Loading...
PC 1960-1961-270. '4~:.._ ,. _... . .,..~.r.-. ._.,...- i^' ._~ ~~ RBSOLUTION A10. 270. SARIBS 1960-61 A RH$OLUTION OP !fffi CITY PIANNING Cd~G~I~SI@I CP TFIB CITY QP ANAHSIM THAT PBTITIOAI POR VRRIANCB N0. 1368 BH G?tANTSD 1PH~tBA3~ the Citq Planning Comaieaioa of 4he City of Anaheim did recsive a verified Peti43on for Vasiance from William Walker, 2664 Bruce Avenue, Anaheim, California, Owner. of certain reel property aitusfied ~.~n #he City: of,!l~+ehe~n, Countq o£ Orac~e~ State of Califoraia~ a~ deacribed in Bxhibii "A" or sa foilort~: Lot 45, Tract No. 3007. ~~ i ; ; and 1Vfi~RBAS, the City Planniag Commisaion did hold a public hea:iag at the City Hali in the City of Anaheim~on May 29, 1961 at 2:00 o~cloc}i P.M.; aotice of said public hear3ng haviag been duly givea as required bylarr and ia accordnace Mith the provi- eicas of.the Aaahe~m Muaicipal Code, Chapter 18.68~ to hear ead coa~ider evidencr for and againat sa3;d propoaed,varicace and 3o inveatigate aad nate fiadinge snd recoaomendntioas ia conaection tHese~rith; aad Nt~A3~ said Comm3saioa~ aftez due insQectior(~ investigntioa,and studq mnde~tsy iL= eeif.and ih ita behalf,. and nfter due eonsideratioa of ali evideace and repo=te offe~ed as said hearing, doea find aad determiae the folio~ving facta: •1. That the petitioaer requemts a varianca from the Aaalteim 1&unicipal Codte BeCtion 18.24.030 (3) to permit the encroachment of seven (7) feet aito the required rear yard, ~ 2, That there axe exceptional or extraordinarq circumstaacee or coaditions app~3Gable !o the property iawlved or to the inteaded uae of the propesty tha4 do aot epply generally to the prcpertq or clasa of uae ia the same vicinity aad zon~. 3, Thm4 the requeaEed vsriaace i3_,aeceeaery for the preaervation onG ea,~oyaent of a 6ubstdalial proparty right posaeesed by other property in the same ~+ici~i.tq snd zone,:and denied to the propertq in queBtioa. . • 4. That the requeated variance wil not be mster3aily detriseatoi to the public waifare or ia3urious to tlae property or iuprovemeata in auch vicinity aad zone ia which the property is located. 5. That the requeated variaiace wiii not_ adversely afrtct the Coraprehenaive :General Plen, 6. That the proposed construction will occupy approximately ,9 percent of the required rear yard and, therefore, will allow an adequate amouat of rear yard to remain. 7. That the proposed construction will not be detsimental to the surrounding area. 8. That no one appeared in opposition to the subject petition. V-1 i ,: - -- ,..._---,-... .__ .-~"~"""y- a-U, u~ ~ , ~. -1- ; .. ...-'__ .. . ........... . . ...._._._._ ...__._-.__.--- --~ , ~ ' . ~ ~. _ - ~- '--~- -•._ .. ,. ~ - ~rl~ ~ ~A ~ ~ ~. ~+~, S NUW, THHRBPORB~ BS IT RE50LVHD that the Anaheim Ci4y Plaauiag Commiasion hereby approves Variance No. 1358 , upon the following conditioas which are herebq found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pr,opoaed uae of the aub,~ect pro- perty ia order to preaerve the safety and generni ~eifare of the CiLiseas of Anaheim: 1. Developm~nt substantially in accordance with plans preaented. 1~ Pc~tHGOING AHSOLUTI~I is aigned and approv.d by se Hie 29th day of May, 1961. . VICE CNAI ANAHBIM CITY PLANNING C019~AI88ION ATl~9T: ~ ~ IF( C1~TY PIAMdxIid piWI93IQ[i a~-x~ c~-~.z~~ ~ COUNTY OP O~AANOB ) es. CITY OP ANAHBIM ) I~ J~ pA~ ~ aecretar~ o£ the City Plaaaing Coaaic~ion of the City nf AnaTieim, do hereby certify thst the foragoins reeoiubion aas pa~eed ~ad adopted at a nee4iag of the City Piannina Com~,issioa of the City of Anaheia~ held on Msy 29, 1961 at 2:00 !~~ciock P,!!.~ by the tolloxiag vote of the aesber~ thereofr AYB,l: C014dI88ICi~tBs Maxcoux, Morris, Muageil, Perry, 3ummera. NQB~s CahCdI90I~tat None, A88BNT~ COh9~lIQ9IQV~tet Ailred, (iauer, Hapgood. iN pITt~9a L1HBR80P~ 8 have herauato aot iey haad thie 29th day o~ Msy, 1961. Ild CITlC VC~-A ~y_ . aaaor,uTioN xo. 270 j i ~ i ._____.. ~~~ ~ ---...___ ----_ . ___ - ---- - -~-- ------ .~ _ __ __ _ ..._.__. ... - ------- - -- ~ ~ ~ ~ . _ ~~ • ,. .- .. _ . _ ---~,