Loading...
PC 1960-1961-243%::\~:~~+.. ~'t:~:.;' .~1. ; ,5 I~ 'c i f _. '« 4_J~ t_-~ - RPSOLUTTON N0. 243, SBR3BS 1960-61 , A RBSOLUTIOPI OF Tf~ CITY pLaNN3NG COtA~{I5SION OF 1~$ CITY OP /~NAF~ID( R~CQMldffiQDING TO THH CITY CLUNCIL OP 7~ CITY OF A~iAHSIM rAAT PBTIZZON POR RHCIAS9IPICATION N0. 60-61-85 BB ~RAN1Bfi . 1Vl~tBA3, the City Planning Co~aiasion of the Citq of Anahein diil receive a~erified Petition for Rec1a&aificatinn from Giadys Kraemer Allec, Lucy Rraeme~• Coniglio and Louise Araemer Hefner, ~~z;2:~; Georgia Manestar, c/o Roberts Real Hstate and :~:nvestment, 9752 ICatella Avr_:tue, Anaheim, California, Agent, proposing the reclassifica:ion of the follow- ing propertip:s; legal descriptions on file in the office of the Planning Department. i ~ WFIH.RBA9, the Ci~v PAanning Co~ission did hold a public hearing at the ~it~ Hall in the City of Anaheim on April 17, 1961 at 2;00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by]aM ana ia accordance xith ttt provi- sions of the Anaheim Municipai Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear and consider evideace for a.ad agaiast said proposed reclussification and to investigate and make fiadinga oad x~~e~or~a- dationa in connection therewith; and WF~RBAS, said Commisaion, after due inapec4ion,investigatiott~ and s4udq raade by it- aeif and in ita beh~lf, and after due coneiaeration of all evidence and reports offered at said hear:tag, e~eA €i~d and determ3.ne the £ollowing facta: 1. ~at the petitioner pro~osea a reclasaificatioa of the above described pro- perty from 4Le R-A, RBSIDHP)TIAL AGRTCULTURAL, 'l.ONH to the C~1, NHIGHBORHOOD COhAlHRCIAL, ZONE and the G3, HBAVY COMN(ECtCIAL, ZONH. 2. That the propoaed reclasaification of sub3ect psopes4y ~s neceaear' or desixabie for the arderly aad proper deve.fopmeat of the comarcity. 3. That the proposed :eclassificatioa uf sub,~ect Qroperty doea properly rela4e to the zonem and their uermitted uaea locaily eatablished in cloae proxinitp 40 aub,ject property and to the zones and their permitted uaes geaerally eate~bliahed through- out the comnuai#y, 4. That the proposed resiasaification of aub,~ect propertq does sequire dedication for aad standard improveaent of abutting atreeta becauae said property does reiate to and abut upon streets and highways which are aronosed to carrT tlte type and quantity of traffic, which will be generated by the peraitted uaea, ia •eecord- ance with the circwlation element of the General Plan. 5• Tnat no one appeared in opposition to subject petition. R-1 -1- ...., ;'~--__------~--- ----- .._....,,_ , "r _. . _... . .v.a,Ary . 1 . . ~~ . .- .. . . .. ,. ,1 t a :( ~ .~~ ~ ~••~ ~~ ~ ~~ t r } ~-~ i4 ~~~~~ I 1.;: 4 ~F ~ N(7iV, ZHBRHPORS, BH IT RHSOLVBD that the Anaheim City Planning Commission hereby recomuends to the City Council af the City of Anaheim that Petition for Reciassification No. 40-61-85 be approved and, by so doing, tha' T?tle 18-2oning of the Anaheim Municipzl Code be amended to exclude the above described property from the R-A, RESIDBNTIAL AGRICULTURAL zone and to incorporate said described properfZ' ST1 theC-1, NSI~"-~?9~tH00D COMMHRCIAL ZONE, and~the C'=S, HBAVY CONMBRCIAL ZONE; npon the'foYlowing conditions which are hereby £ound to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject pro- perty in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the citizens of Anaheim; 1. Development substantially in accordance with plans presented. 2. Dedication of 53 feet from the monumented centerline of Orangethorpe Avenue and Dowling Street (20 feet existing on both streets). 3, preparation of street improvement plans for Orahgethorpe ALenue and Dowling Street and installation of all improvements in accordance with approved standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer.at the time of development. 4. Payment of $2,00 per front foot for Orangethorpe Avenue and Dowling Street for street lighting purposes at time of development. 5. Provision of utility easements along exterior boundaries as determined by the Directflr of Utilities. 6. Time limitiation of 90 days for the accomplishmer.t of Items 2 and 5. 7, provision of a six (6) foot iandscaped s*.rip abut•;ing the easterly and southerly planned highway right-of-way lines of subject properties, excepting therefrom that property con- t•ained in Parcel No. 2, and the provision of five <5) faot by five (5) foot i:ree wells at forty (40) foot intezvals adja,ent to the pianned highway right-of-way line~anQ the in- stallation of street trees therein. All portions of said parkway not iille3 in with concrete shall be properly landscaped in the manner provided for herein. Plans for said landscaping anQ ;~ater supply, including the spacing of street trees and shrubs~ shall be subject to the approval of the Supe-- intendent of Parkway Maintenance. THB PCQtBGOING RHSOLUTION is signed and approved ~i me this 17th day of Apri , 1961. A ' CHAIRMAN ANAHfiIM CITY P ING CQA4ytISS ~ AT1~3T: ~ o TARY ANAHBIM ITY Y ING CQA9~tI33I0N STAT'd OF CALIPpRiVip ) COUN1:' UP ORANGE ) ss. CITY OP ANAHHIM ) I~ JHAN PAGH , Secretary o£ the City Plunaing Co~nission of the Ci~y of Anaheim, do hereby certify thafi the foregoing reaolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on April 17, 1961 at 2:00 o~clock p,M., by the following vote of 4he members thereof: AYR,S: COD4~fISSI013HRS: ASlred, Gauer, Mazcoux, Mossis, Mungall and Summers. NOB3: COMMISSIONffitS: None. ABSBNT: C~t~4lI3SIONHR3: Hapgood, IN WITNBS3 WHBRHOP, I have hereunto se~ my hand this 17th day of April, 1961 -P-aG~v G~ ~ 5E Y AHAHHIM CITY PIA~ (Y~4~SI93ION R2-A -2_- _ .. ----~--° - ~____- ----------- ~__._~_.____-_~.__, .. . __ ._...._ __w„---~-----~-.1 _ ~ . . . . .. _ . .. .9~ . 1 . . . _ _ . ...