PC 1954-1955-82~q~;~4~?~ ~.~:" ' R~SOLUTION NO. 82 -- S~IES 19~55
l~ ........ ~ A R~SOLUTION OF I~ GIIT P~ING CO~ISSION OF I~ CIIY OF ~IM
~'~4'~ :'~ ~ ', ' ~ING V~I~ NO. 287
~ ~.~.~.~'~j]{~.~ ~:., ~ ..~ ~ . 1 WHEREAS~
:, ,,:.~,~ - Verified Petition from DAVID CO~N, 1130 North West Street, ~aheim,
.~ ~..~ ~ California~ as owner, of a certain parcel of real pzoperty sit6ated in the City
.~.~'~:~' ~ of ~aheim~ County of Orange, State of California~ described as follows:
~;'~ ~ A portion of Lot 10 of ~iles Rancho~ situated on North West Street~
~:~?~ ..~ 4 ~' 223 feet North of the center line of Wes~ La Palma Avenue and extending
~l'~i'~ ~ 5 Northerly 139.25 feet.
~.~ ~. The applican~ requests pe~ission ~o cut T~ LOIS from this parcel:
:,.~.~ ~ One lot ~o be 71 fee% by 150 fee%, and %he other %o be 68 feet by
~ ..~, · 150 feet. The p~ope~ty is p~esently zoned as R-A~ RESIDE~I~
:~:~; ~ A~I~LT~.
.[~; ~ 8 ~ER~S~ The Gi%y Planning Go,lesion did hold a Public Hearing at %he Gi~y
l:~ .': Hall i~; the Gi%y of ~ahelm~ on W~nesday~ February 9~ 1955~ NOTICES OF ~[GH
-~.:~.; . SAID PUBLIC HE~ING were duly given as required by law and the provisions
-~.~,~ '. the ~I~ ~CIP~ COD~ Section ~00; and
~{~ ~' 10
~,~ ~ER~AS~ Said Commission after due inspection~ investigation and studies
~..~:~ ll made by itself and in its behalf and after due consideration of all evidence
k .~ and reports offered a% said Hearing, does find and dete~ine the following:
;i'~- 1. That three Variances have been granted to the applicant to cu~
jli ~ 15 lots off in the past three years.
~; 14 2. This method gets around the filing of a subdivision map~ but
~h~ under our new subdivision ordinance~ the cutting of even a
......... ~--..i .... lB property.
'~'~ NOW, TH~EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE AN~EIM CI~ PLANNING CO~ISSION
z~-:~' 1~ HEREBY ~AI~S V~i~qCE NO. 287~ subject
:<~ ~ 18
~:~ 1. Ihe applicant bringing in a ~itten petition from ~he property
,.. owners to whom he has sold lots, stating that they are willing to
put in improvements as required by the City Engineer.
'~:'~ ~ 20
~:':~5 2. That the two particular lots requested by this Variance must be
.~' ~ improved as required by %he City ~ngineer.
~}i~': 3. Pa~ent of $25.00 per lo~ for the acquisition of Park and
hff~-; Recreation Si~es.
~','~- THE FORE~ING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 9th day of
'*~ February~ 1955.
.~ ~ ~ ~ ../ ~/
~, ~ ' , R.~o. ~RS, Chairman
~:~:~ ~6 AT~ST ~;~ AN~EIM CITY PLANING CO~ISSION
.~' 28 ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING ~SSION
.... STATE OF CALIFORNIA
"- ~9 COUNTY OF ORAN~) ss.
~'" CITY OF ~A~IM
:.~ $0 Ij R. W. MUNGALL~ Secretary of the City Planning Co,lesion of %be City of
'.L, ~1 Anaheimj do hereby certify that the foregoing ~SOLUTION NO. 82 - S~IES 195~55
was passed and adopted by a mo~ion duly made~ seconded and carried at an
'J'~J ~Z Adjourned Regular ~eeting of ~he City Planning Commission of the City of ~aheim
~'{ held on %he 9th day of February~ 1955.
~ IN WITNESS ~EREOF, I have hereunto set my h~~th day of Febru~ryj
f 1955. '
~ R. ~, ~UNG~L~ ~c~%ary '