PC 1956-1957-115 RES~I.UTION NO. 1.15 - SU. RI]I~; 2956..57
A ll~SOI~{T~ON OF THE CITY PLANNINO COHM.~SSION OF TIlE C!T~ O~ ANAF.IBIH
DU~t~ VARIANC~ NO. 673
1 ~D~R~AS, The CJ.~y Planning Commission of the CJ.~y of Anaheim h~n received
Verified Pe'~i~J.o~ from MRS, P~L~ BO~AT, 124 Evelyn Drive, ADaheim, California,
~zed Agen~ of a certain parcel of real property situated in the City of Anaheim.
~ County of Orange, S~ate of California, described as follows:
4 1717-]73I Eas~ Center Street, further described as bein~ Lots 1. 2 and 3
of 'Frac~ No.
5
The applican~ reque~(~ permission to use the above proper~y for the erec-
tion of smull modern Retai% Stor~ Physici~n, Den~al or other Pcofess{.onal
Offices.
9U~IAS, The City Planning Commission did hold a Pub/lc Hearing at the City
8 Hall t, the City of Anaheim, on December 3, 1956. N~']C~S of which said Public
Hearing were duly given as requxred by law and ~he provisions of ~he ANA}IE~M
9 ~NIC/PAL CODE, Section 9200{ and
10 %Fl~AS, Said Commission, after due inspection, investiga~ion and
made by itself and tn ~8 behalf and after due consideration of all evidence
~1 and reports offered at ~aid Hearing, does find and determine the follow/~
~ ]. lF~e applioation requested C-1 zontnK for the purpose of buildin~
small, modern retail ~tores, physician, dental and other professional
1~ offices.
2. )t was apparent at the hearin~ that onl~ retail stores were co,-
14 temp~ated wi~hm professional offices.
3. ~ese five lots, facing on Center Street, were reclassified some
~5 time ago at the request of the o~er to R-2, ~I0 ~A~IILY RBSIDE~IAL.
4. Tv~o of tt{ese lots, namely 4 and 5 have been improved ~ith duple~
{ 16 dwelling~ and ~he other three lots, 1, 2 and 3 could be so used.
5, Protests from residents who purchased from the present owner, stated
thnt their understanding was that there would be no co~erci, ai develop-
17
sent a~ the entrance ~o this tract.
,,~. ~ch a development might be detrimental ~o other properties {n the area.
18
H~, ~EREFORF, BE IT RESOL~,D '~T ~IE A~HEIS' CITY ~I~NNING
19 ]'~UBY DENIES VARIANCE NO. 673.
20 T~ FORGOING ~SO~TION ts signed ~d approved by me this 3rd da~, of
December,. I956.
2~ R'. S' SUN.RS, Chairman
2~ ~~ A~HEIM CI~ PI~NNI~ ~MIS~OH
25 R.W. [~H~A~S~retary
4.N,']IEIH C]~ P~I~ CO~I.SSION
ST;T~ O~ ~I.IFORNIA )
27 c~J~' oF Or~N~ ) ss.
~, ~. W. ~NC~LL, Secretary of th~ City Pla~n~n~ Commission of ~he City
29 Anaheim, do hereb~ certif~ that the foregoing RESOWTIO~: NC. I1~ - S~alPS
~7, '~as pas~d ~nd adopted by a motion duly made, seconded and carried al a
~0 R~gul~r Hecting of the City Planning Co~ission, held on the 3rd day o~ D~cember.
~N W~TNrSS W[~R~O~, I have hereunto se* my h~d day o~ December.