PC 1956-1957-226 RF~,LUTION NO. 226 - S~ 2956-$7
A I~ESOL~-i-iON OF ~ ~ITT PLANNING ~I$$ION OF TflE CITY OF ANAflEIM
R~C0~ERNDT~ TO ~HE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF ANA}flZIM T~AT P. ECLASSIFICATION
NO. F-$6-S7-72
Wffl~S, The City Plaing Commission of the City of Anaheim has received
Verified Petition from the property o~ner(s) of cer~aia real proper~
~ ~he Ci~ of acid, Co~ of O~e, State of C~ifo~h, tesc~i~d ~s follow:
Stating at the ~ez~cti~ of E~ ~ Pa~ A~e n~ N~h E~t Street
thence ~est alo~ ~e S~t~rly ri~t~f~y 1~ of ~ ~ A~,
~st~ce of 495 feet, m~e or less; ~ence Sou~ li9 fe~, more ~ less;
The~e ~st 146.3 fe~, more ~ less, to a po~tl t~ce North ~ feet, mo~e
or less to a po~t; th~ce c~t~ ~est 2~ f~t ~ore or less to a po~t;
~ence South ~0 ~eet, more o~ less to ~e Nort~Ay r~t~f~y 1~ of
North Street, ~en foll~ie~ ~st ~o~ a=4~ ri~t~f~y l~ of North Street,
250 feet more or lea to a po~t; thence North ~7.~ feet more oz less to
the sout~rly r~t~f~y lhe 6S0 feet more or less to t~ ~t of ~lin-
The applic~ts z~uests t~t thek p~o~t~ ~ recl~sffied fr~ R-1 to
The applic~ts ~e: ~T ~, 211 East Ce~r S~, A~he~, ~lMo~nia
~. D. ~I~, 805 ~st No~h Street, An~e~, ~lifo~nia
~N E. DI~ON, 750 North Tonka Street, A~e~,
~l~om~.
NfI~REAS. The City Planning Co~u~ission did hold a Public Hearing at the
City Hall in the City of A~heimupon said VERIFIED PETITION of RECLASSIFICATION
NO. F-$6_$7.72 on the §tl~, day of May , 19 $7, NOTICE of which said
Public Hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of the
ANA~I~ MUNICIPAL CODE, Section 9200: and
~IEREAS, Said Commission, a£ter due inspection, investigation and studies
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence
and reports offered at said Hearings, does find and determine the following facts:
1. These lots will face on the South side off East La Patna Avenue and
look over to the Flood Control Ret~ding Basin, which may or may not
be suitable
2. The property a~t t~e Railroad tracks is only suitable for ~4ultiple
Pas/ly Use or ~factm~ing.
3. There ~as some opposition from p~operty o~ers to the East of the
subject property, b~t it vras pointed out that some time they might ~lso
desire to cut their lots in t~o as they now a~e double frontage lots.
NOW, Tf~L~FOP. E, BE IT R~SOLVED THAT ~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CO~g~ISSION
HEREBY RECO~g~E~)$ TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAheIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION
NO. F-$6-S7-72 ~E APi~RO~ SUB. CT TO:
-1-
1. The keeping of the~ East lots on the Arnold property as R-I,
Fant~y Resldent ial~,
2. The leaving of the D!ckenson property on ~ast North Street as
Single My Residential.
-', 3. Reclassifyin~ the baknce of the property ~ithin 80 feet of the RaiLroad
tracks ~ th°se f__~i~ East La Pal~a to R-S, ~nltiple P~ily Residential.
, ,t. The i~p~ove~ent of l~ast La Pal~a Avenne ~ith a ~ ~idth s~reet
havl-g a 32£oot tra~el~y ~n f£ont of the prope~tie~ x~-cluesti~
street ~ith a 24 foot tza~el~ay through to No~th East Street as shown o~
the =ap.
$. The [illr~ of R-3 deed restrictions.
TH~ POP. I~GOING RESO~ION is signed and approved by me th~s 5th day of May.
CHAI~ A~lg Ci~ P~ ~ISSION
~ OF 0~ ) ss.
CI~ OF ~IM
I. R. W. ~, ~cretar~ of the City Pla~hg C~ssi~ of the City
of An~eim. do here~ certify that the fore~o~s ~ON ~. ~6 - ~ 1936-37
~s pa~sed ~ ~opted at an Regular Meethg of t~ City Pl~g
Co~ission of ~e ~ty of ~ahe~, held on the 6thday of ~y , 19 57
by the ffollo~ ~te of ~e mem~zs thezeoff:
~-~SSIO~: D~ols, ~, ~, ~zz~, S~ezs, Th~ps~
ABSENT: CO~L~ISSlONERS: Hapgood a~d Bates.
IN ~ITN~$$ WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my h~nd th/s 6th day off ~tay, 1957.
i SI~CR]~ SSION
-2-