PC 1958-1959-275 ~TION NO. 275- SERIES
A RESOLUTION OF T~E CITY PLA~ING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
REC0M}AENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANA[~IM THAT RECLASSIFICATION
NO. F-56-57-42 be Approved. .
WHYS, The City P18nning Commission of the City of Anaheim has received
a Verified Petition from the property owner(s) of certain real property situated
in %he City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, describe~ as follows:
The South 110 ft. ~f the West 117 ft. of the fast 142 ft. ~,f the N~Z of the NW~
of the NW~ of Section 18, T4S, R10W, S.B.B. & M. and further described as being
9102 Lincoln Avo. in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State .,f California.
The City Council returned this application t~ the Planning Commission for a
recommendation to ~.~nsider ~hether is area should be reulassified fr~m C-i,
N~IGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL to R-i, SINGLf PAMILY R~SID£NTIAL, to permit the applicant
to erect a dwelling and move an existing dwelling presently on the front of the
property to the rear of the property.
ANGL~O J. SCAGLIONE, 9102 Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim~ California, as Applicant.
~]~EAS, The City Pl-n~ing Commission did hold a Public Hearing at the
City Mall in the City of Anaheim upon said V~IFIW. n PETITION of RECLASSIFICATION
NO. F- 56-57-42 on the 29thday of June , 19 59, NOTICE of which said
Public Hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of %~e
A~ANEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, Section 9~00; and
W~S, Said Commission, after due inspection, investigation amd studies
made by itself amd in its behalf, and after due considoration of all evidence
amd reports offered at said Hearings, does find and determine the following facts:
1. The applicant shows on the Plot Plan presented a street alnn9 ~h~ s~,!th side 'of
the properzy out not on his property.
2. It is believed that he world have to dedicate one half of this street cr purchase
enough land from the property to the south for this half street.
3. It would appear that this would he a satisfactory development of the property with
a less intensive use than as presently zone~, hut should include the entire
south frontage of the property.
NOW, THEP~EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE ANAAtEIM CITY PLA~ING COMMISSION
R~REBY RECOMMENDS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF A/~AHEIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION
NO, F-56-57-42 be approved for the entire south frontage for a depth of 120 ft. f£om
the South property line be recl]ssified to R-l, subject to=
-1-
1. The dedication to the City of Anaheim cf 30 ft. along the southerly property line for a
future street or the purchase of 30 ft. from the property t~.~ The s~uth for one half street.
2.If 30 ft. on the south is not purchased the building set-backs to be 55 ft. from the
south property line.
3.All improvements to be put in when development takes place on properties to the east,
west and south.
4.Determination to ~ made by the City Engineer whether 25 ft. alley on the east side is to
be a p~:ivate or public alley.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and :E:p--oved by me %his 29th day of June, 1959.
'~ A~'AHETM C~TY P~NTNG C0~ISSI~
AZ~E~
SEC~T~Y ~'~ANEIL~ CITZ PL~NI~G CO~,~,~ISS!0N
STA~E 0F C~IF0~IA )
C0~TY 0F 0~GE ) Ss.
CItY 0F ~EIN )
I, R.W. NFUNGALL, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the CitF
of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION NO. ~~ 275, SERIES
1958-59 was passed and adopted at an Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City
Planning Commission of the City of ;~naheim, held on %he 29thday of June , 19 59
b~ the following vote of the members theroof:
AYES: C0NNISSI0~.qKRS: Allred, Hapgotd, Mauerhan, Morris, Summers, Thompson, ~ungall.
NOES: C0~ISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: C0~ISSI0~'ERS: DuBois an~ Gauer.
IN' WITNESS WI~0F, I have hereunto sot my h,~ud this 29th day of June, 1959.
-Z-