Minutes-PC 1982/10/04~ ~ '~.~
~. , , "
RgGUL11R MQi1~TIN0 OF THE AN)1HEIM ~IT1f PIJINNINCi COMMISSION
[tECiL1IJ-R !~~'I'ING The reguler meetinq a! the llnAheim Cit•y Plenninq Cammiesion
w~e celled to order by Chairman P'ry nC 10:00 a~m. ~ October
4, 1982, in the Council Chamber, a quoruai beirg pre~ant and
the Comm.in~ian revirwed plans of the iteme on toAay'n
aqondr .
Receea: 11:30 e.m.
R~convenc: 1s30 p.m.
PRLSBNT Cheirmen: Fry
Connnieeianeras Houea, Pushore, Flerbat, King, i.n Cleire,
McBurney
Agg},rNT Commiseionera: None
ALSO PREBENT AnnikA Santalehti
Jack Wt~ite
Shirley Lend
Jack Judd
Qean SherQr
John Anderson
Edith Herris
Aeeietant Director f or 7oninq
Aaeietent City Attar ney
Trelfic Engineering Aeeiekent
Civil Gngineerinq Aa~+ociete
Aasociate Plenner
Aeeoclate Planner
Planntng Coaimiaeion 8eeretery
APPROVAL OF MINUTESs Cbmmiasianer Boaas ~ffered a caotion, secoraded by
Commisaioner Kinq and MOTION CAttRIED, thet the minutea of the n~eting af
September 2Q, 1982, be approved as submitted.
ITEM l. ENVSRONM~NTAI. IMPACT REPORT IdO. 254 (PREVIOUSLY 1-PPROV!'sU) , WAIVER OF
CnDE REQUIREMENT ANC CONDITTONAL USE PERMI~' NO. 2322 (RSIIDVSRTI SED)
PUHLIC HEARING. OWNER: WILLIAM P. DR~GI~NZA, ET ]hL, 2045 S. Karbor Boul~vard,
Anahein, CA 92902. RGENT: WALTER C. HO~NG, 3315 Gerden Terrace . Hacienda
Neiqhta, CA 91~45. Property is deacrlbed as nn irregularly-ehaped parcel of
land consiating of approxitnAtely 3.3 acree, 2045 S. Harbor Aoulevard iReqency
Eiotel ) .
Continued from the meetinq of September 8, 1982.
To permit a 12-etory, 108-foot hiqh, 488-room hotel with accessory ub3B and
on-sale alcoholic beverages with waivers of a) permitted locati on oP
freeatanding signs, b) minimucn dietance betWeen aiqns, c) maxiaara~m hEight of
illumiuated roof eigns, and d) minimwa nuatber of parking speces .
Thert waa one person indicntinq h3s presence ir oppoeition to s~bject requeat
and althouqh the atatf report was not read, it is referred to a=~d made a part
of the minutes.
0157H 87-515 10/4/62
~ ~~µ~ ~
MINUT88, MI)1Hl~IM CTTY PI~J-NNING COMMI89ION, (~CT08ER 4, 1982 H2-51G
JeCk White, A~sietent Ci.ty Attarney, steted et~t! w~oulA racononcnd a
tnodilicetion to Condition No~ 15 of the Intarcfepertmental Conanittee
r~ecommencletiono to reed es f~llaw~t "ThaC by aocoptence .~nd exercise of thid
petmit, devtlop~er/owrter ~cknowl.odqee the euthority of the City ko terminat~.
madify or impose eddit.ional cc-nditione ot' c~pore• iona ~ursuant to thie permit
for any of the reesc~n~ aet lortti in Sec~ion 18.03.092 of thg Anahei.m Munici~al
Code, including, but not limited to eny det'icionay in thA numbcr at on-eit~
~rking epacee.~~
D~ean 3herer, Aesocietu Plannar, anked thet ConQition N~. 6 ba deleted since
t~~e ex~eting etructure will b~ demoliehed and thet Conditian No. 8 be daleted
nn L•he beais that it hae beon complied with end la no l~~qer necessery.
Wdltor Honq, ngent, aek~d for r_larificetion reqnrding the City Attornoy'e
modilicatio~ to Condition No. 1.5. Chairmnr~ Fry alerified t.here .ia n~ mention
in the pXOpased ~nodified condition ~f th~ parY.ing asadsAment dintrict.
Jeck WhiGp explained thc conditi~n, ae pre~enCly propoeed, is rathar veguc and
would bo diPS'icult to enforce eincP it do~~ not dePine ina~leqi~ete park7ng. He
ataCed Section 18.03.092 ~f. the C~dA allc~w~ the City to cAll for a public
herring and ~.i va natice to tho dwnere ancl r~urroun<ting ~roperty ownc~ra end meke
a d.:termineCion the't tha publi.c int~rest, health, sat'ety and general welfero
would be best served by requiring additi~r~~l parking.
Mr. Honq steted ho had met with the staff ~~F dffferent ~~ity departments Iast
week an8 worked out tr+sffic conc~rns and the lncati~n of the tresh bina and
clar.lfied Che circulatior- haa not be~n chanqed on ~hia revis~d plen.
Davi.l Th~mas, 1.837 S~iuth Veimont, Los Anq~los, atatc~ he is repre~venting
Thrif'timarts that t'~ey are rot particularly op~aed to the develc~pment of thia
hotcl bUt wa~nt ta re~e~t their concerns regardinq their parking lot aince they
hav~ hail problQms .~ the paet w.ith the unauthorized uae of their parking lot
et Harbar Bouleverd and Oranqewoo~ ancl noted their parking lot ie ~nly
avallable for their cuat~mers. He etated tt~ey have frequsntly had to have
automr~bile~s, campers or trucke remc~ved at cor-eidereble cont to the owners of
the vnhicles. Ne stated ~hc~y are concernecf that thie development will create
addit~onal problems with the queatx of the hotel using their parking lot and
wanted to be sure it ie underetood that :~ey will not, undex any conditi~na,
permit: unauthorized use of thoir parking lot.
Mr. Hc+ng stated there will he a mr~s~nry wall on the south property 11ne and
their quests will n~t be able to welk through and he felt they will have more
than adequate parking.
THE PUBLIC HEARING W11S CLO$P'D.
Coa~miseioner Herbst asked if the parking 8tructure will be desiqned and
constructed witl~ adequate footings and fo~undation sa that r~dditional floora
can be added in the future, iP necessary. Mr. Hang agreed they would comply
with that stipulation.
Commissi~ner Herbst eeked about the shada~w effect of a 12-story hotel and
a~keci whether or not the netghbora were aware of thie Change from 6 stories as
origine.lly proposed.
10/4/82
~
~k~
~.
MINlJTES, 11NJ1HEIM CITY PLANNZNG COMMISSION, OCR'08TR 4, 1982
: _~
A2-517
Deen Aher.er expleined the revi~ad plenp were readvertisod !or 12 et~riea en~~
th~ neiqhhore were notitied.
Mr~ Hong oxplein~d the moet w~eterly str~~rture he• not b~en chenqed end e
6-atery building with adequate eetbeck lrom the re~idential neiqhborhood is
propoAed.
Commiseioner Herbet atated other high hotola in the aree heve intertered with
teloviaion reception end caused eome discomfort to the reqitlenta beceuse the
hotel wee eti~ding their hackyerds, etc.
Mr. Hong etet~~d the propoaed conditione incl~ide requ~remente to elleviat~+
thoae concerns and the structure edjacent xa the reeidencee is only 6-atnrieA
high and thR 12-story ntructure is actually only 11 storiest however, he! did
not think the structureg w.ill cauAn eny blockagi~~ ~f eunliqht, etc.
Commieaionex King clnrified tr~at the hl<~ck well on the south prnpw_rty line
wi.ll bcs continuous ~rom the w~st to the eest property tine with no getes.
Cotnmissioner Sur-hozc asked what the i~~stification would be Por the sign
variance end oteted all thc~ other hotele in the area heve conformed ta the
eiqn code. Mr. Hang replied the r.oof sign iA ~ver 100 fAet nway from the
fres-standing siqn vertically. He explained only part of the roof aign would
excee~3 the r~af lin~.
C~mmiseioner Huehore c.larified that essentially the roof aiqn would be the
13th Plaor of the hotel. Mr. Fiong explained t:hey wish to attract the traffic
coming ~ff the freeway.
Commiseioner T,e Claire Qtated there is nothing unusual about the size, shape
or topography ~f subject ~~roperty to warrant the npprovel of a aic~n varience.
C~mmisaioner Bushore esked if t.he environmental impar.t report addresaed a
12-etory hotel and the ehadcnas it woulci creat~, etr.
Dean 3herer stated th~ EIR did addrese the shadow patterne of a 12-story
building, k~ut a 12-story baildinq was never propoeed near sinqle-fnmily
residences, and origin311y was proposed in en eest/west co~~figuration on the
pxoperty.
r.ommiesioner Buahore stated he is concern~d because this plan is drastice~lly
different and felt there probably ahould be an ad~]endum to the EIR. He steted
he did not see any justificatfon for the waiver and did not think the
petitioner has his ideas xedlly formed for thia project becauae this is a
completely different plan.
Mr. Hong $tated the plans were revised after the~• did a coet analyeis of the
underground parking and Rxplained tha 12-story building will actually face
Herbor which ie developed commerciallyt and that the Quality Inn is adjacent
to the north.
10/4/82
4
,
~ «
I~~~
. . ~.
~ .~
..
MINUTEB, ANAHF.IM CITY PLANNINa COMMISSION, OCT08FR 4, 1982 82-518
DeAn Sherer eteted the deeign of Lh1e project ie very muc1~ different then the
origi~al prc~poeal~ h~wever, tho numbr.r o! rooma and heiqht doea not chanqe end
at~f~ anelyzed the pro~act on khe besie that the EIR addre~ased e 12-ator.y,
lOd-foot hiyh, 488-room hotel. i~e stated the Planning Commission mey wiah to
h;~va the BIR amended to retlect the revised ~l.~ne beceuse the project ie not
t•he same es the one enelyted for the EIR. He expleined the percent~ge of
paxkinq weivrar ie '9.1• end it wes originelly 80.5R. Ne pointecl out th~re
were conditic~na included in thcs oriqinal approvel for the bene~it af. the
homeownera end the Commission mey wish to incorporato th~ae semc~ conditiona in
the epproval of this proj~ct, if it is th~ir decision to ~pprove it. He
eteted thosP conditionn were for an 8-toot fiigh bl~ck well and 1S-gellon trves
end mAture shrube on the weat property line, installation af d ceble
televi.sion syst~m for the sinqle-Fnmily residence~s t~ the w~st,
conatruction rstartir-y times no parlier then 7:00 a.m. and the s:te sli~ll be
edequately ~nc~ frequently weterc~d durinq conatruc~ion.
Commisei~ner BuHh~re clarifiod hir~ cancerns are that the ~lans differ
ei.gnificankly from tha oriqindl npproval. Ct~elrman Fry at~+tod he felt the
errangem~nt of the builclings ia much hettor in this pr~>p~sal.
Commia~sioner I,~ Claire steted ehe is c~ncernFd abc~ut the heiqht of the aigne
and ahe d1d not aee any juatif.ication for grentinq that request.
Mz. Honq etated if the heiqht of th~ eign is of real. concern, he would
stlpulate to keeping the ~ign levPl with the h~ic~ht of tF~e parapet makinq it a
w~ll siqn and painted ~ut aynin it is actually facing commercial usc~s.
Dean Sherer exp:tai.ned wa;l signs are conaidhred differe~ntly in the cocle than
illuminated zo~f signa which are limited in terma of distance from reeidential
propert,y and thet this Aiqn will t~e facing Harbor Boul~vard and not have an
i.mpact on the reaidential proparties to the rear, and if tho aign dnea not
exceed the tep of the parapet, it Wovld not be conaidered a roof siqn and
would be a wall sign. Ne recommended thet waivere (b) ~nd (c) bc denied.
Commissioner Bushare stated that would e~atisfy hia concerns regardi.ng the
signs and clerified that emeryency vehicles wo~~ld h+~ve adequate access due to
the canfiguration of the buildi.ngs.
It was noted that F.nvironmental Tmpact Report No. 254 was previously certified
by the ~'ity Cauncil on May 11, 1982, in conjunc~f.on with the original approval
of Conditional Use Permit No. 2322.
ACTION: Coauniasioner La Claire offered a mation, se~onded by Commissioner
Herbst end MOTION CARRIED, that the Anaheim City Planning Consnission does
herehy approve waiver (a) on the basis that thp property to the south is
developed with co~nercial uses and denial would deprive subject property of a
privileqe enjc~yed hy other properties in the eame zone and vicinity and
denyinq waivers (b and c) on the basis that the petitioner stipulated at the
publia l:earing to lower the heiqht of the roof siqn to be level with the
parapet which would then be considered as a wall-a~ounted eignt and qrantinq
waiver (d) on the basis that parkinq demand studies of hotels and motels in
the area indicate a percentege of the guests errive by transportation modes
other than private vehtcle nnd elso on the baais that the petitioner has
stipulated to provide ac~ditional parkinq if necessary in the future.
10/4/82
,.,
i
MINVT88~ ANAHL-IM CITY PLI1NNIt~f3 COMMISSION, OC'~OB~R 4, 1982
~~
82-519
Commioeioner I.A Cl~ire efPer~d Reaolution No. FC82-185 end movad !or ite
passaqe and etdoption that the Anehelm City Plennl.nq Conaniasion does hereby
qrant Conditional Uso Permit No. 2322, in part, aubject to the lollowinq
et~ipuletiann mede by the petitioner at the public hearing~ e) thet an e-loot
hi.qh black well end 15-gellan treee sn~ meture ehrube shall be pzovided on the
wost property linet b) that construction etartinA timea ehall be no earlier
tha~~ 7:00 a.m.~ c) thet the conetruction aite shell be adequately end
frequently wetered during conetructian to eneure thet dus[. will not be e
nui~ancef d) that tAlevision entenna or cable aystem ahall be provided without
charqe to the reeidenta to eneur~ satisft~ctory level o! tel~vision signels and
sub~evt t4 Intordepartmental Committee zecommencfatioi-s including modili.cdtion
to Condition Na. 15 and deletion of Condition Nos. 6~nd A.
On roll call, th4 foreqoinq resolution waa pessed by the following votes
AYES: BOUA3, HUSHORE, FRY, HER9ST, KING, I.A CLAIRE, MC BURNEY
NO~~~~ s NONL
ABSENT: NONE
Jack Whita, Assiatent City Attorney, presonted the wrikten right to appeal the
Planning Commiesion's dACieion within 22 d+~ys to the City Council.
ITEM N0. 2. EIR NF.'GATTVE DECLARATION_AND CONDITZONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2373
PUBLIC HEARING. OWNEA: I$ERHAM AI.I ATA, 26371 Avery Parkway, Mission Viejo,
CA 92675. AGFNT: TALAT RADWAN, 26371 F~vary Pnrkway, Mission Viajo, Ca
92675. Froperty deA~~ribed ns a r~ctenqularly -shaped pe+rcel of land conaiating
of approximately 0.42 acre~ 1725 S. Brookhurst Street.
Continued trom the A,Qeting of 5eptember 8, 1982.
To permi~ a convenience merket with gasoline eales.
There were three persons indicating theix- prosence i.n opposition ~o subject
request and although the staf.f report was not read, it is rPferred to and made
e part of the minutes.
A1 Serreto, 29Q1 S. R~!nee Drive, Srnta Ane, agent, presented photographs of
the existing eervice stetion and the proposed conversion explai,ninq they plan
to spend ~150,OOU remodelinq th~s station and that it will t~e +~n impravement
t~ the erpa. Ele aleo presented er. artiet's renderir-g o: the proposed facility.
Mr. Serrato used the overhead projector to ahow a n!ap of the aite and
e~cplained they feel clo~inq one of the driveways, as euqgested by the Traffic
Enqineer, would have a neqattve effect becauaQ of the intensified traffic
useg~. He painted out ~he thxee c]rivewaye and concern that i.f the ane
driveway is closed, becauee of the sign, with more than one vehicld, there
would be a taaneuvexability problem. He added that Tx~ffic Departanent 8id
r,onsider that there tnay be same problemB it the driveway is closed and he
nsked that they be allowed t~ work with tho Traffi.c Udpartment to work out an
alternatine plan.
t 0/4/82
_ .__._~__..~
~
MIttU'PES, AN1-HEIM CITY PLANNING COMIMJS9ION, OC'POB~R 4, 1982 82-520
Ami.n Radwen (eecretery could not verify name), generel msneqer nt the~ e~rvice
~tetion, steted the mein problem with thie requeet ie the gaeoline eeles end
they could hsve ~he convenience m~rkot tt~ere without the eale of qeAOline. Ne
prenented pe:ltiona e~ignod hy epproximetely 1500 of hia patrona and bueinese
people in the eree who are not oppoee~' ~ceuse they le41 1t w~uld bc
conv~nient for them. He edded he thouqht thie would be a aucreseful bueineen
and an naset to the City end community dnd would hrinq in addltionel texea.
Ramon Chekko, owner af the exi~at.ing maxket et 1701 Hrookhui~st., etate~l he i.s
tryinq to sell hia merket and proApective b~iyers t,evc backed ~ut twice becnuae
of thR propoaed market end thet he i.s A,.ree~iy atruggling to make a living end
stat~d he would sa11 hi$ merket to this petitioner.
Arlene Almeleh, 27 C~etill.a, Irvine, Coor.dinator nP the m~dical ~asi.atant
proqram in the ad~acent achool, etated they axe concerned eb~ut l•hia markot=
thnt there io a sign dieplayed now incllcating thoy intend to sell alc~holic
beveraqr~st thnt their drivewAyA aze the r~eme and people ere rncing their
v~shiclea ir~ the clriveway nnw and they are cnncarnad !he problem wiil be
:;ompounded with thia market. She ndd~d moat of their atudants are female,
~nder 21 and they havF cla~ses until 10:30 p.m. and the e~chool ia concerned
about th~ safety of t:he girls leAVinq in the ~vening.
Jon Van Cleave atated he is epeakinc~ on behAlf of Marvin Barc~b, an adjacent
land owner direc~tly on the nort}t and west ~f ~ubjer.t propertyi that Mr. 9a~:~+~1
ia thc~ former owr~er of the Soutliern Celi fornia Coll.eqQ of Medical and Uent~~
Careers and iR extremely concerned about ttie on-qning prnfessional atmosph+~r~
of the calleg~±, even though he recently sold it, and Mr. Barab is the lrr~=~t~~
for the college alonq with ~ther tenantE and ha~a ~n on-going financial =~rF::
landlord/tenant interest in the adjacent prop~rties. He ad9Ad Mr. Bara,.~, -
n~t psrticularl.y opposed to the sule of nlcoholic beveraqc+s or the sal<~ .~:
gaeoline with food, hut he doeE object to the locati.on of this type faci:: ~:•
in such close pr~ximiky to a profeae3~na1 colleqe. Ne referred t~ th~,
convenience market facility being open 24 hours a day ar-d ~tated there '-~ ~
aerious poseibility of some safety hazarda to theae: y~ung femnle studerrr~~ ~
noted thP existinq market closes at 9:00 p.m.
Mr. Serrato stated there is only an aseua-ption thet the young femal:~ ato~~e~'
safety would be jeopardiTed, but he did not think i~ will. be, and nr~teci sc~
of theae t~tudentx siqned the petition in favor c~f this project.. Refe~ii.n~ to
the petitions, he atated 1000 to 1200 0~ the signatures are from An~Reim
residents which sugqests this will aerve a purpose and is a conveniencw; ,~nd
thbt right now the property fe being under-utilized and they hope this Klil be
a majoz• improvement and he did not see anythinq wran~ with the apirit nf
competition.
Mr. Ra~]wan 3t8tP.(j they will not k~ open 24 hours u c~ay and he did not think
they will create any problems for the community ~r the stuctents at the coileqe
and noted that persona under 21 years of aqe weMald not be pQrmitt^~ed to
purchese the alcoholic beverages.
THE kJHLIC HEARING WAS rLOSED.
10/9/82
..
~~. f ,.~
<~
MINUTfiB, ANAH~IM CITY PLIINNINO COMMISf~20N, OC'I'09ER 4, 1982 82-521
Comtniesioner Kinq steted he thought cloting the middle drivewey would create n
hatard becr~use it ex~sdites Lhe mov~mant ot care off Braokhurst. He etated
competitior- ie the beakbone o! thi~~ country.
8hirley LnnA, Aasistent Trelfi.c Fnqtneer, nteted the petitioner did come into
their oftice end ehe peraan+ally :oviewed the sita end Cha probl~m with the
center drivewey ie that i~ vehi.cles ere occupying the centar pump, other
vehicleg would be atecking out. onto the utreet. 3ho stated ahe did not
beli~ve they need the maesive efgn out !~•ont. She edded their otfice will
w~rk with the phtltion~+r to wor•k c,ut aome nlternar.ivc~ plen with the driveways,
but not to leave the center drivewey ae an entrance, ~+nd tl~ey would recommend
eccommodating tho use with only two driveways.
Mr. Serreto bteted they had discuRaed "no entrance" siqns and uainq that
ciriveway for exit only.
Commissianer La Claixe a~kpd Mr. Chakko iP he had a paper he w.iehed to presAnt
to the Commisaion. Mr. Chekko pr.esented a petil:ion siqned by persone in
opposition to th.is reqti~st anci oxplained thos~ siqnetures were meinly from hi8
customers.
Responding to Ccxiuniseioner La Clair~, Mr. Chakko stated business i~ elow and
hR ia tryinq hard to make a 2iving ar~d did not think his market would have a
chance with Another market openinq in the same l~cation. Ne explained he has
been ther.e for 2 yadrs and that there has been a general c9ecline and thAt last
yeAr wes bettc~r than this year.
Commiesioner Herbst stated service sr.ationa were qranted speci~l privileges by
beinq allowe~l ~lose rc, the street to aerve the travel.ing cuatomeret that there
is a small market in this shoppinq center desigtied ae a merket and he felt
qranting this service station the ~rivilege of having a market would be
qrenting a privilege not qranted to anyone elae and he did not feel denial
would be interPering with free enterpriser and he felt qrenting approval for
markets on these servic~ station corners would be unfair to other busine~sses
who have hed to mect Code requirements.
Commissioner La Clal.re e~qreed and etated she has stated in the past that if
these are going to be continually grnnted, every service station should be
given the right to aell food and every grocery atore should be given the right
to sell qas.
CouanisRioner King stated he felt this conversion shoald be granted as long ns
the project meeta the requirements. He stated if Anaheim is to qrow and
proqreas, tzaffic will increase.
Commisai.oner La Claire etated each one should be reviewed individually, but
there will be more and mo_re of these requeats and these service station lota
were not designed for markets and rQferred to nther convenience market.s wt~ich
were permitted ond which have created problems. Sl~e added that if the project
ia designed to conlorm with Code with the pumpa nnd drivewaye properly
deeigned and eetback from the etreet, they ehould be approvec~, but aPrvice
atations were already qranted privilegea not qi~an to convenience markets and
ehe felt tF.,ere should be a stop to theee dual uaes.
io/a/s2
~
~ t . ~
,. ~
~dINUTRB, ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISS20N, 0('TAB~R 4, 1982 82-522
Commiegioner Kinq atatdd hd falt thia project ig sn ideal llow lzom eeet to
v~ert end Comml.ae.ioner Huahore nddsd he lelt the flow ehould be nortl~ to eeuth
end edded he did not think the site is edequete. He etAted he hea no
objeation to competition but that he could not support this requeet becauee of
the dual use.
Commissloner Herbet noted tho pumpa ere only 15 foet frnm the property lino
And if there ere two cars there et the same time, they would be out orita th~
nti•eet ~nd ttiis would be impecting the property with m~re vPhicles and they
will be stdying longer because they w.ill Ue shopping in the merket,. He statad
he felt the dPaiqn is complet~ely inadequate end he c91d not went to ses thie
property owner granted a apecial privilege.
Commissioner Bushore noted the property owner can have a conveniQnco markeC by
rc~moving the gesolinc+ pumpa.
ACT20N: Commissioncsr IIuahore ~fPered a motinn, seconded b}~ Commiasioner Bouas
end MOTION CARRIED, thrt the Aneheim City Plannlnq Commiasion has reviewed the
propoael to permit e convenience market witt~ qaeoline nales an a
rectenqulerly-shapod percel of land conaiatinq of epproximately 0.42 scre,
having a frontage of approximatEly 160 feet. on tt~e west aide af Brookhurat
Street, end further deearib~d as 1725 South Br.ookhurst Street; and doea herehy
ap~rove the Negative Declar~ti~n frcam the rec~uirement tn prepere an
environmental impact report on the bnais that t1~p--r. would be no significant
individuel or cumUlative ACjVNX'9E! envirorunental impact due to the npproval of
this Negative peclaration sinr_~ the Aneheim Grnerhl Plan designates the
subject property for general c~cmnercial l~nd uFe:~ commensurate with the
proposttlt that no sensitive environmental impectn are involved in ~he
proposals that the Initial Study submitted by the petitianer indicates n~
siqniffcant individutsl or cumul~.tive adverse environmental impacts: and that
the Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoing findinqs is on file in
the City of Anaheim P2anning Dep~+rtment.
Commisaioner eushore offered Resolatfon No. PC82-186 and moved for its pasxage
and adoption that the Anaheim City Plenning Commiseion does hereby deny
Conditional Use Permit Na. 2373 on the basis that the site is not adequaxe to
permit dual uae of the property and would be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and qenerAl welfare of ttie ~itizena.
On roll cdll, the fareqoing resolut.t~n was passed by the foll,owing vote:
AYES: BOUAS, AUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, LA CLAIRE, l~tC HURNEY
NOES: KING
ABSENT: NONE
J~ck White, Aesiatant Cit,y Attorney~ presgnted the written riqht to appeal the
Flanning C~mmisaion's decision within 22 days to the City Council.
10/4/82
~ ~. ~ ~
MINUTS~, AN71H1CIM CITY PLIINNING COMMI88ION, OCT08ER 4, 1982 8~-523
ITEM NO. ~. TsIR NEG~-TIVE DSCLAR7ITION AND V1IRIANCE N0. 3298
PUBI~IC NEI1RINa. OWNRR~ LRIC L6DlER~R, Coto De Cace, M114, Trabuco Cenyon, CA
9?678. Property described er~ e re~ctangularly-ahaped percel ot lend consisting
o! epproxime-tely 19A5 equere leet, 942 N. Claudina 8treet.
Weiver ~! minitnum lot covernqe, minimum lendeceped eetback end minimum nuenber
end t~-pe o! parking epeces to construct e einglo••lamily reeid~nce.
There wae no ene indiceting their preeence in oppoeition to subject request
and although the etef! report was not reed, it is referred tn and mede a per*.
of the minuteR•
Larry Hellermen, 23501 Via Aldndro, Trabuco Cdnyon, agent, explained the
previnus rec~ueet waa denieci by the City Council mainly because thay were ueing
the existing structuz•e nnd because of the number Af waivere requeatod. He
explained they are plenning to alx~lish the exieting etr~~cture and delete the
eideyard setback. He pointed out thia is a small lot.
THE PUBLIC HE~-itING WAS CI.uSF.p.
ACTION: Commi.saic~nor Kiny of£ered e rnotion, aec~nded by Commissioner Bouas
and MO ION CARRIED, that the Anaheim City Plenninq Comtnission hea reviswed the
propoeal to construct e single-family rc~sidence with waivero ofemafimerking
coverage, minimum landscaped setback and minimwn number and CYP roximntely
spaces on a rzctengularly~s~~on~~peroP1~°~loximatelyi351feet~onpthe east side
1945 Rquare f~et, hAVinq groximatel.y 85 feet south af the center.line
of Claudina 3treet and located epp
of La Palma Avenue and further described as 942 North Claudina Streett and
doeo hereby approve the Negative Dpclarati.on from the requirement to prepare
an environm~ntal impact r:.~port on the basis that there would be no si~niflcant
individual or cun-ulative adveree envir~nmental impact due to the ~pproval of
this Neqative DRCleration since the Anah6lm General Plan degiqnates the
eubject propezty for medium density land uses commensurate wi~h the propasals
t~dt no sQnaitive environment+~l impacts are involved in thE proposal; that the
Tnitial Study sutnuitted by the pe~itioner indicat~s no siqnificant individual
or cumulative adverse environmental impt~ctss and that Lhe Negative Declaration
substantiating the foregoing findings ia on file in the Lity of Anaheim
Planning Department.
Commissioner King otfered Reaolution No. PC82-187 and moved for its passaqe
and adoption that the Anaheim City Planninq Commissian ~oes hereby crrant
Varian~e No. 3298 on the basis of the size of the subject property and other
structures ir- the area do heve sitnilar waivers and the project would urqrade
the r4iqhborhood and subject to Interdepartmental Committee recommendations.
On ro11 r.all, the foregoing reeolution was pasaed by the following vote:
AYES: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, ;~LIt83'P~ ICING~ I.~- CLAIRE~ MC BURNEY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
10/4/82
~
~
MINUTES, AN~HEIM CITY PLIINNZNG COMMISSION, OCTOASR 4, 1982 82-524
ITEM N0. 4. L~TR NSC;ATTVE DECLARIITION AND TENTATIVB Ml-P OF TMCT N0. 118S~i
PUBLIC NEARING. OWNffiRs CLYDE H. & JOAN M. SCHLtJND, 616 Peralte Nille,
Anaheim, CA 92807. AGENT: ANIICAL ENGINSERING, ATTN: WAYNE JOLLY, 1900 E.
Le Pe1me Avenue~, P. O. 8ox 3668, Anaheim, CA 92803. Property described ee en
i,rreqularl,y-shrped pArcel o! lsnd caneietinq af approximetely 5.3 eareo, 516
Perelte Nille Drive.
Ta eateblish a 5-lot, RS-HS-43,0000(SC) aingle-family ~one eubdivieion.
There wes no one indicating their preeence in oppoeiti~n to r~ubject request
end although the stnlf report wag nat read, it ie referred to and mede e pert
of the minutea.
Cal Qucyrel, Anacal Engine~ering, was pzesent ~~ anRwer any queatiAne.
It is noted e Negative Decleretion wns approved in connection with thia
pro~ect on September 20, 1982, in c~njunction with Variance Na. 3294.
ACTION: Commiesioner King oflerod a motion, seconded by Commissioner Bouas
and MOTION CAP.RIED, that the Anaheim City Planninq r_ommiaeicn doea hereby ilnd
that tha propased aubdivisian, together with its deaiqn and improvement, is
consiatent with the ~ity of Aneheim General Plan, pursuant tu Government Code
3ection 66473.5s and doee, therefore, approve Tentative Map of Trect No. 11856
fo: a 5-lot, RS-t~s-43,OOn(SC) aingle-family zone subdivieion aubject to the
following conditions:
1. Thet all engineerlnq requiremente of the City of Anaheim, along Cerro
Vista Drive and Peralta Hilae Drive includinq preparation of
improvament plens and inatalletion of all improv~m:nta such as Btreet
qrading and pavem8nt ehall be cnmplied with as required by the City
Engineer and in accordance with apecifications on file in the Office
~f the City Enqineert that security in the form of a bond,
certificate of depbsit, letter oP credit or. ~ash, in an amount and
form satiefact~ry to the City of Aneheim shall be posted with the
Ci.ty to guerant•ee the sat=Rfar.tory installation of the
above-mentioned improvementa. Said aecurity shall. be posted with the
City prior to approval of final map. The above-required ia-prov~ements
ahall be installed prior to occupency.
2. That fire hydrants shall be install~d and chaxged as required and
determined fo be neceasar.y by the Chief of the Fire Department prior
ta coanaencement of structural freming.
3. Tt~at the owner of subject property ~hell pay to the City of Ana~he~m
th~ appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to b~
appropriate by the City Council, said feea to be paid prior to fina].
tract map approval.
4. That ahould ~.his subdiviai~n be developed as more than one
Bubdivigion, each subdivision thereof ahall be submitted in tenta~tive
form for approval,
5. That nll lots within this tract shall be served by underqround
utilities.
10/4/82
~. 4~ ~
MINUTES, ANAHRIM CTTY PL11t~NINGi COMMI88ION, OCTOHER 4, 1982 82-57.5
6. Thet the originel dACUmentn uE che covene~nts, conditione, r~nd
restr.ictions and e letter addreaeed to the developer's title company
~ut.horiting rocordetion thereof, ahnll be ~submitted to tha City
Attorney's 0lfice snd approved by City Attorney's Office, Public
Ut.iliti.ee Depe~rtment, Building bivision, end the Enqineering Divieion
prior to the tinel tract map approvel. Said documente, as spproved,
dhell be recc~r•ded ~.n tho Orfice of the Oranqa County Re~order.
7. Thnt atreet nemes shall be nppraved hy the Cfty Planning Department
prior to epprovbl of a finel trect mep.
8. That drainage of said proporty ehall be diepoaed of in a manner
sat~s~'actory to the C:~ty Engineer. If, in tt~e preparation of the
aite, sufficient greding ie reyuir~~d to necesaitate a grading permit,
no work an grAdinq will be permitted betwQen October 15th end April
15t1~ unleae all required off••aite drainage facilitiea have bec~n
installed and ere operative. Pc,eitive aeaurence shell be provided
the City that such d.rainaqe fecilities will be campleted prior to
Octnbar 15th. Neceae~ary right-of-way for off-sitP drainAge
facilitiee shell be dediceted to the City, or the City Council ~hall
have ini.tiated condomnation proceedings therefore (the costs ~P which
shall be borne by the developer) prior to the c~mmencement of grading
operations. The required drainage facilitiex shnll be of a slze and
typp: aufficient to carry runoff watFra originatinq from higher
propertiea throuqh said pzoperty to til.timate disposal as approved by
the City F.nqineer. Sai.d drainagn faciliti~a ahell be the first item
of construction and sht+ll be completed and be functional throughout
the trect and 1'rom the dnwnstream boundary of the properhy to tha
ultimate point of c~l.eposal prior to the iseue~nce of any final
building inspections or occupancy permits. Orainaqe district
reimburaement aqreements may be mede available ta the developera of
sdid property upon Lheir request.
9. That the existing naturel drainage sha21 be maintair.Qd j.n ita preaent
condition or ~n approved drainage structure constructed to the
satiefaction of the City Enqineer.
10. If permanent s~reet name signs have n~t bePn instal'_ed, t3mpora~ry
stree*_ name siqns shall be installed prior to any accupancy•
11. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay appropriate drainage
assesement fees to the City of Aneheim as determined by the City
Enqineer prior to approval of a finnl tract map.
12. That the owner(s) of subject prop~rty shall pay the txaffic siqnal
assesament fee (Ordinence No. 3896), in an amount as determined by
the City Council, for each new dwelling unit prior to the issuan~e of
e Uuilding permit.
13. Thet the aliqnment and terminal point of storm drain easements shown
on this tentative tract n.ap shall not be considered final. These
easamer.ts ehall be ..ubject to precise design considerations and
apprcval af the City Enqineer.
14. That a deed restxiction be placed in the CC&Rs ~n lots 1 throuqh 4
requirinq that trnsh pick-up be from Peralta Hi11s Drive only.
t0/4/82
MINUTSS, ANAHICIM CITY PLANNINO COMII~lISSION, OCTOHER 4, 1982 82-5~6
IT~M NO. 5. BIR CATRGQRICAT,LY ffiX~MMIPT-CLA89 5 AND VARlANCB NO. 3295
P[1BLIC NEARING. OWNBR~ ROBSRT 8. 6 SHIRLEY M. FORD~ 2761 ~. Viking Avenue,
Aneheim, CA 928n6. Property deacribed es a rectangularly-aheped percNl o~
iand consietinq of appraxitnetely 7215 aquere Peet, 2761 L. Viking street.
Waiver o! minimum renr yerd c~tback to canetruct a room aAdition.
There was no one indicet.ing their preaence in opposition to aubject requeat
end Although the etef~ report wee nat xeed, it is referzed to nnd made n part
ot the minutea.
Robert B. Ford, owner, waa preaent to answor any questions.
THE P~-BLIC HFARING WAS CL09ED.
Respondiny to Commieaipnex Herbst, Mr. Ford clarified thot the project wi.ll
meet City codo.
It was noted the Planning Director or his authorized representative has
determined thdt the proposed project falls within the definitian of
Cetegoricel Exemptions, Clasa 5, ae ~efined in the 3tate Environmentbl Impact
Report GuidelinAe and is, therefor.e, categoricelly exempt fzom the requirement
to prepare an EIR.
ACTION: Commisaioner Herbet offerad Resolution No. PC82-188 and moved for its
passage and adoption that the Aneheim City Planning Conm-1eAion does hereby
grant Variance No. 3295 on the bdsis that the room to be added is an exieting
petio and has had no detrimental effect on the nei.ghborhood and on the basie
that denial would c~eprive subje~c.t property of privileqes enjoyed by other
propertiea in the eame tone and vicinity and aubject ta Interdepartmentel
Committee recommendations.
On roll call, the foregoing reaolutian wns pasaRd by the following vate:
AYES: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HFRB3T, KING, LA CLAIRE~ MC BURNEY
NOES : *IONE
A$SENT: NONE
ITEM N0. 6. EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION, WAIVER OP CODE REQUIREMENT AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2381
PUSLIC HEARING. OWNER: KEZY RADIO, 2NC., 1190 E. Ball Road, Anaheim, CA
92805. Property described as a rectangularly-shaped parcel o~ land consisting
of approximately 5.43 ecres, i313 Nancock Street (KEZY)•
To permit a 213-foot high radio transmitting tower in addition to an existing
radxo transmittinq statio:~ with waivar of permitted antenna.
There was no one indicatix~g their presence in oppoeition to subject request
and al•chouqh the ataff zeport was not read, it is referred to and made a part
o! the minutee.
10 /4/82
MINUTS8, 11NAH~IM CITY PLANNINO Ct~MMI88IAN, OCTOBL~R 4, 1982 82-SZ7
Den Mitoh~ll, Generwl Maneq~r, KEZY, ~xplainscl their prop~sal is to add e
liPth tower to *heir exie~inq lour tower~ to chenqe the conliquration of their
exlsti.nq pattarn.
THE PUBLIC HSARING WAS CL09E0.
Chairmen Fry eeked it thiA eppliceti~n hea boon approved by the FCC with Mr.
Mitchell reaponding that they ar4 in the rr~c~as oP qettinq th~t approval.
Cnmmiasioner euahore clarified that thqy will not uae thir~ towe~r !or nny ~ne
other than themselves with Mr. Mitchell expl.aining the towere will be uaed at
niqht only for their trenamiesiona.
ACTIONs Comtnleaioner King olfared e mation, seconded by C.crnmiasioner McBurn~y
end MOTI~N CARRI~Q, that the Anahpim City Plnnning CommiBai~n hea reviewod the
propoeal t~ perm:t a 213-foot hiqh redi~ traremittinc~ tower eddition to an
exi~tinq radio tranemitting radio etntion ~~ith waiver of permitted antenna on
a rectangulerly-ahepe~ parcel of land coneietinq of appx~ximetely 5.43 acres,
hat'ng a frontage of epproximntely 359 feet ~n the west ~ide of Hencock 3treot
and furthor deacribed as 1313 He~ncock Streett and doea hQreby approve the
Neyntive Decleration lrom the requiremenC to prepere An environmentel impact•
report on the beais that there would be no aignifiaant indivi.dual or
cumulative edverae environmental impact due to the approvel of this Negative
Declaration since the Aneheim General Plan deaiqnates the sut,ject property for
general induatrial lend uaes commensurnte with the propoealt that no sensitive
environmental impacts are involved in the proposelt thnt ti7a Initial Study
submitteif by the petitioner in~icates no eiqnificant individual or cumulative
adverse environmental imp~cta; and that tt~e Negative Decleration
~ub~':antiating the foreqoing findings ia on files in the City of Anaheim
Plt~nning Department.
Commiseioner King offered a motion, aeconded by Commiseioner McBurney and
MOTION CARRIED, that the Anaheim City Planning Commission docee hereby qrent
waiver of code requirPment on the basis of the location and surroundings and
the four existing towera have hdd no detrimental effect on the eurr~unding
neighborhood.
Commissi.oner King offered Resolution No. PC82-169 and moved for its passage
and ndoption that the Anaheim City Planninq Commission does hereby qrant
Condltional U~e Permit No. 2381 subject to Interdeprrtmental Committee
recommendations.
On roll call, the foregoinq resolution was passed by the following vote:
AYES: BOUAS, BUSHt~IiE, FRY, HERBST, KING, ~.A CLAIRE, MC BUFtNEY
NOES: NONE
ABSEti'!': NONE
~
MI'~tJT1C8, 71NAHI~TM CITY pLl1NNINQ CCMMISBION, OC'!'081ER 4, 1982 92-528
IT~ O. 7
RS1tORT8 11NA R~COMM3ND11TION8
11. M11$T1CR ENVIRONMENTAL 1188B881~NT INP'ORM7ITION ?R~88NT1-TION - inlormntia~
only (No action raquired).
John 1lnder~on, Aesocieto Planner, gevc~ n presantation at the Comeniasian'e
morninq review ses~ion oencerning developmen~ a n d epplicati~n of a Mast~r
Rnvironmantel 1-eseesment, besed on tho Annhaim Atlan. There wee no ection
tRken by the Plenning Commir~eion.
8. RH~CLA86IFICl1TION N0. 78-79-5 - Requ~et lrom Hugh ~. Heldermcn, Jr., J.N.H.
Coneultants, tor exteneion o! time for property coneieting o!
approxin~tely 83.8 ncree loceteA ~~n the south aide o~ ,~illov+lek Drive,
approximataly A65 feet eouth of the conterline of Nohl Ftanch Roac:.
ACTION: Commiesi.oner King offered e motion, saconded by Connniaei~ner
McBurnoy and MOTION CARRZED, thet the Anaheim C ity Planning Commiesic~n
d~Qe hereby qrent e rekroective onA-yeer exten s ion of tima for
Recleaeitication No. 78-79-5 t~ expire ~an Auqu e t 2A, 1983.
C. PROgO88D CODB NMENDMENT - Amendment to 3ubsect i ons .130, .131, .132 end
.133 of 3ection 18.41..050 and re~eel of Subsecti~ona .13A, .135, .136, .137
and .138 of Section 1~.41.050 ut Chapter 18.' 3 of Title 18, Zoning,
pRrteininq to office usee in residential struc tvre.
ACTION: Commissioner King offered e m~tian, se conded by Canmissioner
McBurney and MOTION CARRIED, that thA Anaheim C ity Planning Commieeion
does hereby recommend to tho City Council adopt ion of an ordinance to
amend Subsections .130, .131, .132 end .133 of Section 8.41.050 and
repeal of Subsectiona .134, .135, .136, .137 ar~d .138 nf Saction 18.41.050
of Chdpter 18.03 af Title 18, Z~ning, pertaini n g to office uses in
reaidentiel atructure.
D. ABANDONMENT N0. 81-29A - Request from Henry C. Vogt. (owner), to abandon d
etorm drein oasemAnt, located approximately 18 7 fest northerly of the
intersection of Pereqrine Street and Puz•itan La ne, at the northerly
terminus of Peregrine 8treet.
ACTION: Commissioner K.inq offered e motion, s econded by Commiesianer
McBurney nnd MOTION CARRIED, thet the Anaheim City ~lanninq Commission
does her~by recommend to the City Council tha t Abandonment 81-29A be
appr~ved as reco~nended by tt~e City Engineer.
E. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2364 - Request for nunc pro tunc resolution
amending Resnlution PC82-161, property located at 2211-I E. Winston Road.
AC'I'IAN: Com~aiseioner Kinq offered Res~lution No. PC82-190 and moved for
its passage and adoption that the AnahRim City Planning Commi.eaion does
hereby qrant a nunc pro tunc resolution amandi nq the vote in Reeolution
No. PC82-161.
On roll call, the foreqoing resolution wea passed by the tol.lowing vote:
,AYESs BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, KING, I.1~- CI.AIRE, MC SURNEY
NOEBs NON~
a1S8$NT s NONE
~u~4~82
~
`~~
MINVTI~8, 1Wl~H1CIM CITY PI,~INNING COMMI88IOT1, OCT08SR 4, 1982 82-529
F~ GONDITIONIIL U8S PSRMIT N0. Z366 - Requa~t tor A nunc pro tunc renolution
•mending R~~olution No. PC82-162, property locatod at 1450 North Red Gum
Streat.
ACTION: Commie~ionsx King ottered Resolution No. PC82-191 and movsd Por
it pi~~asqe ana adoption that the Anaheim C'ty Planninq Connni.eeion doae
hareby grant e nunc pro tunc r'solution amending tha vote in Reaolution
No. PC82-16Z.
On roll cell, the lorequing resolution wae passed hy the followinq votes
AYEBi BOUAB, BUSHORE, FRY, HERB&Tr 1C.ING. I.A CLAIRE, MC SURNEY
NOBSt NONE
AHSENTs NaNE
OTHER DIACU88ION8s
(A) The Commission briePly diecueeed convereione of ~ervice etatione to
convenience markeks with qaealine sales pertaininq to previouely Approved
eitea which ~rimarily were on corner lotst denial brsed an similar uaee ln
the enme loaetionj enrvice statians no longer oftering servicea and merely
eF•11 qneolinet eale of beer nnd wine witt~ geaoline ealesj oil companiea
seeking infornatfon on aever~l loc~tions in Anaheimt conflicting treffic
and parking.
Annika 8antalehti areted ~ verel weeks ngo the City Council did ask for a
atudy end Zoning staff i ::ollectinq inforc-ation ttnd will k:e suqqesting
criteria pertinent to aize ot property, circulation, parkinq, and the sale
of beer and wine. 8he related ahe received informetion that n convenience
merket/service stati~n in the City of Orange has asked for a third uae, e
car waeh.
B. Commiseioner Buehore sL•ated th~ pxoperty at 627 S. Harbor was reclassified
fro~a RS-7200 to CL with a conditional uae permit to allow canm~brclal uae
o! e residential etructure with waiver ~f minimum number of parkinq
spa~c~s. He atated the atruct,ure now lookts like a store front and is
pc~sted to sell alcoholic beverages.
Dean Sherar explained the property ~ras reclassified for commercial uses
and the petitioner demolished the re~~dential structure and built a
commercial structure ao they could have any conm+ercial use~ perniitted by
code ~nd off-aele beer and wine would not create a parki.rig prablem.
Commiesion~r Buahore atated he eeea e+ real problem for that neiqhbozhood
becauss of the servicemen's center and suqqeeted thc Alcoholfc Beverage
Control eoxrd be nutitied.
Dean Sherer etated ataff would not clear the AeC license thzouah the
department if they felt whatever is propoaed intensified thu ueQ npproved
by Commission.
10/4/82 ;~
:~
~
f
f
r
i
~
~
~
+ ,_ ~,
~
~
.....
~
MINUTEB~ 11N71qEIM CITY pL~1; ~INO COMMISBIdti, OCTQHa~t 4, 1982 82-530
l1CTi0N: Conimis~ion~r Eu~hor~ o!l~r~d a~wotion, eeaoned by Co~aai~aion~r H.rbat
and N~OTION C71RR23lD, instruotinq ~ta!! to x~vie~- th~ property at 62~ 8. Narbor
to d~ti~ranine i! required parkinq io provi dad.
I~DJOORNMbNT: Th~r• bei~q no further bus ineta, Conaniasioner H~rbst o!lered a
tnoLion, seaUnded by Caanaiss ioner MvHuxn~y and MOTION CARRxSD,
th~t the msetinq bs edjourned.
The m~etiny~ was adjourned at 2i57 p.m.
R~ speattully aubmittad
~,~r.aC, ,~° ~~C~-~.~:.,.
Sdith L. Harrie, S~ecretary
Anaheicn City Planning Cr,n~ieaion
ffiLH:lm
10/4/82