Minutes-PC 1992/06/15 (2)~, ACTION AGENDA
MEETING OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, JUNE 15, 1992 AT 10:00 A.M.
PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING
(PUBLIC TESTIMONY)
10:00 A.M. 1:30 P.M.
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: BOUAS, BRISTOL, HELLYER,
HENNINGER, MESSE, PERAZA, ZEMEL
PROCEDURE TO EXPEDITE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. The proponents in applications which are not contested will have five minutes to
present their evidence. Additional time will be granted upon request if, in the
opinion of the Commission, such additional time will produce evidence important
to the Commission's consideration.
2. in contested applications, the proponents and opponent will each be given ten
minutes to present his case unless additional time is requested and the
complexity of the matter warrants. The Commission's considerations are not
determined by the length of time a participant speaks, but rather k;y what he
says.
3. Staff Reports are part of the evidence deemed received by the Commission in
each hearing. Copies are available to the public prior to the meeting.
4. The Comrission will withhold questions until the public hearing is closed.
5. The Commission reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing 'rf, in its opinion,
the ends of fairness to all concerned will be served.
6. Ali documents are presented to the Planning Commission for review in
connection with any hearing, including photographs or other acceptable visual
representations of non-documentary evidence, shall be retained by the
Commission for the public record and shall be available for public inspections.
7. At the end of the scheduled hearings, members of the public will be allowed to
speak on items of interest which are within the jurisdiction of the Planning
Commission, and/or agenda tams. Each speaker will be allotted a maximum of
five (5) minutes to speak.
~,~'920615.WP
1a. CEOA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION-CLASS 21 Continued
1 b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3228 (READVERTISED) to 7/27/92
INITIATED BY: CITY OF ANAHEIM, 200 S. Anaheim Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92803
OWNER; WOODCREST DEVELOPMENT, 17911 Mkchell Avenue, Irvine, CA
92714
LOCATION: ProOQrtv is an~roximately 3.9 acres located at the northeast comer
of Weir Canyon Road and Canyon Vista Drive.
Pursuant to Cade Section 18.03.091 the Planning Commission has inkiated a public
hearing in order to consider termination or modification of Condkionai Use Perrnk
No. 3228 that permks gasdine sales, auto repair, a car wash, a cornenience market
and a 10-unk, 0,700 square-foot, commercial retail center.
Continued from the May 16, 1992, Planning Commission meeting.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO.
OPPOSITION: None
ACTION: Continued to 7/27/92
VOTE: 6-0
(Henninger abstained)
06/15/92
~' Page 2
~..,
2a. E A .' ED GATiVE DECLARATION Continued
2b. RE LA IFICATION NO.91-92-20 to 7-13-92
2c. VARIAN E N 41
2d. TENTATVE TRACT MAP N0. 14641
2e. $PECIAIEN TREE REMOVAL PERMIT N0.92-02
OWNER: M.Y. PELANCONI ESTATE, C/0 BERNARDO M. YORBA, EXECUTOR, 300
S. Harbor Blvd., Ste. 912, Anaheim, CA 92805
AGENT: MOI9GAN DEVELOPMENT INC., Attn: Max Morgan, Preskient, 20341
Levine Avenue, Ste. D~, Santa Ana HelgMs, CA 92707
LOCATION: ';~0 East Santa Ana Canvon Road. Property is approximately 12.38 acres
located on the south skis of Santa Ana Canyon Road and also having
frontage on the north skis of Avenkia Margarita and approximately 1,211
feet east of the centerline of Royal Oak Road.
To reclassHy from the RS-A~3000 (SC) to RS•5000 (SC) Zone.
WaNer of required lot frontage and required location and odentatlon of buildings
To establish a 40-lot RS-5000 (SC) and RS-A-43,000 (SC) single-family resklentiai
subdivision (including the construction of 38 single-family resklences).
To remove 51 specimen trees.
Continued from the May 4, and May 18, 1992 Planning Commission meeting.
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0.
VARIANCE RESOLUTION NO.
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION.
OPPOSITION: 17 people present
2 petitions were submitted In opposRion and 7 letters were received
FAVOR: 6 people present in favor
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Traffic and entrance/exit on Avenkla Margarita (dangerous due to grade and curve);
cannot handle additional traffic, emergency vehicle access, density, safety, property value could decrease;
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Cannot design houses similar to those in the area due to property values; pad sizes
are larger; suggested change would mean a public street, which would probably take 12 feet; people want gated
community; with RS-7200 development, some lots would be much larger; noting there are 45-foot wkJe tots in
other tracts In that area; average lot sizes now are 8375 square feet;
06/15/92
Page 3
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
~~
Henninger - a. Concerned about the length of crib wall (Applicant explained it Is 230 feet long and that they wifl
plant something to grow ever ft and paint with anti-graffiti paint);
b. Felt plan does not seem to fit and seems to be an island of high density; RS-HS-10,000 on two
borders and RS-7200 on one border;
c. suggested that Suncrest oe extended further easK as a cui de sac to the edge of the remaining
Yorba property and developed at RS-HS-10,000 Zoning, and then running the other cui de sec out
of AvenkJa Margarita and developed at RS-7200 with public roads, eliminating retaining walls,
making wkJer lots with natural slopes between the lots, etc.;
d. asked staff for traffic analysis of ex(sting traffic condftions,and stop sign possibilities on Avenkla
Margarita.
Hellyer - a. Asked the net yield difference between RS-5000 and RS-7200;
b. agreed market does not support large lot homes and thought this project would work;
c. suggested action today with developer agreeing to a condition that lots would be minimum size of
7200 square feet.
Zemel - a. Concerned about density and traffic problem.
Bristol - a. Asked for the applicant's comments regarding extending Suncrest cui dt. sac and limiting the traffic
Impact and leaving the other streei pretty much the same; noting wfth the proposed change, the
people on Suncrest would not get any more than Just those 8 to 15 units; (applicant explained those
people right now have 63 homes going out one entrance) (rhe owner explained taking the cui de sac
up to the mkldle of that project would reduce the s(ze of those lots; noting most lots are 150 feet
deep wh(ch provkles large backyard, and nice skleyard and a 7200-square foot lot would gNe a nice
frontago, but they would have 10-foot backyard; that all the lots onto the Yorba site are all view lots)
Masse - a. Though an RS-7200 development with waivers for the lot frontage and 0-lot line would b9 acceptable
because these are large lots.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Engineering - In general, Engineering recommends cui de sacs be no more than 700 to 1000 feet long, but in this
case aril with the specific nature of the traffic flow, Public Works would not be opposed to the
suggestion that the cui de sac be brought to the current Yorba estate and they would not be opposed
to Suncrest being the only access Into this project.
Trefflc - fellow Caltrens Traffic Manual to determine ff stop signs are warranted
Planning - Intent of the general plan in Planning Area B is to minimize grading and preserve as much open area
as possible; the goal is the Gustering concept as well as substftutlon of Implementation zones within
the same reskJential category and it is within the Planning Commission's discretion whether they feel
this meets that goal; that the density is within the limits of the General Plan and the Issue is
implementation; that the RS-7200 Zone does not allow 0-lot line at sfdeyard setbacks and the minimum
of 5 feet would have to be retained; and the RS-7200 Zone has a minimum lot width requirement of 70
fe'~t; 3 lots are toss than 7200 square feet, and ff the property went to the RS-7200 Zone, the biggest
irt~pact would be lot wklth. (Henninger felt it would be a substantial difference in yield because of the
lot wkith requirements.)
ACTION: Continued to 7-13-92, at request of applicant in order to submit revised plans for RS-7200 development,
minimum lot wklth of 70 feet, 7200 sq. ft. lot sizes and 0-lot line configuration, wfth Suncrest cui de sac extended to
the east.
VOTE: 7-0
06/15/92
Page 4
3a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION i Approved
3b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0.328 I Approved
INITIATED BY: The Cky of Anaheim, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard., Anaheim, CA
92805
An amendment to the Housing Element of the City of Anaheim General Plan
incorporating an analysis and programs to preserve assisted housing at risk of
cor>verting to nohow-income uses per SB 1019.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION N0. P -7
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL
MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration
Approved General Plan Amendment No. 328
VOTE: 6-0 (Peraza absent)
06/15/92
~~/ Page 5
4a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION(READVERTISED)
4b. RECLASSIFICATION N0.91-92-13(READVERTISED)
4c. WAIVER OF COU NCIL POLICY N0. 543(READVERTISED)
4d. WAIVER OF COD E REOUIREMENT(READVERTISED)
4e. CONDITIONAL U SE PERMIT N0. 3494(READVERTISED)
4f. TENTATIVE TRA CT MAP N0. 14611(READVERTISED)
OWNERS: NEWPORT PACIFIC REALTY & INVESTMENT, 4400 MacArthur
Boulevard, Ste. 900, Newport Beach, CA 92660
LOCATION: 2861-2863 West Uncoln Avenue (Bel Air Manors. Property is
approximately 1.8 acres located on the north skis of Lincoln Avenue
and approximately 300 feet east of the centerline of Bel Air Street.
Reclassffy from RM-1200 to RM-2400 Zone.
To permk the canverslon of an existing 65-unk 'deck-type' apartment complex to a
65-unk, 'affordable", "deck-type', cotldominium complex wkh waNer of minimum
bullding she area per dwelling unk and required elevators.
To establish a 1-lot, 65-unk, RM-2400, air-space, condominium subdivision.
Continued from the March 23, and May 18, 1992 Planning Commission meetings.
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
Continued to
&29-92
6-0
Peraza absent
At request of
applicant to have
full Commission
presets.
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL
h,INUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS:
a. Mortgage will be at or below the monthly rate they are currently paying for rent;
b. some tenants appear to be prime candkJates to purchase a unk and would deflnkely qualky;
c. current rental rates are between $725 and $750 per month, and normal rates in that area are $850 to $875 per
month;
d. are offering owner financing for current tenants who do not have credk (7 at very low Income level);
e. current tenants want to keep existing gate;
f. dki not want blanket relocation fee of $1500 per tenant imposed but wanted to relocate the tenants and pay
moving expenses on a case by case bass; and would refund securky deposk of $400;
g. requirement of their financing will be that 70% of the project has to be owner-occupied and k cannot be an
investor dominated project and that would be a condkion of CC&Rs.
h. 52% of project would be under affordable housing contrd
06/15/92
Page 6
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
r°"`Henninger -requested addklonal Intercom system so guests could call owner arxf remote abllky for ewner to open
gate to parking structure for guests; concerned about mntal assistance for tenants who move and suggested the
developer agree to provkfe one month's rent for tenants to relocate before they move; coneemed about long-term
Investors purchasing unks and then renting them out.
Henninger & Bouas • concerned would set precedent
Masse & Bristd -felt RM-1200 is too dense for ownersh.~p unks
2emel -gives opportunity for home ownership, but would not allow k if was not already constructed.
Hellyer -Ownership unks better than rentals; helps to stinwlate economy wkh first buyer in and build equky and then
move up. Felt this is opportunty for private sector to Increase ownership stock, willing to take the risk, dkf not feel k
is setting precedent because each case Is reviewed Indivklually, opportunty to provkio ownership unks and k is a
good blend.
Masse: asked about 15-gallon trees noted on plans as gkts (Developer explained trees not taken care when placed
on a deck In a pot; ano fek making them gkts would give owner inventive to water, etc.)
STAFF COMMENTS:
Housing -
a. felt RM-2400 (s satisfactory density for ownership unks because k offers more open space, more
amenkies and more enhancements;
b. concerned about long-term Investors renting the unks;
c. 80% of current tenants are in the very low or low Income bracket, and they are concerned about
displacement and there are other requirements to qualify for purchase of unk, i.e., credk rating and
the developer has not offered any assistance to help curcent tenants qualify;
d. concerned about conceptual design phase and not having construction drawings and did not how
they are going to Implement some of the changes, I.e. drainage of planter boxes, second story
balconies, etc. If approved, would want a condklon requiring that any s(gnfFlcant dkferences ftom
the conceptual drawings to the final construction drawings, would come back to Planning
Commission
Traiflc: -
a. Gate was not approved by the Traffic Engineering Department.
Attomey:-
a. Owner-occupied requirement could be included in CC&Rs but enforcement would be through the
Homeowner's Association.
ACTION: Developer requested two-week continuance In osier to have full Commission present.
Continued to the meeting of June 29, 1992.
Developer agreed to provkle a written proposal of the kerns stipulated to here today -rental relocation
assistance, temporary housing, and assistance to curcent tenants Qow and very low Income) purchasers
VOTE: fro (Peraza absent)
06/15/92
Page 7
5a. CEDA NEGATIVE DECLARATION APPr~~
5b. RECLASSIFICATION N0.91-92-18 Granted
5c. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT Apprd. In part
5d. (`~NDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3517 Granted, in part
5e. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 14672 Approved
(Waivers A & C
OWNERS: WILLIAM SHEA, C/0 Paul Kott, (Steve & Jui Ching) 504 N. State Cdlege denied)
Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92806
AGENT: ANDREW HOMES, 4400 MacArthur Blvd., #900, Newport Beach, CA
92660
LOCATION: 842 South Knott Street. Property is approximately 1.08 acres
located on the east sloe of Knott Avenue and approximately 350
feet south of the centerline of Rome Avenue.
To reclassify ftom RS-A-43,000 to RM-2400.
To permft a 19-unft condominium complex.
a. maximum structural height (denied)
b. minimum landscaped setback adjacent to single-family residential zones.
(approved, In part)
c. maximum she coverage (denied)
d. prh~ate street Improvement (approved in part for 28 foot wide private
street, including 4 foot wkie sidewalk on one skis)
To establish a 1-lot, 19-unft, RM-2400, air-space, condominium subdivision.
Continued ftom the March 23, April 20 and May 18, 1992 Planning Commission
meetings.
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. P 2-71
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. P 2-7
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL
MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 11 people presets
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Density, multiple-family units in their single-family neighborhood, would set precedent
additional traiflc on already busy street, over population with 2184 muRiple family units between Ba~ with this o ect
Knott, will change kientfty of area; concerned about future development of adjacent L-shaped pa P 1
setting a precedent. Feit single-family homes could be built on this sfte profitably. Suggested changing the General
Plan to show single-family residential so future potenti2l developers will know this is asingle-family area.
Devetoprtient of subject property would create asemi-enclosed L-shaped parcel wkh less visibility, more transients,
more gang actNfty, graffiti, etc.
06/15/92
-- Page 8
.,, _ _
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Improving vacant property which has history of Code vitiations, eliminated waivers by
(~ eliminating one unit, were unsuccessful (n purchasing L-shaped parcel. Fett th(s conforms to General Plan
designation; dkl not conskter single-family on this sfte because of the location on Knott aril because of the traffic;
1 /2 the density of standard apartments which is more reasonable and would buffer single-famtly from Knott. L-
shaped parcel is zoned RS-A~3,000 aril General Plan designation is low-medium resklernlal and owner would have
to come before Commission to develop apartments or commercial or any use other than reskJential/agricultural.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Masse -developer did everything requested, except purchase L-shaped parcel.
STAFF COMMENTS: Engineering - If approved, this would be narrowest private street approved for condo protect
and that K is 25 feet wkle and others have been 28 feet wkle which is narrower than the standard. At last hearing, it
was 28 feet wkie, but has been reconflgured. (Developer erplained pavement is 21 feet wkle, with a 4foot walkway
and the 5 feet was transferral to the rear.)
ACTION: Approved Negative Deuaration
Granted Redassiflcatio,~
Denied WaNers a and c
Approval Waiver B, in part -Move bu:idings 3 feet loser to south property line, eliminating 3 feet from
'A' plan unks, provkling a 17-foot wkie setback; and apprcved Waiver D in part requiring a 28-foot wkle
private street (~v!tk 4-foot wide walkway on one skis)
Granted conditional use permft
Approved Tentative Tract Map
VOTE: 6-0 (Peraza absent)
08/15/92
Page 9
6a. rEOA MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I Continued to
6b. RECLASSIFICATION N0.91-92-19 6.29.92
OWNER: THE FLUOR FAMILY TRUST, 4521 Perham Road, Corona Del Mar, Discuss at
CA 92625 Work Session
at 9:0o a.m.
AGENT: CECIL C. WRIGHT, 265 S. Anita Drive, Ste. 205, Orange, CA 92668
LOCATION: ts~0-1?f!2 A!~to Center DrNe. Property is approximately 7.98 acres
located at the southwest comer of Auto Center Drive (formerly Taft
Avenue) and Sanderson Avenue.
To reclassify from the ML to CL Zone and to construct a 2-story, 50,000 square
foot, medical office building.
Continued from the May 4 and May 18, 1992, Planning Commission meetings.
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION NO.
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL
MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 1 person present
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Concerned about zone change because area was previously designated for automobile
dealerships which is large revenue generator for Cfty, sbt auto dealerships closed in Last 3 years, this property would
allow 3 or 4 more dealers, but approval of rezaning would kill the auto center
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Explained they tried unsuccessfully to get an automobile dealership for this srie; that
the property Just to he south (Phoenix Gub) was rezoned and has restrictive covenant prohibriing automobile
dealerships; latter from Criy Manager indicating City would support both industrial and commercial zoning, although
he could not guarantee zone change, but that was an Indication that the Clty would not Impose a more restrictNe
use on ri; that CC&rs were approved by the Criy Council and they ~:~ amend the C&Rs and allowed unlimried
commercial usage on this sfte as well as the Phoenbc Gub. Dkf not want to continue the matter because ft would be
economic loss to property owner.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Felt they needed more background information about this site.
Masse -agreed the Intent was always to go forward wrih an automobile center.
Henninger -suggested an overlay zone to reserve the land for automobile uses.
STAFF COMMENTS: Redevelopment - Concerned because the request for reclassification is consistent wrih City's
General Plan; objectNe was to reserve the land for auto uses and second best opportunity is to preserve the
remainder of the sfte for auto uses.
ACTION: Continued to meeting of June 29, 1992.
Will be discussed at 9:00 work session on that date.
VOTE: 6-0 (Peraza absent)
06/15/92
Page 10
7a. CEQA MITIGATED NEGAZVE DECLARATION Previously approved Approved
7b. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 14697 Approved
OWNER: JEROME MARKS TRUST, 1080 Pad: Newport, Newport Beach, CA
52660
AGENT: DAVID T. Mac ARTHUR, P.E., 831 S. Lantana, Brea, CA 92821
LOCATION: 2144 West Uncdn Avenue. Property is approximately 6.47 acres
located on the south side of Uncdn Avenue and approximately 102
feet west of the centerline of Empire Street.
Petkloner requests approval of tentatNe tract map to establish a 1-lot, 108-unk, alr
space, RM-2400 condominium subdivision.
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIO!J. NOT TO 8E CONSIDERED OFFICIAL
MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
STAFF COMMENTS: Attorney -Noted letter was received from Anaheim Cky Scholl District, and does express
~- concerns regarding cumulatNe Impact; however, Cky is Iimked to the speckic taciikies and the speckic fees.
ACTION: Approved
VOTE: 6-0 (Pereza absent)
06/15/92
Page 11
8a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved
8b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3499 Granted
OWNER: BRADMORE REALTY, LTD., 721 Santa Iwonica Boulevard, Sarda
Monica, CA 90401
AGENT: VAIL SPECK ASSOCIATES, 4 Executive Circle, #150, Irvine, CA
92714
LOCATION: 270 East Palais Road. Property is approximately 4.69 acres located on the
south side of Palais Road and approximately 710 feet east of the centerline
of Anaheim Boulevard.
To permft an auto leasing faciifty with 16,000-square feet of auto preparation and
outdoor storage of 144 vehicles.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. P 2-7
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL
MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
~- ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration
Granted CUP 3499
VOTE: 6-0 (Peraza absent)
~~, 06/15/92
Page 12
cEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Continued to
9a. 6.29.92
9b. WAI~KR OF C DE REQUIREMENT
9c. c`7NDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.350_0
OWNER: C. DARLE HALE REVOCABLE TRUST, 3910 E. Coronado Street,
Unft B, Anaheim, CA 92807
AGENT: DARLE HALE, 3910 E. Coronado Street, Unic B, Anaheim, CA
92807
LOCATION: ;^^~ F ~ ° Palma Avenue. Property is approximately 0.95 acre
located at the northeast comer of La Palma Avenue and Van Buren
Street.
To pemtit an Industrially related office building (including training seminars) wkh
waiver of minimum numter of parking spaces.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0.
06/15/92
~_ , Page 13
10a. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 300 READVERTISED Approved
tOb. SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01 READVERTISED Approved
OWNER: CHEVRON U.S.A. Inc., Post Office Box 2833, La Habra, CA 90632-
2833
AGENT: GREER ENGINEERING, 2050 S. Santa Cnu, Suke 2100, Anaheim,
CA 92805
LOCATION: Anaheim Hills FestNal Center. Property is approximately 85 acres
located at the southwest comer of Sancta Ana Canyon Road and
Roosevelt Road.
Petkloner requests a review of plans pursuant to Code Section 18.74.030.030(a) to
determine whether the proposed location of the ground monument signs for the
previously approved service station is in substantial conformance wkh Specklc Plan
No. 90-01 (fhe FestNal).
RESOLUTION NO. P 2-74
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL
MINUTES.
' OPPOSITION: 1 person present, representing 3 homeowners associations '.
OPPOSITION CONCERNtt: Set a precedent and other businesses in center will want IndNklual signs, and noted
other requests have been denied; and that appearance does not blend wkh surcounding area; did not feel k is
necessary; noted the theater marquee sign on the southwestedy comer.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Requesting relocation of sign closer to Santa Ana Canyon Road due to dkference of
grade from Santa Ana Canyon Road aril elevation of property; would be harmonious wkh theme of the center;
proposed location on slopes Integrates k into the landscaping; needed because gasdine prices do fluctuate; access
to she is restrictive.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Cdors are Chevron's national actors; two of six signs are low identiflcatlon signs
ACTION: Approved
VOTE: 6-0 (Peraza absent)
06/1S/92
Page 14
11a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Previously Approved) I Approved
11b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.34 (READVERTISED) Granted for
2 years
OWNER: ANDRE1h 'f. LUI, 500 North Brookhurst Street, Anaheim, CA 92701
LOCATION: 500 North Brookhurst Street. Property is approximately 1.2 acres
located at the northeast comer of Alameda Avenue and Brookhurst
Street.
To amend or delete condftions of approval pertaining to the time Iimftation and off-sfte
parking agreement for apreviously-approved public riance hall.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. P 2-7'
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL
MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
ACTION: Granted for 2 years, wfth fdlowing condftions added:
(1) That a landscape and Irtigatlon plan be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department for the
replanting and permanent maintenance of the 3-foot wide landscaped strip between the parking lot area
and the public rights-of-way along Brookhurst Street and Valley ~~~eet. Saki plan shall be submitted to
the Planning Department wfthin thirty (30) days from this resdutlon and the landscaping shall be
Installed wfthin sixty (60) days from the date of this resdution.
(2) That the broken and/or missing doors servicing the trash enclosure be repaired wfthin ninety (90) days
from date of this Planning Commission resdution.
(3) That the parking lot area be restriped wfthin ninety (90) days from the date of this Planning Commission
resdution in accordance wfth the plans and specifications on file In the Planning Department for
Condftional Use Permft No. 3421 marked Exhibft No. 1.
VOTE: 6-0 (Peraza absent)
06/15/92
Page 15
12. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3333 -FINAL SITE PLAN REVIEW OF ROOF Approved
MOUNTED EQUIPMENT. SIGNAGE PLANS AND EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND 6-0
MATERIALS FOR APREVIOUSLY-APPROVED SERVICE STATION/CAR WASH (Peraza absent)
FACILITY: Greer Engineering requests for final sfte plan review of roof mounted
equipment, signage plans and exterior elevations and materials for apreviously-
approved service station/car wash facility. Property is located approximately 85
acres on the south skle of Santa Ana Canyon Road west of Weir Canyon Road.
B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3372 -REQUEST FOR A RETROACTIVE Approved
EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMFL~ WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND 5-0
REQUEST FOR SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE REVIEW: Richard Winn (Anaheim (Peraza absent)
Disposal, Inc.) requests aone-year retroactive extension of time to comply wfth (Masse-conflict)
condftlons of approval for Condtional Use Permit No. 3372 (to pennft truck parking
wfth maintenance and fueling wfth waiver of minimum front yard setback) which
expired on December 17, 1991 and if approved, to expire December t7, 1992.
Property Is located at 1231-1235 North Blue Gum Street.
C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3359 -REQUEST FOR A RETROACTIVE Approved
EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND 5-0
REQUEST FOR SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE REVIEW: Richard Winn (Anaheim (Masse -conflict)
Disposal, Inc.) requests a ons-year retroactNe extension of time to comply wfth (Peraza absent)
condftions of approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 3359 (to permit the expansion
of a recycling/resource recovery transfer facility wfth waiver of minimum number of
parking spaces) which expired on December 3, 1991 and if approved, to expire
December 3, 1992. Property is located at 2751-2781 Whfte Star Avenue.
D. c'nNDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1142 -REQUEST FOR TERMINATION: Richard
Winn (Anaheim Disposal, Inc.) requests termination of Condtional Use Permft No. Approved
1142 (to permit the expansion of an existing truck service station and storage yard 5-0
Including the future development of a restaurant). Property is located at 1231-1235 (Masse -conflict)
North Blue Gum Street. (Peraza absent)
TERMINATION RESOLUTION N0. PC92-76
E. REQUEST TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE MOST RECENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEYII
AND MAKE CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH CONSOLIDATED VOLUME Approved
TRANSPORTERS' REQUEST FOR A REVISED STATE SOLID WASTE FACILITIES, 5-0
PERMIT. (Masse -conflict)
(Peraza absent)
F. r•.nNDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3404 -REQUEST FOR A RETROACTIVE
EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Myrle Approved
Hdloway (Rodeffer Investments) requests cone-year retroactive extension of time to 6-0
comply with condftlons of approval for Condtional Use Permft No. 3404 (to permit (Peraza absent)
expansion of a commercial retail center to include auto repair, drive-through
restaurant and self storage facility) which expired on April 22, 1992 and if approved,
to expire on April 22, 1993. Property Is located at 919.959 S. Knott Avenue.
06/15/92
Page 16
G +rryrreTnic Toerr MAP NO 14353 - REQUEST FOR AONE-YEAR TIME Approved
EXTEN~'ON TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Thomas Tyo ~
requests a one-year extension of time to comply wkh condkions of approval for (Peraza absent)
TentatNe Tract Map No. 14353 (to pennk a 6•lot, 55•unk, air space condominium
subdivision, and a I-lot single-family parcel} which expires on July 16, 1992, and k
approved, to expire on July 16, 1993. Property is located 1560 feet south of the
centerline of Santa Ana Canyon Road.
PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT PERTAINING TO THE ACCESSORY RETAIL SALE
H Continued to
.
9F TILE FLOOR COVERINGS AND WINDOW COVERINGS FOR PARCELS ZONED 6-29-92
ML WHICH ARE ON STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD BETWEEN BALL ROAD AND
KATELLA AVENUE:
I. SPECIFIC PLAN (SP90-011 REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW OF Approved
pgOPOSED A6"END6"ENT TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE ANAHEIM 6-0
HILLS FESTIVAL: Taubman Company (John Burroughs) requests Planning (Peraza absent)
Commission review of proposed amendment to condklons of approval for the
Anaheim Hills Festival Speckic Plan (SP90-01) located at Anaheim Hills Festhal.
06/15/92
-~ Page 17