PC 1984/01/23REGULAR MBETING OP THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING ~he r~guler meeting of the Anaheim City P1Anning
Commiasion wae called to or.der. by Chairwoman aouas at
10:00 a.m., January 23, 1984, in the C~.ncil Ch~mber, e
quorum being pr.osent and the Commieaion r.eviewed plana oE
the items on today's Agenda.
REC~SS: 11:30 d.m.
RECONVENE: 1:35 p.m.
PRESENT ChairwomAn: Bauas Fr'.~
Commiesioner.s: ~uohor.e,~ Her.bet, King, La Claire, McBurn~y
ABSENT Commissioner.s: None
ALSO PRESENT Annika Santalahti Assistant Directoc for Zoning
Ja~k White Assiatant City A~tor.ney
Jay Titus OEfice Fngineec
Kendr.a Mor.cies Assistant Planner.
Edith Harria Planninq Commisaion ~ecr.etar.y
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commi~sioner King offer.ed a moti~n, seconded by
~.ommissioner McBUr-•~ey that the minntea of the meeting of Januar.y 9, 1984, be
approved ae submitted. Commissianer. La Claire asked that cor.r.ectiona be made
on Page 84-17, Iast par.agr.aph, firat llne, last wor.d changed from noiae to
odor; ~nd an addition be made on Page 84-18, second ~$ragr.aph that she
intended to a~k Mr.. 6candt how much time he thought he would need ~o get r.i8
of the hor.sea, r.ather than the pr.oblAm. Commissioner. eushoce asked that an
additi~n be made on Paye 84-15, f.ourth paragrepl~ that he intended to say that
the "adjoining five pcoper.tiea ace all RS-A-43,000' instead of 'surr.ounding
five properties are all R-1.' The motion car.ried to appr.uve the minutea
subject to those cocr.ecti~na and additions.
ITEM N0. 1. EIR NEGATIVE UECLARATION ANO VARIANCB N0. 3361
PUBLIC HEARING. OWNERS: DAVID ~. "OOMS, 229 S. Loara Street, Anaheim, CA
92802. AGBNT: OSCAK E. WHITEBOOK, P.O. BaX 314, Yorba Linda, CA 92686.
Pzoperty desccibed as a rectangulacly-shaped parc~l of land consisting of
approximately 0.53 acre, 219 South Loar.a Str.eet.
Waivers of minimum lot ac~a And minirnum lot width to eFtablish a 2-lot
subdivision.
Continued from Oc}ober 31, 1983, and January 9, 1984.
ACTION: Commissioner King offered a motion, seconded by Commiesianer
La Claice and MOTION CA~RI~D, that consideration of the aforernenttoned matter.
be contintied to the meeting of Februacy 6, 1984, in order for the appliCant to
meet with staff and submit development plana as requeated by Pl~nning
CommSasion.
84-28 1/23/84
~INUT~S. ANANEIM CITY Pf~~NNING COMMIfiSION. .1ANUARY 23. 1984 _ 84-29
IT6M N0. 2. ENVIRbNMENTAL IMP~CT REPpRT NO. 262 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
N0. 2461
_.___...__..
PUBLTC NEARING. AWNERS: RIVIERA MOBILEHOME PARKS, 300 W. Katella Avenue,
Anak~eim, CA 928Q2. J-GEI~T: FLOYD G. PI-W~-NO, 2555 B. Chapman Avenue, Suite
415, Fuller.ton, CA 92631. Pr.opecty desc:ribed as an ir.r.egular.ly-ahaped paccel
of l~nd c~~neisting of. approximdtelX 18.1 acr.ea, 300 W~at Katella Avenue
(Rivieca Mobilehome Par.ks?.
To per.mit I.wo 14-atocyr 200-foot higti office complexe~s.
Continued Erom Novembec 28, 1983, and Deeembec 12, 1983.
AC'I~ION: Commiseioner. King ~fEer.ec~ u motion, seconded by Cammissioner
La Clair.e and MOTLON CARRIGD, that consider.ation of the ~afor.ementioned mattec
be continued to the meeting of Febr.uary 6, 1984, i,n or.der. for ttie petitioner
to finalize negoGiations pectaining to aubject property.
ITEM N0. 3. EIH N~GATIV~ bECLARATION AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2523
~REAQVERTISED)
PUBLIC HEARING. OWNEKS: ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, 300 W. Glcnoaks
~oulevard, Glenda,le, CA 91202, ATTN; E. L. Keil. Pcoperty descr.±bed as a
rectangular.ly-siiaped ~arcel of land consisting of ~pproximately 0.51 acr.e,
1801 S. State Co11Q~e Boulevacd (Ar.co Se~:vice StAtion).
To permit a convenience mar.ket with gasoline sales and ofE-sale heec and wi.ne.
Continued fcum DeG~mber 28, 1983, and Januacy 9, 1984.
7't~ere was no one indicating their pr.esence in oppr,sition to subject r.equest
and although the ataff repor.t ~+as not r.ead, it ie r.eferred to And mt+de a par.t
of the minutes.
Laura Kotsir.is, attorney, 540 N. Golden Cir.cle Drive, Santa Ana, was present
to answer any questions.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Eacl Keil, agent foc Arco Petcoleum Company, responded to Commissioner
La Claire that ther.e is a self-service gasoline station exi.sting on the
pxoper.ty.
Responding to Commissioner. Bushorer Mr. Keil stAted he thought Azco curcently
hae thr.ee ox four A.M. P.M. markets in Anaheim.
Commissioner Bushore stated in the past ther.e was an attorney representing
Acco who indicated that Arco had done a survey of their sites in A~;~heim and
had found ther~e were only 5 sites which were adequate for A.M. P.M. mackets;
however, those S sites have all been before the Planni^a ~ommiaslfln and some
were appcoved and some k~ere denied. He asked if Ar.co i~~~,Prids to just keep
coming back with more requests until they have 5 sites approved. He added in
the past, the Planning Commission has t~ied to keep food and gasoline sales
separate.
1/23/84
MINUTES, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNiNG COMMISSION, JANUARY 23~1984 84-30
Mc. Keil stated he had no knowledge o~ what any other. r.epr.esentative hed ~sid
and thst he pldna to ~ubmit this cequeat and one other. ~ite. He expleined to
Comm~aeionec ~a Claice in r.eep~nse to her question aa to wti~:tr,er. or. not Ar.co
actudlly goee out soliciting theae marketa fr.om thefr. opecator.s, that Ar.co has
a sale~ depar.tment whiah handles the nAtional Cranchises An.i explained these
are very de~irous buRinesa~e and rhe concept haa boen overwhelming end they
hava been total aoseta to the community.
Ma. Kotairin atated the owner./oper.atoc of the atation has to expr.ees some
interest in wanting an A.M. P.M. market and it doee take aome capital
investmont on his pACt. She statAd the owner./oper.ator has :o go thr.ough 8ame
secur.ity tr.aining befor.~ Arco agr.~es to the concept and it is not juat thak
their. salee peopl~ ar.e ~oing out tcying to get them to conver.t.
Commissioner 9uahoce atated he felt the real iasue here is thak Ar.c~ did
conduct a sur.vey wt~ich indicated l•here wer.e only ao many feasib.le aite~ in
thia area. He otated the issue of the sale uf beer. and wine wikh gasoline
also is very debatable with the Planning CommisAion.
Ms. Kotsiris stated che would like to have the Commisaion discusR the
desirability oE thia location and pointed out ttiey liave agreed lo do whatever
was cecommended r.egar.ding the dr.iveway~, etc.
CommisRtonr.r Bushor.e ~tated tlie Commiasion thouglil• the location at B~11 and
West Str.ee.t was a mor.e desir.able site becauae there we~e a lot of motels and
hotels in the area to be aerviced and also, it was in the Dianeyland ar.eA;
however, the iub}ect sfte is not located ar.ound ver.y many motels and he di-3
not see the need for a convenience macket ak this location fr.om a planniny
atandpoint. He statEd hP also thought the market could cause pr.oblems wit.h
people who would want to stop and purcha:~~ beec and win~ on theic way to the
Skadium. He noted this is also an industcial area.
Ms. Kotsiris stated Ar.c~ dfd a macketing survey and found that less than 20~
of the people came in just for the mar.ket and moat people stop t.o get gas and
then take advantage of thQ convenience markets rather than stopping sever~l
times. She stated the density of the ar.ea has ver.y little effect on the
actual sales. She stated the mar.keting survey shows that this would be a ver.y
profitable location foz a convenience market.
Commissioner BushozC stated people would buy perishable items cloaer. to their
homea. Mr. Keil stated this will b~ similar *.o a 7-Bleven mar.ket with the
sale of gasoline.
Commissioner La Claire ~tated 3he predicted 4 or 5 year.s ago when the first
request like this came in, that the Commiasion would be getting requeats fr.om
operatora of m~ni-markets wanting to sell gasoline and gasoline stations
wanting to have mini-markets and the Commission has always had a policy
against dual uses on a property. 5he stated this City ahould eithec develop a
new attitiude about allflwing 7-Eleven stores to put in yas pumps or stick to
their view regazding no dual uses on tl~e prcperty because it has been found in
the past thAt dual uses can cause problems.
1/23/84
..~,~. ~ .. .
MINUTES, ANANEIM Ci~rX rLANNiNG COMM:ISSION, JANU~RY 23, 198d __ __ 81-31
She etated ther.e ia a similac facility an LA Palma, but whe ther. or not thia le
tho Kight place for. this use is not the queation and ~he is philosaphically
oppoaed to the ~ual iiae of the prapecty and ~s absalutcly opposed to the sole
of be~r. and Wine oc any alcoholic bever.Ages in conjunction wlth thQ sal~ oE
g~soline becauae in this countr.y thece he~ baen ~ push to p liminoce drinking
and dciving and everything posaible fa boing done to disass ociat~ thc~ae tw~,
parricularly with the yaung Adults and taenage ~opulation, and tt appeera to
be working. She at~lc~ Lr.om a paychological and philosoph i ca.l pc~int oE view
and frotn a view of safety, she could not vote foc appr.oval of the sAle of
alcoholic bever.agea in connection with gasoline salea.
Commisaioner. Rushor.e a~Ated ttie Commission is alao deeply c ancPrned with
off-sale liquor in the induatr.ial ar.ea becauae drinking ]e s~enn a pecaon's
capabilitiea and they might gu bACk t~ wor.k and havc or. ca u se an induatr.ial
accidenl•. He atat.ed he would be oppoaed to ttie ofE-sale u t thie location
becauae it is too close to the Stadium and he t~aa see~ a lo t of p4ople
di:inking And throwing beer. cans al• c~rs in tiie parking lot, with fans yelling
At each other, P~c. And this would m~ke it too convenient f or them to stop by
and pick up beec in cana ttiat could be used in the par.king lo~.
Mr.. Y,eil stated r.eyar.ding the dual uae af selling alcohol with gasoline, he
t-a~ to dr.ive a car. to ttie grocery store and explained this is packaged
oEf-•sale beec And wine and is not something to be aerved o n the pr.emice~.
Commissionex Bunhor.e stated when a per.son goes to the groc er.y ¢tor.e, they go
ther.e to buy food and purchase the alcoholic bever.agea in conjunction with the
food, but in this case, th~ey go there ta b~ay gasoline and buying the beer
would be an 'impulse" decision ur.d it would encourage peop 1e to purchase the
beer or wine and dr.ink it on ~hefr. way home. He atated it is a r.ationale, bu~_
that theae ar.e the concerna of the CammiRSion And the pet i tio~~r ahould either.
be in the gasoli,ne bu~ineas or. an MPG type facility which he felt would be
mor.e appropr.iate on khia site. He etated the Commission h aa gone along with
MPG type usea in other ser.vice stations because it is a n a tural dual u~e, but
in theic estimation, the sale of beer and wine and gasolin ~ does r~ot mix.
Chairwoman Bouas a~ked if tt.a petitioner would be willinc~ to have the
mini-market without the sale of beec and wine. Mr.. Keil s tated they have no
glan~ t~ build withaut beez and wir.e or to minimize their. operation.
ACTION: Commissionec 8ushore offer.ed a motion, seconded by Commissioner Kiny
and MOTIUN CARRIED, rhat the Anaheim City Planning Commis sion has reviewed the
proposal to ~ecmit a convenience market; with yasoline sal es and off-sale beer
and wine on a r.ectangularly-shaped parcel o~ land consist ing of apptoximately
0.51 acce located at the southwest cor.ner of Katella Aven ue and State College
Boulevard and furthec described as 1801 S. State Co.ilege Boulevar.d (Arco
Service Station); and do~s hereby apprave the Negative De claxation upon
finc~ing that it has considered the Negative Declar.ation t agether with any
comments received duxing the public review procesa and f u~rther finding on the
basis of the Initial Study and any comments received tha t theXe is no
substantial evidence that the project will have a signif i cant effect on the
environment.
1/23/84
MZ IVUT~S. ANAHBIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION J~NUARY 23 1984 8q-32
Cvanmiseioner Bushore oEfeced Reeolution No. ~CS4-9 and moved for, ita paeeayP
erad adoption that the Anaheim Gity Planning Commisaion does hereby deny
Co nditional Uso Pecmit No. 2523 on the baoie Chat there ia no neceeaity for a
d u~al ueo of the propecty in that prtmarily induRtr.ial er.ee and also on the
br.naie khat the sellinq of beer and wine would be detcimental to the pe~ce,
h enlth, sAEety and gener.el welfAr.F of the citixene of the City of AnahPim.
Commiaeionec La C1Air.o stated ahe would like fo~ the reAaona to be included
t t~ar this or.ea i~ near. the SkadLum and could cr.eake additional problems with
d~rinking in the par.king lut, etc. and thet this mnr.ket would make it ver.y
s i mple for an 'impuls~" buyer to buy the beer. and wine ~nd take it to the
Szad ium.
C~ommissioner. Bushore stated he has seen how the consumpti~n of alcoholic
beve~agea affects legitimate fans caminy to the gams and that is not a par.t oE
t hi8 ~'eaolu~ivn, but he thinka thie could contr.ibute to that problem.
a n ~oll callr the foregoing resolution was paea~.~d by the following vote:
AyES; BOUA5, BUSHURE, FKY~ HERBST, KING, LA CLAIRF, MC BURNEY
l~t0E5: NONE
AqSBNT: NnNE
s~,ck white, Assistant Ctty Attocney, preaent~d thP wr.itten right to appeal the
Planning CommisRion's decision within 22 days to the City Council.
ZTEM NO. 4. EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION WAIVER OF COQE RE(~UIREMEN'~ AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2518
pUHI,IC HEARING. OWNERS: ANAHEIM ASSOCIATES, 27285 Las Ramblas, Missic~n
~Jiejo, CA 92691. AGENT: ANDRES GURULE, 2985 E. Micaloma, ~J, Anah~~im, CA
92806. Proper.ty deacribed as a cectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting
vf approximately 4.85 acr.e~s located at the northeast cor.ner of Mir.aloma Avenue
and Red Gum Street, 2985 E. Mir.aloma Avenue (Mc. Tcans).
To permit an au~omotive tcansmission shop in the NL aone with waiver. of
minimum number of packing spaces.
Ther.e was no one indicating their presence in opposition to aubject cequest
and alth~ugh the staff r.eport was not readr it is r.efer.ced to and made a part
of the minutes.
Andres Gur.ule, agent, explained the permit is t~ allow him tn do bench
transmisafons and same Gepair work on volkswagens.
THB PUBLIC HEARING WAS CL05ED.
Kendra Morcies, Assistant Planner, responded to Commissioner Bushore that the
actton by the Code Enforcement Officer was because the applicant fsiled to
apply for a bnsiness license or a conditional use permit.
M~. Gurule explained to Commissi.oner 6ushoze that the facility on Regal Park
Dtive was owned by hia wife, but he is the sole owner of this facility.
1/23/84
MINU'rES. ANAk1~IM CITX PI~ANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 23 1984 94-33
Commissione: Buahor.e su99eatsd tha~ tha per.mit be qrante~ for. a 1lmited per.iod
oE t~me beceuae thie ie e~~pecilized tr.ansmission phop. Mr.. Gur.ule explained
his leeee is for three Years.
ACTION: Commie~ianpc Kitig o~fer.ed a motion, seconded by Commissionec MeBucney
end MOTION C1-RRIED, th~t the Anaheim Ci.ty Planning Commisaion has r~viewe~ the
pr.oposal to per.mit an automotive tr.ansmiasion shop in the ML (I~dustr.inl,
Limited) Zone wilh waivec of minimum number. of par.king spaceR nn A
r.ectangular.ly-ahaped parcel of land consisting of oppcoximate.ly 4.85 acre~
located on the n~r.theaet corner of Micaloma Street and Red Gum Street and
fur.ther. deacribed as 2985 ~. MicAlom~ Avenue (Mc. Tr.ans)r and doea 1~er.eby
appr.ove the Negative Ueclacation upon findiny that it hns considerad the
NegaLive Declbra~ion together. with any comments r.eceived dur.ing the public
review pcocess and f.urther finding on the basis of the Initial Study and Any
comments r,eceived that thece is no aubatantial evidence that the pro~ect wil.l
have a 8lgnificant effect on the environment.
Commisaioner King otfer.ed ~ motion, aeconded by ~ommiaeioner Fr.y and MOTION
CARRIED, that the Anaheim City P~anning Commission does her.eby grant waivec of
Code r.equicemenk on the basie that tt~e parking waiver. will not cauae ~n
incr.ease in tr.affic congestion in the tmmediate vicinity nor. adversely affect
any adjoininy land usQS and gxanting of the ~ar.king waiver under the
conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and genecal welfar.e of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
Commissionec King uffer.ed Resolution No. PC84~10 and moved for its passage bnd
adoption that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby gr.ant
Conditional Use Permit No. '251n pursuant to Anaheim Muncipial Code Section
18.03.03p.030 thr.ough 18.03.030.035 fuc a period of 3 years to expire Januar.y
23, 1987, and subject to Inter.depar.tmental Coa~mittee recommendations.
~~mmissioner Herbst clar.ified that the petitioner. undecskoud that all work
must be done inside the ~tr.uctur.e with Mr. Cur.ule indicating he under.stood.
On rol.l call, the Eoregoing r.esolution was passed by the Eollowi~g vote:
AYES: BOUAS, BUSHORE~ FRY~ HER85T, KING~ LA CLAIRE, MC BURNEY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ITE:M NO 5 EIR NL•'GATIVE DECLARATION, WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREM6NT AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2530
PURLIC HEARING. OWNERS: ROi3ERT P. KUTZ, 505 City Par.k WPSt, Or.ange, CA
92668. AGENT: GREGORY L. SALSBURY, 7391 Talbert, Huntington Beach, CA
92647. Proper.ty desccibed as a cectangularly-~haped parcel of land consisting
~f approximately 0.86 acce, 2465 West La Palma Avenue.
Ta permit a contractor's storage yar.d and office use of a zesidential
structu~e in the l~Y~ Zone With u~~ f maximum fence height.
There was no one indicating thei.. -:.~~n:.e in opposi.tion to aub~ecC zequest
and although tt,~ staff report was noc read. it is refecred to and made a part
of the minutes.
1/23/84
MINUTES, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 23 1904 84-34
Gceg Salabury, agent, wa~ pceaent to Anawer any questi.ons.
xHE PUBI~IC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Responding to CommiBAioner. 8usl~or.e, Mr. Salsbury explAine~ thr. slatted fence
will be back 50 feett that there is a house existing 40 feet back and there
wi11 be a~idewalk and .10-foot landscaped area, with the 6-toot wr.ought iron
dec~rative fence behind thet landecaped er.ea around the house for aecucity.
Mr. Salsbury r.esponded to Commieaioner. Bushoce that hopetully na equipment
would be stor.ed on the pco~erCy becauae he wanta to keep it working, and it
~nly in the y~r.d dur.ing the winter. foc one or. two week~ for mainter~anGe and
t,hat the equipment consists of r.ollers, blades, ~a~ter truck, acr.aper., etc.
stated he didn't know For. sure how many piecea of equipment could be stored
there, but cucr.ently they nevec br~ng mor.e th~n two pieces of equipment into
the yar.d at one timE.
is
Ne
Commisaioner Bushore ~tAted his concern ie that this area is a
highly-technical industr.ial ace~ and a canditional use permit does go with the
pr.oper.ty and aome okher. contr.act~r. migtit not have the same type oper.ation. He
stated sitea for. contractor.'a stor.age yar.ds are difficult to find because
adjacent pr.oper.r.y owner.s don't likr the things that go on ther.e; that although
ther.e ar.e no neighb~r.s here to tlie r.eac, east oc weat, ther.e ie some
reaidential accoss t•he aCreet and if ti~e property changes hand~, ther.e could
be some concer.n.
Mr.. Salsbtiry stated they ace going to buy the property. Ele explained they
will be improving the pcaper.ty by ~aving the st.reet, putting in concr.ete curb
and gutter. ar~d sidewalk, one dr.ive a~proach and the 10 f.eet of landscaping,
and that the ciccular driveway will be r.emoved. He stated the six-f~ot fence
is necessacy for secur.ity for the house whict~ is used f~r an office.
Pertaining to a gate, Mr. Salsbur.y pointEd out all access will be thr.ough the
p~cking lot, and theze will be no gate fr.om the street to the parking lot, but
there will be a sliding gate back fifty feet. Commissioner Bushor.e explained
he wanted the fxont left open so the e~uipment won't be out onto the street
when they ar.e coming int~ the lot.
ACTION: Coi~missioner King offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Fry and
MOTION CARRIED, that the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the
pr.oposal to per.mit a contractor's stor.age yard and office use of a zesidential
sttucture in the ML (Industcial, Limited) Zone with waiver. of maximum fence
height on a cectangulacly-shaped paccel of land consisting of appzoximately
0.86 acce, having a frontaye of approxi~ately 163 feet on the north side of La
Palma Avenue, and fur.ther described as 2465 West La Palma Avenue; and does
her.eby approve the Negative Declaration upon findfng that it has consider.zd
the Negative Declacation together with any comments r.eceived ducing the public
r.eview pr~cess and Eurth~r finding on the basis of the Initial Study and any
comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect on the environment.
Commissioner King offered a motion, seconded by Comrnissionec Fcy and MOTION
CAR~IED, thak the Anahein City Planning Commiseion does hereby grant waiver of
Code requir2ment on the basis that khexe are specfal ciccumatances applicable
1/23/89
_ ~
_ - --- -~_, ~ .
MINUTES ANAHEIM CITX PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 23 1984 84-35
to the propecty such ea sizo, ahape, topogr.dphy, locAtion and sur.r.oundings
which do not epply to othec identically r.oned pcoper.ty in the same vicinityi
and that atrict cpplication of the Zoning Code depr.ives the property of
pcivilegea on~oyed by other. propeetiea in the identicdl xone and
clasnification in the vicinity and subj~c~ t4 Inter.depar.tmentel Comm.ittee
rec~mmendations.
Commiasione: King oxf~red Resolution No. PC84-11 and moved Eor, its paseage and
adoption th~~ the Anaheim City Planning Commission doea h~reby ,_rant
Conditfonal Uae Fermit No. 2530 purouant to Anaheim Nunicipal Code sections
18.03.030.030 ttirough 18.03.030.035, and su~ject to Inter.departmental
Commi.tt.ee r.ecommendationa.
On r.oll call, the foregoing r.eaolution wps passed by the following vote:
AY~S: ~OUAS~ BUSHURE~ FRY~ N£RBST~ KING~ LA CLAIRE~ MC BURNEY
NnCS: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ITEM N0. 6. EIR CATEGORICALLY EXBMP'r-CLASS 11 AND VARIANCE N0. 3370
PUBLIC HEARING. UWNERS; ANAHEIM FINANCIAI, PLAZA-1981 c/o Meyer. Investment
Pcopectiea, Inc., 1201 S. Beach Boulevard, La Habra, CA 9Q631. AGENT: MEYER
INVESTMENT PROPERTIBS, INC., 1201 S. Beach Boulevard, La Habr.a, CA 90631,
A~TN: RICHARD J. NEYER ANp MTCHAEL J. ANDERSON. P~~oximatelyc3i8eacreaan888
irregularly-ehaped parcel of land conaiating of app
South West Stceet.
Waivers of maximum number of fr.Eestanding 9igns and maximum height of a
fceestanding eign to per.mit two (2) fceeatanding signs.
Thece was no one indicating their presence irr opposition to ~ubject request
and although the ataEf repoct was not read, it is r.eferr.ed to and made a part
of the minutes.
Michael Anderson, agent, explained the proposal is for a new freestanding sign
adjac~nt to the fr.eeway to provide principal ic:entification for the Chrysler.
Company.
THE FUBLIC HEARING WAS CT~OSED.
It was clar.ified that Meye~ znvestment Proper.ties own3 the proper.ty and wilJ.
occupy the foucth floor.
~ack White, Assistant City Attorney, ~u99ested an additional condition if this
is appcoved to cead as follows:
4. That the advertising dieplay and sign copy shall at all times be
maintained in a manner which does not violate any provisions of
Chapter 4.08 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
Commissioner La Claire asked what the applicant feels is the hAr.dship on this
1/23/84
MINUTE~• ~NAHEIM CITX PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY Z3 1984 84-36
pAtticulac piece of proper.ty to juetify grnnting of thie larger. aign. Mc.
Ander.son stated they ar.e mer.ely deking for a sign of the same dize, height and
magnitude as other. Eigne elong the Eceeway.
Commissioner La Claize stated this City does hove a gign ocdinance and the
Commisoion h~s be~n trying not to incxease th~ aiz.3 of the signs and would
like to ke~p them to a minimum and she thought the ordinance ahould be adhcr.ed
to ainee thace ia r.eally norhi~g u~iusual about the proper.ty and thece is
nothing blocking ttie vlew of the aign. She atated she could not vote foc
approval.
Mr.. Andecaon statcd one h~r.dship ~ould be the tall growth along the fceeway
and explainGd he had mQ~ with cepreoenkativea af Caltrans and they r.efused to
tx~m the shr.ubs whlch are about 30 feet hight that their. sign would be legal
if it wns 25 feeC hight and tf-at if this cequeAt is denied today, they would
cemove the aiyn on West Str.eer and put thia sign at 25 feet high.
Commissioner. Herbst painted out they will be takinq down a sign that ie
bigger. It was clar.ified they would remove the existiny freestanding sign
ad~acent to Santa Ana ~reeway if this reque~t is approved.
Mr.. Andersan stated according ta Code, they are allowed one siyn per. fronta9e,
but the Planning Department rules that the Lceeway fr.ontage does not count.
It was noted the ~lar~ning Dicecl•or. oc his author.ized repr.esentat~vQ has
deter.mined that the pcoposed project Ealla withi.n the definition of
Categorical Exemptions, Clasa 11, as defined in the State ~nvir.onmental Impact
Report Guidelines and is, therefor.e, categorically exempt from the r.equirement
to prepare an EIR.
ACTION: Commissionec Her.bst offer.ed Resolution No. PC84-12 and moved for. its
passage and adoption that the Anaheim City Planning Commission doea heceby
grant VariAnce No. 3370 on th~ basis that a larger. sign is to be r.emoved and
that exposur.e to the site is blocked and on the basin that there ar.e special
circumstances applicahle to the pcoperty such as size, shape, topogr.aphy,
location or surcoundings, which do not apply ta othec identically zoned
pcoperties in the viainity; and that strict ~pplication of the Zoning Code
deprives the property of pr.ivileges enjoyed by other pcoper.ties in identical
zoning classification in the vicfnity, and Rubject to Interdepartmental
Committee recommendations, including the additio~al condition suggested by
Jack White.
On r.oll call, the for.egoing resolution was passed by the following voke:
AYES: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, KING, LA CLAIRE, MC BURN~Y
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ITEM N0. ?. ~IR NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND VAR.IANCE N0. 3373
PUBLIC HEARING. OWN~RS: LARRY C. NOGGLE, 2941 E. La Jolla Street, Anaheim,
CA 92806. Propecty desccibed as a rectangularly-shaped parc~l of land
consisting of approximately 2.26 acres located at th~ northwest cornec of La
d Gum Street 2941 E. La Jolla Stzeet (Souther.n Plastic
Jolla Street and Re • -
Mold, inc.). 1/23/84
MINUTES. AN~HEIM CITY PLANNIKG COMMIS_SION_, JANUARY 23, 1984 _ 84-37
Waiver. of m.inimum otcucture aetbeck to r.etain e car.port.
There was no one indicaL•ing their presencQ in opposition to subject request
and although the staff cepor.t wns not read, it is zef~r.r.ed to and made a p~r.t
of the minutea.
Larr.y Noggle, owner., explained the ociginal plans submitted Eoc approval by
the Building DepacLment ahowed ttie carpor.t with a 22-foot oetback from the
cucb and City ataff incorrectl,y assumed that wua ktie ~r.operty line.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CL.OSEU.
,Jack White, Assistant City Attorney, a8ked that two conditins be added 1E thie
cequeat is approved to r.ead us followa: '2. Thr~t thi~ variance ~hnll
tecminate and the atr.uctur.t shall be cemoved or. r.elocated L•o comply with all
othecwise applicable provisiona of the Anaheim Municipal Code upon tr.anefer of
the owner's interest in the Pr.oFer.ty."t and 3. That the owner oE the pr.operty
ahall execute and Kecor.d a covenant aga~nat the proper.ty in a for.m npproved by
the City Attorriey's Of[ice, agreeiny to the limitatians set for.th in c'ondition
No. 2 above•t and that existing Condition Nu. 2 be r.enumber.e~ ~a Condition No.
4 and the wor.ding wou].d be: "That pr.ior to final building and zoning
inspections, Condition NoB. 1 and 3, abovementioned, r~hall be complied with."
He explained this is the r.eco~nmenc3ation of the Redevelopment Commission.
14r. Noggle explained he and his br.otheK own thia pr.operty and r.un the business
and stated they would be willi.ng to agcee that if they sell the pr.operty, the
car.poct would be cemoved. He zesponded to Commissioner La Clair.e that the
cacport has been constcucted for about 30 days.
Kendr.a Morriea, Assistant Plannec, expl~ined that the original plan sut,mitted
to the Building Department and ultimately appr.oved indicated that the car.poct
was going to be constructed a minimum of 22 feet away from the La Jolla Str.eet
pcopecty line and when it was built, theX apparently measur.ed from the curb
and not the proper.ty line, so it is actually 15 feet away from the fr.ont
pr.uperty line.
Commissioner Bushore asked if that could be conEtr.ued as a contcactor's
ercor. Kendra Morries stated it wou].d ~ie an erxor. on the par.t of the property
owner. or developer and not the City staff. M~'. Noggle stated the dxawings
$howed the posts wece set 22 feet from the cur.b on La Jolla and the proper.ty
line is 15 feet away. He added the contr.ACtor did not show on the dzawing
whethec the line was a prape~ty line or a curb and City staff assumed it was
the property line.
Commissioner eusho~e Asked how much open space ther.e io between the carpoct
and building. Mc. Noggle ceplled 25 or 30 feet, and explained the carpozt was
constructed to cover. existing packing stalls and could not have been built to
Code to cover those apaces.
Commissfoner Herbst pointed out parking is allowed in the landscaped setback
in the industcial zone, but structures ace not pe~mitted in that setback.
1/2~/84
JANU~RY 23. 1984 _ 84-
Commissionec Buahor.Q etated he thought r.he problem ia between khe pxoper.ty
owneC and contr.actoc. Commisaioner. La Cl~i~4 ~~e~obablythaveesenktitaback~for
eubmitted befor.e constxuction, Commisaion would p
r.eviaion. 5hQ stated she ia concerned becauae the petitioner wl11 Fr.obably
own this business for. a long timo which means the car.p~rt will be thece for. ~
lon9 time.
Mr. Noggle r.efer.ro~ to photogr.aphs submitted which show it was done
aesthetically and ther.e is no vi8u~1 r.estrir,tion.
Commissioner. La ~laire atated it ia very important that the Planning
Commisaion makes the ceason for theic decision ver.y clear. becau~e the minutea
are not r.eflecting the ceasonem~oiith~fdecisionsc Cer.tain aubjects and they
are not reflect g
Commissioner. Buatioce stated the ~upPoct bo1L-s tor. this car.port appeAr. to be
boltea to the rouf and thece is no way thie could hAVe been constr.ucted to
meet Code without changing the packing con£igucation and L-he dr.iveway.
Mc. Noggle statPd the contKactor. provided a structucal r.epor.t and an ar.tist's
r.~ndering to the City and that was exactly ~hat k~e. built. Commiasion~r
Bushoce stated those ar.e standpr.d r.equirements.
It was noted the Planning DiKector or his author.ized r.epresentative has
detecmined that the pzvposed pxoject falls within the definition of
Categoxi~al ExemptandslsClther.efoce,dcat~gor.ically exempt~from~thenc~9uirement
Report Guidelinea
to pcepaKe an EIR.
ACTIpN; Commissionec He~bst o£fer.ed Resolution No• ~ommissionadoeaehetebyita
passage and adoption that the Anaheim City Planning
grant Variance No. 3373 on the ba~ose~t~estaedsonutherbasislthat thereaare
detrimental effect on adjoinin9 p P
ap~r.ial circumstancps applicable to the propecty such as ~oZOther.aidentically
topography, location and sucroundings which do not apPlYlication of the Zoning
zoned pcoperty in the same oiciKivileges enjoyedrbytother propertiss in the
Code depKives the property f p
identical zone and classification in the vlcinity and subject to
Intecdepartmental Gommittee recommendations, including additior.al c~nditions
cequiring that ahcovenantu~e becocded~agceeinghtoPsuchrrestcictionsnd also
requiring that
On r.oll call, the Eocegoing r.esolution was passed by the following vote:
AYES: DOUAS, BUSHORE~ FRY, ~ERBST~ KING~ LA CLAIRE, MC BURNEY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ITE~ N0. 8. EIR NEGATIVE DBCLARATION AND VARIANCE N0. 3353
DEUSCH REAL ESTATE DEVELUPMENT, INC.~ 7000 W.
PUBLI^ HEARING. OWN6RS:
Imperial Highway, Los Angeles, GA 90041. AGENT: MAR LYNN SHEEHA~, 1650 E.
Babbitt Avenue. Property de 2~35b ac es 1650 Eastu Sabbitth Avenuea(Practicalnd
consisting of apptoximate y
Schools). 1/23/84
MINUTFS, ANANEIM CITX PLANNING__COMMISSInN. JANUAP.Y 23. 1984 84-39
Waiver oE minimum number of pcxking spacea to r.etain an induatrial training
center..
ACTION; Commissioner. King oFfered a motion, aeconded by Commisaioner.
La C1aiXe and MqTI~N CARRIED, that considecation of the aEor.ementioned matter.
be continued to the meeting of Fpbruar.y 6, 1984~ in ocder for. the applicant ko
reaolve lease negotiations.
ITEM N0. 9. R~PORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. TENTAmIVB MAP OF TRACT N0. 11425 - Request from GcPg B. Stewart, ~or. a
one-yeac extension of time for Tentetive MAp of TrACt No. 11425, pr.oper.ty
deaexibed as the focmec Pr.emant Junioc High ~ehool playf'.eld.
ACTION: Commissioner King ofEered a motion, seconded by Commiseioner. Fr.y
and MOTION CARRIED (Comm~saioner. Bushar,e abstaining), that a one-year.
extension of time f~c Tentative Mup o~ Tr.act No. 11425, be approved to
expir.e Mar.ch 22, 1985.
B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NU. 24U8 - Request from Anthonaissios Nick
Foskaris, for. a one-yeac extension of time foz Conditional Use Per.rnit No.
2408, pcoperl•y located at the norkhwe~t cocner. of La Palma Avenue and
Lakeview Avenue.
Commisaioner La Claire stated she wac ~~oncerned about a drive-through
restaur.ant at thi~ location and thought it Ys one of th~ worsk locations
for such a usP in the entir.e City. She suggested the case be r.eviewed.
It was clarified the original per.mit was approved on a 4-3 vote aecause
of the tr.a£fic concer.n.
The Commission briefly r.eviewed rhe plans a~ origxnally approved. Kendra
Morcies, Assistant Planner., cead the condition included in the r.esolution
r.e5uiring a 20U-foot long median island in Lakeview adjacent to subject
propecky and a 350-foot long median in La Palma to pceelude left-t~r.n
ingress and egres3 to the pcoperty.
Commfasionec La Clair.~ stated she still would not vote for an extension
of time and felt it shou.ld be r.eviewed.
ACTION; Commissionec La Claice offered a motion, seconded by
CommLasioner Auahore that the request for a cet~oactive one-year
extension ot t~me be denied. MOTION FAILED TO C:.RRY by the following
vote: CommisEionecs La Claixe and Buahore voting yes, Commissionera
Bouas, ~r.y, King, Herbst voting no and Commissioner McBu~ney abstaining.
Commissionec King ofEered a motion, seconded by Commisaioner Fry and
MOTION CAkRIEA (Commissioners Bushore and La Claire voting nc and
Commissioner Mcaurney ~bstaining), that the Anaheim Ctty Planninq
Commission does heceby grant a retroactive one-year extension of time for
Conditional Use Permit No, 2408 to expire Januacy 10, 1985.
C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1233 - Requeat fr~m Bill Kumer to terminate
Conditional Use Permit No. 1233, propezty located at 1099 W. Katella
Avenue (Gulf Service Station).
1/23/84
84~39
MINUTES ANANFIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSTON JANUARY 23 1984
Waiver of minimum number ok par.king spaass to r.etain an induetrial tr.aining
~enter..
ACTIpN; Commissioner. King offer.ed a motion, aeconded by Commi~sioner
L~ Claire and MOTION CARRIED, that coneideration of the aforementioned matter.
be continued to the meeting of ~ebruar.y 6, 1984, in order. for. the applicant to
r,eaolve lease negotiations.
1TEM N0. 9. REPORTS ANQ RECOMMENDATIONS
A. 'PENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT N0. ~142~ - Reque~t fcom Gr.eg a. Skewatt, far a
one-year extension of time for Tentative M~p of Tr.act No. 11425, proper.ty
de~ccibed as the L•ormer. Fremont Junio~ High School playfield.
ACTION: Commissionec King offer.ed a motion, seconded by Commissioner. Fry
and MOTION CARRIED (Commissioner. 9ushor.e abctaining), that a one-yeac
extension ot time for. Tentative Map of Tr.act No. 11425, be appr.oved to
expir.e Mar.ch 22, 1985.
g. CONDITiONAL USE PFRMIT N0. 2408 - Request fr.om Anthonaissios Nick
Foskaris, for a one-year extenaion of time for. Conditional U~e Per.mit No.
2408, pcoperty located at tt~e nocthwest cocner. oE La ~alma Avenue and
Lakeview Avenue.
Commissioner La ~lair.e atated she was concerned aboul a dr.ive-through
r.estaurant at this location and thought it is one of the worst locations
for such a use in tt~e entire Cit.y. She ~uggesked tt~e case be r.eviewed.
It was cl-3rified =he or.iginal per.n~it was appr.oved on a 4-3 vote because
of the ~r.afEic concer.n.
The Commissi.on briefly reviewed the plans as oziginally appr.oved. Kendra
Morries, Assistant Plannec~ read the condition included in t.he re~olution
r.equicing a 200-foot long median island in T..akeview adjacent to subject
proper.ty and a 350-Eoot long median in La Palma to pr.eclude left-tur.n
ingce~s and egress to the property.
Commissioner. La Clair.e stated she still would not vote for. an extension
of time and felt it should be revicwed.
ACTION: Commissioner. La Cla:ce offeced a motion, seconded by
Com~aissioner Bushoce that the request for. a Ketroactive one-year
extension of time be denied. MOTION PAILED '"0 CAFRY by the following
vote: Commissionecs La Claire and Bushoxe votiny yes, Commissioners
Bouas, Fry, King, Her.bst voting no and Commissioner McBurney ab~taining.
Commissioner King offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Fry and
MOT10N CARRIED (Commissionecs Bushore and La Claire voting r~o and
Car.~missior.~~r McBurney abstaining), that khe Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hecaby grant a retcoactive one-year extension of time for
Conditional Use Permit No. 2408 to expire January 10, 1985.
~. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1233 - Request from Bill Kumer to tecminate
Conditional Use Permit No. 1233, proper.ty located at 1Q99 W. 'CAtella
Avenue (Gulf Service Station).
1/23/84
. , ,.. ~,~,^
MINUTES. ~NAHEIM CITY PLANNING CQMMISSION. JANUARY 23. 1984 ___ 84-40
ACTION: Commieaioner King oPfored Reso~utlon No. PCd4-14 and moved for
its paesage and adoption that the Andheim City P1Anning Commieaion does
her.~by ter.minate Conditiondl Use Pecmit No. 1233.
On roll call, the fozegoin~ r.eqalution was passed by the following vote:
AYES: BOUAS~ BUSHORE, FRY~ HER~ST, KING, LA CLAIRE, MGBURNEY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
D. CONllITIONAL USE PEItMI.T N0. 1724 - Kequeat from W. p. Cut.hr.ie fc~r.
ter.mination of Conditional Use Per.mit No. 1724, pcoperty locatQd at 624
and 626 South Anaheim 8oulevar.d (U-Haul Moving Stocnge).
ACTION: Commiesioner King ~Efered Resolution No. PC84-15 and moved foz
its passage and adoption th~t the Anaheim City Planning Commiesion does
hereby ter.minate Conditional Use Per.mit No. 1724.
on roll call, the foregaing r.esolution was pdssed by the following vote:
AYES: BOUAS, BUSHORE~ FRY~ HERBST~ KING, LA CLAIRE~ MC BURNEY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
E. CONDITIONAL USE P~RMIT N0. 2258 - Request from Tom E'oskar.is for
tecminatian of Conditional Use Per.mit No. 2258, pcoperty located at the
northwesr_ cor.ner of La Palma Avenue and Lakeview A~•enue.
ACTION: Commissione~ King offered Resolution No. PC84-16 and moved for.
ita pas~~ge and adoption that the Anaheirn Cit,y Planning Commission does
heceby terminate Conditional 'Jse Per.mit No. 2256.
On r.oll call, the foregoing resolution was pas~ed by the followinq vote:
AYES: BOUAS, BUSHORE, rRY, HERBST, KING, LA CLAIRE, MC BURNEY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
F. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2293 - Request fzom Patr.ick ~'. Flynn foc an
extension of time for Condit•ional Use Pertnit No. i293, property located
at 1400 S. ttarbor Boulevard (Avfs Rent-A-C~,r).
Patrick Flynnr applicant, explained the chains ar.e t;~eze for security at
night and that they do not plan any additional landscapin9.
ACTION; Commissioner Bushor.e offezed a motion, seconded by Commissioner
Fry and MOTION CARRIE~, that the Anaheim City Planning Commi.8sion doea
h~ereby grant a one-yeac extension of time for Conditional Uae Permit Na.
2293, to expice on December 31, 1984.
1/Z3/84
MINUTES ~NAHBIM CITY PLANNYNG COMMIBSION JANU~RY 23 1964 84-41
G. REQUEST POR NUNC PHO TUNC RESOLUTION ~MENDING NOS. PC83-251. PC83-;5~,
~nd YC83-253
Requeat from the Planning Commisaion secr.etary for A nunc pro tunc
reaolution amending ~esolution No. PC83-251 in connection with
Condition~l Uae Per.mit No. 20751 PC83-Z52 in co~~iection with Conditional
Uae Per.mit No. 1079 and pC83-253 in connoction with Conditional Uae
Per.mit No. 1761 and VAriance No. 2976.
ACTION: Com~iesioner King offer.od Resolution No. PC84-17 and m~ved for
it~ pa~sage and edoption that the Anaheim City Planning Commiaeion does
hereby gr.anc a nunc pr.o tunc cesolution amend~ng Resolution No. PC83-251,
PC83-252, and PC83-253, in connection with Condir,ional Une Permit No.
2075, Conditional Us~ Pe~mit Nu. 1079, Conditional Us9 Per.mit No. 1761
and Vaciance No. 297~.
On roll call, the focegoing reaolution was paseed by the follawing vote:
AYES: BOUAS~ $USHORE, FRY~ HERBST~ KING, LA CLAIRE~ MC BURNEY
NOES: NQNE
ABSENT: NQNE
A~STAIN: HERRST~ MC BURNEY
OTHER DISCUSSION:
Commiasioner. Herbst stated he was conaecned abnut the proposed jail and
landfill site in the Cnnyon acea and would like the P1Anning Commission to
mahe a~~otion recommending to the City Council that they do samething about
itt that the site ie in the Caunty but is in Anaheim's sPhere of influence;
and khat it appear.s the jail and landfill could be visible fcom some of the
new homes going up in the area. He stated the pcopoaed landfill eite should
definitely have an envir.onmental impact report aince it could affect the
entire cuunty's water supply because the land in that acea is very pocoua with
a loose-type granite rock.
Commiseionec Bushoce noted tt~e natur.al drainage in the area flows right into
th~ Santa Ana River.
Commissioner ~erbst continued that Anaheim is the window for. the underground
water supply. He auggeated that members of the Boe~d of Supervisors ahould
fly over the arEa in a helic~ptes to see that it is the rougheat tecr~in in
the county and he thought the cost to the taxpayez would be enor.mous because
there are no exiating sewer facilikies, roads, bus lines, etc. He stated he
did not think they re~li2e how much tr.a£fic there is in and thcough the Santa
Ana Canyon.
ACTION: Commissloner Herbat affeced a motion, ~econded by Commisaioner
McBuzney and MOTION CARRIED, that the Anbheim City Planning Commiesicn does
hereby recommend that the City Council recommend to the County Soard of
Supervisors that whatever studiee Are necessacy be pr.epared including an
environmental impact repork, to determine the ~ffect on the entire co~nty of
locating the propQaed jail and landEill in the Santa ~na Canyon.
1/23/84
MINUTE3. ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIMG COMMIASION J~NU~RY 23 1~84 8'~'42
Commiagioner Hecbati cot-Cinued he thought thie would be one of the wor.ek
locetiona in khe County for those facilities, e~pecially ain~e the lendfill
will be included. Ne eteted thie will atop ~naheim'a gr.owth to the eASt
bec~uae it would bo located r.ight in tha middle and r.eferr.ed to KauEman 6
Bcoad'e cu~r.ent development.
Commissionece Her.bat and La Claire discuased the focmet that should be
Eollowed to get this requeat to the City Council. Jack White, ~esiscant City
Attorney, explnined that noKmally khe Planning Commission SecreCer.y would send
an excecpt oE thia item to the City Council. Commissioner La Cl~i.r.e f~lt a
letter wou~d be mor.e effective.
Commisafonec Bushoce asked that stAff inform the Planning Commisaion wl~en ~.he
review procesa of an envicunmental impact cepor.t Eoc the jail an~ landfill
site takee place so the Commiasion can aubmit their concer.ns end ask that the
ter.cain versus coats and dr.ainage and per.colation oE the area be addr.essed. L~ ~~
Commissioner La Claire stated she hoped the newapaper,s would alert the ~~~~~*,r
citizens in thet ar.ea of the~e plans and especiAlly to alect them to the fact ~
that theix representative on the Board of Su~er.visor.8, Mr. ~estAnde~ had votPd
in favoc of this locati~n, so they can expresa theic concerns directly to
him. She added ehe did not think the citizens r.eally believe that thie could
happen, but now it ia clear.ly a possibility. She stated she thought the only
thing that will do any good now is for. the City of Anaheim Co take th~ lead,
with the citi.zens behind them, in opposing the caunty's proposal.
Commissioner Hecbat etated the County owna 100 ~c~ea near the E1 Toro Macine
Base that would be a vecy ai~~.table location although Irvine would pcobably be
opposed. He added, that in the Canyon ar.ea, the County will hAVe to buy the
land at taxpayers expPnae, and the pe~ple l.iving in the hills will be looking
duwn on the jail and la~dfill.
Commissioner McBurney stated the Caunty also owns propprty in downtown Santa
Ana and c~~uld expand the exisCing facility, but if the jail is located in the
Canyon azea, they will have to provide bus secvice which will also be at the
taxpayers' expense.
Commi~oior-ec Herbat noted that every County su~erviscr has his own district
and no one wants a~ail in it. He thought ~hat Feople in the Anahsim area,
and Anaheim Hills, should be vecy concerned, alang with Or.ange and Yocba Linda
citfzens and, indeed, the entire County should bb ~tihe~landfillauHe stated he
possible pollution of the County's water supply y
thought an in-depth EIR should be pr.epared to deLezmine the posaible effects.
Comrtiisaioner Bushoce indicated concern that a consultant from another. pact of
the state could conduct the study and might not be familiac with the problems
in this area. He refecred to gtudies ~onducted two years ago which indicated
two potent~al hazardoue waste materiala sitea on the Santa Ana River.
Commiasioner La Claire stated there wece aeven other possible sites for thet
hazardoue waste facility which the ~ounty chose not to study. She felt
Anaheim has to be awaze and watch very cloaely what ia happening in the County.
1/23/84
MINUT88 AN~HBIM CITY PL~NNINa COMMISSION J~NUARY 23 1984 ,_„_ ~4-43
ADJOURNMaNT: Thexa being ~o furthec business, Commiesionec Herbeti ofterad e
motion, eeco~ded by CommisaloneK King and MOTION CARRI~A, thet
the meotinq be adjourned.
The mdeking wea adjourned at 2:55 p~m.
ReapecCfully aubmitted,
~dith L. Harris, SeC~'@tAKY
Anaheim City Pl~nning Commiesion
ELH:lm
0027m
1~23/84