PC 1959-1960-159 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
DENYING VARIANCE NO, 1194
WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim has received
a Verified Petition from the 0whorls) of a certain parcel of real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
The southerly 350.00 ft. of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the norti~vest
quarter of Section 16, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, in the Rancho S~n Juan de Santa Ana,
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in
th,~ City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in Book
52, Page i0 of Miscellaneous ~laps, in the office of the County Recorder of said county.
S~d land is a portion of Lot 7 uf the Helen and Lynch Subdivision, as per map recorded in
Book 442, Page 158 cf Deeds, in the County Recorder of .Los Angeles County, State of Calif.
~e Applicant, IRVING DUMM, III, 11162 Barclay Dr., Garden Grove, Calif.
WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission did hold a Public Hearing at the
City Mall in the City of Anaheim, on February 1, 1960 NOTICES of which said
Public Hearing were duly given as required by law and the provisions of the ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE, Section 9200; and
WHEREAS, Said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studies
msde by itself and in its behalf and a~+er due consideration of all evidence and
reports offered at said Hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. To allow a 20 ftto P-L zone rather than the present 50 foot P-L zone would constitute a grant
of special privelege.
2. Other properties in the area zoned M.-1 maintain thc req[lired 50 foot P-L zone.
3. In his request for waiver of provision as set forth ill Paragraph A, Section~00.11, requiring
a review of any use proposed with in 330 ft. of any public school site, appli9ant could not
show sufficient hardship. (4) School has been a~ this loc~tion many yrs. prior to ~-i zoning
in area & thereby deserves protection afforded bv provision i~code. (5) Loara ~lementary school
~P~nt Teachers Assoc. &s e,mosed to this request.
NOW, TMEREFORE,'BE IT RESOLVED T~AT THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C0~ISSION
HEREBY DHNIHS VARIANC~ NO. 1194.
The vote on the above resolution was as follows:
AYES: CObffiISSIONm~RS: Allred, DuBois, Gauer, ~Iarcoux, ~auerhan, MOrris, Mungall, Sunmlers
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 1st day of February,1960.
CHAIP~N ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMI~S~N
ATTESt:
SE~RE~'~NANEIM CIT~ ~LANNIN~ COIV~ISSION
//PRO TI1~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY 0P ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
Pro ~m
I, GORDON STEHN Secretary ~f the City Planning Commission ~f the
City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION NO. 159 - SERIES
195~60, was passed and adopted by a motion duly made, seconded and carried at
a Regular Meeting of the City Planning Commission held on the 1st
day of February, 1960.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hsnd this 1st day of February, 1960.
SECRETARY~qAHEIM CITY ~L~ING COMMISSION