PC 1959-1960-191 ~UTI0~ NO. 191
A RE~0LU~ION OF ~tE CItY FAA~BY~G COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF A~aW~Tu
EEC0~I~G TO ~ ClAY COU~CTT. OF ~iE CITY OF AF~w~ru T~_~T ~ECI~S$IFICAZlON
N0. F-59-60-75 ~ D~wI~
~, ,--ne City ?~n..~.S Co~.~ssiom of the City of An~he~m~m~ received
a Verified Petition from the property o~=r(s) of certn~n real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange. State of California, described as follows:
All ~hat certain land situated in the County of Orange, State of California ~escrib~d
as Follows: The south half of the south lC acres of the west half of The northwest
q~arter of :he southwest quarter of Section 26, To~ship 4 ~ouTh, Range 10 West,
S.B.B.&M.
The Applicant: W. L. FAP41OW & SON, 9859 Garden Grove Blvd., Garden Grove, Calif.,
requestin~ permission to reclassify the property from R~ to R-1 and C-1.
~L~tEA~, The City Planning Commission did hold a Public Hearing at
City ~all in the City of Anaheim upon said V~RIF~n PETITION of RECLAS$IFICA~ION
· 0. F- 59-60-75 on the 7th day of ;4arch , 1960 , NOTICE of which said
Public ~earing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of the
AN~w~.IM MUNICIPAL CODE, Section 9200 ~ and
Wn~--~L$, ~aid Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studies
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence
an~ reports of~ere~ at said ~earings, does £in~ and determine the follow~z~g facts:
1. l~e applicant is requesting permission for single family xesidential a C-1 for a small
shopping center.
2. The area is predom{nmtly single-family residential.
3. Permiting a .~q~ot of commercial zonin~ in t~is location would establish an undesirable
precedent for similar requests from the other propert~ owners a/ong :he east side
of
4. ~e Comm{ssion fel~ tha~ The ~hes~ and bese use for land in this area is
for residential d~velopment.
NOW, T~RE, BE IT l~0L~u THAT THE A~LH CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
HER~Y RECOMMENDS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION
NO. ~- 59-60-75 ~ DENIED.
-1-
~ F0~GOING ~SOLUTION is si~ned and approved b~ me '~-is 7=h day of Marc-h, !9~O.
I, RICHARD ~]~-~E Secretar~ of the City P!a-nfn~ Commission of the City
of )~eim, do hereby ce~i~
195~ ~S ~ssed ~d adopted at a Re~ Meet~ of ~e City
Pl~,fng Co~ssion of ~e City of ~e~, held on ~e 7th ~y of M~ch . 1960
by ~e follo~ vo~e of ~e m~bers
N0~: C0~I0~
~ W]iTNESS W~EOF, I have hereunto set m~, ~-~4 '~hiS7th day of March, 1960.
SECRETARY AK~.~M Cl~Y FLANNING C0wwrSSI0~
-2-