The URL can be used to link to this page

Minutes-PC 1990/11/05 (2)- , u -----............,.~ vc inc1,.euvtuir;lM ctl'z rLANNING COMMISSION ' -` ~~~ MONDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 1990 AT 10:00 A.M. ~~ ~ ,~~ ~ , ~, .: PRELIMINARY PLnN REVIEW _ PUBLIC HEARYNG y _ (PUBLIC TESTIMONY o ., 10•.00 a.m. 1:30JP.M. , ,( ' f. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: `' BOUAS, BOYDSTUN, FELDHAUS, HELLYER, HENNZNGER ,`~ :< MESSE, PERAZA s s APPROVAL OF MINUTES: September 10, 1990, as cor=ected. PROCEDURE TO EXPEDITE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARI2IGS 1. The proponents. in applications which are not contested will have five minutes to present their evidence. Additional time will be granted upon request if, in the opinion of the Commission, such additional time will produce evidence important to the Commission's consideration. 2. In contested applications, the proponents and opponent will each be given ten minutes to present his case unless additional time is requested and the complexity of the matter warrants. The Commission's considerations are not determined by the length of time a participant speaks, but rather by what he says. 3. Staff Reports are part of the evidence deemed received by the Commission in each hearing. Copies are available to the public prior to the meeting. 4. The Commission will withhold questions until the public hearing is closed. 5. The Commission reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing if, in its opinion, the ends of fairness to all concerned will be aer..ved. 5. All documents are presented to the Planning Commission for review in connection with any hearing, including photographs or other acceptable visual representations of non-documentary evidence, shall be retained by the Curunission for the public record and shall be available for public inspections 7. At the end of the scheduled hearings, members of the public will be allowed to speak on iteute of interest which are within the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission, and or agenda items. Each speaker will be allotted a maximum of five (5) minutes to speak. CA10010E 11/05/90 x~~ ~1 _ la: CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Previously Approved). ~ lb. VARIANCE NO: 2194 - (Readvertisedl TIME EXTENSION - Public Hearing ~~ - ~ ° ~ - ~ - .,,; 4WNER.~- ETHEL.MYERS, 529~Victoria Ave., Venice, CA `90291 '~e `' AGENT: RICK5 PALLET REPAIR SERVICES, P.O. BOX 4151, .Garden Grove, .~>>~ CA ...92642 LOCATION: 1521 N. Miller St. Property is approximately 2 acres located on the west side of Miller Street approximately ~.`.' _ 563 feet south of the centerline of Orangethorpe Ave. ~;. , ~.• ,Y' Request for an extension of time for waiver of maximum fence height to retain outdoor storage of pallets. Continued from the August 27, 1990, September 24, 1990, Planning Commission meetings. VARIANCE RESOLUTION NO. 2a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3317 (READVERTISED) OWNER: F. CULVER, 799 S. Lonestar Lane, Anaheim, CA 92807 AGENT: B. AGARWAL, 30032 Avenida Classics, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90274 LOCATION: 2625 West Lincoln Ave. Property is approximately 1.04 acres located on the north side of Lincoln Ave. and approximately 270 feet west of the centerline of Magnolia Ave. To permit a 36-unit, deck-type apartment complex. Continued from the July 30, 1990, September 10, 1990, and October 8, 1990, Planning Commission meetings. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. v ~ ~ ~7t~ ~,.. ~It4'w v Continued to 11/;1990 , "`~ ~:,~._y Jn ~~ f~ F~ r ,t~,~ a ,, Withdrawn by petitioner 11/05/90 Page 2 1'. _. + ^ ., G CEQA>-~NEGATIVE~ DE~'.RATION ~' y ,_ ~~ .; WAIVER~OF>CODE"'Rc~~UIREMENT ' CONDITIONAL 'USE"`PERMIT NO. 3345 u,: 'OWNER: PECKHAM FAMILY TRUST, ATTN: WILLIAM HOCKENBERRY~,. 180 E. Main St., Ste. 17,x, Tustin, CA' 92680 - AGENT: WILLIAM HOCKENBERRY, 180 E. Main St., Ste. 170, Tustin, CA 92680 ,ifs ~ ;~%~ t. Approv"ed Approved Granted for 5 yrs '>~. f LOCATION: 700 E. Katella Ave.. Property is approximately 2.15 acres approximately 184 feet on the south side of Katella Avenue and approximately 420 feet west of the centerline of Lewis Street. To permit a truck sales and repair facility, with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces and minimum landscaped yard area. Continued from the October 22, 1990 Planning Commission meeting. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC90-254 )WINv^ IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. iITION• None PIONER'S COMMENTS: Fc,rced to relocate due to the I-5 freeway ision. This new location is also ir, the I-5 right-of-way and Caltrans eventually take this locaticn as well in approximately 5 years. Have Lesion by Caltrans to use subject property. Submitted original leering drawings of the sign which they proposed to place on subject :rty; the sign has a 25-foot pole with a 10-foot face; staff wants a nent sign limited to 8 feet; urges Commission to be ably to use the that they have at their existing premises that was purchased at a :antial cost and they feel is attractive and consistent and lower than of the competing signs in the neighborhood; this sign is appropriate :heir interim use prior to Caltrans taking tk:is new location. Concern staff's suggestion that CUP expire in 3 years; urges Commission to :this CUP for 5 years; does not want to build a visual barrier and do id to enhance the appearance; propose to make use of chain link Lng they currently have. [SSION COMMENTS: Concern regarding landscaping; bring irrigation am up to standards and maintain it; in gateway to the CR ~or~e; wants .cant to maximize the appearance of landscaping; concern regarding sign versus an 8-foot monument sign; giving variance from 10 feet to 3t so do not have to expand landscaped yard area; looking to shield of the operation and it is the applicant's desire to open it up; am over the chain link fence versus having wrought iron or slump ~; should not encourage to invest mare in the property then he needs scause Caltrans will take it in 5 years; they are intensifying the use more truck traffic and the dedication is warranted; perhaps it should ganged that the CUP coincide with the lease. 11/05!90 Page 3 '' I s }, STAFF COMMENTS Melan~Adams, Public Works-Engineerin~~stated' , --• ~iiedioation will b ~t ~ ~ v r ti . ~ . , ~ e irtn o ti.e;City.of Anaheim and when Caltrans taken,~the property it would be an a r ; • g eement between the City of Anahe im and ~ Caltrans S ~ ,: he was not ,certain about th A~ ~:.~ ,~ . ., e pa no,~ know the details of the agreement 5id cor tnt ~ at ~° , ~~ ; rec ondition no i page, .regarding the; critical intersection, i.e.,.it makes reference to the intersection of a ~ , , yy K tella and Ball Road, and that.ehould be corrected to read Katella Avenue and Lewie street { ~ ` . ~ ; she emphasized that they ,,are ~,'- jrecommending the dedication of ri ht-of-wa ' ' 9 ~ th ta d ~, y; ~ - ~,~ : ~: e ke in icated by •Caltrans is armaximum take and f th r s. ~} ur e any traffic..improvement-in that urea would aselet Anaheim, t e G ~~, ~ , so h City dose work in conjunction with Caltrans and'.they do request the d i , ~ ~~ r, , ed cation; that intersection is not currently within the 5 year plan, however, it could be ste ed ~ ~ '`~~ pp up and integrated with Caltrans' improvements . ACTION: CEOA Neoative Declaration - A pproved F` Waiver of Code Reouirement - Approved ;''; (Applicant to improve landscaping and bring it up to j City standards subject to the Planning Department's a PProval ~~ prior to commencement of operation). Conditional Use P ~mit No. 3345 - Granted for 5 years (With proposed new pole sign and no dedication) ~x VOTES 4-3 (Commissioners Hellyer, Messe and Peraza voting NO) T Sr , 11/05/90 Page 4 #~ .s: ~. ,. ...... . .. ,.. .,..., ~r[on.'nn 1'~'h7r4,M.4i~4*.l LZa,.i:.:~~~ d t ` 4a. CEOA NEGATIVE DE~ ~ '' ,~ ~ 4b TION .-.. ~, WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT Denied 4c. 'CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 3315 Denied Denied ,, ~ .... OWNER: First ,Church of the Nazarene, Anaheim,, ATTN: Reverend Jarrel_ < ,~ ,;a Garsee, 1340 N. Candlewood St., Anaheim, CA 92805 i LOCATION: 1322. 1326 Norwood st. and 1323 and 1327 Candlewood St ~a "~ and 1340 N. Candlewood St. Property is approximately 3.68 acres located at the northerly terminus of Norwood and Candlewood Streets and located approximately 390 feet ~ } north of the centerline of Xenwood Ave. To permit temporary modular structures and the expansion of an existing church and child day care .center with waivers of minimum number of park.~ng spaces and minimum setback for institutional uses and maximum structural height. Continued from the July 30, 1990, October 8, 1990, and October 22, 1990, Planning Commission meetings. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC90-255 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWZNG IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO SE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION• 22 1 person spoke in favor OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Concern regarding traffic impacts; opposed to tearing down homes for parking; much rather have less parking spaces and keep the two homes; intrusion into their single-family neighborhoods; church has outgrown neighborhood; concern about noise due to concerto, etc.; church did not plan ahead and their neighborhood should not have to suffer. Checked out 84 churches and visited the various locations; 2 were in single-family dwellings with a small cross on the roof that he did not show on the exhibit; showed exhibit marked with blue pins that indicated the various locations of the other 82 locations; 80 ingressed and egresaed on main thoroughfares and only 2 ingressed and egresaed on a residential street. PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Have made some meaningful concessions to the needs and desires of neighbors and Commission; met individually with some of the neighbors; they have advertised and circulated a letter and have had a public meeting with the people in the community who were interested; willing to work with neighbors; church is an effective and vital force both morally and spiritually and an asset to the community; focus is on family and family life issues; new center will provide 8 to 10 classrooms; seeking direct access to East Street; have made an offer to the owner of ;:he house or. East Street that is located directly contiguous to their property, however, they are still looking at options and they have not gotten back to them with an answer and, therefore, do not have the access at this time; owners next to this property are concerned because that puts a driveway next to their house. 11/05/90 Page 5 (.,; , r - a Would not put :on.conce'~ that are in conflict with. the ,..zarene doctrine; ~~ would not rent"out~;;to~uutside interests, banquets,,dancee, etc;'will.not ,~~ use for any kind of housing facilities`for: students ;,including ;preschool or ~~~ college students; will not increase number of current enrollees in~the. i" preschool; can devise a transPcrtation parking demand management program "f, and subrtiit to Traffic Engineer.-for his approval if traffic ie a problem; , lookingl•for,10"8 growth-per year in order. to come. out even; 100 out of the ;r .520 projectQd'~figure are `children: x ? ; s ,, . ' ~~' ~ COMMISSION COMMENTS: Significant ..traffic impact`~to neighborhood; outgrown pwy`~., '! area, ;looking";to:grow even more although they stated it was nat a growth - effort;. it is the Commission's obligation to manage growth; in the morning session, page 10 of the staff report, regarding"fire sprinklers, it waa ..agreed that sprinklers should be included from°the very beginning and not \ have a one year grace period, i.e., they should be installed prior to occupancy of the trailers, however, because they are currently being used, this should be accomplished within 90 days from the date of approval of the .resolution. _, "STAFF COMMENTS: Alfred Yalda, Traffic Engineering, stated the City of Anaheim Code was changed last year, i.e., the no. of parking required was decreased from 15 parking spaces per 1,000 to 14 parking spaces per 1,000 and, therefore, has not increased; the study that was submitted indicated .36 parking attendance per person to .56; in 1983 the proposed seating for the church was 420; they are currently projecting 520 people which is an increase of approximately 24$ in the no. of attendees. He stated traffic demand management works for an office situation where employees come to work from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. It would be difficult to implement such a plan for Sunday when you do not know where the people are coming from and could not be enforced by the City. Greg Hastings, Zoning Division Manager, referenced page 12, condition no. 31 and stated it should reflect Exhibit nos. 1 through 4 in order to incorporate the landscape plan that was submitted at a later date. Melanie Adams, Public Works-Engineering, made the following changes to the recommended conditions: Page 9, condition no. 4: Should be corrected to read "shall be repaired" instead of installed; page 12, condition no. 27: All dedication required has been made and that condition can be deleted; page 12, condition no. 28 in reference to a cash payment is not required and can be deleted; page 12, condition no. 30 in reference to cul-de-sacs on Norwood and Candlewood regarding abandonment is not appropriate because cul-de-sacs do need to remain in the public right-of-way. She offered the following new condition that was discussed with Mr. Anderson, representative for the church, as follows: "That the legal owner of subject property shall dedicate to the City of Anaheim an irregularly-shaped parcel for the Norwood Street cul-de-sac for street widening purposes as required by the City Engineer." ~ _:~. „~ i~ _`rl 11/05/90 Page 6 ~^F'~~ :. ~, ~, i ~ -~.• ~t" /1 15, Y~ '~~_.ST`1r~ ~ ~ ~~ l. ' ', ~ +4' n 11 H ,~~,~ She explained Ghat thet ~ irement for this dedication i~_ chat the City a~ ate. ~~- ~ . Z ~ ~~ .t~. ~~ Y • ., ~fty acquired partial dedication on the cul-de-sac,;.but-the portion to .the west. ~ , that is vacant e ~ ~ ~ ;, now; ,they ',did not require the'dedioation; so it is s .~ fy7~, reque ted at this time. .~ s~h ' ~'?`~~ t ACTION: CEOA`' Necative Declaration -D i d ~ ' jy en e r.~ ~~~: ~i~ r (Based on exieting'.traffic impacts and it wouldonly ;•^~ ^u,~s.n be :exasperated°by this new addition) - ~., ._. Waiver of Code Rewirement -Denied - "~ ~ y,.: (Subject, to findings in CUP) '' ?E I i -~ i ~~ _ Conditional Uae Permit No 3315 -Denied ik-' ~~ ~ (Based upon findings of traffic impact and over . ~i ,. . intensification of the area) ,E I~ 5,.. !J VOTE: 5-1 (Commissioner Bouas voting NO and Commissioner Henninger '• abstained ) ;' I~ . ; ;~ ~. ~~ ~ '', ~;~ l l ~~ ~- b ~. ~. ~, i 11/05/90 (,': j Page 7 ~< ~I:. !~ 11 ` °; ~., 1', !~ r~:'. ~.~~ z,,;.; 5a., CEQA NEGATIVE ~•DEci,ARATION- ~ Approved ~~~'~~_ 5b.. WAIVER OF'%CODE`+?'ic.OUIREMENT Granted ~ ~~ 5c.~ CONDITIONAh'USE PERMIT NO. 3349 ~ Granted ~ OWNER: WESTERN MEDICAL CENTER ANAHEIM, Attn: Mark King, 1025,5. -.~ C ' t' Anaheim Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92805 ~ I~ ~~' _ ., `~ LOCATIONd 1025 SOUTH ANAHEIM BOULEVARD. Property is approximately ' ~~ J 4.45 acres located on the west aide. of Anaheim Boulevard ~~" and approximately 340 feet north of the 'centerline of Ball Road. ~" _> K To permit a 16,500 square foot birthing center addition to an existing hospital (Western Medical Center) with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces. Continued from the October 22, 1990, Planning Commission meeting. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC 90-256 FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Requested deletion of Condition No. 14. Explained property is actually two legal recorded parcels (collateral for financing agreement between the City and hospital as part of reimbursement agreement). Agreed to comply with Cond. No.6 by putting in removable ballards. Concerned about one year time limit in Condition No. 29 because project may take longer than one year. (It was explained extensions of time can be granted). COMMISSION COMMENTS: Agreed removal of ballards would be a better solution and that the Condition No. S should be modified to show that and should include approval by the City Traffic Engineer. STAFF COMMENTS: Engineering explained concern is that parking is on a separate parcel and there should be a parking agreement and agreed with deletion of Condition No. 14. Traffic Engineering - Staff parking is on north aide of property and ae part of the conditional uee permit, a parking management program is required and a 6-foot rolling gate that would be open during shift changes is acceptable for security purposes Planning - Asked that Condition Noe. 10 and 12 be deleted; and that Cond. No. 9 be modified to show street lighting required along Lemon Street. ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration Granted waiver of par;tinq spaces Granted CUP, Deleted Cond. Nos. 10, 12, 14 and modified 8 & 9 VOTE: 7 yes votes r~ M Lf "~,. . ~ 11/05/90 Page B - ~ ~ s ~ 6a. CFOA.NEGATIVE~DEC.. aRATION ~~ #~, G< ~ ;.. 6b. REv^LASSIFICATION NO.'90~91-13 ~~ Approved ~~° r - 6c. 0 VARIAN i CE NO. 4088 ~,~ a Granted, j`" , Unconditonal` }{ ~ ,, . Granted ~` ~ ~ OWNER: ANAHEIM MEDICAL BUILDING PARTNERS, 1251 Bryant Road Lon ~h ~ ~ .Beach, CA 90815. ,. g ~'~ ' ii ^+ ' ~ AGENT.: DAN L. ROWLAND & ASOC. INC., 1290 ' N. Hancock, Ste. 204 ~" Anaheim, CA 928Q7 , ~~: ,, LOCATION: 1820 W. Lincoln Ave. Property ie approximately 64 ac ::, y } locsted south side of Lincoln Ave. . re and approximately 470 feet east of the centerline of Broadview Street. ,;, RS-A-43,000 to CO or a less intense zone. _ Waiver of minimum structural setback to construct a 2,788 eq. ft. 1 & 2 story addition to an existing medical building. Continued from the October 8, 190, Planning Commission meeting. RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-257 VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-258 ----------- __________________ ------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITIC•.~~: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Requested Cond. 13 be amended and that compliancy would not be required unless building permits are obtained. (It was clarified that the reclassification has no conditions and the payment of fees, etc. would only be in compliance with the variance and would be payable upon issuance of building permits. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Concerned about wall sign on the 4-foot high wall blocking view and requested removal; and also requested the pole sign be removed STAFF COMMENTS: Traffic Engineer requested condition recN firing plans be submitted conforming to Standard Detail No. 137 regarding site visibility and that would cover all signs and walls. ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration Granted Reclassification Granted Variance, with additional condition ae requested by Traffic Engineering. V~'aE: 7 yes votes 11/05/90 Page 9 -„__ ~~ ~ :: _ `~' _ 7a. CEOA NEGATIVE.DEbLARATION '' `` ~ ,~ Y, APPr'oved ?~,~ 7b ;,WAIVER OF CODE REOUIREMENT~ " ~~ i°~" `~" 7c. ; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT°NO.' 3352 Denied ~x ~ ` - ~ Granted x 's ~ :~ ; ~ F; :. ,, . ~~ , p in art h ~~; ~ OWNER: DALE SELLON, 3317 HARBJR BLVD., COSTA MESA, CA 92627 -: M . ., r~ - AGENT: TACO BELL, ATTN: STEVE ABBOTT, 17901 VON KARMAN AVE., #303 .. IRVINE, CA 92714 ; ,i LOCATION _.324 S. BROOKHURST ST. Property ie approximately 0.81 acre 3 located on the east aide of,Brookhurat St. and located approximately 320 feet south of the centerline of ~~~ - Broadway. T.o permit a drive-through restaurant with waiver of required setback " ~` abutting a single-family zone. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC 90-259 U ,:± '. FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE k CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: 2 people present ' OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Residents on Archer currently experience problems with parking lot, with customers parking and leaving their coffee cups on th >~ 1;, e wall; and have experienced meat being thrown :~:•er the wall on one ~' occasion; and employees racing their motorcyles in the parking lot during ~` } their breaks; concerned about pollution with care running their engines waiting in the drive-through lane; has always been a dirty area; police has chased away people sleeping in the bushes, etc.; would not be able to enjoy their pool or have meals outside with noise and fumes from cars at the drive-through; additional trash with people throwing things over the wall, or the wind blowing debris from facility such as food wrappers; care waiting for food would have radios on and with engines running, tho3e could be quite loud; people race their engines now in the parking lot after businesses are closed; and also concerned if facility would be open longer; and about crime and felt establishments like this are pcime targets for burglaries; and concerned about noise from the speaker for - - 5 drive-through ]ans. :. I', PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Req. modification of Con. 4 - driveway radios at 20 feet; Con. 5 regarding easement from property owner of property " ` directly south, and did not feel it is necessary and thought Traffic Engineering agreed easement not necessary; Con. 8, 10-foot wide easement ' for existing power lines in rear required and they will not be able to ,i provide 5 feet of that easement and Electrical Engineering siaff have indicated that is no problem; Cond. 10 regarding monument sign not to exceed 8 feet in height, and noted they are removing two existing signs ~ (bakery & chicken restaurant), and felt it is imperative to have height because of existing signs up and down the stxeet; have eliminated power poles by putting utilities undergrcund and will be landscaping the site. 11/05/90 Page 10 ~. ; , ~`~f ~IReaponsea to oppositio*''~ ~ c u t~ \i (Pollufiori) T~ i,,will be working -with AQMD and.. must comply with • all their regulations: Recent study. has shown no a ~ significant increase in'pollution--from cars idling ,,.-' K' ~~ their engines. ' }' ~:` o:~ Will.be removing one restaurant and improving the appearance with ~, ~~~ land~acaping,and improved lighting °~' 4t ,:.. ~~ ' ~~ (Security) Cursant•`driveway along wall adjacent to residential ' area, and this plan will eliminate that access across the back. a .. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Felt 10-foot landscaped setback should be maintained in the rear and that could be achieved by relocating parking spaces and planting nice (high growing) trees. (Applicant responded that would eliminate 12 parking spaces and only other access to site would be drive-thrd lane; •and was concerned landscaping would create security - STAFF COMMENTS: Traffic Engi:eer - plans currently show access to adjacent properties and that should be revised so there is no access shown. (Applicant explained access as presently shown is at the fret of existing Taco Be11 and that would be only access between the two properties and they are eliminating one in the middle and one in the rear. Have amended plans and would provide 58 parking spaces overall, eliminating 12 would Zeave 46 which is more than adequate.) ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration Aenied waiver of required setback 10-foot wide landscaped setback, with 15-gallon, broad-headed *reea to be planted on 15-foot center. Granted CUP, in part. Condition Nos. 4 and 8 modified, Cond. No. 5 deleted, and add a condition that prior to issuance of building permits, the appl~can•t shall submit revised plane which substantially conform to stipulations made at the public hearing, and plans to be approved by the Planning Department and Traffic Engineer. VOTE: 7 yes votes 11/05/90 Page 11 ~: , ~ .`~- ~, 1 ~ ~ 8a CE~A NEGATIVE DECLARATION ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ < . Continued ~ .,. ` ~ 8b RECLASSIFICATION N0...90-91-15 /i ~;; ,, _ ~ ~ A to 11/19/9 0 1" . Sc ;wIAIVER' OF.CODE REQUIREMENT ' /~ . - ~ 'r ~~ 8d. CONDITIONAL~USE PEP.ASIT NO. 3353,. ~%% ~ ~'~, j n / r p.: OWNER: CITY~OF,ANAHEIM, C/O ZUR SCHMZEDE, 300 S. HARBOR. BLVD .;, '~ , ,STE. 900,,. ANAHEIM, CA 92805 °~ :: U _ LOCATZON• ximately `14' S4~ acres (8 15 acres" of r4 54 " o , esr ~ ~~, ~7,. ~ ~ : acr under Cond itionaT Uae Permit No. 3353 onl 1 havina~a' ,, frontace of anorox`imately 360 `'feet on the south aide of Sande•aon Avenue, having a-.maximum denth'of-auoroximateTv''` ;,'~4 ~, _ 750 feet end bpina located approximately 400 feet'"south ~ and west of the centerline of Auto Center Drive ,. { =.5{ i ~ ;, To permit a German Social Club (Phoenix Club) with a restaurant with U `~. =on-sale alcoholic beverages, a semi-enclosed restaurant with on-sale ` ~,, alcoholic beverages, a dance and assembly hall, a picnic „area, an air rifle and archery shooting area, a manager's living quarters to y' include musician livi.nq quarters, a private school, amusement rides "~-' ,, including hot air balloon rides and fireworks displays, a beer `garden area, a soccer field, a 50 foot high clock tows*, a 40 .foot high maypole and 4 storage containers, with waiver of minimum number; of parking spaces and maximum fence height. Petitiener requests reclassification of subject property from the ML(Industrial Limited) zon< to the CL(Commercial, Limited) or a less ir_tense zone. RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE Pi.+LMIT RESOLUTION NO. 9a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Continued 9b. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 90-91-14 11/19/90 9c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3364 Ok'NER: HASSAN AND DIXIE MOHAGHEGH, 3305 MONTEREY. DRIVE, SAN MARINO, CA 91108 AGENT: A. R. MOHAGHEGH, 12652 HUSTON ST., NORTH HOLLYWOOD, CA 91607 LOCATION: 1242 West Lincoln Ave. Subject property consists of two parcels with the following descriptions: Parcel (A1 is an irregularly shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 0.18 acre located or. the northwest corner of Center Street and Villa Place, having approximate frontages of 6 feet on the north side of Center Street and 140 feet on the west side of Villa Place. Parcel .(~, ira a rectangularly shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 0.67 acre located on the southeast corner of Lincoln Avenge ard,Villa Place having approximate frontages of 103 fee*_ on the south c+ide Lincoln Ave. and 285 feet on the east side of '/illa Place. Portion A from CG to CL and Portic'~ B from CG to CL. To permit an 8,981 square foot co~nercial retail center. .,,'' y' h 5 a s r -~~ st _ ' l0a CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION ~ lOc CAIVER'OF"CODE"REQUIREMENT ~ = ; `~~~`77~y ~ ONDITIONAL~USE- PERMIT NO. 3355 ., y.~ ° r~. ~ OWNER: :ASBESTEL - APPLIED, 214 ~~COOPER,:CENTER, PENNSAUKEN; NJ l- 08109. ~ ~./ .. .. - ~ ~ ~, AGENT: MEL BULLINGER, 520 W. WIIITTTER BLVD., MONTEBELLO CA 90640 - ~ 'l~ ~, ~ (t ~ - c~ -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.~ ~. LOCATION: 1295 North Kraemer'Blvd. -Property is approximately`0.48 acre located at the eduthweet corner `of Miraloma Ave. and s; .: Kraemer Blvd. ~ ~=,i To permit a retail and wholesale carpet business with waiver of Jr mc~imum number of parking spaces. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. --=---------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIAERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Concerned about Cond. No. 1 - traffic signal assessment fee (explaining only 5 or 6 employees and 2 outaid'e sales people, 10$ retail sales) and did not feel commercial fe~~ _hould be imposed. Applicant will be improving the landscaping, restriping the parking lot, and making the sire look nicer, but did not feel street lights should be added for this p%~all site. Applicant responded to Commission that he did not attend the IDC meeting, so had not discussed the fees with staff. , COMMISSION COMMENTS: Discussed possibly approving the request and adding language to the conditions that they could be resolved, satisfactory to the appropriate staff. Suggested matter be continued in order for the applicant to attend the IDC meeting and resolve the issues with staff prior to the public hearing. STAFF COMMENTS: Explained IDC for next meeting will be Thursday, 11-8-90 ACTION: Continued to 11-19-90 In order for applicant to resolve conditions with staff. Plans show 90 degree parking bays and Bite has angled parking. Traffic Engineer stated traffic signal assessment fees should be based on the use as industrial rather than retail, which is actually lower, eo there would be a savings. VOTE: 7 yes votes ,.-~ ,I s,~(( `~f 11/05/90 Page 13 lla CEOA NEGATIVE DEC :;CATION ~t~~ ~ ~11b , :WAIVER''OF CODE RE UIREMENT ~ `~ Continued 't ~":. ~, i1c. p ,CONDITIONAL'USE PERMIT NO. 3336` 11-19-9C %f d . c ~: _ ~ ' [, OWNER: o NORWALR~INVESTMENTS, C/O STEPHEN WONG, 1020 n. BATAVIA - . 1 ~t- - ST. , STE.,, B, .; ORANGE,' ;CA 92667 ~' a ~ „ ~, o ."AGENT: PEDRO GOMEZ, 536 S. ROSE ST., ANAHEIM, CA' 92805 ~: ~~ .: : ;. ,. LOt:ATION 536~SOUTH ROSE STREET Property ie approximately 0.60 ~, ~ '~ . acre located on the east side of Roee Street and approximately 530 feet south of the centerline, of Santa Ana Street. ~ , :~~ t~ _ ~) To 'permit an automobile repair facility with waiver of minimum ~,` ' number of parking spaces. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. i FOLLOWING ZS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. °~ OPPOSITION: ], person present in favor 2 people present who were opposed OPPOSITION CO!iV~RNS: Additional parking will create problems for adjacent industrial use: °.+ith large trucks for shipping and receiving which require a large turning radius; additional cars parking in the street are becoming a problem and parking in general has become difficult, 4 or 5 care from across the street park in front of their building, including tow trucks, plus 10 or 11 care in front of the vacant building. PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Have had business at intersection of La Palma and Anaheim Blvd. for 4 years, forced to move due to street widening and that was an economic hardship, and would like to stay in area wi`,h established clientele; use is compatible with are~~ and parking is on site; 2 employees only and they ride with owner; work ie picked up and delivered, a few cars at a time from dealers; pe;~ple do not drop off vehicles, neighbors are very cooperative and willing to work with them in sharing the parking. Explained detailing is done by business next door and this is a repair business. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Referred to people detailing care in the street currently utilizing the parking spaces, and all work ie supposed to be done inside; suggested parking spaces be assigned to individual unite; plans show stziped parking spaces in the rear, but they are not being used for parking nrnv and those spaces are also being used to work on vehicles; apparently theme is a Code Enforcement problem here which should be cleaned up. Suggested a continuance in order for Code Enforcement to investigate the current situation. (Henninger) - thought problems could be alleviated by using the spaces in the rear foz employee parking. (Hellyer) - referred to a trailer parked in front of the building and thought there might be people living there. ACTION: Continued to 11-19-90 in order for Code Enforcement to investigate and report back to the Commission. 11/05/90 Page 14 '~ c~'~ ., ~ • .~ ,~ r^1 -~ .' . ; -~ ~,_ ~ ~` r12d. ,~CEOAeNEGATIVE DECLARATION': ~' '~" 12b WAIVER"OF CODE REQUIREMENT ^~ a, ;_ ~12c ,.CONDITIONAL"USE'PERMZT NO: 3357 ~ ~. . , ~° ,,. , ~~ .. t' OWNER: CHRIS DAGLAS, 15924 Aurora. Crest, Whittier, CA 90605 'E ,, , . , AGENT: CHANGIZ ZOMOREDIAN, 705 S. Neptune, Anaheim, CA 92804 " LOCATION: 100 S.'Brookhuret Stree`t.`n Property ie approximately 0.44. acre located at the southeast corner of Lincoln Ave. and ~"~` ~ Brookhurst Street. a ; ., ,. ~-• To permit .an auto stereo and auto alarm in6tallation store with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces and minimum structural ~~"{~ ~~ setback. t,. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: 1 letter received in opposition OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Trash accumulation, trash enclosure in poor condition. PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Previous owner of donut shop had trash picked up six times a week and the new owners only have it done two times a week; but they have cleaned up the property. Have had business there for nine years, and have done installations in the parking lot, but now have opportunity to have unit next door and put in roll up doors and do installations inside. Would do 4 or 5 installations per day. Would not want to move because they have been there a long time and clientele knows where to find them. Much more parking available with market gone. Has 15-year lease. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Concerned that with roll up door, and if a customer was parked there for installation, another car could atop behind it, blocking it. Business opens at 10 a.m.. and traffic to donut shop fe over by about 9 a.m. Concerned about having a roll up door and felt it would look very strange. (Applicant indicated they would paint it to match the rest of the center and it would be open when they are there.) (Feldhaus) Concerned about installations being done, but no problem with retail; (Meese) Thought front entrance is a concern and suggested entrance from the rear and it was noted, that is not possible. (Hellyer) stated the business has been there for 9 years, and has been doing installations illegally in the parking lot and are now requesting pe~'miseion and has had no problems and apparently neighbors agree with request. 11/05/90 Page 15 rs.. h t •' b t..,,y, c ff STAFFICOMMENTS. Street"~ight fees pertain to Brookh ~~ ~~= F ~ urs treet, rather than Lincoln.. ,. w ,~;,~ {y ~ a jr. ~, \i a ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration ~~~i ~ , '" ` Granted Waiver .of Code. requirement J~ `~` , , ,K ~ ~;" s ~ , (Vote 6=1 (Feldhaue voted NO)) ;; ' , u ~ Resolution . to GRANT the CUP, ;FAILED TO CARRY Fa ~ ,; ~ (Voter 3-4 (Boydstun'; Feldhaue, Meese, Henninger 'voted NO) t,~ . ;;,, '' ; ~j: 0 , , .: x s ~;~ _" Meese `& Henninger were"concerned about the appropriateness of this u ee and Hennin er th `;~ g ought. it wouldrbe turning this into an ° = s, `" ~~' . automotive`related,center. Hellyer felt the Commission should be ' doing everything possible to assist a lousiness which has been s ful ;~ uccess for 9 years.; (Bouas) opposed to the door and suggested f old .back doors or something more ,pleasing so it does not look like ' ~ an automotive repair facility. . tfk;: " t ,, '- ACTION: CONTINUED TO 11-19-90 ~:.,;•. 13a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION 13b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3358 OWNER: MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, 3800 W. Alameda, #`2000, Burbank, CA 91505 AGENT: GREER & COMPANY, 2323 W. Lincoln Ave., x`127, Anaheim, CA 92801 LOCATION: 1680 West Broadway Property is approximately 0.49 acre located at the southeast corner of Broadway and Euclid Street. To permit a convenience market within an existing service station. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. --------------------------- ------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Expressed concern about closure of driveways and requested continuance to work with Traffic Engineering. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Explained Traffic Engineer feels having driveways this close to intersection is definitely traffic hazard. ACTION: Continued to i1-19-90 in order for applicant to work with Traffic Engineering. Request for continuance` -? to 11/19/90 -"; 11/05/90 Page 16 ~~~r~ts'~7~ x ~y 44 fj 1 at~~~ ~ k ~ ~~~ iJ,..: :: ~. ,a i'iidrr`~'~ ~~t 1 ~ r S~ $,/ 't ~ A~~'kw°~y~~(1 ~ ~' 1 ^ _ Cry. a • ;~~; ' 4a CEOA NEGA 14b W TIVE DEG,ARATION C d' ~~ ~ AIVER'OF~ CODE REOOIREMENT ontinue . Mc~1a 14c CONDITION AL USE PERMIT 'NO '3359 ~ to 1.1/19/90 ~s. ~ ~ ~, -a~ti~~, ')., OWNER: ~ 4•r~`' WILLIAM C. TAORMINA .AND VINCENT C. TAORMINA, P.O. BOX `.303, ANAHEIM CA 9 ~ ~ +j .., ~ ' ' , it ... , 2815-0309 ~ ~ ' - ' ' ~~,;} ~ AGENT: RICHARD WItIN/TOM VOGT, P.O. BOX 309, ANAHEIM `C A ~` r ~•,, ;, ~: 92815-0309 ~ .. ~ ,~ L ,: ' _ OCATION: 2761 -2781 WHITE STAR AVE Property is approximately 2.6 acres l '~;~ ~ ocated at the westerly terminus of White Star Avenue and a frontage of approximately 10 feet on the 3 _ north aide of White Star-Ave. ~:+~ ~To permit the expansion of a recycling/resource recovery transfer f '1 rf . aci ity with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces.,. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. r .r. 11/05/90 Page 17 ~, + , . ~~'~'~i~,15ax r CATEGORICAL EXEM~~ °j'~CLASS 3 4 t k ~ i 1~ .. yr!a ~15b. VARIANCE NO 4095. , ~ t ~ ; ,L~'~`' ,. ~~ ~- ~ 'r - ~ Gran ted ,, : , ~~ , .: 0 _ WNER: MYONG SHIK YUN~,;727 S. BEACH BLVD., ANAHEIM CA 92804 a Aj;,'. , ' a,, .. .AGENT: MICHAEL.;LUNA,,27132-A PASEO ESPADA, #422, SAN JUAN " p ;' CAPISTRANO, CA' 92675, . ,:_ ,, ih _ ,_ ~ LOCATION 5050 COPA DE ORO DRIVE S ~~ , ~ : Property is approximately 0.85 ~ r> ` acre located on :the south aide of Copa De Oro :Drive. and ~ £ ~,, _ approximately 875 feet north and west of the centerline of hl ~;.No Ranch Road and Copa De Oro Drive. ~ ~ .~ ~2 .. a .li ., Waiver of maximum structural height to co t c h ~~f ns ru t a 53-foot high, ' (~;-144 square foot-single family residence . , ~ ~ ~r ~~VARIANCE RESOLUTION NO ; ~ . PC 90-260 ?" FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMIS SION ACTION. NOT TO BE '~ CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. ~" OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMEN;i: Reviewed plans and pointed out topography of site necessitates waiver. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Questioned garage. (Applicant explained intent to give appearance of old European Wine Cellar entrance, garage door is very heavy wooden swing out door, parking for azx vehicles in the basement, completely underground. ACTION: Granted Variance on basis that actual structural height of building from the finished grade is 35 feet, unusual grade characteristics. VOTE: 7-0 ;~~ ilt f n ~~ %r' I! `~_ 11/05/90 Page 18 t-? . k stir r < ~:,, ~) i; TO BE ~ HEARD AFTER 6.00 Y~~~M ~. (i ._.... r.t ~, `' 16a. CEOA~NEGATIVS DfiCLARATION ,- `- 16b.";RECLASSIFICATION NO: 90-91-16 ~. r~ 1.'` ~,,' OWNER:, CNITIATED BY 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 200 SOUTH A1NAHEIM BLVD., j~ANAHEIM, CA 92803 I' ~~ LOCATION F-roperty is approximately 96 acres gen'erally~bounded by La h`;'~ -='Palma Ave. to the north, the Union Pacific Railroad ~,~: ~ right-of-way to the east, Cypress Street to~~the south and Anaheim Blvd. to the west, excluding those properties which front on Anaheim BZ.vd: or La Palma Ave., and further F excluding the area generally bounded by Wilhelmina Street to the north, the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way to the east, Sycamore Street to the south and Sabina Street t: to the west. A City-initiated reclassification of subject area from the RM-240U (Residential, Multiple-Family) and PD-C/RM-2400 (Parltinq District-Commercial/RX-2400) Zones to the RS-5000 (Residential, Single-Family) Zone. RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. -------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL XINUTES. OPPOSITION: Approximately 10 people present in opposition and 4 letters of opposition received. SUPPORT: Approximately 40 people present in favor of request. OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Decrease in property value; and existing multiple- family units would be non-conforming and if units were destroyed by fire, etc. could not be replaced except as a single-family structure. Difficult to sell and get financing from Zenders. Wanted two PD-C parcels to remain PD-C on Anaheim Boulevard. Felt boundaries should be changed to exclude property at 928 N. Emily. Loss of new development in the City and loss of fees, continued degradation of the area, new development means improvements such as street Zights. Suggested enforcement of people using garages for parking their vehicles and not storage. ~ ;4x5 f 2' ~3 ~,~ n K ~C t~~~++++++~~~~ tl h Continued to 11 19 90 ~ r 6:00 p.m;: r,. n j 3~ y '~; 11/05/90 Page 19 ~~ ~ SUPPORT •, Thls•:is affo~ble housing and single family uctures should ~c{ ;t , not be demolished to build apartments; save the area by `promoting IoW '~r ~ density 'development;",,property owners are artcz atin ~' ` P P g.in neighborhood ~r ~ preservation programs and trying to maintain the neighborhood; 5 7; years - ~`:~, ' } ~ %~ ago 358 ;of the_'units were owner occupied .and now 65$ are owner. occupied. ~ ; , Units which have gone in have, created parking pxoblems; felt RS- 5000 is ..: , '9 s"~ answer to problems; people living in existing apartments. do not park in ss ~~, , 9arages•,and there ere many people„living in each ,unit, people work on Y'F~ their cars in the street; no ,place for children to 1a P Y: single-f mil a y,. property:'values do go down; when apartments go into area; schools are overcrowded; crime and drugs are larger problems in high density areas. Redevelopment is trying„to'upgrade areas. " %a PETIT.TONER'S CGAXENTS: Reclassification initiated by Planning Commission COMMISSION COXXENTS: Xesse: Requested number of building permits issued since the downzoning 1-1/2 years ago; thought this request is serious and there are good arguments for and against; mail survey revealed_,I6.28 of owners would like to the downzonzng and 13.88 would not; only had responses from 29 or 30;, of the total ownership; and would Zike to see visually on a map or chart where the multiple-family units are located to . determine if possibly some areas could be excluded so that not so many units would become nonconforming. Felt there may be areas which should stay RX-2400 or go to RX-3000. Kenninger: Staff report indicates there aze about 9I3 units zn that area, and Zess than 1/2 are curren~ly single-family and the public testimony tonight indicates the people want to stop the conversion of older single-family homes into multiple-family units and to preserve their neighborhoods; however, with reclassification, over 1/2 of the units would become non-conforming uses and they could not be reconstructed; and that he would like to have a sense as to where those multiple-family wits are located and determine whether they are scattered or concentrated; and did not think the Commission has enough information to approve thin tonight. (Staff responded the higher density multiple-family projects with more than two units are more concentrated in the area east of Olive Street) Hellyer - 708 of the parcels are developed with single-family homes. Referred to previous multiple-family projects which were developed and have been detrimental to the areas; a lot of owners are waiting for the single-family homes to deteroriate so they can. build unite and they are not maintaining their properties and being responsible property owners; that the Commission's charge ie to look at the land use and determine where that area should go; Feldhaus - 188 owners responded to survey and only 7 owners are here to oppose the request. Hv, thought the response was adequate and he would have not problem excluding those properties from this reclassification. Houas Ancther concern is how many people are living in those unite. 11/05/90 Page 20 i' ~ ~ .: ;t STAFF COMMENTSe Staff'~arified;eastern`boundary of`st^ area was the ~' railroad.;tracka;.Mr. Ao~a's property has resolution of intent to .ML and. ,_ ~'~'~ could be excluded from this reclassification; survey was mailed in English ~~ ~ , , ,~ ~" ." ~lariguage only :and he notice ,for this meeting was mailed to both English ' ~and'Spaniah. Would be difficult to come up with an accurate figure on number of units because.,many unite were built a long time ago,, ~.ot of dis~crepanci"es in checking building perinite. Noted numbers used in staff report were taken from the land use maps, but there could be some variation. '~ Redevelopment: -,Has been involved in this area and has different programs ti% to help'upgrade the neighborhoods such as first time buyer programs n .b^cause of an active neighborhood group trying to turn the area around'; `cun~3ing proysams to restore homes, etc.; and Redevelopment staff feels ^~%ciis reclassification would be a valuable tool and resource to the City; Koll Center is`coming in and is a major employer and Redevelopment wants to provide housing; if there is an area where a good project could be put together with condominiums for homeownership, that could be evaluated separately; that the General Plan would still be low-medium density residential and would still allow the applicant to make the request for RM-3000 reclassification; that this would be an overall zoning tool and guide to direct development and protect the single-family homes; and that their recommendation is for RS-5000. ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration Commissioner Feldhaus offered Resolution to approve Reclassification, excluding Aase's property. Commissioner Meese asked that the matter be continued for two weeks in order for staff to provide information on the location of the projects. Resolution failed to carry due to tie vote: Yss: Feldhaus, Hellyer, Peraza No: Henninger, Souse, Mesas (Boydatun - conflict of interest) Feldh~lus indicated he would go along with a two-week continuance. Keith Oelae': stated apartments are scattered throughout the area which ie exactly the problem and t-his reclassification needs to be approved; that the information has been presented over and over; and requested if this is continued, that no building permits be issued in meantime, referring to a project which was developed with building permits obtained the day before the previous rezoning and it is a 3-story apartment complex and that is what the owners want to stop. Commissioners responded the Commission does not have the authority to take that action ACTION: Continued to 11-19-90 for fti:rther staff information, and meeting to be at 6:00 p.m. ~~ i~h ~. 11/05/! J Page 2i 'G J ~ ~, z ' ~ ~ [ ~ l' p r : ,~ "~ 17. :REPORTS WAND`:,COMMENDATIONg ,~" ' c ~ i ;.;~;n ~~ ~ ~, ~, . A. ,,PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT PERTAINI ~ NG TO TENTATIVE'PARCEL MAP PROCESSING'. Rec. Appr o`val~,% g,~ B. ORANGE'COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL~DISTRICT = RE UEST TO ; '~ ' ' ... ~' y : w e t: DETERMINE ` CONFORMANCE -WITH THE' GENERAh~` PLAN ~,+ ~; Approved - n''~ ~r.l ~ Property is located at the"'ncrthwest`corner of Anaheim Hille Road and Nohl'Ranch'~Road ' ~ w . ?, . tR~ ~ , ~ - C. ORANGE COUNTY'GENERAL-SERVICES. AGENCY RE VEST TO' - ~ Approved ~ .~ / DETERMINE CONFORMANCE WITH'THE'GENERAL'PLAN - o. Property is located annroximately 70 feet west of D ouglass Road on the north side of Ratella Ave e nu _ - ~ .R to _ ~ r. i . ~ Ll, ~': ~ ', , ; : ~ '~ ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST None ~:_ ~, ADJOURNMENT• ~~ 8:40 p.m. fa 11/05/90 Page 22 ~~ ~';.. .