Loading...
Minutes-PC 1989/11/06~:~~ ., ~~ ACTION AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 1989, AT 10:00 A.M. PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING (PUBLIC TESTIMONY) 10:00 A.M. 1:30 P.M. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: BOUAS, BOYDSTUN, FELDHAUS, HELLYER, MESSE MC BURNEY COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: HERBST PRESENTATION OF SERVICE AWARD TO JOHN CARUSILLO - Continued to 11-20-89. PROCEDURE TO EXPEDITE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC BEARINGS 1. The proponents in applications which are not contested will have five minutes to present their evidence. Additional time will be granted. upon request if, in the opinion of the Commission, such additional time will produce evidence important to the Commission's consideration. 2. In contested applications, the proponents and opponent will each be given ten minutes to present his case unless additional time is :.~.A,,J requested and the complexity of the matter warrants. The Commission's considerations are not determined by the length of time a participant spaaks, but rather by what he says. 3. Staff Reports are part of the evidence deemed received by the Commission in each hearing. Copies are available to the public prior to the meeting, 4. The Commission will withhold questions until the public hearing is closed. 5. The Commissioi: reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing if, in its opinion, the ends of fairness to all concerned will be served. 6. All documents are presented to the Planning Commission for review in connection with any hearing, including photographs or other acceptable visual representations of non-documentary evidence, shall be retained by the Commission for the public record and shall be available for public inspections. 7. At the end of the scheduled hearings, members of the public will be allowed to speak on items of interest which are within the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission, and/or agenda items. Each speaker will be allotted a maximum of five (5) minutes to speak. 0628b Page 1 ~r--{~--,~~ la. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION y ~ lb. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-08 ~.." lc. VARIANCE N0. 3990 ld. TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 14130 le. SPECIMEN TREE REMOVAL PERMIT NO. 89-09 lf. RFCOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL FOR DISTANCE BETWEEN OIL WELL AND DWELLING UNITS. OWNER: BLASH MOMENY, 2082 Business Center Drive, #185 Irvine, CA 92715 LOCATION: Proper is approximately 5 acres at the northwest terminus of Garland Circle approximately 450 feet west of the centerline of Boisseranc Wav. RS-A-43,000 to RS-5000 or a less intense zone. To establish an 18-lot single-family subdivision with waivers of required lot frontage and minimum distance betweer. an oil drilling site and residential units. Continued from the September 25, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. PC 89-262 VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. PC 89-263 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- «~•~ FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE ~` CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSZTION: 30 people present OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Some neighbors did not receive notice of hearing, 300-foot radius not large enough; will impact traffic on Glenview; exis4ing traffic past saturation point now; danger to children going to schools in the area; suggested combining two parcels and providing another access on Garland; speed of traffic; questioned when traffic study was conducted, and whether it was during a school session; submitted petition requesting speed bumps; day care facility at Esperanza School with students who walk down Glen View to the school during peak traffic hours; private road would eventually beco~~ the City's responsibility; that is only access point for the citizens of that area to get to the Lakeview lake bed which is in Yorba Linda right on the other side of this land (developer indicated lake bed is not public land and belongs to Orange County); concerned about parking; 900-foot long cul de sac; oil well maintenance trucks are long and need about 100 feet to align with derrick and waiver is requested from the 150-foot requirement. November 6, 1989 Page 2 Approved Granted Denied Denied Withdrawn Denied ,V~. ;~ PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Have determined sewers are adequate to ~, accommodate this project; soils study showed no real evidence of contamination; gate could be eliminated; concerning traffic, service trips are a part of calculations used in traffic study, total of 204 trips per day; impact on wildlife would be minimal. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Did traffic study address impact of access through Orchard? (response, not specifically addressed because that is an existing condi~ion in neighborhood); questioned when traffic study was done (traffic consultant responded on October 23, 24 & 25) McBurney - felt traffic impact would be less than once thought; access for trucks removed from public streets is a plus; Messe - private road not wide enough for sidewalks, no guarantee access from Orchard is available for any traffic other than trucks in case of emergency; 200 increase in traffic. STAFF COMMENTS: Traffic Engineer - Holbrook & Glenview have so:•~e unique traffic problems, primarily because of high school and configuration of streets and both streets as diversion of Orangethorpe & Kellogg; working with neighborhood to find solution; other alternative would be traffic diverter; traffic impact from this project is negligible, but would add to existing problems; if access could be provided from Lakeview, traffic would not be as big a problem for neighbors. Fire Department - homes located just outside Lhe 100 feet would have to have a deed restriction prohibiting any additions to the structures. Fire Department did not require road improvements. Public Works Engineering - Street from Orchard too long to meet private ~~,) street standards, grade not to excees 10~ n•.thout prior approval of Fire Department & Engineering; required to ha~;Ze sidewalks on both sides. (Developer responded that road will not 'L~e used by public and is only for service access for oil well maintenance and has been used since 1926 and is not on his property; oil company has agreement with property owners until land goes back to individual owners; that he has to give them access, but not in this location) ACTION: A, Reclassification - Granted (4-2 (Hellyer & Feldhaus voting no, Herbst absent) B. Variance No. 3990 - Denied (5-1) Bouas voting no, A resolution was offered to approve the 3arianceesubjectct~t a. Condition No. 13 being moved from the Tentative Tract to the Variance b. req~xiring improvement of the maintenance road to provide access for emergency vehicles and emergency egress for residents of the tract but not to be a public right of way and that access shall be subject to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer. November 6, 1989 Page 3 r I ~i c. requiring that a 100-foot wide easement and deed restrictions be s`~ recorded on homes located within 100 feet of oil wells, prohibiting -- additions to any structures; and said easement to remain in effect until wells are abandoned. (Commissioner Messe noted this would a single entrance with just emergency access and egress to the stub street; and entry gate is very close to the street. THE RESOLUTION FAILED TO CARRY (2-4) Bouas & Messe voting yes Boydstun, Hellyer, Feldhaus & McBurney voting no) Herbst absent C. TT No. 14130 Denied D. Specimen Tree Removal Permit 89-09 - Withdrawn E. Rec. to CC for Distance Between Oil Well and Dwelling Units - Denied (without prejudice) Commission generally felt they would need to see the project before recommending approval regarding distance between oil well and dwelling units. November 6, 1989 Page 4 ~. 2a. '~ 2b. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION VARIANCE N0. 3993 OWNER: LESLIE CROWELL AND ARLENE CROWELL, P.0. Box 1728, Lucerne Valley, CA 92354 LOCATION: 1110. 1112 and 1114 West Pearl Street Waivers of (a) minimum number of parking spaces, (b) minimum site area per dwelling unit, (c) maximum structural height and (d) minimum side yard to construct a 4-story, 12-unit apartment building. Continued from the October 23, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. Continued to 11-20-89 3a. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT N0. 289 Continued to 3b. GENERAI~ PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 27i 11-20-89 3c. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-22 3d. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT 3e. C,ONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3206 ~ 3f. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT N0. 83-02 (READVERTISED ~ 3g. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 89-02 OWNERS: SAVI RANCH ASSOCIATES, C/0 HILL,MAN ?ROPERTIES, 450 Newport ,,, Center Drive, Suite 304, Newport Beach, CA 92660 ~, , AGENT: CSF, 1717 S. State College Boulevard, Suite 100, `"'~ Anaheim, CA 92806 LOCATION: 1001 to 1100 Pullman Street PORTION A: ML to CL and PORTION B: RS-A-43,000 to CL Request for amendment to she Land Use Element of the General Plan proposing a redesignation from the Existing General Industrial and General Open Space designations to a General Commercial designation to permit and govern the construction of a commercial retail center, an automotive repa5r center, two freestanding restaurants with on-sale and consumption of alcoholic heverages and entertainment, one drive-thx•ough restaurant and a tb,eatre with building heights in excess of 3.5 feet with waivers of minimum number of parking spaces, required site screening and required landscaped setback. Request for amendment and restatement of Development Agreement No. 83-02 between SAVI Ranch Associates and the City of Anaheim; and approval of Development Agreement No. 89-O.1 between Marketfaire Partners and the City of Anaheim. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION N0. RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION Pl0. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. ~~ November 6, 1989 Page 5 /: ~~ ~? 4a. CEOA NEGt1TIVE DECLARATION "~: 4b. VARIANCE .NO. 4006 OWNER: THE HAI,DWIN BUILDING COMPANY, ATTN: DAVID GRAF, 16811 Hale Avenue, Irvine, CA 92714 LOCATION: Subiect 591-acre property (The Summit of Anaheim Hills Specific Plan SP88-2) is located approximately 1 1 miles southeast of the Weir Canyon Road/Riverside Freeway intersection and_is bounded on the north bx the Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan development on the west by The Highlands at Anaheim Hills Specific Plan development and on the south and east by unincorporated Irvine Company property within the County of Orange. Waiver of required site screening to construct up to a 6-foot, 2-inch high wall with up to a 6-foot, 9-inch high pilaster at minimum 7 - 14 foot setbacks from Weir Canyon Road, Oak Canyon Drive and Serrano Avenue. VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. 5a. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT R,F;PORT N0. 273 (PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED) 5b. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT' MAP NOS. 12692 APID 12693 AND SITE PLANS OWNER: PRESLEY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ATTN: STEVE RIGGS, 22659 Old Canal Road, Yorba Linda, CA 92686 AGENT: ELFEND & ASSOCIATES, 4675 MacArthur Court, Suite 660, N~,tport Beach, CA 92660 LOCATION: Subiect property is within the northeastern portion of the 816-afire The Highlands at Anaheim Hills Specific Plan SP87-1 Proiect Area and is further described as Development Area 3. The Highlands at Anaheim Hills Development is bounded on the north by the_5ast Hills Planned Community on the east by Sycamore C~:won and The Summit of Anaheim Hills Developments, on the west by the existing Anaheim Hills Planned Community and the Mohler Drive Area and on the south by the City of Orange and unincorporated land within the County of Orange. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No 12692 and Site Plan: To establish a 39.8 acre, 94-lot subdivision, including 92 single-family detached residential lots and two open space lots. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No•_].2693 and Site Plan: To establish an 8.2-acre, 48-lot single-family detached residential subdivision. November 6, 1989 Page 6 11-20-89 r Approved Approved 1 i ~: %, ~~,, /', , . ~"~. ~' ~ ~ a 9 ~.:.: q -------------------------------------------------------------------- ~~`";~ FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE ,_~ CONSIDERED QFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None ACTION: Approved (6 yes votes, Herbst absent) 6a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATIGN 6b. GENERAL PLAN ~~MENDMENT N0. ?7i 6c. RECLASSIFICATION NO 89-9G-23 6d. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT 6e. CONDITIONAI. E Pk~RMIT N0. 3214 6f. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL_REVIEW OF 6d AND Se OWNER: JAFAR JAHANPANAH, 520 N. Rexford Drive, Beverly Hills, CA 90210 AGENT: RONALD J. CROWLEY, 1700 Raintree Rd., Fullerton, CA 92635 LOCATION: 1585 West Katella Avenue Portion A: RS-10,000 to CO Portion B: RS-10,000 to RM-2400 Request for amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan ~~....~ proposing a redesignation from the existing Commercial Professional '" designation to the General Commercial and the Low-Medium Density Residential designation. To permit an 18-unit, RM-2400 condominium complex on Portion B with waic'er3 of a maximum structural height, minimum building setback and minimum recreational leisure area. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION N0. RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. CONDITIONAL L'SE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMDfl;NTS: Requested Commission input regarding staff alternatives suggested. Will come back with modified plans. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Messe, would consider condos, but not this project with row housing and no recreational area. Single entrance off Katella. Should show additional sensitivity to private single family residences to the north. Boydstun -felt properties should be combined, no recreational area. i ~~..J ~' Continued to 12-4-89 (To be reac~- vertised) November 6, 1989 Page 7 ~;,, STAFF COMMENTS; Fire Department - developer met with Fire Marshal and ~/'~ was given choice of different type sprinklers or hydrant location, Fire ~,,) Dept. would not go against other Department's recommendation regarding street size, 28-foot wide street. Traffic Engineer - Concern is access, entering from Katella, there are existing driveways and recommends one single driveway with joint access for commercial use and residential use with adjacent property owners; single access approximately in middle of property; Katella is designated as a "super street" and will be recommended access points along Ratella be eliminated as much as possible. Public Works Engineering- recommended streets meet Standard Detail No. 122 for Private Streets; 28-foot wide travel lanes and sidewalks and feel strongly about necessity for sidewalks. Planning -.Additional waiver required for remainder Lot A, minimum square footage of 20,000 sq.ft. unless it is eliminated or combined. Commercial parcels required to 20,000 sq. ft. ACTION: Cuntinued to 12-4-89 in order for developer %o consider staff concerns and modify plans. To be readver*ised. 7a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION 7b. RECLASSIFICATION NO 89-90-24 7c. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT 7d. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 3210 ~~~ GWNER: CLARENCE W. MAUERHAN, TRUST, ATTN: WILLIAM MAUERHAN, " 210 Narcissus, Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 AGENT: J. WARD DAWSON, AIA, 24532 Leafwood DriV(`, Murrieta, CA 92362 LOCATION: 1176 W. Katella Avenue (Space Age Lodge) RM-1200 to CR for southerly portion of property. To permit a 169-unit, four-story, 50-foot high, 94,180 square-foot all-suite motel with haiver of minimum number of parking spaces. RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. ---------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION :ACTION. NOT TO AE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: 2 people present OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Property owner adjacent to west has had constant problem with kids climbing over fence; trash bins on the west and they were to plant greenery r'or motel which was never done; planters will be used for kids to climb over the fence; has had burglaries and robberies; a„y!' November 6, 1989 Page d 'Continued Ito 11-20-89 .:~ felt residential area has not been considered; property is eye sore; and "~, property value has depreciated because of it; problems with drugs and teenagers who congregate; adjacent prope~~y is about 1/2 block lower and wall is supposed to be 6 feet high and height was added to at one time; drain pool down Stella Lane; 10-foot distance 100 feet long between adjacent Frcgerty and motel which is littered and not taken care of and is viewed by apartment tenants; criminals jump wall and burglarize his tenants; will landscaping and planters be maintained; parking is also a concern. PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Family has owned property for over 50 years and will be getting the lease back. Plans to develop an all suite motel. Concerned about 12-foot dedication; property in middle of block between Walnut and Casa Vista; does not control commercial property to the west where there is a liquor store; eastbound on Katella, at the intersection with Walnut, curb jogs out 8-1/2 feet, and he thought that was for a bus stop area; and it goes that way for about 1000 feet to the east and at West, it jogs back out in front of Stovalls, and questioned need for another bus turnout; project just east recently completed, did not trovide additional footage for buses; questiva~d condition pertaining to sewer connection into the lateral in Stella Lune; Variance No. 784 was obtained by his dad in 1957 to allow the Carle Restaurant and there is still a lease and it is now a Millie's Restaurant and he could not terminate that variance. City required stub street to provide access in wall for children going to Katella School; does need repair; with new wall and landscaping, would not be a problem. 6-foot high wall proposed, 15 gallon trees and 20 foot centers; thought Stovall would have resolves problems if they had been presented; existing building presents blank wall to north and they have tried to enhance that property. Subject property is unique with residential street behind it. Restaurant has a 62 year lease and property cannot be dedicated; owns other properties in Anaheim and City is now operating a hotel and large parking structure. Was sure could redesign but would lose a lot of what they want to accomplish; not aware of a parking problem. 4 spaces short of requirement. Buses utilizing property now, 4 or 5 paz•ked there today. 30 foot wide area for buses. Would not want to reduce nw~her of units, but could reduce size of rooms. Stipulated if approved, driveways would be adequate width as required by Fire Department & Traffic Engineer. Sewer study requested from Euclid to State College and from 9th to Ball for a 69-unit motel. Katella has 24" main COMMISSION COMMENTS: Conditions require landscaping, walls & planters to be maintained in conformance with Code. Major CR study going on in tha area. Why is the space needed in front. Submitted plans show small car spaces; and 25 foot wide driveway (e«::.ar indicated 30 feat wide) tours by bus would reduce requirea ^~r;cirg as opposed to people driving vehicles. Would like i:o °o~ YJan w°_'-;; :;;;-:oot wide driveway, internal islands and eliminated compact ~paacs; asked if sewer connection could be in Stella Lane?. `»..~ November 6, 1989 Page 9 STAFF COhAlENTS: Property is in the study area for CR study; will address existing codes and review the standards and appropriate land .`~\ ;~:', use, design guidelines and infrastructure needed. Staff is concerned about variances to the current codes; parking waiver proposed Within five months, study will be reviewed by PC and CC. Traffic Engineer: Concerned about parking waiver, parking study conducted for this particular motel shows a deficiency of parking following construction under certain circumstances, obviously not recommending approving parking waiver at this time. Also, concerned about bus parking area since Ratella is scheduled to be super street; ordinance prohibiting parking of buses or stopping of buses in travel lanes, bus pullout area is required; area in front of motel could be developed for that purposes as well as the restaurant, since both properties are owned by same property owner; if bus bay on Ratella cannot be provided, entry driveway would need to be a minimum of 42 feet wide to accommodate buses on site; small car parking spaces not permitted in the City, standard size .reduced to 8-1/2' by 18' (applicant indicated moved building and eliminated most of the small car spaces). Ratella will be redesigned and require curb to curb lanes so there will be additional lanes provided and no buses could stop. Offered to work with applicant. Not aware this particular facility was being serviced by buses because no bus spaces are shown. and if they are going to be serviced by buses, there should be an area for buses on the site. Study addressed individual parking and if facility is served by travel buses or tour buses, that is another issue, tour buses which serve the area for local tours, do mat park there, but tours where driver stays at "`'~ hotel. Felt bus bay up front could be worked out, but not the parking «;°~ deficiency. Fire Department: Have all drives on site been increased to 30 fee~c for emergency vehicle access; plans submitted show 25 feet. Have found in many instances where Fire Department could not get vehicles on the motel sites because of illegal parking. Public Works/Engineering: Relief sewer considered to be an areawide mitigation measure and the developer can proceed with a study that would prove otherwise. City sewer study would take 10 months to complete, September 1990, and then another few months for any sewer assessment fees and area to be defined. ACTION: Continued to 11-20-$9, in order to work with Traffic Engineer. November 6, 1989 Page 10 c~ ,~ n~ u I' 8a. CEQA MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved :; ~ 8b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT Approved 'a''.;, : i 8c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3212 I Granted _ 8d. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14169 Approved OWNER: DONALD G. HUNT, 12844 Inglewood, Hawthorne, CA 90250 AGENT: WILLIAM PEARCE AND PHIL• SCHWARTZ, 14841 Yorba, #203 Tustin, CA 92680 LOCATION: 400 W. Wilken Wav To permit the construction of a 1-lot, 64-unit, RM-2400 condominium complex with waiver of maximum structural height.. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC 89-264 - ------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Design to leave fence exactly where it is. Conditions required trees and they have worked with property owners on Oertley so everyone is happy. s~0~a COMMISSION COMMENTS: Fence on east is not on property line, bigger ~+s.,..~ planter than other side, no windows facing that way, wanted specimen trees planted along that side. STAFF COMMENTS: Requested Commission instruction regarding 20-foot buffer adjacent to single-family for RM 2400 zone. ACTION: Approved Mitigated Negative Declaration Granted waiver of code requirement fro maximum building height. Granted Conditional Use Permit Approved Tentative Tract Map 14169. VOTE: 6 yes votes Herbst absent November 6, 1989 Page 11 9a. CEQA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION CLASS 11 %~ 9b. VARIANCE N0. 3999 ' Granted (Limited to 2 tenants} O'r7NERS: DENNIS M. BERRYMAN AND CAROL p,~ BERRYMAN, ARN R. YOUNGMAN AND PATRICIA A. YOUNGMAN, C/0 PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT GRO-JP, One Corporate Plaza, Newport Beach, CA 92660 AGENT: ADIART, INC, 5107 E. Telegraph Rd., Los Angeles, CA 90022 LOCATION: 430 South Anaheim Hil].S Road (Anaheim Hills Plaza) Waiver of permitted signs to construct a freestanding monument sign (existing sign to be removed). VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. PC 89-265 FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION, NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES, OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS; Rustic sign, background not illuminated. two major tenants ~~~~~ COMMISSION COMMENTS: Questioned requirements regarding hours of illumination. It was noted midnight to 6 a.m. are restricted. (Agent agreed to comply with any conditions), Asked for stipulation limiting sign to two tenants. ACTION: Granted, subject to limited. of two major tenants and hours of illumination not between midnight and 6 a.m. VOTE: 6 yes votes Herbst absent ;~~) November 6, 1989 Page 12 10 a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION ~''°~^+~ lOb. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT ': ? lOc. CONDITIOn~1L USE PERMIT NO 3216 OWNER: VANDERBILT LIMITED, 27122B Paseo Espada, #1021, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 AGENT: DAVE SCOTT, VANDERBILT LIMITED, 27122B Paseo Espada, #1021 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 LOCATION: 8285 East Santa Ana Canyon Road ~o permit the further division of a previously-approved commercial retail building with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC 89-266 --------------------------------------- ---------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSI','ION: 3 persona present OPPOSITION CONCERNS: parking is problem now and rest of center is not developed; circulation and traffic flow; originally designed to have reciprocal parking and access agreements, but separate parcels do not allow customer to have access to parking; requested staff to come out and review the situation; developer sold off individual parcels; patrons !`"~ are parking along street and if there was an emergency, there be a ._..~' problem PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Original intent has changed, prepared a master site plan to get a better feeling of the situation; 3 years ago parking variances was approved and more intense uses than anticipated have come in, this is a sit-down Japanese restaurant; parking study for entire development; ingress and egress approved by the City. Can tell employees where to park. This site has 89'b of parking requirement. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Did parking study review existing uses and the existing problems. Problem has been indicated at certain hours and applicant has requested parking waiver for those same times. STAFF COMMENTS: When development is complete, 617 spaces which will be used by everybody, but right now at certain times, there is a bit of a parking problem. Sit down restaurant and medical use increased parking needs. Traffic Engineer - Looked at parking study, but did not go to site, but did not see a cumulative problem; however, on-site survey concerns him and there appears to be a cumulative problem. Suggested 7 spaces may not be that bad, but the study does not address that and he did not address the cumulative affect of additional parking variances in the area. Study indicated adequate on-site parking, Cars are parking on .~,,,% November 6, 1989 Page 13 Approved Granted Granted F; ~-i: '~; l • c~ ~;~ entry roadway, but after center is developed that would be prohibited. Reciprocal parking and access has been considered, but properties have `;. ) been divided ~o to make adjacent parking areas inaccessible for reciprocal use. Indicated he would have an aerial photograph taken by the helicopter to give a graphic view of what is really happening. Planning: Problem is because of land uses proposed and not because of the walls. ACTION: Granted variance. Instructed Traffic Engineer to conduct study within two weeks 6 yes votes Herbst absent . lla. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT N0. 280 (PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED) Approved llb. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3215 Approved OWNER: SANTA FE PACIFIC REALTY CORPORATION, 3230 E. Imperial Hwz., ~~ #200, Brea, CA 92621 _~' AGE27T: CHUCR CHRISTENSEN, 3230 E. Im erial H #200 P wy•. Brea, CA 92621 LOCATION: Property is aonroximately 26 acres located at the southwest corner of La Palma Avenue and Tustin Avenue and further rte'"'~ described as Santa Fe Pacific t lava. ._ To permit industrially related commercial uses. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC 89-267 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIaI, MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Difficult position of having 24,000 square feet approved and only 3 uses approved. Hotel will be coming in later. Commission agreed in the size. Asked about a donut shop. Never planned to try to attract people from the freeway and planned to generate actively from people who are already there. Agreed to limit size of parking intensive uct. to 500 square feet. November 6, 1989 Page 14 ~_~,`7 COMMISSION COMMENTS: Concerned originally that uses would serve the ~..~ industrial area, and retail uses. Bakery doesn't .serve industrial :~~;°: area. Some of the uses listed could go into a hotel, but this is 24,000 ,`~"~ square feet of retail space and not a hotel. Retailers would be •promoting business from outside the are. Could have wholesale candy operation. Working hours are a concern - wanted to see who tenants would be. STAFF COMMENTS: Approved under a Specific Plan, this uses require a CUP. ACTION: Approved list submitted eliminating barber shop, confectionary stores, delicatessen, sandwich shop, florist, magazine sales and those uses would require a CUP. VOTE: 4 - 1 (Feldhaus voting No; Herbst absent) 12a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PREVIOUSLY APPROVED) 12b. VARIANCE N0. 3941 (READVERTI$ED) OWNER: RODRIQUEZ, JONES AND COMPANY, ATTN: TOM ELSAESSOR, 204b South Haster Street, Suite 10, Anaheim, CA 92802 LOCATION: Property is approximately 2.83 acres and is bo-~aded Santa Ana Street. Helena Street Tlm Street and Clementine S reet. ~'ti ~. '~..,: Amend condition of approval pertaining to park land dedication. VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. November 6, 1989 Page 15 Continued to 11-20-89 /; (, - ~/ ~4 , ~. "~ 13 a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PREVIOUSLY APPROVED) "~ 13b. VARIANCE N0. 1564 (READVERTISED) a' .:- OWNER: HUISH FAMILY FUN CENTERS, IPIC., ATTN: COiJRT HUISH, 33208 Paseo Cerveza, Suite C, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 LOCATION: 1041 North Shepard Street To consider revised plans to include construction of a miniature golf course and maze field and relocation of parking spaces for a previously-approved amusement center. VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MIN[iTES. OPPOSITION: One person present. OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Parking, not enough spaces for weekend use. Lot of young people in industrial area, net enough spaces to increase use and increase problems, traffic control officers have said the kids actually intimidate them. Asked that additions not be allowed. PF.TITI0NET2'S COMMENTS: Wanted to remodel and upgrade recreational center, are aware of the problem; family oriented business, have ~~ security guards; have radio operator sit on top of buildings and they bring in reserve police officers and do not affect City budget and they report violations taking place and call police officers who write tickets. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Asked if traffic cantro~ officers still come there on weekends, would like input from APD and Code ^cnforcement. ACTION: Continued to 11-20-89. To get input from Police Department and Code Enforcement. ~.J November 6, 1989 Page 16 Continued to 11-20-89 14. REPORTS AND RRCOMMENDATIONS: ~,,~ A. SUPPLEMENT TO EIR NO 281 (PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED), THE SUMMIT Ap rov c~ OF ANAHEIM HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN (SP88-2), REVISED AND FINAL SITE ~~~~~ PLAN FOR PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED RESIDEPITIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TENTATIVE f (y TRACT MAP NOS 13460 (37 UNITS) 13461 (30 UNITS) AND 13267 (30 UNITS B. VARIANCE NO 3189 •• REQUEST FOR RETROACTIVE EXTENSION OF TIME TO Approved COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Frank J. Santangelo Jr., requests a retroactive extension of time for property located at 900 North West Street. ~I~ Continued from the October 23, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. /!/~~ • C. REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF OCTOBER 9, 1989 PLANNING Approved COMMISSION MOTION APPROVING TRACT MAP N0. 12995 WALL PLAN fSYC:+'RORE CANYON SPECIFIC PLAN) SHOWING TYPE AND PLACEMENT OF A ..--~.. `,~; WALL ADJACENT TO WEIR CANYON ROAD 1, November 6, 1989 Page 17 %'•'' f, ITEMS TO BE HEARD AFTER 6:OOP.M. ---~ 15a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION 15b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 267-1, 2 AND 3 15c. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-20 15d. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL TO REVIEW 15C OWNER: INITIATED BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 200 S. Anaheim, Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92805 LOCATION: GPA 267-1 - Approximately 3.6 acres generally bounded by Cypress Street to the north, Resh Street to the east, the alley north of Lincoln Avenue to the south and Citron Street to the west; including those four properties on the southeast corner of Chartress Street and Resh Street, having combined approximate frontages of 125 feet on the south side of Chartress Street and 176 feet on the east side of Resh Street. SPA 267-2 - Approximately 2,8 acres consisting of those 18 properties located on the north and south sides of Chestnut Street, beginning approximately 165 feet west of the center line of Harbor Boulevard and extending west approximately 420 feet to the westerly terminus of said street. GPA 267-3 - Approximately 5.1 acres generally bounded by Cypress Street to the north, Clementine Street to the east, ~`y~''~ Chartress Street to the south and the alley east of Harbor °"~" Boulevard to the west. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-20 - Consisting of the three areas described above (excepting those six properties beginning at the southeast corner of Cypress Street and Citron Street extending south approximately 272 feet). Please refer to the attached map for specific reclassification information. Reclassification of properties from the RM-1200 and RM-2400 Zones to the RS-5000 or a less intense zone. Reclassification of properties from the RM-1200 Zone to the RM-2400 or a less intense zone. Reclassification of properties from the PD-C Zone to the PD-C/RM-2400 or a less intense zone. November 6, 1989 Page 18 Approved Approved Granted Approved ~~ ~. ~'> .- n- / GPA No. 267-1. 2 and 3. An amendment to the Land Use Element of the ;'~ Anaheim General Plan redesignating the above described areas from the current Medium Density Residential designation to the Low-Medium Density Residential designation. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 267-1 RESOLUTION N0. PC 89-268 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 267-2 RESOLUTION N0. PC 89-269 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 267-3 RESOLUTION N0. PC 89-270 RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. PC 89-271 FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: 2 people present in opposition 12 people present in favor OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Decrease in property value because could only develop fewer units. Concerned about loss of PDC Zoning. SUPPORT: Want property downzoned to keep density and traffic down, less parking problems, want to keep single-family homes. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Not taking parking away. Actions are result of ,,,~h\ survey and people wanted lower density. f ~`,.,~) ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration. Approved GPA No. 267-1, Exhibit A Approved GPA No. 267-2, Exhibit A Approved GPA No. 267-2, Exhibit A Granted Reclassification No. 89-90-20 VOTE: 5 yes votes (Herbst absent) f f i i I Y November 5, 1989 Page 19 16a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved 16b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 268-1 AIv"D 2 . Approved ~ ' w~ OWNER: INITIATED BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 200 S. Anaheim Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92805 LOCATION: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 268-1: Property consists of approximately 5.6 acres generally bounded by Santa Ana Street to the north, Janss Street to the east, Water Street to the south and the alley west of Resh Street to the west. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 268-2: Property consists of approximately 1.9 acres generally bounded by Santa Ana Street to the north, the alley east of Citron Street to the east, Water Street to the south and Citron Street to the west GENERAL PLAN AMENDiENT N0. 268-1: City initiated amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan to consider redesignation from Medium Density Residential to Low-Medium Density Residential. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 268-2: City initiated amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan L•o consider redesignation from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 269-1 RESOLUTION N0. PC 89-272 ~j GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 268-2 RESOLUTION N0. PC 89-273 t~.~~' ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: 1 6 people present in favor. OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Decrease in property value. ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration Approved GPA 268-1 and 2 VOTE: 6 yes votes (Herbst absent) ``~ November 6, 1989 Page 20 ~J 17a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION ;~, 17b. GENE°ar. pr.ap: AMENDMENT N0. 269-1 AND 2 17c. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-9~-21 OWNER: INITIATED BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 200 S. Anaheim Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92805 LOCATION; GPA 269-1 - Approximately 2.88 acres generally bounded by Cypress Street to the north, Emily Street to the east, the alley north of Lincoln Avenue to the south and Claudina Street to the west. Also including the area generally bounded by Cypress Street to the north, Olive Street to the east, Lincoln Avenue to the south and Philadelphia Street to the west. GPA 269-2 - Approximately 7.8 acres generally bounded by the alley south of Center Street to the north, Atchison Street to the east, Broadway to the south and Olive Street to the west; excepting the easterly 125 feet. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-21 - Consisting of the two areas described above. Reclassification of properties from the CG, PD-C and RM-1200 Zones to the RS-5000 or a less intense zone and reclassification of properties from the PD-C and RM-1200 Zones to the RM-2400 or a less intense zone. An amendment to the Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan redesignating the above described areas from the current Medium Density Residential designation to the Low-Medium Density Residential designation. GENERAL PLAN N0. 269-1 RESOLUTION N0. GENERAL PLAN N0. 269-2 RESOLUTION N0. RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: 5 15 people in favor November 6, 1989 Page 21 Continued to 11-20-89 I~ 1 `, r OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Historic house will become non-conforming use and ~'~, couldn't be rebuilt if destroyed. Decrease in property value, asked ~,;;~~' that his property be left as is. would CUP go with new property owner. Properties with multiple units should not be changed and exceptions made, financing is a problem is zoning is changed. STAFF COI~dENTS: Historic house is in Neighborhood Preservation Area and if destroyed would have to be replaced with another historic structure. ;.~ ACTION: Continued to the meeting of 11-20-89 VOTE: ADJOURNMENT: 9:05 p.m. November 6, 1989 Page 22 .. - ~' :.