Loading...
Minutes-PC 2009/06/22City of Anaheim Planning Commission Minutes Monday,June 22, 2009 Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California Commissioners Present :Chairman: Joseph Karaki Peter Agarwal, Kelly Buffa, Gail Eastman, Stephen Faessel, Victoria Ramirez, Panky Romero Commissioners Absent :None Staff Present : CJ Amstrup, Planning Services ManagerElaine Thienprasiddhi, Associate Planner Ted White, Senior PlannerRaul Garcia,Principal CivilEngineer Mark Gordon, Assistant City AttorneyDavid Kennedy, Associate Transportation Planner David See, Senior PlannerGrace Medina, Senior Secretary Della Herrick, Associate Planner Agenda Posting: A complete copy of the Planning Commission Agenda was posted at1:00 p.m. onWednesday,June 17, 2009, inside the display case located in the foyer of the Council Chamber, and also in the outside display kiosk. Published:Anaheim Bulletin Newspaper onThursday, June 11,2009 Call to Order-2:30 p.m. Attendance: 9 Pledge of AllegiancebyCommissioner Agarwal Appreciation Plaque Presented to Commissioner Gail Eastman Public Comments Consent Calendar Public Hearing Items Adjournment JUNE22, 2009 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda -2:30 P.M. Public Comments: None ITEM NO. 1A –May 27, 2009 Meeting MinutesMotionto approve minutes (Eastman/Faessel) Receiving and approving the Minutes from the Planning Approved Commission Meeting of May 27, 2009. VOTE: 6yes votes, 1 abstention Chairman Karaki and Commissioners Agarwal, Buffa, Eastman, Faessel and Romero voted yes. Commissioner Ramirez abstained. 06/22/09 Page 2of 16 JUNE22, 2009 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Public Hearing Items: ITEM NO. 2 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1322 Resolution No. PC2008-061 (TRACKING NO. CUP2008-05356),Resolution No. PC2008-062 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4014 (Buffa) (TRACKING NO. CUP2009-05428) AND VARIANCE NO. 2009-04776 Approved Owners: Sidney Bickel 5585 Via Dicha#B Amendment to Laguna Hills, CA 92653 CUP No. 1322 Modified Condition Nos. First Southern Baptist Church 3and 15 1275 East Broadway Anaheim, CA 92805 Applicant:VOTE: 6-1 Phil Schwartze PRS GroupChairman Karaki and 31872 SanJuanCreekCircleCommissioners Buffa, SanJuanCapistrano,CA92675Eastman, Faessel, Ramirez and Romerovoted yes. Location:633 South East Street (Quartz Dealer Direct) Commissioner Agarwalvoted 1275 East Broadway no. (First Southern Baptist Church) The applicant proposes toreinstate a previously-approved Project Planner: Ted White conditional use permit for Quartz Dealer Direct, an automotive twhite@anaheim.net wholesale and retail auction facility with fewer parking spaces than required by Code, and delete a condition of approval which sets an expiration date for the permit; and,amend a previously- approved conditional use permit for the First Southern Baptist Church and private school to permit satellite parking for the Quartz Dealer Direct business with fewer parking spaces than required by Code. Environmental Determination: A Negative Declaration has been determined to serve as the appropriate environmental documentation for this requestin accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This item was continued from the May 27, 2009 Planning Commission meeting. Ted White, Senior Planner, provided a summary of the staff report dated June 22, 2009,along with a visual presentation. 06/22/09 Page 3of 16 JUNE22, 2009 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Chairman Karakiasked for confirmationtheapplicant wasgoing to use wristbands or tickets to monitor access to the facility and dissuade their patrons from parking on the nearby streets.He also inquired about the possibility of using cones or a-frame signs to help alleviate the problem. Chairman Karaki opened the public hearing. Phillip R. Schwartze, representing Quartz Dealer Direct,31872 San Juan Creek Circle, San Juan Capistrano, statedtheyhad researched the possibility of using temporary signs on Crestbrook Place to inform their patrons to not park on the street; however, becauseof City restrictionsregarding the use of conesor signs in the public right of way,the ultimate decision was made to usewristbandsto control parking and access. The bands would be usedone time only and color coded by day to prevent reuse. When a patronboardedthe jitney atthe off-site location, a wristband would be issued. Only persons with wristbands wouldbe allowed on the property. In addition, a uniformed security guardwould be stationed at Crestbrook Place during the auto auction periods, which would be Monday and Friday afternoons. Mr. Schwartze said he had sent a letter to the neighbors who made comments at the May 27, 2009 Planning Commission Meetingasking for their ideas onhow to eliminate the parking issue. He also asked them for photographs of patronswho parkedon the street so they could identify them. He hadnot received any correspondence from the residents. Commissioner Eastman referred to a letter from a resident stating the parking situation had improved. She said she was concerned that people were parking on the street several hours beforethe auction commenced. She suggested the applicant’s security guard ask people sitting in parked cars on Crestbrook Place if they were there for the auction. Mr. Schwartze said he they had considered providing the security guard with a camera. He would take pictures of the vehicles in question, including the license plate numbers, which would be fairly simple for Quartz to trace. Commissioner Ramirez asked if the brokers attending the auctions were repeat customers. Mr. Schwartze said most brokers wererepeat customers. At times, Quartz receivedcars from rental companies which brought in a different type of customer. However, theymust all be licensed wholesale auto brokers in order to buy cars. Commissioner Ramirez asked if these brokers were made aware of the parking issues on Crestbrook Place. Mr. Schwartze said because they now had a permanent off-site parking locationwhere customers couldconsistently park, it would be easier to inform them. Commissioner Ramirez inquired about a statement made by a resident of Crestbrook Place at the May 27, 2009 meeting,that persons parking on the street were waiting for brokers to exit the auction. Mr. Schwartze said he was not sure why theywould be there. If photographic evidence was provided to him, license plate numbers could be traced. Commissioner Faessel said he was in the vicinity on Monday, June 15, 2009,at approximately 5:15 p.m. and spent time examining the layout. There was significant action throughout the area: cars 06/22/09 Page 4of 16 JUNE22, 2009 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES were being moved around, entering and exiting the driveway. However, he did not see any cars on Crestbrook Place. He said he had been in the area again on Monday, June 22, 2009,at approximately 1:15 p.m. He noticed many cars were parked on Crestbrook Place; however, he was not able to determine if the cars belonged to auction customers or residents of the neighborhood. He did not observe a guard in the area. Mr. Schwartze said the guard normally begins his shift at3:00 p.m. Commissioner Faessel suggested a guard begin his shift earlier in the day. He said he was concerned withthe overall impact of the parking situation onthe residents. Leslie Anderson, 1209 East Crestbrook Place, Anaheim, stated the following concerns: although parking issues have decreasedwithin the last month, onFriday, June 19 at 11:30 a.m., he noticed several vehicles from Quartz parked on CrestbrookPlace for a short duration;and, the parking situation on Crestbrook Place had notbeen conveyed toauction patronssince the last Planning Commission hearing. Considering that the issues had been occurring for the past eight to ten years, he did not believe thiswas a positive signthe business would be able to address the problems.He commended Mr. Schwartzefor hiring an outside security companyto attempt to find a solution to the parking situation. He hadobservedthe guard sittingin his car, discouragingpersons from doing business on CrestbrookPlace. Mr. Anderson could not confirm whetherthe guard was wearing a uniformor not.He said that in September 2007, after a Planning Commission hearing, the guard was only there for a couple of weeks. He was concerned that this would bea temporary solutionand that problems would persist. Mr. Anderson askedwhy the Planning Commission wouldconsider a two year permit as Quartzhadreceived a one year extension in September 2007,which expired in September 2008.He asked if a two year permit was granted, could he expect it to expire in three years with no conditions.Mr. Anderson said he hadalso witnessed a patronpark his car on Dawn Street and walk over to the auction.He saidthe parking problems were not just limited to Crestbrook Place. Mr.Schwartze said when they filed for an extension,they realized the church which allowed them to use their parking lot had an expired conditional use permit. The new site for parking had only been available to brokers within the last forty-five days. He said he believed the parking issues would be alleviated as brokers become aware of the new site. Chairman Karaki closed the public hearing. Commissioner Buffa said she believedthe community hada legitimate complaint that they were bearing the burden ofoverflow parkingfrom the business. She suggested periodic inspections by City staff, such asninety days from the meeting date and again in six months, to ensure the new conditions were effective. Shesaid shebelieved the wristband program could work. Commissioner Ramirez agreed with Commissioner Buffa’s comments. She saidthere was a condition in the resolution requiring the owner to pay for inspectionsif necessary. She suggested the frequency of the inspections should be determined by Planning staff. Commissioner Romero said hewas concerned with placing aburden on the neighborhood. He said in hindsight, the proactive uniformed guard and wristband program should have been implemented two years ago. He also agreedthere should be periodic inspectionsby City staff. 06/22/09 Page 5of 16 JUNE22, 2009 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Commissioner Eastman stated that parking was an issue throughout the city and it wasdifficult to attribute a stray car to any one source. She said she would like to see the Code Enforcement records which would indicate how much proactive reporting there hadbeen in the Crestbrook Place neighborhood. She encouraged the residents to continue calling Code Enforcement to report people who do not belong on their street or who aresleeping or sitting in their cars for an extended amount of time. Commissioner Faessel said he agreed with the comments made by Commissioners Buffa and Eastman. He stated this permit wouldexpire in August 2010. He asked staff how long it would it take for it to returnto the Planning Commission. Ted White, Senior Planner,said the requestwasfor a retroactive two year extension of time, from August, 2008toAugust, 2010. He clarified that by code, the applicant hada six month period after expiration of a permit to submit a request for reinstatement. In this case, the applicant had submitted the request within the required time period. However, because they were working on the parking agreement, it took additionaltime to get the item on the agenda for Commission consideration. Commissioner Faessel said he agreed with Commissioner Buffa’s comment regarding placing an unnecessary burden on the neighborhood residents. There had been testimony in the past hearings regarding on-going parking issues. He agreedthat more oversight was needed. Commissioner Agarwal said the applicant’s proposal was not sufficient. He stated for the past seven to eight years,the Commissionhad extended the permit with the hope that an alternative site would be found and that hadnot happened. He said he did not support the project. Chairman Karaki said he sharedthe same concerns as his fellow Commissioners. This wasonly a partial solution, but he would like to give the applicant the benefit of the doubt that compliance would be achieved.He recommended that the residents report any activity that was not in compliance with the conditions of approval. Commissioner Buffaoffered a recommendation that the Planning Commission adopt the resolutions attached to the June 22, 2009 staff report, determining that the Negative Declaration servesas the appropriate environmental documentation for this request and approvingan amendment to Conditional Use Permit Nos. 1322 and 4014and Variance No. 2009-04776,with modificationsto Condition Nos. 3 and 15 of Conditional Use Permit No. 1322. The modification to Condition No.15 would providefor quarterly Code Enforcement inspections. The modification to Condition No. 3 would requirea uniformed guard be posted at Crestbrook Placethree hours in advanceof any auto auction and during all auction hours. Grace Medina, Senior Secretary,announced that the resolution passed with sixyesvotesand one no vote.Chairman Karaki and Commissioners Buffa, Eastman, Faessel, Ramirez and Romero voted yes. Commissioner Agarwalvoted no. 06/22/09 Page 6of 16 JUNE22, 2009 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OPPOSITION: One personspoke in opposition to the subject request. CORRESPONDENCE: One piece of correspondence was submitted. Mark Gordon, Assistant City Attorney, presented the 22-day appeal rights ending at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 14, 2009. DISCUSSION TIME :35minutes (2:38to 3:13) 06/22/09 Page 7of 16 JUNE22, 2009 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ITEM NO. 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2009-05406Resolution No. PC2009-063 (Eastman) Owner: Robert Smith Approved Smith Properties 3500 East La Palma Avenue VOTE: 6-1 Anaheim, CA 92806 Chairman Karaki and Applicant: Phillip SchwartzeCommissioners Agarwal, PRS GroupBuffa, Eastman, Faesseland 31872 San Juan Creek CircleRamirez voted yes. San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675Commissioner Romero voted no. Location:1011 North Grove Street The applicant proposes to operate a towing and impound yard Project Planner: David See in conjunction with automobile repair and outdoor and indoor dsee@anaheim.net vehicular storage on a property developed with a warehouse building. Environmental Determination: The proposed action is categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Class 1(Existing Facilities). David See, Senior Planner, provided a summary of the staff report dated June 22, 2009,along with a visual presentation. Copies of a letter from an anonymous property owner on Grove Street,opposing the project wereprovided to the Commission. Commissioner Agarwal asked staff if Grove Street would be used by ambulancesas an entrance and exitto Kaiser Hospital once it was built. Mr. See responded that the driveways would serve as entrance and exit to service vehicles, paramedics and emergency vehicles. Commissioner Agarwal asked if there were plans to widen Grove Street. Raul Garcia, Principal Civil Engineer, said there was not an active project to widen the street; however, Kaiser Hospital had been conditioned to dedicate an additional six feet of right-of-way adjacent to Grove Streettoprovide a sidewalk and parkway only. The curb and gutter wouldnot change. Commissioner Agarwal asked whetherGrove Street met the minimum requirements forastreet with parkingon both sides. He wanted to know whether the street was wide enoughfor emergency vehicles to use. 06/22/09 Page 8of 16 JUNE22, 2009 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Mr.Garcia said the existing street standard allowedfor parking on both sides with a travel lane in each direction. David Kennedy, Associate Transportation Planner, said on-street parking accountedfor eight feet of pavement on either side of the street. Grove Street is designated as an “Interior Industrial” street and hada width of fifty two feet from curb to curb and parking would occupy sixteen feet of thatwidth. If cars were illegally parked, there would still be enough room for an ambulance to travelon the street. Commissioner Faessel asked staff if there would be an increase in traffic because of trash vehicles, vehicles carrying oxygen and other materials that hospitals normally required, and the additional delivery vehicles associated with the new utility plant on Grove Street. Mr. See said staff’s main concern was the blocking of traffic lanes. Commissioner Faessel said he was concerned not only with the off-loading of vehicles, but alsothe normal traffic associated with the hospital. Commissioner Romero said he concurred with the statements in the letter from the anonymous property owner. He said he haddriven past Grove Street several times throughout the day and evening and noticed it was often blocked with cars. He said he could not imagine what congestion issues there wouldbe once the hospital opened. Chairman Karaki opened the public hearing. Phillip Schwartze, the applicant, 31872 San Juan Creek Circle, San Juan Capistrano, stated that in the past, tow truck operators had used the entire cul-de-sac as their own private space because there was not much traffic going through. In the last six or eight months, the traffic and parking along Grove Street had increased due to the construction at the Kaiser Hospital and The Crossings Apartments. He said Robert Smith, the property owner, would ensure that the lessee of the tow truck business would conform to the rules and regulations. There were currently two and one half businesses on the property. One was Bitetto Towing and the other an auto repair business which builtcustom cars. Commissioner Faessel said he had driven by the previous Saturday and observed numerous cars on the street as construction work was in progress. He asked how a tow truck driver would deliver a car onto the property once construction was completed. Mr. Schwartze said a truck would normally off-load on one of the two Grove Street entrances to the tow yard into a slot in the yard or inside the building. Commissioner Buffa asked if the auto repair business wasopen to the public for general automotive repairs. Mr. Schwartze said they only do custom work. Chairman Karaki closed the public hearing. 06/22/09 Page 9of 16 JUNE22, 2009 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Chairman Karaki commented that once the hospital is built, the property owner would have to comply with all the regulations and Condition No. 9 pertaining to accessibility to Grove Street. Commissioner Agarwal said all the conditions would not be met all of the time. A problem will arise when an emergency vehicle needs to get through and there are vehicles blockingits path. Commissioner Buffa commented that within a fifty two foot right-of-way, even if you lose eightfeet on either side for parking, there would still be two generous travel lanes. If a tow truck or trash truck were on one side of the street and anambulance needed to get by, it would use the oncoming traffic lane as they have the right to do. She said she could not foresee a circumstance where an ambulance would be blocked. Commissioner Buffa stated that the traffic problems would decrease once construction was complete and there would not be as many traffic issues. Commissioner Eastman offered a recommendation that the Planning Commission adopt the resolution attached to the June 22, 2009 staff report, determining that a Class 1 Categorical Exemption serve as the appropriate environmental documentation for this request and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2009-05406. Grace Medina, Senior Secretary,announced that the resolution passed with six yesvotesand one no vote.Chairman Karaki and Commissioners Agarwal, Buffa, Eastman, Faessel and Ramirez voted yes. Commissioner Romero voted no. OPPOSITION: One piece of correspondence opposing the project was submitted. Mark Gordon, Assistant City Attorney, presented the 22-day appeal rights ending at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 14, 2009. DISCUSSION TIME :25 minutes (3:13to 3:38) 06/22/09 Page 10of 16 JUNE22, 2009 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ITEM NO. 4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2009-05410Resolution No. PC2009-064 (Faessel) Owner: Kazem Khoyloo BP West Coast Products Approved, added condition P.O. Box 5015 pertaining to the installation Buena Park, CA 90622 of right turn only signs on Applicant:the two easterly driveways Fiedler Group Ericka Skeie rd 2322 West 3Street VOTE: 7-0 Los Angeles, CA 90057 Chairman Karaki and Location:2445 East Ball Road Commissioners Agarwal, Buffa, Eastman, Faessel, The applicant proposes to establish a convenience market in RamirezandRomerovoted conjunction with an existing service station.yes. Environmental Determination: The proposed action is categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare Project Planner: Della Herrick environmental documentation per California Environmental dherrick@anaheim.net Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Class 1 (Existing Facilities). Della Herrick, Associate Planner, provided a summary of the staff report dated June 22, 2009,along with a visual presentation. Commissioner Faessel asked if the convenience store immediately to the west sold liquor. Ms. Herrick responded yes. Chairman Karaki opened the public hearing. Ericka Skeie, representing the applicant, the Fiedler Group, 2322 West Third Street, Los Angeles, said she was available to answer any questions. Chairman Karaki closed the public hearing. Commissioner Faessel said there was a constant traffic problem with cars exiting the driveways on the east side of the gas station trying to turn left and head north on Sunkist or trying to get into the left turn laneto head east on Ball Road. David Kennedy, Associate TransportationPlanner,said there were currently no prohibitions from turning left out of the driveways onto Sunkist Street. Traffic conditions madethat movement extremely difficult, particularly during peakmorninghours.Mr. Kennedy suggested installation of right turn only signs at both driveways on the east side of the property. 06/22/09 Page 11of 16 JUNE22, 2009 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Chairman Karaki re-opened the public hearing to allow the applicant to respond to Mr. Kennedy’s suggestion. Ms. Skeie said they would be willing to install right turn onlysigns at both driveways located on the east side of the property. Chairman Karaki closed the public hearing. Commissioner Faesseloffered a recommendation that the Planning Commission adopt the resolution attached to the June 22, 2009 staff report, determining that a Class 1 Categorical Exemption serve as the appropriate environmental documentation for this request and approvingConditional Use Permit No. 2009-05410with the addition of a condition which would include the installation of right turn only signs on both drivewayson the east side of the property. Grace Medina, Senior Secretary,announced that the resolution passed with sevenyesvotes. Chairman Karaki and Commissioners Agarwal, Buffa, Eastman, Faessel, Ramirez and Romero voted yes. OPPOSITION: None Mark Gordon, Assistant City Attorney, presented the 22-day appeal rights ending at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 14, 2009. DISCUSSION TIME :14minutes (3:39to 3:53) 06/22/09 Page 12of 16 JUNE22, 2009 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ITEM NO. 5 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1215Resolution No. PC2009-065 (TRACKING NO. CUP2009-05423) (Faessel) Owner/ Michael Carlston Applicant:Approved Kenney Golf Enterprises, Inc. 3200 East Carpenter Avenue Anaheim, CA 92806 VOTE: 7-0 Location:3200 East Carpenter Avenue Chairman Karaki and Commissioners Agarwal, The applicant proposes to operate a day care center inBuffa, Eastman, Faessel, conjunction with an existing entertainment facility (Camelot Ramirez and Romerovoted Golfland).yes. Environmental Determination: The proposed action is categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare Project Planner: Elaine Thienprasiddhi environmental documentation per California Environmental ethien@anaheim.net Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines,Class 1 (Existing Facilities). Elaine Thienprasiddhi, Associate Planner, provided a summary of the staff report dated June 22, 2009,along with a visual presentation. Chairman Karaki opened the public hearing. Jim Kenney,representing Golfland, 3200 East Carpenter Avenue, Anaheim, said he was available to answer any questions. Chairman Karakiasked Mr. Kenney why he had decided to open a daycare at his existing facility. Mr. Kenney said that during the week when school wasin session, business wasvery slow. In responseto the current economy, he came up with this idea to increaserevenue.During the day, they could have children in an area that was virtually unoccupied. They hired consultants to start the program and they look forward to starting a new branch of their business. Commissioner Faessel asked Mr. Kenney if the restaurant/party area was the space that was being converted to use as the daycarecenter. Mr. Kenney said it was and that it would still be used on the weekends and evenings for parties and special events. Commissioner Ramirez asked Mr. Kenney if he was currently working with State agencies to meet all applicable requirements to operate a daycare facility. He asked how far they werein the process. th Michael Carlston,181 North 19Avenue, Phoenix, AZ, said he was overseeing the Camelot facility. They were currently inthe application process withthe State. He hadattended meetings and an 06/22/09 Page 13of 16 JUNE22, 2009 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES orientation regarding the rules and regulations. He said they could notsubmitan application until they appointed a director, which would be done ifthe Planning Commission approved the request. Mr. Kenney said the process normally takes approximately 180 days. Chairman Karaki closed the public hearing. Commissioner Eastman offered a recommendation that the Planning Commission adopt the resolution attached to the June 22, 2009 staff report, determining that a Class 1 Categorical Exemption serve as the appropriate environmental documentation for this request and approving an amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 1215. Grace Medina, Senior Secretary,announced that the resolution passedwith sevenyesvotes. Chairman Karaki and Commissioners Agarwal, Buffa, Eastman, Faessel, Ramirez and Romero voted yes. OPPOSITION: None Mark Gordon, Assistant City Attorney, presented the 22-day appeal rights ending at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 14, 2009. DISCUSSION TIME :6minutes (3:53to 3:59) 06/22/09 Page 14of 16 JUNE22, 2009 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ITEM NO. 6 ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2009-00079Motion to continue item to July 8, 2009 Applicant: Planning Department(Eastman/Agarwal) City of Anaheim 200 South Anaheim Boulevard VOTE: 7-0 Anaheim, CA 92805 Chairman Karaki and Location:Citywide Commissioners Agarwal, Buffa, Eastman, Faessel, This is a proposal to amendvarious chapters of Title 18 of the RamirezandRomero voted Anaheim Municipal Codepertaining to Zoning Administrator yes. authority, drought tolerant landscaping provisions, freestanding sign provisions within the Scenic Corridor (SC) Overlay Zone; creation of an off-site parking arrangement process; and, approval, appeal, withdrawal, modification and revocation procedures/timeframes for various zoning actions. The chapters proposed to be amended include: Chapter 1.12 Project Planner: Vanessa Norwood (Procedures); Chapter 14.60 (Transportation Demand); Chapter vnorwood@anaheim.net 17.08 (Subdivisions); Chapter 18.18 (Scenic Corridor (SC) Overlay Zone); Chapter 18.24 (South Anaheim Boulevard Corridor (SABC) Overlay Zone); Chapter 18.30 (Downtown Mixed Use Overlay Zone); Chapter 18.36 (Types of Uses); Chapter 18.38 (Supplemental Use Regulations); Chapter 18.42 (Parking and Loading); Chapter 18.44 (Signs); Chapter 18.46 (Landscaping and Screening); Chapter 18.52 (Density Bonuses); Chapter 18.56 (Nonconformities); Chapter 18.60 (Procedures); Chapter 18.62 (Administrative Reviews); Chapter 18.64 (Area Development Plans); Chapter 18.66 (Conditional Use Permits); Chapter 18.74 (Variances);Chapter 18.114(Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No.92-1); Chapter 18.116(Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No.92-2); Chapter 18.118(Hotel Circle Specific Plan No.93- 1); and Chapter 18.120(Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94-1). Environmental Determination: The proposed action is categorically exempt from therequirement to prepare environmental documentation per Section 21080 of the Public Resources Code. DISCUSSION TIME :This item was not discussed. 06/22/09 Page 15of 16 JUNE22, 2009 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MEETING ADJOURNED AT 4:10P.M. TO WEDNESDAY,JULY 8, 2009AT 2:30P.M. Respectfully submitted, Grace Medina Senior Secretary Received and approved by the Planning Commission on July 20,2009. 06/22/09 Page 16of 16