PC 1958-1959-60 ~' ~LUTION NO. 50 - SERIES ~9~8-~
A HESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GPANTING VARIANC£ NO. 1031
WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission of the 'City of Anaheim has received
a Verified Petition from the Owner(s].of a certain parcel of'.real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, Oounty of Orange, State 'of California; described as follows:
The Northerly 50 feet of the following described land~ That portion of
Acacia Street (vacated and Lot 1 in Block 2 of the Koeffler Tract, in the
City of Anaheim,.a$ shown on a map thereof 'recorded in Book 30, Page 17,
Miscellaneous Records .of LOS Angeles County, California, described a~
follows~ Beginning at a point in the Westerly line of Palm.Street as
shown on said map, 5 feet Northwest of the most Northerly corner of Lot
3 in Block 1 of said tract; thence Southwes.terly parallel with the South-
easterly line of Acacia Street (vacated) llg.35 feet; thence Northwesterly .
parallel with'the Westerly line of Palm Street, 100 feet; thence North-
easterly parallel with the' SoUtherly llne of Acacia Street (vacated)-
119.35 feet to the Westerly line:of PalmStreet; thence Southeasterly
along the Westerly line of Palm Street, lOOfeet to. the point of beginning;
EXCEPTING THeReFROM the Northeasterly 10 feet adjoining the West¢:rly line
of said Palm Street.
The Southerly 50 feet 'cf..the. following described land~ .That portion of
.. Acacia Street (vacated) Ind'Lot ! in Block 2 of the Koeffler Tract, in the
Ci y of Anaheim, as shown' on a map.thereof recorded in Book 30, Page 17,
M~Iscellaneous Records of Los Angeles County~ California, described as '"
follows~Beginning at a point inthe Westerly line.of Palm Street, as
shown on said map § feet Northwester the most Northerly corner of Lot 3
in BlOck 1 of said tract; thence Southwes'terly parallel with the'South-
easterly line'of Acacia Street (vacated)'119.35 feet; thence Northwesterly
parallel with the. Westerly line of Palm Street 100 feet~, thence North-
-- easterly parallel with the Southerly line of Acacia Street (vacated) ~"
...... ' ~ 119;35 feet to the Westerly line of Palm Street ~ ;thence'Southeasterly "~
along the WeSterly line cf Palm Street 100 feet to the point of heginning~
HXCBPTING TH~P~ROM the Northeasterly 10 feet adjoining the Westerly
line of Palm Street., and further.describsd as 847-851No~'th Palm Street.
Applicst~ Frederick A. Rusch, 902 Jade Way, Anaheim, California.
WHF~S, The City Planning Commission did hold a Public Hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim, on Octob,r6, 1'958,. NOTICES Of which said
Public Hearing were duly given as requ~re~ey ~aw anc the provisions of the ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE, Section 9200; and
l
WHEREAS, Said Co~ ~sion, after due inspeetion,.ttn- ~tigatton'and studies
madeb~ itself and in its ~half and after'.due eonsideratio'..~f all evidence and
reports offered at said Hearing, does find and determine the following faces:
1. The subject property is presently classified as R-2, TWO-PAMILY
RESIDENTIAL.
2. There i~ a non-conforming.use on the lot directly to the North,
namely, a small grocery store.
3. Palm Street.is gradually converting to business and proffessional
4. The granting of the variance should not be detri~ntal to Other
properties in the area.
NOW, THEI~EFOR~, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE'ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING OOMMISSION
HEREBY GRANTS YARIANC~ MO. 1031,' subject' tot
1. RePair sidewalk and curb, where necessary, on North Palm Street,
as specified By Public Works Dir.~ctor.
2. Place a sign at the rear o:~ the property entering upon the'aLleys 'entitled, ',Stop and T~rn Right .Only" .
3. Place a saga at tho alley ante'ring, onto La Verne Street' entitled,
"Stop'Before: Ente~ing"~ ~ ' - -
4,' .r F~ect building and o~f-atreet parking in conformity with Plot Plan and elevation presented,
THE FORE~OIN~ RESOT,UTION is signed and approved'by me this!.6th day of
October~' 1958, ~.' ' .
" ...... ~' ' C[']AI~ ANAHEIM CITY PI~NNING COMMISS~O~
STATE OF OALI]~0RNIA )
COU~TY O~ 0RANGE ) es.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
' I, W. ~' Secretary of the City Planning ~.ommission of the
19§8-§~, was passed and adopted by a motion duly made, seconded and ca¥~ied at
a Regular Meeting of the City Planning Oommission held on the"
day of October,
1958. IN WITNESS WHF~OF, I have hereunto sjet~'m~an)' , this 6th day of October,
SECRETAHY ANA~II' C~TY/PLANNIN6 CO~I$SION