PC 1960-1961-56~" , {-"iESOLUTION..j.~. NO. 56 - SERIES 1960-'Il_.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION
NO. F-60-61-15 BP- D]LNIBD.
WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim has received
a Verified Petition from the property owner(s) of certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described a,.~ follows:
Being that certain zeal property lying north of Tract No. 1635 as shown on a map
recorded in Book 49, Pages .1 and 2, Miscellaneous M~ps, records of Orange Co,,u'~y, City of
Anaheim, County o£ Orange, State of California! described as £ollows:
Beginning at a point at the intersection o£ the north line of said Tract No~ 16~5 and the
centerline of New Avenue; thence from said point of intersection South 89e $1· 50" West
1137.73 feet to a point; thence North~447o $1· ~0" east $3.19 feet to a point; thence
North 00e 07· 30" east 287.20 feet to a ~oint; thence north 89e $2~ 00" east 1100.$9 feet
to a point; thence south 00o 10~ 40" West '324.76 feet to the point of beginning.
BXCHPTING THBRRPROM the east 145.00 feet.
The Applicant:
ROB~T L. BAIRN
700 W. Orangewood Avenue
Anaheim, California
WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission did hold a Public Hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said VERIFIED PETITION of RECSASSIFICATION
NO. F- 60-61-15 on the 15th day of August , 1~0 , NOTICE of which said
Public Hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of the
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, Section 9200; and
WHEREAS, Said Commission, after due inspection, investigation'and studies
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence
and reports offered at said Hearings, does find and determine the following facts:
1. R~3 in this.area would establish a'precedent for similar usage of the undeveloped
property to the north.
2. Development'on'this parcel would involve a tie in, via Carolyn Way, with an existing
R-1 tract.
3~ ~Strong opposition h~s been expressed by residents in thc =rca.
4. The subject property is an integral pa~t 6f an area developing for quality single
family residences.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
HEREBY RECOMMENDS TO THE~CITY COUNCIL 0F THE CITY OF'ANAHEIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION
NO. F-60-61-15 be denied, for R-3, MULTIPLE P~ILY P~BSIDBNTIAL.
THE FOF~GOING RESOLUTION is signod and ap. proved by me thislSth dSy of August, 1960.
CHAIF~,,~.~N ANAHEI~ CITY PLA/~NING CON/~ISS~
ATTEST:
SECRETARY ANAHEI!,! CiTY PLANNING C0,%h%tISSIO.~i
STATE 0F C~IFORNIA )
COUN~Y 0F 0~NGE ) ss.
CITY 0F ~AHEIN }
I, RICH;LRD RRWSR, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City
of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fgregoing RESOLUTION N0~ )~ 56, SP_RIWS
1960-61 was passed and sdopted at a Regular Neeting Of the City '
Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on the 15thday of August , 1~60
by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: C0~NISSIONERS: Allred, DuBois, GaUer, llapgood, ~larcoux, Norris, ~ungall and
Summers.
NOES: C0h~ISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: C0~{~ISSIONERS: Mauerhan.
IN WITNESS WHEREoF, I have hereunto se~ my hand this 15th'day of August, 1960.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLi~NNING C01~3.{ISSi0N