Minutes-PC 1982/10/18~ `'Y ~
R~CiULAR MRS;TING OF TH$ 1W11HEIM CITY PLANNIN6 COMM288ION
RECiULAR MEb"PING Tha requler me~ting o! the Aneheim City Planning f:onnni~ai~n
wae callecf to order by Chairmen Fr.y et 10:00 e.m., Oc~ober
18, 1982, in tha Council Chamber, a quorum beinq preeent
And the Commisaion reviewed plene ~f the items ~n today's
egende.
RECE85: 11:30 c-.m.
RECONVENE: 1:30 p.m.
PRESENT Clteirmen s Fry
Commie~eioners: Bouas, Buahore, Herbst, King, La Claire
ABBENT C~mmfesionere: McBurney
ALSO PRESENT Annika S~ntalehti Aersietent Director for Zoiiing
Jack White Aasietent Cit,y Attorney
JAy Titue Office Engineer
Shirley Lend Treffic Engineerinq Aesia~~nt
Greq Hastings Associate Planner
Edith Harris P].anninq Commieaion Secretary
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commisaioner King offered a motion, secondod by
Commisaioner. 8ouas and MOTION CARRIED (Commissioner McBurney abeent), thQt ~he
minutee of the maeting of October 4, 1982, ba approved AA submitted.
ITEM NO. 1. ENVIRONMENT'AL IMPACT REPGRT N0. 253, RECLA$SIFZCA'rION N0.
82-83-4, WAI~}:R OF CODE REQUIREMF.NT, CONQITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2362
PUSLIC HL~ARING. OWNER. ALHERT BOR~CHARD & KENNETH L. LARSON, 5915 Burchard
Avenue, Los Angelea, CA 90034; ROY W. MAH1.:E, 2651 Weat Lincoln Avenue,
Annheim, CA 92801. AGENT: GFELLER DEV£L)PMENT COMPANY, INC., 228 West :•.ain
Street, Tustin, CA 92680, Att: Bob Reese. Property dea.;zi.bed as a
rectanqularly-shaped parcel of land co:isiatinq of epproximately 19.57 acres,
2925 West Lincoln Avenue tLincoln Beach Mobile Manor Park).
Continued from the meetinge af July 26, Auqust 23, September 20, and
October 8, 1982.
To permit a 810-unit, 38-faot high condominium complex with waivers of a)
required lot frontage, b) minimum floor area, c) minimum landscaped setback,
d) minimum recre~,tional-leisure area, e) minimum dis-ance between buildings,
f) minimum nunlber, type and dimensi.one of parking spaces, 8nd q) minimum
diatance from parking epaces to dwelling units.
It was noted the p~etitioner ha-s requested a two-week continuance in order to
re-advertise the request.
ACTION: Commtesioner lC~ng offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner La
Claire and MOTION CARRIED (Commiseioner McBurney abaen~), that consideration
ot the aforementioned mstter be continued to the regulnrly-scheduled meetinq
of Novaaaber 1, 1982, at the reque$t of the petitioner in or8er to re-advertise
the request.
0189H 82-531
! ~ ~ [
~ Y
MINUTaB, 11NANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMIRBION, OCTOBBR 18, 1982 82-532
ZTEM N0. ~. EIR NEGiATIVE D$C'~ARATION 7WD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2382
PIIAI~iC HEARING. OWNERe ATLANTIC RICHFIELq COMPANY, 3Q0 W. Glenoeks
8ouleverd, G1Andele~ CA 912p2. Property described ae a reatanqularly-ehapod
parcel o! lend conaiating o! epproximt~tely 0.47 ncre locet~d at the aoutheaet
corner of South Street end Stato College Boulevard, 700 South Stnte CollegQ
AouleverA (Arco Service Stetion).
To permit a convenience merket with gnsuline sales.
There wes no one indica~ing their prosence in oppoaition to subject requeat
and a]though the staff .re~pnrt waA not reed, it is referr.ed t~ and mnde e per.t
of the minute~s.
Chaz~lie Hicks, repzenenting Atlentic Richtield Company, explained e previous
npplicntion to permit n convenience markAt with gaaoline ealee at thiA
locetion wes deni~~ primarily -~ecause of treftic concernn. He ~tatod they
have done additianel work and ere proposing to cloAe the two corner drivewaye
es recommendad by the Tre~fic Engineur and install a landeceped buffor, and
ere alea requeetinq an exteneion ~f tha pr4aent driveway on S~uth StrAet to 45
~A9t.
Mr. Nicks rePerrec9 to Condi.tlon No. 3 requiring an ettendant ta be on duty for
diepeneing gaeoline and explained their diepenserg will be fully computerixed
and the cuetomer will pey for the gesoline first nnd the diepeneer will
automAtically shut of.f when the c~esignated amnunt ie pumped, eo he did not see
the neec9 for an ette»dant.
THE PU$LIC HEARING WAS CLOSEp.
Chnirman Fry stated this is b+~aically the same a~+plication which was denied in
December, 198]., except the two drivewc~ye are cloaedj hawever, none e~f the
ott-er concerns listed rs reasone Ror the denial have been resolved.
Mr. Hicks atated their company alr.eady hAS two exieting conve~iience marketa
and this site is a little larger then the one at Aall Road and West Street.
Commiasioner King referred to ata~f's recommendPd criteria for these sitee an~1
nnted this aite does not mest the recotmnended minimum site area of 150' x 150'
since it is only 1.20' x 116'.
Comcd:dsi~ner Nerbet stated the Council ov,rruled Commies~on'e denial ~f the
aite on La Pelma end it has turned out to be a treffic problem. He stated
se:~vice etation eitee were qrantad a spe~ciel privileqe by beinq ellowed close
to the at,reet to eervice the traveling public ~nd were not in competition with
o~ ~. c n-arkete in the aree.
ACTI(.~N: Commiesioner Herbst ofPered a motion, seconded by Commiesioner King
and MUTION CARRZED (Commiesioner McBurney absent), thnt tha Anah~im City
Planziing Commisaion has reviewed the proposal to permit a aonvenience market
witn qasoline salee on a rectangularly-shaped parael of lnnd conaieting a!
approximately 0.47 eare located at the aoutheast corner ot 8outh Street and
State Collec,~c Boulevard, and turther deecribed ee 7Q0 8outh State College
Boulevardt and ~oeB hereby approve the Neqati.ve Decleration from the
1982 82-593
MINUTEB- 1~NAHEIM CITY PLI~NNINC~ C~MIB~~ON, OCT09ER J.B,
requirement to ~xopare an ,~nvironmente-1 im~~act re~rt on the besig that there
would 2~e no significent individB~iVOr~~O~~~tio~ ~ince~thenAnaheimf1aenereldct
due to the approvn]. of thi.~ Neg
Plan doeiqnates the~ eubjact property for general commercial. lend uses
commenaurata with the propoeal~ t1~at no eent~itive anvironmenta~hempe~itiQner
• rolved i:~ the proposel t thst the Initi~+l 5;tudy aubmitted by
indicatQS n~ significant indivi~luel or cumuletive adverae envl.r~nmental
impectst and that thQ N~h~tCi~y o~~Anaheim PlanninyiDeparttecntfnregoing
findings is on file ~n
Commiseioner Herbat offez~d Reeolution No. PC:82-192 and moved far ita paseage
and adoption that the Aneheim City Plenninq C'~mmiesi~n d°~`~ hernby deny
23g2 on ~the beaie Chat the aizQ aF the property ie
Conditional UAe Permit No. ranted
not adequate to aceo~ing~Allowedlcl eeato thevstraetAe-nd~allo~rl.ngQeedual uue
a special privileqan Additional pri~~ilege not granted nther propertiea e+n<l
would be qranting
would create additi~na~e~uirementsn g~r Hxiet:ing marketA devalop~sd n
conformance with Code Q
pn roll cnll, the foregoing r~sol~it~~~n Was P~£&~d b; the f~~l~wing vote:
AYES s BOUAS, aU&HORE ~ FRY ~ NE~ST' KI~G • 1'~ ~I.AI R~
NOES: NONE
Agg~NT: McBURNEY
Jack White, l~ssistant City AttorneX, ~~~'esentc:rJ tfle written right to ap~eal the
Courac 11.
Planning Commission's decision within 2z ~3ays to the City
ITEM NO. 3• EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND COHAITIONAI. USE PERMI'1' N~~~3a3
PUBLIC HEARING. OWNER: R. J. D£VLIA'PMENT '~~ANY, 1913 ~. I7th 5'treet. Suite
21g, Santa Ana, GA 92701. AGENT: JONN ~• QUTHERFORD~ 5379 Wi.llowi~~k Drive,
descrit~ d as rs rectanqularly-ahaped Qnr~el of
Anaheim, CA 92807• p=°~~~ately
land consisting of app .27 acre 1.ocatecl at the northwest corner ~f
Coronado Street and Lance Lane, 1205 North I.ance I~e+ne.
To permit an sutomobile Uody ahop 1n the MI. (Industrial, I.i~it~aa ZQnA.
There was no onE indicating their presence in ~pP~$ition to aubject request
and although tho ataff xeP°~'~ ~-as not read, it !s referred to and mnde e+ part
af the minutes.
Jack Rutherfnrd, agPnt~ w~g pre8, ~t to answer any v.uestions.
T}IE Pt1HLIC HEAItING WAS CIASED .
Comu-issioner King •:larified that all work and storage wi.ll. be done insi~~e the
buildinq•
MIt~TgB, 11N11H1~IM CITY I~LIINNING COMMZ88I0N, ACTOBSR 18, 1982
82-534
ACTIONt Commirxioner King olfered e motion, seconded by Coaani~eioner Bouee
an Md~OTZON CARRIED (Commiosioner McBurney sbsent), thnt the ~neheim City
Pla~~ninq Cuatmiseian hee reviewad the propoeel tu pormit dn automobile body
ehop in the ML (Induetriel, LimiteA) 2one on e rectanqulnrl.y-ehepod parcel af
lend consietinq o! appr.aximatoly .27 acre loceted dt the northwest corner oP
Coronado Street ~nd Lence Lane, and further described no 1205 North I,ence
Lanet nnd doe$ hereby approve the Neqa~tive Decleretion from the .requirement to
prepere an environmental impact report an the basie thet there would be+ no
aiqnilicant individuel oY cumulative ndverse environmentel impact due to the
approval af thie Neqetive Decleration nincQ the Anaheim Generel Plen
dBeiqnetes the ~ubject property for generel induetriel land uees commenaurnte
with the pxopoealr that no t~eneitive environmentnl impaats are involved in th~
proposalt t:hat the Initiel Study aubmitted by the petitioner indicetes n~
aiqniticant individue-1 or cumulative adverse environmental impactAr and that
the Neqetive Declaretion subAtantiating the foregoing flndinga ie on filc~ in
the City o! Aneheim Planninq Depertment.
Commis~aionex King offere~ Reeolution No. PC82-193 an~ movQd for its pa8sage
end edoption that the Aneheim City Pldnning Cammissicm does hereby grant
Conditional rJae Permit No. 2383, aubject to Interdepertmentel Committee
recommendetir.me.
On roll call, the foresqoinq reaolution was paseed by the f~lluwinq vote:
A1'E3: BOUA3, BUSHOl2E, FRY, HERSS'P, KING, LA CLAIRE
NOES: NONE
ABgENT: McBUF~IEY
ITEM NO. 4. EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND GONUITIONAL USE PE!2MIT NO. 2384
pCTBLIC HEARIhG~~ OWNER: ROGER LEE AND KATNLEEN P. NELSON, P. O. B~x 6082,
Anaheim, CA 9s:806. AGENT: JOSEPH FARGO, 2820 ~. Mir~loma Avenue, Anaheim,
CA 92806. Property described ae a rectanyu~nrly-shaped parcel of land
consiati~~q of aFproximately 0.86 acre, havinq a frantaqe of approximately 132
feet on the south side of Miralou-a Avenue, 2830 East MiralAma Avenue.
To retaiti a truck and trailer storage yard in th~ ML (Industrial, Limited)
Zone.
Thera was no one indicating their presence !n opposition to subject request
and although the staff report was not read, it is referred to and made a part
of the minutes.
Greg Willard, 2820 E. Miraloma, Anaheim wda present to answer any queations.
THE PilBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Comu-isaioner Bouas clari.fied that the front portion of the eite is used for
the roofinq company's storage and the rear portion will be used tor trailer
repair.
~
'`ti~
MINUTE8~ ANIIHEIM CITY PI.ANNING COMMIl48I4N, OCTOE6R 18, 1982 82-535
Mr. Willerd expleinad they plan to repe~ir 5 or 6 treile~re per d~y and expect
to be ;~t this site !or s~riod o! one or two yeere.
1~CTION: Conani.sefoner Herbat oftered a motion, ~ecunded by Commiealoner King
and MOTION CARRIED (Commigr~ionor McBurnay ebeent), Chet the Anaheim City
Planning Coaimiesion hns reviewed the propoeel to retnin e truck And trailer
atareqe yerd in the ML (Induatriel, Limited) Zone c~n a rectnnqulerly-ahaped
percel o! land coneietinq of approximetely 0.86 ecr.e, I~nving a tr~nteqe of
~ppraximately 132 feet on the eoutli side of Mirelome Avenue, end lurt.her
deecribed es 2830 Eeet NRiralomn Avenuer nnd does heresby approve the NeqativA
Decleretion f.rom tl~e requirement to prepare ~n onvironmentel impnr,t report on
the baaia thet there would be no aiqnificnnt individuel or cwnulative adverae
environmentnl imp~ct due to the eppr.ovA.l of th.e Naqetive Declaration ei.nce
the Aneheim Generel Plan d~eignatQ~ L11P. Ruhjc~ct property for g~nerel
lnduatrial land uaee commeneurete with r.he pro~x~aalt that no sensitive
environmental impaata are involved !n ti~es prap~sali that the Inltial Study
submitted by tho petitionEr indicatce nn r~lgnificent irid~.vidual or r.umuletive
adveroe environmental impacte; ~nrl kkiat the Negative D9clRration
subetentieting the forey~~ing findinqs La on file in the Ci~y of Aneheim
Plen~i.nq UepartmAnt.
Commiseioner Herbat offered RcAsulution No. PC82-:94 and moved for ite pessege
and edoption that ~he Anahe.i.m City Planning Commission ~~ea horeby qrant
Conditional Use PNrmi.t No. 23ti4, for a period of two (2) yeers, to expize on
October 13, 1982, subj~±ct to InGerdepertmental Committep recom¢nendations.
On roll call, thc f~rRqoing r~~olution wes p9saed by the following vote:
Al"ES: BOUAS, BCSNnRE, FRY, NEFtSST, KING, L.A CL,AIItE
NOE8t NGNE
ABSENT: Mc$URNEY
ITEM NO. 5. EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION, WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT AND
CONAITZONAL USE P~RMTT N0. 2385
PUBLIC }IEARING. OWNER: ROLANp R. DOEGE, 9312 Samoline, Downey, CJ- 90240.
AGENTs ERIC E. AOEGF., 1207 W. Cent~r 3treet, Anaheim, CA 9280~. Property
described as an irrequlerly-sheped parcel of land consistinq of approxime~tely
0.18 acre, having a frontaqe of approximately 50 fePt on the north side of
Center Street, 1207 Weet Center Street.
To permit an 80-sest playhouse and aon~ercial use of e residentiel structure
with wniver of minimum number and type of perking ~paces.
There werQ six pc+raone indicatinq their pr~sence in oppoaition to sub~ect
request and althnugh the ataff report was not read, it is referred to and mad~
a part of the minutea.
Noward Zele£sky, aqent, explained they nre propoaing an 80-aeat playhouse for
leqitimate thenter and convereion of a sinqle-lami.ly dwelling to offices. He
explained this theater will be uaed by thoee people purauinq n career in the
performinq erts. He preeented petitiona aiqned by reaidents ared busineas
people in the area in favor of the requeat.
MINUTSB, IWAHI~IM CITY PIJINNING COMMIS$ION, GCTOBER 18, 1982 82-536
Mr. 2elePrky stated th.y contacted ]lneheim's Arte Commit.tee who e+ncouraqed
them to seek approval o! thia requeet sinc~ there i• n leck of perlorminq erte
theeters in the county and city.
Mr. ZelaPoky steted they hnve renched nn eqreement with Mr. Merricel, property
owner of a perking lot itnmedietely to the weat. He preeented an eeri+~l
photoqraph ehowing the parking apecea Mr. Marricel hes agreed to ellow them to
uee in exchange, !or matnkenance of the parkinq ar~a. HE P~~la!ned the theater
would }~e open Thuradey through Sunday, 8s30 to 10:30.
He expla~ned th~ propertY ie zoned !or commercidl uaee end they feel thie
project will upgrade the erea nnd fill a void.
8haron Becker, 1129 W. Center, Annheim stated she is opposed to thia request
because of traffic end noiee and ~lno concern thdt people wc~uld park on the
atreeta.
Ruby Edmondston, 1130 W. Center, Aneheim etated thia its a residcntit~l.
community with sever~l emall children and elready have e traffic problam and
they do not want eny further devclopmAnt that will take away from their
neighborho~d priv~cy.
Mr. Mosay, 110 S. Walnut, Anaheim staCed they have plenty of treffic there now
and it is a ha~zard end he felt thia uoe would be a detriment to the area.
Dave Pritcherd, 757 N. Weat Str_~t, stated hc awns praperty at 1123 Chestnut
and 115 Wa].nut end thet he would quest.ion this type uae in that area and edded
he wonders what kind of playhouse thia will be, whether it will be on the up
or the down side.
Nowerd Zelefaky pointed out the parking ar~se is ju~t west of Villa Place and
they will heve a traffic attendant and directional siqns. He painted out the
north side of l.incoln is all commercial uses with a mix of comn-ercial and
residential on the aouth side. He added h~e ran asaure the Cornmiseion thie
wi11 be a legitimate theater and stated they would be wi.lling to comply with
any conditions the Cc,nrtmisaion may wiah to add to guerantee it will be far
legitimate theater only.
THE PUHLIC HEAFtING WAS CLOSED.
Commissioner Herbst staLed t}iere is not enough parking for the people who will
be there and the public will park ns cloee a$ poesible and that will be on the
etreets and they would also probably ude Norm's Re~taurant's parking lot.
Coaimiseioner La Claire etated ehe really likes the idea of a playhouse auch as
this and felt it is needed and ehe would encouraqe the getitioner to find
another Yocation. She atated she felt thia would create a real trafFic
problem for the nelyhborhood.
~
MINUTEB, 11N1-HEIM CITY PLIINNING COMMII88ION, OCT(~eER 18, 1982 82-53~
ACTIONe CommiBSioner Le Cla.ire ottered a mation, seconded by Cc-rtanieeioner
Kinq and MOTION C1IRRISD (Cofimieeionsr MeHurney ebaent), that ~ho Anaheim City
Plenning Cotnmie~ion has raviewo~! the prapasel to parmit an 80•seet playhouee
and coaanercial use of a residantlnl etiucture with waiver ot minim~.im number
end type of parkinq opecee an en irregulerly-shnpe+d perael ot land conaisting
o! approximetely 50 feet on the north eide of Center Straet, end further
Aescribsd ee 1207 Weat Center Stree~tt and doea hereby apprave the Negative
Decleretion lrom the requiremenr to propnre en enviranmentel itnpect report on
the besie thet Lhere wauld be no signiticant individual or cumulative edverse
environmentel impact due to the approval oP this Neqative beclaration eince
the Aneheim General Plan dee~ignatoe the eubject property For general
commereiel land uses comm~naurate with thQ proposalt thet no senaitive
environmentel impacte are invc,lved in thQ propoenl~ that the Initiel study
eubmitted by the petitioner indicatos no aiqnificant individual or cumuletiv¢
r~dverse environmental impects~ end that the Negetive Declaration
subetentiating the toregoinq findinqg ia un tile ~n the CiCy of Anahelm
Planning pepartment.
Commisaioner Le ~].eire ofxered Resc~lution No. PC82-195 and trtoved for its
passaga and edoption thet the Anuheim City Planning C~mmiseion does hereby
~9eny Condi~tional Uae Permit No. 2385 on thc basis the ur~e would creste txaffic
and parking problems for the eurrounding res.idEntial neighb~rhood.
On roll call, t'.~e toregoing reaolution wes pxaeed by ths following vote:
AYES: BOi1AS, BUSNORi~, FRY, HERBST. KING, LA CLAIRE
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: McBURNEY
Jack White, Assistant City Attozney, presented thN written riqht to appeal the
Planning Commission's decision within 22 days to the City Council.
ITEM NO. 6. EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND CUNDITIQNAZ, USE PERMIT NO. 2386
PUBLIC NEARING. OWNERs ROGERS A. AND BARBAFA A. SEVERSON, P. O. Box 2058,
Huntington Heach, CA 92647. AGF•NT: G1tLG ST[JMPF, 2831 White Star Avenue,
"H"~ Anaheim, CA °.'2806. Property described as an irreqularly-sheged parc~l
of land consistinq of approximately 2.1 acres loaated at the ttortheaRt corner
of White Star Avenue and ,91ue G;un Street, 2831 White Star Avenue, Unit H(NBS
Body end Paint).
To retain an automobile body and paint ahop in the MI~ (Industrial, Limited)
Znne.
It was noted the petitioner was r.~t present.
ACTION: Conanisaionez King otPered a motion, s~conded by Cammj.ss~or.er Houas
and MOTION CARRIED (Coaenissfoner McBurney absent), that conaideration of the
aforementioned me.tter be continued to the reqularly-scheduled meeting af
November 1, 1982.
MINUT~9, AN~HSIM CITY PLANNING COMM138ION, CCTOBER 18~ 1982 82-5~8
ITEM N0. 7. L~IR N~(iATIVE DECL11R11TION, 'AAZV6R Ol~ COUE REQU~ T~ 11ND
CONQITIONAL U~4E PERMIT NO. 2387
PUBLIC HEARING. OWNERt EMKAY DEVELOPMFNT CC~MPANY, INC.~ ~. 0. Box 2390,
Nawport Heech, CA 92660. Property described as an irregulerly-sheped parcel
o! lanc! cannixtinq of approximetely 0.59 ecre, loceted et the eouthweat cornQr
of Pacifico Avenue and Sente Cruz Street.
To permit e commerciel oiFiae buildinq i~ the ML (Induatrial, Limited) Zone
with wniver ~! minimum landsceped eeCback.
There wee no one indicnting their presenr_o in opposition to aubject request
nnd although the ataff raport wes not rodd, it is refarred to and made a pert
of the minutes.
Suenn De Nemur, repreaenting Emkay Development Company, was present t~ enswer
eny quostiona.
THE PUBi.IC HEARING WAS C.LOSED.
Commis~ionez Bushore asked what the justi!.iceti~n w~uld be for the wniver of
lendsceped eetback end asked if other induetriel buildings on Pacifico Avenue
have landscaped buffer waivere.
Annika Santalr~!iti, Asaiatant Director f~r 2oning, i•aplied sh~ thought the
uuildinqa met Code requirament.
Ms~. Oe Namur expldin~d ahe felt the jur~tificati.on for the wniver ia the aize
of the l.ot which makes th3 placement of the Uuilding to the front of the lot
in order to provide proper traffic flow.
Co:~mifleioner ~3ushore pointed out thia lot'e size is aimilar to others in the
area and Commiesioner HErbat pointed atit the aetback can be used for parking.
He nleo atated he felt the building is just too big for the size of the lot
n~d that he would not vote !or approvel of the variance for a aetback.
Commiasioner King stated he could not vote for the vnriance becauae he wants
th~ buildinq to be conaistent with othera on the+t etreet.
Cocnniesioner Herbat suggested relocatinq the buildinq utilizinq the front
port! on.
Ms. De Nnmur repliecl they coulcl relocate the buildinq but did not feel it
would be the beat utilization of the site.
Commiseianer Hzrbst suqgested the petitioner requeet a continuance to consider
revision of the plans, with Ma. De Namur requesting a two-week contirniance.
ACTION: Commiseioner Herbst offered a motion, seconded by Cononisaioner Houas
and MOTION CARRIED (Co~nmissioner McBurney absent), that the Anaheim City
Planninq Cemmission doee here~y continue consideration of the above-mentioned
matter ta the regularly-acheduled n-seting of November 1, 1982, at the requget
ot the petitioner.
MINU'I'88, 1~N11HEIM (:ITY PLANNING COI~IIMIBSION, aCTOHFR 18, 1982 62-539
ITEM N0. 8. EIR NiBGATIVE DECLARATIC:i AND CONDITIONAI, tlSE PERMIT NO. 2388
PUSLIC HEARING. ~WNERi KENNETH KEESEE, 1928 "G" 8. Aneheim Blvd., Anaheim,
CA 92805. AGSNTs :LI HUSAM, 1745 Comino Pelmero, ~i216, Las Anqelee~ CA
90048. Proprrty deecr:bed as an irreqularly-ahaped pdreel ~! l~nd con~istinq
of appraximetely 1.42 ac e, having a frontaqe ot approxi~nately 255 feet on the
eaet eide of Ane~heim Hou~evard, 1928 "A" South Aneheim eoulevar~.
To permit retail sales of copiers in the NQ. (Industr.iel, Litnited) Zone.
Ttiere was no one indicating their presence in apposition to subject requeet
and elthough the steff report wae ~ot read, it is r~ferred to nnd made a part
of the minutes.
Kenneth Keeeee explained this is an induatrial complex snd he is loasing the
building to s firm in Los Angeles as a showrnom for copyinq mechinest thet
tt~ey are lo~king for a plece for rspair and maintenance and to show clientole
their product. NQ stated e varinnce wae qrnnt•ed in 1974 an the building
across the parking nrea as an nutomobile lensi7g company but that lease was
cancelled in 1982 and during thet ~eriod, they did not have any traffic or
parkinq pr~blQms.
THE PUBLIC HLARING WAS CI,C~SEn.
ACTZON: Comm.iasioner King offered a~or.ian, eeconded by Commissioner Bouas
and M~TION CARRIED (Commissioner McBurney abaent), that the Anaheim City
Plnnninq Commieaion hes reviewQd the proposal to perm3t r~tail sales of
copi.ere in the ML (Industrial, Limited) Zone on an irreqularly-ehaped parcel
of land conaisting of epproximately 1.42 acre, having e frontage af
approximetely 255 feet on the east side of Anaheim 8oulevard aad further
deacribed es 1928 "A" South Anaheim Boulevardj and does hereby approve the
Neqative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact
report on the basis that thero would be no significant individur~l or
cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval. of this Neqative
Declaration since the Anaheim Gen~ral Plan designates the subject property for
qenernl industrial land uses commensurate with the proposal~ that no sensitive
environmental impacta are involved in the proposalt that the Initial Study
submitted by the petitioner indicates no eiqnificant individual or cumulatf ve
adverse environmental impactsJ and that the Neqative Declaration
substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in xhe City of Aneheim
Planning Department.
Coamiissioner King of£ered Resolution No. PC82-196 and moved for its passage
and adoption that the Anahe~m City Planning Counnission does hereby grant
Conditional Use Permit No. 23H8 eubject to Interdepartmental Committee
recommendations.
On roll call, the foreqoing resolution was paesed by the followir.q vote:
AYESs BOUA3r BUSHORE~ FRY~ HERBS'I'~ KING~ LA CLAYRE
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: MeHURNLY
~we
.j
MIN[)TE8, ANIINSIN CZTY PI.7WNING GOMlrlZ88IVN, OCTOB~SR 18, 1992 82-540
ITEM NO. 9. BIR td~GATIVE DBCLARATION A?iD CONDITIONIII. U8L: PSRMIT N0. 2389
PUALIC HEARZNG. OWNLRt P2ERRE AND FFtANCOISE A. APNR88~T'CHE, 5531 Vie
Arboleda, Yorbe Linde, CA 92860. AGENTI M. N. OSBORN, 2315 N. 3antiaqo,
Sente Ana, CA 92706. Property described ae en i.zreqularly-eh~:~ed parcel at
land coneietinq o! epproximately 0.31 ar.re loceted at tho aoutheeet corner o!
Bisenhowpr Circle and Lekeview Avunu~, 1380 Nnzth I.dkoview Avenue.
To permit dn automobile repeir fecility in tho ML (SC) (Industrie].,
Limited-Scenic Corr.idor Overlny) Zon~.
There were two pereone inc3icating thoir presance in oppoeition to aut,ject
requeat and alth~ugh tiie ataff report was not reed, it i.s z•eferred t~~ and mede
e pdrt ~f the rninutes.
M. Osborn, aqent, wae prasent to nnewer any quostiona.
Keith Murdoch, 516 Wedqewood [~riv~, Anaheim, repressenting Ray 2ro11, dav~loper
of thr_ LakRView In~9uatrial Perk, stated their conc.ern is the developme~t of
this type usQ in thQ Scenic Corridor Overlay ?.one and ia part ot the Cenyon
Induat:rial A.-~Qa and it ie tl~e intant t,o develop it with a"better-than
average" concept. He gtated with autoa-obile rept-ir come~ storeqe of
automobiles and ~his aitcs actually Pronts on Lekeview Avenue end ie a window
to this induetriel perk. He added thie parcel has limitad parking And all 14
apdcea are in front and any storage will be vi,ewed trom the ~stzeet and they
feel this would be a downgr.ade of the wAy this industrial park ia developing.
Bill Keha, Oranqe Micro, stated they will be the adjacent Lenant and have
op~erate3 in Anaheim for two years and were lookinq f~r a very profesaional
park to relocate their research and development fecilitles. He stated they
have the ~ame concerns as stated by Mr. Murdoch.
Mr. Osborn atated he was a Honda Service Manaqer for over five years and
repaired 40 to 50 Hondas per day and ne~~er pArked any vehiclea outside or
worked on any vehicles outai~e. He atated therP is room for at least 40 Honda
cars inside this facility. H~ added his insurance also requires all vehicle~
to be inside. He stated he rune a very clear oQeration and his busineas
depends on i'~. He etated there is a great need for thie type operation in
this area.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Commissioner Bushore wae concerned that the developer of thia pro~ect ia no~
in fsvnr of this r~qusst and it was later ascertained that thie petitioner is
sub leasing the aite.
Mr. ~sborn explnined there is a boat rWpair facility, a Volkswagon repeir
shop, a towinq facility and wrecking yerd, and a roofinq com~,any in the
i~mnediate area= and at one tia~e the ddjacent sita was approved for automobile
repair facility.
~._._ .__...>...-.,.~.a~..._.:._..._.,._. a,:__~.__ .....__.._ . _..__.. ...~. ._..______._.,_._. _ .. .~~~e,~.
~~
MINUTEB, 1W11H~IM CITY P1,ANNING COMMI88ION, OCTOB~R 18, 1982 82-5a1
Conuni~~loner Hu.horp nated those buoineeaes r~terred to ere not qoa9 l~oking
bueinseee^ snd pointec'! eut the PlenninqCcxnmiaeion recommended d~nial ot th~
requeat whi~h thd ~^ouncil ep~roved limito~f to e poreion ot the canpl~x.
Mr. Oeborn stetad the computRr lirm mc~vinq in next door wsa not thare end thet
he hed canvaesed ell the surrounding buelneeace end lound no objections.
Commiseioner Buehore ~el.t Lhis wc~uld be contribut~ng to tha problem exiatinq
in the eroa.
Mr. Osbc~rn ex~lained chey nnticipete rApair.ing ~0 to 25 care per cley au-ximum
and he could park 25 vehicles inelde ande~till heve rc~om ko wark.
Comcniaeiongr L+~ Cleir~ aeked if the une permitted for reteil, comtaerciel
office end nutomc~tive repair under Conditional Uae Permit No. 22h1 f.s in
exietance todey. She clarified thA adjace nt use will be computer reaeR:~ch and
developmen±.
Commieatoner La Claire etr,ted Cnuncil juet ~pprovec~ e Mexc: ~on Benz deelerehip
in thie area adjacant to Werner-Lambertand she would tind it difficult to
deny this request ein ce it would hnve less retail sales end ehe lelt an
automobile rapair l~cility has mare right to kie in tha industrial eree than
automobile f3Al@9.
Commisaionor Herbst s tated Lhie ie diFfure nt because it faces Lnkeview end
A'I so the MnrcedeA dealership was fully bermed end the repeir fncilittes were
i.- the rear. He a-tated the reason for the conditional use permit procedure is
to determine whet the use wili do to the aroa.
Commiaaioner Buehore stated he did nat think thie use w~uld be ccm-petible with
~ha computer research and development fit~m which employs many nare peopte end
etated he thouqht this would be a misteke in gcx~d planning.
Mr. Osborn stated he hes trained nnd employed 12 llonda mechanica over the last
five yeara.
Commigsioner King no ted the conditionalase permit can be terminated if the
c~nditions are not ~:o~plied with.
Commis~ioner Buahore stated he doQa notfeel the design of the building and
the area is ndequate for thic~ use. ~
Cortm-iseioner Le Clai r e atated the building where the computer operator ie
going to be w~s approved for automobile repair e,nd it fronta on Lakeview. She
replied to Coa~misaioner Bushore that ehe voted againat it previouely because
it was foY retail and not juat automobile repair.
.. ,....:,:~;.~=~
~ .
8Z-542
MINUT~S, At~111HEIM C.ITY PI.ANNIt~i COMMIISAION, OCTOBER 18, 1982
)1CTION~ Commin~ionsr 1Cing aftered n mot~on, s~can9ed by Commiseioner 6ouee
a~ Md dflpN CI-RRIBD (Ccxnmissioner McAuxney abeent~r that the 11nah~im City
Planning Coauni~~ian hss r9viewad the proposal to pern-it an eutomobile repair
fncility in th~ MI. (8C) (Industrial, Limitad-Scenic Corridor Ovarleyl 2one on
en irreqularly-eheped parcel o! lend coneieting ot epproximetaly 0.31 ecre
located at the eoutheaet corner ~t I:leenhower Circle ~nd Lekeview Circle, and
lurther deecrit~d ea 1380 North I,aknview Circl wt and doee herehy ~pprovA the
Neqative Declaretiun trom the requiremAnt to propare an environmentel impnct
zeport on the basie thet there would be no aiqnifice n t individudl ~r
cumuletive adveree environmentel impnct due to the a pprovel of thia Negntive
Declaratian sincA tt-e Anaheim Generel Plen c~e4ignates the subject property for
qeneral induatriel land uees commenaurate with the propoeelt thnt no senaitive
anvironmental impe~cte~ are involved in the propoanlJ that the Initi~l 9tudy
submitted by the petitioner inAicetes n~ siqni licnnt indivi~lual or cumuLative
adverae environmentel impactst end thet the Ne getive Declaretion
substentiating tho foregoing findinga i~ on f i ln 1n the City of Aneheim
Planning Depertment.
Cammisaioner La Claire offered Resolution No. PC82-1 97 end moved tor ite
paseage and adoption that the Anaheim City P1 a nn.inq C~mmiesion doea hereby
qrant Conditionel Uae Permit No. 2389, aubjec~t tn jnterdepartmontal Cammittee
recommendationa.
On roll c$11, the ~oreqoinq resolution was paseed by the following vote:
AYESt BOUAS, FRY, 1CxNG, LA CLAIR~
NOE3 s AUSHORE, HEttBST
AB3ENT: McBURNEY
Mr. Osborn asked ahout the condition recjuirinq si~~ walks, with Jay Titus,
Offi^e Engineer, explaining the petitloner can rey ~e st a temporary waiver of
sidewet~s requirement fram the City Engineer and au qqested this conditian be
retained.
Comatissioner Bushore asked thet the develope r of th ia property correct ttie
drainage problem on rhe corner of tl~e property~
ITEM N0. 10. EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND V~-RIAI'iCE N0. 3292.
PUBLIC HEARING. Ot4NER: WILLIAM C. AND CYNZ'fiIA LYNN TAORMINA, P. 0. Box 309,
Aneheim, CA 92805. Property dencribed as a rectanqulnrl.y-shaped parcel of
land conaieting of approximetely 0.49 acre 1 aceted at the southwest corner of
Adele Street and Ane-heim Houlevard, 327 North Maheim Bouievard.
To ~onatruct a commercial office building with waiver of minimum nutnber of
parking spac@s•
There was no one indicatinq their presence in opposit'.on to subject requeat
and nlthough the staff report was not read, it ie referred to nnd mnde e part
o! the mi.nutea.
~
~
~
F
MINU'PRB, ANAH~ZM CITY PL1b~INING COMM288ION, OCT08BR 18, 1982 82-543
Willinm C. Teormina, ovmer, stetsd he ie cheirm~n o! e- aommittse appointed to
^tudy haw l~neheim Boulevard nhould be widoned. He expleined it thi~ plan i•
epproved i'or thie oflice building, ho will hdva ta dedicete ths property e nd
t:~at will set tt,~ prec~dent !ar how wide the etraet ir qoing to ba which could
l~e teking edventaqe of the reat o! hie neighbore. He steted ha would like to
get thie plan appraved end then altar it ie decidad how wide the streat will
be, he will modify the plens to plece the building wh~re it should be.
Mr. TAOrminu replied to Chdirmen Fry thet tha committee will ba makinq n
recommendetion within 20 deye or lees.
Commisaioner La Cleire pointod out thie requeet ia for a parkinq weiver end
the dedication has nothinq t~ c9o wi~h it.
Jack Whi.te, Asaistant City Attor ne,y, stated the firat recommended Gondition
reletes to the dedication of lan d and in order to exerciee the variance, the
owner would be required to deaicste the property. He ateted he hae no
object.i~n t~ the petitioner's auggc~stion from a leqal stendpoint tn modity
that condition wherein tti~ owner. ahall deed to the City a str.ip of land of
auch width as subePquently deternnined for atreot widen ing purpoaes alonq
Anaheim Boulevard.
Mr. Taormina atat.e8 he wnuld ntipul~te to thaC wording ~f Condition No. 1.
Commiesionez Herba~ stated he hn s Ae9n thase three nroposed strect wideninq
plans and it appeera ~o him that the street wideninq could aftect the size of
this huildinq signifi.cantly.
Comn-issioner Le Clairg suggested waiting for 20 days.
Mr. Taormina ngreed a continuance would l.~e accepkeble.
ACTION: Commisaioner La Claire offered a mot3on, eeconded by Commisaioner
Kinq and MOTION CARRIED (Commiss i oner McBurney absent), that consideration of
the aforementioned matter be con tinued to the regularly-echeduled meetinq of
Novamber 15, 1982.
ITEM NO. 11. ESR CATEGORICAL EXFa1PTI0N, CI.ASS 5 and VARIANCE N0. 3296
PUSLIC HEARING. OWNER: GEOIiGE SIRNBAUM, ET 1-L, 2900 S. Main Street, Loa
Anqeles, CA 90007, Prope.rty de s cribed as a rectr~nqularly-ahaped parcol of
land consistinq of epproximately 1.34 acres, having fronta ges af approximately
160 feet on the north side of Ronsneya Drive, 310 feet on the west side of
Euclid Street and 150 f.eet on the south side of Medica 1 Center Drive.
To permit conatre~^t: ~n of an addition to an exietinq c:oma-ercial building with
waiver of minimum landacaped setkaack.
It was noted the applicant was not present.
ACTION: Comn-issioner Herbst offered n saution, seconded by Commiasioner Bouas
and MOTION CARRZED (Commissioner 1NcSurney absent). thnt conaiderntion oP the
aforementioned taatter be continued to the requlerly-achodul.ed meetinq of
November 1, 1982.
MINUTBB, 11NAHffiIM CITY PLANNINf3 COMMI98ION, OCTOHER 18, 1962 82-544
ITl~M NO. 12. 8IR NEfiATIVE D$CLI-R1~TION IWD VARII~NCE NO. 32y7
PUFILIC HBIIRING. OWNIER: C~8ARx0 l~ND EUBTOL21~ GARCIA, 861-1/2 8outh Lemon
Street, Anaheim, CA 92805. Property ie deacribed se a rectengulerly-shapc~d
parcel ot lsnd consiAtinq o! approximately 7706 ~quare teet, 961 and 861-1/2
South Lemon Street.
WAivers ot mi.nimum bu~lding eite drea and minimum number and type of parking
epecea to construct e~n eddition to e detachad aingle-family dwelling.
There was no ono indiceti~g their preeence in oppoaition to aubject requeat
end elthouqh the etaPf report wae not reed, it is referred to nnd made ~ part
of tho minutee.
Cesario Garcia, ownor, and Jeseie Lopez, L,a Puentr~, interpreter, were preeent
ta nnawer nny questiona.
THf: PUHLIC HEARING WAS CI.OSED.
Mr. Lopez responded to Commiasioner Herbst that tt~e owner desiree thie
addition fo.r more room for hie family and that_ it will not be an apartmQnt.
Cheirman Fry pointed ouL- nn additionel candition needa to be added requiring
one foot af dedication for alley widening purposes. Mr. Lopez explained the
additional condition to Mr. Garcie~ and responded r.hat he is willinq to aqree
to dedicate the property.
ACTION: Commissioner. La Claire offered a motion, seconded by Comtniseioner
King and MOTION CARRIED (Commiesioner McBurney nbeent), that the Anaheim City
Planning Commisaion has reviewed the propnaal to construct an addition ta e
detached ainqle-£amily dwelling with waivera of minimum building site area and
minimum number and type of parking spr~cea on a rectangvlarly-sheped parcel of
laad conaisting of approximately 7706 equare feet, having a frontaqe of
approximately 50 feet on tfie weat aide of Lemon 3treet, and farther described
as H61 and 851-1/2 South Lemon Streett and doea hereby approve the Negative
Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on
the basis that ther.e would be no significant individual or cumulative adverae
environi„ental impact due to the approval of this Neqative Declaration since
the Anaheim General Plan deaignates the subject property for low-medium
denaity land uses commeneurate ~aith the proposalj that no aensitive
environmental impects are involved fn the proposalt that the Initial Study
aubmitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative
adverse environmental impacts; and that the Negative Decleration
aubetentiating the foregoing findings is on F12e in the City of Anaheim
Planning Department.
Commieaioner Le Claire offered Resolution No. PC82-198 and moved for ite
passaqe and adoption that the Anaheim City Planning Conunission does hereby
grant Variance No. 3297 on the basis that denial would deprive subject
property of a privilege being enjayed by other property owners in the same
zone an3 viciniry and eubject to Interdepartmentnl Comm~ttee recommendations.
On roll call, the foreqoing reaolution was pasaed by the followinq vote:
AXES: HOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, KING, LA CI.AZgE
NOEB: NON~
~188ENT: MeBURNLY
~ ,~ ~J-
MINUTS9, 71NAfiSIM CITY PLANNING CC~MMIS8xON, OCTOH$R 18, 1982 8Z-545
ITEM N0. 13. SIR NEGATIVS DECLAMTION 1-ND V11RI11NC~ N0. 3299
PUALIC HEARINa. OWNERs LOUIS A~ UGALOE, ET AL, 317 E. Wilhelmina 8treet,
Anehaim, CA 92805. Property deocribed sa a reotengulerly-aheped parcal oP
land coneistinq o! epproximately 0.15 acre, 317 Eaet Wilhulmina 8treet.
Waivers of: a) mini.mum buildi~;? eita area, b) minimum fl.oor aree, c) minimum
eide yard eatback, d) minimum renr yard ~etr,eck and e) minimum type o! perking
apacee to conetruct an addition to a dntached single-family dwelling.
There were two poraons indicating their preeenco in oppoeition to eub~ect
requeet and elthouqh the etatf rep~rt wes not rsad, it is rePerred to end mede
n pnrt of the mi.nutes.
Louis A. Ugalde, owner, explained he wauld like tn expand the exiating
etructure s~ thet he can liv~e there. 1ie explained there i~t n 2-cer garage and
did not think there will t~e perking pzoblemfs.
Stoven Vasburq, 303 E. Wilhelmina, Ar~aheim, ateted hes is ~~ppoeed bec.r~uae there
are a lc+t of duplexea and conver~ed garnqee in this area and there ;s a
parkinq problem. He stated hie neiqhbor c,~ten parke elong e1Ae his reaidence
on Philadelphie ar~d there is a car on Mr. Uqalde's proper.ty with the hood off
taking away perking spacea. Ne ec:eted he feels thia runs down the
neiqhborhood end hiR property wi.ll loae its value. He strted the ddnsity in
the erea is hiqh and felt it should be etopped. He r~sponded to Chairmnn F'ry
that he had reviewed the plane.
Mr. Orduno, 316 E. Wilhe,lmina, etated he is ccncerned about the parking and
did not believe there are eight parking spacea on thia eite. He stated tliere
~re pa.rkinq problems in that azea alreedy an~3 referred to other adjacent
propertiea contributing to the parkinq problems.
Greg Hastinqs, AsROCiate Planner., p~lnted nut the spnces provided ere tend~m
apaces.
Mr. Ugalde stated t}~e opposition ref erred to other proparties and he has no
control over them. He pointcd out there is a two-cer garage and a long
driveway.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WA3 CIASED.
Mr. Uqalde responded to Chairtnan Fry thet he plans to reaide on the property.
He reaponded to Commiar~i.or,~r La Claire that tihe inoperable vehicle doea not
belonq to him, and it can be ~.owed away. He also explained to Commiesioner
Bouas that there is another livinq uj.!t on the property and that he and a
friend own the property.
Cammissioner Buahore stated he seeg no problem and ther~ be 8 parkinq
spaces which wili help the perking problem.
MINUTEB, ANAHaIM CITY PLIWNING COMMIABION, OCTOHER 18, 1982 82-546
ACTION: Comenissianer Bushor.e offered a mc,tion, aeconded by Commie~ion~r Bouae
and MOTZON CARRIED (Canmieuioner McHurney absent), that th~ Anaheim City
Planninq Commie~ion has revlewed the proposal to conetruct an eddition to e
detached sinqle-family dwellinq with weivers of minimum building site aree,
minimum floor erea, minimum aide yard setbnck, minimum re~r yard eetback and
minimum type o~ pnrkinq epacee on e ractanqularly-ahaped parcel of lend
c~neieting of epproximately 0.15 ~cre, hevinq e fronteqe o! approximetely 50
feet Qn the north sid~ of Wilhelmine 9treet, end further deacribed as 317 ~aet
Wilhelmine Street~ and does hereby approvn the Neqative Declaration from the
requiremen~ to prapare an environmentel impect report on the baeis that tharo
would be no significnnt individual or cumulative edverae environmental impact
due to the approvbl o~ thi8 Neqative Decleretion sinco the Anahoim GonerAl
Plan desiqndtes the eubject prop~rty for medium deneity land uses commenaurnte
with the propoAal~ that no senaitivo environmental impacts are involved in the
propoealt that the Initiel Study eubmitted by the potitioner indicatea no
eiqnificent individual ar cumulative adveree environmentdl impactet ~nd that
the Negative Declerntion substantieting the foregoing findinge is on fil~ in
the City o~ Anaheim Plenninq Department.
Commiseioner Hushore offered Reaolution No. PC82-199 and moved for ita passage
and edoption that the Anahei.m City Planninq Commission does hereby qrant
Varianc.e No. 3299 on the basis that the ut~ite are exietinq and additional
parking spaces will be added to a~loviate ~ome of the exiating parking problem
in the neiqhLorhood and the improvemQnt will enhence the neiqhborhood= and
denial would deprive subject ~roperty of privilegea being enjoyed by other
propertiea in the same xone and vicinity and subject to Interdepartmental
Committee recommendationa.
On roll call, the foregoing resolution wes paesed by the following vote:
AYES: 80UAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERH3T, KING, LA CLAIRE
NOES: NQNE
ABSENT: McBURN~Y
~~
MINUTEB, AN~HEIM CSTY PLIWNING COM~lI88ION, OCTOBSR 18, 1982 82-547
ITSM N0. 14. EIR N0. 218 (pR$VIOU$LY APPROV~D) AND TENTATIVS MAP OF TRACT NO.
10409(REV. 3) (READVERTIBED)
PUBLIC N~AR2NQ. OWNLR: TEXACO~ ANAHEiM H2LLS, iNC., 380 9. Anaheim Hills
Roed, Anahelm, CA 92807. AaRNT: J.H.H. CONSULTANTS, 540 t3. Goiden Circle,
Drive, Suite 111, Senta Ana, CA 9?705, ATTENTION: J~UGlJ8T F. DOMMLR.
Property deecribed aa an irreqularly-ehaped parcel o! land cansieting o!
approximdtely 32.1 ecrms, having approximate ~ronteqea o! 550 feet on th9
aAUth aide of Willowick Drive end 550 feet on the north aide of Imperi+~l
Highway, and being locetad approximately 850 Feet sauth o! the centerline of
Nohl Rnnch Road.
To re-eatablish e 44-lot, 40-unit RS-HS-10,00(SC) Zone subdivision.
There was no one indiceting their preaence in oppoeition to subject requeet
and although the atafg report was not read, it ie referred to and made A F,:~rt
of the minutes.
Hugh Halderman, 540 N. Golden Circle Drive, Santa Ana, engineer for Texaco
Anaheim Hills, Inc., was preaent to answer any queations.
THE PUHLIC HEARING WAS CLUSED.
Commiseioner Herbat eaked why the alopes ere not being maintained today and
statad he doesn't want to approve any additional tracta if the alopea nren't
qoinq to be maintainsd.
Georqe MaBOn, 380 Anaheim 1lills Road, Anaheim, Presider.t of Gunston Hall
Compnny, M~nager for Texaco-Anaheim Hills, explained Anaheim Hills Planned
Community Aseaciation was f~rmed in 1977, and only affects those tracte
developed since that timet that those portions developed prior to January
1977, are not subject to the CC&Rs of the Master Aeaociatian and that the
Maeter Aesociation is operated by the hon-eowners since Texaco-Anaheim Hille,
Inc. no longer has any ropreeentation on the board.
Commisaioner La Claire stated previously there was a lot of interest in
maintaininq the area and in the association by the developer obviously to
increase the value of the property, but recently many areas have been allowed
to deteriorate~ that sprinklexs were broken for months on Anaheim Hills Road,
the gateway to Anaheim Hills, and the beautiful fescue gresaes were allowed to
deteriorete and h~d to be cut low. She asked why ~exaco-Anaheim Hills Inc.
qot out of the aseociation and wt-~y they are no lonqer interested, pointinq out
they do have a veeted interest in thia property.
Mr. Mason explained pursunnt to the CC&R,s, the number of votes that
Texeco-Anaheim Hills Inc. had gave them no power ko control the aesociationt
that the aesociation has reached a matuxe state and has an incoae of nearly
one helf a million dollars a year which is applied to maintenance of the
slopea~ tha~t eome of the hocaeowr-era who live there felt very etxongl,y that the
acseociation was designed and aet. up to be a vehicle of the homsowners. He
gdded i~ ie improper and wrong for any developer to maintain control over a
homeowner's aesociation.
( a * ~
MINUT~S, JWIIHEIM CITY PL7INNING CaMMlI~18ION, OCTOBBR 18, 1982 8Z-548
Mr. Masvn skaCed the M~ater )lasociatian hae +~ very active boerd end they know
1-naheim Hilla Rosd has been a problemt and thet tho City hao li.nally eccaptad
the maintenenca o! tho madians end the sprinklere hevs been repaired eaverel
montha aqo.
Concerning the leacue qreseeo, Mr. Mason eteted he did n~t think it will be
poosible to meintain that gror-th nnd it ie not certain thet thet ie tha proper
ty.pe af grassee !or thie are~ becauee tr~e,y do need a Cremenduus em~unt o!
water. He expleined etiudies aze currently underwny with experta to poaeibly
chnnqe come o! the landecaping.
Mr. Mnson etaked Texeco-Anaheim Iiill~, Inc. relinqui~hed cuntrol of the
aesocintion in Apri1 of ttiis year when the baard c,E hameownPr~ was elected.
Commissioner HQrbet etntecl the City haa been yetting complaints and hR feels
Anaheim Hills, znc. has bean reaponeible and doing e fine ~ob for e long time
and now some of the axe~s are going downhill.
Commiesioner La Cldire etated ehe felt Texeco-Anahei.m Hille ahould have
repreaentation on the board beceuse they do have a veated interest, even
thouqh the control ie turned aver to the homeownera. Mr. Mason replied they
do attend the meetinga. He further axplained the decision to relinquieh
control was be-eed ~n leqel advice Co Texaca-Anaheim Hills, Inc. He at.ated
when the Anaheim Hi~lle, Inc. mannqement contract was terminated in 1981,
Gunston Hell Company assumed thoae responsibi.litiea. He stnted they are atill.
interested in eelling the property and continued development of the property
will depend upon nu~rket conditions. He stated Texaco no longer fe~ls they can
~fford to perform some of the functions which th~~y were doinq voluntarily.
Commiaeioner Suahore asked if any property eold will be heve deed reatrictions
and CCbRe to protect the integrity of the cemmunity.
Mr. Mason etated it is the intention that propertl.ee eold wauld be annexed to
the Master Assaciation. He added it is conceivable, however, that a lnrge
parcel (600 to 1000 acres) could be sold and developed indepcndently by the
purch~ser. He added L•h~re are no diacussions at this time, but it ia posaibl.e.
Conunisaionez La Claire asked if there ia a quarantee thet theae two tracts
before the Cosnmission today will be included in the Master AeAOCintion.
Mr. Maeon stated tl~eae tracts are already qraded and would b8 develdped
coneistently with other ti~acts ~nd tke conditiona require that they be a part
of the asaociation•
Commissioner Bushore stated he wes concerned that people who bouqht ~htA the
planned community are not abandoned.
Mr. MaP~n stated they have the strength of the Master Association with a
subetantinl income and reaerve and reaponsible manaqement and the homeowners
ere in a position to control ~'~eir own environment.
1
MINUTE9, AN11[~t1~IM CITY PLANNxNGi COMMI88ION, OCTOBER 18, 1982 82-549
Commiseioner Bushore stnted he would be concsrned if e portion eu~h as 60Q0
ecrea waa sold and nnt rsstricted to bo a pert of ttie Mester ]~ssocintion
bocausa it coul~! be subdividad.
Mr~ Meeon expleined he hed not suqgaeted 6000 ecrea could be soldt that there
are only about 2600 4cras left, ot which about 1600 are developeble and a
portion is under the intluence o! the Cit}• of Oranqe end aould be developed
under e dilPerent concept with no impect on the dev~eloped portions of Maheim
Hille.
Responding to Commisoioner i,e Claire, Jeck WhitQ expleined thoir otfice has
not reviawed the CC&Rs to ~ee it e vote is required by the Master Aaeocietion
to include theee tracte. He steted any tzact epproved in the Anaheim Hills
area cen be subject to the condition rQquiring GC&Rs, but hQ did nor. know if
the Commiesion cen require the annexation to tht Master Aasocir~tion.
Commisnioner La Claire stated the City has been quaranteed for years by
Anaheim Hills, Inc. that these propcsrtiea would qa into the Master Asenci~tion
dnd tfiese tracts were epproved subject to thnt condition and now it ie not
kn~wn wliether they will or not rnd ehe wantod to know if the promises made
over the yeere are going to be kept.
Mr. Mnson stated r.here ie no question thnt both of the~e tracts will be a part
of the Master Asaoci.ation.
It is noted that EIR 218 was previousl}• certifi.ed in conjunction with approval
of Tentative Map of Tract No. 10409 (Rev. No. 3) and Reclassification No.
78-79-5, approved by the Planning Commissian on Auquat 28, 1978.
ACTZONs Commisaioner Herbet affered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Bouas
and MOTION ~..ARRIED (Commissioner McBurney absent), that the Anaheim City
Planning Conuniasion does hFreby find that the proposed subdivieion, together
wi.th its desiqn and improvement, is consistcsnt with the City of Anaheim
General Plan, pursuant to Government Code Section E6473•51 and does,
therefore, epprove Tentative Map of Tr.act No. 10409 (Rev. No. 3) for a 44-lot~
40 unit It3-H3-10,000(SC) 2one subdivieion subject to the following conditions:
1. That should this aubdivision be developed as more than one
aubdivision~ each aubdivision thezeof shall be submitted in tentative
form for approval.
2. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot hiqh masonry
wa11, wrouqht iron fence or combination thereof, shall be constructed
on the southeaet property line separatinq Loti Nos. 29 throuqh 32 and
Lot C from Imperial Highway• Rieaeonable la~ndacaping, includinq
irrigation facilitiea, shall be ir~atalled in the uncemented portion
of the arterial highway parkway the full diatance of said walls plane
for said landscapinq to be submitted to and oubject to the approval
of the b'uperintendent of Parkway Maintenancet and followinq
installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the
responaibility for maintenance of said landacapinq•
MINUTEB, 11NAHBIM GI~Y PLANNING COMMI88ION~ OCTOH&R 18, 1982 82-550
3. mhat all lotd ~ithin thie tract ehell be eerved by underqround
utilitiee.
4. Thet e final tract mep of sub}ect property ahall be subenitted to end
appxoved by the City Council ~nd then be recarded in the Office of
the Ornnge County Recorder.
5. That the originnl documents of the propoeed covenantm, c~n-9itione,
end reetrictions, end a letter adAreeeed to devAloper'~ title company
authorizinq recordetion, ahell be aubmitted to the City Attorney's
Oflice and ~ppraved by the City Attorr~ey'e office and Enyineering
Diviaion prior to tlie tinal tract map eppraval. 8aid ~ocument$ de
approved ahell be filed and recorded in the Officv of the Orange
County Recorder. In additian, covenants, conditions and reEtrictions
shall include the perpetuel maintQnence aqreement for Lc~ta A, B, C
and D•
6. That strec~t names ehall bQ eppraved hy the City Planning Department
prior to approval of a final trect map.
7. ThRt the owner of aubject prope.rty shall pay to the City of AnahE:im
the appropriete park and recreation in-lieu feea as determined to be
appropriate by the Gity Council, said fees to be paid at the time the
building permit is issued.
8. That drainage of said property shall Ue disposed of in a manner
satiefactory to the Ci.ty Engineer. If, in the preparation ~f the
site, auffic;ient gradinq ia requir.Pd to necessitate a grading permit,
no work on greding will be permitted between October 15th and April
15th unless all required off-Aite drainege facilities have been
installed and are operative. Positive aseurance shall be provided
the City that such drainaye fncilities will be completed prior to
October 15~.h. Necessary riqht-of-way for off-site drainaqe
facilitiea shall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall
have initiated condemnation proceedinqs therefore (the costs of which
shall he borne by the devcloper) prior to the commencement of gradinq
operatione. The required drainaqe facilities shall be of a size and
type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from higher
ptoperties throuqh sai8 proper~y to ultimate disposal as approved by
the City Engineer. Said drainaqe fecilitiea ahall be the first item
of construction and shall be completed and be fnnctional throughout
the tract and from the downstream t~.oundary of the property to the
ultiraate point of disposal prior to the iasuance of any final
buildinq inspections or occupancy permits. Drainage district
reimbursement agreements mxy be made available to the developers of
sai.d property upon theiz request.
9. Thet qrading~ excevation, end all other construction activities shall
be conduated in such a manner so as to minimize the poasibility of
any silt originatir.q from this project beinq carried into the Santa
Ana River by storm water oriqinating from or flowing through this
project.
~ ~
MZNUTEB, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIN(i COMMI88ION, OCT08ER 18, 19B2 82-551
10. That the aliqnment and terminsl point o! atorm dra~ns ehown on this
tentative tract mep ehell not be coneid~re.1 final. TheBe dreine
ehell bo subjoct to preciee deaiqn cnnsiderdLtona end approval of the
City F.ngineer.
11. If perm~nent etreet neme siqne have not baen inetalled, temporery
etredt neme rsigne shall be inetelled prior to any occupancy.
12. That the ~wner(s) of subject property shell pey epproprie-t~ drainege
aseeaemont feen to the City of Anaheim as determined by the City
~ngineAr pzior to iseuence o~ e- building permit.
13. That ownership nnd maintenance reaponaibility of Lote A, B, C and D
ehall be reteined by the homeawneXS aesnciation.
14. Thet the tull riqht of wey af Imperial ti.~qhway (105 feet) frc~m the
AeotArly trect boundary of subject tract to the Anaheim city limit
aiiell be irrevocably offAred for dedication to the City of Anaheim
for streot and ~.~ublic utility purpoaeR. Seid dedication ahall be
dccepted by the City upon the determinetion by the City Engineer that
an imminent project for the conetruction of Imperial Hiqhway oxisto,
or that the health, eafety, and gen+~ral welfarc af the public
requiras it.
15. That all engineering requirements of the Citv of Anaheim, along
lmperial Hiqhway from the easterly tract boundery tu tl~e city limits
including preparation of lmprvvement plans anci installaCion ~f r~ll
im~rovements suct~ as curba and gutters, sidewr~lks, etreet qradinq and
paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenent work ehnll be
complied with as required by the City Engineer and in ~ccordance with
specifications on file in the Office of the C:lty Enqineers that
street liqhting facilities along Imperial Hiqllway From the easterly
tract boundar.y to the city limits shall be in~tnll~d as r.equired by
the Office of Utilities Gener.al Manager, xnd lr~ eccordance wi.th
specificntions on file in the Office of the ~~fice of Utilitie~
General Manager and/or that security in the form of a bond,
certificate of deposit, letter of credit or caeh, in an amount and
form eatisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be poated with the
City to quarantee the satiefactory ina*_allation of the
above-mentioned improvemente. Said security shall be poated with the
City prior to approval of final map. The abc,ve-required improve..+ents
shnll be constructed u~on the determination by the City Engineeer that
an im~ninent project for the construction of tmperial Highway either
side of subject tract exiats, or that the health, safety, and qeneral
weltare of the public requirea it.
16. That fire hydranta shall be inatalled end charged as required and
determ.ined to be neceseary by the Chief of the Firs Departtnent prior
to cotnmencecaent of atructural framinq.
r-;
I , ~ ~ ~
M=p~+$g~ AI~IAHEIM CITY PLANNINO COMMI88IOtlr OCTOBER 18, 1982
82-552
17• w11th tha requiiu~ant~ o~tthetCityiol1AnaheimCFiredZane~No1 4~esly
epproved by the Fire Department.
18. That fuel breaks ehell ba provided as datermined to be required by
the Fire Chiel. •
19. That the ownerfs) of aubject property ahell pey the tre!!ic siqnal
assesement fee (Ordinance No. 389G), in an amount ae determined by
the City Council~ for each new dwelling unit prlor to the issuance o!
a building permit.
20. That any specimon tree rem~vel shall be subject to th«~ z•eguletions
pertnining tn treu preeervation in the Scenic Gorridor Overl.ay 2one.
21. In accordance with the reQuiremanta of Sertion 18.02.047 pertaining
to the initiel sale oP. residential homes i~ the City of Anaheim
Plnnning Area "H"~ the seller shall provide each buyer w~th written
infurmation concerninci the Anbheim Gonaral Plan e~nd Che existing
zoning within 300 feet of ~he bour.daries ~f aubject tract.
22. That the ownare of the subject praperty shall oxecute and record a
covenant obligating the homaowners aaeocia~tion to therkwal~WOfg where
applicnble: (1) mriintain the landa~aped p~rtion °8cent toyassociation
arterial streete (Imperial HighwaY), parkways adj
maintained alopes and/oz common areas and ell median islands
installed in conjunctian with said aubdivision except thoee located
within arterial ~treetsr (Z) indemnify and hold the City ha~rmless for
damagea zesulting therefromt and (3) maintein liaaslanYadditional for
seid pnrkwaye and median islrtndR naming L•he CitYroved b Che City
l.nsured. The form of said covenent shall he app Y
Attorney's Office and shall be recorded concurrently with the final
tract map• '1'f'-e devaloper of the r~ubject tract shall improve and
maintain the hereinabove deacribed parkwaya and medi.an ielands,
includin~ providing the above specified inauranc$~edntherefor aa~ a~
the homeowners association becomes ~eeh~ll postga bond in a:- amaunt
here~nabove providQd. The develope arantee performance
and form satisfactorY to the City of Anaheim to gv
of developer's obligations hereunder. Evidence of the required
insurance and bondPshall be pubDV~lPOfttheafinalpmap,d by~ the City
Attorney s Office rior tu a p
.~..~,
. .. ..
___ ___.... _ . _ ;
,.~,,,,,~....~.,~....».._.. - ~--- , _~
- ~~ _
__ _ ~"""" .._ ~_ ._---~----
~ j
MINUT~S. 1-NAHEZM CITY PL~NNINO COMM=SBION, OCTOHER 18, 1982 8:-553
NO. 15. ~;R N0._224 (PRF.1-IOUBLY APPROVED) AND_ TENTATIV~ MAP OF TRACT Nv.
1061 T ( READV$x~rr.s~o 1
PUBLIC HBARING. OWNERs 'PEXACO, ANAHBIM HILLB, INC'., 380 8. Andheim Hills
Road, Aneheim, CA 92807• AGRNT: J•H.H. CONSULTAAITS, 5~t0 N. Golden Circle,
Drive, Suite 111, 3anta Ana, CA 92705, ATTENTION: AUGU3T P. DOMMER. Property
described na an irreqularly-ahaped parc:el of land coneisting of epproximately
14 acres, havinq a frontaqe of epproximately 968 feet on the edst eide of
Imperiel Highway, approximately 1650 feet eouth of the centerline of Nohl
Ranch Rc~ed.
To re-eatablish a 27-lot, 25-uni.t RS-HS-10,000(SG) Zone subBivision
(residontial plenned unit devel.opment).
Hugh Haldezmdn, 540 N. Golden Circle Drive, Santa Ana, Engineer for
Texaco-Aneheim Hille, Inc. and George Mason, Presidc~nt of Gungton Hdll
Compa~iy, Manager for Texa~:o-Annheim Hills, Inc., 380 8. Anaheim liilla Road,
Anaheim, were pr~3aent to anawer any questions.
tt ts nnted that EZR 224 waa prev~ously cortified in con~unction with approval
of Tentative Map of Tract No. 10617, Recl+~c~eification No. 7H-79-25, approvQd
by the Planning Cocrmiesion on January 29, 1978.
ACTIONs Commissioner Herbat offered a motion, seconded by Commisaioner Houas
dnd MCM'ION CAR1tIED (Commissioner McBurney absent), that the AnahESim City
Planning Commiasion does hereby find that the propoaed eUbdivision, toqether
with its design and imgrovement, is coiisistent with the City o.f Maheim
General Plan, pursuant to Government Code Section 664~3.5i ~-nd does,
therefore, approve Tentative Nlap of Tract No. 10617 for a 27-lot, 25-unit
RS-HS-10,000(SC) Zone subdivieion (resi.dential p~.anned unit development)~
subject to the followinq conditions:
1. That sho~ila thie subdivision bA develaped as more than one
subdivieion, each aubdivision th~ereof shall be submitted ir. tentative
form for approval.
2. That all lots within this tract ahall be served by undergroun~i
utilitiea.
3. That prior to the introduction of an ordinance a finsl tract map of
aubject property shall be submitted to and npprov~d by the City
Council and then be recorded in the Offlce of the Oranye C~unty
RecorSPr.
q. That the oriqinal documeiits of the propoaed covenants, conditions,
and restrictions, and a letter addressed to developer's title company
authorizinq recordation, shall be Aubmitted to the City Attorney's
office and apprnved by the City Attarney's office and Engineerinq
Division prior to the linal tract map approval. Said d~cuments as
approved shall be Piled and recorded in the Office of the Orange
County Racorder.
~
MINUTSB, ANAtiEIM CITY PL1I~TNINC3 COMMISSION, OCTOBSR 18, 1982 82-554
5. That draineyo o! seid property el~ell be diapossd of in a me~nner
eatistectory to the City Engineer. If, in the pxeparation a! the
eite, eutficient greding ie required to nocesaitnte e qrnding permit,
no work on gredinq will be permitted between October 15th and April
15th unle.s nll required ~f!-eito drainaqe lecilities have been
i.nakelled nnd axe operative. Poeitive ae~urence aha11 be provided
the City thet such dz•a.inaq~ facilitiea will be completed prior to
actober 15th. Necessary right-ot-wey !or off-site dr~inege
fa~ilities ehnll be dediceted to ti.he City, or the City Counail ahall
heve initieted condemnntion proceedinqe therefore (the costa of which
shall be bc~rne by the developer) prior to the cor~nencement of qrading
operntions. The required drainage facilitieo P:~ell be of n eize and
type sufficient to carry runoff wetere originnting from higher
propertiea through eaid property to ±altim~te diepoeal es epprovod by
the Ci.ty Engineer. Said drdinngtl facilitiee shall be ~he first item
of constr.uction and ehnll be completed and be functione.l throuqhout
the tract and from the downetream houndary of the propQrty to the
ultimate point o~ diapc~eal prior to the issuance of eny final
buildinq inspectione or occupancy permita. Drainaqe district
reimburaement aqreementi~ may be made aveilable to the developers of
said proper.ty upon Cheiz request.
'v. Y'hat qrnd.ing, excavation, and ell other construction activities shall
be conducted in such a manner so es to minimize the poasibility ~f
any silt originating from this project be~ng carried into the ~anta
Ana River by Atarm water o.riqinating from or flowing throuqh this
Proi~'~t•
7. That the Qwner of subject property ahall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropziate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be
eppropriate by the City Council, said fees f.o be peid at the time the
building~ permit is isaued.
8. That all private streats shall be developed in accordance with tt~e
City of Anaheim's Standard Detail No. 122 for private atreets,
includinq installa~ion of atreet name aiqns. Plana For the pri~vate
atreet lightinq, as required by the etandard detail, shall be
submitted to the Building Division for approval and inclusion with
~he building plans prior to isauance of building pezmits. (Private
etreets are those whtch pravide primnry acceee and/or circulation
within the project.)
9. That the alignment ~,nd terminal point of storm drains shown on thia
tentative tract map shell not be coneidered final. 7`hese drains
eh~ll be subject to precise deaiqn coneideratione dnd approval of the
City Enqineer.
10. I! permanent street name siqns have not been instaxled, tempo~:ry
street name eiqns ahall be instelled pxior to any occupancy.
11. That fire hyciranta aha11 be installed and charged as required and
d~termined to be neae~ssary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior
to commencement of structural framing.
, ,
MINUTE9~ ANAHBIM CITY AI.J-NNINO COMI~1I86~tpN, Of.`T08~R ~8, 1982 82-555
12. That all r~quiraments u! Fir~ Zone 4, ~thsrwiee ident ltied d• Fire
1ldminiatrntive Order No. 76-01, will b~ met. 8uch r~yui.rements
include, but ere not limited to, chimnay epark errea tors, protected
attic ~nd under tloor openinge, Cless C or bett~r rao ~ing nu~tnrisl
and one h~ur lira resistive construction of horitonta 1 surieces i!
within 200 feet of adjecent bruehland~
ls. Thet nntive slop~e adjacent to nEwly constructed home s shell be
hydroaeed~d with a low luel canbustlbla saed mix. Su ch slopes shell
he aprinklered end waeded ea required to eeteblish 1 ~ 0•leet
eeparetion of ttammablu veyetetion trom any ~tructur~.
14. TF.at ths etorm draine end e~nitnry aewern outside th~ public right ot
wey oP Imperial Highwey shell be privately owned r~nd privetely
meintrined.
1S. In acc~rdenr,e with the ~equirementa oF Section 18.02 ~OA7 pert~ininq
to the ini~ial eAle of reaidentiel hnmes in the City of Anaheim
Plannir-q Area "8", the seller shall provido Qech buy~r with written
intormetion concerning the Anahein C,enexal Plan and the existinq
zoninq within 300 feet of the bounaarfe6 of ~ubject trect.
16. Thet any specimen tree removal shall be eubject to ttze reguiations~
pertaining to tree preservatfon in the Scenic Corridor Uverlay Zone.
17. That the owner(s) of subject pro~:^ty sht~ll (n) deed to the City of
Anaheim e strip of lnnd 53 feet .in wid*h from the ce nterline of the
atreet along Imperial Hiqhwey for atreet wide.iinq pu rposea.
18. Thet all enqi.n~erinq requiremc~nta of t`~e City of Ana2~eia1, nlong
Imperial Hiqhway including preparation of improvemen ~ plens and
i~istellation of all improvemente auch as curbs and q~ttera,
aidewslks, strRet grading and paving, drainage facil ftiee, or othsr
appurtE~ant work shell be ~amplied wi~h as required by the City
E~gineer and in accordnnce with sper_ificationa on fi 1e in the Office
of the City F.ngineurt that street lighting fncilities alor-g Imperial
Fliqhway ahall be inatalled as required by the Office of Utilities
General Manager, and ir. accordance with specificatiaz~e on file in the
Offi~e of the OPfi~:e of Utilitiea Generel Managez arid/or that
securlty in khe form of a bond, certificake of depos jt, letter of
credit ~r cash, in an amoun~ and form satiafactory to the City of
Anaheim r~rall be poated with ~he City to quarantee the satisfactory
inetallstion ot ihe ebove-mentionRd improvements. Said aecurity
ahall be poated with the City prior to approva.l of f inal map. The
above-required improvemen~e ahall be installed prior to occupancy.
19. Ttiat atreet names ehall be approved by the City Planning pepartment
prior to epproval of n final tract map.
20. That the owner(s) ~f subject property shall pay appropr.iate 9ra.inaqe
eRaessment fees to the City of Anaheim As determined by the City
Enaineer prior to isauance of a building pez~ait.
~, ~
62-5'S6
MIN~'PEB, 11N11H1~IM CITY PLl-I~Nlt~lfi COMMI88ION, OCT088R 18, 1987
Z1. Thot ~~propriate wat~er •ase~~nent l~es as d~t~rminsd by tha Oltice o~
Utilities CianarRl Manager shall be p+~id to the City o! Anaheim prior
to the i~euanc~ c! a buildinq pern~it.
2Z. Thdt the owners o! the subjsct prapertY •hall axecute and reaord a
covenant obliqa t inq the homeowners spopcia~Tion Eo therkw~lowi~Pg wher•
epplicablec (1) ~aintain tha lendsca edrpodts°Ad~acent to association
erterial etreets (Imperial Highway), p~ Y
me~intained elcp~s anti/or common ereas and all medien islnnds
installad in conjunction with eeicl subdiv~sion axoept thoad located
within artarial atreetef (2) indemnily and hold the City har.mlese !or
dnm~ge8 resulting thexetromt and ( 3) ~intain liabil.ity ineurence ~or
eaid pnrkwdys an d medinn ielende nnminq th~ CitYrovednbydtheiGity
insured. The torm o! seid covanent ehall be app
1-ttorney's Of£ice and shall be recorded conaurrently with the linal
tract meP• The developer o! the subject tract ohall in-prove and
tneintein the he reinabave described parkways end medien ielanda,
including provi ding the abave specitied ineurence, until euch time ae
the homeowners association beaomes leqally obligated there+lor as
hexeinebove provided. The developar shAll pc~et e bond in en amount
and torm eatistactory to the City of Analieim to querantee per~ornence
of developer's obli.9ntiona hereundor. Evidence of the r~quired
insurance end bond shell be eubmitted to, and appr~ved by, ths City
Attorney's OfE i ce prior to approval of the final mep.
1 ~ ~
MINUT38, 1WANE:~M CITY PLANNING COMMI88ION, OCTOBBR 1.8, 1982
~Z-557
ITaM NO. 16
R]SPORTB ANb RECpNWENpAxInNB
A. VA~ g pp~ 3~gg _ Reque~st for nunc pro tunc resolution emendinq
keaolution No. PC82-1~4 to indicate 118 pnrkinq apacee requized.
1~_,C~TION~ Cotnmissioner KSng oflered Reeolution No. PCB2-200 and moved !or
ita paeeeqe end edoption that the Anaheim City Plenning Commiseion doee
hereby qrent e nunc pro tunc reeolution emending R~seolution No. FC82-174
to indicats :118 parkinq gpnces r~quired.
On roll call., the loreqo.ing resolution wea peseed by the follow!ng vote:
AYB3s BbUA;;, BUSHORE, F'RY, tiF.R83T, KiNG~ LA C7,AIRE
NOE$t NONE
AHSENTs McBURNEY
g• RECLASSIFICATION NO. 80-81-36 - Requast for an Axtonsion o! time trom J.
E Co. peland, Quick 3tert, !or property located ak 135 S. L~~ara Street.
ACTION: Commiseioner King offered a motlon, seconded by f;ommieeioner
Herbat and MOTION CARRIED (Commiasioner McHurney absen~), that the Aneheim
City Planning Commiseion does hQraby grent a retroactive extenaion of time
to expire on June 1S, 1983.
C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1063 - Request for an extension of tima ~rom
R.A. McNees for propurty loceted at 1.721 S. Menchester Avenue (The Cowboy). ,~ ~
r
, . c.,. -
ACTION: Commissioner Kinq ofterad a motion, aeconded by Commissioner Fr'~,l
• ~;;--~
He and MOTION CARRIEp (Commise~oner McHarney absent) thet the Anaheim~~~p,.-~-
City Planning Commisaion does hereb ~~''
exteneion of tlme for Conditional UsQ pet-mit NoH 1063 ~ expireVOn October ~'/ ~' v~
7, 1983. ~. ~•~~
D• ABANDONMG~NT N0. 82-2A - Requeat to abandon a public utility easement
acquired by the City of Ana~-eim, located on the north si.de of La Palma,
east of Kraemer Boulev~rd.
It was noted the Planning Director or his authorized repreeentative has
determined that the proposed groject falls within the definition of
Cateqorical Ex~mptiona, Class 5, as defined in the 3tate Environmental
Impact lteport Guidelinea and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the
requirement to prepare an EIR.
ACTION: Commiabtaner Kina offered a motion, aeconded by CommiRS~oner
Herbst and MOTIO~ CARR2ED (Commiasioner McBurney absent), ttiat the Anaheim
City Planninq Commiasion does hereby recommend to the City Council that
Abandor.ment No. 82-2A be approved as recommended by Lhe Gity Engineer.
i
MINUTES, 11NAH8IM CITX PL7INNING CCIMMISSION, OCTOAER 18, 1982 82-S5B
~, PROPOSSD CODE AMENDN~t~IT - Amendment to Section 18.61.050.600 adding
S3ubaaction .612 to Chapter 1E~.61 oP Title 18, Zoninq, perteining to
Recycling/Resaurc~e Recovery Transfer F~cilities in the Anahaim Cenyon
Industrial Area.
Vince Taormina end 8111 Taormine, P.O. Hox 309, Aneheim, CA 92805 were
gresent to enaw~r eny questione.
ACTI ON: Commiaeioner Herbet offered n moti.on, seconded by Commiseioner
Hu shore end MOTION CARRI~D (Commioeioner Mc9urncsy ebsent), thnt khe
Aneh eim City Plnnning Commisaion does hereby recommond to the City Council
that the pro~osed Code Amendmant be approved edding Subsectic~n .612 to
SQ ction 18.61.050.600 pertnining to kecyclinq/Resources R~ecovery Trnnsfer
Facilities in ±ne Anet:pim Cdnyon Industrial Area.
OTHER DISCUSSION:
~~ -
(A) ACTION: CommiesionQr Herbbt of.fered a motion,secon8ed by Can~niaeioner La
C la ire and MOTIOh CARRIED (Commiesioner McBurn~y ebsent), thet the Aneheim
C iky Planning Commisaion doea hereby command ttie Anaheim City Fire
nepartment t~r their ability and their diligent end aggzessive suppreeaion
of the !'ire in the Anaheim W1118 a~ren an October 9, 1982.
C ou~ntesioner Herbst stated he lives in the Meheim Hills area and was very
impressed t~y the action of the FirQ Department. He r.eferred to t1-e
presentation by the Fire Chief of the fire resistan~t ~ ' ahingles and
fe 1 t bucause the recominendation requiring this type zonfing was approved,
even though tha.re wa~ a lot of opposition trom builders, there was no loss ~f life
in thet fire.
Commisaioner La Claire stated she also livea in that area and commended
the Fire Department for their nfforts. 3he added she was concexned,
however, about the lack af emergency information availeble and t~eked why
the cable televieion capabi.li.ty was not used ta alert reeidents.
Conunissioner Herbst agreed there is e need far that type service and
suggeated it should be reviewed.
Anni.ka SantAlahti stated she would re2ete the Cocamission's concerns to the
Public Information Officer anc] also referred to a presentaL_ .n made by the
F ire Department to the City ~ouncil about the recent fires which could be
made available to the Commiasion, if so deaired. Sne added shE
out if there ie a achedule for the presentation to be made to ~
c itizen qroupa wl~ich the Commiasionera could ettend.
1
~
', 1
MxNUT~B~ 11D1711lEIM CITY PLi1NNxtiG COMMlI88I0N, OG'T~sER 18, 1982 8Z-SS9
~8) Caaeaitslon~r Hushora r~lateQ a praperty ovm~r'• conc~rn p~rtaininq to a
vdriano~ !or twc-~tory units an La Pelma whiah wat denied, hav-aver, th~
unit~ ar~ being oon~truatecl at, th• sanw~ heiqht a~ an• story snd h• l~1~
thet, d~l~uta tho purpos~ !ar tihe dsnial beceu~e o! sir llaa~ ohedov~-~, e~c.
1-nnike 8dntalahti explsined the Coda rele~tes to livabl• spac~ •nQ not
spac~ u~~d !or aesthetic purposes.
ADJOURNM~NT: Thsre being no lurther buainess, Connnioeionar Harb~t ott~red a
awtion, ~econd~d by Cot~-iosloner King and MOTION C7IRRIEO
(Conimiasioner McHurnay sbsant), thet tha meeting be edjourne+d.
The meetinq we-s ad3ourned At 3sA5 p.m•
R~spactlully nubmitted,
~~, ,~ Z,~,~.-
~d1th L. Harris, 8ecretary
Anaheim City Planning Conuaiegion
ELH Ym
; .
~----- . . .._ .~~~+~rtt..~1Ma .z_z~..t~ +" f r~ _z7 a~.'enti t _ .~,,Pt .. r, ~~ Y-. ."r'~'_i
. ~ ~ : . - <~:..
.~ . ~,,, _ ~~ ~
_ .: „ - - .- 4 : . -, ,, ,
, ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . . . `L~ ~ . . .
3