated they are a~aking for what le re;ssonable end just. He etAted
whan the conunittee l~oked at a 500-mile limit, +:hey +~ew the implicdtion of aNe
etudy thet would incorporete parks 500 miles away to nrrive et nn everage.
ststed ~~ w~uld love a 500-mile radi.us and the.n f ind ane rark itt ^+e-nt~ Rosa
thet would be compaz•able to what ie here and finding the averege for moving to
Santa Roee~ but only a-ove 5 milee away bec~usa he would like to have the
difference of the value in his pocket. Ha statdd the 125-mile limit is a
compromise to bring the Q~reraae within reason.
Judy Graham, Riveria, aqreed wit~i Mr. Cramor and atated nhe objects to the
word "ben~fita" in rhe ordinance becauRe th~y are ~ot beir~g benefited in an~+
way in thls situation and pointed out some people have alr.eady left the pnrke
and taken a fraction of their value becdLSe they cannot. take the intimidation
by the owners. She otated she spoke to the former mayar of Anaheim about
compensating the reeidenta or owners of mobilehomes wholly end he very
strongly stated thac ;~e intended that that should be done and eo did Mrs.
Kaywood, end ahe did not think any thinq leas could bQ accepted and thouqht
the word "benefits" ahould be~ changed to "compensation" and that adequate
compensation in the event any l~~~rk ia cloaad should include somett~inq for the
pain, trouble and harassment they have ~een throuqh, p~inting out that aome
people are livinq in deteriorated pazks dnd they ahould be compeneated on an
individu8l basis. She atated some people would Ue happy to move a short
diatanae if their coat waa paid, but other people have to have new roofe, atc.
to move to a new park. She etated the mab~lehoc~e park owners v~ho get the
estimates probably never lived in a mobilehome and doesn't know what it takes
to make a mobilehome livable again and she thouqht some humane equitable
aqreement has to be reached which takes the position t}~et peopla in the parks
deserve the same consideration for their property rights as the park awner.
She atated that ia what they a.re goinq to fight for.
John Parensic, Friendly Village, stated the:'e ia talk of compensatlnq for
skirts, car.ports, etc. and asked how t4 compensate f~r dignity and pride of
being a senior citizen.
Dee Shubel, 121 S. n4enchester, Space 89, stated she bought a new coach in 1979
and could hnve had a space anywhere because her caach was new; that after
being informecl she would have to move, she took time off work ar~d ser~rchEd the
area for a space and even though the salesman asaured her sh~e would have no
problem findinq a apace, ahe found there was no space for a 1979 coach, but
she was offered a space if she wanted to tzade her coe~ch in for a new one, at
an additional cost of ~8,000 to ~10,000. She stated she cannot afford to make
such an agreem~ntt that she hae worked for 27 years with the same company
which is 6 milea each way from her pregent locetion and that ehe cannot afford
to drive 5~ven find ~es~ace foryatZ979raoach~ a3hewatatedisheifeels sheeis, if
she could e
entltled to a fair rett~rn on her inveetment.
'i~
~.. .~
MINUTES, AN~iSIM C2TY PLANNZNG COMMI88ION, ~lugust 9, 1982 82-444
Mrg. 8hubel rePerred to e n~wspeper artiala ssversl montha ~qo ebout d
proF,oeed rulinc~ whereby a certain percentags ot tnobilehome perk ~paces, when
they become vacant, would be made available !or :•~eale or !or people who havo
to move. 8ha etated ahe hse en +~dvan~age bee~+uae ahe realisas there nxa some
people who hnve coacheE ~ -h locel parke would not even consider because they
are older end euqgested .,onsideretion be qiven to th^ pooeibillty that e+
certain number of epscae could become avell~able in ths parke where e peraon
would not hevea to buy ~ rew mabilahome, but could move their coeah into thnt
epace. She etdtAd ahe neliaved thnt no money will c~mp~aneate her i! ahe l~ae
to move 50 or 100 milen from here beceuee nt her job a~d ehe thought that
ehould ba cor+eidered. She ateted ehe realizee each per4on cannot be
considered eolely on hie own and etated ehe appreciated the tima end elfortc
o! tho poople li~.e Glenn Irving who ie trying to help end shd doee renlize
t.hat the Conanisaion end Committee do went to help.
Laverne Merrill, 124~ S. Aeach Doulevnrd (Tra11d End), etated thie is a smell
park and most senior citizens who livo tliere d~ not heve cdra. She etnt~ed her
hueband ie in a wheelchair and they heve to heve e re-mp and that a lot of the
parks will not ec.cept rnmpa or enyone in wheelchairs. She steted only ~ne or
two af the coachee in their perk would be aaceptable in enother park because
of their ege end asked what they are auppased to du• She aeked that this
situetion bg taken into coneidsration.
Lorrdine Alyeon, Westwinde, atated they have 1-een put out of their pnr;c and
she bought a mobilehome in oregon where hsr ~!~ilciren live an~! sold her
mobilehome here which was worth ~15,000 for ~4,OOOt that she gave a thirty-day
rotice and aeventeen ~jr~ya later was informed that they were noC qoing to pAy
hert that ahe was already packod and ready to movet and her son was ready to
came down end move her. 3he atated she tived up to her obliqation and gave
the thirty-day notice and noted there are five others in the park with eimilar
situetiana who heve given thei.r notices and are atill waitingt thnt one person
tiave moved out end they refueed to pay him bec~iuse his 8' x 30' coach we-s not
considered a mobilehome. 9he stated she had her caach sold, but the people
who bouqht it backed out because they enid they could not stnnd the harasement
that srie hae qone throuqh becauso they were senior citizen~ and noted ehe is
almost 70 ~~ears old. She asked if having to sit here with all the boxes
packed is fair and asked if that is what all th~se oth~r r.eaidents will have
to go throuqh.
I.ucy Miller atated she ia not cryinq today; tt~at shQ is madt thet she qave
~otice on February 27t.h thet ehe had found a hou~e and they werA aupposed to
take ovcr her mortqaqe and ~ive her ~3,000 and now she has half of her things
moved to the house and has paid four months rene and she is still eittinq
there because of A lawsuit or something. She at.~ted ahe cannot understand
becauae ehe thought it was all settled. 3he stdted they are makinq paymenta
en her martqaqe but will not settle with t.he bank.
Preston Stuart, 501 E. Orangethorpe, stated ther~e are 4500 plua spa~es in the
Ana~heim area and moet of the neople wha live in mobilehocaes are a proud qroup
of people who are providing for themselves end do not throw themselves on the
mercy of the City and he ia proud to be a member of that group. He atated
they are now operatinq under Conditional Use Permit No. 78 with no time limit
and asked how that would compare with the MHP 7•one pertaining to a time limit
end what additionnl protection they would have under L•his zone~.
M=N~JTgg, 1-I~U1HaIM CITY PL7INNIN(' COMMIISSION, AuguoC 9, 198Z 82-445
Jack Whits oxplaineQ any park soned into tha MFW Zono can only be usee! !or +s
mobil~home pr n~bilehome park eubdiviaion until euoh tiime as ths proparty ie
resonsd and currently i! thia park is axis~inq under e conditional usa per~ait,
it haa an unAerlyinq aone and thsre is no requirem~nt by lsw that the exiscing
aonditianel uee p~rn-it continue to be exerciaed !or eny pezticular lenqth of
tinta and th• ownsr could decif.e tomorrow to changa the use to a use pertnited
under tho underlying zonA end could get buildi.ng pormite with~ut n public
hasrinq. He explained thie ordinenc-ie ie to be in con~~anction with the 3tate
law which would still be appliceble pex'tnininq to noticee to tenante, etc. Ne
edded the MHF Zone, in one eenee, doee provide protection in thnt the
res'.dants nra aeaurad thet the nnly uee the property will hr.ve will be e
mobilehome park unless there ie a public heerinq to chanqe the xone end then
everXone woui9 heve a riqht to v~ice their opini~ne.
Mr. Stuert. edded maybe this ordinenc e will give *_hem a little more breathinq
room.
pale Smith, 501 E. Orenqathorpe, as kezd who can initiete tha proaeedi,nga for a
rezoninq into the MNP Zone alter the ordinnnce iR edopted.
Jack White expleiner3 tt-e proceedinqs can be i~iti.eted either by the park ow~~er
or the agent or by the Planninq Commiesion or City C~4nci1. He addod he
thought there will be a recommendeti on trom the Planning Depditment to initiate
rezoning by the City to thia MHP Zone after it ia adoptad•
Dele 3mith asked about the timetabl e for t~tarting ihese pr•~ceedinas end nsked
if d recommendation will be me-de by the Planning Comm3.asion an any of the
parks and if so. how many?
Chairman Fry stated the Coaanission probably will n~t make any recQmmendations
until euch time es an evalu~tion i.s made by the Plenntng staff.
Canmisaioner HuRhore stateA the or d ina-nce will give the City the vehicle 1n
which t., rezone the perks and it would he hia intent that once the ordinance
ie adopted, in order to give eome pedce of minrl and breathing r.ooa- to these
tenante, that the City would actua 1 ly initiate iezoning nll of tha parka. He
steted after looking at several of these older pa;ka and what staff considEred
poasible pot~ntial for aonvereions• the Task Force felt they did not want to
be the catalyst to init :nte the converaion of ti~oee perks; th+~t if the Taek
Force had said they looked at 9 paz-ke and eqreed that five were potential
conversions, he felt thet would have alerted tha lend owner or apeculator to
corne in and etart to rezone the park. He stated this ordinance will establish
som~e n-inimum ruleat thet when the Task Force wea appointed, everyone was told
what the deciaion would probably be~ and the Taek Force attea~pted to qet as
emtch as they could from the mobileT~ome park ownere up front and to preaume
thnt the Task FoXCe could have done any more is not realietic and nothinq
would have b~en accompliehed nnd thie may not be 100 i of what ia desirable,
but et leaet i.t is e atart.
Mr. S1Q-ith etated he understood the Taek Force had problema with ownere and
attorneys and that they took up a lot of their time. He stated if the
requiren~nt ia that the owners mus t request a raclassification to thie MHP
Zone, he did not think they would ever do it and asked if the Planninq
Co:~+isaion will initiate the proceedinqe.
~.
82-44G
MINU'PEB. ANIIHEIM CZTY 1~I.11NNING CONQAI~SION, I-uguet 9, 1982
Jaak White e~ated the an~wer is probably y~!a nnd th~ Citn ~a f~~onlo!'bthe
working on that loeu• and Mill come backrinuae~~as~~ntopthet xone.
ordinance with re~oninq of epca~ o! the p pd
1-nniks 8nntelehti~ Aseistant Direccar, eteted r-ormnl adoption o! the ordinanae
by tha City Council would be require~d tollowing the Plenn~ng Caaimiesion
hearing end the MHP Zone would not be eftective t ntil Noveml~ex 4 end the next
public hearing balora the planning Conanission to xscone eny mobilahome perk
would be on Novembar 15th snd lollowing the normal procedures and a wsuming
there are no problema,no mobilehome park in Anaheim could ectually bis rezongd
until about the 20th ot Jdnuary and because there are 32 parka, it i s
impone ible for the Planning pepertment to rezone all tha parks at one time.
8he atated she wuuld entieipate there would probably bo some+ ~ort o! lietinq
as to whet p~nd8thatlwill probnbly beadiscuaseddwithnthdiTeskhFor eufiret.
rons iderod,
Mz. F landers, Midway Trailer Court, aaked if thie meetinq perteina to rezoning
mobil ehome perka to commercial usea with Chairmen Fry =~$P°ria~ks couldibonot
the intent. Mr. Flnndeza aeked if the exieting mobilQhome pe-
Chairman
rezon ed for commercial propertiea if this overley zone is ndopted.
Fry stated that is possible. Mr. Flendeze etated everyone is worried about
heving to move and asked what the Planning Commiasioners would do if someone
~old thamdtihi$~WQUld be theisamemas rezoningtthesepmobilehome p rk s end n~d
nnd atate
etate d he did ~ct think that is quite fair.
Commiseioner Herbat stated every pr~perty owrier IldB the riqht to esk for a
zone chdnge on his property, but that doeB not m~an it will I~e appr oved. H~~
added e~me people have been notiFied to mave end this ia w!zat atnrted thie
iesue and he felt because the City ie involved and ia concerned nbout the
tenants' we11 being, tx-gse p~:blic heerinqs are to Provide the protection
dese rved and this ordi.nance will protect them from being discriminated aqainst
aa far ea the City can leqally do it. He stated park ownere have tried to
make people move out of their homea and the Planning CoGUnission ha s agid "no"
and as Ci•cy officials do try and solve problems where it is lair to both
sides. He added he thouqht it is qreat that thie many people have come out to
help the Planning Coaanission make the right deci~ion•
Rick Solenski, 1009 S. Harbor (Orangeqrove Park), stated he has a 1976 coach
and tiae founaeked~ifnthereeisianYrwaY~thdyn°oulduqethinto th 8e sp8C~8~out by
dealera and
Pat Kieh stated the individuel residents would not be required to seek out
ava ilable epacea, but that would be the responsibility placetl on the park
owners or the developer -aha is aeekinq to chanqg the use of the park and that
would be one of the many r~.,~*'ictions built into this ordinancCouncilwould
have to be aomPlied with prior to Plenning Conunission or Gity
approval• d hQS~tpblento cocnehbefore th e9overnmentalsbody~tof requesttthee
epaces woul
change ~
Nlr. Soleneki stated their park qave everyone notices in February 1981 to be
out by Februa ~n8~°nstateddthe Planning1C~sa onrcannot8enswertle9a19e
noticea~ Cha Y
sluestions.
J
E
MINUTEB, 1W11tt1CZM CITY PLANNINQ COMMI88ION, Auqust 9, 1982 82-4A7
7-n uniQdntilied lady trom tha eame park statecl they wers told th~re i~ e
a-or~torituni that the managera Cold them slter sll thie io over, they could
give them 60-days notice ~nd they weuld have to mover nnd thet just e!ew
montha ego thwy t~ld thew the park wauld etay as it is end now they aay they
will be cloAinq becauKe they ere th~re under e conditional uee parmit.
Commiss~oner La Claire state~ i! thie ordinance ia adopted, it will. •atequsrd
thie type+ aituation end thet ie one o! the retiaons !or trying to qet it
epproved quick 1 y ne poasiblo and ehe weg nat eure what the perk ownere could
do betore it iis edopted.
Commiestoner Herbet et.ated eny reaoning of the mobilehomo park would be txifore
th~ Planninq Co~nniseion and noted the Pl.nnninq Commiesion hue not seen any
requeace tor n ahange irom thet park. The unidentified lndy eteted they have
been rold that the owner hes already r~equeetod n chenye at use nnd a lot ot
people have sold their c:oachea very ct~eep.
Annika Sentalahti expleinod to ac~ually pe~s the ordinence take~ nbout 30
day~, iqnorin q the pub11G hearing. Sh~~ stnted she believed the Orengegrove
Perk clid give e notice o! intent laet ~~ear. ihe unidentiPied ledy statad they
have given not ica- but it went past the dete enu r.he ownera changod it because
they eaid they c~uld not a~Fford the high interest.
THE PUHLIC HEARING WA3 CT,03FD.
Co~nmission~r H erbet etated the one point: of contention aeema to be the 10~ ot
people who coulct n~•t yuality and possib]y the 80• of improvement coste and
stated he wou 1 d have s herd timo decidir.~g wha would be eliqible and felt it
ehould be more opecific es to actual need. He suqqeateci mayue it should be
based on thw inc~me level becauee it would be hard to c?raw the~ lin~.
Chairman Fry atated that is a dit~icult ;portion of ,.:ie ordlnancv f.or him and
noted when th e property ia pur.chased by the RedevAlopment nqency, they are
raquired to pay 100• of the feir enerket value at the time of acquisition +~nd
even in an eai3.nent dc-m~in ection, 100i of° fair market value is required.
Commiasioner Herbs~ statsd chanqinq that portion of the ordinance ta 100•
would aolve t2ze problem•
Commissioner La Claire explained the Task Force came up with the 809 figure
after diacus s ion that ~oa-e peopla beinq :elocated to comparable parks will be
required ta have new c:arporta, new awninqa, etc. and othexs may not and would
qe* nothing for the coet of improvea~nt and that eome people qetting the new
improvements would be ha~:py to pay the 20b. She added the Task Force had felt
this 80~ figure would be feir and equitable. She added they had arrived at
the 100! Piqure ba sed on atudiea done in a couple of the existinq parks which
showed there were leas than 10! in thoge parks etudied who could not aftord to
pa,y anything.
Commfssioner Herbst sugqested chanqing the 80$ to 100a and recoam-endinq
appzoval to ths C ity Council and let theun provide a percentaqe. He thouqht i~t
ia poesible that the person who has to move may be happy to move to a pnrk
where he would be happY withdut getting paid for new improvements and it' he is
satis~ied, that is all that really cantters. He added the pereon can a~ake his
own deal with the owner es long ae it goes along with the qui.8elines of thia
ordinance. He added he would eliminate the recommendation of l0i and everyone
would qet 100l~
~
~.ZNUTEB~ A!p-liEiM CITY PI.71Pit~lINCi COMMI88ION, 1-uqus~ ~, 1992 82-448
Com~nis~ion~r La Clair• ~uqqested ohanqing tha estienatecl coets of aesembly end
r~-ne~ealblY to actual costa.
Jack Whit• steted the ditticulty with thet would be that the parson could not
get paid until alter the sctual costo wera sAteblished and that would be after.
they have biten ralocated nnd it was f:h• intent to pey th• psople betore they
have to move. He atated it ie essier to submit thet intormntian in the
Converaion Impect Report by findinq out the eeti.mated coe~t which ia norn-ally
very cloae.
Jack White eugqested khet .04U3 be modifleS tn delete the worde "en Rmount
~qual to 80• o!" in the tirst line artd delAting the words "providing, however,
that up to 10• ~f the awbilAhome ownere should be vligible to recei.ve 100t of
snid eetimetad improvement coete, besed on the mobilehome ownere fine+ncial
nead or other special circumstanaea as identitied in the Conver$ion Impnct
Rep~rt or es epproved by the City heering bodY"•
11CTION: Comaiiaeioner Herbat offered e mc~t3on, seconded by Commiseioner
McB- u ney and MOTIOt~ CARRIED UNANIMOUBLYr thet the Annht~im City Planninq
Commiasion doea hereb,y recomanend to the Maheim City Council thnt the draft
ordinAnca perteining to the Mabilehoma Pnrk Overlay Zone (MHP) be adopted,
suhject to the recommended chengee on Page~ S, 9 ans 10, Section .0403 to read
as foll~ws:
"The estimated additionel coat ths di$placed mobileiiome owner will be
require~ to spen~ to meet an averaqe comparable mobilehome park'e lawful
rnquirements for improvementa to the mobileoohcrepnCasAndmtTOVementgcoatsW~ich
is beinq zelocated (collectively referrod P
The peraon or ent.ity propoaing the change of uae shall establish the
improvement costs of an average compareble mobilehome park by surveying a
representative nwaber of comparable mobilehome parks where evailable
replacement epaces can be identified within a 125-mile rediua from the
taobilehom~ perk to be converted. Theae iw~rovements costs shall be
categorized as to their tyFx!, includinq requiramente for skirting, awninga,
landacaFinq and other epplicable categories. The estimated additionel coat
for each displaced mobilehome owner to canform to each of theae cateqories
sha~l a].so be eetablished. These coete will be eatablished on the basis that
the work ie to be done by a professional contrectnr hired by the mobilehoc~e
owner, rather r.han the cnobilehoa-e owner performinq the work himself. The
information epecified in this subeection ahall be included in the converaion
impact report and shall be subject to review and approval by the City hearing
body."
ADJOURNMENT: Ca~mnisaioner Herbat ott`ered a motion, epconded by Co~nmissioner
Bouas an3 MOTI~N CARRIED that the meetinq be adjouzned.
The meetinq wat~ adjourned at 9:25 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
~ ~~ ~ ~~~~.v
~;l,v~''
EdSth L Harris, Secretary
Anaheim City Planning Comcaission
.~