Minutes-PC 1990/12/03 (2)C ~dR"~ / ~ r t~'~' +~ ~ i , ~ ~ ~~~'~ r 1
~f - r ~ ~r~~ r, r r rn v ~ XN~'C;~r ~{~'
a ~
dy'' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ Ii" ""i
f f ' ' r
rr
ca rf - ~ ~ ~ r ~'..,
A,.~ i ~ i a~..
• `°~ ~ ~ ~ACTION ~ ~ .
;: r s ~ AGEND}~ ~`~
,: I r~.
. _ ,, •
;~ r ,, rr ~ . < ~
k r f_ ~ x f ~~'9
r
Y
`i -REGULAR MEET~iNG ,OF THE,,ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION , ~ c4~.
~ ~;` gyp, ~~ MONDAY; DECEMBER •~3, 19940, AT 10:00 A M fit
nix ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ;~i"
`_:
,-.. - ; ....~ ~ '.. - .~t Zen
~. U r PRELIMINARY'PLAN REVIEW 1, r, ~ ,
~ PUBLIC ,HEARING ~-: 5,
J~ ~. ~ ~,
(PUBIC TESTIMONY)
~~
~ ~~ 10.00 A.M. ~~ `
f~: I .~ .,
1:30 P.M '
,~
~~ COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: BOYDSTUN, BOUAS,, FELDHAUS, HELLYER, HENNINGER, ~'
MESSE, PERAZA X3'6
li J
PROCEDURE TO EXPEDITE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS ;
rJ
~! 1. The proponents in applications which are not contested will have five ,
i' minutes to present their evidence. Additional time will be granted upon "i
request if, in the opinion of the Commission, such additional time will
produce evidence important to the Commission's consideration. ~''
2. In contested a p p
pplications, the ro onents and opponent will each be given
ten minutes to present his case unless additional time is requested and the
complexity of the matter warrants. The Commission's considerations are not
determined by the length of time a participant speaks, but rather by what
he says.
3. Staff Reports are part of the evidence deemed received by the Commission in
each hearing. Copies are available to the public prior to the meeting.
•4. The Commission will withhold questions until the public hearing is closed.
5. The Commission reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing if, in its
opinion, the ends of fairness to all concerned will be served.
_ 6. All documents are presented to the Planning Commission for review in
connection with any hearing, including photographs or other acceptable
visual representations of non-documentary evidence, shall be retained by
the Commission for the public record and shall be available for public
inspections
7. At the end of the scheduled hearings, members of the public will be allowed.
to speak on items of interest which are within the jurisdiction of the
Planning Commission, and or agenda items. Each speaker will be allotted a
maximum of five (5) minutes to speak.
CA10050E
_ Page 1 ;~
_ . ~t ,.. w
a ,~
' la CE~A NEGATIVE DECLARATION; ;~` ~ ~ >> _ x
~ ~~ nlb;'`~ WA~hVER" OF~'CODE~REOUIREMENT ~ Approved
'I ''Approved
/~'~1C~ CONDITIONAL'~ITSE~PERFIIT~"~NO: 3357 ~ " , - ~' ~ ~,~ ~ `, ;+'>„~
rSf ,~r v ~
~~~~z~~~"~~~ n ;~,P ~~ '~ ~ . - lr ~ a 4 ~ Grunted .
~~ 'OWNER CHRIS DAGLAS,,15524 Aurora Crest Whittier, ;CA 90605 ~''P~'~}'~~I,~,+
"~.'tv.r.E`V}'". ,i ~ rx ~yir r'~l '"~ r~ .~= .t t~ 4~`~~n ~' ~s~(,ftW~+n~~
~~ ,~^~~ AGENT CHANGIZ. ZOMOREDIAN; 705 S. Neptune, rAnaheim} CA ,92804 ~ `~,=~"'
7 r~ LOCATION: 100 S Brookhurst Street,'Units G and"H ° '~
" .5r~ r : ~ ~, er~ - ~ Property. is a ~~ .,
~ _ approximately' 0 41; a4c?re located''at t}ie southeast corner' of ~ , ~ .'`-a
~~~: ~~Lincoln''-Ave 'ands Brookhurststreet: ~~ ,a-
i,a ~~
f :~~ <,,
a; To perm~,tran auto stereo and .auto alarm installation store .`with
waiver of minimum number of parking, spaces',; and. minimum"structural..
setback:
.j , , :,~
` Continued from the November `5, 1990 Planning Commission meeting. _
~$ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC90-270
~~..,
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY''OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE ''
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. -'+
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: They are doing installation which is very clean
and neat; will not be heavy automotive and landlord would never allow it;
if they leave the premises they have an agreement with the landlord that
it would convert back to the original store front;J!they are taking up
parking spaces now for installation and by moving "it inside it would
create less parking demand; can move handicapped space over by the donut
shop and ramp can still be used in the evening after they are closed;
everything will be kept very retail looking so if someone should look into
the window it would be neat and clean and if there is<a problem they could
tint the window; have spoken to the Fire Department and. they need to
reinforce the wall as they need a 2 hr. fire wall so will increase the
thickness of the dry wall; removed signage from windows so they comply
with the 20$; does Commission want them to do bottom portion of the door
to look like the buildings next to them?
COMMISSIONI COMMENTS: 10 year lease and into it just 1 year; ; traffic
study is adequate, but how about the parking? Considered possibility of a
3-yr time limit, however, would have to come back twice; have a right to
review CUF at any time and would like to see applicant get the 9 yrs; make
bottom portion of door solid to blend in with buildings next to them.
STAFF COMMENTS: Alfred Yalda, Traffic Engineering, stated the existing
use is a retail store and when they exchanged to this use the requirement
for parking remained the same, i.e., 5.5 per 1,Oa0.
Page 2
t2f3/9o
a~ ~,
r 7
r'rCw m`~'t~f.~iF ,~.~' .~ rf~, i ~ r 'l rg1~,R~r SStc'J` ~ r}` 'N. ~, kr' .FAG iti
".`ACTION: CEQA Negative°'Declaration Approved ~N ~,. -• ~ v f
¢~yWaiver~ of'~COd~f~Requi'rement ~tApproved ~}~
'(C~~1issionertF~l~dhaus-voting` No)~ ,~ ~~~' ~ ys~ ~~~•,a °'
Conditional Used Permit. No 3357 ,Granted r ~ ~~ -`~ ~E ( 5 "
- 3+'HtWja9l~tinF~s{dat• ~.~~ t,~1St(.; + -r~ Y~rE-r .i ~Or 9 year9 ~Q ~ ,r ~, ~ ~~,
,,~„, (.Commissioner Feldhaus voting No) ~ r.rr•'~ f,,.~z_.- ~~~~~' ; ~' ,~ ~t•
~,a ~ ~, ~, ~ .ti
r
Add the fol~lowino~conditiYOne "~ , "~ `~~^~~g, _ ~~,~
i.~~d~w~o-~~,~~~.,~ f~~^ is ~ .; : . ~:~: 'r ~ i 5 ;~,.r ~~~~
•~ ~rn~'p,~%1 `'~"- ~'~That this be 'only :for installation of auto• stereo; radio, alarm and' ~ ~' ~"~
a 4 yk Ghy f:~i4°fa7(c s,~~ v .r •r _. ,.-
:~ t ~ -> ,telephone ao- it travels .with the CUP ' in case • they 'sell ., ~ `~ ,, ~`~
~_" 2 ' " That if~ the CUP is ~;to tern ~ ~ ~ ~'"
,,,, ,. minate• at some ~ time that the 'roll .up :.dour ~~ ?~'_ .
'~~ be replaced-with a normal"'store front.' ..
i
~' ~'- ` voTE. " 6=1 Commissioner~~Feldhaus voted .NO) ~
i.'
r - ; ; ;;
~ _ ,, ,
i? .
`~''
;i ~ ~ t
l~'. _ _
;;
a - 'i
i~
Page 3
12/3/90
~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~
~ ~. , _ ,.
-4A N ,~ .~ t ~~~ ,. ~ `m ~ ~y ~ F" ~a i ~~~
2a;. CE EGATIVE~DECLARATION, ~~~~ t ~ ~`~~ 7 r~~ ~~ ~~,;
~r~ WAhVEROF:~'CODE R~~E (jIREMENT ,' ~~~ y
` , ~~ Approved
. ~2q~ ~CONDITIONALUSE~'PERMT`rN0 "'3359: ~ ~ ~~ .A r
~Y,~w~~~a3 •.~ ra..u~ ~, ~ ~ ~~, READVERTISED ~ ~~t ~~, ~a,,yy~ PPved,
} eti *';~'~'~ , e r tia r'~.~`~ ' s y ~ 1 h _. , i ~ d3'!~Granted~
v ~z"-f`' ~ fiF s+ro is c x ~ g ..; a ~ ~ ~ d~ ~, sin pdrt
~~, r~~~ ~~'` OWNER ~ ,BILL "TAORMINA/ANAHEIM: DISPOSAL, 2761° Whitestar ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~
" ~~ ~_~~~ ~ ' A~ dhelm,~ CA,' 92806 ~,~ Ave , Q,~ ~~~ r y~
~ ' _ ~
~""~'~ "` r'"A ENT ~ ~( WILLIAM WINN~/ANAHEIM DISPOSAL" j y~ ~ t~ ~' '
~~ ~~, rz ~ ~~F .~~~<< _ 2761 Whites'` r Ave ;,
,~/ t ;Anaheim;, CA' `92675 ~ ~~ ~
\ Y
-,.~..
~` LOCATION. `2751 2781 E` White Star Ave. Pro ert is a a
~!~ 11 5 acres located on th'e west. side of B1uepGumXStreeEY "
> _.
- " _ _, _
~~ _ approximately 32'feet north of~the"centerline:~'of La ..Palma
,,; Ave. rx.
~:
~`
1
~' To permit the expansion of a ~ecycl'in ~ resou \` '
facilit /,• g/ rce recovery ranafer
1" y.with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces,,minimum
landscaped area adjacent to the freeway; maximum fence height and ~
required improvement of parking areas. ~,~ `'y'
,•,
Continued from the Ployember 5
and November 19, 1990, Plannin ~~• ~
Commiss' .,
ion meetings;( 9, ~
~;
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO:
PC90-271
~^ ;,
FOLLOi~ING IS:,A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION,: NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. -
OPPO~ION: 1 '
1.
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Neighbor to facility; referenced memo from Code
Enforcement and stated it says there has been only 1 complaint this year;
they have filed numerous complaints with the South Coast Air quality
District; problems with dust generated by vehicle traffic; increase in
volume of trucks make it worse; use to have a street sweeper and a foot
patrol to pick up papers in the neighborhood; odor is a constant problem
and nothing has been effective; grinding wood under a tent with no dust
collector.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Purpose of project is to enlarge an existing
warehouse and recycling sorting facility on their property to accommodate
the increase in recyling programs being implemented throughout the City;
project is in"conjunction with a new package that will be before
Commission„on 12/17/90 to move their truck parking and maintenance to
another off-site .£acility to reduce traffic congestion and increase the
availability of parking; the addition of this building will b.elp to
mitigate the dust problem and will provide a sight screen for travel on
La Palma; they purchased a street sweeper about 90 days ago and it rune
everyday; they have a 4-man foot patrol that goes from Kraemer Blvd, to
Sunkist, Miraloma and then back around and is ongoing everyday.
'` Page 4
12/3/90
:1
I
:~.I
u li
i x ~"'•~+. -, `, ~1 `n ~+~Y a 1.11c1G are .going to :take "~ ~~~~'~ r ~~ ~Yl u
r~.zt want.;t ` '~ r"~.~, place, dO nOt,'~ ~ ~`4~ ,cp
~,,~{~ ~ ,~ „„ his tom;create .more of a' "` ~r
l
problem. ~ o sti _ r~ti~~
t ~ ~„~
~~~~~~jt'~x~~3TAF]? COMMENTS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ (,
s Envirocunental staff looked rat .the initial 'study( znd .th-e s ~`}~ ,
~~
.. !~
infbrrpation that was provided, determined there would be no. additional
_ s,
"' ° impacts from the;,`facility, that :basically there;-was a, change in ttie way; it, 54`
` was being handled rather than any increase; expanded initial study ~.
analysis to include not onl this ~ `'
>~;; Y project .but the•proposed-off-site truck ;~: ~v ~j'
, packing area, wtiich~ they considered at a later date in the analysis and '' ?"
~ ~~
''with.that information staff determined a4negative declaration would be o
., appropriate; overall concern that some of the site is below grade ;from the ~~/ ~
elevated streets and what method could applicant use to screen that. F
%i
Alfred Yalda, Traffic Engineering, stated they had an'-extensive parking ;` 4 ';xF
study for the entire site; they had trucks that are disabled and not x
moveable that 'they paac on that site; the
"disabled trucks, artd provide more area for thepregularrtrucksaandothisel, ~
' will .open up additional area for the employees to park; it will reduce the
overall demand for parking 'and they will also relocate some of the repairs
- off-site.
John Poole, Code Enforcement Manager, stated they have mitigated merry
problems that came up and does not see that this will be anything but a
help to the overall picture. He stated recycling has caught on :and they
should be able to get things squared away.
~,,
ACTION: CEOA Negative Declaration - Approved
Waiver of Code Re irement - Approved in part
Grant Waivers A, B and D
Deny Waiver C
Remove 5-foot fence around the parking area
Conditional Use Permit No. 3357 -.Granted
'Condition this CUP on the approval of the CUP
involving the moving of the trucks for off-site
parking prior to issuance of a building permit
for this project.''
Amend Condition No. 9 to allow for the metal fencing
that currently exists on-site and put a fence
along the freeway; the existing fence is currently 6-foot
high, raise to 8 feet and keep the same type of so~id screening.
Note: Caltrans gave them a permit to redo that.
_ 12/3/905
,: ,
,'J,. .. _
,•
c
jj~~} y~y (; d
. d~'3'4.ctie.,a.~~4u'4w,di i4H• ; . r4~i, i.1;.~.i~e ,~ ,~, i,..
~~~~^~~~; ~ '`~ PP ~r~s"~r ~ f ~a~4~ w~L~ ~~i»~na~and~one ~of~"the y
~ -~ t = ~ ~~
~ ~t~~ conditions of• a rbval is; that they ,r `- ~' a
are to come back to-.the °~~.~-'
~~ ,F~ Commission with a Repor£s a a d~ Recommendation `item . ~i~th~ a ~~~m~
~{''~~~'`" , ~ a agnage~ prog_ am. w ~~~, },.
~k~''~'Pt~; ~ ~ ~r z
~ 7 7~ ~. _~ P` ifr +~'
~ _ ~ ~~Y~
~x~ar ~ yoTE:^ 6-0 (Commissioner Feldhaus declared a conflict)~^ : :_Ffi
~,r ~ ~ ,,,
~ , ~V ,
L
k l ! T~
,. ~l lLwr
5~= - ~ .'
~~r ~-`I n ~F'
~,; U `
T+, 0 ~, yH
;~
~. ~ n
:. _;..
~ :y
f` ~ i
'~~:
~;
r. - ~~Al~,'.
~'
`.f'
(.
f5
l
1. ~, V
1 - ui
S ~ i ~ ..
,. . ~~ .. Z
'C. ~~ ~. 1
:~
i
.. ..1
L
F,
Page 6
12/3/90
}, ~ r
~,
~; -
~' ~~ . " _
~~ ~:
~~ - ,.
,~
-` ,., _ ^
i4&~6s:En
~ ~~
x 5~,5 ;feet east ,of the 'centerl'ine o'f= Shepard street ~," a
~~
~r
r
s, v v ~. _
i
4
n
` t. ~
1 i ~ t~
~
' To permit a 9,804 square.~foot addition to amexisting olubhouae (for
~
z _ i .. r,,~c ~{ "~-
_
,
f an additional' arcade and`snack'b~ar area). v -:~
1' i:•
u~_ j~k ~~ ~,_
~.
.Continued from the; November 19;~ 1990 Planning Commission meeting.
- _.
-.
tt
U L
~T
t' I ~~ J i
~.
i
:~
- ~ - _ y- =7 ~ ~
------
' -.t-- ------ -- ------•~-----~.-.~-- -----•~-- --------- ---
FOLLOWING.:IS A~'SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING,iCOMMISS:CON ACTION
N l
n
~
0
.
OT TO HE
~~ ~~CONSIDERED OFFICIAL'MINUTES. ~ -
r- ~ ~ ~~ ~ - ~. ~,
_ ~ 1~„ -
_
~
~: ~OPPOSITION:~~None ~
~:
`'~ ~
'- r. ~ -,~_:-(1 person `'spoke in fador::representing Dominion Properties' ~,
„
- ~ immediately adjacent tb Camelot)
`_PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Family owned businoss; propose to build`'a 9,800 ~
sq. ft. addition; built a similar addition in 1984; on Saturday afternoons ~~
and Friday nights, it is very crowded and they need more space; after the
addition they would have 300 parking spaces and that is more than
adequate; currently use 75$ of their parking; have previously contacted
P.D. and asked about hiring off-duty Police Officers and they were told
they were not allowed to do that.
'COMMISSION COMMENTS: Suggest they use off-duty Police Officers if
possible; concern expressed about using only one security guard; parking
'
appears to be adequate.
- STAFF COMMENTS: Police Department testified to the amount of cruisin
i
g
n
the area and that it has been cut down considerably; recently changed
their security and they now have someone in a police type uniform;
recommend that they use this type of security outfit and not what they
have had in the past where they wear a Camelot wind breaker; need a
minimum of 2 security guards.
ACTION•
,'
VOTE• 7-0
CiQA Negative Declaration -Approved
Conditional Use .Permit No. 1215 - (Motion require) Approved
Recommend to City Council to change the recommendation on page
6 of item no. 4 to state that at least 2 uniformed security
guards shall be present ir, the parking lot and strike the word
"private."
Page 7
12/3/90
__
..
~a~~nr~ ..n..~cc ~ tvvxwtu,x~llVVr,S1MENTS,,,xC/OaSTEPHEN:WONG 1020 rc a~BATAVI~~~~'"
r 'x. ~ w~ 7wsVcwN.r,nn m- k ~ r • Y x~a~
~~ ~ST`~, ~SPE: bB; ORANGE `A'CA 92667 ~ S " +~>~~~~ry~
*n J a r
i r r 'fix k,c ~~' axe ~•r~° ~i~n~ "'~'~' p t`_~~ Jr~ 1 ;' ti ~ r ; .ttM~, ,-U~ ?-r v ~h m+
jY ~h'.s .~N '~ 1 Y: . 4~ , ' '. F C, ice, ~. ` ~, %C u~,.,
r4 1 ~ ,AGENT .~ ~ PEDROy GOMEZ, 536 , 5 . ROSE , ST , ANAHEIM, CA1, 9,2805 ~~'` 0 »'~
z ffi'6 a
~fi7 _ I ~~.'" "r Mii x~ ~~'tl 1 ~' ~ ".~ .., q i,.i _ r „~ r 1;~~
,~~, ., LOCATION 536~South Rose' Street. Property "is approximately 0' 6 acre ~~r.
`, ~~;", ocatefl on the:east,side of Rose Street and.-,approximately
_, ;r:>
s
`~ ~ ~ '530 feet south of the centerline' ~of Santa Ana Street. "~~ '
~. M1p .. ; ,,;,
r L - To permit an automobile repair facility with waiver of .minimum '}.
`number "of parking spaces. ~ .. ° `;~
,.. ,,.
{-
~=" Continued from the November 5, 1990 Planning Commission meeting. ,
~, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. "" c ;:
'' `=s`' FOLLOWING ZS A SUMMARY OF'THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTICN. NOT TO BE
M
r::;~ CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
i,° ;, -
~` OPPOSITION:` None `~
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Property Manager stated he has made it clear to
Mr. Gomez about the concern as to the outside; have addressed the concern
of stripping out,in the front for the parking and haves addressed some of
the minor trash maintenance problems in the front; have taker. several
steps-and stopped by prior to the meeting to look at the 4 properties and
he thought it looked better.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: What about oil and storage in the back that Code
Enforcement shows in their report; does not sound like it is being handled
properly; is back of prcperty asphalt or dirt; should be all asphalt; it
is property. management's responsibili~~y to take this back to the owner
that it should be done; do have a Code requirement that the area must be
paved; it is not just Mr. Gomez's activities that are causing these
problems; the property management needs to get the message that the whole
group of uses in that area needed to clean up their act ana if that is not
accomplished voluntarily then Code Enforcement will be out there; property
manager can set an example and get the tenants to clean up and do their
work inside; they are all there on CUPS"and the management could find
themselves with empty buildings; parking along Rose Street could be =
mitigated by having the owners and employees of the businesses park in the
rear lots where the striped parking is and leave front a-gas for,customer
parking; property manager to get owners and property a,anagers together at
a meeting and get the block cleaned up; anyone who does not ,cooperate in
the clean up will be brought back before the Commission to look at their
CUP." ;r,
Page 8
12/3!90
-~
,4.
yy`1. ..
~ ,,.~,,,~,,~~ ~ ~ d ~ ~.a~ ~goes„~on, tn~~eL is 'atecontinual ~"'~~ ~ •~
,problemwith the ,ten'ant"`s wo k n outside ~»•~~,,,'yy, "`~~•^;"~ }~=~'+~'~~~'~'"Y+~'w~'4 x~
~;~ ,~,~~~.~~~~, y,, g performing a'var~.et x„ofawork .~at r ~-
gone tiine~all that^7was awed and a ~ '`~'~°~' ~ '~ ~ ~'~~'~ s~~y~'• ~ ~~ ~ ,.`~~. ~~ a~ ~t; ~~
m ~„~'~~~ P~~ ~ ~ pparentlyr over the years something ate up
the. pavement,,. before al3'owin an r ~' "" ~ "`' ~-~' ~- ~~ ti '
g, y"other uses what is there should.~be a ', ~
~ ~, ~«'~nv~,Y ~r rk,c«~ if,., ,~, ,~ ~ ~~ , iii-~~rs~ ~ ~ F`~q
s, ~~~,~~~Nc,~ean2dqup,~tithere:has been an overall-;disregard of cleaning up anything ~f
.lout there ands these 4T•.properties have had more of.. a' share of their ` ~ ;~.
~~~ ~~. prob~lems~Xtt%ar~`~ some, of the others, ~ each .rear yard+~on plans has parking ?~~
shown 'inr it
'`~, ~ ,, Code Enforcement <"would be willing to send': an officer: to' talk ~ ; by
to then,property managers~~and tell them what needs to be done;; could get ', ;;,
~~'~, y most. o''f whaf- needs to be, done- in 30 or 60 days then they--could come back r ?"5
in a'nd Cortuni'asion could ~give'M'r`. Gomez his ,CUP and. they would. not
,,. ~. ~ ~~
~- 'administratively
4 take„any action,..:against Mr. Gomez'.., y
..' ~ -
` :ACTION': ..Continued to 2/11/90;' Work with Code Enforcement; `turn°those in
¢, that do not cooperate and pull them in regarding the revocation of their
s `CUPS. ~~
~~~ ~ ~'
'\
•
G
~3
~~~ , ~~'~~~~~"i~~~;lo ated"'W,~~;~.~, .,~ ~ 4u~~r~~`Y is aPProad atelY 0~~49~acre k .
~; a~at the.~southeast,_ corne~jr~~~ of Bro p ~'~~ .~ w
'~'i a`~~,~if 1 z r"S~~' @t mr~'~ ~ ~ m _ '='3r'~t`F`( •+A'i,l~.'ir bt+J~tlu ~ha~rE~'~tl1Clj.d~a "~~'~' ~,
~' ~ ~ ~ L
' - i ``~ ~"4' r~''"r~ "' uCt~~rr
~ i ~ ~~~~
~ Te permit" a conven ~~~ ~` ~ ~ ~ ~~
fence, market within an -existing `~ " z``~"'~M
'" - '~ service station ~
~ ~ -, ;: .
t~, ~'i4 ;~~' ~ Continued :from November .~ ~ ~ ~ ' •~ ~ > ~ `:,=}'
r ~~~, ,: ••mee£ings. ~ and November 19, 1990 Planning Commission ~ _
~.
f'F.. CONDITIONAL' USE-.,PERMIT~'RESOLUTION`NO. ~'`
...
.y a
,'w_`
R~ _ _
.i!T
J ~ ' v.~
«. _ .:i
iAAC: ~ ;r
(
r, .
1t
',+
~'.. Y: ..
~' - -
Y ~. ~ F
r ~ .
,u ~'~
Page 10 =M
~' ]2/3/90 ~•
~~
_ t
- <~
r
.~~.
~ ~~ " ,
'ra R.. ~ ~ r°'~~
x;..
cyy] ~'[~~~3k`6~~~.y,, L°~~i,p~~~+FYI~)tr<5~'^n -~N ,~ ~ r~ a.~y ~(~p ~ .p~
.~ ~1'.•~w'~,~.w}SL'4..vd~ V,d'+f f~ ~• ~ritAY41'h~Yr cif.-!''4J.9S_. !YV'.'VVa . .. .. }ul'S(.+IYA...e.)... ~L .,a __ ....~_ ..~~.. ..~.._ ~ .. _
1' ,,
~. ~ ~~ ~~ J~LCeL ~ rroperty is approximately 3 ~`-4a?'~rsft~
•^~ n I 7Fb ^i~* ~ raw fnyF.+~ 'Y'Y~s(~ 3aH) k.. k.~i a o; L-}:
x.~. ~ tacr~eys, ,~located~at the northeast' corner of Suena Vista Ave ,°~~W~
y< and E Street. ~„w:
~ ~ t '~ : To pemit a,private fine arts college for-gifted`~persons with mental ~~
~~.~^+~w `~` retardation, with; waiver of .minimum number. of parking spaces;
t~ requredrsetback for playground,maximum fence height and maximum ''
n-~..;_ 4 ~,, structural height adjacent to,isingle-family zoning. '`
. '`
~a c
"~~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION'NO. `PC90-272 f
,y
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAI;,MI?iUTES.
~;~" '
OPPOSITION• ,1vNone
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: .Mentally retarded students have been on the
property for the past 3~_years; property has been sold to the Anaheim
Korean Presbyterian Church with the 'provision that they could remain for 5
years while they ra=se a"building fund and move elsewhere; use of property
is not intense and the students do not drive.
Speaker for the Church. Put up sign on Sundaysnot to park on the dirt
lot; will look into it if it is a problem; do not know of any agreement
with Loara High School to park on their lot; have tried to beautify area
and have painted the shed and put on a new roof, but have no definite
plans; shed currently used as a storage facility, however, can restructure
it or tear it down; do not have any current pions regarding landscaping of
southern portion of property, however, they are open to suggestions; feel
that Hope University is a part of them and that they are doing community
service by providing this facility to them and at the same time are
sensitive to the neighborhood. '
Page 11
12/3/90
~~ ,.
~'~"" be~encloaed~r s s. ~r c' 4 ; - r "~ ' w~ ~~1t13' E' r m1~-- ~ ua.. i.~ r; ~ ~ ~ ~~r+,
,~ in the trash` enclosure; Hope ynivereit ie~'a~ '~~ •~' ~• '7a~~• '
n~'w~•~~Fnur~~fi;~ ~ r~•~„~ ~~~ a •..,~~ ~rrr(. y ~ sgreat`asaet to ~ 7
. ~,~a ~the~;church, z is there a"way they can, approve the'. CUP without the "'
• _
. .. (r~~/
~" ~~~ ~:condtitonea~
~. ..
.isl. .:
~• °STAFF COMMENTS Mr HaBtings stated a lot of the conditions cari`'be' ~ ~ ',~
T deleted, and the ones with" the asterisk- can be monitored by Code ,~~_
,Enforcement;,
s~~ conditions t the only condition that ahnuld remain is"condition no. 8, the J -~.,,
'' hat .pertain. to improvements of the right-of-way would have to •
~` be-deferred to Engineering and Traffic Engineering.
~;,, -~:a
,,, •' ACTION: CEQA Negative .Declaration - approved
Waiver of Code Requirement - Approved 6 ~~
'-
~ _ Conditional Uae Permit No. 3362 - Granted
- (No time limit) Ij ~~~ .
(Delete conditions, 1,2, and 3). °,,,
It was noted that the conditions left are up
to the owner of the property.
VOTE: 7-0 '
Page 13
12/3/90
.r
I to ~ ~r ...: a a r ~~y r a r Iy ~ '' ~~ F J -n r ~,+[a`"`~'~Jt'±.
'~#'~~~ ieh!!e d.~'i3 sy,*~3~'~~' ~$:w' r ' n ~( p~f `' '' tln, x~C
7a CEOA~MITIGATED'n~NEGATIVE~DECLARATION ~ ~t,;Approved
~~,. .
7:b~' f~.W SUERY60F~CODE~~REOUIREMENT v ~1t~~Appr'~o e
7a a ~'~CONDITIONAL'~USE~PERMIT~'NO': 3363, ~" ,. G anted
.t, ~'~, ~'~WS~~a t~ 1 ".t r ~~ ~ , , ~ y}~3~~` rs
t 4~- ~~ ~ _ ~ ~ F k A,.xynl~.
~''~~ OWNER CANYON WEST AND ?VINEYARD MINISTRIES ~ 333 E. CerritosPAve ~? ~`-~~:'"?"".. .
~ ~' ~' tir CA 92805.- t ~ ` '~~~
,~~ ~.,~~ ~y ~ i .;?tw~5, ~
~ AGENT• Phillip R;. Schwartze,'27132 :Paseo°,Espada Ste: ,1222 ,'',San ` ~ ,''` ~is~~
:,-,,,~ ~. t w'
r Juan CA 9?,675 ~ ~>> - '' „
tit 1 ~ ~ ~a . ~ ri
.fir} LOCATION 530Q~45340"E La Palma: Property is approximately 16.8 ,4.
4,, .
1 t 4Y ... 7 ~ .. ,.. '. '., .,, s hi7f
~~' r~ acres locatSP ! approxmately° 141 feet on ;;the west '"side of
"~rrI ' Lar,,'Palma ;Ave. and approximately 141 feet west of the ~?'~
~ '~ centerline of Brasher `St. ,,
t
.,,
~ ,~ To permit a church facility with waiverso°f,minimum number ofd; ~~;
,,.~~
parking spaces and permitted hours of operation. %! r:,
.. ,..
,:
CONDITIONAL .USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC90-273
.. ~.
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT, TO BE~.~,
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. lt,
,. ~ ~1
OPPOSITION: None
i
~.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: The Anaheim City Code has a provision to allow
churches in the industrial area; request to move into an existing vacant ;
office space that has approximately 200,000 square feet;. request to
initiate an amendment to Code to be heard at a later time to allow
churches, under certain circumstances, that the City approve this use on a
permanent basis; will invest approximately 20 million dollars in the
acquisition of the property and in addition 2.5 million in renovation;
this will be a complete rehabilitation of the facility and a purchase
acquisition; will also construct a recording and T.V. studio and printing
facility; discussion took place regarding the conditions; CUP applies to
the 2` existing buildings and future expansion into the 2 easterly vacant
lots would be appropriate for a later discussion; church would like to
have a day school; it is not a strong request, but something the church is
very interested in; would be looking at about 120 children, K-12; will be
a total of 4,600 in the 3 services; no bingo.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Property to the west of driveway that shows vacant
will not be used; would 2 vacant lots be picked up by Vineyard at a later.
date; Code says you can, only get a CUP fora 3 yr. increment for a total
of 9 yrs. and wanted to know what the plan was.; great use of the property,
however, faced with a letter that client wants to purchase the property
and wondered why he would purchase it without any guarantees; if property
is owned and a church wanted to build on it, with a CUP they could go into
any zone; can they go under a perman_nt CUP because they are going to own
the property; could be a requirement of the Code Amendment; questioned the
proposed uae that there will be a day school; was not in the staff report.
Page 13
12/3/90
ist Ieasing.ythe buildsngJfor'
°~ '~,r"~.~}''~'1~"'`+ `i'~'~Sk .}rRa~ F uti.° e ~ r ~ ~".. y ±vu~ouwni Vnat r.ne 3ccumul~ateCl~effect ~~. 't ,i' ~'[~~'~
,f `~~y~Ybring him into: more 'o f, a litigated negative declaration- z an+EIR ~ ' ~s~~~+"~"
ire ~V~`l~x;cti•11''uP~~ F'7e +J~ ~A~ ~ T ", ~ 3 j~k" i I - :'. ~ ' : ~ ~ F vay
~~fkG~~,;~AYfred,Yalda, Traffic En ineeiin stated: the site3"plans shows plenty, of ~ k -.
v << , i 4 9. s 2~'~.r~Y ,
4°f~ ~ ,parking, if ,traffic ancreases:~~there is lent ~ of room ,that they co 1d add ._ ',x
' ~ 1 „ T~
'~ P
}"~-,a ~ ~.r.° ~~ • ~ ~ kin an changes; wil l r ,, y •
~sr ~~parking without iaa g y, ' ~, estripe for .full size cars, have ~`
:~:;
~~ ~ one condition regarding : alignmiFnt of ;their easterly driveway;?: 3 f intensify ;;~~.
`use, whey will ask tliem~to rea]agn the ingress and egress on'Brasher `O ':~
r ~ Street; traffic signal study ~sti~ould be done and signal .in'stalled even ~>x
<though it would be offset aboutl140::feet.
~ - ji ~~1 `
~v •;
~,, ACTTON: CEOA Mitigated Negative Declaration - Approved
~'' ~~ (Add to mitigation';~some kind of chart that shows;. who is ,~
r- responsible and what the timings will be). Conditions 6'. and 7 ~'
r
~,'` ~; should be timed prior to final inspection of the property; the
way the mitigation monitoring program is set up is that they
'will be incorporated into the conditions of approval; ,there is
a condition requiring the applicant to meet whatever the
requirements are for the cost of implementation.
i, Waiver of Code Requirement -,Approved
Conditional Use Permit No. 3363 - Granted
1. Limit to 3 years with two 3 yr. renewals
2. Delete condition no. 6
3. Change condition no. 7 to show that a study shall be made
prior to final inspection and that the easterly driveway
will not have to be moved at this time.
4. Change condition no. 12 - exempt national holidays and add
. Good Friday; includes day care and school only on Sunday.
In addition tha following motion was made:
Commissioner Meese offered at motion, seconded by Commissioner Hellyer and
MOTION CARRIED, that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
recommend that in a workshop session they discuss the initiation of a Code
Amendment that would permit a permanent use of facilities for church
ownership of land in the Canyon Industrial Area and any other requirements
~ that they deem proper; and to include the concept of a K-12 school
associated with the church and to compare the traffic impacts of a church
versus an office use on the same property.
VOTE• 7-0
~ ~'q~Eb~7z lwit• 2dk'~~?t. .S _.
Bat CEQArNEGATIVE~ DECLARATION
~
~ f~ U ~ .~'4~f'` I'I ,S ~ {~~~
~ 1 ~' f' ,-` ~Contlnued
,t
°~r8b ~'t~ rRECLASSIFICATI0NNO_~~90'' 91 I8
.5.3lK
1? ~` {f P~~~t02~/11~/91
~
r~~+~8c s WAIUER~OF'~CODE~~REOUIREMENT rr ,_;
}
~ `
~., ~ ~j `
~•
"~''8d
~'
CONDITIONAL`'USE``PERMITyNO". '3364
~r~ ~' , ~
~~
" in
~
OWNER:
Dr: MYRON
SIMON'AND MR
STANLEY
P
O : B
3182
An
he
~~
,,
:
.
,
. ox
,
a
im,,. r,;
wu~
^'
u # CA 92803
~ ~ r.
~
ti~ st .
~ '
n
~ H ,,
t ~
,~
,
~ ~
AGENT: JOHN O COTTON,: 1408 Third Street Pr
I omenade, Third Floor, ~f
_
Santa Monica, CA 90401
~ L ^~Y
Cf~~
w
.
~'~
,
~
~.~ ' L~CATdAN 1334~West'La Palma Ave Property is
~".•
`~ approximately A.72 ~ *,~;
~
:
F. acre located on the south side,of La Palma`
Ave, and 75
'r,
~,~ ~' feet at the nor~therl terminus of Lo ,
ara Street °~'`
~
..;
s ~
approximately, 131 feet west of the centerline'of,Hermosa _ '~•
~
:~
,
~
~.
~: Drive: :
-
r~ ~ .-
' '
;w RS-7200 to
RS-A-43,000: „r
~
~. ~
}~~' " To conatruct;a55-unit-deck type "affordable"` senior citizen a
apartment building with waivers of minimum lot area and minimum site
r
~r. ,. area per dwelling unit.
°~; '-CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0.
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION NO.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 3 opposed and 1 in favor
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Not necessarily opposed to the type of project, but
to the number of units; traffic impacts; density too intense; La Palma too
busy for senior citizens.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Tried to run as an old age home and then tried to
sublease property and it burned down; has been vacant for 15 years; people
have tried to dump things on the property, etc. Went to feasibility study
and came up with the need for senior citizen's housing which would be
oriented towards a lower rental factor.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Project too dense; looking at managed growth; should
not be zoned RS-A-43,000; too close to single-family residences; elevators
situated too far away.-from the entrance; developer should not come in
with 'something so out of lime to see what Planning Commission will do for
them; want to send a strong message to people who would bring in an overly
dense glan in the hope of negotiating some additional units that the
Commission would not ordinarily give and Conunission is not going to play
that game; need to have a sensitivity to the neighbors; suggest they come
back with a design for condominiums.
ACTION: Continued to 2/11/91 to look at condominium possibilities.
Page 15
12/3/90
y
r ~ i ~ i
r i~~ y c;
. ~rw
~ ,Y
?
M:D , X1570 E Gl'enoak,Blvd
Glendal
,
I ~ , ~ ,,
~
~~,~ ~ ~~x j~ ~
" ~, r 1 ,~ ~a ,~ ~;
IANA,~~700
N Harbor Blvd ,` Anaheim,
~" ~ ~ .r 'txt arc .are ve ~~ u^ ~ ~. -'f? Jti `4k+lSt°i" ,~~ ~t ELI M
4~ ~- ~+~' 0 43~ acre located approxirt-atel} ''104 feet on the
` r~ ~~ ` i
t
id
e r t x ~ ~, s :
~~' ~W - ~~of'National Street :and approxunafely .180 eas
s
e;
...~- . ~ ~. ~,w .~i
feet nor`tti"fof
the a
~ ~ `~ centerZ ne" of Liberty' Ave.' ; ` ~~~~st~
~ Y
{i
7
- To retain 324 square-foot. spray booth.
~ f i-
ti "`~
w
~? ~ _ o ~_
'CO rQ 4[;•
~
,,;
NDITIONAL USE
- PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC90-274 , ~' } I''`
t~ , -~.{
c
"
_
--------------- ---------°----~
-` rt.
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION.
NOT TO BE ,y
CONSIDERED'OFFICIAL MINUTES.
'€<~
~
=;
>i OPPOSITION: None ~- -
- _
~.
ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration -Approved
Conditional Use Permit No. 3365 -Granted v
~, VOTE: 7-0
.~1
~' A
i2/3/yp 16
~ t u;~., , a:.. -
~ ~' Y~i't/) ' c;~~~4 ~~~~ s -' ~~li { YV~ jai ~'~''~~~1,~~~~_(~,c,,~'y~~~2~ N?+~ ;~ _ }
~f - ~ ~1'~'~,.~~•~,T&~r,~" ~ { X .. ti: y~ ~~~~ it;`3 yv1'~;r' rj '1+~'. ~ ,
10a: ~ CEOA NEGATIVE+:DnCLARATION " ,, ;' ~ ~~ x~ '~ ''Continued
lOb. WA*IVER~OF~CODE'~REOUIREMENT '' a~ y~ " ''"
. '' , r ~~ ~~~ ~,tol~'/14/9i1
lOc ~ CONDI•TIO~USEPERMIT NO 3367 ~~ ~,.,, ~"~
k
+OWNER .I ~~}`+aWILLARD LEGG, 1433 East Lincoln 'Ave. , Anaheim, CA, 92805 r~yuax,~ '"~
~ ~ .: .. _ ~~.. r
,~~ '~~ AGENT~''~' JOHP1 DALLAH, 17380 Briardale Lane, Yorba Linda, CAS, 92686' i~,t
. ~.
4!
~,F,,x,.~~.,
~`~~'p~r LOCATION 1433 East Lincoln Ave. Property is approximately 0.16 ,~,
,,~x~' ,acre located. b"n the "north side of .Lincoln ,Ave. and '
~rs~ approximately 275 feet west of the centerline of Larch `~`
Street.: G '? ~ -
,a ~ a.
~ ~: ,-0:
livPnrmitarters1andtWaiverslof mini residential structure with
~~ g ~ mum number of parking spaces, 1
~ maximum structural height and minimum interior site eetback.
,,r,
11 CONDITIOIQAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO.
- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
~"~ _ CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. -
'' OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Buying a residential family residence that is
zoned commercial; buying in a mixed zoning .area; would utilize house for
office and for living quarters for himself or his caretaker.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Code allows him to use as a business and living
quarters far himself,, however, he cannot make the modifications such as
signage; if zoned CL there would not be a problem; prefer the business
owner living in the residence and would propose that they limit this to
the business owner in the suggested Code Amendment.
STAFF COMMENTS: Ts currently zoned CO which allows conversion of the
house under conditional use permit to an office use. In the CL zone, you
can have a caretaker's quarters in with a converted home to a commercial
use, but in this particular zone there is a provision that does not allow
for the mixture of uses. It is unclear as to whether that means within
the same building or different uses within the same property. It would
depend on Planning Commission's interpretation. Rezoning to CL would
re
ira a Genera
<Iu 1 Plan Amendment c
ur
rentl this is
zoned CO and '
Y it is
part of the CO zone Code that says no combination of residential and
commercial uses shall be permitted.
Could look at a Code Amendment which would exempt cases where there is a
conversion from asingle-family home into an office use to clarify for
future usage; need interpretation from the Cit*~ Attorney's office;
agendize this for the January 7, 1991 Work Session.
Page 17
12/3/90
x +~
C ;^^ r:, ' ','
~e.following `r
fw;
~:-:City Attorne
• •a apeciucall st
• ~ ~`+' +rA~~,~ ~ u ri ~Y atea
~fus
C
shall~b ,": ., •v- ." °~ ~n light of ,the fact' ~0
the
' no combination o
f resid
a 4 ~r
,~
1
~
~ s
~
e permitea. ^ enti
l and oo n mer
cial
1
~•i ,-
~~t•~~f i ~
` '~~ ~'
" ,
~
~t
ACTION•
..
Continued to 1 '`
,. o rHt
_
_~ ~
~ > fi(,
~K
YF.
cl O ~ J O h-~ ~ ~ ~~
N
~ 3'r
4 c o
-
'~
., vi V1 W It m n 4
~~ o
., , `' 3 0 ~ a y
~~
_-.~ a
o 3 r• ~.
,.
s ~ ~ __
~ 0 m
rt ~., O 7
~ W 0 cr W ~,.
~ rr ~ n O f~D _
~`~
ro ~
~~ ~ M ~ n
ct d M K
''C (D
Si N cT ~
~
rt
~
0 ~..
0 N ~
5 ~ p 0
N w fD
;J .!
tq ~ .~ 4
n
Fi y
M O h1
M ~ 0 H
~
"
r• 3 K
L~l
" ~ .i
~o rt ~ a ~ '
roam
m
a o
~~
n c, o ~
- w .4 ] w
p ~
n H
~ ~;
;
f~ ~,'
m c r• m
n m ~ ~ o' ',
1 -
ti .. N M 0 ~ n:
,
~ 0 N
~ ~
- ~
m ~r m ro
r
i.+
~ ',
c ~
m ro o ~
~, o
`,
] 5 s
(D ~ Ct
n d w it"
~~ a
~ n
.
'
m a ~ .
~
W rr A'
E :,
~;.
it
•
~'
~
- PAGE 18 '" i
~ a'.
~;
~~ a
.~
~• .. ,_
~i`~`~H~~ ny~A~;20 Ppx~Katella~'Y~e"~Yp- ert~.~,:ro~~~`,~~t-~~~r'~~`~,"' ~' ~ ~ ~ .
~~ „~ ti ~~~, ~~. ,,~ s.- .~ e,~l P Y is ~approx.imatelYel3~ w9 acres r
a a ~and~a roximatel 665 feet on the south~'side? ~ f {K tells `~`~ "'~ ~ ~ "~"Y ~-
~-,R r+~ ~ -~"- "Ave , anclpappr ximatel~l 7.;470 feet-east ofY~t2ike~ ce 1 ° ~`x~s ~r ,!~+q1~~"
M r /^;~ -v'jA{+ 4i'•f~'LK~Lw ~o~. .L~.. • 9, P~~•
~~~ ,; ;tf of State College: Blvd. a ine
~; lTo permit two fre_eaL'anding monument signa4in the .CO (COmmeraial
.~. Office)' .Zone.
~~, is ~~ • ,' .' _ ~ -._ .~~~ ~ ~~ ~. '•_'~~
r, _ a c"
~,~; ~~` „CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT `RESOLUTION NO. }
.. .
~-
e:~ ~ ,` ~ ~ - __-
:,:; ` -
i„ ~ ,. -.
+- ~ r ; y~
,~,~; . i .
~.
~,.,. -~
R-
K:..
~' '. i
l
i,`
i.
).
`~
P2 / ~/ ~(~
r' 1
,. .
t7 ~~
.. ~ I7
~ ,`~ raN~~~~+i~~ tre t•7r+.~s~* 'S '' ~ s ~sr " c~~~~
~ 4 ~~ t_ .
a ~~ & ~'i a ~~: ,~ y ~,~,
li- ''
,~„ ,~; To establish ;a 40 unit,, `RM-2400 (Residential, Multiple-Family) zone •'~
•~,,~, ~ condomih'ium_ subdivision: ` ,~
~ _
;~ ~ i
~'~~'° - ---- -- , --- ---,-- ---- ,---- ---~ I --- ----- - i -- --- -- ,' ,
~€'~~?, FOLLOWING IIS A.SUMMARY OF `THE.PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION.. NOT TO BE "'
~yy.=, ~~ r ~ . ., ~
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES: •
7 ~
~~~ A- ..
OPPOSITION: None _ ~, ,,~
~~ to PETITIONER'S COMMENTS .-Approve a tract map which conforms to the '
site
~`~~. a plan which has-been,.app~oved by the City for this project; asking that ,.~ .'' ° ~5~
~`i condition no. 3 on page 5 be modified to prior to certificate_of use of
lr _ .
~~' P, occupancy as it is almost impossible tc,. get those things done to final
~, map. This project was brought before Council in Octolaer with no
°, recommendation and was brought back'to the Planning Commission for some
considerations.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Most developers meet the deadline for the CC&Rs
prior to certificate of use of occupancy; there have been instances where
they have granted this request and they once granted this to this
petitioner under some very special circumstances.
_ STAFF COMMENTS: Selma Mann, Deputy City Attorney, stated it is her
understanding that the reason the CC&R requirement has been maintained at
prior to final map approval, is because there is no adequate mechanism for
the trigger at any dater ~ioint; prior to the final `map, it can be
monitored by the Planning Department, but the Building Department'
apparently does not have a similar procedure szt up.`, She further stated
that the Anaheim City Code requires the Planning Conunission to make the
preliminary recommendation to the City Council.
Greg Hastings, Zoning Divisian Manager, stated there is the problem ~.: a
building permit is issued without a tract map, because basically you are
issuing a permit for apartments because there is no authority to'subdivide
- the properties.
Paga 20
', t x:/3/90
. :~
k , ~_
r n~,iauN
PPrJ~r.~.~~re~~ ,r~
~
~~f,3~r.,. ~~
~ ~ -, egative;Declaration A roved ~ '~''
~ z
,'
1~ ~~ :~«
~
'
4 ~~~ ~
~
~
~
G
~ .
o
~ ~
~ ti
~
r r4
. .
~,
'' Tentative Tract
No 14'406 Denied ~. '
~ ~ ~
~s _.
~ .
~~{{
.~~De "edon ~t~he'~basi~`s that' it` is~~not physicall
~
' `s' ,
~,
y
s
t
bl
r ~~ ~~'`
osypgq~ ~ r ~.,~ _
~" ~6~~15#Hx
tW$4R"~i
~ t
e of develo ment ) ,
ui
a
e fo
the
~y. ~„ ~~r
~~
zi
-
~ ~
_.
VOTE ~~ -
f 6 1 Feld a
( h u
voti
° t ~
~ , ,
F
~~
~ ~,~ '
s
ng NO)
"~ ~ - -
- .
;
~+~
'
~~ ~ b,
nr
~~
r
<< L
~1
.3'~ v
' G
> .. _. J Y
_
~ ~
~'~"~r-,
~
n ~ T/
r' .
_ 1
_, ~ _ ,.~~
~ - ~
r' f~
,
~n „
u, ~ r~`
!,
~ _
4,
?'~
l ,i ~ i
~ -
r,
` ~ ~
! ,
~~
-
Page 21 '
,~
+~
j
~12L3/90
,, _
_
yr ~ i~
, -~,{~
~~yj~q~J{q~~yL fitc -~:. ...~'r'.
u ytgYYt.i. !S r:-7.
''~~~~ i~ .~~approximately~ll~`79'acr~`es~l co ated at'~`'the nort'~~east corner t .~~
K
~~"~~~~~^t~ of,'"State~'College Slvd nd'Kaella Ave'. ~~ , `~ ~ ~~ , ,°rma .
~y~'4'~t^4 ~ ~ :;~ sit a+, ,' :: ~ , , , '~ r~f~1~~
fi L~7cL~t,d~t7 - p3 ~.~~- a ~: Z~; v,,,. ~~ ~ ~' ..~9fi+ J ~. ~' ~~,'~~~ia
~, ~~ ;Peti'_ioner requests certification of~ Environmental Impact Report ~ .~-,~,~~"1'~~
~~
~' ~ ° _ _ ° _ _ ~~.~i
~, ~-,:rTo permit two,~~200 foot high, 13 story office towers,289,000 V. t.
w~~'r square foot each); one,~3 story, 134:-room `all suites (fuhl°kitehen)
n~ ;_- hotel" a c4 cktail lounge with'in' a 10, 000 Ys4quare~=.foot restaurant,; and `~_;~:;
,. 6,OOO~aquare,,;feet of specialty service/retail uses inc~luding,~faet~ ~°~~
~~~ `Yfood,rin conjunction with one-7-level parking structure ,and six ``~~
;~r` freestanding signs with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces'.)
~, ~°Petitoner requests`approval'of Development Agreement.
- > ,, ;j
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION NO. ~``
7 is :; 1:
., ,
s ' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. ''
0
sir ,.c~
Page 22
' 12/3/90
~' c , ''
;.,~~ ~. -
. :k
~:~i
~~
!,
~.i
,t { ~.vuad'l.nArlr,A 17 06 TO 7
$ st ti, PROVIDE~FOR~~THE~'CITY~ENGINEER~~TO'~ r i -f~!"~''r
a,.<~u~ ~ ,~ _ APPROVE OR DENY" WAIVERS
~ ` ` ~OF~'ANY"~REO
~'
" "'' ^zc,~xnc-,r
r tiAPPrOVed
~f,f" -~~_Jtti ~
x ~~~
UIREMENTS
OF
~~+ ya . n
THIS~CHAPTER~ ' '•- •~
r
~ , ~,
,.~°~"aR x~vC~~~z~p ~ ~3:'
k
~ z
,'~~
~ s
~
'
r
=s n ~, s -
.- ,
7
s:~~~J y~~
i a. .. _
~~ ~
~~ rxr :ITEMS' OF 'PUBLIC ~<INTEREST ~
-
~ ~ ~ ~:-~= "
n
-
tr `+, ,~t
s ~~~ ; 11DJOURNMENT• .. ``
'r~•., j -_~, Adjourn ,to work session on December- 10
1990
l~
t l'~~Sl{r
,
„
a
~, ,, 1:00 P.M, in"the Planning Department conference room ~ •
. r s,
t,
•
f
.
~~ V .
}
'
~~
;~
~~
~, ~ ~ =3
~~
~z!,
y~
~~`.
;
r~ ~
,
~
L
, ,
r~
i1
;~ ,
f,
• w
t
a
~
+
a
t
~y
t~ij
s
,Y.
.,
Page 23
12/3/90
t,;a
- ??
_ _ . L ~ '®