PC 1955-1956-219 .RESOLUTION NO. zlg.-.r SFiRIES
A RESOLUTION 0F THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM RECOM2~J~DING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT RF~LASSiFICATION NO. P-55~6-45 R~ D]tNI~B..
WHER~S, The City Planning Com~ssion of the City of Anaheim has received a
Verified Petition from the property owner (s) of certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as
follows: The ~ co~nez of South Placentia Avenue and M~rava Avem,e and fu~the~ described
as starting at a point 30 feet from the center line of South Placentia Avemxe an~ extend-
ing Westerly ~long the Northerly right-of-way line of Morav~ Avenue, ~ ~46tance of 190
feet; SJaence Northerly pa~xllel to South Placentia Avenue a distance of 123 feet;
thence ~aster!y a distance of 35 feet pa~a~lel to Vermont Avenue; the~.~.e Southerly a
distance of $5 feet pa~a.llel, mo~e or less, to Verde Street; thence ~.asterly 152 feet,
more or less; thence Southerly 137 feet, m~re or less, to the point of beginning.
The applicant, T~AS L. MC LAU~r-?N, $55 South Placentia Avenue, Anaheim, California,
requests that the f~ontage on South Placentia Aven~e be reclassified to
~CIAE ~ that one lo~ facing on Morays Avenue be reclassified to R-3, M~LTIPL~-
WHERFAS, The City Planning Commission did hold a Public Hearix~ at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said VERIFIED PETITION of RECLASSIFICATION NO.
_F-55-$~-45 on the 4th day of June . . , 19 56, NOTICE of which said
Public Hearing-Was duly given as required by law and the provisions of the
ANAHEIM 5rUNICIPAL CODE, Section 9200; and
WHF~FAS, Said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studies
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and
reports offered at said Hearings, does find and determine the following facts:
There ~ be a la, ge commercia~ center located ~ithin 1/8th of a mile
2. More commercia~ uses axe not necessary in this ~rea.
This w~uld be spot zo-~g by recla~sif£cation.
The p~operty can be used for sim~lax uses now in the area, namely, single
f~m~ ~y residences.
3. The reclassi~ication comld be de~rimental to other properties in the axes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE ANAH~M CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
HERR~y RECOMMENDS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 4th day e£ J,me,
1956.
OHAIF~MAN ANAHEIm' CITY PLANNING
COMMISSION
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALI~RNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHETM
I, R. W. MUNGALL, Secretary of the City Planning Commission' of the-City
of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION NO. 219
was passed and adopted at a Regular Meeting of the'City' Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on the . 4~h day of T, me .. ,
..... 19 $$ by the following vote of the m:embars thereof:
AI~ES: COMMISSIONERS: Auest, G~uer, Hapgood, Riutcel, S-~mezs, and Mungall.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Schumacher
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Thompson
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set m~ hand this 4th day of June, 1956.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM O~T~ ~LANNINO
COI~ISSION .~.