PC 1960-1961-251.~:- „ ~~ ~ ~
RHSQLUTION N0. •..1 SHRIHS 1960-61
A P,&qOLUTIOAI OP THH CITY PYANNING CdrlklI3SIUN OF THS CiTY OP ANAPIHIN
TF1AT PHTYTION PQR CONDITIQNAL U3B PBRMIT N0. 11? BB DENIHD.
WHERBA3, the City Ylanning Commiasion of the City of Aaa~eim did receive a vesified
Petition for Cottdit±onal Use Permit from Helen L. Poc:rtmeyer, 439 Dale Avenue, Anaheim,
California, Owner.
of certain real propertq situated in the City of Aaaheim~ CouLty of Arange, 3tate of
California, as described in ~chibit "A" or as follows;
Bxhibit "A" on file in the office af the Planning Department.
:.'; aAd ";
WHHRBAS, the City Planaing Commission did hold a public heariag at the City Hall.ia
the City of Anaheim on May 1, 1961 a~ 2:Q0 o'clock P,M., notice of said .
public hearing ha~ing been duly given as required by]ap and in accorcdance with the provi-
sions of the Anaheim Afuaicipal Code, Chapter 18.64~ to hear and coasider evidence for and
against said proposed conditional use and to investigate aad make Findings and recommea-
dations in conaection therewith; and
6VHSRBAS, said Commission, after due inspection,investigation, and atudy made bq it-
self and in its behalf, aad after due consideration of all eeidence and reports offered
at said hearing, does find and de#exmine the following facta:
1. That the proposed use ~s properly one for xrhich a Coaditional Use Perait
is authorized by this Code, to wit: A church,
2. T2tat the proposed use will adve~sely affect the adjoining land uses and
the growth and develogment of the area in which it ia proposed to be loca~~d.
3, That the size and shape of the site proposed fnr the use is nat adequate to
ailow the full development of the proposed use in $ manner not detrimenta2 to the parti-
cular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general wei€are of the citizens of the
City of Anaheim,
4, That the traffic ge~~ruted b~ +t~e ~aroposed use wili impose an undue bur-•
den upan tJ~e streets and highaays designed and ~proved to earry the traffic in the area.
5. Thr~t the g.ranting of the Conditional Use Permit uttdez the conditions inposed,
if any, will be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the
citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That the subject area is developed primarily £or single family residentiaJ. use
and the proposed development is not compatible with the existing residential development.
7. That verbal opposition was recorded against snbject petition.
2
~.
~ ~,~ .
4
~- ~~ '
~-1 -1-
.
_ :~;-:a
~,`. -...,,r.~.....
ti ..:
~i'i' L ~
~~
;
s
;
NC~J, TfiHItBPORE, SS IT RB90L;'.°~ that the Anaheim City Planning Commission hereby
deaies Conditional ;ise Permit iv~. 117 FOR THB COiVSTAUCTION OF A CHURCH on ihe bas3s of the
aforemention~d findings.
T1~ PQRHGOING RHSOLUTION is signed and approved bq me this lst day of May, 1961.
~yICg CgpIgMpN pNAHHIM CITY P ING COA4~iI$9ION
~ pTi~39T: t
,7
~ ~ ~
~
'
~; ANAHBIM CIT3f ING COh4f133I0N
Y
'`a '
;
~' ST OP CALIPORNIA ) y
; .
~,'. COUNTY OP ORANGB ) ss. ~
:;~
r
,~~ CITY OP ANAl~fM ) '
';
,
;~ Secretary of #he City Planning Commiasion of the City of 3
r,, I gpN pp~g ,
, J
do hereby certify that the foregoiag resolution was passed and adopted at a
pnaheim ~
~
l:
?'~ ~
meeting of the City Planning Comaission of the City of Anaheim, held on May 1~ 1961 :j
:; at 2:00 o'Clock P.M.~ by the folxnwing voL•e of the members theteof: a
,:
L
°~
AYB3: CQ~II3SIONffit8: All~ed, Gauer, Marcoux, Morris and Summers. i
~
,~
~a
NQBS: CO~A9aIS9I0riSR3: Mungall.
X ,
~~ AB3HIdT: COP4Ax33I0NHft9. Hapgood. '
' '
1~
~ I have hereunto se4 my hand this lst day of May, 1961.
IN WITNB35 WFIDRBOP ;f
~ ,
~,
a
'{ ~ %
~~~~
k
~~ .
,
~• SECRH ANAHHYM CITY PIANN COM+IISSION
' #
'; .
r
i ~a
; 7'~i
~
VC2-D -2- i:
.
~}
~; RBSOLUFION N0. 251, SffitI3S 1960-51. ;
,
';
*: ;
;~
~:; ;;=n;
~
~
.
, ..
_.
.
_,
, ,
.___.
____ .
~
_.- ..
~.___.____.__ _____ _ _
_..-
_., _._._ _~.__~...~.-----
. ~
__. ; .
. ~
_
_ _ ~ . . ~a~ , ~ . . ~.:, .... . _
_.