PC 1954-1955-64 RESOLUTION NO 64 -; SF~IES 195~-5~
A-PmS0ZU I0 oF PnAF -,LW OF,
~ ,~;~A$ ~e city Pia~: Oo~iasion'o~ :the 0ity of ~be~ ~s recetve~
~?~ 2 ~ ~TITiON from ~UIS 0~E, 515 South !ll~oi~ S~reet, ~e~ o~if.
~ as o~er of~ cert~ parcel of r~ property,si~t~ in the Cit~ of~,~,
~ Oo~y_:of 0~ge, State of O~lifo~, describ~ as follows:
?~ ~.~ A ~T 1~, BLOCK A, B~T ~0T, ~ f~ther described as 515 South
'~ ~,. ~e ~e= request~s ne~isSiOh t~ operate, m ~io ~ Television R~mir
~ 6 ' Business :i~ the ~e locate~~on said premises. ~e present zoni~ is
' ~ ~EAS, ~e Oit~ Pla~g Co~ission did hold a ~LIO ~A~ING mt the 0ity
~ ~11 ~ the Oity Of ~e~, on December 20 19~, NOTICES 0F ~IOH SA~ ~LI0
~, ~A~G were d~y given as reQuir~ bylaw ~d the provisions of the
~' l~IO~ ~DE, Section 9200; ~
~: 10 ~ ~S, Sai~ Oo,,,,.~ssi0n ~ter due ~spection, ~vestistion ~ st~ies ~e
. ~' by itself ~ inits behalf;and after due conside~tion off ~1 evidence ~ report,
. ~j~: 1i offffere~ at said ~A~TNG, does:f~ ~ ~etem~elthe fo~lOw~:
2. There are ~ e~eptio~l ctrc~tance~ or co~itions applicable to
vicinity.:
· ~ 14 3. ~e grating of. the VARTA~0E is ~ necessa~ for theprese~tion
enJo~ent of a property ri~t :possess~ by other property in the
: 15 ~ deni~ the Subject Property. ~.
the ar~'.
.lg .NOW/ ~0~,} ~ ~T ~SO~ ~ ~ ~n~ o~ ~A~G OOmq~SS~O~
';i'~;;~: ~ ' ' i9 December, 195~.
, , So , ' ..
.:~ 21 . , ~:':' :. .R.S.:S~, C~t~,
'' .G. E; ~LYO~, Secreta~ Pro-tern
- S~ O~ C~I~IA: )
25 CO~TY OF O~GE ~ ) ss. --
26 . "'~ '.-: . : . '
27 City 0f ~eim, d~y ~ppo~?e~,;~o herebyce~ify t~t the foregoi~ ~SOLUTION
28 -~ carried at mn ~Jou~odl Re~r MeetS'of the 0ity Pla~ 0o~ission of
the ~tY'of ~e~', hel~ 0n the 20~h ~7 o~ Dec.Bet,
30 ig~.E W!~SS ~W~F,. I ~ve~here~to .set.my ~ this 20th..~y~of :Doc~b~r,
, .
31
" 32 O.E. ~LYO ,', Secreta~ Pro-tm
. ~IM CI~ P~T~G COMMISSION