Loading...
Minutes-PC 1991/01/14~[:' aid: ACTION AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE ANAFIEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, JANUARY 14, 1991 AT 10:00 A.M. PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING (PUBLIC TESTIMONY) 10:00 A.M. 1:30 P.M. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: BOUAS, BOYDSTUN, FELDHAUS HELLYER, HENNINGER, MESSE, PERAZA MINUTES APPROVED: May 21, 1990 PROCEDURE TO EXPEDITE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. The proponents in applications which are not contested will have five minutes to present their evidence. Additional time will be granted upon request if, in the opinion of the Commission, eurh additional time will ~ produce evidence important to the Commission's consideration. i J ... In contested applications, the proponents and opponent will each be given ten minutes to present his case unless additional time is requested and the complexity of the matter warrants. The Commission's considerations are not determined by the length of time a participant speaks, but rather by what he says. 3. Staff Reports are part of the evidence doemed received by the Commission in each hearing. Copies are available to the public prior to the meeting. 4. The Commission will withhold questions until the public hearing ie closed. 5. The Commission reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing if, in its opinion, the ends of fairness to all concerned will be served. 6. All documents are presented to the Planning Commission for review in connection with any hearing, including photographs or other acceptable visual representations of non-documentary evidence, shall be retained by tiie Commission for the public record and shall be available for public inspections 7. At the end of the scheduled hearings, members of. the public will be allowed to speak on items of interest which are within the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission, and or agenda items. Each speaker will be allotted a maximum of five (5) minutes to speak. -~ CA1O160E 01/14/91 3a',"~ 'Rr. `tf; e. i; -:Y;: ' "cr~._ ~v .~r. ;~. .^.= la. CEOA NEGATIVE DEOLARATIgN Continued to ~ ` lb. WAIVER OF CODE REOUZREMENT lc CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 3367 I 4-22-91 ) . . OWNER: WILLARD LEGG, 1433 East Lincoln 1v n., Anaheim, CA 92805 AGENT: JOHN DALLAH, 17380 Briardale sane, Yorba Linda, CA 92686 ~ ' LOCATION: 1433 Eaet Lincoln Ave. Property ie approximately 0.16 acre located on the north side of Lincoln Ave. and approximately 275 feet west of the centerline of Larch Street. To permit a real estate office in a residential structure with living quarters and Waivers of minimum number of parkiny spaces, maximum structural height and minimum interior site setback. Continued from the December 3, 1990, Planning Commission meeting. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO SE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None . ~. _., PETITIONER'S COMMENTo: Requested deletion of Condition No. 6 requiring 5-foot utility easement. Use could be handled with Home occupation Permit, but nc signs are allowed. Zf waiver for sign was granted, would be able to request Home Occupation Permit. Would live an property after house is remodeled. COMMISSION COMMENTS: With Home Occupation Permit, could not be ronted to anyone else. No mixed use on commercially zoned property, so could not live there. Suggested applicant moat with staff to determine all the implications of a Home Occupaction Permit, etc. ACTION: Continued to 4-22-91 ' i 01/14/91 ~,% Page 2 ;eRt . • r . ~;.: ~~.:, 2a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION ontinued to 2b. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 11780-REVISION !1 -11-91 OWNER: HORTIS ET AL, C/O Stefan Wambach, 1482 E. Lincoln Ave., Anaheim, CA 9280 LOCATION: Pzoperty is approximately 4.47 acres with a frontage of approximately 85 feet on the south aide of Rio Grande Drive and located approximately 306 feet east of the centerline of Quintana Drive. To re-establish an expired 7-lot (plus one lot for a private roadway) RS-HS-22,000 (SC) Zone, single-family residential subdivLeion. Continued from the December 17, 1990, Planning Commission meeting. FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLAt1NING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: 9 people present OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Grading, drainage, elope erosion and slippage, view obstruction and referred to previously recorded view easement; property values, and unstable Boil and felt all their homes would be endangered wh~an this is graded. Riding trail would be widened and one property owner was concerned about drainage pipes under his property; another neighbor waa concerned about a 28-foot high crib wall behind their property; one neighbor was concerned about drainage across their property. i~ETITIONER'S COMMENTSs Crib wall designed based on Boil configuration and would be professionally landscaped and would be an enhancement to the area to protect property values; when property ie developed, property values all ar~_ .d it are increased, plus these would be custom built homes; soil and elopes would be stablized and re better tt.an it ie right now. Tract approved in 1987 based on soils testa, and that is still valid in 1991. ( COMMISSION COMMENTS: Bouas - asked if they would be willing to grade all the property at the same times wanted to see landscape plans for crib walls.. Hellyer - drainage for Lote 6 and 7 appears to be towards existing residences, noted drainage can not be onto someone else's property `7+,~ (Applicant responded drainage would be into a central drainage system, '~ along the new street). Wanted to see if condition could be included in CC&Re informing buyers that views above would be intruded. Wanted geotechnical information on the pads. ~, 01/14/91 . Page 3 U Henninger - Not comfortable with grading and wanted more details and informations was not sure adequate building sites could be graded on these ~ 7 lots without additional crib walls, and felt Commission should have final ~ grading plane. Did not think existing view easement would help these neighbors; wanted more information on what Parke Departments wants; Meese - Agreed more information needed on grading; wanted to be assured Commission would have opportunity to review plane of what ie proposed in specific locations. 'i STAFF COMMENTS: Engineering - Drainage onto adjacent property would require agreement with property owner; gradirq plane would not be approved if adjacent owners do not agree to accept it; applicant is indicating drainage primarily to the private street and then along •the equestrian trail and then tie into the 24" storm drain. Drainage as designed now does not have adequate capacity to carry the flow; requested drainage information with regard to adjacent properties which have experienced slope elides; geotechnical repot required by code prior to issuance of grading permits grading and drainage reviewed by City Engineer; would be looking for substantial conformance with pad locations and pad elevations and all pads to be graded at the same time. Soils teats submitted were reviewed, but did not address elide areas. Requested owner to meet with property owners who experienced elide problems and to submit a updated drainage report and geotgechnical report. Planning - explained 18-foot equestrian trail is shown on plans before the Commission; however, Parke Department feels 9 feet along the westerly boundary ie sufficient, but 10 feet along Rim Court Drive. ~. ACTION: Continued to 2-11-91 in order for applicant to su`-it additional _ studies and information on drainage, grading, equestrian trails and landscape plane, including crib walla. VOTE: 7-0 `R•, '•:~ 3a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION A pproved ~ 3b. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 90-91-19 tREADVERTISEDI G ranted, ae ~ ~ Modified to ' RM-3000 OWNER: CITY INITIATED, 200 S. ANAHEIM BLVD., ANAHEIM, CA 92805 LOCATION: 2625 West Lincoln Ave. Property is approximately 1.04 acres on the north aide of Lincoln Avenue approximately 270 feet west of the centerline of Magnolia Avenue. RM-1200 to RM-2400 or less intense zone. Continue .'rom the December 17, 1990, Planning Commission meeting. RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION NO. PC 91-01 FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. I OPPOSITION: 1 person present in opposition 25 people present in favor of reclassification OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Loss of property value; access to property through Lincoln which is commercial, not economically conducive to low density ~ multiple-family development; would propose to develop 28 units. ~ _ PROPONENT'S COMMENTS: Owners of condominium unite adjacent to the north did not want apartments developed on this site due to existing traffic and high density in the area creating crime and safety oon.cerns, lose of privacy, increased exhaust fumes and additional costa to the City for Police and Code Enforcement. Felt apartments would decrease their property values. Have not heard from doveloper and have not assn a plan with access through their condo project, but willing to meet with developer; too many apartments on that street now causing overcrowding and overflow parking, lose of privacy, increased noise and congestion. Wanted to see rezoning to commercial and a commercial development, rather than apartments. Did not want existing large trees removed. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Boydstun - pointed out this downzoning was initiated by Planning Commission to reduce density. Suggeetod condominium project consistent with condo project (Carbon Creek) ``" adjacent to the north, with possible access thruug'h their project and with gin them being a part of their association. ' Henninger - explained this reclassification was naS: initiated by Commission ' because of general concern for the City but afCer owner of property ~ proposed apartments at RM-1200, then withdrawing that request and agreeing to meet with adjacent condo owners to wosk out some plan that wold compatible, and that was not done. This reclasei~ication ie to low-medium density, not low density and is a problem of lanGi use and trying to maintain the health, safety and welfare of the community. 01/14/91 Page 5 •I "~ ~i.. Melee - Felt it is unfortuante developer did not meet with neighboring homeowners' association and unfortunate homeowner's assn. not willing to Would consider irs h th ~ . e consider access for a condo project compatible wit to RM-2400 sinco they did not reach agreement. Would f ti i on ca ~ reclassif consider reclaee to RM-3000 if they reach agreement or CG. Peraza -support lower density, noted a lot of good people live in apartments and do not buy homes. ee rezoning to commercial or lowest poseibl.e t o e Feldhaue - would like residential density. Asked if developer had discussed with owner the possibility of condo project with access through adjacent condo to north. ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration Granted Reclassification to RM-3000 VOTE: 5-2 (Commissioners Bouas and Mesas voted no) to the north (wanted access agreement with adjacent property owners ndo for access their through existing condominium project so co project could be developed on Chia site.) pproved 4a. ^°OA NEGATIt~ DECLARATION ranted 4b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3368 OWNER: CATTELUS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, 3230 E. Imperial, X100, Brea, CA 92b21 AGENTS LAY ICHUN SY, 2500 E. Imperial Hwy., 1104, Hrea, CA 92621 LOCATION: Pro rt is a ro imatel 26 scree located at the southwest corner of La Palma Avenue and Tustin Avenue. To permit a 1,008 square foot doughnut shop. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC 91-02 FOLLOWING 1S A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None '~~, ACTION: Approved Negative Granted CUP { VOTE: 7-0 01/14/91 Page 6 U rP }t: ' ,, J i~iN. Sa. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 280 (Previously Certified) Sb. AMENDMENT NO 1 TO SANTA FE PACIFIC PLAZA SPECIFIC PLAN (SP68-31 5c. REVISED SITE PLAN OWNER: CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT, 3230 E. Imperial, #100, Brea, CA 92621 AGENT: PHILLIP R. SCHWARTZE, 27132-B PASEO ESPADA, STE. 1222, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 LOCATION: Prov~rty ie avvroximately 26 acres located at the southwest corner of La Palma Avenue and Tustin Avenue. To permit the addition of "warehouse and distribution facility in support of pernitted on-site office uses" and "indoor physical recreational facilities in support of permitted on-site office uses" ae accessory uses and structures for Development Area 1. RESOLUTION NO. PC 91-03 FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE P.'.ANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Storage area for the storage old files., etc.; and ~•. on-site, low-density, indoor physical recreation facility for the office uses, and will not generate traffic. Prime tenant would be using the facilities. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Questioned if recreation facility would be just for tenants of this complex; and noted there are a lot of reetroome; (Applicant responded would be tenants of office building and not hotel) Bouas - asked about the assembly area and whether that would be a place for assembly of products or where peopla would assemble; (Applicant responded he thought that area is where they would bring the materials to be stored, and did not think it was proposed as a meeting room and stated there would be nc bingo, church or meet.ings). Explained site is parcelized for financing purposes. ACTION: Approved Approved revised site plane. VOTE: 7-0 f.., 01/14/91 '~,~i Page 7 .~ ~F ~r; _,; .. ;x, ,~ ,;~~±. 6a. CATEGORICAL EXEMPT-CLASS 11 5b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3375 r~ i OWNEA: ANAHEIM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, 1111 W. La Palma Ave., Anaheim, CA 92803 AGENTx SIGN DESIGNERS, 322 S. San Gabriel Blvd., San Gabriel, CA 91776 LOCATIONS Prooerty is anvroximately 11.0 acres Socated at the ~Sorthweet corner of La Palma Avenue and West Street._ To permit two monument signs. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC 91-04 FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Explained will be removing the existing pole sign at the main entrance. ACTION: Granted \~. VOTE: 6-0 (Souse - conflict of interest) n- 01/14/91 ~~ Page B 7a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION 7b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT r„\ 7c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3377 OWNER: CENTRAL CHURCH OF CHRIST, 1590 W. Ball Rd., Anaheim, CA 92802 AGENT: DAVID E. LEWIS, Deacon, P.O. 1098, Westminster, CA 92683 LOCATION: Prooerty is aporoximately 1 76 acres on the south aide of Sall Road aporoximately 170 feet east of the centerline of Loara Street.. To permit 4,436 square feet of modular classrooms for pre-school and uay care with waiver of a) maximum structural height b) minimum number of parking spaces and c) setbacks for institutional uses. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC 91-05 FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None (1 interested person preeenY.) OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Concerned about location of children's playground and noise and asked if they would play on the parking lot. PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Explained playground will be located in the turfed area on the southt explained they do intend to have some hardecape play on the parking lot; children are only outside for recess and lunch break. Children ages from 2 to 5 years old; and would drive their little care on the par'.~ing lot. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Boydetun - requested trees be planted along the west wall. (Applicant agreed). Mesee - questioned hours of operation (Applicant agreed to 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.); suggested having some hardecape on the south aide in the turfed area, with a landscaped hedge, rather than having them play on the parking lot. (Applicant agreed to keep the children within that one area, with no play permitted on the parking Zot). STAFF COMMENTS: Code requires that playground area and parking lot area be set back and advertisement of waiver for the church parking allows them to e::croach into area which ie not normally allowed for a playground. ACTIONS Approved Negative Declaration Granted waivers Approved CUP, subject to location of playground being limited to south aide, and with a landscape hedge planted; and hours of operation being limited to 6:30 a.m.to 6:30 p.m. VOTE: 7-0 1~ 01/14/91 Page 9 pproved ~,`•i. 8a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION 8b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3081 (READVERTISEDI ~~ OWNER: HXUNG HWAN PARK, 2712 Wyckersham Place, Fullerton, CA 92633 AGENTt• KING DELIGHT INC.,12692 Garden Grove Blvd., Garden Grove, CA 92643 ALAIN HALLY AS'.OCIATES, 511 W. Glenoaks Hlvd., Ste. 334, Glendale, CA 91202 LOCATIONS Property ie approximately 0.57 acre located at the northeast corner of Kat~tla Avenue and Bayless Street. An amendment to conditions of approval pertaining to hours of operation for a 5,184 square foot restaurant located in a 7,160 square foot, 2-unit (previously 6 unit) commercial retail center. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. ACTION: Withdrawn by applicant. ~., 01/14/91 ~~ Page 10 i~ t_. ,,~~~ ~~: 9, REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ~~ A. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 13716 - REVIEW OF LANDSCAPE PLANS Hill Williams, applicant, requests approval of landscape plans on property located on the east aide of Fairmont Boulevard, approximately 1,120 feat southeast of tha centerline of Santa Ana Canyon Road. B. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-51 - Nunc pro tunc resolution to correct legal description contained in Resolution No. PC90-105 granted in connection with Reclassification No. 89-90-51. Property located on the west aide of Magnolia Avenue and south Bide of Yale. RESOLUTION N0. PC 51-06 C. CONDI IONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3352 - Nunc pro tnnc resolution to amend legal description contained in Resolution No. PC 90-259. Property is located at 324 S. Brookhuret Street. RESOLUTION NO. PC 91-07 D. CONDITIONAL USE PERu[T NO. 3204 - REQUEST FOR A RETROACTIVE EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - Greg Hammill, ayent, requests approval for a one-year extension of time. Property located at 101 Chaparral Court. E. VARIANCE NO 3527 - REOUEST 'OR A RETROACTIVE EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - Gerald R. Buehore, owner, requests a retroactive approval for a one-year extension of time. Property located at 381 South Henning Way. g, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 2269 - REOUEST FOR REVIEW AND DETERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS. - Paul Norris, Vice President of LA Fitness Center, requests review and approval of revised Plana to permit a hair salon within a previously approved physical fitness center. Property located at 2560 E. Katella Ave. G. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-24 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT No. 3210 - Request for a retroactive time extension to comply with conditions of approval. Property located at 1176 West Katella Ave. (Space Age Lodge). ~vvu, . to ivy tad on to pre- graffiti Approved ontinued to 1-28-91, in order for applicant to be present 10. ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST NONE 01/14/91 ~`J Page 11 ~~: ~'~'~ S _ ~ ti k~. ~. ~ ~ ~. ry l1v F' i- ~1 N6~~' ~.5~~~ i~ '~~M~~ Y{LtiyN;~ ~. Cy ~~ Y~: ~ . _ h~~~ i~~ 4. 11. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION AS REQUESTED BY THE PLANNING__ ~••~ COMMISSION: r, ') a. Ceneiderat±on of Code Amendment to clarify mixed-use (commercial./residantial) in the CO-Zone. b. Consideration of Code Amendment allowing Home Occupation Activity in single-family residences in non-residential zones. ADJOURNMENT• Adjourned to 2-4-91, 3:00 ,Work Seeeion. Adjourned at 4x40 p.m. i 01/14/91 Page 12 I I