Minutes-PC 1993/02/08ACTION AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 1993, AT 11:00 A.M.
PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING
(PUBLIC TESTIMONY)
11:00 A.M. 1:30 P.M.
Mkchell T. Caldwell Swom in as new Planning Commissioner
ALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT
STAFF PRESENT: Selma Mann, Greg Hastings, Jonathan Borrego, Alfred Yaida, Melanie Adams,
Greg McCafferty, Bruce Freeman, Edith Harris, Margarka Solorio
PROCEDURE TO EXPEDITE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS
t. The proponents in applications which are not contested will have five minutes to present their
evidence. Addtional time will be granted upon request ff, in the opinion of the Commission, such
addtional time will produce evidence important to the Commission's consideratl0n.
2. In contested applications, the proponents and opponent will each be given ten minutes to present
their case unless additional time is requested and the complexity of the matter warrants. The
Commission's considerations are not determined by the length of time a participant speaks, but
rather by what is sold.
3. Staff Reports are part of the evidence deemed received by the Commission In each hearing.
Copies are available to the public prior to the meeting.
4. The Commission will withhold questions until the public hearing Is closed.
5. The Commission reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing if, In ks opinion, the ends of
fairness to all concerned will be served.
6. All documents presented to the Planning Commission for review In connection with any hearing,
including photographs or other acceptable visual representations or nontlocumentary evidence,
shall be retained by the Commission for the public record and shall be available for public
Inspections.
7. P.t the end of the scheduled hearings, members of the public will be allowed to speak on Items of
interest which are within the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission, and/or agenda Items. Each
speaker will be allotted a maximum o. five (5) minutes to speak. Anyone wishing to speak should
fill out the forms available in the rear of the Council Chamber and submit them to staff prior to the
mooting.
020893tt.wp
1a. c`EO4 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION-CLASS 11 Approved
1b. VARIANCE N0.4218 Granted
OWA!ER: TRIDER CORPORATION, Attn: Alan Trider, 435 S.
Anaheim Hills Road, Anaheim, CA 92607
LOCATION: 435 South Anaheim Hllls Road. Property is
approximately 5.31 acres located at the northwest corner
of Nohl Ranch Road and Anahei•, Hills Road.
Waiver of required sfte boundary screening to construct a 6-foot high
wrought Iron fence wfthln an existing 125-unft senior citizens' apartment
complex.
VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. P ' -17
------------------------------•----------------------------- i
I
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: One person present
Roy Nichols, 525 S. Anaheim Hills Road
Voiced objection to wrought iron fence after the action was
taken. '
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Explained the owner next door has no objection to wrought
Iron and he thought there was no objection from anyone.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: None j
STAFF COMMENTS: None
ACTION: Granted Variance 4218
VOTE: (7-0)
22-day appeal period
~~ 2-8.93
Page 2
2a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PREVIOUSLY APPROVED) Approved
2b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2809 (READVERTISED) Approved, In part
OWNER: TRIDER CORPORATION, Attn: Alan Trider, 435 S. Anal,aim
Hills Road, Anaheim, CA 92807
LOCATION: 435 South Anaheim Hills Road. Property Is
approximately 5.31 acres located at the northwest corner of
Nohl Ranch Road and Anaheim Hills Road.
Petitioner requests modfflcation or amendment to condiions of approval
and/or stipulations pertaining to landscape requirements for Conditional Use
Permft No. 2809 (to permft a 2 and 3-story, 125-unft senior citizens'
apartment complex).
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. P -1
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 3 PEOPLE PRESENT
Roy Nichols, 525 S. Anaheim Hills Road, presented letterfrom Canyon
Hills Club
Jim Jones, 6006 Hillcrest Clrcia
Tom Fraker, 6010 Hillcrest Circle
OPPOSITION CONCERNS:
Letter from Canyon Hllis Club requesting that the landscaping commftments
regarding the greenbelt along Nohl Ranch Road be met as agreed to at the
June 9,1986, Planning . ~mmission meeting.
One of the original homeowners explained it has been agreed all along that
that area would be a greenbelt and now a new owner says he cannot afford
to comply.
Was told that 3/4 acre area at the top of the hill was designated as
greenbelt, but neighbors have had to cut the weeds on many occasions, and
questioned the sincerity of the petitioner to maintain this property unless ft
is really tied down; concerned about what would happen if the prr. -erty
changes hands; felt new owner should be required to comply with the
commftments of the previous owner.
PETITIOWER'S COMMENTS:
Attempting to get certificate of final occupancy but have been burdened with
a tremendous amount of addftional requirements by the Cfty, fees increased
from $386,000 to 5915,000; have owned this property since January 1988,
and this project had conditions of approval which called for a temporary
irrigation system and a hydroseed mfx and that they have a landscaping plan
approved (stamped and signed) by the City of Anaheim and there was
J 2-8.93
Page 3
nothing in the condtions of approval to the contrary; and that is what they
are willing to provide; that this protect has been burdened wfth an excessiva
amount of addftional costs; that plans had to be totally redrawn to make the
project 100% handicapped; that 25% is affordable and ft Is a bond projoct;
probably the nicest senior's project in Southern Calffomia, and is more like
condominiums. He stated he will compromise and provide a hydroseed mix
and put In a permanent ircigation system; that there is about 3/4 acre which
has weeds right now and they do mow k occasionally and there is a very
expensNe equestrian trail and they had to improve a major intersection.
They have 47 residents ready to move in and 25 people have moved their
furnish?ngs in, but he cannot get a final occupancy permit from the City.
Explained they were not the owner in June 1986.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Messe -Asked what that property would look 11ke in 3 or 4 years ff the
developer hydroseeds ft. Was a Commissioner when those stipulations were
made that that top plateau was going to be landscaped and ft was a very
specific thing.
Henninger asked ff the developer's commftment included maintenance.
(Applicant responded there are some nice hydroseed mUdures, and he would
be maintaining the irrigation, and that it would be nicer than ft is now.)
Henninger -Explained recently procedures have been amended and
applicants have stipulated to certain things and those stipulations are
translated Into conditions of approval and previously we relied in good faith
on the stipulations and many approvals were only granted because those
stipulations were made by the applicants and that Is what happened in this
case; that the hillside codes have standards for landscaping and that
Includes the number of trees and shrubs and ft seems there is not a great
difference between what is being proposed and what Is requested and he
did not understand why the applicant is not agreeing to plant the trees. He
added those stipulations were made in a public hearing the applicant could
have read the minutes of those meetings to protect himself. He suggested
approval subject to fifteen 20-gallon trees being planted which Is less than
what staff has recommended and more than the applicant Is proposing. He
added he would want the hydroseed mix approved by staff.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Code Enforcement -There is no business license for that location. (It was
explained they are not actually in operation as yet.)
Attorney - Explained since this is a modification to the CUP, findings are
required, Section 18.03.092.040 that the permft or variance granted is being
or recently has been exercised contrary to the terms or condtions of such
approval; and the second finding that may be applicable is that the approval
granted has not been exercised since the final approval has not been
granted, the final occupancy permit, and that based upon addftionai
information that has come before the Commission, the facts necessary to
support one or more of the required showings for issuance of the entitlement
no longer exists and the reason would be that ff this application was coming
before the Commission without that condition, whether the same findings
with regard to the compatibility with the surrounding area that was a
_i 2-8-9b
Page 4
requirement of the CUP ar the iinding regarding the welfare of the
surrounding area could still be made
Planning - Pointed out ff landscape plans have to be approved by the
Planning Commission, the permfts would be held up until those plans have
been approved.
ACTION: Approved, in part, in conformance with findings as indicated by the City
Attorney In Section 18.03.092.040 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
That a landscape plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning I
Department staff for the area along the north side of Nohl Ranch Road,
between Hllicrest and Anaheim Hilis Road and that that area shall be I
pem>anently maintained with an irrigation system and hydroseeded, and wfth
twenty (20) 15-gallon trees being planted . f
I
VOTE: 7-0
2-8-93
Page 5
3a. CEOA MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I Continued to
3b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT March 8, 1993
3c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3536
OWNER: EUCLID STREET BAPTIST CHURCH OF ANAHEIM
AND BRYAN CROW & EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATES,
Attn: Rev. Bryan L Crow, 8712 E. Santa Ana Canyon,
Anaheim, CA 92808
LOCATION: 8712 East Santa Ana Canyon Road. Property is
approximately 3.3 acres located on the south side of Santa
Ana Canyon Road and approximately 5,460 feet east of the
centerline of Riverview Drive.
To permit the phased developr,~ent of a 100,000 square foot church facility
including a 2,000 seat sanctuary, bible study classrooms, nursery,
gymnasium, amphitheater and 9otanical gardens wfth waiver of permitted
number and size of freestandi!ig Identification signs.
Continued from the November 2, 1992 and January 11, 1993 Planning
Commission meetings.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0.
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
ACTION: No Discussion
Continued to 3-8-93
VOTE: 7-0
~~_J
2.8.93
Page 6
4a. ~EQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved
4b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3579 Granted.
(Unsuborinated
OWNER: CANYON ACRES RESIDENTIAL CENTER, Attn: Dan covenant to be
McQuaid, 233 S. Quintana Road, Anaheim, CA 92817 recorded Ilmfting the
facility'to a maximum
of 30 children.)
LOCATION: 233 South Quintana Road. Property Is approximately 4.6
acres located on the west side of a private access road
from Quintana Road and approximately 300 feet south of
the centerline of Arboratum Road.
To expand a boarding ono lodging home for 30 dependent children,
Including an 840-square foci addition to a bunkhouse and a proposed 4,499-
(Previous 6,469) square foot multi-purpose building.
Continued from the January 11 and January 25, 1993 Planning Commission
meetings.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC 93.19
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 3 people present; several letters were received in opposition
1 person telephoned support of the project
Steve Walbrink, 145 Bonnie Jean Lane
Peggy Varner, 165 Bonnie Jean Lane
Steve Sharpy, 155 Bonnie Jean lane
Beth Smith, 175 Bonnie Jean Lane
OPPOSITION CONCERNS:
Felt homeowners are not being shown the overall master plan,
sbc CUPs have been approved for this facility;
expansion will destroy the residential Integrity of the neighborhood;
size of facility too large for 30 children,
concemed that property could be sold to another user such as Boy's Town,
Salvation army, etc which would be more like an institution;
Increased noise and traffic and
redue!lon in property value;
large delNary trucks making deliveries into their residential neighborhood of ftems
they purchase in bulk,
speed bumps, large parking area (all rot characteristic of residential community).
A second temporary trailer was placed on the property without approval;
thought 4600-sq. ft, muiti-purpose room was being proposed to el(minate the
1440 sq. ft. temporary trailer; and was concerned about the proposed use for the
extra 3000 sq. ft. ;
facility Is seeking foster families and neighbors felt there would bean Increase in
;,,,~ 2-8.93
Page 7
foster parent training.
Commission had asked the appiicant to meet with the neighbors, but that never
happened.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS:
Presented revised plans indicating the project had been reduced in size by 1/3,
the elevated lighting has bean el(minated and there is no expansion of the
northern parking lot proposed; plan to Iimft use of the multipurpose building to
7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m; and to record a covenant restricting occupancy to 30
maximum.
Willing to restrict use of the top floor which is proposed for school uses to hours
of operation between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. Building will be on the opposite side of
the property away from the Fieldstone homes and that neighbors shove have
seen the plans and have no objections. Willing to commft that there will be no
Increase in capacity and the request is to better serve the curcent residents at
Canyon Acres. Regarding the use of the multipurpose room, they wanted to be
able to use the facility for therapeutic activties, (boy scouts, girl scouts, talent
show, rehearsal, etc.)
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commissioners Caldwell & Mayer both Indicated they had listened to tapes of the
previous hearings relating to this matter.
Boydstun -Asked about additional staff (applicant explained there are 32 staff
members present on site at peak times.
Concerning foster parent training, suggested a condition be added that any
training not related to the residents in the facility would have to occur off she.
(Applicant explained foster parent recrufting and training would take place in the
community, but did not want to Iimft any existing programs for parents of the
children at the facility, explaining about 15% of the children who':ft the facility
last year were reunited with their families.) Temporary trailer should be removed
within 70 days.
Explained a covenant recorded on the property would restrict the use to 30
children, even iF the property is sold.
Messe - suggested a change to the proposed covenant restricting the capacity
to the current 30 children for residential and educational uses and that ft Is for the
benetft of the surcounding neighbors and the City of Anaheim; plus there shall
be no further development of the property beyond that approved by CUP 3579.
Henninger -asked about use of the lower portion of the building and the request
for expanded hours of operation. applicant explained the lower portion of the
building contains the kitchen and storage area so they can store and prepare the
food more efflclently;
Messe & Taft felt 9 o.m. time Iimft would be adequate and Caldwoil felt activities
on the upper Ievei for the children could impact the neignborhood.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Attorney -Asked that wording be added to the submitted covenant making ft an
unsubordinated covenant, plus language added making ft a covenant that runs
~~ --~ 2.8-93
Page 8
wfth the land, and a provision that ft may not be terminated or amended wthout
the Cfty's prior approval.
Planning - condftion No. 3 regarding the trail should be modified to read that the
Improvements shall be completed wfthln 120 days rather than 30 days
ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration
Granted CUP 3579, subject to
a. That prior to Issuance of a building permit, an unsuborlnated restrictive use
covenant, in a form approved by the Planning Commission and approved
by the City Attorneys Office, shad be recorded against the property Ilmfting
the facility to a maximum of thirty (30) children, to benefit the Cfty and the
surcounding property owners, and wfth a requirement that the covenant
may not be amended or terminated without prior approval by the City of
Anaheim.
b. That hours of operation of the second floor of the multipurpose building
shall be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., and the lower floor shall be
limited to 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
c. That staff shall be Iimfted to a maximum of 38 on sfte at any one time.
d. That any foster parent training or counseling shall be conducted off site
e. That the northern parking lot shall not be used by staff working the evening
shift.
f. That lighting standards shall be Iimfted to a maximum of 3 feet high.
g. That the unpermitted office trailer shall be removed wfthin 60 days of the
date of this resolution.
h. That Condition No. 3 shall be modified to read 12G days rather than 30
days.
VOTE: 7-0
22tJay appeal period
~ 2-8-93
Pape 9
5a. CEQA N°GATIVE DECLARATION (PREVIOUSLY APPROVED) I Continued to
5c. ~1NDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1623 (READVERTISED) February 22, 1;;d3
OWNER: M. SMITH/CORY ROBERTS, P.O. Box 54029, Term. Annex.,
Los Angeles, CA 90054; DARRYL SNYDER TRUSTEE,
PATRICIA MC CLURE TRUST, C/0 EDWARD GOLDSTEIN,
110 E. Wilshire Ave., Ste. 305, Fullerton, CA 92632
AGENT: FARANO AND KIEVIET, Attn: Thomas G. Kieviet,
2100 S. State College Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92806
ANAHEIM COACH AND TRAILER CO
Attn: Sharman Baird, P.O. Box 8129, Anaheim, CA 92812
LOCATION: 2222 East Howell Avenue. Property is approximately 3.3
acres located on the southwesterly side of Howell Avenue and
approximately 520 feet northwesterly of the centerline of
Katella Avenue.
Request for an amendment to or deletion to conditions of approval to retain
a recreat(on vehicle storage yard and on•ske caretaker's unk (including on-
premises sales and installation of recreational vehicle parts and accessories)
wkh waiver of permkted accessory uses and structures.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0.
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS:
Tom Kieviet, Agent, responded to Chairman Henninger that they had Just gotten
a copy of the letter from the Bank of America regarding their authority to file this
application; that they are requesting an amendment to condtions of an existing
CUP; that they originally proposed to inkiate a new CUP application and that
caused them to attempt to get the property owner's approval as required by Cky
policy, but the property owner would not grant such an approval without a
Phase I environmental audk and that is not financially feasible.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Messe -felt wkh evidence of some contamination, did not see how the
Commission could approve this request. (Agent responded that is solely
speculation on part of the property owner; that at one time they did change oil
and had drums authorized by the Fire Department, and had them properly
removed, but felt raising the issue of contamination is totally unwarranted.)
Henninger -felt the Issue of authorization should be worked out before the
Commission goes forward wkh a public hearing.
2.8.93
Page 10
i
:,~.
STAFF COMMENTS:
-_ Attorney - Feit she did not have all the Information and Planning staff has
Indicated that a request for a change in a CUP is treated somewhat differently
than an application for a complete new CUP, and h seems H there is a change
such as expanding a CJP, some of the same considerations would be
applicable with regard to rights of the property owner, particularly such as this
where there has been a suggestion made that there may be some
contamination to the property. Requested a continuance in order to radress
!hose Issues more thoroughly.
ACTION: Continued to 2.22.93
VOTE: 7-0
I
~-
i
+-
6a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
6b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
6C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3581.
OWNER: HUTTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, 201 E. Sandpolnte, Ste.
300, Santa Ana, CA 92707-6707
AGENT: REEVES ASSOC. ARCHITECTS, INC., Attn: Lawrence C.
Reeves, 417 South Hill Street, Ste. 1100, Los Angeles, CA
90013
LOCATION: 8205 E. Santa Ana Canvon Road. Property is approximately
3.34 acres located on the north side of Santa Ana Canyon
Road and approximately 1050 feet west of the centerline of
Weir Canyon Road.
To permit an automotive repair facility including the retail sale and installation
of automobile parts and accessories with waivers of minimum setback
adjacent to a freeway, permitted freestanding sign, permitted wall signs and
permitted roof-mounted equipment.
Continued from the January 11, and January 25, 1993 Planning Commission
meetings.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0.
Continued to
February 22, 1993
------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF T~iE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: No discussion
ACTION: Continued to 2-22-93
VOTE: 7-0
l~
2-8-93
Page 12
~F
7a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved
7b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT Approved, in part
7c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3583 (READVERTISED) Granted
7d. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PREVIOUSLY APPROVED) Approved
7e. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3148 - READVERTI EDT Granted in part
AMEND PREVIOUSLY APPROVED EXHIBITS 5 years
OWNER: TAYLOR 8US SERVICE, INC., 18818 Teller Avenue, #210,
Irv(ne, CA 92715
AGENT: TRANSPORT INTERNATIONAL POOL, INC., Attn: Steve
Metzger, 7170 E. Bandinl Blvd., #095, Commerce, CA 90040
LOCATION: 1880 South Lewis Street. Property is approximately 1.8
acres located on the east side of Lewis Street and
approximately 315 feet north of the centedine of Gene Autry
Way.
To permit rental and outdoor storage of semi•truck trailers, minor
maintenance/repair and use of a modular oft(ce building with waiver of
minimum landscape requirements, required parking lot landscaping and
required Improvement of outdoor storage and parking areas.
To amend previously approved exhibits for Conditional Use Permk No. 3148
to delete the subject parcel from the exhibits approved for an adjacent bus
storege terminal.
Continued from the January 25, 1993 Planning Commission meeting.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3583 RESOLUTION N0. P -2
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3148 RESOLUTION N0. PC93-21
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: NONE
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS:
Referred to the requirement for paving of tha site and explained that
would be very expensive; that adjacent facilities have crushed gravel and
this site also has crushed gravel at this time and the previous tenant was
allowed to use the property in that condition.
Regarding internal shrubbery, he explained the pane{ 1.8 acres and wil!
be used for storage of truck trailers and it would be dffflcult to put in a
greenbelt with shrubs; that the trailers are 43 to 53 feet long and need a
large turning radius.
The third concern was the 3-year time Iimft and explained they don't
0..~
2-8.93
Page 13
manufacture anything on the property and will strictly be renting, leasing
~-. and sometimes selling truck trailers and cannot amortize the costs over
3 years.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Mayer - Asked ff trailers are always empty when they are stored on the
property (applicant explained they are empty).
Henninger -asked about the minor maintenance and repairs to be done
on the site. (Applicant explained they may Install light bulbs, mud flaps,
etc. and there would be no major repairs; and that they would not be
doing any oil changes, etc.)
Would be willing to approve a longer term than 3 years, but would want
some landscaping and he was uncomfortable with waiver of
improvements.
Suggested a condition be added prohibiting oil changes on the property
and that the trailers shall not be washed on site unless a proper system
is Installed to catch the runoff.
Peraza -noted wooden slats in fence need to be replaced.
Messe -asked what time limit the applicant is looking for (Applicant
responded five years and has a five year lease based on this approval.
Caldwell -asked if the freeway widening and Lewis Street would Impact
this property. (Attorney explained whether or not the widening makes the
property unusable may be considered to a certain degree with regard to
the waivers of landscaping or fences, but the application has to be
considered based on the statutes and regulations in effect at the time h
is being considered.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Engineering - responded to question whether land acquisition for freeway
widening is being accelerated that the current schedule is acquisition In
1994, but that changes.
Planning - if waiver b is denied, they would be required to Install a 10-foot
fully landscaped buffer (Messe -felt maybe 5 feet should be required, Just
on Lewis Street and applicant agreed to 5 feet)
ACTION: Approved negative declaration
Granted waiver of minimum landscape requirements, In part, 5 feet of
landscaping on Lewis Street and landscaping to consist of fast growing
hedge with trrigatlon system
Granted CUP 3583 In part for 5 years, and subJect to additional
condklons:
A. That no vehicles shall be washed on the site unless a proper
system for collection of the runoff water is installed.
B. That there shall be no oil changed on the she.
C, That the use is granted for a period of five (5) years, to
expire on February 8, 1998.
D. That a 5-foot wide fully landscaped buffer shall be provided
2-8.93
Page 14
W
along Lewis Street and the landscaping shall consist of fast
~ growing hedge and an irrigation system and the irrigation
and landscaping shall be permanently maintained.
Granted request to amend previously aparoved exhibits to delete subject
parcel from the adjacent bus storage terminal. (CUP N0.3148)
VOTE: 7-0
22 day appeal period
8a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION I Approved
8b. r4NDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3586 Granted
OWNER: LEDERER ANAHEIM LTD., ATTN: LES LEDERER, 1990
Westwood Boulevard, 3rd floor, Los Angeles, CA 90025
LOCATION: 1440 South Anaheim Boulevard. Property is approximately
14.74 acres located north and east of the northeast comer of
Cerrkos Avenue and Anaheim Boulevard.
To permk an Indoor soccer field in conJunction wkh an existing Indoor swap
meet facflky.
CONDITIONAL USE PrSRMIT RESOLUTION N0. P 93-22
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS:
No significant impact on traffic or parking, proposed soccer held will most
Ilkeiy have fewer people than the retail uses; leagues will be made up of
approximately 80 local teams, children would play mainly on the
weekends and adults would play on week nights, only 5 people per team,
plus referee would be on the field and even with 10 friends or family
members attending for each player, the viewing audience would not
exceed 100 people; that same area currently holds up to 35 retail stores,
average 1-1 /2 employees and 2 or 3 customers per store at any given
time, and that is 140 people with the retail usage. No seating is proposed
for the viewer area, no obstructions to the fire exits are proposed In the
viewing area and an excellent escape route is provided in case of an
emergency; and there is a 15-ft. roll up door directly next to the proposed
soccer area leading to the outside parking lot and k would remain open
the whole time the soccer field Is in use.
There was a concern that the Marketplace is becoming increasingly
recreational in nature, but the batting cages and this proposed soccer
use are mainly to enhance the retail portion of the facility; compared the
soccer field to ice skating rinks in shopping malls. Soccer field is allowed
by right, but CUP is required because of size.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Peraza -concerned about safety and that place was crowded during
ChrJstmas shot,ping days
Henninger - Conrmission must decide k this is an appropriate land use.
Suggested modffication to Condkion No. 1 requiring Fire Department
approval prior to start of improvements and adding a condition that
U
2-8-93
Page 16 ~
n
screening details of the soccer field ba approved by the Parks &
~ Recreation Department.
Mayer -asked about restrooms (Applicant painted out there are two
areas where restrooms are located and they would be willing to add
more restroom facilities ff necessary).
Messe -asked what the surface would be and the applicant responded
h would be an astro-turf type material.
Caldwell - yuestloned the size of a standard Indoor soccer field and
applicant responded a standard field is about 2-1 /2 times the size of this
field.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Planning -Parks & Recreatlon staff felt the only way they would feel
comfortable with the Indoor soccer field would be ff the netting covered
the entire top of the field, and that was not clear on the drawing. Plus, It
is not known how many spectators & players will be using the facility.
(Applicant responded the field would be covered with netting and will still
allow the existing fire sprinklers to operate.) Suggested a specific time be
added to the condition since no building permfts are required.
Flre Department -have not had opportunity to study this and would 1(ko
more time to review ff I
ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration
Granted CUP 3586, sub)ect to additional condtion that screening detail
plans shall be approved by Parks & Aecreation Department and
Condition No. 1 amended to require Flre Department approval prior to
start of Improvements.
I
VOTE: 7-0
22 day appeal period
ga. ~~^^ NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PREVIOUSLY APPROVED) Approved
proved 3 yrs
A
~ 9b. rONDiTIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2165 (READVERTISED)
REQUEST TO AMEND OR DELETE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL p
to expire
9c.
PERTAINING TO TIME LIMITATION FOR AN EQUIPMENT RENTAL YARD 1-12-96
AND CONCRETE MIXING OPERATION
OWNER: D. RAYMOND WOLL ANA? ADA MAY WOLL, 4460 E. la Palma
Ave., Anaheim, CA 92807
AGENT: GKN RENTALS, Michael L Stevens, Risk Manager, 100
Chaparral Court, Ste. 1;4t, Anaheim, CA 92808-2236
LOCATION: 4460 East La Palma Avenue (GKN Rentals). Property is
approximately 2.4 acres located at the southwest comer of La
Palma Avenue and Lakeview Avenue.
Petitioner requests amendment or deletion to a condition of approval to allow
indefinite ertenslon of time to stain an equipment rental yard and
an
concrete mixing operation.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC 93.2
-------------------------------------------------
' FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY CF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINLri ES.
OPPOSITION: NONE
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: None ~
i
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Henninger - Aski~cant res3onded themi had asked folethat to
applicant. (App P Y
ba extended to 9 years, but could Ifve A h Icant~ex lained
Boydstun -asked about landscaping. (pp P
bougalnvillaeaspianted three years ago as requested by the
Commission are there, but are bare this time of year.)
STAFF COMMENTS: years would elquirea public hearing and that isiestablished
by Code.
ACTION: Approved NegatNe Declaration
Granted, for 3 years, modif<catfon to Condition No.13 removing the reference
to LaPalma Avenue.
VOTE: 7-0
~,J
2.8.93
Page 18
t
10. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
~ A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3559 - REVIEW OF LAND- Approved
SCAPE PLANS: Thomas J. Davis Associates, requests review of landscape
plans for Condkional Use Permk No. 3559 (to permk an auto service and
fire installation facility), Winston Tires. Property is located at 222 North Beach
Blvd.
B. CITY COUNCIL REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION Approved
REVIEW OF EXISTING MULTIPLE•FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
SIGN ORDINANCE.
C, cONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3576 -REQUEST REVIEW APPROVED
AND APPROVAL OF PARKING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS: see below
Ilan Bazal requests revlew approval of parking and landscape plans
for Condkional Use Permit No. 3576 (to permk the division of an existing
retail unk). Property is located at 755-763 North Euclid Street.
Approved subject to landscaping plans to Include climbing vines to protect
north end of the building.
APPOINTMENT OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S REPRESENTATIVE TO THE
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND CONVERSION SUBCOMMITTEE (REPLACEMENT FOR
STEVc BRISTOL).
r- ADJOURNME.YT: Meeting adjourned at 4:05 to 9:00 a.m. February 22, 1993.
l.i
2-6.93
Page 19