Minutes-PC 1990/04/09s:
`:
,,~
ACTION
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING GF THE ANAHEIM CITS: PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, APRIL 9, 1990, AT 4:00 A.M.
9:00 - REDEVELOPMENT STAFF PRESENTATION Pertaining tU the
proposed Anaheim Plaza Redevelopment Project Area
and Downtown Project Area Alpha update.
PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING
(PTJBLIC TESTIMONY)
10:00 A.M. 1:30 P.M.
PROCEDURE TO EXPEDITE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. The proponents in applications which are not contested will have five
minutes to present their evidence. Additional time will be granted upon
request if, in the opinion of the Commission, such additional time will
produce evidence important to the Commission's consideration.
2. In contested applications, the proponents and opponent will each 'be given
ten m?.nutes to present his case unless additional time is requested and
the comp?.exity of the matter warrants. The Commission's considerations
^~ are not determined by the length of time a participant speaks, but rather
~__, by what he says.
3. Staff Reports are part of the evidence deemsd received by the Commission
in each hearing. ropies are available to the public prior to the meeting.
4. The Commission will withhold questions until the public hearing is closed.
5. The Commission reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing if, in
its opinion, the ends of fairness to all concerned will be served.
6. All documents are presented to the Planning Commission for review in
connection with any hearing, including photographs or other acceptable
visual representations of non-documentary evidence, shall be retained by
the Commission for the public record and shall be available for public
inspections.
7. At the end of the scheduled hearings, ;nembers of the public will be
allowed to speak on items of interest which are within the jurisdiction
of the Planning Commission, and/or agenda items. Each speaker will be
allotted a maximum of five (5) minutes to speak.
0753b
Page 1
1 ~`1
la. CEOA NEGATIVE DE~raRATI~N
lb. WAIVER OF ODE REOUI EMENT
lc. CONDITIONAL USE PFRM~__3226
.~T N0.
OWNER: STEWART GREEN & ASSOCIATES, ATTN: ROSALIE McCORMICR,
2180 E. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92806
AGENT: ANAHEIM SPORTS MEDICAL CENTER, ATTN: MARyrpN BAH,
2238 E. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92806
LOCATION: 2238 Bast Lincoln Avenue. Property is approximately 27.1
acres located at the southeast corner of Lincoln Avenue and
State College Boulevard.
To retain a 3,557 square--foot physical therapy (massage) sports
medical center with waivers of (a) minimum number of parking spaces
and (b) permitted location of an "adult entertainment business".
Continued from the December 18, 1989, January 3, February 12, 1990
and March 12, 1990, Planning CommiSSion meetings.
CONDITIONAL USE 1OERMIT RESOLUTION N0.
---------------- ___ _______
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
~,
_\ FETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Requested 4 week continuance in order for legal '
counsel to be resent.
P Some legal issues relating to traffic on Sta,~,e
College to be resolved.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Traffic problem needs to be solved; this has been
continued several times.
ACTION: Continued to 5-7-90
''~
Page No. 2
4/9/90
Continued to
5-7-90
1~~'~~
~~~ --
'"~ r'm°,
2a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (READVERTISED) Approved
(~ 2b. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-43 (READVERTISED) Granted
k'" 2c. WAIVER OF COL'z; REQUIREMENT (READVERTISED) Approved
2d. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3248 (READVERTISED) Granted
OWNER: DENNIS RASE, RAVE AASE AND SANDRA AASE, 701 E. Cypress
Street, Anaheim, CA 92805
LOCATION: 701 E. Cypress Street. Property is approximately 1.05
acres on the south side of Adele Street approximately 90
feet east of the center:ine of Pauline Street.
RM-2400 to ML or less intense zone
To permit the storage of automobiles and parts with waivers of
maximum fence height and required improvement of parking areas.
Continued from the March 12, and March 26, 1990, Planning Commission
meetings.
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. PC90-82 ~~
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC90-83 .~ "~
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANN?NG COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. '
i
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Electrical Depa.~tment indicated to petitioner
there would be no problem with storing anything under the power lines
that was not a permanent structure; did not want to pave the surface, but
would agree to putting something to EPA standards on the surface that
would eliminate the dust; wanted clarification of construction of a
planter island around area of proposed power pope; concern over
cul de sac, i.e., Redevelopment did not want 2 driveways. j
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Redevelopment's main concern way visibility of
storage yard from Cypress; Commissioner Messe requested nos. 1 and 5 of
item no. 20 on page 4 of staff report be delete3 and nos. 2, 3, and 4 be
added to Che conditions.
STAFF'S COMMENTS: Concern about storage under electrical wiring; other
things are being tziken into consideration with the sale of the Union
Pacific :~.ailroad property; they are waiting for a response from the
Attorney's office; Greg Hastings suggested c'eletion of conditio^ no. 5 on
page 7 and modification of condition no. 4.
.~~
Page No. 3 4/9/90
~, ,
_ '~, ~
ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration
- Granted Reclassification No No 89-90-43
- Delete nos. 1 and 5 of item no. 20 on page 4 of the staff report.
Approved Waiver of Code Requirement
Does not need to pave surface, but must treat the surface with
something acceptable to EPA standards to keep the dust down.
Uranted Conditional Use Permit No 3248
Add nos. 2, 3 and 4 of no. 20 to conditi:ns.
Condition no. 4 of page 7 was reworded to read as follows:
"That the legal owner/developer of subject property shall
construct the driveway so as not to conflict with the
existing and proposed power poles to the satisfaction of the
Electrical Engineering Division."
Delete Condition No. 5 on page 7 of staff report.
VOTE: 7 yes votes
,•^"~
`~ ;
`.,..~
.,,~~
Page No. 4 4i 9/90
~ 1'1,
,may 3a. CEOA MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
t, 13b. WAIVER 0'' CODE REQUIREMENT
"'` 3c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3242
O'v1NER: COACHMAN/PAYEE, PARTNERSHIP, 301 N. W. 63rd St, Ste. 500,
Oklahoma City, CA 73116
AGENT; ROGER ANDERSON, 1663 Sawtelle Blvd., Ste. 240, Los Angeles,
CA 90025
LOCATION: 615 West Ratella Avenue. Property is approximately 0.54
acre located on the north side of i~atella Avenue
approximately 200 feet west of the centerline of Harbor
Boulevard.
To permit a 6-story, 130-unit all-suite hotel with waiver of
permitted encroachment into required yard. (waiver deleted by revised
plans)
Continued from the January 29, February 26, and March 12, 1990,
Planning Commission meetings.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC90-84
-------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
..-~ CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: They have kept the basic building; redesigned the
circulation and bus loading and unloading; and have come up with a plan
for the refuse collection.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: The Sanitation Division stated at the morning Work
Session and in the staff report, that the refuse collection was
inadequate; traffic issues have not been mitigated.
STAFF'S COMMENTS: There is a problem with the traffic circulation, bus
loading and unloading and trash pickup.
VOTE: DENIED CEQA MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Waiver of Code Requirement (No action required)
DENIED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3242
Traffic issues have not been mitigated; inac'.equat~~ refuse
collection; buses loading and unloading and site being gateway
to CR area and site coverage.
ACTION• 7 yes votes
Page No. 5
4/9/90
Denied
No Action
Denied
f ~ ~r'
~~:, ,
~ i"1
4a. ADllENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO 256 (PREV CERT )
'. 4b. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-46
`"~' 4c. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
4d. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3262
OWNER: BEDFORD DEVELOPMENT CO., 3002 Dow Ave., Ste. 502, Tustin,
CA 92680
AGENT: ROBERT D. MICHELSON, 328 N. Glassell, Orange, CA 92660
LOCATION: Property is ap~rox=mately 2.25 acres located at the
northwest corner of Monte Vista Road and Weir Canyon Road
CO (SC) to CL (SC)
To permit a commercial retail center and carwash facility with
gasoline sales with waivers of setback adjacent to scenic expressway
and secondary highway.
Continued from the March 26, 1990, Planning Commission meeting.
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION NO.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
,~
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
~~ CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
PETITYONER'S COMMENTS: Car wash service is needed in the area; sound
study was not received in time for public hearing.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Concern as to how gas trucks would get in and out
once they are on the lot; over parked by 14 spaces, perhaps they could
reduce the parking and increase the landscaping.
STAFF'S COMMENTS: Staff has not had a chance to revie;r sound study.
ACTION: Continued to 4/23/90
~....~
Continued to
4/23/90
V cl
,.~ i.'.I G'`
Page No. 6 4/9/90
K
Y <_:~
' 1 ~1 .. :i
5a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
5b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
~"" Approved
5c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3257 Approved
Granted
OWNER: B. U. PATEL, 25812 Nellie Gail itoad, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 1
AGENT: JOHN F. SWINT, Architect, 707 W. North Street, Anaheim, CA
92805-1735
LOCATION: 2171 S. Harbor Boulevard. Property is approximately 1.9 acr es
on the west side of Harbor Boulevard approximately 130 feet
north of the centerline of Wilken Way.
To permit the expansion of an existing motel with waiver of minimum
number of parking spaces.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC9~'85 ,r
{/r `'
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNI2dG COt~fISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 1
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS:
/~ 1. Tom Rievet submitted modifications to condition nos. 1 and 6.
;.
.
..:.
2. Conc4rned about condition no. 14, not sure when rezoning will take
place, suggest they could modify the condition that the application fo
the rezoning shall be filed prior to issuance of a building permit; th t
it shall be rezoned prior to final building inspection, therefore
the
,
will not have to wait fcr the rezoning process to be completed before
they can pull the permit.*
I 3. Final condition is no. 18 concerning freestanding monument signs; need
clarification as to the existing signage; freestanding pole sign may n ed
to be relocated due to this development.
STAFF'S COMMENTS•
1. Greg Hastings stated the recommendation would be to eliminate Condit
no. 14 and for the Commission to initiate the proceedings today, ass
the project is approved; *_herefore, the City will be processing the
reclassification and it would not be tied into this project.
Page No. 7
4/9/u0
}ng
~ r~
2. Regarding condition no. 18 - Greg Hastings stated the intent was that any
new sign would also include any relocated sign; if he wants to keep the
original sign in the same place, the City would have no problem with
that. He suggested rewording the condition to say, "any new or relocated
freestanding sign on City property", to clarify the condition.
3. Alfred Yalda, Traffic Engineering, stated they would accept the
alternative verbage for condition no. 6.
4. Melanie Adams, Public-Works Engineering, stated the alternative verbage
for condition no. 1 is acceptable. In the staff report on page 4, second
paragraph, last sentence, should say "prior to occupancy".
ACTION: Approved CEQA Negative Declaration
Approved Waiver of Code Requirement
Granted Conditional Use Permit No. 3257
VOTE: 7 yes
~~.
'~:..::
Page No. 8 4/9/90
.~; (,r _
6a. CEOA MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
6b. WAIVER OF CODE REOUZREMENT
"'`~ 6c. CONDITIONAL U£E PERMIT NO 3258
OWNER: CONESTOGA PARTNERS, 1240 S. Walnut Street, Anaheim, CA
92121
AGENT: PHILLIP R. SCHWARTZE, 7.4841 Yorba, #203, Tustin, CA 92680
LOCATION: 1240 South Walnut Street. Property is approximately 6.4
acres located on the south side of Ball Road and on the
east side of Walnut Street, approximately 340 feet east and
345 feet south of the intersection of Eall Road and Walnut
Street.
To permit a vacation ownership resort with waiver of minimum number
of parking spaces.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MIN"JTES.
OPPOSITION: 9 people present in opposition
~^-1 OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Buses currently parking there; heavy volume of
~_. buses and they have Pngines running for 1/2 hour to 45 min.; mistake was
made when Conestoga was developed and now is time to correct that
mistake; access to residences is limited; suggested limiting access at
southern driveway to right turns; traffic is major concern; eliminate
completely buses using Walnut; main access on Ball is improvement, but
nothing in plans to indicate Walnut is a secondary entrance; need buffer
from noise and fumes; project too large for this site; no parking area
for buses on site; proposed parking for banquet facilities not adequate;
no EIR to discuss alternative sites; felt they had inadequate time to
review project
PETITION'ER'S COMMENTS: Primary entrance would be on Ball; secondary on
Walnut; did look at over 60 other sites; requested change in TOT
percentage from 30'b to 20'b
.~,i
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Matter to be continued in order for neighbors to
have more time to consider the project; hotel is there and will remain,
but now is the time to make the situation better for the neighbors; felt
time share operation will improve bus situation
STAFF COMMENTS: PD&A felt TOT should be 30`b as indicated in fiscal
impact analysis prepared and submitted by applicant; changed requested
would mean loss of revenue of about $55,000 per year to the City.
ACTION: Continued to 4-23-90
Page No. 9 4/9/90
Continued to
4-23-90
''~,
~~,u ,. ,
i
,-~
7a. ENVIRON:LNTAL IMPACT REPORT NO 273 (PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED)
7b. REQUEST TO DELETE CONDITION OF APPROVAL NO 118 OF PREVIOUSLY
,,,r APPROVED VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NOS. 12685 12686
12687 and 12688
OWNERS: PRESLEY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Attn: Kevin Sharrar, 22658
Old Canal Rd., Yorba Linda, CA 92686
AGENT: FRANK ELFEND, ELFEND AND ASSOCIATES, 4675 MacArthur Court,
Sty. 660, Newport Beach, CA 92660
LOCATION: Property comprises four (4) previously ap roved vesting
tentative tract maps totaling app-oximately 221 acres,
generally bounded on the north by The Highlands at Anaheim
Hills Development Area 1 on the west and south b}- the
original Anaheim Hills Planned Community and the Mohler
Drive area, on the east by The Highlands at Anaheim Hills
Development Areas 6 7 9 and 10 and further described as
The Highlands at Anaheim Hills Specific Plan previously
approved Vesting Tentative Tract. Map Nos. 12685 12686
12687, and 12688 within Development Area 2 4 and 5
Request to delete Condition of Approval No. 118 of previously
approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. 12685, 12686, 12687, and
12698 pertaining to the requirement that the Planning Commission
review and approve final grading plans for said tracts prior to
issuance of a grading permit.
----------------------------------
-------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Concerned about City Council's decision to remove
Planning Commission from the review process of transitional grading
areas; also, concerned that someone with a real concern would have no
recourse if they did not agree with City Engineer's decision. McBurney
- had no problem wit:Z this particular project; Herbst - it does comply
with ordinance just passed by City Council; felt the public should have
recourse with elected officials if they don't like the City Engineer
decision.
ACTION: Approved
Deletion of Cond. 118
"That prior to issuance of grading permits, final grading
plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning
Commission."
VOTE: 6 yes votes
(Commissioner Messe absent)
tip,} Approved Commissioner Herbst's motion requesting that the City
Council review their previous action that the decision of the City
Engineer would be final on transitional grading areas (area between
existing developed areas and areas that require grading); and
consider amending it to include the right to appeal the City
Engineer's decision to the elected officials (City Council).
Page No. 10 4/9/90
Appraved
Approved
deletion of
Cond. 118
r 7/,f
L/
. ;,~
~ n
8a. CEOA MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 301 Continued to
,,-..,.:
8c. RECLASSIFICATION NO 89-90-52 5-7-90
8d. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT 1st on
8d. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3259 agenda
8e. REQUEST FOR CITY COUPICIL REVIEW OF 8c 8d and 8e
OWNERS: PAUL T. SALATA, 3100 Airway Ave., Ste 124, Costa Mesa, CA
92626; CALTRANS, District 12, Attn: Ralph Neal, 2501
Pullman Street, Santa Ana, CA 92705
AGENT: I:AMILLE COURTNEY, 711 E. Imperial Highway, Ste. 200, Brea,
CA 92621
LOCATION: Prouerty is approximately 10 5 acres located on the north
side__of Riverside Freeway and south side of Addington Drive
Request for amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan
proposing a redesignation of subject property from the existing
Hillside Low-Medium Density Residential designation to the Hillside
Medium Density Residential designation.
RS-A-43,000 to RM-2400 (Portion A) or a less intense zone and
RS-5,000 to RM-2400 (Portion B) or a less intense zone to permit a
168-unit condominium complex with waivers of maximum fence height and
maximum structural height.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION N0. ~~~
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. ~.//~ .:% "~
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 35 people present
Petitions submitted
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Restricted access; en*_rance on Riverdale would be
traffic safety hazard for residents in the area and in the project;
would be like a freeway ramp to those .residents on Addington right into
their back yards; purchased property knowing the designation and are
wanting 2-1/2 times the density; would not maintain single-family
integrity; Riverdale is commuter street for people trying to bypass
Riverside Freeway; emergency access onto Addington proposed - what is
guarantee that it would not become standard access in the future; trash
enclosure and parking next to home:; 20-foot fully landscaped buffer
should be required; felt EIR should be required; air pollution and
fumes; view obstruction; whole area landlocked with two bridges over the
freeway and a bridge over the river and in emergency such as earthquake,
if bridges were knocked out, no access for residents; large project at
Tustin and LaPalma should be considered with additional traffic, etc.
Page No. 11
4/9/90
,; . >;..
s~.~t:~~: ~--..
~rw~gvrs:ra ^z~y ~ie.~
~_~~
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Single-fancily homes would create many of the
same problems, would be 20 feet from property line; and this project is
y'i:T.•r:
set back 50 feet; trash enclosure behind 6 to 8 foot high wall, homes on
other side are 3 to 9 feet lower; traffic analysis indicated signal not
warranted; person standing on deck could not see into back yard of
single-family homes; with single-family development, every home would
have a two-story residence behind them looking down into their yard;
questioned if 20-foot landscaped buffer is a design standard (noted that
would probably be a Code requirement by the time the project comes back,
and any projects approved prior to the ordinance becoming effective
would be excluded); questioned if traffic study approved by staff for
168 units would need to be revised for a project with reduced density
(McBurney felt that would be depend o~lresults of site distance study)
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Trash against homes; proximity to freeway;
pollution; should have EIR because of access and traffic; areawide
impacts have not been addressed, especially with large complex going on
at Tustin and La Palma; density; hardship parcel and should not be
developed with twice as many people; traffic impact on Riverdale;
parking at the rear of existing homes should not be permitted; not in
favor of increasing density with the City trying to reduce density by
downzoning because of major traffic problems; felt possibly RS 5000
single-family homes would be feasible; site distance study needed; two
story single family homes would mean only one family overlooking the
neighbors, not several families; suggested reducing density to about 91
units, with perhaps paired housing, moving trash away from back wall and
eliminating carports would help revitalize neighborhood to northeast.
Hellyer - traffic is a problem now and this developer cannot be held
accountable for persons breaking the laws on Riverdale; and felt there
is a compromise; Herbst - did not feel full EIR is required - just
traffic and access further studied, and felt other concerns could be
mitigated with reduced density; would be willing to permit private
street with a RS5000 gated community project.
STAFF COMMENTS: General Plan for this area currently hillside low
medium density, permittinc,• 6 units per acre; there are some issues here
- traffic impact on existing neighborhood and air quality concerns in
existing and proposed neighborhoods, noise and dust, vibration from
freeway, visual intrusion to existing neighborhood; ingress and egress
creating safety hazard are all things that would be addressed in an EIR;
impact of traffic congestion on Riverdale and emergency access,
Riverdale as a commuter street are fire and safety concerns; that if 168
units is not what the Commission would like to see on this property,
application could be preparing a EIR for a project that is going to
ultimately be denied anyway; suggested giving applicant alternatives
such as single-family, RS 5000, reduced density condominium project,
etc.; Engineering - through streeL• would have to}~~a 60-foot wide right of
way for an internal street
ACTION: Continued to
For applicant
To be first o
.~~,,i
VOTE: 6 yes votes
5-7-90
to consider revised plans.
the agenda.
~:~4y
Page No. 12 4/9/90
a"
%-, ~••~
9a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
9b. WAIVER OF CODE REOtTREMENT
~, T:r
9c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 3263
~:
n OWNER: ^uHELL OIL COMPANY, Post Office Box 4848, Anaheim, CA 92803
~ AGENT: SERVICE STATION SERVICES INC., Attn: Angela T. Smith, 2122
S. Grand Avenue, Ste. E, Santa Ana, CA 92705
LOCATION: 1200 N. Euclid Street. Property is approximately 0.59 acre
located at the northeast corner of Romneya Drive and Euclid
Street.
To permit a car wash facility in conjunction with an existing service
station with waivers of max~.mum sign area, permitted location of
freestanding sign, maximum number of freestanding signs and minimum
distance between freestanding signs.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0.
------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUD4fARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
ACTION: Continued to 5-7-90
Page No. 13
4/9/90
Continued to
5-7-90
/'u/
::
m..~__,,,., ..,,,~,,......_.. __
~~,'''
,~ ,-~
!"t.
10a. .CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION-CLASS 3
~~ lOb. VARIANCE N0. 4~
OWNER: BILL MaCALONEY, 401 North East Street, Anaheim, CA 92805
AGENT: DAN L. ROWLAND & ASSOC. INC., 1290 North Hancock Street,
#204, Anaheim, CA 92807
LOCATION: 401 North East Street. Property is approximately 1.63
acres located at the southwest corner of Sycamore Street
and East Street.
Waiver of improvement of right-of-way to construct a 3,780 square
foot retail building.
VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. PC90-86
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Requested deletion of requirement to gay for
street improvements, agreed to dedication.
~~. STAFF COMMENTS: Public Works-Engineering agreed with waiver.
,` J .
ACTION: Granted
VOTE: 6 yes votes
(Messe absent)
. _ _ .. ,; , ..,,gym
Granted
Paye No. 14 4/9/90
~.
~~~ lia. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
F llb. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3264
f,n,
OWNER: Rotanda Development Corp., Attn: Afshin Boghai, 2082
Michaelson Drive, #305, Irvine, CA 92715
AGENT: HOSSIEN VESAL, 2256 Seaview Drive, Fullerton, CA 92633
LOCATION: 1101 West Lincoln Avenue. Property is approximately 0.45
acre located at the northwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and
West Street.
To permit an approximately 2,000 square foot convenience market with
off-sale beer and wine within an existing commercial retail center.
VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-87
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING CUMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 3 people present
Petition submitted
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Opposed sale of alcoholic beverages this close to
school, other establishments selling alcohol in close proximity; crime;
~~ traffic; left turns not safe
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Traffic report indicates would not affect
Lincoln, will have back doors, so trucks would not be parking in
shopping center, applicant willing not sell alcohol before 8 a.m. and
12:00 and 1 p.m. to anyone; would have canned goods, some produce but no
fast food; indicated would not sell any hard liquor, just beer and wine,
and that operation would not be profitable without beer and wine sales
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Plans do not indicate back door. asked if he
would be willing to stipulate not to sell beer and wine. Did not feel
proper location for this use. Thought convenience stores were discussed
previously and felt not appropriate in this location when original CUP
was approved. Bad intersection and limited access to site, close
proximity to school.
ACTION: Approved negative declaration but rescinded that motion.
AND DENIED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
DENIED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT.
due to traffic congestion on that corner and limited access to
the site
vote: 5 yes votes
(Commissioner Feldhaus abstained)
(Commissioner Messe absent)
Denied
Denied
Page No. 15 4/9/90
~z
,~--,.
.M
12a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
12b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
12c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3265
OWNER: SUNNYMEAD POULTRY RANCH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, TAIME
NEUTSCH, TRUSTEE, 403 N. Palm Drive, Beverly Hills, CA
90210
! AGENT; THE CORNERSTONE CHLiRCH, 200 N. Lawrence, Fullerton, CA
92632
LOCATION: 1250 North Red Gum Street. Property is approximately 1.06
acres located on the east side of Red Gum Street
approximately 500 feet south of the intersection of
Miraloma Avenue and Red Gum Street.
To permit a church in an existing industrial building with waiver of
minimum number of parking spaces.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC 90-88
------------------ ____ _____
------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
~~ ~~
~,,_,~ OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Parking is adequate and could qet agreement with
next door owner if necessary
ACTION: Granted
For 3 years
VOTE: 6 yes votes
(Messe absent)
`.,,,~,/
Approved
Granted
Granted
3 years
~%k~.~
Page No. 16 4/9/90
1
~';
~.
0
,,++''''~~ 13 a. CEOA MITIGATED NE ATIVE DDCLARATION
':?;;;l13c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3266 Approved
' Granted
OWNER: WILLIAM C. and VINCENT C. TAORMINA, P.O. Box 309, Anaheim,
CA 92805
AGENT: KAREN R. PETERS, OCDF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PROGRAM, 606 E.
Chapman, Orange, CA 92666
LOCATION: 2780 East White Star Avenue Property is approximately 1.9
acres located at the northwest corner of La Palma Avenue
and Blue Gum Street.
To permit household hazardous materials collection in conjunction
with an existing recycling/resource recovery transfer facility.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTI04T N0. PC 90-89 ';~~'
------------------------- __ _____
------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSYTION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Requested deletion of Conditions 1, 2, 4 & parts
of 6.
^.
•~. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Agreed that certain conditions could be deleted,
because no building permits are being required
STAFF COMMENTS: Engineering - No problem with waiver of conditions
ACTION: Granted
Deleted Condition Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 6
VOTE: 5 yes votes
(Messe absent and Feldhaus - conflict of interest)
,,,~ rl
Page No. 17 4/9/90
.~
14 a. CEOA MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
14b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 3254
OWNER: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Attn: W. P. Thornton, 1 River
Road, Schenectady, A*ew York, 12345
AGENT: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Attn: John G. Plrimmer, 3601 E.
La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92806
LOCATION: 3601 East La Palma Avenue. Property is approximately 6.33
acres on the north side of La Palma Avenue approximately
905 feet west of the centerline of Tustin Avenue.
To permit the expansion of poly-chlorinated biphenal (PCB)
processing and storage facility.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC90-90
-------------------
-------------------------
----------------
OLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIOPJ. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Asked locations of incinerator sites where
~-~, material is taken (usually to Chicago); and how often it is transported
'~t~' (1 truck per week)
ACTION: Approved Mitigated Negative Declaration
Granted CUP for 5 years
VOTE: 5 yes votes
(Messe & McBurney absent)
~\
i
Page No. 18
4/9/90
Approved
Granted
5 years
~~~~
R
i.
15a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLA&2ATION
I5b. GENERAL P~,AN AMENDMENT N0. 299-1 and 2
~~:; ~.;.
15c. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-51
15d. REQUEST POR ~iTY COjUNCIL' REVIEW OF 15c
INITIATED BY TME CrTY OF ANAHEIM, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim,
CA 92803
A City-initiated amendment to the Land Use Element of the General
Plan redesignatia-g subject areas from the Medium Density Residential
designation to the Low-tiedium Density Residential de.si.gnation (Area
1) and to the Low Density Residential designation (Area 2) .
LOCATION: Area 1, apnroxima~tely 24 acres consisting„of those
properties fronti~_on the west side of Magnolia Avenue
beginning approximately 325 feet north of the centerline
of Lincoln Avenue and extending north ap~roximatel~ 1,650
feet.
Area_2, approximately 1.5 acres consisting of those
properties located Qn the south side of Yale Avenue
beginning at the easterly terminus of said street and
extending west approximately 665 feet to the Southern
California Edison Easement.
A City-initiated reclassification from the RM-1200 (Residential,
Multiple-Family) Zone to the RM-2400 (Residential, Multiple-Family)
or a less intense zone.
LOCATION: A rectanqularlv_-shaped parcel of land consisting of
approximately 9.27 acres, having a frontage of
approximately 662 feet on the west side of Magnolia
Avenue, having a maximum depth of approximately 611 feet
and being located approximately 160 feet south of the
centerline of Baylor Circle and further described as 425
North Magnolia Avenue.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION N0.
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0.
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Would like continuance - main concern is schools.
STAFF COMMENTS: Has been working with applicant; 334 units is really
dense and concerned that EIR may be required.
ACTION: Continued to 5-7-90
2nd on the agenda
r
.~,,
"~i ;'
-~,,
Page No. 19 4/9/90
~t
~?
,-~
16a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
16b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO 300
''''''
~,
INITIATED BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim,
CA 92803
LOCATION: Prouerty is approximately 6 3 acres having a frontage of
approximately 630 feet on the west side of Willowbrook
Lane, having a maximum depth of approximately 500 feet and
located approximately 220 feet north of the centerline of
Chapman Avenue.
A City-initiated amendment to the Land Use Element of the General
Plan redesignating subject area from the Medium Densitl° Residential
designation to the Low-Medium Density Residential designation.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-91
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTEa.
OPPOSITION: None
ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration
Recommend CC adoption of GPA 300
~,,
4.;; VOTE: 5 yes votes
(Messe & McBurney absent)
I' Approved
i Approved
~~G;.L/~
I~~ ~~~:
~~
Page No. 20 4/9/90
k - .,~:D
`~ ~ l _
1:~
17. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
~r `
.~~.
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 2324 -• REQUEST FOR DELETION OR
Continued to
AMENDMENT TO A CONDITION OF APPROVAL PERTAININ TO STvNAGE: I
5-7-90 ~
William A. Torresala, Pan Pacific Hotel, requestor for pro ert
p y ;.
;~ w~.:frc~+ ~
~~^
located at 1701 S. West Street.
(MOTION to City Council)
i
B. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RhCOhEdENLING ADOPTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE PLAZA ~
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-92
r
C.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 3161 REOUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Approved
TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Christine Felix,
requests .an extension of time for property located at 121 North `
~ i,
~/~~
Beach Boulevard, Ca ~~P~,..~ S•_ 22 _ q~ ,
~
Adjourned to 4-18-90 Work Session at 1:30 p.m. '
Adjourned at 8:25 p.m.
f:~
`
~;;
6
I
~.
~.
!Y
I;'
1
I:
i
~,`
age No. 21 4/9/90 i
,
i
i
i
~
~.
~`