PC 1956-1957-166 ..R~SQL~TION NO. 166- S~RI~.S 1956-57
A R~SOLUTION OF TH~ ClT~ PIANNIN~ COMMISSION OF TH~ CITY OF ANAHBIM
R~COMM~NDING TO ~H~ CITY COUNCIL OF T~B CITY OF ANAHEIM
.. . NO. ~56-57-48 HE
WRBRBAS, The City Plann/ng Co..,,,.!sslon of the City of Anaheim has received
a Verified Petition from the property owner(s) of certain rea~ property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of C~/£fornla, described as follows:
A portion of the $~ of the ~ of ~he NW~ of Section 9, T45, R10W, S.B.B. & M.,
in the Coau~y of Or--ge, State of C~lifor-;-, described as fo/lows: Begriming
at the Southeast corner of the S~ of the SW~ of the NW.~ of said Section 9;
thence West a.long the South ~{,e of said S} to the Southeast corner of that cer-
t~{~ parcel of land conveyed to H. LeRoy w_~11 n-d wife by deed recorded March
13th, 1930 in Book 360, Page 385 of Officia.1 Records; thence North s.lon~ the
~st line of P~rcel I as described in Deed to Floyd M. Hatfield and wife recor-
ded April 25th, 1935 in Book 745, l~e 446 of 0fficlal Records to the North line
of the S} of the SW} of the NW} of sa/d Section 9; thence ~-ast alon§ the North
//ne of said South ha/f to the Northeast corner of said S}; thence South a/0ng
the ~ast line of said South half to the po~.~t of
The applicant, L~ Ao M~CE]~qI'H~T~, 1530 Avolenci~ Drive,
Califore{a~ as Owner, STW~mN ~. G~-T~GH~R, Ca~{for-~ Bank B,,~I~-S;
California, as Authorized Agent, requests that the ~bove property be reclassi-
fied from R-A, Pv-_~IDV. NTIAL AGkICULTURAL to C-l, NBI~HOOD CON~{CIAL.
WHERP.~S, The City Pla~_ning Commission did hold a Public Hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said V~RI~IED P~TITION of RECIASSI~ICATION
NO. F~6-57-48 on the 18th day of Nebruary , 19 57, NOTICE of which said
Public Hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of the
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL COD~-, Section 9200; and
WHR~UAS, Said Commlsslo~., after due in~pectlon, investig-.ti~_ :~d s~dles
made b7 itself and in its behalf, and after due cons~deratlon of a/1 evidence
and reports offered at said Hearings, does f~nd and determine the following facts:
1o The property to the ~ast ~d South is being developed with C-1 uses.
2. This property shou/d h~ve the smze property rights,
3. The development sho-ld not be detr~mer~! to ocher .Dro..~ert. ies in the
NOW, TH~.~BPOR~., B~ IT R~SOLV~D THAT THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~R~BY R~COMMBNDS TO TH~ CITY COUNCIL OF T~ CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT P-BCLAS£IFICATION
NO. p- 56-57-48 ~ ~0~ SUB~]~CT TO: THE D~ING TO T~ CTTy OP ANA~IM
OP 10 ~ t~a THE WIDENING O~ LOARA STR~V~ ~OM ~ ST~mT NORTH TO T~ NORTH ·
--1--
IKE FOKEGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this lSth day of
~ebruary, 1957.
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C0MM~S~ION
ATTEST:
SECRETARY ANAH]~IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STAT~ OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAP~IM )
I, R. W. MUNGALL, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City
...... of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION NO. F-166-SEEIRS 1956-57
was passed and adopted at an Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Planning
Commission o£ the City of Anaheim, held on the 18thday of l~ebruary , 19 57
by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYBS: CON~ISSIONP]~S: GaUer, H~p§ood~ Mauerhan~ Mozris, S,~ers, Thompson,
NOES: C0~4ISSION~RS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Bates -~ DuBois.
IN WITN~SS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 18th day of February,
1957.
~CKETARY ANAI-IEIM CItY ?LANNING COMMI'SSION~