PC 1958-1959-218 r' ~0LUTION NO .... 1., - SERIES .1,95~-5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF"THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOM~fENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY' 0F ANAHEIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION
NO. I:-58-59-90 BE DENIED WI'il'lOUT PR]IDj'UDICE
WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim has received
a Verified Petition from the property owner(s) of certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State.of California, described as follows:
The Southerl. y 330.00 feet of thc Northerly 396,00 feet of that portion of tile
Northwest quarter of. Section 13, Township 4 South, Range 1.]. West, in tile Rancho
Los Coyotes, in tile City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Califorzia, as per map
recorded in Book 51~ Page 11 of Miscel~neous Maps, in the Off,ce of the County Recorder
of said Couuty, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said
Section 13, North 89° 41r 15" East, 13.62.30 feet from tile Northwest corner thereof, thence
South 0o 10' 55" East, 1338.29, feet to a point on tile South line of the North half of tile
Northwest quarter of said Section 1.3; distant ehe~eon North 89° 37t 30" Hast, 1162.58 feet
from tile intersection of said South Line with the West l. ine of said Section 13; thence
South 89· 37t 30" West, 184.58 feet .along said South line; thence North 00 10t 15" West,
1338.d3 feet paralle! with the West lille of said Section 13, to tile North line thereof;
thence North 89' 41t 15" East, 184.30 feet' to tile point of beginning. HXCEPT the ~asterly
92.00 feet thereof.
The Applicants C. AND MILDRHD V. '~REAMS, 11062 Paye Street, Garden Grove~ California, as
Owners, request that the subject property be reclassified front R-A, RESIDENTIAL AGRICUL-
TURAL to C~3, IIEAVY
WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission did hold a .Public Hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said VERIFIED PE~ITION cf RECLASSIFICATION
NO. F- 58-59-90 on the 4th day of May , 19 59, NOTICE of which said
Public Hearing was duly given as required by law and %he provisions of the
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, Section- 99.00; and
WHEREAS, Said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studies
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence
and reports offered at said Hearings, does find and determine the following facts:
1. It is proposed to place on .the subject property a restaurant and a store for package
liquor, both of.which are C-1 uses,
2. There is a motel just Basterly of the subject property and other "C" uses in the area.
3, The lot in question is 90 feet in width with a depth of 300 feet.
4, All the original lots in tt~s area are over 1300 feet in depth and if the frontages
are al/ sold off, the rear of these lots could be land locked.
5. The Commission believes that a layout of the area should be made.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
HEREBY RECOMMENDS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THATRECLASSIFICATION
NO. F- 58-59-90 BE DENIED WITHOUT PR~DJUD1CH ,Until the Plmming Staff can,make a plan for
the entire area.
-1-
THEFOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 4th day of May, 1959
SECRETARY. ANAHEIM ~ PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE 01~ CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY 0F ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I,: Ri W. MUNGALL, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City
of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION N0.~~~"~X 218, SHRIES
1958-59 was passed and adopted at a Regular Meeting of the City
Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on the ~th day of May , 1959
by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISsIONERs: Allred, DuBois', Hapgood, Mauerhan~ Morris, Sub, ers,
Thompson, Mungall.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Gauer.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I havo horounto sot my hand this 4th day of l~lay, 1959.
-2-
5 ' ..,UTION NO. 2!~3 - SERIES !9~-'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COM~ISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION
NO. F_Bn~_59_~3
WHEREAS, Tho City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim has r,,ceived
a Verified Petition f~om tho property owner(s) of certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
That portion of Vineyard Lot BI, in the City of Anaheim, as shown on a map recorded in book 4,
pages 629 and 630 of Deeds, in the Office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County, Calif.,
described as follows: Beginning at the Southwesterly corner of said Vineyard Lot "BI"! thence
Northerly 404.05 feet along the Westerly line of said Vineyard Lot "BI" to the Southerly line
of the Northerly 10 acres of said Vineyard Lot "Bl"~ thence Easterly 100.00 feet parallel with
the Northerly line of sa~d Vineyard Lot "BI"; then~.o Southerly 404.12 feet parallel with said
Westerly line to the Southerly line of said Vineyard Lot "BI"; thence Westerly 100.00 feet along
the Southerly line to the point of beginning. Except the Southerly 7.00 feet thereof as
conveyed to the City of Anaheim for widening Sycamore Street.
The applicant, ARfHUR MORALES, 805 E. Sycamore Street, Anaheim, California, as Owner, Russel O.
Roquet, 127 W. Broadway, Anaheim, Calif. as Authorized Agent request that the subject property
be reclassified from R-l, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL to M-l, LIGHT MANUFACTURe.
WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission did hold a Public Hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said VERIFIED PETITION of RECLASSIFICATION
NO. F-58.59_8~ on the 27th day of A~ril , 19 59 , NOTICE of which said
Public [{earing was duly given as required By law and the provisions of %he
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, Section 9200; and
WHEREAS, Said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studies
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence
and reports offered at said Hearings, does find and determine the following facts:
1. This is a · small parcel of land lying next to the Santa Fe Railroad tracks.
2. It ts not suitable for residential or Commercial and is best suited for a warehouse type of
bu~ineas.
$. There will be a 32.7 ft. alley along the side of the lot.
4. The residents alon$ Vine Street ~ere only interested ir: setting the alley impxoved.
desisned
5. Rendering submitted shows a well ~I~M~JX~, attractive buildin~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
HEREBY REC0~IENDS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION
NO. F-58.59.83 be approved for reclassification from R-l, SlNGL~ FAMILY R~-SID~NTIAL
· to M-I, LIGHT ~tANUFACTURING, subject to:
t. The erection of the building essentially aa per the rendering presented.
2. That there be or~parking apace per each 1000 sq, £t, of gross £1oor area,
3. Building set-back to be 10 ft. back of pro~erty line and to be landscaped.
4. Remove and remode! improvements on Sycamore Street.
5. Dedicate 32 ft. from the centerline of East Sycamore St. to the City of Anaheim,
6. Irrigation line to be relocated and protected in accordance with Anaheim Union Water Co.
and City of Anaheim specifications,
7, That a 90 day time limit L~ set for the accomplishment of conditions
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me %his 27th day of April, 1959.
~ . ':' -: 7,: , ~' / ,.' ~_ ,~,~ ~ :~;..£,,
O~IRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
./
ATTEST:
SECRETARY ANAHEI~ CZ~ ~ANN]Na CO.leSION
STATE OF CALIFO~IA )~
COUNTY OF O~NGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANANEIN )
I, R.W. MU~ALL, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City
of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing P~ESOLUTION NO. ~~
1958-59 was passed and adopted at a AdJottraed Regular Mee~n~o~e ~y SERIES
Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on the 27thday of April ' 1959
by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DuBots, Hapgood, Morris, Summers, Thompson, Mungall.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Mauerhan,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this
27th day of April, 1959.