The URL can be used to link to this page

Minutes-PC 1982/09/08~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~iULJ1R MICETING OF TN$ AN11F1EIM CITY PL71NNlNCi COMMISSION RIDGULAR MIB1tiTINCi The regul~r msetinq o! the Annheim Gity Plenninq Ccrosnie~ion wes celled to arQer by Ghsirman Fry ~t 10i00 a.m., 8eptetnbez 8, 1982, in the Coun~?il Chamber, a quorum be.ing present end the Conm-isaion reviewed plans of the it~me on today'• agendn. p~gg~ Cheirman ~ Fry Connnieoioneres Boues, Bushore, Herbet, King, MrBurr~ey (Coumti.eaioner Herbnt errived et 1:35 p.m,1 fCoam~i.seioner Bouaa errived at 1s40 p~m•) AB9ENT AL30 PRESENT Canmieaionersi Le Claire J-nnikn 3antalahti Jeck White Ja~y Titus Shirley Land Deen Sherer Edith Nnrrie PLSDGE OF ALLBG=ANCE TO THE f~'LAG I.LD BY: Aesietant director !or Zon ing Aesietant City Attorney O~tico Engineer Trnffic ^nqineerinq Aesist2+nt Asaocinte Planner Planninq Cammission Secret ary Commieeioner Fry AppROVAL OF MINUT$Ss Coamdi~sioner Kiny offered a motion, eec~~~ded by Commiesioner McBurney and MOTION CARRISD (Commissloners Bouas, Herbat and La Claire abnent), that the minut~e of the meetinq of Auquat 23, 1982, be approved as submitted. ITRM NO. l. EIR NO. 254 (PRL~VIOUSLY APPROVED) COND" I- TI~ONA1, U$E pERMIT NO. 2322 (READVERTISEA) , WAIVER OF CADE RF~ PUHLIC HBARING. O~P[4ERs WILLIAK P. DRAGANZA. ET AL. 2045 S. Harbor Soulevard, Anahaim, Ctelifornia 92802. AGSNT+ W]hLTER C• H~tG, 3315 Garden Terrace, Hacienda Heiyhte, California 91745. Propei':y described ae an irregularly-shaped parcel oP land coneletinq of approximately 3.3 acr se, 2045 South Harbor Boulevdr~ (Reqency Hotel). To permit a 6-story, 64-toot high, 488-room hotel with acceseory uses and on-sale of alcoholic beveraqea and waiver of minimum nuatber of parking spaces. It wea noted the petitioner had requested a tour-wsek continuance. ACTION: Commiesioner McB+.irney ~ffered a motion, eecoaded by Coanniaeioner Kinq and MQTIC~] CARRIED (Bouae, Herbet dnd La Claire abs~nt), 'Ghat coneideration of the above-n-entioned niattnr be continued to the meeting of October 4, 1982, at the requeat of the p~titioner. 82-460 a . ,7 MINUTIEB, AN11tlEIM CITY PL11tiNINCi COMMZ88ION, SEPTaMB~R 8, 1981 82-461 ITSM NO. ~._ $IR NE(3ATIV8 DBCLIIRATION AND CONAITION7IL U8B PERMIT_ N0. Z364 pVHLIC N~l1~RIN(i. Ot4NSRs WINSTON 7NDU8TRI~L PROPBRTISS, 2201-11 Eaat Winston Road, l-nnh~im, C11 92806. A(iaNTi R1-YMOND ORT2?, 507 N. (irand, Santa 1-na, c:A 9Z804. Pxoperty described na a rectenqulnrly-shaped paroel of lsnd aoneisting of epproximetely 4.7 .~cres, 2211-I Eaet Wineton Rr~ad. To pe~nit an eutomobile upholatcry shop in th~ MQ. Zone. 'i'hera wee no one indicating their preeence in oppoaition to subject requost and nlthough the stalf re~rort to the Pl+~nning Canmission weo nat read at the public heaririq~ it is ref~rrud to nnd a-ade a part o! the minutea. Reytnond Ortiz, eqent, wae present to anewer eny queetione. THE PUBLIC NEARZNG WA3 CLOSED. Commiaeioner Buehoro eskecl Mr. Ortiz to stipulete that there aill bes no vehicles aL•ored outside~ Mr. Ortiz replied the leasing otficer hed made that reeCriction very clenr and that ho would only be working on one or two vehicles at a time and all work would be done ineide the facili~y nnd no vehicles will be stored outeide the facility. Commissioner Herbst errived et 1:35 p.m. ACTION: Ccmm-isaioner King otfered e motion, sec:onded by Commit~aioner McB~~rney and MOTION ~;ARRIED (Cammiseioners Bouea and Ln Claire abaent, Commi.»aioner Herbst abete~ininq) that x.hcs Anaheim City Plenninq Commiasion hes review~d the propoanl to pes'n-it dn automobile uphdletery shop in the ML (Industzial, Linited) Zor.e on n rectanqularly-ahaped parcel ~f land conaiating ~f approximately 4.7 acres~ ha~•ing a frontage of approximi-tely 3~0 feet o:~ the north side of Winston Road, and further deecribed ao 2211-I Eeat Wineton Roadr and doea hereby approve the Negative Declaration from the rQquirement ta prepare an environmental impact report on the basis that there would be no aignificant individual or C:U~'~~~LZlL'aVe a~lveree environmental impact due to the approval of thie NegaLive ~.~eclar~tion R'nce the Anaheim General Plan deeiqnetea the sub~ect property f~r q~nezal induatrial land useg commensurate with the propc salt that no senaitive ~~+~ironmentel impacts are involved in the proposal; that th~~ Initial Study suba~itted by the petitioner indicatea no siqnificnnt individua.l or cun-ulati.ve advsrse environmenCal impactas and that the Negative Declaration subatantiatinq the foreqoinq findinqs is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Departtnent. Commiseioner lCj.nq offered Resolution No. PC82-161 and moved for its passage and edoption that the Anaheim City Plaaning Commiasion does hereby qrant Conditional Use Permit No. 2364 subject to the petitione~r's stipulation that all work will be conducted inside the facility end that no vehicles shell be atored outside the facility and aubyect to Interdepartmental Comm-ittee recommendationa. On roll call, the foreqoing reso2ution wae passed by the following vate: AYSS s SUSROItE. FR'Y ~ 1CIIdG, MC BURNEY NOES: NONE AgggNT= I,7~ (S.AIRg, (BpUl-S e~rrived at 1s40 p.m• ) ABSTl-IN s EIIiRBBT e. ~ ~. ,i '~.~ 8?-462 MINUTESr 11l'1l1HEIM CITY PI.~-IdNZN(i COI4~lT88I0T1, S~4T1iMHBR 8, 1992 ITBM N0. 3. EIR NE~iATIVE DECIJ-RATION W)IIVER O~' CODB UzR~M~NT ~p CONDl'TIONl1L U81! PBRMIT NO. 2366 p~gg= 11NTONIO H. tt)-N(iSI.. ~CT 1-L• 318 N. 8terduet 1-vonue, 4U8LIC HICARING. P. 0. Sox 148, Placentis, CA 92670. !-GENT~ 8T1CpN1~N N~ BW-~~'ORD & A880Ciy_shapad percal o! Placsntin, C1~ 9267~• pxoperty d~scribad as +~ rsctnngu land coneisting ~P wpproximat~ly 1.5 acree, 1450 North Rsd Gum Street. To xetain contract~rs' b;°~ni~~=lAndecapedisetback,tc) rec;uired lot frontege~ and d) raquirad enclosure o! outdoor ueae. Thsre wes no one and elthouqh thc public hear.ing• lollowinq: e) me-ximum lence height indicating their preeence in appositio~i to subject requsst staf! reP~reatto endpma~f~ia9pa~°f~~he minutes~read at the it i~ ref pean Sherer, Aneociate planner, et,nted the Rede~~mit~subjectmtosthen recommended approval of this conditionel use p rt, but stipulations end conditiona listed on Paqe 3-e of the Ste£f. Repo recommencle8 denial ~f the waiver. 1-ntonio Rt+ngel, owner. explained thie conditional use permit is needed in ordex for them to c~~~nWBedg~~ntedaint1970aandptheynwauld like to split tha propertyt that a pe F•operty into three parcels. Ne explained thOePUfoiithe~lastntwelveiyear8~rag and the propcrty has been ueed for that purp THE PUBLI~ HEARING WAS CLOSED. Chairn-en Fry read Paraqraph 19 of the Stalf Roport wherein tho conditiona oP approvdl af Conditional Usehinr~wit othelpr pertYnandcthereehave~beendcodeted the owner hae not done Anyt ~n cna~per shells, keeping o! swine, etc. and violatione with people living aaked if the property oaner p:ans to clean up the property. Mr. Rengel etnted he has not been able the use is temporary stornge and there thnt there are to+o people livinq there to qet building pe='n-itat that most of are free-etandinq et.orage sY~eds and to take aare of the property• peen Sherer explnined this situation came to staff'e attentintoafourrparcglef an application for a parcel map to subdivide this property two et which would not have frontage on ~s dedicated streett nhine~ectiondof prepared to qo ahead with the variance request~ however, upo P the property, diecovered Pee~tvNo~a1153B foundfcertainiconditionsrwereunotn qranting Conditional Use coaaplied with and felt a new °Ppirintithathalldviolationstbe•nbate8xnndine staff recommende conditions requ g ~ He explained the applicent etay not requiring eite screeninq and landacepinq lication. have been aware of statt'e intent wit1~ this new dpp ~.,' 4 ~ ~J' ~4 MINIJTE8, JINAHEIM CITY PLIINNINO COhMIBl3ION, 9EpT1~MBLR 8, 1982 82-463 Cc~nanisoionar Nerbat euqgseLed s Cemporary delay of this heari.ng in order !or th• applic~nt to review this ~te!! r.eport. He statad h• had looknd nt t':e proparty end it ia a maa• and the induetriai area has chanqed and it ir time this property i• cleanad up and prop~rly screened eo that adjoininq pr~perty ownere will no« be ebls to see it enQ el.o that ths propsr oetbacke must be provided. He added he would be wi,llinq to ofter a metion !or epproval if the applicant is wil.ling to aqree to nll the conditlonm, k+ut he would not be in fnvor of the waivere. Mr. Ranqel egreod he wuuld like a tem~x+rery deley until later in the meetinq end stnted meybe hia aeeociete would be preaent by then. Jack White, AssistAnt City Attornay, resporided tu Commieaianer Bush~re that if it ie determined thet the conditions o! approvel heve not bean coalplied with for a conditional uae permit within the time apacified or one yenr, whichevar ie leseer, then the pertnit would be deemed termineted. Coannissioner Buahore atated ainc~ the property ie actually q~ing to be eubdi.vidad into fnur percels, it might be more eppropriate ta consider e conditionel use permit for this nppl~cant's portian of the property only nnd hear the other tYiree percels separately, because o! the paet Qroblems. Jack White atated the application was tor e cond:tional use permit, contingent upon the percelization of the four lota, nnd a pPrmit does qo with the land and nnyone would hove to comply witt~ the conditioner however, if L•he concern is thnt there mey be a ditferent use, this request could be denied And the parcelization requirod firatr however, by epprovinq thls conditiona]. uae permit, the City can require that khe improvemente be mnde for the entire area. Corrv~ ,saionar Bushore etr~ted he hns no problem with parcelization of .lnnd, pr~ i~:ed the lendecaping and ecreening nre provided, but questioned the wisdom of x~lanket epproval an four 8itterent parcels aince it ie not known haw they will be developed and ~elt that ehould be dealt with on a ceee-by-case basie. Jeck White etnted the Planning Cowniseion can impose whatever conditions they feel ecceptable and reaeonnble that would apply to all four parcele and it the operetor ie unable to comply or proposes a difPerent use, he can ~pply Por n m~ditication or a new permit and wovld be required to comply with wha~tever :~itians are imposed. r+C~rIONs Coatmiseioner Herbet oftered a motion, ~econdod by Coaanieaioner Bouas ancl MOTION CARRIED (Commiseioner La Claire absent), that conaideratian of thia matter ba continued unt:' later in koday's hearing. Following the hearinq on Item No. 4, Mr. Ranq-el explained he hne read the etat! report and is willinq to comply with tt.e recoamasnded stipuletion~ and conditione and will cleen up the property and :.ako ell the improvements. Responding to Cnmmfasioner Bueh~re se to when t2~e~ee thinga could be eccompliehed, Mr. Ranqel etnted one portion of the ataff report indicates 60 daye and another indicates 90 days. ~~ ~:~~~ :~ MINUTaB, AN11HffiSM CITY PLANt~IINCi COMFtIS8I0N, 8aPT1EM8BR 8, 1982 82-464 Dean 8har~r explained s condition was omitted l:~oen the atat! repc+rt and ehould bs addad a. lollow~t "That Condition No~. 2, 3, 7, 8, 9 and 10 ehall be canpletad prior to epproval o! final parcel map or within e period o! 90 daye lrom approval ot Lhie conditinnal use permit by the Plnnninq Com~niseian, whichever occurs lirat". He furth~r explained i! the own~r do~e not g~ lorward with tha psrcel map, he would ~till he required to comply with the condition and i! he does qo forwnrd with t~ psrcel map, could not qet epprovel until the conditions are met. Connnieaianer Herbet ateted he eeea no problem if the petitionar is willinq tn comply with all the etipulations within 90 deys. Dean Sherer clariiied thut the Commiaeion is coneidering recommending epprovnl of Wsiver (a), al]owinc~ the eubdivieion without lut lrontaqee, but denyinq waivere (b), (a) and (d). Coauniseioner Herbet clarified that the petitioner underatcod the requirement perteininq to the tight-of-way easemente being approved by the City Attorney's Office tor thoee lota without atreet frontaqe. Jack White explained that norma~lly waivera woulc~ be approved under the conditional uee permit end if a conditional use permit is not required, n varie-nce will be proceseEd nnd that the approval criteria for approval ia the eame either wny. pean Sherer explnined to Chairmen Fry the waivez of :neximum fence heiqht pertning to the Fi-foot high fence adjacent to the street end it ahould be relocated out of the required s~tback. ACTION: Commieaioner Herbat offered a motion, seconded by Caamiseioner Bouas and MOTION CARRIED (Commieeioner La Claire abeent? thet the Anaheim City Planninq Commiasion hes reviewed the proposal to retain contraotors' storaqe yard with waiver of required lot frontaqe, oainimum landscaped setbnck, meximum fence heiqht dnd required enclosure ot outdoor uaea on n rectanqularly-shaped pnrcel of land consiating of approximntely 1.5 acres, havinq ~~ frontegre of approxiaately 150 feet on the eaet side of Red Gwn Street And lurther deacribed as 1450 North Red Gum Streett and does hereby approv~ the Neqative Dwclaration from the requixement to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis tha~ there wauld be no siqniticant individual or cuiaulative adverse environtaental impact due to the approval of this Neqative Declaration since the Anaheim G~eneral Plan desiqnetes the aubject property for qeneral induetrial lnnd uees conaaeneurata with the proposalt that no aen~itive environmental impacte are involved in the proposalt that the Initial Study s~bntitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individuai or curnulative edverse enviranmental impecta~ and tht~t the Negative Declaration eubatantiaLing the foreqoing tindinqa is on file in the City ot Rnaheim Plnnninq Department. : ~~ ~~~ ~~ MINUTEB, 11Nl1KSIM CITY PL~INNINO COMtMI88ION, 86PTEMHLR 8, 1982 82-465 Comtnissioner H~rbot oftered e motion, •~cond~d by Commi~oioner Souaa and MOTION C1IRRIEA (Coemission~r Ls Claire absent), that th. Anah~im Ci.ty Planning Go~aaai~~ian doeo har~by grant waiv~r i~) on th~ baoi~ that clenia?. would deprive eubjeot prop~rty ot privileg~a ~njoysd by othsr property in the same zone end vicinity end denying aaivera ib, c and d), on the ba~f~ that the patitioner e~i~ lated nt the public hear~.ng to comply with c~da rmquirements !or minimum le~ndACapod setback, au~ximum tence heiqht nnd requir~ed eneloeur.e of outdoor uees. Commis~i.onar Herbet oltered Res~lution No. PC82-162 end moved !or its paasage and adoption that the Anaheim City Planninq Commi~alon doAe hereby qrant Conditional Use ~ermit No. 2366, in part, eub~ect to the peCitioner'e etipulations to reloeete the 6-loot high pl.ywood ldnce adjacent to Red Oum Street to ~rovide a 5-foot wide minimum fully izrigated landecapdd eetb~ck and to provide requlrAd ecreeninq of outdo~r usee by a masonry wall or a chain link t~nce with redwood or cedar slate And that ell autetandiny code violutione ehall be abated within 90 deye, including the pereone livinq in cemper shella and the keeping o! ewine on the property nnd aubject to Interdepertnu~ntal Committe~+ recommendations inaludinq en edditionel Condition No. 11s Tt~at Condl.ti.on Noes. 2, 3, 7, e, 9, 10 and 11 shell be complnted prior ta epproval of final pnrcel nwp or withl.n a period of ninety (90) deyg of appr~vdl o! this conditionel use permit by the Plenning Cort~niaeion whichover occure first. On roll call, the foregoing resulution wAS peseed by the following voteo AYES: 80VAS, SUSHORE, FRY, H$RBST, KING, MC BURNE1t NO~'S s NQNS A83ENTs LJ1 CLIIIRE Jeck White, Assietant City Attorney, presented the written riqht *o a~peal the Planning Conimission's decial.on within 22 dnye to the City Gauncil. ~ a w ~ ~. ..:~ MINUT88, 11N71Ft8IM CITY PI,~NNING COMMiT88ION, SL~PT3MBSR 8, 1982 82-466 ITEM N0. 4. $IR NICGATIV$ D~Ca.)1RATInN 11ND CONDITIONAL USE PffiRMIT Nv. 23E8 PUBLIC ti~ARING. OWNER: N'RgDBRICK R. AND RUTti F. BI~CHER, Box 249, El Toro, CA 92630. 11(iSNR't DON1-VON A. V'1~N OV~R, 11691 Nmw Zael.~nd, Cyprepe, Cl- 90630. Proparty de~cri.bed ae an irregularly-.hapad garcel of ldnd consisting o! approxitmtely 2.0 dcres, 2972 E. Le Pelmn Avonue. Ta permit retail eeles of epartinq qoode in the ML Zone. There was no one indicating their preaence in oppoeition to aubject requeet and although the staP~ report to the Planninq Commission wae not read at the public henring, it id referred to and made a part of the minutee. Oean Sherer, Aseociate Planner etated the Redeveloptnent Comcniesion had revi.ewad thie mattsr at their. meeting thie morning and recoa~ended approval (3 - 1 vote) aubject to conditions. Robert Ven Over, eqent, etetad they wish to put in a retail sportinq qoods etore, using lOS of the squere lootaqe involved and would be cnterinq to the profesaional fisherman and hunter end will not be catexinq to younq people. He sfiated tha property is alreedy beinq used ea a warehouae and thay can handle bulk merahandiAe euch as shot for. reloadinq end that e l~t of alub~a huy it in volume. He ddded their traffic will be after normal working h~urs ar.d wi.ll not conflict with the heavy industrial traff.ic in the erea. Mr. Van Over referred to the recommendation to cloae the driveway up~e3te the truck loadinq dock end atated that would make 90i of the building ur.usable and they would not want to cmnply with that reconanendation. He added thnt most oP th~ traffic is into the warehouse and truckinq aspects ~f the b~~sinees and is in the early morninq hourss however, in a rare instancc if thetr neiqhbnr had d 45-loot trailer in their loading dock a~~~! they needed to back a 45-foot trailer into thia loadinq dock, it would be impossible under the existinq conditions without using the 36-foot driveway +~nd the whol.e buildi.ng would be affected by closinq that driveway. THE PUBLIC HF~RING WA3 CLOSED. Responding to Caeuaiesioner Herbet, Mr. Van Over explained 10~ of the total squere footage would be devoted to thie ret+~il operation nnd 208 of the dollar value would be froca thie buainesa, exQlaining the warehousing operation is the mainstay of the bueinesa and that they dietribute Granny's Potato Chips from their warehouse end that these are two separate businesees. Respondinq to Commiseioner Rouae, Mr. Van Ovar explained they would only advertise in trede journals euch ae Weetern Outdoor Magazine, etc. and thnt would be on a small sca-le and thet there would be n~ bannera, etc. He explained to Com~niseioner Bushore that these twa businesses have no~hinq to da with each other end that they have the exiating epace in the warehouae which could be eaeily made availeble tor a sportinq gooda etore where they need room ~or b~:lk merchandlee euch as decoye, etc., and this is a family ~peration and he has been in the epor~inq qoods buainess for seven yeara. Commiaeionar Buehore asked if the agent had been made aware ot the Planninq Caam~ission's c:oncernn reqardinq ratail usR in the ~ndustrial zone. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ MINUTIE3, 11NAHL~IM CITY PLI-NNINa COMMI88ION, 8EPT8MadR 8, 1982 82-467 Mr. Van Ovar raplied he realies~ bulk tra!!ic i~ not we~nted in that erea, but that will not be s aoncsrn hare beoauee the most vahicles he would have nt eny ona ti~^e .ould be eiqht to ten. . ,sioner Hushore pointed out n eimilar type operation for a qolf etore hed ..~ denied just down the etreet b~ceuse i! theee type requests are contl.nually approved, this will become e retail area breakinq down the inteqrity ot the ~eone and he did not see where thie ~peration would do eny qood far the indueLrial area. Fie explai.ned the Traffic Enqineer has recomm~ended cloeing the dr.iveway and that the nqent had admitted thet would a~fect tha warahouae bueinese. fie added tnixinq ueae brinqe in ditferent traflic rnquire~nente which is the reeson t~r the Traffic Enqineer'e recommendntion, end theae little thinqs have a cumulative effect. Commieeioner Herbst steted if thie wns wholesalinq of en ltem made on the premiaea,it would be en accepteble use as long as it was not more thnn 15i of the business, but that thie is a totally new busineee qoing into a t~tally different operetion now bei.ng canducted. He nqreed this would be openinq the door to future probleme. Mr. Van Over stated becauee of the volwaQ raquired, this u$e would not b~ suitable in a commercial center. Conmaiasioner Buehore stated eportinq ga~d itema could be warehoused at thi~a location and transported to a~~othgr outlet in a coma~ercial ar.ea and that enythinq could be etored there as long as it does not create a fire hr~znrd and meete the Fire Deper~ment's npproval. Mr. Van Over stated that w~uld be impossible to do with the staff he preoently has end that there would be only two or three people runninq the operation. He reaponded to Coma-issioner Herbat that the liours of ~per.atlon for the retai2 operation would be 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. end that thAy will sell ehot and powder for r~loading and t~untinq and fishing qenr !or the proteBai~nal baes fishern-an. Jack White, Asai.stant City Attorney, stated this location is in the Canyon Znduetrial area and there aro special rulea which apply, auch as a conditional use permit for co~mmercial $niee would be appropriate only if the use primnrily aervee and ie compatible with the industrial customers, so the Cocamission ehould make that detertnination. Chairman Fry etated he doea not think this use would serve the induetrinl community and would primarily be fo.r the qeneral public'a usage~ Commiasionsr Herbst asked if the petitioner wnuld be allowed to handle the mnasive shot as long as it ie no more than I5l, with Jack White reepondinq that the product hea to be manufactured on the pren-ises. '~ ~ ~~ MINUTlS, 11N71HEIM CITX PI.IINNZNO COM~tI88ION, BEPTEMBER 8, 1982 82-468 Mr. Van Ov~r stcted tha huntar loads the •ho~ himsel! so it i~ not done on the premi~~s. He explainad ~:hey will repair lishing and huntinq equipaent on the premisea. 1~CTION~ Commie~ionsr *tuahore o!lered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Souas an McI~OTSON C1IRRIED ((:onaniASioner La Claire absant ), that the 1lnaheim City Planning Cc~cnmi~sion has review~d t~he pr~~posal t.o permit retail sel~e ot eportinq qood~t in the MlL (Industr,ial, c,imi.ted) 2one on nn irrmgularly-sheped percel o! land consietinq o! approximately 2.0 acres loceted on the aouth side ot La Paln-e Avenue nnd lurther desc.ribed ae 2872 ~eat I.e Palma Avenuet and does hereby approve the Negetive Declaretion trom tha requirement to prepare an environmental impect raport on the be01e thet there would be no siqnilicant individuel or cumulative ndveree enviz•onmentel impact due ta the a-pproval o~ this Neqative Declaration since the Aneheim (3eneral Plan deeiqnates the eubject property for qenernl. industriel land uses cocnmeneurate wit~~ the propoealt that no eeneit~ve environmental impects aza involved in Che proposa~lt that the Initial 3tudy eubmitted by the petitioner. indicates no siqnificant individual ox cumuletive advaree environmentAl impactat And that the Negetive Declaretion aubetantiating the ~oregoinq findinqe is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Depertment. Coa~missioner Buehor.e offered Regolution No. PC02-163 nnd m~vRd for i.ta paesaqe nnd ndoption that the Anaheim City Planning Conanission doee hereby deny Conditionel Une Permit No. 2368 on the baeia that the proposed uee Kould not pr3marily serve and be compatible with the surr~~i~nding industrinl area end thie is tt-e wrong l~cation for thia ty~pe busineee. On roll cnll, the foregoinq reaolution wae peesed hy the following vote: AYES: HOUAS, HUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, KING, MC BURNEY NOE3s NONE ADSENTs Ll~ CI.AIRE Jack White, Asaistant City Attarney, preeented the wr3tten right to appeal the planninq Couaaiseion's decisicn within 22 daye to the City Council. J ~' i ,l`. MINITr68, AN]-HEIM GITY PI.IINNIN4 COMM28820N, 8EPTI~MBER 8, 1982 82-469 ITEM N0. 5. 8IR NEf3ATIVE DECLARIITION, Nl12VER 0~" COQ~ REQUIREMlENT 1WD CONDITIONIIL USE PEMIZT NO. 2369 PUBLIC Hl~AR2Na. OWNl~R: RICHARD B. tiAN80N, ET ~I,, 1751 W. Rdnneya Drivs, MD, 11nah~im, C11 92801. AGBNT: J08~PH RICICMAN, x04~ Ra.inbow Ut-i ve, Santn Ana, Cl- 92705. Froperty described na a rectanquler.ly-sha~ed percel of land coneistinq ot approxitndtaly 5001 aquare feat, 125 South Herbor Bouleverd. To permit commerciel uae of two residantinl structur~s with weivere af the Pallowing: s) required location of pnrkinq s~acee end b) required numbar end type o! perking spacee. Thare wee ona pereon l.ndicating hie preeence in oppoeition to subject requee* and althaugh the eteff report to the Planning Coa~miesion w~e not read at the public hearinq, it ie r.eferred to end mnde e pez•t o~ th~ -,inutes. Jos~ph Rickmen, e-qent, explnined they wiah lo convert an r~xisting aingle-family reatdence into ineurance office~s and that the re+~r residence will eventuelly be c~nverted into nn ~ffice building. Jim Grilfith, 524 W. Cheetnut Street, presentod ~ petition Aiqned by li~teen res!dents on the atre~et, npposinq the request for perking waiver. He atatsd ~he vaa~nt lot acroer~ th9 etreet has a rlqhk-to-negotiate approved by the Redevelopment Aqency and a two-etory otfice complax ie propoeed for that property and thay feel this office camplex will impect the etreet with overtlow pnrkinq and r~oted the etreet is alreedy being 118e(I !or pdrkin~. Ne etated they feel tlig npplicant should comply with all requirements. Mr. Grittith atated he pereonally opposes the project and convereion from r.eeidential to oftice uaea at a time when housea are nt a premium and there F eeeme to he an abundance o! office apaces, noting the ex:etinq buildinq ~ adjacent to City Hall hea e siqn edvartlainy space for leaee end aleo the E1 Camino Bank Building has e s±qn. He stated he aldo leels this will impose en - additional traffic load on the otreett t'~'., there ere more than twenty siaall , c.hildren in the neighborho~d and they do not feel they ~1eed additional traffic. He atated he ia in the procese of restorinq hia raeidance an~ aould like tu know if Cheetr:ut will be cor~vert~d like thie, piece by piece, becauee if that is tlie plan, he will chnnge his plans. Chairman Fzy stated there ia no way to anawer that question and he would hope that i~ not the way Chestnut Street will be developed. Mr. Rickman stated he would not want buein~asee naxt to his house either; however, the property is already zoned end there ia no reciuest for rezoninq. He etated they have the required number of parking apacea on the property and thie project will eliminate some of the parking problems on the street. He explained they would probably never need cnc~re than two or three pnrking apeces. He etatec] this uae ehould not create nee-rly the traffic that any othar busiaess would generate. He atated he did not se~e how the proposed two-story office building would have any beering on this project. ~µr `~ ~ w.,~ 82-470 MI1~VT38, ~1l171H1lIM CITY PT./1NNINCi COMIMISBION~ BEPT~DIER 8, 1982 Mr~ Ri,ckman rel~rr~d to th~ Tra!!ic Bnqine~r'r rocooansndation that ona ap~ae be eliml.natsa 1»aause th~ two end spacss arR oub~tanaarcf. Coauais~ion~r Herbst pain~.d out the proposed parktnq ordinanoe will re~olv~ that probleca by allowing oompact car parkinq spacea. Oean Sherer, Associata Planner, stetad i! pern-its ar~ requ~eted attor the new parkinq ordint~no~ is adopted by the City Council, thare will be no problam, but it is not know~: when that ordinance will be adopted. Tyg pUBI.IC HSARZNG W718 CLOSBD. Canimissioner Herbst stated he telt thie property ehould probably ba deeignnted CO rdther than CG. Dean Sherer ststed cortuaercial generel ~oning would ello~+ oflice uses on this property by riqht and this conditionnl use permit ie only for the office uae cf Lhe residentinl etructures. Cononieeioner Herbst eteted e conditionel uee pezmit could be tied to npecitic use~e and he, lelt beceuae tha property is zoned amm~-e~i~i~Foula beltieddtoetheae beinq converted to of~ices, the conditionel use p apecilic uaea. [dr. Rickman eteted they would want. to use the front buildinq f~r insuz'ance oftices only and would like to meintain the reer residences !or residential purpoees for a period of timn. Jack White, Aegiatant City Att~rney, explained any usea permitted in the CG Zone w~uld be permittad. Commieaioner Herbst eteted he did not think qeneral commercial ueas should be allowed in residential etructurea. He suqqested the front atructure be limited to insurance offieee and approval granted tor the rear atructure when a uae ie estnbliehed• Jack White stated thie is the due procesa hearing when the neighbors have the riqht to know what uses nre propaeed and no public hearinq would be required under Rc+ports and Recaamnendations and the neiqhborhood could not object and whatever uaes ere qoing to be percnitted ahould be deaiqnated at this time. Coanniseioner Bouna dsked if the agent ie thinki.ng of any paiticular uses nt this timES ~or the rear structura, with Mr• Rickman replying they are considerinq profe~eional offices for that atructure. He aqx'eand8remo9elin o!lice could not be permitted because of the lack of paxking 9 would bci prohibitive. Commiesioner Herbst suqgegted limiting the ~ront etructure to enqineerinq, attorneys, ineurance, etc. Mr. Riclanan stated t?~ere ia a conditlon to coHeert the rear buildinq befor.e finalizinq the p~snaits on the front etruature. etated there ie a housing shortaqe and it would be a r~hame to convert the rear buildinq to prole+seional offices at thie time and they would like an extension o! that con~ition Eor one year and indicnted they are Killinq to poat a bond. Jack [4hite atated that could be donet that the code relatea to non-contorminq usea and eince this would be allowed under a conditional uee~ permit~ it vrould not be aonsidered nnn-confortainq and the commercial and reaidential uses could ba mixed. __....__..~..__.,~ .. ~"`,, ' . . .,l •.. MINUTBS, ANJ-HEIM CITY PIJ1NNIt~16 CAlMM1I88IOt1 r 81~PTbMHBR 8 ~ 1982 82-471 tl~r. Rickmsn f.elt thet woula givs the noighbor^ on Cha~tnut a buflar. Ha stated he undarstand• all the property on the north side o! Ghastnut 9treot is ~eoned tor p+irking. l1CTIONs Co~nrti.ni.oner Harbat o!lered a motion, eaconded by Caan~iseinner King end MOTZON C1lRRI8D (Com~ai.sion~r La Clsire absent), thet th~ Aneheim City Planninq Commission hae reviewad the proposnl to pe+rmi~ commnercie.l use of two re~sidantial atructure• with waiv~re o! required location of parkinq spacea end required number and typ~ of. parking apaces on n rectanqulerly-ahaped percel of land coneisting af approximetely 5001 equare fcet located et the norkhw~st corner o! Che~stnut 8treet nnd tlarbor Eoulevard and lurther deecribed 125 3outh Harkx~r Soulevardt and doee hereby approvo the Neqetive Decleration i'ran the requirement to prepare en environmental impact report an the bneis that there would be no siqnificnnt individual or cwtnuletive edveree envir.onmental l.mpect due to the apProval of thie Neqative peclaration eince the Anaheim General Plan deeiqnatea the eubject property for generel commer.ciel land uaes commeneurete with the proposal~ thet no eenaitive environa-ental isnpacte are involved in the propasalt that the Initial 8tudy aubenitted by the petitioner indicntea no eignificent individuel or cumulative adverse environtnentel impactas nnd that the NegetivQ Decleration eubstdntiatinq the foreqoing findings is on file in tha City of Aneheim Plenning Department. Comn-iesioner Herbot offered a motion, seconded by Comc-isai~ner 8ouas and MO'I'ION CARRIED (Com4ttles.ioner La Claire absAnt), that tho Anaheim C1ty Planning Co~unission does hereby grant waivQre (a and b) on Che basis of the aize of thP pro~erty due to the proposed use, the parkinq sgncea w~uld be adequate aince the cuetomere would only be in the office for a ahort period of time, and denial would deprive subject property of a p:i~•ilegH enjoyed by other properties in the s vne zonc nnd vicinity Comu-iasioner Herbat offered Resolution No. PC82-164 +~nd moved for its passaqe and adoption that the Anaheim City Planning Comn-ission does hereby qrant Condition$1 Use Pe~nit No. 2369 to pe.rmit the front etructure to be uaed for commercial office uses limited to enginoering, insurance, and attorneys rnd that the re+sr atructur~ shall be used for resider. ial purpoaes indefinitely until it ia converted to commerc3al uee at which time a nPw public hearing would be required and subject to Interdepa~rtmental ~onnnittee recoaanendations, deletiny Condition No. 5. On roll call, the foreqoinq resolution was pasaed by the following vote: AYES: BOUAS, BUS!?ORE, FAY, HSRBS'P~ KING, MC BURNEY NOES: NONE ABSENT: LA CI.AIRE 3ack White~ Aseiatnnt City Attorney, preaented the written right to appeal ths Planning Comn-ission's decieion within 22 days to the City Council. Commieeioner Ha:bat po~.nted out this use as nn insurance office would probably be one of the liqhtest uses that cauld be proposed on this property since it is zoned for coaunercial usas. ; ~i ~~ . , MINi~EB, Ht4111iEIM CITY M.~INNING COMMI68ION, 81lAT~tSER 8, lyBZ 82-47Z ITtbl NO. 6. EIR ND~l1'~YV~ DECLJIMTION 11ND CONUITZG~NAL U8~ PaRM_ IT NO . 2370 PUHLZG Ha1-RING• OMN1CRt 0~~:' ': J. 11ND CONSTANCIR J. CiI880N, Z15 8. St~te Coll~qd Hlvd., '+naheim, C!1 92805. 1-~ENT~ PHILI~IP 1-. Zyn+laiel, 300 8~ Harbc~r Blvd., Suita 8~ 1, 1-nsheia~, CA 92805. Property d~ecribAd ~~ s rsctangularly-ahaped parce~l o! land conpietinq ot epproximntely 0.14 acre, 3Z4 N. Oall l~ed. To permit an otfica uao in s residential atructure. There was no ona indicating their presa~c• in oppoeition to subject raquest and elthouqh the •tatt raport t~ the Planninq Coam-ieeion wae not r~ed et the public hearinq~ it ie reterrad to and a~ad~ a pert of the minutee. Jack White, Awwistant City Attorney, expleined t.he aub ject property is cur.rently 2oned RS-7200, with e r.eeolution o! intent to the CO Zon~, and one of the conditione of approval of this permit is that the aoning to coaamerc.iel office being finalized end, if that occur~, Lhe Code 3ection relerred to in ttie atetf report ~hould be chenq~d to 16.03.030.010. lie cleri.lied thi~ chanqe would not eff~ct the legdl edvertisement c~f this project~ Richard Bozech, eqent, was preaent to enswer any questions. Reepondinq to Commiealonar Houae, lrlr. BOLdC11 explnined this will be otfices f~r attorneys end no medicnl nlfices are proposed. ACTI04~1s Commieaioner King offered a motion, 8e canded by Conmiasioner Herbat end MOTION CARRIED (Commieeioner Le Claire abaen t), that t..he Aneh~ im City Plenninq CoQUnission has reviewed the propoa~i to permit ~n ~lffce use in a reeidential etructure on e r~ectdngulerly-eheped perc~l of lend con aistinq of npproximately 0.14 acre hnving a front~qe o! approxi.metely 64 teet on the auuth side of Eall Road and f.urther deacribed n a 324 Weet Bt~ll Raa dt end doea hereby approve the Negative Oaclsration trom the requirement t~ pr apara an anvironmental impact report on the basie that th ere would be na s i qnificant individual or cumulnti~e adverae environmental impect due to the aipproval ot thie Neqative Declaretion aince the Anaheim Gene zal Plen deeiqnat~ea the subject property for commercial professional land uses commensura te ~rith the proposalr that na aenaitive environmentnl impact e nre involv~d in the propoealt that the Initial Study submitted by the petl.tioner indi cates no significant individur~l or cua~ulative adverse environmental impactst nnd that the Neqetive Declaration subst~.antiatinq Lhe for e goinq findinqa is on file in the City of Ariaheim Plenninq Depertment. Cocnaissioner King offered Resolution No. PC82- 165 and moved for ite paseaqe and adoption thet the l~naheim City Planninq Coamnisaion does hereby grant Condittonal Use Per~ait No. 2370 aU' ject to Interdepartmental Coca~itte~e recommendation. On roll call, the foregoing reeolution was pas sed by the followinq vote: AyEg = BOU11$ , BUSHORB , FRY , HERBST, KII3G, MC BURNEY NOE3s N~NE AD8$NT: IJ1 CLAIRE Jeak White, l~esistant City Attorney, pree~nt~sd the written riqht to appeal the Planning Ce~eaiesion'e deciAion within 22 days to the City Council~ ~. MINU'T~$r 7u'1AHExM CITY PI~NNINO COMMI9$2QN, B~PT~IB~R 8, 1932 82-473 ZT3M N0, 7. EIR NbGNTIV6 DI~CI.ARIITION, N1IIVER OF CODS RRQ~lIRBMSNT 11ND PUBLIC NEARIhf3• OWNFR: BCM T~IMIT~D P1IRTNERSHIP, ?31 W. Kntelln 1-venue, 1lneheim, C1- 92802. Pr operty described a• a rectenqularly-eheped parcel of land consiatin4 0! approximatety 0.42 acre, 231 W~ Ketelle Ilvenue (Tex4co Service 8tntion). To retain sutomobile s~lee in ronjunction with an a,cioting sutomobilo rental aqency and service ats tion with weiver ot prohibited aigns. Thmre wae ne one indi cnting their presenee in ~p~~ition to subject requeet and althouqh the etn! t rep~rt to ~he Planninq Comtnie~ion was nat reed et the public hmnring, it is referrnd to enc' mede a part of the minutes. David Capelouto, ?10 E. Monroe, Oxenqe, aqent, wes present to enswer eny questione. Harold R. Stokee, Attorneyr 330U Irvine Bouleva~rd, Nevrport Suach, re~erred to Condition No. 1 requi ring an irrevocnble offer to dedicate a 45-foot atrip of lend elonq Clementine Street and stated that would be taking eway apprnxitrately 2139 ec:vare toot r~f sub ject praperty and added there will be no extraordinnry ar eubs tantial increase in the trafllc llow and no reaeonable relationehip betwF:n this applicati.on and the requirement for dedication. HQ etated there is a ne qativo declarati4n on file dnd Pareqrnph 21-d of the staff report indicentea a f i nding mus~ be niade thac the trnffic yenernted by the pzopoaed use will not impose e-n undue burden on the etreets and highways deeigned nnd improved to cerry the tra~tic in the ereA. He ateted Heztz-fient-A-Car ope ration does sell cars on the edjacent property. He referred to Resolution Nu~ 72-74 wherain the Planning Conaaission qranted th~e conditional uae permi t to the Hertz operr~tion fur theae same activities and there wes no requirme~t for a 15-fuot dedicntion on that property. He atnted they feel Condition lvo. 1 is not a proper isaue for thie CUP epplication. Mr. Stokea relerred tu Condition No. 4 requiring that the westerly drivewdy on Katella be closed, noting there are two ontranc9a on K~Celln wh:ch e~ter the Texaco Service Stati on nnd closing one of those driveways would create a traft~c problem; and also closing the ~xiveway on Clementine would be unreasonable end a burden on the propertV owner na well as those people uainq the property tQ eith~r rent a car or purchase gasoline. Mr. 8tokes added th~y have no problem complyinq with the requeat for tr~eh enclosur~ nreae, etc . but do object to the ninety-day time lin~it imposed with Condl.tiorie 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. THE pUBLIC HEARING WA8 CLOSLD. Coam'Aaioner Kinq ref~rred to the requeat to nllow portable signs and sugy~:sted stiakere be placed ineide the windowa o! the vehicle$, shawinq the expected a~ileage, coat a! veh~.cles, etc. inetead ot siyns on top of cars. Mr. Capelouto responded thet they do have the portable atickers on the veh~cles and reaponded to C~msaiseioner Suehoxe that their cocipany doea own the vehicles thnt are tor ~ale and he doea not brinq in vehicles from othez aqencies to se12. ~ ~~r~ ~~ MxNtlTte, ANl1li1CIM CITY PL11IiNINC3 COMlII88IQN, SRPT~IBBR 8, 1982 82-474 Conuai~~ion~r Hushor~ notsd almost ~v~ry o~r on th~ lot i~ edvertised !or uAle and r~t~rzod to th~ H~rt~ oper~tion whers th~r.e i~ mryb• on~ vdhicle lacing Cl~msnti.i~e !or sAla and maybe one lsaing lCat~lla. Mr. Capelouto ttetad all ot khsir zantel car• ar~ !or aal~ et any time snd that Hsrts only put~ sign~ nn two or thras o! their aar~, but +~11 of. thre vahicles north of thie proparty are !rr s~le. Crnnmiesioner Bushoro atatad the di!lerencs is thet Herts does not qive the impre ~~ion that tha cars ar• all !or ~sala. Mr. Capalouto explained the Zoninq Snlorcament O!liaar h+rd etopped beca uea tho signs we~rs put out by the service etation. Ha explsin~d he owna the e~ervice stetion, but it is leesed and operated by eomeone else. Commie~ioner eushore atatod he sees no problem with thie uee if the ei q~na e r e limit~ed to one or two becauae thle looks lfke e ueed car aalas lot rattaar then a anr rentel agency end thAt ia whet ie ~aue~ng the pru~t,em. Regerdin q the dedication, he explsined Convantion Way will ev~+n~ual]y connect with Clementine nnd he would •uggeet that Che dedication be made cond'hiona 1 ly to t~e tnkan if end when the etreet ie widened. Commieaioner Kinq atated thet he did nc~t leA1 the southerly drivewsy eFaould be closed. Shirley Lend, Aasietant Tro~~~~ Enqineor, responded that thQ traffic conditi.ane on C.lementine are changing becauee of ~ievelopmant nnd the freowny ramps. She atated the Txnflic Enqineer has deked that the drivewnve b,e cloeed becauee they ere located too close ta the intereection• Cemmiseioner King eteted it the gaeoline cuaton-ere ere torced to qo through th6 northern driveway, they would not be tredinq et this station very long and he felt closinq the driveway would detinitely be a hardahip on the epp 11cen t. Chairman Fry stated there are actually three eepsrate uaes on thid property, sezvice etation, car rental and cnr ealee. Commiesioner Herbet atated these three operatiane nre impactinq the proparty and the operator will have to give up eowathinq. He ateted he will not eupport the request without the irrevocat~le ofler of dedication and hG did not think the property owner is bei~g discriminated aqeinet b~anuee n lot of property ownerg have had to dedicnte street wideninq property. lkr. Stoke^ atated the Department o! Motor Vehialee Stete of Gal~fornfe~ regulates c:er rentel aqencies and they ara allowed to sell vehicl~e~. He atated i! requiring the dedication iB an imperative issue, w`~e ~djacent property owner with a aimilnr ~+rn-it nhoul.d have the eune requirements. He ~tated requirinq the dedicntion of th~e applicant only is a~elective activity. Coma~iseion~r Buehare suggeeted hhe npplicant c~ight vish to withdzaw tlrae appl3cation i! he ie not willing to dedicate the property and figura out another los~ conapicu~s any to •ell the vehicles. ~~ . ~. ~ ~ ~. ~ MINUT]!8, 1-N1INEIM CITY PLl1NNINfi COMMI88ION, BBPTEMBBR 8, 1982 92-475 Comaie~ioner 8ou~-• poin~ed out that Hoztc doe~ not have a qaoolin• operation et their lscility !or th• qaneral public and •h• wa• not •ur~ i! there ware •ny plans !oz vridaning th• stre~t when th~y epplied !or theix permi~. Mr. Stokes indicetad he wae tryinq to alarily that thare is no evidenae thie activity ~rill inorea~• tha tre!!ic llow bec~u~e there i~ no chnnqa in whet ia now baing done and thsy l~eel thi• is a lorcad dsdication withaut oompensetion. Dsan ~4her~r, Aa~oeiete Plannar, stated the Hertz oparntion did have e uxe permit agproved in 1972 and thay wer~ not required to maka ths dedicntion bsceuse a t that time that portion of Clementine wea de~iqneted as e Collector 8treatt however, in July 1979, the City Council amended the Genernl Plnn Sesignati ng it ae en Arterial Highway. Commissioner Hu~hore seked how meny vehicles ere on the premieea st the presant tims, with Mx. Capalouto replying there ere approximataly eighteen et the prea ent time. He etated they have ninety vehiclee that nre maintnined either at thie facill.ty in Analieim or ~n their Ontario property. Cammiesioner Buahore polnted out the meximum allowed ie twelve dnd euggeete6 tn+~ybe s cloeer look ehould be taken e+t this operetion. Mr. Cepe 1 outo explnined the 8con~-Rantal o eretion is no lonqer there. Mr. 3tokees replled to Commiseioner Kinq thnt the applicent ha~ no objection to removing the portabl~ aigna, but ia mora concerned about cloainq the two driveweys . Coum~isei onar Buehore agreed cloaing the two driveweys would be detrimentel to the prop~ rty beceuse of the smount of traffic going in and out of the aervice etation and the rental agency. Commisaioner Herbst noted the petitioner ie requestinq automobile aalas ~n conjunct i on with the previously approved rental aqency, n~ting the plnna indicate d a maximum of twelve vehiclea and now the petitionez is indiaating there A r~ eometimea 18 or more vehicleE and pointed out any time there are more than twelve, chere ie a violation ot the con~9itiondl use pertait. Dean She rer pointed out they are currently allowed a maximwn of fifteen vehicles on the premisea. Mr. Cape 1 outo explained that they cnn use the two garaqe bays, natinq only t.heir vehicles are repaired at this qaraqe. He explained employees park at the east end of the property. C~uaiaeioner Buehore stated the qaeoline ealea are incidental to the rental ope:ation with Mr. Capelouto aqre~einq. Jack White, Asaiatant City Attorney, explained the law pravides that tha dedication of the land tor public improvementa must bear a reasoneble relationship to the public needa creatad by the propoaed d~velopment enS khe Commiaaion must detezmine whather or not the praposed use for which thie conditianel uae permit ie required ie a uee which crentes public need for the conditiozss beiag requested. He explained that is precisely the reeson another pxoperty may not have been raqu~red to make mueh a dedication. ~., ,~~~, ~. ~. MINUTEB, 1W1-HEIM Ci'PY PI.ANNING COMMI88ION, SSPTIEMBER 8, 1982 82-A76 Conmairsi~nar 1Cing aaksd i! dadiaatinq a t3-loot •krip would put the clisnt out o! busino~~, with Mc. Stoke• r~plyinq that they lael it i~ an unreaeonable requ~~t and it vrould al~o r~strict tha number o! v~hicl~~ and would be d~~rimsntal ta ths car rental bu~in~es. Ha stated th~ CiCy l~ttorney'e oomm~~ntr wera ~exactly whaL h• was tryinq to point outt thst this i~ e continuaLion o! an ectivity which has baen thsre since 1969 end opsreted by this epplicant eince 1978 and thera ha• not been a tremendoue impact~ Mr. Capelouto aeked if the number o! vehicles permitted on ~the proparty would be roduced if he made the dmdication. Reaponding to Comaiie,ionar Herbet, Jsy Titue, Otlica Enqi.near, axQleinRd hu doea not heve n specilic date tor the widenlnq of Clementine. He clerifiad the condition is not nsking !or immediat~ dadication, but en irrevocnble ofter of dedicetion whici~ will become effective whesn the etreat ie widened end thet would clepend on other development in the ar~a. Ha expleined the improvementa would l~e made at the ai~y's expi+nse. He point~d out the motel acroes the atreot wne required to dedic+~ke tha 45 feet on Clementine ao thie is not an isolated case. Commisefoner Herbat pointed out if the property owner ever decidea to change the uee o! that property end the atreot hed tc+ be wi.dened to accommodate that uae, the owner would be required to pny for the improvements. Connniseioner Kinq stated t17e Planning Comnission hee recommeaded in the past that service stationa should be on a 150 x 150-foot lot dnd reducing the size of this property by 13 feet would makR the lot smaller than recommended for e service atation. Hp did not aqree that this sorvice etetion is an incidental use because it is v9iy busy. Comzaiseioner Herbat ateted when this wes appraved for a sprvice atation, it wae o! adequate size but now it ie being impacted by a car rentel nqency end a car sales agency and thie is probabl}~ one of thQ heavtest impacted service station lots in town. Mr. 3tokes etated the s+ervice station ia leased nnd thie is a dual purpc.ss on the lot and is an ectivity ia~portant to the property owner and is not really incidental and ie not just servinq the rental care, but servinq the genernl public• Mr. Capelouto stated h~ had meant it wae incidental to the ce+r rental bueinese and averaqee about 75,000 gallons og qaBUline per month and he thought that wae about averaqe for a gae station. Commiae~ioner Bu~hore pointgd out if the petitionar does away with the portable eslqne, he has a permit to rent the vehicles and if the sales are done in an inconspicuoue maaner in conformance with the California Vehicle Code, then th~ petitioner would have no probleat with this uee and should withdraw the requeet sf.x-ce he does not wish to dedicate the property. ~~ f.., ~ ~ MINUT88, ANAHEIM CYTY PLl-NNINC COMMI98ION, 3SPTEMBER 8, 1982 82-477 Mr: Stokes atated i! thay •r~ raquirad to qet rid ot tha siqns altugether that would be anothar saloctive action becaus• Nertz, next door, hea eigno on thei.r vahicles. Ha statsd they will be ealective ee to the number c! siqne aaoording to the wishee of tha Planning Commission. He stated Hertz h~s a lot mors ~tigna on weekmnda. Mr. Cap~louto atated the northern part af tha property dooa look like a r.nr lot, but the portion on Kate]la doee not. Commieaioner Bauae augqested new eigninq to explain the operation which would attrect buyera without putting the siqns un t~p o! the vehiclee. Mr. Capelouto dqraed it ia a reeaoneble requeet to eliminate e lot of the eignst that Hertz usually hes eix or aeven eigne on top of their vehicles on waekendet however, he f~1t three or four e3gna would be reasonable for thie operetion ~n weekends. Commisaioner Buehore Ateted 1ie would preaume Hertz does not have permi~g.lon to have portable siqne with Dean Sherer roplying they ~lo not. have a vari~ncp. Cc~mmisaioner Bushore stated if these thrw.e or four signs are allawed, the applicant has glr.eady said that Nertz is in vi~lation and he felt this w~~uld just open the dnor to a lot more requests. Ne added thia is a special area in the City and referred ta his suqgestion that the app].icant come up with a less conspicuaus way of selling the car~. He stated he does not want to deny the petitioner the right to sell the cars bec~+use he knnws all the rental aqencies do sell cara on a r.egular baeia, but he does not war~t khi~ property to become a used cer lot. He stated he doea not eee how the petitioner. can live up to his originel pQrmit which allows fifteen vehiclea F~ecause it would be imposaible if Y~e ~wns ninet.y vehiclea dnd the weekends are busy and these cars hnve to be moved around. He stated mayt,e the ges atation Ehould be eliminated. Fie added he woul.d not vots for the portable siqns. Mr. Capelouto stated the Zaninq Enfor.cement Officer had indicated that Hertz had the rigt~t to sell the vehicles and he would 7ot want to poirt a finger at Hertz. Dean Sherer clarified that Her~x does have the riqht to sell the vehicles but not to put portable aigns on top. He explained this applicant hgs app:oval by Council to have a maximua- of fitteen rental atitomobiles on the property at any one titae and this zequent is not to increase that number, but to maintain the fifteen and aleo allow him to aell thoae fifteen vehicles in eddition to havinq the portab7.e siqns. He stated he believes the Comcnission is not willinq to qo alonq with portnble aiqns but probably will approve tho uae of aellinq automobiles, ae lonq ea the number doas not exceed the fifteen oriqin~nlly approved. ~ l `'j! ~ MINUTEB, 11N11HExM CI'PY PLANNINf3 COMMI88ION, $BPTS'~BER 8, 148Z 82-478 1~CTION: Commi~~ioner Herbat olforeA d pao~lon, ~econded by Commie~ioner McBurney end MOTION C~RRxaD (Conaaitsionar La Clairs abnent), thet the Anaheim City Planninq Conuniasion h~o rnvieWed the propoeal to rotain automobile ealas in conjunction with an axistinq rental aqenay and •arvic• atetian with waiver o! prohibited eiqns on a racCanqulerly-ahaped parcel of land consietinq o! approximately 0.4Z acre locateQ at tha nartheast cornar o! Katella 1~v'nue and Clementine straet snd Purth~r described en 231 Weet Katella Avenuer and do~s hereby approve the Negative Declaretion trom the r~quirementi to prepnre nn envi.ronmantal impact report on the bseie thet there would be no eiqnilicant individual or cumulativa adv~rse environcnental ieqpact due to tha approval o! thia Neqative Declaration since the ]~naheim Ganerel Plan deaiqnetee the eubject property !or commerciel recrdati.on land uses commeneurate with the proposalt that no seneitive environmentnl icipacts nre involved in the propoealt that the Initial Study ~suba~itted by the petitioner indicates no siqnificnnt individual or cumulntive adveree environmentdl impactet end that the Negetive Declare~ion subst+snti~ting the foreqoing findinqa is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Department. Commisaioner Herbet oftered a motion, seconded by Conuoiasioner McBurney and MOTION CAARIED (Commiseioner La Claire absant), thnt the Aneheim City Planning Commiasion doea hereby deny the requeet tor wniver of. code requirament on the beeia that no hardship wee demonstrateA. Commisaianer Herb~t offered Resoluti~n No. PC82-166 and moved for ita pnssaqe and edopti~r- that the Anaheim City Planninq Commiseion doos hereby grant Conditional Uae Permit No. 2371, in part, denying the roquested weiver and subject to Interdepartmental Conunittee recom~endatione, deleting Condition Na. 4, requirinq the two drivewaye to be cloaed on the baeis that due to the service etAtion operation, the drivewaye ere needad for safety. On roll call, the foreqoing resolution was pessed b~! the followinq vote: AYES: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERHST, ICING, MG BURNEY NOF.S t NONE ABSENT: I.A CI.AI1tE Jack White, Assistant City Attorney, presented the written right to appeal the Planninq Comtaisaion's decision within 22 days to the City Council. RTSCESS There was a ten-tainute receas at 3:25 RECONVLNE 3:35 p.m. TTEM N0. 8. EIR NEGA~IVE DECLARATIqN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2365 PtJBLIC HEARZNG. OWNER: R]~YMpND G. 3PfiHAR, ET AL, 6937 Avenida De Bantiago~ Anaheim, CA 92807. Property described as an irreqularly-ahaped parc~l af land consistinq nt epproxima~ely 1.8 acre, 5750 E. Le Palmn Avenue. To permit on-sale alcoholic beveragea in a proposed reataurant. It was noted the petitioner had requested a two-week continuance. ACTIOei: .Commiseioner 1Ctng oflered a motion, seconded by Commisaioner McBurney and MO'xION CARRIEA (Commies~oner I,~+ Claire abannt), thet coneideration ~f the efoxe-mentioned item be continued to the reqularly-acheduled meeting of September ~0, 1982. ~.~ ,! MIN[1TE8, 11N11HtIM CITY pI.ANNIN(i COMWI88ION, J3EPTEMtH6R 8, 1982 82~479 ITEM NG. 9. SIR N8X'iATIVE DECLIIMTIONi WA~IVER OF CODE REQUIREM[3NT 11ND PUBLIC HEIIRING. OWNSR: IIdPSRIAI. PROPBRTIEB, P. O. Sox 2480, Newport 8eech, C11 92660. J-(iSNT: 1-l.Ati HOI.MaB, 261 8. Solomon Driva, Aneheim~ CA 936(17. Prop~rty descrlbed ee an irreqularly-dhep~d parcel of lend c~nsistinq o! appraximately 10 ucres, 5781 Se~nta Ann Cenyon Aned (Pit aerbecue Reetaurent). To permit a walk-up wind~w at en existing reateur~n* witti waiver of minimum number o! perking epacea. There wea no one indicating their preaence in oppoaition to eubject request and elthough the etef! report to the Plann~ng Coaimlaei.on wee not reed ~t the public hearing, it is reterred to end mede a part of the minutee. Alnn Holmes, 261 So~omon, aqent, was preaent to answer nny questions. THE PUBLIC HEARING WA9 (20SED. Mr. Holmes expleined three compect cdr parking epeces cou~d be provided etter the window is conetructed. ACTION: Coauniasioner McBurney ~ffered e motion, seconded by C~nm~ssioner Herbst and MOTION CARRIEU (Commisaioner La Claire nbsent), that the Anaheim City Planninq Coa~miaeion has reviewed the propoeal to pezmit a walk-up window at an existing restaurant with waivar of minimum nuinber of parking spacea on an irreaulerly ehapod percel of land coneiating af approximately 10 aczes, having d frontage of apuroximately 775 feet ~n the north sides ot Sentn Ana Canyon Road and further deacribed as 5718 3anta 1-ne Cenyon Roa~dt e+nd does hereby approve the Negative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis that there wnuld be no siqniticnnt individual or cumulative a~dverse environmental impnct due to the appraval of this Neqative Declaration since the Anaheim Generel Plan designetes the subject property foz qeneral cc~mwercial lend uaea commensurete with the proposalr th8t no sensitive environtaentnl impacte are involved in the pro,posalJ that the In~tial Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no siqnificant individual or cumulative adverse ~nvironmental impactst and that the Neqative Declaration substnntiatinq the foreqoinq findfnge .te on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Department. Commiasioner McHurney offered a motion, aeconded by Commissioner Bouas e-nd MQTION CARRIED (C~nm-issioner La Claire absent), that the Anaheim City Planninq Commi.esion does hereby grant the request for wdiver of minimum number of. parkinq epaces on the basis that the change in use will actually decresse the need for parkinq becmuse the customer flow will be increaeed and on the basis that denial would deprive aubject property of a privilege enjoyed by other properties in the satae tone and vicinity. Coam~ieai.oner Mceurney offered Reeolution tio. PC82-167 and moved for its passage and adoption ~hat the Anaheim City Planning Conmiission does hereby qrant Conditional Use Pera-i:: No. 2372 subject to Interdepaxt.~aentnl Coma~ittee r.ecommendations. On roll call, the foregoing resolution was passed by the fo2lowinq vote: AY88: HOUAS. BUSHOItE r FRY , KEItBST, ICING ~ MC BURNEY NOE8: NONE ABS$NT s LA CIaIItB ~. MINUTEB, ANl-HEZM CITY PL~NNINO COMb1I88I0N, ~SPTSN88R 8, 1982 82-480 ITEM N0._10 ___~IR. N_EGIITIVE 0$CI,~7-~t1~TION~ RSCL~88IFICATxON N0. 82-83-7,` W1-IVSA PUBLIC HBARIN(i. Oi4NaRs KNIK-CHEK RF.ALTY COMPANY, INC., 124Q 8. $tata Calleqe Bouleverd, M100, Aneheim, Cl- 9280d. 1~aENT s TttE SO~JTHL1-ND CORP. , 1240 S. 8tat• Colleqa ~oulevnrd, Anaheim, CA 92804. Property described ee en irrequlerly-ehaped parcel o! lnnd consiatinq of approximetely 0.37 acre, 775 N. Laat Street (7-Eleven Stare). To parn-it a conveniance n-arket with qasoline sales and weiver of a-inimum number o! perking apacea. There wae one peraon indicnting his presence in opposition to subject request and nlthouqh the eteff raport to the Planninq Cotomiesion was not read at tho public hearinq, 1t ie referr.ed to nnd mede a part of the minutes. Peul Mula, 1240 Ste~te Colleqe, Annheim, stnted thia requeat ia to add one qeeoline diepenaer to service a maxim~im of two vehicles at one time et this aonvenience merket whict~tias been in businees eince 1974 end noted it ie not ane of their hiqh volume storee. He atatad they woulA anticipete ebout 1/3 of tJ~o avAraqe 75,000 qallon per month ellocation for en averaqe $ervice stetion. Mr. Mula referred to tt~e recoramended Condition No. 2 requiring that the exisrinq driveways on La Palma and North be moved weaterly from East 3treets that concerning rhe driveway on North Street, there is no record of any accidents at that intersection ar ima~ediately adjacent to the driveway and moving it a few feet ia an extremely costly venturet and noted the totel for both Conditiona 2 and 3 represents a cost nf abc~ut ~18,000 which would prevent them fron- putting a dispenser in et this location. Reqardinq the driveway on the nozth eide o£ the property on La Palma, he noted it was sugqested that driveway be moved weaterly; however, there is a major problem becaus~ the property owner to the west has not dedicated that portion of La Pelma and the praperty line extende out inta the eastbound travel lane, thus blockinq the view of the driveway and the further westerly it ie rnoved, the more it wauld enhanr,e the possibility of an accident. He atated in researching the number of accidents at that intersecti~n for the pest three yeare, they could only find two a~ccidente which had anything to do with their property. He stated he felt movinq the dxiveway would be detrimentnl to the t.raffic ~low. Concerninq Condition No. 3 for e raised median on La Palma, Mr. Mula noted the Traf.fic $nqinesr had requested a median 250 feet ir, length and that their property is approximately 130 feet from the intersection and they would have no problem exten~'ng the median for the 130-foot length of their property which would prevent anyone from turninq lpft. Jim Lucey, 1217 E. La p~la~a, atated he objecta to increasinq this fast food businese because of the noiae and lack of control at the aitet that now they have tractora and trailers all through the niqht coininq in from the aren to the north of the freeway and it is noisy. ~ ".,~~ ~ MINUT~B~ 11N71E~EIM CITY PLANNING C.OMMIABION, 9~PTBMIB~R 8, 1982 82-481 Chairman Fry pointed out this is not e raetnursnt. Mr. Luosy atated he livea directly ecroes the stroet and this is a laet food restsurant or e 7-Elsven Store serving hot lood and trucko and cars are in and out a11 niqht and exe loud and there i• hnt-rodding up and down Centar lrom tihat lucation. He added i! thio ie npproved, the median atrip would be e muat beanuee the truak• coming south on East Street ignore siqne and cut diaqonally acrosa the interrsction inta the 7-8levan driveway. He added he hes had to put up a fence to keep t1~e trash q~nerated by the 7-Eleven etore out of hia yardt that the 7-Eleven Store hae bean a poor naighbor and thnre ere no trash cene or any e~tempt to qat the peuple to diepona ot thoir tranh and thet wae not e~roblem belore the 7-Elaven Store wae there. Mr. Luc~y eteted that ie e bsd ir~tereection and there ar~ frequent eccidents. He etated he would ahellenqe the negetive declazation on the bnsis there le noiea and trash qenernted and edded they Y-ave the Raymoncl eettling baei.n acroes th~ street enw he did not know if epilled qesoline would nfPect it. He stated he elso challenges the Comtniesion to consider the residente who own homes and are trying to live in a~eacelul neiqhborhood. He adcled eo far, this Commission ie attempting to "apot zone" thet neighborhood. Mr. Mula stated they are in the qrocery bueinase and thie is a 7-Eleven &tore and they do offer aanclwiches just like a lot of major grocery atorae, but iL ie not a fast food business like McDoneld'a. t!e atated the 8outhland Corporation hee always enjoyed a yood working relationship with Police Departmonts and is surprised there is a problem and noted 7-Eleven ia not aware of thet problem and will do whatever is neceaeary to correct it. Regardinq a raised center ciivider, he indicated he hae not said they would not aqree ta put in a center divi.der, but they are ob~ectinq to the whole 250-foot length and thought going to their proparty line, epproximately 130 feet from the intersection, would certainly reeolve the prable~ae fndicntad by Mr. Lucey relative to large trucks crossing the atreet, etc. He etated if this ie approved, when they do put in a center divider, it will solve nn innaediate problem relative to accidenta at the intersection. THE PU'HLZC HBARING WAS CLOSED. Com~niesioner Kinq asked if air and water will be furniahed for the customera if this is approved• Mr. N~ula atated City Counail approved Condition~l Use Permit No. 2285 on Februnry 23rd for a 7-8leven Store at Gilbert and Ball and requi.red that they inatall those facilities, which they have doneE however, they hAVe found that 95• of the usaqe has been by the hiqh school students aaroes the str~et and there has been a constant problem with vandaliem coeting approxia-atelj $100 per month. He etated they will consider thoee facilities if it is the only way to qet this requeat approvedr but that it has been a costly problem. Mr. Mula explained one pwap will dispense three grades of gasoline and can serve two vehicles. --- ~ ~ ~ ~ MINUT88~ AN11H8IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, 8E1~TBMBFR 8, 1982 82-48?. Connniesioner Ruehore etatsd ha has been in that •tore end what tha oppo~ition has ~aid ia truet and thet oanvanience a-arkste atartad out aa a good idea, but over the years they have turnad out to be beer and wine outlsta and an arcade !or the younqster~+ and a le~t tood oparation, and all o!' thoee di!lerent aapacta he+ve added to the cumulative etfect nnd halp~d to dacline the qeneral area and addinq one more uee, suah aa qa,olina sales will heve a lurther a!lect and the more uaes allowad contribute to tra~tic probleme, which ie tha reason the Trn!!ic Enqineer has auqqeated relocation ot the drivewaye and the raiaed median. Ha stated the Couun!esion haa atatieti~a o! tra~~ic accidente at that intereection ovar the pae~ three yeare. He etate+d the Commiseion has only apprnvad two convenience markets nnd thay were both in the Dieneyland area whare they were needed. Commissioner Herbst atdted in the paet the Planning Commiesion denied a service etation on thie corner and at aeveral ~ther locationa on Eest 8treett however, they were approved by the Ctty Council dnd he thouqht there were thirteen from Ball Road to Orengethorpe nnd since then they hnva all closed which proves there is no need tor q~~oline in that location. He etdted he hds opposed service atetians eelling convenience qooda becauee it 1s a dudl uae and also there are markats in the eren Rnd a service atation acroas the street and he thouqht approva7. ~f thie .requeet would be~ gi.vi~g this proparty owner a privileqe being denied othera. He atnted he felt this ie probnbly one of the worst corner.s iri the City for this typs use. He added he did live in that area for 27 years and knowa thie is not a safA corner under any conditions without adding any rnore uaea. Commiasioner King edded the property at Gilbert and Ball wae largcr for the convenience market and he did not think thie property is large enough to accommodate this use. Mr. Mula stated he is not prepared to deal kith alcoholic beveraqe control iasues or amueement qame isaues and felt if those iesuea are a problem, they should bo dealt with through the City orclinances and the Alcohalic Beveraqe Control Board. Mr. Mula stated thir~ is not e mejor gaeoli.ne installation and that they do not anticipate an increase in the activity. He stated gasoline stetions nre closed because of the increaeed cost of property, taxes and the decrease in the me~rqin per qallon of gasoline sold and their corporation is looking to buy thoae corners where there are closed gas atations and put in combination 7-Eleven convenience iaarkets and qae etatinns. He etated approximetely 2600 of their 7,000 7-Eleven stores have qasoline pumps. Nx. Mula $tated putting in the medfan divider will help ~he existinq si*.uatiun. Commiasioner Herbst atated moat cf theae 7-Eleven operations heve qone to 24-hour operationa and thia property ie adjacent to a reaidential area and he felt thie does interfere with the neiqhb~r's sleep with motorcycles, trucks and care comi.nq in and out. He referred to the City's Noise Ordinance and stated exceeding the noiee amient level at niqht, a motorcycle ~-ould be extremely loud and if the noise continues and the neiqhbora continue to complain, the use could be proven e nuieance. ~'~ ~..t ~ MINUTES, ANAHEIM CITY PLANN2N(i CQMMI88ION, SEPT~MBER 8, 1982 82-483 Mr. Mula stntad he io aware o! noise problsms sinca he ia ad~ACant to a busy hi.Qhway end a ya~olina pw~p would ba on the othor sid~ of the ~tore, eway lrom the resid~nces snd he 8id not think tha tra!!ic qenarated at niqht would be nny mora than thoee people coming to the atore enywdy and he did nat think it would bei any louder et the qe. pumpe than et tha ~tore. Chsir.man Fry asked if the houra of operetion were etipulated in the originel approval of Variance 2590. Canm~iaeioner McBurney stated he aqrees with tho opposition but wanted to point out that thie ie nn opportunity to try and correct a hezardaus eituation becauee ut ernne point the City will hnve ~o put in the medien, but was not eure i! edd~ng thie uae would offset that benefit. Commie~ioner Herbat felt add±ng the qasoline would increase the bueinees late et night nnd he wes concerned ebout the neighborhood. Commiseianer Buahore felt requirinq the medien wauld help tralfic in the intereection, but the whole intereection ie the problem becduae some of the properties bave not been dediedted and c+there have dedicated a much lonqer partion and, in fect, the intersection is not properly aliqned. Mr. Mula etated they will be more thr..n happy to extend the median divider from the intersection 130 feet. Commiasioner Herbst asked if they would consider reducinq the~ houre of operation to close at 11s00 p.m., indicating that ~.s the only way he could vote for appravnl. Mr. Mula stated he is not prepared to make that conunitment Chairman Fry atated he felt the 24-hour operation ia the problem. Commiaeioner Huahore atated a-aybe thie market should be converted back to a convenience market without tre arcede qemes or the gasoline sales becauee that is part of the problem and that is why the Commission is not willing to qrant the qasoline ealea. He stated arca~le games nre not any Fart of a conveni.ence market and do contribute to the problem anfl if those problems did not exiet, the Commission miqht look at thie requQet fox qasoline sales in a different liqht. Respondinq to Commisaioner Bouas, Mr. Mula explained they have eiqht similar operations in Anaheira and have gaeoline sales at one and have experienced no problem that they are sware of. Commissioner Bouas noted hhe operation at Gilbert and Aall has a lot more epace. Mr. Mula stated when that was agproved, the City Council requeated that criteria be established for dun]. use gasoline/conveniant stores and he was asked to wait until thet criteria wae eatablished. Coma~isaionex Herbst stated the commfteaent on their existing operetion wae 7 a.m• to midnight. ~ti ~ ~~~ 4, , ~ MIpUT38, 11N11HEIM CIZ'Y PL11NP1ING Cd4lI88ION, SSPTlII~tHSR 8, 198Z 8Z-484 Mr. Mula ptal:sd ha understood khat wa~ ahang~d the next yeer. Annika Santalahti, 1-~sistant Oir~ctor tor Zoninq, dtnted sho reoniled the time limit plue the eale ot alcoholic bevaraqa w~e considereA later and wae approved. Commissioner Herbst stated he !'eels this ie a very importent i~sue, end the racords should ba r~eeerched becaus~e i.t would eflect the way he votee on this requeet. Chairman Fry eteted thet would be e aeperate ection end thie action. Con~ni~aioner Bushore referred to ataff'e mamorandum dated September eth reqerdinq criterin for convenience markate and atnted he c11d not think thie location meets very au-ny af thoee reconanendetions auch as, tninimum site of property to be 150 foot by 150 foot with driveweya located awny froca the intereection, and the locetion of the gae pumpe. He pointed out there ere four housee directly facinq the pump l~cation. It wae noted this plan doea meet the landscaping requirementa. Comtnieaioner Buehora ateted he cannot e~uoport the rrquest and he did not think a continuance ah~~uld bo qranted in ordeL f~i the petit3oner to discuas the houra of operation. He stated the Plnnning Cot~mission denied a roclaaaification requeat in 1970 on the baeis it would be "ap~t zoning" and he felt, in all fairneas to the neighborhood, the zoning ehould be left exactly as it is. ACTION: Conwtisaionei Hushore offered a motion, aeconded by Caamissioner McBurney and MOTION CARRIED (Conimiesioner I,a Claire absent), that the Anaheim City Planninq Coaunigsion has reviewed the propoeal ta recldaeity subject property f.rom th~~ RS-7200 (Residential, Single-Family) Zone to the CL (Commercia~, Limited) Zone to permit a convenience nusrket w~th gasolir-e salea with waiver of minimum number of parking sgaces on an irreqularly-ehaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 0.37 ecre located et the southwest corner of La Pnlu~a Avenue and Eaet Street and further described as 775 North East Streett dnd dce~ hereby approve the Neqr~tive Declaration frcmt the re~quirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the b~sie that there would be no eiqnificant individua~ or cumulative Adver~e enviroruoental ia~pact due to the appr~vel oP this Neqative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan de~iqnates the sub~ect property ~or medium density residential land uses connnensurate with the propoealt th~t no sensitive enviroruaental impacta are involved in the proposali that the Initial Stucly submitted by the petitioner indicatas no significant individusl or cumulative adverse environmental impactss and that the Negative Declaration substentiating the foreqoing findinqs ie on file in the City of Anaheim Plannirig Department. Commisaioner Suahore otfered Reeolution No. PC82-:~a anli utoved for its pagsage and ndoption ihdt the Annheim City Planning Commission doea hereby deny Reclassificakion No. 82-83 -7 on the basis it w-ould be coneidered spot zoning. On roll call, the loreqoinq resolution wes paesed by the following vote: AY$S: ~OUAS, BUSFiORE, FRY, HER88Tr K:NG, I~C BURNEY NOBSs NONE ABSSNT: LA CLAIRE ~ ~ ~ MINI)TEB~ 71NAHEIM CI'1'Y PIl1NNIliO COMM28820N, BaPTEMB3R 9, 1982 82-d85 Caanni~sion~r Su~th~rs o!l~r~d a raution, ~eoonded by Conani~rionor H~rb~t and MOTiAl~1 Cl1RRIlID (Comai~~ion~r La Clai.r~ ~bs~nt), thst th~ An~h~im City Planning Coanni~sion do~• h~rsby deny r~qu~st !or w~iv~r o! codQ r~quir~aaent on th~ ba+~is that no hard~h~p was d~n~on~tr.~t~d prrtair~ing to th~ prop~rty loaetion, ~i~ee or topogr~phy. Commiarioner Buohoze o!larad Ra~oluCion No. PC82-169 and mov~d !or its pas~ags anQ •!loptior that the 1-nshaita City Planr~inq Commisaion c9o~o heraby dsny Conditional Usa Pera-it No. 236~ on th~ basis that the use will ~dv~rs~ly attact tha sdjoining l~nd u~~s and that the ~ise And ohsps o! tha ait~ is not adequat~ to allow tiho proposad use end thet the tza!!ic qen~reted by the propoAOd usa will iaapAes an undue burcSen on the etrsets and hiqhways and be detrimantel Co the p~ac~, health, ~at~ty and general wella~r• o! tha citisens of th4 City ot Anaheim. On roll call, tha foraqoing reoo].ution wds pessed by the~ lolloNinq votes AYEBt BOU713, LUBHdRE, FRX, HBRHST~ lCING, MC BURNgY NOESs NONE AB88NT: LA CLAIRE Jeck White, Aeeiete-nt City Attorney, presanted the writtdn right to appeal the Planning Camniseion's deci.elon within 22 deys to the City Counail• Commiasion~r Herbet asked staff to reaearch the records to eecertain whether or not the houre of operation have been violated pertaining to the exiatinq use fp: a 7-~leven market nt thin location. i ~r~ M2NUTE8, 11N71H$IM CITY ALl~1NNINti Cd!lMI88ION, PRPT~aR 8, 1982 82-a86 ITEM N0. 11. 8IR N~G1-TIV$ DECL11R1-TION 11NQ CONUZTIONIIJ. U8E PL~RMI'P NO. 2373 PUBLIC H8JIRZNG. OWNBRe IBaRH11M1 11LI ATA, 26371 1-vuzy P~rkway, Miseion Vie jo, C7~ 92675. 11GaNTi TALAT RApW11N, 26371 l~vary Perkw+~y, Mi~sion Vis jo, CA 92675. Propar:y deecribed ee a rrctangulerl.y-ehepad par.cel u! land conoistinq of approximetely 0.42 ecre, 172` y. Brookhurst Straet. To permit e convenience merket with gaeoline sele.. Thare were two psrROne indicating the~r preeence in opposition to subject requeat and nlthough ~he ate~t report to ~he Flanninq Coa~miseion wa.e not read at khe public heering, it ie re~erred ~o end mede a part of the m,inutes. Talet Ra9wen, 3312 W. First 3treet, 3ante Ana, etated thia property cannot continue ta be opezated as a ges station only because of the decrease in the margin Eor qasoline salest that they purchaee~l the property in 1981 an~t intended to contlnue the operet.ion as a qae stetion h~:t ~uund ii ie impoasi.ble to do busin~ssa based on the gae incom~+. H~ eteted they woulci like to have a c~nvenience market with sor~e automobile ncceReory abl.es, including a~utocnobile parta, wexes, batt~riea, etc. and tha t they plen to continue to aell qnaoline. He a~ated this m3rket will not coa-pete wi.t.h eny other mnrkot in the area and will not cause any traflic probleme beceuse they agreed to cloae the one .irivewayr and that there will not be very much noise. HQ poi.nted out the area is mostly commercial. He added if thie request ie not granted, he will b~ forced to close the facility. Harmon Mdwan, general mnneqer at 17 25 S. Brookhurst, stated he would like the rsquAat qranted b~ceuae it w~uld be very cnnvenient to have the qxa atation and market together f.or the cunsua-er so thoy can ahop et one place nnd thouqht it would help the community. He ata ted they cann~t eurvivs on gas ealea only, gointinq out there is a lot of compe tition end they hnve had to drop the pricee. He atated the only aolution they have been aLle to find ie to open a market to aell small ftems. He added they are willing ta comply wiL•h nll City recommendati~ns. Chairman Fry stated this Coaanission is not ellowad the privilege of considerinq the econnmics in these requeste and muat review theee projects on a land use standpoint only. James Horat, 2176 Crestwood Lane, r~tated there ie a Standard aervice etation o~i the corner of erookhurat and 1Catella which sells batteries and autoanobile parta and a market for food xnd aspi rin, etc. about 30 yards from thi.a stet~on which closes at 11:00 p.m. He stated they heve robberies in the nef.ghborhood naw and do n4t need another little market which would impact their neiqhborhood and cause young people to hang around conatantly. H~ stated th±s is a bad area and they do not feel they need this market in that locakion because of the impact o~ crime, etc. Norman 3hadow (eecretnry cuuld not veriPy name), stated he owns the market about 30 yards away fram the service etetion and hae been there eince January, 1982, and that he lives in Rialto becauee he adnnot afford to live in Anaheim and is trying to make a livinq here. . ~ s^ E ~ ~!. 6~ '~ MINUTaB, 11N71HEIM CITY PLIINNINO COMMI88ION, 8BPT8MBRR 8~ 1982 82-4A7 Mr. Aedwan etate+d the •ervioe statior~ do~e have ~ame e~tocaobile pexte and aca~tsorimst how~v~r, thsy Nill not b~ lurniehinq any labor or any instullation and ths buyer must insta 11 it th~maalves or qo to a service •tatic+n. Na •tat~d th~re i• no reason tor younq people to h~ng around in thet arsa bscause th~y will not br providing vid~a gam~s, atc. He etated there ie no ons taarket that can provide all th' need~ tio all cuetomer~ at nne time. He atated thay hava all varietiae o! lood available !or the conswner in that aren alrendy and that thay will not ba cowipetinq. Ha statad they heve dbnut 400 auetomere per dey for qa~ but they would like to be eble to provide them tha services o! purchaaing batterioe, 1~oaee, etc. at ona etop. TH1~ PUSLIC NEARING WAS CLOS~D. Gortueiesioner Kinq asked ebout closin g the drivewey, with Mr. Redwan noting the tniddle drivaway will be iieleted. Commisaloner Kinq pointed out thnt they do provide air and water to their cuetomAre end eeked i.f they will continu~ t,o do shop work. Mr. Redwan replied they wi.ll not ba doing any repeir work. Comiaisaioner Kin~ eeked if they are allowed to park cnre along the wall running north and south of the wdat property .line. Mr. Mdwen explained tha~t is not their property behind the wal l~ Commiseioner Herbet etat.ed sarvice s tations used to provide aervices such ea air tor tires, water for betteriea, windshiold cleaning, oil check, etc. and every etation he has owned in the pa st provided these services and made more prot~it from those servicea than on t?~e gasoline. He atated thesse oamere want to go into campetition with their ne ighbor. who already hne a merket and aeked i! they would objoct if thet neiqhbor wanted to put qasoline in front ot his store. He noted the ~tdtion wae al 1 owed there to aervice specific auatomers and tha market ia there to sdrve specific cuetomers and now, becauae the station ia experiencing prubleme, th ey want to infringe ~apon the othez buainesses. He telt to make the service etation pralitable, they need to provide the aerviaes. Ne stated he would not vote for chanqr~a in the uae to intertere with the other uaes, hecause he ie op~sed to ellowing e convenience market in a shop~inq center like th i s becnuae that would be grenting a privileqe denied to others eince service etationa were allowed right out on the etreet to meke it eney for the traveling public to purchase qas. Chairman Fry stated the isaue shoul d be land use only with Ca:mnisaioner Herbat replying he felt dual uae of the ln nd is a land use issue. Mr. Radwan etate8 if the public is willinq to pay ~1.50 por qallon Por gasoline, there probably will be mor e statione, but under this econoa~ic atrees, everyone is trying to cut pricea to etay competitive and they are having n marqin of 1 to 2 cents per gallon and they cannot provide window washing, air checks, etc. on that uiarq~n. Coamtiseioner Bouas aeked i! beer and wine would b9 aold and also what ather itaas ai11 be sold. Mr. Radwmn stated if the Alcoholic Beveraqe Control BoArd allowe them to sell beer and wine, they will, but any profit from thoee sales will be donated to a charity due to their reliqion. He reaponded to Commie~ioner Bouas thnt they will b~ selling spark plugs, soda pops, emall qroaery items, etc. but mainly they will be eelling automobile parts and accesaories. .. w,. \. . `', ' ~~ MINtlTEB, ]Wl-NEIM CITY PLANNZNG COMt~Z88ION, BEPTEM!l~iR B, 1992 82-488 Commi.~sionax 8ushor• •tat~d und~r the CL Zone, a convsnience a~arket w~auld be gorn-itted without Ch• qasoline •ales and kh~t ia the nain i~sue nnd the res~on !or this r~qua~t. Dean Sh~rsr, 11~~oci~te Plann~r, exI :ained the ovmar ha~ a aondiCional use permit !or a qadoline station and i! he wsnta to opan ~ conveniencA market, he he-a to ato~ e~lling gasolins unles s ths parmit i~ qranted. Commissioner Bushora notmd one o! the recomn-endetione is thRt the owner shall have a aeperate ~ttendant on duty at ell times for the diapeneinq of qasoline end eskad why that is necc3eeery i~ thie le a self-earvice operation. Desn 8herer clerilied that conditi on ie recomtnended on all theoe types o! reque~ta and la a requirement eo th ere ~rill be at loaet ona ft~"-time employee aveilable in cese there is n probl ~n-ouch as someone dropping n ho~e, atc. Mr. Redwnn respondod to Commiasioner Buahore that the repeir tecility hae alread,y been cloeed. Commieeioner Ruat~ore etetecl every stetion rnmer he hee over known, did not make his prolit from aQlling gaeol ine, but from the repair work and other inst~-llatione and qas anlea we~e i ncidental to his repeir eervice. He asked the hours o! operation now with Mr. Andwdn replyinq they are open lro~ 7:00 e.m. ta 11:00 p.m. and they would probably stny opnn 24 hours e dey etter the tirst yeer if this ie profit~b?.e. Commiseioner Bushore stated he fel t th~y need to meke a deciaion whether or not to uae the lnnd for a qasaline service etntion nnd relet~d aervicee or a convenience mnrket because he ~e a not lika dual usee. H~+ ateted he knows what that neighbor.hood is llke an d it does have socao problgms now, and the neighbore are c~ncerned about the cumuletive affect. Mr. Radwan stated he would like to dis cu»s thia matter with hic advisor and make a choice between ~aeoline an 1 ea or a n-arket and nsked for a continuance. Chairman Fry stated if the petiti oner aakes a choice, he will not need a conditionel use perm.it because he ie allowed Lo do one or the other. Comm~iseloner Herbst steted they ca n continue the present opAration and handle the autoa-otive parts without any problem. Mr. Radwan r~tatad he aould like ttze opportunity to come beck. ACTION: Chairman Fry ~tfered a n~tion, seconcted by Conmtiesioner McBurney and MpTZpN CARRSE~ (Commiseioner La C lai.re abaent), th~t considerati.on of the agorementioned matter be continued to the reqularly-scheduled .~eetinq of October 4, 1982, at ths re~uast o! the petitioner. ~rt u : ~~ 82-189 MI~RB, AN1-NEIM CITY PL7~tiNING COMMYPBION~ BE~T~~R 8, 1982 ITl~1 t~0 12. 1lIR CATIDCiORICAL lCXEMpR'ION-CLA86 11 IWD VJ1R~11NGE N0. 3293 PUSLiC KEJ-itIt7G. OWN6R: T,2I-TR]S1~OAY8 1U380CIAT68, 2222 Corinth 1-w+nue, i.os I-nqdles- CA 90064~ AG3NT~ M8• A86IE DU!'!'Y~ 2121 W. Cre~cent 1-venua, NH, l~nahsimr C7- 9~801• Propsrty d~~cribed e~ sn irr~qulerly-thspad pa-rc~l ot lnnd coneistiinq o! approximetely 9.2 acr~e, 7Q0-720 North Velley Streat. Wsivaru o! permitt~d locetion ~an8 maximu~n height to retein a lroeetending sign. There was no ona indicetinq their pr~sence in oppoeition to subject request end althouqh the etaLt report to the Plenning Caa~mission wt~s not reed at the public hearing, i.t is relerrad ko end nwde a part of the minutee. 1~b~iQ Dufty, egent, 1118 PerRqrino Place, 1-naheim, roa~d a prepared statement (~apy o! whioh ie in the P1aRriing Department fi.lea) indiceting thay leel they hsve en obliqation to the 97 indlvidual buelneesee which occupy 123 c~uites in ttais perk whoen eurvival dependa on locetion~l identityt that the park ie~ not ors e heavily trav9led arkery and without the lreeway eiqn, the location idenl.ity is m.inimeli that the eiqn ie 40 feet hiqh, which le necegeary due to t?~ae re~lrodd between the eign end the Senta Ana Freawayt thet they leel the requeet im justifiQd bneed on the preccsdent o! Veriance No. 2973, grent~d October 3, 1977, for A 48-l00~ hiqh ~reQ-atending siqn on the property centiguoua to subject propertyt that. the aign ~s Placed not to he a~ iz~lrinqement on e cesidential erea to ttie north acrose the freewey and t1~e railxond. T'~i~ PUBLIC HEAAING WAS CI.03ED . Cs~mmiseioner King Rtated hg c~uld eaeily aee the hardehip here and lorcing the applicant to remove the eiqn does not n-~ke sense and Cc~mmissioner Horbst agreed, eapecialla~ since there is no edjoining ueeble property. =t was noted the Plann~ng Di~ actor or hie authari~ed representative has detertnined that the propc~eed projeat falle within the definition of Cateqorical Exemptione, Claas 11~ ns detined in the State Enviroruaental Impact Repozt Guidelines end is, theretore, cetegorically exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR. ~r~ ,. !-CTIpN: Commieaioner•ottered Resolution No. PC82-170 and moved !or its pasaege and adoption that the Anaheim City Planniny Commisaion doas hezeby grnnt Variance No. 329a on the basis of the aize nnd ehnpe o! the px'operty and on the basis that this siqn lies been exiating tor six years and haa not had a detritoeiital ePfect on the surroundinq erea and due to the location of the sign relative to ite..urroundinq and angle and due to walle and qreenery at the Torth side of the propezty and the railroa~t track, the residente tu the north are n~t disturbed nnd eubject to Interdapartmental Cona~-ittee recommendations. ~oeami.seioner Buehore asked that a gtipulation bn added to the resolution that the si~ will only b~ ueed to advertiee avQilab3e epace in the complex And would not adveztis~a individ~al producta with Ms. Dutfy agreeinq to that stipulation. On roll call, the loragoinq resolution aas ~nssdd by the following vote: AYES : SOVAS ~ BUBI30RE i P'1~Y r HERSST ~ lCING, MC HURNEY N~EB: NONffi ABgEt~Ti' s LA CLi-II~ \= ~ `~.~ ~ MINUTEB, 11Ii11Nl~IM CTTY pIJ1Nt~1ING Cq~tlII88ION, 91CPT8MBER 8, 19H2 H2-490 ITEM N0. 13. EIR C11T300RIC11L 1lXEMPTION-CLA88 5 11ti0 VIIRII-NC8 N0. 3291 PU!lLIC HgJ1RINt3. OWNER: 1~MNK N. ~1ND lMRT~t11 WIBR, 6707 Eucslyptue Drive, J-nahsim, G 9Z807 and JBNNY 8. YIM, 9~7 8. Hadin Court, Anaheim Ca 92807. Property deacri!»d as an ixr~qularly-ahapsd parc~l o! land aonsiating o! approximately .66 ecre, 6707 Euce~lyptus Drive. Waiver o! mnximum fence heiqht to penait e tennia court. There wes no o~a indiceting their preeence in opposition to subjer,t request +~nd elthouqh the etaf! report to the Planning Commission wae not read et the public hearinq, it is referred to and made a pert oP the minutes. Mnithe Wiee, proparty owner, wde preaent ta answer nny questions. THE PU9LIC HEIIRING WAS CLOB~b. C.ommieeioner McBurney clarilled the varience is neceaoary becauoe code permits a maxianun lenca heiqht o! 42 inchee in the requlred 10-foot eetbeck adjecent to a private ecceaA eesement and the plane indicate a 12-loot high chain link tence enalosinq the proposod tennia court located 1 to 3 feet lrom tha eaeterl.y property lir-e adjecent to the Sucalyptus Drive, s priv~te road. Dean Sherer, Aeaaclete ~lnnnez, explained the location of this court is actually in an erea defi.ned by code aa e front yerd which requirea a 25 toot aetback. Ms. wiee refezred to comments by ths Tr+~tfic Enqineer reqarding clear vehicular line-of-aiqht and expleined there esre only four h~usas on the privete street. Dean Sherer claz~ified the 'Treflic EnqineAr had reviewed che ~lans nnd has deleted that recocnnendation. It was noted the Plenninq D.irector or hie authorized repreaentative has datermined thnt the proposed pro~ect falls within the definition of Cateqorical Exemptions, Class 5, ns defined in the State 8nvironmental Impact Report Guidelines end ie, therafore, ceteqorically ~xempt fro~a the requirement to pr.epare an EIR. ACTION: Conmaieeioner Herbet oftered Reaolution No. PC82-171 and moved for ita pnseege and adoption that the Annheim City Planning Commieaion doea hereby grant Variance No. 3291 on the basis that denial would deprive subject property o! privileqae enjoyed by other propertios in the same zone and vicinity end aubject to Intordepartmental Committee recota~endations. On roll call, the foreqoing ree~lution Nas pa~••asd by the followinq vote: AYE8: BOUAS, BUSHORE, !'RY, HER83T, ICYNG, MC BURNBY NOESt NON~ ABSSNT: LA CLAIRB l ~ ~r MINUTEB, 11Nl1NEIM CITY PLJII~iNZNG COMMZ8820N, SEPTl:1A86R 8, 1982 82-491 ITaMI NO. 14 REPOATB 11ND RECONM3NU11TION8 8tsf! raports on the lollowinq wera presentad but not reud: 1~.. CONDITIdN11I. U88 PllRMIT NO• 1825 - Ibsque~t !or termination lrom Carl iYellace~, Robert 8chuller F[ini~trie4, o! Condition~+l Uee Permit No. 1825 for prap~+rty locetad on the eouth eide of. Orenqawood 1lvenue, npproxiawtely 437 leet nn the eest eida o! Lawis 8treet, end 236 leet on the eouthweet eide o! Manchester Avenue. It wae noted th+~t City Council termineted Conditi~nAl. Uee Pezmit No. 1825 at ~hair reqularly-scheduled meetinq of Auguet 24, 1982, (Reaolution No. 82-439)rtherefore, no action by the Planning CooQrtiasi.on wae neceeanry B. CONDITZONAL tJSE PERMtIT N0. 888 - Requeat for nunc pra Cunc reROlution unending Reeolution No. PC81-197• Followinq the Planning Commnission meeting, it was detcrmined thnt NO ACTION wee neceasar.y on the abovo-mentioned matter. C. CONpITIONAL USE PERMZT N0. 2100 - Requoet for an exteneion of time fran Judy Ptahuta, McDonald's Corporetion tor property at 119 Weat Bell Rond. Commisaioner King olfered e motion, seconded by Commisaioner McHurney and MOTION CARRIED (Comn~is~ioner Lai Claire absent), that the Anaheim City Planning Coam-ieaion doee hereby qrant a retroactive one-year exteneion of titne for CAnditionnl Use Pera-it No. 2100 to expire on August 11, 1983. U. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2090 - Requeet for an extension of time from Harvey Owen, for property located a~ 1160 North Krnemer &~uleverd (Oscar's). Cocoa~iaeioner King offered a motion, seconded by Coauiesioner McBurney and MOTION CARRI~D (Ce~mmiasioner La Claire absent), that the Anaheic- City Planning Commisaion does hereby qrant a retroactive one-year extensi.on af tl.me for Conditional Use Permit No. 2090 to expire on June 2, 1983. . ~ ' ~ MINU'PES, 11t~1J1HEIM CITY PLANNZI~ COMKISSION, SEPTEMHER 8, 1982 82'492 B. CONDITIONIIL U8~_ PERMIT N0. ~093 - Reque~t !or en sxt~n.ion o! times tr~om Robert S~nchet tor prop~rty located at 911 South Sylven Str~et. Canmis~ioner King ot~ered a e~otion, ssconded by Cammi~sionar McBurnoy and MOT20N CARRISD (Ceadrtissioner La Claire aboent), that th• 1lnehe.lan City Planninq Conaniseion does h'r~by qrant a two-yoar r~troa~ative extansian o! tin~e !or Conditional Use Permit No. 2093 to expire on June 30, 1984. F. CONDITTONAI. U8B PE1iMIT N0. 22b8 -~~quest !or nn extension o! time fran Gena 1-. and Katie M. Albin, for propsrty located nt 354 Orangewood Avenue. Cammission~r Kinq o!lered a motlon, saconded by Commisaioner McBurney and MOTION CARRIED (Commia~ioner ~s C'aire ab~ent), th~t the Anahaim City Planning cnmmission dosa hereby grant n retroactive one-yedr oxtenaion of time !or Conditional Use Permit No. 2248 to expire on J~uquat 2•-. 1983. G. CONAITIONAI. USE PERM7T N0. 1985 - Request for tern~ination frum Douq Gnrnee, l4outhweat Leaaing +snd Rentnl Inc., for property located at 1843 Mountni.n Vi~w Avenue. Commi.tisioner Kinq offered Reaolution No. PC82-172 and moved for it.e passage and ndoption thet the !-naheim City Planning Caem-iesion doas hereb~~ terminete Conditional Uee Permit No. 1985 previously approved undex Reaolution No. PC79-117. On roll cnll, the foregoing resolution was paseed by the following vote: AYES: BOUAS, BUSHOi2E, FRY, HERAS'f, KING, MC BURNRY NOES: NONE ABSENT: LA CLAIRE A0.TOUIiNMENT: There being no furt!~er bu~ineea, Coma-issioner Herbat oftered A motian, secanded by Commissionpr McBurney and MOTION CJ~-RRIEn (Coamtissioner La Clair~ abaent), that the meeting be adjnurned. The meetinq was adjourned at 4:55 p.m. Respecttully sub~aitted, ~ A,,~,~ ~ `~k'~iV~'~'s~ E~CJ~ Edith L. Harris, Searetary Anaheim City Plenninq Commission ffi,H: lm - :_ ~ - - _ x - _ . r... w _ t r•~:+r~ v .~ +( t ~ arrp°K+711 +._:i. ~ - ~ . . _ , .. . . - . . . . ~w . .. ~ ~ . . . . .. '~ . . ;.. .r ~~~ - . r 5.~'n. ia ... . .. .. _ . _. .e ? ... ~ : : .', , , ...,. ~ ~~ ` : "~ . r ~.;.:. . __-.. _.-:.. . .~.:-~.,. . ... ,-- ....,~.-: .~~.. . ~.i. .-a..~~.. . _ ... . ..~r :.:..2. .. _: . I ' ks _ t ~ .: ..,,..~..zs._x`~ f_~~=ywv~4. r ~f: }. 1V.1. ;~.~ pi