PC 1960-1961-121 A RESOT,U~XON OF ~HE fll~Y P~NXN~ COI~XSSXON OF I~ ~I~Y OF
W~S, Tho O~t~ P[ann~n~ ~omm~SS~on of tho O~t~ of ~o~m has received
Verified Pot~tlon from tho Owner(~) of a certain parcel of real proportF s~tu~tod
tho C~t~ of An~o~m, Count~ of Orango-,'.,Sta%o of 5a~fornta, described 8s'fo[[ow2~....., :'./..':'.."/'
Lot 48 of Tract No. 1931 as per map recorded-in Book 54, Pages 9-11 of ~isc. Maps in the
office of the county recorder,
'l'ne Owner:
James D. Ross
2118 W. Porest Lane
Anaheim, Cal£fornia
WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission did hold a Public Hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim, on November 7, 1960 NOTICES of which said
Public Hearing wore duly given as required by law and the provisions of the ANAHEIM
~UNICIPAL CODE, Section 9200; and
WHEREAS, Said C~'uission, after due inspection, ,~'estigation and studies
made by itself and in i't~behalf and after due considerat~n of all evidence and
reports offered at said Hearing, does £ind and determine the following facts:
1. Peti'~ioner requests a variance from Code, Section 18.24.030(3), which requires for
subject property a 25 it. rear yard, to permit encroachment of 11 ft. into required
rear yard in order to construct an addition to the back of an existing residential
structure.
2. ~xistin§ rear yard is 44 ft. in depth. Proposed addition would occupy approximately
12~ percent of required rear yard.
3. There are additional areas available on the rear of the property which would more than
compensate for the proposed encroachment.
4. Although Ord. No. 957 requires installation of sidewalks, no sidewalks have been
constructe~ to dar% iii this tract.
5. No one appeared in opposition to the petition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE ANAHEI~ CITY PLANNIN~ O0AP~ISSION
HEHEBY GRANTS VARIANCB NO. 1311, FOR ~ WAIVER OP ILRAR YARD S~TBAC~ R~QUIR~RRNT TO
P~IMIT ~NCROACH~NT TO WITHIN 14 PT. 0~ P.~AR PROP]~RTY LINB FOR TH~ ADDITION OF A fAmILY
ROOM, subject to the followin§ conditions:
1. Bevelpmen~ substantially in accordance with plans presented.
2. Installation of sidewalks per Ordinance No. 957.
The fore~oin~ conditions were found to be a necessary prerequisite to the use of the
property in order to preserve the safety and welfare of the Citizens of Anaheim.
On roll call the fore§oin§ resolution was passed by the followin§ vote:
AY~S~ CON~ISSION~RS: Allred, Gauer, Hap§cod, Marcoux, Morris, Mun§all and Summers.
NOBS: ~O~qISSION~RS: None.
ABSENT: CO~ISSION~RS: None.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is si~nod and approved by me this 7th day of November,
1960.
CHAIRM~A.NAHEIM CITY PLANNIN~
STATE 0F ~IFO~IA )
COUNTY 0F 0~E )
CITY OF ~AHEIM )
I, ~ PAGB, S.~cretarM of the City Pl~ninE Comm~Ssion of the
OitM of An~eim, do hereby oertif~ that the foreEoing ~SOLUTION NO. 121 - SERIES
1~0- 6~ was passed ~d adopted bM a motion dul~ made, seconded and carried at
a ReEula~ MeetinE of the 0itY Pl~inE Co~ission held on the 7th
dam of November, 1960.
IN WITNESS WHE~0F, I have hereunto set m~ h~d this 7th dam o~ovember, 1960.
SEC~T~Y AN~EIM ~ C0~ISSION