Loading...
Minutes-PC 1990/12/03 ,. ACTION AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1990 AT 10:00 A.M. PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING (PUBIC TESTIMONY) 10:00 A.M. 1:30 P.M COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: BOYDSTUN, BOUAS, FELDHAUS, HELLYER, HENNINGER, MESSE, PERAZA PROCEDURE TO EXPEDITE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. The proponents in applications which are not contested will have five minutes to present their evidence. Additional time will be granted upon request if, in the opinion of the Commission, such additional time will produce evidence important to the Commission's consideration. 2. In contested applications, the proponents and opponent will each be given ten minutes to present his case unless additional time is requested and the complexity of the matter warrants. The Commission's considerations are not determined by the length of time a participant speaks, but rather by what he says. 3. Staff Reports are part of the evidence deemed received by the Commission in each hearing. Copies are available to the public prior to the meeting. 4. The Commission will withhold questions until the public hearing is closed. 5. The Commission reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing if, in its opinion, the ends of fairness to all concerned will be served. 6. All documents are presented to the Planning Commission for review in connection with any hearing, including photographs or other acceptable visual representations of non-documentary evidence, shall be retained by the Commission for the public record and shall be available for public inspections 7. At the end of the scheduled hearings, members of the public will be allowed to speak on items of interest which are within the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission, and or agenda items. Each speaker will be allotted a maximum of five (5) minutes to speak. CA10050E Page 1 ~. ~, la. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved lb. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT Approved lc. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 3357 Granted _°^.:_ :a OWNER: CHRIS DAGLAS, 15924 Aurora Crest, Whittier, CA 90605 1, ,.~ , ~ ~~ AGENT: CHANGIZ 20MOREDIAN, 705 S. Neptune, Anaheim, CA 92804 --Z,~::~..7•- ~:~ tip; `. LOCATION: 100 S. Brookhurst Street Units G and H. Property is approximately 0.41 acre located at the southeast corner of Lincoln Ave. and Brookhurst Street. To permit an auto stereo and auto alarm installation store with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces and minimum structural setback. Continued from the November 5, 1990 Planning Commission meeting. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC90-270 FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETZ7'IONER'S COMMENTS: They are doing installation which is very clean and neat; will not be heavy automotive and landlord would never allow it; if they leave the premises they have an agreement with the landlord that it would convert back to the original store front; they are taking up parking spaces now for installation and by moving it inside it would create less parking demand; can move handicapped space over by the donut shop and ramp can still be used in the evening after they are closed; everything will be kept very retail looking so if someone should look into the window it would be neat and clean and if there is a problem they could tint the window; have spoken to the Fire Department and they need to reinforce the wall as they need a 2 hr. fire wall so will increase the thickness of she dry wall; removed signage from windows so they comply with the 20~; does Commission want them to do bottom portion of the door to look like the buildings next to them? COMMISSION COMMENTS: 10 year lease and into it just 1 year; ; traffic study is adequate, but how about the pa;.king? Considered possibility of a 3-yr time limit, however, would have to come back twice; have a right to review CUP at any time and would like to see applicant get the 9 yrs; make bottom portion of door solid to blend in with buildings next to them. STAFF COMMENTS: Alfred Yalda, Traffic Engineering, stated the existing use is a retail store and when they exchanged to this use the requirement for parking remained the same, i.e., 5.5 per 1,000. Page 2 i~/3/90 ~. =-~ , r-~. ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration -Approved _ Waiver of Code Requirement -Approved (Commissioner Feldhaus voting NO) ' Conditional Uae Permit No. 3357 -Granted for 9 years ';. (Commissioner Feldhaus voting NO) (y~.`~fJ~:r ii~c~Y~ Add the followina conditions: ~~. - 1. That this be only for installation of auto stereo, radio, alarm and telephone so it travels with the CUP in case they sell. 2. That if the CUP is to terminate at some time that the roll-up door be replaced with a normal store front. VOTE: 6-1 (Commissioner Feldhaus voted NO) :~ f~ ~. k• `~ i ~r k' 7. a. S ?i ~i :~ '1.~ I ~I Page 3 12/3/90 :c rTi~t ,/~1 2a• CEOA NEGATrvE DECLARATION 2b. WAIVER OF CODE REO[1IREMENT Approved 2c• CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 3359 READVERTISED APProved Granted in part OWNER: BILL TAORM.INA/Ai7AHEIM DISPOSAL, 2761 Whitestar Ave., T.naheim, CA 92806 AGENT: WILLIAM WINK/ANAHEIM DISPOSAL, 2761 Whitestar Ave., Anaheim, CA 92675 LOCATION: 2751-2781 E. White Star Ave. Property is approximately 1i.5 acres located on the west side of Blue Gum Street, approximately 37. feet north of the centerline of La Palma Ave. To permit the expansion of a. recycling/resource recovery transfer facility with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces, minimum landscaped area adjacent to the freeway, maximum fence height and required improvement of parking areas. Continued from the November 5, and November 19, 1990, Planning Commission meetings. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC90-271 -------------- _____________ -------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUM_MARy OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPO_ S_ ITION, 1 . OPPOSITION CONCERPIS: Neighbor to facility; referenced memo from Code Enforcement and stated it says there has been only 1 complaint this year; they have filed numerous complaints with the South Coast Air quality District; problems with dust generated by vehicle traffic; increase in volume of trucks make it worse; use to have a street sweeper and afoot patrol to pick up papers in the neighborhood; odor is a constant problem and nothing has been effective; grinding wood under a tent with no dust collector. PETITIOt7ER'S COMMENTS: Purpose of project is to enlarge an existing warehouse and recycling sorting facility on their property to accommodate the increase in recyling programs being implemented throughout the City; project is in conjunction with a new package that will be before Commission on 12/17/90 to move their truck parking and maintenance to another off-site facility to reduce traffic congestion and increase the availability of parking; the addition of this building will help to mitigate the dust problem and will provide a sight screen for travel on La Palma; they purchased a street sweeper about 90 days ago and it runs everyday; they have a 4-man foot patrol that goes from Kraemer Blvd. to Sunkist, Miraloma and then back around and is ongoing everyday. Page 4 12/3/90 ' ~ ' ; -,~ Attempted to reduce amount of trash to landfill through wood chippin,; ' this is a temporary setup and will be dealt with when this building is . complete, i.e., they will convert one of the other buildings that is currently a warehouse and install the wood operation with a bag house and full dust control; no hazardous materials and waste treatment will not change, but handled differently once it gets into the facility. COMMI_. SSiON COMMENTS: Asked staff about the Environmental Impact study; before construction starts would like to get approval from the South Coast Air Quality District for the plans that are going to take place; do not want this to create more of a problem. STAFF COMMENTS: Environmental staff looked at the initial study and the information that was provided; determined there would be no additional impacts from the facility, that basically there was a change in the way it was being handled rathez• than any increase; expanded initial study analysis to include not only this project but the proposed off-site truck parking area which they considered at a later date in the analysis and with that information staff. determined a negative declaration would be appropriate; overall concern that some of the site is below grade from the elevated streets and what method could applicant use to screen that. Alfred Yalda, Traffic Engineering, stated they had an extensive parking study for the entire site; they had trucks that are disabled and not moveable that they park on that site; they propose to remove all of the disabled trucks, and provide more area for the regular trucks and this will open up additional area for the employees to park; it will reduce the overall demand for parking and they will also relocate some of the repairs off-site. John Poole, Code Enforcement Manager, stated they have mitigated many problems that came up and does not see that this will be anything but a help to the overal]. picture. He stated recycling has caught on and they should be able to get things squared away. ACTION: CE_QA Negative Declaration - Approved Waiver of Code Requirement - Approved in part Grant Waivers A, B and D Deny Waiver C Remove 5-foot fence around the parking area Conditional Use Permit No. 3357 - Granted Condition this CUP on the approval of the CUP involving the moving of the trucks for off-site parking prior to issuance of a building permit for this project. Amend Condition No. 9 to allow for the metal fencing that currently exists on-site and put a fence along the freeway; the existing fence is currently 6-foot high, raise to 8 feet and keep the same type of solid screening. Nute: Caltrans gave them a permit to redo that. Pagge 5 i2/3/qo Ifs .. ,., ~ "', Add condition to have current wood chipping operations and the bagging facilities on their conveyor belts in place by June 1, 1991. There are 2 other stipulations: 1. Continue street sweeping operations daily. 2. Keep 9-man trash collection team that operates daily. Note: There are no p~-mits for the signs and one of the conditions of appro~._ is that they are to come back to the Commission with a Reports and Recommendation item with a signage program. VOTE: 6-0 (Commissioner Feldhaus declared a conflict) Page 6 12/3/90 ,, , 3a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION 3b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1215 .~*. OWNER: KENNEY GOLF ENTERPRISES INC., 1486 Enderby Way, Sunnyvale, CA 94087 LOCATION: 3200 Carpenter Ave. Property is approximately 5.89 acres located on the south side of Carpenter Ave., approximately 55-feet east of thr centerline of Shepard Street. To permit a 9,804 square-foot addition to an existir:g clubhouse (for an additional arcade and snack bar area). Continued from the November 19, 1990 Planning Commission meeting. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None (1 person spoke in favor representing Dominion Properties immediately adjacent to Camelot) PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Family owned business; propose to build a 9,800 sq. ft, addition; built a similar addition in 1984; on Saturday afternoons and Friday nights, it is very crowded and they need more space; after the addition they would have 300 parking spaces and that is more than adequate; currently use 75$ of their parking; have previously contacted P.D. and asked about hiring off-duty Police Officers and th:.~y were told they were not allowed to do that. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Suggest they use off-duty Police Officers if possible; concern expressed about using only one security guard; parking appeazs to be adequate, STAFF COMMENTS: Police Department testified to the amount of cruising in the area and that it has been cut down considerably; recently changed their security and they now have someone in a police type uniform; recommend that they use t:nis type of security out~it and not what they have had in the past where they wear a Camelot wind breaker; need a minimum of 2 security guards. ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration - Approved Conditions: Use Permit No. 1215 - (Motion required) Approved Recommend to ~.ty Council to change the recommendation on page 6 of item no. 4 to state that at least 2 uniformed security guards shall be resent in the parking lot and strike the word "private." VOTE• 7-0 Approved Page 7 12/3/90 '~• n 4a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLAR;ITION 4b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT 4c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3336 OWNER: NORWALK INV1'sSTMENTS, C/O STEPHEN WONG, 1020 n. BATAVIA ST., STE. 8,• ORANGE, CA 9266'7 AGENT: PEDRO GOMEZ, 536 S. ROSE ST., ANAHEIM, CA 92805 LOCATION: 536 South Rose Street. Property is approximately 0.6 acre located on the east side of Rose Street and approximately 530 feet south of the centerline of Santa Ana Street. To permit an automobile repair facility with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces. Continued from the November 5, 1990 Planning Commission meeting. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. -------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLAPINING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Property Manager stated he has made it clear to Mr. Gomez about the concern as to the outside; have addressed the conce:•n of stripping out in the front for the parking and have addressed some of the minor trash maintenance problems in the front; have taken several steps and stopped by prior to the meeting to look at the 4 properties and he thought it looked better. COMMISSION COMMENTS: What about oil and storage in the back that Code Enforcement shows in their report; does not sound like it is being handled properly; is back of property asphalt or dirt; should be all asphalt; it is property management's responsibility to take this back to the owner that it should be done; do have a Code requirement that the area must be paved; it is not just Mr. Gomez's activities that are causing these problems; the property management needs to get the message that the whole group of uses in that area needed t~ clean up their act and if that is not accomplished voluntarily then Code Enforcement will be out there; property manager can set an example and get the tenants to clean up and do their work inside; they are all there on CUPS and the management could find themselves with empty buildings; parking along Rose Str=et could be mitigated by having the owners and employees of the businesses park in the rear lots where the striped parking is and leave front areas for customer parkit;g; property manager to get owners and property managers together at a meeting and get the block cleaned up; anyone who does not cooperate in the clean up will be brought back before the Commission to look at their CUP. Continued to 2/11/90 Page 8 12/3/90 i ,.~ n STAFF COMMENTS: Code Enforcement officer stated the back rear lot was still dirt, there were 5 gallon buckets of oil being stored with discarded oil and there was oil seeping into the rear property; there was outside work being done; there did not seem to be room in the rear for additional parking and she only saw 2 marked parking spaces out in front; John Poole, Code Enforcement Manager stated it seems like there has been a continual stream of complaints; they have been out on each one of those properties on a routine basis; recently Code Enforcement did some sight screening because just to the east are residential apartment buildings so those people are directly affected as to what goes on; there is a continual problem with the tenants working outside performing a variety of work; at one time all that was paved and apparently over the years something ate up the pavement; before allowing any other uses, what is there should be cleaned up; there has been an overall disregard of cleaning up anything out there and these 4 properties have had more of a share of their problems than some of the others; each rear yard on plans has parking shown in it; Code Enforcement would be willing to send an officer to talk to the property managers and tell them what needs to be done; could get most of what needs to be done in 30 or 60 days then they could come back in and Commission could give Mr. Gomez his CUP and they would not administratively take any action against Mr. Gomez. ACTION: Continued to 2/11/90; Work with Code Enforcement; turn those in that do not cooperate and pull them in regarding the revocation of their CUPS. Paye 9 12/3/90 ~. 5a. 5b. CEOA NEGATTV~ nECLARATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3358 Continued to 12/17/90. OW.YER: MOB'2L OIL CORPORATION, 3800 W. Alameda, #2000, Burbank, CA 91505 AGENT: GREER & COMPANY, 2323 W. Lincoln Ave., #127, Anaheim, CA 92801 LOCATION: 1680 West Broadway Property is approximately 0.49 acre located at the southeast corner of Broadway and Euclid Street. To permit a convenience market within an existing service station. Continued from November 5, and November 19, 1990 Planning Commission meetings. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. Page 10 12/3/90 6a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION 6b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT 6d. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3362 OWNERS ANAHEIM-KOREAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, 1408 S.Euclid Street,. Anaheim, CA 92802 AGENT: HOPE UNIVERSITY-UNICO NATIONAL COLLEGE, P.O. BOX 4818, ANAHEIM, CA 92803 LOCATION: 1408 South Euclid Street Property is approximately 3 acres, located at the northeast corner of Buena Vista P.ve. and Euclid Street. To permit a private fine arts college for gifted persons with mental retardation, with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces, required setback for playground, maximum fence height and maximum structural height adjacent to single-family zoning. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC90-272 -------------------------------- FOLLOWTNG IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Mentally retarded students have been on the property for the past 3 years; property has been sold to the Anaheim Korean Presbyterian Church with the provision that they could remain for 5 years while they ra=se a building fund. and move elsewhere; use of property is not intense and the students do not drive. Speaker for the Church. Put up sign on Sundays not to park on the dirt lot; will look into it if it is a problem; do not know of any agreement with Loara High School to park on their lot; have tried to beautify area and have painted the shed and put on a new roof, but have no definite plans; shed currently used as a storage facility, however, can restructure it or tear it down; do not have any current plans regarding landscaping of southern portion of property, however, they are open to suggestions; feel that Hope University is a part of them and that they are doing community service by providing this facility to them and at the same :ime are sensitive to the neighborhood. Approved Approved Granted Page 11 12/3/90 r"1 %-, COMMISSION COMMENTS: There is no doubt that they have been good neighbors; there are several things aboue the property that are a problem; addressed problems relative to the property and not to Hope University; there is a wooden, hand painted sign on the southern portion that says "Church Parking" and wanted to know if they were using the dirt lot on Sundays for parking; sign should come down and there should not be any parking; is there an agreement with Loara High School to park on their lot; any plans for the lot; questioned plans for shed on southern portion of property; shed does not look good; concern about landscaping on the southern portion of the property; expressed concern about the dumpster that is sitting out in full view of everyoiae; City Code requires that it be enclosed in the trash enclosure; Hope University is a great asset to the church; is there a way they can approve the CUP without the conditions? STAFF CGt:.'*.ENTS: Mr. Hastings stated a lot of the conditions can be deleted, and the ones with the asterisk can be monitored by Code Enforcement; the only condition that should remain is condition no. 8; the conditions that pertain to improvements of the right-of-way would have to be deferred to Engineering and Traffic Engineering. ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration - approved Waiver of Code Requirement - Approved Conditional Use Permit No. 3362 - Granted (No time limit) (Delete conditions, 1,2, and 3). It was noted that the conditions left are up to the owner of the property. VOTE• 7-0 PagE~ 12 t2/3/9U ~ r-. 7a. CEOA MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved 7b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT Approved 7c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3363 Granted 3 yrs. OWNER: CANYON WEST AND VINEYARD MINISTRIES, 333 E. Cerritos Ave., CA 92805 AGENT: Phillip R. Schwartze, 27132 Paseo Espada Ste. 1222, San Juan CA 92675 LOCATION: 5300-5340 E. La Palma: Property is approximately 16.8 acres located approximately 141 feet on the west side of La Palma Ave. and approximately 141 feet west of the centerline of Brasher St. To permit a church facility with waivers of minimum number of parking spaces atld permitted hours of operation. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC90-273 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: The Anaheim City Code has a provision to allow churches in the industrial ares; request to move into an existing vacant office space that has approximately 200,000 square feet; request to initiate an amendment to Code to be heard at a later time to allow churches, under certain circumstances, that the City approve this use on a permanent basis; will invest approximately 20 million dollars in the acquisition of the property and in addition 2.5 million in renovation; this will be a complete rehabilitation of the facility and a purchase acquisition; will also construct a recording and T.V. studio and printing facility; discussion took place regarding the conditions; CUP applies to the 2 existing buildings and future expansion into the 2 easterly vacant lots would be appropriate for a later discussion; church would like to have a day school; it is not a strong request, but something the church is very interested in; would be looking at about 120 children, K-12; will be a total of 4,600 in the 3 services; no bingo. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Property to the west of driveway that shows vacant will not be used; would 2 vacant lots be picked up by Vineyard at a later date; Code says you can only get a CUP for a 3 yr. increment for a total of 9 yrs. and wanted to know what the plan was; great use of the property, however, faced with a letter that client wants to purchase the property and wondered why he would purchase it without any guarantees; if property is owned and a church wanted to build on it, with a CUP they could go into any zone; can they go under a permanent CUP because they are going to own the property; could be a requirement of the Code Amendment; questioned the proposed use that there will be a day school; was not in the staff report. Page 13 12/3/9 ~~ STAFF COMMENTS: Churches can go into any zone except for the Commercial Recreational area; CUP for Canyon Industrial Area is the only area in the City which the CUP is restricted to 3 yrs. and the intent was not to build churches, but to actually move into industrial buildings until such time as they are able to find a new location; there is no provision between ownership and someone who is leasing the building far 3 years; questioned perking study; if applicant does come back for other uses by way of Code Amendment it is important that they remember that the accumulated effect may bring him into more of a mitigated negative declaration or an EIR Alfred Yalda, Traffic Engineering, stated the site plans shows plenty of parking; if traffic increases there is plenty of room that they could add parking without making any changes; will restripe for full size cars; have one condition regarding alignment of their easterly driveway; i.f intensify use, they will ask them to realign the ingress and egress on Brasher Street; traffic signal study should be done and signal installed even though it would be offset about 140 feet. ACTION: CEOA Mitigated Negative Declaration - Approved (Add to mitigation some kind of chart that shows who is responsible and what the timings will be). Conditions 6 and 7 should be timed prior to final inspection of the property; the way the mitigation monitoring program is set up is that they will be incorporated into the conditions of approval; there is a condition requiring the applicant to meet whatever the requirements are for the cost of implementation. Waiver of Code Requirement - Approved Conditional Use Permit No. 3363 - Granted 1. Limit to 3 years with two 3 yr. renewals 2. Delete condition no. 6 3. Change condition no. 7 to show that a study shall be made prior to final inspection and that the easterly driveway will not have to be moved at this time. 4. Change condition no. 12 - exempt national holidays and add Good Friday; includes day care and school only on Sunday. In addition the following motion was made: Commissioner Messe offered at motion, seconded by Commissioner Hellyer and MOTION CARRIED, that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend that in a workshop session they discuss the initiation of a Code Amendment that would permit a permanent use of facilities for church ownership of land in the Canyon Industrial Area and any other requirements ~ that they deem proper; and to include the concept of a K-12 school associated with the church and to compare the traffic impacts of a church versus an office use on the same property. VOTE: 7-0 12/3g~~014 -~ I ^1 8a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION 8b. RECLASSIFICATION IQO. 90-91-18 So. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT 8d. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3364 OWNER: Dr. MYRON SIMON AND MR. STANLEY, P.O. Box 3182, Anaheim, CA 92803 AGENT: JOHN O. COTTON, 1408 Third Street Promenade, Third Floor, Santa Monica, CA 90401 LOCATION: 1334 West La Palma Ave. Property is approximately 0.72 acre located on the south aide of La Palma Ave. and 75 feet at the northerly terminus of Loara Street approximately 131 feet west of the centerline of Hermosa Drive. RS-7200 to RS-A-43,000. To construct a 55-unit deck type "affordable" senior citizen apartment building with waivers of minimum lot area and minimum site area per dwelling unit. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: 3 opposed and 1 in favor OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Not necessarily opposed to the type of project, but to the number of units; traffic impacts; density too intense; La Palma too busy for senior citizens. PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Tried to run as an old age home and then tried to sublease property and it burned down; has been vacant for 15 years; people have tried to dr.~p things on the property, etc. Went to feasibility study and came up wi:ii the need for senior citizen's housing which would be oriented towards a lower rental factor. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Project too dense; looking at managed growth; should not be zoned RS-A-43,000; too close to single-family residences; elevators situated too far away from the entrance; developer should not come in with something so out of line to see what Planning Commission will do for them; want to send a strong message to people who would bri~•:g in an overly dense plan in the hope of negotiating some additional units that the Commission would not ordinarily give and Commission is nit going to play that game; need to have a sensitivity to the neighbors; suggest they come back with a design for condominiums. ACTION: Continued to 2/11/91 to look at condominium possibilities. Continued to 2/11/91 Page 15 12/3/90 ~,,,. ~,, 9a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION 9b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3365 OWNER: STANTON MAY, M.D., 1570 E. Glenoak Blvd., Glendale, CA 91206 AGENT: GEORGE SADAGHIANA, 700 N. Harbor Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92805 LOCATION: 1808 North National Street. Property i.s approximately 0.43 acre located approximately 104 feet on the east side of National Street and approximately 180 feet north of the centerline of Liberty Ave. To retain 324 square-foot spray booth. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC90-274 --------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None ACT10N: CEQA Negative Declaration - Approved Conditional Use Permit No. 3365 - Granted VOTE• 7-0 Approved Granted t 2~3/ggo 16 _~ ,~ 10a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Continued ~ 1G'v. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT to 1/14/91 lOc. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3367 OWNER: WILLARD LEGG, 1433 East Lincoln Ave.; Anaheim, CA 92805 AGENT; JOHN DALLAH, 17380 Briardale Lane, Yorba Linda, CA 92686 LOCATION: 1433 East Lincoln Ave. Property is approximately 0.16 acre located on the north side of Lincoln Ave. and approximately 275 feet west of the centerline of Larch Street. To permit a real estate office in a residential structure with living quarters and Waivers of minimum number of parking spaces, maximum structural height and minimum interior site setback. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Buying a residential family residence that is zoned commercial; buying in a mixed zoning area; would utilize house for office and for living quarters for himself or his caretaker. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Code allows him to use as a business and living quarters for hii~~oelf, however, he cannot make the modifications such as signage; if zoned CL there would not be a problem; prefer the business owner living in ttie residence and would propose that they limit this to the business cwner in the suggested Code Amendment. STAFF COMMENTS: Is currently zoned CO which allows conversion of t..e house under conditional use permit to an office use. In the CL zone, you can have a caretaker's quarters in with a converted house to a commercial use, but in this particular zone there is a provision that does not allow for the mixture of uses. It is unclear as to whether that means within the same building or different uses within the same property. It would depend on Planning Commission's interpretation. Rezoning to CL would require a General Plan Amendment; currently this is zoned CO and it is part of the CO zone Code that says no combination of residential and commercial uses shall be permitted. Could look at a Code Amendment which would exempt cases where there is a conversion from a single-family home into an office use to clarify for future usage; need interpretation from the City Attorney's office; agendize this for the January 7, 1991 Work Session. Page 17 12/3/90 .. .r..~Ci 1..: \ ~1 The Planning Commission made the following request to the City Attorney's office: Planning Commission directs the City Attorney's office to determine if a single-family residence in a CO zone is eligible to apply for and receive _ a Home Occupation Registration and if not, recommending steps to tak: to allow the mixed use of commercial ar.~i residential in light of the fact the CO zone specifically states "no combination of residential and commercial uses shall be permited.^ ACTION: Continued to 1 •" " H ~ o e o n n c o ~ v, •• o ~ J w .. ~: 3 h 4 ii y t.: 4 (D a 3 0 X w u3r• N ~ E ~ rr O ? W 0 rr N r• ] w N rt o ~+ a s O m ~w o z m ro ~ M~ ~ ~ } ° w o cr ' " m ~ ~ '` r r ~ r r ~ o m ~ ° . n nnu o ~ m ~ w '•C N w ~ o ~ n 0 ~D M H ~ ~ 0 K ~ " ~ x ~ r r o rt xm a m z ' ° a ~ G r r x a m 5 a ~ . m h m ,c a p n ~ mar• m `Q m m r c ~ ~ ro o " M m n n 3 u N m o 3 N ~ B ~• ~ ro ! N 0 i rt ~ ~ m ° ° ro ~. ~ ° m a F m p rt n p r • e f. ° ~° ro . ~ aw a ~ ~ '' ro n w m ~ m a a w rr ~` i I i , s PAGE 18 ~; 12/3i 90 f {~ i ~;~: ~\ /~\ lla. CEOA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - CLASS 11 llb. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3369 Continued to- 12/17/90 OWNER: ANAHEIM LAND ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 450 Newport Center Drive, #304, Newport Beach, CA 92660 LOCATION: 2420 E. Katella Ave Property is approximately 13.9 acres and approximately 665 feet on the south aide of Katella Ave. and approximately 1,470 feet east of the centerline of State College Blvd. To permit two freestanding monument signs in the CO (Commercial Office) Zone. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PzI~3/9~ lw~~ ~~~ }~ . '~. ,--. 12a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved 12b. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14406 (Readvertised) Denied UWNER: DMP PARTNERSHIP, 1534 Victoria 'Aay, Placentia, CA 9267(1 AGENT: MASSOUD MONSHIZADEH, 1524 Victoria Way, Placentia, CA 92670 LOCATION: 1575 W. Katella Ave. Property is approximately 2.21 acres located on the north side of F:atella Ave. and approximately 314 feet east of the centerline of Carnelian Street. To establish a 40-unit, RM-2400 (Residential, Multiple-Family) zone condominium subdivision. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Approve a tract map which conforms to the site plan which has been approved by the City for this project; asking that condition no. 3 on page 5 be modified to prior to certificate of use of occupancy as it is almost impossible to get those things done to final map. This project was brought before Council in October with no recommendation and was brought back to the Planning Commission for some considerations. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Most developers meet the deadline for the CC&Rs prior to certificate of use of occupancy; there have been instances where they have granted this request and they once granted this to this petitioner under some very special circumstances. STAFF COMMENTS: Selma Mann, Deputy City Attorney, stated it is her understanding that the reason the CC&R requirement has been maintained at prior to final map approval, is because there is no adequate mechanism for the trigger at any later point; prior to the final map, it can be monitored by the Planning Department, but the Building Department avoarencly does not have a similar procedure set up. She further stated that the Anaheim City Code requires the Planning Commission to make the preliminary recommendation to the City Council. Greg Hastings, Zoning Division Manager, stated there is the problem if a building permit is issued without a tract map, because basically you are issuing a permit for apartments because there is no authority to subdivide the properties. Page 20 12/3/90 Melanie Adams, Public Wor)cs-Engineering, stated for clarification, the applicant is asking for a delay of the CC&Rs; she concurs with the Deputy • City Attorney that this is very difficult to track after final map approval; previously the cases where the CC&Rs have been delayed were master CC&Rs developed for some of the ranches and this was incorporated into their Development Agreement and Specific Plana and there was a mechanism to follow their projects; this project is very different and it would cause an added tracking problem. ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration - Approved Tentative Tract Map No. 14406 - Denied Denied on the basis that it is not physically suitable for the type of development). VOTE: 6-1 (Feldhaus voting NO) ^ Page 21 12/3/90 N xL 7e"_.~.I yV'.. .... .. . ~ ,,., 13a. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO 304 Continued ta' 13b. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 90-91-17 12/17/90 13c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3356 13d. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 90-02 OWNER: RAR ANAHEIM. L.P., FOUR EMBARCADERO CENTER STE 2600 San Francisco. CA 94111 LOCATION: 1750 South State Co11eg'e Boulevard• Property is approximately 11.?9 acres located at the northeast corner of State College Blvd. and Katella Ave. Petitioner requests certification of Environmental Impact Report. ML to CO To permit two, 200-foot high, 13-story office towers, (289,000 square foot each), one, 3-story, 134-room all-suites (full kitchen) hotel, a cocktail lounge within a 10,000 square foot restaurant, and 6,000 square feet of specialty service/retail uses including fast food, in conjunction with one 7-level parking structure and six freestanding signs with waiver of minimum numk~er of parking spaces. Petitioner requests approval of Development Agreement. RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. Page 22 12/3/90 ;~ r"\ ''A~ . - _. ... _... _.. mt7~ 14. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ?: ; A. PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT PERTAINING TO THE PROHIBITION ROTATING OR REVOLVING SIGNS - SIGNS - SECTION Approved 18.05.064.060 B. AMENDMENT TO ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 17.06 TO PROVIDE FOR THE CITY ENGINEER TO APPROVE OR DENY WAIVERS Approved OF ANY REQUIREMENTS OF THIS CHAPTER ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST ADJOURN ENT: Adjourn to work session on December 10, 1990, at 1:00 P.M. in the Planning Department conference room. s'- i '. ~: r i