PC 1960-1961-225 ~.~; r-;
~
.~r
I
. . . .. .. . . ._.... . , .,
. _ . . . . . . .. .
. .~ ... .... ... .
. . . ~. :~. ~ :
i~r~.+F' ,1.1 .
` ,M1 "' ~-
.... ... ... ~ r -;... . ...
. . . ~ ~ t~~ ~ .- . . _ . . ~ . .
l '.
~ , ~ ~ ~.
~ RESOLUTION NO 225, SfiRIES 1960-61
A RESOLUTION OF THS CITY PIANNING COt~tISSIQN OF 3TiH CITY OP ANAHHIM
RBCOhL~lSNDYNG TO TFI3 CITY CdUNCIL OP 1H8 CITY~ OP ANAf~IM THAT
PBTITTON FOR RSCIASSIPICATIOPI N0. 60-61-83 BH GRANTHD
WHBRBAS, the City PSanning Commission of fhe Citq of Anaheis did reeeivn a~erified
Petition for Reclassification f=om II, I. C. - Ba11 and Magnolia, a limited partnership,
Suite 704, 900 North Broadvey, Santa Ana, California, Owners.
Legal description on file in L•ae office of the Planning Depaztment.
; and
~ '
F ~. .
,,
i: :.
~ :
r
p ; l
E <d.
~ '; .. . ...
f. '•'
WHHRBA3, the City ~lanning Commission did hold a Fublic heariag at the Zity Hali in
the City of Anaheim oa April 3, 1961 at 2:00 o~clock P.M.~ notice of said
public hearing having beea duly given as required by7ax and in accordance ~rith the provi-
sions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, ChapBer 18.72, to hear and consider evideace for and
against said proposed reclassificatioa and to investigate and make fiadings and recommea-
dations in connection therewith; and
P1F~RBR3, said Commission, after due inepection,inves43gation, and study made by it-
seif and in its behalf, acid after due consideration af all evidence and reporta offered
at said hearing, does find and determine the followiag facta:
1. That the petitioner propos~es a*eclassification of the above described pro-
perty from the R-A~ Residential Agric~lkural, Zone to the C-1, Neighborhood Commercial,
2one.
2, Thnt the propoaed reclauaificatioa of sub3ect property ~_ nece~ear~ or
d~sirable for the orderly nnd propea development of the community,
3. That the proposed recJ.aesification of aub,~ect property doas properly
relate to the zonea and their per.mitted uses locally establiahed in close proxinitr to
subject property and to the zones and their permitted uaes geaer$lly eatabliahed through-
out the co~unity.
4. That the proposed reclaasification of aub,~ect property doea not require
dad:.cation for and standard improvement of abutting streeta becauae said property
does relate to aad abut upon streets and highways which are imoroved to carr~ the
type and quantity of traffic, which wili be generated by !he pezaitted uaes~ ia •secord-
ance with the circulation element of the General Plan.
5, That Phase No. 1, in:.orporating that portion extending northerly 240 feet to the
p~cperty line abutting Ball Road on the north and extending easterly 522 feet from the pro-
perty line abutting Magnolia Avenue on the east, excepting therefrom that portion located
on the southeast corner of Ball Road and Magnolia Avenue and measured 150 feet by 150 feet,
has been developed for the C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, zone and the reclassificata.on of
said property from the R-A, Residential Agricultural, zone to the C-l, Neighborhood
Cammercial, zone will establish the proper zone for said development,
6. Verbal opposition to subject petition, although the proposed C-1 zoning for the
subject area was favored, was recorded by one 3nterested party.
-1-
R-1
~
;,-,,,;..
,-
~;;
~ ~
NOW, 1HBkHFORB, BB IT RESOLVHD that the Anaheim City Planning Commission hereby
recommends to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that Petition for Reclassification
No, 60-61-83 be approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim
Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above described property from the R-A, Residential
Agricultural zone and to incorporate said described property in the C-1, Neighborhood
Commercial zone, Phase No. 1, described as follows: incorporating that portion of the
subject property extending nor~therly 240 feQt to the propertp line abutting Ball Road on
the north and extending easterly 522 feet from the property line abutting Dfagnolia Avenue
on the east, excepting ther.efrom that portion located on the southeast corner of Ball Road
and Magnolia Avenue and measured 150 feet by 150 faet.
THB PORHGOII~ RBSOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 3rd day of April, 1961,
ATTEST:
.,.~ ~
SEC T Y ANAFiHIM CITY P NG C~9rlI3STON
STATB OP CALIPORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) sg,
CETY OP ANAHBIM )
~ - .
CNAIR ANAHHIM CITY P NNING COb~~I SION
I~ JBAN PAGB , 5ecretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a
meeting of the City Plannidg Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on April 3, 1961
at 2:00 o~clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYSS: COhAfISSIONBRS: Alired, Gauer, Marcoux, Mor.xis, Mungall and Summers
NOB3: C(k4~SISSTONffit3: None.
~ ......: ~
-- ~
AHSBNT: COMAtI9SI0NHR3: Hapgood.
IN WITNBS3 WHBRHOP, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of April~ 1961.
~ G~L/ ~~~ ~
SB Y ANAHEIM CITY PIANN CObAlI33ION
R2-A -2--
. ~ .. _ _ _ _... .. . _.. .~