PC 1960-1961-218~
.. s.g-- :.- ~~'~ ^~.
218, SBRIBS 1960-61~
RBSOLUTION N0.
A RBSOLUTI~I OP 7['F~ CITY PIANNING CN~OlISSIQ~I OP THH CITY OF ANAhBIM
RBCQA9~ffiiDING TO THB CITY COUN~Ii OP TEffi CITY OP ANAHBIid THAT
PBTITION POR RBCIA33IPICATION N0. 60-61-82 BB QWNTED.
t~l~ltBA3, the City Planning Commission of the Citq of Anahein did reeeive a Yerified
Petition for Reclasaific2tion from James L. Pritchard, 11341 Skyline Drive, Santa Ana,
California, Owner and McDaniel 8ngineering Company, 222 Bast Center Stree4, Anaheim,
California., Agent.
Legal description on file in the office of the Planning Department.
; aad
WF~RBA3, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Ci#y fisll in
the City of Anaheim on Y~pril 3, 1961 at 2:00 o'clock P.M.~ notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as reguired by]aM aad iu accordance ecith the provi-
sions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to.hear and conaider Rvideace for and
against said p~oposed reclassificatioa and to investiga4e and make findiags and reco'men-
dations in conr.-ectioa therewith; and
WtffiY'~AS, said Commisaion, after due inspectioa,inveatigation, and study made by it-
self and in its behalf, and after due consideratioa of all evidence and reporta offered
at said hearing, does find and determime the foilowing facts:
1. That the petitiouer proposes a reclasaification of th~ abo~e described pro-
perty from the R-A, Residential Agricultural, Zone to the R-3, Multiple Pamily Residen-
tial, Zone.
2, That the proposed reclses3~ication af sub,ject propertq ~,_ neceas~ar~ or
desirable for the orderly aad proper development of the commuaity.
3, That the proposed reclassification of sub,~ect property does pzoperlq
selate to the zonea and their permitted uses locallq establiahed in close proximity to
subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally establiahed through-
out the co~unity,
4. That the ~zoposed recias~ification of sub3ect property doea require
dedicatic±~ for and ~tandard improvement of abutting streeta becauae said property
does reiate to snd abuY upon atreets aad highways which are proyosed to carr~ the
fiqpe and qua:atity ~f traffic~ which wili be generated by the ptr.iit#ed usea, in •accord-
ance with the circu.latioa element of i:he General Plan.
5. Verbal opposition by one owaer of propezty in the vicinity was recorded against
the sub,ject petition,
R-1 -1-
~. r ,__"_'_'_.__...__'.' _.~_~'__'..u._............~. _....._..,. .. .-......,.. .. ....:._,..._....__.._._._ . ~ ... . . ...
ak~`r7 , , . ~ .
~~ ~ ~i
,..
~,
; . ~
:.. aE
.' ~
* _.. ..~. .. __..i :.... -. _ ... .ry . xSat =. ~ .r~~ _:. s . . ... ........ .
1
''; ~ ~
. ef ' ' ~`'. J i. '
,, a. ~~
4': NOYd, 1fIIHREFORB, BB IT RESOLVBD that the Anaheim City Planning Commission h~reby ~
recommends 4o the City Council of the City of Anaheim that Petition for ReclassificaYion
.;_, -r-
t ~:;,
[ ii'
,t
9 r;;
4. `%~
G ~::
~:. ,.;
G~:
i '"~ ,.•t
:, ;';'
:~
No.60-61-82 be approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Arx::,heim
Muaicipal Code be amended to exclude the above d.escribe~ property from the R-A~ ResidentiaY
Agricultural zone and to incorporate said described property in the R-3, Multiple T?amily
Residential 2one, upon the following conditions which are liereby found to be a neces••
sary prerequisite 4o the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the
safety and general welfare of the Citi:;ens of Anaheim:
1. Development substantially in accorr~ance with plans presented sub,ject to approval of
Petition for Variarice No. 1348.
2, Bedication of 53 feet from the moc:umented c~nterlisze ~~f Ball Road (30 feet existing).
3, Dedication of 20 feet along rear 1ot line for alley.
4. Preparation of street improve~nent plaris and installation of all improvements in
accordance with approved standard p1aAs on file in the Office of the City ffi-gineer,
oh Ball Road and the alley.
5. Fayment of $2,00 per front foot for stzeet lighting purposes.
6. Time limitation of 90 days for ti?e accomplishm~nt of Items No. 2, 3, 4, and 5,
7. Blimination of vehiculac access to Ball Road upon the completion of dedication and
improvement of the alleq abutting the northerly property line and extending from
Da1e Avenue to Ball Road.
TI~ID PGRHGOING RHSOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 3rd day of April, 1961.
ATTBST:
~ ~
SEC T Y ANAHBIM CITY P ING C(ThNlI33ION
STATE OP CALIFORIZIq )
COUNTY OF ORANGB ) ss.
CITY OP ANAHBIM )
v ,c',
CHAI ANAHHIM CTTY PIANNING SSION
I+ J~ pA~ , Secretury of the City Planning Commission of thF: City o'
Anaheim, do hereby ce~tify that the faregoiag resolution'was passed and adop•ted at a
meeting of the City pl~rmiag Commisaion of the City of Anaheim, hel~l on April 3, 1961
at 2;00 o'clock P,M.,'by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYB3: CQW~lI3SIONBRS: Allred, Gauer, Marcoux, Morris, Mungali and Summers.
NOS3: C~4~fI;>,SI~NBR3: None.
AB~ENT: C0I~4dI3SI0NHR8: Hapgood.
IN WI1NB$9 Wi~t730P, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of April, 1961.
~ ~
SECRH ANAHBIM CITY P COFA4I98ION
;
R2-A
-2--