Loading...
PC 1959-1960-52 , ................. ~, ~he ~/ty Pl~ln~ ~o~/ss/on of the ~ity of ~e/m has ~eae/ved a Verified Petitio~ ~ro~ the 0~er(s) of a oerte~n pa~oel of ~e~l p~ope~ty situated La the 5ity at ~ei~, ~o~ty of 0r~e, State of California, described aS follo~s~ of ~and described as ~a~:e~ ~3-& in a i~o~ice of &~t~o~ dated ~azeh ltth~ 1955 in Case No, 649,0~ in the Superior Cou~t of ~he St6te of Californ£a in and for the County of Orange, entitled the State of O~li£ornia rs, Orban ~e~t~er anO others, a certified copy o£ which was recorded Match ltth, lg$$, in Book 2996, l~ge $20, of Of¢icial Recordsl Begtnniug at the northeast corner uf Lot 3~ of Anaheim Bxt~nsion as shown on a map of survey made by~m. Ha~e~ and filect in the office of ~he O, unty Recorder of Los A~geles County, Californial running thence along the northerly boundary of said lot, westerly to its intersection with the easterly line of the S~at~ Highway I00 feet wide knotm as ~anchestar Boulevard, as condemned for the'use of ~h~ people of ~e State of California by Ptnal Order tn ~ndem~ttoa made November 4th, 1936 in Action No. 33172, tn the Bupettot ~u~t of the State of Caltfotl, i~ and Eot the ~un~y of O~ge, a ce:tilted copy of ~hlch was recorded in Book 847, Pa~e 4T8, off O~ficiai Recot~, in the office of the COunty Recorder of said Orange County, thence Southeasterly sion& ti&hr of way to the land now formerly of R~on~u~latl thence easterly along the no:therly l~ne of said ~u~la:~a l~d to the easterly boundary of said Lot 321 thence aotthe~ly alon~ a~d e~tetly boundary to the point of be&Inning. ~INg '~FR~ the no,th 240 feet of the south 513 feet of the east 111 feet. ~SO ~C~ING ~OM the South 273 feet. ~O~ING'~I the east 125 feet of that portion lying nott~ of the south 5~3 feet thereof. Applicant, UNITtRD. N I~OCII~ OF 01~ COUNTY, 1625 Ctestlane Anahe~.m, California. ~S, ~he Olty Pl.nning ~o~eission did hold a Publi.- .~ea~ing at the 0ity Hall in the 0ity of ~eim, on September 8, 19~9 N0~I0~S of which said ~blio ~ea~ing were duly ~iven as ~equi~e~ by law ~d the p~ovlalons of %he ~A~IM MU~IOIP~ 00O~, ~eation 9~001 ~a : . ~, ' WI~R~S, '~atd Oom~'si°n' '.afroF dUo 4ns~oot4on, in,~ti~atiozi ir~ StUdies ~epo~t. affered at .eLd Hea~,,n~, doss fled ~d detains'the' ~ts ~s a p~ob~em parcel of land 17~~ a!ofl~ the ~My, tha~ ~s, p~e~ou~y been considered as a ch~t~ 8~e by ~o~he~ group ~ for a ~ ~se ~s a church s~te ~u~d be ~ess ~n~e~s~ use o~ ~he that m~ght be proposed. 3, ~e:e W~ be a 6 foot b,Lock ~lJ, bet~en the residences on West ptope:~y. 4. ~e p~s fo~ the buttings $o be erected shows that they shottld ~o~ be detrimental to the area. NOW, THRRIFOREo BE IT RESOI~VED THAT THE JJiAHEIM 1, ~e e~ec~on of the b~l~s ~fl ~ccor~ce w~h the plan sub. tied. 3. P~e~ of $2.00 a front foo~ o~ g~a ~a Street for street l~h$~ purposes. The vote on the .above resolution was as A~ C~ISSIO~S~ All~ed, Oauer, Hapgood, Mauerhan, Mo~r~s, Supers, NO~ ~I~I~St None. ~S~T~C~I~IO~S~ Du~s ~d ?/ ~O~Y OF CITY OF ~xa . ) I, 1. W, M~, ~ao~ota~ ol !,ho ~lty Pl~in~ 0o~iasion ct tho ~9~0 a Re~l~ Meetin~ of the ~lty PlaY. ins ~o~ission held on the 8th day o~ X. WXT~,, ~0F, l hav. ho.e~to ~~ this 8th day of ged,ember, 195g.