PC 1958-1959-245 NO. 245- SERIES
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANHIHG COMMISSIOH OF THE CITY OF ANAPEIM D~NYING VARIANCB NO. 1122
WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission el'the 'City ef Anaheim has received
a Verified Petition from the~Owner(s) of a certain parcel ef real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
All that certain real property situated in the State of California, COunty of Orange,
City of Anaheim, described' as follows:
'~]at portion of Lot 5 of Block 17 of a Subdivision of the south half ~of Section 21,
~'. Township 4 south, Range 10 West, S.B.B. & M., as shown on a map recrodedin Book 1, . "
Page 33 of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County, California, a portion of said
Lot 5 also being shown on a map of Tract No. 2177, recorded in Book 59, Pages 36 and 37
of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange CoHnty; Calif0rnia., described as follows:
Beginning at the Northwest corner 'of the Southerly 260.00 feet' of said Lot 5; thence
South 890 41~ 50" ]~ast 255.01 feet 'parallel with the Southerly line of Said Lot' 5' to a
fine parallel with and distant Easterly 25~00 feet, measured at right angles, from the
Westerly line of said Lot 5; thence North 08 55' 00" ]~ast 102.26 feet along said
parallel line 'to the Southerly line of Lot 21 6f said .Tract No. 2177; thenc~ North
89e 33t 43" West 255.01 feet along said Southerly line and' its Westerly prolongation to
the Westerly line of said Lot 5; thence South.0· 55' 00" West 102.85 feet to the point of.
beginning.
The Applicant, WAYNE ~RL SHULL, 1675' West Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California.
WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission did hold a Public Hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim, on June 2, 1959 NOTICES of which said
Public Hearing. were duly given as required bY law and the provisions of the ANAHEIN
MUNICIPAL CODE, Section 9200; and
WHEREAS, Said .Cm~.,.ssion, after due. inspection, ir '~stigation and studies
made by itself and in its behalf and after'due consideration'of all evidence and
reports offered at said Hearing,' does find and determine the following facts:
Ii The subject property is a vacant lot 102 feet in frontage on Ruclid Avenue with a
depth of 203'feet after the dedication of 53 feet from ~he center line of Muclid
Avenue.
2. It is proposed to develop same with professional o[fices, retail stores and a Cocktail
bar with the building to be'two stories in height.
· ! 3. In view of the Councils policy, it was believed that a two story building next to the
residential lots would not be desireable.
4. The property is presently classified as C-l, N~I~{BORHOOD CON~i~LRC/3LL.
5. A petition of protest' signed by 73 property owners was filed with the Commission
agains~ the permitting of a Cocktail Bar near their residential properties.
'NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT TRE ANAHEIM CITY PL~NNING. CO~ISSION
HEREBY DBNIBS VARIANCB NO.'l122[
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved b~y me thiS../ .2nd day of
I, R.W. M~GgL~., Seorotar~ of the City P!~ni'ng Co~ission of
Oit~ of ~eim, do hereb~ oerglf~.that ~ho foregoing ~80~U2ION NO. 245 -
1~8- 5~ was passed ~d adopted b~ a motion dUl~ made, seconded ~d carried at
a Re~lar Meeting of the City Plonntng Co~ission hold on the 2nd
~a~ of June, 1959..