PC 1953-1954-24 RESOLUTION NO. 2~, -- SERIES
A P.~OLUTION OF TEE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF TEE CITY OF ANAw~,IM
DENYING VARIANCE NO. 207.
1
2 WF~E~S, The City Planni"~ Commission of' the City of Anaheim has received a
Verified Petition from BURTON Z0UL, 862 South Philadelphia Street, Anaheim, Calif.
3 as owner of a certain parcel of real property situated in the City of
County of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
of said Lot 26, said point be.ng the. intersection o.f the center line of South
5 LOs Angeles Street With the center line of Ball Road; running thence North
15°-32~-IS"-Weet 150 feet along the northeasterly line of said Lot 26; thence
6 South-V4°-271-J$5"-West 30 feet; thence South.86o-3~ I-~0"-Weet 173.86 feet to
a point in a line which' ts parallel to and 200 feet Southwesterly from said
7
hortheasterly point of Lot 26; thence South 15°~2.~-lS"-EaSt 1~1.!3 feet. along
8 ~he line parallel to and 200 feet ~outhwesterly of 'said Northen~terly line of
Lot 26 to a point in the South 'linc'of said Lot 26; thence North 89°-55~-15"-
9 East 207,51 feet along the said South line of Lot 26, said line being the
center line of Be.. Roa~l, to the point of beginning'[
l0 The p~rcel is also described as a lot at the northwest corner of South Los
Angeles Street and Ball Road.
ll
It is requested.th-_t permission be greeted to erect a building 60 feet by 60
12 feet to be used for a UNION NE~TING HALL an~. OFFICE. The property is presently
zoned as I~A, P. ESIDENTIAL-AGRICULTUI~AL ZONE.
15
WltEI~S, The City Planning Commission did hold a. Public Nearing at the City
14 Hall in the City of A~_heim, on Monday, the 2nd day of November, 1953, NOTICES of
which said Public hearing were duly given as required by..law aad the provisio~s of
15 the k'~all{ MUNICIPAL 00DE; Section 9200; and
Wt~REAS, Said Commtssion after due inspection, investigation and studies made
16 by itself and in itc .behalf and after due consideration of all evidence and reportf
17 offered at said Hearing, does find and determine the following:
1. There appear to be no exceptional or extrao~ :ary circumstances applicable
18 to the Sub Jeer'Property that' do not apply to other prope~'ty in the same
vicinity and zone.
19
2. The granting of the proposed VARIANCE is not necessary for the preservation
20 and enjoyment of any substantial property right of the Applicant. already en-
Joyed by other property owners in the same vicinity and zone.
21 ~. The granting of the proposed VARIANCE might be detrimental to improvements in
the area since the whole area has been considered for reclassification.
22
NOW, TEEltEFORE, BE IT I~ESOLVED THAT THE Ai~iwEIM CITY PLANNING CONNIS$ION
ME~wmy DENIES VAAIA~CE NO. 207.
24 TEE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this. 2ad day of Novembe:
R..~ StFIMERS, Chairman,
27 AN~W~IM 0ITT PLANNING 00MNISS'ION
ANAHEIM 0ITY PLANNIN~'C~4MISSlON
STAT~ 0F CALIFORNLt )
a0 COUNTY 0F ORANGE ) es.
0ITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, R. W. MUNGALL, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the 0ity of
~ Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing tfl~SOLUTION NO, 24 - 5~RIES
was passed an~ adopted by a motion duly made, seconded and carried at a Regular
Meeting of the City Planning Commission o.f. the ~'City of Anaheim~,.-hel~ on Monday,
the 2nd day of November, 1953.' After DENEING the VAi~IANCE,/a/~-'t~9~ was duly _m~cl~
seconded, and carried to institute action to .condider a re~lass~t~ation-
area along South Los Angeles Street between ~ormont Avenu{