Minutes-PC 1995/05/01SUMMARY/ACTION AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
May 1, 1995
\,.
10:00 AM. - PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW
1:30 P.M. - PUBLIC HEARINGS BEGIN (PUBLIC TESTIMONY)
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: CALDWELL
STAFF PRESENT Greg l~astings
Selma Mann
Jonathan tiorrego
Melanie Adams
Greg !: cCafferty
grace Freeman
Alfred Yalda
Margarita Solorio
Zoning Division Manager
Deputy City pttomey
Senior Planner
Associate Civil Engineer
Associate Planner
Code Entorcement Supervisor
Principal Transportation a goer
Sr. Word Processing Op
PRQCEDURE TO EXPEDITE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS
t, The propose ranted uplon trequest if hin the opfn on of the lommission, isuch addWonal timeiwill iproduce ev dance
time will b g
Important to the (`pmmisslon's consideration.
2, In contested applications, the proponents and opponent will each be given ten minutes to present their case unless
additio fined be theiengtheof tme a pa cipla t speaks, buttratherrby what is said, mission's considerations are not
determ Y les are available to
3. the publpic prior to the meetingidence deemed received by the Commission in each hearing. CoP
;, The Commission will withhold questions until the public hearing Is closed.
5, The Commission reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing if, in its opinion, the ends of fairness to all concerned
will be served.
6 ~hotocraphs opothertacceptable visualgepresentations orrnon~documentary evidence ahallrbe retainued by the
P g
Commission for the public record and shall be available for public inspe ons.
7, At the end of the scheduled hearings, members of the public will be allowed to speak on Items of interest which are
within the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission, and/or agenda items. Each speaker will be allotted a maximum of
five (5) minutes to speak.
AC050195.WP
05/01/95
Page 1
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
~) A. REGIUEST T DETERMINE CONFORMANCE WITH THE ANAHE~ Determined to be
ENERAL PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED SALE OF COUNTY in conformance with
WNED PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. Requested General Plan
by County of Orange General Services Agency, Attn: Donna Garza,
i4 Civic Center Plaza, P. 0. Box 4106, Santa Ana, Ca 92702•
Property is located at 1621 South Douglass Road.
Continued from the April 17, 1996 Planning Commission
B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 3666 - REQUEST F R Apprnved
RETROACTIVE EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH (to explre 4-6-96)
^ONDITION5 OF APPROVAL: Convention Center Inn, Ltd. (c/o
Bharat Patel), 1734 South Harbor Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92802 requests
a retroactNe extension of time to comply with conditions of approval
for Conditional Use Permit No. 3666 (to permft an 84-foot high, 5-
story, 312-snit motel complex, including the demolition of a 78-unit
building and a 3,800-square foot restaurant, remodel of the existing
122-unit building, and construction of a 190-unit building and a 5,776-
square foot restaurant) to expire April 4, 1996. Property is located at
2017 South Harbor Boulevard.
It was noted the expiration date should be corrected in the staff
report.
C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 284 -REQUEST FOR INITIATION and or modfflcatt~on
OF M DIFICATION OR REVOCATION PROCEEDINGS. City /
Initiated request to initiate modification or revocation proceedings of proceedings
Conditional Use Permit No. 284 (to establish a restaurant and cocktail
lounge). Property is located at 420 South Brookhurst Street.
ACTION: Instructed staff to initiate revocation or modification
proceedings based on information provided by Code Enforcement.
D. RE VEST TO DETERMINE CONFORMANCE WITH THE ANAHEIM ineconformance with
GENERAL PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED SALE OF COUNTY
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1170 NORTH ANAHEIM BOULEVARD: the Anaheim
Requested by the County of Orange General Services Agency, Attn: General Plan
Donna Garza, 14 Civic Center Plaza, P. 0. Box 4106, Santa Ana, Ca I
92702. Property is located at 1170 N. Anaheim Boulevard.
05/01/95
Page 2
Continued to
2a. CEf~A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION-CLASS 21 May 15, 1995
~,~ 2b. VARIANCE N0.4018 (REp,DVERTISED)
INITIATED BY: City of Anaheim, Code Enforcement Division, 200 S.
Anaheim Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92805
OWNER: John AcevOes 58/Plaza Square #JMOrange, CA 92666
LOCATION: approximately 0 29 a Bes located atrtheesouthwest
comer of Midway Manor and Anaheim Boulevard.
Request to consider the termination or modification of Variance No. 4018
(to establish a commercial use to a residential structure) pursuant to
Zoning Code Section 18.03.091.
Continued from the February 22, April 3, and April 17, 1995 Planning
Commission meetings.
VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0.
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Mark Botich, Architect, 883 S. Anaheim Boulevard, speakln^, ohey just haverthe hl
concerning corrections and bringing the building up to Code and getting all tho inspections,
electrical to be done and aro calling for inspection tomorrow and once that is completed, they can call for
building inspection. The delay was due to correcting the plumbing which was the gas 11ne and it had to ba
thelele~ctricai wlas also due to the age and stomeuof the boxes thatwere there, were not grounded. The delay on
Commissioner Messe asked about the unsightly curtain on the interior of the building.
Mr. Botich responded that is going to be removed. They have ordered blinds but ttoey have not been delivered.
The d d not feel ittshould be visible.s He thought the blinds will be delivered someetime thistweekpuipment inside
and
ACTION: The matter was continued for two weeks to the meeting of May 15, 1995, in order to allow the
owner/permittee to:
(a) Make the necessary plumbing, mechanical, electrical and/or building corrections an
obtain final building inspection; and
(b) Obtain the Certificate of Occupancy to legally occupy the structure for commercial office
use.
VOTE: 6-0 (Commissioner Caldwell absent)
Mr. Botich stated he appreciates the cooperation of the Planning Commission.
05/01/95
Page 3
3a. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT N0.317
3b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0.334
3c. SPECIFIC PLAN N0. S4-1
ftnciudina 2onina and Development Standards)
INITIATED BY: CITY OF ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMi3SION, C/O
Anaheim Redevelopment Agency, Attention: Michael
Welch, 201 South Anaheim Boulevard, #1003, Anaheim,
CA 92805
(A) Consideration of EnvironmentalRm~e ct p poi Agency) and
prepared by the Lead Agency
adoption of a Statement of Overriding Consideration.
(B) Approval of General Plan Amendment No. 334 to amend the
Land Use, Parks Recreation and Community Services and
Environmental Resources and Management
(Conservation/Open Space) Elements of the General Plan to
establish consistency between the General Plan and the
Development Areas ident~ied within the proposed Speciffc Plan,
to amend the General Plan designation for the acreage within
the boundaries of SP88~ (not a part of the subject Specfflc
Plan as follows:
t'iOntlnUed t0
May 15, 1995
A. Land Use Element
1) To add text to the General Plan Land Use Element recognizing that
the Anaheim Northeast Area Specific Plan is an implementing zone
for the Northeast Industrial Area; and that the Specific Plan
establishes buildincf intensity for each of the development areas (i.e.,
industrial., Industrial Recycling, Expanded Industrial, La Palma Core,
Transit Core and Commercial Areas).
2) To amend the General Plan Land Use Element Map for eighteen
(18) areas within the Northeast Industrial Area as follows:
Figure 1 - An approximate 113.5-acre area from the General
Industrial to Business Offire/Service/Industrial designation. Subject
area is generally located south of Miraloma Avenue, west of Tustin
Avenue, north of the SR-91 Freeway and east of Miller Street.
Figure 2 - An approximate 39.3-acre area from the General Open
Space and General Industrial designations to the General
Commercial designation. Subject area is generally located south of
the SR-91 Freeway, west of the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe
Railroad right-of-way and north of the Santa Ana River Channel.
05/01/95
Page 4
Figure 3 - An approximate 11.9-acre area ftom the General Open
Space to the Consen-ation/Water Use designation. Subject area is
l.~% generally located south of the SR-91 Free~rvay, west of the SR-
91 /Tustin Avenue interchange, north of the Santa Ana River Channel
and east of the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad right-of way.
Figure 4 - An approximate 2.8-acre area ftom the General Open
Space to the ueneral Commercial designation. Subject area is
generally located south and east of the SR-91 /Tustin Avenue
inter:,i-wnge.
Figure 5 - An approximate 11.3-acre area from the General Industrial
to the General Commercial designation. Subject area is generally
located on the s~~st side of Tustin Avenue between La Palma Avenue
and the SR-91 Freeway.
Figure 6 - An approximate 8.0-acre area from the
Conservation/V1later Use and General Industrial designations to the
General Commercial and General Industrial designations. Subject
area is generally located at the Tustin Avenue/Miraloma Avenue
intersection, and north and west of sari intersection.
Figure 7 - An approximate 2.1-acre area 'nom the
Conservation/Water Use to the General ('bmmercial designation.
Subject area is generally located between Orangethorpe Avenue
and the Atwood Channel, and west of the City limits.
Figure 8 - An approximate 7.9-acra area from the General Industrial
`° to the General Commercial designation. Subject area is generally
located immediately north (on both sides of Miller Street) of the
Miraloma Avenue/Miller Street intersection
Figure 9 - An approximate 46.8-acre area from the General Industrial
to the Conservation/1Nater Use designation. Subject area is
generally located south of La Jolla Street, west of the Carbon Creek
Channel, north of Miraloma Avenue and east of Kraemer Boulevard.
Figure 10 - An approximate 10.7-acre area from the General
Industrial to the General Commercial designation. Subject area is
generally located at all four (4) legs of the Kraemer
Eoulevard/Miraloma Avenue intersection.
Figure 11 - An approximate 10.7-acre area from the General
Industrial to the General Commercial designation. Subject area is
generally located at the r~ortheast, southeast and southwest comers
of the Red Gum Street/Miraloma Avenue intersection.
Figure 12 - An approximate 5.0-acre area from the General Industrial
to the General Commercial designation. Subject area is Generally
05/01/95
Page 5
located at the northeast and southeast comers of the Blue Gum
Street/Miraloma Avenue intersection.
c_
Figure 13 - An approximate 52.9-acre area from the General
Industrial to the rasner2l Commercial designation. Subject area is
generally loarted south of La Palma Avenue, west of Shepard
Street, north ref the SR-91 Freeway and east of White Star Avenue.
Flgure 14 - An approximate 9.1-acre area from the General Industrial
to the General Commercial designation. Subject area is generally
located at all fou: (4) legs of the Blue gum Street/La Palma Avenue
intersection. (This GPA has been deleted.)
Figure 15 - An approximate 13.7-a,re area ftom the General
Industrial to the General Commercial designation. Subject area is
generally located at all four (4) legs of the La Palma
Avenue/Richfield Road intersection.
Figure 16 - An approximate 23.8-acre area ftom the General
Industrial to the General Commercial designation. Subject area is
generally located at all four (4) legs of the La Palma
Avenue/Lakeview Avenue intarsection.
Figure 17 - an approximate 58.1-acre area from the General
Industrial to the Conservation/1lVater Use designation. Subject area
is generally located south of La Palma Avenue, west of Fee Ana
Street, north of the Santa Ana River Channel and approximately 570
feet east of the centerline of La Palma Avenue and Van Buren
'~= Street.
Figure 18 - An approximate 15.7-acre area from the General
Industrial to the General Commercial designation. Subject area is
generally located on the south side of La Palma Avenue,
approximately 468 feet west of the ;enterline of La Palma Avenue
and Imperial Nigh::ay, and north of the Santa Ana River Channel.
B. Parks, Recreation & Community Services Element
1) To delete a proposed Community Park site designation from the
Park Facilities Plan (Figure 5.1) of the Parks, Recreation &
Communityy Services Element. Said site is located south of the SR-
91 Freeway, wcM of the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe P.ailroad
right-of-way and north of the Santa Ana River.
C. Environmental Resource and Management Element
1) O en S ce - To delete an approximate 38.7-acre open space area
deaicted on'he Environmental Resources and Management Open
Space/Conservatio~~ Element Exhibit, generally located south of the
05/01/9.r
Page 6
SR-91 Freeway, southeast and southwest of the SR-91 /'fustin
Avenue interchange, and north of the Santa Ana RNer. (The
proposed delration is necessary for internal consistency between the
`~~ subject element and the proposed changes to the Land Use
Element as identified in Figures 2-4 above).
ss+nsenration - To make modffications to Water Use areas as
depicted on the Environments) Resources and Management Open
Space/Conservation Element Exhibit as follows:
a) An appro~:imate 11.9-acre addition to the Water Use area
adjacent to the Santa Ana River and generally located
south of the SR-91 Freeway, west of the SR-91 /Tustin
Avenue interchange, north of the Santa Ana River Channel
and east of the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad
right-of-way.
b) Recognizing the approximate 184-acre Warner Basin as a
Water Use area in addftion to it's Sand and Gravel
designation. Subject basin is generally located east of
Tustin Avenue, south of La Palma Avenue, west of Fee Ana
Street and north of the Santa Ana River Channel.
(C) Consideration and adoption of a Specific Plan identffying six (6)
Development Areas for the Northeast area which currently encompasses
2,645 acres Including the Canyon Industrial Area as well as properties
wthin and surrounding the bourxlaries of the Redevelopment Project Area
Alpha. The Specific Plan anticipates a total buiidout area of 29.3 million
square feet by the year 2010, of which 21.8 million square fee: is existing.
Approximately 3.3 million square feet of this existing 21.8 million square
feet is anticipated to be reconstructed. Approximately 7.5 million square
feet is anticipated as new development.
(D) Adoption of zoning and development standards to set forth standards,
procedures and guidelines for the development of industrial services,
corporate headquarters, research and development, supp
offices and commercial retail areas to serve the demand for a wide variety
of goods and services within the Specific Plan area as provided for in
Chapter 18.93 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. The proposed Specific
Plan zoning designation, SP94-1, would replace the current zoning
designations of ML (Umited Industrial), RS-A-43,000
(Residentia~/Agricultural), and CL (Commercial Umfted).
05/01/95
Page 7
The proposed 2,645 acre Northeast Area Specffic Plan and General Plan
Amendment project area is generally bounded by the Orange (SR-57) and the
Riverside (SR-91) freeways, Orangethorpe Avenue and Imperial Highway, and
includes the Canyon Industrial Area and properties within and surrounding the
boundaries of Redevelopment Project Area Alpha. The 26-acres located at the
southwest comer of Tustin Avenue and La Palma Avenue which is located wf~hln
the boundaries of Specific Plan No. 88-3 (Santa Fe Pacific Plaza Specific Plan,
also known as PaciflCenter) are not included within the boundaries of the
proposed Specific Plan but are included within the boundaries of the proposed
General Plan amendment area.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION N0.
SPECIFIC PLAN RESOLUTION N0. _-
FOLLOWING IS A SI;MMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION.
IN FAVOR: 6 People spoke in favor of proposal with some concerns
Commissioner Messe declared a conflict of interest.
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Michael Welch, Anaheim Redevelopment Agency and Community Development
Department, explained the Northeast Industrial Area Specific Plan represents about 2500 acres of the city's
largest and oldest redevelopment project area established in 1973 and includes portions of the Canyon Industrial
~: Area adjacent to the boundary of the Specific Plan area. The documents represent a redirection toward
`~ improving the fiscal and economic enhancement of the Northeast area. The documents include rewriting and a
supplement to the existing Zoning Code, upgraded and improved corridor landscaping enhancement program to
the 91 freeway and major arterials, establishment of new pattern of land use throughout the Northeast area
including the industrial and commercial land use and a designation that will include a higher intense
development area adjacent to the La Palma/Tustin intersection. The methodology used in the Specific Plan was
one of first assessing the existing conditions and infrastructure and land use and historic development data of
th(s area beginning in 1990. It was determined that a number of conditional use permits and variances through
the planning and development approval process reflected a land use pattern that included a number of
commercial and industrial businesses, retail, and corporate uses spread throughout the 2400 acres under the
current industrial designation of the General Plan.
They studit:i how best other land uses could be incorporated into the industrial area and came up wfth two
recommendations. Looking at implementation of a new plan based on a corridor's approach of redesignating
the La Palma/ Kraemer/ Tustin/ Lakeview corridors as commercial. The corridors approach was reviewed by
the City Council and Planning Commission and the present concept and new land uses based on the pattern of
development (referring to the General Plan Amendment exhibit and the Development Area exhibit) reflect new
land use designations of that specific plan. The plan elements include design guidelines for development of new
industrial expansion of existing manufacturing, and corporate business park uses, improving the marketability of
existing land uses based on a marketing study that was prepared by the consultant. The development net
growth is approximately 8 million square feet which is a low end estimate of what could theoretically be built out
based on the Specific Plan Amendment. It is substantially less Intense than the present zoning or General Pian
dssignation. This is a self mitigating plan in which the City and the Redevelopment Agency and others will seek
05/01/95
Page 8
to provide the necessary infrastructure to allow the development at this level to occur and to accommodate the
long term development goals of the Cfty.
'~ Another objective was optimizing the City's revenues In tenns of property tax reassessment in the future, looking
towards maximizing sales tax and reducing the need for consuming ern-ironmental review. They are trying to
streamline the development process and encourage uses that are consistent with the land uses in the new Cade.
T andreflects an approach for the city to make this arealthe focusrofltheoCfty of tAnahe mi s Avenue Development
P `,
Program.
Phillip Schwartze, Planner, representing two different interests, referted to the property located at the comer of
Shepherd and La Palma and added he is supportive of the fact that the Commission is finally getting this spec'rfic `
plan undenNay and they have been working with staff during the last couple of yea ~~ t~y do have somle
moves along. He thought ff this plan is adopted, ft will be a great help to that area,
questions about things that have occurred in the last few days, however. He stated that property is vacant and
ft is shown adjacent to some commercial property and they are suggesting that this she should have the
commercial designation added. This sfte is right in front of the Camelot Miniat~ure~gdo that area, ft would make ft
to get development started on that property and ff commercial could be expa
possible for them to develop that property. He added he could show where the commercial could be taken
from so that ft will balance.
Mr. Schwartze stated there is an existing property located close to Mira Loma at the northwest comer of
Rict~fleld and la Palma which is shown with a commercial designation and actually that is an existing building
ndlustria pand they wouldl like ~ have the building which is part of that triplextcontinue to be shoewn asx~~~
"expanded industrial".
Mr. Schwartze stated the only other thing is that throughout the months there have been a number of revisions
to the document and he wanted to clarify that the uses which were shown in some of the older versions of the
and that included offices and otheri uses.. He a~umed albl those uses conltinue to falltunderpindustrial ses and
that would also include corporate offices.
He added he hoped the Commission would make those two changes and that this Specific Plan is approved.
1131 N. Blue Gum,
Richard Winn, Director of Safety, Health and Environmental Affairs, Taormina Industries,
stated they are very supportive of this program, in spfte of differences. They have a couple of parcels located in
this area and they will be significantly impacted in what they can do to deverticularl ,~ Pa maand Blue Gumton
building and landscape setbacks from the freeway and arterial highways; pa Y
the south side. The elevation of the La Palma overcrossing and the decline east of Blue Gum creates some
hardships on the development of that parcel. He thought they will be back before the Commission for a
variance but the 50-foot seiinck really creates problems for using that property consistent wfth their operations.
Concerning signage, Mr. Winn stated he really did not understand ft and will need further information.
Marion Byrean, owner of property at 2727 Coronada, stated he was interested in the effect of the recycling
overlay on the land in that area.
David Challis, 4420 East La Palma, stated he understood that area is zoned RSA-43000 and ft will be rezoned to
CL He stated he has had his business there for 24 years and he did not think this would affect that business
and thought ft would be compatible with the zoning. He stated he has 8 years left In his condtional use permit
and hopes to get a conditional use permit without a time 11mft. He explained his business (s a storage facility for
05/01/95
Page 9
boats, motor homes and trailers. There was a public works project there recently and the Redevelopment
Agency helped with that construction. He stated he has been trying to get a conditional use permit without time
~~ limits, but it has not been possible even though he has made dedications and done everything requested.
Pat Anthony, 3166 E. Orangethorpe, stated she owns a 4unit apartment complex at this address and asked how
this will affect her property.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Michael Welch referred to the comments regarding the property on Shepherd (Camelot) and stated at one time
one of their concepts showed the extension of commercial along the La Palma Corridor which was more
reflective of commercial development along La Palma and the freeway edge considerably east of where R is
now. There was a refinement to that concept which would limit commercial along the freeway; and the property
on Shepherd north of the Camelot property was the dividing Tins and it seemed that the division of that land use
should be Carpenter Street to the south. The Intent was to reflect the commercial land use designation adjacent
to the freeway to the (ntersection of Kraemer and La Palma. The intent was to confine it to that portion of the
freeway edge and not extend it further east.
Chairwoman Boydstun asked 'rf they could request a conditional use permft on that property to expand their
operation.
Mr. Welch explained the land use at Richfield/La Palma was based on the prop lines, nott oiwnership~~Their intent
to the intersection at Richfield, and the boundary would have followed property
of the concept was that it made sense at the intersection to have commercial land uses and that boundary could
certainly be moved to accommodate their property.
Chairwoman Boydstun asked about the recreational vehicle facility on Coronado?
;5~ Mr. Welch responded he understands that property is just west of the Lakeview Intersection and that is not within
then would not change the zoningtand the busUness could stay just as ft is WHe added theerest ofhet properryc
pia
all the way to Imperial is zoned industrial.
Commissioner Henninger asked ff recreational vehicle storage is a permitted conditional use in the industrial
zone in the proposed specific plan.
Mr. Welch responded ft is and stated the specific plan is very flexible and existing uses will be acceptable.
Greg Hastings, Zoning Division Manager, stated this property would be rezoned to the specffic plan zone and
the use would be "grandfathered" and further explained the ML Zone will go away and be replaced with the
specffic plan zone.
Chairwoman Boydstun pointed out to Mr. Challis that this will not affect his property. She explained 3 new
business would have to comply with the new zoning, but this business could remain.
Mr. Welch referred to Mr. Winn's questions and explained that they did work closely with the property owner and
that this is an entrance to the area. They have drafted an Owner's Participation Agreement for ultimate
development of the entire site which is approximately 20 acres.
Concerning Ms. Anthony's question, Mr. Welch stated all the property along Orangethorpe which is within the
specffic plan area is all zoned industrial.
05/01/95
Page 10
Greg Hastings painted out that Ms. Anthony's property is in the redevelopment area, but ft is not in the specffk:
_, plan area.
`-' j Concerning the recycling overlay at the far west end of the protect, Mr. Welch stated that is an overlay zone that
allows the existing recycling facilities to remain. Presently a conditional use permft Is required and that use
permft continues to be amended and modified as the operation, requires. This plan accommodates the long
term program under zoning up to a certain level of vehicle trips and would allow the expansion of the existing
facility by approximately 5096 in terms of volume being processed on a dally basis. The recycling zone will allow
existing manufacturers to obtain low Interest loans through the State of Calffomia and the City's Economic
e istin p recyclPinggbusir+.esses.i The zonteliallows expansion ofhexlsting recycing facilfties a~the Wesi end. mer>ts to
9
Chairwoman Boydstun reopened the public hearing in order to allow another property owner to speak.
George Adams, Orange County Steel, reforred to a letter written on his behalf by Phil Anthony, and explained the
proposed specffic plan talks about 'recycling facilfties", but does not talk about "processing centers' which would
exclude the uses on their side of the freeway. He stated they were hoping that language could be added to
inc1ud'e "processing facilfties" rather than just "collection facilfties".
Mr. Welch stated the specific plan land use designation for cammerciai uses was at the direction of the City
Counci! to accommodate long term commercial and freeway-oriented retail sales along that edge of the project
of wa and that wa t ooked at as a long terimiland useewhich wasepreferred bylthe City CouncilthHe aldded heht
Y
would refer Mr. Adam's question to Iegai counsel.
Selma Mann, Deputy City Attorney, said a letter was received from Mr. Adams with regard to the stipulations of
the judgement that was entered into between Adams and the City of Anatieim. She stated actually for
Development Area 5 there is a provision among the permitted temporary uses and structures which specfficaliy
has incorporated the zoning they need to continue their use. There is nothing in the judgement itself or in the
stipulation which gives the Adams' business any sort of vested right to continue in the existing business. That is
going to be an independent decision of the Planning Commission and Cfty Council wfth regard to the zoning. It
does say that provided all of the clean up obligations are performed, Mr. Adams, just Irkec~uresheThe provi ion
owner, will be able to a fply for a new condftional use permit in accordance wfth city p
the iopdeis found undepthetDevelopment AreaSprovisons so that the proviisions of the stipulations can be can up
P
complied with.
Mr. Adams stated their only concern was that by not having ft covered in the General Plan, at the end of the
period of time which is not very many years away, ft would be impossible for them to be able to continue the
use. Also, ft would prohibit the use of the neighbor's property and he thought they are making plans for building
new buildings now. Specifically, the order allows that they can reapply but ft would be very difficult to reapply ff
it is prohibited by the General Plan.
Chairwoman Boydstun asked ff that use would be prohibted by the General Plan.
Greg Hastings explained the DBW facility is currently trying to get a condftional use permit under the existing
zoning; however, under the proposed zoning for Development Area 5, they would not have the ability to apply
far a conditional use permit under a large collection facility. The General Plan would be changed to commercial
and the Development Area 5 provisions would preclude that use from being as ft is now unless there was a
change to that in the zone.
05/01/95
Page 11
difficult and ft
inst it when it comes
r Adams stated he thought to change the General Plan back at a later date would ve
CouncA from voting ro It would be
M dficult to ever get R app and ~ felt that
seems by allowing the use to be included doe ~ ~ uld be very C ve the right to reapply
but his firm and
up, but ff it is not covered in the General Plan, s they ha
zoned right out of existence. The Court Order specifically say n s ifically
e covered in the General Plan. He stated he understands about the collection facil ,
ccording to the definition of the collecti~sfa Ve ~endpoeucs amount
should b tar e e ui ment and a
the DBW firm are using 9 q P are using shredders and their neighbo
says no powered equipment. He noted they
. and handled now.
of equipment. He thought ft should be looked .. ~ frontage and
loner Henninger stated when this firs t a 8 a'or the C4ity. a~e~ ~entffied was the freeway
Commisa imizing tha
asked how the Plan addresses max from just east of Tuu ~~e av~~opmie~o~~ndards
the freeway frontage along the 91 freeway
the 57 freeway will be enhanced by
Mr. Welch responded used as >t is now, unless there
freeway edge to the 57 freeway and north along reclude that area from being
whacchainge touthat in~ he zoneascaped setback top frontage represents in
is
Commissioner Henninger stated his question revolved around the asset which the fteewa
if the plan does anything to maximize that asset in terms of bringing
good businesses into gtaheim d asked
to the area between Tustin Avenue e'Ida~a~mer and all tha south side ofNh A re rt f'those
il' in terms of employment. At ona time there
Mr. Welch referred ees there no pa
particular. He referred to the downsizing of the Rockw have worked with the City of Anaheim to retain
were 25,000 employees there b d Ro kwell Inte~ national and they 3000 employ
parcels were declared surplus Y s Electronics
and relocate large businesses within the regi with a large retailer in the region and pointed out Fry'
He stated the City staff has been negotiating le of what the Redevelopment Agency and
is a potential sales tax generator. He fomotehalong the freeway
~" Economic Development staff seek to p
a ro erty to the west, he stated that ow n on that property along a freeway iedgento
Regarding the Taromin p P to 0 m
improving that property and over time will invest up ~
a Corridor there are other properties which show seghaps lea in9 the area. He referredrto last
Along the l.a palm retained and others being recruited from p
, nt of TRW in Riverside who sought to relocate to Texas and then announced last wee e
existing businesses being
or within this project area. Part of that a well as the
week s announceme ment plan proposed,
had decided to relocate to Anaheim on the La Palma Corn
believed, was based on the w ~liserve this areaent of the city and the develop a 17 of
commuter rail program that
rofessional nfflce parking
principal Transportation Planner, stake shot Id be reta nedhand on the P e offioe usesw ich are
Alfred Y41da, that the existing C which is at
the staff report recommending
be changed to 3 spaces per 11a0tform inrDevelopment Area 4,
requirements the parking required may ro osed commuter bay P
La Palma Avenue. They recommend that the 5.5 per 1000 square feet of retail park ng
within 1000 feet of walking distance of the p p
the corner of Tustin and with public Works
is appropriate. ment staff worked closely
Devolop
Division and long term capital improvements for th ovement h st rm e
Mr. Welch stated Redevelopment Agency and Community traffic and intersection imp
Engineering and the Traffic Engineering
invested $45 million dollars into public improvements, including
ins sewers and other public utilities and required infrastructure since the late 1970's. 5
dra 65/01/9
Page 12
As part of the implementation of this plan, the City and the Agency and other people that will be irnoNed in
providing those r.Rcessary improvements to make this plan happen will need to significantly contribute to the
improvement of trafti~ and transportation-related improvements.
~/
Mr. Welch pointed out the transit core area that Includes the PacifiCenter is really the focus and the most intense
development area over time that would allow mixed use projects by right and would be rezoned to commercial
office. The plan is based, to a great deal, on the ability to use the commuter rail program that is approved to
provide ridership ftom employees that are presently located in the inland empire (Riverside/San
Bernardino/Corona) and those areas into Orange County.
The Redevelopment Agency has worked with the regional transportation system and they have approved in their
pecuirementl inghati cen~ral area shou debe adopted and they would support the TrafficaEngineering new parking
q
recommendations in the other areas.
(:onceming the commuter rail and transit improvements, Commissioner Mayer suggested language be added
(Page 49 of the Specific Plan, .3.0) abort networking through the federal, state, regional and county programs
that offer funding sources and guidelines for improvement and enhancement to landscaping and aesthetics at
these gateway centers and specifically the commuter/metrorail station. There is an opportunity to enhance that
through some other funding sources. The OCTA Aesthetics Guideline Master Plan is addressing that and
approaching finalization, and it would be nice to have some language so that those two can be put together.
She added San Diego has three under construction right now and they can make ft quite interesting and
aood longortunity to~gef some additional funding n She t ought rightVnow, jusmatp atfio m issproposed.s like a
9 pP
Selma Mann stated in connection with Mr. Adams' earlier comments, that he has been in full compliance with the
stipulations to the best of her knowledge and has been removing the shredder waste from the property.
~. Bruce Freeman, Code Enforcement Supervisor, responded to Chairwoman Boydstun that they are removing the
waste and providing the City with bills of lading on a weeMy basis.
Commissioner Henninger stated in the past Camelot was a problem and asked ff that has been resolved.
arise oc asionally during thelsummer, butrhe hasrnot hea deof any major concerns avid no complaints haven
been received for some time.
reoort and statement ofeo~er ideng onsideratonsmCommissioneBMayerCseconlded thetMotion and the motion t
P
carried.
Selma Mann clarified that the motion included the findings indicated on page 30 and Section 5 of the staff
report.
Commissioner Henninger stated with regard to the GPA, he thought it makes sense that the designation for the
area at La Palma and Richfield does not cut anybody's property in half. There is a existing development there
desi tnation.uiHenasked thatparchange be mlade tosthe boundaryito inc ude c~~at whole propertys are another
9
Greg Hastings clarified that the Commission wants that to be within Development Area 2 which is the industrial
base rather than Development Area 5 which is commercial. Commissioner Henninger responded that is correct.
05/0 /95
~ Page 13
Commissioner Henninger stated regarding the area adjacent to Camelot, there are commercial facilities and
there are recreational facilities which are similar to the commercial uses and it makes sense to extend that
commercial designation one lot further to the east.
was ncluded i nAreall which~ls theeindusMal area, and c atrified he is talking about thew de st p from they
hotel.
Commissioner Henninger stated he did not think the answer to his glare nioto the Taromtina facility as a fac Iity
properly util?zing the fteeway ftontage was really very responsive, po 9
that appropriately uses freeway frontage. He though that could be recreational, but unfortunately, they have
made a big investment there and it needs to stay. With regard to the area to the south, he thought in past
workshops commercial uses along the freeway frontage had been discussed which would take advantage of all
the people driving by on the freeway to be drawn to a commercial site.
Commissioner Bostwick stated looking at the existing land uses and at the property owned by the State, which
is a landfill, which he did not believe would be developed Into a commercial use without a great amount of
economic investment, it seems reasonable to leave the existing zoning in that area fnr the present time. He
c earto ttre otheriend further east todwheretFry's is located should probably be commaer IC from where ft is now,
Mr. Welch stated they did discuss the land uses on the south side of the 91 Freeway that is shown as
commercial wfth the City Council and it was strongly urged that that be long term retail sales and commercial
oriented designation to Increase revenue to the City along that edge and that could be recreational vehicle,
automotive related sales, etc. rather than industrial.
Commissioner Henninger pointed out there are recreational facilities on the north side up to and including the
bowling alley.
~ Mr. Welch stated there are those who believe the existing bowling alley is an interim land use and that long term
development should be industrial.
Commissioner Henninger noted there was a recent decision to locate Fry's in that area.
000 sq. ft. for retail and
Mr. Welch stated the way the Code is proposed, there is a minimum requirement of 50,
Fry's is a greater than 50,000 sq. ft. retail center. The edge at the other end was extended and did reflect a
commercial land use. That was discussed at the work sessions and was scaled back based on direction to
confine that commercial land use to the existing boundary.
Ha added one could say that with the bowling alley and wfth Fry's and other uses, in effect, the edge is
becoming more commercial as opposed to less commercial. He stated they are following the direction they
were given.
he accessn oints forget numbers of people into heesite~and expl nedthey would be codminga off la P Ima.
P
Mr. Welch stated the development plan has direct access off La Palma and also secondary access from the
street located to the east of DBW.
Commissioner Mayer asked if access would be proposed off Frontera ff commercial uses were intensffied on the
south side.
05/01/95
Page 14
Mr. Welch stated they have reviewed potential development for the south edge of the 91 Freeway and
understands that access and circulation for traffic and fire would require substantial dedication for some type of
loop frontage road that would serve that property from both Frontera and most likely looping back toward the
freeway or'e tedtretafl and comlmerlcial uses, including retailtrecreational vehtcl~es, boatsr an expa slon of ue
automotive uses, etc.
Chairwoman Boydstun agreed that the access there is very limited.
Commissioner Bostwick added the prospects for getting a road through the county around to Tustin Avenue is
probably nil. It is more practical for that land to be industrial. He thoubgu tthe trend has gonle that way.orCamelot
and that he is not sold on commercial on the south side of La Palma,
is going to want to expand and it might make sense to make that all commercial along there.
Mr. Welch stated a land use could be supported as a condftional use with a time limit on that designation and
proposed that the industrial land u; ~ `:.~ allowed by condftional use permit and that a time Iimft of 3 years be
permitted like other CUPs with limits for review. He th~;rght that type of use could be allowed In that manner.
ke to see that la d fusels as proposeed as reflecing loing term pohlcy and that may beoa way torallo~ They would
consideration of this use.
how dee
Commissioner Henninger stated if they are talking about commercial on the north side of the freeway, p
would it be and added he did not see it going all the way up to La Palma between the freeway and La Palma.
He added people do find their way to the bowling alley and that is not easy.
Mr. Welch stated most of the lots extending from La Palma to the freeway are deep lots and most of the
industrial parcels had their buildings located near La Palma and parking to the south along the freeway. Most of
that property in the past has been devoted to parking lot. One exception to that would be the bowling alley that
incorporated the purchase of a smaller parking lot site.
Commissioner Henninger asked how much of that parking lot is surplus and could be converted into some other
in the o as9 and ft is co 9 eivableithat some of the buildingsr out theregoday m ght be removed, m Orange County
P
but the far er buildings such as
Mr. Welch agreed that some of the smaller buildings could go that way, 9
Rockwell would stay. He referred to two properties at Mira Loma and Kraemer which are on the market for Vale
by Rockwell and those are two-story buildings. Rockwell is aggressively seeking users of that property. 'They
are seeing the industrial market respond very well during the past six months more towards the larger users in
those larger buildings.
An unidentified person pointed out to the Commission that Exhibits 19 and 20 of the Specific Plan do put the
type of development mentioned as potential reconfiguration of the deep lots.
Commissioner Henninger stated he thought this should be continued so staff can consider the Commission's
comments and maybe have another hearing regarding this matter. He stated the south side does not have the
demand for circulation like ii does on the north side.
Mr. Welch stated they would be glad to continue this matter and work with staff and the Planning Commission to
look at solutions for the freeway edge and fo- the area.
05/01/95
Page 15
the P ainninneCommissgons pse ous action relating to the E R The motionacaerried with ifive yes vo es.wfthdraw
9
`'~ The public hearing was reopened.
ACTION: Continued subject request to the May 15, 1995 Planning Commission meeting.
VQTE: 5-0 (Commissioner Messe declared a conflict of interest and Commissioner Caldwell was absent)
Chairwoman 3oydstun asked that the Commission's suggestions for the south side be considered.
r
+~:
05/Ot/~
Page 76
`...
4s, CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
4b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3756
OWNER: CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM,
7667 Folsom Boulevard, Sacramento, CA 95826;
FRANKLJN D. COLE, 1111 Towne And Country Road, Ste.
39, Orange, CA 92662
AGENT: MARK WHRFIELD c/o Donohue Schriber, 3501 Jamboree
Road, Ste. 300, Newport Beach, CA 92660; ERNIE WEBER
c/o Donohue Schriber, 3501 Jamboree Road, Ste. 300,
Newport Beach, CA 92660
LOCATION: ~QO North Eucli~+ cf.ppt Anaheim Plaza t n
Shogaina Centerl.
Property is approximately 9.02 acres located at the
northeast comer of Crescent Avenue and Euc11d Street.
To permft a 110-foot high cellular communications tower with a maximum
of sixteen (16) microwave dish antennae varying i~ size ftom 2-feet to 10-
feet in diameter, including an accessory equipment room
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0.
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION.
Continued to
May 15, 1995
SR5709KD.WP
Chairwoman Boydstun stated this matter will be continued; however, ff anyone wants to give input today, they
can do that or wait until the matter is heard later.
Grace Howard, Western National Property Management, stated they manage the Monte Verde apartments which
are to the east of this property and this is the first she has heard about this. She stated she would like to have
an artist's rendering of what would be there and what she would see from their 150-unit apartment complex.
She asked what kind of impact it will have on her property.
Chairwoman Boydstun stated ft is Commission's understanding that they are looking at some other sites.
Jonathan Borrego stated the applicant has asked for a two week continuance. He added staff has some
renderings in the file.
Commissioner Bostwick offered his copy of the rendering given to the Commissioners for Ms. Howard to show
her owner.
Commiss~o f antennas on top,ts mar totheaCalifomia iFederal Bank Build ~gside and it is 110 feet tall and it will
have a to 0
OPPOSITION: 1 perso~spoke
It was noted one view on the rendering Is from the shopping center and one is from Westmont.
05/01/95
Page 17
Greg Hastings suggested that Ms. Howard contact Karen Dudley in the Zoning Division since she is the planner
working on this project.
`-~~ Commissioner Henninger asked ff this includes antennas mounted on roofs of buildings.
Greg Hastings stated staff would like to explore that issue. They have had meetings with some of the carriers
and they may wish to place these on buildings effher on the top or on the skies and there is new techndogy
and staff would like to see these come in as a master program to see ff they are on tops or sides of buidings or
freestanding.
Commissioner Henninger asked ff the recommendation should include roof and wail mounted antennas.
Mr. Hastings responded that should be included and worded to include any type of wireless communications,
towers, or monopole facilities. He stated the master plan could be controlled by a condtionai use permit as
well.
ACTION: the appli~canttoesearch for aoltemative re5ocat~io5n sites~ng Commission meeting in order for
M TI N: Commissioner Bostwick offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Messe
and MOTION CARRIED (Commissioner Caldwell absent) that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby direct the City Attorney's Office to prepare a draft ordinance for
immediate and direct submittal to the City Council for their consideration and adoption
requiring a conditional use permit for cellular or wireless communications, towers or
monopole facilities in all commercial and industrial zone and, further, that subject ordinance
include an exemption for the existing cellular facilties being considered for relocation in
conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 3756.
~ VOTE: 6-0 (Commissioner Caldwell absent)
05/01/95
Page 18
5a ~E(iA NEGATNE DECLARATION (Previously Approved)
5b. rONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3670 (Readvertised)
OWNER: 10100SPioneerCBivdN~C 106SSaM..aCFe SpringsO, CA 109 650
AGENT: TAYLOR CAITLIN PROPERTIES, P.O. Box 3568, Huntington
Beach, CA 92605-3568
Continued to
bAPy 31, 199'5
LOCATION: 14 N Beach Boulevard (tormeriv The Electric Circus).
Property is approximately 0.67 acres located on the east
side of Beach Boulevard and approximately 1,050 feet north
of the centerline of Lincoln Avenue.
Petitioner requests modification or deletion of conditions of approval
pertaining to the Ilmitation of time, unffomted security, bar or lounge area,
and code enforcement inspections to permit the on-premise sales and
consumption of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with an existing
~staurant/billiard center with musical (live entertainment).
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0.
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION.
OPPOSITION: None
ACTION: Continued subject request to the May 31, 1995 Planning Commission meeting, as requested by
the applicant.
VOTE: 6-0 (Commissioner Caldwell absent)
05/01/95
Page 19
~~
6a, EOA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION-CLASS 11
6b. VARIANCE N0.4270
OWNER: ORE HOLDING COMPANY, 865 S. Figueroa Street, #3500,
Los Angeles, CA 90017
AGENT: TRANSTAR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE, 2115 W.
Crescent Ave., #201, Anaheim, CA 92801; OUTDOOR
DIMENSIONS, Attn: Jana Roberts, 1818 E. Orangethorpe,
Fullerton, CA 92631
LOCATION: 2101 2121 West Cresce Avenue and 700-720
~~°~~°V Street ITri Freeway Commerce Parkl.
Subject property consists of two (2) irregularly-shaped
parcels of land: Parcel 1 consists of approximately 3.4
acres located at the northeast comer of Crescent Avenue
and Valley Street, having approximate frontages of 490 feet
on the north side of Crescent Avenue and 240 feet on the
east side of Valley Street. Parcel 2 consists of
approximately 9.2 acres located north of the Orange
County Flood Control Channel having a frontage of
approximately 840 feet on the east side of Valley Street,
having a maximum depth of approximately 890 feet acid
being located approximately 360 feet north of the
centerline of Crescent Avenue.
To construct two freestanding monument signs with waiver of permitted
number of freestanding signs.
VARIANCE RESOLUTION NO. PC95-45
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION.
No action
Granted
Jana Roberts, Outdoor Dimensions, 1818 E. Orangethorpe, Fullerton, stated these two signs are existing on the
property he foundaout that~hey wereano~t lab o to have the two signsasi cethe ordinan ehhas been c~hangfed.the
permits,
Basically, they would like to be able to continue to have the two signs.
OPPOSITION: None
ACTION: Granted Variance No. 4270 with the findings shown on Page 4 of the staff report and with the
following added finding:
That special circumstances apply to the subject property due to its large size and the
proximity of the Orange County Flood Control Channel which intersects the property and
creates a natural separation of the two halves of the business park.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
VOTE: 6-0 (Commissioner Caldwell absent)
Selma Mann, Deputy Ciry Attorney, presented the 22 day appeal rights.
05/01/95
Page 20
rFne NEGATIVE DECLARATION Continued to
7a. May 31, 1995
~~ 7b. CONDITIONA' "SE PERMIT N0.375fd
OWNER: MO0 YEOL RAH and HWA JA RAH, 2207 W. Woodley
Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92801
LOCATION: 2211 and 2207 West Woolley Avenue and 323 North
Brookhurst Street. Property is approximately 0.60 acres
located at the northwest comer of Woolley Avenue and
Brookhurst Street.
To permit an expansion of an existing child day care facility (in
conjunction with asingle-family home).
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0.
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTfON.
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Moo Rah, owner, explained this request is to use the em•,',ty building at 323
Norts eroonikhhas about 25 aThe emilpty building has been ato urce of graffiti and vandalism and is an eyesoireren,
but Y
She stated two thirds of the children attend school, and that parking is not a problem. She has a van and picks
~~. up some of the children at school and brings them to the facility.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Chairwoman Boydstun stated all the concrete in front bothered her and thought five parallel parking spaces could
be provided there, plus a driveway and 12 feet would be left that could be bermed and planted with grass. She
thought that would make it more eye appealing for that neighborhood.
Ms. Rah stated she would comply with whatever the City requires. She explained she has a contractor to do the
work the way the City had indicated. She responded to Commissioner Henninger that she did not think ali the
parking spaces required are needed.
Alfred Yalda, Principal Traffic Engineer, showed Ms. Rah a sketch of what Chairwoman Boydstun was talking
about.
Jonathan Borrego, Senior Planner, stated when the petitioner spoke with Planning staff last week, she indicated
that she had contracted with someone to remove the landscaping at 2207 Woolley and staff had told her not to
have the work done until after this action was taken by the Planning Commission. Staff had felt since the
property is still used as a residence, the landscaping should remain. If she ever vacates the property, ft probably
would be used as a residence again.
Commissioner Messe asked how many parking spaces could be provided if the landscaping Isn't removed.
Jonathan Borrego stated there were five spaces available on the property on Brookhurst; there were two garage
spaces and the two spaces behind the garage at 2207 Woolley which they use now, and then there would be
05/01/95
Page 21
three spaces in front of 2211 Woodley, so there would be 10 ~,~aces and all the landscaping could be retained on
2207 Woodley, and there is no landscaping at 2211 at the present time. He stated the amount of concrete would
~~ remain the same but the parking would be restriped. He stated staff would recommend a continuance of four
weetts so this matter can be readvertised for parking and landscaping waivers.
Commissioner Messe suggested the applicant consider the suggestion proposed wtth landscape berm to hide
some of the parking.
ACTION: Continued subject request to the May 31, 1995. Planning Commission meeting for redesign and
possible readvertisement of the project.
VOTE: 6-0 (Commissioner Caldwell absent)
.~
05/01/95
Page 22
Approved
8a. ~EOA NEGATIyE DECLARATION Granted
8b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3753
OWNER: JAMES BOSTICK and ROSEMARY BOSTICK, 15856
Garden Bar Drive, Grass Valley, CA 95949
AGENT: JAMES H. ELROD, 373 EI Encanto Dfire, Pasadena, CA
91107
LOCATION: 2670E La Cre~+~ Avenue. Property is approximately
1.88 acres located on the south skle of La Cresta Avenue
and approximately 785 feet east of the centerline of Blue
Gum Street.
To permit a truck maintenance facility with outdoor storage of vehiclas,
fueling islands, vehicle washing facility, vehicle repair, and office uses.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC95- 6
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION.
OPPOSITION: None
Jim Elrod, Architect, stated he had read the staff report and conditions and that the owner is willing to comply
with the conditions as proposed.
+~ THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Commissioner Henninger referred to the staff's recommendation for a berm and block wall Instead of what is
shown currently on the plans and asked ff that is acceptable to the owner.
Mr. Elrod responded it is not acceptable exactly as it is written. He explained he has in mind to provide a berm
wfthin that 10-foot area and put a low hedge along the top of the berm. The purpose for the wrought iron fencing
is to provide securely. The owner has a lot of expensive equipment. They would like to work with staff and come
up with a Idea for the wrought iron fence which is very expensive and then put the berm in the middle of the 10-
foovide a 3 ootlberm and maybe a 2 ort3tfoot high hedge with the w~oughtdiron fence behind the lberm and~he
pro
fencing would be 6-foot high.
He stated the eye level w111 be at about 5 feet from the top of the sidewalk. They are in the middle of getting their
grading plan right now and they will be berming the entire site on the front.
Jonathan Borrego stated Code required any storage area to be completely screened from public view~and hned
make sure thatseverythinglthaelt is sdtored onathe site is f ly screened fromfpubUc view a with the app
Commissioner Henninger stated a condition cout Qbe~abd P anai g sotraff to fully sc eenthe sto ge fromff public
applicant will have a landscape/fencing plan app Y
view.
u5/o1 /s5
Page 23
Mr. Elrod stated they have another request following this which is two lots to the east and they will fdiow the
same theme as the result of this hearing on that property. They would like to keep some continufty since ft is
~,} owned by tra same owner.
ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration
Granted Conditional Use Permft No. 3753 wfth the following added condftion:
That prior to iss~nce of a building permft, the applicant shall submft a landscape/fencing plan to
the Zoning D(vision for review and approval by staff. Said plan shall demonstrate the complete
screening of the equipment storage area from public view.
VOTE: 6-0 (Commissioner Caldwell absent)
Selma Mann, Deputy City Attorney, presented the 22-day appeal rights.
L
05/01/95
Page 24
( ~~ 9a. r'EtIA NEGATNE DECLARATION
~-.• 9b. WAIVER OF CODE REGIUIREMENT (DELETED)
go, ^^o•',^o'ITI^"~AL USE PERMIT N0.3752
Q;JIfNIER: CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 1065 N.
ParfBCenter Drive, #200, Anaheim, CA 92806
AGENT: CALM=ORNIA DANCE ACADEMY, Attn: Danielle Long, 1265
N. Manassero Street, #307, Anaheim, CA 92807
LOCATION: 12x5 N Manassero Street Ste 307 and 308. Property
is approximately 8.1 acres located at the northwest comer
of La Palma Avenue and Manassero Street.
To retain a physical fitness center (dance studio/school) with waiver of
minimum number of parking.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC95-47
FOLLI'1WING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION.
OPPOSITION: None
Approved
No action
Granted, in part
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Danielle Long, owner, stated she has had a business in the industrial area of
;_.. Anaheim since 1990, and is applying to move 0.3 of a mile west of the original location.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Commissioner Messe asked if the hours of operation shown in the staff report are acceptable and Ms. Long
responded they are.
ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration
Took no action on Waiver of Code Requirement because waiver was deleted
Granted, in part, Conditional Use Permit No. 3752
VOTE: 6-0 (Commissioner Caldwell absent)
Selma Mann, Deputy City Attorney, presented the 22-day appeal rights.
05/01/95
Page 25
Approved
10a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved
~~ 10b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT Granted for 3 years
10c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3754 ('ro expire 5-1-98)
OWNER: DOW'S ACREAGE, C/O KEWSKI PROPERTY, P.O. Box
6295, Garden Grove, CA 92645
LOCATION: 128-136 South Brookhurst Street. Property is
approximately 6.99 acres located south and east of the
southeast comer of Lincoln Avenue and Brookhurst Street.
To permit a 6,500-square foot church within an existing shopping center
with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RES~~LUTION N0. P 4
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION.
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Pastor Ray Valverde, Pastor of Victory Baptist Church, stated the building will be
ul o the wi I have an office there.aThe chuc h is currently mreetng athashotel and it s getting t roncrowdedek and
as y
because their congregation has grown.
'~ THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Chairwoman Boydstun asked ho~v many members they have and he responded there are about 130, including
the children.
Pastor Valverde clarified the hours would be 9 to 5, Tuesday through Friday, for the office and that the night
meetings would start at 7:30 p.m. and go to about 9:00 p.m. on Friday nights, and on Sunday mornings from
10:30a.m. to about 12:30 p.m.
Commi~~`~ner Messe asked if he had read the staff report and conditions and Pastor Valverde responded he had.
ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration
Approved Waiver of Coda Requirement
Granted Conditional Use Permit No. 3754 for 3 years.
Modified Condition No. 1 to read:
That church services and congregational meetings shall be held no earlier than 7:00 p.m.
Monday through Friday.
VOTE: 6-0 (Commissioner Caldwell absent)
Selma Mann, Deputy City Attorney, presented the 22-day appeal rights.
05/01/95
Page 26
The meeting adjourned at 3:40 p.m., to the regularly scheduled morning sflssfon of Msy 15, 1995 at
~} 11:00 a.ni.
Respectfully submitted,
~~?~ ~l.
Edith L Harris
Planning Cpmmissi~n Support Supervisor
'~ 05/01/95
Pase 27