Minutes-PC 1983/08/22~ ~
, ;;
a
,,
,
RE(iULAR MEBTINO Oi~ Tl1~ J1NA!lBIM CITY PLJ-NNINO CO~II88ION
RBGULAtt MB~TZNG Th~ r~yu 1 dc m~~t~nq o! th• Anah~im CiLy Pl~nning
Commiasio~ was cell~d to order by Chaicwomen Boues at
10:00 a.ta., Auyuat ~Z, 1963, in ths Council Chambc+r, a
quorum b~ing preasnt and the Cammi~rion reviewe~i plan• of
the items o~ today'a ~gende.
RECB88: 11:3U a.m.
RECONVENEt 1:33 p.m.
PRESENT Chdirwoman: Bouea
Commiea i one ra : Buehore,
McDurney
ABSENT Commisaionera: None
Fry, Herbet, King, Le Claire,
ALSO P1tE3ENT Ron Thompaon
1-nnika Santalehti
.lack Whi te
Chris Jarvi
Jay Titus
Shirley Land
Dean 5he rer
Greg Hestings
Edith Harria
Plenning Director
Aasiatant Director for 2oning
Assiatent City 1-ttorney
Director Parics, Recreation and
Community Srrvices
Office Engfneer
Traffic Engineering Aseociate
1-aoociatp Plan~er
1-ssociete Plenner
Planning Commission Secretary
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commis Sioner King nffecrd a motion, seconded by
Commiasioner Fry ~nd MOTION CARRIED (Commiasioner Buahore absteining) that the
minutes from the meeting of a-ugust 8, 1983, be approved as aubmitted.
ITEM NO. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL Z lIPACT RRPORT N0. 235 (PREV. CLRT.)f TENTATIVE M1-P
OF TRACT NOS. 10967 THROUGH 10978
PUBLIC HEARING. OWNERSo ANaNEIM HILLS, INC., 380 Aneheim Hills Roa~d,
l~naheim, CA 92807. 1-GENT: LIND AND HILLBRUD, TNC., 2065 Huntington Drive,
San Ma-ino, CA 91108. Prop~ rty desccibed as an irregularly-shaped parcel of
land conaiating of approxima tely 346 acrea located southwesterly of Nohl Ranch
Road betwee~ the intersectivn of Nohl Aench Roed with Canyon Rim Road and
5errano Avenue, having a f r o~tage oE ~pproximately 320 feet on the south side
of Nor,l Ranch Road, having a msximum depth of Approximetely 6,097 feet and
being located approximately 2300 feet aoutheaet of the centerline of Canyon
Rim Road.
Pekiti~ner proposes to re-es tablish one open space (OS(SC)) tract and eleven
reaidential tracts with 207 RM-2400(SC) u~its, 327 RM-3000(SC) units and 25
RS-HS-22,OOQ(SC) units.
Cvntinued f rotn .Tune 13, 27 and July 25, 1983.
There wAe no one indica~tistg their preaen~e in oppoaitiun to subject request
and although the staff repo rt was not read, it ie ceferred to and made a pdrt
of the minuL•es.
83-450 8/22/83
INUTBB._ ANAHBIM CITY PWINNING COMMISSION. 11U(iUBT Z2, 1983 ~,. 83-451
G~orge Mason, 380 1-naheim Hills Road, Anah~im, atat~c! thia reque~r ia £oc
appro~el ot the twelv~ tcecte ea shown on the exhibit whicb wsce praviously
approvad by the Planning Commieaion in Fsbcuary 1980 ar~d ~xpired on 1-ugu4t 11,
1983. Mr. Maeon r~f~rred to Exhibit /- diaplayed on th~ wall snd explain~d the
open spACe eaeementa given to tha County of Orange and the ~squeetcian end
H iking Trails proposed. He ~xpleined both the treila propoaed ere ahown on
the Meeter Plan of Hiking dnd ltiding Treils end are c u rrently consrcuct~d and
e re uaed primarily by eyu~strlen users, but can be us e d f o[ hiking~
Mr~ Meaon etated the tcacte ae they are deaigned on t h eee plena ere
a ubetantially the same as thoae previously appcoved, e xcept the coadway ecrosa
the eesemenr to tie inta Covec~d Wagon hae been eliminated and ia merely a
fire lane ao there will be no traffic fcom covered Weg on acroae the easement
into the tract.
!!r. Mason stated Texaco, l~naheim tlills, Inc., as pect of this development, is
bonded to conatruct the Twin Peaks Reaervoir and will piek up e 16• water line
at the boundary of Tract 1U940 which will procaed thro uqh Camino Grande to
Peridot Plece and down peridot Place to Emorald Circl r end to the south to the
c~servoir. He ataked they have prepared Exhibit B to shew the general
landacape plan and staked ell those aceae will be main tained either by the
Anaheim Hills Planned Community Master Asaociation or the aub-asaociations
which will be formed.
Z'HE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Jack White, Aseistant City Attocney, suggested the f o llowing chenges to the
propoaed conditions and explained the changes should apply to ~11 the tracts
even though he would only indicate one tract.
Condition No. 3- add the following wor~a to the end ~concucrently with
recordati~n of the f inal ma~•i Conditiona 10 dnd 13- add a new aentence as
followa: •Any obligations imposed on the propecty owner which are to be
performed aubsequent to the approval of the final mep , shall be evidenced by e
written agceement or covenant, approved by the City 1~-ttorney's Office and
recorded againat the property prioc to oc concurrentl y with the recordation of
the final map', Condition No. 21-change the firet wo r d from 'the" to 'any' in
the last aentencet Condition 31 which appeare in some of the tracts pertaining
to reclassification to RM-3000 should have the wocdR added •prior to final map
approval'. He auggested a new condition be added to all the tracta to read as
follows: 'That prior to final tract map approval, t he owner of the property
shall record an irrevocable offer of dedication for Camino Grande Stceet
(Stage Coach Road) as ahown on Tentative Tcact ltaps 1 0967-10978, inclueive,
and install all Street improvements including curbs a nd guttecs, aidewalks,
street grading and pevement, sewer and dreinage facil ities, or other
appurtenant work as required by the Cit1 Engineer ana in accordance with
epecfficationa on file in the Office of the City Eng i neers or post security in
a form and amount satisf ectoty to the City of J~nahei m to guarentee the
satiafactory completion of said improvementet or irr evocAbly offer to dedicate
and improve that portion theceof necessary to provide public atreet access to
said tract prioK to final building inapect.ione and i s auance of xcupancy
permits for any portion of said tract."
8/22/83
MINUT~B. ANAHBIM_CITY PLIINNINC COMM288ION. AUGUBT ~2, ~983 83- ~5Z
Commiaaipn~c Buahore ceF~cced to the recommended condition requ~ring
maint~nance of the equeatrian and hik~ng treila and sakad if the City hes
r~quired homea~~ners daaociation4 to meintain tcail~ in perpetuity in the pae t.
~ack White staled thet augqeation wse re)ected by the Planning Commission in
connection with a~othec tract in the peet. Ne expleined Condition No. 20 on
PAge 1-p only requicee the praperty ownec to dedicate and improve the treil
~nd once the propetty ie accepted upo~, improvamente, maint~nence will become
the reaponeibility of the City.
Commiaeionec Buahore ref ecced to Pege 1-c, Condit.ion No. 3 which cequicea the
homeownera eesocidtion, ~naheim Hills Planned Community Aeeociation or other
reaponeible entities to be ceaponeible for mai~taining all open apACe lota~
landacaped end natucal slopes and ell equestrian and hiking treils.
Annika 3antalahti, Asaiatant Dicector for Zonirig, st~ted the RasC/west treil
is an Ocange County eaeement and ahe underatood the County would be
responslble for maintenance of th~t trAil and Condition No. 3 does include
other responeible entities. Sh~ otated thece ia ~ north/south trAi1 along the
easterly aide which will be dedicated to the City and the condition ie
recommending thet lhe association meintain ~hat trail. She expleined thece
are twn different trails and there ie already a mnintenance egreement with the
County for one trail.
Commissioner Bushore atated he well remembers the eleven-lot eubdivision on
which the Planning Commission rejected thia auggeation for the maintenence and
liability of the trails. Annika Sartalehti atated that particular portion of
the condition cou~d be m~dified or eliminated.
Dean Shecer, Asaociate Planner, atated unlese there is eome prioc arran~~ement,
typically it ia rhe City's reapanaibility to maintbin any equeatrier. Lrail
once it hae been dedicated and improved. He etated there is a little bit of
confuaion with the wording of this condition and it sounde like the homeowne ra
association is being asked to maintain the trails.
Commissioner Bushoce stated that portion of the condition ahould be
eliminated. He then ref erred to Par~graph 15 on Page 1-j pertaining to the
six problem 6reas and asked if that is included as a condition. (it was c. ed
it was not included as a condition.) Commissioner eushore stated the
Commission would like some assurance that theae problems will not be
cepeated. Dean Sherer replied that it w~e included by staff to make the
Flanning Commisaion awAre of the improvoment failures and auggeats that those
problems be reeolved bef ore approval of these trects becauae aimilar
situations may be expecienced in this area unlesa the developer is required to
bath maint~in and repair such improvements in perpetuity. He atated in other
are~s of Anaheim Hills, existing improvements ~ave failed and stdff is lookiny
for some kind of security from Anaheim Hill~, Inc. that these problema will ce
cocrected and something preventive done to keep this from happening in Area 19.
Commissioner euahore asked what assurance we could have that these items will
be pursued ir: a timely manner, even though theae thinga have nothing to do
with theae tracte on the agenda today. He stated he did not think Che City
should be asking the developec to maintain tho$e improvements fn perpetuity
and once they eccept khe dedication, they accept the responsibility. He
explained Commission would like eome assurancea, however, as to how theee
mattere will be reaolved.
MINUT~S. ~NAHBIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION. A~GUBT 22. 1983 8~-153
__...._.__
Mr. Meson atated on those items which thoy ar• obliyated to take cac• ot, they
will be disposing of the problemai how~ver, he had an opportunity ta ch~ck
th~ir bonda exonerated file and the bond for Nohl Rench Roed from 1-n~hsim
Hilla Roed to 8errano wae exanerated in 1975 end the roed waa built in 1973~
that he reviewed th~ problem of th• bulge in the center of Nohl Rench Road and
that they do own the pcopecty on the weatorly aidel howevec the cucb and
eidewalY, at that point ahow no eiqn of atreas end he Qid not know whet was
cauaing the bulge in the center of Nohl Rench Roed, ten yesre after it wa~s
built. He stated based on hie experience it certainly haa nothing to do with
the pcobleme they heve expecienced in Area Z3 end he suapected there mey be a
pipe under the coer9 thet ia leaking. He etated in ell fairness he did not
believe the developer ahould be called on to meke that kind of repeire eftec
that period of timP.
Mr. Meson atated Item 3 is c]~erly their reaponsibi2ltyt however, they have
not done anything becauae there wea an indicakion thet the City might wank
aomething built in a different manner then wha~ was designedt however, they
will pcaceed ae promptly as poaeible on khat construction. tte atated the
othec problems ere no~ legally binding on the part of Texaco, Anaheim Hills,
Inc. and he cannot commit to them spending money for something for which they
are not reaponeible. He stated Texaco, Aneheim Hille hAS not owned that
property for over ten ygars and the problema with slope slides on Peguaus
Drive could be a aubstantial prablem.
Dean Sherer stated etaff has estimated the needed repeira may cost ovec three
million dollera and staff ie willing to work with Anaheim Hills, Inc. to
reaolve theae problem~. He stated ateff feels the pcimary pcoblem is th~t
these pcoblema occurred becauae of sometliing done durinq conatruction.
Commiasionec Bushore aeked for a progreas repoct on these six matters in
60-days.
Dean Shecer atated ataff wanta, as part of the public record, an indication
that Anaheim Hills, Inc. and the Commission are ~wece of theae problems and
staff expects the developer to help cesolve the problems bette~ then in the
past.
Chairwoman Bouas ateted ehe main c~naideration fs approval of these tract mapa
today and the Commiasion does not want theae seme things to happen again and
she felt thH City has to be more careful in appcoval oE engineering plans, etc.
Responding to Commissioner Buahore, Jack White explained there are va[ious
types of bonds and the bond provieions are controlled through the Subdivision
Map Act which provide for faithful perfocme~nce, labor and material and
maintenance bond~ and they ~re provided typicelly for a one-year period. He
stated he is not fully pcepaced to answec the question pertaining to a longer
period of time foc the bonda.
Ron Thompson, Planning Director, asked the Commiaeion to determine whethec or
not Mr. !lason would be willing to work with skaff to determine the
responaibilities since he has only indicated some responsibilities to the
issue in No. 3 and City staff is under the opinion that ~naheim Hills, Znc.
may hs~ve ~ fer greater reaponsibility.
8/22/83
MINUT88, _~NAHBIM_CITY PLIINNING COMMISSION. AUGU~T 22. 1983 _~___,83-45~
Commi~sioner La Cleir• otated whan th~ee tcecta w~ce originally approved,
Texaco-An~helm Nilla, Inc. wsa reepansible For putting in the improvements and
now ther• are certain failure~ in tihet acea and while ahe did not teel they
ahould be totally reeponsible foc every cent of the repaira, ahe did teel
befoce appcoval of theae trecte, the Commiaaion ehould meke aure the situation
will not happen again. She asked how Commieaion could meke the developet
responsible fos any failucea thet heppen in the future.
Commisaioner Bushore steted et some point the responsibility has to be
released and pointed out the CQmmisaion daes r:,~t know all the fects in order
to aesign reaponsibility.
Commieaioner La Cleice clarified she ie not trying ta a~sign responsibility,
buC ahe ie concerned about the tracte before th~ Commiesion today end how to
Avoid ttiie aitudtio~ in the future.
Commieaioner Nerbat steted the City hae some reaponsibilizy here and maybe the
gcdding ordinance is not beinq followed thcough by the City Ine~ectarat th~t
if the developer puts n a trac~ and atreets in ~ccordance with City atandarde
and the City insperts and pAeaes them, the City muat accept resp~nsibility.
He stated maybe the ordinance neede to be tightened up and that he does not
like to eee the City held reaponaible foc thcee million dollACa worth of
rep~ir wock and the City taxpey~ca having to pay for it, but meybe there are
some hills that should not have been built on. Ne $tnted if kh~ soila reports
wete adequate to the City Engineer and accepted, the City haa to be
reaponeible, but if there is any doubt that there may be a slope failure in
the future, it should be stopped now.
Commisaionec ~a Claice stated when Anaheim Hills, Inc. originally came in, one
of theic aelling p~lnta wAS their reseac~h in developing slopea which was
unique and the Commission had a lot of faith in them and they aeemed to be
taking reaponsibility foc a lot of thing$s and that the City hed never done
anything like this before and ahe was sure they both had done the beat they
could. She statod mayb~ the beat way L•o prevent this fcom happening is to
tighten up the rules and bc toughet.
Commiseio~:ec Herbat atated the grading ordinance was originally passed because
Anaheim Hills, Inc. atarted grading those hil.ls like crazy, really cutting
them up, so the City quickly adopted a ordinance. He asked if these problems
diecusaed were before or aFter the grading ocdinance was adopted.
CoRanissioner La Claire atated the grading ocdinance was adopted in 1976.
Jay Titua, Office Engin~er, stated F~e thought L•he problem of the fallure of
the cut slope and slope drainage facilities on Nohl Ranch Roed causing the
coadway to riae probably occurred before the adoptio~ of the ordinance end
algo the problem of raiaing of Serrano Avenue was prior to adoption of the
ordinance, but he was not su[e of the timing. He atated he thought the City'a
grading ordinance was entirely adequate and is one of the toughest onea in
California. Concerning soils engineering, he steted the City does not have a
Soils Engineer on steff and that soils engineering ie an unprecise acience so
the City accepts professional consulting Soile Engineers Repocts because they
hAVe the staff and equipment to conduct aoils inveatigations and they make
cert~in recommendatione and if the City feels they are reasonable, the reporte
are accepted. ~e stated it is staff's opinion that the developer is
8/22/83
MINUTB~, 1-NAH~IM C TY PLANNING COhMIS8I0N~ ~UGUST 2Z. 1963 83-455
cesponaible for the ultimat~ pcoducc since the Soila Bngin~or ia working for
him snd nor the City and qince aoile engine~ring ie a very unQrecise sci~nce,
there are a lot of thinga ~het sce not really aubjact to pceciee anelysis and
alopes can leil even aftec the best engineering. Ne atated, however, the
elopea are u0ually outeide the ~ublic cight-of-wey and ere owned either
privately oc by the homeownere association end their Failurs does impact
publlc etceets and this occu[e very soon after conatruction and ia the
develop~c's reeponsibility and thia ia not something that juat happened
recently. He stated City staff hae been working with Aneheim Hills, Inc.
principles for eight to ten yearo on thase problems ~nd are trying to get ~hem
reaolved. He steted eeclier ~naheim Hills hed accepted the responsibility for
these things, but the City cannot gat them corrected.
Commiaeioner Herbst atated there ie d big queation in his mind ae to why the
bonds were releaaed. Commiasionen c~Bucney atated the developer could hold
the subcontractota reaponeible on probably a two to three-year bund.
Commiseioner Hecbst stAted some of theae things are after the tact.
Chaicwoman Boues etated some of theae things happened in leas than aeven yeArs
and staff ia bcinging it to the Commiesion's ett~ntion now but it is something
the develoger and the City will have to aock out. Commissioner Herbst etated
a gopher can ruin a slope end it is hard to plece the blame on enyone. He
auggested ti~htening up the bonding and inspectiona pcograma before releasing
the bond.
C~mmissionec McBurney suggested increasing the bond peciod to two to three
years.
Responding to Commissioner La Claire, Ron Thompaon state~ the developer and
the City ahould meet as soon as poasible to determine whose responsibility
theee are since apparently many of these thinga have been an iseue for quite a
long peciod of time because it is possible that. $ome of the liabilitiea may
ultimately become public liabilities and Anaheim Hflls, Inc. or whoever has
some responsibility may no longer exiat.
Chairwoman Bouaa stated Mr. Mason has stated he ia going to meet with City
ataff as soon as poesible to determine who is responsible and thp City will
have to prove the facts to him, with Ron Thompson indicating he ~elt the
developer should have to prove ta the City that they are n~t responeible.
Ron Thompson stated reaponeibflity should not be affixed to Mr. Mason because
he has not been with the company that long, but some of the respo~sibility had
been assumed by prior management of Anaheim Hills, Inc. and the solutions were
nevec implemented. He stated he would auggest that prior to approval of any
more development in Anaheim Hilla, there ahould be a determination made of
responsibility.
Commissioner La Claire stated there ehould be a detecmination made and before
anything elae is done, en egreement should be reached as to the cesponaibility
for these problems. She stated ahe remem~ere there was a'Gentlemen's
Agreement' which said, in esaence, the developer would cooperate in everyway
posaible, but if anything happened, they would take care of it and ~he felt
that wa~ probably one of the reasons the bonds wexe released. She stated
8/22/83
MINUTBB. ANANBxM C1TX PWIAINING COMMI$BIpN,_ AUCUST _ 22~ _1 _9_83 ______ __ ____ 83-456
however, di!l~rant ma~nayers heve work~d in ditE~renk aspects with the City.
She atated she did not egr~e that th~y are not reeponaibl• tor et l~ast pect
of the pcoblema, but would agre~ th~y er• not re~ponsibie toc all ot Chem end
ahe did not want the ~expayera to be aeddled with the whole deal.
Ron Thnmpson atared pcior to additional epprovels, there would be an incentive
for the City and Anaheim Hille, inc. to get together and he wea not sure Chat
it ia e11 Aneheim Hilla problem And it is poasible the City and 1-nAheim Hille
celisd on a f~ulty soils or geology report, buC eomewhere it hea to be
Aetermined who ie reaponaible and correctione mede beceuae he did not want the
publie to be left holding the bag in the futuce.
Commiasionec La Cleire eeked whet kind of bonds ace needed. Jeck White
responded thet the condition does not apecify time periods for the bonde end
staff can look inCo the stetuery limitatlona Eor bondg and can wock to aseure
the City gete the ultimt+te ptotection that ia ].egelly allowed under the lewa
and the conditiona here ere aufficient to c~ver that situetion. Ne ateted
with the knowledge of the Plenning Commisaion's intereak in obtaining the
mdximum protection from the bonds, he would reaeerch the ~ituation. He steted
the Commiasion should be aware that the bonds are not the real iesue and the
ceal iesue is whethet or not there ie ability to detecmine liability foc the
slopes ancl bonda anly secure the .liabili•y for a given limited period of time
and it still muat be proven who is respona~.ble.
Commi.ssioner Fry stated the bonds provide the vehicle to asaure Chat certein
thinge will be performed.
Jack White etmted there is no bond that has yet been devised that is allowable
u~der the map act that will guarantee in perpetuity that somfone shall forever
be reaponsible for any defects that will occur in the future after the wock ia
completed, but there is some civil liability that may or may not be evailable,
depending on the length of time involved before the defect wAS discovered. He
etated staff will attempt to work out the maximum protection and liabilfty to
gPt these problems resolved.
Jack Whits suggeeted the Commisaian's motinn for approval should find thah. the
proposed subdivisiona together with their deaign and impT vementa are
consistent with the General Plan of the City and any specific plana adopted
pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and that the subdivisions are consiatent
with the Eindings as required under Sections, 66474, 66474.6 and 66473.1 of
the Subdivisione l~ap Act.
It was noted EIR N0. 235 was previously certffied.
J-CTION: Commiaeioner Herbst offered a motion, seconded by Commiasioner Fry
and MOTION CAiZRiED, that the Anehefm City Planning Commission does heceby find
that the pr~posed subc7lvieions, togethec with their desi~n and improvement,
are consistent aith the City of Anaheim General Plan, pursuant to Government
Code Section 66473.SJ and further finding that each of the proposed
subdivisione meets the findings es set farth in Government Coc~e Sections
66474, 66474.6 and 66473.1s and does, therefore, approve Tentative Map of
Tract Nos. 10967 through 10978 to re-establieh one open apace (OS(SC)) tract
and eleven residentie~l tzacts with 207 RM-2400(SC) units, 327 RM-3000(SC)
unita and 25 (RS-HS-22,000(SC)) unite, subject to the following conditions:
8/22/83
t~INUTBB. ANAHBIM CITY P,LANNING COMM188ION, ~~GUBT ~~, 1983____ 83-457
RBVI~IO_ N~, NO_3 p,_ F TBNTATIVB TRJ-CT N0. 10967 s
1. Thet should thie subdivioion be developed aa more than one
eubdivision, each subdivision thereof ahell bo suDmikteQ in
tantative form for Appcova~l.
2. Tha~t all lota within thie trsct shall be aecved by underground
utilities.
3. That prior ko final tract map approval, the following itemo ahall be
submitted to the City 1-ttorney'e Office end epproved by the City
l~ttorney's Office, Public Utilitiea DRpArtment, Planning Dep~rtment
and Engineecing Division:
(a) The ocigina~ documenta of the covenants, conditions and
cestcictions,
(b) A letter addressed to the devRlopec's title compeny +~utho~izinq
recocdation theceof, and
(c) Any agreement(s) pertaining to the maintenance reeponeibility
for nreae (landscaped elopes end trnils) as ahown on Exhibits 1-
'Ocanqe County O~en Space Easements and Equeatrien Tra~ils' end
B 'Slope Cace Plan'.
Said agreement(s) e+nd CCbRs ehall identify the entities (individual
lot owners, subject track hom~eownere' asaociation, l~naheim Hills
Plenned Community Associetion, County of Oranqe, City of Anaheim or
other responaible entity) which will partic:ipate in and/or be
ceaponeible for pecmanently maintaining all OS (OQen Space) zoned
lots, all landscaped and natucal slopes and all dedicated equestrian
and hiking trAila shown on the subject tract map and Bxhibits A
"Orange County Open Space Easements end Bqueatrian Ttr~ila and B
'Slope Care Plan•. Said documents, as approved, will then be
executed and filed ~nd recorded in the Office of the Ocange County
Recorder concurrently with recordation of the final tcact map.
4. That psior to final tract map appcoval, street namea ahdll be
approved by the City Planninq Department.
5. That prior to any oc^upancy, temporary street name signa ahall be
inatslled if pecn~:nent street name sign$ have not yet been installed.
6. That drainage of subject pcoperty shall be disgoaed of in a manner
satiafactory to the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the
site, auf:icient grading ie required to necessitate a grading
permit, no work on grmding will be pgrmitted between October 15th
and April 15th unless all required ~ff-aite drainage facilitiea have
been inatalled dnd are operative. Positive aesurance ahall be
provided to the City that such drainage facilities will be completed
prioc to October 15th. Neceasary rfght-of-way for off-aite drainage
facilitiea ehall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall
have initiated condemnation proceedinga therefor (the coste of which
8/22/83
~'I
MINUTE3, AN11NgIM CITY PLIINNING COMMISSION. AUGUST 22, 19E33 83-458
shall be borne by the developer) prior to th~ commencement of
greding operationa. The required dreinege facilitiee 8he11 be of a
eize e~d type eufficienC to cArry runolf wetars origineting from
highec propectiea throuyh aubject property to ultimste dis~oael ea
epproved ~y the City Engineer. said drAinege facilitiee ehall be
the fitat item of conetcuction and shall be completed end be
functiona~l throughout the ttect and from the downetredm boundery of
the prop~arty to the ultimete point of diapoeal prior to the isauance
of any final building inspectiona or occupency permite. Dcainege
diatcict ceimburaement agreemente may be made aveilabl.e ko the
developers of s~id propecty upon their requeat.
7. That greding, excavetion, end all other construction ectivitiea
ehall be conducted in such a menner ao as to minimize Che
poeaibility of any eilt ociginating from this pcoject being carcied
into the Santa Ana River by etorm watec origineting fcom or. fluwing
through this p[oject.
8. That all private streete ahell be developed in accordance with the
City of Anaheim's Standdrd Detail No. 122 for private stceeta,
including in:atall~tion of street name aiqna. Plana for the private
atreet lighting, as required by the atandard deteil, aha12 be
submitted to the Building Division foc approval ~nd ~ncluded with
the building plans ~rior to the ieauance of building permits.
(Private atreete are thoae which provfde primary accesa and/or
circuletion within the project.
9. That prior to ffnal tract map approval, the developec of aubject
tract shall enter into a special facllitiee agreement with the City
of Anaheim for water facilitlea in the High Elevation Syatem, as
reyuired by Rule 158 of the Water U~ility Ratea, Rules and
Regulations.
10. That prior to final tract map approval, the developers of the
Anaheim Hills Plenned Community (Texaco Anaheim Hills, Inc., or
tt~eir succeasors, assigna, or tcanaferees) shall submit a parks and
recret+tional facilities plan to the Parks, Recreatian and Community
Serviaes Department for review and appcoval. Said propoeai ehall
determine the specific means by which the developer provides perk
and recreation facilities for the future residents of the area
encompassed by Tract Nos. 10967 thcough 10978, inclueive. Such
meana may include, but need not be limited to, the following: pay
the City of l~neheim park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined
to be eppropriate hy the City Council at the tlme of building permit
iseuance, or dedicete ~ark landa acceptable to the City of Anaheimt
or a combination thereof. Acceptance of the specific means ahall be
subject to the approval of the ~icector of Parks, Recreation and
Community Services. any obliqatione imposed upon the property owner
which are to be performed subaequent to approvel of the final map
shall be evidenced by written agreement or covenant, approved by the
City Atto=ney's Office, and recorded prior to or concurrently with
the recordation of the ffnal map.
8/22/83
MINUTBB. AN~bBIM CITY P~AIiNINa COMMISSION. AUGUST 22. 1983__ 83__~59
11. That prior to Einal tr~at map approval, theco ahall be •ubmittied ko
the City Planning Commie~ion for review ~nd epproval, epecific plena
of devslopment. Finel specific plans ahali include, but naed not be
limited to, the followinq:
a. Topographic map.
b. Site plane end elevatione showing the placement of the
buildinga and etructuresi the front, aide and reer ~levekionej
and the exterioc buildinq materiale including roofing.
c. Lot dimenelons end pad size of all lota sufficient to indicete
the rel~tionahip of the proposal to the nature and extent of
the cut-end-fill oc earthwork involved.
d. Landecaping pl~ne indicating the extent and type of prcposed
landscaping and including any existing veqeCation.
e. Vehicle circulation dnd parking plan indicating the nature end
extent of Public and privete atreeta, or public acceseways for
vehiculAr circulmtion, off-street parking end vehicle etor~ge.
f. Eque~trian and hiking tcails pl~n ahowing the placement end
improvementa of the trails eaeemenka for the Regional Treil No.
3(~naheim Hille Tr~il) and Backbone Trail No. 19 (Oak Canyon
Tseil) ae deslgnatPd by the Equestrian and Hiking Trails
Component of the Aneheim Genecal Plan Traila Elementt including
the specific design for any location where a trail crosses over
a public or private streeti end also including the off-aite
trail easement as shown on Exhibit No. 2 of Reclassification
No. 79-80-25.
g. Fence and/oc wall plans indicating the type of fencing along
any lot line of a site abutting gublic or private streets.
12. That in accordance with the proviaions of Anaheim Nunicipal Code
Cha~ter 18.31 all m~ltiple-family dwelling units in the RM-3000
(F=sidential, Multiple-Family) Zone ehall be atteched unitej
provided, however, that any detached one-family dwellinga shall be
built aubject to all reatrictions and regulations of either the
RS-7200 or RS-5000 (Residential, Single-Pamily) Zones.
13. That prior to final tract map approval, the developers oF said tract
(Texaco ~ndheim Hills, inc. or their successora, assigns, or
transfereee) shall submit to the Director of Public Utilities for
his review and approval, a proposed plan foc the ecreage payment of
water main extenaions feea. Said plan shdll consider all land
within ihe ared encompagsed on Tract Nos. 10967 thcough 10978,
inclusive, i~cluding open spdce. Any obligations imposed on the
property owner which are to be performed subsequent ~o approval of
the final map ahall be evidenced by written agreement or covenant,
approved by the City ~ttorney's Office, and tecoraed prior ta or
concurrently ~ith the record~tion of the final map.
8/22/83
MINUTBS. AN~HEIM CITY PLIINNING COMMI88ION. AUaUST 22. 1983 83-460
1~. Thet pcioc to commencement ot atructurel Eraming, fire hydrAnto
ahall be inetslled And cherged ea required and determined to be
neceesecy by the Chief of tho Fire Dopartment.
15. Thet ell requirements of Fice Zone 4, otherwiae identified as Fire
~dminiatretive Order No. 76-O1, ahell be met. 3uch requirementa
include, but ace not limited to: chimney aperk acrestore, protected
attic end undec floor openinga, Cl~se C or bettec [oofing meterial
and one hour fire resiative cvnatcuction of horizontal surtacee if
located within 200 feet of edjacent bruahlnnd.
16. That fuel breaka ahall be provided ~~ determined to be necessary by
the Chief of the Fire Depertment.
17. That prior to finel tcact map approval, no public ot private etreet
gcades ehell exceed l0i excepk by prior appcoval of the Chief of the
Fire Department end the Engineecing Divialon.
18. That native slopes adjacent to newly conetructed homes shall be
hy~roseeded with a low fuel combustible aeed mix. Such slopes shall
be eprinklered and weeded es required to eatablieh a minimum of 100
feet of aeperation b~tween fl~mmable vegetation ~nd any structure.
19. That fn the event subject property is to be divided for the purpose
of sale, lease, or financfng, a parcel map to record the appcoved
divi~ion of aubject praperty shall be aubmitted to ~nd ep~coved by
the City of Anaheim and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange
County Recorder.
20. That prior to final tract m~p approval, the ownec(s) of subject
property shall dedicate and improve ten (10) foot wide eque~trians
and hiking trails as ahown on the Equestcian and Hiking Tca~ls
Component of the Anaheim General Plan Tcails Elements that
improvement plans, in accocdance with standacd plens and
sp~cifications on file in the Office of the City Bngineer, shall be
submitted in conjunction with Ghe grading plan, and/ot that a bond
in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be
posted with the City prioc to final tract map approval or issuance
of a grading permit, whichever occurs first, to guarantee the
inetallation of the above-mentioned requirements prior to
occupancy. Said dedication and impcovement shall inclnde the
off-site Backbone Trail No. 19 (Oak Canyon Trail) located in Tract
No. 10940.
21. That prior ta final tract map approval, a prugram foc the
maintenance responsibility and estimated cost theceo~ of a21
open-space zoned lots, recreation~l lots and landsca~ed slopes shall
be submitted to and approved by the City o# Anaheim. Any
agreement(e) referred to in Condition No. 3, aforementioned, shall
be executed when the entity responsible for maintenance is not
either a property owner in this tract ot the homeown~r~' association
for thie tract.
8/22/83
MINUT~~. ANAHBIM CITY PLJINNING COMMI88ION L,~UGUST 22. 1983 83-461
22. That pkiot to final tract map epproval, Trect No. 10978, a whdlly
open epace tract, ~hall be r~corded with the 0~tice of the Orange
County Recocdec and eccepted by the Anah~im Hills Master Homeownera
~eaociationl or, iF eaid Tract No. 10978 ia not recorded, all the
conditione of eaid tentetive trect ahall have been complied with.
23. That in accordance with Che requirements of 8ection 18.02.047 af the
~naheim Municipal Code pertaining to khe initial aale of reside~cea
in the City of Anaheim Planning Area 'B', the aell~r ehall provide
edch buyer with written informatian concecniny the ~naheim Generdl
Plan and the exieting zoning within 300 feet of the boundariea of
eubject tract.
24. Thdt pcioc to tinal trdct mep ~pproval, tihe owner(s) of subject
propecty (Texaco Anaheim Hills, Inc., oc their eucceasora, assigna,
or traneferreee) ahall install a traffic aignal at the intecsection
of Nohl Ranch R~ad and 3tage Coach Road (to be renamed Camino
Gr~nde) as requiced by the City Trdffic Engineer and in accocdence
with apecificetione on file in the Offfce of the City Engineect or
that a bond, certlficate of dgposit, lettec of credit or cash, in an
amount and form setisfactory to the City of ~nAheim shall be posted
with the City to gudrantee installAtion of said signal prior to
occupancy of any dwelling unit in the area encompAesed on Tract Nos.
10967 th~ough 10978, inclusive.
25. That gateo shall no~ be inetalled accosa any driveway or private
atreet in a manner which mdy advecaely affect vehicular tcaffic in
the adjacent public streets. InstallatSon of any gatea within a
distance of forty (40) feet from said pu~lic street righta-of-way
ah~ll be eubject to the review and approval of the City Traffic
Engineer.
26. Th~t trash storage aceas shall be provided in accordance ~ith
approved plana on file with the Street Maintenance and Sanitation
Division.
27. That prior to final street inspections, 'No parking for street
sweeping' signs shall be installed as required by the Street
Maintenance and Sanitation Division and in accordance with
specifications on file with said division.
28. That the 8eller ahall provide the purchaser of each reeidential
dwelling with written information concerning ~naheim Municipa2 Code
Section 14.32.500 ~ectaining to "Parking restricted to facilitate
street aweeping•. Such written information ehall clearly indicate
when on-street parking is prohibited and the penalty for violation.
29. That all str~.~;~t dedicatione and impr~vements within Tract No. 10967
shall be made in accordance with provisions of Section 17.08.390,
~naheim Municipal Code.
8/22/83
NIN~9'E8. ~N~HBIM CITY P_~ a COMMI88ION. AUaUBT ZZ. 1983 63-462
30. That pci~r eo linal trect mep appcoval, th• owner o! the prop~rLy
ahell record an irrevocabl~ olter o! dedication !or Camino Grande
Stc~et (8tag• Coach RoeQ) ao shown on Tentstive Tract Map•
10367-10978~ incluaive, end inatall all straet imprav~mants
inclu~ing cucbo and yutt~ca, aidAwalko, •trest grading and pevertant,
•~w~r end dreineg~ facilitiea, oc other appuctenent work aa c~quited
by th~ Cti:,y Enqineer end in accordance witt- apecificdtion~ on lile
in the O~fioe o! the City Engineec or ~oat ecucity in a foGm snd
amounk satiefactory to tha City o! Aneheim to guerentee the
eetisfectory complecion of aaid improvementat or lrrevocebly oftec
t~ dedicete end improve that portion theteof neceasecy to provide
public atceet acaeea to ssid trect prior ta final building
inapectlone and iseudnce of occupAncy k~ecmits for any portion of
aeid tract.
REVISION NO. ~ OF TRACT NO. 10968:
1. That ~hould this subdivision be develuped ~s moro than one
subdiviaion, each subdivieion thareof ahall be submitted in
tentative form fur epprovAl.
2. That all lots within this tract ehell be served by ~~ iergcound
utilities.
3. That pcioc to fina7 trect map ~pprova], the followiny ikems shell be
eubmitted to the City ~ttorney's Office ar.9 approved by the City
Attocney's ~ffice, Public Utilitiea Depactment, planning Departmen*
and Engineering Divieion:
(a) The original docu~ents of the couenants, conditiona and
reatriction~,
(b) A letter ~ddresaed to the develope~'s title company authorizing
recordation thereof, ~nd
(c) ~ny agreement(s) pectaining to the maintenance responsibility
fot areas (landscaped alop9s and trailsl as ehown on Exhibits A
'Orange County Open Spece Eaeemente and Equeatrian Traile' and
b 'Slope Care Plan'.
Said agceement(s) and CC6Ra shall identify the entitirs (individual
lot ownera, aubject trect homeownecs' association, An~heim Hills
Planned Community ~ssociation, County of Orange, City of ~naheim or
other cesponaible entity) which will participate in and/ot be
reaponsible for permanently maintaining all OS (Open Space) zoned
lota, dll landecaped and natural elopes and a:l equeatria~ and
hik~ng tcails ahown on the subject tract map nn~ Fxhibits ~"OrAnge
"onnty Open Space ERSementa and Equeatrfan Traila and B'Slope Cace
Plan'. Said documentg, as appraved, will then be executed snd filed
dnd recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recotder
concurcently with recordation of the final tract map.
4. That pxfor to final r.ract map approval, street names ehall be
approved by ~ho CiLy Planning Department.
8/22/83
MINUT68. ~N~H6IM CITY PL1-NN ZNO COMMIBSION. AUQUrT 12. 1483 83_~63
5. That pcioc ~o any uoaupsncy, temporery etceet nam~ aigns ohall be
inatalled if pocmanent str~et nem~ siyns hav• not yet b~~n ina~allad.
6. That drainaqe of aubject property aheil be dispoaed oP in a menner
eseiafactory to t t~e City ~ngineec. If, in the prsparation of Ehe
site, aufticient grading is cRquired to necesait~te e grading
permit, no work on greding will be permitted between Actob~r 15th
end April 15th un leea all requiced off.-aite dreinAge facilitiea hav~
been installed ~nd are opecetive. Positive aasurance ahall be
provided to the C ity thet auch drainage fecilities will be completed
prioc to Octobec 15rh. Neceasery cight-of-way for off-site drainage
fnciliti~s ehall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council ehall
heve ir.itieted c o~demnation proceedinga therefoc (the coste of which
ehall be borne ~y the developer) prioc to the aommencement of
g-ading operetion s~ ':l~e cequired drainnge facilitiea ehell be of a
size and type 9uf ficient to carry runoff wetera originating from
I~igher propectie ~ l•h•ough aubject propecty to ultimete diaposal ae
appcovdd by the City Engineer. seid dreinage facilitiea ahall be
the first item of constcuction and ahell be completed and be
functional throug hout the tract and from the dawnetream boundary of
ttie pcoperty to the ultimate poin~ of dieposal prior to the ieaudnce
of ~ny f1na1 building inapections or occupanCy permita. Drainage
diat~ict reimt •sement agreernente may be mede available to tt~A
developere of o~ id propecty upon their cequeat.
7. That greding, ex cavation, and all other construct!on activities
ahall i,e conducted in such a manner so as to minimize ~he
poasibility of a ny ailt originatiny from thia pcoject being carried
into the Santa A na Kiver by storm watec originating fcom or flowing
through this pro ject,
8. That all private etreeta ahAll be developad i~ accordance with the
City of Aneheim' ~ standard Detail No. 122 for pcivate streets,
inc.uding instal lation of atceet name aigns. Plan~ for the privdte
street lighting, ae required by the etandard detail, shall be
submitted to the Building Diviaion for epproval and included with
the buildiny pla ns prior to th~ lssuance of building permits.
(Private s~ceets ere those which provide primary accesa and/o:
circulation with in the project.
9. That pcioc to f i nel trect map approval, the developer of subject
tract shall ente r into a apecial facilities Agceement witti th~~ City
of : naheim foc water facilitiea in the Nigh Elev+~tion Syctem, as
required by Rule 15B of i;~e Water Utility Rates, Ru'.es and
Regulrstiona.
10. That prior to f i nal t ract map approval, tt;~~ developers of the
~naheim Hills P1 anned Community ~Texaco Anaheim Hills, Inc., or
their s~~ccessocs, aeaigna, or transferees) shall submit a parks nnd
rec-eational facilities plan to the Parka, Recreation and Conan~~nity
Services Departa~ent for review and approval. Said proposa~ shall
determine the specific me+~ns by whi^h the developer provides park
an~ recreat±on f~cilitiE - the future residents of the Area
8/22/83
~INOT88. l1N~HBIM CITY PLANNINa CQMMI88ION. AU0~8T 2~. 1983 83-464
~ncompaaaed by Tract Noo. 10967 thcouqh 10978, inclue~ve. Suc h
maan• msy include, but n~ed not b~ limicRd to, tha lollowing: pay
th~ City ot ~neh~im park and r~cr~btl~- ~n-li~u fee~ aa deter~wined
to be appcopriate by th~ City Council ac the time ot building p~cmit
iaouanc~, or d~dicate perk landa accepteblw to the City ot Anaheimt
or e combination thereol. Acceptenc• ot th~ ep~cific maan~ stiail be
eubject to th• ~pprovel of the Dice~~oc of Packs, R~creation and
Community Secvicea. ~ny obligetions impo~ed on the propecty own~r
which are to be pecformad subA~quent to epprova~ of the finel mep
ehall be evidenced by written egreement or covenent, epproved by the
City At`orney's Office, and cecorded prior to or concurcently with
the rocordation of tt~e finel map.
11. That priur to Einal tract mep approval, there ahall be aubmit ted to
the City Plenning Commiaeion foc review end a~pproval, speciti c plena
of development. Final epecific p~ans ahell include, but need not be
limlted to, tl~e following:
a. Topogrephlc mep.
b. Site plene and elevatione shawing the placRment of the
buildinya and etructucest the front, side end rear elev a tionss
and the extetioc building matecials ineludi~g roofing.
c. I,at dimensiona and ped gize of all lote aufEicient to iradicate
the relationahip of the proposal to the nature and exte nt of
the cut-and-fill or earthwork involved.
d. Lendeceping plans indicating the extent and t~pe of proposed
landscaping and including any existing vegetation.
e. Vehicle c~rculation end parking plan indicating the nat ure dn.i
extent af public snd pcivate str~ete, oc public aceeaswaye for
vehicular circulation, off-aCreet packing and vehicle s torage.
f. Equestrian and hiking traila plan ahowing the pldcement and
impcovements of the trails easements foc the Regional T zail No.
3(Anaheim Hills Trail) and Backbone Treil No. 19 (Gak Canpon
Trail) as designated by the Equestrien and Hiking Trail s
Compone~t of the Anaheim Genecal Pl~n Trails Elementt i ncluding
the specific design for eny locetion where ~~rail cros $es over
a public or private streett and also including the off -eite
trail ease-nent as P.~own on Exhibit N~. 2 of Reciassific ation
No. 79-80-25.
g. Fence and/or well plans indicating the type of fencing alang
a.ny lot l.ine of a site abutting public oc ~+rivate ratreets.
12. That in acc~r.dance with the provisions of Anaheim Municipal Code
Chapter 18.31 all multiple-fa~aily dwelling units in the RM- 3000
(Reaiden ial, Multiple-Pamily) 2one shall be attached units ~
provided, however, that any detached one-famiZy dwellings s~-sall be
built subject to all cestcictione and regulations of either the
RS-7200 or 1tS-5000 (Resid~ntial, Single-Family} Zones.
8/Z2/83
MINUT6~j ANAbBIM CITY PLANNING COMMI8~IUN. AUGUST 32. ~983 83-165
13. Thet prior to tinal tract ma~ dpproval, the dav~lopere of oaid track
(Texeco Anaheim Nills, inc. or theit •uccespoca, essigna, or
trenaf~reeo) ahsll submit to the Director of Public Utiliti~e for
his cevi~w and ~pproval, a propoesd plan for the acceage payment ot
wet~c main extenaiona tees. Said plen ahell con~ider all lend
within the aras encompesaed on Tract Nus. 10967 through 10978,
inc~usive, including open epece. ~ny obliyatione imposed on the
pcoper.ty owner which are to be performed bubaequent to epproval of
the final mep shall be evidenced by wcitten agreeme~t oc covenant,
dpprov~d by the City Attorney's OEfice, end racorded prioc to oc
concurcently with the recordetlon of the final mep.
14. That prior to commencement •E atructur~l freming, fire hydrents
shell be inatalled end cheryed as requireci and determined to be
neceseary by the Chief oE the Fire Depertmtnt.
15. That all cequirements of ~ire Zone 4, otherwise identified ae Fire
Adminietrative Ordec No. 76-01, ehall b~ met. Such [equiremente
include, but are not limlted to: chimney spark erreetots, pcotected
attic and under floor openings, Clase C or better roofing materiel
end one hour fire rest ~.ive ~onstruction of hocizantal surfec:e if
locdted witi~in 2U0 foet of ~djacent brushland.
16. That furl breaka shall be provided ne detetmined to be necPssery by
the Chief of the Fite Department.
17. That prior to fin~l tract map appcovdl, no ?ublic or privete atreet
grades ahall exceed lU~ except by prior appcaval of the Chief of the
Fire Uepartment and the Engineering Division.
18. Thar. native elopes ~djacent to newly constcucted homes shall 5e
hydcoaeeded with a law fuel combustible seed mix. Such slopea shall
be sprinklered and weeded as recsuired to establish a minimum of 100
feet of aeparation between flart~able vegetation and any structure.
19. That in the event aubject properCy is to b~ divided for the putpoae
of sale, leaee, ar financing, a parcel map to record the approved
diviaion of subject propecty ahall be su5mitted to and app~oved by
the City of Aneheim and then be record~d in the Office of the Orange
County Recordec.
20. That prior :o final tcact map approval, the owner(sl of subject
pcoperty shdll dedicate and improve r,en (1~) foot wide equestriana
er~d hiking tcails ae shown on the Equestrian and Hiking Traiis
Component of the Anaheim General Plan Trails Elements that
impr~vement plans, in accordance with standard plans and
specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer, shall tie
submitted in conj~nction with the grading plan, and/or thae e bond
in an Amount and :ocro satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be
posted with the City prioc to final tract map appcoval or issuance
of a grading permit, whichever occurs firet, to guarn~~tee the
inatallation of the above-mentioned cequir~ments prior to
occupancy. Said dedication a~d improvement shall include the
off-aite Backbone Trail No. 19 (Oak Cnnyon Trail) 2ocated in Tract
No. 10940.
8/22/83
k~
MINUTES, ANIIHBIM CITY PLANNINa COMMI88ION, AUQOST 22, 1983 83__1f6
21. Thet ptior to final trect map epproval, a pcoqrum foc tihe
maintenancA reapo~eibility end eqtimeLed cost th~reof o! all
opan-spece zoned lote, cecreetionel lota end lend~ca~ad elupes ahall
be aubmitted to and epproved by the City of Aneheim. 1-ny
agraement(s) ceferced to in Condition No. 3, eforementioned, ahell
be executed when the enti~y reeponaible foc maintenence ie not
either a pcoperty awnec in thie tract or the homeownern' aesociation
for thie tract.
22. That prior to finel tcect mep epproval, Tract Na. 10978, u wholly
open apace tract, shall be recocded with the Office of khe Orango
County Reaorder and accepted by the Anaheim Hills Mastec Nomeownere
Aasocietiont or, if Aaid Tract No. 1U918 is not recucded, all the
conditinns of eaid tentative trect ehalt have been compiie~ .~ith.
23. That in accocdance with the requiromente of Section 18.02.047 of the
Anaheim MunicipAl Code pertaining to the initial sale oE residences
in the Ctty of Anaheim Pla~ning Area 'B', the sel~er shall provide
each buyer with written information c~ncerninq the Aneheim GNneral
Plan and the existing zoning within 300 feet of the boundaries of
eubject tract.
2A. That prior to final tract mep approval, the owner(s) oE subject
pr~pe~ty (Texaco Anaheim Hills, Inc., or the~r auccessora, aseigns,
or ~.raneter~eea) ~hall install e ttaffic signal at the intersectian
Af Nohl Rench Road end Stage Coach Roed (to be renamed Camino
Grandel as required by the City Traffic Bngineec and in accordence
wtth specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineert or
that a h,ond, cectificate of depasit, letter of credit or cesh, in an
amount and form satisfactocy to the City of Anaheim ehall be posted
with the City r,o guacentee inatallation of eaid signal prior to
occupancy of any dwelling unit in the erea encompassed on Tract Nos.
10967 through 10978, incluaive.
25. That Lot No. 39 shall be modified so t~s to adjoin another
residential lot in confocmance with the aforementioned Condition t~o.
12, unless said lot is developed with a deteched one-family dwelling.
2G. That g~tea shall noC be installed across any dtiveway ~r private
atreet in a manner which may ddvernely affect vehicular traffic in
the adjacent public streets. Installetion of any gc.tes within a
distance of forty (40) feet from said public street righta-of-way
ehall be suD~ect ko the review and npproval of the City Traffic
Engineec.
27. Tt:at tcash atocage aceea shall be provided in acc~rdance with
ap~roved plans on file with the Street Maintenance and Sanitetion
Uivision.
28. That prior to final street inspections, "No pa.rking for street
sweeping' signs ehall be installed Aa required by Che Street
Mai~tenance anc~ Sanitation nivision and in accocdrnce with
apecificationa on file witF said division.
8/22/83
MINUTE^~ ANAH~IM CIT1' PLANNIN4 CO~MIS$ION. AUGU$T 2Z. 1983 83-467
29. That the sell~c ehall provid• the purcheeer of esch reaidenti.al
dwelling with written intocmation concerninq Aneheim Municipel Code
&ec~ton 14.32.500 pecteining to "Parking cestcictmd to fecilitste
stzeet swfeping•. Such written infoxmeti~~ ahall clearly indicAte
when on-atreet parking ie prohibited end the ponelty for violation.
30. That ell etreet dedicationa end improvemants within Tcect No. 10968
shell be mede in eccordance with provisions ot section 17.08.390,
Aneheim Municipal Code.
3.1. That pc.oc to final tract map epproval, the ownec of the property
ahAll record an irrevocable offer of dedicetion for Cemino Grande
street ~Stage CoA~h Roed) as shown on Tentative Trnct Mape
10967-10978, incluaive, and install all street impcovementa
including curba and guttere, ~idewAlke, etreet grdding end pavement,
aewer and drainage facilitiea, or other Ap~uctenant work as required
by the City Engine~r and in accocdance with specificationa on file
in the Office of the City Engineec or post secucity in a form and
amount satiafactory to the City of ~naheim to quacantee the
satisfactory completion of said improvem~nCat ar iccevocably offec
to dedicate and improve that por*.ion thereof neceasary to provide
public street acceas to BAid tract pcior to final building
inapections ~nd isauance ~f occupancy permika for any portion of
eaid tract.
P,EVISION N0. 2 OF TENTATIVE_TRACT NO.~ 10969:
l. That ahould thia subdiviaion be develope~ es morQ th~n one
aubdivfaion, ~ach subdivision thereof ehall be submitted in
tentative form foc approval.
2. That dll lota within thie tcact atiall be aerved by underground
utflities.
3. That prioc ta final tract map approvnl, the following items shall be
submitte~ ko the City Attorney's office and appcoved by the City
Attorney's Office, Public Utilities DepArtment, Planning De~artment
and Enqineecing Division:
(e) The original documenta of the covenants, conditions and
restcictions,
(b) A letter addressed to the developer's title company authocizing
recordation thereof, anc
tc) Any agreement(s) perkaining to the maintenance responsibility
for areae (landacaped alopea and trails) as ahown on Exhibits A
"Orange County Open Space Basemants and Equestridn Trails• and
e "Slope Care Pl~n'.
8/22/8's
MINUTEB. ANAN~IM CITY PLANNZNG COtlMISSIQN. AUGUST 22. 1983 83-468
SAid agreem~nt(s) and CC6Ra ehsll identify the entitiea (indiviAual
lot owner6, 6.~bject tract homeownera' eaeocietion, ~neheim Hil]s
Plenned Communit~ ~eecciation, County of Orange, City of ~naheim or
other cesponeible enlity) which will p~rticipate in end/or be
reeponsi.ble for permanently meintsining all ~S (Open SpACe) zoned
lots, all landsceped dnd neturel slopee end all dedicated equeatrien
And hiking tceila shown on r.he subject treck map ~nd Exhibite A
"Orange County Open Spece Eeaements nnd ~questrian Treile and B
'Slope Care Plan". Seid documents, ea appcoved, will then be
executed end filed and recorded in the Office of the Orenge County
RecordeK concurcently with recorddtion of the fin~l tract mep.
4. That prior to final tract map approval, atceet ndmes ahall be
approved by the City planning DepartmF~t.
5. Tt~at prioc ta any occupancy, temporac, street name eigns ••nall be
inntalled if permanent atreet name signe have not yet been installed.
6. That drein~+ge of aubject property shall be dispoard of in a manner
satisfactr,ry Co the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the
eile, au~~ficient gra~ing is re~uired to necessitate a grading
permit, no work on grading will be permitted between October 15th
and April 15th unlese ell required off-aite drainage faciliti:s have
been installed and ace aperative. Poaitive assurance shall be
provided ta the City that auch drair,e~3e facilitiea will be completed
prior to qctober 15th. Necessary right-of-way foc off-site drainage
facilities shall be dedicated to the City, oc the City Council ahall
t~~ve initiated condQmnation proceedinga therefoc (the costs of which
shnll be bocne by the develope~) pcioc to the commencemenk of
gcading operations. The required drainege facilitiea ahall be of a
size and *_ype sufficfent to carry runoff waters originating from
higher properti~s through subject property to ultimate diaposal as
approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities shall be
khe ficst item of construction and shall be aompleted and be
Eunctionel throughout the t act and from the downstream boundary of
the property to the i~ltimate point of dieposal prior to the issuance
of any final building inspections or occ~ipar~cy petmits. Drainage
district teimburs~ment agreeme~its may be ~ade available to the
developers of said propecty upon their request.
7. That grading~ excavation, and a11 other construction ac;.ivities
shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the
poaeibility of ar~•j silt originating from this project bEing carried
into the Santa Ana River by atorm water ociginati~g fcom or flowing
through this project.
8. That all private streeta shall be devsloped in accordance with the
City of Anaheim's Standard Detail No. 122 for private streets,
including inatall~tion of stceet name aiqns. Plans for the private
~treet l:ghting, as cequired by the standard detail, ahall be
submitted to the Building Division for approval And included with
the building plans pcioc to the issuance of building permits.
(Private streets are thoae which provi~e primary access and/or
circulation within the project.
8/ 2/83
MINUT6S. ANAHEIM CIT_,_,Y PLANNING COMMI88ION. ~UGU$T 22. 1983 33-46~
9. That prior to linal kcaat map appcoval, th~• d~veloper of aubjec~
tract shall enter into a speciel lacilitir~ agrfement with the City
of ~nsheim tor watar facilitiea in the High Blevatiun SXstem, es
cequir~d by Rul~ 15B of the Wetec Utility Rates, Rulea and
Regulations.
lU. That prior to final tcact mep approval, the developets of the
~naheim Hills Planned Community lTexaco Aneheim Hills, inc., or
their succesaoce, eae~gna, or traneEereea) ehell eubmit a parke and
r.ocreational facilitiea pldn ta the Pecks, RecreAtion end Community
Servicea De~ertment for review end approvel. Said propoael shell
detecmine the apecific means by which the developer prnvides perk
and recredtion facilitiea foc the futuce reaidenta of the area
encomp~saed by Tcact Noe~ 10967 through 10978, inclusive. Such
meane may include, but need not be limited to, the following: PaY
the City of ~naheim park and reccedtion in-lieu fees a~ determined
to be appropriete by the City Council at the time ~f building permit
ieauance, oc dedicate perk lands acceptable to the City of Aneheimi
or a combinetion thereof. Acceptence of l•he specific means ehall be
aub3ect to the appcoval of the Dicector of Parks, Recceation and
Community Secviceg. Any obliqationa imposed on the property owner
which are to be performed aubaequent to approvel of the final mep
ahall be evidenced by written agreement or covenant, approved by the
City Attorney's OfficE, and recocded prioc to or concurrently with
the recordatlon oE the final map.
11. T~at prior to final tract map approval, thece ahall be aubmitted to
the City Planning Commission for review and approval, epecific plane
of development. Final specific plans shall include, but need not be
limited to, the following:
a. Topogcaphic map.
b. Site plana and elevatfona showing the placement of the
buildings and atructures= the fcont, side and rear ~levationat
and the exterior building materisls including roofing.
~. Lot dimensious and pad size of all lnts sufficient to indicate
the relationship of the proposAl to the nature and extent of
the cut-and-fill or earthwork involved.
d. Landacaping plans indicating the e~..•nt and type of proposed
landacaping and including any existing vegeta~ior~.
e. Vehicle cicculation and parking plan indicating the nature and
extent of public and private strpets, or public eccessways for
vehicular circulation, off-street parking and vehicle storage.
f. Equeatrian and hiking trails plan showing the pl~cement and
improvements of the tralls easements for the Regional Trail No.
3(Anaheim Hills Trai11 and Backbone Trail No. 1S (Oek Cany~n
Trail) aa designated by the Equestrien and Biking Tr~ile
Component of the Anahefm General Plan Traile Elementi including
8/22/83
MINUT~B. ANAHBIM CITY FLANNING COM_MISSION, AUGUST 22, 1983 83-470
the epeaific deoign !oc any locet~on where a trail cros~ee over
a public oc pcivate stceett end eleo inCluding the off-aite
trail easement Aa ahown on Exhibit No. 2 of Reclaesification
No. 79-80-25.
g. Fence and/or wall plens indicnting khe type of fencing along
nny lot line oF r eite abutting public or priv~te atceeta.
12. That i~ accocdance with the pcovisione of Aneheim Municipel Code
Chapter 18.31 all mu:~iple-femily dwelling unite in the RM-3000
(RPSidential, Multiple-Family) Zone ah~ll be Attached unitst
provided, however~ that uny detdched one-family dwellings ahall be
built aubject to all reatcictiona and reguletiona of either the
RS-7200 or RS-5000 (ReaidenCial, Single-Family) Zones.
~3. That pcior to final tr.act map approval, th° developeca cF said tract
(Texaco Aneheim Hills, Inc. or their aucceaeocs, assigna, or
tcanRferees) ahall submit to the nirer.tor of Public Utilikies for
hia ceview and approval, a propoaed plan for the acreage paymenk of
watec main exteneions fees. Said plen shell coneider all lAnd
within ttie area encompasaed on TrACt Nos. 10967 through 10978,
inclusive, including open space. Any obli~ations impose~ on the
pcoperty owner which are to be performed subaequent to appcoval of
the finei map ahail be evidenced by written egreement or cov~nant,
approved by the City ~ttorney's Office, and recorded prior to ~c
concurrently with the recordation of the final m~p.
14. That pcio* to commencement of structural fcaming, fire hydrants
shall be installed and chrrged as cequired and determined to be
neceasary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
15. That all requirementa of Fice 2one 4, otherwise identified as Fire
Admini~trative Order No. 76-O1, sh4~1 be met. Such requirements
include, but are not lfmited to: chimney spark arre8tors, prolected
attic and under f!oor openings, Class C n~ better coofing m~teriel
and one hour fire c•esistive constructi4r. of horizontal su~faces if
located within 200 fe~t of adjacent bsuet~land.
16. That fuel breaks shall be provided as determined to be necessary by
the Chief of the Fire Department.
17. That prior to Einal tcact map approval, no public or private street
grades shall exceed 10~ e.~ept by prior approval of the Chief of the
Fire Uepartment and the Engineerinq Divieion.
18. That native slopes ad~acent to newly constructed homes shall be
hydroaee8ed with a low fuel combuetible seed Rix. Such slopes shall
be eprinklered and weeded as required to est~blish a minimum of 100
feet af separation h8tween flammable vegetation and any struct~re.
19, That in the event subject property is to bQ divided f~r ~he purpos~
of sale, lease, or financing a parcel map to record the approved
diviaion of subject property shall be eubmitted to and approved by
the City of ~naheim and then be recorded in ~he Office of the Orange
County Recorder.
8/22/83
MINUT~B. ~N~HEIM CITY PLA~ytNG COMMZ~S2oNl_ AU~UST 22. 1983 83-471
20. Thet prior to Final trect map a~pcoval, the owner(e) of subject
property ahall dedicete and improve ten (10) ~oot wlde equestrians
end hiking trai~a aa sh~wn on the Equeetrian and Hiking Trei'.e
Component oF the Aneheim Ceneral Plen Traile Elementi thet
improvement plAne, in accordence with standerd plans end
specificetions on file in the OEfice of the City Engineer, ehall be
aubmitked in conjunction with the grediny pl~n, end/oc that e bond
in en amounr, end form eatiefactory to tne City of Aneheim ahall be
posted with the City prior to final tract map apprnvnl or ieauancf
of e gcading pecmit, whichever occura firet, Co guarantee the
installation af the dbove-mentioned requirAmenta prior to
occupancy. Said dedication and improvement ahall include the
off-site Backbone Treil No. 19 (nek Canyon Treil) located in Tract
No. 10940.
21. That prior Co finel tcact map a~ ~ovel, a~rogram for the
mc~intenance responaibili and estimated coat thereof of a.l
open-epare zoned lote, recreational lota and lendacaped alopea ehall
be su~mitted t~ and ap~roved by the City of Anaheim. Any
agreement(s) referred to in Condition No. 3, af~rementioned, ehall
be executed when the entity cesponsible for maintenance ie not
either a property owner ln thio tract or che homeownera' aasociation
fnr this tract.
22. Thai prior to final tract ~sp approval, Tr~cC No. 10978, a wholly
open space tcact, shall be recorded with the Office o£ the Orange
Countv Recordec and accepted by the Anaheim Hills Master Hameownecs
Aasociationt or, if raaid Tcact No. 10978 ia not recorded, all the
conditions of said Centative tract aha:l nave been complied with.
23. That in accordance ~~th the cequirements of Section 18.02.047 of the
Anaheim ilunicipal Code pertaining to the initial sale of residences
ir the City of Anaheim Planning Area 'B', th~ seller shall provids
each ~u~er with written infor~ation concerning the Anaheim Genp~~l
Plan and the existing zoning within 30Q feet of the boundari~ of
subject trac~.
Z4. That pri~r to final tcact map approval, the owner(s) o£ subject
propexty (Texaco Anaheim Hil:s, Inc., or their suc~eseota, asa~gns,
or transfecrees) sholl install a traffic signal at t~~e int~csection
of Nohl Ranch Road and Stage Coach Road (to be renamed Camino
Grande) as rpquiced by tne City Tra£fic Engineer and in accordance
with specif, tions on file in the Office of the City Engineer; ur
that a bond, ~erti.ficate of deposit, le~ter af credit or cash, in an
amount and focm eatiafact~:y to the City of Anaheim shall be posted
with the City to guarantee installation of said aign~l prior to
occupancy of any dwelling unit in the area encompassed on Tract Nos.
10967 thcough 10978, incl~aive.
25. That all 2ots haviug wfdths of. less thr~~ fifty (50) feat as measured
at the publi.a street frontage and taking vehicular access from said
~treet, e':all share a circular driveway with an a~jacent lot.
6/22/83
MINUTEB. ANAH~IM CITY pLANNTNQ ~OMMI88ION, ~UQUBT 22. 198~ __ 83-472
26. That qetea ahall not be inatelled ecroee eny driveway or private
etceet in e mennec which may advecsely stfect vehicular trafiic in
the 4djacent public atreete. Inetellation of eny gatee within a
distenc~ of forty (40) teet from said publi~ atreet cighte-ot-wny
ehall be aub~e~t to thc Keview and epproval of the City Treffic
Engineer.
27. Thak trash atorage ~reaa eha11 be provided in eccordance witf~
eppcoved plene or~ file with the StceQt Mai~tenenee and Sdnitetion
Divis:on.
28, That prior to final etreet inspecl•1ona, 'No Parking for atreet
sweeping' efgns ahall be r~etell~d as ceq~aire~ by th~ SCceet
Maintenance and Sanit~tion Division and in accordance with
sPecificdtione on file with said division.
29. That the seller ehall pcovide tt-e ~urchaser of each reaidenti~l
dwelling with written inforrt~atio~ conce~ning Aneheim MuniciFll Code
Section 14.32.500 pertaining t~ •Yacking reatricted to facilita_e
street ewc~eping'. Such writtc•n i~~Eorma*.i~~n shAl?. clearly indicat~a
when on-street parking ia ptohibited ar.:i the penalty for violation.
30. That all street dedications and improvements wi~t~in Tiact Na. 1096y
ahall be mAde in accordance wfth pxovisians of Section 17.08.390,
Anaheim Municipal c:ode.
31. That pcior to final mapa approval t;~is tract shall be ceclagsified
to the RM-3000(SC) Zone (instead of the RM-2400(SC) Zone) ,d the
OS(SC) Zone.
32. That prior to final tcact map approv~l, the owner of the property
shall record an ircevocable offe~ uf dedication for Camino Grande
Strzet (Staqe Caach Road) as shown on Tentdtive Tract hlaps
10967-10978, inclusive, and inatall all stceet improvements
including curbs and gutters, aidewalks, ~treet grading and pavement,
sewer and cirain~,ge facilities, or other appurtenant work as required
hy t.he City Englneec and in accocdance with specifications on file
in ~he Offiee of the City Engineer oc post security in e form and
~mount satiafactory to the City of l~naheim to guarantee the
satisfactory completion of said im;rovementa= or irsevocdbly offer
to dedicate a~~ imcrove that portion thereof necessary ta provide
public etreet acce~s ro said kract prior to final building
i.nspections and issuance of occupancy pecmits for any portion of
said tract.
REVSSIUN N0. 2 OF TENTATIVE TRACT :+0. 10°70:
1. '~I~a: sho~ild t:~ia subdivision be developed as more than one
subd3vision, each 8ubdivision thereof ahall be submitted in
tent~tive form for epproval.
2. That all lots within ~his tzact ahall be served by undQrground
utilities.
8/2" '93
MINUTES, ~NAH~IM CITY PLANNING COMMIBSION. AUGUST ~~. 1983 83-173
...
3. That prioc to fi.nal tcect map epproval, the following itema eh~ll be
aubmitted to the City Attorney'e Oft~ce end approvad by the City
Attorney'a Office, Public Utilities Depsrtment, PlAnning Depertment
and Engineering Divteion:
(a) The originel documenta of tt~e covenents, co~ditione end
restrictione,
(b) A letter addressed to the develoEer's title company euthorizing
ation theceof, and
(c) , agreement(s) pertdinlny to the maintenance re~ponsibility
for areas (le~ndscaped slope~ end tracta) ea ahown on Exhibi.ts A
'Ocenge County Open Space Easemenks and Eque~trian Traile' dnd
B •Slope rare E~lan".
Srid agreemenC(s) and CC6Rs shall id~ntify the entitiea (individua~l
lat owners, aut~~ect lcact homoowners' essocietion, Anaheim NillB
Planned Community Ar~soclation, County of Orange, City of Aneheim or
other responsible entity) wh~ch will participate ~n and/or be
responaible for pecrt~anently maintai~ing all OS (Open Space) zoned
lote, all la~~uscaped and natural slopes and all dedicated equeatrian
and hiking trails shown on the aubject tract map and Exhibite A
"Orange r.ounty Open Space Easements and Equestrian Trails and e
'Slope Care Plan'. Said documenrs, aa approved, will then be
executed and filed and rec~rded in the O~ficQ of the Ocange County
Recorder concuccently with recoru~:~io~ of the final tract map.
4. That prior to final track map appcoval, street names shall be
approved by the City Plenning Department.
5. That prioc to any occupancy, temporary street name aigns shall be
inatalled if permanent street name signs have not yet beEn insCalled.
6. That ~cainage of eubject property ehall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactocy to the City Bngineer. tf, in the preparation of the
site, s~~fficienti grading is required to necessitate a grading
permft, no work on grading will be p~rmitted t+etween October 15th
nnd April 15th unless a11 cequiced off-site drainage facilities have
been installed and are operative. Poaitive assur~nce shall be
provided to the City that such dcainage facilities will be completed
prioc to October 15th. Necessary right-of-,~ay for off-site drainag~
facilitiea shall be dedicated to the City, or the City Co~ncil shall
have initiated condemnation prncee<°ings therefor (the coste of which
shall be botne by the developer? prior to the commencement of
graiiing operations. The cequired dtainage facilities shall be of a
size and type aufficient to carry runoff waters originating from
higher properties through subject property to ultimate disposal as
approved by the City Engineer. SAid drainage facilities shall be
the fir~t item of aonstruction ~end shmll be completed and be
functional throughout the tract and from the downstream boundacy of
the property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuance
of any final building inspections or occupancy permits. Drainage
district reimbuxsement agreementa may be made available to the
developers of said property upon their request.
8/22/83
f
i
i
MINUTEB. 11NAHBIM CITY PI.I.NNING CUMMI88ION~__11U(3UST 22. 1983 __ 83-474 ,
i
7. Thet grading, excavetion~ and all other conetruction ectiviCiee
ahall b~ conducted in such s mdnner so ae to minimize the
posaibility of r~.y ailt originating [rom this project being cerried
inko the Santa Ana Rivec by aCorm watRr ori~ineting fc~m or flowing
thtough this ptoject.
8. ThAt all privete etreeta shall be developed in acaordence witt~ the
City of Anaheim'a Standard Detail No. 122 fot private atreeta,
including inatallation of etreet name aigna. Plana for the private
street lighting, ea rQquired by the atanddcd detail, shall be
submitted to the Building Div181on for approval and included witt~
the building plana F~rioC to the iaeuance of building permite.
(Pcivete atreeta are those which provide pcimacy acceas and/or
circulation within the ptoject.
9. That p[iar to final tract map approval, the develope[ of siibject
tCdCt ahall entec into b apecial facilitiea agreement with the Citl
of Anaheim foc water facilities in the High Elevetion Systc:m, as
required by Rule 158 of the Water Utili.ty Ratea, Rules aid
Regula':! ons.
10. That prior to final trac!, map aQpcoval, the developeca of the
AnahPim Hills Planned Community (Texaco Anaheim Hills, Inc., or
theic s:ccessora, assigns, or trenafecees? shall eubmit a packs +~nd
recreatLonal facilitiea plan to the Parks, Recreation a~d Communit:y
Services Depactment foC review and approval. Said proponal shall
determine che specific meana by which the developer providea park
a~d recreation facilities for the futuce ceaidents of the area
encompasaed by Trect Nos. 10967 through 10978, inclusive. ~~'h
means may include~ hut nced nat be limited to, the followiny: pdy
the City of Anaheim pack and recreation in-lieu fees ae determined
to be appropriate by the Ciky Council at the time of building permit
issuance, or dedicate park lands acceptable ta the City oE Anaheims
or a combination thereof. Acceptance of the specific means ahall be
su~~ect to the approval of the Director of Parks, Recreation and
Community ServiceR. Any obligatfons impased on the property owner
which are to be performed subsequent ta approval of the final map
will be evidenced by written agreement or covenant, appcoved by the
City Attocney's Office, and recarded prior to or concurrently with
the cecordation of the finel map.
11. That pri~r to final tract map approva]., thece shall be submitted to
the City Planning Commisaion for review and appcoval, specific plans
of development. Pinal sPeaific plans shall include, but need not be
limited to, the following:
a. Topographic map.
b. Site plans and elevations showing the piacement of the
buildings end structures= the fcont, side and rear elevations;
and the exterlor building materialt~ including roo°fng.
S/22/83
MINU~ T,,,,BB,~,_,J1NAH~IM C1TY PLANNING COMH188ION, AUGUST 22~ 1983 _ 8~3-.475
c. Lot dimenaiona end pad eiae of all lote sufficient to incli.cate
the reletionahip of the proposel to the neture and extent of
the cue-dnd-fill oc eerthwork in ~lved.
d. Landsca~inq plene indicating the extent and type of propoeed
:andecaping and including anX exieting vegetation.
e. Vehicle circulation end pecking plar~ indica~ing the na~tuce and
extent of public end private atteets. or public acceeeways for
vehicular circuletion, off-atreet pa~rking ar~d vehic2e etoraqe.
f. Equeatrian and hiking trrils plan ahowing the plecement and
impcovements of the treils easements foc the Regionel Trail No.
3(Anaheim Hills Trail) and aackbone Trail No. 19 (Oek Canyon
Trail) e-s designated by the Equeatrian end Hiking Traila
Component of the Anaheim Gpneral Plan Trails Elementj including
the npecific design for any loc~tion where a treil crosaes over
a public or private atreets and a~so includino ~he off-site
trail easement as ahown on Exhi~f~ No. 2 of R~claseification
No. 79-8U-25.
g. Fence and/or wall plana indicating the type of fencing aJong
any lot linP of a site abutting public or private 3treets.
12. That in accordance with the provisiona of Anaheim Municipal Code
Chapter 18.31 all multiple-family dwelling unita in the RM-3000
(Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone ahall be attached unitef
ptovided, however, that any detached one-family dwellinge ahell be
built subject to all restrictione and regulations of either the
RS-7200 or RS-5000 (Residentisl, 5ingle-Family) Zones.
13. That ptior to final tract map approval, the developecg of said trect
(Texaco An~heim Hills, Inc. or their auccessors, assigna, or
tranafeceea) shall aubmit to the Director of Public Utilities for
his review and approval, a proposed ~lar. for the acreage paymert of
water main exteneions fees. Said plan shall consider all land
within the area encompast~ed on Tract Nos. 10967 through 10978,
incl~ieive, including open apace. Any obligation imposed by the
propesty owner which are to be perfocmed aubsequent to approval of
the final map ahall lye evidenced by written agreemant or covenant,
approvEd by the City Attorney's Office, and recorded prior to or
concurrently with the recordation of the final map.
14. That prior to commencement of struct~~rnl framing, fire hydrants
shall be installed and charged as cequir~d and determined t.o be
necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
15. That all requirements of Fire Zone 4, utherwise identified es Fire
Administrative Order No. 76-01, shall be met. Such requirements
include, but are not limited to: chimney apark arcestore, protected
attic and under floor openings, Class C or betLer roofing material
and one hour fire resistive construction of horizontal ~urfacea if
located within 200 feet of adjacent bruahland.
8/22/83
MINUTBS. ~N~HE~M CITY R4ANN:NG COMMISSIO_ N~ AUGUST 2Z, 1Sq3 83-476
16. That tu61 breeka shall be provided aa determi~ed to be neceoaary by
the Chief of the Fica D~partment.
17. That priar to final tcact map appcoval, no public or private str~et
gradea ehall exceed 20t excspt by prior eppcoval of the Chief ot the
~ire Depertmeni end the Engineering Divieion.
18. That n~tive elopes edjacent to newly conetructed homeA ehall be
hydroseeded with a low fuel combuetible aeed mix. Such slopes ehell
be eprinklered ~nd we~ded es re~.~uired to eatabllsci e minimum of 100
feet of ae~aration betwean flemmable vegetation and eny atructuce.
19. That in theevrnt eubject property ie to be divided foc the purpoae
of sale, lease, or financing, a pacc~al :nap to record the approved
diviaion of subject property ahell be eubmitted to and approved by
thc City of Anaheim and then be cecocded in the OfficP af kt,e Orange
County Recorder.
20. Thbt prioc tu final tract map approval, ;.he own~r(s) of subject
propecty ahall dedicate and improve ten (10) fo~t wide equestrlana
~nd I~iking trails ae shown on the Equestcian and Hiking '"raila
Component of the Anaheim General Plan Trails ~lementt that
imrrovement plans~ in accordance witti standard plana and
specifications on file in the AEfice of the City Engineer, shall be
s ubmitted in conjunction with the grading plan, and/or t`~at a bond
in an amount and form satiefactory to the City af Aneheim ahall be
posted wit.h the City prior to final tract map approval or isauance
of a gracing permit, whichevec occura firet, to guarantee the
installation af the abave-mentioned requicements pciar to
occupancy. Said dedication and improvement ahdll include the
off-site Backbone Tc~il No. 19 (Oak Canyon Trail) loc~ted in Tcect
No. 1Q940~
21. That pcior ta final tract map approval, a program for the
maintenance ceaponaibi2lty and estimated coat theceof of all
open-space zoned lots, recreational lots and landscaped sloppa shall
be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim. Any
agreementle) referred to in Condition No. 3, afocementioned, ahall
be executed when the entity reaponsible for ma~intenance is not
eithec a propecty owner in this tract or the homeownera' association
for this tract.
22. That prior to final tract map approval, Tract No. 10~78, a wholly
open apace tract, ahall be recorded with th.: Of.fice of the OrAnge
County Recocder and accepted by Che Anaheim Hills Mester Homeowners
Associationt or, if ~rid Tract No. 10978 is not cecorded, all the
conditiona of eaid tentative trect shell tave beer complied with.
23. That in accordance witt. the requirements of Section 18.02.047 of the
Anaheim Municipgl Code pectaining to the initial sale of residences
in the City of Anaheim Planning AreA •0', the seller shall provide
each buyer with written information concernfng the Anaheim Genecal
Plan and khe exiating zoning within 300 feet of the boundaries of
subject tcact,
8/22/83
MINUP68. JINAHEIM CITY PLANNINO CpMMISSION. AUQUST 2Z, 1963 ___,___~ 8r3-~77
24. That prio~ to finel tract map eppr~val, the owner(~) of eubja~.t
prop~cty (T~.aco Aneheim Hille, Inc., or their eucaasaore, aeaiqne,
or tranaferreaa2 ehall inatall a traffic aignal A t the ir,t~caection
of Nohl Ranch RoAd And 8tage Coach Road (to ba re ~emed Cemino
Grande) ea r~quired by the City Treffic Engineer and in accordance
with epecificetiona on File in the Office of tha City Englneer~ ar
that e bond, certificate of depoeLt, lettec of cr edit or caah, in an
emount and Focrt~ aetiefactocy to the City of ~nehe im ahell be poeted
with the City to guarAntee installation of said s ignal prior to
ocaupancy of eny dwellinq unit in the eree encompaeaed un Trq~t Nos.
10967 through 10978, incluaive.
25. That all lots having widtha of leas than fiEty (5 O) feet ds meesured
at the public atceet frontage end tahinq vehicula r accesa from said
street, ahall ehare a cicculer dciveway with en a djacent lot~
26. ThaC gbtes ahall not be installed acroae any driv eway oc private
street in e manner which may advecsely affect veh iculor treffic in
the adjecent public streets. Inetallation of any gAtea within a
distanae of ~octy (40) feet from seid public atce et rights-of-~ay
shall be aubject to the review and approval of th e City Tteffic
Engi ~ee r.
27. That tcash storege dreas shall be pcovided in acc Arde~nce with
aE~proved plana on file with the Street Maintenanc e and Sanitdtion
Division.
28. That prior to finel street inspections, 'No parki ng for atreet
sweeping" signa shall be installed se required by the Street
Maintenanc~ and Sanitation Diviaion and in accord ance with
specificationa on file with said divisinn.
29. That the sellec shall provide the purchaser of ea ch reaidential
dwelling with wcitten information concerning 1-ne he~im Municipal Code
^ection 14.32.500 pertaining to 'Parking reatric t ed to facilitc+te
street sweeping•. Such written infocmation ahal 1 clearly indi.cate
when on-street parking ie prohibited and the pena lty foc violation.
30. That all. atreet dedications and lmprovements wit h in Tract No. 10970
shall be made in accordance with provisions of Section 17.08~390,
Anaheim Municipal Code.
31. That prioc ~o final tract map approval, this trac t shall be
reclaesified to the RM-3000(SC) Zone (instead of the RM-2400(gC)
2one) and the OS(SC) Zone.
32. That prioc to final tract map approval, the owne r of the property
shall record an icrevocable offer of dedication f or Camino Grande
Street (Scage Coach Road) aa ehown on Tentative Tract Mape
10967-10978, inclusive, and install all atreet is~rovements
including curbs and gutters, sidewalks, streel• q rading dnd pavement,
sewer and drainage fecilitiea, or other wppurtenant work as required
by the City Frtgineer and in eccordance with apec ificationa an file
8/12/83
MINUTBB. !-NANBIM CITY PWINNING COMlII88ION. Al7tiU~f1' Z2. 1983 ~3"~78
in ths 0lfice of the City ~nqineer oc post s~curity in a~or~a and
amount s~tietecto =y to the City o~ Anaheim to guecant~e tl~e
setisfectury comp letion ot aeid impruvementet or iccevocably otfac
to dRdicate and i~arrove thet portion theceof necosaary to provide
public etreet acc ~es to said tract prioc to Einal buil~ing
inepections end i seuance o~ occupency pecmite !or e~y poction of
said tract.
REVISION NO~ 2 OF TBNTIITIVE TRACT NO. 10971:
1. That ehould thia subdivieion be developed ss mote than one
aubdivision, eAC h subdiviaion thereof ahell bp ~aubmitted in
tentAtive form fot npproval.
2. That all lots wit hin thie tcact ohall be secved by underground
utilitien.
3. Thet prior to ff nal trect map approval, the following iteme ehall be
aubmitted Co the City Aktocney's Uffice end approved by the City
Attarney's Off i c e, Public Utilitiea Uepartment, Pla~nning Depactment
~nd ~ngineering Diviaion;
(a? The origin a 1 documenta af the covenants, conditions and
cestrictions,
(b) A lettec addressed to the developer's title company authorizing
recocdation thereof, and
(c) Any a~greeme nt(s) pectaining to the maintenance responeibility
for areas (landacaped alopes and tcails) as ahown on Exhibita A
'Orange Co unty Open Space EAaementa dnd Equesrrian Trails' and
e 'Slope Care Plan'.
Said agreement(s) and CC6Ra ahall identify the entities (individual
].ot awners, sub ~ect tract homeowners' aseociation, 1-naheim Hills
Plann~d Community l~er~ociation, County of Oxenge, City of Anaheim or
othec responaib ie entity) which will participate in and/or be
responsible f o r permanently maintaining all 05 (Open Space) zoned
lots, all lands caped and netural slopea ~nd ell d~~icated equeetrian
and hiking tr.a i ls ~hown on the subject trect map r~nd Exhibits A
'Ocange County Open 5pace Eeaements and Equestrian Trails and B
'Slope Caee Pl an'. Said documenta, as appcoved, will ther~ be
executed and f i led and cecorded in the OfEice of the Ocenqe County
Recorder concu r rently with cecocdation of the final tract maps.
4. Thet prioc to f inal tract map epproval, street names ahall be
approved by the City Planning Departme~t.
5. That prior to any occupancy, temporary ~treet nAme signs shdll be
instelled if perrtwnent atreet name aigns have not yet been inet~lled.
8/22/83
INU~BS. ANAH~IM CITY PLIINNING COMMISSION, AUGUBT 22. 198 3 83-47
6. That drainag~ o! •ubject prop~rty ahall be dispoa~d of in ~ manner
eatiafeceory to eh~ City Bnyineer. Tf, in the p rapecetiun o! the
eite, aufticient gredinq is required to neceasit ate a grdding
permit, no work on gcading will be permitted ba twa~n Octo~er i5th
and ~pril 15th unleea ell requiced ~ff-site dca i naqe feciiitie• hdve
been inetalled end ere operstive. Poeitive nes ucence ahell be
pcovided to the City that auch drainAge fecilit i ee will be completed
prioc to Octobec 15th. Neceaeary right-af-wey f or off-aity drainage
fecilities shell be dedicated to the City, oc t h e City Council ahell
have initinted condamnation proceedings theref o r(the casts~ of which
ahall be borne by the developer) prioc to the c ammencemenC of
grading operationa. The coquired drainage faci lities ahnll be of a
aize and type aufficient tu cerry runaff waters originating from
higher propecties thraugl~ subject property to u ltimete dispc-sal as
approved by the City ~ngineec. Said drainage f acilitiea shzll be
the ficst item of conatruction and shall be cc mpleted nnd be
functional throughout the tract and from the d ownstream bou rn~acy of
the pcoperty to the ultimate point of di~poaal pcio[ to the :[esuance
of any final building inapections or occupancy pecmite. Drai.negN
district ceimbucaement agreementa may be mede availablP to the
developers o[ s~id property upan their request.
7. That grading, excavation, and all othec constr u etion activiti~~a
shall be conducted in such e manner ao as to m i nimi2e the
poeaibility of any silt originating from this project being ct.trried
into the 5anta Ana River by atorm weter originating from or flowing
through tt-~a projpct.
8. That all privete streets shall be developed in a^cocdance with the
City of Anaheim's Standard Detail No. 122 for nrivate streets,
includiny instellation o~ stceQt name signs. Plans for the prlvate
street lighting, ds cequired by the standard detail, ehall be
submitted to the Building Division ~or appcov a 1 and included w~th
the building plans prioc to khe issuance of bu ilding permita.
(Priva~e streets ste those which provide prima ry acceae and/or
circul,ition within the project.
9. That prior to final tcact map approval, the developec of subject
tcact shall enter into a special facilities ag reement with the City
of Anaheim foc water facilities in the High E 1 evation System, as
required by Rule 158 of the Watec Utility Rat e s, Rulea and
Regulations.
10. That r-ior to final tract map approval, the d evelopers of the
Anahei~a Hills Planned Communiky (Texaco Anahe i m Hille, Inc., or
their suceessora, easigns, oc transferees) s h all aubmit a packs and
cecreational facilitiea plan to the Parks, P ecreation and Commuriity
5ervices Department for review and approval. Said pcoposal shall
determine the specific means by which the dev eloper provides pack
and recreation facilities fnr the futuce res i dents of the area
c~ncompassed ~y Tract Nos. 10967 th:ough 1097 8, incluaive. Such
!aeans may include, but need not be limited to, the followfng: p8y
tae City of Anaheim paYk and recreation in-1 i eu fees as det~ermined
8/22/83
~ NUTBS. ~-NAbBIM CITY PL~ N,~NG CONMYSBION. AUaU8T 21, 1983 83-480
to b~ sppropriate by the City Council at the time of building permit
iseusnco, oc d~dicate park lands acce~teble to th• Ciky o~ ~naheimt
or s combinetian thereof. ~cceptence of the epeciPic meens ahall be
euDjec~ to the epprovel of th• Director of Parke, Recreation as~.~
Community Services. ~ny obligationa impoeed on the property owne[
which ace to be perfocmed aubaequ~nt to eppcovAl of l•he finel map
ehall be evidenced by writtRn agreement ac covenent, approved by the
City Akkocney'a Office, A~d recorded prior to oc concurtently with
the ceco`detion of the finel mep.
11. That prior to final tract map approv~l, there ahall be nubmitked to
the City ~lanning Commigsion for ceview and appcoval, apecific plane
of development. Final epecific plana ahell include, but nead nat be
limited to, the f ollowing:
a. Topagraphic mep.
b. Site plana and elevations ahowing the placement of the
buildinge and atructuress the front, side and rear elevaCionas
and the exterior building materials includiny roofinq.
c. Got dimensions and pad size of all lota suffic~ent to indicate
the relakionship of the ~copoeal to the ~atuce and extent of
the cut-end-fill or Qarthwork involved.
d. Landacaping plans indicating the extent and type o. pcopoaed
landacaping and including any exisCing vegetation.
e. Vehicle circulation and ~erking plan indicating the nature and
extent of public and pcivate atceets, or public accessways fnr
vehiculat circulation, off-etreet parking end vehicle atoraqe.
f~ Equeatrian and hik±.ng trails plan ehowing the placement and
improvements of khe trails easements for the Regional Treil No.
3(Anaheim Hills Trail) and Backbnne Trail No. 19 t0ak Canyon
Trail) as deaignated by the Equestrian end Hiking Trails
Component of the ~naheim General Plan Trail~ Element; including
the speciff c deaign for ~ny location where a trail crosses ovec
a public or private atreeti and also includin~ the off-eite
trafl easement as ehown on Sxhibit No. 2 of Reclassification
No. 79-80-25.
g. Fence and/or wmll plans indicating ttie type of fencing along
any lot line of a site abutting pubi~c or private atreeta.
1 2. Thet in accordance with the provisi~~is of Anaheim Municipal Code
Chapter 18.31 all multiple-family dwelling units in the RM-3000
(Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone shall be attached unitst
provided, however, that any deteched one-family dwellings shall be
built subject to all cestrictiona and regulations of either the
RS-7200 or RS-5000 (Residential, Single-Family) Zones.
8/22/83
MINUT~S. AN~bBIM CITY PLI-NNING COMMI38ION. AUGUST 2Z. ~983 83-481
13. That prior to final trect mep approvel, the developers of aaid trect
(Texaco ~neheim Hille, inc. or their eucceesora, aesigns, oc
transteceea) ehel.l eubmit to the Directoc of Public Utilities ~or
hia raview end approval, a propoeed plan for the acreege payment af
weter main extenaions Eees. Seid plan ehel~ coneider ell lnnd
within the acea encompaased on Tcact Noe. 10967 through 10978,
inclusive, including open epace. ~ny obligationa impoaed on the
~ropecty owner which ~re to be perfocmed eubeequent to approvel of
the finel map ehall be evidenced by written dgreement or covenant,
approved by the City ~ttorney's Office, and recorded prioc to or
concurrently with the recordation af the final mep.
14. Tliat prior to c~mmencement of atcuctucel framing, fire hydrente
shell be inetalled and ch~rged aa required and dekermined to be
neceaeacy by the Chief of the Fice Depnrtment.
15. That all ceyuirementa of Fire Zone 4, otherwise identified as Fire
Administrative Order No. 76-01, shall be met. Such requirementa
include, but ere not limited to: chimney apark erreators, pcotected
attic and under floor openinga, Clasa C or bettec roofing m~terial
and one hour fire cesietive construction of hocizontal sucfaces •lf
located within 200 feet of edjecent brushland.
16. That fuel breaka ahall be provided as determined to be neceseary by
the Chie£ of the Fire DepArtment.
17. That prior to final tract map approval, no public or private street
grades shall exceed lU• except by pcioc approval of the Chief of the
Fire Department and the Engineering Divislon.
18. ThAt native slopes adjacent to newly conatructed homes ahall be
hydroseeded with a low fuel combusti.ble aeed mix. Such slopes Rhall
be sptfnkleced and weeded as required to establiah a minimum of 100
feet of aepacation between flammable vegetation and any atructuce.
19. That in the event subject property is to be divided for the purpose
ot oale, lease, or financing, a parcel map to record the approved
diviefon of aubject pcoperty shall be submitted to and approved by
the City of Anaheim and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange
County Recorder.
20. That prior to final tract map approval, the ownerfs) of eubject
property shall dedicate and improve ten (10) foot wide equestriane
and hiking trails as shown on the Equestrian and Hiking Tcails
Component of the Anaheim General Plan Trails Elementt that
improvement plans, in accordance with st.andard plane and
epecifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer, shall be
submitted in conjunction with the gx~dinq plan, and/or that a bond
in an amount and form eatisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be
poeted with the City prior to final tract map approval or issuance
of a grading permit, whichever oacurs first, to guarentee the
instellation of the above-mentioned reguirementa prior to
occupancy. Said dedication and fmprovement shall include the
off-site Hackbone Trail No. 19 (Oak Canyon Trail) located in Tract
No. 10940.
8/22/83
~IINUTBB. ANAHBIM CITY PL~NNING COM~288ION~,AUGUST 22. 1983 83-482
21. That p~ior to tinel traCt mdp epproval, e program for tlro
maintenance ceaponaibi2lty and eatimeted coat theceot of all
open-apaca zoned loks, recreetionel lota and landaceped alopee ahAll
be submitted to dnd epproved by the City of Anaheim. Any
agceement(e) reterr~d to in Condition No. 3, aforementioned, ehell
be executed when the Pntity reaponeible for mAintenance ia not
eithec a pcopecty owner in thie tract or the homeowners' eaaocidtion
for this tr~ct.
22. That prfoc to finel tcect map approval, Tract No. 10978, a wholly
open apace tcact, ehall be recorded wlth the OEfiee of the Ordnge
County Recocder an~ eccepted by the Andheim Hills Mester Homeownere
Asaocietiont ac, if Raid Trect No. 10978 ie not cecorded, all the
conditfona of sAid tentative trdct shall have b~en compllQd with.
23. ThAt in accordance with the requiremente of Section 18.02.047 af Che
Anahefm Municipal Code pertaining to the initial sale of ~eaidenc~a
in the City of Anaheim Planning Acea "B•, the seller ehall provide
each buyer with wcitten information concerning the Anaheim ~enera].
Plan and the exiating zaning within 30U feet of the boundaries ~f
aubject tract.
24. That pr.ior to final tract map approval, the owner(s) of aubject
property (Texaco ~naheim Nills, Inc., or their aucceseora, assigns,
or transfecreee) sha11 inaCall a tcaffic signal nt the intersection
of Nohl Ranch Road and Stage Coach Road (to be [enamed Camino
Grande) as required by the City Traffic Engineer and in accordarce
with epecifications un file in the Office of the City Engineert or
that a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of ccPdit or caeh, in an
amount ~nd form satisfactnry to the City of Anehelm shall be poat.ed
with the City to guacantee installation of gaid signal prior to
occupancy of any dwelling unit in the area encompassed on Tract Nos.
10967 ttirough 10978, incluaive.
25. That gates shall not be installed acrons any drivewey or privete
atreet in a manner which may adversely affect vehiculac txaffic in
the adjacent public stceets. Installation of any gates aithin a
distance of forty (40) feet frnm said public street rights-of-way
shal]. be eubject to the review and ~pproval of the City TrAffic
Engineer.
26. That trash ;~torage a:eas shall be provided in accocdance wikh
appcoved plans on fi~e with the Street Maintenance and Sanitatian
Division.
~7. That prior to final street inapectioas, •No parking for s~reet
sweeping' aigns shall be installed as required by the Street
Maintenance and Sanitation Division dnd in accordance with
specificatione on file witt, said divisi.on.
28. That the aeller ehall provide the purcl~aser of each resldential
dwelling with written infocmation concerning Anaheim llunfcipa~l Code
Section 14.3Z.500 pertaining to `Parking restricted to facilitate
street eweeping'. Such written inforn~tion ahall clearly indic~te
when on-street parking is prohibited end the penalty for violation.
8/22/83
MINUT88, ~NAHffiIM CITY PW-NNING COMMI$S~;ON, AUGUST 2~. 19$3 83-483
29. Thet all street dedications and imgcovementa within Tract No. 10971
~hsll be msde Ln accardance with provi~ione af Saction 17.08.390,
A~aheim Municipal Code.
30. That pcior to Einal kract n~ap Approval, khe ow~er of the properLy
eha~l cecord en icrevocabl~ offer of dedicatfon for Cemino Grande
F:reet (St,age Coaah Road) ms ahown on Tentative Tract Mapg
IU967-10978, inclusive, ar:~ i.natell all etcaet i.mprovements
inclu~ing curba end guttecs, aldewalke, street greding and pa~e~nent,
sewer and dca~nege facilSttes, or othec apPuctenank work as required
by the City Enginee~ and in accocdance with apeciFicationa on file
in the Uffice of the City ~ngineec or poet eecucity in A form and
amount aatiRfactory to the City of Aueheim ta guerantee the
aetiefectory complati~n oE aaid improvementas or irrpvocab2y offer
to dedicate and improve that portlon ~her.eaf necraedry to provide
public streQk ~cces~ to said tract prior to final building
inspections and i~euance of occupancy permit.a foc eny portion of
aaid tract.
KEVISIVN N0. 2 OF TBNTA'PI~'E TR~CT Nn. 10972:
1. That ahould thie subdfvision be dAveloped as more than ane
subdivioion, each subdivision thereof shall be submitte~ in
t~ntative f~~rm for ~pproval.
2. That all lots within this tract ahall be aecved by underground
~tilities.
3. Tt-at pr~~c to final. c.ract map approval, the followin~ items shall be
aubmitted t~ tt~e City Attorney's Office and approve~,1 by the City
Attorney's Oftice, Public Utflities Departmenc, Pla.nning Department
and Engineering Divisian:
(a) The original documents of the covenants, corn•;litiona and
restrictions,
(b) A lettec rddresaed to the developer's titl~~ compeny authoriring
recoKdation thereof, anJ
(c} Any agceement(s) pertaining to the mainter~ance responsibility
for areaa (landecaped alopes and tcails) as shown on 6xhibits A
•Orange County Ope~ Space ~asements and Lquestrian Trails' end
B 'Slope Care Plan•.
Said agreement(s) and CC~Ra shall identify the entities (indfvidual
lot owners, subject tract homeowners' association, Anaheim Hilla
Planned Community Aasociation, County nf Orange, City of Anaheim or
other respcnaible entity) which will p~rticipate in and/or be
respansible foc permanently maintaining all OS (Open Space) zoned
lots, all landscaped and natural ~lopes and all dedicated equestrian
and hiking trails ehowa on the subjec.. tract map and Exhibits ~
'Oranga County Open Sp~ce Easements nnd F.questriar. Trails and B
•Slope Care Plan•. Said documenta, as approved, will then be
executed and f~led and recorded in the Office of the Orange County
Recorder concurrently with recordation of the final tract m~p.
8/22/83
MINUTEB._AN~HBIM C1TY RLANNING COMMIBSIUN, ~UGUST 2~. ~983__ , _ 83-48~
-----~-- ~---'~'-
4. Thet pc+~r to Eina~ krect map ep~:ovsl, aere~t namea ehell be
Approved by the City Pla~nning Depertment.
5. ThAt prior to a~y occupancyr tempo,~~ry streat name eigna shall be
inatAlled if permcnent street name signs have not yet I~een instdlled.
6. Thnt drain4ge of eubjeck propert.y nhall be diapoged oi. in a menner
aetisfactocy to the City Bngineec. If, in tbe preperation of tt~e
eite, eufEicient grnding is requiced to neceaeitAte r grAding
permi.t, no work on gcading will be permitted between Octobec 15ch
and Apr.il 15th unleas all required off-aite iirainage facilltier~ have
boen instelled and ace opecativN. Posltive easucan~~e shell be
providod to the City thet such drainage fdcilities will be cotnpleted
prioc to Octnber 15th. NPC.esaAry right-of-way Eor off-eiCe dreinage
facilitiea shall be dedicated to the Clty, nr the ::iky Council ahall
have ~nitiated condemnntion proceedinga therefor (the costa of which
ot.~lZ be borne by the developer) pcior to the cumriencement uf
gcadin~ ope[stiona. Thp require;~ dreinage fecilities shall be of e
size and type aufficiont to carry cunotf waters originating from
hiyher propertiee thcr.llagh subject property to ulCimate disposal as
Appcoved by the CLty ~~yineer. Said drainage facilitiea shall be
the first item of ~~=-ruc~ion and ~hall he completed and be
functional througs~~~•~' ~,he -;ract end from the downatream boundary oE
the property to r~~ ~,:.~ma_r.e poin.. of c?ieposal prior to the iesuence
of any f 1na1 bui f~ : ~„ :n~~ercr.ions or occupancy permits. Drainnge
dist~icr. reimbu.~~h-~~~c :~~-*~en~;nta may be mede aveilt~blp to the
develo~era of s+~= ~~ ~~t-!~r""y uEon their request.
7. That grediny, ~a.,~r.~.a~•~on, and all other constcuction activ.ities
shall be con~~-: "~ ~f a~ch d menner so as to minimize t:he
posaibility us ~~r1 ''~1~ originating from thia project being cacried
into the se~~t~ ~ra -wiver by storm water origfnating fro~n qr f.lowing
thcough this tj~:~~.,t,.
8. That all priv~:.~ -a:reetR ehall be developed in accocdance with the
City of Anah~sim''~~ stendard Detail No. 122 for private streets,
including ins~t~L-i~acion of Btreet name signs. Plana for the privatp
etreet lights~y.. as required by the stendacd detail, shall be
submitted to el~ Building Division for approval and included with
Che buildi!r~g g~rne pcior to the iaouan~e af building permits.
(Privete stce~ are hose which provide primary access end/or
circulatio~: ~.i~zhin t .~ pro ject.
9. That prior ta final tract mdp approvtel~ the developer of subjecC
trsct shall enter into a special facilities agreement with the City
of ~-naheim for watec f.acilities in the High Elevation System, as
require~t by Rule 15B of the Water Utility Rates, Rules and
Regulstion+~.
8/22/83
i
,~xN T~B~ ~NANBIM C1TY FLANNING COMMI$8ION. AtlGUST 22. 1983 83-485
10. Thet prior to fin~i tcect map epprovel, the davalopere of the
Anaheim Hilla Planned Commu~ity (Tax~co ~neheim Hills, Inc., or
th~ic auccesaoca, ~~aigne, or tr~naferees) ahall eubmit a perk• and
c~cceetional fscilitiee pl~~ io the Parka, Recreation and Community
8erviceo Department For review end epprovdl. Said proposal ~hall
detesmine the specific meane by which the devtloper pcovides perk
end recreation fecilltiae tor the Putuce ceaidents of tha area
encompassed by Tr~ct Noe. 10967 through 10978, incluaive. Such
meens m~y include, but need not ~e limited to, the following: pey
the Citiy of AnAheim perk and cecreation in-lieu feea ~e determined
to ~a eppcopriete Uy the City Council at the time af building pecmit
issuance, or dedicate park lande Acceptable to the City of Aneheimt
or a combination theceof. Acceptance of the ape:ific meana ehall be
subject ta the approval of the DirecCoc of P~rka, Recceation end
Community Secvicea. Any obligetions imposed on the prop~rty owner
which are to be performed subsequent to approvel of the final mep
shall be evidenced by written agreement or covenant, dpproved by the
City Attorney's Office, end recorded prior to or concurcently with
the recordation ot the final map.
11. Thdt ~rior to finel trect map approval, there ahall be aubmitted to
the City Planning Commiseion for review nnd epproval, aPecific plans
of development. Final apecific plans shall include, but need not be
lim~ted to, the following:
a. Topoqraphic map.
b. Stte plans and elevdtions showing the placement of the
buildinga dnd structuresJ the front, side and rear elevacionas
and the exterior building materiala incli~ding roofing.
c. Lot dimsnsions and p~d size of all lots sufficiert to indicate
the relationehip of the propossl to the nature and extent of
the cut-~nd-fill or earthwork involved.
d. Landscaping plans indicating the extent and type of proposed
land$caping and including any existing vegetation.
e. Vehicle circulation and parking plan indicating the nature and
extent of public end privrite atreets, or pub.lic accessways for
vehfcular circulation, :ff-street parking and vehicle storage.
f. Equestrian and hiking trsils plan showing the placement and
improvements of the ttails easements for the Regional Trail Nc
3(Anaheim Hills Trail) and Backbone Trail No. 19 (Oak Canyon
Trail) as designated by the Bquestrian and Hiking Trails
Component of the Anaheim General Plan TcAils Elementj including
the specific desiyn for any locat~on where a trail crosaes over
a public or private streetj and a~so including the off-site
trail easement as ahown on Exhibit No. 2 of Reclassification
No. 79-80-~5.
g. Fence and/or wall plans indiceting the type of fencina along
any lot line of a site abutting public or private etreets.
8/22/83
MINUTES. AN~H~IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION. AUGUST Z2, 1983 83-486
12. That in ac~orGance with the proviaione of Aneh~im Municipal Code
ChApter 18.31 all multiple-family dwelling units in the RM-3000
(Residential, Multiple-Pamily) Zone ehall be ettached unit$t
pcovided, howevec, that nny detached one-family dwell.inge ehell be
built subject to nll -~atrictiona ~nd tegulatione of uither the
RS-7200 or R8~5U00 lReeidential, 3ingle-Family) 2ones•
a3. Th~t prior to final trect mep appcoval, the developer.s of aaid trac~
(Texaco Anaheim Hille, inc. or theic aucceseora, a$signe, or
tcanefere~s) shrll submit ko the Direct~r of Public Utilities for
hia review and approval, a proposed plan for the acreage payment of
weter main exteneiane feea. said plan aha.ll consider e11 lend
within the Aree encompaseed ~n TrACt Nos. 10967 thraugh 10978,
inclusiv~, including open apece. Any obligationa impoaed on the
property owner which ace to be pecformed subsequent to appcovel of
the final map ahall be evidenced by written agreement or covenant,
approved by the City Attorney's Office, and recorded prior to or
concurrently with the cecocdation of the final map.
14. That prior to commencement of structural ftaming, fice hydcants
shall be inatalled amj charged ea requiced and detecmined to be
necessary by the Chief of the Fire Depertment.
15. xhat all requicement~, of Fite zone 4, otherwi»e idpntified ae Fice
Adminiatrati~e Ocde~ No. 76-01, shall be met. Such requirements
include, but ace not limited to: chimney eperk Arrestoca, protected
attic and under floor openings, Clase C or bettec roofing material
and one houc fire resistive conetruction of horizontel aurfaces if
located within 200 feet of adjacent bruahland.
16. That fuel breaks shall be provided as determined to be necesaary by
the Chief of the Eire Department.
17. That prior to final tract map approval, no pu~lic or pcivate street
grades ahall exceed 108 except by prio[ approval of the Chief of Che
Fire Depactment and the Engineering Division.
]e. That native slopes adjacent to newly constructed homes shall be
hydroaeeded with a low fuel combuatible aeed mix. Such slopes shall
be sprinklered and weeded as required to establ~sh a minimum o~ 100
feet of aeparation between flammable ve~etation and any structure.
19. That i.n the event subject property is to be divided for the purpoae
of Rale, lease, or financing, a parcel map to record the a~pcoved
division of subject property shall be s~~bmitted to an9 approved by
khe City of ~naheim and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange
Cuunty RPCOrder.
20. That prior to final tract map approval, the owner(s) of subject
property shall dedicate and improve ten (10) foot wide equestrians
and hikfng trails as shown on the Equestrian and liiking Trails
Companent of the Anaheim Generel Plan TrailA Elementt that
improvement ~lans, in a~~ordance with standard plans and
~/22/83
~~.
I~+INUT68. ANAHBIM CITY PL1-NNING COMMI$SYON. l-UG~S~ 22. 1983 __ 8z-487
specificdtiona on file in the c~ffice of thm City ~nqineec, e~hell be
submitted in conjunction with the grading glan, and/oc thAt a bond
in an amcunt end focm aetiafac~ocy to the City of ~-naheim ahall be
posted with the City prior to fin~l tcact mep a-pprovel or iasuence
of a greding pecmit, whichever occ~~re first, to guarentee the
inatallation of the above-menti.oned requirementa pri~r to
occuNency. 3aid dedica~tion and impcovement ehall include the
off-aite BACkbone Trnil No. 19 (O~k Cenyon Tceil) loc~ted in Tract
No. 10940.
21. That prio[ to final trect map approval, a pr~gcem for the ~
maintenance responaibility and eatimated cost thereof of ell f
open-space zoned lata, recreationel lots 1nd landscaped alopes shall. i
be aubmitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim. Any ~:
agreement(s) referred to in Condition No. 3, afocementioneA, ahall a
be executed when the entity cesponsibl~ for maintenance is not ?,
either a propec~.y owner i.n thia tract ar the homeowneta' easociation ~,
for thia tract.
22. That prior to final ttact map approval, Tract Nu. 10978, a whclly ;
open epace tract, shell be recorded with the Off:ce of the Orange
County Recorder and accepted by the Anaheim Hilla Master Homeownecs
Asoociationj or, if eaid Tcact No. 10978 ia not recocded, ell the
conditions of said tentative trdct ehall have been complied witt~.
23. That in accordance with the requirements of Sectiun 18.02.047 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to the initial sale of residencea
in the City of Anaheim Planning Area 'B'r tihe ~ellei sh~ll provide
each buyer with written information concerning thP Anahei~m Generel
Plan and the existi~~g zoning within 300 feet of the boundariea of
subject tract.
24. That pcior to final tract ma~ approval, the owner(s) of sub~ect
property (Texaco Anaheim Hills, inc., or their sucoessors, assigne,
or tranaferrees) shall install a traffic aignal at the inters~ction
of Nohl Ranch Road and Stage Coach Road (to be renamed Camino
Grande) ~~ requiced by the City Treffic: Enqin~aer and in accordance
with specifications on fil~ in the Offic;e of the City Engineets or
that a bond, cectificate of deposit, letter of credit or cash, in an
amount snd form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted
with the City to guarantee installation of said siqnal prior to
occupancy of any dwelling unit in the area er~compa~soed on Trac` Nos.
10967 through 10978, inclusive.
25. That gates shall not be installed a~=russ any dri:::way or private
street in a manner which may adversely affect vehfcular traffic in
the adjacent public etreets. Installation of any gates within a
diet~nce of forty (40) Peet from said public street cights-of-way
shdll be aubject to the review and approval of the City Traffic
Engineer.
8/22/83
MINUT~ ANAH IM CITY PL~NNING COMMZSSIQN AUGUST 22 1963 83-488
26. mhat tcash storaga ar~ae shell be pcoviddd in ecaordance with
epproved pleng on file with the Street Maintenance and Snnitation
Divieion.
27. That prior to finel atreet inapections, 'No parking for atreet
sweeping" aigne ~hell be instelled ae required by the Street
Ma~nten~nce and Sanitation Aiviei~n end in accordence with
apecificationa o~ file with said division.
28. That the seller shall provide the purchnser of each residentiel
dwelling with written information concecni~g Aneheim Munici.pal Code
Section 14.32.500 pert~ining to "Parking reetcicted to fecilltate
street sweepinq". Such written information ehall clearly indicate
when on-atreet packing ia pcohibited and the penalty for violetion.
29. That all atreet dedicationa and improvementa within Tr~ct No. 10~72
ahall be mAde in accocdance with provisions of Section 17.08.390,
Anaheim Munici~~l Code.
30. That prior to ~inal tract map appcoval, th~ ownec of the property
ehall record an irrevocable offer of dedication for t:a~ino Grande
Stceet (Stage Coach Road) as ahc.rn on Tentative Tract Maps
10967-10978, inclusive, and install ~11 atceet improvements
including curba and gutters, ~fdewalka, atreet gradin~ and pavement,
sewe[ and drainage facilitiea, or other appurtenant wc~rk as required
by the City Engineer and in accordance with specifications on file
in the Office of the Ci.ty Engineer or post secucity in a form and
amount satiafactory to the City of Anaheim to 4uarante~ the
satisfactory completian of said improvementss oc icrevc~cably offer
to dedicate and improve that portion thereof necessary to provide
public R~Keet ~ccesa to said tract prior to final building
inspections and isauance of occupancy permita for eny portion of
said tract.
REVISION N0. 2 OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10973:
1. That ~hould this subdivision be developed as more than one
aubdivision, each subdivision thereof ahall be submitted in
tentative form for approval.
2. That all lots within this tract ohall be served by underground
utilities.
3. That prioc to final trnct map approval, the following iteme ahall be
submitted to the City Attorney's Office and approved by the City
Attorney's Office, Public Utilities DE~partment, Planning Department
and Engineeting biviaion:
;a) The original documenta of the cavenants, conditions and
reatrictiona,
(b) A letter addressed to the developer's title com~any authorizing
recordation thereof, and
8/22/83
MI_ ~UTEB• AN~HEIM CxTY PL~NNING COMMI88ION. AUQUST 22. 1903 83-489
(c) Any agre~ment(a) pertaining to the msin~enence responalbility
Eor aceea (landacaped slopea and treils) as ehown on Ext~ibits A
"Orenge County Opan Spece Eeeemente end Equeatrisn Trails" and
B "Slope C4[e Plan'.
Seid agreement(8) And CC~Re shell idgntify the entities (ind:viduel
lot ownere, eubject tract hc~eownars' aeeociation, ~naheim Hille
Planned Community Aseociet:on, C~ounty ot Orenge, City of Anaheim or
o*.her responsible entlty) which will participete in and/or be
responsible foc permanently maintaining all OS (Open Speae) zo~ed
lots, all lAndscaped and netural elopes and all dediceted equestrien
and hiking trails ahown en thP subject trACt map and Exhibita A
"Orange County Open Space Easemente and Equeatcien Trails and B
'Slope Cace Plan'. Said clocume~ta, es epproved, will then be
executed and fil~~d and recorded in the Office oE the Orange County
Recorder concurrently wirh recordetion uf the final tract map.
4. That pcioc to f!nal trar.t map approval, street names shall be
approved by the City Pldnning Department.
5. That prior to any occupancy, temporAry stceet name eigns shall be
inatrlled if p~rmanent atreet name aigna have not yet been inatalled.
6. That dzain~ge of aubject propecty ahall be diaposed of in a menner
satiafactory ta the City Engineer. if, in the pceparation of the
site, sufficient gr~ding ie required to necessitate e grading
petmit, no work un grading will be permitted between Octobec 15th
and April 15th unlF:es ~11 required off-aite d[ainage facillties have
been installed and ace operative. Positive assurance ahall be
provided to *_he Ctty that euch drainage fecilities will be completed
prior to October 15kh. NecessarY cight-o~-way for off-site drainage
facilities shall be dediceted tu the City, o~ the City Council shall
hav~ initiated condemnation ptoceedinga therefor (the costs of which
shall be borne by the developer) prior to the commencement of
qcading operetione. The required drainage facilities shall be oi a
aize and type sufficient to cdrry runoff waters ociginating from
higher propertiea through sub~ect pcopecty to ultimate disposal as
approved by the City Engineer, SAi~ drainage facilities ahall be
the firat item of conatruction and shall be completed and be
functional throughout the tract and from the downstream boundary of
the property to the ultimate point of diepceal prior to the iasuance
of any final building inspections or uccupancy permite. Drainage
district reimburseme~it agreemeots may be made available to the
developera of said property upon theic request.
7. That grading, excavation, and all other construc.tion activities
ehall be canducted in euch a manner so as to ninimize the
pasaibility of any ailt originating from this project being carried
1nt0 che Santa Ana River by storm w~ter originating from or flo~~inq
through thie project.
8/22/83
MxNUTBS. ~NAH~IM CITY PLAHNINa COMMi8820N. ~UGUBx 21. 198~ , 83-490
8. That sll pciv~te atr~ets ehall be devaloped in accordanc• with kh•
City of A~ah~im'a Standard U~tail No. 12Z !oc private ~~r~~ts,
includiny instielletion o~ atre~t name eiyna. Plans foc Gh~ private
street liqht~ng, dr r~quired by th• standecd detail, shell be
aubmitted to tha Building Divioion for epproval and includad wikh
th• buildinq pl4n~ prior co the i~suence of building permita.
(Pcivate etceeta ace tho$e which pcovide primACy ecceaa and/or
cicculation within the pcoj~ct.
9. That prior to final tract map approval, the developer ~f eub~act
tcect ahall entec into e epecial fecilitiea ~gr~ement with the City
of ~neheim for wator Eacilitiee in the High ElevAtion System, ae
cequired by Rule 158 of the W4tec Utility Rates, Rulea and
Regulationa.
10. That prior to final trect map approval, the developera oE the
~naheim Hills Planned Community (Texaco Anaheim Hilla, Inc., or
their succeesoce, assigne, or transfecees) ahell submit a parka and
ceccpation~l facilitiea plan to the Perke, RecGeation and Community
Services Department fat ceview ~nd Approvnl. sAid proposal aha.ll
determine the ~pecific meana by which the developer provides pack
and recreation facilitiea for the future reaidenta of the ~rea
encompassed by Tract Nos. 10967 through 10978, incluaive. Such
meana may include, but need not be limiked to, the following: pay
the City of Anaheim pnrk and recreation in-lieu feea as determined
to be ~ppropri~te by the City Council at the time of building permit
issuance, or dedicate park l~nds accepteble to the City of ~neheimt
or e combination thereof. Acceptance of the epecific meens ahall be
auwject to the approval of the Director of Parks, RecreAtion and
Community Services. Any obligations impoaed on the property owner
which are to be performed aubsequent to approvel of the final map
shall be evidenced by written egreement or covenant, approved by the
City Attorney's approved by the City Attorney's Office, and recorded
pcior to oc concucrently with the rec~rdation of the final map.
11. That prior to final tract map approval, there ahall be submitted to
the City Planning Commiasion for review and approval, specific plnna
of developmsnt. Pinal specific plans shall include, but need not be
limited to, the following:
a. Topogcaphic map.
b. Site plana and elevations ehowing the placement of the
buildings and structurea~ the fcont, aide and rear elevetionat
and the exterior building m~terials including roofing.
c. Lot dimeneions and pad size of all lots euff:cient to indicate
the relationship of the proposal to the nature and extent of
the cuL-end-Eill oc earthwork involved.
d. Landscaping plans indicating the extent and type of proposed
landscaping and including any existing vegetatian.
8/22/83
MINiJTSB. ANAHRIM CTTY PWINNING COMMI88~QN1 AUGUBT Z1. 1983 83-491
~~ V~hicl• circuletion And p~tkinq plen indicatinq tha neture and
ext~nt of public and pcivete ~tr~eta, or public •cc~s~waya tor
vohicular circulation, oPf-atire~t psrkinq end vehicl• •tocag~.
f, Equeatrian and hlking tcail• plan showing kh• plac~m~nt end
in~prov~m~~;~e o! th• tcaile essemente for the Regional Trail No.
3(]-neheim Hilli Trail) and Backbon~ Treil No. 19 (oak Canyon
Zreil) a~ deaigneted by the Equestrian and Hikinq Treile
ComROnent oE the Aneheim G~netal Plen Tcaila ~lement~ including
the s~~ciEic design foc eny location whece a trail craseea ovec
a public or private ntceetr and alao including the off-aite
trail eesemar.r, aa s hown on Exhibit No. 2 of Reclaeaification
No. 79-80-Z5.
y, Fence and/or wall vlane indicating the ~ype oE fencing elong
any lot line oF e site abutting public or pcivete atceets.
12. Tha~t in accordence With the provieiona of Anaheim Municipel Code
Cheptec 16.31 dll multiple-;fb:nily daelling unita in the RM-3000
lNesi~«-ntial, Multiple-Pemily) Zone ehall be etteched unitas
provided, however, thet any detaci~:~d one-family dwellinga ehall be
built subject to all reatrictions ar-9 regulations of either the
R8-7200 or RS-5000 (Residential, Single-Pemily) 2ones.
13. That prior ko ~inal tract map approval, the developers of $eid tract
(Texaco Ant+heim Hille, In~. or th~ir auccesaoc~, aaeigne, or
tranaferres) ahell ~ut~mit to the Director uf Publi: Utilities for
hie ceview and approval, e proposed plAn for the ecren~e payment of
water main extenaions f eea. Said plan ahall consider e11 lend
within the erea encompassed on Tract Nos. 10967 through 10978,
inclusive~ including ap~n apace. Any obligations imposed on the
property owner which ore to be performed eubsequent to a-ppcoval of
the finel map ahell be evidenced by wcitten dgreement or covenant,
approved by the City Attorney's approved by the City l~ttorney's
Office, end recorded prior to or concurrently with the recocdation
of the final map.
14. Thak prior to commencement of atructucal framing, fire hydrents
shall be inatelled and chacged as requi.red and determined to be
necessary by the Chief of the Fire Departmen~.
15. That all requirements of Pire Zone 4, otherwiae identified as Fire
Administrative Ordsr No. 76-01, ehall be m~t. Such requirements
include, but are not limited to: ahimney apark arrestora, protected
attic and under flaor openings, Clase C or bettec roofing material
and one hour fire resiative conatruction of horizantal eurfeces if
located witbin 200 feet of adjacent bruehland.
16. That fuel breaka shall be provided as determined to be neceesary by
rhe Chief of the Fire Department.
17. That prior to finA1 tract map approval, no public or private etreet
gradea shall exceed lOt except by prior approval of the Chief of the
Fire Depertment end the Engineering Division.
8/22/83
~INUTEB. ANAH~IM CITY PLJINNING COM~IB$ION, ~UQUBT 22. 1983 83 - 49~
18. Thet nNtiv~ alop~a adiac~nC to newly conotructed hom~e shall be
hydroaeeded with e low tu~l combuotible s4ed mix. Such alopas •hall
b~ sprinklered an~ w~~d~d ao rtquic~d to eotabltsh e minimum o! 1 O 0
feet of ~~pareCion b~tween fiammaDle vegetation ~nd any ~kructure .
19. That in the ev~nt eubject pcopecty ie to be divided Eor the purpos e
of sale, leaee, or finencing, ~ parcel map to reaoxd the epproved
divisi~n of ~ubject property ehall be submitted to and appraved bar
the City of Anaheic~ And then be cQCOCded in th~ Office of the Oca nge
County Recocder.
20. Thet ptioc ~o final tract map ~pproval, the ownerfe) of aubject
pr~,erty ehell dedicate end improve ten l10) toot wide equesttia n s
end hiking trails as shown on the Equeatrisn end Hiking Tcails
Component of the Anaheim Genecal Plen Traile ^tementt thet
improvemunt plans, in Accocdance with etandard plans and
apecificatione on file in the Of~ice of the City Engineer, ahall be
submitted in conjunckion with the grading plen, and/or thet e bon d
in an nmount and focro s~tisfactory co the City of ~naheim ahall be
posted with the City pcioc to final tract map approvel oc iseuenc e
of e grading pecmit, whichever occura firat, to guer~ntee the
installation of L•he above-mentioned requirements prior to
occupancy. said dedication dn~ impcovem~nt shall include the
ofE-site Backbone Trail No. 19 (Oak Cenyon Trail) located in Tra ct
No. 10940.
Zl. That prior to final trock map approvai, a program for the
maintenance responsibiliky and estimeted cost thereof of ell
open apace zoned lota, recredtional lota and lnndscaped slopes s tiall
be aubmitted to and Approved by the City of An~heim. Any
agreement(s) ceEerced to in Condition No. 3, afotementioned, sha 11
be executed when the entity responsible for maintenence is not
either a property owner in this tract oc the homeowners' dssocia tion
for thia trer,t.
22. That priar to final tract map appcoval, Tract No. 10978, a whol~y
open space tract, shall be recorded with the Office of the Ornng e
County Recorder end eccepted by the Anaheim Hills Master Homeowners
Associatiant oc, if said Tract No. 10978 i~ not recorded, all t he
conditiona of eaid tentaki~~e tract ahall have been complipd wit h.
23. That in acco~dance with the requirements of Section 18.02.047 0~ the
l~naheim Municipal Code pertaining to the initial sale of reaidences
in the City of Anaheim Planning Area 'e', the seller ahall prov ide
each buyer with written in£ormation concerning the Anaheim Gene ral
Plan and the existing zoning within 300 feet of the boundaries of
subject tract.
24. Tfiat prior to final tract map approval, the owner(s) of aubject
pcoperty (Texaco Anaheim eills, Inc., or their succesen~s, assigns,
or transferrees) shall install a traffic aignal at the interaec tion
of Nohl Ranch Road and 8tage Coach Road ~to be renemed Camino
Grande) as require~i by the City Tcnffic Engineer and in accordance
8/22/83
,~INUTE,$,_ J-NJ-H~IM CITY PGANNING COMMIS$ION. AUCiUST 22. 1983 83-/93
with sp~citicationa on file in the 0lEice of the City Bngin~ar~ or
thr~t a bond, cettiflcste oE depoait, lettor ot cr~dit or caah, in en
emount and form satiefactory to th~ City of J-nehei~ shell be poeted
with the City to guacentee installation oF seid eignel pcior to
occupency oP eny daelling unit Ln the aree encompase~d on Trect Nos.
10967 through 10978, inclueive.
25. That gAtea ahAll nct b~ inskalled ecroea any drivewey or pcivate
atreet in a manner which may advereely eFfect vehiculac tcefEic in
the ad jacent publ ic at~eete. Inatellation of any getes within a
distAnce of focty ( 40) faet f rom said public etreet right$-of-way
shsil be subject to the ceview nnd approval of thc City Traffic
Engineer.
26. That tcash atorage areae ehall be provided in accocdance with
appcoved plane on f ile with the Street Mdintenence and Sanitation
Diviaion.
27. That pcioc to Elnal street i.n8pections, 'No pArking foc street
sweeping' signe shall be inetalled es cequired by the Street
Meintenance and Senitetion Division end in accordance with
apecificatione on file with said divialon.
28. That the aellec shall provide the purcheaer o~ each residentiel
dwellinq with written infocmation concerning ~-nah~im Municipal Code
Section 14.32~500 pectaining to 'Packing reatricted to facilitate
street sweeping'. Such written information ahall cleatly indicate
when on-etreet parking ia prchibited and the penalty for violation.
29. Thet ell street dedications and improvemente within Tract No. 10973
shell be made ln accordance with provieione of section 17.08.390,
Anaheim Municipal Cod~e.
30. That prior to Einal tracL mep aPproval, the owner of the property
ahall recoxd an i r revocable ofEer of dedication f or Camino Grande
Stceet (Stage Coach Road) as ahown on Tentative Tzact Mapa
10967-10978, inclusive, and install all 6treet improvemen:c
includi.ng curbs and gutters, aidewAlke, stceet grad.ng and pavement,
aewe~ and drainage facilities, or othec appurtenanr work as cequired
by the City Engineer and in accordance with speci fic.~tiona on f~le
in the Office of the City E~gineer or post aecurity in a form and
amount satiefactor~~ to the City of 1-naheim to gue~ rentee the
s~-tisfactory completion of said improvementss or irrevocably offer
to dedicate and improve thet portion thereof necessary to provide
public etreet accesa to seid tract prior to final building
inspections and isauance of occupancy permits for any portion of
said tract.
REVISION NO. 2 OF TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 10974:
l. That should thi$ subdiviaion be developed as mor~ than one
aubdivision, each subdivision theceof shall be s:abmitted in
tentative form for eppcoval.
8/22/83
~INUT68. ANAHEIM CITY FLANNING COMMI88ION. AUGUST 22. 1983 83-494
2. ~h~t sll lots within thio tcact et~all be •acved by u~dergcou~d
utilitiea.
3. That prioc ko final tract map approval, the following iteme ahall be
au bmitted to the Gity Attocney'e Offlce end approved by tt~e City
At torn~y'e Office, Public utilitisa Depertment, Pl~nning Depectment
and ~ngine~ring Uivieion:
(a) The original documents of the covenente, conditions end
cestrictione,
(b) A lettec eddressed to the develoPer'e title comp~ny authorizing
recordation thereof, and
(c) ~ny agreementla) pectaining to the maintenence responsibility
for a:eas ~lendscaped slopes or trsils) es shown on Exhibits A
•ocange Caunty Open Space Easemente and Bqueatrian TrAi1s' and
B 'Slope Care Plan'.
S aid ~greement(s) and C~~Ra shall identify the entities (individual
lot ownere, subject tr~ct homeownere' asaociation, Anaheim Hilla
Pl ~nned Community Aeaociation, County of Oranqe, City of Anaheim or
ot her reaponsible entity) which will participdte in and/oc be
responeible for p~cmenently mainteining all OS (Open Space) zoned
lota, all landscaped a~d natural slopes and all dedicdted equestrian
a nd hiking tcaila ahown on the eubje~`- tract map end Exhibite ~
"Ocange Caunty Open Spa- ~.asements and Equeatrian Trails and B,
•Slupe Cace Pia~.'. a ~~cument~, as approved, will then be
executed and filed .. .~~~ed i~ th~ Office of the Ocange C~unty
Recorder cc ~urrently w. =.rddtion of the fin~l tract map.
4. That ~:ioc ~.u final tract mep appcov~l, street names ahall be
~pproved by the City Planning Department.
5. That prior to any occupancy, temporacy atceet name signs shall be
inatalled if perm~nent street name aiqna have not yet been installed.
6. That drainage of subject nroperty ahall be diaposed of in a manner
s atisfactory to the City Engineer. if, in the preparation of the
s ite, sufficient grading is required to neceasitate a grading
permit, no wock on grading will be permitted b~tween October 15th
a nd April 15th unlese all required off-site drainage facilities Mave
been installed and are operetive. Positive assurance shall be
provfded to the City that such drainage facilitiea will be completed
p rior to October 15th. N~cessary right-of-wey for off-site drainage
f acilities Rhall be dedic~ted to the City, or the City Council shall
have initiated condemnation groceedinge therefor (the costs of which
shall be borne by the 3eveloper) prioc to the commencement of
grading operations. The requirec' drainage facilikiea shall be of a
size and type sufficient to cacry runoff waters ociginating from
higher properties through aubject property to ultimate disposal as
approved by the Cfty Engineer. Sald drainage f acii~~-!ea ahall be
~he ficst item of canatruction and ehall be complet~ and be
8/22/83
~rN~T~g, /~IANBIM CITY PLANNING COMM288ION, AUOUST 22. 1983 93-495
functional throughout th• tcact end from the dow~~~kceem boundery o~
tha propecty to the ultimate point o! dispoeel pcior to the is~uance
oi Any linal building inapectiona or occupancy pormita. Drainage
distriat reimbura~ment +~greementa may be made evsilsble to the
developere of eaid pcoperty upon theic requeat.
7. Thek grading, axcavation, end ell other conetruction ectivitiea
ahall be conductad in such A mennec ao as to minimize tbe
poasibility of any eilt origineting fcom this project being carcied
into the santa Ana Rivec by atorm weter originating fcom oc flowing
thcough thia project.
8. Thet ell pcivate streete shall be developed in accordan^.e with the
City of Anaheim's Standacd DetAil No. 122 for privete atreeta,
including inetellation of etceet ~ame aigne. Plane Eoc the privete
atreet lighting, as required by the atanderd detail, ehall be
aubmitted to the euilding Divieian for approv~l end included with
the buildfng plana pcior t~ the isauance of building permits.
(Private stceets ace thotie Nhich provide pcimacy access a~d/ar
circuletion within the pcuject.
y. That prior to final trect map approval, the developec of subject
tcact st~all entec ~nto a epecial facilitiea agreement with the City
of Anaheim Eor water fecilities in the High Elevation Syntem, aa
requiced by Rule 158 ~f the WAter Utility Rates• Rulea and
Regulationa.
10. That prior to final tra^t map approval, the developera of the
Anaheim Hills Planned Community (Texaco ~naheim Hills, Inc., or
thoir succesaoca, aASigns, or trenaf~rees) ahall aubm~t e parka and
recreational facilities plan to the Pnr-,, Recreatfon And Community
Servicea Department for review and aFp ~11. Said proposel shall
determ~ne the apecific meana by which tne developer providea park
and recreation facilities for the future teaidents of the area
encompassed by Tract Nos. 10967 thcough 10978, inalusive. Such
means may include, but need not be limited to, the following: paY
the City of Anaheim p~rk and cecceation in-lieu fses as determined
to be approPciate by the City Council at the time of Duilding permit
issuance, oc dedicate park landa accAotable to t1~e City of Anahefmt
or a combination theceof. Accept ~: of the specific means shall be
subject to the ~pproval of the D°~ a: of Packa, Aec[eation and
Communi:y Services. ~ny obligatior~c ~mpoaed on the property owner
which ate to be performed subaequent to approval of the final map
shall be evidenced by written agreement or covenant, Approt'^" by the
City Attorney's Office, and recorded prior to or currently ~:th the
recordation of the final map.
11. That prior to final trect map approval, there ahall be submitted to
the City Planning Commission for review and approval, apecific plana
of development. Final specific plana shall include, but need not be
limited to, the following:
a. Topographic map.
8/22/83
l~,~1UT68. AN~HEIM CITY PWIN,r NING COMMI88ION, ~UGUST ZZ. 1983 83-496
b. 81te plane and elevationa ahowing the placement o~ th•
buildinge and structur~a~ the front, stde end r~ar el~vakionst
snd th~ extrcior buildinq meteciel4 includinq rooiing.
c. Lot dimeneiona snd ped aiae of all lots aufficient to indicete
the rQlationahip o~ the proposel to the nature end exeant o!
the cut-and-till oc eecthwock involved.
d. Ldndscaping plens indicating the extent and type of propoeed
lendacaping and including Any exieting vegetation.
e. Vehicle cicculation and perking plan indiceting the netute end
extent of public and priv~te etreets, oc public ncceeawaye for
vehicular circuletion, off-street perking and vehicle etorage.
f. Equsetrian and hiking treila plen showing Che placement and
improvements of the Creile eesemonte for the Regional Trail No.
3(Anaheim Nills TrAi~) and Backbone Trail No. 19 (O4k Cenyon
TrAil) as deeignated by the F~queetrien end Hiking Tra~ls
Component nf the Anaheim General PlAn Trails Elementt including
the apecific design far any location where a treil crosaee over
e public or private streett and eleo including the off-aite
treil easement as shown on Exhibit No. 2 of Reclassification
No. 79-80-25.
g. Fence and/or well plans i~dicating the type of fencing along
any lot line of a aite abutting public or private atreeta.
17.. That in accordrnce with the provisions of ~naheim Municipal Code
Chaptsr 18.31 all multiple-family dwelling units in the RM-3000
(Reaidentiel, Multiple-Faaiily) Zone ahall be attact~ed unitar
provided, however, that eny detached one-family dwellinga ehAll be
built subject to all cestrictions dnd regulationa of either the
RS-7200 ar RS-500q (Residential, S~ngle-Pamily) Zones.
13. That pcior to finel trect map approval, the developere of said trect
(Texaco ~naheim Hills, Ine. or their succgesora, assigns, or
tcanaferees) shall submit to the Director of Public Utilities for
his review and Approval, a pcoposed plan for the acreaqe peyment of
wAker main extensions fee~. Said plan shall conaider all land
within the acea encompassed on Tract Noe. 10967 through 10976,
inclusive, including open epace. Any obligAtiona imposed on the
property owner which ere tc be performed subsequent to approval of
the fir~al map shall be evidenced by waitten agreement or covenant,
approved by the City Attorney'g Offi~e, and recorded prior to or
currently with the recordation of the final map.
14. That prior to commencement of etructural framing, fire hydrahts
ehall be instelled and chgrged ~s regufred and determined to be
necessary by the Chief of the Pire Department.
6/22/83
NU'r6~. ANA!lBIM CxTY PLJ11~lING~is~ION.. ~UGU~,T 21, 1983 83-4~7
15. Thet all cequicemanta of Fire Z~ne 4, othe~wls• id~ntitied an Eir~
J-dminis~rative Ocd~c No. 76-01, shail be met. Such cequir~mento
ir-clude~ but are not limitfd to: chimney ap~rk a~cceetors, protected
ettic and undet #loor operinq~, C1d~E C or better rooting mateciel
and one hour fir~ ceeistive conatructi.on of ho.izontsl suriacea ii
loceted wlth~n Z00 Leet of edjACent bruehlerd.
16. That fuel breeke ahell be provided aa determined to be necessary by
the Chlef of th~ Fira Depactment.
17. That prior to final tract mAp approval, no publ~c ac pcivete etceet
grades ahall axceed 104 excepk by prior approvel of the Chief of the
Pire Department and the Enginegting pivieion.
1B. That native slopea ed~acent to ~ewly conatructec~ hones shall be
hydroseeded with a luw fuel combu$tible aeed rrtix. Such slopea ahall
be sprinkler.dd and weeded as regui.red to esteblish a minimum of 100
feet of seperatinn between flammable vegetation and any skrucrure.
19. That in the event aubject propecty ia to be divided ~or the purpose
of sale, lease, or financing, a peccel map to recocd the ap~roved
division oE subject propeKty shall be eubmitte~d to end +~pproved by
the City of Anaheim and th~sn be recorded in the Office ot the Orange
County Recocder.
2q. That prior to final tract map approval, the ownertel of subject
psoperty ahall d~~icare and i.mpcovP ten (10) foat wide equestrians
and hiking trails as shown on the Equea':rian and Hiking Tcaila
Component of the Anaheim Gene[al Plan T~aile ElemenCs that
imr~rovement plr~na, in acco:~ance with utand~rd plans and
specificationa on file in 2he Office of the City Engineer, shall be
submitted in canjunction with the qrading plan, and/or that a bond
in an amount and furm satisfactocy to the City of ~naheim ahall be
pocted with the City priar to fina: Cre~:t map approval or issuance
of a grad:ng permit, whic!'.evec occurs first, to gua[antee the
ins al.lation o# lhe abo~~•-iaentioned requfremen~s pr~.or to
occupancy. S~id ~r• •'~f i~r, a--:i impcovement ahall include che
off-eike Saci:bane Trail N~. 19 (Oak Canyon Trail) located in Tcaet
No. 1U940.
21. That prfar to final tract map approval, a program foc the
maintenance responsibili.ty and estimated cost thFreof of all
open-space zoned lota, recreational lots and landscaped slopes sha21
be submitted tu and approved by the City of ~-naheim. Any
agreement(s) ceEerred to in Condition No. 3, afocementioned, shall
be execsted when the entity responsible for maintenance is not
either a propetty owner in this tcact or the homeowners' association
far this tract.
22. That prior to final tract mdp approval, Tract No. 10978, a wholly
open space tract, ahall be recorded with the OfFice of the Orange
County Recorder and accepted by the 1-naheim Hilla Master Homeowners
Associationt or, if said Tract No. 10~78 is not recorded, all the
canditiona of said tentative tract shell hav~ been complied wikh.
8/22/83
~tlGUBT 2Z. 1983 _ 3-4
INUT~S. ~N~HBIM CITY PLIINNING CQMMI88ION.
23. That in acaord~iice with th~ c~quicemonte of 8fction 18.02.047 ot th~
~neh~im Municipol ~ode p~r~.aininq to the initial ssle of ce$ldances
in the City of ~~aheim Planni~g Acea •B', the sellar shall prnvide
each buyer with written infarmation concerninq the Aneheim General
Plan and the exiating zaning within 300 feet of the boundariea oE
aubject tc~ct.
24. That prior to fin~l trect map appcov~l, the owner(s) of eubject
property (Texaco ~naheim Hille, Inc., or their eucceesors, aseiqne,
or traneferreea) ehdll inatell a treffic signal at the intersection
of Nohl Ranch Road end Stage Coech Ro~d (to be renamed Camino
Grande) As required by the City TtefEic Enqineer and in eccordance
with epecificatione on file in the Office of the Citx Engineert ar
that a bond, cectificate of depoeit, letter of credit or cash, in an
amount and form aatiefactoGy to the City of Anaheim shall be posted
with the City to gudrantee instellation of eaid signel pcior to
occupnncy of any dwelling unit in rhe Area encompaeae~ on Tract Nos.
10967 through 10978, inclusive.
25. The~ gates shell not be i.~et~lled acroas any driveway or private
atreet in a manner which mey adversely affect vehicula= trAffic in
the adjacent public etreets. Inatallation of any getes within a
distance of forty (40) feet fcom eeid povalCOftthetCityhTcAffic~Y
shAll be eubject to the review and app
Engineer.
26~ approved$plansron~fileawithathebStr~etiMaintenancerandcSanitation
Divi~ion.
27. That prior ta final atreet inspections, 'No parking for atreet
sweeping' gigns ahall be installed as required by the Stceet
Maintenance and Senitation Division dnd in accordance with
apecifications on file with seid diviaion.
28. That the aeller shall provide the purchaser of each residenti~l
dwelling wikh written information concerning Anaheim Municipel Code
Section 14.3?.500 pertaining to 'Packing cestriate~ to facilitate
street sweeping'. Suc:, wcitten information sha11 clearly indicate
when on-atreet parking is prohibited and the penalty foc violation.
29. That all utreet dedicdtiona an~ improvemente within Tracti No. 10974
shall be made in accordance with provisions of Section 17.08.390,
Anaheim Municipal Code.
30. That pcior to final tract map approval, the owner of Che property
shall record an irrevocable offer of dedication for Cam:no Grande
Street (St~ge Coach Road) ae shown on Tentdtive Tract Maps
10967-10978, inclueive, and install all street improvements
including curbs and gutterer eidewalks, etreet grading and pavement,
sewer and drainege facilities, or other appurtendnt work as required
by the City Engineec and i~ accordance aith specifications on file
in the Office of the City Engineer or post aecurity in a form end
8/22/83
amount aatiafectory to the City of Aneh~im to guacantaA tha
~atiefactory compl~tion of aaid improvementet or irrevocably offer
to dedicate dnd improve thet portion theceof necessary to provide
public atreet acaesa to said tract prioc to linal bu~1Qortion of
inapections end iseuance of occupancy permita for any p
seid tcact.
REVISION N0. 2 OP TENTATIVB TRACT N0. 10975•
1~ subdivialon,teach8subdivisionbthereofQShallBbeoeubmittednin
tentative form foc ~pprovel.
2. Th~t all lots within this tract ahall be served by underqrou~d
ukilitias.
3. Thet pc.lor to final tract map epproval, the following items shall be
submitted to the City Attorney'a Office and approved by the City
Attorney's Office, Public Utilities pepactment, Planning Department
~nd Engineeriny Division:
(a) The ociginal documente of the covenanta, conditions and
reatrictions,
(b) A letter ad~r~~aed to the developer's title company authorizing
recocddtian thereof, And
(c) ~ny agreement(s1 pect~ining to the maintenance reaponaibility
for a~eeCountydOpeneSpecepEasements~end'Equest[ian Traila'iAnd~
"Orang
e 'Slope Care Plan".
Said agreement(s) and C~6Ra shall identify the entitiea (individual
lot owners, subject ttect homeownera' assaciation, Anaheim Hillg
Planned Community Aas4cietion, County of Orange, City of Anaheim or
other sesp~nsible entity) which will participate in and/or be
responsible for pecmanently mAint~ining all OS ~Open space) zoned
lots, all landscape~ and natucal slopes and all dedicated equestrian
and hiking trails shown on the subjeck tcact map end Exhibits A
•Orange County Open Space Easements and Equestrian Traila and E
•Slope Cace Plan'. Said documents, ~s aPPraved, will then be
execuaeL concurrentlydwith recordation offthe finaletcactgmap.unty
Recoc
a. That prior ko final tr~ct map apProval, street namee shall be
approved by the City Planning Department.
5. That priociE ermanentpstreettname signsthave noteyetgbeenhinatalled.
inetalled P
8/22/83
MINUTB$. ANAHBIM CITY PL~NNINa COMMI88ION. AUGUST ~2. 1983 83-500
6. That dceinage of aubject propecty ahell be disposed oE in d manner
aetioFectory to the City Engineec. If, in th~ prepacetion of the
aike, aufFicient gcadiny ia requiced to neceesitete a grading
permit, no work cn gceding will be pecmitted batween Octobec 15th
and April 15th u~~lese all requiced off-eite drainege facilities heve
been installed and era operetive. Poeitive aenurance ahall be
provided to the City that euch drainage tecilities will be completed
prioc to October 15th. Neceasery right-of-way for off-aite dceinege
fecilitiee ahall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall
hdve initiate3 ~u~~demnetion proceedings therefor (the coats of which
ahall be borne~ by the developer) prioc to the co~~encement uf
gcading operationa. The reyuired drainage facilitiea shall be of A
size And type eufficient to cdrry runoff w~tera ociginating from
higher pcoperties through aubject property to ultimdte diapoeal ee
approved by the City Engineer. Seid dcainege facilities ahell be
the firat item of conatruction and shall be completed and be
functionel thcoughout the tcact and from the downatream boundery of
the property to the ultimate point of dispoael prioc to the iaeuance
of any final building inspections or occupancy permite. Dtai~age
diatrict reimburaement agreements may be made available to the
developece of said property upon their requeat.
7. That grading, excavdtion, and all other conatruction activities
shall be conducted in such d manner ao as to minimize the
possibility of any silt uriginating from this project being carried
into the Senta Ana River by stocm water originating from or flowing
through thia project.
8. That all private streets shall be developed in accocdance with the
City of Anaheim's Standard Detail No. 122 for private streets,
including inatallation of et.ceet name signa. Plana for the ptivate
atreet lighting, as required by the ~tandard detail, ahall be
submitted to the Building Divieion for approval and included with
the building plans prior to the issuan~e of building permits.
(Private streets are those which provide primary acceas end/or
circulation within the p[oject.
9. That prior to final tract map approval, the develaper of subject
kract ahall enter into a special facilities agreement ~ith the City
of Anah~im for water facil~ties in the Hiqh Elevation System, as
required by Rule 15B of the WatQC Utility Retes, Rul~s and
Regulations.
10. That prior to final tract map approval, the developera of the
Anaheim Hills Planned Community (TexACO Anaheim Hills, Inc., or
thefr succeseors, assigns, or transfereea) shall submit a parks and
recreational facilit~es p1An to the Pdrks, Recreatian and Communiky
Services Department for review and approval. Said proposal shall
determine the epecific means by which khe developer provides park
and recreation facilities for the f~ture residenta of the area
encompaased by Tract Nos. 10967 through 10978, inclusive. Such
means ~ay include, but need nat be limited to, the following: pay
the City of ~naheim park and recreatian in-lieu fees as determined
6/22/83
MINUT~~ ~HBIM CITX PL1~11INa,_COMMI88I N. AUOUST Z2R 1983 83-501
to be eppropriat• by ths City Council at the tims of buildinq permit
isauance, or daQicate park landa accaptabl~ to the City of Anehaimt
or e combination thoceof. ~cceptenc• of the apecific meana ahell be
subject tu the eppcoval o~ tha Director oF Parks, Rscredtiion end
Community Servicee. Any obligatione lmpos~d on the propecty owner
which are to ba performed subaequent to approv~l of the final mep
ehall be evidenced by written agceement or covenent, approved by the
Ciky ~ttorney'e Office, and recorded prior to o[ concurrently with
the Kecordation of the finsl map.
11. Thet pcior to finel tc~et map approval, there sh~ll be eubmitted to
the City Planning Commiasion foc review dnd dpprovel, apecific plens
oF development. Pinal apecific p1anA ahall include, but need not be
limited to, the following;
a. Topographic map.
b. Site plena And elevationa ahowing t;e placement of the
buildinge ~nd etcuctuceaj the front, aide and cear elevationer
and the exterior building m~teriala including coofing.
c. Lot dimenaiona and pad eize of ell lota snfficient to indicate
the relationahlp of the proposal to the nature and extent of
the cut-and~fill or earthwork invalved.
d. L~ndeceping plane indicating the extent and type of propoaed
landacaping and lncluding eny exisking vegetation.
e. Vehicle circulation and parking plan indicating the nature and
extent of public and pcivete atreets, or public accesswaya for
vehicular circulation, off-atreet parking and vehicle storage.
f. Equestrian end hiking treile plan ehowing the placement and
improvements of the trailg eeaements foc the Regional Trail No.
3(Anaheim Hillb Tr~il) and Beckbone Trail No. 19 f0ak Canyon
Trail) as designated by the Equestrian and Hiking Trails
Component of the Anaheim General Plan Trai1R Elementt including
the specific design foc any :~cation where a trail ccoases ovec
a public or private atreets and also including the off-site
trail easement as shown on Bxhibit No. 2 of Reclassification
No. 79-SO-25.
g. Fence and/or wall plens indicating th~ type of fencing along
any lot line of a site abutting public or private streeta.
12. That in accordance with the provisions of Anaheim Municipal Code
Chapter 18.31 all multiple-family dwelling units in the RM-3000
(Residentiel, Mnltiple~Family) Zon~ shall be attached unitst
provided, however, that any detached one-family dwell.ings shall be
bu~lt aubject to all cestrictions and regulations of either tne
RS-7200 or RS-500~ (Residential, 5ingle-Family) Zones.
8/22/83
MINUT~B AN~HBIM CITY PL~NNING COMMI8820N~ AUOUST 1Zr 198~ 83~50~
13. That prior to finel tcect map epproval, the developers of eaid tract
(Texaco Anaheim Hille, inc. or theic aucceaeors, aAeigns, or
tren~fecees) shall aubn-it to the Dicector of Public Utilitiea !or
hie review end Approval, a pcoposed plan foc the AcKeaqe peyment of
weter mein extenelons Feee. s~id plen ohell consider ell land
wi~hin the A[@d encompassed on Trect No~. 10967 through 10978,
inclusive, including open epece. Any nbligetions imposed on the
propecty owner which are to be performe~ subaeque~t to epprovel of
the finel map ahall be evidenc~d by wcitten agreement oc covenant~
apprpved by the City Attorney's Office, and recocded prioc to or
concucrently with the recordation af the final map.
14. ThAt pcior to commencement of structural framing, fire hydrante
shell be inatalled and charged as rgquited end determinad to be
necessary by the Chief uf the Fire Department.
15. That All requicemenCs of Fire Zone 4, otherwiae identified as Fire
AdministC~tive Ordec No. 76-01, ahall be met. Such requirementa
include, but ace not li.m~led to: chimney apark arrestors, protected
attic and under floor opesiinga, Class C or bettec roofing meterial
and one hour fire reaiFtive c~natruction of horizontal surfacea if
located within Z00 feet of adjacent brushland.
16. That fuel breaks ahall be provided as determined to be necessary by
the Chief of the Fire Department.
17. That prior to final tcact map approval, ~a public or private stceet
gradpe shall exceed lOB except by pcior approval of the Chief of th~
Fire Department and the Engineeriny Diviaion.
18. That native slopea adjacent to newlx conatructed homes ahall be
hydroseeded with a low fuel combustible seed mix. Such slopes shall
be eprinklered and weeded as required to eatablish a minimum of 100
feet of sepacation between flammable vegetation and any etructure.
19. That in the event subject propecty is to be divided for the purpose
of sale, lease, or financing, a parcel map to record the approved
division of subject pronerty shall be submitted to and spproved by
the City of Anaheim and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange
County Recorder.
20. That prioc to final tract map approval, the owner(s) of subject
property shall dedicate and imprnve ten (10) foot wide equestrians
and hiking trails ae shown on the Equestrian and Hikinq Trails
Component of the Anah~im General Pian Trails Elements thdt
improvement plans, in accordance with standard plAns and
specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer, shall be
submitted in conjunction with the gcading plan, and/or that a bond
in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be
posted with the City pxior to final tract map approval or issia nce
of a grading permit, whichever occurs firat, to guarantee the
installation of the abov~-mentioned requirements prior to
occupancy. Said dedication and improvement shall include the
off-site eackbone Trail No. 19 (Oak Canyon ~rail) located in Tract
No. 10940. e~22~g3
MINUT~B. ~NAHBiM CITX P~~NNINO CQMMI88ION, AUGU3T 22, 1983 a3-S03
Zl. That prior to final tract msp epprovsl, a pcogram Eor th~
meintenence ceeponoibility end eatimated coat thsr~of oE all
open-ep~ce aonfd lota, racreational loes end lendsceped alopee shAll
be aubmitted to ~nd eppaoved by the City of ~neheim. Any
agreement(g) referred to in Condition No. 3, aforementioned, ehall
be ex~cuted whan the entity re~poneible for meintenence is not
either a property ownec in Chis trect oc the homeownere' aeeociation
~or this trect.
22. That prior to final tcact mep eppcoval, TrACt No. 10978, a wholly
open apace tract, shall be recocded with the Office oE the Orange
County Recorder and ~ccepted by the Anaheim N1118 Master Homeownera
Aesociationf or, if said Trect No. 10978 is not recorded, all the
conditions of eaid tentetive trect shall heve been complied with.
23. That in accord~nce with the requirementa of Section 18.02.047 of the
Andh~im Municipel Code pectAining to the initial sAle of reeidenaea
in the City of Anaheim Plenning Area "B", the seller ahdll provide
each buyer with written informAtion concerning the Anaheim General
Plbn and the existing zoniny within 30p feet of the bounderies of
aubject tract.
24. That prior to final tract map approval, the ownec(e) of aubject
property (Texaco Anaheim Hills, Inc., or their succeasors, assigns,
or tranaferrees) shall inetAll e traffic aignal At the intecsection
of Nohl Ranch Road ~nd Stage Coach Road (to be cenamed Cam~no
Grende) as required by the City Traffic Engineer and in accord~nce
with specificationa on file in the Office of the City F.ngineert or
that a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit or caeh, in an
amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted
with the City to guarantee instellatian of said signal prior to
occupency of eny dwelling unit in the area encompasaed ~n Tract Nos.
10967 through 10978, incluaive.
25. That all lota having widths of less than fifty (50) feet as measured
at the public street frontage end taking vehicular accesa from said
street, shall ahaGe a circular driveway with an adjacent lot.
26. That gates ahall not be installed across any driveway or private
etreet in a manner which may advecsely affect vehic~lat traffic in
the adjacent public streets. Installation of any gates within a
distance of forti (40) feet from aeid public street rights-of-way
shall be aubject to the review and approval of the City Traffic
Engineer.
27. That trash storage areAS shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the Street Maintenance and Sanitation
Diviaion.
28. That prior to final street inspectiona, •N o parking for streeG
8weeping' eigne shall be installed na required by the Street
Maintennnce and Sanitation Division and ir~ accordance with
apecificetions on file with sai: divi.=iu:~.
8/22/83
~INUTBB. ~NAHBIM CITY PL~NNINO CONMI88ION. AUOU8T 21. 1963 _~__ 83-504
~9. Tha: th• a~ll~r ahell provid• tho purchas~c oi •ach r~~idential
dw~l~i~y with writ~en inlocmation canc~cning ~n~hsim Municipel Code
8ertion 14.32.500 pec~sini~g to •Parking ceatcic-^d to lacilitate
otreet aw~epiny". 8uch writt~n i~Cocmntion shela .l~etly indic4te
wh~n on-street packing i~ prohibited end th~ ,pens:ty for violation.
30. Thet all etreet dadir.Atione ~nd improvamente within Tract No. 10975
eh~ll be made in acrnrdancs with provisions of BecGion 17.08.390,
Anaheim MunicipAl Code.
31. That prior to final tcect mep appr~val, this Lcact ah~ll be
recleeeified to the RM-3000(SC) Zone tinatead of tha RM-2400(sC)
Zone) end :he OS(SC) Zone.
32. That prioc to final tract map epproval, the owner of the pr.operty
shall reeard en iccevocable offer of ~edicetion Eor Camino Gcande
Street (St~ge Coach Road) as ehawn on Tent~tive Tract Mape
10967-10978, incluaive, ard inatell ell etreeC improvemente
including curbe end gutteca, sidewalke, ~treet greding and p~vement,
aewer and drainage facilitiee, or other eppuctanent r~ork as teauired
by the City Engineec end in accocdance with apecificeCiona on ' le
in the Office of the City Engineer or poet security in e form and
rmount setiafnctory to khe City of Anaheim to guarantee the
satiafactory complekion of seid impcovemen~st or irrevocably offer
to dedicate and improve that portion theceof neceesery to provide
public atreet eccesa to said tract prior to Finel buildiny
inspections and isauance of occupency pecmita for any portion of
said tcact.
REVISION N0. 2 OF TENTATIVE TR~CT N0. 10976:
1. That ehould thie subdivieion be developed es more thAn one
subdivision, eact~ subdiviaion thereof shall be submitted in
tentative form for epproval.
2. That all lots within khie tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
3. That prior to final tract m~p approval, the following items shell be
aubmitted to the City Attorney's Office end approved by the City
Attocney's Office, Public Utilities Depectment, Planning Department
and Engineering Diviaion:
(a) The nriginal documenta of the covenante, conditions and
restcictians,
(b) A lettec addreased to the developer'a title company authorizing
recordation thereof, and
(c) Any agreement(s) pertaining to the mAintenence responsibility
for Are~s (lendsceped slopes and trails) aa ehown on Exhibits A
'Orange County Open Space Eaaementa and Equestrian Trails' and
S •Slopp Cere Plan'.
8/22/83
~~NU~ 3N~H~1M CITY PLANNING COMMI88ION. ~UQUBT Z1. 1983 83_5Q5
8aid dqre~mentto) end CC6Rs ohall id~ntity the entitiea (individual
lot ownaca, ~uDject trsct homeownecs' s~eociation, Anehsim Hilla
P1ennAd Community Association, County o! Ocange, City o~ ~nehoim oc
oth~c r~aponsibl• entity) which will participete in and/or b~
reeponrible for permen~ntly maints~ning ell OS (Open Space) zoned
lots, all lendscaped and netursl alopea and all dedicated equestcian
And hiking treil8 ahown on the aubj~ct trect map and Exhibits ~
•Orange County Open 8pace Eseaments dnd EqueatGian Treils and B
"Slope Care Plan". Seid ~~•umente, ae appcoved, will then be
executed and Eiled end rec~.:ded in the Office of the Orange County
Recorder concurrently with recor~~etion of the final tr~ct map.
4. ThAt prior to final tcect mep approval~ street names shdll be
npproved by the City Planning Depactment.
5. That prior to any occupency, temForary atceet name eig:~s shall be
inatalled if pecmanent etreet name eigns have not yet been instelled.
6. Thet dr~indge of aubject propetty 8ha11 be diepoeed of in a mAnnec
sat;sfactory to the City Engineer. If, in the pcepacation of the
aite, sufficient grading is re~uiced to necessitate a grading
permit, no wark on grading will be permitted between October 15th
and April 15th unless all requirPd off-aite dcainag~ fdcilities hav~
been instelled and ere opecative. Poaitive assucance ahall be
provided to the City that auch drdinege facilitiQe will be completed
prior to October 15th. Necessary cight-of-way for off-site drainage
functional thcoughouk the tract and from khe downstream boundary of
the property ta the ultimate point of diapoeal prior to the issuance
of any final building inapectiona oc occupancy permits. Drainege
diatrict reimburaement aqreemen*a may be made available to the
de•~elopers of said property upon their request.
7. That gcading, excavation, and all other conseructi~n activities
shall be conducted in euch a manner so ~s to minimize the
poasibility of any silt originating from thts project beinq cecried
into the Santa Ana River by storm water originating from or flowing
through thia project.
8. That ail private stceets shall be developed in accordance wit~ the
City of Anaheim's Standard Detail No- 122 fpr private streets,
including installation of street name signa. Plans for the private
street lighting, as required by the standard detail, shall be
submitted to the Buflding Division for approval and included with
the building plans pcior to the issuance of building pecmits.
(Privete streets are those which provide primary accesa and/or
circulation within the project.
g. That prior to final tract map approval, the developec of aubject
tract shall enter into a special facilitiea agreement with the City
of Anaheim for water facili' _s in the High Elevation System, as
required by Rule 15B of the Water Utility Rates, Rules and
Regulat~ons.
8/22/83
~ ~
MINl1T~A. 11Nl1HEIM CITY PW~NNING COMMI88I9N~ J-U008T 22, 1983 83-50
10. Thet prior to linei traat mdp eppcovel, th~ d~velop~r~ of th~
Anah~im Hilla Plenn~d Community l"'r~-ACO AnehAim Hills, Inc., or
their suco~asors, aseiqns, oc trensEereea) ahall aubmit a parks end
reareational facilitiee plan to tno Park., Reccestion and Community
S~rvicas D~partment for roview And epprovel. Seid pcopoeal ahell
datermine the epecific meane by whict~ the d~v~lopec provid~a perk
and reaceetiAn facilitiea foc the Putuce reeidents ot the acea~
encompas$ed by Tract Noa. 10967 through 10978, incluaive. Such
means may includa, but need not be limited to, the fo~lowing: pay
the City of Aneheim peck and recreation in-lieu fees ae determined
to ba ~ppropriete by the City Council et the time of building p~rmit
iaeuence, oc dedicate perk lande eccepteble to the City of 1-neheim~
or d combination thereof. Acceptance of the apecific meane $hdll be
subject to the appcoval of the Direct~c of Parks, Recreetinn and
Community 3arvices. Any obligetions impo~ed on the property owner
which ere to be performed eubsequent to approvel of tne fin~l mep
ohall be evidenced by writl•en agreement or covenant, approved by th~
City Attorney's Office, end cecorded pcioc to or concurcently with
the cecordation of the finel map.
1]. That prior to final tract mep approval, there eha~ll be submitted to
ht~e City Planning Commission foc review and approval, epecific plans
oE development. Final specific plans shall include, but need not be
limited to, the following:
a. Topoyraphic map.
b. Site plana and elevations showing the plac~ment ~f the
buildings and structureat the front, side and rear elevationat
dnd the exterior building materials including roofing.
c. Lot dimensions and pad size of all lots sufficient to indicate
the celationship of the propoeal to the nature and extent of
the cut-and-fill oc eacthwork involved.
d. Landscaping plans indicating ehe extent and type of propoaed
landscaping and including any existing vegetation.
e. Vehicle cicaulation and parking pla~n indicating the nature and
extent of putslic and private streeta, ar publfc accessways for
vehicular circulation, off-atreet parkir.g and vehicl~ storage.
f. Equestrian and hiking trsils plan showing the placement and
improvements of the trails easements for th~ Regional Ttail No.
3(Anaheim Hille 1'rail) and 9ackbone Tr~il No. 19 (Oek Cany n
Trail) as designated by the Equestrian and Hiking Trails
Component of the l~naheim General Plan Traila Elements including
the specific deeign foc any location where a trail crosses over
a public or private streett and r~lso includtng tihe off-site
trail easement as shown on Exhibit No. 2 of Reclassification
No. 79-80-25.
g. Fence and/oc wall plan8 indicating the type of fencing along
any lot line of a site abutting public or private etreeta.
8/22/83
11. Thet prior to final tract mAp ~pprovel, the dav~lop~rs o~ eaid tr act
(T~xeco Anaheim Hill~, xnc. or thaic eucceasoco, eesigne, ~c
tcanefeceee) shell subm:.t to the Directoc o! public Utiliti~• Lo r
hie revisw end appcov~l, a proPoaed plan !oc the ecc~~ga peyment o~
water mein ext.n~ione l~ea. 9eid pldn shall coneidar all land
within the erea encompASSad on Tract Nos. 10967 thcough 10978,
inclueive, including opan epece. ~ny obligntions impoaed on the
property owner which er~ ~o be pertormed subsequent to epproval o~
the final mep ahall be evidenced by wcitten agreement or covenan t,
dppcoved by the City A~tocney'e Office, nnd cecorded prior to or
concurrently with the recordation of the final map.
13. Tr-ati prior to commQncement of atructurel freming, fire hydrante
shall be inetalled And charged as [equiced and determined to be
ndcessary by the Ghief of the Fire Department.
14. That all requirementa oE Fire Zone 4, otherwiBesuchncequicement sre
AdministrAtive Ocder No. 76-01, ahall be meBLk arrestora, protec ted
include, but ate not limited to: chimney ep
attic and under floor openinga• Cla~s C or better t~ofing mater i al
a n d o n e h o uh niZQO[feettofeadjacent bcua h la n d,rizontal eucfdces if
located wit i
15. That fuel breake ahall be pcovided as determined to be neceeae~r y by
the Chief of the Fir~ Departmenr..
1G. That prior to final tra-ct map epproval, no pub~.ic or private street
grades ehall exceed 10~ except by prior approval of the Chief of the
Fire De~artment and the Engineering Oivision•
17. That nativ~~ alapes ad~acent to newly constructed homea ehall be
Such slopes shall
hydroaeeded with a low fuel combustible seed mix.
be sprinkleredtion betweendflammabledvegetationianddanynstruct ure00
feet of sepaca
18. That in the event aubject propertarceltmap~toicecordithetapptoved$e
of sale, lease, ~r financing, a P roved b
divisi~n of ~naheim andpthen bearecotdedbintthe Office ofpthe Orange
the Ci y
County Recorder.
1g. That pcior to final tract map approval, the owner(S) of subjec t
property sh~-11 dedicate and improve ten (10) ~oot wide eTrailsiana
and hiking trails as ehown on the Equestrian and Hiking
Component of the ~naheim Genecal Plan Trails Elementt that
improvement pla~ne, in accordance with standard p1Engineer, s hall be
apecifications on file in the Off•ice of thelan,yand/or that a bond
submitted in conjunction with the 9~o the City of l~naheim sha 11 be
in an amount and forn~ =iai~tocfinal tract map approval oc iasuance
poeted with the City p
of a gcading perrait, whichever occurs first, to guarantee the
installdtion of the above-mentioned requirementa prior to
occupancy. Said dedication and improvemenk shall include t he
off-eite Backbone Tra~il No. 19 (Oak Canyon Trail) located in Tcact
No. 10940. 8/22/83
~
~
k
~
h~NUT68. ANANBIM CITY P4~~1_~NG C4MM_~SBION. ~UGUST 22. 1983 83-5Q8
20. That prior to linal ~cact mdp appcoval, a proy cam !or the
mAintananc~ raapon~ibility end ~etimat~d coet thec~o! ot all
open-space zon~d lota, recceational lots and lendscap~d olopes sha11
be submitted to and approved by the CiCy ot Ana~heim~ 7-ny
agceementla) retecred to in Cundition No. 3, eforementianed, ehsil
be exQCUted when the cntity responaible for mAintenence ie not
eithac a property ov+ner i~n this trect or the homeownere' aseociatio~
fo[ thls tCact.
21. That pcior to final tr~ct ma~p appcovdl, Trect No. 10978, a wholly
open spece tract, s hell be cecorded with the Office of the Orange
County Recorder and nccepted by the Anaheim Hilla Maeter Homeownera
Aesocietion~ or, if ea~id Tr~ct Ho. 10978 is not recorded, all the
conditiona of seid tentetive tract ahall heve been complied with.
22. Thet in accordance with the requiremen~s of Section 18.02.047 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code pectaining to the initial sele of residences
1n the City of Ana h eim t'lanning Area 'B', khe aeller shell provide
each buyec with wrf tten infocmdtion concerning the Anahefm General
Plan and the exist i nq zoning within 3U0 feet of the boundaries of
subject tcact.
23. That prior ko fina 1 tract map approval, the owner(s) of subject
property (Texaco Ar~aheim Hills, inc., or their succesaora, assigna,
or transfprceeo) s hall inetdll a traffic signal at the intersection
of Nohl Ranch Road and Stage Coech Road (to be renamed Camino
Grande) as cequired by the City 'I'rdffic Engineec and in accordance
with apecifications on file in the Office of the City ~ngineer; or
that a bond, certi ficete of deposit, letter of credit or cash, in an
amount and form sa tisfactory to thc City of Anaheim shall be poated
with the City t~ g ua[antee installation of said eignal prior to
occupanGy of any d~rellinq unit in the aree encompassed on Trect Nos.
10967 thcough lU9 7 8, inclusive.
24. That gates ahall n at be inetalled ecro~s any driveway or private
atreet in a manne r which may adversely affect vehicular traffic in
the adjacent publ i c etreets. InatAllation of any gate~ within a
dietance of forty (40) feet from said public street r•ights-of-way
ahall be subject t o the review and approval of the City Traffic
Bngineer.
25. That trash skorag e areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on fi~e with the Street Maintenance and Sanitation
Division.
26. That prior to final atreet inapections, •No parking for street
sweeping' signe s~all be installed as required by the Street
Maintenance and Sanitation Division and in accordance with
apecificationa on file with said division.
8/22/83
i
MINUTBB. 11N1-HBIM CITX PLANNxNG COMMISSION, AUQUBT 22. 1983 83-509
27. That the eellar eh~ll pcovide the purchaser of ~ach r~~-i~ential
dwellinq with wcitt~n intormation concecning 1-naheim Municipel Cod•
Saction 14.32.500 perceining to 'Parking restricted to facilitete
street sweeping". 8uch written inParmdtion ehall al~erly indicate
when on-~trest parking ie prohibited end the pena~lty for violstion.
26. That ell street dedicatione and improvemente within Tcect No. 10976
aha~l be mede in eccordance with proviaione of Section 17.08.390,
1-naheim Municipel Code.
29. Thet prior to final tract map rpprovel, the ownec of the property
shall cecord an irrevoceble offec ot dedication for Camino Grande
Stceet (Stnge Coech Road1 ae ahown on Tentetive Trect Meps
10967-10978, inclueive, and inatell ~11 atreet improvementa
including curba and gutte~ce, aidewalke, street grading and pevement,
sewer and drainage faeilitiea, or othec appurtenant work ae cequired
by the City Engineer ar~d in accordence with specificationa on file
in the Offiae of the City Engineer or poet security in a form and
amount ea~tisfactocy to the City of Anaheim to guarentee the
satiefactory completian of said improvementet or irrevocably offer
to dedicate and improve that portion thereof necessary to provfde
public etceet acceea to adid tcact prior to final bu~ldinq
inapectione end iasuance of occupancy permitA for e~ny portion of
said tract.
REVISION N0. 2 OP TENTATIVE TRACT NU. 10977:
1. That should this subdivieion be developed as more than one
subdiviaion, each subdiviaion thereof shall be submitted in
tentative farm for approval.
2. That all lots within thie tract ahall be served by undecground
ut~.lities.
3. That prior to final tract map epproval, the following items ahall be
submftted to the City Attorney'$ Office and approved by the City
Attorney's Office, Public Utilitiea Department, Planning Depattment
and Enqineering Diviaion:
(a) The original documents of thP covenants, conditions and
re~trictions,
(bf ~- letter addregsed to the developer's title company suthoriziny
recordation thereof, and
(c) Any aqreement(s) pertaining to the maintenance responsibillty
for areas (landecared slnpes and trails) as shown on Exhibita A
'Ora~ge County Open Space Easementa and Equeatrian Traile" and
~ " lope Care Plan".
8/22/83
83-S1Q
INUTBS. AN~b6IM CITY RLANNING CO~IMI$BION ~ AUaU$T Z~~ 1983 -
said eqr~emant(~> snd CCaR• shall ido~tiily ths •ntitiea (individusl
lot ownaro, subj~ct tract ~omeowner~' as~ocistion, ~nsheim Niilo
Plann~d Community Aiaocistion, County uP Orang~, Giry o~ Anaheim or
othec responeible entityl which will participate in end/oc b~
responsible for pecmanently meintaini~g all US (Open Spsce) zoned
lots~ ell landscaped end ndtural elopea ~nd ell dedicat~d equoatcian
end hiking traile show~ on the subject tcact mep end ~xhibita ~
•Orange County Open space Easeme~te and Equestria~~ Tcails and B
•51ope Cece Plen'. Said documenta• as aFproved, wi11 then be
executed end tiled and recorded in the Office of the Orange County
Recorder concurrently with recordation oE the final tc~ct mep.
4. That prior to final trect map dppro~~~- street n~mee shnll be
appcoved by the City Planning De~artment.
5. That pcior to eny occupency, temporery atceet name signa shall be
inetalled if permanent street name aigns have not yet been installed.
6. That drainage of subjeat pcoperty ahall be dls~osed of in a mann~r
eatiafactocy to the City Engineor. If, in the preperetion of the
site, sufficient grading ie required to necesaitate a grading
permit, no work on grading will be pecmitted between Octobec 15th
and April 15th unless all requir~d off-site dreinage facilitie~ have
been inatalled and ace ope:ative. poaitive assurance shall be
provided to the City that such drainage facilitie~ will be completed
prior to Octobec 15th. Necessacy right-of-wey for off-eite dreinage
Facilities shall be dedicatNd to the CiCy, or the City Council shall
have initiated condemnation proceedinge theref~c (the costs of which
shall be borne by the developer) prioc to the commencement of
gcading opecations. The requiced drainage facilitiea ahall be of ~
size and type auffieient to cdcry tunoff wat~cs ociginating from
higher pcoperties through subject property to ultimate diepo.sal ae
approved by the City Engin~er. 5aid dtainAge fecilities shall be
the first item of construction and sh~ll be completed and be
functional throughout the tract and from the downatream boundary of
the property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuanee
of any final building inspections or occupancy permits. Orainage
diatcict reimbursement agreements may be made available to the
developera of said property upon theic request.
7. That gcadin4, excavation, and all other consttuction activities
shall be conducted in such a manner ao as to minimize the
possibility of any ailt oc~ginating from this ptoject being carried
into the Santa Ane River by storm water originating from or flowing
throuqh this project.
8. That all private streets shall be developed in accordance with the
City of Anaheim's Standard Detail ~o. 122 for private streets,
including installation of atreet name eigns. Plans for the private
stceet lighting, as required by the standard detail, ahall be
submitted to the Building Division for appcoval and inermits.With
the building plans prior to the isauance of building p
(Private straets are those which provide primary accesa nnd/or
circulation within the pcoject.
8/22/83
MIN~TB,~,,~AN~.MBIM CITY PWINNING CO I58IONLAU~UST Z2. 1983 ,,,,. 83-511
9. That pcior to final tcact map epptoval, the d~velopet of ~ub~ect
ctact ehell anter into a opeciel faciliGies egreement with the City
of 1lnaheim tor watrr facilities in the High P.lavation Syetem, ea
requited by Rule 15B ot the Water Ukility Rates, Rule4 and
Regulatione.
10. Thet prioc to finel tcueC mAp approvel, ti~e developere of the
/-nahe~im Hilla Plonned Community (Texeco 1-naheim Hille, Inc., or
theic aurce~sore~ esaigna, or tcenefereee) ehall aubmit a parke end
cecreational facilitAes plAn to the Parks, Recceetion end Cammunity
Servicea Department for review and approval. Said pcupoeal ehall
determine the specific meena b~+ which the developer p~ovidea park
end cecreation f+~ciliti~re for the future residente of the erea
encompasaed by Trect Nos. 10967 through 10978, inclusive. Such
meana mey include, but n~e~ not be limited to, the following: pey
the City of Anaheim park and recreation in-lieu feea es determined
to be appropriate by the City Council at the time af building permit
isauance, or dedicAte pe:k lend$ a~ccepteble to the City of Anaheim~
or a combinetion thereof. Acceptence of the epecific means shall be
subject to khe approval of the Director of Parks, Recceetion and
Community Sorvices. 11ny obligatione impoaed on the property owner
which are to be performed subaequent to approval of the final map
$hall be evidenced by written agreement or covenant, appr.oved by the
City 1-ttorney's Office, and cecocded prinr to or concurrently with
the cecordation of the final map.
11. That prior to finel. tract mep apptoval, rhere ahAll be submitted to
the City Planning Commission for teview and apptoval, apecific plana
of development. Final specific plans shall include, but need not be
limited to, the fallowing:
a. Topographic map.
b. Site plans and elevations eh~wing the placement of the
buildings and structuress the front, eide and rear elevationat
and the extecior building materials including coofing.
c. Lot dimensiona and pr~d eize of all lota aufficient to indicate
the re].ationship of the proposal to the nature and extent of
the cut-and-fill or earthwork involved.
d. Landscaping plans indicatiny the extent and type of proposed
landsc~ping and including any existing vegetation.
e. Vehicle circulation and parking plan indicating the nature and
exkent of public and priv~te atreete, or public accesawaye for
vehicular cicculation, off-street parking and vehicle storage~
8/22/83
i
t
~IN~~TB_S`~NAHB~IM CITY PLJ-NNING COMMIS&ION. AUGUST 2~ 19~3 83-5
f. Bqu4atrien and hikinq treila p.len ahowinq th• pl~cement e~nd
impcovem~nta of the trail4 ~ae~menta for the Rsqional Trsil No.
3(1-naheim Hills Traill end Backbone Trail No. 19 (Oak Cenyon
Trail) ae deeiqnat~d by khe Bqu~stcian and Hiking Trails
Componant of the A~eheim General Plsn Tcails Elements including
the specific design for eny locntion whece e- trail croeaea over
e public or private atreett end alao .including the off-aite
tcdil easement as ehown on Exhibit No. 2 ~f Recleaeificati.on
No. 79-80-25.
g. Fence and/or well plane indiceting the type of fencing along
any lot line of e aite ebutting public or private atceets.
12. 'rhat priot to final tract map approvAl, the developere of said tract
(Texeco Anaheim Hills, Inc. or their auccessors, assigns, or
transfecees) shall submit to the Director of Publ~c Utiliti~em~n~rof
his review and approvel, a propoaed plen for Che ecreage p y
water main extensione fees. Said pl~n ehall considec all land
within the erea encompassed on Tract Nos. 10967 through 10978,
inclusive, including open epace. 1-ny obligationa imposed rovAleof
property owner which ace to be performed subsequent to app
the final mep ahall be evidenced by said agreement or covenent,
approved by the City Attocney's Office, and cecorded prior to or
concurrently with the cecordation of the final map.
13. That prioc to commencement of stcuctural framing, fire hydranta
shall be installed and charged as requiced and detetmined to be
necessery by the Chief of the Pire Department.
14. That all requicements of Fice 2one 4, otherwise identified as Fice
Administrative Qrder No. 76-O1, ahall be met. Such requirements
include, but are not limited to: chim~ey epack arrestors, protected
attic and under floor openings, Class C or bettec coofing material
and one houc fire cesistive construction of horizontal eucfaces if
located within 200 feet of adjacent brushland.
15. That fuel breaka shall be provided as determined to be neceasary by
the Chief of the Fire Department.
16. That prior to final tcact map appravel, no public or private atreet
gradea aha12 exceed 108 except by prior approval of the Chief of the
Fire Dwpartment and the Bngineering Division.
)7. That native slopes adjacent to newly conetructed homes ahall be
hydcoseeded with a low fuel combustible aeed mix. Such slopes shall
be aprinklered and weeded as required to es~.ablish a minimum of 100
feet of seParation between f lammable vegetation and any structure.
18. That in the event subject praperty is tu be divided for the pucpose
of sale, lease. or finencing, ~ parcel map to record the approved
division of subject property ehall be aubmitt~d to and approved by
the City of Anaheim and then be recorded in the Office oE the Orange
County Recorder.
8/22/83
YTN~~~B, ~NAHgIM CITY PL~NNING COMMIaSION~ AUQO~T 12. 1983 83-5~3
19. That pcioc to final tract mop approvel, th~ own~cts) ot aubjecti
praparty ahell dodicat~ and impcove tan (10) Eoot wide squsstrian~
and hikin9 tcaila aa ahown on the Squeatrien and Hiking Treila
Component of th~ ~naheim Genaral Plan TrailA Elementl that
improvement plena, in accordance with stendard plens and
apecificatione on file in the a~Eice of the City ~ngineer, ahall ba
submitted in conjunction with th~ grsding plan, and/or that a bond
in an dmount ~nd focm eatiisfactory to the City of ~nehaim ahall be
poetad with the City prioc to finel ttact map appcoval or ieaudnce
of e gceding permit, whichever occurs ~iret, to guarantee the
inetdlletion oE the above-me~tioned cequiremente pcior t~
occupancy. Said dedicetion end improvement ahall include the
off-eitQ B~ckbone xr~il No. 19 (Oak Canyon Trai11 located in Trect
No. 10940.
20. Thet priot to finnl trect map eppruv~l, a progcam for the
maintenance responsibility ~nd estimated coet thereof of all
open-apACe zoned lote, cecreational lote And landscaped alopes ahall
be submitted Co and appcoved by khe ~.'lty of ~naheim. Any
egreement(s) referred to in Condition No. 3, ~forementioned, shall
be executed when the entity cesponeible f~r maintenance ia not
eithsr a properky owner in thia tract or the homeowners' Aasocietion
for this tract.
21. That prior to final tract map approval, Tract N~. 10978, a wholly
open space tract, shall be recocded with the Office of the Orange
County Recorder and accepted by the Anaheim Hills M~ater Homeowners
Aseociation~ or, if said Tract No. 10978 ia not recorded, all the
conditione of aaid tentative trect ahall have been complied with.
22. That in accordance with the requicementa of Section 18.02.047 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code psrtaining to the initidl sale of residences
in the City of Anaheim Planning Area '8', the seller shell pcovide
eac~ buyer with written information concerning the Anaheim General
Plan and the exieting xoning within 300 feet of the boundaries of
subject tract.
23. That pcior to final tract mep approval, the owner(s) of aubject
property (TexACO anaheim Hills, Inc., or tt,eic succesaors, aseigns,
or tr~nsferrees) shall install a traffic signal at the intersection
of Nohl Ranch Road and Stage Coach Road (to be renamed Cemino
Gcande) ae required by the City Traffic Engineer and in accordance
with epecifications on file in the Office of the City Engineerl or
that a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of ccedit ot cash, in an
amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be poeted
with the City to gunrantee inatallation of said signal prior to
occupancy of any dwelling unit in the area encompassed on Trect Nos.
1096T through ~0978, inclusive.
8/22/83
I,~INUTBS, ~NAH~IM CITY PLANNING COMMI88ION. AUOUBT Z2. 1983 63-514
24. Thet g ~t~~ shall n~t b• inatalled scroas any drivaway ac ptivatie
atr~at in a msnnec rrhich mdy adveraely afl~ct vehiculAC trattic in
tha adiscent pubiic atreeri. inetallation of eny gat~e within s
distance ot fotty (40) feet from said public etreet cight~-ol-wey
shall be eub~ect to the ceview and approval of the City Treffic
Bngineer.
75. That ttesh etoraqe acees ahall be provided in eccocdence with
approved plana on file with the StreeC Meintenence and Sanitetion
Divieion.
26. Tnat prloc to final stceet inspections, 'N o parking for etreet
eweeping' aigns ehAll be inetalled as cequiced by the Str~et
Maintenence and Sanitetion Division end in accord~nce with
specificdtions on file with aeid division.
27. That the aeller ahall pcovide Che purchaeec of each residential
dwelling wiCh written information concerning AnAheim Municipal Code
SecCion 1A.32.500 ~ectaining to 'Packing restricted to facil~tate
akreet aweeping'. Such wcftten informetion ahall cl~arly indicat•:
when on-etreet parking is prohibited and thP penelty for violation.
28. That all atceet dedicationa and improvements within Tract No. 10977
ahall be made in accordance with proviaions of S~ction 17.08.390,
Anaheim Municipal Code.
29. That prior to finA1 tcact map approval, the owner of the propecty
shell cecord an frrevocable offer of dedication for Camino Grende
Street (Stage Coach Road) as shown on Tentative firact Maps
10967-10978, inclusive, and install all atreet improvementa
includlnq curbs and guttere, aidewelks, street gcading artd pavement,
sewer and drainage facilitiea, oc other appurtenent work ea cequired
by the City Engineer and in accordence with specifications on file
in the Office of the City Engineer or post aecucity in a focm and
amount satisfactocy to the City oi Anaheim to guarantee the
satiafactory completion of said impcovementes oc ircevocably offer
to dedfcate and improve that ~orti~~ thereof neceasary to provide
public atreek acceea to said tract ptior to final building
inapections and issuance af occupancy permite for any portion of
said tract.
RBVISION N0. 2 OF TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 10978:
1. That should thie aubdivision be developed as more than one
subdivision, each subdivision theceof shall be submitted in
tentative form foc approval.
2. That prior ta final tract map appcoval, a program for the
maintenance responsibility and estimated cnst thereof for thia
entire open-sp~ce zoned tract shall be aubmitted to and approved by
the City of ~naheim, and an agreement shall be executed whereby gaid
maintenance responeibility is accepted by the Anaheim Hills
Equestrian Center or othec entity acceptable to the City. Said
Agreement ahall be approved by the City Attorney dnd ahall then be
recorded with the Office of ~he Orange County Recorder.
8/22/83
MINUTB ANAHBIM CITY PLANN G COMMISSION AUGUST 22 1963 63-515
3. That prior to finel t[ect map approvel, the davelopece ot the
~nshoim Hilla planned Community (Texaco ~naheim Hills, Inc., or
thair suac~eaoco, a0eigne, or transPereea) ahall eubmit to the
Dicecta[ of public Utilitias for hia review And approv~l, a propoaed
plen for the ecre~ge peyment of water main extension Fees. Sei.d
plan ahall consider ail land within the areA encompaesed by Trect
Nos. 10967 through 10978, inclusive, lncluding open ap~ce. ~ny
obligationa impoaed on the property uwnec which are to be performed
aubaequent to approval af the final m~p ahell be evidenced by
written agreement oc coven~nt, approved by the City Attorney's
Office, and cecorded peioc to oc concucrently with the cecordation
of the final maP.
4. That fuel breaks shdll be pcovided as determined to be required by
the Fire Chief.
5. That prior to findl tcnct map appcovel, the following $hall be
aubmitted to the Planning Commieaion for review end approval: an
equeskrien end hiking tr~ila plan for the area encompdsaed by Tcact
Nos. 1096~ through 10978, inclueive, ahowing the placement and
improvements of the trails easements for tl~r RpgionAl Trail No. 3
(Anahelm Hills Trail) and Backbone Trail No. 19 (Oak Canyon Trail)
as designated by the Equestrian and Hiking Traile Cornponent of the
Anaheim Gener~l P1dn Tcails Element. Said plan aha~l include the
specific design for any location whe~e a trail crossea over a public
or private ati•eet and shall also include the off-aite trail easement
as shown on Exhibit No. 2 of Reclasaification No. 79-80-25.
6. That prior to final rract map approval, the owner(s) of subject
pcope[ty ahall dedicate and improve a ten (10) foot wide equeatrian
and hikfng treil identified ea Backbone Trail No. 19 (Oak Canyon
Trail) on the Equeatcian and Hiking Treile Component of the Anaheim
General Plan Trails Elements improvement ahall be in accordance with
standacd plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City
~ngineecs and/or e bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the
City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City prior to finai tract
map approval or issuance of a greding permit, whichever occurs
first, to 9uarantee the installation of the above-menkioned
requirements pcioc to occupancy in the acea (Tract Nos. 10967
through 10978, inclueive). Said dedication and improvement shall
include the off-site portions of Backbone Trail No. 19 (Oak Canyon
Ttail) located in Tract No. 10940.
7. That prior to finel tract mnp appcoval, this tract ehall be rezoned
to the OS(SC) Zone.
8. That prior to Einal track map approvel, the owner of the pcopetty
shall record an irrevocable offer of dedication for Camino Grande
Street (Stage Coach Road) as shown on Tentative Tract Maps
10967-10978, inclusive, and inatall all atreet improvementa
including curbs and qutters, sidewalka, atreet grading And pavement,
sewer and drainage facilitiea, or other appurtenent wock aa required
by the City Engineer and in accordance with sYecifications on file
8122/83
MINUTBS~ ANAH~IM CITY P~ING COMMI58ION. AUGpBT Z2. 1983 _ 63-516
in the OfEice ot ths City Enqineer or poet security in a lorm a~nd
amount eetiafactory Co khe City of Aneheim to guecentee the
satiafactacy completion of sa~d improvementar ac icrevocably oFfer
t.o dedicete and impcov~ that portion theceof neceasary to provide
public st~eet eccesa to seid tract ptioc to f:nel building
inapectione end iaeuance of occupancy permita tor eny portion of
said tract.
Commiaeioner Herbat offered a motion, aeconded by Commisaionec King and MOTION
CARRIED, that lhe dbove npproval ~hall include eppcovel of Exhibite A Orange
County Open Space Easemente and Equsatrian Trails and Exhibit B"Slope Care
Plan'.
Commiesioner Nerbst stated the Commisaion would like a report from eteff.
within 6U ddys as to the pcogreas on thoae problems as listed in Parr~gtdph 15
af the ataff repo[t.
CommiasionRr F[y asked how the bonda are actuAlly released and Jay Titus
explained the developer oc whoevec posted the bond requeste thAt the bond be
released and the City has an inspecto~ review the aituation and if everything
looks satisfactocy to that inspeetoc, the City Engin~ec writes a letter
releaAing the bond. Responding to Commiesioner Fry, Mr. Titus atated the City
hae inspectora on-site during construction a~d the performance bond ia
released as soon ae the work is completed and inspected to the satisfection of
the inapectors and there ia a one-year guarantee period aftec the bond is
releae~d.
Jack white explained the one-yeat quarantee is a proviaion in the Subdiviaion
Map Act allowing thE City to gain a one-year guarentee that the wotk performed
is fcee from defec:ts and the one yedr is a stetutory period which is a maximum
under the MAp Act. he stated aftec the bond is released and the one-year
peciod has expire~, if the work becomes deEective, the City can no lonqer look
to the bonding company, but asauming it is still, within the statute of
limitations, tt~ere may be some liability on someone's part from a civil
liability standpoint for the alleged defective work.
Commissionec McBurney stated the City does not have to accept the public
cight-of-way until khey feel the work is properly done and holding ita
stability and that cculd be the last item to be accepted. Jay Titus atated
when the dedication ia recorded, the property becomes City propertys however,
the City would nok accept the improvement far maintenance until the
coc-atruction is completed.
Chaicwoman Bouas stated she is sure Mr. Mason is willing to meet with the City
to resolve these pcoblems and Mr. Mason respanded he would meet with the staff
and dibcuss the isauea.
S/22/83
M,,INUTE~ ~N~HBIM CITY PL~NNING C01~2$SION, ~UGUST 2~. 1983 _i,_ 83-5~7
i'CIONI-L
i
PUBLIC HBIIRING. OWNER3s RAI~~P. FOUNDATSON NOSi~ITALB, 333 8outh Grand l-venue,
~3400, Los J~nqeles, ~A 90071. Pcoperty deacribed ae en irregulecly-eh~ped
paccel conaisting of approximately 9.6 acreA located et the nocthweat corner
of Riverdale Avenue and Lakevisw Avenue, hevinq a fcontege of approximetely
628 feet on the north eide of Riverdale 1-venue and a frontage of a-pproximately
6~0 feet on the west eide of Lakevi9w Avenue and further deaccibed es 441
Nocth Lakeview Avenue (Keisec Foundation Hospitel).
To permit an expaneion of an exiating hospital with waiver of minimum numb~x
of parking space$.
Continued from June 27, .1uly 25, August 8, 1983.
ACTION: Commieaioner Fry offered a motion, seconded by Commiasioner King ~nd
MOTION CARRIBD, that consideration of the aforementioned m4tter be continued
to the regularly-scheduled meeting of September 19, 1.983, at the ceyuest of
the petitioner.
ITEM N0. 3. EIR NEGATIVE D~CLARATIQN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2474
PUBLIC HEARING. OWNERS: ORANGE COUNTY WAT~R DISTRICT, P.O. eox 8300,
Nountain Va11ey, CA 92708. AGENT: BLAIR PAVINC•, 'NC., 4071 E. La Palma
Avenue, Suite Br Anaheim, CA 92807. Property desccibed as aii
irregularly-shaped parcel of land conaisting of approximakely 4.3 acres,
located at 11.01 Richfield Road.
To permit a portable asphalt concrete plant in the RS-A~43,000(SC)(FP) Zone.
Continued from July 25, 1983.
ACTION: Commissioner King offeced a motion, seconded by Commiaeioner Le
Claire and MOTION CARRIED, that conaiderati~n of the aforementioned matter be
continued to the regularly-gcheduled meeting of September 7, 1983, at the
request of the petitioner.
ITEM N0. 4. EIR NEGATIVE DECI+ARATION AND RECLASSIPICATION NO. 8,~ 3-84_1
PUBLIC HEARING. 4WNER: NORBERT A. WATERS, 12132 Morrie Lane, Garden Grove,
CA 92640. Property described ae an irregularly-shaped parcel of land
consisting of app[oximakely 0.40 acre on the north side of Ball Road,
approximat~ly 280 feet eaet of the centerline of Sunkist Street and
fmmedistely west of the Orange (57) Freeway.
RS-A-43,000 to CL.
ACTION: Commissioner King offered a motion, seconded by Commisaioner La
Cla~re and MQTION CARRIEA, thAt conaideration of the aforementioned matter be
continued to the regularly-scheduled meeting of September 7, 1983, at the
requeat of the petitionec.
' l? 2'
NUT~B. AN~1H6~ rtTV tit.~WwiNC: COMMI88ION. AOGUST Z2. 1983 b3-5
I~~M N0. 5. BIR NBGATIVE DBCW1JtJ1TI0N, WAIV~R 0! C008 RBQUIREMENT AND
~NDITIONAL U~d PERM~T NO. 2175
PUDLIC HBARING. OWNBRB: NOR9RRT A. AND RUTH M. WATERS, 12132 Mocrie Lan~,
G~rden Grove, CA 92640. Proper~y deacrib~d ae en icregularly-shdped Qarcel of
1enQ consieting of approximately 1.40 screa on the north aide of Ball Road,
immediately weet of the Orenge 57) Pceeway.
To pecmit en 80-u~it motel snd cocktail lounge with waivere of minimum
etructurel eetback, meximum atructural height and permitted locaCion of
fteeetanding eign.
Continued from August 8, 1983.
ACT~ ~N: Commiesioner King otfered a motion, seconded by Commiesionec La
Clr~re and MOTION C~RRIED, that considecetion of the aforementioned matter be
concinued to the regulerly-acheduled meeting of Septembec 7, 1983, et the
requeat of ttie peti~ioner.
ITEM N0. 6. EIR CATEGORICAL ~XEMPTION-CG~SS 1. ti~IVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT ANA
CONDITIONAI~ USE PERMIT NQ. 2479
PUBLIC HEARING. OWN~RS: EWALD F. DARGATZ, ET AL, 766 W. Sycamoce, Reedley,
CA 93654. AGENT: GEOF,GE KATSAMFES; 3242 W. Lincoln Avenue, ~n4heim, C~
93654. Propecty deacribed as an irreqularly-ahaped parcel af land conaiating
of approximately 1.5 acrea located south and e~st of the southeast corner of
Lincoln Avenue and Westchester Drive, 3242 Weet Lincoln Avenue (Games Plus).
To pecmit on-sele beec and wine in an exiating billiard parlour with waiver of
minimum number of parking apaces.
Thece wAS no one indicatiny their presence in oppoaition to aubject request
and slthough the ataff report wea not read, it is refecred to and mede a part
of the minutea.
George Katsampes, agent, explained this requeat is ta perm!' beer and wine at
their billiacd and arcade center. 6A stated they heve aubm.tted a parking
etudy ~nd the City Tr~ffic Engineer has reviewed it and feels their perkiag
adequate. He atated if there is any concecn relating to the sale of wine,
that they are only applying for a beer licenee. He explained they have other
similar establishmenta ~nd it ~a their policy to sell beer :o only those
persons playfng billiarde oc game rtiachinea so this will not bo a beer bar oc
cocktAil lounge. 8e atated their bueinesa definitely needs the eale of beer
and it is an intergal part of the businesa and 80~ of theic customere h~ve
rsqueeted it.
T~E P~BLIC HEARING W~S CLOSED.
Con;-.fssioner 1lerbst atated thie is ~a be a fa~r~ily enkertainment center, but it
will not serve food and asked the percentage of children versua the ++dults.
Mr. Katsamges stated there will be snack fnods available, but not prepared
fooda. He stated they ha~ve a facility in Coata Mesa with an identical floor
plan and they have 10 to 15+t children under driving age.
8/22/83
INUTE~~ 11NAHBIM CITY P4~NNIN; COMMI88ION. ~UGUST 1Z. 1983 83~51
CAmmlasionac H~rbet btdt~d L~enagoca would be moce euec~ptible to the be~r
than the you~g~r children and that ia the problem he hen with thie r~quest.
He atated this ie s family entie r teinmont centec end with the eele of beer, it
could become a beer bec.
Mc. Ketsampes ateted they have n evec hed e~ problem with the kids buyi~q or
dcinking the beer becsuee ~nyone buyinq the beer muat ahow an I.D. and it hae
been thaic policy to hnly eell t o thoeo pleying the gamee or billiarda. He
att~ted their bueineas hae an ex c ellent repuCation ae e family-oriented
enterteinment centec end pointe~ out this would be no diffor.ent then e bowling
elley where femilies take their childcen (Commieaioner Hecbst atated a bowling
alley would aerve food). Mr. lcateampea ateted moat oE the billiard centera in
Orange County aell beer and the majority of the people ~here ere older since
most pool playera are older men _ He stated there ie A wrought iron railing
seper~ting tha game room end th e billiard coom. He stated the wh~le center
does not lend ~taolf toward you ng people and ~A an adult enviconment.
Commiasioner He~rbat stated this could be an edult entect~inment center with no
kida allowed and asked why it i s cdlled a family entertainment cente~ i.f most
of the bueineas is for adults. Mr. Kate~mpea stated BSa of there buai.nRea ie
adults and 10 to 15~ children a nd responded to Chairwoman Bouas that moat of
the young people do come in wit h their. pArente and it is rare when they come
in alone, but it has not been a problem in the past,
Commiesioner La Claire stAted s ince only 10 to 158 oE the busineas is for
children, ehe would suggest th a t they get an adult entertainment J.icense
noting she hae the eame problem with this requeat becauae of the children
~~ithin walking distance where t hey can drop in. She atated alcoholism and
drug aauae are big problema in thia country today and ahe thaught children
coming 1n and watching what is going on would not be a good idea. She stated
ahe could understAnd if parent s bring their children in, but did not like the
idea of children being able to drop in.
Mc. Katsampes responded he wou 1 d run into a problem if they prohtbited
children, if the parents wanted to bcing them int that in Costa Mesa they
t~ied to discottrage very small chi;dren and if the parenk,s bcing a child in,
thQCe is a problem because the y do not understend why they ace not allowed.
He stated if the Commissfon ha s any real concerna, he would suggest that the
cequest be granted on a limited trial bdsi~ for one year so they can see how
the operation is run. He stAt ed children are around alcohol at a baseball
game, bowling alley, race tcac ks, etc. and he has even seen beer for sale at r~
miniature golf course. He sta ted they would not aell beer to any one th~t is
not at a table and they are ab 1e to wetch closely and aee how much beer ie
consumed. He cesponded to Cha irwoman Douas that the game room and billiard
room are in close proximity and it would be difficult not to allow beec in the
game cooms however, they can police it very well.
it was noted the Planning Directo[ or his authorized representative has
determined that the pcoposed project falls within the definition of
Cetegocfcal Exemptions, Class 1, as defined in the State En~~ironmental Impact
Report Guidelines an~ is, the r efo[~, categorically exempt fcom *he requirement
to prepare an EIR.
8/22/83
MIN~T~B, Ai~1ANEIM CITY PLANNINO COMM~SBION, AUaUBT 2~. 1983 e3'S~
~CTI N: commi~sion~r King olt~ced a motion, seconded by Commi~~lonRC Mcs~rn~y
and MOTION CAARIBD, that tha AnAheim Citiy Pl~nning Commi~~ion do~• h~ceDy
yrent waiver o! Code csquicement on th• bdsi~ thet the parkinq atudy submitt~d
indicstos the parking vecienc• will not cau~~ en increaAe in trelEic
congaation in th• immediete vicinity nor advecaely attect eny edjoininq lend
uaee and the varianco under the condition~ impoaed, if any, will ~or be
detrimentel to the peece, haalth, aefety or genacal welfare of t~~e citizena of
the City of Anaheim.
Commiea~oner Kinq offered a ceeolution thet the Anaheim City Plonning
Commieaion dose hereby gcnnt Conditionel Use Pecmit No. 2479 for e period of
one year pucsuant to findinga cequired under Secti~ne 18.03.030.031 thtough
18.03.030.035 oE the ~ndheim Municipel Code end subject to intecdepectmental
Committes rer,ommenda~tiona.
On roll call, the foregoing resolution PAIL~D TO CARRY by the following vote:
AYES: BOU11S~ KING, MC BURNEY
NOES: BUSHURE, FRY, HER83T, L1- CLAIRE
~-BSENT: NONE
Commiasioner Herbst ofiered Resolution No. PC83-145 and movPd f.or ita pdesage
and edoption thet the Annheim City Plenning Commission does hereby deny
Conditional Use Permit No. 2479 on the besis thet the uae would be detrimental
Lo the peACe, heelth, edfety and genecal welfa~re of the citizens of the City
of Anaheim.
Commisaionec H~rbst added that since only d small percentage of the businees
relates to young people, he would suggget thet the petition r apply for ~n
adult enterteinment license which would prohibit children in the esteblishment.
Jack White pointed out this pcoperty could not qualify for an adult
entertainment permit beceuse of its location and cloee proximity to the
residentially ~oned property to the east.
Dean Shecer suggested the petitioner epply for e beer bac licenae nnd
conditionel uee permit which would limit the age of the petrons to 21 years of
age or older.
On roll call, the foregoing resolution was passed by the following vote:
AYES: BOUAS~ BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, LA CLAIRB
NOES: KING, MCBURNEY
]~BSENT: NONE
Jack White, Asaistant City 1-ttorney, pcesented the written right to appeal the
Planning Cotmniesion'a decieion within 22 days to the City Council.
Commissioner Buehore atate~ he had some problem with the children but As lonq
as food is not served, he would not vote for a beer bar in this location. He
steted the applicant hes to either have a billiard and arcede bueiness or a
beer bAr business.
8/22/83
INUT~~1 ANAH6IM CITY PI+~NNING COMMI138ION. AU~! 8T 2Y=„~,9~3 83-52
Mc. KeteampA• stet~d oth+~r billiard parlouc~ in An~h~ im vpaca~te in thie aeme
mannec and asked ~h• dittec~nce. Coauai~eioner Bushor e reepon0~d there ac•
diFterent Planning Commioeion~r~ and dilfecent Counc 1 1 membere periodicelly.
RECE88i 2=55 p.m.
RECONVBN~: 3:05 p.m.
ITL~M N0. 7. EIR NSGJ-TIVL DECLIIRATION 1-ND CQNDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2480
PUBLIC HEAkiNO. OWNERS: OAK GARDENS RECREATION ASSOCT~TION~ P.O. BoX 8156~
An4heim, CA 92802. AGENTs Z'IMOTHY M. JOHN3TON, P.O . 9ox 1008, 1-neheim, CA
92802. Property is described as en iccegularly-she~d parcel of land
conaieting of appcoximately 3.4 ecres loceted at the southea8t corner of
Alemeda ~venue and Br~~okhurst Stteet, 2176 Weet Alam~da Avenue.
To convert en exiating cecreetion building to a aecu rity guerd cesidence.
There was no one indicating their presence in opposi~ion to subject cequest
and although the eteff report wae not read, it is re ~erred to and made a~art
of the minutes.
Ti.mothy Johnaton, Agent, stdted theae buiidinge are ~0 years old and the
clubhouse t-,s not been used in yeaca and the young ~~ople in the erea use it
as a play arEa. He stated they have tried aecucity ~ith one of the building
managere but he is not home all day and that 3 of th e 4 doors are made out of
steel end they have added bars to the windows foc a e curity, but they have no
control ovec the area. He steted thece are eixteen awners of the eighteer~
buildings and they are improving the area ~nd feel a ppco~al of this permit
will help solvp their problema and will provide sec u rity in exchenge Eor
sPCVice.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLO5ED.
Responding to Cortuniseinner La Claire, Mr. Johnston explained he had contacted
twelve of the owners and they signed an agreement t o this plan. He atated
they have not discuesed hiring a gua~rd and would probably 9ive the guard f ree
rent in exchange for security. He stated the covenant eets the asaeeaments
end the owner will be given ten days to come up witts the money. He atated
there is a very nice bedroom in the rear which coul d be used end they will aek
~ermission to open the dooc to the bathroom so it c an be used immediately f or
a person who would Chen fix the place up in exchang e f or rent. He ateted all
the owners have a share in this and are members of the association. He stated
the maintenance is paid foc out of the associAtion duea and this will be f or
security only. He explained the building ie used f or 8tornge now.
Commiseioner La Clnire indicated concern thdk the b~ilding could be rented for
another unit and Dean Sherer explained there is a c endition included which
limits the occupancy of the buflding to a aecurity gunrd.
ACTION: Conuaissioner King offered a motion, gecond~ed bY Gommi.saiener McBurney
an6 MOTION C1-RRIEU, that the Aneheim City Planning Conunisaion has ceviewed the
proposal to convert en existing recreation building to a aecurity gua-d
residence on an irregularly-ahc~ped percel of land c onsieting of approximately
3.4 acres located at the southeaat corner of 1-lameda l~venue and erookhurs~
Street and further descrlbed ae 2176 West 111emeda ~venuet and does hereby
8/22/83
NUTB9. ~N~HBIM CITY_PL~NNIN4 CUMNISSION, AUOUST Z2. 1983 83-5ZZ
app r ove ths N~qativ• oeclaration lrom the requirement to prepare An
env i sonmentsl lmpect report on the beaie that thece would be no eiqni~icant
ind i vidual or cumulative adverae enviconmental impa~t due to th• approval af
thi s Negative Declaretion eince the ~naheim C~,narel Plan deaiqnatea the
sub j ect property for medium d~ngity r~oidenkial ~and ucee commeneurete with
tha pcopoaelt that no aenaitive environment~l impecta sce i~volv~d in the
propoaeli thet the Initial Study submitted by the petitioner indlcate8 no
eig n iEicant individuel or cumulakive edveree environmentel impactsr and that
thR Negative Declaretion subatantieting the forego~ng findinge ia on file in
the City of Aneheim ~lanning Department.
Comtaieaioner King offered Reeolution No. PC83-146 end moved for ite paesage
end adopLion that the ~naheim City Planning Commisaion does hereby gcant
Con ditionel Ues Permit No. 2480 pureuent to Sections 18.03.030.031 through
18. 03.U30.035 of the Anaheim Municipal Code and eubject to Interdepartmental
Comnnittee recommendetiona~
On r oll call, the foxegoing reaolution wAS passed by the Eollowing vAte:
AY ES: BOUAS~ BUSHORE~ PRY~ NERB5T~ KING, LA CLAIRE~ MC BURNEY
NOES : NUNE
ABSENT: NUNE
IT El~1 N0. 8. EIR NEGATIV~ DECLARATION AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMTT N0. 2481
PUBLIC HEARING. OWNERS: CHECK WING AND CHEW NAR CHBNG, 2691 W. Le Palma~
Av e r.ua, Anaheim, CA 92801. Property described as a rectangulacly-shaped
pa r cel of land consiating of approximately 1.0 dCC@ having a fcontage of
appr~xim-` 'y 168 feet on the north side of La Palma l~~~enue, 2691 West La
Palma Avenue ( La Palma Inn Motel ).
To permit an 18-unit addition ko an exiating 50-unit motel.
Th e re was no one indicating their presence in ~ppoaikion to subject request
and although the staff report was not read, it is referred to and made a part
of the minutes.
Conunissioner King declared a confl.ict of intereat as defined by Anaheim City
P1 a nning Commission Reaolukion No. PC76-157 adopting a Confl.ict of Interest
Cad e for the Planning Commisaion and Government Code Section 3625, et seq., in
tha t this tract is a Dunn Properties (a subeidacy of Pacific Lighting) project
and he owns Pacific Lighting Company stock and pura~a nt to the proviaions of
the above Code~, declared to the Chairwoman that he was withdcawing from the
hea ring in connection with Conditional Uae Permit No. 2481, and would not take
pa r t in either the discuasion or the voting thereon and had not discuase~ this
ma t ter with any member of the Planning Commiasion. Thereupon Commissionec
King left the Council Chamber at 3:17 p.n~.
Fr ank Politeo, 809 S. Garfield, Sen Pedre, agent, was present to answer any
questions .
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
8/22/83
INUTB_ AN~HBIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSZON. AUaU3T ZZ. 1983 __83-523
~CT1pN: Commi~eion~r Herba~ oftered a motion, aeconded by Conunission~r Fcy
and MOTION CARRIBD (Commisaion~r Kinq absent), thet the Aneheim City Planning
Commie4lon haa revitwsd the ptopoaal to permit an 18-unit addition to nn
exiating 50-unit mot~l on e rectangulariy-sheproxim~tel ~168AEeet~onithennocth
epproximately 1 ecce, hevinq A irontege of epp Y
side of La P~lms ~venue and lurther deacribed as 2691 Weet Le Palm~ (La 'Pelme
Inn Motel)t and does hereby appcove the Negetive D~claratlon from the
requicement to prepare ~n cnvironmentel impect report on the beais thet there
would be no aignificent individusl or cumuletive edverae e~viconmentAl impect
due to the approvAl of this Negetive Declaration aince the ~neheim GenAral
Plan designetea subject pcopecty for general commercial land uses commenaur~te
with the pcoposeli that no seneitive environmental impACta Are invulved in the
proposdlt that the initial Study eubmitted by the petitioner indicatea no
significent individual or cumulative ddverae environmental impectat ~nd that
the Neg~tive Declerdtion aubatantieting the focegoing findinga ie on file in
the City of Anaheim Planning Department.
Commiasionec Hecbek offeced Reaolution No. PC83-147 and moved for its paseage
and adoption that the ~naheim City Planning Commieaion does heceby gcant
Conditional Use Permit No. 2481 purauant to Sections 18.03.030.031 through
18.03.U30.035 of the ~naheim Municipnl Code dnd su~ject to inte~departmentel
Committee recommendations.
On roll call, the foregoing resolution wae passed by the following vote:
AYES: BOUAS, BUSHORE~ PRY, HERB5T, LA CLAIRE, MC BURNEY
NOES: NON~
ABSENT: KING
Commisaioner King returned tn the Council Chamber at 3:20 p.m.
Commiseioner McBurney left the meeting and did not return.
ITEM N0. 9. EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION RECLASSIFICATION NO. 83-84-2 AND
CONDITIONAL U5E PERMIT NO. 2482
PUBLIC HEARING. OWNERS: THE HUSTON BUILDING, 438 E. Katella, Sutie H,
Orange, CA 92667. AGENT: JOSAM OZYP, 7227 Cedar, Sa~ Bernacdino, CA 92406.
Property described ag an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of
a~pcoximately 1.48 acces, having a frontage of approximately 230 feet on the
west side of Harbor Boulevard, 1251 North Harbor Boulevard.
CG to CL
To permit a 3-story, 120-room motel.
There were nine peraons indicating their presence in opposition to subject
request and although the etaf~ report was not read, it ia referred to and made
d part of the minutes.
Josam Ozyp, agent, explained she met with the Planning Department staff July
27th co request annexation of a small 1200-square foot parcel on the westerly
end of the property and a question was reised regarding an easement to be
8/Z2/83
MINUTBS. ~NAHEIM CITY PL1-NNING COMMI88ION. AUQU9T 22. 1983 __ 83-524
gcanted through th~ pcop~rty to allow people leaving Menzenita Park accea8,
but it waen't clarifiedt that the ieeuo wae dieausaed egein on the 15th a!
thia month And ahe had requestad that if that would meen dn ingreaa and ~gcees
through the sub~ect property, thet it not be a condition. She •tated ahe hed
invitad ell the neighbore to e meeting and did meat with some of them on
Thuraday and Linda slACkwell, who repreeenta the neighborhood, ceme to thet
meeting and that ahe hdd found out there was another meeting to be held on
Setucday end ohe hed met with Mca. Bleckwell and About 15 of the neighbocs end
ceviewed the plans and canderings with them. She ateted they had discussed
the neighbore' concerns pectaining to the ~erk accesa with a block wall
causing an influx of people who frequent the perk to come down Raleigh Stceec
~nd the neighbora hdd requeetdd juat a break in the fence.
Me. Ozyp ceferred to evaluation Pardgraph 15 pertaining to that poction of the
property to be annexed which wes to ptovide five additional parking spaces for
the motel and explained they plan to provide additionel greenbelt erea on
Harbor with two parking epaces on either side of the lobby and they would heve
adequdte parking without that property. She steted they have a genuine
concern about granting an ~cceas easement for the ~ rk because she understands
the City does have s problem with people using aubje~t propecty cight now foc
acceas to the Orangefaic ehopping center and the neighbora ere concerned that
with this property develope~', those people cu[[ently using it for access will
be coming through their neighborhood. She stated the people in the
neighborhood do not even uae the pack and ehe underetenda thece ie going to be
a requeat befoce the City Council foc elock Grant Funds to have a review of
the park situation. She atated the neighbor~ expressed theic concerna about
noise, but she received no other negative information and she thought they had
come to an understandin~. She added she thought one oE the concerns from the
commercial neighbore was competition.
Ms. Ozyp etated having built motele in the past, they would not want to have a
gete through their property and it sounds like there may be a problem already
with peoplp fcom the park and that she had reviewed other motels in the area
and they did not have the access gates through their propecties.
Ms. Ozyp ref~rced to Condition No. 5 requiring a modified cul-de-sac to be
provided at the terminus of Raleigh Street and atated there is already a
modified cul-de-sac in existence and she would like to have that clarified.
She also ceferred to the annexation of the 12U0-square foot parcel and the
requirement foc an acce$a easement by the Parks and Recreation Department and
stated they did not want to go ahead with annexation aince they do not need
the additional parking and were goin5 to use that property to provide
additional landscaping.
Linda Blackwell, 1230 Nocth Raleigh, Anaheim, stated the reaidents all agreed
that the motel probably would be the best of other uses they have heard about
in the pastt howevec, their concern ia the ~ar~ anita Park access. She
referred to the Bluejay/Robin/Wren erea which has about 2500 residents and
stated a lot of rhe residenta use that pro~erty for access. She stated the
shortest route right now to the commetcial areas ia through the park and
subject property and at any given time you can see at least two people usinq
the access and maybe as many ss five peuple. She presented a map showing the
neighcorhood park, the proposed m~tel and the two routes uaed and atated if
8/22/63
MINUTE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNINO COMMI$SION, AUOUST 22, 1983 83-5~5
that pcop~cty ~~ao blocked oft completoly, the padeetrien tra~fl~ uld be
focced down Raloigh an~ Riveria. Shs atated one of their khoughte wea to have
the park complet~l,y blocked off At Ralsigh, Rsed and Ravanna stceeta.
Da~n 3hecer stated thet is a queation thet would have to ensweced by the Parke
and Recre~kion Depactment end it is not up to the Planning Commisgion to
diacusa that ieaue.
Me. elackwell continued that she reelizes the motel will cceate more tcaffic
and curcently theic Neighborhood Council is very active and the number of
burglary incidents ace down, but ~ith this additional ped~atrian treffic, they
will not know who belonge in their neighborhood and who doean't. She steted,
howevec, this would be a nice looking matel end they do aupport the concept
except for that one problem. She aeked if there ie some wey to open up an
access caad acound the end of the pcoperty on Releigh diverting the foat
treffic away from the property line of the motel making sure pedestrian
traffi~ can't got thcough that way to the commerci~l areaa.
Mra. Wdlter Jones, 603 Reed Avenue, An~heim, steted her pcoperty is directly
acrosa the atreet and pointed out thece are three motele neerby already and
she was concerned whet would happen to these motels af~er the Olympice. She
stated with a 3-atocy hiyh bulldi.ng, they would have no privacy in theic
backyards or home. She also asked about the office building that wae proposed
on this site sevecal years ago and asked ebout accesa onto Raleigh fcom the
motel.
Dean Sherer explained there is no pcoposed access from Raleigh and the
condition is asking that any access rights be dedicated to the City to prevent
that from happening.
William Allen, 1713 B. 5ycamore, ~naheim, atated he owne proper~y at 1235
Raleigh and that he did not agree with rezoning that portion of the property
from reaidentfal to commercial uaes. He stated there are four motels within a
one-mile radius and that he believed something ahould be developed on subject
propertyt however, he wanted to know ff this motel could turn into a'house of
ill-repute" because there are so many hotels and motels on Harbor Boulevard
already which the City cannot control. He etated he thought it would be hard
to keep theae units rented.
Betty Sutton, 2447 W. Valdina, Anaheim, stated ahe repcesents the owners of
the Anaheim Motoc Lodge and the Akua Motor Hotelt thAt they are accoas the
atreet on the east aide of the pcopoged motel and are not concerned with the
competition, but ace concerned with the i~flux of motels to the south which
have affected ~heir bus~ness and thece ia another addition to the Holiday Inn
juet 1/2 block up the stceet and felt thie 1Z0 unita will make it virtually
imposaible for any of them to make a living on the off-season basis. She
stated off-aeason occupancy hae gone from 80t to 60~ and they don't feel
another motel could be supported in this area.
Pete Lapis, Fullerton Travel Lodge, stated he agrees with Ms. Sutton thnt
there are too many motele in the are~ and he is concerned about what will
happen aftec the Olympice. He atated he thought 3 atories was quite high and
will require a lot of perking.
8/22/83
~
MINUT~B. ANAH6IM CITY PLANNINa COMMi$BION, ~UQ~BT _22. 1983 83-5Z6
Joeam Ozyp point~d out the raof-line o! the motel ia of A reaidential natuce
and it will look like a niae condominium project end the ee~backa meet Code
requirementa and there is additionel lendacaping with a 6-foot high block wall
along Releigh ~nd alang the eouth~rn boundary. She steted moat people don't
ait in theic cnoma and look down in ather people'a homes. she atated
netionwide occupancy ratea run 55 to 60t and they will heve the "eeat Weatern'
at~ndard and their rate$ will be ~35 to ~45 per night and they anticipate a 55
to 60t occupancy rate and they are peying ~14 per foot for this 1.48 acres
which ie e co~~ecciel price, end ahe did not think A motel of thie quality
would become a'houee of ill repute.'.
Commisaioner Fry augqe~ted a 4 to 5-foot walkway accesa elong the ].ong side of
the trienguler portion of the pcoperty which ia in the City of Fu'ilerton. Ms.
Ozyp pointed out thet ~rea to be ennexed will provide 5 pArking sp~cea and
pointed out the parking epaces and trash areea propoaed on the plan and
explained that keking off 6 feet elong that propecty line will meen
redeaigning the project and asksd if they eould juat eliminate that por.tion of
the propecty. She atated the question is also what type of easement is being
requeated.
Commiasionet Bushore stated he is talking about a 3-foot fenced easement end
stated those five p4rking spaces could be eliminated since they are not really
needed. Ms. Ozyp stated ahe did not think those epaces are needed to meet
Code requirements, but it doea give them the opportunity to provide additional
landacaping facing Harbor.
Commiseioner eushore stated he did not see the problem with loaing thoae few
parking spaces and noted parking varience~ have been granted for other motele
and stated he did not think the whole plan would have to be redeRigned.
There was a brief diacusaion regarding redeaigning the plan to eliminate that
portion of the property. Commissioner Bushore atated he thought a 3-foot
walkway would be adequate which kould prevent vehiclea or motorcycles fcom
uaing it.
Ms. Ozyp clarified that they would be required to provide the walkway And
stated if they can work out somekhing cegarding the pdrking, she thought the
problem could be resolved. She referred to the matter going before the
Council and the possibility that HUD Block Grant monies would be available to
provide the walkway.
Commissfoner Fry pointed out that 98 parking spaces are required to meet Code
and the plan provide8 98 apaces, no~ counting the 5 spaces in the triangular
porkion of the property to be annexed.
Commisaionet La Claire stated ahe would be interested in seeing the plan
ceviaed, eliminating that portion of the property and auggested that the
petitionec request a continuance in ordec to submit reviaed plans and pointed
out variancea for less than Code requirement of parking apaces have beea
granted.
8/22/83
MINUTBS. AN~HEIM_CITY PL1-NNINO CONMI88ION, ~UG~ST 22~ 1983 83-527
Ma. Ozyp eteted she thought they would ~ose more then two parking apacaa in a
redeeigned plen. Commiaaionec Buahore etetsd h• felt cevereing the epacea,
movinq the kraah locetion and relaceting tho compact cac spacea would provide
edequate room. Dean Sherer etnted he thought e continuance would be
appropriace in order to allow the petitioner to wock with ataff of thQ
Planning Depertment and Parks end Recreetion Department. Ms. 02yp ateted ehe
would preter a ruling today becauae they nre in the poeition of releasing
funda and it waa noted there is also a 22-ddy appeel period.
De~n Sherec steted the Commisaion could approve the project today with A
condition that the accese will be provided. Commissioner Buehore ateted he
did not w~nt to approve the project without seeing the pl~ns and it ie
poasible the mettec would heve to be readvertiaed.
Chalrwoman BouAa pointed out reviaed plana would have to be submitted by
Friday in order for the maCtec to be heard in two aeeka. Ms. Ozyp st~ted the
conaideratiun would be for a 3-foot walkway easement. Cammisaioner Bushore
pointed out eome of the motels along Katelle have had to provide d
line-of-sight plan to show the visual intrusion and he thought thet would be
neceseACy on this project.
Commisaioner Hecbat asked if the City will accept the dedication for the
access. Annika Santalahti stated stAff would have to discuse thAt with the
Parks and Recre~tion Department.
Commiesioner La Claice atated she wou13 like to have a repreeenketive preaent
from the Parks and Recreation Dopartment when there are queations of this type
on the agend~. Dean Sherec stated the latest information he received fcom the
Parks and Recreation Department was that they are not requiring a dedicated
acceas across the propetty, nor were they wanting to ha~e to maintain an
acc~as, but simply wanted a hole in the wall that would allow the people to
get through the ptoperty to Harbor Boulevard.
Commisaioner Herbst stated he thouqht that was ask.ing too much and if they
want access, they should be wil.ling to accept the dedication and maintain it,
Chris Jarvi, Director of Parka and Recreation, City of Anaheim, clarified this
isaue refere to the eaet end of Mar~ anita Park end stated the accesaway is
desirable and it should be about 4-feet wide, but that 3 feet would be
acceptablet however, 4 feet would be better for two people passing and atated
that they would accept dedication and maintenance. He stated he thought they
could prevent motorcycles from usi~g the walkway with mototcycle barriers.
Commiasioner Bushore steted he did not want a blind area created w!th a block
wall with Mr. Jarvi stating they would suggest a chain link fence. He stated
thex have had problema with people cuttfng the fence along the freeway
right-of-way to access Harboc and he thought that pr~blem would be alleviated
with a right-of way of thia nature.
Commfssionec La Claire etated the Commiesion could go ahead and approve thie
ptoject if the petitioner would egree to what the Parks and Recreation
Director is requesting.
8/22/83
~INUT~S. ~N1IHBIM CITY PW-I,NINa COMMI$$ION, AUGU$T ~2. 1983 83-9Z8
Jeck White ststed if thare ia a loaa of perking apacea below Cod~ requirement,
the metter would heve to be readvertised at e leter date for a parking
varianca.
Commiseianec Buahore eteted he ce~lly thought the Commieeion ahould look et
the viaual intrusion.
Chris Jacvi stated they would b~ willinq to accept e 3-foot easement
dedicetion Eor the accaes.
ACTION: Commiseioner Bushote offered a motion, seconded by Commisaioner Fry
and MOTION CP-RRIED lCommiaeioner McBurney absent), thet conaideration af the
ePorementioned matter be continued to the cegularly-echeduled meeting of
Septembec 7, 1983, at the requeAt of the petitione~ in order to aubmit cevised
plans concerning the accese to the per.k, perking eituntion that mey have to be
changed and aleo the viaual intcuaion to ceaidentiel pcoperties to the aouth
and west.
ITEM N0. 10. EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION, W~IVER OF CODE RE4UIREMENT AND
CONDITIONAL USE PE1tMIT N0. 2463
PUBLIC tiEARING. OWN~RS: EDW~RD A. BLANK, ET AL, 85b South Walnut St[eet,
Anaheim, CA 92802. AGENT: LOIS M. R1IMONT ANU MARILYN R. WATSON, 2516 Ames
Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92806. ~cope[~y deacribed as a rectangularly-shaped
parcel of land consisting of ~pproximately 0.7 acre locAted at the northeast
corner of Beacon Avenue and Walnut Street, 856 South Walnut Street.
To permit e bed and breakfast inn in the R~-A-43,000 Zone with waivet of
minimum landscaped setback.
There was one peraon indicating her pcesence in opposition to subject request
and although the staff ceport was not read, it is referred to and made a pert
of the minutes.
Lois Ra~ont, agent, stated she and hec pdrtner's families have ~een
vacationing in bed and bteAkfast inns for six yeare and they are usually
located in residential areas and are aldec homes which have been restored with
antiques, etc. She stated they feel this pcoperty at 856 5. Walnuk Street
would be an ideal location for this type uset that the houae was built in 1910
as the mayor's mansion for John Cook and is a very large home on 3/4 acre.
She stated they would reatore the houae and yard to ita original condition and
try to get it on the Historical Reyister. She stated it wi21 be ko their
benefit that the houae look goo~ and it will not look like a commercial
property because the clientele likes the feelinq of taking a trip back in
timet that there wi21 be n~ television or telephones in the rooms and there
will not be any big signs out ftont. She stated she thought this would be an
aeaet to the neighbochood and they met with th~ neighbors last night and after
tdlking with them, there was no opposition,
Hildegard Ronberg ateted she lfves with her brother et the southweat corner of
Beacon and Walnut and that ahe would like more informations thet ahe wes not
aware of the meeting held last night and did not receive any notice of the
meeting. She st~ted a big ptoblem has alwaya been traffic congeationt that
8/22/83
~
MINUTBB. ~N~HBIM CITY PLAN~INa CQMMIS~ION~ AUGUBT 22. 1983 _ 83'"gZ9
e~econ end Welnut ere both nartow etr~ete snd tr~ttic on WAlnut ia extremely
heevy going to hotela end motele in tha ~cee. She ateted the oth~t question
is people coming in et ~ight end certainly there would be noie• and poasibly
even motorcyclos. 3he atated she was concerned about a aign on the building,
pointing out this ia ~ re~idantiel neighborhood and felt thie w~uld be n wedge
in the regulatione established for that erea. She Asked who wouid be running
the estebliahment and felt ~hia could develop into something moce thdn just A
bed end breakfest inn.
Ma. Ramont eteted there will be 8 unita for rent, ao that would not creatie d
greAt deel oP tcatfic~ thet the propertY was p[evipusly approved foc a chutch
with 125 members which would hdve c~o~ted a lot more trafficj that they heve
10 perking spaceB off the atreeL• which is ~dequdte and that they do not went A
big aign out fGOnt and will be h~ppy with just a plaque on the bu.ilding or a
emall sign in the front. She at~ted ahe And her partne[e are in the proceas
of buying the property and thei[ experience with bed and breakfest
eetablishmenta ie thak they do not create noieet that ~he units ~re rRnted fo[
~65 to $110 pec nighk ar-d wfll attract a quiet raserved clientele. She stated
moat guesta would not be coming in at an unreaeor~able hour and explained that
she and her partners would be thete ftom 7:00 A.m. until 9:00 p.m. and there
will be someone on the premises all the time, poasibly one of her daughtecs or
a college etudent at night~
David Collins, 952 Flore~ Anaheimr atated he has lived :or 23 yeara with his
backyacd adjacent to a parkin9 lot of a motel an~ noise has nevec been a
concern and even with the motel now being 3 storiea, it ha~ not been a
problem. He stated he did not t.hink people living across the street from thia
house will be aware af the t[affic bec~uae People do not make v~ry much noise
coming and going.
Barbara Ward, 2501 Banyan Court, Anaheim, etated this pcoperty has been
appcoved foc conditionel uses in the pask and in hec opinion, thia would be
one of the best usee because the building will be restoced to its original
conditiont and that when it was approved for A nursery school end r.hurch, it
lost that historical value. She stated ehe would like to see thie permit
granted and the site inaluded on the Hiatocical Registec.
THE PUBLIC HE1-RING WAS CLOSEp.
Commisaio~er King clarified that the pte~~ses will be brought up to Code
including the fence that is in bad condition.
Ms. Rdmont stated the fence w111 be repaired or replaced, but she was not sure
with what type fencing. Concerning the shed, she stated that will be restoced
to look like a carriege house, but in reality will be e 1-bedroom man~ger's
apartment and that the trash locdtion will be a fenced area and the proposed
location ie necessary becauae of access for ttash trucke.
Commissioner 8erbet etated he felt this ptobably would be one of the best
locations for a bed and breakfaet inn and the house is authentic and
hiatorical and this would be an asset to ~neheim, especielly if it is actually
placed on the Histocical Re9iatec. de steted he thought some of these type
establiahment~ belong in Anaheim beceuae this ie a touriat-oriented area and
S/22/83
M'iNUTEB, ANAH~IM CITY pLJ1N~lINQ COI~MI88IQN. AUGUST 22, 1983 ~ 83-530
thia will not crenta an impact on the area. He pointed out thia aite wee used
for a church end nucsecy achool and this bed end breekfast inn would be a very
light uao compeced to thoee and probebly on~ of the beet uaes proposed !oc
thet corner he hes aeen.
Chairwoman eouas poinLed out with a houae this large, a family could move in
with a lot of children who could drive motorcycles or vehicles and ahe thought
with the rental rate mentioned, motoccycle clientele would not bR ettrected to
thia inn.
Commiesionec euahoce stated the petitionecs hav@ obviously done tt~eic homework
because in the pdst there has been a lot of opposition fcom the neighbnra when
other uaes wete propoaed on this propecty. He atated he is acquainted with
theae petitioners end knowa they ere going into L•hia with their eyea open and
thougnt they could meke thie operation something the City cen be proud of and
he did not think it would be necessary to lmpoae a time limit on the perm.it.
He atated, however, if thie !a approved, terminetione should be c~queated ot
the other conditional use permits.
Ms. Ramont sGeted they would not like to hev~ to widen the driveway in ordec
to keep the residential look of the propecty, but if it is a safety hazet~,
they would be willing to do i*..
Mre. Ronberg etated she wao intereated in the statiement that thN tatea would
be $65 to $110 per night because that meens tt~e houee would have to be
completely renovated, pointing out she has lived in Chat house and knows the
cundition it is in.
Jack White suggested a condition be added requiring the petitioner to pay the
transient occupancy tax a~ required by Section 2.12 of the Anaheim Municip~l
Code.
Ma. Ramont responded they will b~ willing Co pay that tax.
ACTION: Commissioner King offered e motion, seconded by Commiseioner Fry and
MOTION CARRIED (Commissioner McBurney absent), that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the pcoposal to psrm~t a bed and bre~kfast inn in the
RS-A-43,000 Zone with waivec of minimum landscaped setback on a
rectangularly-ahaped parcel of land consieting of approximately 0.7 acre
located at the northeast cornec of Beacon Avenue and Walnut Street and further
described ae 856 W. Walnut Street= and does hereby approve the Negative
Ueclaration from the requirement to prepare an envfronmental impact report on
the basis that thece would be no significant individual or cumulativp advecse
enviconmental impact due to the approval of thie Negative Declaration aince
the Anaheim Genecal Plan designates the subject property for low density
residential land use~ commensucate with the proposalf that no sensitive
environmental impacta ace involved in the pcoposals that the Initial Study
submitted by the petitionet indicates no significant individual or cumulative
adverse environmental impacts~ and that the Negative Declaration
subetantieting the focegoing fin~ings is on file in the City of ~naheim
Planning Department.
8/22/83
MINUTBB._AN~HBIN CITY PLl-NNINQ COMMIBSION. ~UOUST 22, ,}~63 ,_____ 83-531
Commleeioner King ott~red a motion, aecondaQ by Commiasion~r Hecbst and MOTION
CARttiED (Commissioner McBurney ebaant), that the 1-neheim City Planning
Commiasion do~a hecsby gcent waiver of Code rfquicemsnt on the beeia thet
there ace ~pscial circumetencea epplicable to the properky such es 4ize,
ahape~ topogrephy, locetian or surroundinge which do not apply to other
prupertiea in tt~e vicinity ~nd etcict Application of the Zoning Code deprives
the pcoperty of privilegos enjoyed by other properties undec identical zoning
clAaeificationa.
Commisaioner King utfeced Reeolution No. PC83-148 end moved for ita peesage
and adoption thet the Anaheim City Plenning Commiaeion doea he~eby grent
Conditional Use Permit No. 2483 pura~n nt to Sections 18.03.030.031 Chrough
18.03.030.035 of l~neheim Municipa2 Code a~d subject to interdepertmentel
Committee racommendetio~s including the condition thet the petitionec ahall be
cequired to pay tcansient occupancy tax in eccordance with Section 2.12 of the
AnAheim Municipal Code.
Commiseioner Herbet added he would like to add approval of this permik ia
granted on the basis that the houae will be cestored to its originAl condition
and poasibly be on the Hist•orical Registec.
On coll call, the furegoing cesolution wAS pnased by the following vote:
AYES: BOUASr BUSHORE~ PRY, HERBST~ KINGi LA CLAIRE
NOES: NON~
ABSENT: MCBURNEY
Jack White, Aasistant City Attorney, presented the written right to appeal the
Planning Commisaion's deciaion within 22 days to tho City Council.
ITEM N0. 11. ~IR NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND VARIANCE N0. 3344
PUBLIC HEARING. OWNERS: ROGER L. WILLIAMSON AND PAUL D. WILLII~MSON, 3450 E.
I.a Palma Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92806. Property described .s an
irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of appcoxicnately 4.54 acres
having a frontage of appcoximately 492 feet on the aouth side of La Palma
AvEnue, 3450 East La Palma Avenue.
Waivecs of minimum numbec of parking spaces and maximum fence height to
conatruct a mini-storage facility.
There was no one indicating their pceaence in oppoeition to subject request
and although the staff report wae not read, it is referred to and made a pert
af the minutea.
Roger Wi111Amson• owner, explained the parking study was submitted and has
been accepted and approved by the City Traffic Engineer and also the
Redevelopment Commisaion hes recommended approval of thie request. He stated
they have been operating e recreational vehicle stor~~3e facflity for several
years and they have been a good citizen and this is aomething the City can be
proud of. He stated the parking will be edequate for the self-storage
waxehouse type use and the 8-foot fence is necessary for Becurity.
8/~2/83
MINUTBS AN~ 6IM CITY PLA NIN~ C MMI SIC-N wUGUBT 22 1983 83- S3Z
THE PUBL~IC NE~RING WAS CLO&~p.
AC_ TIpN= Comm~eaioner King oEfeced a motion, aeconded by Commiss ioner Fcy and
MOTION CAItRIED (Commis4lonac McBurney abeent), that the Aneheim City Plenn ing
Commiasion haa r~viQwed the pcoposal to conetruct a mini-atorege fecility with
waivere of mir-imum numbec of perking spaces and max~mum Eenc~ he iyht on an
irregulariy-sheped pacc~31 oE lend conoisting of approxim~zt.~::~y 4.54 accen,
having a frontage of appcoximetely 492 feet on the auuth aide of Ls PAlmd
AvenuR and further describ~d as 3450 La Pelmn Avenue~ end doea h ereby epprove
the Negetive Declaration fcam the requirement to prepare an env i conmentel
impact repoct on the basis that thece wauld be no aignificent individua,~ o r.
cumule~tive edverse enviconmentdl impACt due t~ the epproval of t hia Neqakive
Decl~rr~ti~n since the Anaheim General Plen deaignatea the aubjec t property f or
general ina~strial :and uaes oommenaurate with the ~roposalt that no sonsitiv~
envicanmental impACCs ece involv~d in the pcopoealt that the In itiel Study
submitted by the petitioner indicetos no eignificant individual or cumulative
adverse environmenCel impacta~ and that the Negetive Declacatio n
substantiating the focegoing findinga ia on file in the City of 1-neheim
Planning Aepartme-~t.
Commie~sloner King offeced Resolution No. PC83-149 and move:~ for its paesage
and adoption that the Anaheim City Planning Commisaion doea he r eby gtant
Vu• ance No. 3344 on the basio that the parking waiver will not cause an
incceae~ in traffic congestion in the immediate vicinity nor adversely aff ect
any adjoining land ueea and that the granting of the parking v a riance under
the condition impused will not be detcim•.ntal to the peace, hea lth, safety,
and general welfare ~f the citizens of the City of Anaheim a~-d grantinq waiver
(a) on the ba~is t.hat there nre $~e[aph ~iloaationCOr sutcoundieqs~that do not
pco~erty euch as afze, shape, topog p Yr
apply to the s~~rounding propertiea in the vicinity and strict a~plication of
the zoni~,g Code deprives the property of pcivileges enjoyed by othec
pco~etties in identica~ clasaification in the vici~ity.
Un roll call, the foregoing resolution was passed by the following vote:
AYES: -10~~ASr BUSHOP:'~ FRY~ HE128ST, KING~ LA CLAIRE
NOES: NONE
ABS~NT: MCBURNEY
ITEM N0. 12. EIP. IVEG]~TIV~ DECLAItATION AND VARIANGE N0. 3345
PUCLIC HEARING. OWNEP.: HUGO A. VAZQUEZ, 619 South Live Oak Drive, Anaheim,
CA 92805. Property describ~d as a cectangularly-shaped pacce 1 of land
consieting of approximately 0.2 acre having a frontage of app roximately 68
feet on the west aide of MelroAe Street, 129 South Melr~se St zeet.
Waivers of minimum lok area per dwelling unit, maxir,.m struct ural height,
maximum site coveraqe and minimum side;ard sQtbac~ to construct an 8-unit
affordable apartment complex.
There were two peraona indicatfng their presence in oppositiori to gubject
request and although the eteff report was not read, it is referred to and made
a part of the minutes.
8/22/83
MINqT6~ 1-N~H~IM CITY PWINNIN(~ CO_„MMIS6ION. AUGUST 2Z. 1983 83-533
it wes noted ~he a~plicant wa• not prasent and Jack White, Aa0lstant City
Attorney, expleintd the Commiesion could hesr the mettec it th~y ao daeired.
Commie.ionar Buahore declered a conflict o! interest se detined by Anaheim
City Planning Commission Reeolution Nu. PC76 -157 adopting e Conflict of.
Intereat Code !oc the Pldnning Commiaeion and Government Code Section 36Z5, et
seq., in thet the property ia within the Redevolopment 1-rea and t~e is e
conttactual agen* foc the Redevelopment Agency and pursuent to the pcovislona
ot the above Codb~, declAred to the Chaicwomen that he was withdrawing from
Che henring in connection with Vatiance No. 3345, anQ would not teke pert in
eithex khe discueaion or the voting theceon And hed not diacusaed thia metter
with eny membec of the Plenning Commiaeion. Thereupo~ Commiaeinnet Buahore
left the Council Chember.
Candy Anding, llb Melrose, Anaheim, pcesented a pe~Ltion ei4ned by nei3i~bors
in the aree who are opposed to the cequest becduse they do not Eeel t-~e size
of the project is in chdre-ctec with lheir neighborhood= thek they ere elso
concerned about the type of people the petitiuner will be renting to, pointing
aut the etaff report indicatEa subject propecty is dPVeloped with a
single-fami~y residence, but it hds been converted to a duplex and the:e are
more than two families living there and they `eel if 8 epertments e~re allowed,
there will be no control over the number of pe~ple rentiny the units. She
stated they are concerned ahout the pedestrian traffic and par''~g even though
the petitioner is ~:roviding adequa~te packing spacea. She state~. most of the
~;~ighbors h~ve one or two emall children and they are concerned about theic
safety. She et:.t~d this is e street with oldec homea end they ~re concerned
about keeping it quiet.
Darwfn Stockwell, 1212 Maplewood, stated he represents the familie~ at 202,
206 a~d 210 Melcoae and there i3 a terrible parking problem now because the
people in the apartments dan't use theic gacagea and park on t`~e atceets and
there are a lot of residenF.s in the area who do not cere ebo~t the area dnd
croes their lawns and thtow trash out, etc. He ateted they wiah ~o protest
this cequest.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Jack Wbite, Aasistant City Attorney, stated the Commisaion can act on this
request, but he did nok think they have suffici.ent ~evidence to epprove itt
howevec, they could deny it or continue it so that the petitioner could be
re-contacted so he could attend the meeti~g.
Commisaioner La Claire stated the property is zoned °or RM--1200 and she does
not objoct to multiple-family un~ta, but thoucht the property ie being
overbuilt because of all the varfances being requested and the petitionec is
not greaent to juatify any of the variances. She atated ~he could not vot~
for thie request because of the numbst of waivecs and ahe felt the matter
ahould be denied so the petitioner can submit a revised plan. Commissioner
Fry agreed ar.d stated *.his is a logical. area for land a~~embly, but putting
thie much on one parcel ie, in his npinian, too muct.
8/22/83
63-531
MIN T~ 1-NI- BIM CITY PL INCi C MISSION AUGU8T 21 a 983
Commiaaionec Horbet stated thia ie in the neig hborhoed preservatf.on a cee end
he ehouyht the oituation 4houl~f b~ cle-rifiad a8 to whether oc not. new
buildinga are qoing to be allowmd oc if the ne iqhbochood is going to be
preo'rved as it ie.
Commieaioner La Cleice a~dted ahe t~ought that haa to do with funding only~
allowing the existing housas to be fixed up, if that ie what the owne x
deaices, but the zoning ie foc multiple-femily.
Commisaioner Hecbat agreed thie pro~ect fac ov ecbuilds thig pcoperty end
providing two nffocdable unita in order to ge t the varianc~s, ie not meeting
the intent of the Code. He steted he could not vote for 8 unitet hor+ever., the
petitionec might be able to provide 6 unita and meet all khe requiranaents.
Jack Wtiite explained the request is for four ditEerent variances and weiver
(A) clearly appeacs to be the one waiver relating to the dsneity tha t would
entitle the petitionur to the denaity bonus o~ 251- and waivere (b), (c) a~~d
(d) appear ko be waiveca which requice the n ocmal variance findings.
Commiasioner Herbst suggeeted a 4-week contin uance in orde[ for the petitioner
to be able to submit [eviaed plans aince he is entitled to multiple- tamily
unita becauae of the zoning.
Gommieaioner La Claire stated ahe would have no objections to d 4-.~e ek
c~ntinuance and suggested staff tell the petitionec the Planning Com~mission's
concecna.
ACTION: Ccmmi.ssloner La Claire offered a mokion, eeconded by Commiseion~r
King and MuTION CARRI~D (Commissionec McBurney absent), that conside~atinn of
the aforementioned matter be continued to the meeting of September 39, 1983,
in order tor the petitioner to b~e preaent and submlt cevised plans.
Chairwoman eouas pointed out the opposition would not be re-notifiee~ of the
September 19th hearing and ahould contact the Plann!ng Department t a make
aertain that item ia still scheduled.
Commisaioner Herbst explained the pcopecty is zoned RM-1200 whieh ~rould allow
apartments on this pcoperty and apactments could be built wiChout a public
hearing if all the Code requf[ementa a[e me t.
Commiaeionec La Claire suggeated that this mattec be the first itE~ on the
agenda on the 19th.
8/22/83
'r
MINUTBS 1-N HEIN CITY LJ-NNING CO MIS$ION AUGU T 1Z 1983 83-535
13. REPORTS I~ND R~COMMBNDATIONS -
A. RECL1188IFIC1ITI N 81-82-13 i CONOITIONAL USB PERMIT N0. 2292
Reyu~st f ~om Stetewide Developers, Inc. for review end appcoval of
reviaed plans, propecty loceted on the aouth eide oE Crescent Avenue,
eppr.oximately 330 feet woat of the centerline of 6rookhuret Street.
1-nnika San~ale~ti, 1-asistent Dicector for Zoning, preaented the steff
ceport and ~xplained theae revieed plana are quite different from the
ones originally approved and the biqges~ diEference ie in the grosa floor
erea. She stated she did not think there wea any neighbochood oppoaition
to the oriyinal request and that ia the ceaeon ateff didn't recommend a
public hc~aring. She atated, howevec, if the Commisaion feels the changes
are aubetantial, they can $et the matte~ foc public he~nring.
Jack White, ]~seistant City Attocney, atated hia only concern ie why thece
was no opposition at the previoue hearings that it is poseible there wea
no oppogition to the project as ociginally dasigneds or that this happena
to be in an area where thece could simply be no oppoeition to thi.s type
praject because of the surrounding land uses. He atated he does hev~
some concern ~nytime any significant change ia made to a~lan when the
approvt-1 oE thz original conditional use per~~;t or v~riance requires thet
the pcojp ct be developed in r~ccordance with plana ~uL•~nitted becauae there
is poten t idlly a leqal pc~blem.
Reapondi ng to Commisaionec Pry, Jaek White atated uriginal appcoval was
far 36 u nits and there is no change to that number, and the only areas of
change a r e gcoss floor area increasr~ from 17,130 to 28,946 square feet,
building coverage incre~sed from 20.6! to 34i and the
recreati onal-leisure area is incceased but thet is a benefit.
Susan Bemis, State Wide Developers, stated tWerepnotehappy$witpKthedfloor
about 1- I/2 years ago for 36 units end they
plan so they hi:~d a difCerent architect and he changed the plans. She
stated t hey feel this revised plen addresses not only the marketability
of the p ro~ect, but the aestbetica of the site much better than the
origina 1 glan and includes covering the flood contcol channel. She
stnted s he really doesn'L know why the plan ahows auch a large change !n
the gros s floor erea, becauae the unit si2es are actually smaller and the
number of units is the same. She stated ahe thought maybe one of the
figures ie wrong. She etated the setback waiver has beer. removed.
Respond i ng to Commissioner Buahoce, Ma. Bemis ate~ted when they ocigfnally
submit ted the plane, it wae not cesclved whether or not Orenge ~ounty
would r equire that the channel be covered.
Commiss ioner Buahore asked if covering the channel would inccease the
usabili ty of tihe property. 1-nnika Santalahti xesponded the grc+ss floor
area pe rtains to the square footage o' Ehe building and garages, not the
coveced channel.
Commiss ioner I•a Clr~ire stated she did not see any problems. Ms. Bemia
stated the units oriyinally were 1224 equare feet and now will be 1180
aquare feet, snd will be 2-bedroom, 2-bath condominiuma.
1~, N~ UTB~. ANAH~,~, IN CITY PI~IINNING COMMISSION. A~QU$T Z2, 1~83 83-536
Ma. eemia otsted thece wea pcabably no oppooition originally becauae the
site ia not near eny c~aidential ereer.
1-CTION: Commi$aloner Fry oEfered a motion, seconded by Commiasiorec
Herbat end MOTION C1-RRIBD (Commiseionar McBurney absent and Commisaionar
Buahore ebstaining), that cevised Plene (f.e!vieion Nc 2) to constcuct a
36-unit, 45-f~ot high (4-etory) condominium camplex are heceby epproved
eub~ect to the following conditions: ^
C. UrS c~'vr ~--e-~
(e) Thet Bs~ook~v~8t Street ehall be ce-etriFed, providing e left-turn 7~7
pocket For weat-bound traffic accessing t~e propecty per ~~~
recommendetion of the City Tr~ffic Engineer. ~-~
_' ~.~Sc.[f~f'
(b) Thak no packing ahell be pecmitted on i~oek~wrat Street in front of
subject ~roperty.
(c) That a 6-foot high block well $hall be installed on the east
property line adjacent to the commercial office buil~ing.
(d) That trash ntocage areaa shall be provided in accordance with
requirements of Street Maintenance a~d Sanitation Department. No
tca~sh ch~~~ea at~all be permitted.
B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2100 - Requeat Erom Stephen L. Schuater for an
exkenaion of time, property loceted at J.19 W. eall Road (McDoneld'~).
ACTION: Commisaioner King offeced a motion, aeconded by Commissioner Fry
and MOTION C1-RRIED fComrniaslune r MeBurney absent and Commieaionec Buahoce
voting no) that the AnAheim City Planning Comr~:.,sion does heceby grant a
one-yeat extensaon of time for Conditional Uae Petmit No. 2100 to exp'_ce
on J-ugc~st 11, 1984.
C. CONDITZ~NAL USE PERMIT N0. 21~8 - Requeet f[om Gene A. b Katie M. Albin
for an cxtension of time, propetty located at 354 Orangewood Avenue.
ACTION: Commisaioner King aEf ered a motion, seconded by Commissioner
Herb~t and MOTION C1~RRIED (Cammiesi.o~er McBurney abeent) that the Aneheim
Cit~• Dlanning Com.~nission doea hereby grant a one-year extension of time
for ~nditional Use Permit No. 2248 to expire on J-ugust 24, 1984.
ll. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 482 & 1617 - Requeat fcorr~ Esther Duffy Kasile
for termination of Conditional Uae Permit Nos. 482 and 1617, property
located at the southwest corner of Ball Road and Anahefm Boulevar3.
ACTION: Commissioner King off ered Resolution No. PC83-150 and moved for
its pas~age and adoption that the Anaheim City Planning Commiasion ddes
hereby terminate Conditionel Use Permit N~s. 482 and 1617.
On roll call, the foregoing cesolution was passed by the following vote:
AYES: BOUAS~ FRY~ HBRBST~ KING~ L11 CLAIRB
NQES: NONE
1-BS~NT: MCBURi~IEY
ASSTAIN: BUSHORE
_ ....__.. _ . ._. .._ _ _. ,,...._,. ~_~..,... ...- --..._ .. _.._... .. _ _... . . .._.....____ .. . - ~
. . ..... _ •k
~ , ~ =,~
!{INOTBS~ 11NAH6Il1 C1TY 8LJINNING CQ,fIMI88IONi 11UGI~8'C 22~ 1983 83-53~
E. ~~NDITi0N1-L U86 P6R~hIT N0. Z307 - Requeat Erom Maurice Pinto !or
tetmination of Conditional Ua~ P~tmit No. Z307, pr~perty located at 914
South Herbor e~ul~vacd.
1~CTION: Commiasioner King o!l~red ReBOlution No. pC83-151 and moved for
ite paeeege and adoption that the Anahsim City Plenning Commiaeion doea
hereby terminate Condition~l Use P~rmi~ No. 2307.
On coll call, the faregoing resolution wee pe+~aed by the following vote:
1-YBSS BOUA3~ BIJ$HORB~ FRY~ HGR83T, KING, LJ- CGAIRE
NnES: NONE
11BSENT: MCBURNEY
~THER DISCUSSION:
Commiesioner La Cleire stnted she has been watching aome of the City Council
heeringe on television and [elt, bdsed on eome of their actiona r~leting to
planning Commiseion maCters, that it might be beneficiel if the Commiseion and
Council could meet fn e~n informal ~ork se$dion to discuea current
philosophies, euch ae density, affordeble houaing, br~! and bceakfest inna,
unit eizes, etc.
Commissionec Fcy agceed and AnnikA SenCalahti replied ahe would relay the
Commisaion's interest to the City Clerk.
1-DJOURNMENT: There bein~ no further businese Commissioner Herbat offered a
motion, aecunded by Commisaionec Fry and MOTION C1-RRIED
(Commissioner McOurney a~baent), thet the meeting be adjourned.
The meeting was Adjourned e~t 5:0~ p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
~ /~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~~D~~/~•s a~
Edith L. Herrie, Seccetary
Anaheim City Planning Commiseion
BLH:lm
0002m