PC 1960-1961-212A ItBSOLUTI~1 OP THB CITY PIJINNING COD0AIS3IfiN OP THB CIT`Y OP I-NAFi~IM
RHCOP~iDIPiG TO Tf~ CITY COUNCIL OP ~ffi CITY OP kNA}~Yk THAT
PSIZTION POR RBCIASSIPICATION NO b0-51-76 BB GRA~A
{VHffitBAB, the City Planain.g Commisaion of the City of Anaheis did reeeive a oerified
Petition for Reclassification from John N. and Marinete J. Dovalis, 635 Plint Avenue,
Long Beach, California, Owners and Sheldon Chip Chasin, P. 0. Box 842, Balboa, Califor-
nia, Agent. '
Hxhibit "A" on f•ile .'_r~ t~:e office of the Planning Department.
; and
WHBRBA3, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the 8ity Iiali in
the City of Aneheim oa March 20, 1961 a4 2:G0 o~cloct P.~l.~ sotice of said
public hearing having been duly given as required by]aa and ia accordance rith the provi-
sions of the Ana.heim N.unicipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear aad consides evideace for and
against said proposed reclaseificatioa and to iavestigate and make findinga sad recommen-
dations in connection theretvith; and
bPFiBREAS, said Commiasion, after due inepection,invea4igation~ and study nade bq it-
self and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence aad reports offered
at said heariag, does find and determine the following facts:
l. That the petitioner propoaes a reclasaification of the above descsibed pro-
perty from tIIe R-A, Residential Agricultural, zone to the R-3, Multiple Pamily Residential,
zone to permit the development of an i8 unit apartment building.
2, That the propoaed reclasaificatioa oF sub3ec4 proper{y ~_ necessary or
desirable for ;:iie orderly and proper developaent of the comaunity.
3. That the proposed reclassification of aub3ect property dces pr,opesly
relate to the zones and their permitted usea locaily establiah~d in c1oeQ proximit~ to
subject property and to the zones and their permitted uaea geaerally eaiseiiahed through-
out the co~nunity,
4. That the proposed reciasaificatioa of sub3ect property doee requYre
dedication for and standard improvement of abutting :~treete becauae said proResty
does relate to and abut upon streete and highways which are n~n+n"~a to carry the
4ype and quaatity of traffic, which wili be generated by the peY~itt~d uaea~ ia •accord-
ance with the circulation element of the Generai Piaa,
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is in accordance with
the Precise plan recommended f~r the subject area.
6. No one appeared in opposition to the subject petition.
;: -1-
. R_1
_ ~,
~
..... -.._ .... .
.
.
---._ _ .._.._. .. _ .... . ._ _ __- - -- -
...._<,.... . ..
. _
~
.~ .
,.___....._ h,
.~
,
::~
:
'
. ~ '
-.,...,-'--- ,_^+^-... . . ... _ .... ...
. , ..
~
.... . ___.__.~.~.__ .__.:..^ .. ~
. . . , . . r-~
,
. ~--
~•':~~~,i
.
P:'::
t~ _ _ t "~ r.~
RBSOLUTIOId NO 212 SBR7EC i9~n-Ri
. ....... ........
1
i
J
' ~t :,~
~ L. ~~ ~..~
~ NC1W, 1HBRB,PORB, BH IT RBSOLVHD that the Aaaheim City Planning C~+mwissian hereby
; recommends to the Citp Council of iche City of Anaheim that Petition for Reclassifi`cation
~ No, 60-61-76 be approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-c'.an3ng of the Anaheim
~ Municip~l Code be amended to excl~ide the above described property from the R-A, Residential
; Agricultural zone and to incor~,orate said 3esc:ribed progerty i:t the R-3, Multipie Family
t Residential zone, upon the followin~ conditictis which are hereby fo~und ta be a neces~
; sary prerequisite to the proposed use of thc suoject property in orlar to preserve the
;_ safety and general welfare of the Citizens c+f Anaheim:
i 1. Dedication of 53 feet from the monumented center line of Ball Road (30 £eet existing),
i
~,
j 2, Dedication of 20 feet for r.n alley al~ng the northerly property line,
}: ,3. Preparation of street and alley improvement plans and ins~tallation of atl impruvemen+:s
' in accordance with approved standard ~.lans on file in the officecf the City ~ngi~eer,
~ .
r
k 4. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes,
5. Time limitation of 90 days for the accomplishment of Item i~o•a, i, 2, 3, and 4.
6. Subject to the approval of a Petition for Variance from the Code reqsirement
limiting the height of structures to one story within 150 feet of the R-1, Single
Family Residential, zone.
7. Piling of standard R-3, Multiple Pamily Residential, deed restrictions.
8. Development substantially in accordance with plans presented and dated March 20, 1961,
TF18 PCIRHGOING RB30LUTION is signed and approv~d by methis ?.Oth day of March, 1961.
~
~. :~'`,
:~:,;
,° °
t~;~;:;:
ATTBST:
/ ~
3BC ' RY NAHBIM CITY P~ Cat+~! $ION
STATB OP CALIPORNIA )
COUNTY OP ORANGH ) es.
CITY OP ANAHHIM )
,~Gff'~`'l9/`~
CHAIRMAN ANAHBIM CITY ' IpN[1ING COI~R~ ON
I, J~N pAGB~ , Secretary of the City Planning Commission 9f the Citp qf
Anahe3.m, do hesel~y certify that the foregoing reaolution was passed and adopted at a
meetin~ of the Ci4~y Yla:miag Commisaion of the City of Anaheim, held on March 20, 1961
at 2:00 o'clowk P.M „ by ~he f.ollowing vote of the members thereaf:
R2-A
AYB3: CQ~4(ISSIONBRS: ASlred, Gauer, Marcoux, Morris, Mungall, Summers.
NOS3: COM2l133ION~t3: None.
ABSBPIT: COFAlI3SIONHRS: Hapgood.
IN WITNB3S Wf~EtHOP, I have hereunto set my har.3 this 20th day of March, 1961.
SB y pppHB7(M CIT3l P NG CQI~tISSION
-2--
i
;
...7
;~.