PC 1960-1961-250:~
..~4''~t.
~!...~
. i:.
: ;~ ,r
RBSOLUTION N0. 250, SffitdBS 1960~6Y
A RBSOLUTION OP THH CITY PIANNING C~tMiI3SI0N OP THB CITY OF AT~IAHBIM
THAT PHTITION P~t CONDITIONAL USB PHRMTT N0. 116 BB DHNIHD.
~ YlHBRBA3, the City Planning Commiasion of the City uf Anaheim did receive a verified
Petition for Conditionai Use Permit from Long Beach Ban~na Distribatoss~ Tt19 Magnolia,,.,
Avenue, Long Beach, California, Owner; Tswin Hnterpsises, 3ucorpopa~ed, Lesaee.
of certein real propertq s3tuated in the City of Aa~heim, County of Osaage, ~tate 'of
~' California, as described in 9xhibit "A" or as follows: ~ `'
~ ~ ~;'.
Lot 236 and 237 of Tract No. 2377, in the Ci~y of Amaheim, Coun~y of Oaaage, S4a~e of '~
, Caiifornia, as pez map recorded in book 75, pybes 29 to 35, incYusive, of Miscellaneous. r ~' ?~,
~'; Maps, in the office of the county reco*der of said coun4y.
~~.
; aad
WHSRBA3, the City Planning C~mmission did hold a public hearittg at the City Hall in
the City of Anaheim on Ma.y 1, 1961 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said
publ~c hearing having been duly gi~en as required by]aw and ia accordance aith the provi-
sions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.64, to hear and consider evideace for and
against said proposed conditional use and to iavestigate and make findinga and recoarmen-
dations in connection tberewith; and
WF~FtBAS, said Commission, after due inspection,investigation, and s4udy made by it-
self and in its behalf, and After due consideration of all evidence and reports offered
at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use i,~_ properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit
is autborized by thfs Code, to wit: a cocktail lounge.
2, That C~e proposed use wi11 adverse3y affect the ad,joining iaad uses snd
the growth and developmant of the area in which it ia proposed to be located.
3. That the granting o€ Lhe Conditic:~al Use Permit under the'condi~ions imposed,
if any, will be.detrimenta! to the peace, health, safefiy, amd genexal welfase of the
citizens of the City of Anaheim.
4. That tre proposed use is not compatible with ~the C-Y, NBIQiBdRH~D.COMhiSRCIAL,
.2ocling and deaelop~ent of the subjec~ area,
5. That verbal opposition, in addi#ion ~o a petition of protest cott4aining 70
signatures and a ietter of protest, were recorded against subje~~ getrition.
C-1
-1-
i
~3
, r,, _
i ;~T~
~',~:
~
:
f. __.__.~~-r-..-, --._._..«_-.~._ _ _._ ,,.:. _ . . ,
.__ _ ____ . .
_ ~ ~ ~ . .. ._ . _
~ ~ .,
,~ ,V ~ , ~
3
NOW, THHREPOR~, BB IT RBSOLVBD 4hat the Anaheim City Planniag Commission hereby
denies Condit~onal Use Permit No. 116 FOR TFIB OD.ERATION OF ~ rp~gTAI3, LOUNGB on the basis
of the aforementioned findings:
TFffi PORBGOING RBSOLUTIGN is signed and approved by me t is lst day o¢ May, 1961,
'~ ~ ~
VI(. I ANAHBIM CITY PIANNING COMMI83ION
ATTS3T:
V li~-
SIT Y ANAHBIM ~ITY P ING COMMISSION
STATS OF CALIPORNIA )
COUNTY OP ORANGS ) ss.
CITY OP ANAHBIM )
I, JBAN PAGS, , Secretary of the City Pianning Commission of the City of
Anahe~m, do hereby certi:y that the £oregoing reaolution was passed and adopted at a
meeting of the City Planning Co~ission of the City of Anaheim, held on May 1, 1961
at 2:00 o'Clock P.M., by the foilovring vote of the members thereof:
AYE9: CQMMISSIONBR3: Allred,~Gauer, Marcoux, Moxxis, Mtsngall and 3ummers,
NQBS: CQ19~4IS3IONBR3; None.
kB3HNT: C01~9~tI33I0N]&ItS: Hapgood.
IN WITNBSS WfiBRBOP, I have h2reunto set my haad this lst day of May, 1961.
..GGfiv/ (/ ~.
. ~ SIT Y ANAFIBIM C]iTY P IR;C COt~tdYSSION
YC2-B
ItHSOLUTION N0. 250, SHRI~S 1960-61
i
~
~,. . ... . . . ~ 1'.
-Z-
._.., .. -. .
~~ .. .
`i
~~~ ~~~y
;!:-',~~',