Minutes-PC 1990/02/26s::a-s~,
;;:.~- -
~1
~...
ACTION
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, E'EBRUARY 26, 1990, AT 10:00 A.M.
10:00 A.M. Study Session for Impelementation of
Redevelopment 20~ Housing Set-Aside Program
PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING
(PUBLIC TESTIMONY)
10:15 A.M. 1:30 P.M.
PROCEDUI<E TO EXPEDITE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. The proponents in applications which are not contested will have five
minutes to present their evidence. Additional time will be granted
upon request if, in the opinion of the Commission, such additional
time will produce evidence important to the Commission's
consideration.
2. In contested applications, the proponents and opponent will each be
given ten minutes to present his case unless additional time is
requested and the complexity of the matter warrants. The
Commission's considerations are not dete~^mined by the length of time
i`y\,' a participant speaks, but rather by whac he says.
3. Staff Reports are part of the evidence deemed received by the
Commission in each hearing. Copies are available to the public prior
to the meeting.
4. The Commission will with'.:old questions until the public hearing is
closed.
5. The Commission reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing if,
in its opinion, the ends of fairness to all concerned will be served.
6. All documents are presented to the Plannin~3 Commission for revieta in
connection with any hearing, including photographs or other
acceptable visual representations of non-documentary evidence, shall
be retained by the Commission for the public record and shall be
available fui public inspections.
7. At the end of the scheduled hearings, members of the public will )~e
allowed to speak on items of interest. which are within the
jurisdiction of the Planning Commission, and/or agenda items. Each
speaker will be allotted a mas.imum of. five (5) minutes to speak.
0718b
Page 1
.,%
la. CEOA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION CLASS 3.
i-',~~ lb. VARIANCE N0. 4014
OWNER: HENRY ULLOA AND JUANA ULLOA, 646 N. Carleton Avenue,
Anaheim, CA 92801
LOCATION: 646 N. Carleton Avenue
Waiver of minimum lot size for accessory living quarters to retain a
379 square-foot accessory living quarters with kitchen facilities.
Continued from the meeting of January 3, 1990
VARIANCE RESOLUTION NO. PC 90-46
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERL'~D OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION; 6 people opposed
1 person present in favor
Petition containing 28 signatures in opposition submitted.
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Opposed to variance, overcrowding, traffic,
parking, set undesirable precedent.
-~~ PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Owner purchased property with living quarters
;_~ with kitchen facilities and was not aware that was a violation; permit
was granted an Zoning Administrator said area could be used as a
bedroom. Living quarters used far persons who care for a disabled
child; questioned accuracy of report by Code Enforcement. Indicated
.letters are available from neighbors who do not oppose request; reported
ene neighbor has an existing violation wii:i a converted garage being
used for living quarters.
A~~ent who sold property stated the only viola ion is stove and rwner was
told a permit was not needed for stove. Present owner has improved
property and has eliminated parking problem. Inspection by Code
Enforcement did not reveal overcrowding. Property was purchased in this
condition because of living quarters for persons caring for disabled
child could stay.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Approval was to permit a rumpus room and
additional stora3e area with a bathroom; unit has been used as a rental
unit for several years illegally. Variance goes with land and no :+ay to
tie approval to an owner. Felt 379 sq. ft. too small area for four
peop]a to live.
STA::~'F COMMENTS: Code Enforcement indicated complaints began in October
because of additional vehicles parking in the area. Approval subject to
this owner would be hard to police and overcrowding is a problem and
difficult to prove.
~~'""~ ACTION: Denied
VOTE: 5-2
(Com. Messe abstained
Com Bouas voted No)
f'%,
Page No. 2 2/26/90
2a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
2b. VARIANCE N0. 4026
~:,~,;
OWNER: GRAIG PAINTER and SFTARON PAINTER, 7671 Corto Road, Anaheim,
CA 92808
AGENT: ANACAL ENGINEERING COMPANY, 1900 E. La Palma Ave.,
Suite 202, Anaheim, CA 92803-3668
LOCATION: 380 South Timken Road
Waivers of minimum lot area and required lot frontage to establish a
4-lot subdivision.
Continued from the meeting of February 12, 1990.
VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0.
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 5 people present in opposition
Letters of opposition submitted.
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Additional traffic on Timken Road, which is a
,~ private road; access currently through subject property would be
eliminated; no emergency vehicle access; set precedent in area for
` smaller lots and destroy integrity of area; Parcel Map 87-108 was for
three 1/2-acre lots and one lot to remain as orange grove; construction
equipment is already destroying Timken Road, and if approved, req~iested
condition that no construction equipment be permitted on Timken Road.
1/2-acre zoning assured with Mohler Drive area annexation; larger lots
typically in area because of drastic terrain; does not meet site design
standards far flag lots; or grivate accessway requirements; violates
State Subdivision Map Act, presented copy of real estate law.
Anaheim Hills Coalition opposed; questioned conformance with General
Plan.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Minor request, felt precedent has been set in
the area for lots somewhat smaller than 22,000 sq. ft.; this property
was vacant a lot of years and has been used as an equestrian access and
a variety of other things; access in case of fire wou],d have to be on
foot because of terrain. Will be supplying a waterline from Cordo Road
to Timken Road and for security and safety, that would be an asset for
back up water supply for that area.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: No hardship to grant variance, Scenic Corridor
Overlay Zone restrictions must be adhered to; request is to basically
comply with minimum requirements and request a variance.
} ACTION: Continued to 3-12-90
~`-J Request of applicant .o consider 3 lots rather 4, possibly
eliminating need for variance.
5-12-90
~~-~~
to
Page No. 3 2/26/90
x; ,;,_,
3a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION ont;inued to
~;',:, 3b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT -12-90
~,, _, ,
~~~ 3c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3242
r .
OWNER: COACHMAN/PAYEE, PARTNERSHIP, 301 N. W. 63rd St, Ste. 500, ~; ~~~
Oklahoma City, CA 73116
AGENT: ROGER ANDERSON, 1663 Sawtelle Blvd., Ste. 240, Los Angeles
CA 90025
LOCATION: 615 West Ratella Avenue
To permit a 6-story, 130-unit all-suite hotel with waiver of
permitted encroachment into required yard.
Continued from the meeting of January 29, 1990
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING CG'MMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
ACTION: Continued at request of applicant to review sewer study which
was delivered to the Engineering Department on February 21, 1990.
~~./'
Page No. 4 2/26/90
4a. ADDENDUM=E"TVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT N0. 293 PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED) pproved
4b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3241
"-'" ranted
OWNER: B.U. PATEL'AND LOREN WAGNER, 650 Town Center Drive Suite /f
1'90, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 ~~,~/~
AGENT; F:R:RANO AND Y.IEVET, 100 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 3410,
AnaIxeim, CA 92805
LOCATION: 201 West ICatella Avenue
To permit a 12-story, 384-unit hotel.
Continued from the January 29, 1990, and February 12, 1990 Planning
Commission meetings.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-47
---------------------------
----------------
LLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 1 person present
OPPOSITION CONCEEBNS: CLP should not be granted until CR study is
f,.~, completed; key project on a key parcel which is highly visible.
~„"~ PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Revised lans to
and additional lobby and storageparea. Requested4modificationntoarea
Condition No. 8 language approved for previously-approved project
allowing cash payment for cost of construction for 300 ft. right turn
lane Kateiia & Hastert No. 9, left turn at Clementine, not in previously
approved project [Traffic Engineer agreed condition could be deleted);
No. 15 requiring agreement regarding any sign to comply with CR sign
code as it may lbe amended in the future and agreed to stipulate to
comply with sign code currently being proposed; and No. 37 regarding
water service, requested modification as submitted.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: No moritorium on construction in CR area; wanted
utilities underground;
STAFF COh4~L31fiiS: Traffic Engineer - Tour bus bay will serve other
hotels; condition intended to insure studies are done. Condition No. 34
modified regarding relocation of utility poles; requires undergrounding
as well as r~elpcation of poles if necessary, as approved by Utilities
General A4amager.
ACTION: Approved Addendum to EIR No. 293, including Mitigation
Asonitoring Program
Gz~anted CUP 3241, with modifications to Condition No. 8, 15
and 37 and deletion of Condition No. 9.
~ VOfiE': 7 yes votes
`~
Page No. 5 2/26/90
5a. CEOA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION CLASS 5
"-'" 5b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3225 Withdrawn
:.'•
OWNER: OREH CATERERS, ATTN: JIM INGRASSIA, 7221 S. Atlantic
Avenue, Bell, CA 90201 ~~
LOCATION: 2115 E. Orangewood Avenue
To maintain two (2) existing office trailers in conjunction with a
catering business.
Continued from the December 18, 1989, and January 15 and January 29,
1990, Planning Commission meetings.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION rIO.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
,~
Page No. 6 2/26/90
\~.''
a 6a. CEOA NEGAT7vE DECLARATioty
`,N^11, 6b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
6c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3244
OWNER: ENDOWMENT REALTY INVESTORS, INC., 400 S. Hope Street, #600,
Los Angeles, CA 90071-289'9
AGENT: CALLISON, 950 Sixth Ave., Suite #200, San Diego, CA 92101
LOCATION: 5550 Santa Ana Can on Road
To permit the expansion of an existing commercial retail center with
waivers of minimum number of parking spaces, minimum structural
setback, permitted signs and maximum number of wall signs.
Continued from the February 12, 1990, Planning Commission meeting.
CONDITIONAL IISE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO.
------------------------------
------------
FULLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
TWO PERSONS (tenants currently in center) spoke in favor
of renovation of the center.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: This is renovation ~f existing center; waiver of
setback requested to match existing buildings with 30-feet setback;
other commercial projects in the area intrude on 1'00-foot setback from
Santa Ana Canyon Road; parking for new building meets code; signs needed
because it is quite a distance from street; buildings on corners block
visibility to this site.
COMMISSION COMMENTS; In 1971 buildings allowed on the corners to
encroach into the 100-foot setback setback; and corners were to be
tiotally landscaped so no cars would be parked on corners; several public
hearings held and State designation that this area was to be Scenic
Corridor had certain restrictions. This would be in strict violation of
SC ordinance; and would set precedent. Asked if access to Imperial was
considered (petitioner responded it wasp. Suggested relocating the
building near the back on the west side which is not used for parking
now.
ACTION: Continued to March 26, 1990, in order for petitioner to
consider relocating the building and working with Traffic
Engineer.
Page No. 7
2/26/90
ontinued to
3-26-90
~Y/ '
ea
7a. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT N0. 300
7b. SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 90-01
7c. ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
OWNER: TAUBMAN WESTERN ASSOCIATES, P.0. Box 200, Bloomfield Hills,
Michigan 48303
AGENT: TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY, 625 The City Drive, Suite 110,
Orange, CA 92668
LOCATION: Southwest corner of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Roosevelt Road
Request for consideration and adoption of a Specific Plan (including
Zoning and Development Standards and a Public Facilities Plan) for
the proposed "Anaheim Hills Festival", to provide for the development
of a 56.4 acre commercial development area, a 4.5 acre 150-room hotel
and restaurant area and a 17.7 acre business commercial area.
SPECIFIC PLAN RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-48
-----ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-49
--------------- __ _ __ ___
----------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION; 6 interested persons present
INTERESTED PARTIES CONCERNS: Anaheim Hills Coalition - appreciated
efforts of developer to resolve their concerns. Concerns were:
1. parking structure - wanted restrictions to apply to any
parking structures that might be constructed in the future.
2. structural height - if approval given now for Areas 3 and 4
-protection regarding orientation of buildings towards
residences - windows would be concern.
3. hours for deliveries
4. hours for use of trash compactor
5. grading plans - grading has been revised to pull it away from
the cul de sac, but plans currently being considered by
Commission does not show that revision.
6, community center facility - understood not part of this
approval, but would be subject to a lend swap agreement.
7. 24-hour on site security to prevent drag racing, etc.
8. crib wall landscaping, and suggested mitigation measure:. were
excellent regarding screening whether the crib wall is seen or
not.
V
ified
owed
~~1•~~~
Page No. 8 2/26/90
Other
a. Homeowners on Kendra Ct. did not receive notices
°•~&T~'
b. Concerned about signalization of intersection of Monte Vista
Road and Bauer, and traffic traveling north to the center and
the 5000 additional homes being proposed in the area;
c. building heights in Areas 3 and 4;
d. roof mounted equipment;
e. height of lighting standards;
f. color of roof tops;
g. wrought iron fence location
h. responsibility for maintenance of the slopes;
i. when fence would be constructed, and felt should be
concurrently with Phase 1;
j. noise from a car wash operation;
k. entrance and box office of theater should be oriented away
from residences, but can be seen by most homes on Ke;idra Court
and suggested rotation by about 25° away from their area;
1. size of initial trees to be planted and wanted something
larger than 15 gallon, particularly in the parking lot area;
m. hours of illumination of signs and wanted signs to be turned
off when businesses close;
n. parking lot 13.ghting for security after hours should be lower
than during business hours and suggested two levels of
lighting, high for safety and low for security;
o. construction of office building in Area 4, facing residences
on Kendra Court and would like solid wall with no windows or
if windows, that they be louvered.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS:
A. Agreed to restricted hours for delivery, except for
supermarket, suggested between midnight and 6 a.m.;
B. also, same hours for compactor;
C. updated grading plan has been submitted and does show 2:1
slope pulled back from adjacent residences to the south;
D. 24-hour security planned;
E. will provide traffic signals as recommend by traffic engineers;
F. building heights as indicated by cross section exhibit;
G. view of office building to Kendra Court (Area 4), residents in
their back yards would have to turn to see the building,
distance is 1000 feet;
H, height of lighting standards is 35 feet;
I, neutral color proposed for roof, something other than black or
dark gray;
J. wrought iron fence for security and no preference as to its
location, but would like flexibility
R, would like to have car wash allowed and it would be directed
away from residences and there would be no noise impact;
L, theater orientation cannot be changed because of impact of
parking and circulation;
M. would stipulated to 24" box trees in parking lot area;
N. would stipulate to reasonable hours of illumination for signs;
~,
Page No. 9 2/26/90
0. two levels of lighting for parking lot are acceptable;
P. felt it would be difficult to completely screen any roof
~~~` mounted equipment, but are planning architectural parapets and
some tower elements and neutral paint to match color of roof;
resident's down view would be mitigated and out view would be
maintained.,, 34 residents on hillside and they will be impacted
by a shopping center of this size and best way to hide roof
mounted equipment would be painting it out and a good job of
landscaping.
Q. asked that the word (minimum) be added to Cond. #5.
R. requested Condition No. 14 be deleted since it is actually a
part of condition No. 15. (Traffic Engineer agreed to
deletion.)
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
1. Felt car wash should require conditional use permit approval.
(Petitioner asked that the use be allowed, with the locatic:i
requiring a CUP).
2. Corner on Santa Ana Canyon Road should be fully landscaped for
30 feet at main entrance; and parking should be in tY.e rear.
(Petitioner agreed to 30 feet, originally not being fully
landscaped).
3. Roof-mounted equipment should be totally screened in
accordance with Scenic Corridor ordinances, and plans to be
approved by the Planning Commission. This is a massive
building and should be architecturG'_ly designed so people
;--, above will not be looking down on roof-mounted equipment.
y Architectural features for screening should be painted same
color as roof, and shall be neutral color other than black or
dark grey.
4. Truck access through project, rather than turnarounds.
5. Lighting standards at 35 feet are too high and should be
lowered. (Petitioner agreed to 30-foot high lighting
standards).
6. Condition to review plans for the office building in the
future because of concern regarding the heights, rather than a
firm approval in the Specific Plan, because plans can change.
(Petitioner indicated plans would be reviewed by Commission
when that project is pr.oposed.)
7. Alternate site listed on page 30 indicates location is in
Fullerton, but it is in Anaheim.
II. Size of lettering on signs - felt rather large. {petitioner
felt it was small based on distance from Santa Ana Canyon Road
which is a high speed road.
9. Delivery hours - should take traffic patterns on 91 freeway
into consideration - restriction between midnight and 6 a.m.
except for supermarket is reasonable.
10. Trash compactor operation hours restricted between 10 p.m. and
6 a.m., unless completely muffled.
11. Sign illumination restricted to hours of business operation,
plus one hour before and one hour after business is closed for
each individual business.
\~~ 12. Crib walls to be landscaped if seen by public.
13. Parking lot lighting intensity to be reduced at night.
Page No. 10 2/26/90
14. Minimum size of trees to be planted in parking lot is 24" box.
,~~,,
=rN`;; 15. Wrought iron fence on south property line to be constructed
prior to occupangy permits. Location of fence to be approved
by the City Engineer.
16. Questioned grading - going right up to the homes. (Petitioner
explained that was from a previous agreement between Kaufman &
Broad and Taubman requiring off site grading and landscaping;
and that area along the south will conform to the contour
grading ordinance.
i7. Felt Condition No. 14 could be deleted.
18. Agreed with petitioner's request to modify Condition No. 34 to
read that any revisions not deemed to be in substantial
conformance by the Planning Director.
19. Agreed first sentence of Condition No. 91 could be deleted.
20. Clarified utilities are underground.
STAFF COMMENTS:
1)Sign ordinance for SC was not related to regional shopping
centers, but to neighborhood centers. Felt size is reasonable
since center is two levels, and this is a reduction over
original sign program.
2)Square footage of retail corrected to 136,600 sq. ft. in the
staff report and monitoring program.
3)Condition regarding monitoring program should be amended to
require developer to comply with the mitigation measure
itself, as well as to comply with the monitoring program.
4)Crossing lot lines requires waiver which will come back to
Commission as R & R.
5)Grading plans approved following public hearing before City
Engineer. Mitigation measure requires grading p"lans to
conform to Council Policy and ordinance before approval of
Specific Plan by Commission and that could be changed to prior
to approval of Specific Plan by City Council.
6)Deletion of Santa Ana Canyon Road widenin from Condition No.
17 acceptable.
ACTION: Recommended certification of EIR No. 300
Approved Specific Plan No. 90-01, subject to modifications,
additionals and deletions
Approved request for Ordinance of Zoninig and Developmetn
Standards.
VOTE: 7 yes votes
,~
Page No. 11 2/26/90
8a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
!I;" 8c. CONDITIONAL USE PF.?tMIT N0. 3243
OWNER: PALMALL PROPERTIES, INC., 1428 West Bay Avenue, Newport
Beach, CA 92663
AGENT: DIMITRIOS KALOGEROPOULOS, 300 S. Manchester Avenue,
Anaheim, CA 92805
LOCATION: 300 South Manchester Avenue
To permit a drive-through lane for an existing fast food restaurant
with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-50
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUI4.MARY OF TfIE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: none
ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration
Granted Waiver of Code Requirement
Granted Conditional Use Permit
VOTE: 7 yes votes.
~J;
9a. CEOA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION-CLASS 11
9b. VARIANCE N0. 4031
OWNER: Kenneth E. Sarvak, 424 Old IJewport Boulevard, Newport
Beach, CA 92663
AGENT: Victor Stapf, 424 Old Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA
92663
LOCATTON: 2283 West Lincoln Avenue
Waiver of signs permitted in residential zones to construct one
freestanding sign.
VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0.
~~~
Approved
Granted
Granted
~~ ~~
Withdrawn
~/~
Paye No. 12 2/26/90
- i
10a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PREVIOUSLY APPROVED)
,:,"t, lOb. CONDTTIONAL USE PERMTT NO 3059 (REAnVERTISED)
x /4.
OWNER: DONALD T. TAKAI and DOROTHY TAKAI, 3174 West Rome Avenue,
Anaheim, CA 92804
AGENT: MAGDY HANNA, 4400 MacArthur Boulevard, 9th Fioor, Newport
Beach, CA 92660
LOCATION: 150 South Dale
Amendment to condition of approval pertaining to required street
improvements to establish a ?.7-unit mobile home park.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO.
----------------------------------------
----------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMM:,RY uF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 1 person present - cor_cerned about wall and error
indicating it faces the south side and it is supposed to be the north
side.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: W!-.en grading plans submitted, City Engineer said
bridge across Dale must be widened in order to comply with Condition No.
3. Questioned if that is a legitimate requirement under Condition No. 3
since it was not discussed previously. Cost between $150,000 and
$200,000 whcih is enormous for a small 27-unit mobilehome park.
PETITIONER'S TRAFFIC CONSULTANT:
Presented diagram showing site distance showing distance that will exist
at the intersection u~ oropos~d driveway and creek channel, and bridge
railing which creates b1ir~A spot, using Calif. Site Distance Procedures
in California Highway Desiyn Manual.
-road has profile and dip
-suggested painting curb red to e.:<minate parking and put in small
median to prohibit left turns, woula create acceleration lane.
-Critical speed is 38 mph
-stopping distance is 250 feet
-suggested widening sidewalk by pushing rail back 10 feet which
would provide full stnadard site distance for motorist comining out
of driveway
-restrict driveway to right turn only in and out and put in small
median to eliminate left turns.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Safety issue with city liaLility and wanted to hear any
alternatives.
Drivers speed to make signal.
~~../
tinued to
3-12-90
~~
^age No. 13 2/26/90
,.._ t%^
STAFF C02~fENTS: Traffic Engineer - Even though speed is posted for 35
mph, that is not the speed most people drive; very hazardous situation
with visibility with right turns or left turns at the driveway; did not
think widening sidewalk would increase visibi).ty.
These suggested alternatives by petitioner not yet reviewed by
Engineering Department.
ACTION: Continued to 3-12-90 in order for petitioner to meet with
Traffic Engineer, with recommendation to do everything possible to
correct situation without widening bridge.
•-~~
Page No. 14 2/26/90
lla. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
!. llb. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 291-1 and 291-2
~i.;;~
INITIATED BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim,
CA 92803
d
AREA 1: ~~
REQUEST: Redesignation from the Medium Density Residential " /%'~
designation to the General Commercial designation.
LOCATION: Property is approximately 2.0 acres located west of the
northwest corner of Ball Road and Dale Avenue, beginning
approximately 180 feet west of the centerline of Dale Avenue, having
a frontage of approximately 144 feet on the north side of Ball Road
and extending north approximately 590 feet.
AREA 2:
REQUEST: Redesignation from the General Commercial designation to the
Low Density Residential designation.
LOCATION: Property is approximately 0.36 acre located on the
southwest corner of Devoy Drive and Dale Avenue, having approximate
frontages of 144 feet on the south side of Devoy Drive and 135 feet
on the west side of Dale Avenue.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-51
,--~
'J -------------------------------------------------------------------------
,~ FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
ACTION: Approved GPA
VOTE: 7 yes votes
•'~..,;
Page No. 15 2126/90
12 a. CEOA NEGATIVE DE('LARATION
12b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 292
~'"`±''~} 12c. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-42
12d. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF 12c
INITIATED BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim,
CA 92803
LOCAT2O2d: Property is bounded by Pearl Street to the north West
Street_to the east, the alley south of Pearl Street to the
south and Carleton Avenue to the west
A City ini*_iated amendment to the Land Use Element of the General
Plan redesignating subject area from the Medium Density Residential
designation to the Low-Medium Density Residential designation.
A City initiated reclassification of properties from the RM-1200
(Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone to the RM-2400 (Residential,
Multiple-Family) or a less intense zone.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-52
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-53
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
f•°°~. FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
~ CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: NONE
PEOPLE SUPPORTING REQUEST: 5 people present
Thanked the Commission for denying the recent request for apartments on
Pearl Street (Variance No. 3993) and stated they wanted to maintain the
integrity of their neighborhood.
COMMISSION COMMEITS: Asked that action agenda reflect those people
present response in favor of this request, and their support of denial
of Variance 3993 which has been appealed to City Council.
ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration
Granted GPA 292
Granted Reclassification 89-90-42
Requested City Council review of Reclassification in
conjunction with General Plan Amendment.
VOTE: 7 yes votes
i
'/
Approved
Granted
Granted
~~
Page No. 16 2/26/90
13 a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION ~,Q
13b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 282 /'
INITIATED BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim,
CA 92803 '
LOCATION: Subject area from the General Industrial designation to the
General Commercial designation. Parcel 1: Approximately
2.52 acres having a frontage of approximately 400 feet on
the north side of Orangethorpe Avenue, having a n.aximum
depth of approximately 275 feet and being located
approximately 512 feet east of the centerline of Lemon
Street. Parcel 2: Approximately 0.63 acre having a
frontage of approximately 100 feet on the north side of
Orangethorpe Avenu" having a maximum depth of
approximately 275 feet and being located approximately 915
feet east of the centerline of Lemon Street.
Amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan redesignating
subject area from the General Industrial designation to the General
Commercial designation.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-54
---------------------------
~~ FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
~;~,~,,J CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
tiJ
ACTION: Approved GPA
Exhibit A
VOTE: 7 yes votes
Page No. 17 2/26/90
.,
~Ei,'
~:::.
~;:.
14 a. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT N0. 289 (PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED) (Approved
14b. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 89-02 (READVERTISED) Granted
s, ye~jy
AGENT: SAVI RANCH ASSOCIATES, c/o HILLMAN PROPERTIES, 450 Newport
Center Drive, Ste. 304, Newport Beach, CA 92660; and ROLL
COMPANY, Attn: RON KEITH, 4345 Von Barmen, Newport Beach,
CA 92660-221
AGENT: COMMUNITY SYSTEMS ASSOCIATION, 1717 S. State College Blvd.,
#100, Anaheim, CA 92806
LOCATION: 1001 to 1100 Pullman Street (MaYtietfaire at Anaheim)
To govern and permit the construction of a commercial retail center,
one free standing restaurant with on-sale alcoholic beverages and
entertainment, one drive-through restaurant, an automotive repair
center, a service station and mini-mart with fast food and off-sale
beer and wine, and an automotive car wash, with building heights in
excess of 35 feet, with waivers of minimum number of parking spaces,
required site screening and required landscaped setback.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-55
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
~,-~~ CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
``
OPPOSITION: None
ACTION: Approved
VOTE: 7 yes votes
I~
Page No. 18 2/26/90
15. REPOTtTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS•
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 508 REQUEST FOR TERMINATION: pproved
Stephen I. Bierman, request termination of Conditional Use
Permit No. 508 for property 1335 N. Sunshine Way. `~ 7,~
~~
L~
RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-56
B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 3143 - REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Approved
TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Stu Alan, requests to 8-26-90.
for an extension of time for property located /~,~J~
~
at 511 E. Katella Ave. ~
(// ~~.i ~
C. VARIANCE N0. 3624 - REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY Continued to
WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Michael J. Rubino, Stradling, to 3-12-90.
Yocca, Carleson and Rauth, requests for an extension of /
time for property located at 2940 Frontera Street. /~7
(j
D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2994 - REQUEST FOR REVIEW OF REVISED Approved
PLANS FOR DETERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS: David R. Jackson, Fairmont Schools,
Requests approval for property located at 1557 West Mable Street
16. OTHER DISCUSSION:
A. Discussion pertaining to landscape plan submittal in conjunc
with all Planning Commission items (other than single-family
residences) - requested by Commissioner Messe.
Page No. 19 2/26/9